Testing of a promising new torpedo completed

Testing of a promising new torpedo completed

KTRV products


In Russia, the state tests of the latest promising torpedoes and an adjustable bomb of a caliber of 250 kilograms have been completed. This was announced by Boris Obnosov, General Director of the Tactical Missile Weapons Corporation (KTRV).

Responding to a question from journalists, Obnosov said that the corporation had completed state tests of a new promising torpedo and that documents and an aerial bomb were being prepared for it. At the same time, he did not voice the name of the torpedo, since work on it will still be underway.

Now they are getting documentation

- he said.

In addition, the general director of KTRV noted, the corporation is modernizing torpedoes that were still developed in the Soviet Union and have worked well.

(...) there are already so many ships, so many torpedoes. The quantity ordered by the USSR is probably no longer needed. But the torpedoes of the Soviet development, currently in service and well-proven, we are modernizing

- he said.

Obnosov noted that KTRV is not threatened with a reduction in state defense orders, since the corporation is engaged in a wide range of missile weapons, which includes aviation, land and sea subjects. According to him, only this year it is planned to finish three topics on air-to-air missiles, on adjustable air bombs of 1500 and 500 kg, on air-to-surface products, and several more projects.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

77 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. bessmertniy 14 February 2020 10: 56 New
    • 10
    • 5
    +5
    It is good that one promising torpedo in the country has become more. hi
    1. Crimean partisan 1974 14 February 2020 11: 25 New
      • 11
      • 3
      +8
      do not carefully read the post ...... the latest promising torpedoes and adjustable bombs of caliber 250 kilograms, ...... that is, two products, all more than one latest and most promising.
      1. bessmertniy 14 February 2020 11: 32 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        I am also happy about the bomb, but the torpedo simply attracted attention, because the sea was behind the window. request
        1. cherkas.oe 14 February 2020 12: 07 New
          • 8
          • 11
          -3
          Quote: bessmertniy
          I'm glad too to bomb

          Paradox, we rejoice at the bomb (by the way, too), but we could rejoice at new schools and kindergartens, but in the modern world, built on the principle - "Who is strong is right" - you can’t do without bombs and torpedoes. request
          1. bessmertniy 14 February 2020 12: 12 New
            • 6
            • 5
            +1
            Well, yes, I was only happy with the bomb, as they immediately minus it. So think to yourself: what else in our life still rejoice. Indeed, schools and kindergartens, alas, are not enough for joy today. repeat It is necessary to supplement something else.
            1. cherkas.oe 14 February 2020 12: 46 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              Quote: bessmertniy
              Well, yes, just rejoiced at the bomb, as they immediately minus

              Do not worry, here on the site people are different, someone delves into what is written, opposes or supplements, and someone simply flexes his fingers lazy even to get to the bottom of the essence.
          2. pipetro 14 February 2020 12: 18 New
            • 13
            • 2
            +11
            There would be no bombs - there would be no kindergartens. The civilized world of the 21st century.
            1. ser56 14 February 2020 13: 02 New
              • 4
              • 0
              +4
              Quote: pipetro
              The civilized world of the 21st century.

              you might think in other centuries it was different .... request
          3. Ratmir_Ryazan 14 February 2020 12: 29 New
            • 18
            • 3
            +15
            Paradox, we rejoice at the bomb (by the way, too), but we could rejoice at new schools and kindergartens, but in the modern world, built on the principle - "Who is strong is right" - you can’t do without bombs and torpedoes. request


            We rejoice at the new bomb and torpedo because only this provides us with peace and the opportunity to build schools, kindergartens and everything else.

            For a completely “gifted” example, Libya did not produce weapons there, but irrigated the desert, built schools, kindergartens, there was good social protection for the population, but this did not save them from the destruction of the state by Western countries.
          4. Kurare 14 February 2020 16: 03 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: cherkas.oe
            Paradox, we rejoice at the bomb (by the way, too)

            If you are not happy, it means that you made a mistake with the address and were in the wrong forum! soldier
            1. cherkas.oe 14 February 2020 17: 36 New
              • 1
              • 2
              -1
              Quote: Kurare
              If you are not happy, it means that you made a mistake with the address and were in the wrong forum!

              Do you have a nice eyes problem? Or with a head not frets? Have you carefully read my comment? Once again, for you - a particularly gifted one, I write: - Paradox, we rejoice at the bomb (I AM BETWEEN ALSO) - I rejoice too! Do you get it now? If not, let me know - I will explain again.
              1. Kurare 14 February 2020 18: 08 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                I more than understood everything perfectly, that's why I added your comment to my post (by the way, too). Only you did not understand me. And to be rude - do not!
                1. cherkas.oe 14 February 2020 18: 33 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Kurare
                  Only you did not understand me. And to be rude - do not!

                  How should I understand you? If you, in response to my comment, read me a moral and affirm the opposite of what I wrote. Apparently you have too "high style", which even Aesop would envy. hi
          5. Simargl 14 February 2020 19: 36 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: cherkas.oe
            but in the modern world built on the principle - "Who is strong is right" - without bombs and torpedoes it is impossible.
            Not who strong one is right а who is strong is alive!
        2. Kurare 14 February 2020 16: 06 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: bessmertniy
          I'm glad too to bomb ...

          But is it not for the "Hunter"? 250 kg yes in the window just what was missing for example in Syria.
  2. Lamata 14 February 2020 11: 00 New
    • 7
    • 9
    -2
    Not everyone has finished off the optimizers, Good.
  3. novel66 14 February 2020 11: 10 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    to a big ship - a big torpedo!
  4. Andrey Mikhaylov 14 February 2020 11: 11 New
    • 7
    • 4
    +3
    At the same time, he did not voice the name of the torpedo, since work on it will still be underway. C'mon, otherwise torpedo specialists will come running here, they will tell you right away about torpedoes, incapable Russians, about the killed industry, and so on.
    1. Eugene-Eugene 14 February 2020 11: 23 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Perhaps it’s about the Predator high-speed underwater rocket. Since 2013, the development of individual units. Designed to replace the VA-111 Flurry.
      1. Sky strike fighter 14 February 2020 11: 38 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        State tests completed the torpedo Case (Physicist-2).
        1. g1washntwn 14 February 2020 12: 29 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Physicist-2 was adopted in 2017 and is a developer of the Research Institute of Marine Heat Engineering.
      2. Crimean partisan 1974 14 February 2020 11: 38 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Perhaps it’s about the Predator high-speed underwater rocket. .... at the expense of all kinds of things .... firstly, the VA-111 is an underwater ROCKET and not a torpedo, secondly, work on the "Predator" is carried out by the Electropribor design bureau and this design bureau does not rub with KTRV concern, together with Obnosov finally separate flies from cutlets
        1. Eugene-Eugene 14 February 2020 11: 47 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
          underwater ROCKET and not a torpedo

          What's the difference? In terminology? For example, “Flurry” is a super-cavitating forward-propelled torpedo, aka a high-speed underwater missile (Decree of the USSR Council of Ministers No. 111-463 of October 13, 1960 on the beginning of development). In terms of subordination: The electrical appliance could not be the parent organization when creating the "Predator", it is responsible for the control system. Command of the parade there KTRV.
          1. Crimean partisan 1974 14 February 2020 12: 15 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            reactive super-cavitating upright torpedo, .... judging by the text of the post, we are talking about a torpedo and nothing more (well, it’s also a promising bonus), let's all specify and not pour water and also call a spade a spade, unlike the territory At
            In terms of subordination: The electrical appliance could not be the parent organization ..., literally, is not part of the KTRV corporation, the side of the EP is rubbing on the topic Predator with Malachite. which is also not included in the KTRV concern, why is the manure crushed in the stupa ?? KTRV has no side to the Predator
            1. Eugene-Eugene 14 February 2020 12: 26 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              Where does this love for casuistry come from? Well, if absolutely according to the law of letters, then catch ... A missile / missile complex warhead is called a torpedo. Examples: M-5 torpedo - Shkvala warhead, UMGT-1 torpedo - 83R / RN warhead, MPT-1 Hummingbird torpedo - 91R1 and 91RT2 warheads (in the MPT-1UM version), APR-3 "Orel" -M "- warhead missiles 91R1 and 91RT2 (in the version APR-3M), torpedo MTT" Baby "- warhead complex" Package "

              PS. A domestic torpedo cannot go on its own on its own. She needs to fly through the air to the point of "landing" in the water, so the torpedo is an integral part of the rocket.
              1. Crimean partisan 1974 14 February 2020 12: 39 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Examples: M-5 torpedo - Squall warhead, ..... that is, a torpedo as a warhead, an underwater MISSILE Flurry, well, about the Squall warhead there was a lot of stuff shoved, and the nuclear charge and just a land mine. so if you please, terminology is a thing that requires accuracy, otherwise it will not be explained
                1. Eugene-Eugene 14 February 2020 12: 43 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  This is the domestic practice: it was not possible to use control coils from the launchers, which forced them to launch torpedoes into flight. "Physicist" was to be an exception to it, going into the water without a preliminary flight.
              2. Operator 14 February 2020 12: 45 New
                • 1
                • 2
                -1
                A “flurry” is not a rocket, but a jet torpedo - since it has a ramjet engine installed on it, the fuel for which is magnesium + sea water.

                Rocket torpedoes have a rocket engine with ballistic fuel.
                1. Crimean partisan 1974 14 February 2020 13: 20 New
                  • 0
                  • 3
                  -3
                  A flurry "is not a rocket, but a rocket torpedo ... where did you find such nonsense? Magnesium + sea water serves as fuel for it. ...... in the course of chemistry lessons for you are forever lost, water and magnesium serve to create a cavity, there is a gas shell, a flurry moves in a gas environment and not in a water environment, your school chemist has not died yet?
                  1. Operator 14 February 2020 15: 16 New
                    • 2
                    • 3
                    -1
                    How does it move - fart steam? laughing

                    Tie already with a demonstration of your suburban education, read at least something about the "Flurry" in our Rusnet.
                    1. Crimean partisan 1974 14 February 2020 19: 07 New
                      • 1
                      • 1
                      0
                      Tie already with a demonstration of your suburban education .... past, Soviet education, rather you need to read, read, and read it with the Unified State Examination, to begin with, if you master it, start with Rocket Hydrodynamics, although I doubt that you master it
                  2. Dzafdet 14 February 2020 16: 37 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    VA-111 “Flurry” - the Soviet complex with a high-speed underwater missile (torpedo) M-5 [1]. Designed to destroy surface [2] and underwater targets. It is part of an armament complex deployed on a surface ship, submarine or fixed installation.



                    That's the whole story ...
                    1. Crimean partisan 1974 14 February 2020 19: 09 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      VA-111 “Flurry” is a Soviet complex with a high-speed underwater missile, the term in brackets is the time when this product did not know what to name, in any case it is described in detail in the works on “Rocket Hydrodynamics”, master it, and there’s no way
        2. Nikolaevich I 14 February 2020 12: 07 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
          .the first VA-111 underwater ROCKET and not a torpedo,

          Fir-trees-paly ... underwater rocket, whose torpedo ... Casuistry, damn it! For example, there was a jet torpedo RAT-52! What is not an "underwater rocket"? However, officially "fixed" "jet torpedo"! The term "rocket torpedo" is also "popular" ... Maybe you shouldn’t deal with core in terminology in the future?
          1. Crimean partisan 1974 14 February 2020 12: 31 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            For example, there was a jet torpedo RAT-52! ....... Wax is an aviation lotion, you can’t shoot a torpedo launcher. narrow specialization in the carrier, so that the stone is not in that garden,
            The term "rocket torpedo" is also "popular" ...... and it’s even easier, the delivery of a conventional torpedo using a rocket. just business, but an underwater rocket. this is an underwater rocket, all the same terminology was invented to distinguish one from the other, for example, bathyscaphe and bathysphere,
            1. Nikolaevich I 14 February 2020 14: 13 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Duc, "jet torpedoes" were created entirely in the 19th century! In my opinion, the Americans succeeded in this matter, although ... There were "jet torpedoes": 1. Monzhera; 2. Deveza; 3.Quika; 4. Barbera; 5. Erickson; 6. Shpakovsky; 7. Weeks ... etc. ! So .... do not talk about "aviation gadgets"!
              1. Crimean partisan 1974 14 February 2020 18: 58 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                So, "reactive torpedoes" were created entirely in the 19th century! ....... teza, in general, you need to clearly distinguish between what a torpedo is and what is a rocket, so here, the VA-111 moves in a gas environment, torpedoes, regardless power plant, in a liquid medium, in my opinion this is all, or is it all to remind the state of aggregation of matter
                1. Nikolaevich I 15 February 2020 05: 52 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
                  it is necessary to clearly distinguish between what a torpedo is and what is a rocket, so, VA-111 moves in a gaseous environment, torpedoes, regardless of the power plant, in a liquid medium, in my opinion this is all, or is it to recall the aggregate states of the substance

                  And I try not to confuse the usual concepts! Only now they don’t coincide “in something” with yours ... 1. For example, “flurry” in publications is very often called “rocket-torpedo”, but the names are also “popular”: “jet torpedo”; "submarine rocket" ... (Whoever is much, but it doesn’t bother anyone ... everyone understands: what are they talking about!); 2. missile carrier + torpedo = anti-submarine missile (like the carrier rocket) + depth bomb = anti-submarine missile ...); 3. It doesn’t matter for the rocket in which medium it is “moving”: “gas”, in vacuum, “liquid” ... 4. What are the main blocks of a rocket? What are the main blocks of the reactive torpedo?
                  1. Crimean partisan 1974 15 February 2020 13: 27 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    4. What are the main blocks of the rocket? .... a reactive block (a nozzle of a combustion chamber, fuel, in the case of a decrease in hydrodynamic resistance, a gas productivity block) and an instrument compartment with a warhead. , if controllable then the control compartment is a plus,,
                    What are the main blocks of the reactive torpedo? jet engine and warhead. correction elements are possible. but this is not essential, since cavitation makes no corrections for the reactive dashboard, in any case, the science of Rocket Hydrodynamics explains this
                    so what about Obnosov. there is progress as this product is even called, I repeat the "latest" and "promising"? according to the torpedo Physicist everything is clear. and Obnosovskaya having no analogs reaches Physics ????
        3. Simargl 14 February 2020 19: 40 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
          first VA-111 underwater ROCKET and not a torpedo
          1 - Her, like, torpedo missile (or torpedo missile) was called?
          2 - Who is stopping the Flurry pusher from being fastened to the Flurry? A flurry unmasks the submarine, and so - released the product, it moved a certain distance, received target designation and launched the taxiway. It will turn out right Predator.
  5. Sema0 14 February 2020 11: 11 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Happy! We did not manage to destroy everything in troubled times. We will restore everything, this should be a lesson for us.
  6. Crimean partisan 1974 14 February 2020 11: 16 New
    • 3
    • 9
    -6
    that the corporation completed state tests of a new promising torpedo ......... Avon as, that is, a torpedo completed a state test, but still promising. that is, have not yet come up with why it is needed. only in perspective. that is verbiage. if you believe what a perspective in life is, then this is (literally)
    - an integral picture of the future in a complex, contradictory relationship of programmed and expected events, on which, in the opinion of the individual, his social value and the meaning of life depend.
    yeah, eco Born Obnosov wound up, go and Stirlitz will not figure it out
    1. Piramidon 14 February 2020 11: 57 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
      that is, the torpedo completed the state test, but still promising

      If the equipment, even already adopted for service, has prospects for modernization, then it is promising.
      1. Crimean partisan 1974 14 February 2020 12: 17 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        has prospects for modernization, then it is promising ..... unfortunately, apart from the words "latest" and "perspective", there’s nothing in the post, so you can guess on the coffee grounds, but in general, purely in my opinion, there isn’t bringing the latest and promising
    2. cherkas.oe 14 February 2020 12: 33 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
      eco Born Obnosov wound up, go and Stirlitz will not figure it out

      You are like Khlestakov, with everyone on a short leg. And with B. Obnosov too? good
      1. Crimean partisan 1974 14 February 2020 13: 14 New
        • 0
        • 2
        -2
        And with B. Obnosov, too? ...... and it would be better for Obnosov to voice what his latest product is and how effective it is than the previous one, because if Cherkasy suits a statement like the most recent and promising. then I am not, therefore, and banter
        1. cherkas.oe 14 February 2020 14: 38 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
          The type declaration is the newest and most promising. then I am not, therefore, and banter

          To begin with, to be rude to a stranger without his presence is a cowardly meanness (baseness), not a banter, this is the first. If something doesn’t suit you in the information about these products, you can search them in open sources on the websites of enterprises of developers and manufacturers, and also on the MO website, if there is no information there, then this is classified information, you can search in closed sources if you have access to them, but something tells me, judging by your literacy and manner of communication to you before access, as from Crimea to Moscow on all fours. Therefore, be content with what was provided to you yes
          1. Crimean partisan 1974 14 February 2020 18: 51 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            what to be rude to a stranger without his presence - if you please, there’s no rudeness on my part, in any case I didn’t notice
            about these products you can search them in open sources ..... I would love to search and find if ..... the product itself was named. Call me, but I can offer you the same thing, find a torpedo in posikovik with parameters such as "latest" and "promising." if you got a screenshot
            judging by your literacy ..... call me. but yours are off scale compared to mine
            1. cherkas.oe 14 February 2020 20: 55 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
              I don’t have any rudeness on my part, at least I didn’t notice

              I would like to see how in the presence of B. Obnosov you would call him Borka and show him that he had wooed something. I think your rudeness, you would have to notice with one eye, at least.
              Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
              if you got a screenshot

              And the plebeian manner of poking and trying to hide their ignorance by distributing instructions to strangers gives you an individual born in prison.
              1. Crimean partisan 1974 14 February 2020 21: 09 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                gives you an individual born in prison .... but this is rudeness,
                as you would call him Borka in the presence of B. Obnosov ... you will not believe it, I will call it. since it is for my taxes and similar obnosov sculpts its wonders. so everything is in place. the only Cherkasy is out of place. instead of justifying what exactly is hiding under the torpedo, the “latest” and “promising” turns to the individual, and on the topic full 0
                Circassian, reminding me of a capman at number 2627 from "The Hound of the Baskervilles" when asked by Sherlock (Livanov)
                -what can you say about your rider ... describe his appearance ..
                capman
                -... dressed neatly, beard .... black. perhaps I can’t say anything more
                it is in the course of your competence ... Circassian
                There will be something on the topic. You can debate tode. all the more, the request to send a screenshot to find the product of the “latest” and “promising” has remained in the shadows, and it’s not good to switch to particular ones.
                1. cherkas.oe 14 February 2020 23: 56 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
                  .a this is rudeness,

                  Come on, when it comes to your beloved - rudeness, and when you yourself behave like a boorish banter. Well done. On the topic, I the young man hinted to you that the product is still secret and that their performance characteristics have not been announced by anyone and not anywhere, and you can learn about them only with access to the state secret. You’ll talk about the Baskerville dog in the yard, especially since it’s so emotional and multi-letter. And you won’t be able to insult me, the regular supply of words and thoughts is not the same, so you can not try.
                  1. Crimean partisan 1974 15 February 2020 11: 19 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    the regular stock of words and thoughts is not the same .... that is, as you put it in the wrong system, falling on the sand flying out of the window (white desert sun)
                    now on the topic, .... it was known that the product was still secret and its performance characteristics were not announced by anyone and cannot be found out about them only having access to the state secret ... strange as that, for example, the technical characteristics of the torpedoes of the physicist were voiced, as soon as she became in service with the Russian fleet, and from the first words of the chief designer. what is wrong with Obnosov. Well, TTX. but even though the name of the product is the latest, in short, you yourself do not know and do not want to know. that is our difference
                    1. cherkas.oe 15 February 2020 11: 38 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
                      falling on the sand flying out of the window (white desert sun)
                      Nevertheless, I am right with the diagnosis — no words, some pictures — you are not interesting to me as a young man with your clip thinking. No one is visible behind Sherlock and Comrade Sukhov - emptiness, I expect in your next opus something like that from Herbert Wells.
                      1. Crimean partisan 1974 15 February 2020 13: 34 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        something like that from Herbert Wells .... why so pessimistic. I can please .... your optimism can be envied. as San Sanych said in the film "Sportloto 82" and. the main thing is not any specifics. Duc that there is at least about the Onos abbreviation of the latest torpedo ???? weak ??
                      2. cherkas.oe 15 February 2020 14: 37 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
                        Duc that there is at least about the Onos abbreviation of the latest torpedo ???? weak ??

                        Well, you are like Panikovsky: - “Give, give, give the millionaire. Look through the pictures, maybe you will find, in general, look -“ Shura “- look.
                      3. Crimean partisan 1974 15 February 2020 15: 23 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        , in general, look for - "Shura" - look for .... already found, shears old torpedoes as new ones. according to the technical specifications, torpedoes are obnosovy, torpedoes Physicist is a cut above in all respects. so alas. rub the shabby saddle of obnosovschina further and be glad, I am personally glad that the obnosovskie “projects” will remain projects without devouring budget funds. Well, today is Afghanistan’s withdrawal day, I have an older brother, an Afghan internationalist, so I thump, see you the day after tomorrow ....
                      4. cherkas.oe 15 February 2020 15: 33 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
                        "Shura" - look .... already found,

                        Well done, sit down - four.
                        Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
                        me is an older brother an internationalist afghanistan so i thump

                        Me too, but you can’t drink and I walk in the park with my grandson.
  7. SovAr238A 14 February 2020 15: 41 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
    And with B. Obnosov, too? ...... and it would be better for Obnosov to voice what his latest product is and how effective it is than the previous one, because if Cherkasy suits a statement like the most recent and promising. then I am not, therefore, and banter

    Have you tried to learn to read the rules of the site and quote the words of your opponent according to the rules of "quote" - there are such
    quotes
    to use
    1. Crimean partisan 1974 14 February 2020 18: 52 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      according to the rules of "quote" - there are such ....... it is not necessary, it’s more convenient for me, the site’s rules do not prohibit this, let's better on the merits of the topic
  • Monter 14 February 2020 12: 43 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    With Bork Obnosov on a friendly foot? And essentially. The fact that the rocket completed the test is good. It is good that she gave out the specified characteristics and have stopped at this for now. The limit of perfection, as you know, is not, therefore it is necessary to stop in time. And the fact that the torpedo has a development prospect is great. Remember the SU-27. Who was and what became.
    1. Crimean partisan 1974 14 February 2020 13: 27 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The fact that the rocket completed the test is good. .... waxes in a post Obnosov’s words about a torpedo, and there is complete lack of clarity about the performance characteristics and other combat advantages, or again the Soviet rake .... a terrible secret, but that's bad luck. our sworn partner is much more knowledgeable than the “newest” “prospective” shoved to us (it’s good that there is no world-wide analogue) WHERE THE MILITARY CHARACTERISTICS of this product are, I am personally interested. or is it necessary to go to the Jens annual fly?
      1. Monter 14 February 2020 21: 17 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Maybe you should attach the “Instructions for the use of weapons” with the article? Well, so you do not turn to the "sworn partner" for information?
        1. Crimean partisan 1974 14 February 2020 21: 23 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Maybe you should attach the “Instructions for the Use of Weapons” with the article? ..... and why not, why spend money on a foreign publication, and at the same time not cheap, it would not be easier to tell the taxpayer in the first person (so to speak the breadwinner) what an innovation on the dashboard. than it is better in combat capabilities than the previous ones. and so on. in any case, Western sworn partners do just that. and it doesn’t matter whether the product is good or not, with Oblomov everything is somehow ornate. that is, it is alarming that finance has gone in the wrong direction
          1. Monter 14 February 2020 21: 42 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            And indeed, why not. This will kill industrial espionage in one fell swoop, a bunch of scientific departments of our "sworn partners" looking for and analyzing crumbs of data on weapons from the Internet will be dissolved. And why did they give up if I read the article on VO, downloaded all the attached instructions and performance characteristics and order. Cheap and cheerful. And then, you know, they came up with a "military secret"!
            1. Crimean partisan 1974 14 February 2020 21: 59 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              I downloaded all the attached instructions and TTX and order. Cheap and cheerful ......... well, waxing a military secret is detailing the design of the product and the hardware, that is. from which there is a housing .. marking of materials of construction. BIUS algorithms, operating frequencies of AGSN or PGSN, .... ATTX is not something secret, but Oblomov did not even bother to do this. it wasn’t clean, for example, the adoption of the Physicist torpedoes in 2017 was known, and this product was also provided with technical characteristics, and moreover, they were announced by the designer of the torpedo armament of the Research Institute of Marine Heat Engineering, who was developing a new project, Alexander Grigoryev, the details were secret, and the technical characteristics on welcome ..... what is wrong with Onosov and his concern? the impression is that a bunch of Obnosov's lawyers have piled up because the sawn dengue needs to be worked out
  • Forest 14 February 2020 11: 25 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    There is technical data on the stand, but they are not in the article, there is nothing for the article.
    1. Eugene-Eugene 14 February 2020 15: 07 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      TTX of what? The product is not named.
      1. Forest 14 February 2020 15: 56 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        "The latest promising torpedo and adjustable bombs caliber 250 kilograms."
  • gridasov 14 February 2020 11: 45 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Let me ask you very modestly, but what's new and promising? Maybe a better mover or explosive with a higher energy density. Al what else? Well, yes, a secret. Well, okay.
  • Operator 14 February 2020 11: 53 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Supercavitating reactive torpedo "Predator" ("Flurry-2") with aluminum fuel and magnetometric seeker, not? bully
  • Ros 56 14 February 2020 12: 23 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    It is a pity that the fault of overseas nerds have to create not what people need. But there’s nowhere to go, life makes you, so you have to be the best in this matter.
  • Petrol cutter 14 February 2020 20: 24 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Well, there’s nothing to discuss. Since everything is classified.
    1. ADEPT 14 February 2020 20: 32 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Benzorez
      Well, there’s nothing to discuss. Since everything is classified.

      Well, that’s good, surprises will be again! .. And then in the 80-90s everyone signed and handed over ..
      Even the United States gave plutonium with joy EBN .. And they are already on our borders around ..
      But we didn’t sell everything (thanks to the designers who remained alive patriots) .. and now they can be delivered to AUGs on metal bully
      1. Petrol cutter 14 February 2020 20: 42 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        And I always advocated secrecy.
        There is a ton of information that is completely unnecessary in the public domain. Moreover, only a limited circle of persons should have access to them.
        1. ADEPT 14 February 2020 20: 50 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: Benzorez
          And I always advocated secrecy.

          I, too, for this .. And then there are a lot of crooks spinning our chatter .. negative
          Quote: Benzorez
          There is a ton of information that is completely unnecessary in the public domain. Moreover, only a limited circle of persons should have access to them.

          I agree and not casualties IN is so popular with some of the small and cunning country ..))) wink
  • sivuch 15 February 2020 12: 17 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In fact, the mention of the bonbon is even more important than the torpedo. But the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation stubbornly does not want to have in its arsenal of small things with a caliber of 100-125 kg like SDB
  • lvov_aleksey 15 February 2020 20: 40 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    torpedo - beautiful, missile bomb - well done !!! back in the old film - the classic "Listen in the compartments" sounded "missile-bomb installations tovs"