“The SAA, with the support of the Russian Aerospace Forces, has every right to strike at Turkish occupants” - Russian General

202

The Syrian command ordered air strikes against militant groups that broke through the SAA defense line in the south-west of Aleppo province. Recall that the success of the militants in the area of ​​the village of Miznaz was preceded by an artillery strike inflicted by the Turkish army.

Also Syrian military aviation attacked a cluster of militants in the area of ​​Al-Atarib. In this area, the terrorists attempted to regroup with the aim of further advancing in the direction of the northern part of the formed protrusion of the positions of the CAA - the town of Al-Sheikh Ali.



Against this background, the Syrian army advanced about 2 km west of Al-Rashidin, which until recently was under the control of militants. This promotion is carried out against the background of the active transfer of manpower and equipment of the Turkish Armed Forces in the northern part of Idlib province. Recall that today Turkish special forces were deployed to the SAR.

The situation with the activity of Turkish troops in Idlib was commented on by the Chairman of the Presidium of the Russian Officers, Hero of Russia, Major General Sergey Lipovoy. According to Major General, this activity is associated with the ambitions of Recep Erdogan.

From the commentary for "Military Review":

All Erdogan’s actions are dictated by only one thing - the desire to restore the Ottoman Empire. Ankara needs not only Idlib, they need, first of all, Aleppo, more than which in the Ottoman Empire were only Constantinople and Cairo. Erdogan's claims extend all the way to the Georgian city of Batumi. He does not even hide it.

According to Sergey Lipov, it is Erdogan, along with the US authorities, who is one of the culprits of the outbreak of the civil war in Syria.

Sergey Lipovoy:

Assad is inconvenient for Turkey, and it is clear that Turkey will not just leave Idlib and will continue to sponsor terrorists. The intervention of Russia confused the maps not so much even the United States as Ankara, on their way to restoring the borders that were before the Lausanne Accords of 1923, as a result of which Turkey lost vast territories. If Erdogan moves from words to actions, that is, he brings his threats to life, then he will have to answer. The Syrian army (CAA), with the support of the Russian Aerospace Forces, has every right to strike at the Turkish invaders on its territory. And in this direct clash, if it happens, Erdogan will lose.
202 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +68
    13 February 2020 17: 00
    Major General Sergey Lipov is retired and has the right to freely express his personal opinion.
    The headline however is provocative.
    1. +8
      13 February 2020 17: 07
      All Erdogan’s actions are dictated by only one thing - the desire to restore the Ottoman Empire. Ankara needs not only Idlib, they need, first of all, Aleppo, more than which in the Ottoman Empire were only Constantinople and Cairo. Erdogan's claims extend all the way to the Georgian city of Batumi. He does not even hide it.

      I don’t think that Pomodoro even dreams about it. It’s just a shame that for so many years so much has been invested in the "opposition" and suddenly everything collapses before your eyes, so your nerves could not stand it, and most importantly, the rating is already falling, the authorities may decide , so he went to all the trouble, playing on popular ideas among the population. There is a struggle for his 5 point and for staying in power in his built castles. I would like to restore the Empire, then I would not merge the opposition in the same city for so many years Aleppo. He pretends that he allegedly wants to restore the Empire, but firstly who will give him, and secondly, he speculates on popular topics in order to be popular and stay in power, living comfortably.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. +8
          13 February 2020 18: 44
          Quote: SanSanych Gusev
          You wrote about him or our king

          Do you have a king?
          1. +4
            13 February 2020 22: 51
            not a king but a king!
          2. +4
            14 February 2020 08: 28
            I don’t know about the king, for SanSanych without a king in my head, that's for sure
        2. -3
          13 February 2020 20: 11
          Two boots - a pair, SanSanych. Change a few words in your text and oil painting.
        3. -3
          14 February 2020 06: 17
          Indeed: the fate of the USSR is before our eyes, if the NATO mongrels in Ukraine and Turkey do not hesitate to wipe their feet (three times a day) on the "lord", then who is he against the Regional Committee? -Yes, the surrender of Ukraine was the last nail in the skin of the Moscow lads. (this is for those who do not want to notice anything and believe in the blue screen).
          1. -4
            14 February 2020 06: 23
            Yes, and the very remark that it is possible (really?) To deliver blows to the occupier, symptomatically, then this is not unconditional, there are doubts? - We have so lost the habit of the fact that sovereignty must be defended in recent years, but what about the dazzling, touching, quivering love of foreign money? -the last religion of the "Third Rome?"
            1. ABM
              0
              14 February 2020 13: 03
              look, tribesmen live in a neighboring state, right? one faith. But they do not like the policy of this country, which leads to armed rebellion. The government army is trying to advance on their territory, contrary to preliminary agreements. A neighboring country helps its co-religionists with the full approval of the people! what's wrong ? Answer if not difficult
      2. for
        +1
        14 February 2020 00: 21
        They will give and still help.
    2. -1
      13 February 2020 17: 08
      commented on the chairman of the Presidium of the Russian Officers, Hero of Russia, Major General Sergey Lipovoy.

      In 2005, he was transferred to the reserve.
      1. +1
        14 February 2020 12: 36
        So what? Has he stopped being an officer? Or became a political officer?
        1. -1
          15 February 2020 16: 05
          He became a man who does not solve anything.
    3. -4
      13 February 2020 17: 14
      Quote: Livonetc
      Major General Sergey Lipov is retired and has the right to freely express his personal opinion.

      Judging by the protest, do you see a different opinion? Is everything gone, are the gypsum removed?
      1. +22
        13 February 2020 17: 42
        My remark is only in terms of the emphasis of the headline aimed at drawing attention to the publication.
        It seems that the officially voiced position of the acting military on behalf of the leadership is being declared.
        My opinion is sharper and does not reflect the "modern vector of state policy development."
        1. +9
          13 February 2020 17: 53
          Quote: Livonetc
          It seems that the officially voiced position of the acting military on behalf of the leadership is being declared.

          Understandably. I think Zhirinovsky’s statement will be even sharper. The same can be said by Lavrov and Maria Zakharova, don’t strain like that. We have specialists who will find a solution .. Perhaps even with the help of a strike .. Already there is information about the transfer to the conflict zone of several SZA divisions of the largest caliber, such as TORNADO and SMERCH, and they are already deployed against the Turkish divisions. In general, those who have more instruments began to measure.
          1. +1
            13 February 2020 17: 57
            Tornado With it of course.
            120 km. However.
            You can even cover MLRS positions in Turkey.
            And unrequitedly.
            However, such a calico is unlikely.
            1. -15
              13 February 2020 18: 07
              Erdogan also wants to eliminate the anusra
              1. -3
                13 February 2020 22: 32
                I apologize. You were a little mistaken in the word "ausru", you have to write anus ru. Erdogan seems to have become this anus ru himself.
                1. 0
                  14 February 2020 07: 43
                  no, I was not mistaken)))
          2. +9
            13 February 2020 18: 03
            Quote: Mar. Tira
            I think Zhirinovsky’s statement will be even sharper.

            this one yes! laughing
            Quote: Mar. Tira
            Lavrov and Maria Zakharova can say the same thing, do not strain so much.

            but they are definitely not. these are the very "officials" who speak on behalf of the Russian leadership. they "filter the bazaar".
    4. +5
      13 February 2020 17: 31
      Decades of "convenient" headlines and statements have brought Russia to the place where it is now.
    5. +6
      13 February 2020 17: 40
      Quote: Livonetc
      Major General Sergey Lipov is retired and has the right to freely express his personal opinion.
      The headline however is provocative.

      He quoted the UN charter.
      Article 51 of the Charter allows for the possibility of an exception to the provision prohibiting the use of force provided for in Article 2 (4) of the Charter. In cases of armed attack on a member of the United Nations, the right to individual or collective self-defense is permitted.
    6. -8
      13 February 2020 18: 08
      Quote: Livonetc
      Major General Sergey Lipov is retired and has the right to freely express his personal opinion.
      The headline however is provocative.

      I agree. Opinion of the wedding general on issues of state level ....... Even the current ones, and even not for that. Although of course, the pens itch, put the Sultan in place. feel
      1. +2
        13 February 2020 23: 48
        fake is not a wedding general, he is a military general. Before you talk on the air - study the issue, General VO.
        1. -3
          14 February 2020 06: 26
          The country saw enough of "combat" generals during the shooting of the Supreme Soviet in Moscow. (And when the army and navy, the last allies of Russia, are sold out, don't you remember? -I recommend.).
          1. +1
            14 February 2020 23: 53
            Once again, for illiterates - before speaking - study the question. What are you? Was Google banned?
    7. Maz
      +3
      13 February 2020 19: 19
      While Erdogan yells and scares, the Syrians beat off two more villages off the M5 highway
  2. -4
    13 February 2020 17: 07
    And I wonder who the Faberge art objects are harder among Russians or Turks?
    1. +6
      13 February 2020 17: 08
      and we and they are fine with eggs. At one time they bent Europe as soon as they wanted.
      They were an empire. Everything is like ours. They wouldn’t get in touch with the Russian - they would be stronger. And how much blood they drank from each other.

      Worthy enemies.
      1. +39
        13 February 2020 17: 15
        The enemy is really good. Friend is bad. winked
        1. +8
          13 February 2020 17: 40
          Friend is bad.


          There is no friendship. There are national interests. Intersecting with ours.

          I don’t even believe in friendship between the USA and Canada. There will be interest - Canada will crush only on the road

          Therefore, everything is like everyone else. Competition of Nations / States
        2. 0
          14 February 2020 08: 03
          Suvorov "suffered" with them.
      2. +3
        13 February 2020 17: 21
        Quote: s-t Petrov
        Worthy enemies.

        In the 21st century already - no.
        1. +2
          13 February 2020 17: 42
          Greeks bent
      3. +7
        13 February 2020 18: 15
        After the war in the First World War (the last war of the Turks and Russians), both empires fell apart. Everyone should remember this. I am sure that in the USA and Europe they look at Idlib and at the tension between Turkey and the Russian Federation, grin joyfully.
      4. -1
        13 February 2020 18: 56
        Until the 17th century, we were a two-pronged Empire. Then the Great Troubles (in our country) and enmity for three centuries ... By the way, the Double-headed Eagle (our coat of arms: two heads under one imperial crown) is the symbol of this "empire's two-unity": Constantinople - Second Rome and Moscow (as a region, and not the city initially) - Third Rome, i.e., two centers of one Empire. Including, it is already necessary to realize our common origins and not quarrel over nonsense ... drinks
        1. 0
          13 February 2020 21: 15
          I want to add that before the Ottoman Empire, the Turks in Asia Minor had a different Seljuk empire, and the most interesting is that their coat of arms was also a Two-headed Eagle, like the current one in Russia.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +2
            13 February 2020 22: 13
            I will add: "two-headed" flashed on the coats of arms of all the nobility of Europe almost until the middle of the 19th century (AD). The same as the "crescent" with a cross or a star.
            1. +1
              14 February 2020 00: 14
              As for the double-headed eagles on the arms of the European nobility is not sure. Although it may be. If this nobility came from the Byzantine Empire. And as for the cross and the crescent, take a closer look at the ancient Orthodox churches. there are crosses and a crescent moon, and much of the unexpected can be seen.
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. 0
                14 February 2020 12: 33
                Take a closer look at the ancient Orthodox churches. there on the crosses and the crescent
                Why "old"? There are many examples and remakes with such symbols. The "crescent" is actually an image of an eclipse of the Sun (observed shortly after the execution of the Savior) - the Moon does not look like that even during a lunar eclipse (it closes completely). Including, "crescent", "star", "cross" - Christian symbolism.
        2. +2
          14 February 2020 00: 07
          Russia was not a two-pronged empire with Turkey. The double-headed eagle came to Russia from the Byzantine Empire. With Sofia Paleolog. True, the Byzantine Empire and Constantinople by that time had already fallen under the blows of the Seljuk Turks.
          1. 0
            14 February 2020 12: 23
            The double-headed eagle came to Russia from the Byzantine Empire.
            Where does this come from? Erroneous sly version of historians. Images of the "two-headed" one appeared at the end of the 15th century just after the so-called "fall of Constantinople" in 1453. Sophia Palaeologus is a kind of historical myth, like Ivan III, also "Terrible". The history of the time of Ivan III the Terrible covers some real events of the 15th century that we cannot know today?
            1. 0
              14 February 2020 23: 58
              Actually, Ivan the Terrible was called Ivan the Terrible.
          2. 0
            14 February 2020 12: 38
            The dispute is off topic, gentlemen! Violation of the Rules of VO. Let's calm down?
    2. +6
      13 February 2020 17: 16
      Quote: Dur_mod
      And I wonder who the Faberge art objects are harder among Russians or Turks?


      Do you feel like checking? Naughty ...
    3. 0
      13 February 2020 17: 17
      Quote: Dur_mod
      And I wonder who the Faberge art objects are harder among Russians or Turks?

      Would you like to?
      1. -2
        14 February 2020 06: 31
        And where does the -Russian? -Russian-Japanese -shame on the defeat and collapse of the empire, and a little later (with all the jambs of a dry-armed paranoid) -Russian kicked the Japanese out of the continent, all things at the Center (if you have it, of course, that's not a fact )
    4. +9
      13 February 2020 17: 44
      The Turks did not win against Russia, not one, out of twenty-odd wars. Neither on land nor at sea. I believe the Faberge debate is not appropriate here.
      1. +5
        13 February 2020 17: 47
        The Turks did not win against Russia, not one, out of twenty-odd wars.

        perseverance is inherent in them. That is yes. What we see in Idlib. Well, in order to fight with the Russians 20 times, Faberge is needed. We just have them stronger


        1. +7
          13 February 2020 17: 52
          Quote: s-t Petrov
          persistence is inherent in them

          Perseverance, sometimes confused with stupid stubbornness, or even with obstinacy .. In my opinion, the Turks simply for a long time, did not rake from anyone, so they played too much.
          1. -5
            13 February 2020 18: 26
            "sometimes confused with stupid stubbornness" Apparently you do not know the history and mentality of the Turks. They are from the rare peoples who love to rule, created the thousands of years old Seljuk and then the Osmansuk Empire, fought for centuries, died in millions, killed, but never were under someone else, themselves ruled over others.
            1. +8
              13 February 2020 19: 32
              Quote: Oquzyurd
              , fought for centuries, died in millions, killed, but were never under someone, they ruled over others

              Yes piled on them all and sundry. Starting from the Crusaders, and ending with Serbs and Hungarians. It is not necessary to conquer small peoples and tribes, such as Bulgarians, Romanians, Macedonians, or Armenians. But their main mistake was that they were drawn to Russia. This was the beginning of the final and irrevocable decline of the Ottoman Empire. Erdogan should teach history, and not pretend to be a “sultan”. But to kill someone, yes, the Turks have always been very happy.
              1. -4
                13 February 2020 21: 00
                "Yes, they piled up all and sundry." They piled so much that this empire of the Turks lived, ruled from 1071 to 1912 (23), in the territories of Asia Minor, the Middle East, North Africa and the Balkans, longer than any other empire in history. Crusaders, 6-7 countries gathered together, attacked, and, as always, got tinsel from the Ottomans. The last attempt was the battles of Galipoli.
                1. +5
                  13 February 2020 21: 55
                  Quote: Oquzyurd
                  Empire of Turks lived, rules from 1071 to 1912 (23)

                  What happened in 1912? Is the imperial fuse over? More than a hundred years passed, and then the old woman remembered how young she was. I dare to note that the Ottoman Empire ruled in such a way that Turkey has no friends at all among the neighboring nations. And many, very much even strongly dislike Turks. Some already "cannot eat". so if Turkey gives slack even a little, it will be torn to pieces, with particular bitterness. You are so proud of the descendants of those peoples whose power over them in the past.
                  1. +1
                    13 February 2020 22: 13
                    All empires have a beginning and an end. And their neighbors always do not like them, because they always feel from them, they feel danger.
                    "is the fuse over?" You can say so. But, the heirs, great-grandchildren at the genetic level preserve the seeds of that greatness, they are waiting for the moment to grow a new empire from these seeds. This applies not only to the Turks, but to all the former empires, and the Russian one too. Syria, apparently, for both gave the ground for planting these seeds)) You can grow together, or trample together. Agree, everything is good for both. The other option is dangerous ...
                    1. +2
                      13 February 2020 22: 36
                      Quote: Oquzyurd
                      Agree, everything is good for both


                      Of course you can agree. But you forget that there is a third player, the most important one. Which any conflict is at hand.
                      1. +2
                        13 February 2020 22: 52
                        "that there is a third player, the most important one." That's right, that's why we must grow together, and not trample, so that the third hand will remain empty.
                    2. 0
                      14 February 2020 20: 22
                      Common thoughts, albeit a Turk. Learn. Adequacy has always been appreciated.
            2. The comment was deleted.
              1. -2
                13 February 2020 20: 44
                You are mistaken, even very much. The Turks had a cult of "Tengri". This is also a kind of belief in a single God, the Blue Sky, the heavenly Spirit-master. Therefore, they much smoothly voluntarily (most) switched to Islam, at the level of authorities, rulers, then There were also wars, for example, the movements of the commander Babek (798-838) in the Azerbaijani territories, who fought with the Arabs for 17 years, defending the Khurramism movement Yes, the influence of the Arabs was, especially since the faith originated in the Arab desert, the Koran and the Adhan , prayers in Arabic. But, the banner of Islam was raised by the Türks, after the Mongols came and crushed the Arabs. It is not by chance that the Türkic crescent is perceived throughout the world as a symbol of Islam.
                1. +3
                  13 February 2020 21: 32
                  Quote: Oquzyurd
                  There were also wars, for example, the movement of the commander Babek (798-838) in the Azerbaijani territories, who fought with the Arabs for 17 years, defending

                  Oguz, did Babek have a Turkic component in his blood?

                  And yes ... 180 years ago, it was RI that saved Turkey from the Arab army, which was only 200 km away. from Istanbul ...
                  1. -2
                    13 February 2020 21: 40
                    "Oguz, did Babek have a Turkic component in his blood?" I was not surprised that an Armenian reacted to this. After all, Babek was surrendered to the Arabs by an Armenian named Sumbat) Babek was a real Turk who took the banner of the fight against the Arabs from Javidan. He was also a Turk. But Sumbat remained in history as a traitor. Not surprising, not very surprising, not surprising at all good
                    1. 0
                      13 February 2020 21: 47
                      I remembered about Smbat ...
                      Another question, again forgotten over time ... But was Bug of what nationality?
                      1. 0
                        13 February 2020 21: 59
                        Boga is a Turkic name. I can’t say anything more.
                      2. 0
                        13 February 2020 22: 53
                        Clear...
                        Why did I ask about Babek ... If I remember correctly, it was only at the beginning of the 9th century that the Persians began to invite the Turks to work in the Mugan steppe ... Or was Babek a Turk of Khazar origin?
                      3. -2
                        13 February 2020 23: 19
                        "The Persians began to invite the Turks to work in the Mugan steppe .." Yeah, they were directly invited to work, like the Armenian asphalt pavers are invited to Russia))) Like, they would not be invited, and there would be no Turks in Azerbaijan. Oh this Armenian globe, to what absurd Babek was a Khurramite and they have nothing to do with the Khazars. He is from southern Azerbaijan, from a Turkic family, who lived in these lands for centuries, before the arrival of the Arabs in the 8th century. Arabs sources speak of the Turks as a local population in these parts.
                      4. +1
                        13 February 2020 23: 24
                        Quote: Oquzyurd
                        .Arab sources speak of the Turks as the local population in these parts.

                        It seems to me that in South Azerbaijan before the Arabs began to carve out entire cities of the Persians, there could not have been Turks at all ... Then, most likely, it was the Arabs who could invite the Turks, as opposed to the Persians ...
                      5. 0
                        14 February 2020 00: 00
                        lol I also think a lot of things, but I can’t interpret it as a story)
        2. 0
          13 February 2020 18: 09
          Not with the Russians, but to show that they are cool, at one time their Kurds well remembered where they burned the leopard
        3. 0
          14 February 2020 08: 22
          Quote: s-t Petrov
          perseverance is inherent in them.

          Once upon a time, during a happy childhood, I had a turtle. And when I let her walk on the floor, sooner or later she rested against the baseboard, but continued to try to crawl on. Rowing and rowing, until I turned it in the opposite direction. It was funny. I don’t know if it’s persistence or something else ...
      2. -1
        13 February 2020 18: 58
        During those distant wars there was neither the Montreux Convention nor the Turkish Stream. Times have changed and now they don’t go to the bayonet. They will find, for example, a clue in the Montreux convention and prohibit the passage of the Russian military transport ships through the Bosphorus, here's a kirdyk to supply the Russian military in Syria. With the Turkish stream can stir up ... inconsistencies with 3 energy package, then, yes .....
        1. +5
          14 February 2020 00: 36
          So once the Turks wanted to close the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles for ships from the USSR. To which Comrade Gromyko (Minister of Foreign Affairs of the USSR) at a reception in Washington told the reporters who had gotten him: Let them shut it down. Only then will there be another strait nearby, deeper and wider. But there won't be Istanbul. "And that's it! In the morning, the issue of unhindered passage of USSR ships through the straits was resolved positively and in favor of the USSR.
      3. -2
        14 February 2020 00: 49
        Turks won the first war with RI. The sad campaign of Peter the Great. I had to pay off in order to return back. And then yes. Thunder them thoroughly.
      4. 0
        14 February 2020 12: 41
        One won outright. When the great Vezir of Peter the Great sealed to the bank of the Prut and the Turks took Azov away
    5. +1
      13 February 2020 19: 30
      the Turks are very stubborn and always fought to the last, but we turned out to be more stubborn. How it will be now depends on the leadership,
    6. 0
      13 February 2020 19: 56
      The dinosaurs ..., so they died out.
    7. -4
      13 February 2020 20: 26
      Quote: Dur_mod
      And I wonder who the Faberge art objects are harder among Russians or Turks?

      And then Faberge? It all depends on who wins the most money in the war - as they say, it's just business. This is capitalism, sir.
      1. +2
        13 February 2020 20: 38
        Quote: Doliva63
        Quote: Dur_mod
        And I wonder who the Faberge art objects are harder among Russians or Turks?

        And then Faberge? It all depends on who wins the most money in the war - as they say, it's just business. This is capitalism, sir.

        But in Russia, something did not work out with capitalism .. How do you like this?
        And so and so to eat that leg, and Soross something that waved his hand at Russia)))) Uneducating ..!
        Here we will teach the Turks I smell .. They forgot the story
  3. -7
    13 February 2020 17: 08
    The Syrian army (CAA), with the support of the Russian Aerospace Forces, has every right to strike at the Turkish invaders on its territory. And in this direct clash, if it happens, Erdogan will lose.

    If such a respected person, the chairman of the Presidium of the Russian Officers, Hero of Russia, Major General Sergei Lipovoy said so, then it really will be so and Erdogan will lose. Now, somehow, it is necessary to convey this information to Recep Tayyip, I'm afraid he simply is not aware of this ...
    1. +9
      13 February 2020 17: 17
      Erdogan plays on the patriotic feelings of the Turks in order to stay in power. If Erdogan would like to implement the project of the Ottoman Empire, he would have sent troops to Syria back in 2012,2013/2014 or XNUMX and there would have been no Assad for a long time and would not have merged the green "opposition" for so many years , facilitating its transportation from all over Syria to Idlib, would not sit at the same table with Assad's allies Russia and Iran. Is this really not clear? I just decided to raise my rating with the next military operation in Syria. The people love strong patriotic rulers. Responds to the request of society.
      1. -6
        13 February 2020 17: 26
        Maxim, in your words there is a rational kernel and a share of common sense, only I spoke a little about something else.
        Dear person, retirement and social activist - predicted Erdogan’s defeat in the event of a possible direct collision with the SAA and our VKS.
        - Why at the moment the CAA cannot force the Turks out of its territory?
        - Yes, because Erdogan does not know what he lost if the VKS connects.
        That's actually all that I wanted to say and asked to inform the Turkish president about it, he simply does not know about it.
        1. +2
          13 February 2020 17: 42
          Count the number of our planes in Khmeimim and Turkish F-16s at Turkish bases. And the number of combat units in the SAA and the Turkish army will understand. Our limited contingent is geared towards supporting the SAA against militants, but not against the regular army of Turkey.
          - Why at the moment the CAA cannot force the Turks out of its territory?

          She only learned to supplant the green opposition, and even with our assistance. Shabby in many years of battles. Strength is not enough obviously against 50-100 thousand Turkish groups, plus 30 thousand green ones.
          - Yes, because Erdogan does not know what he lost if the VKS connects.

          Lipov's statement is intended for those who are not aware of these topics.
    2. +1
      14 February 2020 00: 43
      don't be scared, professor. This information has already been delivered to Recep. He took note of this. It depends on him how he will dispose of it. And the poisonous oil on the military general is not lei. It will not help you.
  4. +3
    13 February 2020 17: 11
    It can and does have, but will it be allowed?
  5. +1
    13 February 2020 17: 12
    CORRECTLY: Allah upstairs will figure out where the Turkish askers are and where the barmales are.
  6. -1
    13 February 2020 17: 12
    Saha presses the barmaley, so they know something since the Turks are not afraid
    1. +5
      13 February 2020 17: 25
      Quote: Nastia Makarova
      Saha presses the barmaley, so they know something since the Turks are not afraid

      hi
      If Erdogan decides on a muzzle with the CAA and the Russian Federation, then he will have a problem with Iran. Israel will take the Chinese pose of "a monkey on a rock", but how the goat-bearded Sam will behave is unclear (will he want to punish Erdogan for his obstinacy or will defiantly put his shoulder out?).
      1. -6
        13 February 2020 17: 59
        There will be no problems with the Russian Federation, he also wants to liquidate the anusra and leave the pro-Turkish groups
  7. -6
    13 February 2020 17: 18
    Right without opportunity, costs nothing. They will close the Bosphorus, the airspace of Turkey and it will be difficult to ensure our grouping and CAA, and given the mosh of the Turkish fleet, Khmeimim will become a desert back very quickly. A direct clash is not in our favor. There is no need to number ...
    1. -4
      13 February 2020 17: 24
      Hmeimim will become a desert back very quickly. A direct clash is not in our favor.

      Not in Turkey’s favor, given our nuclear arsenal. But seriously, then all of Turkey can become a desert very quickly.
      and considering the mosh of the Turkish fleet

      Turkey has a very medium fleet. Old and small. A little more than our Black Sea Fleet.
      1. -1
        13 February 2020 17: 34
        Not in Turkey’s favor, given our nuclear arsenal.
        Our leadership is not so hot-headed, so no one from behind Idlib, even together with Khmeimim, Syria and the whole Middle East, will use nuclear weapons, which is clearly written in the military doctrine of the Russian Federation.
        Turkey has a very medium fleet. Old and small. A little more than our Black Sea Fleet.
        The Turkish Navy is a tangible threat to the Black Sea Fleet, and even more so for the serial express, the BDK will not oppose anything to it!
        1. -1
          13 February 2020 17: 59
          The Turkish Navy is a tangible threat to the Black Sea Fleet, and even more so for the serial express, the BDK will not oppose anything to it!

          Like the Black Sea Fleet, a tangible threat to the Turkish Navy, given our submarines, the Bastion SCRC, naval aviation with the Kh-35U, Kh-31AD, possibly even the Kh-32.
      2. -8
        13 February 2020 17: 41
        Aren't you scared for your compatriots, residents of the Black Sea coast of Russia, in the event you strike a nuclear attack on Turkey?
        To Crimea, by the shortest route - 263 km.
        From Sochi to Trabzon - 300 km.
        You will also receive curses from friends on the CSTO. The common border of Turkey and Armenia is 311 km.
        Well, from NATO comrades will fly automatically, in all major cities and administrative centers, a retaliatory attack, in the event that the launch of our ICBMs is detected.
        You are ready to pay a very high price for supporting Bashar al-Assad.
        1. +4
          13 February 2020 17: 55
          in case of detection of the launch of our ICBMs.

          I am purely theoretically talking about the answer for Khmeimim, I put a word to you. Is the ICBM in Turkey? Turkey located overseas? About the tactical nuclear weapons, which are carried by the KR and the same Iskanders have not heard?
          Well, from NATO comrades will fly automatically, in all major cities and administrative centers, a retaliatory attack

          Erdogan was sent to NATO when he asked for help in Idlib, but do you want NATO to arrange Armageddon for Turkey and get an ICBM in return? Funny. Turkey is a useful consumable for NATO, no more.
      3. 0
        13 February 2020 18: 29
        It is amazing that with three stars you do not know the Turkish fleet.
        1. 0
          13 February 2020 19: 29
          Quote: Oquzyurd
          It is amazing that with three stars you do not know the Turkish fleet.

          Check out the quality of the Turkish Navy at the link below. Or old, or decommissioned American ships. On submarines only torpedoes. Not impressive.
          The Turkish Navy includes (after the reorganization): 165 warships and boats (including 16 frigates, 10 corvettes, 16 patrol ships, 13 submarines, 11 minesweepers, 33 landing ships and boats, 18 missile boats and 33 patrol boats) , 16 aircraft of base patrol aviation and 38 helicopters. The surface fleet is based on 24 patrol ships: 16 frigates and 10 large multi-purpose corvettes.

          https://anna-news.info/vms-turtsii-obzor/
    2. -2
      13 February 2020 17: 48
      Quote: KBaHT_BpeMeHu
      Close the Bosphorus

      This is a direct declaration of war. And not to anyone, but to a nuclear power. In the military doctrine of the Russian Federation, it is clearly said that in which case, Russia may even gobble. I think that Erdogan’s sciatic place is not iron.
      1. -1
        13 February 2020 17: 54
        This is a direct declaration of war.
        And bring down the plane, is that so, is it okay?
        that in which case, Russia may crash.
        Yes, the devil is in the details, and we can only gasp in case of a threat to the existence of Russia, does he understand the difference?
        1. +1
          13 February 2020 18: 06
          But a declaration of war, is it not a threat to existence? Hypothetically.
  8. +2
    13 February 2020 17: 22
    CAA, it will strike. Maybe the VKS will not allow the Turks to fly over Idlib. What will happen in the event of a land operation by the Turks?
    1. +5
      13 February 2020 17: 27
      Another coup attempt in Turkey. I’ll venture to suggest that this time is successful.
      1. +2
        13 February 2020 17: 28
        ..... or offensive in Libya?
    2. -2
      13 February 2020 17: 46
      Maybe the VKS will not allow the Turks to fly over Idlib.
      But the Turks, in principle, do not have to fly into Syria, conventional artillery is enough to strike from the territory of Turkey. In this case, what would the SAA strike in Turkey? This is suicide.
      1. -1
        13 February 2020 17: 48
        Yes .... but the SAA has artillery, and in addition the TochkaU complexes, against which the Turks have nothing.
        1. -1
          13 February 2020 17: 50
          about the artillery is in the SAA, and in addition complexes Point
          AND? To strike in Turkey? If not NATO as a whole, then Turkey will gladly rip the ATS into rags.
          1. +2
            13 February 2020 17: 53
            We are talking about clashes in Syrian territory ..... and if they shoot from Turkish, then what are the restrictions on firing in response? NATO must respond to something ..... aggression towards Turkey is not here.
            1. -6
              13 February 2020 17: 57
              there is no aggression towards Turkey.
              There is direct aggression, and the Turks will take full advantage of this. As I said 1.5 years ago, no one is going to implement the Idlib agreement, so now you can remember this.
              1. +2
                13 February 2020 18: 03
                Agreements on Idlib have done their job .... all the main bandits there! That makes sense.
                If the Russian Federation closes the sky, then it will be very difficult for the land Turks. And without a conflict with the Russian Federation, the offensive will be unlikely. But CAA is hardly ready for such a conflict. Let's not forget about the supply ... through against in Turkey. There are no other ways.
                1. 0
                  14 February 2020 01: 25
                  supply ... through the Strait in Turkey. There are no other ways.

                  The route through Gibraltar is only 4 times longer. It is necessary to gradually increase the number of cargo ships and show the Turkish colleague that he is not the navel of the world
        2. -1
          13 February 2020 18: 40
          Such conflicts are decisive in infantry, artillery and tanks, sometimes air cover. Tochka-U missiles do little to solve, because they are limited in number, roads. Let's say Syria has 50 pieces (I doubt it) but still, what will it change? The Iran-Iraq war everyone remembers which missiles and in what quantities they threw each other. Yes, they cause damage, but they do not affect the front line.
          "The point against which the Turks have nothing." Are you sure?
      2. +2
        13 February 2020 18: 03
        Quote: KBaHT_BpeMeHu
        Maybe the VKS will not allow the Turks to fly over Idlib.
        But the Turks, in principle, do not have to fly into Syria, conventional artillery is enough to strike from the territory of Turkey. In this case, what would the SAA strike in Turkey? This is suicide.

        Turkey is already striking with might and main artillery and MLRS on the SAA in Idlib. Or is Idlib already Turkey?
    3. +1
      13 February 2020 17: 59
      Quote: Zaurbek
      What will happen in the event of a land operation by the Turks?

      If the VKS cover the sky over Idlib, then I would not bet on the Turks. SAA has 9 years of continuous battles, the Turks do not have so many fired soldiers.
    4. +2
      13 February 2020 18: 51
      Quote: Zaurbek
      CAA, it will strike. Maybe the VKS will not allow the Turks to fly over Idlib. What will happen in the event of a land operation by the Turks?

      And under what pretext will Erdogan begin a ground operation?
      On April 8, 2019, he announced:
      It is necessary to maintain the territorial integrity of Syria, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said.
      “In Syria, we are working together with the Russian Federation, because of the presence of terrorist elements, our work is difficult ... It is very important to preserve the territorial integrity of Syria. This cooperation must be preserved in this direction.

      Here let it save.
      1. 0
        14 February 2020 08: 11
        He has different statements once a month, in different directions.
        1. 0
          14 February 2020 08: 25
          Quote: Zaurbek
          He has different statements once a month, in different directions.

          Adapts to the current environment.
  9. 0
    13 February 2020 17: 36
    The situation with the activity of Turkish troops in Idlib was commented on by the chairman of the presidium of the Russian Officers organization,

    If this were stated by the General Staff of Russia, then the reaction would have been immediate ..
    And so far everyone is silent, and the Turks are wetting the Syrians and soon I feel the United States and Israel will join
    It is necessary to solve something in this difficult situation, so you look and the military will begin to work out blows at our bases so that they do not protrude ..
    1. +4
      13 February 2020 19: 02
      Quote: Case
      The situation with the activity of Turkish troops in Idlib was commented on by the chairman of the presidium of the Russian Officers organization,

      .. everyone is silent, and the Turks urinate the Syrians and soon I feel the United States and Israel will join
      It is necessary to solve something in this difficult situation, so you look and the military will begin to work out blows at our bases so that they do not protrude ..

      Broadcast too gloomy forecasts. If they start working on our bases, then our Armed Forces "will strike at the decision-making centers." Putin announced this out loud. Those who have ears have learned everything well. soldier
  10. +8
    13 February 2020 17: 41
    All social networks and the press of the Turks are filled with hatred of the Russians, up to the total bombing of our bases. If not for Russia, they would have owned Syria: there is still that imperial spirit and bloodthirstiness. It was the same after the destruction of our aircraft. Tourists, I'm afraid the season is provided with a fun.
    1. -1
      13 February 2020 17: 48
      Tourists, I'm afraid the season is provided with a fun.
      One was already, and nothing. Better than before.
    2. -1
      13 February 2020 19: 01
      everyone has divan military. In real life, everything is a little different
  11. +1
    13 February 2020 17: 47
    And this is a very correct opinion, whoever would not speak against.
  12. -3
    13 February 2020 17: 51
    Chatter worthy of a layman in the kitchen, not a general.
    In the event of a direct collision, Turkey will close the straits and dry our bases in the bud. In addition to tomatoes, they have nothing to fear
    1. 0
      13 February 2020 19: 05
      Yeah and stay without tourists with 400 nuclear power plants and gas? Nah etozh not Ukrainians laughing In the case of kneading, not only our tourists will fly there, no others will fly. Since all airlines will cancel flights there automatically, so as not to repeat mistakes with the loss of civilian flights
      1. -5
        13 February 2020 19: 18
        without our tourists - this is a kick, of course, but not strong. tourism for Turkey is 5% of GDP; our tourists make up a fifth of the total, i.e. Exaggerated 1% of GDP Gas Turks are able to replace LNG (the corresponding terminals are built and operate, Qatar is an ally) and Azerbaijan. AES is our popos, c400 has already been delivered.
        Turkish exports to the Russian Federation in the region of 4 billion are significant, about 2.5% of total exports, but again not a disaster.
        1. +1
          13 February 2020 19: 29
          Quote: protoss
          tourism for Turkey is 5%

          Oh oh Well, let's say. And how many are dissatisfied with Erdogan’s policy? And how many of them will be added with a column of 200 cargo? Have you forgotten about the coup attempt yet? And Erdogan probably remembers
          Quote: protoss
          AES is our popos

          Yeah, that is, the Turkish side does not need it from the word at all? laughing
          Quote: protoss
          The c400 is already delivered.

          How much is delivered? I remember another test debugging is in progress, and the crews are not trained.
          Quote: protoss
          Turkish exports to the Russian Federation in the region of 4 billion are significant, about 2.5% of total exports, but again not a disaster.

          And you know, a chicken pecking a grain, and in the aggregate, this war did not fall on the Turks in one place.
          1. -4
            13 February 2020 19: 36
            Of course I did not fall, but what you described as a catastrophe does not pull. our export to Turkey, by the way, 15 yards. Are we ready to lose it?
  13. -7
    13 February 2020 17: 53
    summarizing the comments on the topic of idlib, I can say that all patriots are confident in our victory over Turkey if something happens, but in the end they rely only on nuclear weapons, while they are easily ready to sacrifice all the personnel in the himeim and tartus, realizing that they are not residents , and they are firmly convinced that NATO, primarily the United States (are they not Hiroshima / Nagasaki?), will not decide on a nuclear response.
    as I understand it, our population already has nothing to lose, a bright future is not visible, so to die with music.
    1. -2
      13 February 2020 18: 01
      I got too who wants a big war
    2. +1
      13 February 2020 19: 12
      Quote: protoss
      summarizing the comments on the topic of idlib, I can say that all patriots are confident in our victory over Turkey

      And who is talking about the war with Turkey? They talk about the war in idlib. And this is not a word synonymous with Turkey. On the other side, no one wants to die either.
      1. -5
        13 February 2020 19: 21
        everyone is talking. the full-length idlib war is clearly considered by everyone to be a losing one, and then the stories about the vigorous loaf begin.
        1. 0
          13 February 2020 19: 38
          Looks like you and I understand this "full growth" in different ways. Let's remember the wars in Korea and Vietnam. It didn't come to the edren loafs. Let's remember the recent aggravation of the Indo-Pakistani conflict. Where is it now? They rattled like a weapon, and even shot down each other's plane. So it is here. Show their teeth and sit down at the table again
          1. -4
            13 February 2020 19: 51
            read the first comment, most local strategists rely on nuclear weapons. the standard line of thought is as follows:
            1) we are in law, if the Turks will wet Asad, we will have to wet the Turks,
            2) yes, but then the Turks will wet us and we will quickly end in Syria
            3) yes, but we are a nuclear power, then we will take the hell of Istanbul and Ankara to hell
            4) all of us will be scared and pretend that they did not notice. victory.
            1. 0
              13 February 2020 20: 11
              Well, in the first place. De yuro will kill the Turks asad. And de facto it will remain in the shadows. And secondly, the Turks will not officially kill us. But they will kill the Assad. And how it comes out in the batch, how the map will fall. But it will not be long and not large-scale. And there are couch warriors on both sides of the baricades, so on the Internet more than once it will be "bang ... the whole world in dust ... but then" laughing
    3. -1
      13 February 2020 20: 03
      since the pluses of the minuses you equally draw conclusions that half of the readers are tired of life. truly free who is ready to die tomorrow)))
      1. -3
        13 February 2020 20: 07
        Quote: Sadam
        since the pluses of the minuses you equally draw conclusions that half of the readers are tired of life. truly free who is ready to die tomorrow)))

        Yes laughing
  14. -4
    13 February 2020 17: 57
    PHCHMNP. Campaign Chuyka did not let me down.
  15. +5
    13 February 2020 18: 01
    Quote: KBaHT_BpeMeHu
    Close the Bosphorus

    Based? This will come to them and hiccups so that they won’t be glad.
    Turkish actions in Syria have no legitimization. Zero. We have full carte blanche, incl. in accordance with the UN Charter. Turks in this situation from all sides are in a very deplorable position.
    Butting seriously in the legal, economic, and power fields with such an adversary as Russia, modern Turkey is simply not up to the grasp of the hat.
    1. +1
      13 February 2020 18: 44
      Quote: Mentat
      Turkish actions in Syria have no legitimization.

      And who when did it stop? We believe that NATO illegally bombed Yugoslavia. But they bombed them, not really bothering what we think.
      Most of the countries consider Crimea joining unannounced. But we attached it, not really bothering what they consider to themselves there. So it was and will be further.
      Quote: Mentat
      We have full carte blanche, incl. in accordance with the UN Charter

      So I do not understand, are you going to apply carte blanche against the Turks? And the performance characteristics of this wonderful weapon can be found?

      PS What you say is absolutely correct from the point of view of international law.
      But the right of the strong acts in the world much more often. hi
  16. -5
    13 February 2020 18: 01
    I hope that this general understands that an attack by the Russian air forces on the Turkish army in Syria will have very unpleasant consequences for supplying both the Russian contingent in Syria and the Assad regime. It is quite easy to block the Bosphorus for Russian ships, and it is unlikely that it will be possible to supply BTA forces. An attempt to attack directly the territory of Turkey (and this country is still a member of NATO) may in general become an occasion for a world war.
    1. +2
      13 February 2020 19: 15
      Quote: Zeev Zeev
      An attempt to attack directly the territory of Turkey (and this country is still a member of NATO) may in general become an occasion for a world war.

      Can you name the states that will declare war on Russia in this regard?
      1. -3
        13 February 2020 20: 13
        Announce? And who will have time to declare a world war? It just starts.
        1. +2
          13 February 2020 20: 16
          Quote: Zeev Zeev
          Announce? And who will have time to declare a world war? It just starts.

          The main thing to watch out for Israel! As soon as the main thing starts to scatter to Australia, all wait for the war, dig trenches
          1. -4
            13 February 2020 20: 19
            Run away from Israel? During the war? On the contrary, everyone will go back to Israel
            1. 0
              13 February 2020 20: 50
              Quote: Zeev Zeev
              Run away from Israel? During the war? On the contrary, everyone will go back to Israel

              laughing tongue wassat
              Why is your elite in Australia building bunkers? Probably ten meters dug simple ..? hi All of you are boasting, atu the hods themselves are shaking
              1. -1
                13 February 2020 23: 58
                Bunker in Australia? To escape there? I have not heard. Bunker in Israel? We have been building bomb shelters since 1941. For all.
        2. +3
          13 February 2020 23: 45
          Quote: Zeev Zeev
          Announce? And who will have time to declare a world war? It just starts.

          Announce the entire list of states that will begin hostilities against Russia.
          If only the Poles with the Balts. And then on Facebook.
          Although I must tell you that the invasion of Turkey is not planned. The situation is just the opposite. And we are talking about the fact that the Turks will rake in Syria if they are too carried away by the search for adventure.
  17. +3
    13 February 2020 18: 03
    Quote: Zeev Zeev
    I hope that this general understands that an attack by the Russian air forces on the Turkish army in Syria will have very unpleasant consequences for supplying both the Russian contingent in Syria and the Assad regime. It is quite easy to block the Bosphorus for Russian ships, and it is unlikely that it will be possible to supply BTA forces. An attempt to attack directly the territory of Turkey (and this country is still a member of NATO) may in general become an occasion for a world war.

    What are you saying? This is Assad. request
  18. -1
    13 February 2020 18: 05
    The Ministry of Agriculture reported that a quota for the import of tomatoes from Turkey to Russia has not yet been selected
    February 13, 2020, 12:48 | Economy
    45

    The Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation said that the quota for importing tomatoes from Turkey to Russia has not yet been selected, while about 150 thousand tons of products were delivered ... However, we must wait. →
    1. 0
      13 February 2020 18: 13
      Garbage reform is the disposal of barmaley.
  19. -4
    13 February 2020 18: 06
    the classics are eternal ..
  20. 0
    13 February 2020 18: 15
    With the support of the videoconferencing, then of course. The Khmeimim base has already demonstrated a hundred sorties per day and a hundred thousand point strikes per year, chewing on Ishil, and going through others if necessary.
    1. 0
      13 February 2020 18: 22
      and the Syrian Express will continue to provide uninterrupted supplies. but what about ..
      1. 0
        13 February 2020 18: 27
        The Turks will not go into the open war with the Russian Federation, and the supply not only of the Bosphorus can live.
        1. 0
          13 February 2020 18: 30
          you yourself proposed an open war with Turkey. and I will listen with interest about alternative supply routes that provide "one hundred combat missions a day"
          1. 0
            13 February 2020 18: 33
            It is a sin to negotiate, I did not suggest this. A hundred thousand strikes - one barge with ammunition, well, two.
            1. +1
              13 February 2020 18: 40
              "With the support of the VKS, then of course"
              those. VKS attacks on Turkish troops, you do not consider an open war?

              "And one hundred thousand strikes - one barge with ammunition, well, two" - well, if the pilots are inflicting strikes exclusively from personal weapons, it could be a barge) and the full load of the Su-34 reaches 8 tons.
              1. -2
                13 February 2020 18: 44
                A full load can and 8 tons, and a blow of 250 kg. This can be called a war if Turkey will arrange this war by declaring war on an ally of the Russian Federation.
                1. -2
                  13 February 2020 19: 06
                  plan powerful strikes .. the Turks, unlike the broads and air defense available. and you are going to carry one bomb?
                  1. +1
                    13 February 2020 19: 12
                    The fact is that Russian aviation bombes anyone who wants to legally in Syria, representing the legitimate authorities of Syria, it’s illegal to shoot down it in the Syrian sky, it can fly to the palace, from the air defense of the Turks only S-400, the missiles to which the Russian Federation supplies, the Syrians also have air defense, armor, beeches and S-300 from fresh, an old one is also working.
                    1. -4
                      13 February 2020 19: 29
                      here you are funny with your "legal". I see such frames every day from the car at pedestrian crossings, they go like a brick without looking left / right with a sense of absolute priority on the road. with this feeling of "legitimacy" under the wheels they die.
                    2. -1
                      13 February 2020 19: 38
                      so far, these "whoever wants" are only local babakhs. and yes, you yourself don't find it funny to use the word "legal" in light of Turkey's recent actions? Not to mention the past ..
                      as for the Turkish air defense, it is of course rather weak, but there is a place to be. Like 120 S-400 missiles ALREADY delivered to Erdogan. + not bad air force.
                      an easy walk will definitely not work
                  2. +1
                    13 February 2020 19: 18
                    Quote: ender
                    plan powerful strikes .. the Turks, unlike the broads and air defense available. and you are going to carry one bomb?

                    The Netherlands have not exported their Patriots from Turkey yet? This is what kind of air defense in Turkey, except for the S-400,
                    F-16?
                    1. -1
                      13 February 2020 19: 43
                      for example, their "Hisars", the supply of which is probably now being forced, given the development of the situation.
                      and actually, what are bad, in this capacity, 2 hundreds of F-16s?
                  3. +6
                    13 February 2020 21: 19
                    Quote: ender

                    plan powerful strikes .. the Turks, unlike the broads and air defense have

                    The last decades are full of examples of what fate can befall a country with a seemingly powerful and numerous army, after it has been systematically processed from positions unattainable for the armed forces of this country. You just need to have a "longer arm" and a little patience.
                    Gauges in this regard are no worse than Tomahawks. And if you systematically crush the enemy’s military infrastructure with missile weapons, then you can go to closer distances.
                    And further. Why does everyone forget about Iran? Iran also knows who it is betting on today.
                    Surprise people who are trying to put Turkey’s position in the comments as something enviable.
        2. +1
          13 February 2020 20: 16
          Can I find out the supply route of the Russian group without the Bosphorus? BTA? Expensive and scanty volumes. Around Europe? Long. Trucks through Iran and Iraq? Are you seriously?
          1. +2
            13 February 2020 20: 56
            Quote: Zeev Zeev
            Can I find out the supply route of the Russian group without the Bosphorus?

            Why, right away, without the Bosphorus? If we are at war with Turkey, then we must be supplied through OUR Brsfor.
            Why play giveaways? It's not smart
    2. -4
      13 February 2020 19: 43
      30 planes and helicopters based at Hmeimim, like that John Rambo will deal with the prevailing enemy forces.
      The only thing we should do when the ammunition and fuel runs out, pause, eat Twix?
      1. +1
        13 February 2020 19: 46
        The only thing we should do when the ammunition and fuel runs out, pause, eat Twix?


        here they have already calculated that for "one hundred thousand strikes - one barge with ammunition, well, two."
        1. -4
          13 February 2020 21: 00
          Then it’s not necessary to pull only two barges through the Bosphorus, you can try to swim with internal waters to the Tigris and Euphrates wink
      2. +5
        13 February 2020 21: 43
        Quote: Professor Preobrazhensky
        30 airplanes and helicopters based on Khmeimim

        Why do you think that in which case, Russia will bind itself to 30 Hmeimim aircraft?
        1. -1
          13 February 2020 22: 14
          Because it will be necessary to arrive at the theater of operations by requesting a corridor in the airspace of a number of countries. Try to map the route from any of our airdromes on the mainland to the Khmeimim base on the map, look over who you will fly, who will give the good, and who will simply knock off the s400 with our complexes
          1. 0
            14 February 2020 09: 18
            Quote: Professor Preobrazhensky
            Because it will be necessary to arrive at the theater of operations by requesting a corridor in the airspace of a number of countries

            From Crimea to Ankara 20 minutes of summer.
            You think in vain that in case of war Russia will sit on its hands and will fight back shaking its head. This is a complete surr. It is quite obvious that the plans of our General Staff in the event of a war with Turkey include work from the Crimea and from other southern regions of our country. Turkey’s long maritime border, which provided its peace tour industry, will become a gateway during the war that Turkey cannot close.
            For us, a war with Turkey is a serious operation; for Turkey, a war with us is suicide.
  21. 0
    13 February 2020 18: 42
    Pralno general said, albeit retired.
  22. +2
    13 February 2020 18: 53
    Quote: Dur_mod
    And I wonder who the Faberge art objects are harder among Russians or Turks?

    Learn the story.
    However, the Turks have always been a serious opponent.
  23. +2
    13 February 2020 19: 27
    On our site already some sofa experts are starting to shout Zrada! And they say we warned, we talked!
    Only the SAA continues to attack and is not very afraid of the Turkish "mighty" army and the Sultan's formidable statements!
    I think this is not just that, or someone considers himself smarter than the strategists from the General Staff who own the real situation and take ten steps forward!
    1. +2
      13 February 2020 19: 51
      Well, here's one clown has already put a minus and "in silence", and reasonably answer "the gut is thin", apparently a coward and "vsepalschik".)))
  24. +5
    13 February 2020 19: 29
    Yes, luck will accompany our children and their allies!
  25. +3
    13 February 2020 19: 45
    There will be no war with the Turks, that's for sure, now it will be intelligibly brought to Erdogan that the Syrians only turned on the answer and that it is not good when the bandits covered by him disturb us and the Syrians.
    Do not understand, the offensive will continue.
    If she wants to go to the heap, she may get problems in Libya with Haftar, problems with the Kurds, well, of course, there are tomatoes and a tourist flow there.
  26. +3
    13 February 2020 20: 03
    Here's a little off-topic, but about Syria: many consider the Avia pro resource "yellow press", but they often post unverified information, but also quite quickly, they also have fairly accurate information, according to yesterday's articles about the allegedly shot down Turkish F- 16, Mi-17, today they got a video of the fact that the helicopter was hit from the ground ...
  27. -1
    13 February 2020 20: 42
    The Turks need oil, so they won’t leave Syria. There won’t be a large-scale war there, but local conflicts will be anything.
    1. 0
      13 February 2020 22: 15
      Is there oil in Idlib? Oil in Rojava, but it is covered by the Americans, not the Turks.
    2. -5
      14 February 2020 02: 19
      Level cheers patriot.
      The training manual has changed. Turks need clay and yolks. Spread, do not reflect.
    3. -1
      14 February 2020 11: 26
      there is no oil there !!!
  28. +3
    13 February 2020 20: 47
    Quote: Leshy1975
    Quote: Mentat
    Turkish actions in Syria have no legitimization.

    And who when did it stop? We believe that NATO illegally bombed Yugoslavia. But they bombed them, not really bothering what we think.

    Turkey is very, very far from NATO. And Russia today is far from Russia of that time.
    Here on the forum for some reason they constantly try to ascribe to Turkey the possibilities of the USA. Meanwhile, it is extremely far from reality. Turkey is a regional state with a lot of conflicts with neighbors, quarrels with Europe and the United States. They have many weaknesses.

    Quote: Mentat
    We have full carte blanche, incl. in accordance with the UN Charter

    So I do not understand, are you going to apply carte blanche against the Turks? And the performance characteristics of this wonderful weapon can be found?

    This miracle weapon is called truth and legitimacy. It works great. There is nothing to cover Turkey. He climbs into trouble, breaks the wood - he will cry bitterly. You do not even need any force.

    I already mentioned that Turkey lost $ 20 billion last time. This is never the limit. It is economically possible to put pressure on Turkey in such a way that it will simply crack, and this is not counting the discontent among the military, the followers of Gulen, the Kurds, Greece, lawyers, journalists and the “creative forces”, who have not forgotten at all about the purge of Erdogan.

    PS What you say is absolutely correct from the point of view of international law.
    But the right of the strong acts in the world much more often. hi

    In addition to the complete legitimacy of Russia's actions in Syria, the strength on our side is obvious to everyone. In the event of a serious conflict, to which they will try their best not to bring, of course, nothing shines for Turkey at all.
  29. -4
    13 February 2020 20: 51
    To deliver an ultimatum to Turkey - either the invaders leave Syrian territory, or Russia inflicts a thermonuclear strike on Istanbul and Ankara. That's all
    1. +4
      13 February 2020 22: 06
      Do not forget to evacuate tourists from Turkey just before the thermonuclear strike. It is very important Yes
      1. +2
        13 February 2020 22: 59
        And civil engineers from nuclear power plants.
  30. +2
    13 February 2020 21: 51
    anxious. Not enough information. what's at the breakthrough point.
    Weighted statements by MIL and the General Staff suggest that they are ready for such a scenario.
    It pleases, but still ...
  31. +2
    13 February 2020 22: 22
    Erdogan's claims extend all the way to the Georgian city of Batumi.
    There his grandfather was born when she entered Turkey, so Georgia will have to give in.
  32. +1
    13 February 2020 22: 34
    Stop talking, do it!
  33. 0
    13 February 2020 23: 41
    Finally, even though someone called a spade a spade, Turkey is an enemy and an occupier, and if we do not get rid of dangerous illusions about Turkey, we will face big, big problems in the geopolitical future
  34. kig
    +1
    14 February 2020 03: 29
    In general, Syria is slowly turning into Spain of 1936 - citizens of one country are fighting on both sides, supported by other countries that are also involved in the conflict with limited forces.
  35. -1
    14 February 2020 04: 12
    - "The Syrian army (CAA), with the support of the Russian Aerospace Forces, has every right to strike at the Turkish occupants on its territory." - Erdoganushka foresaw, bought S400 !!! this is with regards to our videoconferencing.
  36. +1
    14 February 2020 05: 57
    And what prevents the Syrians from launching the P17 and making a couple of dozen kilometers of mistakes and covering any command post of the Turks ??? And then apologize. Play by the Turkish rules
  37. 0
    14 February 2020 08: 05
    Turkey must leave Syria. Then the Turks will not die.
  38. 0
    14 February 2020 08: 51
    Less words, more punches
  39. 0
    14 February 2020 11: 00
    Quote: Miron
    Less words, more punches

    Erdogan will not be able to agree with Moscow on the division of Syria - he needs a new Ottoman Empire, and only in this case will he continue to remain the ruler of the Turks. But if he gets in the teeth during the Syrian war, his days will be numbered. No closure of the straits will help him. The Russian Federation will not fight Turkey "officially", just as NATO will not fight on the side of Turkey, again "officially", according to the NATO Charter. Everyone understands that the Idlib gangs are supplied both through Turkey with weapons and are supported by the actions of the Turkish Armed Forces against Assad's troops. Moscow does not intend to divide Syria into pieces and therefore Idlib will be Syrian, and all Turkish checkpoints on the M5 highway that remain in the rear will be squeezed out "peacefully". Erdogan's Threats to Shoot Down Over Idlib And Russian planes and helicopters will cost Turkey much more than the previous "tomatoes". soldier
  40. The comment was deleted.
  41. 0
    14 February 2020 13: 20
    Right that is, yes there is no way.
  42. 0
    14 February 2020 14: 31
    Maybe I don’t understand something, but, in my opinion, Erdogan behaves like a shaped nerd.
    Instead of fitting in with his lured militants in Idlib - which would inevitably lead to a clash with official Damascus, and through him - with Russia, he had to merge the militants and heroically announce the great Turkish victory over terrorism in neighboring Syria. Then, as a defender and a winner, sit down at the negotiating table with Assad, bargain a couple of some goodies, like Assad's oath promise to restrain the Syrian Kurds. And then, loudly and proudly declare their brilliant talents as President-negotiator and President-guarantor of security.
    How much do you need to be a person to not see such a chic opportunity for your own PR?
  43. 0
    15 February 2020 02: 10
    This is not only a right, but also an obligation. The Syrians defend their homeland, and we use ALL means to help them. Stop being terpils. Already the whole world is laughing at Russia. Put tomatoes in Putin’s pockets. And the Turks piz..yule!
  44. -1
    15 February 2020 08: 46
    This is our last and decisive battle - the whole world is in ruin! But it's better than just fading away
  45. 0
    15 February 2020 15: 41
    Why publish such stupid articles here?