Amsterdam refused to transfer to Moscow the case against the Russians on the collapse of MH17

Amsterdam refused to transfer to Moscow the case against the Russians on the collapse of MH17

The Netherlands will not hand over to Russia the case against three Russians accused by Dutch investigators of involvement in the crash of the Malaysian Boeing MH17 in 2014. It is reported by Radio Free Europe.


According to Dutch Minister of Justice Ferd Grapperhouse, Russia back in October last year sent a letter requesting the transfer of criminal proceedings against three Russians, but this letter was not taken into account.

The Ministry of Justice and Security replied that the transfer of criminal proceedings against the three Russian suspects by the Dutch authorities is not an option and was not taken into account. The government is fully confident in the independence and quality of Dutch justice

- he said.

According to Grapperhouse, the trial of the suspects is "important for establishing truth and justice." At the same time, he emphasized that Amsterdam is sure that three Russian citizens and one Ukrainian citizen involved in the MH17 disaster are hiding in Russia and Moscow is not going to extradite them.

As previously reported, Dutch investigators "identified" four people allegedly involved in the crash of the Malaysian Boeing, mentioning Girkin, Dubinsky, Pulatov and Harchenko.

None of them pressed the button themselves, but they worked closely together to deliver weapons, and therefore they can be considered suspected of being involved in the downing of MH17

- said the head of the National Prosecutor's Office of the Kingdom of the Netherlands Fred Westerbeke, adding that according to the criminal law of the Netherlands, even if a person was not present at the commission of the crime, but was involved in it, he is also guilty.

In addition, the Netherlands continues to claim that "Russia was involved in the crash, as it provided the Buk air defense system with which the plane was shot down."

At the same time, the Netherlands prosecutor’s office says that they have “all evidence of Moscow’s involvement”, but for some reason they refuse to provide these materials.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

123 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. CAT BAIYUN 13 February 2020 12: 13 New
    • 21
    • 2
    +19
    They smoke a lot there ... Yes, and a pickled product apparently ... Not so long ago they generally insisted on a tribunal in relation to Moscow.
    Let's see if more interesting facts come up from the notorious German, who conducted the investigation on his own. But it seems like the Golandos refused to take into account the facts he established.
    I am sure that sooner or later everything will come up. And it will be very unpleasant to smell for the whole de .. democratic community.
    1. novel66 13 February 2020 12: 16 New
      • 15
      • 1
      +14
      its, as you know, does not smell, it is democratic
      1. Mountain shooter 13 February 2020 12: 28 New
        • 12
        • 1
        +11
        And where were the Skripals? Do not want to investigate?
        1. Gene84 13 February 2020 12: 32 New
          • 17
          • 2
          +15
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          And where were the Skripals?

          they’re probably dead already. Britain did not leave traces of witnesses alive.
          Quote: CAT BAYUN
          Let's see if more interesting facts come up from the notorious German, who conducted the investigation on his own. But it seems like the Golandos refused to take into account the facts he established.

          why do they need an independent investigation? they need to blame Russia. if they take into account an independent investigation, unpleasant moments may come up and they will have to admit that Ukraine shot down the plane.
          1. Tatyana 13 February 2020 12: 53 New
            • 11
            • 1
            +10
            Amsterdam refused to transfer to Moscow the case against the Russians on the collapse of MH17

            Firstly, this is a flagrant violation of court proceedings in general!

            Secondly. Well, everything is clear. On the one hand, the Dutch, in their investigation, “fell on” there in their investigative materials in full - so to speak, according to the precepts of the Minister of Propaganda of the Third Reich Goebbels! And now they are afraid that their provocative "work" under the arguments of the Russian Federation in court will be untenable. And no one in the world will have confidence in conviction for previously appointed perpetrators.

            Thirdly. It becomes clear that the “trial” is being implemented as another anti-Russian provocation, which is intended only for internal use for Western Europe and the United States to fool the local population against Russia.
            1. tihonmarine 13 February 2020 13: 39 New
              • 8
              • 2
              +6
              Quote: Tatiana
              Thirdly. It becomes clear that the “trial” is being implemented as another anti-Russian provocation,

              A country or similarity called BENILUX will judge people from Russia who do not live there. Soon it will reach the point that the Republic of Comoros will begin to judge.
              The United States has announced that it will cancel or refuse to issue visas to members of the International Criminal Court, which is investigating the actions of US troops in Afghanistan or other countries.
              The United States never joined the ICC, where Attorney Fatou Bensouda approached judges in November 2017 for permission to open an investigation into alleged U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan.
              That's how America protects its citizens. Good must always be learned.
        2. novel66 13 February 2020 12: 33 New
          • 5
          • 1
          +4
          consumables taken after disposal
        3. kot28.ru 13 February 2020 13: 43 New
          • 2
          • 3
          -1
          It is possible that the same place as their cat. Consumptions are of little interest to anyone. Those who are more capable of betraying. hi
        4. Trotil42 14 February 2020 06: 28 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          Here on the site there was an interesting version about Skripals ... there’s nothing to investigate .. they really didn’t poison them ... if we assumed that Skripal, a double agent and Petrov and Boshirov arrived to contact him ... all this provocation was needed to show the world that Russia synthesizes and produces chemical warfare agents .. which undoubtedly happened ..
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Leshy1975 13 February 2020 12: 47 New
      • 8
      • 17
      -9
      Quote: CAT BAYUN
      They smoke a lot there ... Yes, and a pickled product apparently ... Not so long ago they generally insisted on a tribunal in relation to Moscow.
      Let's see if more interesting facts come up from the notorious German, who conducted the investigation on his own. But it seems like the Golandos refused to take into account the facts he established.
      I am sure that sooner or later everything will come up. And it will be very unpleasant to smell for the whole de .. democratic community.

      Over time, anything is possible. hi But doesn’t it seem strange to many that the Russian Federation generally raised such a question. In (source RBC) this sounds more clear:
      In a letter, Grapperhouse said that in October 2019, Russian authorities turned to the Dutch with the request that the cases of three suspected Russians considered the court on Russian territory.

      Which court? We, it seems, do not even admit, theoretically, a different fault, except for the Ukrainian one. What are we talking about, citizens? I already wrote earlier and again I was mercilessly minuscated that I was afraid, no matter how they would not give out, in exchange for my skins, not guilty, of the same Strelkova, because I do not believe in the guilt of the militias. And what? Ah, it turns out that we are ready to participate in the trial ourselves. And after this turning of power in one place, someone will assure me that I fantasize and this is not possible, because de constitution prohibits extradition! So, then we can close it if something happens and assume that everything went as it should ?!

      PS About how many “miraculous” discoveries we have yet to learn after the change of today's power. What I really hope for. And then, the real culprits, in surrendering everything and everything, will appear and answer before the law. And namely, in front of the Russian. In the meantime, while the greatness of Putin’s RF knows no boundaries. In the main borders of the TV. hi
      1. New Year day 13 February 2020 13: 10 New
        • 6
        • 4
        +2
        Quote: Leshy1975
        Which court? We, it seems, do not even admit, theoretically, a different fault, except for the Ukrainian one.

        everything is logical.
      2. Anatoly Anatoly 13 February 2020 13: 59 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        Quote: Leshy1975
        Which court? We, it seems, do not even admit, theoretically, a different fault, except for the Ukrainian one. What are we talking about, citizens?


        On acquittal by the court. Is it that hard to understand?
        1. Leshy1975 13 February 2020 14: 04 New
          • 4
          • 5
          -1
          Quote: Anatoly Anatoly
          Quote: Leshy1975
          Which court? We, it seems, do not even admit, theoretically, a different fault, except for the Ukrainian one. What are we talking about, citizens?


          On acquittal by the court. Is it that hard to understand?

          And who is this excuse, except on a talk show at Solovyov’s notice? This is not difficult to understand? That this will only be an additional trump card, so as not to admit such an excuse and accuse Russia of biased court and concealment. hi
          1. mikh-korsakov 13 February 2020 15: 02 New
            • 7
            • 1
            +6
            Goblin! If Holland agreed to a trial in the Russian Federation, then Dutch investigators would have been obliged to provide the Russian court with all the investigative materials obtained during the investigation, because in Russia no investigation was conducted on Boeing. Otherwise, how can one judge by the size of the waist or what? wink Just the disagreement in judging them in Russia makes it possible for the Russian authorities to take a stand - you never know what you got there - we did not see this, although we wanted to read it, so we are in vain for your investigation, we do not believe him. and since you don’t want to provide, it means they probably cheated. Therefore, the step is at least of little significance, because it will be cut off, but it is not useless.
      3. DymOk_v_dYmke 13 February 2020 15: 22 New
        • 2
        • 7
        -5
        Quote: Leshy1975
        PS About how many "miraculous" discoveries we have yet to find out ...

        For possible discoveries:
        The court in the case of the destruction of the Malaysian Boeing over Ukraine on July 17, 2014 may call for the questioning of director and political strategist Sergei Kurginyan. Because three days before the tragedy, he said: “Our talented, even brilliant electronic engineers will of course fix it, and I think they’ve already repaired the Buk installation captured by the Ukrainian Bandera bandits (I’m not talking about the Ukrainian people). I just know the brilliant electronic engineers who "flew in there as representatives of civil society to help the fraternal people. And, perhaps, it will even turn out that there are several installations!"
        Then Kurginyan swore that his words did not have the slightest meaning, because everyone knew about the air defense system, but these excuses looked wretched. It is possible that with the consent of the Kremlin he will explain that there was a provocation: to bring down the plane and provoke the accusation of Vladimir Putin. Which was insidiously framed by the former Minister of Defense of the DPR, Igor Strelkov, who is among the accused. Monarchist, "fascist", an agent of the "black international" and generally a bad person, whom the witness exposed even then. Further, any options are possible, including extradition of the accused to the court or his sudden suicide with three bullets in the back of the head.

        © http://www.apn-spb.ru/news/article31488.htm
        1. Leshy1975 13 February 2020 15: 28 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          Quote: DymOk_v_dYmke
          Quote: Leshy1975
          PS About how many "miraculous" discoveries we have yet to find out ...

          For possible discoveries:
          The court in the case of the destruction of the Malaysian Boeing over Ukraine on July 17, 2014 may call for the questioning of director and political strategist Sergei Kurginyan. Because three days before the tragedy, he said: “Our talented, even brilliant electronic engineers will of course fix it, and I think they’ve already repaired the Buk installation captured by the Ukrainian Bandera bandits (I’m not talking about the Ukrainian people). I just know the brilliant electronic engineers who "flew in there as representatives of civil society to help the fraternal people. And, perhaps, it will even turn out that there are several installations!"
          Then Kurginyan swore that his words did not have the slightest meaning, because everyone knew about the air defense system, but these excuses looked wretched. It is possible that with the consent of the Kremlin he will explain that there was a provocation: to bring down the plane and provoke the accusation of Vladimir Putin. Which was insidiously framed by the former Minister of Defense of the DPR, Igor Strelkov, who is among the accused. Monarchist, "fascist", an agent of the "black international" and generally a bad person, whom the witness exposed even then. Further, any options are possible, including extradition of the accused to the court or his sudden suicide with three bullets in the back of the head.

          © http://www.apn-spb.ru/news/article31488.htm

          Kurginyan, yes, that one. I remember how he drowned Strelkov. And about this incident, with the seizure of the air defense base and the repair of air defense systems, I remember hints on TV then. For Strelkova, worried. I consider him a man of honor, this is my personal opinion. hi
    3. Krasnoyarsk 13 February 2020 14: 41 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: CAT BAYUN
      They smoke a lot there ..

      In order to follow the instructions of the curator. no need to smoke.
      Quote: CAT BAYUN
      I am sure that sooner or later everything will come up.

      I’m sure nothing will come up. Everything will be buried under the vulture - secretly.
    4. The comment was deleted.
  2. Tank jacket 13 February 2020 12: 14 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    In response, the following territories will have to be accepted into the Eurasian Union:
    Aruba
    Curacao
    Sint Maarten - South of St. Martin
    Caribbean Netherlands
    Bonaire (Bonaire)
    St. Eustatius
    Saba
    "They fought, he says, so bring them here" (c)
  3. sergo1914 13 February 2020 12: 19 New
    • 13
    • 1
    +12
    according to Dutch criminal law, even if a person was not present at the commission of a crime, but was involved in it, he is also guilty


    Seriously? And let's talk about the Netherlands and the Third Reich in this context. Not all in Nuremberg fit on a bench?
    1. helmi8 13 February 2020 13: 07 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: sergo1914
      according to Dutch criminal law, even if a person was not present at the commission of a crime, but was involved in it, he is also guilty

      Seriously? Let's talk about the Netherlands


      I agree with you completely, for the flight was from Amsterdam. According to their logic, the Netherlands is on a par with all those accused of their "impartial court"
    2. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 13 February 2020 13: 28 New
      • 1
      • 4
      -3
      Quote: sergo1914
      Seriously?
      But is it not so in Russia? Organizers and accomplices are not planted together with direct performers?
      1. sergo1914 13 February 2020 13: 38 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich
        Quote: sergo1914
        Seriously?
        But is it not so in Russia? Organizers and accomplices are not planted together with direct performers?


        Sometimes it happens. Do you think that seated high-ranking bribe-takers did not bring higher?
        1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 13 February 2020 13: 39 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          This is clearly not an experience that should be considered a model of justice.
    3. tihonmarine 13 February 2020 13: 41 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: sergo1914
      And let's talk about the Netherlands and the Third Reich in this context. Not all in Nuremberg fit on a bench?

      This would not hurt to do in the first place.
  4. Lamata 13 February 2020 12: 21 New
    • 9
    • 1
    +8
    So, and in all where Milosevic was killed?
    1. kot28.ru 13 February 2020 13: 46 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      And most importantly, for what, and how true were the evidence of the prosecutors!
      1. Lamata 13 February 2020 16: 40 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        I read. sketchy protocols of the tribunal - dregs.
    2. tihonmarine 13 February 2020 13: 58 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: Lamata
      So, and in all where Milosevic was killed?

      Something here resembles the People's Court of the Third Reich.
      as Dr. Frank said. "Under National Socialism there is no independence of the law. When making any decision, ask yourself:" What would the Führer do in my place? "That's how decisions are made so far.
      1. Lamata 13 February 2020 16: 42 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        they will show the theater of justice for a long time
  5. Gray brother 13 February 2020 12: 23 New
    • 8
    • 3
    +5
    Well, all the same, you will have to provide evidence, and if the prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation finds them sufficient, then he will give out the suspects, of course.
    What is the problem, I don’t understand.
    1. New Year day 13 February 2020 12: 28 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Gray Brother
      Well, you still have to provide evidence

      The most balanced answer
    2. Andrey Shch 13 February 2020 12: 30 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      Quote: Gray Brother
      Well, all the same, you will have to provide evidence, and if the prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation finds them sufficient, then he will give out the suspects, of course.
      What is the problem, I don’t understand.

      Will not give out. "Citizens of the Russian Federation who have committed a crime on the territory of a foreign state are not subject to extradition to this state" (Article 13 of the Criminal Code). And the more so
      1. Gray brother 13 February 2020 12: 36 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Quote: Andrey Shch
        Will not give out. "Citizens of the Russian Federation who have committed a crime on the territory of a foreign state shall not be extradited to this state"

        Well, there are all kinds of extradition treaties, for something their desire to obtain these persons is based, but if not, then it's just an excuse cheap to end the investigation.
        1. Andrey Shch 13 February 2020 13: 52 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Gray Brother
          Quote: Andrey Shch
          Will not give out. "Citizens of the Russian Federation who have committed a crime on the territory of a foreign state shall not be extradited to this state"

          Well, there are all kinds of extradition treaties, for something their desire to obtain these persons is based, but if not, then it's just an excuse cheap to end the investigation.

          It is perfect as an excuse. Only they will most likely go to the end, they will conduct a trial and convict in absentia, and then they will poke us with this decision (sentence) everywhere.
      2. Gray brother 13 February 2020 12: 49 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: Andrey Shch
        not subject to extradition to this state"(Article 13 of the Criminal Code)

        And to another?
        1. Andrey Shch 13 February 2020 13: 48 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Gray Brother
          Quote: Andrey Shch
          not subject to extradition to this state"(Article 13 of the Criminal Code)

          And to another?

          Already wrote above. Isn't that obvious? They do not give out (according to the law) even where they committed. Why should I give it to outsiders?
          1. Gray brother 13 February 2020 14: 00 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Andrey Shch
            Isn't it obvious?

            So people without apartments remain.
            But it’s better to turn to the Constitution, I read it just now and it is normally written there:
            "A citizen of the Russian Federation cannot be expelled from the Russian Federation or extradited to another state." Article 61, however.
            1. Andrey Shch 13 February 2020 14: 10 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              Quote: Gray Brother
              Quote: Andrey Shch
              Isn't it obvious?

              So people without apartments remain.
              But it’s better to turn to the Constitution, I read it just now and it is normally written there:
              "A citizen of the Russian Federation cannot be expelled from the Russian Federation or extradited to another state." Article 61, however.

              So it was necessary to read from the very beginning. What was it about? Not about the extradition of any persons whatsoever, but about the perpetrators of the crime. According to the Dutch. So I gave a link to the Criminal Code. First he writes, blurs, and then reads, and even tries to learn something.
              1. Gray brother 13 February 2020 14: 16 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: Andrey Shch
                and about the perpetrators of the crime.

                But there is no difference - both those and other citizens of the Russian Federation.
                Quote: Andrey Shch
                and even trying to learn something.

                Why should I teach you? Just well-written documents do not allow discrepancies, especially an article of the Criminal Code, and I read it and found a jamb.
                1. Andrey Shch 13 February 2020 14: 38 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  Quote: Gray Brother
                  Quote: Andrey Shch
                  and about the perpetrators of the crime.

                  But there is no difference - both those and other citizens of the Russian Federation.
                  Quote: Andrey Shch
                  and even trying to learn something.

                  Why should I teach you? Just well-written documents do not allow discrepancies, especially an article of the Criminal Code, and I read it and found a jamb.

                  Yes, what is the cant then? The Criminal Code is a criminal law subject, and the Constitution is a more general document (Basic Law). It’s just for your information that in jurisprudence, if there are two or more laws governing a particular topic, a special, more “narrow” law is applied. And the Criminal Code in relation to the Constitution is such, as well as the rest of the laws. You know, of course, you are free to express your point of view on any topic, but if you start to argue, then it’s nice to learn something on the topic. If you just want to leave the last word for yourself, then for God's sake, write what you want.
                  1. Gray brother 13 February 2020 14: 56 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    Quote: Andrey Shch
                    Yes, what is the cant then?

                    The fact that you can read in different ways. It is written in the Constitution that no state can be extradited at all, and in the Criminal Code it is written that only to the one in which the crime was committed - that means the rest is possible because what is not prohibited is allowed.

                    In the context of the requirements for Russia, this can be considered so that the crime was committed in Ukraine, and Dutch drug addicts demand extradition.
                    According to the Criminal Code, it turns out you can issue, but according to the Constitution, no.

                    I don’t know about the "narrow laws", but I always thought that the whole mover is on the rise and the constitutional mechanism is turned on last.
                    Those. first, they work out less significant legislative norms, and then what happened is checked for compliance with constitutional norms.
                    And in order for these constitutional norms to work, the Dutch need to submit a request for extradition with proof, otherwise all this bureaucracy will not reach the articles of the Constitution)))
      3. tihonmarine 13 February 2020 17: 55 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Andrey Shch
        Will not give out. "Citizens of the Russian Federation who have committed a crime on the territory of a foreign state are not subject to extradition to this state" (Article 13 of the Criminal Code).

        This is a different question, first the evidence, and then the answer. No evidence, no conversation. What is the issue here.
    3. ccsr 13 February 2020 13: 00 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Gray Brother
      Well, all the same, you will have to provide evidence, and if the prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation finds them sufficient, then he will give out the suspects, of course.
      What is the problem, I don’t understand.

      The fact that the whole thing will fall apart due to the lack of evidence about the guilt of our citizens. And this will lead to a new investigation, because you still need to hang on someone what was done by people who were familiar with this plane.
      1. tihonmarine 13 February 2020 18: 12 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: ccsr
        And this will lead to a new investigation, because you still need to hang on someone what was done by people who were familiar with this plane.

        And this "body-foot" will last again five years, until a new "body-foot" appears.
    4. figwam 13 February 2020 13: 14 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Gray Brother
      Well, you still have to provide evidence

      They were not and never will be, computer graphics of the movement of the BUK, "left" rocket, etc. they have only a lie covered by a lie.
    5. Lamata 13 February 2020 16: 40 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      according to the constitution of the Russian Federation does not issue its citizens.
  6. rotmistr60 13 February 2020 12: 24 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    This letter was not taken into account.
    It was not taken into account many facts obtained during the Russian side’s own investigation (the bombing of the Buka missile, identification of the number of the rocket, etc.) and indicating Ukraine’s involvement in this tragedy and the politicization of the Netherlands’s investigation.
    1. New Year day 13 February 2020 12: 45 New
      • 5
      • 8
      -3
      Quote: rotmistr60
      bomb detonation of the Buka missile,

      Russia itself disavows this blast, as it does not correspond to the true parameters of the explosion
      1. reservist 13 February 2020 13: 12 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        but where about this can be read in more detail?
        What miscalculated during a full-scale experiment with an explosion?
        1. New Year day 13 February 2020 13: 14 New
          • 3
          • 3
          0
          Quote: reservist
          but where about this can be read in more detail?

          after 17-00 I’ll throw it off, now I’m writing from the phone
        2. New Year day 13 February 2020 13: 55 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: reservist
          What miscalculated during a full-scale experiment with an explosion?

          * Strange figures about the downed Boeing: why Almaz-Antey could not refute the Dutch version * Author Lukashevich
          Minuscules to read first if truth is not important
          and more
          * Truth and fiction about the downed Boeing. What became clear 5 years after the disaster *
          While no one could refute what was written
          1. reservist 13 February 2020 14: 52 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Silvestr
            Russia itself disavows this blast, as it does not correspond to the true parameters of the explosion

            Is it right that "Russia itself" disavowed the Almaz-Antey experiment?

            Quote: Silvestr
            Strange figures about the downed Boeing: why Almaz-Antey could not refute the Dutch version * By Lukashevich

            I read the signature of the article - Vadim Lukashevich, Forbes Contributor

            suppose that V. Lukashevich is even really an “air expert,” but what does this contributor (as I understand it is a columnist in a newspaper / magazine) have a relation to Almaz-Antey?
            Or maybe the Russian Defense Ministry or someone else gave Mr. Lukashevich of Forbes the authority to make any statements on behalf of the official authorities of the Russian Federation?

            Quote: Silvestr
            While no one could refute what was written

            did someone try?
            But for me it’s interesting exactly the opinion of the pros on this issue ... and then suddenly for them contributor Lukashevich is the same as “the elusive cowboy Joe” ...

            PS I read the article ... even when it was printed ...
            A familiar PPS’s friend PPS says that he’s more or less prepared to calculate the mark of a civilian passenger on the radar ...
            1. New Year day 13 February 2020 15: 13 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              Quote: reservist
              the prepared calculation marks the civil passenger on the radar ...

              So on the website of the air defense system there are many, let's defeat Lukashevich! I am for!
              Quote: reservist
              did someone try?
              here for me it is interesting precisely the opinion of the pros on this issue ...
              1. reservist 13 February 2020 16: 35 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: Silvestr
                So on the website of the air defense system there are many

                Are you talking about someone specifically?
                I've never once anti-aircraft defense ...
    2. Crystal of Truth 13 February 2020 16: 36 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Leontiev with a kilometer MIG is also not called for some reason
  7. Sergst 13 February 2020 12: 30 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: Gray Brother
    Well, all the same, you will have to provide evidence, and if the prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation finds them sufficient, then he will give out the suspects, of course.
    What is the problem, I don’t understand.

    Russia does not give out its citizens. And these are not emotions, but a legal fact
    1. ccsr 13 February 2020 13: 04 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: Sergst
      Russia does not give out its citizens. And these are not emotions, but a legal fact

      Those. you want to say that our citizen will not receive a punishment, perhaps even more severe than in the country where he committed the crime with evidence? It doesn’t happen - he will either be condemned with us, or if he obtained citizenship after committing a crime and took refuge with us, he will be extradited to the country where he came from.
  8. anjey 13 February 2020 12: 33 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The blame for the apparatus of power of Poroshenko.
    He himself is the chief and the black cardinal of this tragedy ...
  9. Andrey.AN 13 February 2020 12: 35 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    A legitimate court will not care, empty.
  10. Vladimir61 13 February 2020 12: 36 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    And with Tzemakh, whom did the SBU accuse the chief executor of that span? They burned themselves in the evidence, which is why he did not get on the list ... maybe on these, we’ll hang in absentia.
    1. New Year day 13 February 2020 12: 53 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: Vladimir61
      And with Tzemakh, whom did the SBU accuse the chief executor of that span? Burnt in evidence


      I think that just in this case a long game is going on: they will demand it as a witness or accused, they will apply for extradition to Russia (Tsemakh has a Russian passport), and his place of residence is under the control of Russia.
      And here the pitchforks: they will extradite - the principle of not extraditing a citizen is violated, they will extradite - the charge of blocking the court and sheltering the suspect, which in their opinion is Russia's indirect participation in the downing
      1. ccsr 13 February 2020 13: 06 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Silvestr
        I think that just in this case a long game is going on: they will demand it as a witness or accused, they will turn to Russia for extradition

        So, the documents of the case must first be presented in order to decide whether to give it out or not - it could not be otherwise, well, unless it is some kind of cunning exchange of special services agents.
        1. New Year day 13 February 2020 13: 13 New
          • 4
          • 6
          -2
          Quote: ccsr
          So the documents of the case must first be presented

          so in court they will show who starts the game with trump cards?
          1. ccsr 13 February 2020 13: 20 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            Quote: Silvestr
            so in court they will show who starts the game with trump cards?

            In cases involving the attraction of foreign citizens, this does not happen - before issuing a citizen, it is necessary to thoroughly study the case, to what extent it complies with our legislation and whether all evidence is genuine.
            1. New Year day 13 February 2020 13: 43 New
              • 4
              • 2
              +2
              Quote: ccsr
              In cases involving the attraction of foreign citizens this does not happen.

              it happens - 1 suspect participates in court with a group of lawyers, including 1 lawyer from Russia
  11. Den717 13 February 2020 12: 39 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    This barrel organ threatens to survive eternity. Russia, according to the constitution, does not extradite its citizens. Participation in a crime is punishable in Russia. Therefore, if you need to investigate in order to find the real culprits, you need to send reasoned materials to Russia to interrogate the suspects by Russian investigators on issues raised by the Dutch prosecutor's office. And it is better to involve the Russian side in the investigation with 100% tolerances in all the materials of the case. What is happening in this SSG now under the slogan “Haili Like” will most likely not be evaluated by our prosecutor’s office as a sufficient basis for holding Russian citizens to any responsibility. The topic will take too long, but it is unlikely that we will come to a logical end. The Netherlands will blame Russia, we, in turn, will “roll out” the Dutch for the lack of desire to conduct an adequate investigation. In the meantime, lawsuits in the countries of the victims will periodically flare up with an attempt to sue compensation in cash .... This will be a long and not very successful one. It is hard to imagine what all this can stop at. But obviously, Russia will not go along the path of Libya and will not recognize the results of the trial.
    1. New Year day 13 February 2020 12: 58 New
      • 6
      • 4
      +2
      Quote: Den717
      it is better to involve the Russian side in the investigation with 100% tolerances in all the materials of the case


      What does Russia have to do with this plane? Non-Russians died, fell on the territory of Ukraine, Malaysian aircraft, Russia did not participate in the armed conflict.
      What is the legal justification?
      1. Den717 13 February 2020 13: 21 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Quote: Silvestr
        What does Russia have to do with this plane?

        Firstly, in the case is a product made at Russian factories. In the interests of business, representatives of companies whose products were involved in the crash are always involved. The United States and Malaysia should have been on the same basis. The whole group was created by amateur proctologists, and with predetermined goals that do not coincide with the righteous. That is why doubts arise in their work. I mean the correct work, in order to search for the really guilty. How else? Our court on foreign materials will not make a decision. laughing
        1. New Year day 13 February 2020 13: 39 New
          • 5
          • 1
          +4
          Quote: Den717
          Firstly..

          Holland obtained the right to conduct a technical investigation under the auspices of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) from Ukraine in accordance with clause 5.1 of Appendix 13 “Investigation of Accidents and Incidents” to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation. The investigation was conducted by a specialized body - the Safety Board (Dutch Safety Board, DSB) with the involvement of experts and various organizations from the Netherlands, Russia, Ukraine, Malaysia, Australia, the UK, the USA, Germany, France, Italy, Belgium and Indonesia. The ICAO and the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) also participated in the DSB investigation.
          Russia's involvement in DSB and JIT investigations was determined by its extraneous status. The dead plane was produced in the United States, belonged to Malaysia, was controlled by a Malaysian crew, flew from the Netherlands, followed to Malaysia, there were no Russian citizens on board, it did not enter Russian airspace, it did not enter under the control of Russian dispatchers, it fell into Ukraine. Legally, Russia has nothing to do with the disaster of flight MH17. In a DSB technical investigation, the status of Russia is defined by Appendix 13 to the ICAO Convention as “any other state that has information relating to the investigation” provided “upon request”.
          Quote: Den717
          How else?

          No, you can send all international authorities to the toilet and incinerate everyone with anger and emotions. That's just emotions and only
          1. Den717 13 February 2020 14: 01 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Quote: Silvestr
            you can send all international authorities to the toilet and incinerate with anger and emotions of all. That's just emotions and only

            Do you understand that all this SSG is assembled and engaged for political purposes? They push their interest, we - our. The entire investigation is initially conducted with violations. This is also understandable. Therefore, we will continue to butt them for our interest. That is why the priority of domestic law over a third party is introduced into the constitution. It is to simplify a process like this. The requirement to extradite Russians to a foreign state is contrary to the constitution, which means that they will be fulfilled regardless of Russia's participation in international treaties and agreements. No need to incinerate anyone. The United States does not incinerate, but simply ignores. One must do the same.
            1. New Year day 13 February 2020 14: 05 New
              • 5
              • 1
              +4
              Quote: Den717
              Is this SSG collected and biased for political purposes?

              Do you have a complaint about these international requirements? The group is assembled about the death of the plane and people

              Quote: Den717
              The requirement to extradite Russians to a foreign state is contrary to the constitution

              who was asked to issue?
              Quote: Den717
              No need to incinerate anyone. The United States does not incinerate, but simply ignores. One must do the same.

              Who's stopping this?
              There is anger and indignation, but there are international requirements and laws. Is it possible to get out of all international laws and organizations?
              I do not emotional, but try to soberly reason and evaluate information
              Read comments, emotions and more. Where are the links to international laws and law? To bomb all and destroy all or all fools, and we are the smartest? laughing
              1. Den717 13 February 2020 14: 22 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Quote: Silvestr
                Do you have a complaint about these international requirements?

                I have. And you?
                Quote: Silvestr
                who was asked to issue?

                The Dutch have read our documents too, so for now it’s somehow like this:
                "... As Westerbeck pointed out, the Netherlands has four arrest warrants for all persons involved, they will be put on the national and international wanted lists. However, Amsterdam will not ask for the extradition of these people, since the Russian and Ukrainian Constitution prohibit the extradition of citizens of these countries. Instead of this, Westerbeck said, Amsterdam will send a formal request to Russia asking Moscow to hand over to the suspects subpoenas demanding to appear in court in The Hague .... "
                But power is changing, Yeltsins are possible in governing the country, which means that you need to have "safety tabs."
                I don’t understand something about your line. What do you want to convince me of? Our guilt? In the inability or unwillingness of the leadership to defend the interests of the country? I am not a lawyer, but I think that the country will find ways to "snap" without losing face. If you have any practical suggestions, send to the prosecutor general. They might even say thanks ... wink
                1. New Year day 13 February 2020 14: 34 New
                  • 5
                  • 1
                  +4
                  Quote: Den717
                  I'm not a lawyer
                  I also

                  Quote: Den717
                  the country will find ways to "snap" without losing face

                  We will see
                  Quote: Den717
                  I don’t understand something of your line

                  The line is simple - who shot down? And without emotion and tear vest on the chest. Do you really need Yes, for me. And without cuts. Whatever she is.
                  Above, my colleague gave links to work on this issue. Almaz-Antey could not refute their outcome. Do you trust Antei?
                  Or do you trust Konashenkov with his attack aircraft or Leontiev with his space imagery, from which even Ernst disowned?
                  1. Den717 13 February 2020 15: 23 New
                    • 3
                    • 0
                    +3
                    Quote: Silvestr
                    do you trust Konashenkov with his attack aircraft or Leontiev

                    This is excusable, without case materials they can only put forward versions. There is nothing strange. I see, Mr. Lukashevich, who has been criticized more than once for his "expert" assessments, is closer to you. Well ... Well, as Comrade Marx said, practice is the criterion of truth.
                    Quote: Silvestr
                    Do you trust Antei?

                    And what is wrong with Antei? I will not touch on any geometry from Lukashenko. The question is simpler: whose rocket? They showed fragments with numbers, received information from the company where they sent it. Where is the revision of the documents for the further movement of this rocket, where are the documents for its installation on the complex, the shooting report, etc. I have not heard that they conducted elementary things such as checking the presence of rockets in installations, which, how much, where they are. Which unit was introduced into the conflict zone, what was it, etc. etc.? Where is the dispatcher, who gave the command to change course, who cut down the control station, who canceled the order to "close the sky"? CCG did not ask these questions to anyone. Why? What will Mr. Lukashevich tell us? It is possible to practice trajectory calculations for more than one decade, and deviations of the results of full-scale experiments are quite possible, because, apart from the built-in algorithms, there are a lot of random factors that influence the flight of the rocket and the moment of undermining. But the dispatcher, for example, a specific individual where? It was repeatedly said that the entire procedure for a flight accident was violated initially. Why? For what purpose? Not even all the fragments of the bodies were collected ... I'm not talking about laying out the plane ..
                    Quote: Silvestr
                    Do you really need Yes, for me. And without cuts.

                    I also need the truth. Therefore, questions arise, why is it not being sought? There is such a saying that the thickness of the report prevents it from reading. I'm afraid this is a similar situation. They pick up a carriage of wastepaper, complicated calculations and other papers so that no one would want to pull this case into civil society "without cuts." Therefore, I do not trust European justice very much, especially in the disputes between Europe and Europe.
                    1. New Year day 13 February 2020 15: 47 New
                      • 3
                      • 1
                      +2
                      Quote: Den717
                      This is excusable, without case materials they can only put forward versions.

                      they confirmed their versions with radar data and photography. Do you want to say that these are not methods of objective control?
                      Quote: Den717
                      closer Mr. Lukashevich, who was criticized more than once for his "expert" assessments.

                      great! But for me, Lukashevich’s drum, it’s only the fallacy of Antei’s conclusions that Antei himself admitted, accusing Holland of incorrectly set experiment parameters.
                      Quote: Den717
                      And what is wrong with Antei?

                      incorrect experiment parameters
                      Quote: Den717
                      whose rocket?

                      wait, see
                      Quote: Den717
                      who canceled the order to "close the sky"?

                      and who closed it? Just the fault of Ukraine in the absence thereof. But the question is, why did Russia close it the day before and why did the dispatcher send the plane to a closed area? The Federal Air Transport Agency did not answer this question
                      Quote: Den717
                      Therefore, questions arise, why is it not being sought?

                      why not looking? Truth is born in a dispute
                      Quote: Den717
                      I do not trust European justice very much

                      me too, but Konashenkov and Leontiev do not cause trust hi
                      1. Den717 13 February 2020 18: 13 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        Quote: Silvestr
                        and who closed it? Just the fault of Ukraine in the absence thereof.

                        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8gVWyJHUrU
                        Look, there is such a thing ... 11-40 is just about closing the sky. There is something to think about ...
                      2. New Year day 13 February 2020 18: 32 New
                        • 2
                        • 1
                        +1
                        Quote: Den717
                        Look, there is such a thing.

                        looked and what?
                        But what about the confessions of a defector about the attack aircraft that shot down the Boeing and about the pilot Voloshin, who said "he was not shot down"?
                        Words, words, where is your sweetness?
                      3. Den717 13 February 2020 21: 01 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: Silvestr
                        But what about the defector’s confessions about the attack aircraft,

                        It’s already difficult to interrogate him in court ... But I see that Lukashevich is closer to you. He bluntly said - Russia shot down ... One thing is not clear, why?
      2. ccsr 13 February 2020 17: 57 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Silvestr
        Russia's involvement in DSB and JIT investigations was determined by its extraneous status.

        How can Russia have an “extraneous status” if the investigation points to the armament of officials of the RF Armed Forces who allegedly served in the air defense forces?
        Quote: Silvestr
        Legally, Russia has nothing to do with the disaster of flight MH17.

        How does it not, if we are charged, that it was our calculation that shot down the plane?
        Quote: Silvestr
        No, you can send all international authorities to the toilet and incinerate everyone with anger and emotions.

        All that we did not subscribe to, or those who do not give us any rights, and that will be right.
        Quote: Silvestr
        That's just emotions and only

        These are not emotions, but normal practice, which the US adheres to by the way.
        1. New Year day 13 February 2020 18: 09 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Quote: ccsr
          How can Russia have an “extraneous status” if the investigation points to the armament of officials of the RF Armed Forces who allegedly served in the air defense forces?

          understand yourself. what did you write? Outside Status and Suspects? How can the latter participate in the investigation? Even purely hypothetically?
          Quote: ccsr
          How does it not, if we are charged, that it was our calculation that shot down the plane?

          here and wait for their arguments
          Quote: ccsr
          All that we did not subscribe to, or those who do not give us any rights, and that will be right.

          International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
          Safety Board (Dutch Safety Board, DSB)
          European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
          It seems to be participating in them
          Quote: ccsr
          These are not emotions, but normal practice, which the US adheres to by the way.

          Where are the links to international aviation organizations? Their decisions? hi
          1. ccsr 13 February 2020 18: 16 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Silvestr
            Outside Status and Suspects? How can the latter participate in the investigation? Even purely hypothetically?

            The citizens of Russia are suspected, and our state is obliged to protect its citizens - that's why we should participate, at least at the level of the provision of lawyer services.
            Quote: Silvestr
            International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
            Safety Board (Dutch Safety Board, DSB)
            European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
            It seems to be participating in them

            We participate in them, but we did not subscribe to the execution of the decisions of the Dutch court.
            Quote: Silvestr
            Where are the links to international aviation organizations? Their decisions?

            Do not translate arrows with judicial actions of another country, to our participation in international aviation organizations - these are two big differences.
            1. New Year day 13 February 2020 18: 24 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: ccsr
              The citizens of Russia are suspected, and our state is obliged to protect its citizens - that's why we should participate, at least at the level of the provision of lawyer services.

              it's already done
              Quote: ccsr
              but we did not subscribe to the execution of the decisions of the Dutch court.

              so even no trial
              Quote: ccsr
              Do not translate arrows with judicial actions of another country, to our participation in international aviation organizations - these are two big differences.

              there’s nowhere to translate arrows because:
              1. The investigation is based on international aviation organizations:
              International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
              Safety Board (Dutch Safety Board, DSB)
              European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
              2. There is no judicial action in another country because there is no court. It only starts on March 9th hi
              1. ccsr 13 February 2020 18: 36 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: Silvestr
                investigation is based on international aviation organizations

                Nothing of the kind, because, in fact, the investigation and trial could be carried out by Ukraine, Malaysia and the Netherlands. There is no independent aviation court - at least I have not heard of this.
                1. New Year day 13 February 2020 18: 46 New
                  • 4
                  • 1
                  +3
                  Quote: ccsr
                  investigation and trial could be conducted by Ukraine, Malaysia and the Netherlands.

                  back to the roots:
                  "The Netherlands obtained the right to conduct a technical investigation under the auspices of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) from Ukraine in accordance with clause 5.1 of Appendix 13," Accident and Incident Investigation, "to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation. The investigation was conducted by a specialized body, the Dutch Safety Board , DSB) involving experts and various organizations from the Netherlands, Russia, Ukraine, Malaysia, Australia, Great Britain, USA, Germany, France, Italy, Belgium and Indonesia, ICAO and the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) also participated in the DSB investigation. "
                  1. ccsr 13 February 2020 19: 03 New
                    • 2
                    • 1
                    +1
                    Quote: Silvestr
                    "The right to conduct a technical investigation under the auspices of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Holland received from Ukraine

                    And why did not Malaysia receive it, especially since it was their plane and most of the passengers were from this country? This "source" than did not suit Ukraine?
                    Quote: Silvestr
                    with the involvement of experts and various organizations from the Netherlands, Russia, Ukraine, Malaysia, Australia, the UK, USA, Germany, France, Italy, Belgium and Indonesia.

                    The involvement of experts does not mean that they can decide instead of judges - this is obvious and does not mean anything.
  • Sergst 13 February 2020 12: 39 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    Quote: Gray Brother

    Well, there are all kinds of extradition treaties, for something their desire to obtain these persons is based, but if not, then it's just an excuse cheap to end the investigation.

    Nobody tried to get Russian citizens, it was only about a Ukrainian citizen
  • Andrea 13 February 2020 12: 39 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    what As far as I know, you can only judge the accused, but not the suspects. And who said that the court can establish the truth?
    In this particular case, the court can only legitimize lawlessness, given how the investigation was conducted from the very beginning. How the Ukrainian side intensified the shelling, how the Dutch got to the crash site for a month, how they prevented the Malays from getting to the Donbass and they had to conduct a special operation to pick up the “blacks” boxes "which, incidentally, it took them only a few days.
    1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 13 February 2020 13: 34 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Andrea
      As far as I know, you can only judge the accused, but not suspected.
      The four have recently been formally charged by the Dutch prosecutor.
  • Pavel73 13 February 2020 12: 40 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    I'm sorry, what? "Did not shoot, but guilty"? That is, who shot, they are not going to find out at all? One of two things: either they are preparing a surprise, or they are just arrogant and hypocrites.
  • Ros 56 13 February 2020 12: 45 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    At this time, the Dutch your way through the forest on foot erotic journey. Drugs should be consumed less.
  • Piramidon 13 February 2020 12: 50 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    the Netherlands prosecutor’s office says that they have “all evidence of Moscow’s involvement,” but for some reason they refuse to provide these materials.

    Postmen Pechkiny, damn it.
  • Jcvai 13 February 2020 12: 57 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Hmm Given that concealment is tantamount to complicity, if you fail to successfully “rewrite history”, as they are now working hard on World War II, they run the risk.
    Purely political, it is possible to organize a counter-court based on only facts, at the same time dropping into the list of defendants all those involved in the intentional concealment of evidence.
    ... as a result, it may turn out to be very interesting: the direct perpetrators of the launch were not identified, but the accomplices were clearly identified, to whom the deadlines were issued.
  • Prjanik 13 February 2020 12: 57 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I wonder why they are going to establish "truth and justice", again fake pictures with "Buk" from Facebook and recording conversations that have nothing to do with Boeing? Well, we will be the apotheosis, since the suspects did not appear in court, we will automatically blame them. wassat
    After the "white helmets" receive the "Oscar" I am not surprised at any lies and hypocrisy.
  • Retvizan 8 13 February 2020 13: 05 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    And where on the slides is the photo of Parashenka?
  • tihonmarine 13 February 2020 13: 09 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    The government is fully confident in the independence and quality of Dutch justice
    Netherlands justice, the Hague tribune, the ICC and who are the prosecutors and judges.
  • iouris 13 February 2020 13: 10 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    It seems like a principle widely known in narrow circles: to figure out "as it should be" and punish (attract) anyone.
    Incidentally, it is politically incorrect: among the “attracted” there are no Afro-Russians.
    1. kot28.ru 13 February 2020 14: 08 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Asians are also absent roosters gay, no LGBT women laughing
  • Sergst 13 February 2020 13: 11 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: ccsr
    Quote: Sergst
    Russia does not give out its citizens. And these are not emotions, but a legal fact

    Those. you want to say that our citizen will not receive a punishment, perhaps even more severe than in the country where he committed the crime with evidence? It doesn’t happen - he will either be condemned with us, or if he obtained citizenship after committing a crime and took refuge with us, he will be extradited to the country where he came from.

    “does not give out” and “does not condemn” are two different statements. I wrote only about "does not give out." No more. Of course, he will condemn if he finds the corpus delicti and its evidence. It is clear that “high-likly” in our country is not evidence in court.
  • askort154 13 February 2020 13: 22 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    "... Dutch investigators "identified" four people allegedly involved in the crash of the Malaysian Boeing, mentioning Girkin, Dubinsky, Pulatov and Harchenko. "

    The list does not include the main "witness" - Obama.
    A few hours after the disaster, he said - "we have satellite data that the plane was shot down by Russia, but they are classified."
    And now for 5 years, the "commission" is trying to prove it. angry
  • Servisinzhener 13 February 2020 13: 24 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    None of them pressed the button themselves
    And who was stinging? Someone, after all, was sitting in JMA, ROM, SOC and KP, and these are two dozen people.
  • Operator 13 February 2020 13: 27 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    The Netherlands admitted that the Boeing was shot down by a numbered rocket delivered to Ukraine before 1992 - because it did not refute the corresponding data of the rocket manufacturer sent to the investigation.

    Then why all these Dutch tricks and jumps with the alleged transfer of the Russian Buk air defense system with full ammunition to the Donbass - such as the ammunition was then returned to Russia, and the air defense system loaded with local missiles? laughing
  • rocket757 13 February 2020 13: 56 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Back in October of last year, Russia sent a letter requesting the transfer of criminal proceedings against three Russians, but this letter was not taken into account.

    Logically, do not take into account all their attempts ....
  • Zaurbek 13 February 2020 14: 22 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Everything turns into a court for the sake of the court .... then we won’t give it, it's secret .... and then they still want to execute their decision.
  • g1washntwn 13 February 2020 14: 50 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The same Western rake about "we installed, but we will not show anyone." The task is to concoct a charge. So no materials will be transferred. How the trial will be conducted and what will be shown there will also not be shown to the court. And if they try to draw by ears to indirect participation, then the direct is not proved - a fake. And since direct participation is the original fake, then the number two attempt is just a mine during a bad game and convulsions of the organizers of this bloody show.
  • Prisoner 13 February 2020 16: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Here are the Dutch geese! Echo, echo, but to hell! Lying stoned dogs!
  • Tavi 13 February 2020 16: 39 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    reminded a joke:
    Vasily Ivanovich went with Petka on a business trip abroad. Parted
    in different directions. Meet after three months. Vasily Ivanovich
    hungry, ragged, and Petka all in gold.
    VI Where did you get it.
    P - I go to the club, and there they play cards in a point. At first, that card did not go.
    And then one says, "I have a point," and I show him, show him, and he
    "Gentlemen believe the word"
    And here I have a map as it flooded ....
  • kventinasd 13 February 2020 16: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It is necessary to institute proceedings against the Dutch chickens, but the matter cannot be transferred to them.
  • Karacupa 13 February 2020 16: 53 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Again, five years of chatter ..There are the essence of Russia’s deflation not to remove!
    Something Skripal forgot)))
    As one analyst at AiF said ... Sanctions for Russia are forever!
    So the men are calm, only calm .. hi
  • The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.