UVZ: Serial deliveries of the T-90M “Breakthrough” will begin this year

108
UVZ: Serial deliveries of the T-90M “Breakthrough” will begin this year

Series deliveries of the new tank T-90M "Breakthrough" in the Russian army will begin this year. This was announced by the head of Uralvagonzavod Alexander Potapov.

Answering journalists' question about the start of serial deliveries of T-90M to the troops, Potapov confirmed that they would begin in 2020, but refused to answer the question about the number of tanks that the Ground Forces would receive under the contract.



Yes, you understood correctly, in 2020. Volume is not a topic for the outside world.

- he said.

At the same time, the general director of UVZ specified that Uralvagonzavod maintains all the terms of the contract for the supply of T-90M, everything is agreed upon with the Ministry of Defense.

We maintain the contractual terms with the Ministry of Defense. The tank is definitely new. Now all experts, including foreign ones, say that this is not a modernized tank, this is a new tank. And the approach to it as a new tank. I think we will see them soon this year.

he told reporters.

Earlier it was reported that the tests of the newest Russian tank T-90M "Breakthrough" were successfully completed, the timing and volume of serial deliveries of tanks to the troops will be determined by the Ministry of Defense. It is also known that funds for the purchase of T-90M tanks have already been allocated, the delivery of serial vehicles is expected in 2020.

Last year, the media repeatedly flashed information that the first batch of incoming T-90M weapons could be at least a battalion set.

The T-90М tank was developed as part of the Breakthrough-3 development work and is a deep modernization of the T-90 with increased combat and operational characteristics.

In the course of modernization, a new turret module with a 90-mm gun of increased survivability and accuracy was installed on the T-125M. A remote-controlled machine gun installation caliber 12,7-mm is installed on the turret. In addition, the new tank is equipped with a highly automated digital fire control system that provides search, recognition, auto-tracking and hitting targets.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    108 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. -3
      13 February 2020 10: 30
      UVZ: Serial deliveries of the T-90M “Breakthrough” will begin this year

      And the "Armata"?
      1. +10
        13 February 2020 10: 36
        Quote: Olgovich
        And the "Armata"?

        And what about Armata? The efficiency / cost metric is still more important.
        At a cost 2 times lower than Abrams, Breakthrough will be one and a half times more effective.
        And Armata will wait.
        1. +19
          13 February 2020 10: 40
          There will be a day - there will be "Armata", and for "Breakthrough" is worth rejoicing. hi
        2. -4
          13 February 2020 11: 50
          And Armata will wait.
          _________________
          as if she had not become obsolete during this wait and rust did not eat her wassat
          1. +2
            13 February 2020 16: 22
            Quote: Graz
            as if she had not become obsolete during this wait and rust did not eat her

            T-72 is not outdated, but modernized and retains its relevance. Why Armata should be outdated now? In terms of the next generation tank, we are the closest in the world to mass production.
            And about the T-90, as I said a couple of years ago, the next 10-15 years it will be our main tank. They will buy Armata in small batches and at the same time bring all the units to condition.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. +1
                13 February 2020 16: 35
                Quote from rudolf
                Hi Andrew! But about the T-95 that is exactly what they officially announced: it is outdated at the development stage.

                Hi Rudolph. The T-95 was not outdated, but was excessively expensive. Well, everyone was told that I could, because the old sofsem has become.
              2. 0
                13 February 2020 22: 18
                Quote from rudolf
                Hi Andrew! But about the T-95 that is exactly what they officially announced: it is outdated at the development stage.

                So the object 195 was developed in 1988, and in iron it was normally embodied only in 2007 approximately ... Naturally, for 19 years it has become outdated. Moreover - Armata is a modular platform that can be very easily upgraded, but object 195, alas ...
        3. -9
          13 February 2020 12: 06
          In Almaty, the motor died shorter than they can create something better than B 2
          1. +1
            13 February 2020 22: 20
            Quote: Sether
            In Almaty, the motor died shorter than they can create something better than B 2

            Yah? And when did he die? What is she pedaling now? Do not disgrace, retelling rumors with Yandex Zen! I explain - the armata rides on an X-shaped engine, it is expensive and difficult to maintain, so they are developing a classic V-engine to replace it - as many as two projects, one of the projects was covered, the second is being developed further.
        4. -10
          13 February 2020 12: 09
          Volume is not a topic for the outside world.

          here and at an o'clock on a small spoon, not on a scoop.
          if the eccentrics consider it trolling, I will go for the Amur and LNG76 to Tsitaty Nosov from "Kashi", which climbed out of the pan, or you can see the movie "Masha and the Bear"
          I did not expect that it would poke a "spoon" on the brain like this - for 3 months already
      2. +1
        13 February 2020 10: 39
        Someday, years through ...
      3. -2
        13 February 2020 10: 41
        Now we will have a worthy adversary for Abrams and Leopard. Previously, the order was for 60 tanks.
        1. +2
          13 February 2020 16: 25
          Quote: figvam
          Now we will have a worthy adversary for Abrams and Leopard.

          A worthy adversary for the Leapards and Abrams is the RPG Competition and Vampire. Tank battles, as under Prokhorovka will not. In this case, the main enemies of the tank is an infantryman with an RPG and a helicopter.
          1. 0
            13 February 2020 16: 59
            Quote: NEXUS
            Tank battles, as under Prokhorovka will not.

            And I said that there will be battles like under Prokhorovka? No need to invent for me what I did not say. Maybe you forgot, but in the ammunition of all tanks of the world there are sub-caliber and cumulative shells designed to destroy enemy tanks
          2. 0
            14 February 2020 05: 04
            Quote: NEXUS
            A worthy adversary for the Leapards and Abrams is the RPG Competition and Vampire. Tank battles, as under Prokhorovka will not. In this case, the main enemies of the tank is an infantryman with an RPG and a helicopter.

            Andrei, it seems like it’s written correctly, but the question arises, based on logic - why then do you need a tank? If the main enemy is an infantryman, then there are other means of interfering with shit. There is enough artillery and lighter armored vehicles. If a helicopter - that is, air defense systems. Is a tank really outdated? It seems to be not, it is still considered the main military unit.
            1. -2
              14 February 2020 11: 01
              Quote: Gritsa
              Is a tank really outdated?

              I would say it is not becoming obsolete, but in the future it will degenerate into something like a heavy armored robot. That is, the robotic platform will perform the functions of the tank and not the fact that it will resemble a tank.
              In fact, we use technology thousands of years ago ... I mean gunpowder. With the platform itself, the platform will also change. I won’t be surprised if in 20-30 years we abandon gunpowder in favor of something more technologically advanced and efficient.
      4. +2
        13 February 2020 10: 43
        And "Armata" on parades and collectors' shelves.
        1. +7
          13 February 2020 10: 48
          Quote: Alex 2020
          And "Armata" on parades and collectors' shelves.

          Here's a little info for you to think about:

          T-34 (Plant No. 183):

          1939 of release - 596 373 rubles
          1940 of release - 429 256 rubles
          1941 of release - 249 256 rubles
          1942 of release - 165 810 rubles
          1943 of release - 141 822 rubles
          1944 of release - 140 996 rubles
          1945 of release - 136 380 rubles
          1. -1
            13 February 2020 10: 51
            T-14 Armata from 900 to 2260 rubles hi
            1. +12
              13 February 2020 10: 54
              If you produce 10 Armats per year or 1000 of the same modification - the cost will differ significantly. I mean it.
              1. -6
                13 February 2020 11: 20
                I suspect that Armat will have to wait in sufficient quantities for a long time, which will reduce the cost of production in general and of an individual facility in particular. Rather, it will all remain a beautiful fairy tale, which is not destined to become true. hi
                1. +3
                  13 February 2020 22: 24
                  Quote: Alexey 2020
                  I suspect that Armat will have to wait in sufficient quantities for a long time, which will reduce the cost of production in general and of an individual facility in particular. Rather, it will all remain a beautiful fairy tale, which is not destined to become true.

                  in 2011 they shouted that there would be no armata!
                  in 2015 they shouted that there would be no armata at the parade!
                  in 2016-2018, they shouted that they would not produce fittings in series!
                  in 2019-2020 they shout that the rebar will not be mass-produced yet soon ...
                  When the first batches of armatures will be armed, what will they scream?
                  1. +3
                    14 February 2020 15: 07
                    That it’s not Armata, but another tank ... Don’t worry, they will smoke and shout something
                    1. +1
                      14 February 2020 21: 36
                      Quote: Stalllker
                      That it’s not Armata, but another tank ... Don’t worry, they will smoke and shout something

                      Exactly! So wait, sir ...
      5. -1
        13 February 2020 10: 50
        According to the latest news for Armata, there are no engines now
        engines did not go into series
        1. +7
          13 February 2020 11: 16
          Quote: Name Surname
          According to the latest news for Armata, there are no engines now
          engines did not go into series

          There is an engine, A-85-3A, and it was shut down due to a design error 12TV373CH ("The Seagull") which was more economical, modern and promising, while another engine will be developed in the Armata series, it will go from A-85-3A and it will it is the first Armata and ride.
      6. +9
        13 February 2020 10: 58
        Armata is still being tested.
      7. -20
        13 February 2020 11: 21
        Russia cannot make Armata, there are no personnel, resources, the ubiquitous "Moscow" is not profitable
      8. -10
        13 February 2020 11: 23
        And the "Armata"?
        They wrote that they can’t answer the engine. Apparently there will be no while.
      9. +3
        13 February 2020 12: 08
        What does the T-90 do not like ??? The 90M has a new "head", a new "muzzle", fresh electronics. Over the protection pozhamanili. In experienced hands, a deadly machine turns out! Still, "bullets" are good for him, that would be in the forehead of "anyone." And the main thing is cheap !!!
        1. 0
          14 February 2020 10: 31
          And the "muzzle" there still looks like the old one :(
          1. +2
            14 February 2020 14: 52
            Declared what will be new, let's see in the finished product
      10. +2
        13 February 2020 12: 12
        Apparently every vegetable has its own time, or is something incomprehensible?
      11. The comment was deleted.
      12. +3
        13 February 2020 18: 34
        Well, first of all, the T90 will be upgraded. Plus, due to the fact that after the start of the operation in Syria, we managed to deliver T4 to 90 countries, and even agreed on modernization with the Indians, the cost of T90 decreased. So that's ours and they want to build a little for themselves too, while it’s profitable. But Armata has not finished yet. Further refinement. Plus, the deployment of mass production takes time. Armata is a tank that will gradually enter the army, but it certainly will not become the main one in this decade. The basis for the coming years is t72b3. As long as he has opportunities for modernization, he will continue to modernize.
      13. -1
        13 February 2020 22: 29
        Armata is a "wunderwaffe". Tanks are effective when there are more than enough of them.
      14. +1
        14 February 2020 13: 50
        The topic did not indicate that there will be a helm instead of levers and an automatic transmission
        important points
    2. +1
      13 February 2020 10: 39
      Naturally ask, and where .......
      However, the criterion of reasonable sufficiency has not been canceled. The giraffe is big, he knows better.
      1. +3
        13 February 2020 10: 58
        [quote = rocket757] It is natural to ask, and where ....... [/ quote]
        [quote] The meteorological center reported at lunch:
        "There will be no weather, no weather."
        They called from "09", told their time.
        Neither ... I do not believe them! Neither ... I do not believe them!

        And in the news again everyone lies,
        Like little children.
        I need a newspaper then
        When I'm in the toilet.

        "Blues" Leningrad

        Well, for the T-90M, I'm certainly glad
        1. +5
          13 February 2020 11: 03
          The media, of course, in vain is called some kind of power, they are on the premises, but as arsonists of all sorts of different passions, please.
    3. -14
      13 February 2020 10: 44
      At the moment, one of the best tanks in the world is undoubtedly. but a log for self-pulling
      from the outside it looks strange, and in my opinion it will get stuck and stop.
      1. +21
        13 February 2020 10: 48
        such logs save any tracked vehicles, not just tanks. Armored personnel carriers, all-terrain vehicles, tractors - logs can be found on almost everyone. The promised video is a confirmation of this (wind immediately at 5:40):
        1. +3
          13 February 2020 10: 58
          I know this very well - I mean only its placement - usually it was at the back -


          a side mounted, it may be stuck
      2. +10
        13 February 2020 10: 52
        Quote: Constanty
        self-pulling log
        from the outside it looks weird and in my opinion it will get stuck and stop

        The log is not for stretching, but for training the Russian spirit smile
        1. +1
          13 February 2020 12: 10
          Asked a question to the Americans.


          I look forward to hearing from them.
          Ilcha could have been on Saturdays, but that would be too much for the Americans.
      3. +4
        13 February 2020 11: 04
        the need for this piece of wood has been proven thousands of times) so that no matter how it looks, but it was and will be)))
        1. +5
          13 February 2020 11: 08
          I don’t mind, I know the need for this piece of wood, I wrote only about the place of its attachment. Different from usual in the back
          1. +5
            13 February 2020 11: 25
            I completely agree with you, I will supplement you:
            1. The machine’s overall width is increased by at least 30 cm, because of this, when transporting it by rail, it must be dismantled — the machine is out of range, elementary problems can be driven out of the box, problems with passing limited passages.
            2. The juice of the self-extracting log service is very short, it will be constantly damaged during movement.
            It seems that the designers simply did not know where to put it when creating the protection of the tank aft.
      4. +4
        13 February 2020 11: 31
        Quote: Constanty
        At the moment, one of the best tanks in the world is undoubtedly. but a log for self-pulling
        from the outside it looks strange, and in my opinion it will get stuck and stop.

        It looks "strange" on this 62-ton Laiba.
        Yyyy:


        Yes, and chains from the construction market cling)))
        1. +3
          13 February 2020 12: 22
          They’re doing something strange, the log looks like a left one, judging by its length, the chains are likely to have them specially for the log of self-extraction. But what they depicted in the photo is most likely a demonstration of how this is done. I can’t find the photo with the log fixed to the abram in one of the positions, who saw it - post it here, curious.
          1. +8
            13 February 2020 12: 28
            Quote: AlexGa
            chains, probably they have such specially for the log self-extraction.

            They don't have any "special" chains, the Estonians gave the British the Most Important Russian Secret and they tried to apply the knowledge gained in practice.
            It turned out so-so, but it didn’t work at all, otherwise they would have boasted necessarily.

            They use chains because a cable cannot be threaded into such a track in principle.
            1. 0
              13 February 2020 13: 35
              They don't have any "special" chains,

              Maybe, of course, not, but if Americans are stuck using such evacuation methods, then something is used. This work is carried out by the crew and the fittings are transported by car in the spare parts.
              1. +3
                13 February 2020 13: 42
                Quote: AlexGa
                then something is being used.

                Such chains on the tank can only be used for sadomasochism)))
                1. 0
                  13 February 2020 15: 28
                  You shouldn’t be so. In my opinion, it is quite possible that it is more convenient, it is possible to tighten the log to the caterpillar. Both the tow rope and the cables 62 and 72 are uncomfortable. Few people know how to use them.
                  1. 0
                    13 February 2020 16: 18
                    Quote: AlexGa
                    Few people know how to use them.

                    So you have to learn, cadets are taught.
                    1. 0
                      13 February 2020 16: 23
                      They are taught in schools and in the army, but there is also laziness, mother. It is impossible to convince that it is necessary to perform preliminary work during self-extraction. The result is a broken log. Bad, but there is dry firewood.
                      1. 0
                        13 February 2020 16: 29
                        I have not heard about preliminary work.
                        There is no such thing here:
                        1. +3
                          13 February 2020 17: 16
                          That's how they teach everywhere. In fact, it turns out like this: The tank sits on the bottom, and the tracks are free to rotate. When you simply fasten the log and start moving, the caterpillars on the sides of the log press on it, and the middle is above the rut and the log simply breaks. Try to put a match across the pencil and push on its ends. Crunch and no logs. Therefore, a trunk for logs is always dug so that it lies as evenly as possible. This is not taught. As they say, experience, like sexual impotence, comes over the years. This is humor, barracks.
                        2. 0
                          13 February 2020 17: 19
                          Quote: AlexGa
                          , then the caterpillars on the sides of the log press on him, and the middle is higher than the rut

                          I get it. If the soil is soft, then you can hammer on it.
                        3. 0
                          13 February 2020 17: 20
                          If the soil is soft, then you can hammer on it

                          Quite right, but it’s better to dig. The new log is more expensive to look for.
                        4. 0
                          14 February 2020 05: 56
                          Quote: AlexGa
                          Quite right, but it’s better to dig. The new log is more expensive to look for.

                          I wonder if there are instructions from which tree species it is necessary to use a log? Or a drum?
                        5. 0
                          14 February 2020 08: 30
                          You know, a good question! I thought about it myself, but no, the requirements determined 330 mm and how much is plus or minus. We used pine, there were no other options.
    4. 0
      13 February 2020 10: 45
      Good news, sorry about the amount not said, refused to burn.
      1. +2
        13 February 2020 10: 51
        Really good news. Well, the rest, as far as the units are equipped, I think they will inform us additionally, be patient my friend. Yes
        1. 0
          13 February 2020 10: 54
          Yes, I’ll say that after 3 years they will be removed from the military register. And the army needs more technology.
          1. +1
            13 February 2020 10: 57
            I agree, but still be patient. Yes Decent technology.
            1. +1
              13 February 2020 11: 03
              I hope that it’s decent, the enemies do not sleep. Interson will then read reviews on the operation and use.
    5. -3
      13 February 2020 10: 48
      Quote: Thrall
      The efficiency / cost metric is still more important.

      Then you need to take anti-tank systems and not tanks. There, this ratio surpasses.
      And only their collision will show better / worse. Which so far is not particularly observed.
      Our iron is perhaps better. For digital technologies this is unlikely, for example, for example, all normal domestic-made thermal imagers based on imported matrices. Do you think someone will sell this latest-generation military equipment to our country ?. We do not even produce our own calculators (from and to), so it will be strange if we surpass the leaders in the filling.
    6. -2
      13 February 2020 10: 48
      It would be great!
    7. -6
      13 February 2020 10: 49
      Quote: Olgovich
      UVZ: Serial deliveries of the T-90M “Breakthrough” will begin this year

      And the "Armata"?

      Do not step on the sore spot of hurray patriots.
      1. +2
        13 February 2020 11: 07
        But what does patriotism have to do with it? difficulties were expected by all and those who are in the subject are little surprised. t 14 is too complicated and new to make everything work out quickly. and it’s better to let them bring to mind normally than then to arrange dances in the troops along with representatives of the plant.
        1. +2
          13 February 2020 11: 18
          Despite the fact that since 2015, jingoistic patriots are waving checkers, kirdyk you "Abrams". And in response to fair remarks that first we must wait for the adoption of the tank for service and launch into the series, they puff out their cheeks, and so on. It's strange that you didn't notice ...
          1. +1
            13 February 2020 11: 20
            this is done either by children or those who are not related to tanks. from the series, my dad is the strongest and your dad is getting hit. point to focus on this? Well they say and they say. the dog barks the caravan goes.
            1. -3
              13 February 2020 11: 26
              children need to be raised ...
    8. +6
      13 February 2020 10: 49
      Everything is good, it’s bad that there is no KAZ on the T-90M and this is a very significant minus.

      When will it come to the leadership of the army and the country that a tank with a KAZ is cheaper and more economical than burying the crew, preparing a new barge and making a new tank to replace the destroyed one ?!

      Yes, KAZ will not give a 100% guarantee of security, but it significantly increases the survivability of tanks from ATGM fire and even sub-caliber ammunition.

      And besides, I see no reason not to give KAZ to protect the upper hemisphere of the tank, which will protect it from the defeat of the 3rd generation ATGM, as well as damage by helicopters and aircraft !!!

      KAZ anti-missile is several times cheaper than ATGM or helicopter anti-tank missiles !!!

      KAZ gives the tank excellent protection, so when will it be put on our tanks ?!
      1. -4
        13 February 2020 10: 51
        effective KAZ has not yet been developed
        1. -1
          13 February 2020 17: 02
          Quote: Nastia Makarova
          effective KAZ has not yet been developed

          and Israeli trophy? (checked in real databases) Russian Arena? Russian Afghan? All are not effective ???
          1. -2
            13 February 2020 17: 15
            I'm talking about the Russian kaz, what you two called for some reason can’t satisfy me
            1. 0
              13 February 2020 20: 44
              Quote: Nastia Makarova
              for some reason they don’t satisfy me

              where are the firewood from? Shoigu shared information? If anything, then the Arena, and Afghanit, and Drozd have the letter O1. Do you know what that means?
              1. -1
                14 February 2020 07: 41
                there were articles that the Defense Ministry did not satisfy one or another KAZ
                1. 0
                  14 February 2020 10: 32
                  Quote: Nastia Makarova
                  there were articles that the Defense Ministry did not satisfy one or another KAZ

                  links can ???

                  The letter O1 means that the product has passed the entire test cycle and is ready and recommended to mass production (which, translated into Russian, understandable to women, suits the Customer)
                  1. 0
                    14 February 2020 11: 51
                    if everything suits then why not release?
                    1. 0
                      14 February 2020 11: 54
                      Quote: Nastia Makarova
                      if everything suits then why not release?

                      the reason is financial. KAZ thing is quite expensive. It is not even known whether KAZ will remain in the basic configuration of Almaty and Kurganets (on the front cars complexes are installed)
      2. +1
        13 February 2020 17: 01
        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        it’s bad that there is no KAZ on the T-90M and this is a very significant minus.

        unquestionably

        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        KAZ will not give a 100% guarantee of security, but it significantly increases the survivability of tanks from ATGM fire and even sub-caliber ammunition

        Well, KAZ with the ability to intercept BOPS is complex and very expensive. In the current realities, when 90% of the ammunition issued by the tank is ATGMs and RPG grenades, I consider it quite possible to get by with a relatively simple KAZ capable of intercepting only the above ATGMs and grenades

        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        KAZ anti-missile is several times cheaper than ATGM or helicopter anti-tank missiles !!!

        counter-ammunition - yes, but not the complex itself. KAZ is not a cheap thing. Apparently, this is the only reason that it is not installed on domestic armored vehicles.

        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        When will it come to the leadership of the army and the country that a tank with a KAZ is cheaper and more economical than burying the crew, preparing a new barge and making a new tank to replace the destroyed one ?!

        So I would like to know the answer to this question. Following the Israelis, the Americans reached out already, the Chinese, Germans and French would soon catch up, and we ... Despite the fact that the USSR was in the lead in developing these systems.
    9. -7
      13 February 2020 10: 50
      Quote: Thrall
      Quote: Olgovich
      And the "Armata"?

      At a cost 2 times lower than Abrams, Breakthrough will be one and a half times more effective.
      And Armata will wait.

      What are you saying? Share the information.
      1. 0
        13 February 2020 11: 08
        oh well harol troll. like a child to her God. what information to share with you about the car about which few people specifically know something? go gosy. that's all.
    10. -1
      13 February 2020 10: 51
      the tank is good, but without KAZ they will burn like matches from ATGMs
      1. 0
        13 February 2020 18: 33
        Unfortunately, the Soviet / Russian tanks and tankers are not accustomed to burning more than other colleagues - opponents ... they drive the shaft due to quality If earlier this was related to production, now due to lack of funds it has spread to modernization (T-72B3)
    11. 0
      13 February 2020 10: 52
      The main thing is not to forget to upgrade ALL already built T-90 to the level of T-90M
      1. 0
        13 February 2020 11: 41
        Like 50% T90M, this is a modernization of the T90
    12. 0
      13 February 2020 11: 00
      The main question is will Arena-M be installed?
    13. 0
      13 February 2020 11: 14
      Again, nothing is said about KAZ Arena M or not?
      1. +1
        13 February 2020 11: 40
        Not the fact that the Arena is already. In the news they wrote about the testing of the Arena modification and the Drozd modification ...
    14. 0
      13 February 2020 11: 16
      Quote: carstorm 11
      oh well harol troll. like a child to her God. what information to share with you about the car about which few people specifically know something? go gosy. that's all.

      So it's okay to shake the air? Or is the author of the post a bearer of secret knowledge, since he did not even indicate what modification of the Abrams is 1,5 times superior to the T-90M? laughing
    15. +2
      13 February 2020 11: 39
      "foreigners say that this is not a modernized tank, this is a new tank." ///
      ----
      What is fundamentally new?
      Can he shoot unitary long OBPS? This is a question of questions.
      Those OBPSs that are now can’t penetrate Abrams’ forehead.
      1. 0
        13 February 2020 20: 57
        it is not yet clear if in it 2A82 then it can be the “Vacuum-1” bps, but the information is contradictory, for example
        Officials at the Russian military-industrial complex confirmed that there will be no 2A82 on the T-90M. Instead of a cannon from "Almaty" they install the modernization of the old - 2A46-M5.
      2. 0
        14 February 2020 06: 01
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Those OBPSs that are now can’t penetrate Abrams’ forehead.

        Real heroes always go around
    16. 0
      13 February 2020 11: 39
      In some sources, gun 2a46, others 2a82 ....
      1. 0
        13 February 2020 18: 40
        They say the production of 2a82 problems. Like the Ukrainians with tank guns, by God ... Fraternal peoples, whatever you say.
        1. 0
          14 February 2020 11: 01
          I read it ..... but last week they wrote about 2A82 on the T90M ...... product trunks are complex, they write that metallurgists have problems, they can’t do stubs for trunks (namely 2a82) stably. This also applies to sniper rifles (advanced).
      2. 0
        14 February 2020 10: 55
        If you watch the famous video "Military Acceptance" about the T-90M

        At 9:35 am Colonel Alexander Panteleev, head of the Research Testing Center of Armored Vehicles of the 3rd Central Research Institute of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, says: "The barrel is used the same ..."
    17. 0
      13 February 2020 12: 28
      It is not clear is the newly built T90 or the modernization of the earlier released?
      1. 0
        13 February 2020 15: 13
        Answered below.
    18. 0
      13 February 2020 12: 48
      great news any movement forward and the arrival of new equipment is an indicator that the factories are working, the engineers think, and the army receives the equipment
    19. 0
      13 February 2020 15: 08
      For whom are the tales about the "unknown quantity" calculated?
      30 tanks were supposed to arrive in 2019. 10 already built (for the first time since 2011 our army would have received new tanks), 20 alterations. This did not happen, respectively, the deadlines were postponed to 2020. Then another 30 tanks. In the long term, they were going to remake all the remaining T-90 A.
      These figures were "boasted" by the authorities themselves.
      It’s sad that people have a memory like goupe fish ....
    20. 0
      14 February 2020 06: 02
      Will the T-9B72 be put up or chased at the May 3 parade?
    21. +1
      14 February 2020 10: 31
      I think the T-90M "PRORIV" is really a breakthrough in our tank building, now the task is to update our armored fleet with an emphasis on this MBT ... well, Armata is still a tank of a different level and it will also come up, but later ...
    22. -1
      14 February 2020 22: 49
      Of course, do not be offended, but lately we have had good "breakthroughs" only for dams.
      As a citizen of a great power, pumped up with patriotism on TV, I would like to see the T-90, not some sort of "outdated" T-XNUMX, coming into operation, but really "Kuz'kin's mother" in the form of hundreds and thousands of Armata tanks, but I still don’t find a clear answer why they are still not there after such a pompous presentation.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"