UVZ: Serial deliveries of the T-90M “Breakthrough” will begin this year

UVZ: Serial deliveries of the T-90M “Breakthrough” will begin this year

Series deliveries of the new tank T-90M "Breakthrough" in the Russian army will begin this year. This was announced by the head of Uralvagonzavod Alexander Potapov.


Answering journalists' question about the start of serial deliveries of T-90M to the troops, Potapov confirmed that they would begin in 2020, but refused to answer the question about the number of tanks that the Ground Forces would receive under the contract.

Yes, you understood correctly, in 2020. Volume is not a topic for the outside world.

- he said.

At the same time, the general director of UVZ specified that Uralvagonzavod maintains all the terms of the contract for the supply of T-90M, everything is agreed upon with the Ministry of Defense.

We maintain the contractual terms with the Ministry of Defense. The tank is definitely new. Now all experts, including foreign ones, say that this is not a modernized tank, this is a new tank. And the approach to it as a new tank. I think we will see them soon this year.

he told reporters.

Earlier it was reported that the tests of the newest Russian tank T-90M "Breakthrough" were successfully completed, the timing and volume of serial deliveries of tanks to the troops will be determined by the Ministry of Defense. It is also known that funds for the purchase of T-90M tanks have already been allocated, the delivery of serial vehicles is expected in 2020.

Last year, the media repeatedly flashed information that the first batch of incoming T-90M weapons could be at least a battalion set.

The T-90М tank was developed as part of the Breakthrough-3 development work and is a deep modernization of the T-90 with increased combat and operational characteristics.

In the course of modernization, a new turret module with a 90-mm gun of increased survivability and accuracy was installed on the T-125M. A remote-controlled machine gun installation caliber 12,7-mm is installed on the turret. In addition, the new tank is equipped with a highly automated digital fire control system that provides search, recognition, auto-tracking and hitting targets.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

108 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Olgovich 13 February 2020 10: 30 New
    • 19
    • 22
    -3
    UVZ: Serial deliveries of the T-90M “Breakthrough” will begin this year

    What about Armata?
    1. Thrall 13 February 2020 10: 36 New
      • 30
      • 20
      +10
      Quote: Olgovich
      What about Armata?

      And what about Armata? The performance / cost indicator is more important so far.
      At a cost 2 times lower than Abrams, Breakthrough will be one and a half times more effective.
      And Armata will wait.
      1. bessmertniy 13 February 2020 10: 40 New
        • 34
        • 15
        +19
        There will be a day - there will be Armata, but for the Breakthrough it’s worth rejoicing. hi
      2. Graz 13 February 2020 11: 50 New
        • 7
        • 11
        -4
        And Armata will wait.
        _________________
        as if she had not become obsolete during this wait and rust did not eat her wassat
        1. NEXUS 13 February 2020 16: 22 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Quote: Graz
          as if she had not become obsolete during this wait and rust did not eat her

          T-72 is not outdated, but modernized and retains its relevance. Why Armata should be outdated now? In terms of the next generation tank, we are the closest in the world to mass production.
          And about the T-90, as I said a couple of years ago, the next 10-15 years it will be our main tank. They will buy Armata in small batches and at the same time bring all the units to condition.
          1. rudolff 13 February 2020 16: 27 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Hi Andrew! But about the T-95 that is exactly what they officially announced: it is outdated at the development stage.
            1. NEXUS 13 February 2020 16: 35 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              Quote: rudolff
              Hi Andrew! But about the T-95 that is exactly what they officially announced: it is outdated at the development stage.

              Hi Rudolph. The T-95 was not outdated, but was excessively expensive. Well, everyone was told that I could, because the old sofsem has become.
            2. Albert1988 13 February 2020 22: 18 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: rudolff
              Hi Andrew! But about the T-95 that is exactly what they officially announced: it is outdated at the development stage.

              So the object 195 was developed in 1988, and in iron it was normally embodied only in 2007 approximately ... Naturally, for 19 years it has become outdated. Moreover - Armata is a modular platform that can be very easily upgraded, but object 195, alas ...
      3. Sether 13 February 2020 12: 06 New
        • 4
        • 13
        -9
        In Almaty, the motor died shorter than they can create something better than B 2
        1. Albert1988 13 February 2020 22: 20 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Sether
          In Almaty, the motor died shorter than they can create something better than B 2

          Yah? And when did he die? What is she pedaling now? Do not disgrace, retelling rumors with Yandex Zen! I explain - the armata rides on an X-shaped engine, it is expensive and difficult to maintain, so they are developing a classic V-engine to replace it - as many as two projects, one of the projects was covered, the second is being developed further.
      4. antivirus 13 February 2020 12: 09 New
        • 1
        • 11
        -10
        Volume is not a topic for the outside world.

        here and at an o'clock on a small spoon, not on a scoop.
        if the eccentrics consider this to be trolling - a transition for the Amur and LNG76 to the quotes of Nosov from "Kasha", which climbed out of the pan or you can see the movie "Masha and the Bear"
        I didn’t expect that he’s stuck in the brain with a “spoon” - already 3 months
    2. Deniska999 13 February 2020 10: 39 New
      • 15
      • 14
      +1
      Someday, years through ...
    3. figwam 13 February 2020 10: 41 New
      • 7
      • 9
      -2
      Now we will have a worthy adversary for Abrams and Leopard. Previously, the order was for 60 tanks.
      1. NEXUS 13 February 2020 16: 25 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Quote: figvam
        Now we will have a worthy adversary for Abrams and Leopard.

        A worthy adversary for the Leapards and Abrams is the RPG Competition and Vampire. Tank battles, as under Prokhorovka will not. In this case, the main enemies of the tank is an infantryman with an RPG and a helicopter.
        1. figwam 13 February 2020 16: 59 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Quote: NEXUS
          Tank battles, as under Prokhorovka will not.

          And I said that there will be battles like under Prokhorovka? No need to invent for me what I did not say. Maybe you forgot, but in the ammunition of all tanks of the world there are sub-caliber and cumulative shells designed to destroy enemy tanks
        2. Grits 14 February 2020 05: 04 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: NEXUS
          A worthy adversary for the Leapards and Abrams is the RPG Competition and Vampire. Tank battles, as under Prokhorovka will not. In this case, the main enemies of the tank is an infantryman with an RPG and a helicopter.

          Andrei, it seems like it’s written correctly, but the question arises, based on logic - why then do you need a tank? If the main enemy is an infantryman, then there are other means of interfering with shit. There is enough artillery and lighter armored vehicles. If a helicopter - that is, air defense systems. Is a tank really outdated? It seems to be not, it is still considered the main military unit.
          1. NEXUS 14 February 2020 11: 01 New
            • 0
            • 2
            -2
            Quote: Gritsa
            Is a tank really outdated?

            I would say it is not becoming obsolete, but in the future it will degenerate into something like a heavy armored robot. That is, the robotic platform will perform the functions of the tank and not the fact that it will resemble a tank.
            In fact, we use technology thousands of years ago ... I mean gunpowder. With the platform itself, the platform will also change. I won’t be surprised if in 20-30 years we abandon gunpowder in favor of something more technologically advanced and efficient.
    4. Alex 2020 13 February 2020 10: 43 New
      • 23
      • 21
      +2
      And "Armata" on parades and shelves of collectors.
      1. Thrall 13 February 2020 10: 48 New
        • 13
        • 6
        +7
        Quote: Alex 2020
        And "Armata" on parades and shelves of collectors.

        Here's a little info for you to think about:

        T-34 (Plant No. 183):

        1939 of release - 596 373 rubles
        1940 of release - 429 256 rubles
        1941 of release - 249 256 rubles
        1942 of release - 165 810 rubles
        1943 of release - 141 822 rubles
        1944 of release - 140 996 rubles
        1945 of release - 136 380 rubles
        1. Alex 2020 13 February 2020 10: 51 New
          • 6
          • 7
          -1
          T-14 Armata from 900 to 2260 rubles hi
          1. Thrall 13 February 2020 10: 54 New
            • 16
            • 4
            +12
            If you produce 10 Armats per year or 1000 of the same modification - the cost will differ significantly. I mean it.
            1. Alex 2020 13 February 2020 11: 20 New
              • 6
              • 12
              -6
              I suspect that Armat will have to wait in sufficient quantities for a long time, which will reduce the cost of production in general and of an individual facility in particular. Rather, it will all remain a beautiful fairy tale, which is not destined to become true. hi
              1. Albert1988 13 February 2020 22: 24 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                Quote: Alex 2020
                I suspect that Armat will have to wait in sufficient quantities for a long time, which will reduce the cost of production in general and of an individual facility in particular. Rather, it will all remain a beautiful fairy tale, which is not destined to become true.

                in 2011 they shouted that there would be no armata!
                in 2015 they shouted that there would be no armata at the parade!
                in 2016-2018, they shouted that they would not produce fittings in series!
                in 2019-2020 they shout that the rebar will not be mass-produced yet soon ...
                When the first batches of armatures will be armed, what will they scream?
                1. Stalllker 14 February 2020 15: 07 New
                  • 4
                  • 1
                  +3
                  That it’s not Armata, but another tank ... Don’t worry, they will smoke and shout something
                  1. Albert1988 14 February 2020 21: 36 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: Stalllker
                    That it’s not Armata, but another tank ... Don’t worry, they will smoke and shout something

                    Exactly! So wait, sir ...
    5. Name Surname 13 February 2020 10: 50 New
      • 7
      • 8
      -1
      According to the latest news for Armata, there are no engines now
      engines did not go into series
      1. figwam 13 February 2020 11: 16 New
        • 9
        • 2
        +7
        Quote: Name Surname
        According to the latest news for Armata, there are no engines now
        engines did not go into series

        There is an engine, A-85-3A, and it was shut down due to a design error 12TV373CH ("The Seagull") which was more economical, modern and promising, while another engine will be developed in the Armata series, it will go from A-85-3A and it will it is the first Armata and ride.
    6. LifeIsGood 13 February 2020 10: 58 New
      • 10
      • 1
      +9
      Armata is still being tested.
    7. Alexey from Perm 13 February 2020 11: 21 New
      • 4
      • 24
      -20
      Russia cannot do armata, there are no personnel, resources, the ubiquitous “Moscow” is not profitable
    8. Kamikadze19 13 February 2020 11: 23 New
      • 3
      • 13
      -10
      What about Armata?
      They wrote that they can’t answer the engine. Apparently there will be no while.
    9. Stalllker 13 February 2020 12: 08 New
      • 7
      • 4
      +3
      What does the T-90 not suit ??? In 90M, a new "head", a new "barrel", fresh electronics. Shaman over protection. In experienced hands, a deadly car turns out! Still, the "bullets" are good for him, that would be in the forehead of "anyone." And most importantly cheap !!!
      1. Cympak 14 February 2020 10: 31 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        And the "barrel" there still seems to be old :(
        1. Stalllker 14 February 2020 14: 52 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Declared what will be new, let's see in the finished product
    10. Ros 56 13 February 2020 12: 12 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Apparently every vegetable has its own time, or is something incomprehensible?
    11. The comment was deleted.
    12. g1v2 13 February 2020 18: 34 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Well, first of all, the T90 will be upgraded. Plus, due to the fact that after the start of the operation in Syria, we managed to deliver T4 to 90 countries, and even agreed on modernization with the Indians, the cost of T90 decreased. So that's ours and they want to build a little for themselves too, while it’s profitable. But Armata has not finished yet. Further refinement. Plus, the deployment of mass production takes time. Armata is a tank that will gradually enter the army, but it certainly will not become the main one in this decade. The basis for the coming years is t72b3. As long as he has opportunities for modernization, he will continue to modernize.
    13. Luty 13 February 2020 22: 29 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Armata is a "prodigy." Tanks are effective when they are more than enough.
    14. Skubudu 14 February 2020 13: 50 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The topic did not indicate that there will be a helm instead of levers and an automatic transmission
      important points
  2. rocket757 13 February 2020 10: 39 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    Naturally ask, and where .......
    However, the criterion of reasonable sufficiency has not been canceled. The giraffe is big, he knows better.
    1. mark1 13 February 2020 10: 58 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      [quote = rocket757] It is natural to ask, and where ....... [/ quote]
      [quote] The meteorological center reported at lunch:
      "There will be no weather, no weather."
      They called from 09, reported their time.
      Neither ... I do not believe them! Neither ... I do not believe them!

      And in the news again everyone lies,
      Like little children.
      I need a newspaper then
      When I'm in the toilet.

      "Blues" Leningrad

      Well, for the T-90M, I'm certainly glad
      1. rocket757 13 February 2020 11: 03 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        The media, of course, in vain is called some kind of power, they are on the premises, but as arsonists of all sorts of different passions, please.
  3. Constanty 13 February 2020 10: 44 New
    • 3
    • 17
    -14
    At the moment, one of the best tanks in the world is undoubtedly. but a log for self-pulling
    from the outside it looks strange, and in my opinion it will get stuck and stop.
    1. DMB 75 13 February 2020 10: 48 New
      • 21
      • 0
      +21
      such logs save any tracked vehicles, not just tanks. Armored personnel carriers, all-terrain vehicles, tractors - logs can be found on almost everyone. The promised video is a confirmation of this (wind immediately at 5:40):
      1. Constanty 13 February 2020 10: 58 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        I know this very well - I mean only its placement - usually it was at the back -


        a side mounted, it may be stuck
    2. Thrall 13 February 2020 10: 52 New
      • 12
      • 2
      +10
      Quote: Constanty
      self-pulling log
      from the outside it looks weird and in my opinion it will get stuck and stop

      The log is not for stretching, but for training the Russian spirit smile
      1. Strashila 13 February 2020 12: 10 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Asked a question to the Americans.


        I look forward to hearing from them.
        Ilcha could have been on Saturdays, but that would be too much for the Americans.
    3. carstorm 11 13 February 2020 11: 04 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      the need for this piece of wood has been proven thousands of times) so that no matter how it looks, but it was and will be)))
      1. Constanty 13 February 2020 11: 08 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        I don’t mind, I know the need for this piece of wood, I wrote only about the place of its attachment. Different from usual in the back
        1. Alexga 13 February 2020 11: 25 New
          • 6
          • 1
          +5
          I completely agree with you, I will supplement you:
          1. The machine’s overall width is increased by at least 30 cm, because of this, when transporting it by rail, it must be dismantled — the machine is out of range, elementary problems can be driven out of the box, problems with passing limited passages.
          2. The juice of the self-extracting log service is very short, it will be constantly damaged during movement.
          It seems that the designers simply did not know where to put it when creating the protection of the tank aft.
    4. Gray brother 13 February 2020 11: 31 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      Quote: Constanty
      At the moment, one of the best tanks in the world is undoubtedly. but a log for self-pulling
      from the outside it looks strange, and in my opinion it will get stuck and stop.

      But on this 62-tonne weight-bearing it looks "weird."
      Yyyy:


      Yes, and chains from the construction market cling)))
      1. Alexga 13 February 2020 12: 22 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        They’re doing something strange, the log looks like a left one, judging by its length, the chains are likely to have them specially for the log of self-extraction. But what they depicted in the photo is most likely a demonstration of how this is done. I can’t find the photo with the log fixed to the abram in one of the positions, who saw it - post it here, curious.
        1. Gray brother 13 February 2020 12: 28 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          Quote: AlexGa
          chains, probably they have such specially for the log self-extraction.

          They don’t have any “special” chains, these are Estonians who gave the British the Most Important Russian Secret and they tried to put the acquired knowledge into practice.
          It turned out so-so, but it didn’t work at all, otherwise they would have boasted necessarily.

          They use chains because a cable cannot be threaded into such a track in principle.
          1. Alexga 13 February 2020 13: 35 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            They don’t have any “special” circuits,

            Maybe, of course, not, but if Americans are stuck using such evacuation methods, then something is used. This work is carried out by the crew and the fittings are transported by car in the spare parts.
            1. Gray brother 13 February 2020 13: 42 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Quote: AlexGa
              then something is being used.

              Such chains on the tank can only be used for sadomasochism)))
              1. Alexga 13 February 2020 15: 28 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                You shouldn’t be so. In my opinion, it is quite possible that it is more convenient, it is possible to tighten the log to the caterpillar. Both the tow rope and the cables 62 and 72 are uncomfortable. Few people know how to use them.
                1. Gray brother 13 February 2020 16: 18 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: AlexGa
                  Few people know how to use them.

                  So you have to learn, cadets are taught.
                  1. Alexga 13 February 2020 16: 23 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    They are taught in schools and in the army, but there is also laziness, mother. It is impossible to convince that it is necessary to perform preliminary work during self-extraction. The result is a broken log. Bad, but there is dry firewood.
                    1. Gray brother 13 February 2020 16: 29 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      I have not heard about preliminary work.
                      There is no such thing here:
                      1. Alexga 13 February 2020 17: 16 New
                        • 3
                        • 0
                        +3
                        That's how they teach everywhere. In fact, it turns out like this: The tank sits on the bottom, and the tracks are free to rotate. When you simply fasten the log and start moving, the caterpillars on the sides of the log press on it, and the middle is above the rut and the log simply breaks. Try to put a match across the pencil and push on its ends. Crunch and no logs. Therefore, a trunk for logs is always dug so that it lies as evenly as possible. This is not taught. As they say, experience, like sexual impotence, comes over the years. This is humor, barracks.
                      2. Gray brother 13 February 2020 17: 19 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: AlexGa
                        , then the caterpillars on the sides of the log press on him, and the middle is higher than the rut

                        I get it. If the soil is soft, then you can hammer on it.
                      3. Alexga 13 February 2020 17: 20 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        If the soil is soft, then you can hammer on it

                        Quite right, but it’s better to dig. The new log is more expensive to look for.
                      4. Grits 14 February 2020 05: 56 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: AlexGa
                        Quite right, but it’s better to dig. The new log is more expensive to look for.

                        I wonder if there are instructions from which tree species it is necessary to use a log? Or a drum?
                      5. Alexga 14 February 2020 08: 30 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        You know, a good question! I thought about it myself, but no, the requirements determined 330 mm and how much is plus or minus. We used pine, there were no other options.
  • Lamata 13 February 2020 10: 45 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    Good news, sorry about the amount not said, refused to burn.
    1. Rusland 13 February 2020 10: 51 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      Really good news. Well, the rest, as far as the units are equipped, I think they will inform us additionally, be patient my friend. yes
      1. Lamata 13 February 2020 10: 54 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Yes, I’ll say that after 3 years they will be removed from the military register. And the army needs more technology.
        1. Rusland 13 February 2020 10: 57 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          I agree, but still be patient. yes Decent technology.
          1. Lamata 13 February 2020 11: 03 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            I hope that it’s decent, the enemies do not sleep. Interson will then read reviews on the operation and use.
  • Fibrizio 13 February 2020 10: 48 New
    • 4
    • 7
    -3
    Quote: Thrall
    The performance / cost indicator is more important so far.

    Then you need to take anti-tank systems and not tanks. There, this ratio surpasses.
    And only their collision will show better / worse. Which so far is not particularly observed.
    Our iron is perhaps better. For digital technologies this is unlikely, for example, for example, all normal domestic-made thermal imagers based on imported matrices. Do you think someone will sell this latest-generation military equipment to our country ?. We do not even produce our own calculators (from and to), so it will be strange if we surpass the leaders in the filling.
  • smaug78 13 February 2020 10: 48 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    It would be great!
  • smaug78 13 February 2020 10: 49 New
    • 6
    • 12
    -6
    Quote: Olgovich
    UVZ: Serial deliveries of the T-90M “Breakthrough” will begin this year

    What about Armata?

    Do not step on the sore spot of hurray patriots.
    1. carstorm 11 13 February 2020 11: 07 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      But what does patriotism have to do with it? difficulties were expected by all and those who are in the subject are little surprised. t 14 is too complicated and new to make everything work out quickly. and it’s better to let them bring to mind normally than then to arrange dances in the troops along with representatives of the plant.
      1. smaug78 13 February 2020 11: 18 New
        • 5
        • 3
        +2
        Despite the fact that since 2015, the ura-patriots have been waving checkers, kirdyk you Abrams. And in response to fair comments that you first need to wait for the tank to be adopted and launched into the series, cheeks and so on are inflated. It is strange that you did not notice this ...
        1. carstorm 11 13 February 2020 11: 20 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          this is done either by children or those who are not related to tanks. from the series, my dad is the strongest and your dad is getting hit. point to focus on this? Well they say and they say. the dog barks the caravan goes.
          1. smaug78 13 February 2020 11: 26 New
            • 0
            • 3
            -3
            children need to be raised ...
  • Ratmir_Ryazan 13 February 2020 10: 49 New
    • 9
    • 3
    +6
    Everything is good, it’s bad that there is no KAZ on the T-90M and this is a very significant minus.

    When will it come to the leadership of the army and the country that a tank with a KAZ is cheaper and more economical than burying the crew, preparing a new barge and making a new tank to replace the destroyed one ?!

    Yes, KAZ will not give a 100% guarantee of security, but it significantly increases the survivability of tanks from ATGM fire and even sub-caliber ammunition.

    And besides, I see no reason not to give KAZ to protect the upper hemisphere of the tank, which will protect it from the defeat of the 3rd generation ATGM, as well as damage by helicopters and aircraft !!!

    KAZ anti-missile is several times cheaper than ATGM or helicopter anti-tank missiles !!!

    KAZ gives the tank excellent protection, so when will it be put on our tanks ?!
    1. Nastia makarova 13 February 2020 10: 51 New
      • 4
      • 8
      -4
      effective KAZ has not yet been developed
      1. Grigory_45 13 February 2020 17: 02 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: Nastia Makarova
        effective KAZ has not yet been developed

        and Israeli trophy? (checked in real databases) Russian Arena? Russian Afghan? All are not effective ???
        1. Nastia makarova 13 February 2020 17: 15 New
          • 1
          • 3
          -2
          I'm talking about the Russian kaz, what you two called for some reason can’t satisfy me
          1. Grigory_45 13 February 2020 20: 44 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Nastia Makarova
            for some reason they don’t satisfy me

            where are the firewood from? Shoigu shared information? If anything, then the Arena, and Afghanit, and Drozd have the letter O1. Do you know what that means?
            1. Nastia makarova 14 February 2020 07: 41 New
              • 1
              • 2
              -1
              there were articles that the Defense Ministry did not satisfy one or another KAZ
              1. Grigory_45 14 February 2020 10: 32 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: Nastia Makarova
                there were articles that the Defense Ministry did not satisfy one or another KAZ

                links can ???

                The letter O1 means that the product has passed the entire test cycle and is ready and recommended to mass production (which, translated into Russian, understandable to women, suits the Customer)
                1. Nastia makarova 14 February 2020 11: 51 New
                  • 1
                  • 1
                  0
                  if everything suits then why not release?
                  1. Grigory_45 14 February 2020 11: 54 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Quote: Nastia Makarova
                    if everything suits then why not release?

                    the reason is financial. KAZ thing is quite expensive. It is not even known whether KAZ will remain in the basic configuration of Almaty and Kurganets (on the front cars complexes are installed)
    2. Grigory_45 13 February 2020 17: 01 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
      it’s bad that there is no KAZ on the T-90M and this is a very significant minus.

      unquestionably

      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
      KAZ will not give a 100% guarantee of security, but it significantly increases the survivability of tanks from ATGM fire and even sub-caliber ammunition

      Well, KAZ with the ability to intercept BOPS is complex and very expensive. In the current realities, when 90% of the ammunition issued by the tank is ATGMs and RPG grenades, I consider it quite possible to get by with a relatively simple KAZ capable of intercepting only the above ATGMs and grenades

      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
      KAZ anti-missile is several times cheaper than ATGM or helicopter anti-tank missiles !!!

      counter-ammunition - yes, but not the complex itself. KAZ is not a cheap thing. Apparently, this is the only reason that it is not installed on domestic armored vehicles.

      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
      When will it come to the leadership of the army and the country that a tank with a KAZ is cheaper and more economical than burying the crew, preparing a new barge and making a new tank to replace the destroyed one ?!

      So I would like to know the answer to this question. Following the Israelis, the Americans reached out already, the Chinese, Germans and French would soon catch up, and we ... Despite the fact that the USSR was in the lead in developing these systems.
  • smaug78 13 February 2020 10: 50 New
    • 2
    • 9
    -7
    Quote: Thrall
    Quote: Olgovich
    What about Armata?

    At a cost 2 times lower than Abrams, Breakthrough will be one and a half times more effective.
    And Armata will wait.

    What are you saying? Share the information.
    1. carstorm 11 13 February 2020 11: 08 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      oh well harol troll. like a child to her God. what information to share with you about the car about which few people specifically know something? go gosy. that's all.
  • _Ugene_ 13 February 2020 10: 51 New
    • 3
    • 4
    -1
    the tank is good, but without KAZ they will burn like matches from ATGMs
    1. bars1 13 February 2020 18: 33 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Unfortunately, the Soviet / Russian tanks and tankers are not accustomed to burning more than other colleagues - opponents ... they drive the shaft due to quality If earlier this was related to production, now due to lack of funds it has spread to modernization (T-72B3)
  • bars1 13 February 2020 10: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The main thing is not to forget to upgrade ALL already built T-90 to the level of T-90M
    1. Zaurbek 13 February 2020 11: 41 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Like 50% T90M, this is a modernization of the T90
  • Sergei 777 13 February 2020 11: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The main question is will Arena-M be installed?
  • BARKAS 13 February 2020 11: 14 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Again, nothing is said about KAZ Arena M or not?
    1. Zaurbek 13 February 2020 11: 40 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Not the fact that the Arena is already. In the news they wrote about the testing of the Arena modification and the Drozd modification ...
  • smaug78 13 February 2020 11: 16 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Quote: carstorm 11
    oh well harol troll. like a child to her God. what information to share with you about the car about which few people specifically know something? go gosy. that's all.

    That is, shaking the air is normal? Or the author of the post, the bearer of secret knowledge, since he did not even indicate which modification of the Abrams 1,5 times exceeds the T-90M? laughing
  • voyaka uh 13 February 2020 11: 39 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    "foreign, they say that this is not a modernized tank, this is a new tank." ///
    ----
    What is fundamentally new?
    Can he shoot unitary long OBPS? This is a question of questions.
    Those OBPSs that are now can’t penetrate Abrams’ forehead.
    1. _Ugene_ 13 February 2020 20: 57 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      it is not yet clear if in it 2A82 then it can be the “Vacuum-1” bps, but the information is contradictory, for example
      Officials at the Russian military-industrial complex confirmed that there will be no 2A82 on the T-90M. Instead of a cannon from "Almaty" they install the modernization of the old - 2A46-M5.
    2. Grits 14 February 2020 06: 01 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Those OBPSs that are now can’t penetrate Abrams’ forehead.

      Real heroes always go around
  • Zaurbek 13 February 2020 11: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In some sources, gun 2a46, others 2a82 ....
    1. bars1 13 February 2020 18: 40 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      They say the production of 2a82 problems. Like the Ukrainians with tank guns, by God ... Fraternal peoples, whatever you say.
      1. Zaurbek 14 February 2020 11: 01 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I read it ..... but last week they wrote about 2A82 on the T90M ...... product trunks are complex, they write that metallurgists have problems, they can’t do stubs for trunks (namely 2a82) stably. This also applies to sniper rifles (advanced).
    2. Cympak 14 February 2020 10: 55 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      If you watch the famous video "Military Acceptance" about the T-90M

      At 9:35 am, the head of the Research and Testing Center for Armored Vehicles of the 3rd Central Research Institute of the RF Ministry of Defense, Colonel Alexander Panteleev says: "The barrel is used the same ..."
  • alex aircraft 13 February 2020 12: 28 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    It is not clear is the newly built T90 or the modernization of the earlier released?
    1. Odysseus 13 February 2020 15: 13 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Answered below.
  • master 52 13 February 2020 12: 48 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    great news any movement forward and the arrival of new equipment is an indicator that the factories are working, the engineers think, and the army receives the equipment
  • Odysseus 13 February 2020 15: 08 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Who are the fairy tales about the "unknown quantity" for?
    30 tanks were supposed to arrive in 2019. 10 already built (for the first time since 2011 our army would have received new tanks), 20 alterations. This did not happen, respectively, the deadlines were postponed to 2020. Then another 30 tanks. In the long term, they were going to remake all the remaining T-90 A.
    The authorities themselves “boasted” about these numbers.
    It’s sad that people have a memory like goupe fish ....
  • Grits 14 February 2020 06: 02 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Will the T-9B72 be put up or chased at the May 3 parade?
  • Alexey-74 14 February 2020 10: 31 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I think the T-90M BREAKTHROUGH is really a breakthrough in our tank building, now the task is to update our armored fleet with emphasis on this MBT ... well, Armata is a tank of a different level and it will come to it, but later ....
  • Bshkaus 14 February 2020 22: 49 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Of course you don’t be offended, but recently we have had good “breakthroughs” only dams are obtained.
    As a citizen of a great power, pumped up on television with patriotism, I would like to see the new “outdated” T-90 there, but a real “Kuzkin’s mother” in the form of hundreds and thousands of Armata tanks, but I still don’t find a clear answer why they are still missing after such a pompous presentation.