The first French nuclear "Barracuda" began testing

38
The first French nuclear "Barracuda" began testing

The French lead multipurpose nuclear submarine Suffren of the new Barracuda project began immersion tests. The first static dive took place at the Naval Group shipyard in Cherbourg (Normandy). It is reported by Naval News.

The static diving procedure allows you to check the reliability of the sealing of the submarine, as well as evaluate its stability in the underwater position. After checking for leaks, the submarine will go to sea tests until the end of the first quarter, which will last several weeks. At the first stage, off the coast of Cherbourg, the submarine will continue to develop static dives of the submarine without the use of a mover. Then, "Suffren" will make the transition in the vicinity of Brest, where it will perform deep sea dives.



At the end of summer and early autumn, tests of weapons systems off the coast of Toulon are planned.

The submarine, dubbed Suffren - in honor of the French admiral Suffren de Saint-Tropez - was built over 10 years. It was laid in December 2007, launched on July 12, 2019, the transfer to the customer is planned at the end of this year.

The project "Barracuda" is one of the largest defense projects in France, even the fact that French President Emmanuel Macron and the Minister of Defense Florence Parley attended the ceremony of its "launching" show this.

The project to build six nuclear submarines of the new generation was launched in 1998 year and was initially estimated at 7,9 billion euros. But the costs eventually exceeded nine billion. Due to technical difficulties, the project was also delayed for three years.

Submarines of this series are to replace in the French Navy obsolete Rubis-type submarines built between 1976 and 1993 a year.

The submarine's displacement is about 5300 T, the length is 99 m, the service life of a nuclear reactor reaches 10 years. Submarines will be armed with Scalp Naval and Exocet cruise missiles, as well as heavy Black Shark torpedoes.
  • https://www.navalnews.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -13
    12 February 2020 16: 38
    Truly, for the price it is not a barracuda fish, it is a pure white shark! 9 billion is the French Zumwalt for the submarine fleet!
    1. +8
      12 February 2020 18: 15
      Quote: Thrifty
      Truly, for the price it is not a barracuda fish, it is a pure white shark! 9 billion is the French Zumwalt for the submarine fleet!

      Sir, you are truly "thrifty"! laughing
      But 9 lard not for one, but for 6 units - total: 1,5 for each. Now they are worth it. What is there to be surprised, all the more so, the Eureka is not ours - the French!
      AHA.
      1. -4
        12 February 2020 19: 27
        Let's see how quickly they will "pull" when mass construction begins, if it starts. It is possible that the price tag will go down a lot for 9 lard, so the series will have to be cut. It's too early to say, but the fact that it took a long time to build is a fact.
  2. +3
    12 February 2020 16: 39
    Displacement of the submarine - about 5300 tons, length - 99 m

    If not mistaken, the smallest (combat) nuclear submarine in the world. From that and the complexity of the project.
    In general, the French love to "pull an owl on a globe", otherwise they will succeed as with Charles de Gaulle. He just did not get out of the repair.
    ... the service life of a nuclear reactor reaches 10 years.

    And here, it seems like a typo. Something very little 10 years!
    1. 0
      12 February 2020 17: 28
      The prototype (Ruby) is even smaller. You need to understand the replacement of 6 by 6. Only if the budget-emigrants allow you to somehow feed.
      1. +6
        12 February 2020 18: 14
        Quote: knn54
        Only whether the budget allows immigrants to somehow feed.

        hi We must pay tribute to the French, they, almost the only ones in continental Europe, who keep their gunpowder dry. So let's see.
      2. +7
        12 February 2020 19: 06
        Quote: knn54
        The prototype (Ruby) is even smaller. You need to understand the replacement of 6 by 6. Only if the budget-emigrants allow you to somehow feed.

        Well, honestly, we found something to worry about. About the French budget and their migrants. Their migrants live better than many of our citizens.
      3. -3
        12 February 2020 19: 28
        Yes. With such prices, it would not have been necessary to cut the series.
    2. 0
      12 February 2020 22: 01
      Quote: Kurare
      Something very little 10 years!

      this is the period until the reactor core is rebooted (fuel change). On Soviet-built boats, the reload time of the reactors was the same 8-10 years. Americans have more - from 20 to 30 years between periods of change of the active zone. It also depends on the intensity of operation of the reactor.
  3. +2
    12 February 2020 16: 40
    I wonder where the French are yanking on their boats. Basically, talk about ours and the striped, and about these and the British somehow silence.
    1. +3
      12 February 2020 17: 18
      Protect the native shore))
  4. +1
    12 February 2020 16: 41
    Something strange among the French, all military equipment is obtained, for which they won’t take it, it costs like gold by weight.
    1. +3
      12 February 2020 17: 20
      Precisely, both Leclerci and Rafali seem to be sawing from gold. Prices do not really match the competition.
      1. 0
        12 February 2020 19: 29
        So the boats also stand - be healthy, with a very relative quality.
    2. +2
      12 February 2020 17: 46
      They cram more super-duper lotions, and the series is small. So it turns out their technology is more expensive than gold.
    3. +9
      12 February 2020 18: 51
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      Something strange among the French, all military equipment turns out ...
      "It's a penchant for grace," as one Western fan said. Interestingly, the Barracuda is 2 times more Rubies in displacement, but 2,5 times less than our Ash ... Half the size of Virgins. A sort of "little inch" from the kingdom of Neptune. But nevertheless, it carries 20 units of weapons, including Scalpa, heavy TO (coupled BIUS with their heavy t-doy F-21 Artemis, now you can refuse English products!). We looked at the Germans and stuck a MICA-IR underwater missile, developed on the basis of RVV SD with a 2-mode IR seeker. The start is underwater, in a capsule, but the radius is up to 20 km and the height is up to 8, it seems ... So, the Germans have only to wipe themselves off with their MANPADS. We also worked on underwater controllability at large moves. The X-shaped stern plumage with rudders prevents the stern from sagging during circulation. They also borrowed this from the Norgen. We worked on the noise ... But it was not impressed - 45-50 dB is more than that of the 885M on the GEDs ... Yes, they also borrowed from the Yankees the idea of ​​a capsule (Sea Wolfe) for combat swimmers. But only 12 people fit. The scope is not the same ... Amy 36 shoved!
      Interestingly, out of 60 crew members, only 4 quartermasters (contractors) are the remaining officers and non-commissioned officers (midshipmen), which implies a high professional level of training for submarine crews.
      Quote: Omskgazmyas
      Cram more super-duper lotions ...

      They have one interesting detail - tech. decision. They combined the nuclear power plants and the PUF into one energy block ... And 10 years, this is the term for the reloading of fuel elements.
      Here is a brief summary of what we managed to find on the "baby with shark teeth".
  5. +5
    12 February 2020 16: 45
    The boat is interesting in that it is “small” ... very expensive and with incomprehensible performance characteristics.
    The French - may have opened a new niche ... or maybe screwed up.
    I like the idea of ​​Small submarines with nuclear reactors - I like it. But I am not a submariner at all. feel
    1. -5
      12 February 2020 16: 56
      The service life of a nuclear reactor reaches 10 years.

      If this is so, then screwed up. Or can you put a new reactor later? Maybe it's some kind of French know-how?
    2. +4
      12 February 2020 18: 12
      Quote: Hunter 2
      The French - may have opened a new niche ... or maybe screwed up.
      I like the idea of ​​Small submarines with nuclear reactors - I like it.

      I also expressed the opinion that a small boat with a nuclear reactor should be better than the same boat with VNEU. In every way. Yes, even if with a full electric motor, and a supply of batteries - a kind of hybrid. When we connect all sources - the speed is up to 40 knots! Purely at the reactor - up to 30, on batteries, quietly - 20 ... Ours just possess the necessary technologies. And the smaller the boat - the more secretive it is ... Crews of 20 people. All the same, the 21st century. Automation...
  6. 0
    12 February 2020 16: 47
    Promising French naval cruise missile to destroy ground targets NCM (Naval Cruise Missile, French abbreviation MdCN). Is there accurate data on its performance characteristics?
    KR NCM is based on the design of the Scalp EG rocket and was previously designated as Scalp Naval, but is made in a narrower fuselage. The NCM missile is created in two versions - a vertical launch, for launching from the Sylver A70 runway, and a boat launch, for launching from 533-mm submarine torpedo tubes. Estimated firing range exceeds 1000 km.

    https://bmpd.livejournal.com/1019043.html
  7. +4
    12 February 2020 17: 09
    Quote: Kurare
    And here, it seems like a typo. Something very little 10 years!

    Reboot possible after 10 years
    1. 0
      12 February 2020 18: 15
      Quote: Old26
      Reboot possible after 10 years

      Yes, and this is not enough! But, the boat is very small, which means that the dimensions of the reactors are on the verge of possible. So, it may well be that you are right.
      1. SAG
        -1
        13 February 2020 01: 31
        Quote: Kurare
        But, the boat is very small, which means that the dimensions of the reactors are on the verge of possible. So, it may well be that you are right.

        That is, Poseidon did not impress you with its size? laughing
        1. 0
          13 February 2020 11: 21
          First - Poseidon unmanned aerial vehicle. You can compare it with the inhabited submarine, but immodestly.
          And secondly - Poseidon "one-time", ie. like a cruise missile under water. After all, they also do not put a drive on it with a resource of several hundred hours, it makes no sense. It's the same with Poseidon's mover.
          1. SAG
            0
            13 February 2020 23: 26
            Quote: Kurare
            First - Poseidon unmanned aerial vehicle. You can compare it with the inhabited submarine, but immodestly.
            And secondly - Poseidon "one-time", ie. like a cruise missile under water. After all, they also do not put a drive on it with a resource of several hundred hours, it makes no sense. It's the same with Poseidon's mover.

            Let's start again, because you apparently did not understand the essence of the comment. You wrote that the dimensions of the reactor are on the verge of possible. I tried to hint that this is not even close. And then the purpose and technical characteristics for some reason began to compare ...
            1. 0
              14 February 2020 11: 40
              Quote: SAG
              You wrote that the dimensions of the reactor are on the verge of possible. I tried to hint that this is not even close.

              That's just the point that on the verge of possible for combat submarine... It can be compared with "Losharik", it is also smaller than "Barracuda". But "Losharik" does not travel at a speed of 25 knots, and "Poseidon" does not need either the protection of the crew or the durability of the nuclear power plant. Therefore, he hinted that the comparison is incorrect.
              1. SAG
                0
                14 February 2020 17: 51

                That's just the point that on the verge of possible for combat submarine... It can be compared with "Losharik", it is also smaller than "Barracuda". But "Losharik" does not travel at a speed of 25 knots, and "Poseidon" does not need either the protection of the crew or the durability of the nuclear power plant. Therefore, he hinted that the comparison is incorrect.

                The comparison is correct, because combat apl does not have to be inhabited (technologies are developing). What do you mean by crew protection and what is your data on the Poseidon YaU resource?
                1. 0
                  14 February 2020 18: 03
                  Quote: SAG
                  The comparison is correct, because combat apl does not have to be inhabited (technologies are developing).

                  That's when Barracuda becomes uninhabited, then we will compare.
                  Quote: SAG
                  ... do you have data on the Poseidon YaU resource?

                  Such data are not available in open sources, but for the dissemination of these you can lose your head)) My assumptions are based on analogies, the same cruise missiles.
                  1. SAG
                    0
                    14 February 2020 18: 08
                    That is, the bottom line: Two nuclear submarines on underwater vehicles (about the life of which we reliably do not know anything), but the size of the Russian installation ON ORDER less french hi(Of course, the French have more power, but the specific power is probably no more than yes)
                    1. 0
                      14 February 2020 18: 41
                      Power is one thing. But the crew protection. They, just right on Poseidon, can be neglected. Further, it is not required to restart the reactor at Poseidon, it probably has enough fuel for one trip. In Barracuda, of course, there are more of it. Further, systems providing secrecy on submarines are more developed, which means that they take up a lot of space. You can still list a lot.

                      As for the specific power, I think that Poseidon will give a considerable head start. Well, so they have different tasks. hi
  8. +2
    12 February 2020 17: 17
    For the whole fleet. And the French, too, see the manners ..
    1. -2
      12 February 2020 18: 02
      Their admirals also want to eat ...
  9. 0
    12 February 2020 18: 01
    The project to build six nuclear submarines of the new generation was launched in 1998 year and was initially estimated at 7,9 billion euros. But the costs eventually exceeded nine billion. Due to technical difficulties, the project was also delayed for three years.


    Yes, China can give everyone a head start, I don’t know about boats on surface for sure ...
    1. +3
      12 February 2020 18: 06
      Well, it’s still not known what quality the Chinese ships are riveting at such a pace
      1. +3
        12 February 2020 18: 27
        I agree, time will tell ...
  10. -2
    12 February 2020 22: 04
    They built it for 12 years ... But it’s interesting, the French all-embracers (if there are any) cried that in France they forgot how to quickly build submarines?
  11. 0
    13 February 2020 13: 11
    Quote: SAG
    That is, Poseidon did not impress you with its size?

    And not tired of always and everywhere trump "Poseidon"? We are talking about the nuclear submarine, its dimensions and the fact that the operating time of the reactor is 10 years. What side is "Poseidon" here at all ???

    Quote: TermNachTER
    Let's see how quickly they will "pull" when mass construction begins, if it starts. It is possible that the price tag will go down a lot for 9 lard, so the series will have to be cut. It's too early to say, but the fact that it took a long time to build is a fact.

    We will see. But they usually fulfill their plans. Whether the price tag will go much beyond 9 lard or not is still unknown. For the French, if the price tag goes away, then not much .. I agree about the long construction. But our headquarters were also built oh how long. That the boats of the project "Ash", that "Borey"

    Quote: Sky Strike fighter
    Is there accurate data on its performance characteristics?

    Previously, the shipborne cruise missile for the destruction of ground targets NCM (MdCN) was called Scalp Naval.
    Available in two versions. Boat and ship. The boat is fired through a 533 mm caliber TA, the ship is fired from the Sylver A-70 vertical launcher.
    range in the boat version - 1000 km, in the ship - 1400 km. Length - 5,5 m, diameter 500 mm. Starting - 1400 kg. carries 300kg warhead
  12. 0
    13 February 2020 23: 30
    we are not the brakes, but we think ours are already there, noise, etc. (TTX) will appreciate the future

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"