23 July 1985 for the first time was launched on combat duty by a mobile soil missile system "Topol"

31
23 July 1985 for the first time was launched on combat duty by a mobile soil missile system "Topol"In February, 1983, the famous PGRK Topol passed its first tests. The first test flight of the rocket was conducted at the Plesetsk 8 cosmodrome in February 1983 of the year. The first launches were made from modified stationary type mines in which RT-2P missiles were previously based. All launches were successful, except for one. The tests continued until December 23 1987, during which time a total of 70 Topol launches were made. In 1984, the construction and equipment of sites for the installation of combat systems began, the patrol routes of the Topol mobile missile systems, service areas, obsolete types of missiles, in turn, were removed from the positions. After successful completion of the first series of tests by the middle of 1985 (1985 test launches took place in April 15), the PT-2М rocket was put into service, and on July 23 1985 in Yoshkar-Ola entered the first regiment of the PGRK on combat duty. At the same time, tests related to the combat control system continued. Missile tests ended only 23 December 1987 of the year, and test activities of the entire missile complex ended only in December 1988 of the year. That is why the final decision on the adoption of the Topol complex was made only in December 1988 of the year, that is, three and a half years after the start of the actual operation. At the time of the signing of the START-1 Treaty in 1991, the USSR had at its disposal 288 Topol missile systems. After the signing of START-1, the work on the improvement of these systems was continued. At the end of 1996, the Strategic Missile Forces of the Russian Federation deployed 360 combat units to the Topol PGRK. Since then, at least one control launch of a Topol rocket from the Plesetsk test site has been carried out every year. During testing and operation, several dozen missile test and test launches were performed. All of them were successful.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union 81 combat unit PGRK Topol remained on the territory of the Republic of Belarus. 13 August 1993, the withdrawal of the Topol PGRK grouping from Belarus began, and it was completed on November 27 1996. According to July 2006, 243 mobile Topol missile systems are in service. They are located in the areas of settlements Teikovo, Yoshkar-Ola, Yurya, Nizhny Tagil, Novosibirsk, Kansk, Irkutsk, Barnaul, Vypolzovo. An interesting fact is that the Topol complex is the first Soviet strategic ballistic missile, whose name was declassified in the Soviet press, in an article that refutes the accusations of the American side that Russia seems to be testing a new missile system in violation of the Arms Control Treaty.

29 November 2005 of the year was carried out training launch of a ballistic missile RS-12M "Topol" from the Plesetsk cosmodrome on the target at the Kamchatka test site Kura. By that time, the rocket had been in service for 20 for years. This was the first case in practice, not only of domestic, but also of world rocket production, when such a complex launch of a rocket, which had been operated for so long, was successfully implemented.

Battle shooting "Topol" continue and pass more often. Over the past year there have been three successful missile tests. This refers to the launch of Topol from the Plesetsk 3 September 2011 of the year, the November shooting and missile tests that took place at the Kapustin Yar testing ground recently, 7 June 2012 of the year. The tasks of the test run were completed in full. In the course of the June tests, missilemen received information on the various parameters of the Topol’s work, which can be used in the development of new effective means of overcoming the missile defense system of a potential enemy.
June missile tests
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. iSpoiler
    -1
    23 July 2012 09: 01
    Pinned fire extinguishers in the foreground ....
    "The people we have a fire, a nuclear bomb is burning, we need to extinguish .......... Pashol on ..... idiot, we need to *** ............ budyzhschschsch" ))))))))))))

    In general, I’m glad that they continue to launch, and they are modernizing ..... Calmly somehow chtoli.
  2. fern
    +6
    23 July 2012 09: 47
    eh ... The most dangerous tree in the world
    1. tverskoi77
      0
      23 July 2012 10: 42
      there is another name: "X @ Y in the bushes" and also the most dangerous in the world!
    2. +1
      23 July 2012 16: 10
      Forgot about "Ash" ...
  3. 755962
    +5
    23 July 2012 09: 58
    On the night of June 8, residents of several Caucasian and Middle Eastern countries observed an unidentified flying object in the sky. It was best seen in the South Caucasus, including Georgia. Later it became known that we are talking about the Russian Topol-M rocket, which was launched from the Astrakhan region for educational purposes. The leading Georgian expert in this field, the editor-in-chief of the independent military-analytical magazine Arsenali, Irakli Aladashvili said in An RFI interview that the Russian Ministry of Defense simply tested a missile that has long been in service with the Russian army.

    “I think it was not an act of intimidation, but just a missile test. "Topol-M" adopted in service in 1985. During such launches, it is checked whether these missiles can still be in service with the Russian army. By the way, the creator of the Topol-M mobile-soil missile system is the Georgian designer Alexander Nadiradze. "
    1. GG2012
      +7
      23 July 2012 10: 08
      This is how it happens, you sit at your place in Tbilisi, drink "Chacha", eat shashlik-mashlik, drink "Barzhomi", and then it flies ...
      After this, only a tie to bite and stays.
      1. +1
        23 July 2012 20: 29
        GG2012, After this, just bite with a tie and remain .-- if you have time !!!! wink Yes
        1. GG2012
          +5
          23 July 2012 20: 48
          For datur (1) Today, 20:29 ↑
          Saakashvili has a special tie - "SamoVrotClimbing".

          Or here, from "OnlyWhat Invented"
          "The boy drank a little,
          Went to pour under the Topolek.
          Accidentally pressed a button ...
          Where is Britain? They asked in Washington timidly ... "

      2. bamboo
        0
        24 July 2012 19: 45
        + + + + + + + + + laughing better to have a red tie)))
  4. +6
    23 July 2012 10: 12
    I asked the poplar ..
  5. John from the USA
    0
    23 July 2012 10: 30
    The development of 30 years ago is still in operation, in a modified version.
    Yeah!

    It's time to develop a new complex that will overcome Aiges. bully
    1. 0
      23 July 2012 16: 16
      Thickly troll)
  6. +3
    23 July 2012 11: 21
    Good product. This "TREE" is a real guarantee of the sovereignty and independence of Russia.
  7. sxn278619
    -1
    23 July 2012 11: 21
    All the same, it’s not clear, American PU satellites see on the route.
    1. 0
      23 July 2012 13: 12
      bzhrk time to restore. I wonder what route length they see or not7
      1. 755962
        0
        24 July 2012 00: 20
        Quote: oleq197429
        bzhrk time to restore

        BZHRK- THING !!! Eh .... Guess once, why did the Americans order to destroy them in the first place?
    2. -1
      23 July 2012 16: 32
      Quote: sxn278619
      All the same, it’s not clear, American PU satellites see on the route.

      Probably not. I will explain why I made such conclusions.
      Firstly, the number of satellites is not unlimited and they are not in geostationary orbits.
      Secondly, their position at a given time interval is known and the time of entry into the calculation zone is known.
      1. Valboro
        +2
        23 July 2012 22: 30
        The answer is: they see, and almost always in real time. Several ranges of reconnaissance satellites provide visibility and tracking. It was back in the 80s. By the way, like the BZHRK. These satellites were also seen by our satellites - the corresponding research was carried out. And one more thing: geostationaries do not look at this, for this there is a low-orbit grouping.
      2. Akela
        -1
        27 July 2012 14: 37
        Why follow the launchers on the march if you can simply calculate the launch points?
    3. qwerty_zxc
      0
      31 October 2012 14: 44
      of course they see
  8. +5
    23 July 2012 15: 13
    perhaps ............... the best cure for the virus of violent volatile democratization
  9. Wolkin
    0
    23 July 2012 15: 32
    At the end of 1996, the Strategic Missile Forces of the Russian Federation had 360 combat units of the Topol PGRK.

    As of July 2006, 243 Topol mobile missile systems are in service.

    Arithmetic!
    1. +1
      23 July 2012 16: 11
      By the way, nothing surprising. How long is the Topol service life? Somewhere about 25 years old. So they are removed from combat duty. For their place they put "Topol-M" now put "YARS"
      Quote: Wolkin
      As of July 2006, 243 Topol mobile missile systems are in service.

      Count 243 + 18 "Topol-M" +18 "Yars" = 279. And for warheads 315. Parity, however. And now there will be less and less of them. Let's say the Irkutsk division is preparing for rearmament at YARS, and the complexes that have not exhausted their resource are being prepared to transfer somewhere near Novosibirsk to storage bases.
      1. Wolkin
        +1
        23 July 2012 16: 58
        And how much is needed for a guaranteed defeat of a probable enemy?
        And if he will defend himself and he has a great missile defense? And how many warheads does a likely enemy have as opposed to ours?
        1. -1
          23 July 2012 17: 37
          Quote: Wolkin
          And how many warheads does a likely enemy have as opposed to ours?

          The United States, like us, will have 1550 deployed warheads under the agreement. Now something about 3000 on each side.

          Quote: Wolkin
          And how much is needed for a guaranteed defeat of a probable enemy? And if he defends himself and he has an excellent missile defense?


          It depends on what you want to use the Strategic Missile Forces for. If you want to inflict damage to the enemy incompatible with the acquired benefits, then it is enough to hit 10-12 targets (New York, Washington, Los Angeles, Beijing, Bangkok, Tokyo, London, Paris, etc.). That is 10% of the available warheads. I think they will certainly fly even with the most modern missile defense. If you destroy the world, then there is no need to fly missiles to the United States. You just need to launch and blow them up over your territory. The United States will do the same, only launches will be on our territory. The only difference is that we die quickly and not hurt, but they are long and painful. (nuclear winter, radioactive rains and clouds, dust and other delights of nuclear war). By the way, scientists calculated that in a nuclear conflict of medium intensity (about 600 javas), about 20-25% of the world's population will survive. And it doesn’t matter where the nuclear weapons will be
          1. Eugene
            +3
            23 July 2012 17: 43
            Write some tales from the Cold War.
            Quote: skiff-1980
            By the way, scientists calculated that in a nuclear conflict of moderate intensity (about 600 javasters), about 20-25% of the world's population will survive. And it doesn’t matter where the nuclear weapons will be

            600 jav, what type? Air? Underwater?
            If we consider air:
            We take the most massive warhead in service with the United States:
            1 W74 = 100Kt
            100 W74 = 10Mt
            600 W74 = 60Mt

            AN-602 57Mt and no one died.
            1. -1
              23 July 2012 18: 01
              Quote: Eugene
              600 jav, what type? Air? Underwater? If we think air: We take the most massive warhead in service with the United States: 1 W74 = 100Kt100 W74 = 10Mt600 W74 = 60MtAN-602 57Mt and no one died.

              What they said is not clear.
              You think that after a nuclear war we will live long and happy, I doubt it. Look at how much dust was raised and where the cloud reached. Then imagine that this dust is raised over a large area. While she settles plants and animals simply die out. And these are not fairy tales.
              The bottom line is that nuclear weapons are not weapons of attack, but weapons of deterrence. If nuclear weapons could not cause irreparable harm to the environment, then the United States would have used it back in 62
              1. Eugene
                +3
                23 July 2012 18: 16
                Quote: skiff-1980

                What they said is not clear.

                You do not understand what they write to you?

                You wrote that 600 jav will arrange hell and a nightmare on Earth, and it makes no difference where to blow them. I asked what type of explosions you would be, and gave an example from the life of the AN-602 (Tsar-Bomb if you understand this), which was blown up on October 30, 1961 on the Novaya Zemlya archipelago (you said anywhere) had a capacity of 57 Mt. power to the 600 W74 warheads that make up the U.S. base. As a result of this explosion, nothing terrible happened. This means that you wrote nonsense or tore information out of context.
                1. +1
                  23 July 2012 19: 35
                  Let's start with the fact that the UGM-133A Trident II (D5) rocket is based not only on the W74 of 100 kt, but also on the W88 of 475. As for the Tsar Bomba, I know about these tests. And the detonation was carried out at an altitude of 4200 meters. And if blown up at an altitude of 300-500 meters. The third shell of the explosive device was made of lead, which made it possible to make the explosion "clean", although the blast wave circled the globe three times. Do you think the thermonuclear warheads have a third lead shell?
                  The W88 warhead for the Trident 2 missile designed according to the Teller-Ulam scheme
                  1. Primary starting charge ("trigger")
                  2. Secondary charge
                  3. "Pusher body": a peanut-shaped capsule body that directs X-rays from the primary to the secondary
                  4. Plastic filler "body-pusher"
                  5. Tritium capacity booster
                  A. Trigger explosive charge
                  B. Plutonium-239
                  C. Tritium and deuterium
                  D. Lithium Deuteride-6
                  E. Uranium 235 initiator
                  F. Compression charge from uranium-235
                  G. Uranium-238 Case

                  And I’m glad for you that you think that after a nuclear war roses will bloom.
                  The essence of the comment was that after World War III, IV, if it happens, will be with stones and spears.
                  1. Vldmr
                    +2
                    23 July 2012 21: 00
                    All models of the onset of a nuclear winter imply an explosion in cities where there are a lot of combustible substances (according to the 1986 model, about 4,5 billion tons in large cities) and the formation as a result of these fire tornadoes that will throw soot into the stratosphere. It also strongly depends on the season, how many forests will burn, etc. etc. High-altitude air explosions will not give much radiation, roughly speaking, only the body of the bomb and the remnants of fissile material, plus fission products, plus a few more radioactive carbon C13 (irradiation of carbon dioxide in the air with neutrons) will be radioactive. Only long-lived isotopes are dangerous, and these are the remnants of fissile matter and fission products, and even then not all. Of course, if you don't make a bomb body from cobalt :))) In the case of a ground explosion, of course, everything is worse, but not so bad. The total activity of radionuclides at the site of a ground explosion falls a million times per day. Regarding the nuclear winter, there was a book by the Canadian journalist Lydia Dotto, like 1986, by the Mir publishing house, if I am not mistaken. Everything was more or less revealed there, but only all this is theory. I think the global pi..tsa will not happen, a couple of three years of very cold years and everything will return to normal. Krakatoa banged 200000 Hiroshim and 18 cu. km of ash in the atmosphere, one cold year and everything settled down. So it's okay :)) And about Kuzkina's mother, the third stage is uranium amplification of almost 3 tons of U238, radioactive mud would of course be added pretty much, the West would go to shit, so they replaced it with lead. And so the third stage would add another 50 MGt. And the fact that a nuclear war on modern mankind will put an end to it - do not go to grandma. Long live Mad Max :))) And the earth will not scratch, it has gone through more than one extinction of living beings and falls of meteorites of 10 km3. One mold will disappear and another will start :)) A holy place is never empty :))))
                    1. Valboro
                      +2
                      23 July 2012 22: 49
                      Dear Skiff-1980. Nice to read professional explanations. I will add to yours: in the 80s, after one of the research projects was carried out, they received that with the simultaneous (in a period of 1-2 days) breaking through the enemy's defense (no matter what), 10% of the charges available at that time and their ground explosions for the country occurs so-called. n. "nuclear winter". And it lasts not 3 years, but 15-20 years. This does not mean that all living things will perish. Probably someone will survive. But the survivors will not celebrate victory, but will fight for their own survival. Maybe even together with the vanquished. That is why they say that nuclear weapons are a deterrent. Any large-scale use of it is death.
                      Unfortunately, even the military does not always understand this. You know, the attitude towards artillery preparation in the Patriotic War. An artillery barrage is carried out before an attack 20 km deep. And now it is possible to "full depth" ... But it is not. The Americans and, I hope, ours understood this long ago.
                  2. Eugene
                    +1
                    24 July 2012 00: 25
                    Quote: skiff-1980
                    To begin with, the UGM-133A Trident II (D5) rocket is based not only on a W74 of 100 kt, but also a W88 of 475.

                    And you take an interest in how many W74 you managed to make, and how many W88 and how fewer there are.
                    Quote: skiff-1980
                    And the blast was carried out at an altitude of 4200 meters. And if you blow it up at an altitude of 300-500 meters.

                    In your comment you did not indicate the type of explosion, so I took the right to choose any convenient for comparison.
                    Quote: skiff-1980
                    And if you blow it up at an altitude of 300-500 meters.

                    It is difficult to say, but there are approximate formulas for calculating.
                    Quote: skiff-1980
                    The third shell of the explosive device was made of lead, which made it possible to make the explosion "clean", although the blast wave circled the globe three times. Do you think the thermonuclear warheads have a third lead shell?

                    Yes, such a decision was made, but it must be taken into account that even though the AN-602 principle used the principle of "radiation implosion" and is very similar to the Teller-Ulam principle, it is still an original development of our scientists and often this type is called either "3rd Sakharov's idea "or, the design itself, by the Trutnev-Babaev scheme named after its developers.
                    In addition, it was also far from perfect and it can not be directly compared with such a modern device as the W74. And the exact data, as always, is under the bar.

                    The rest is described to you by a colleague below. What you described will undoubtedly lead to the deaths of tens of millions of people, but will not destroy their civilization. 600 charges at random points on the earth's surface is not enough for this.
                    If it was a question of several thousand charges with the expectation of destroying oil storage facilities, chemical plants, forests - then I would probably agree and then in doubt, my colleague Vladimir has already written to you about Krakatau, and I am above too. And on the memory of mankind there were more powerful eruptions. Life is a tenacious thing ...
  10. +2
    23 July 2012 16: 16
    Our answer is Their democracies!
  11. Sablezub
    0
    23 July 2012 21: 28
    it is unfortunate that the trains with such sausages were removed from service ... for amers, these trains were like a haemorrhage in a very neglected form ...
    1. -1
      30 July 2012 15: 24
      Trains can be restored in six months. This is not an aircraft carrier with a 0 build. The railway network has never been reduced, on the contrary, we built new branches. :)
  12. Valboro
    +3
    23 July 2012 23: 11
    In the Topol-M video (the 8-axle chassis is clearly visible, the Topol has 6 drive axles and 7 "bulldozer", as the testers said about it). And the launches are not of Poplar, but of Iskander
  13. 0
    24 July 2012 04: 33
    Of course, not everyone will immediately see the arctic fox, but over time, all people will die 100%! We stupidly do not have time to adapt to such a rapid change in the environment, a generation change occurs on average once every 20-25 years. And the holiday will probably come to the streets of insects such as cockroaches. These are the pies ...