Gazprom spoke about the timing of the launch of the Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline

Gazprom spoke about the timing of the launch of the Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline

The launch of the Russian Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline is scheduled for the end of 2020, follows from the presentation of Gazprom, released by investor day.


The Russian company Gazprom announced the launch of the Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline at the end of this year. Earlier, the head of the Ministry of Energy Alexander Novak said the same, who said that the pipeline would be completed despite the pressure of some countries, in particular the USA.

Gazprom itself does not talk about the methods and methods of completing the pipeline; earlier, the operator of the Nord Stream 2 company has denied information about sending requests to the Danish authorities to amend the permission to build the pipeline so that it can be completed, despite US sanctions .

It was alleged that gas pipeline builders were looking for the possibility of building a gas pipeline using tandems - anchor pipe-laying barges in conjunction with vessels equipped with a dynamic positioning system (anchor-less), which is prohibited by the terms of the agreement.

Most likely, the remaining kilometers of the gas pipeline will be laid by the Akademik Chersky crane-assembly and installation pipe-laying vessel, which recently left Nakhodka and is heading for the Baltic Sea. This vessel belongs to Gazprom and in all respects meets the conditions for laying the pipeline.

Last year, Energy Minister Alexander Novak announced that Academician Chersky was the only vessel capable of completing pipe laying for the Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline. He said that to start work he needed additional preparation, which would take some time.

As previously reported, due to US sanctions, the Swiss company Allseas withdrew its vessels from the pipeline construction area, thereby halting construction. To date, it remains to lay no more than 130 km of pipes along the bottom of the Baltic Sea.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

156 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Theodore 11 February 2020 18: 24 New
    • 12
    • 10
    +2
    Well, right! They know less - more “sensational” in their newspapers! laughing
    1. Thrifty 11 February 2020 18: 32 New
      • 10
      • 11
      -1
      FEODOR - taking into account the fact that the main part about the ship’s campaign to complete the pipe is laid out “for general viewing”, you can’t wait for sensations!
      1. cniza 11 February 2020 20: 30 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        Why? , in our time, everything can be and the ship can go in the wrong place ...
      2. antivirus 11 February 2020 20: 31 New
        • 1
        • 24
        -23
        on completion of the pipe laid out "on public display", sensations can not wait!

        in other words - a small spoon is shown to the whole world ---- the incredible popularity of a small spoon
        "chasers! waiting for cons
        The main relations with the outskirts are the highway and the air + shipbuilding, + villages \ households + labor migration.
        and raw materials are a trifle in a spoon (to determine the level of competencies)
        1. businessv 11 February 2020 21: 47 New
          • 14
          • 0
          +14
          Quote: antivirus
          in other words - a small spoon is shown to the whole world ---- the incredible popularity of a small spoon
          "chasers! waiting for cons

          Colleague, try next time not so chaotically express your thoughts please! drinks
          1. antivirus 12 February 2020 07: 56 New
            • 0
            • 11
            -11
            I am writing to you, and I answer all the minusers for spoons (approx 3-5 months already). FUNNY.
            according to Pavlov, a reflex is developed - I trained him on the word "spoon"
            ON ESSENCE- it is possible to supply raw materials to Europe and the world, but at least return to the level of production of the whole complex of Russian machine-building structures (2 and 3 repartitions) -NADO.
            It is easier to do this on the former USSR.
            Therefore, linking (like the United States and China) raw materials is nevertheless closer and cheaper with our export to the outskirts. Luke must be in our team.
            To crush them in all azimuths for gas-oil + access to the Russian market (we need from Bandera) NO FRIENDSHIP WITH BROTHERS.
            - And also: the censor (?) Tersky (I don’t know for sure) deleted my about “epaulets and points - the site played in the war game. His right.
            1. Piramidon 12 February 2020 08: 16 New
              • 6
              • 1
              +5
              Quote: antivirus
              according to Pavlov, a reflex is developed - I trained him on the word "spoon"

              Yes, as much as you like, train yourself personally, but to equate all users of the site to Pavlov’s dogs is, at least, incorrect. Why should people remember what kind of “spoons” you have there? Especially those who read your post for the first time. request Very similar to some kind of nonsense.
              1. antivirus 13 February 2020 04: 14 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                You’re right, it’s stupid to argue about spoons, it’s strange that a child’s saying so hooked up “patriotic heroes” --- AND WHO WASN’T CONSTRUCTED 5 WHOLE CARRIERS ON GDP FOR ANYONE (AND 300 PIECES SU 77 (??) WASN'T CREATED) -only for a little a spoon.
                I confirm my position - as the authorities consider --- they are building the state-army + navy (for a small spoon)
                a friend had a daughter about 10 years ago, as she grew older, she said such a thing and react like that.
                this is 146% of my hype on delirium (whose?).
                you can ban SMarshak everything, and Nosov

                when it was “driven into the skulls” of those who are objectionable, I will tease (according to my mood) the audience.
                and funny in epaulettes and points - such was the life of the site authors in the 70s-80s.
                philosophy - it is necessary to rejoice that the state is alive and we (with the Russian literary language and "including" little birds ")
            2. businessv 12 February 2020 12: 48 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: antivirus
              It is possible to supply raw materials to Europe and around the world, but at least return to the level of production of the whole complex of machine-building in Russia (2 and 3 repartitions) -NADO.

              Well, only a very narrow-minded person can argue with this! I just think that our government will not agree with us, they don’t need it! Above them here, but does not drip over their children in far abroad countries, so their life was a success!
    2. Arthur 85 11 February 2020 21: 27 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Right. And then they chat like women in the market. Sometimes you open the news and grab your head: why, cretins / enemies of the people, do you publish this? Moreover, in such a context that it even causes me some irritation, and uncle Vasya will cause fierce hatred in a locksmith ...
  2. Victor_B 11 February 2020 18: 28 New
    • 15
    • 8
    +7
    More than once the Americans will shit under the door!
    Lots and lots!
    They just got a taste.
    Denmark, in fact, lured the highway into its waters, and Gazprom could go around, the pipelayers would also leave, but the work could be continued from any barges.
    In general, “saving” on the route was already more expensive.
    1. Pete mitchell 11 February 2020 18: 34 New
      • 20
      • 9
      +11
      Quote: Victor_B
      More than once the Americans will shit under the door! Lots and lots! They just got a taste.

      But it’s wildly interesting for me: runaways and those who did not do the job, is there a legal way to punish and demand compensation? The contract is drawn up competently or so, on the fingers without the responsibility of the parties
      1. Barmaleyka 11 February 2020 19: 16 New
        • 7
        • 8
        -1
        Quote: Pete Mitchell
        The contract is drawn up competently or so

        as always .... so
      2. Terenin 11 February 2020 19: 16 New
        • 11
        • 6
        +5
        Pete hi
        If there would be
        Quote: Pete Mitchell
        The contract is drawn up competently
        that would not be no
        Quote: Pete Mitchell
        runaway and not completed work

        Here, the purest - sloppiness! negative
        1. Prisoner 11 February 2020 19: 40 New
          • 10
          • 10
          0
          Well, what to expect from "effective" (although it would be more true defective) managers and thieves-major lawyers? what
        2. Edik 11 February 2020 20: 57 New
          • 8
          • 2
          +6
          Quote: Terenin
          If there would be
          Quote: Pete Mitchell
          The contract is drawn up competently
          that would not be
          Quote: Pete Mitchell
          runaway and not completed work

          Here, the purest - sloppiness!

          You put yourself in the place of the Swiss.
          Under what conditions would you agree to build a gas pipeline, knowing that the United States can turn on sanctions against you at any time?
          This will be the answer to all your perplexities.
          1. Terenin 11 February 2020 23: 06 New
            • 5
            • 1
            +4
            Quote: Edik
            Quote: Terenin
            If there would be
            Quote: Pete Mitchell
            The contract is drawn up competently
            that would not be
            Quote: Pete Mitchell
            runaway and not completed work

            Here, the purest - sloppiness!

            You put yourself in the place of the Swiss.
            Under what conditions would you agree to build a gas pipeline, knowing that the United States can turn on sanctions against you at any time?
            This will be the answer to all your perplexities.

            Edik, let them think about the Swiss ... request (e.g. Africans)
            I, about our "intellectuals" in the government ...
            1. Edik 12 February 2020 06: 38 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Quote: Terenin
              Edik, let them think about the Swiss ... (for example, Africans)

              And the casket just opens.
              The Swiss, if they are crazy, prescribed in the contract that in the case of US sanctions, they just wash their hands!
              In principle, you can thank them for the work done, it remains only 160 km to finish.

              Quote: Terenin
              I, about our "intellectuals" in the government ...

              No, you're still for the contract!
              A contract concluded, Gazprom and porters.
              1. Terenin 12 February 2020 18: 20 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                Quote: Edik
                No, you're still for the contract!
                A contract concluded, Gazprom and porters.

                Yeah winked .
                As the movie hero B. Shcherbakova said: "You reason correctly, but on the scale ... of a superintendent."
                Edik, this Gazprom with its "analysts" was given to you ...
                I’m talking about the role of the shortsightedness of the Government of Russia (the intrigue of sanctions and the consequences ... belay who would have thought?) in the long disruption of the construction of SP-2. And that’s it.
                1. Edik 12 February 2020 18: 23 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: Terenin
                  I’m talking about the role of the shortsightedness of the Russian Government (the intrigue of sanctions and the consequences ... who would have thought?) In the long disruption of the construction of SP-2. And that’s it.

                  And so it’s you for the Crimea ...
                  1. Terenin 12 February 2020 18: 28 New
                    • 3
                    • 0
                    +3
                    Quote: Edik
                    Quote: Terenin
                    I’m talking about the role of the shortsightedness of the Russian Government (the intrigue of sanctions and the consequences ... who would have thought?) In the long disruption of the construction of SP-2. And that’s it.

                    And so it’s you for the Crimea ...

                    All the best.
                    1. Edik 12 February 2020 18: 34 New
                      • 1
                      • 0
                      +1
                      Gennady, take an interest in these vessels!
                      They would have stood up to us very dearly and not when they hadn’t paid off! But anyway, ours had already insured themselves against this case by buying Academician Chersky.
          2. boss 11 February 2020 23: 31 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            why do we put ourselves in the place of the Swiss ?!
            they had to do the work according to the contract.
            for money.
            for very good money.
            and we should not even be closely worried about their fears, phobias, etc.
            or fines.
            fines covering losses.
            it is a commercial enterprise, there are investors, banks and their investors.
            and yes, there are huge losses arising from unfulfilled work.
            what is there to rassusolit then?
            the fact that the Swiss did not calculate possible political or any other risks are the problems of the Swiss, and if the work was insured, then the insurers.
          3. anzar 12 February 2020 00: 22 New
            • 2
            • 3
            -1
            You put yourself in the place of the Swiss.

            Which ones? Gazprom? After all, he is also registered there. Therefore, as the Swiss and the Swiss ...)))
          4. Nikolai Grek 15 February 2020 22: 36 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Quote: Edik
            You put yourself in the place of the Swiss.

            not worth it ... they didn’t lay it for thanks !!! request
      3. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 19: 52 New
        • 8
        • 7
        +1
        Quote: Pete Mitchell
        the interval is composed correctly or so, on the fingers without the responsibility of the parties

        В any The contract has a clause on liability for the unilateral termination of the contract.
        It’s not necessary to think that “yellow-handed” graduates of law schools are sitting in Gazprom
        1. 210ox 11 February 2020 19: 59 New
          • 14
          • 4
          +10
          Judging by how and how many times Gazprom falls into the headstock, the competence of those responsible is in doubt.
          1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 20: 01 New
            • 8
            • 7
            +1
            Quote: 210ox
            Judging by how and how many times Gazprom falls into the headstock, the competence of those responsible is in doubt.

            Gets in the courts.
            After the verdict "Ukraine is a poor country and therefore Gazprom owes it," not one lawyer will not resist
            1. Pereira 11 February 2020 20: 12 New
              • 8
              • 6
              +2
              Judging by the results, absolutely anyone can work as a lawyer in Gazprom. This is not everyone will be taken to the rig.
              1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 20: 17 New
                • 4
                • 2
                +2
                Quote: Pereira
                Judging by the results, absolutely anyone can work as a lawyer in Gazprom. This is not everyone will be taken to the rig.

                Check out my post a little higher about the courts
                1. Pereira 12 February 2020 21: 08 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  Why did I always know this about the love of bourgeois courts for Russia, but there are no lawyers? Apparently, I'm more professional.
            2. 210ox 11 February 2020 20: 45 New
              • 2
              • 3
              -1
              Well, then, judging by your words, the completion of SP2 by Gazprom alone raises very serious concerns.
              1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 20: 51 New
                • 3
                • 2
                +1
                Quote: 210ox
                Well, then, judging by your words, the completion of SP2 by Gazprom alone raises very serious concerns.

                Yes. I think so too.
                Sticks in the wheels just started to insert. The closer the ending is, the more these sticks will be and they will be thicker
                I do not exclude direct sabotage against our pipe layer
                1. I do not exclude direct sabotage against our pipe layer


                  Exactly! I don’t think it will be combat swimmers, but all sorts of green ones, especially Danish ones!
            3. boss 11 February 2020 23: 36 New
              • 5
              • 1
              +4
              You forgot to specify, a mentally retarded lawyer.
              When concluding contracts, the parties themselves choose a court where they will consider mutual claims.
              The choice of the Stockholm arbitration tribunal, which makes deliberately unfair or biased decisions, is precisely a matter of competence for Gazprom lawyers.
              it turns out that the lawyers in the RF Ministry of Defense are better; they received both money and fines and penalties for undelivered Mistrals, as nice ones.
              and the Stockholm shameful decision is the direct fault of the lawyers, the results of their incompetence, and the lack of analytical and legal departments.
              and now the FSE is to blame, but not them!
              1. kapitan92 12 February 2020 01: 33 New
                • 4
                • 0
                +4
                Quote: patron
                The choice of the Stockholm arbitration tribunal, which makes deliberately unfair or biased decisions, is precisely a matter of competence for Gazprom lawyers.

                There is its own national arbitration, which considers the disputes of companies from their country. There are several arbitration institutes in which the geography of disputes is much wider. These are recognized world arbitration institutions such as the London International Arbitration Court (LCIA), the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC Institute), and the International Arbitration Court of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).
                LCIA (London)
                SCC (Stockholm)
                ICC (Paris)
                Also, to resolve disputes with contractors from certain regions or for other reasons, you can choose slightly less well-known, but no less effective arbitration institutions, which can be distinguished by region:
                American-Australian - American Arbitration Association (AAA);
                Asian - China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC); Japan Commercial Arbitration Association (JCAA); Hong Kong International Arbitration Center (HKIAC); Singapore Center for International Arbitration (SIAC). May be attractive to Russian companies located in Siberia and the Far East;
                European - German Arbitration Institute (DIS); Chamber of Commerce in Geneva (CCIG); Chamber of Commerce in Zurich (ZNK); International Arbitration Court of the Federal Chamber of Economics of Austria (WKO); Belgian Center for Reconciliation and Arbitration (CEPANI); Netherlands Arbitration Institute (NAI), etc. The listed arbitration centers can be selected to resolve disputes with European companies;
                Stockholm arbitration is the most popular arbitration among Russian companies. This is due to the agreement concluded in 1970 between the USSR and the USA ("Optional Arbitration Clause of 1977"), according to which all disputes between organizations from these countries were referred for resolution to this institution. SCC has not lost its leading position for Russian companies at present. The dispute resolution process is as transparent as in London, but slightly less expensive, which is undoubtedly an advantage.
                The court decision in favor of the outskirts is clearly biased, politicized, which does not honor him and “tarnishes” his reputation.
                Do you think that the decision on this issue in London or Paris would be different? hi
              2. Piramidon 12 February 2020 08: 26 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                Quote: patron
                When concluding contracts, the parties themselves choose a court where they will consider mutual claims.

                Do you believe that the Swiss Allseas would have agreed to arbitrate in some Basmanny court in Moscow?
        2. Pete mitchell 11 February 2020 20: 10 New
          • 7
          • 3
          +4
          Gentlemen, I agree with everyone and at the same time I really want Sergey, Lipchanin to be right
          Quote: Lipchanin
          It’s not necessary to think that “yellow-handed” graduates of law schools are sitting in Gazprom

          We have to hope for the best, although events suggest that
          Quote: 210ox
          how and how many times Gazprom gets into the headstock, the competence of those responsible is in doubt.
          1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 20: 18 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Quote: Pete Mitchell
            and at the same time I really want Sergey, Lipchanin to be right

            Thank you hi
            1. Pete mitchell 11 February 2020 20: 23 New
              • 8
              • 1
              +7
              Sergei, I always want to believe in the best, but as I said: I agree with my colleagues, I hope we are mistaken. It cannot be that decent lawyers do not stand behind such a stream of money. I’m forgiven a lot at work, but God forbid to step aside from standard actions and take a chance on your own initiative - it’s not enough
              1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 20: 29 New
                • 5
                • 4
                +1
                Quote: Pete Mitchell
                It cannot be that decent lawyers do not stand behind such a stream of money

                Even the most lawyers cannot resist the state.
                And it was the state that stood up against the construction.
                We will not discount courts. As they judge, we have already seen.
                So, there are already few that depend on lawyers.
                They did their job, made a contract, But how the court will turn everything around, not one lawyer will not say
                1. Pete mitchell 11 February 2020 20: 33 New
                  • 9
                  • 1
                  +8
                  Quote: Lipchanin
                  it was the state that stood up against construction
                  It is certainly impossible to play gambling with the State, but it is time for the Russian Federation to remember how to defend its interests
                  1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 20: 38 New
                    • 4
                    • 2
                    +2
                    Quote: Pete Mitchell
                    It is certainly impossible to play gambling with the State, but it is time for the Russian Federation to remember how to defend its interests

                    Yes, the Russian Federation cannot influence these courts. request
                    They are already bought by the mattress.
                    Soon another farce will begin. Boeing Court
                    And the result is predictable
                    1. Pete mitchell 11 February 2020 20: 51 New
                      • 8
                      • 0
                      +8
                      We'll have to chop without assistants.
                      Quote: Lipchanin
                      Soon another farce will begin. Boeing Court

                      To tell you the truth, I don’t quite understand which side of the Russian Federation is in this matter. The evidence presented does not look confident, it’s more about verbal casuistry. Now the question of closing the airspace in the Rostov zone is very popular with the bourgeoisie, but they have not tried to read the restrictions .. I think that Clintonsha asked the general line for this show / court back in '14: 777 was shot down by a Russian rocket. She told the truth - yes; she said nonsense - yes .., the public is not used to delving into
                      1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 21: 09 New
                        • 3
                        • 1
                        +2
                        Quote: Pete Mitchell
                        The evidence presented does not look confident

                        Yes, they do not need any evidence. From the word at all. Everything has already been decided and scheduled. The court is needed only to oust the true culprit.
                        If the Orcaines weren’t in business, and Russia was to blame, the Americans would have laid out their evidence that “We have them, but we won’t show them to you”
                      2. Pete mitchell 12 February 2020 02: 18 New
                        • 8
                        • 0
                        +8
                        Quote: Lipchanin
                        Everything is already decided and scheduled.

                        We are constantly returning to the discussion about the passivity of the position of the Russian Federation. Perhaps you need to get the candelabra and apply as directed ...
              2. businessv 11 February 2020 21: 56 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: Lipchanin
                And it was the state that stood up against the construction.

                Quite right, moreover, a hostile state with all its "grunts", which makes the task of completing the gas pipeline very difficult, not only technically, because one of the reasons for the sanctions is also money! Indeed, for this time delayed before the start of the Stream, minke whales will be able to enter into the old Europe a lot of their own, quite expensive oil and gas product, but on the contrary, we will lose a lot of benefits!
                1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 22: 08 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Quote: businessv
                  minke whales will be able to suck in an old woman in Europe a lot of her, quite expensive oil and gas product,

                  That's why the Germans did not bend to the last
                  I really don’t know what they are and how now request
              3. doodlez 11 February 2020 22: 32 New
                • 2
                • 2
                0
                And it was the state that stood up against the construction. So you need to defend yourself and not at random. Gazprom What did the states know only yesterday? Where is the domestic pipe-laying machine? What did these managers think.
                1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 22: 41 New
                  • 2
                  • 2
                  0
                  Quote: doodlez
                  So you need to defend yourself and not at random

                  And where did you get the idea that Gazprom acted at random?
                  Where is the domestic pipe-laying machine?

                  Goes to work
                  What did these managers think.

                  Looks like you were the only one thinking for the whole Gazprom
                  Can one replace everyone there?
                  In saving will
                  1. doodlez 12 February 2020 23: 21 New
                    • 0
                    • 1
                    -1
                    And where did you get the idea that Gazprom acted at random? From the facts of their activities, Bulgaria, Ukraine, joint venture 2
                    Going to the place of work. Have you looked at the ship? And why was the ship not ready yesterday? Itichi .......... It looks like you were the only one thinking for the whole Gazprom
                    Can one replace everyone there?
                    For the sake of saving, you will appoint you will find out. P. With maybe the hare will be naive and kind, the West will not appreciate it.
      4. Barmaleyka 11 February 2020 21: 37 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Quote: Lipchanin
        In any contract, there is a clause on liability for the unilateral termination of a contract.

        as well as force majeure situation
        Quote: Lipchanin
        It’s not necessary to think that “yellow-handed” graduates of law schools are sitting in Gazprom

        Quote: Lipchanin
        It’s not necessary to think that “yellow-handed” graduates of law schools are sitting in Gazprom

        Well, judging by some representatives of the government or the governor’s corps, I can quite allow this
        1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 21: 51 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Quote: Barmaleyka
          as well as force majeure situation

          Quote

          In any contract, there is a clause on liability for the unilateral termination of a contract.

          It is about the unilateral termination of work
          Force majeure is prescribed in a separate line
          Well, judging by some representatives of the government or the governor’s corps, I can quite allow this

          I will quote again
          Do not think that in Gazprom sitting "yellow-handed" graduates of law schools

          Where is there even a word about "some representatives of the government or the governor’s corps"?
          1. Barmaleyka 11 February 2020 22: 50 New
            • 1
            • 2
            -1
            Quote: Lipchanin
            It is about the unilateral termination of work
            Force majeure is prescribed in a separate line

            so it will be force majeure
            Quote: Lipchanin
            Where is there even a word about "some representatives of the government or the governor’s corps"?

            Do you think that in state corporations it is different?
            1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 23: 04 New
              • 1
              • 2
              -1
              Quote: Barmaleyka
              so it will be force majeure

              The threat of sanctions?
              And everywhere, force majeure is considered a hurricane, tornado, earthquake. In general, that does not depend on the person.
              Are sanctions related to natural disasters?
              Do you think that in state corporations it is different?

              I believe that the best of the best are being recruited to such an organization.
              They are allowed money to choose just such
              There is a competition for admission more than in any prestigious university
              1. Barmaleyka 11 February 2020 23: 09 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Quote: Lipchanin
                Are sanctions related to natural disasters?

                where did you get that force majeure is only natural disasters ?!
                Quote: Lipchanin
                And everywhere force majeure is considered a hurricane, tornado, earthquake

                everywhere it is only with you
                an unpredictable event, independent of the will of the parties involved in the transaction, but leading to the inability to fulfill contractual obligations
                it is written about the impossibility to fulfill obligations FOR THE TIME of the action of such forces, that is, as soon as the mattresses refuse sanction, they will immediately continue
                Quote: Lipchanin
                I believe that the best of the best are being recruited to such an organization.

                you think so
                Quote: Lipchanin
                There is a competition for admission more than in any prestigious university

                are you reassuring yourself
                give you examples from our not so distant past with crap and other things?
                1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 23: 17 New
                  • 1
                  • 2
                  -1
                  Quote: Barmaleyka
                  independent of the will of the parties involved in the transaction, but leading to the impossibility of fulfilling contractual obligations

                  Is sanction an impossibility? belay
                  Strange, but we live under sanctions and nothing, alive

                  you think so

                  Anyone thinks so normal employer.
                  However, if you want to ruin your company, dial from the street
                  are you reassuring yourself

                  I know that for sure
                  Here is an elementary logic. Bad staff, bad work, no profit.
                  They pay crazy money to players, but they save on staff? Take anyone to work?
                  Well, you probably do that
                  1. Barmaleyka 11 February 2020 23: 21 New
                    • 2
                    • 1
                    +1
                    Quote: Lipchanin
                    Strange, but we live under sanctions and nothing, alive

                    our winter is considered a natural disaster for europe so relax
                    Quote: Lipchanin
                    I know that for sure

                    do you work there
                    Quote: Lipchanin
                    Here is an elementary logic. Bad staff, bad work, no profit.

                    the profit will be a lard more a lard less this is a trifle with those volumes
                    Quote: Lipchanin
                    They pay crazy money to players, but they save on staff?

                    these are show-offs and nothing else
                    Quote: Lipchanin
                    Well, you probably do that

                    Will you forgive who you work for and what is your experience in managing work?
                    1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 23: 36 New
                      • 2
                      • 3
                      -1
                      Quote: Barmaleyka
                      our winter is considered a natural disaster for europe so relax

                      That's right, it does not depend on a person.
                      Sanctions also do not depend on a person?
                      You can’t fight winter.
                      With sanctions too?
                      do you work there

                      Friends work in branches and tell how difficult it is to get a job and what are the requirements
                      the profit will be a lard more a lard less this is a trifle with those volumes

                      Is your head okay?
                      I have nothing to talk about with you.
                      Since you consider sanctions an unstoppable force.
                      Since you think that the largest company signing international contracts is gaining lawyers from the street.
                      Since you think that for the state company BILLION is not money.
                      You are either stupid or an ordinary troll.
                      I have no desire to talk with such a person
                    2. Barmaleyka 11 February 2020 23: 39 New
                      • 2
                      • 2
                      0
                      Quote: Lipchanin
                      how hard it is to get a job and what are the requirements

                      well this is an argument, it is indisputable
                      Quote: Lipchanin
                      I have no desire to talk with such a person

                      according to your disputes, the CTO troll is very visible
                      and in the situation with VTB sberbank and gazprёm, the level of legal experts is very clearly visible, by the way, do not specify the figures for the losses of these three organizations over the past five years in litigation in the west?
                2. Barmaleyka 11 February 2020 23: 22 New
                  • 1
                  • 2
                  -1
                  Quote: Lipchanin
                  Is sanction an impossibility?

                  don’t completely swear a vision, if, as a result of sanctions, the company may go bankrupt, then what impossibility
                3. Barmaleyka 11 February 2020 23: 26 New
                  • 2
                  • 3
                  -1
                  Quote: Lipchanin
                  Is sanction an impossibility?

                  What penalty did France pay for the Mistals? repeat
                  1. Edik 12 February 2020 06: 53 New
                    • 1
                    • 1
                    0
                    Quote: Barmaleyka
                    What penalty did France pay for the Mistals?

                    The French paid 1,12 billion euros.
                  2. Barmaleyka 12 February 2020 08: 05 New
                    • 1
                    • 2
                    -1
                    you see the difference between the return for outstanding volumes and the penalty see ?!
                  3. Edik 12 February 2020 08: 18 New
                    • 1
                    • 1
                    0
                    Quote: Barmaleyka
                    you see the difference between the return for outstanding volumes and the penalty see ?!

                    I see what? What question, such an answer.
                  4. Barmaleyka 12 February 2020 08: 24 New
                    • 1
                    • 2
                    -1
                    so the French did not pay the penalty, they returned the money for what they did not
                  5. Edik 12 February 2020 08: 26 New
                    • 1
                    • 1
                    0
                    Quote: Barmaleyka
                    so the French did not pay the penalty, they returned the money for what they did not

                    No sir, they just paid the penalty.
                  6. Barmaleyka 12 February 2020 08: 42 New
                    • 1
                    • 2
                    -1
                    Penalty (fine, penalty) - the amount of money specified by law or by the contract that the debtor is obligated to pay to the creditor in case of default or improper performance of obligations

                    for Mistral there were no fines returned OUR money
                    800 llamas of payment and another plus for carrying out the experimental work France did not pay ANY FINE
                  7. Edik 12 February 2020 09: 06 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: Barmaleyka
                    800 llamas of payment and another plus for carrying out the experimental work France did not pay ANY FINE

                    No sir, this is exactly what you wrote:
                    Quote: Barmaleyka
                    Penalty (fine, penalty) - the amount of money determined by law or contract that the debtor is obligated to pay to the creditor in case of default or improper performance of obligations

                    Without any advances, pure penalty!
                    As the media present, this is a politicus.
                  8. Barmaleyka 12 February 2020 09: 13 New
                    • 0
                    • 1
                    -1
                    it’s not fines; it’s a refund; not fulfilled volumes, plus we didn’t receive
                  9. Edik 12 February 2020 09: 16 New
                    • 1
                    • 1
                    0
                    Quote: Barmaleyka
                    it’s not fines; it’s a refund; not fulfilled volumes, plus we didn’t receive

                    No sir, this is exactly the penalty for breaking the contract!
                  10. Barmaleyka 12 February 2020 09: 29 New
                    • 0
                    • 1
                    -1
                    Apparently you don’t understand what you are writing about, you paid in advance for making a fur coat, you didn’t make a fur coat for any reason, and you received a refund of any FINE paid in advance, they returned the ADVANCE PAYMENT and by the way not 1.2 lard, but less than one lard, in any case, according to the statement of the French
                  11. Edik 12 February 2020 09: 55 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Vladimir, was wrong, sorry!
                  12. Barmaleyka 12 February 2020 10: 00 New
                    • 1
                    • 1
                    0
                    Quote: Edik
                    was wrong, sorry!

                    is hi
  • major147 11 February 2020 20: 23 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    Quote: Pete Mitchell
    The contract is drawn up competently or so, on the fingers without the responsibility of the parties

    There was information that the situation with the sanctions was laid down in the contract as "force majeure".
    1. Pete mitchell 11 February 2020 20: 31 New
      • 8
      • 1
      +7
      Quote: major147
      sanctions laid down in the contract as "force majeure".
      Then I take off my hat to the lawyers of Gazprom’s counterparties
  • cniza 11 February 2020 20: 34 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    Quote: Pete Mitchell
    Quote: Victor_B
    More than once the Americans will shit under the door! Lots and lots! They just got a taste.

    But it’s wildly interesting for me: runaways and those who did not do the job, is there a legal way to punish and demand compensation? The contract is drawn up competently or so, on the fingers without the responsibility of the parties


    Everyone will write off for force majeure and no one will be able to return anything unless the contract says about possible US actions, which is unlikely ...
  • Nyrobsky 11 February 2020 21: 39 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Quote: Pete Mitchell
    Quote: Victor_B
    More than once the Americans will shit under the door! Lots and lots! They just got a taste.

    But it’s wildly interesting for me: runaways and those who did not do the job, is there a legal way to punish and demand compensation? The contract is drawn up competently or so, on the fingers without the responsibility of the parties
    It depends on what force majeure is considered to be major, if such is specified in the contract - ship flooding, tsunami, diarrhea of ​​the entire crew, etc. that is, force majeure circumstances arising spontaneously. A man-made problem immediately emerged under the pressure of a third party, incl. perhaps the companies that were forced to interrupt the work under the contract will be able to file a lawsuit against this “third party” for compensation for lost profits and for compensation for damages paid in the form of a fine and penalty for outstanding work. Only all this time, and not at all fast.
  • BARKAS 11 February 2020 21: 40 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    In the contract, this situation with sanctions was stipulated in advance as force majeure and no one compensates anyone.
  • antivirus 12 February 2020 08: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    even without fingers - if only Washington was not against it, for the time being. time is running out.
    They distribute candy wrappers for raw materials around the world
  • Observer2014 11 February 2020 20: 25 New
    • 4
    • 6
    -2
    Quote: Victor_B
    More than once the Americans will shit under the door!
    Lots and lots!
    They just got a taste.
    Denmark, in fact, lured the highway into its waters, and Gazprom could go around, the pipelayers would also leave, but the work could be continued from any barges.
    In general, “saving” on the route was already more expensive.

    wink Viktor Petrovich. That's all kind of grown-up people. How can you even start a grandiose project knowing that under the sanction sight without your pipe layers? bullyAnd the second sanctioners, so to speak lol Didn’t find anything better how to spoil the finish line? And eat a fish. And come back for dinner. You can feel the multi-way strategist.?
    1. Lexus 12 February 2020 01: 44 New
      • 4
      • 3
      +1
      “Fairytale” with these “streams”, like an addict / alcoholic who, in order to “throw himself in,” drives with junk stolen from his relatives, at pawnshops, waiting for some huckster to “drive”, and upon returning home "asks to be treated with understanding." Absolutely all the results are more than natural.
  • tihonmarine 11 February 2020 20: 53 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Victor_B
    Denmark essentially lured the track into its waters, and Gazprom could go around

    Something here, not everything looks perfect, somewhere there is some kind of dirty trick.
  • Arthur 85 11 February 2020 21: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Yes, I also thought why these Danish (censorship) were taking time, and I suspected (censorship). Well, here it is.
  • Thrifty 11 February 2020 18: 30 New
    • 4
    • 11
    -7
    So what is there with compensation for the work that was not completed by the Swiss? Is it even written in the contract? Or, as always, the hope of "maybe" was stronger than common sense?
    1. Lamata 11 February 2020 18: 35 New
      • 6
      • 5
      +1
      Stopudovo on force majeure porters will refer. And Comrade Miller, how will the next get a bonus, or whatever they will do to him.
      1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 19: 53 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Quote: Lamata
        Stopudovo on force majeure porters will refer

        They can refer at least to anyone.
        This "force majeure" must be proved
        1. Lamata 11 February 2020 20: 22 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          Believe me, the lawyers are cunning there, and another very important question is which court will consider the lawsuit and whose law will be applicable.
          1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 20: 31 New
            • 3
            • 2
            +1
            Quote: Lamata
            which court will consider the lawsuit and whose law will be applicable.

            Do not go to the grandmother, not in our favor
            1. Lamata 11 February 2020 21: 40 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              I hope that any “independent” arbitration is specified in the contract.
              1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 21: 56 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: Lamata
                I hope that any “independent” arbitration is specified in the contract

                Yes, what to guess. All the same, no one has ever seen and will not see the agreement.
                We will look in court. If he certainly will
    2. Lord of the Sith 11 February 2020 18: 35 New
      • 6
      • 4
      +2
      Compensation afterwards, after completion of construction.
      1. Sadam 11 February 2020 20: 03 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        what you are discussing is not money, it is surrender))). The key word is given to me - the end of construction. that's where the interesting game lies ahead. recent sanctions have updated not only builders but users. Trump in the fall re-election - demonstrative action may take place. some strange movement in the Reichstag with the future Kansler ....
        1. Lord of the Sith 11 February 2020 20: 13 New
          • 4
          • 6
          -2
          Are you sure you speak Russian? As if a slurred stream of subconscious))
        2. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 20: 19 New
          • 1
          • 5
          -4
          Do you even understand what you said? belay
        3. major147 11 February 2020 20: 30 New
          • 4
          • 1
          +3
          Quote: Sadam
          recent sanctions have updated not only builders but users

          These sanctions are not about anything. Gas came to the hub in Baumgarten and everything, but who specifically received the molecules, cannot be technically determined
          1. Sadam 11 February 2020 20: 38 New
            • 5
            • 1
            +4
            Of course I do not pretend. it's just my thoughts out loud. over the same sanctions for contractors, neighing here for half a year no one believed and suddenly everything fell upon you when 90% paved .... underestimating the enemy and overestimating friends is stupid
            1. major147 11 February 2020 20: 39 New
              • 3
              • 1
              +2
              Quote: Sadam
              Of course I do not pretend. it's just my thoughts out loud. over the same sanctions for contractors, neighing here for half a year no one believed and suddenly everything fell upon you when 90% paved .... underestimating the enemy and overestimating friends is stupid

              And what do you think?
  • Leshy1975 11 February 2020 18: 31 New
    • 15
    • 7
    +8
    The launch of the Russian Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline is scheduled for the end of 2020, follows from the presentation of the company "Gazprom", released on the day of the investor.

    Well, here's how to finish it, then we'll see what is the result. In the meantime, with planning and forecasting from Gazprom, from the word - no matter how.
    And presentations and pictures, yes, they know how.
    1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 20: 20 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      Quote: Leshy1975
      and forecasting at Gazprom

      Could such a turn of events be predicted?
      1. Leshy1975 11 February 2020 20: 29 New
        • 6
        • 4
        +2
        Quote: Lipchanin
        Quote: Leshy1975
        and forecasting at Gazprom

        Could such a turn of events be predicted?

        It should have been, and not just possible. Otherwise, many (analysts, intelligence) in vain eat their bread. Sanctions did not arise yesterday, and the Americans advertised their tightening, as they say now that the next ones will probably come to consumers of Russian energy carriers. So it was hardly a big secret. And the options for sanctions should have been calculated and should have been prepared for them, it’s not about pennies. But taking into account that Gazprom miscalculated:
        1) with the Ukrainian GTS
        2) with TP
        3) with SP-2
        About the Power of Siberia, this will become known later, although it is already an economically dubious project.
        Don't you think that there are too many miscalculations? There are so many that suspiciously resemble a pattern. And then, look for who benefits from it. But I already wrote a lot about it. hi
        1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 20: 45 New
          • 2
          • 3
          -1
          Quote: Leshy1975
          It should have been, and not just possible.

          You know, there’s nothing to talk about. We do not know anything. From the word at all.
          We see not that the top, its very edge. The pitfalls there are known to a narrow circle of people. Even Germany completely went against mattresses. But they squeezed all the rest. So we had confidence that the hostages would not be able to bend everyone like that. And confidence is not from scratch. Apparently, the “trump cards” were stronger among the hostages.
          1. Leshy1975 11 February 2020 21: 19 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            Quote: Lipchanin
            Quote: Leshy1975
            It should have been, and not just possible.

            You know, there’s nothing to talk about. We do not know anything. From the word at all.
            We see not that the top, its very edge. The pitfalls there are known to a narrow circle of people. Even Germany completely went against mattresses. But they squeezed all the rest. So we had confidence that the hostages would not be able to bend everyone like that. And confidence is not from scratch. Apparently, the “trump cards” were stronger among the hostages.

            You have a logical error in your reasoning. If, as you assure
            We do not know anything. From the word at all.

            Then you can’t have your own opinion on this topic. It’s not possible to talk about something you don’t know anything about, right?
            But at the same time, I consistently, not for the first year, wrote that Gazprom’s affairs are bad. For which he was mercilessly minus all the time, but time confirmed who was right. Where did I get the information from? Media, other bloggers (of course, as a rule, opposition) who have more detailed understanding of this problem. Conclusions, and the conclusions were already made by myself. So there was enough information, but many until the last did not even want to look for her, and not that to trust her or analyze her. Indeed, why, if many trust only what the authorities say on federal TV.
            Fortunately for me, I completely stopped watching federal TV. And I’m looking for the necessary information on the Internet and already analyzing it. Therefore, the results of Gazprom’s “work” did not come as a surprise to me.

            PS I personally appeal to you too. Stop trusting the federal media and start thinking critically, look for information yourself. Compare it with what you see, how much this corresponds to the reality around, and not to fantasies from TV. And then you, too, like I at one time, at first will be very upset by the recognition of reality, but then, for you, it will become less incomprehensible. hi
            1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 21: 34 New
              • 0
              • 2
              -2
              Quote: Leshy1975
              Then you can’t have your own opinion on this topic. It’s not possible to talk about something you don’t know anything about, right?

              Right. but you missed one phrase
              We see not that the top, its very edge.

              So I talk about what I see. I'm trying to prove on a branch that I don’t have to go deep. It makes no sense to argue whether Gazprom’s lawyers are guilty or not guilty. none I didn’t see the contract in my eyes.
              Everything else is from the evil one. Solid speculation
              So there was enough information

              No. Again a small part. All the important part is classified. Again you only know what you are allowed to know.
              By the way, when I didn’t say that Gazprom had everything in chocolate
              Fortunately for me, I completely stopped watching federal TV.

              Only sports and series
              1. Leshy1975 11 February 2020 21: 49 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Quote: Lipchanin
                Quote: Leshy1975
                Then you can’t have your own opinion on this topic. It’s not possible to talk about something you don’t know anything about, right?

                Right. but you missed one phrase
                We see not that the top, its very edge.

                So I talk about what I see. I'm trying to prove on a branch that I don’t have to go deep. It makes no sense to argue whether Gazprom’s lawyers are guilty or not guilty. none I didn’t see the contract in my eyes.
                Everything else is from the evil one. Solid speculation
                So there was enough information

                No. Again a small part. All the important part is classified. Again you only know what you are allowed to know.
                By the way, when I didn’t say that Gazprom had everything in chocolate
                Fortunately for me, I completely stopped watching federal TV.

                Only sports and series

                Well, after all, there is an evaluation criterion, known for a very long time, back in the Bible:
                judge by business them and not according to the words.

                I was interested in talking with you, but today, unfortunately, I have to leave. Let's talk about different topics. hi
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. DMB 75 11 February 2020 19: 19 New
      • 9
      • 2
      +7
      You are not the only one "stunned", to put it mildly. And they are on the ground, and they get millions of "salaries" ...
      1. Lamata 11 February 2020 19: 52 New
        • 4
        • 5
        -1
        one effective managers and even one friend
  • DMB 75 11 February 2020 18: 33 New
    • 9
    • 3
    +6
    As previously reported, due to the imposed US sanctions, the Swiss company Allseas withdrew its vessels from the pipeline construction area, thereby halting construction.

    Penalty. The contract should have been spelled out. If, of course, you didn’t conclude "effective managers" ...
    1. old friend 11 February 2020 18: 42 New
      • 6
      • 4
      +2
      do not expect. The Swiss have normal lawyers. This is 100% force majeure.
      1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 19: 55 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Quote: old friend
        This is 100% force majeure.

        And is it called the sanction from the State Department?
      2. Pereira 11 February 2020 20: 13 New
        • 0
        • 3
        -3
        It was necessary to Gazprom Swiss and hire. And the result would be cheaper.
        1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 20: 21 New
          • 0
          • 3
          -3
          Quote: Pereira
          It was necessary to Gazprom Swiss and hire.

          Where to hire?
        2. old friend 11 February 2020 20: 39 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          The Swiss company has an almost monopoly position in the stacker market. Not Gazprom dictated the conditions to them, but they - to Gazprom. Therefore, it doesn’t matter what the lawyers of Gazprom would like to include in a force majeure contract.
          1. Liam 11 February 2020 21: 01 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Quote: old friend
            The Swiss company has almost a monopoly position in the stacker market

            Not really. Competitor-Saipem
            1. old friend 12 February 2020 16: 01 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              IMHO, only in April 2019 did Gazprom have a showdown with them over the failure with the South Stream. It is unlikely that they were seriously considered until this moment, as an alternative to All Seas.
              1. Liam 12 February 2020 19: 39 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: old friend
                IMHO, only in April 2019 did Gazprom have a showdown with them over the failure with the South Stream. It is unlikely that they were seriously considered until this moment, as an alternative to All Seas.

                But the Blue Stream and Turkish who laid?
                1. old friend 13 February 2020 13: 16 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  about blue - I have no idea, but it was a very long time ago. Turkish, like, All Seas worked
                  I explain: at the time of the decision to lay the SP-2, there may have been unclosed legal issues with Saipem.
    2. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 19: 54 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      Quote: DMB 75
      not "effective managers" concluded ...

      Actually, lawyers make contracts
  • Lord of the Sith 11 February 2020 18: 34 New
    • 6
    • 4
    +2
    The main thing is that the Yankees, and their jackals tame, do not spoil, even to the point that the warships are guarded by the pipe-layer.
    Because of their chasing, a whole year is lost.
    1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 19: 56 New
      • 2
      • 6
      -4
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      up to the point that warships are guarded by the pipe layer.

      The problem is that he will lay the pipe in the territorial waters of Denmark.
      And there anything can happen
      1. Lord of the Sith 11 February 2020 20: 00 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        It cannot, if they sign an agreement on laying pipes in territorial waters, in which case they are fully responsible for everything that happens at home.
        1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 20: 05 New
          • 0
          • 6
          -6
          Quote: Lord of the Sith
          Can not,

          Can. You can always make a trick. This is taught to all saboteurs. For example, the WWII mine will pop up and accidentally fall under our ship
          And then refer to the notorious force majeure.
          No Witnesses Anyway
          1. Lord of the Sith 11 February 2020 20: 10 New
            • 1
            • 3
            -2
            No need to invent fairy tales, this is not Hollywood. Our specialists are not made with a finger, there are no mines there, saboteurs will not pass and will not emerge.

            But the protection is needed. Then they will not turn up, there will be no provocations and sabotage.
            1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 20: 23 New
              • 0
              • 2
              -2
              Quote: Lord of the Sith
              No need to invent fairy tales, this is not Hollywood.

              I didn’t seem to argue about the mine. I said a sneak always can be put
              saboteurs will not pass and will not emerge.

              Who will stop them?
              1. Lord of the Sith 11 February 2020 20: 48 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                Who will stop them?


                Cheburashka and Crocodile Gene, what do you think? laughing
                1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 20: 55 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  I think no one
          2. major147 11 February 2020 21: 12 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Quote: Lipchanin
            You can always make a trick.

            They do not allow ships with anchor positioning to lay pipes due to the flooding of large quantities of chemical and other weapons in those waters. They can easily fine-tune something.
            1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 21: 36 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: major147
              due to the flooding in those waters of chemical and other weapons in large quantities.

              I didn’t know about it
              Just sure that if the state went against the construction, they will be able to do anything
  • impostor 11 February 2020 18: 35 New
    • 7
    • 2
    +5
    Along with 161-ФЗ, there must be a federal law "On effective liability"
  • anjey 11 February 2020 18: 40 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    The Russian company Gazprom announced the launch of the Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline at the end of this year. Earlier this was announced by the head of the Ministry of Energy, Alexander Novak, who said that the gas pipeline would be completed despite the pressure of some countries, in particular the United States.
    Here it is in our opinion - the boy said, the boy made, the GDP promises to raise the standard of living and of the simple people of Russia would have come true, that would be positive for the rest of his life laughing .
    1. Kronos 11 February 2020 18: 42 New
      • 6
      • 5
      +1
      Just said so far
      1. Lamata 11 February 2020 19: 54 New
        • 3
        • 5
        -2
        But he’s the most kid boy.
  • paul3390 11 February 2020 18: 43 New
    • 13
    • 5
    +8
    Something of our type "effective managers" every year more and more kosyachat. And the guarantor was broadcasting - that these are super-qualified specialists, who, if you do not pay a billion a month, will be immediately captured by foreign concerns .. Funny? Yes, somehow not very. For the number of jambs at all levels of power is slowly becoming simply disastrous ..
  • AlexG83 11 February 2020 18: 45 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    It was necessary to create the appearance that "the evil Russians forced to complete the remaining site at gunpoint." And fit 1-2 warships for the background, so to speak.
    1. Thrifty 11 February 2020 18: 51 New
      • 3
      • 5
      -2
      AlexG83 - then the porters, when our warships appeared through the pipeline home, would run away!
  • Guards turn 11 February 2020 18: 53 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Gazprom - the impression is that you take an example from Ukraine (the main thing is to shout, and then whatever happens). It is necessary to do everything quietly and silently, these loud reports are useless.
  • Vladimir Mashkov 11 February 2020 18: 57 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    And the "Academician Chersky" is already approaching Tsushima ...
    1. Vladimir Mashkov 12 February 2020 19: 10 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      And the "Academician Chersky", walking slowly, is now almost in the Tsushima Strait. It is unclear who and why is minus my message. Maybe someone misunderstands him?
  • Tank jacket 11 February 2020 19: 05 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    It would seem where does this news?
    "MOSCOW, February 11. The relocation of the Sea Launch floating spaceport from the Long Beach port in the USA, California, to the Slavic ship repair plant in Primorye will begin on February 22, a source in the rocket and space industry told RIA Novosti."
  • Erich 11 February 2020 19: 07 New
    • 5
    • 5
    0
    Can it happen that this ship will not be allowed to complete the pipe?
  • Barmaleyka 11 February 2020 19: 09 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    The launch of the Russian Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline is scheduled for the end of 2020, follows from the presentation of Gazprom, released by investor day.

    in the summer on the site I was terribly mined for such a thing and even called all sorts of different indecent
  • 7,62h54 11 February 2020 19: 16 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    And if they could finish it in a month, read directly the threats of amers.
  • Victor March 47 11 February 2020 19: 23 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    Quote: Pete Mitchell
    Quote: Victor_B
    More than once the Americans will shit under the door! Lots and lots! They just got a taste.

    But it’s wildly interesting for me: runaways and those who did not do the job, is there a legal way to punish and demand compensation? The contract is drawn up competently or so, on the fingers without the responsibility of the parties

    I think the performance is yet to come. And the amount of the fine will still be calculated, and it depends on the losses, deadlines and costs. It’s too early to talk about this.
  • impostor 11 February 2020 19: 31 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Write sho Turpotok can redirect to the joint venture. The Taming of the Shrew? Then you won’t envy the tomatoes in Idlib ...
  • Old Horseradish 11 February 2020 20: 13 New
    • 2
    • 6
    -4
    Kirdyk will soon be these "effective managers." Again, the loot will be pulled over.
  • 123456789 11 February 2020 20: 20 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    It’s time for the project to change manager
  • ustinov.yuri 11 February 2020 20: 22 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    About 30% of the shares of the "public domain" belong to the American investor. This is the reason for the sluggish and belated sanctions. Financial analysts say it takes 1,5 to 2 years to gain access to a controlling stake. Almost all aluminum (over 90%) is already owned by the United States. There is a process of selling energy. Guys, our grandchildren will not have anything, including the country.
    1. old friend 11 February 2020 20: 48 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      something can belong to someone who owns a controlling stake (and not always that). The rest are entitled to dividends and take part in management (without a blocking vote).
      Financial analysts say it takes 1,5 to 2 years to gain access to a controlling stake.

      from 1.5 to 2 years ??? You better not spread this nonsense. You can only get to a controlling stake in 1 way - if the current owner wants it - the state. This is impossible, at least until the power changes.
      1. ustinov.yuri 11 February 2020 21: 30 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        That is why the current government will sit until the full sale of everything and everyone. Remember how the state was poured. money in banks, supposedly for stabilization. And help to “poor oligarchs” because of sanctions? How much was presented to Deripaska and Russian Cars? Whose are PM and aluminum now? I hope you remember that the United States ate it for 5 months?
  • ANB
    ANB 11 February 2020 20: 58 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Victor_B
    More than once the Americans will shit under the door!
    Lots and lots!
    They just got a taste.
    Denmark, in fact, lured the highway into its waters, and Gazprom could go around, the pipelayers would also leave, but the work could be continued from any barges.
    In general, “saving” on the route was already more expensive.

    Yes, there is no route there without Denmark.
  • cat Rusich 11 February 2020 22: 26 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    "The security service of Gazprom does not work well." "Academician Chersky" could have arrived in advance at the "place of events" ...
    1. old friend 12 February 2020 14: 35 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Chersky was supposed to be in the Baltic at the very beginning and participate in the work, IMHO. At the same time, the team would have gained experience. And now the Baltic season is the storm season. Perhaps this is why they are not in a hurry. At the end of spring they will begin and by autumn they will finish. With such weather and gas consumption in Europe, there is nothing special to rush.
  • iouris 11 February 2020 22: 37 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Gazprom "told" - Gazprom did. Only here with the deadlines sometimes they do not guess.
  • Brturin 11 February 2020 23: 27 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    News ... "Of course, the completion of construction will be postponed for several months. But I hope that by the end of this year, or in the first quarter of next year, the work will be completed and the gas pipeline will work." - Putin (11.01), "Based on the results of my conversations with Miller I can say that the implementation of the project should be completed and its launch should take place at the end of 2020 or at the latest in the first quarter of 2021 "- German Ambassador to Russia Geza Andreas von Geir (31.01). And here’s one more time about this ... Shell’s representative in Russia Cederic Kremers (17.01/06.02) - “We believe that pipeline transport has advantages, therefore we support the project. The sanctions that were introduced - yes, they affect the project. They are the reason that the project can really be postponed for some time. "Head of Austrian OMV Rainer Seele (2) -" The project operator company, Nord Stream XNUMX, is working on a plan, but they are not yet ready to present this plan. We don’t think that in the short term the construction of the pipeline will be resumed. "I hope that this plan will appear soon and the situation will be clarified, but for now ...
  • paco.soto 12 February 2020 05: 40 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    After reading it several times, I was horrified by this text!, Which was like nonsense, not worthy of being in
    With the facet of Professor Preobrazhensky’s face: “who stood on whom” ?!
  • Cheerock 12 February 2020 17: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Pete Mitchell
    Quote: Victor_B
    More than once the Americans will shit under the door! Lots and lots! They just got a taste.

    But it’s wildly interesting for me: runaways and those who did not do the job, is there a legal way to punish and demand compensation? The contract is drawn up competently or so, on the fingers without the responsibility of the parties

    As a rule, in international contracts there is a Force Majeure clause, which lists the conditions under which the parties are exempted from the contract. A typical clause in contracts looks like this:

    Should any circumstances in the country of the producer of the goods producing or in the country of the Buyer of the goods arise preventing either party from complete or partial fulfillment of its obligations under present Contract, namely: fire, acts of elements, war, military operations of any nature, blockades, strikes or labor disagreements of strike charter, prohibition / hindrance of export and / or import, government juridical acts preventing performing the obligations under the present Contract shall be extended for a period equal to that during which such circumstances and contingencies continue to be in force.
    Should these circumstances continue to be in force for more than 30 days, either party hereto shall have the right to renounce any further fulfillment of the obligations under the present Contract. In this case, neither party shall be entitled to make any demand upon the other party for compensation or penalty.
    The party for whom it becomes impossible to fulfill its obligations under this contract shall immediately advise the other party of the beginning and cessation of the circumstances preventing the execution of its obligation.
    Certificate issued by Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Buyer's or Seller's country shall be sufficient proof of such contingencies and their duration.
    If any dispute, ICC 421 will be used for the settlement of the force majeure.

    I think that since there is silence on the air about a showdown with All Seas, then the case is recognized as force majeure.
  • The comment was deleted.