Officers and warrant officers will be banned from concluding annual contracts

Officers and warrant officers will be banned from concluding annual contracts

Officers and warrant officers serving in the Armed Forces of Russia under the contract will be further banned from concluding one-year contracts, offering to sign an agreement for a period of 3 to 10 years. This proposal is contained in a new government bill adopted by the State Duma on February 11 in the first reading.


The new bill amends article 38 of the law "On Military Duty and Military Service." In particular, the document proposes to restrict for officers and warrant officers (warrant officers) serving on a contract the right to conclude a contract for a period of one year. Instead, it is proposed to conclude contracts for a period of 3 years (lower limit) to 10 (upper limit). In addition, there are contracts for an indefinite period, i.e. until reaching the age limit for military service.

The adoption of this bill is due to an increase in the number of annual contracts concluded, especially by young officers, the developers of the document explain.

The new bill does not affect the rules for concluding a contract for ordinary and sergeant personnel, as well as military personnel who are in military service beyond the age limit for military service.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Gardamir 11 February 2020 16: 40 New
    • 21
    • 33
    -12
    How so? They promised democracy, liberalism, and then bans. If you return totalitarianism, then return the Soviet power.
    1. vladcub 11 February 2020 18: 28 New
      • 7
      • 5
      +2
      Actually, military service and liberalism are fried snow! It is enough to recall the story of what will happen if they begin to liberalize. The most obvious example: the RIA even in March 1917 was a significant force, and A. F. Kerensky patched up everything that the army turned into an armed herd. Then demanded that the soldiers fought
      Remember, Andrei from Chelyabinsk told what was in the fleet in the spring of 1917?
      PS. I apologize: in March1917 the army was no longer called the imperial.
  2. lis-ik 11 February 2020 16: 47 New
    • 15
    • 18
    -3
    Everything is simple. When concluding a contract, I think the amount of payments is determined. And since we have inflation (permanent), it is naturally beneficial for the Moscow Region to fix the official salary, etc. for the entire service life.
    1. carstorm 11 11 February 2020 17: 00 New
      • 18
      • 8
      +10
      MO does not fix it. salaries are changed by government decree. The Ministry of Defense is preparing a draft government decree providing for an increase of 1% in salaries for military personnel and employees of some federal authorities from October 2020, 3. A notice of this has been published on the portal of draft regulatory legal acts. an increase in minimum terms is a common thing in any department. in this case, the annual contracts allowed leaving, while the MO spent money on training and so on. and a man could leave without doing anything. One-year contracts were initially made for hot spots and other special tasks. it's time to change it and that's it)
      1. lis-ik 11 February 2020 17: 09 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        I agree. I completely forgot my service at the Central Federal University with my business.
        1. carstorm 11 11 February 2020 17: 17 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Yes, I somehow forgot too much already))) this is normal.
      2. 2 Level Advisor 11 February 2020 17: 36 New
        • 5
        • 4
        +1
        The article is mainly about the young .. And if the young officer is confident in his desire to serve the motherland, he will not imprison for a year, and if he is not sure and thinks if he should leave, should he be kept? But is such an officer needed who wants to blame and serve perfectly, definitely will not? But what about those who didn’t have enough years of service for 1-2 years, now it’s a fact to re-serve ..
        1. Sergey79 11 February 2020 17: 59 New
          • 21
          • 2
          +19
          Everything is very simple. See statistics on retired people in 20-25 calendars. And you’ll be horrified ... Officers at the age of 37-42 “flee” from the Armed Forces. And this is due to mistrust. Many different bad rumors go about changing the law. Especially with regard to retirement. For example, changing the age limit, or paying a pension from 65 years. There are many examples.
          1. Glory1974 12 February 2020 09: 41 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Officers in the 37-42 years "flee" from the armed forces. And this is due to mistrust. Many different bad rumors go about changing legislation

            I agree with you.
            Experience shows that legislation changes only for the worse for the service side.
            He left for these reasons. Those who quit after me still have not received housing, and some have lost the right to receive it.
        2. Old Michael 11 February 2020 19: 46 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          for those for whom 1-2 years of service were not enough, now to re-serve is a fact ..

          Limiters and limiters will not affect:
          contracts remain for an indefinite period, i.e. until reaching the age limit for military service.

          The new bill does not affect the rules for concluding a contract for ... military personnel serving in excess of the age limit for military service.
          1. 2 Level Advisor 11 February 2020 20: 12 New
            • 2
            • 2
            0
            ok .. then why? young forcibly held, who can escape? But do they need such an army?
            1. Glory1974 12 February 2020 09: 45 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              young forcibly held, who can escape? But do they need such an army?

              It is possible as before, in the Soviet Union - if you want, you don’t want, but you must serve 25 years.
              And it is possible under the contract to serve a certain period. But here it is already necessary to do some kind of preferences so that a person serves and suffers the deprivation of military service.
              Which is easier? The question is rhetorical. Deny resignation regardless of the conditions of service, in fact, return to the recruitment recruitment: he got into the army and rammed 25 years before the demobilization. Where is the service more effective?
              1. 2 Level Advisor 12 February 2020 10: 02 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                I completely agree .. at the beginning of 00x, 5 out of 4 of us left the unit after a 5-year post-secondary contract, and that’s because even after 5 years they didn’t fire even those who played in the “top ten” (I went to work every 10 days so that not to fall under the Criminal Code), but how did the situation normalize, one out of five began to leave .. did the people "run" again?
                1. Glory1974 12 February 2020 10: 09 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  in the mid-90s, lieutenants wrote reports on dismissal right in the districts, refusing to go to the units after school.
                  Now the situation is simpler, but people are fleeing. Changes to the law are introduced almost every month. The media do not write about this, but they read the orders on the readings. At the same time, it is impossible to immediately calculate the consequences of changes, but as a rule, only for the worse.
                  Persistently rumor has it that the military will cancel the pension. That is, you will be able to receive it only when you reach 65 years of age, as a civilian, and when you leave your job at the age of 45-50, go work.
                  1. Severok 13 February 2020 16: 54 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    This does not take into account either the state of health or length of service in regions with adverse conditions of service (remoteness, climatic conditions, highlands). And for health reasons, a command was secretly given in all executive bodies where military service is provided, not to dismiss. Only at the end of the contract, length of service, etc., but not for health.

                    In general, everything is for the people, at any time of the year. That's just not the good of civilization and the achievement of socialism.
  3. Ros 56 11 February 2020 16: 59 New
    • 15
    • 5
    +10
    In fact, the right decision in terms of combat effectiveness of the Armed Forces. The defense of the country should be handled by professionals, not day laborers. soldier
  4. Alexga 11 February 2020 16: 59 New
    • 11
    • 1
    +10
    Wild is all this. In my time, they chose this profession for life. Although, new times and new defenders, probably.
    1. carstorm 11 11 February 2020 17: 29 New
      • 8
      • 3
      +5
      there is nothing wild in contracts) is just another system. as one man said, one must go to the army only to those who do not represent anything else in life. they always kept on and will continue.
      1. Alexga 11 February 2020 17: 41 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Dmitry, your man said very correct words, I fully support him!
    2. kenig1 11 February 2020 17: 38 New
      • 12
      • 6
      +6
      In your time, officers did not jump into rented apartments, there was no inflation, there were no problems with kindergartens. Now they sit at video conferences all day, and in the evening they set tasks, they need to complete tasks during the night and that the slides would be ready for the morning conference.
      1. carstorm 11 11 February 2020 17: 44 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        C'mon?))) I’ll say with my parents I jumped into office apartments. his was not. it’s cool to live with two children in odnushka-Khrushchev, and even the official truth?)
        1. Alexga 11 February 2020 19: 59 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Yes, we all had service housing. After retirement by age, privatized.
          1. Piramidon 12 February 2020 09: 41 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: AlexGa
            Yes, we all had service housing. After retirement by age, privatized.

            What a blessing to have a privatized apartment in a godforsaken garrison, with a dozen residential buildings.
            1. Alexga 12 February 2020 14: 06 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              As far as I heard from my colleagues in Russia, housing certificates were issued there with certain choices of the future residence. For example, having graduated from service in Ulan-Uda, he received an apartment in Kovrov. But more precisely pensioners of the Russian army will tell you.
              1. Piramidon 12 February 2020 14: 17 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: AlexGa
                As far as I heard from my colleagues in Russia, housing certificates were issued there with certain choices of the future residence. For example, having graduated from service in Ulan-Uda, he received an apartment in Kovrov. But more precisely pensioners of the Russian army will tell you.

                In 1991, I still managed to get a warrant for an apartment by dismissal, and not a certificate. But those who after that received certificates had to pay extra to become the owner of a more or less decent apartment. My colleague with a certificate (without surcharge) was able to purchase an apartment in the house, "Khrushchev", built in 1972. For something better, the certificate was not enough. True, this is in the region. center. Perhaps in some kind of regional urban settlement, one could count on something better. hi
                1. Alexga 12 February 2020 15: 41 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  And now, as you have, too, is it left or have you come up with something more perfect?
                  1. Piramidon 12 February 2020 17: 02 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: AlexGa
                    And now, as you have, too, is it left or have you come up with something more perfect?

                    Until the middle of the “zero” it was the same, but with those who later quit, I no longer contacted.
        2. kenig1 11 February 2020 20: 04 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Well, I hopped through 9 cities, a month at a rented or dormitory, and later on, an office apartment was introduced.
      2. Alexga 11 February 2020 17: 48 New
        • 9
        • 0
        +9
        It was also not sweet, the wives did not work, they served in very wild places, there were no kindergartens. But to say that the state does not solve your everyday problems, I could not say even while serving in ZabVO. Regarding your second remark, I will say this: I don’t think it is normal for a state that makes its defenders have an idea where to live with their family and how to feed this family. We were all once young lieutenants, and as it was then difficult.
      3. BISMARCK94 11 February 2020 18: 04 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        Now they sit all day at video conferences, and in the evening tasks are set, tasks must be completed during the night, and slides would be ready for the morning conference.

        Directly described by Russian Railways))
      4. lis-ik 11 February 2020 18: 12 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        In my time, the officer even had an apartment in the GSVG, approximately like a modern five-story building, they didn’t pay for it at all, it was DOS. This is the GSVG in 1987., the missile division.
        1. Doliva63 11 February 2020 19: 49 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: lis-ik
          In my time, the officer even had an apartment in the GSVG, approximately like a modern five-story building, they didn’t pay for it at all, it was DOS. This is the GSVG in 1987., the missile division.

          No, they took me for utility bills (in the GSVG), albeit a penny. And there was no rent, yeah.
          1. Alexga 11 February 2020 20: 02 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            In Mongolia we paid only for electricity and some penny for water and heating. By the sums, you can not say that we paid the rent in comparison with life in Suze.
            1. Doliva63 13 February 2020 20: 15 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: AlexGa
              In Mongolia we paid only for electricity and some penny for water and heating. By the sums, you can not say that we paid the rent in comparison with life in Suze.

              So water is utilities, if that). It is strange that we did not understand each other.
              1. Alexga 13 February 2020 21: 08 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                I wanted to say that it was such a penny that you can not talk about it.
                1. Doliva63 15 February 2020 07: 33 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: AlexGa
                  I wanted to say that it was such a penny that you can not talk about it.

                  Well yes. I agree.
  5. knn54 11 February 2020 17: 01 New
    • 11
    • 1
    +10
    According to the law, servicemen who have less than a year left until the end of the contract, even the day after the contract is concluded, cannot be transferred to another locality by way of replacement. Most likely, this moment is the main reason for the cancellation of the annual contract.
  6. Thrifty 11 February 2020 17: 04 New
    • 10
    • 5
    +5
    So encourage them to solve housing issues, trips to our Crimea, give them free, increase their salaries. Otherwise, stupid prohibitions alone will not achieve a positive result.
    1. vladcub 11 February 2020 19: 07 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      In fact, lately they recalled one statement by Napoleon about his own and alien army. There is a lot of information about this on the site, too. The other day I met such information: servicemen with rewards will pay less in the store for goods. I didn’t read everything, but I caught the thought
    2. Severok 13 February 2020 17: 04 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      It’s for sure: don’t go even 10-30 km beyond the garrison, don’t go on ice, don’t go fishing, do not go to crowded places, do not violate traffic rules, do not drink alcohol, don’t swim in unequipped water bodies (and hunting in water to plunge! Especially if the water temperature is a maximum of +14!). This I listed the weekend instructions. And unofficially for women not to intervene, to avoid bullies and not to give them change. These are prohibitions.
      As for the sanatorium-resort for 17 years, not a single resort has been and not a single sanatorium has been offered. Yes, and can not afford. Yes, here's another thing, rations remained only in the Far North, business trips per day with a maximum of 300 rubles, this is if you go to Moscow-Peter. Payment to the place of vacation also remained only in the Far North.
      So tell me, who wants to serve in the ranks of the rank-and-file and sergeant staff with a salary of no more than 3 tons of rank !? D and the ensigns also do not have much in the middle lane and in the south, I dare to estimate that it is not higher than 27-35 tr, depending on the tariff category. And how to feed the family ???? And also with scam pensions.
  7. Blue fox 11 February 2020 17: 11 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    It will be difficult for those who planned to “finish off” the year to the necessary length of service;
  8. Lamata 11 February 2020 17: 15 New
    • 7
    • 5
    +2
    Yes, when they introduced the contract system, the desire to serve was undermined, it was never in Russia that the officers served under the contract, and then the Democrats made a fuss.
    1. Alexga 11 February 2020 17: 20 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      in Russia never that contract officers served

      Very correct words!
    2. AU Ivanov. 11 February 2020 17: 37 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      Yes, but in RI an officer could always leave the service without giving reasons. It was possible to quit in the Union only for negative reasons, or for health reasons.
      1. Lamata 11 February 2020 18: 30 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        From SA, yes, it was difficult to leave.
    3. vladcub 11 February 2020 19: 32 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Regarding the contract, a double-edged sword: on the one hand it’s kind of wild: a contract, something alien. But on the other hand, if a person loves his service, what is bad if the state pays him more and creates some advantages.
      My brother told me: in Afghanistan, those who decided to stay extra long were ready to carry on their hands.
  9. Olezhek 11 February 2020 18: 37 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    The adoption of this bill is due to an increase in the number of annual contracts concluded, especially by young officers, the developers of the document explain.


    Something nonsense with this same officer service ...
    Nonsense...
    Some annual contracts ...
    Something we did not go there.

    it has never been in Russia that contract officers served


    something like that. Some kind of crap. request
    1. Lamata 11 February 2020 20: 07 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      The contract is already just an employment contract. Recall a phrase from the great film "Officers" - There is such a profession, to defend the homeland.
  10. vladcub 11 February 2020 19: 00 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: carstorm 11
    there is nothing wild in contracts) is just another system. as one man said, one must go to the army only to those who do not represent anything else in life. they always kept on and will continue.

    Gold words. I recall my commanders: they were different and mediocre and talented, but there were those who lived in service. The army has always been and will continue to be.
  11. vladcub 11 February 2020 19: 19 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Probably want to get rid of random people. It’s a sin to hide, now there are a lot of random people among the officers: who doesn’t know why he joined the army, and who didn’t get a job as a civilian. Now the officer will think twice before signing the contract.
    1. polar fox 12 February 2020 02: 21 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: vladcub
      Probably want to get rid of random people.

      as in the police ... the certification was carried out, now there are no random ones, only "verified", such as Zakharchenko)))
  12. Doliva63 11 February 2020 19: 39 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Quote: AlexGa
    Wild is all this. In my time, they chose this profession for life. Although, new times and new defenders, probably.

    Now there is even a marriage contract, pah, damn it! What a society, such is his army, alas.
    1. Alexga 11 February 2020 20: 05 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      What a society, such is his army, alas

      In Belarus, some people already call the military parasites, though the internal military among the people also refers to the military.
      1. Doliva63 11 February 2020 20: 17 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: AlexGa
        What a society, such is his army, alas

        In Belarus, some people already call the military parasites, though the internal military among the people also refers to the military.

        And once in Minsk, cops put me on a plane with armed fighters in the absence of travel documents to Moscow. Like, we ourselves served, we understand. There was a time.
      2. Lamata 11 February 2020 21: 44 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        and PROTECT who will be RB? Opposition?
        1. Alexga 11 February 2020 22: 47 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          No, these are very few, it will be precisely those who are called that who will protect it. The problem is more that the interests of those below are too different from those who manage them. This is a big topic, not for discussion on the internet.
  13. Victor March 47 11 February 2020 20: 01 New
    • 0
    • 7
    -7
    Come on, I will conclude a contract with you for something for a period of 1 day. And the whole headache in determining the workplace, the issuance of a tool, work clothes, acquaintance with work will be attributed to you. obliging you to pay for this day under the Law, that is, with all the burdens for you.
    You still come here with the Constitution. Wimp.
  14. Victor Wolz 11 February 2020 20: 26 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Another disgusting state, like retirement age, will hit just those who have one year left to serve before retirement. Because the first contract is always concluded for five years. Everyone in their age wants to go to paradise, and it is advisable that they die at work and don’t pay a pension.
  15. Sergey Averchenkov 11 February 2020 21: 26 New
    • 3
    • 7
    -4
    What are you? Gentlemen / fellow officers ... I certainly understand that there must be mercantile moods ... But after all ... Hmmm ... I cease to respect the officer corps. And do not complain about your bad life, believe it is not sugar for everyone. I will not be like you and will not shed tears here. Disgusting.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. vladcub 12 February 2020 09: 01 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: polar fox
    Quote: vladcub
    Probably want to get rid of random people.

    as in the police ... the certification was carried out, now there are no random ones, only "verified", such as Zakharchenko)))

    Aha