Stoltenberg: Destruction of INF Treaty helped NATO blame Russia for this

Stoltenberg: Destruction of INF Treaty helped NATO blame Russia for this

The complete destruction of the INF Treaty (the agreement on the elimination of intermediate and shorter-range missiles) demonstrated the strength of NATO, since all countries that are members of the North Atlantic Alliance were able to agree on blaming Russia for this. This was stated by Alliance Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg at a press conference ahead of the meeting of the Alliance’s defense ministers.


The collapse of the INF Treaty is bad, but it demonstrated the strength of NATO, because as a result of intensive consultations we were able to agree that Russia violated it and coordinate our next steps

- said the Secretary General of NATO.

Stoltenberg announced the negotiations of the defense ministers of the alliance countries, which will be held on February 12. The main topic of the talks will be "an answer to the threat to NATO’s security from Russian nuclear and conventional missiles."

We will discuss our response to the full range of Russian missile systems: conventional, nuclear and missiles under development

- he said.

Earlier, the NATO secretary general accused Russia of continuing to “develop and deploy” new missiles that violate the provisions of the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles. At the same time, he referred to some "independent intelligence", without giving any concrete evidence.

The problem is that a few years ago, Russia began to develop and deploy medium-range missiles with nuclear potential in Europe. And these missiles are mobile, hard to detect, they reduce the warning time for any use of nuclear weapons in armed conflict and therefore the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons

he said, adding that all NATO countries, together with the United States, called on Russia to return to compliance with the treaty and destroy its violating missiles, but Moscow refused to do this, thereby forcing Washington to withdraw from the INF Treaty.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

100 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. smel 11 February 2020 14: 28 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    Another confirmation that the powder must be dry with us
    1. Olgovich 11 February 2020 14: 42 New
      • 40
      • 7
      +33
      we were able as a result of intensive consultations reach an agreementthat it violated Russia
      No real Violations identified the culprit, and ... AGREEMENT of the parties: he understands what carries? fool
      1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 14: 54 New
        • 12
        • 1
        +11
        Quote: Olgovich
        He understands WHAT he is?

        And they have long been fenced, whatever. All the same, no one will correct and say, "Uncle, that you are lying"
        1. Olgovich 11 February 2020 15: 30 New
          • 10
          • 4
          +6
          Quote: Lipchanin
          And they have long been fenced, whatever.

          Duc, tomorrow they AGREE on a bargain that Russia ... arranged a climate warming, Kennedy soaked and provoked Hiroshima from Nagasaki ... belay request

          something must be answered ... recourse
          1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 15: 46 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            Quote: Olgovich
            Quote: Lipchanin
            And they have long been fenced, whatever.

            Duc, tomorrow they AGREE on a bargain that Russia ... arranged a climate warming, Kennedy soaked and provoked Hiroshima from Nagasaki ... belay request

            something must be answered ... recourse

            You know, listening to these "politicians", I realized that they can blurt out anything. There are no barriers anymore. Demolished ...
            something must be answered ...

            What for? Yes, let them practice stupidity. They blurt out every day.
            The ulcer will dry up to answer them, but no one will hear.
            I’m waiting for them to resign and tell the whole truth.
            1. Tatyana 11 February 2020 16: 07 New
              • 6
              • 0
              +6
              Quote: Lipchanin
              I’m waiting for them to resign and tell the whole truth.

              Retired Stoltenberg will not tell any truth, because his family in Norway got rich immorally on military orders of the Third Reich even during WWII and now almost all Norwegian military-industrial complexes belong to the oligarchic “Stoltenbergs”.
              At the same time, Stoltenberg himself, heading NATO, under the wing of the Pentagon continues to earn money, and now - not just on the arms race, but also on the intimidation of Europeans by the military threat from Russia. The shameless marketer is still one!

              Who about himself publicly admits this and tells about himself ?! Presumably no one. Stoltenberg will not be recognized for sure!

              Stoltenberg’s nastiness has made me personally sick for a long time!
              1. Shurik70 11 February 2020 21: 23 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                And Stoltenberg does not need any resignation to tell the truth. Rather, talk about it.
                After all, he did not say that Russia was to blame.
                He said, "We agreed to blame Russia."
                If the case were to be tried in an objective court, this would be a plea of ​​guilty to the stipulation.
                1. Shurik70 11 February 2020 22: 11 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  At the expense of recognition.
                  In the United States, the film "Ukrainian Deception" was released, which tells, with the names, schemes and amounts of the robbery of Ukraine by people close to the Obama administration, showing interviews of snipers who shot people on the Maidan.
                  https://www.facebook.com/russianamericatv/videos/185616332508867/
            2. Zapaska 11 February 2020 16: 16 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: Lipchanin
              What for? Yes, let them practice stupidity. They blurt out every day.

              I agree ! They are crying with these cocks, trying to piss Russia off so that they hysterically just like that ... Yes, figs to them.
              As they say dogs bark the caravan goes ..
          2. helicop-man 11 February 2020 23: 27 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            So it is) Highly Likely called))))))
      2. Sergey39 11 February 2020 14: 56 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Yes, it’s a great achievement to blame the adversary for their violation of the contract. Still, they can still consistently lie.
        1. figwam 11 February 2020 15: 07 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          On August 2, 2019, the agreement ended, on August 18, they launch Tomahawk from the MK41 ground launcher that is used for the United States missile defense prohibited by the INF Treaty, and in December, the Americans officially launched a new missile that violated this agreement, after 4 months the rocket was ready! Here are the hypocrites.
          1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 15: 18 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            So the GDP immediately after the announcement of the exit said that they had riveted this rocket for a long time
            1. figwam 11 February 2020 15: 22 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Quote: Lipchanin
              So the GDP immediately after the announcement of the exit said that they had riveted this rocket for a long time

              Yes, right, and now this European clown is rewriting history again, but we have all the moves recorded.
              1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 15: 48 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: figvam
                and now this European clown is rewriting history again,

                Yes, let it weave. This is nothing more than a game to the public. Serious politicians know the truth and do not pay attention to this boltology
                1. helmi8 11 February 2020 16: 04 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: Lipchanin
                  Serious politicians know the truth and do not pay attention to this boltology

                  And who do you mean? Someone may not pay attention, but at all international political gatherings (they can’t be called otherwise), it turns out that Russia is always to blame for all conceivable and unimaginable sins, and remains in the minority at any vote ... And where are these serious politicians, and how many are there at all?
                  1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 17: 32 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    The rules of the game are as follows. Sanctions seem to be introduced, but in fact they themselves bypass them.
                    Remember how Trump introduced “sanctions”?
                    He took "Forbes" and entered the first ones on the list. The most ridiculous
                    1. helmi8 11 February 2020 18: 04 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: Lipchanin
                      The rules of the game are as follows. Sanctions seem to be introduced, but in fact they themselves bypass them.

                      With this, everything is clear - business is business. But what is happening in the information field cannot be called anything but lawlessness in relation to Russia.
          2. tihonmarine 11 February 2020 15: 33 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: figvam
            On August 2, 2019, the contract expired, on August 18, they launch Tomahawk from the MK41 ground launcher which are used for the United States missile defense, prohibited by the INF Treaty,

            The West has always been distinguished by its hypocrisy for as long as it exists.
      3. knn54 11 February 2020 15: 21 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        Through the mouths of Stoltenberg the Yankees verb.
      4. Oyo Sarkazmi 11 February 2020 18: 46 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Olgovich
        AGREEMENT of the parties: he understands what carries?

        Alas. They are sure that what is written in the newspapers should drive us to shame: NATO has agreed to consider Russia guilty. And about target missiles, atomic bombs on the F-16 - not to write about it, and NATO will not be ashamed.
  2. K-50 11 February 2020 14: 30 New
    • 7
    • 1
    +6
    The collapse of the INF Treaty is bad, but it demonstrated the strength of NATO, because as a result of intensive consultations we were able to agree that Russia violated it

    So what, what could agree? The truth is that it did not. And if anything, you will grieve in Hell, and pin dosniks will do their best to provoke a new war in the geyrop, so that the "competitors" become less or at least weaken them. fool
    1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 11 February 2020 14: 35 New
      • 4
      • 5
      -1
      Quote: K-50
      The truth is that it did not.
      Well, there recently with Iskander-M they were wise on tests, and he flew more than the declared TTX:

      https://topwar.ru/166617-bolshe-zajavlennyh-tth-v-hode-ispytanij-raketa-otrk-iskander-m-proletela-okolo-627-km.html
      1. K-50 11 February 2020 14: 43 New
        • 4
        • 4
        0
        Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich
        Well, there recently with Iskander-M they were wise on tests, and he flew more than the declared TTX:

        Yes, nevermind, what's up with Iskander!
        Europeans must hand the pin of Dosniks around the arms and legs so that the INF Treaty continues to operate, because it is in their personal interests. Missiles of shorter and medium range will not reach Omeryga, if only in Alaska, there is no sense in that. Therefore, he and that, (INF Treaty), were written off.
        Missiles of this range are needed to strike Russia from close range, because the flight time is much less and it is (theoretically) more difficult to repel it.
        But the answer will fly to the starting positions, read Europe and decision points, read Europe, to the places of concentration of troops and warehouses, read Europe. So the NATO, well, except for Omerigi, "laid their neck under Damocles’s ax, voluntarily and are still proud of it. lol
        1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 11 February 2020 14: 47 New
          • 6
          • 8
          -2
          Quote: K-50
          Yes, nevermind, what's up with Iskander!
          This is a very strange point of view. A contract that is not respected does not make sense.
          1. K-50 11 February 2020 14: 54 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich
            This is a very strange point of view. A contract that is not respected does not make sense.

            But does it make sense not to take into account the nuclear missiles of Britain and France?
            Which possess the entire nomenclature of short- and medium-range missiles, as well as cruise ones, in various equipment. Even whatever would be found, the “good” pin plaques would gladly throw them to the Allies, because they plan to turn Europe into an arena of military operations, and for this they are good at all.
            Is the Iskander really important after the advent of the Caliber, which shoot all Europe, to Ireland, and these missiles in no way fall under the INF Treaty. hi
            1. A.TOR 11 February 2020 15: 17 New
              • 1
              • 10
              -9
              Dear, besides you and people like you, no one is going to turn Europe into an arena of war. By the way, with the advent (God knows why the necessary calibers), the contract altogether lost its meaning
              1. kot423 11 February 2020 15: 24 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                "Dear, besides you and people like you, no one is going to turn Europe into an arena of war."
                Yeah, why is it so streamlined? Ie psheki, tribalt, etc. - Is it "like you", and the rest is all white and fluffy? I’m still not writing a digression into history (lazily, you will find it yourself) about "white and fluffy arrogant Saxons and their next generation. Mattresses = runaway criminals, exterminators of Indians, etc. etc.
              2. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 15: 55 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                Quote: A.TOR
                except you and people like you, no one is going to turn Europe into an arena of war

                Then what are the hostages doing there?
                We left Germany, they don’t think.
                By the way, with the advent (God knows why the necessary calibers)

                Necessary so that it would never occur to anyone to turn "Europe into an arena of war"
                "Gauges" by the way, rockets Maritime basing and did not fall under the contract
                Teach materiel
                By the way, on a nearby branch there’s a good headline like “We need a plane that can bomb Moscow”
            2. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 11 February 2020 15: 22 New
              • 2
              • 6
              -4
              Funny how fast you moved from "yes they all lie" к "and correctly violated, and what, what do they care about".
              1. A.TOR 11 February 2020 16: 12 New
                • 0
                • 3
                -3
                This is a standard procedure, first like that, then like that, then ... how ?! arms race?!! why?!! what are we doing here? !!
                ... and why has salt so risen in price?
          2. Sanichsan 11 February 2020 15: 19 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich
            A contract that is not respected does not make sense.

            Well, as it were, the NATO countries have already indicated the violation of the treaty. dual-use missile defense launchers are an obvious violation. Iskander who supposedly fly farther than it should be, this is an alleged violation.
            1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 11 February 2020 15: 24 New
              • 1
              • 10
              -9
              Quote: SanichSan
              Iskander who supposedly fly farther than it should be, this is an alleged violation.
              Have you read the article in the comments above about the Iskander-M tests?
              1. Sanichsan 11 February 2020 15: 33 New
                • 4
                • 0
                +4
                Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich
                Have you read the article in the comments above about the Iskander-M tests?

                and? a month after the expiration of the treaty, the United States launched a cruise missile with a range of 2000 km from the missile defense system.
                or do you want to say that the United States should not comply with an inoperative treaty, and Russia must comply?
                I draw your attention that the IskanderM missile is a new missile, while the missile defense launcher and cruise missiles have long been in service with the United States.
                Still have questions about who and what broke? bully
              2. figwam 11 February 2020 15: 33 New
                • 4
                • 0
                +4
                Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich
                Have you read the article in the comments above about the Iskander-M tests?

                Dear, the Iskander rocket was tested on January 9, 2020, the contract ended on August 2, 2019. Where is the violation here?
                1. Sanichsan 11 February 2020 15: 35 New
                  • 3
                  • 0
                  +3
                  Quote: figvam
                  Dear, the rocket was tested on January 9, 2020

                  exactly "Dear"? I have serious doubts. a citizen rubs us some game.
                2. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 11 February 2020 15: 37 New
                  • 1
                  • 3
                  -2
                  No violation. No contract - no violation. Everything is good.
                  1. figwam 11 February 2020 15: 51 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich
                    No violation. No contract - no violation. Everything is good.

                    So you do not have to wishful thinking.
            2. K-50 11 February 2020 15: 32 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              Quote: SanichSan
              Iskander who supposedly fly farther than it should be, this is an alleged violation.

              And, you must admit, the use of target missiles falling under the RSMD Pin Agreement is not conducive to its preservation. This time.
              The second one. How much time is needed for design and research to organize the production of SMD missiles and how much time has passed since pin-outs and their test launch of such a missile have left the Agreement? Strange huh?
              Finally, the appearance of long-range strike drones is already nullifying this Treaty. Of course, they do not fall under him, theoretically, but our Oka did not fall under him, but they were forced to destroy them.
              So in fact it was not a treaty, but some sort of sieve. Moreover, all the “holes” were in favor of pin dos.
              1. A.TOR 11 February 2020 16: 16 New
                • 0
                • 3
                -3
                Do you even read what was the launch container (PU), what kind of rocket. Just to blurt out
                1. Oyo Sarkazmi 11 February 2020 19: 00 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  UNIVERSAL launch container. Which can be charged by ANY missile from the range of sea and land-based missiles. Do you want - anti-aircraft gun, do you want - Tomahawk. A universal launch container is legal on board a ship. On land - no. Even if there are barrels of oranges inside.
        2. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 14: 56 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: K-50
          and decision points, read Europe,

          Yes, in general, the decision on the application is taken over a puddle.
          True, something more powerful will fly there
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. NEXUS 11 February 2020 14: 42 New
      • 8
      • 2
      +6
      Quote: K-50
      So what, what could agree?

      An indicator that in most EU countries that are members of NATO, puppet regimes are at the head. At the same time, this statement clearly shows that none of these chief officials put anything into the opinion of ordinary citizens of their states. Europe completely forgot what war is, and therefore these statements are being poured. Young people know the European War only from computer games and from Hollywood films.
      1. cniza 11 February 2020 14: 47 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Young people know the European War only from computer games and from Hollywood films.


        And he thinks that they have many lives and can recover ..., this is a big problem, it will be very difficult to negotiate with them ...
        1. NIKN 11 February 2020 15: 24 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Quote: cniza
          that they have many lives and can be restored ... this is a big problem

          In order to recover, one must save, but with this ..., with the instinct of self-preservation, I look at them with serious problems. sad
      2. swnvaleria 11 February 2020 14: 58 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Europeans probably don’t understand that in the case of warriors they will be consumables, and that it will not be just a war with tanks, planes and trenches, it will be total destruction within a few minutes, and their rulers will be guilty because of the puddle that installed their proteges in head of their government and use it as the people of Europe want
  3. Aliken 11 February 2020 14: 30 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    What a passage.
  4. Sergey Olegovich 11 February 2020 14: 33 New
    • 11
    • 1
    +10
    we were able as a result of intensive consultations reach an agreementthat it violated Russia

    They gathered in a quiet company and agreed to appoint Russia guilty. Not politicians, but some kind of "little brothers" from crime.
    1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 14: 58 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Sergey Olegovich
      They gathered in a quiet company and agreed to appoint Russia guilty.

      Thieves' gangway
    2. Vladimir B. 11 February 2020 15: 59 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: Sergey Olegovich
      Not politicians, but some kind of "little brothers" from crime.

      According to Zadornov: they are full of glavnyuk laughing
  5. Gregory2 11 February 2020 14: 33 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    he said, adding that all NATO countries, together with the United States, called on Russia to return to compliance with the treaty and destroy missiles violating itHowever, Moscow refused to do this, thereby forcing Washington to withdraw from the INF Treaty.

    These are the missiles that NATO is most afraid of. "Let them cut it - they throw money away, and we will secretly build it up at the expense of our allies in NATO, which are not members of the INF Treaty. Let them pour their heads on ashes." Russia will not allow this ...
  6. Pacifist 11 February 2020 14: 36 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    The collapse of the INF Treaty is bad, but it demonstrated the strength of NATO, because as a result of intensive consultations we were able to agree that Russia violated it and coordinate our next steps


    Only psychiatrists can figure out this phrase ...
    I laughed at her for half an hour ... it is surprising that it would seem an adult, in all seriousness, aloud, to pronounce such nonsense ... That is not confirm the facts of guilt, but agree who is to blame ... Burned everyone.
    1. Vladimir B. 11 February 2020 16: 01 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: Pacifist
      it is surprising that a seemingly adult person can, in all seriousness, aloud, pronounce such nonsense.

      Among foreign politicians, serious people are very rare.
  7. cniza 11 February 2020 14: 37 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The complete destruction of the INF Treaty (an agreement on the elimination of intermediate and shorter-range missiles) demonstrated the strength of NATO, since all the countries that are members of the North Atlantic Alliance were able to agree to blame Russia on this.


    He himself at least understood what he said lol ... gave a confession, if correctly translated ...
    1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 15: 06 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: cniza
      confessed, if correctly translated ...

      "Cracked at the First Schucher" (C) lol
      1. cniza 11 February 2020 15: 07 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Rather pierced by chatter ... yes
        1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 15: 20 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: cniza
          Rather pierced by chatter ...

          Yes, they have not controlled the broom for a long time.
          Off-road rod
          1. cniza 11 February 2020 15: 53 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            "For your words and condemn ..."
            1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 16: 01 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: cniza
              "For your words and condemn ..."

              God forbid ...
  8. rocket757 11 February 2020 14: 38 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The collapse of the INF Treaty is bad, but it demonstrated the strength of NATO, because as a result of intensive consultations we were able to agree that Russia violated it and coordinate our next steps

    Psissa the talker, does not differ in mind, but talkative without measure! A find for journalists and other overexcited.
    1. cniza 11 February 2020 15: 08 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      I think his tongue will be cut ...
      1. rocket757 11 February 2020 15: 13 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        will be hands, gestures, "great secrets" show! this can’t be stopped ... except to open the tail, to the ears!
        1. cniza 11 February 2020 15: 50 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: rocket757
          will be hands, gestures, "great secrets" show! this can’t be stopped ... except to open the tail, to the ears!

          Yeah, but leave the tonsils on display, but in general they completely lost their fear, there are no shores ...
      2. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 15: 20 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: cniza
        I think his tongue will be cut ...

        They will also give a prize
        1. cniza 11 February 2020 15: 52 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          They’ll give, they’ll catch up and once again ..., will go on increasing ...
          1. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 16: 01 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: cniza
            will increase ...

            I have no doubt
            1. rocket757 11 February 2020 18: 13 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Basically, in NATO, the Yankees rule, the talker chats what they need, basically ... and they don’t limit themselves to anything.
              Maybe there’s not much that shines in the heroic structures, so there are enough of them who control the Yankees ... I will find a place for him.
              1. cniza 11 February 2020 19: 09 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                He already has a "top" post in NATO ... it seems that Ostap began to enter ...
                1. rocket757 11 February 2020 19: 21 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  There is no limit ... Wishlist, some. Although sitting high, he’s just a talker! Maybe he specifically wants to steer what, by whom.
                  1. cniza 11 February 2020 20: 27 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    Well, yes, "the mistress of the sea" let Pushkin revered ...
          2. rocket757 11 February 2020 18: 15 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Psis sings to the owner, specifically, the owner feeds, protects and attaches.
  9. Whisper 11 February 2020 14: 41 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Like we got together and outwitted everyone cool. Did he say that?
  10. Lord of the Sith 11 February 2020 14: 44 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    Complete addiction. We ruined the agreement, it’s bad, but it’s good that we agreed to blame Russia for this.

    We decided so, and that's good. La la wassat
    And then there is a dance of homeless black children performed by Stoltenberg to consolidate the effect of the drama.
  11. Thrifty 11 February 2020 14: 45 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    What other strength? A flock of hyenas yawned from around the corner toward the bear! And, it was only after the jackal barking from the USA, and they themselves were sitting evenly that they had no right to sneeze without permission from across the ocean! A collection of non-liquid, living at the expense of three countries that have preserved the economy in Europe, all your NATO.
  12. Alexga 11 February 2020 14: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    that all NATO countries, together with the United States, called on Russia to return to compliance with the treaty and destroy its violating missiles, but Moscow refused to do this, thereby forcing Washington to withdraw from the INF Treaty.

    As far back as 1986, a certain tagged one persistently convinced the Americans about their loyalty, which is why they speak such words even now that the USSR is no longer there. Once allowed, and reaping the benefits so far. And on the other hand, there is no contract - no obligations.
  13. Amateur 11 February 2020 14: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Stupid Europeans. The INF missiles are primarily directed against the countries of Europe, as You can’t get ICBMs from Russia to France or Stoltenberg Norway. As a result, tactical nuclear weapons aimed at Amer’s bases in Europe, “partner” capitals and logistics centers will get “on their backbone”.
    And it will be all good and fun.
  14. jetfors_84 11 February 2020 14: 58 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Reading bullshit, which is this character, is like listening to a psychiatrist.
  15. Al_lexx 11 February 2020 14: 59 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    IMHO, all this will end with the next Caribbean obosratushki when the Iskander put up in Cuba, and at the same time the base, for the jump of air strategists, with them on board.
    Sorry, for my Chetlanstky.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  16. zenion 11 February 2020 15: 01 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Mom told her daughter that she found a condom in jeans. The daughter pounced on her husband and began to eat him. Mom smiled for a moment, and then said - dotsya, I found a condom in your jeans pocket.
  17. Nikolay87 11 February 2020 15: 02 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It will be tolerant to explain why three skins will be torn from them. How many are there today? 2-3% of GDP? Will be 4!
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. Al_lexx 11 February 2020 15: 10 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Admins. What are the draconian methods?
    Here people write something wrong.
    I positively do not understand. Maybe I personally offended you?
  20. Operator 11 February 2020 15: 14 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Stoltenberg was reporting quite a bit: as if before the appearance of specific cruise missiles in the Iskander complex, NATO did not blame Russia for breaking the INF Treaty.

    And who else would they blame - themselves (allowing them to place land launchers for the Tomahawk in Poland and Romania)? laughing
    1. Nikolay87 11 February 2020 15: 21 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      With these words, he essentially explains to the whole world that the block of consensus on the Russian Federation, i.e. they are all together and very friendly, and behind closed doors he will later explain to them, why they are all together.
      1. Operator 11 February 2020 15: 22 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        I had in mind another - that Stoltenberg once again lied.
  21. Cowbra 11 February 2020 15: 20 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    The destruction of the INF Treaty, which directly contradicts the interests of all NATO countries, EXCEPT the USA, helped to show that the alliance is not an alliance. And it is the "native forces" of the United States ...
  22. shubin 11 February 2020 15: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Fucking logic, they themselves destroyed, and blamed everything else!
  23. tihonmarine 11 February 2020 15: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    We will discuss our response to the full range of Russian missile systems: conventional, nuclear and missiles under development
    As we had at the time at the party bureau it was "We sat, whispered, and there is no man."
  24. Azazelo 11 February 2020 15: 40 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The talking head is back in business ...
  25. The Siberian barber 11 February 2020 15: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Nothing new: "reward under the door of the neighbor, and accuse him of the deed"
    Company handwriting)))
  26. Gennady Fomkin 11 February 2020 16: 09 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    laughing The prosecutor was found.
  27. Ros 56 11 February 2020 16: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Stoltenberg is simply stupid like a traffic jam, to believe NATO, this is not to respect yourself. The whole world knows about Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya and other large and small wars. Therefore, the GDP is doing just as necessary for our security, literally the freshest infa - from 2012 to this day, the number of precision weapons has increased 30 times, and supersonic carriers 12 times.
  28. evgen1221 11 February 2020 16: 22 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, in this way they can (agree among themselves) on everything that is convenient for them. Incidentally, in the same way, we can also agree on something convenient for us, for example, on the illegality of the dollar in the territory of the Russian Federation and begin to implement this plan, spitting on everyone in a row, because we agreed on this with ourselves as well))) Thank you, for a wonderful precedent for leaving from any political restrictions.
  29. demo 11 February 2020 16: 23 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The collapse of the INF Treaty is bad, but it demonstrated the strength of NATO, because as a result of intensive consultations we were able to agree that Russia violated it and coordinate our next steps

    - said the Secretary General of NATO.

    Is this statement of a mentally retarded or absolutely devoid of a doubt about their righteousness?
    1. alien 11 February 2020 16: 42 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      the alliance has a "brain death" ...
  30. Lamata 11 February 2020 17: 04 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Here a meteorite fell, and under it lies a little Ruska, what kind of misfortune, there’s nowhere to drop a pebble. laughing
  31. Leprikon5656 11 February 2020 17: 34 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Maybe it's a translation? He probably said "have come to a conclusion."
  32. Victor March 47 11 February 2020 22: 51 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Who would doubt that what the penguins did would be blamed on us, Russia. But in any business there are both positive and negative sides. Now we are free to return to a situation where we will again have those 50 thousand tactical nuclear charges. Ten for each carduelis, similar to this.
  33. lvov_aleksey 11 February 2020 22: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    brr, I'm already scared !!!! They persuade themselves - reassure? Who is the specialist here?
  34. tolmachiev51 12 February 2020 04: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    - "since we were able, as a result of intensive consultations, to agree that Russia violated it and to coordinate our next steps" - there was a team in Fashington, and it must be fulfilled !!! for tomorrow you can become ex.
  35. Vyacheslav34 12 February 2020 13: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The only conclusion is that power is not necessary ... the deceased used to say correctly .. if they are stupid