No time for the Medvedev government: versions of the reasons for the resignation

82
No time for the Medvedev government: versions of the reasons for the resignation

Despite the fact that since the moment when Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev and his government were fired, almost a month has passed, the debate about the reasons for this event continues. Also, new versions are being put forward regarding the “true” reasons that this team and its leader were out of the way with the new course announced in the country. Regarding the fact that now is definitely not the time for Medvedev’s Cabinet. Well, I’ll try to make my own contribution to this burning topic.

Official motives were voiced repeatedly, including by Medvedev himself, who, in particular, admitted that he had "stayed" at his post, which he had been able to hold for almost eight years. According to him, “such a precedent in the latest stories There was no Russia. ”



In addition, the ex-prime minister believes that the “old” cabinet would be a brake on the “renewal of the political system” being carried out by Vladimir Putin and the global processes of “changing the balance of power” connected with it. Well, it’s good as a working version, but this is not the only point.

Many experts point to a whole series of points in connection with which the further stay in power of the team that more or less steadily led all the most important sectors of the country's life in recent years has become completely unacceptable. At a minimum, there is some truth in the vast majority of such opinions. The Medvedevs (and Medvedev personally) did indeed manage to collect too much negativity from society. It just so happened, and there are both subjective and completely objective reasons. In this regard, the theories expressed by some Western media that Putin has removed Medvedev from power as a “dangerous competitor” who “knew too much about the Kremlin’s political cuisine” look, to put it mildly, a conspiracy of pure water.

The thing, most likely, is another. The president is changing those on whom the fate of the country will depend in the very near future, since at this stage he needs managers of a completely different type and warehouse than those who have occupied ministerial and other high seats so far.

The simplest analogy: the captain and crew, perfectly managing a pleasure yacht, lazily gliding along the sleeping warm sea under a light and gentle breeze, are hardly suitable for leading a warship into battle, and even in the midst of a storm and a storm. To our great regret, if we talk about Russia yesterday and today, and especially about what it looks like the country expects literally tomorrow, then these are the analogies.

The times of relative peace and prosperity, in fact, ended for us in 2014. Moreover, economic problems and difficulties that seemed temporary to some people did not decrease at all. Sanction pressure, the distinct desire of certain circles in the West for the political isolation of Russia, assuming ever more realistic features, the danger of a collision ... Russia is now not a yacht or a cruise ship, but a cruiser preparing for battle and a campaign. Hence the corresponding personnel decisions.

We have yet to see what exactly the innovations proposed by the president will result in, which, in theory, should affect each and every one of us. It is quite possible, and even more likely, changes in the structure of power and its personalities will continue further. With the enormous scale of what was conceived, Putin can no longer carry everything to the smallest detail alone or relying on a very narrow circle of associates. Now, most likely, an extremely tough selection will be held of those who will be able to lead the country further.

The Medvedev government did not fit into these processes at all. We will not go through everything that failed him: from national projects to, let’s say, not too well-thought-out innovations in the pension sphere. Maybe they wanted the best. But defeat does not recognize excuses, nor does victory require explanation. Now this is the past. Let's see what future will bring us those who have come and will come to replace them.
82 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    11 February 2020 11: 14
    The Medvedev government simply did not achieve positive economic results. With him, we did not have 7% of the economic growth that we planned in the early 2000s. Naturally, the people, instead of becoming a little wealthy, gradually became poorer in comparison with other countries. For a country with great human potential and huge resources - this is unacceptable. It is a pity that they did not remove it earlier, when it became clear that it was not his business to lead the country.
    1. +9
      11 February 2020 11: 45
      Quote: bessmertniy
      It is a pity that they did not remove it earlier, when it became clear that it was not his business to lead the country.

      It's just that when "selfish interests" prevail, it is difficult to set the right priorities in work.
      That’s why they didn’t achieve it. And it is useless to call such people to conscience, it’s like a drug, if you’re used to it, you won’t refuse voluntarily.
      1. +23
        11 February 2020 11: 52
        Oh, come on - "resignation", - a simple "castling" before the elections, and a dummy figure was presented, on whom the impending "unpopular decisions" to create an "electronic concentration camp". Already, there were such - "kinder surprise" and "three percent", have you forgotten?
        1. -1
          11 February 2020 11: 55
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          Oh, come on - "resignation" - simple "castling"

          I did not give an assessment of the new team, I assessed why the old team was not very successful.
          A few words about the new team, some British analyst said.
          He said that Mishustin, as head of the Federal Tax Service, created the best tax service in the world.
          1. -3
            11 February 2020 11: 58
            Where is our FMS the best? When 40 percent of citizens either do not pay taxes at all, or they are underpaid.
            1. +2
              11 February 2020 12: 12
              I hope they didn’t make me, the hard worker from the enterprise in these same 40% .. And then ours just throw the idea ..
              1. -6
                11 February 2020 12: 16
                So you do not pay taxes, the employer pays them for you. So that all questions to him.
                1. +5
                  11 February 2020 13: 10
                  And accordingly it pays me a lower salary. And more, these percentages ... This is just about the population that works in the real sector of the economy. Suggest to twist nuts? The thread will not break?
                  1. -7
                    11 February 2020 13: 49
                    Then do not be surprised at the state of health care, education and the size of pensions.
                    1. +8
                      11 February 2020 14: 32
                      With a surplus budget, it is inconclusive to justify the destruction of education and medicine by tax shortages, to put it mildly ... But alas, it is possible to purposefully destroy the people of Russia.
                    2. +6
                      11 February 2020 16: 20
                      I am surprised how billions disappear from the state pocket into "nowhere". And you mean that "taxes are not enough"
            2. 0
              11 February 2020 14: 05
              Maybe you don’t remember, but in the late 90s and early 2000s no one paid them at all.
              1. -3
                11 February 2020 14: 10
                Therefore, the state was on the verge of collapse.
                1. +6
                  11 February 2020 14: 29
                  Quote: AU Ivanov.
                  Therefore, the state was on the verge of collapse.

                  It infuriates not that taxes must be paid, I pay them regularly, but that I have to participate in a pyramid such as the PFR and the MHI.
                  1. 0
                    11 February 2020 14: 32
                    In general, during a crisis, taxes should not be raised, but reduced. But at the same time everyone should pay.
                    1. +4
                      11 February 2020 16: 21
                      That's right. Everyone should pay. Only everything is different.
                      1. +1
                        11 February 2020 16: 27
                        The more you earn, the more you pay.
                      2. +4
                        11 February 2020 16: 32
                        Right. But only we at the enterprise did not raise wages for the third year. There were questions to the management and one of the answers, by the way, was as follows: "Understand, we have to pay taxes, the Pension Fund, the compulsory medical insurance and all that .." And no one canceled inflation.
                      3. 0
                        16 February 2020 18: 54
                        Andrey is called "progressive tax" ... Do you want to live like in Sweden? There it reaches up to 80% ... But there and the "nouveau riche" ... No comparison ...
                    2. 0
                      16 February 2020 18: 57
                      ... and also do not go to Courchevel ....
                  2. 0
                    22 February 2020 11: 49
                    There is so far the only way out - to work according to gray schemes and save for retirement and treatment yourself.
              2. +4
                11 February 2020 16: 27
                Well, about "no one paid" you zagnuli. Paid. True, there were opportunities to cheat. However, as now.
                1. 0
                  22 February 2020 11: 52
                  OK. Not "nobody". Very few people. The bottom line is that tax collection has increased significantly over 20 years. Now there are questions about the transparency, consistency and fairness of these taxes. Perhaps these are tasks for the next 20-year school.
              3. The comment was deleted.
          2. +13
            11 February 2020 12: 37
            I did not give an assessment of the new team, I assessed why the old team was not very successful.

            And where is the team ??
            Medvedev that - could make some decisions independently ?? Could take and abandon the pension reform ??
            Or maybe Mishutin could refuse it (although he said that he would not do it)
            Or maybe he could introduce progressive taxation ??
            What could these people / can ?? Where is the change of teams ??
            There is only one commander, and so far his commands sound without any changes ..

            He said that Mishustin, as head of the Federal Tax Service, created the best tax service in the world.

            Yes, you can say anything ..
            The question is the best for anyone ..

            Even in my office for 15 people, the accountant has no profit .. although the owner does not have a single Mercedes in the courtyard of the mansion, and does not crawl out of the seas ..
            And all sorts of officials - all the more "dexterous" to get out in their business
            But let any hard worker at the factory just try not to pay a penny ..
            This is the FTS and the "best" in the world .. for them .. And not at all for people ..
            1. +4
              11 February 2020 14: 35
              Quote: Roman070280
              Medvedev that - could make some decisions independently ?? Could take and abandon the pension reform ??
              Or maybe Mishutin could refuse it (although he said that he would not do it)

              Then we continue the list, Putin, judging by his words, deeds also depends on his friends-employers and is far from being an independent political person. They are all one team.
              1. +6
                11 February 2020 15: 53
                "Vaga" is not located in Russia at all.
        2. +26
          11 February 2020 12: 03
          Putin can no longer drag on himself everything to the smallest detail alone or relying on a very narrow circle of associates. Now, most likely, an extremely tough selection will take place of those who will be able to lead the country further.

          Medvedev government in these processes didn't fit at all.

          Well, Putin is always good for us. The author makes it clear that: what a fine fellow Putin, that he removed Medvedev! I am sure that if Putin had not removed Medvedev, the author would have written like this: well done Putin and Medvedev is also well done!

          Let's see what future will bring us those who have come and will come to replace them.

          How can something change due to a change of scenery without changing the script? Here it’s not the scenery that needs to be changed, but the screenwriter’s decorator.
        3. +14
          11 February 2020 14: 37
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          Already, there were such - "kinder surprise" and "three percent", have you forgotten?

          I think the same way, nothing will change fundamentally .. Medvedev's rating tended to negative numbers, the boiler began to boil .. steam needed to be released .. Moor did his job .. taxes, pension reform .. a constant drop in incomes and a reduction in Russian people ..
    2. +14
      11 February 2020 11: 50
      categorically with you, Victor, disagree ...
      any government in the Russian Federation was, is and will be just a toolbox of decisions taken in the "inner circle" ...
      and the LADY with his "whipping boys" was removed for the sake of one thing - under the jubilation and approval of the population, to push through amendments to the constitution ...
      what you just won’t do, if only to rule forever ...
      1. 0
        11 February 2020 11: 55
        Alexey, you are right about something. But ... Medvedev's team is one of the branches of power - it is the executive branch. Along with legislative and judicial, she is independent in decision making. And the government is not just "whipping boys", but the real power, which must be held accountable for its actions. hi
        1. +13
          11 February 2020 12: 18
          Victor, dear, just don't talk about the "independence" of the branches of our government ...
          since when has the State Duma, Federation Council, Cabinet of Ministers and judges suddenly become independent of the "Ozerkovsky inner circle" ??? ...
      2. +4
        11 February 2020 12: 17
        Weird! Why was removed, but not transferred to another job? And it never occurred to you that they are preparing a new performance? What do they offer us? Judging by the fact that we are integrating into the global economy, we are offered a well-proven steam bleeding system. After all, they can propose a presidential election in 3-4 years! Very nice valve! Accumulated negativity around the person, removed. Accumulated around another, again removed! Persons are changing! Story remains! All protests come down to the resignations of the presidents! Putin doesn’t offer a change of order! I believe they want to create presidential structures that are real and will rule. The president will only be the executor of the will of the leadership. What would I do in Putin's place? He would have headed the Security Council and subordinated him to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the FSB and the Russian Guard. Where is Medvedev? Head the State Council! The State Council would include all the leaders of the regions. They would represent the interests of business and the oligarchs. And they would put forward laws in their interests (these are not ignorant actors and athletes). And the State Duma (these actors and athletes) would approve the laws! The system is perfect! No revolutions! Only calm evolution! If there is a riot, you can quickly change the president! The main thing is not to touch the system! laughing hi
    3. +8
      11 February 2020 12: 00
      Do you think he was tasked with economic growth? I doubt it. If they did, they would ask. And for the failure attracted. What was asked from Medvedev and how and what was he attracted to? They deprived of bonuses, salaries, and post (transferred to low-paying jobs). Well, how is it normally done in the workplace. If you work in production, try not to follow the order of the management (owner)! What will it be for you? If you have not removed before, then successfully coped with the work. Is it really incomprehensible? Will you be kept at work if you systematically fail a job?
      1. -2
        11 February 2020 12: 27
        Government is not a booth. He was faced with economic tasks, but the programs adopted were not implemented, and we have the result as it is. hi Again, as for the "independence" of the branches of power from each other, one can argue a lot about this, that it does not exist. But in that case, Medvedev would have been eaten long ago. And so - he kept to himself. He did what he loved - photography, traveled. In general, he seemed to be in charge of the government, with which the majority were dissatisfied, but who would reckon with our majority! request
        1. +4
          11 February 2020 12: 39
          I think before him were set not widely declared tasks with which he successfully coped. Nobody ate Medvedev. So I completed the tasks. It was a good lightning rod. Very successfully defended Putin! People! Well, tell me, who will keep you at work in case of your failures in work? There are such? Well, except for those who are set for bankruptcy of the enterprise. Although here, they clearly fulfill the tasks! Of course there is an opinion of the authorities and there is an opinion of the population. That's just hiring and paying bosses, not the population. Therefore, you can leave your opinion about the layman Medvedev with you as a personal opinion. The leadership of Medvedev has a different opinion! hi No offense! But it is so!
      2. +2
        16 February 2020 17: 49
        Well, why ... Transferred .. And even 2 more assistants were added ... Probably, who is smarter .. Well, it is true, "AURUS" was taken away ... So too little things ... It's an everyday matter, "family". .. Haven't you forgotten this term yet?
    4. +1
      11 February 2020 14: 24
      Quote: bessmertniy
      It is a pity that they did not remove it earlier, when it became clear that it was not his business to lead the country.

      So not only depended on him, it is necessary to change the one who appoints, I’m not only about the president, but also about a bunch of thieves-oligarchs for whom they work. And so it’s just pre-election castling and dust in the eyes.
    5. 0
      17 February 2020 17: 29
      It's not about the faces, but in the class. Change of persons is not able to change anything until the classes in power change. So to believe that the bourgeois will take care of the people or work for the public good is stupid.
  2. +15
    11 February 2020 11: 19
    Let's see what future will bring us those who have come and will come to replace them.

    The new government is likely to continue the policies of the previous government. I believe that the new government has already earned one minus by refusing to cancel the pension reform.
    1. +4
      11 February 2020 11: 50
      I agree with you, and goes the same course of tax administration, that is, strengthening the tax press on the population.
  3. +5
    11 February 2020 11: 20
    I caught Dmitry Anatolyevich a goldfish.
    The fish offered to traditionally fulfill the three wishes of the lucky one.
    The lucky one quickly realized: “I will save Mother Russia from two main troubles.”
    - bad roads and fools, and, naturally, the ninth. "
    He made his first wish and, bam, there are wide bridges around and three-level roads.
    He made a second wish and, suddenly, bam, changed his mind for some reason about an iPhone ....
    1. 0
      16 February 2020 17: 07
      So it is in fairy tales ... or in anecdotes. It's not just that they give the iPhone a drive ...
  4. +1
    11 February 2020 11: 20
    Medvedev needed to be removed in 14-15. Even then, a person more competent than he was needed.
    1. +1
      11 February 2020 11: 30
      If you judge, knowing the situation inside the Kremlin, then yes, if you do not know, then these are fantasies that you need and could be done before.
      1. 0
        16 February 2020 17: 17
        And nobody judges. There are no such rights - to judge these ... (obscene expressions are prohibited on the resource. And there are no others.) "Liberoids" - in the words of A. Wasserman ...
    2. -2
      11 February 2020 11: 36
      This is the number. Medvedev, then, the presidential term has rattled from bell to bell. How can you doubt his incompetence?)
      1. +3
        11 February 2020 12: 06
        Medvedev's incompetence was manifested in his decisions, clumsy lobbying, often at a shallow level of decision-making, and public statements.

        "No money, but you hold on."
      2. +1
        16 February 2020 17: 20
        Exactly - rattled off ... But what kind of ... President is he? So, "warm up the chair" ...
  5. +5
    11 February 2020 11: 27
    Yes, I saw him in fawn a coat of squirrels, immediately everything became clear! laughing
  6. 0
    11 February 2020 11: 29
    They are all from the same deck. It will be necessary to correct the picture in the eyes of the liberal public, ours or foreign, and Dmitry Anatolyevich will be returned. Everything has its time. The man is checked. These are not scattered.
  7. +1
    11 February 2020 11: 32
    In principle, fundamental, NOTHING!
    And there we’ll see what camouflage they will induce, or maybe .....
    1. +1
      11 February 2020 12: 57
      I always want to hope for the best. Yes
      1. +1
        11 February 2020 13: 03
        That's why I write "maybe", like suddenly, the unexpected will happen! And because we are waiting for something that is not joyful, it means that it is unexpected, that something else can \ cannot be.
        1. +2
          11 February 2020 13: 08
          Anyway, tomorrow will be better than yesterday. Yes
          1. +1
            11 February 2020 13: 16
            If ready, you can, go and get started ...
            And if you can’t, do not want to, stay at home and do your own thing ...
            The choice is not great and simple.
            1. +2
              11 February 2020 14: 19
              Quote: rocket757
              If ready, you can, go and get started ...


              Only one thing, but who will let him ...
              1. +1
                11 February 2020 14: 33
                It's right. The second half always has an argument, convincing, there is! Flat or round, it doesn’t matter, the main thing is which hand will be in it!
                1. +3
                  11 February 2020 14: 35
                  It’ll fool you anyway ..., without hardware experience there’s nothing to do there, they’ll eat up, set up, put him in prison ...
                  1. +1
                    11 February 2020 14: 40
                    In general, that from the "clip", the experience for anyone is. Tsuzye doesn't go there.
  8. +7
    11 February 2020 11: 35
    Stated not only Medvedev, and this is absolutely obvious. But Medvedev is much easier to remove than to part with power. There is no complicated circuitry here. The degree of tension in society has risen to a very high level, it is necessary to reset the steam, so we replaced the extras shown on TV with newer ones. Real helmsmen will not give up; this has long been clear.
  9. +8
    11 February 2020 11: 39
    How to name the phenomenon, it will be so. Some for some reason consider resignation. But I see that many members of the government switched to another, more relaxed job, one might say with an increase. Some were punished by remaining in government.
    Just slightly changed priorities. Despite the overwhelming voices from each iron, in fact, everything is not so rosy. It just took people who knew how to take seven skins, but so that the one who was taken off survived and give at least a couple more skins.
    But Medvedev has nothing to do with it, you just have to stay away from the boiling volcano.
  10. +4
    11 February 2020 11: 43
    The post of prime minister obliges to work hard yourself. To force subordinates to work, to delve into hundreds / thousands of questions to the smallest nuances. THIS is not for Medvedev.
    Failures in education, science, healthcare, all can not be counted.
  11. +3
    11 February 2020 11: 51
    Medev, such a plush toy in the prime minister’s chair. His iPhone was more concerned.
    1. +2
      11 February 2020 12: 30
      I think that after all the peretrubation with the constitution and entry into eternal rule, the new prime minister will begin to embody what he was put on the prime minister for ... wait ... there will not be long before digital slavery ...
      no matter how we have to recall the "plush iPhone" with nostalgia ...
      1. +2
        11 February 2020 12: 56
        Quote: kepmor
        the new prime minister will begin to embody what for which he was put on the premiership ... wait ... there will not be long before digital slavery ...


        It has long come and this is an inevitable process, the whole story goes in a circle, with a change in the spiral, then feudalism and so on ...
  12. +4
    11 February 2020 11: 56
    As for me, if Putin had changed his government immediately after re-election, then he would not have lost the trust of a significant number of his voters, and most importantly, such an amount of time in such difficult conditions for the country.
  13. +5
    11 February 2020 12: 00
    Resignation is so .... to move temporarily so that my eyes aren’t ... Putin must resign ... Sorry, but the word with the deed doesn’t coincide ...

    I read the stunning document from 2008 No. 1662-r (signed by V.V. Putin), which promises us that in a few days (!) The whole country will live in unprecedented happiness. What does it say?

    The level of income and the quality of life of Russians by 2020 will reach the indicators characteristic of developed economies. This means high standards of personal safety, access to education and health services of the required quality.

    And if without all these common words. Are there any specific numbers? Yes, there are and they are simply gorgeous.
    There is no time to swing

    All of the following were planned to be completed in 12 years (a decent amount of time), but something went wrong and the plan failed. Although, until 2020 there is still almost a month, they will suddenly be in time. All you need is:

    The establishment of the minimum wage at the level of the recovery consumer budget (exceeding the living wage of the able-bodied population by 2 - 2,2 times)

    We look at the cost of living for the able-bodied population from 10.09.2019/20196/40392 (Moscow) - 44431 rubles. Then the minimum wage should be from 40 to XNUMX rubles. When will already working people really begin to receive at least XNUMX thousand?

    By 2020, the average level of housing will reach about 30 m2 per person.

    At the moment it is about 25 m2 (for example, in the Czech Republic this figure is 40 m2 per person). Thanks to the party for not offering to buy 11 m2 for 2 million. Have I missed everything? Already offer?

    The share of expenditures on education and health in GDP will be about 13-14%, which is comparable to the indicators of leading foreign countries.

    In 2019, expenses for education in Russia were planned - 4,1%, for healthcare - 3,3% of GDP. Total: 7,4%. Not comparable with leading countries.

    The average size of a labor pension rises to 2,5 - 3 living wages of a pensioner by 2016 - 2020.

    The living wage of a pensioner in Moscow for 2019 is 12578 rubles. We get that the pension should be about 31445-37734 rubles. Citizens are pensioners, less than a month is left to wait. While you can choose holiday packages.

    A decrease in absolute poverty from 13,4% in 2007 to 6 - 7% in 2020, an increase in the middle class by 2020 to more than 50% of the population.

    The poverty level in Russia in the first quarter of 2019 was 14,3%, and only 7% of the country's population corresponds to all the characteristics of the middle class.
    Total

    25 million jobs, inflation of 3% per year, PPP GDP of $ 30000, global competition, effective institutions, innovation, modernization, etc. So many right words have been said.

    I sincerely want to see at least something from this list of promises brought to life, but for some reason I remember Mikhail Mikhailovich Zhvanetsky and him: "we promise them, we promise, but they are not enough."
    1. 0
      12 February 2020 00: 02
      Colleague, thanks for the study!
  14. +6
    11 February 2020 12: 15
    They are all from the same nest, from one plate they slurp, And there will be no changes who will break the system built by the very first. Colonels in the billions, generals in the tens of billions, and you don’t have to think about the higher, this also applies to officials.
  15. +5
    11 February 2020 12: 22
    “Everything in the world manages its affairs. “What he asks for, he pulls,” says the proverb. The journey through the chests was a success, so that some of the expedition went into its own box. In a word, it was prudently arranged. Chichikov did not exactly steal, but used it. After all, each of us makes use of something: one from the state forest, one from economic sums, one steals from his children for the sake of some visiting actress, the other from the peasants for the sake of Gambs furniture or a carriage. What can you do if there are so many enticements in the world? And expensive restaurants with crazy prices, and masquerades, and festivities, and dancing with gypsies. After all, it is difficult to resist if everyone from all sides is doing the same, and fashion tells you to hold yourself back! After all, you cannot always restrain yourself. Man is not a god. So Chichikov, like the multiplying number of people who love every comfort, turned things in his favor. "

    N.V. Gogol. Dead Souls, Volume Two.
    1. +2
      11 February 2020 12: 52
      Gogol should be a reference book for those who want to change something. Yes
  16. +2
    11 February 2020 12: 51
    Let's see what future will bring us those who have come and will come to replace them.


    Nothing, since all the work is "torpedoed" by the apparatus, and it is almost impossible to fire them all and replace them, a different approach and a different system are needed, but this does not mean that nothing should be done ...
  17. +5
    11 February 2020 13: 24
    The simplest analogy: the captain and crew, perfectly managing the pleasure yacht, lazily gliding along the sleeping warm sea under the light and gentle breezes, are hardly suitable for leading a warship into battle, and even in the midst of a storm and a storm.

    Ohrenitilny comparison of the country with a pleasure yacht!
    That is, those who rode in a place with the "captain" for 20 years on this "yacht", who, by the way, all this time were completely satisfied with his team and foreign "passengers", suddenly realized that they would not be allowed to hide from the storm in a foreign bay ... There is nothing to sell from this "yacht" except for a strategic reserve, and you will have to go out into a storm. What to do to suddenly get an ocean liner out of a plundered "efficient" control of a "yacht"? Swap the team without changing the system! An ingenious move. lol
    At what "wind strength" in this case will they start shouting from the bridge "MAY DAY" with this approach?
  18. +1
    11 February 2020 13: 26
    Quote: Roman070280
    Even in my office for 15 people, the accountant has no profit .. although the owner does not have a single Mercedes in the courtyard of the mansion, and does not crawl out of the seas ..

    Even if the owner is an honest person, then he can easily register himself or his wife for your company and pay so much (albeit one-time bonuses, but systemic) with attribution, of course, to expenses for tax purposes with income tax, so that there is no profit ... Well, he got denyuzhki and spent it on the Mercians and the Maldives. I'm not talking about the opportunity to work through "gaskets" with tax evasion ...
  19. +7
    11 February 2020 13: 49
    The Medvedev government did not fit into these processes at all. Let's not go through all that ...

    Indeed, what is there to understand ... Let the prosecutor and the Investigative Committee understand “Dimon” or “Dimon” ...
    But did he appear in the political life of the country on his own or did someone bring him? Oh! Now we have seen - all hope for Mishustin ... wassat
    The next step will be: “We wanted the best, but it turned out as always” ...
    Yes
    Expect milk from a shabby bull ... lol
  20. +2
    11 February 2020 14: 20
    The Medvedev government did not fit perfectly into these processes

    Almost the entire economic block remained. There are practically no changes, so there is nothing to expect from the "new" line-up.
  21. +2
    11 February 2020 14: 25
    Russia is now not a yacht or a cruise ship, but a cruiser preparing for battle and campaign. Hence the corresponding personnel decisions


    Strange decisions.
    To replace at such a crucial moment a person who has real experience of war as Commander-in-Chief with a "digital tax officer" ?!
    And what happens?
    - Undoubtedly, full Potrouble wassat

    Here, under it and the new "Victory March" is ready
    / music to the motive "March of taxi drivers" from the movie "Tractor drivers" /

    When he sends us into battle, our Supreme Ruler.
    Yachts, Bentleys, every "business jet" will be put into operation.
    We tax every shot.
    And the budget will immediately fill up.

    We will complete the Tax Maneuver.
    And the Enemy will be broken and surrounded.
    Then he will buy oil and aluminum from us,
    And with them - gas, titanium, and our Football.

    And if the enemy, stubbornly does not give up,
    We introduce a tax on air and rain.
    Tax on the Night, on the Sun and on the Stars,
    To the Image of Thoughts - to help the country.

    Do not doubt, we are all patriots.
    As soon as we overfill your pocket.
    We will smash the crumbs from the king’s table,
    So that the people do not raise us in the forks.
    (C)

    wassat laughing
  22. +2
    11 February 2020 16: 01
    For me it is not clear why there is such a fuss. Governments and prime ministers are changing in all countries. Time is changing, people are changing. I liked everything in the USSR. In addition to the phrase "loud applause, turning into a storm of applause." We must be more modest.
  23. +1
    11 February 2020 17: 36
    Well, yes Siluanov will even go to battle with the golikova. Ha ha ha Dimon will not do a damn thing as always, but his salary is 600 thousand normally
  24. +1
    11 February 2020 17: 49
    It’s clear that liberal Medvedev with the same government didn’t interfere with a non-liberal guarantor ... Now that government is not liberal at all ... laughing
  25. +4
    11 February 2020 21: 30
    So you need to remove not only Medvedev, but also Serdyukov, Chubais and others, from all leading posts ... As long as the people of Yeltsin are not removed from the administration of the Russian Federation, there will be no order in the Russian Federation !!!
  26. 0
    13 February 2020 17: 39
    The president reached the giraffe in the second ten years .... The joke, of course, he and Dmitry are a sweet couple and the president’s decision is preparation for his departure from the presidency. Here, as they say, we can’t stay on the throne, we will transfer it to another place. Just curious what people will say about the reign of the bright-faced in many years? So I understand that he spent time in vain it concerns the state, but the truth has filled his moshna, his comrades and children of troha.
    A point of view of personal prosperity and enrichment is a worthy instance of the Kunstkamera.