Plywood logistics: disposable transport UAVs from Logistic Gliders

71

UAV LG-2K in flight

Currently, the U.S. forces use a wide range of different means to supply remote or isolated units. In the near future, existing systems can be supplemented by promising unmanned gliders developed by Logistic Gliders Inc.

Supply problems


In certain situations, supplying troops by air can be difficult. An aerodrome for a transport aircraft may not be in place, and helicopters are vulnerable to enemy air defenses. The same goes for military transport aviationdropping parachute platforms.



In this regard, the US Marine Corps and the DARPA agency launched the TACAD (Tactical Air Delivery - Tactical Air Delivery) research program, which aims to create new air transport for delivering small cargoes with minimal risk.


scheme drone

Given the level of technology development, customers proposed the development of specialized transport UAVs of simplified design. Such a product should carry a load of hundreds of kilograms, be launched by dropping from the regular aircraft KMP and cover tens of miles through the air. Reuse is optional. The cost of the drone is limited to 11 thousand dollars. Ammunition, provisions, medicines, etc. are considered as potential loads.

One of the participants in the program is the Californian company Logistic Gliders. Back in 2018, she patented the original design of an unmanned glider, and so far has put two types of such equipment with different characteristics to testing.

Two gliders


Logistic Gliders company offers the customer two UAV options under the names LG-1K and LG-2K. The first project was developed with the participation of specialists from the Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory, the second was created in collaboration with DARPA. Moreover, both solutions are based on the same solutions.


Glider details

Both projects propose the construction of a non-motorized aircraft with a normal aerodynamic design. To reduce the cost of production, most of the parts are made of plywood. For the same purpose, the glider has rough contours. The main part of the fuselage is given under the cargo compartment, and the minimum necessary controls are located in the tail.

The fuselage of the LG-1K and LG-2G gliders is made in the form of a plywood box of a given size. The flat nose fairing acts as a shock absorber when landing. In the central part of the fuselage, a straight wing of great elongation, which is laid out in flight, is attached. During carrier transportation, the planes are located along the fuselage, and when reset, a special mechanism translates them into working position. The tapering tail carries plumage with a stabilizer, keel and a pair of washers. The UAV can be equipped with a landing parachute, but it is located in the cargo compartment and reduces available volumes.

For the delivery of goods to their destination, a fairly simple control system based on available components is responsible. It includes satellite navigation and an autopilot that controls the ailerons and tail surfaces. There are also remote controls that allow the operator to navigate. Telemetry and video from the bow camera are transmitted to the remote control.


Glider in transport position in carrier cargo compartment

UAV type LG-1K has a length of 3,2 m with a wingspan of 7,1 m. 0,9 kg of payload is placed inside the cargo compartment with a total volume of less than 320 cubic meters. The LG-2K glider is noticeably larger and heavier. Its length reaches 3,9 m, wing span - 8,4 m. 1,2 kg of load are transported in a compartment with a volume of 725 cubic meters. Own mass of a larger apparatus - only 181 kg. During planning, both samples have a speed of not more than 280 km / h. The maximum planning range is 70 miles. Aerodynamic quality - 12.

According to the customer’s conditions, new types of UAVs should be used with a wide range of transport planes, helicopters and tiltrotors KMP and the US Air Force. Depending on the type and characteristics of the carrier, the glider is transported in the cargo compartment or on an external sling.

The way to use gliders is quite simple. The carrier enters the specified area and dumps the UAV in the transport position. After the reset, the glider opens its wings and begins an independent flight to the specified coordinates. There, the drone performs a horizontal landing or releases a landing parachute. After that, the “addressees” can disassemble the glider and take out the delivered cargo. Repeated use is not provided.


Outboard transport

It is claimed that the LG-1K and LG-2K have a number of important advantages. They are simple and cheap to manufacture, and also fully cope with their tasks. Gliders are compatible with several carriers and are capable of transporting a variety of goods that meet the restrictions of the cargo bay. They also show fairly high flight characteristics and represent an extremely difficult target for enemy air defense.

Real results


The TACAD program has already reached prototype testing, and Logistic Gliders' developments have demonstrated some of their capabilities. The first flight tests took place in January last year. Then we conducted several new tests.

In January trials, 12 UAVs of the LG-1K type were used. Half of the gliders started from the external suspension of the aircraft, the rest were dumped by transport aircraft through the aft ramp. 7 flights performed with remote control; others were carried out offline. The first tests did not provide for flights at maximum range, because of which their total duration did not exceed 55 minutes. Nevertheless, it was possible to confirm all the basic characteristics and capabilities of gliders.


Aircraft reset

Until the end of the year, the ILC, DARPA and Logistic Gliders conducted several more tests using different platforms and in different conditions. In December, it was reported that since the start of the tests, 18 flights have been completed with a total duration of 96 minutes. They used various media, up to the military transport aircraft C-130. 10 flights were performed offline with a demonstration of the required accuracy of launch and landing.

New tests took place in mid-January 2020. Gliders were again discharged from aircraft and helicopters of various types. It is likely that UAVs were improved before these tests, taking into account the experience of previous events.

Logistics and Economics


According to well-known data, the TACAD program is still at the stage of flight testing and refinement of equipment. The real prospects of the presented samples from Logistic Gliders have not yet been determined. Nevertheless, the basic capabilities of such a technique, its scope, advantages and disadvantages are already clear.


LG-2K in flight. Visible wing and strut design

First of all, the approach to the design of special UAVs is interesting. Fulfilling the customer's requirements in terms of cost, the development company used the simplest and cheapest materials and components. This made it possible to obtain the necessary characteristics and an acceptable resource.

Gliders combine good flight characteristics, acceptable carrying capacity and successful controls with two modes of operation. The flight control method, stand-alone or according to operator’s commands, can be selected depending on various factors.

The developer’s statements about the high stability of the UAV to the enemy’s air defense systems are interesting. A predominantly small-sized wooden glider is difficult to notice and hit. In addition, it is unlikely to become a priority target for anti-aircraft gunners, although it will reduce the risks for its carrier.

For special tasks


In general, Logistic Gliders managed to create an interesting and successful specialized model of equipment for solving specific transportation problems. Tests of the two types of UAV gliders are still ongoing, and the design is being improved. However, the main features of the technology have already been identified and are unlikely to change in the future.


UAV after horizontal landing

It is to be expected that the ILC, the Air Force and DARPA will show greater interest in new models and, possibly, even bring them to adoption. As a result, the US Army will receive a fundamentally new means of logistics that can occupy a characteristic and important niche, reducing risks for other vehicles.

However, drones of new types should not count on a large series and wide distribution. Situations in which they are necessary do not occur too often - and in other conditions, well-developed and familiar forms of air transport can be used. However, this is the case when the presence of a highly specialized tool is better than its absence.
71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    9 February 2020 18: 14
    Cheap planning bomb.
    1. +3
      9 February 2020 18: 21
      Cheap glider bomb

      A normal plywood bonba is far from planning stop
      1. 0
        9 February 2020 23: 07
        An interesting concept is a single-use UAV container.
        Although, in my opinion, dropping a container by parachute is easier and cheaper.
        Moreover, modern parachutes have learned to make planners. It remains only to add an autopilot. Although on the battlefield, when you need to transfer a box with shells to a specific trench, this UAV is still useful.
        1. +6
          10 February 2020 00: 01
          dropping a container by parachute is easier and cheaper.

          But not so far and aiming.
          And not the fact that a controlled parachute / paraglider will be cheaper than the plywood parcel of the postman Pechkin, even with wings, navigation, an autopilot and an operator’s camera.
          1. 0
            10 February 2020 03: 28
            In addition, you can make the electronics block easily removable and at least slightly protected, and reuse, as if the multiplicity will be higher than that of parachutes.
            1. 0
              10 February 2020 12: 48
              Are parachutes disposable?
              And not people in the container, you can make the requirements for the terms of use less stringent.
              1. 0
                10 February 2020 14: 35
                Will you collect a transport parachute under fire and send it to the sender?
    2. +1
      9 February 2020 21: 28
      Quote: OldMichael
      A normal plywood bonba is far from planning

      The Germans took Holland and Belgium with wooden gliders, and we defeated the Germans with the World Aircraft in 1945 with wooden planes drinks
      1. +1
        10 February 2020 00: 06
        We defeated the Germans with wooden planes in World War II

        Here the goal is more modest - to quickly, accurately and inexpensively deliver half a ton of useful goods to a difficult point, without getting involved in the counter with the enemy’s air defense.
        1. +1
          10 February 2020 12: 04
          quickly, accurately and inexpensively deliver half a ton of useful goods to a difficult point, without getting involved in the counter with enemy air defense.


          I tried to imagine this "difficult point" with difficulty. So, there is not suppressed air defense (even if only Pantsir-s remained at a minimum). There is no way to bypass it - it means that our "difficult point" is in the ring or behind the front line at a distance of no more than 112-20 = 92 km. Is this a partisan detachment? Okay, let's say there is a Kovpak in the USA with a bunch of scouts. Without heavy weapons, equipment ... Okay, let them live. Our wolves also need something in the forest in winter.
          This idea is just right for supplying the barmalei in situations similar to Idlib. But this is a unique situation, which appeared due to the indecision of politicians, and not the military. Wonderful wars is a wonderful technique.
          1. +1
            10 February 2020 14: 45
            just suitable for supplying barmalei in situations similar to Idlib ...
            But this is a unique situation.

            Something like that I had in mind. And now this situation does not look unique even for the USA, and besides them there are other interested parties - there are no local conflicts only in the Antarctic.
            The drug industry is also likely to check out such a thing. In general, there are buyers.
  2. +3
    9 February 2020 18: 18
    And in the bottommost photo, did he seem to have scribbled upon landing?
    Although, for a fan plan without a pilot, this is probably not critical.
    1. -1
      9 February 2020 18: 58
      Quote: OldMichael
      And in the bottommost photo, did he seem to have scribbled upon landing?
      Although, for a fan plan without a pilot, this is probably not critical.

      Something is unclear to me how IT is managed?
      1. +2
        9 February 2020 19: 04
        unclear how IT is managed?


        As usual:
        For the delivery of goods to their destination, a fairly simple control system based on available components is responsible. It includes satellite navigation and an autopilot that controls the ailerons and tail surfaces. There are also remote controls that allow the operator to navigate. Telemetry and video from the bow camera are transmitted to the remote control.
    2. +6
      9 February 2020 21: 27
      absolutely nothing wrong, disposable plywood product
      as for me it’s very interesting, suddenly parachute systems can be even more expensive
      again - a very interesting approach
  3. 0
    9 February 2020 18: 19
    We need to do such one-time shock drones until they bring to mind Altaira and other non-flying crafts.
  4. +4
    9 February 2020 18: 21
    If I am not mistaken, something similar was already described sometime ... But, in any case, it is interesting and promising - one such premise will be able to replenish the company with food and BC for a day!
    There is only one question - the maximum flight length? Didn't it turn out that the package was thrown away, and the air defense covered the whole "Hercules"?
    1. +2
      9 February 2020 18: 46
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      one question is the maximum flight length?

      So it is written:
      The maximum planning range is 70 miles.
      1. -2
        9 February 2020 19: 05
        Sorry, I didn’t notice somehow ...)
        1. +3
          9 February 2020 19: 17
          Quote: Leader of the Redskins
          Sorry, I didn’t notice somehow ...

          That's not at all ... But you are right, it was written about this method of supply not so long ago, most likely here, in VO.
    2. 0
      9 February 2020 19: 05
      From the article:

      The maximum planning range is 70 miles.

      Those. in terms of kilometers roughly 112 km. Although if for the ILC, they could indicate the range in nautical miles.
  5. +4
    9 February 2020 18: 22
    A test piece, as if the amers were not bonfire, but they know how to create.
  6. +2
    9 February 2020 18: 24
    Personally, I like it.
  7. +5
    9 February 2020 18: 31
    In general, like the bulk carriers "Liberty", they are many and cheaper.
    The Yankees knew how to do it.
    1. +4
      9 February 2020 19: 52
      Ha, Liberty etozh generally super! It seems that he walks a few more along the seas. For what amers unconditional respect.
      1. +2
        9 February 2020 20: 07
        Somewhere in Africa or Indochina they showed one of the last ships. Successful project, workmanship at the level.
  8. 0
    9 February 2020 18: 33
    Quote: Sergey39
    Cheap planning bomb.

    It depends on the terrain, air humidity, temperature, wind, etc., and then I did not understand what is the advantage over parachute systems
    1. +3
      9 February 2020 18: 51
      Quote: Balu
      what is the advantage over parachute systems

      About LG-1000 they wrote:
      It is made entirely of wood and its cost is only 600 dollars, which is 1/3 of the cost of a modern parachute system.

      Already saving. Plus he drives to the destination.
      1. +1
        9 February 2020 19: 05
        Quote: region58
        Quote: Balu
        what is the advantage over parachute systems

        About LG-1000 they wrote:
        It is made entirely of wood and its cost is only 600 dollars, which is 1/3 of the cost of a modern parachute system.

        Already saving. Plus he drives to the destination.

        Before World War II, airborne cargo gliders were in Germany and the USSR. And how did this affect at least one large-scale operation?
        1. +2
          9 February 2020 19: 26
          Quote: Balu
          And how did this affect at least one large-scale operation?

          I do not argue. The bourgeois have such plans, I will quote:
          Today, the US Army and Marine Corps use transport aircraft to deliver cargo to ground units. These loads are dropped from aircraft by parachute. This delivery system has been tested for decades, but has already ceased to meet modern realities.
          The fact is that during the fighting, the troops of the fighters are far removed from each other, and parachute systems cannot plan a considerable distance. It can be very expensive and dangerous to organize targeted flying around a transport aircraft.
          A new delivery method was proposed by Logistic Gliders Inc. ...

          PS Maybe this case will not take root ...
        2. +1
          9 February 2020 22: 00
          Quote: Balu
          And how did this affect at least one large-scale operation?

          For example, they took Crete by storm. Using these same plywood gliders. Although it would be better, of course, they didn’t do this :))
  9. -2
    9 February 2020 18: 42
    Another promising concept for trash cans in Krajina.
  10. +2
    9 February 2020 18: 47
    It is interesting why unmanned cargo delivery systems strive to make it out of plywood. After all, delivery can be carried out using a simplified unmanned cargo paraglider-machine: it will cost about the same, but after landing it is guaranteed not to break into chips, easily assembled on the ground, transported and reused, easily repaired by a darn on a sewing machine.
    1. +3
      9 February 2020 19: 24
      I think that there’s convenience in the form factor of the airframe: a rigid box, which is simple to store and launch, does not work with a paraglider.
      1. +1
        9 February 2020 19: 32
        The box of cargo can be taken on the cargo hook of the automatic paraglider even when loading, the paraglider itself is separate, in its own "box". And throw everything out automatically with an ordinary rubber-fabric conveyor for transporting goods (like in supermarkets).
      2. 0
        9 February 2020 20: 07
        Quote: Proctologist
        I think that there’s convenience in the form factor of the airframe: a rigid box, which is simple to store and launch, does not work with a paraglider.

        and balancing?
    2. 0
      9 February 2020 20: 59
      In a managed version, it is probably easier, cheaper and more practical than an article made of plywood.
      A paraglider (or parachute - wing) is lightweight, but not at all simple and has serious limitations on weather conditions.
      1. Lad
        +1
        9 February 2020 23: 02
        A paraglider and even such a weight will be much more expensive. Plus the ability to fold. And unfolding also at that speed is still that task. Well, in general, a paraglider maintain such a speed ... In short, the difference is immediately visible to paragliders and gliders, but it is difficult to see it when flying.
        1. 0
          10 February 2020 20: 42
          The Americans have already successfully tested a controlled and reused automatic machine wing (1990s: JPADS program (Joint Precision Airdrop Systems, Russian - “Interspecific means of precision landing”)). The actual cost of delivery was about $ 60 / kg, the maximum mass of cargo in the line of parachutes was 19 tons, and they almost began to design a parachute for 28 tons. A box with wings - on competitive terms $ 15. But in practice there will be slightly more. But nevertheless, since the costs do not differ by orders of magnitude, uncontrolled and controlled parachutes continue to be used and now and from time to time they try to refine them.
    3. +1
      9 February 2020 21: 21
      Well, how does the wing of a paraglider unfold at an altitude of 4000+ meters with a high-speed head of the carrier in kilometers of 450+?
      1. 0
        10 February 2020 19: 57
        Well, how does the wing of a paraglider unfold at an altitude of 4000+ meters with a high-speed head of the carrier in kilometers of 450+?

        This is taken into account by the designers of the paraglider: they develop tape supersonic parachutes and parachutes of spacecraft - with even more difficult application conditions.
        1. 0
          10 February 2020 20: 24
          Do you have any idea about the difference between the descent parachute and the wing of a paraglider? And you saw the same tape parachute? He can fly where the thread in addition to the direction of the wind?
          And why give a goat a button accordion. If there is a cheap plywood cabbage?
          1. 0
            10 February 2020 20: 56
            The Americans, on the other hand, successfully developed a stratospheric gliding kite (Report number: NASA CR-66918, at the link - http://2e5.com/kite/nasa/reports/) - that was a long time ago. And modern space parachutes are made in the form of inflatable shuttlecocks, which can also be controlled - for example, by distorting their shape with tension lines.
            1. 0
              10 February 2020 21: 05
              Yes, why do all this then? If plywood is available in any corner of the globe. A set of control electronics and drives with accumulators and power elements for assembling such a UAV will fit in a small drawer. They brought plywood sawn. Twisted on the screws in place. Or collected from the go whale. They threw them for a certain number of kilometers and voila crashed so do not worry the plywood by the shaft, the control system is not more expensive than for a quadrocopter.
              Why all these rope cables with incomprehensible control and an unknown result!
              Just the key to success. And here it is simple and cheap.
              1. 0
                11 February 2020 06: 02
                Fabrics are produced in very large quantities in the world - there are so many of them that they are quietly spent on disposable cargo parachutes. The estimated cost of ASG LCADS-LV is $ 1260, LCADS-HV is $ 495, and CDS type CDS is $ 3815. Both wood and fabric have their intrinsic advantages.
                1. 0
                  11 February 2020 09: 05
                  Of course. Only plywood is everywhere and the fabric needs to be bounced. Well, with a cherry on the cake, there is a cutter machine for sewing and qualifying a seamstress. And I cut the plywood with any hacksaw and voila.
                  1. 0
                    11 February 2020 19: 42
                    Only plywood is everywhere and the fabric needs to be bounced.

                    Plywood is made in a plywood factory and does not grow in the forest. This is an imported material, like a fabric, a tool - there is no noticeable difference from fabrics in terms of logistics and availability. The fabric from the manufacturer is being transported rolled in wagons - look for what about the type of "roll of fabric for 5 tons." to tell.
  11. +3
    9 February 2020 19: 23
    Quote: Balu
    Before World War II, airborne cargo gliders were in Germany and the USSR. And how did this affect at least one large-scale operation?

    I mean, how did it influence ?!

    10.05.1940/XNUMX/XNUMX, Belgium, for example. Or the rescue of Mussolini.
    https://www.popmech.ru/weapon/515802-odnorazovaya-aviaciya-samye-znamenitye-boevye-planery/
  12. -1
    9 February 2020 19: 25
    The score for the downing of such prodigies flying to Khmeimim, already goes to hundreds. So on the topic of sustainability ... excuse the complete garbage, except from the point of view of American means of object-based air defense. winked But as an option for a cheap means of delivery, this is quite an argument.
  13. 0
    9 February 2020 19: 46
    Quote: Balu
    Quote: region58
    Quote: Balu
    what is the advantage over parachute systems

    About LG-1000 they wrote:
    It is made entirely of wood and its cost is only 600 dollars, which is 1/3 of the cost of a modern parachute system.

    Already saving. Plus he drives to the destination.

    Before World War II, airborne cargo gliders were in Germany and the USSR. And how did this affect at least one large-scale operation?

    The American airborne landing in Normandy became the first US military operation during Operation Overlord (the invasion of Norman forces by the anti-Hitler coalition during World War II) on Day 6 June 1944, 13.100. About 82 paratroopers from the American 101nd and 6st airborne divisions landed on the night of June 3.937th. During the day, 2 glider soldiers also landed [XNUMX]. As the beginning of Operation Neptune (the assault part of Operation Overlord), American parachute divisions landed on the continent, performing two parachute and six glider missions hi
    PS Information from Wikipedia.
    1. 0
      9 February 2020 20: 09
      So after all, the glider was controlled by pilots, balancing the center of gravity was carried out on the ground. And here is just a container
  14. +2
    9 February 2020 19: 48
    About the delivery of goods is for the removal of eyes. Plywood kamikaze for barmaley experience. How to drink give similar soon appear in the Middle East.
  15. 0
    9 February 2020 19: 59
    Is this part of the military assistance to Ukraine? )
  16. -3
    9 February 2020 20: 51
    You do not need to be bitten by Bath to predict that the final cost of a unit from the voiced one will differ ten times, and upwards. And after it turns out that to bring down this plywood, a hundred-dollar drone with AliExpress a, to which a photocell was attached, and a cumulative charge will be enough. Well, they provided the simplest homing firmware. Speed ​​to catch up and burn to crap - enough for almost anyone.
  17. +1
    9 February 2020 21: 04
    The United States won’t just come up with to supply the barmalei terrorists with weapons, BP, medicines around the world ...
    This invention has already been informed at VO.
  18. +4
    9 February 2020 21: 11
    An extremely reasonable decision. Extremely cheap and simple, plywood also provides another non-obvious advantage: in severe cases, it is also a little extra fuel.
  19. 0
    9 February 2020 21: 14
    Quote: Balu
    So after all, the glider was controlled by pilots, balancing the center of gravity was carried out on the ground. And here is just a container

    Well, where does the characteristics of the airframe, just to your passage about how the use of gliders affected the results of operations, I gave an example. That's all. hi
  20. +1
    9 February 2020 21: 48
    Everything ingenious is simple. The idea of ​​cargo gliders during World War II was quite justified. By the way, it’s a pity that nobody wrote about it at VO
  21. -1
    9 February 2020 21: 57
    >>> The cost of the drone is capped at $ 11 ... Reuse is optional. <<
    ...
    The rich have their own habits. Already enviable.
  22. +2
    9 February 2020 22: 03
    Great idea! Just a flying plywood box. Management from a pair of Chinese microcircuits, the price is scanty, the planning range is decent, you don’t have to climb into the enemy’s near-air defense zone.
  23. 0
    9 February 2020 23: 14
    There is a suitcase without a handle, there is a handle, and now with plywood wings. A great way to support reconnaissance, cut off units, mountain outposts.
    One concern: otherwise, if it lands (lands) in the zone of the Barmalei, will it give them a gift for 700 kg of ammunition / ammunition / application / medication?
    The lock should be put with a code so that a suitcase spreads +30 meters around in chips, if the PIN code is incorrect).
  24. Lad
    0
    10 February 2020 00: 30
    Add to this a small engine, chassis and stool, and instead of a control system, a dear oneself. Yet K = 12 is not so little, it would be quite possible to ride. )))
  25. +1
    10 February 2020 01: 34
    Mdaaa ... it is not for nothing that it is said that "new is well forgotten old ..."! Gliders were widely used in WW2 ... and, more often than not, as "disposable", although sometimes it was supposed to be disassembled "after" and delivered to the "base"! Interest in gliders also led to the idea of ​​motor-gliders ... (the motor-glider took off with the help of a towing plane, and there ... "herself, herself ..."!) There was such a "crazy" idea in the project ... the glider took off " himself "with the help of, for example, a liquid-propellant engine or turbojet engine; but, after climbing, the" block "with the engine (s) was dropped by parachute and could be reused ... That's just the" robotic pilots "then did not have time to come up with ... everything did, like children, the old fashioned way!
  26. 0
    10 February 2020 04: 18
    $ 10000?) ... "not enough" will be
  27. +2
    10 February 2020 09: 19
    Well, the next step is edible plywood. A kind of container of chips ...
  28. 0
    10 February 2020 10: 37
    I wonder how secure the control system is. I took control and now you have a whole box of gifts laughing
  29. -4
    11 March 2020 12: 46
    And if you make it from edible materials ...
    1. -2
      12 March 2020 09: 21
      If you do not know or understand something, then this does not mean that someone is wrong. (hint) Yes
      Such experiments have long been conducted. laughing
  30. 0
    April 21 2020 12: 54
    Plywood flying kitchen for eleven thousand dollars. That way they will have to increase the budget again.
  31. 0
    2 May 2020 20: 47
    Very interesting glider. The launch range of more than 100km allows you not to enter the affected area of ​​most anti-aircraft missiles. To dump vital cargoes in the environment. It can fly to the lighthouse.