Israel is ready to destroy the Syrian warehouses of WMD, the United States against

74
Israel is ready to destroy the Syrian warehouses of WMD, the United States against


The rapid escalation of the Syrian crisis increases the risk that in the near future Damascus may lose control over the arsenal of chemical and biological weapons. The army of free Syria has formed a group whose goal is to ensure the safety of weapons of mass destruction. However, the international community fears that it will fall into the hands of terrorists.

In July, the Syrian army began redeploying chemical weapons. This was followed by a tough US reaction that warned Bashar al-Assad about the consequences of using weapons of mass destruction against civilians. However, American intelligence sources believe that the purpose of this measure is to prevent weapons from falling into the hands of opponents of the regime.

Representatives of the US administration told The New York Times that the United States and Israel are conducting ongoing consultations on the Syrian issue. According to the publication, the IDF has prepared a plan to destroy the Syrian arsenals of weapons of mass destruction, but Washington fears that the Israeli intervention will rally the Syrians around their president.



The British Daily Telegraph writes that Thomas Donilon, US presidential adviser on national security, visited Jerusalem the other day. He tried to dissuade the Israeli leadership from the attack of Syria. The newspaper reminds that when it comes to a threat to existence, Israel acts without regard for the international community.

20 July Minister of Defense Ehud Barak gave an interview to Israeli television. He said that Israel would use military force to prevent weapons from falling into the hands of terrorist groups, which could change the regional balance of power.

“Syria has modern anti-aircraft missile systems, ground-to-ground missiles and chemical weapons. I have instructed the IDF to prepare for a situation when it is necessary to consider the possibility of an attack,” he told the Second TV Channel.

Both in Israel and in the US, we are confident that the Assad regime has not yet lost control of weapons of mass destruction. Jerusalem and Washington consider it unacceptable to fall into the hands of terrorists. However, the US administration and the Israeli government hold opposing views on what needs to be done to avoid this.

The US is convinced that the problem can be solved by starting the process of transferring power to the interim government. Israel believes that after the overthrow of Assad, Syria will turn into a state that has collapsed for a long time. Under the conditions of anarchy, the central government cannot avoid getting weapons of mass destruction in the hands of terrorists.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

74 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    23 July 2012 07: 14
    Not well, at first they wreaked havoc, and now fears have arisen that chemistry will fall into the wrong hands fool Assad’s chemistry is not measured, and fucking in the warehouses with this rubbish, personally, I don’t have enough imagination what can happen and on what scale. Maybe the site has a special on chemical weapons, if there is one, enlighten the people. what
    1. +9
      23 July 2012 07: 20
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      at first they wreaked havoc, and now fears have arisen that chemistry will fall into the wrong hands

      Sasha, salute. No, there is another motive here - much more eloquent and dangerous - to drag one more pretext behind the ears to justify possible aggression against Syria. Remember Iraq ...
      1. Vanek
        +2
        23 July 2012 07: 23
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Assad’s chemistry is not measured


        Saddam also seemed to have it.

        Quote: esaul
        Remember Iraq ...


        And as in Iraq, they (Chem. Weapons) will not be found.

        Hello to everyone.
        1. +5
          23 July 2012 07: 34
          Quote: Vanek
          Saddam also seemed to have it.

          Hi Vaniok, Assad really has it, no one hides it in the prince. And if in Iraq it was a pretext invented to start aggression, then in Syria it is, which our people also confirm. But to whom it can get in case of aggression, what kind of rubbish in warehouses is a question?
          1. Vanek
            +2
            23 July 2012 07: 39
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            , Assad really has it


            And it’s good that there is another reason to think. Is it worth it or not, to intervene there (into Syria) with aggression.
            1. +7
              23 July 2012 07: 45
              Quote: Vanek

              And it’s good that there is another reason to think. Is it worth it or not, to intervene there (into Syria) with aggression.

              The problem is that amers think with their ass, not their head. They will start to think when the blue-green-orange smoke covers Sicily, or whatever.
              1. +6
                23 July 2012 07: 57
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                They will start to think when the blue-green-orange smoke covers Sicily, or whatever.

                They disappear when the wind blows in the other direction laughing
                1. +6
                  23 July 2012 08: 47
                  Quote: Steam Train
                  They disappear when the wind blows in the other direction

                  To Israel or Qatar, or maybe to Saudi Arabia? wassat
        2. +4
          23 July 2012 07: 36
          Salute, Ivan!
          Quote: Vanek
          And as in Iraq, they (Chem. Weapons) will not be found.

          And this, brother, is no longer important for them. The main thing is an excuse, and there they will repulse!
          1. Vanek
            +4
            23 July 2012 07: 40
            Good afternoon, Valery.

            Quote: esaul
            The main thing is an excuse, and there they will repulse!


            Do not go to the grandmother.
        3. Zmeyuga
          +3
          23 July 2012 08: 00
          Actually, we supplied Syria with missiles capable of delivering precisely chemical weapons :)
          Syria has a significant number of operational-tactical missiles that can be used in both conventional and chemical weapons. The most advanced missile systems in Syria are 18 9M79 Tochka launchers with a firing range of 120 kilometers, a circular deviation of up to 150 meters and a cluster warhead, which poses a serious threat to objects such as air bases.

          Maybe it's a little, but ...
      2. +8
        23 July 2012 07: 26
        Greetings Valera, Sasha. My opinion is that the diplomat did not cheat after all. It is unprofitable for the United States that the people stand for their president, they are trying to split him in every way, but if the bombing starts, then all efforts and money will go to the sand, as the people will understand the true face of the "opposition".
        1. +7
          23 July 2012 07: 40
          Quote: Steam Train
          , as the people will understand the true face of the "opposition".

          Hi Zhenya, the people already understand this. They show us in the news of the pro-Western that the Syrian people are ardently meeting terrorists. And the fact that the money goes into the sand is not money! This is paper, it will be necessary to print more laughing
          1. Sergh
            +8
            23 July 2012 09: 10
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            understands this is us in the news of the pro-Western show

            Alexander, I look at the situation every day in Ankhar’s blog from Syria, there really is something to look at ...



            It seems that with the murder of the commanders, the patience of the Syrians has run out, there is a massive destruction of thugs throughout the territory. The sniper video from the grenade launcher especially looked, the first shooting, the second in the testicle or in the balls: "Flying sniper. Don't laugh out loud!"



            http://anhar.livejournal.com/
            1. +5
              23 July 2012 09: 18
              Quote: Sergh
              "Flying sniper. Don't laugh loudly!"

              Could not hold on laughing Good flight, so low low.
              1. +6
                23 July 2012 09: 31
                Quote: Steam Train

                Could not hold on Good flight, so low low

                That's just worthless aerodynamics, with such a thing you can’t reach Allah laughing
            2. 0
              25 July 2012 11: 53
              Respected. Do not read Soviet newspapers at breakfast. (c) And do not speak with patriotic slogans - they are stupid.
              There is a situation of civil war, which is now entering the sphere of religious conflict. The Alawites are an overwhelming minority, although they occupied the main posts in the state. The Alawites are a sect close to Shiism. But Sunnis cannot tolerate Shiites, they are considered heretics.
              There it will all end very badly. And it is well understood everything seems like you.
        2. +5
          23 July 2012 07: 49
          Quote: Steam Train
          The United States is disadvantageous because the people are behind their president

          Zhenya, welcome. And how can it be profitable for them? For decades we have been promoting our values ​​on the ball in all Western countries, we are used to being looked into their mouths, but here they don’t look !!! Disorder! It is necessary to hit with "democracy"! am
      3. +4
        23 July 2012 07: 37
        I remember, but there were no weapons in Iraq, but here a bunch of them and in a wide assortment do not want to get grass. The pretext is understandable, but in this case I am talking about the consequences of a blow to warehouses with chemistry.
        1. 0
          25 July 2012 11: 55
          The consequences are more political. In reality, the warehouses are located in local zones, and during bombardment the bulk of gases will be simply burned out by fire.
      4. Zmeyuga
        +3
        23 July 2012 07: 55
        All this fits into the concept of unleashing a local nuclear war in the Middle East
      5. FiremanRS
        0
        23 July 2012 20: 51
        Perhaps, perhaps ..... But the threat of falling into the hands of the rebels also exists .... The only thing that worries me is that we didn’t go offensive stinking waves around the planet .... It’s enough for me to smoke) )))
    2. Zmeyuga
      +4
      23 July 2012 07: 54
      And civilians will perish.
      1. Vanek
        +6
        23 July 2012 07: 56
        Quote: Zmeyuga
        civilians will die.


        What do you want? It is democracy.
        1. 0
          25 July 2012 11: 57
          Respected. The dictatorship is even more so. Remember the same massacre in Hama that Hafez carried out. This is not the first uprising in Syria. And now what do you think civilians are not dying? This is a civil war, dear. And "our son of a bitch" loses in it.
    3. 0
      25 July 2012 11: 49
      As for chaos, this is the wrong steppe. Assad more or less, Israel is the same suit. And the States in a sense - too. Here more sin on the Sunnis - Qatar with Saudi Arabia and Turkey.
    4. 0
      17 January 2013 17: 03
      Another enemy, as with the chemical weapons of Iraq, which were not found ...
  2. +3
    23 July 2012 07: 40
    I wonder if everything will fly into the air the consequences will be for civilians? or do they care the main thing that it does not fall into the hands of terrorists? driven by the US and the Arabs?
    1. +4
      23 July 2012 07: 43
      Quote: jagdpanzer
      or do they care the main thing that it does not fall into the hands of terrorists?

      They don't really care about the people. They are not Jews. And the states, in general, even if the Yankees lived there, they need a reason to "bring peace"
  3. rinzhak
    +1
    23 July 2012 07: 49
    so still, Turkey or Israel will start a war against Syria?
    1. +3
      23 July 2012 07: 56
      Quote: rinzhak
      so still, Turkey or Israel will start a war against Syria?

      At the same time - the company is sung. More states will rush to "protect" them ...
      1. rinzhak
        +2
        23 July 2012 07: 58
        Quote: esaul
        At the same time - the company is sung. More states will rush to "protect" them ...

        what are you ?! I will never believe that Israel and Turkey fought against someone together No.
        1. +1
          23 July 2012 08: 05
          Quote: rinzhak
          what are you ?! I will never believe that Israel and Turkey fought against someone together

          You know better ... you - Brzezinski ... "Am I correctly setting out my idea?" belay
          1. rinzhak
            +1
            23 July 2012 08: 15
            Quote: esaul
            You know better ... You - Brzezinski... "Am I getting my point across correctly?" belay

            yes, smart man!
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            What's the difference? Who cares who the fuck is?

            Well, I think Israel’s military potential steeper than Turkish will be, and then Israel will be followed by the world community with the United States at the head. And beyond Turchandia, who is the Turkic world? laughing
            Quote: Steam Train
            And they are not together, they will rush to Syria from different borders. And honor and glory to the one who takes the first capital.

            Ah, this is already a thought! now geopolitics has become like a wolf hunt - whoever caught the prey first, that’s what wink
    2. +2
      23 July 2012 07: 59
      Quote: rinzhak

      so still, Turkey or Israel will start a war against Syria?

      Who cares? In any case, they say that this is for the sake of peace and democracy.
      1. rinzhak
        +2
        23 July 2012 08: 02
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Who cares? In any case, they say that this is for the sake of peace and democracy.

        yes, that for the sake of democracy, this is understandable ...
        But Israel is not in very good relations with Turkey in order to fight shoulder to shoulder against Syria. Israel - Jews, Turkey - Muslims are mostly Muslim. No, there is someone alone, with the support of either France or the USA
        1. +1
          23 July 2012 08: 09
          Quote: rinzhak
          No, there is someone alone, with the support of either France or the USA

          What's the difference? Who cares who the fuck is?
          1. 0
            25 July 2012 12: 00
            Big one. Israel is a purely air operation, with minimal impact. Turks - a full-fledged operation, with the introduction of ground forces
        2. +2
          23 July 2012 08: 10
          Quote: rinzhak
          I will never believe that Israel and Turkey fought against someone together

          And they are not together, they will rush to Syria from different borders. And honor and glory to the one who takes the first capital.
        3. 0
          25 July 2012 12: 00
          You in vain from the picture exclude the CA and Qatar, as well as other Europeans.
      2. rinzhak
        +1
        23 July 2012 09: 11
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Who cares?

        I think so - whoever can end the war faster will be given the United States the task ...
    3. +3
      23 July 2012 08: 11
      Quote: rinzhak
      so still, Turkey or Israel will start a war against Syria?

      This question needs to be asked not for us, but for that clown on your avatar!
      1. rinzhak
        -1
        23 July 2012 08: 16
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        This question should not be asked to us,and the clown on your avatar!

        why clown? Are you offended by him or something?
        1. +3
          23 July 2012 08: 48
          Quote: rinzhak
          Are you offended by him or something?

          A colleague, you probably get a special thrill, hiding behind the Kazakh flag, banter, cynically asking such questions. Stopudovo, that the majority of older people who survived all the post-Soviet hard times do not feel gratitude to this Russophobe and, if possible, would spit in his face. Well, and you, in all respects, are a young man, not stupid, but not yet surviving the collapse of your plans. I wish you to know life in all its diversity ...
          1. rinzhak
            -3
            23 July 2012 08: 52
            Quote: esaul
            Stopudovo, that the majority of older people who survived all the post-Soviet hard times do not feel gratitude to this Russophobe and, if possible, would spit in his face.

            Do you think that older people know who Zbigniew Brzezinski was?
            1. Sergh
              +4
              23 July 2012 09: 38
              Quote: rinzhak
              older people know who Zbigniew Brzezinski was

              Well, yes, yes, we even read Nikolai Gogol (Yanovsky), although not in the original, but it would not hurt to correct your crown in principle ...
        2. +4
          23 July 2012 08: 52
          Quote: rinzhak

          why clown? Are you offended by him or something

          And who is he, the patriot of Russia or the one who dedicated his life to the fight against Russia? When he dies, I will drink champagne!
          1. rinzhak
            -3
            23 July 2012 08: 56
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            And who is he, the patriot of Russia or the one who dedicated his life to the fight against Russia? When he dies, I will drink champagne!

            Quote: esaul
            A colleague, you probably get a special thrill, hiding behind the Kazakh flag, banter, cynically asking such questions.

            no, I believe that Brzezinski was a worthy opponent of Russia, because you must agree in his time both Russia and America were strong, and the confrontation was great. Well, what can you do if he turned out to be stronger than the Soviet hawks. By the way, I did not understand, and who was the Soviet hawk - Andropov or what?
          2. +1
            23 July 2012 09: 05
            I'm with you! For company. Only he will clearly survive us.
            1. rinzhak
              0
              23 July 2012 09: 08
              Quote: Banshee
              I'm with you! For company. Only he will clearly survive us.

              Are you implying that he is a harmful old man?
    4. GG2012
      +3
      23 July 2012 08: 59
      Your avatar is not good.
      You did not touch yesterday ?!
      1. rinzhak
        -4
        23 July 2012 09: 04
        Quote: GG2012
        Your avatar is not good.
        You did not touch yesterday ?!

        why are you all so embittered at this old man?
        The normal face of an intelligent and intelligent politician Yes
        read what he thinks of Marxism -
        Marxism represents a new, extremely important stage in the development of the human worldview. Marxism means the victory of a person who is actively related to the outside world over a passive, contemplative person, and at the same time, the victory of reason over faith ... Marxism puts in the first place a systematic and strictly scientific study of reality, as well as leadership in the action arising from this study.

        Incidentally, has the pedagogical status of a professor! And you're really so expressive about him - "not kind"
        1. +1
          23 July 2012 09: 36
          Quote: rinzhak
          The normal face of an intelligent and intelligent politician

          That's when it is buried intelligently! In Russia there will be a red calendar day. You need to look not at education and a suit, but at a person’s actions.
        2. Evgeny B.
          0
          23 July 2012 10: 07
          rinzhak. True, no offense, your avatar, personally with me, really causes a physical feeling of Nausea. I believe that out of respect for the vast majority of visitors to this site, it is necessary to change it.
          1. rinzhak
            0
            23 July 2012 11: 02
            Quote: Eugene B.
            I believe that out of respect for the vast majority of visitors to this site, it is necessary to change it.

            well, persuaded ...
            Here is such a person I think does not offend anyone with his gaze?
            winked
    5. 0
      25 July 2012 11: 58
      Turks. Israel has no reason to go there at all. And the Turks-so very much. But they will keep the situation to the last - for the time being they will provide indirect support to those rebels who are - and there are more and more of them.
  4. zzzel
    +1
    23 July 2012 07: 56
    I don’t understand another, who is there? the liberation army of the opposition or the terrorists, according to the words of amers and the like, but somehow it turns out in two ways laughing
  5. +1
    23 July 2012 08: 06
    Quote: rinzhak
    so still, Turkey or Israel will start a war against Syria?

    - because NATO does not feel much desire to invade, I think that both of these countries + some particularly zealous Arab states will attack under this pretext or another, but the intervention will be simultaneous and massive. They are unlikely to attack one at a time - and they will not master it, and they themselves are scared. Waiting for s. They just need another good provocation. I think it will be a chemical bomb explosion in some locality of Syria, which Assad will be accused of. He will, of course, reject the use of chemical weapons, but who will listen to him? Now they just don’t listen to him, the dictator is bloody and that’s all. Even here they are trying to get it right in all seriousness. In all seriousness, with a smart look, we had some common sense and Abramovich, preceding this thought with the statement that they are smarter than much 95% of local forum users, said that if Assad (summarizing all rulers and politicians) was a legitimate president, the people would even did not think to overthrow. I laughed for a long time, neighing even my slippers! -)))))). Let me remind you that in Libya this rubbish disappeared unintentionally, and the developed countries made this rubbish, similar in its properties to the Syrian muck, which is two fingers on asphalt.
    1. rinzhak
      0
      23 July 2012 08: 18
      Quote: aksakal
      - because NATO does not feel much desire to invade, I think that both of these countries + some particularly zealous Arab states will attack under this pretext or another, but the intervention will be simultaneous and massive.

      but I don’t remember anything in any way that NATO as a whole would participate in any wars. Basically, the States have to swell for everyone ...
      And everyone loves to eat, by the way drinks
      1. 0
        25 July 2012 12: 05
        Afghan, Yugoslavia. Of course, the States play a leading role there. But still - they are not the only ones there. It should be noted that de facto NATO took part in an extremely limited number of operations. The first was in Yugoslavia, then the aftermath of the earthquake in Pakistan, then Afghanistan.
  6. 0
    23 July 2012 08: 11
    How "inadequate" the politicians and warriors of Israel and the United States are - they are afraid of weapons of mass destruction falling into the hands of TERRORISTS and at the same time they are doing everything to make this happen: they finance and supply the same terrorists with weapons and try to make the country go into chaos. What is this politician-patients of a psychiatric clinic or a court of the international tribunal ????
    1. 0
      25 July 2012 12: 06
      Look at the wrong steppe. Israel there sideways, Assad suited him. Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey are the main players. France yet. The states — insofar as they don’t want to release the steering wheel — and they were removed from it, in fact, have to do a good face with a bad game.
  7. 0
    23 July 2012 08: 17
    another show between the Jewish diaspora of the United States (which is the main oil robber of the Arabs) and the same Jews of Israel; this clowning is an old propaganda weapon that here we are what American Jewish oligarchs are "good"
    1. 0
      25 July 2012 12: 07
      About Arab oil robber and ZOG - that's great 8)
  8. +2
    23 July 2012 08: 18
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    The problem is that amers think with their ass, not their head. They will start to think when the blue-green-orange smoke covers Sicily, or whatever.

    What is it for them? They live in the other hemisphere. On the contrary, it is beneficial for Europe to bend. Yes, and we are not far away.
  9. patriot2
    0
    23 July 2012 09: 23
    I do not think that the Israelis will risk attacking the CW warehouses. Even with a favorable weather forecast for them (the Israelis), secondary contamination of the area is possible when the surface wind vector changes: the result is contamination of the territory of Israel or another state: Turkey, Iraq, Lebanon, Cyprus. "Fun" will be a situation when there is not enough respiratory protective equipment, cattle die and epidemics begin.
    Is the Israelis mindful? I think the Jews will not tempt fate.
    But the Muslim brothers in Egypt want to destroy the famous pyramids. These precisely can do things.
  10. +8
    23 July 2012 09: 25
    I read the comments and was "disappointed" - most of the "commentators" have no idea what is going on there.
    For those interested, I will explain:
    Assad's regime was Israel's most convenient neighbor, the border with Syria for 40 years was the most calm and safe (Druze sometimes only smuggled drugs). Thousands of tourists were taken to the border. It is simply stupid to accuse Israel of being interested in regime change, because according to Defense Minister Barak, "Syria will not become Switzerland" and "Alah Huakbar" will become an alternative to Assad
    Regarding chemical weapons, we are talking about preventing radicals from getting these weapons (as well as advanced air defense systems), and this can only happen after the fall of the Assad regime. Hence the conclusion that Israel is not looking for reasons to attack Syria and overthrow Assad (he himself barely holds in his chair and his days are numbered) and is not going to attack him.
    1. +4
      23 July 2012 09: 53
      Yes, everyone understands that Israel is not profitable to intervene in this war, otherwise your neighbors will become active and they will sing a lot of blood. It’s just that sometimes your politicians make such statements that you can doubt the adequacy of these people’s understanding of the situation.
    2. +4
      23 July 2012 11: 30
      Quote: professor
      Assad’s regime was Israel’s most convenient neighbor, the border with Syria for 40 years was the most calm and safe

      I agree with the professor. Assad’s almost secular regime didn’t bring much concern to Israel.
      After the overthrow, strengthening the position of the Arab League is also not in favor of Israel.
  11. Tirpitz
    +1
    23 July 2012 09: 29
    If Israel is not afraid to bomb Syria, then what about NATO? There would be an excuse, and it is being sought stubbornly. It seems to me that the fate of Syria has already been decided.
    1. Tirpitz
      0
      23 July 2012 10: 52
      Who puts a minus - argue with what do not agree!
    2. +3
      23 July 2012 11: 39
      Quote: Tirpitz
      If Israel is not afraid to bomb Syria, then what about NATO?

      Israel is concerned that opposition actions will lead to the fall of the Assad regime, in which case the arsenals will fall into the hands of the opposition, and the ranks of the opposition are motley, and there is a connection with various terrorist organizations.
      So timely destroy the chemical. weapons for the Israelis relevant.
      The Assad regime suited the Israelis.
  12. lm_
    +2
    23 July 2012 09: 42
    Western interest position: when talking about warehouses, only terrorists fight there, and when it is convenient for them, these bandits are called the armed opposition.
  13. Ottofonfenhel
    0
    23 July 2012 09: 46
    In general, I doubt that Syria has WMDs, especially a tank. weapons, the Iraqi script is painfully reminiscent of, the amers stubbornly proved to the whole world that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, and when everyone released it, they said damn it, but it really wasn’t and quickly blamed on inaccurate intelligence data.
    1. 0
      25 July 2012 12: 09
      But what can be doubted if the Syrian representatives officially declare this?
  14. yacht
    +2
    23 July 2012 13: 01
    Quote: professor
    It is simply stupid to accuse Israel of being interested in regime change, because according to Defense Minister Barak “Syria will not become Switzerland” and “Alah Huakbar” will become an alternative to Assad


    If we take Syria separately, then it’s absolutely true that Assad’s fall is not beneficial for Israel, it certainly won’t be better. BUT if you take the combination of Iran-Syria-Hezbollah together, it becomes obvious that of the two evils, Israel, in his opinion, chooses the lesser. It is with the fall of Assad that Hezbollah’s defeat becomes possible, and therefore it will be possible to begin solving the Iranian nuclear problem, no longer fearing a retaliatory strike from Syria and Hezbollah. This shows that in Syria, Israel is solving its strategic tasks.
    1. 0
      25 July 2012 12: 10
      But how to say whether it is less or not. Having an incipient Sunni caliphate at one’s side is hardly a lesser evil. So there was a Shiite radical axis - it will be Sunni.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"