The Ministry of Defense called the delivery time for the deeply modernized Tu-160M

The Ministry of Defense called the delivery time for the deeply modernized Tu-160M

The first modernized strategic missile carriers Tu-160M ​​will begin to arrive in the Russian Aerospace Forces in 2021, according to the previously scheduled dates. This was reported by the press service of the Russian Ministry of Defense.


According to the report, the first deeply modernized strategist Tu-160M ​​will be handed over to the military in 2021, and then every year the supply of missile carriers will increase.

Under the current contract, the transfer to the troops of the upgraded strategic Tu-160M ​​bombers will begin in 2021 with a further annual increase in the number of deliveries

- said in a statement.

As previously reported, in the course of modernization, the Tu-160M ​​should receive a new airborne radar of the Novella family HB1.70 instead of the Obzor-K airborne radar standard for the Tu-160. A new “glass cockpit” is being installed on the aircraft, a new navigation system HO-70M with the inertial system BINS-SP-1, the astronautical system ANS-2009M and navigation BTsVM, navigation radar DISS-021-70, space navigation receiver A737DP, autopilot ABSU-200MT , communication system S-505-70, state recognition system BKR-70M and on-board defense complex "Redut-70M". Information about new systems and devices was taken from open sources, so ultimately the equipment installed on an aircraft may differ from the above.

In addition, the aircraft will receive new NK-32-02 engines (series 2) and new missile weapons.

Modernization will increase the range of the strategist’s flight by 1 thousand km, as well as the overall effectiveness of the missile carrier in carrying out combat missions as intended.

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Defense published on the web a video of the first flight of the first prototype of the deeply modernized Tu-160M ​​missile carrier. The flight took place on February 2 of this year, the plane took off from the airport of the Kazan aircraft plant and spent 34 minutes in the air.


This Tu-160M ​​model received all the improvements, except for the new engines, which will be installed on it later.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Buntovshik 6 February 2020 18: 10 New
    • 10
    • 10
    0
    We are waiting for the latest strategic bomber! .. Has something subsided or will the surprise again be on Victory Day?
    1. Sky strike fighter 6 February 2020 18: 28 New
      • 13
      • 4
      +9
      The newest is the Tu-160M2, and the Tu-160M ​​is the modernization of drill machines.
      Russia launched the production of a strategic missile carrier. Yesterday, April 19, the Interfax news agency reported that PJSC Tupolev had begun to create the first Tu-160M2 aircraft.
      “The first Tu-160M2 aircraft is already under construction. The Tu-160M2 is a fresh glider, a completely new aircraft, and the Tu-160M ​​is a modernization of aircraft in the formation, ”said Alexander Konyukhov, CEO of Tupolev PJSC.

      https://warspot.ru/11727-nachata-postroyka-nastoyaschego-tu-160m2
      1. the most important 6 February 2020 18: 50 New
        • 5
        • 5
        0
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        The newest is the Tu-160M2, and the Tu-160M ​​e

        And when will the production of the Tu-160M2 begin? In recent publications of nonsense journalists, only about the modification of M was written as about new aircraft.
        1. Sky strike fighter 6 February 2020 19: 05 New
          • 6
          • 2
          +4
          In my post at the link above it says that the construction of the first Tu-160M2 began in April 2018. If the deadlines are not disrupted by the same NK-32-02, then its first flight should take place next year.
          1. NKT
            NKT 6 February 2020 22: 27 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            This glider is not yet new, from the Soviet backlog, the third in a row, there is one more, the last one left.
            A whole new promise by 2021-22.
        2. Sky strike fighter 6 February 2020 23: 06 New
          • 7
          • 2
          +5
          I apologize not for the topic. Sarakib under the control of SAA. Turks left observation posts around Serakib. Photo and video link below.
          After lunch on February 6, CAA assault teams entered the encircled Sarakib and began to clean up. Anna-News military commissars are passing from the center of Sarakib.
          In the city there may still be several dozen fighters, snipers and mines. Therefore, the Syrians will still need some time, although from an operational point of view, Sarakib has already played a card.

          https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/5622052.html
        3. the most important 6 February 2020 23: 21 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          Quote: the most important
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          The newest is the Tu-160M2, and the Tu-160M ​​e

          And when will the production of the Tu-160M2 begin? In recent publications of nonsense journalists, only about the modification of M was written as about new aircraft.

          As I understand it, they are either minuscule by me who cannot understand the meaning of a five-word phrase, or people who hate the development of the Russian army. In any case, their opinion is ABSOLUTELY indifferent to me!
        4. The comment was deleted.
        5. DarkMatter 7 February 2020 02: 07 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          only about modification M

          It seems to be now decided to combine and call both versions simply Tu-160M, but this is not accurate =)
      2. Buntovshik 6 February 2020 19: 15 New
        • 11
        • 12
        -1
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        The newest is the Tu-160M2, and the Tu-160M ​​is the modernization of drill machines.

        You do not understand me, dear, I wrote the NEWEST development!
        We in Russia like to show cartoons, and then suddenly they’re really putting them on combat duty .. I’m talking about this!

        Of course, they will start kicking me now, but I don’t feel it is a fairy tale .. Surprises like in our country for the West to present unexpectedly hi
        1. Sky strike fighter 6 February 2020 19: 28 New
          • 0
          • 5
          -5
          Well then, another 10 years will have to wait.
          The start of deliveries of a long-range bomber for armament is planned for 2025-2030 after the tests. In January, the general director of Tupolev PJSC Alexander Konyukhov announced that the terms for the creation of the PAK DA would be comparable to the terms for the creation of the Tu-144 supersonic passenger liner and would be about five to seven years.
          At the same time, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Yuri Borisov, who was then the Deputy Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation, reported that a new strategic bomber could take off in 2025-2026 and go into production in 2028 or 2029.

          https://aviation21.ru/predvaritelnye-ispytaniya-dvigatelya-dlya-pak-da-nachnutsya-v-2020-godu/
        2. VO3A 6 February 2020 19: 35 New
          • 7
          • 8
          -1
          Your cartoons have nothing to do with reality ... The appearance of PAK YES is approved and known, as well as its performance characteristics. Learn to use the Internet ...
        3. AKS-U 6 February 2020 22: 11 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          Cool cartoon
    2. VO3A 6 February 2020 18: 29 New
      • 7
      • 35
      -28
      According to the report, the first deeply modernized strategist Tu-160M ​​will be handed over to the military in 2021, and then every year the supply of missile carriers will increase.

      To be more precise, planes restored to combat readiness due to the installation of new serviceable equipment ... For the old has collapsed for a long time ... What will grow? There are only 16 of these dinosaurs with outdated engines and a design for modernization ... They also promised to release 10 pieces by 2027, and they will make no more than 5 ... Well, right, they’ll train to master the release of PAK YES, and he to hell is not needed, except for succession and preservation of personnel and structure ...
      1. Mihail2019 6 February 2020 19: 03 New
        • 10
        • 2
        +8
        Explain that in the world there is a “fresher” of these, as you pejoratively wrote, “dinosaurs”?
        The B-52, which even compared to our Tu-95s, is it high time for the museum to be on a par with the B-17?
        And why such bold statements about the "outdated design", let me curiosity?
        1. VO3A 6 February 2020 19: 49 New
          • 7
          • 18
          -11
          Airplanes with variable sweep of the wing are long outdated ... This is not an advanced achievement, but an anachronism ... Such a design is outdated and has long outlived itself ... It is not used on modern airplanes ... It has more drawbacks than advantages ... It’s just at a certain stage in the development of aircraft manufacturing, there were no other opportunities to achieve better performance ... But this stage has already been completed. And the integrated design of the fuselage allowed to abandon the outdated scheme .... Irrational use of the wing volume, increased weight, and most importantly a small resource of heavily loaded rotary wing parts forced the designers to abandon such a design ...
          1. helmi8 6 February 2020 20: 05 New
            • 13
            • 5
            +8
            Quote: VO3A
            Airplanes with variable sweep of the wing are long outdated ... This is not an advanced achievement, but an anachronism ... Such a design is outdated and has long outlived itself ... It is not used on modern airplanes ... It has more disadvantages than advantages ..

            Tell this to the F-35A pilots who were unable to catch up with this “anachronism” over their “super-duper” planes over the Sea of ​​Japan ...
            1. VO3A 6 February 2020 20: 11 New
              • 7
              • 14
              -7
              Escorting enemy aircraft is not a form of combat. This kind of fun, and such gray townsfolk, are led to by virtue of their primitivism and limitation ... And to see this achievement, this is the height of stupidity ... and it was not F35 ...
              1. Ka-52 7 February 2020 06: 47 New
                • 1
                • 2
                -1
                And to see this achievement, this is the height of stupidity ... and it was not F35 ...

                so don’t blaze like that) you convinced us that your beloved Americans defeated everyone, and we see nothing except vodka and balalaika in the forests laughing Amen.
      2. Piramidon 6 February 2020 21: 04 New
        • 9
        • 2
        +7
        Quote: VO3A
        To be more precise, planes restored to combat readiness due to the installation of new serviceable equipment ... For the old has long since collapsed ...

        And how are they now flying with faulty, collapsed equipment? fool
        1. VO3A 6 February 2020 21: 39 New
          • 5
          • 10
          -5
          And how many of them fly? And how many can take off at the same time ... Usually two, well maybe three, and one of them is the last half-serial ... I have reliable information from the bottom, although they have been pulled up lately ....
          1. Ka-52 7 February 2020 07: 02 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            I have reliable information from the bottom, although lately they have been pulled up ....

            from which "the very" bottom? from who in Engels lawns in md. Does "Flying Town" cut? You are a pea liar, may the admins forgive me. Now Kopylov, Muromets, Reshetnikov, Kuznetsov, Novikov, Sudets, Deinekin carry out scheduled flights
            1. pavelty 7 February 2020 08: 59 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              And can you find out two Andrei, what did you finish? So for fun ...
      3. The comment was deleted.
    3. 1959ain 6 February 2020 18: 44 New
      • 6
      • 12
      -6
      Quote: Rebel
      We are waiting for the latest strategic bomber! .. Has something subsided or will the surprise again be on Victory Day?

      Where is the money Zin, on what will you drive to the store
      1. Sky strike fighter 6 February 2020 18: 47 New
        • 3
        • 7
        -4
        Everything is going according to plan. What are you hinting at?
        The planned modernization of strategic missile carriers Tu-95, Tu-160 and long-range bombers Tu-22M3. They get the opportunity to carry both the latest cruise missiles and other promising weapons. The construction of the strategic missile carrier Tu-160M2. Its first flight is scheduled for 2021, and deliveries to compounds and parts of long-range aviation should begin in 2023. Until 2027, ten such missile carriers will be purchased.

        https://bmpd.livejournal.com/3921645.html
        1. Nastia makarova 7 February 2020 07: 54 New
          • 1
          • 3
          -2
          all-crawler got out
  2. Nikolay87 6 February 2020 18: 10 New
    • 8
    • 10
    -2
    Well done, at the pace until PAK YES modernize laughing good
    1. Observer2014 6 February 2020 18: 42 New
      • 7
      • 9
      -2
      Quote: Nikolay87
      Well done, at the pace until PAK YES modernize laughing good

      Tu 160 upgrade to subsonic PAK-DA? laughing You before you lodge. Though study a question of lapping fool negativeAnd note. I in no way claim that PAK-YES is a worse platform than the Tu 160. These are completely different platforms. yesDifferent in everything. Well, except that they are airplanes. :
      1. lis-ik 6 February 2020 18: 50 New
        • 7
        • 21
        -14
        Well, with our effective leaders, I won’t be surprised that they can easily upgrade to PO-2.
        1. mark2 6 February 2020 19: 40 New
          • 9
          • 8
          +1
          Become a leader and do it right. Or doesn’t give you a diploma in philology. Your phrase shows that you know exactly how to
      2. Buntovshik 6 February 2020 19: 26 New
        • 9
        • 7
        +2
        Quote: Observer2014
        Tu 160 upgrade to subsonic PAK-DA? laughing you before you go. Although you study the issue of go-go

        Well, without your liberal whining, we’ll somehow create it ..
        Remember how people like you were hungry for our development of supersonic, etc ...
        "Vanguard" already last year put on duty .. And for the rest, I hope, too, and especially do not chat ..
        1. Observer2014 6 February 2020 19: 36 New
          • 3
          • 20
          -17
          Quote: Rebel
          Quote: Observer2014
          Tu 160 upgrade to subsonic PAK-DA? laughing you before you go. Although you study the issue of go-go

          Well, without your liberal whining, we’ll somehow create it ..
          Remember how people like you were hungry for our development of supersonic, etc ...
          "Vanguard" already last year put on duty .. And for the rest, I hope, too, and especially do not chat ..

          laughing MY RYUNEMOGU WITH YOU: laughing : In this article. I’ll ask you not to confuse with your attempts to understand the topic of the article about weapons. For this subject is difficult for you to understand. By its nature. And with uramarginalism it does not have any common understanding: fool Learn the “materiel.”: For this subject is complex. And it opens understanding in the geopolitical processes of the planet. yes
        2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Nikolay87 6 February 2020 20: 41 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Quote: Observer2014
        Quote: Nikolay87
        Well done, at the pace until PAK YES modernize laughing good

        Tu 160 upgrade to subsonic PAK-DA? laughing You before you lodge. Though study a question of lapping fool negativeAnd note. I in no way claim that PAK-YES is a worse platform than the Tu 160. These are completely different platforms. yesDifferent in everything. Well, except that they are airplanes. :

        I meant that while they create PAK YES, the TU-160 will have time to upgrade so that it will not be inferior to the aforementioned. In short, he simply praised all those involved.
        But there is surely someone to whom everywhere either cheers-patriots, or all-fuckers, or any other form of extreme seems. Praised, bad, scolded, bad .....
        And for that matter, modernization does not always mean “faster, more powerful,” which means technical updating of an object to fulfill its assigned tasks. They will say TU-160 to make only subsonic - they will. And that will not mean "regression." So go learn the materiel yourself laughing
        1. Observer2014 6 February 2020 21: 03 New
          • 3
          • 7
          -4
          Quote: Nikolay87
          Quote: Observer2014
          Quote: Nikolay87
          Well done, at the pace until PAK YES modernize laughing good

          Tu 160 upgrade to subsonic PAK-DA? laughing You before you lodge. Though study a question of lapping fool negativeAnd note. I in no way claim that PAK-YES is a worse platform than the Tu 160. These are completely different platforms. yesDifferent in everything. Well, except that they are airplanes. :

          I meant that while they create PAK YES, the TU-160 will have time to upgrade so that it will not be inferior to the aforementioned. In short, he simply praised all those involved.
          But there is surely someone to whom everywhere either cheers-patriots, or all-fuckers, or any other form of extreme seems. Praised, bad, scolded, bad .....
          And for that matter, modernization does not always mean “faster, more powerful,” which means technical updating of an object to fulfill its assigned tasks. They will say TU-160 to make only subsonic - they will. And that will not mean "regression." So go learn the materiel yourself laughing

          And we are not on the site of pancakes bakers. If you and your friends collect huskies, then collect huskies. tongue further. Everything: And then what you printed earlier .... lol
          1. The comment was deleted.
  3. Victor_B 6 February 2020 18: 11 New
    • 9
    • 5
    +4
    Good news!
    To replace those destroyed by the great ukrams with the help of "probable friends."
  4. Amateur 6 February 2020 19: 09 New
    • 7
    • 17
    -10
    And what, now fly to Venezuela without the help of a slide rule?

    (Tu-160 navigator on the way to Venezuela)
    1. Sky strike fighter 6 February 2020 19: 15 New
      • 3
      • 4
      -1
      Quote from the article.
      A new “glass cockpit” is being installed on the aircraft, a new navigation system HO-70M with inertial system BINS-SP-1, astronautical system ANS-2009M and navigation BTsVM, navigation radar DISS-021-70, space navigation receiver A737DP, autopilot ABSU-200MT
      1. Amateur 6 February 2020 19: 18 New
        • 2
        • 10
        -8
        I read the article. But you to my question:
        now fly to Venezuela without the help of a slide rule?
        did not answer. You don’t know or will there be a calculator now? recourse
        1. NN52 6 February 2020 19: 28 New
          • 12
          • 1
          +11
          Amateur (Victor)

          This is NL -10 (a test device!). And take it quickly and no batteries needed.

          And it doesn’t take up much space.
        2. Sky strike fighter 6 February 2020 19: 50 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          Quote: Amateur
          I read the article. But you to my question:
          now fly to Venezuela without the help of a slide rule?
          did not answer. You don’t know or will there be a calculator now? recourse

          Now there will be a computer.
          The aircraft will also be equipped with the NO-70M navigation system with the BINS-SP-1 inertial system, the ANS-2009M astronavigation system, and a navigation computer.

          https://bmpd.livejournal.com/3088196.html
      2. 1959ain 6 February 2020 20: 34 New
        • 2
        • 6
        -4
        DISS-021-70 navigation radar, and what will it see clouds and all?
        1. Sky strike fighter 6 February 2020 20: 58 New
          • 6
          • 1
          +5
          Quote: 1959ain
          DISS-021-70 navigation radar, and what will it see clouds and all?

          The DIS-021-70 speed, drift, and altitude components of the Doppler meter used new signal processing algorithms using spectral analysis methods that, in addition to measuring the velocity vector, make it possible to measure the vector radius radius and tilt angles (roll and pitch) of the aircraft relative to the earth's surface. Spectral signal processing allows the use of more sophisticated algorithms for estimating the Doppler frequency of a signal and thereby reduce fluctuation measurement errors. In addition, the evaluation of the shape of the spectrum of the received signal makes it possible to automatically determine the type of surface ("land-sea").
          1. 1959ain 6 February 2020 21: 05 New
            • 1
            • 3
            -2
            Quote: Sky Strike fighter
            surface ("land-sea").

            And which planes can he see, and at what distance?
          2. Ryaruav 6 February 2020 22: 02 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            well done jas taxis
    2. Mityay65 6 February 2020 19: 45 New
      • 6
      • 9
      -3
      Quote: Amateur
      (Tu-160 navigator on the way to Venezuela)

      Priceless.
      Just a tub of cold water on hot heads.
    3. Piramidon 6 February 2020 21: 14 New
      • 11
      • 3
      +8
      Quote: Amateur
      And what, now fly to Venezuela without the help of a slide rule?

      (Tu-160 navigator on the way to Venezuela)

      It only says that the preparation of our navigators allows them, in case of failure of navigation systems, to plot a course using the KI-13 magnetic compass, the Belomor pack and the slide rule. And your favorite Yankees, in the absence of zhipies, in three pines get lost. hi
    4. NEXUS 7 February 2020 04: 20 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Quote: Amateur
      And what, now fly to Venezuela without the help of a slide rule?

      In the years of my youth, a comparatively average level, a graduate student of a school very well made calculations on the slide rule. Question to you - today a school graduate generally knows what it is?
      And by the way, in the presence of brains and knowledge, everything is considered quite accurately and quickly on this line. And it takes up a little space, and no spyware or electronic warfare system will crack or disable it.
  5. Vlad5307 6 February 2020 19: 21 New
    • 11
    • 2
    +9
    Quote: Amateur
    And what, now fly to Venezuela without the help of a slide rule?

    (Tu-160 navigator on the way to Venezuela)

    Here the Americans do not know how to use such tools, and here they land with their landings not where they need to. laughing
  6. mortido 6 February 2020 21: 46 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    The news has just passed that MiG and Sukhoi unite, moreover, under the guidance of someone from the MiG
    1. Piramidon 6 February 2020 21: 52 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: mortido
      Just news passed

      Half year ago.
      https://tass.ru/ekonomika/4504063
      1. mortido 6 February 2020 21: 59 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I also remember there was such an infa that there are plans for unification ..., it is surprising that they put Migovtsa in the main, although they have no success
  7. Ryaruav 6 February 2020 22: 11 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    our machine is superior to the Amersky v-1 and v-2 type f-117 experiments that were not very successful, but ours were sharpened under them, the cost of a dib pack is well, I don’t know, and it won’t be in my life for that -22 mm5 in the near future it will be the best car naturally with refueling
  8. Magog 6 February 2020 22: 14 New
    • 7
    • 2
    +5
    “Earlier, the Tu-160M2 project was faced with harsh criticism. For example, some experts tried to suggest that Russia does not need a modernized White Swan, but a Promising Long-Range Aviation Complex. Purely conceptually, it really looks more advantageous: with comparable cruising speed, range and (possibly) combat load, the PAK DA will be inconspicuous, that is, made with widespread use of stealth technology.
    However, advice by advice, and the creation from scratch of an inconspicuous strategic bomber is an overwhelming task, even for the United States. Recall that the Americans produced only 21 "strategist" B-2. At the same time, the price of one car with such a small series reached the unthinkable two billion dollars. The project can be called almost a failure, especially given the fact that the Americans, as some Western media previously reported, are already preparing to decommission these aircraft. There is almost no doubt that the "old" B-52 will survive the invisibility that was created to replace it. Funny circumstance. "
  9. AKS-U 6 February 2020 22: 16 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Deep modernization ... of Soviet weapons. Oh, they could do it before.
  10. sleeve 7 February 2020 05: 08 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    For 1000 combat radius, as I understand it? Eh ... It would be 30 years to stretch on these platforms ... It's expensive all the same, its own global aviation.
  11. fa2998 7 February 2020 05: 32 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: 1959ain
    Where is the money zing

    I wrote for a long time that even “super cool” economies made it possible to produce ONE heavy bomber. We waved both the Tu-160 and PAK DA. Well, yes, you can cut money, you can also show in parades. But it’s really possible to mass-produce and seriously master-bluff. Like the saying "chasing two hares." hi
    1. Nastia makarova 7 February 2020 07: 59 New
      • 1
      • 4
      -3
      everything is gone and what should we do?
  12. lvov_aleksey 8 February 2020 01: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I respect White Swan
  13. lvov_aleksey 8 February 2020 01: 02 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: Nastia Makarova
    everything is gone and what should we do?

    everything is simple, and cowards were shot from the back
  14. lvov_aleksey 8 February 2020 01: 06 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: fa2998
    Quote: 1959ain
    Where is the money zing

    I wrote for a long time that even “super cool” economies made it possible to produce ONE heavy bomber. We waved both the Tu-160 and PAK DA. Well, yes, you can cut money, you can also show in parades. But it’s really possible to mass-produce and seriously master-bluff. Like the saying "chasing two hares." hi

    you are very wrong, I was always amazed about the specialists. Let’s tell here about the performance characteristics of the “White Swan”, its passport data or its weapons
    and if someone doesn’t understand, I want to see files or maps, and department K will consider. )))))