Lukashenko - to officials: What has been done to ensure that Russia fulfills its obligations

241

On the eve of his visit to Sochi, the President of Belarus gathered a meeting on energy issues. The meeting was attended by the head of the Government of the Republic of Belarus Sergey Rumas. Speaking with a report, Rumas informed the head of state that Belarus “lost” several hundred million dollars because of Russia.

Rumas said that this situation was due to the fact that Russia conducted a tax maneuver.



Sergey Rumas estimated the total “losses” as a result of this Russian maneuver at a third of a billion dollars, of which 130 million are direct losses for the Belarusian budget.

According to Alexander Lukashenko, disagreements on the supply of energy resources occur regularly - over 13 years.

President of Belarus:

Although, upon signing, we were given firm guarantees. For example, this year Russia pledged to deliver 24 million tons of oil to Belarus at an intergovernmental level - 2 million tons each month. In January, 500 thousand were delivered - one quarter.

Then Lukashenko addressed the audience with the words:

You will report to me what has been done so that Russia fulfills its obligations.

Recall that earlier Minsk raised tariffs for pumping Russian oil to Europe through the Druzhba gas pipeline by 6,6%. At the same time, the authorities of Belarus stated that they intend to look for alternative suppliers of hydrocarbons.

President of Belarus:

The requirements are well known - not a single resident of Belarus, not a single enterprise should feel the consequences of all kinds of maneuvers of our partners.

A meeting between Alexander Lukashenko and Vladimir Putin in Sochi is scheduled for tomorrow.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    241 comment
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +22
      6 February 2020 14: 07
      because of Russia, Belarus “lost” several hundred million dollars.

      It’s like that, only the stick always has two ends!
      1. +62
        6 February 2020 14: 12
        Famously dad counts "his" money in someone else's pocket. Here he is the result of a policy of beautiful gestures and sponsoring "allies." They sit on their necks. You see, they should. I wonder what Trump would answer to Alexander Grigorievich, if he were in Putin's place, to such a hit?
        1. +24
          6 February 2020 14: 18
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          It is interesting that Trump would answer Alexander Grigoryevich, if he were on Putin's place, on such a run-in?

          Yes, there would not be "dad" already, at the head of his "collective farm"! For a long time, with the whole family, wherever near Rostov, they "huddled" the beds, raised the bulb!
          1. +25
            6 February 2020 14: 32
            Quote: rocket757
            Yes, there would not be "dad" already, at the head of his "collective farm"! For a long time, with the whole family, wherever near Rostov, they "huddled" the beds, raised the bulb!

            Did you just call Belarus a "collective farm"?
            For what purpose? If this is a joke, then not funny.
            Us dad suits, more than. We respect Putin, we do not write nasty things about him on the forums.
            1. +20
              6 February 2020 14: 45
              Us dad suits, more than. We respect Putin, we do not write nasty things about him on the forums.

              If they didn’t suit you. Belarus’s economy rests on a bunch of Lukashenko-Putin. Leave one of them from politics and that’s where the current specific economy of Belarus will end.
              1. +1
                6 February 2020 18: 17
                On the eve of his visit to Sochi, the President of Belarus gathered a meeting on energy issues. The meeting was attended by the head of the Government of the Republic of Belarus Sergey Rumas. Speaking with a report, Rumas informed the head of state that Belarus “lost” several hundred million dollars because of Russia.

                And how much can Russia trust the conclusions of Sergei Rumas? Isn't he a "gray horse"?

                REFERENCE
                Sergey Rumas (born December 1, 1969) is a professional military financier.
                During the collapse of the USSR, his father Nikolai Rumus worked at that time as deputy finance ministers in the office of Kebich *.
                Sergei Rumus, at the age of 25, headed one of the branches of Belarusbank.
                Since 2012, he headed the Development Bank, which actually distributed financial flows to investment projects under the auspices of the state.
                * Kebich, Vyacheslav Frantsevich - Vyacheslav Frantsevich Kebich Vyachaslaў Frantsavich Kebich 1st Prime Minister of the Republic of Belarus September 18, 1991 - July 21, 1994.

                A meeting between Alexander Lukashenko and Vladimir Putin in Sochi is scheduled for tomorrow.
                I can imagine how difficult it will be for both sides!
                1. +5
                  7 February 2020 00: 53
                  [quote] Sergey Rumas (December 1, 1969) - professional military financier [quote]
                  Oh, Tatyana, they made me laugh ......! good He is a professional ACCOUNTANT, TREASURY ... but not a military.
                  In general, colleagues, we are one good people, I am a Citizen of Belarus (half Russian), I lived in Russia (RSFSR) for 16 years, and I can’t say anything bad about my comrades and friends! As in the military commissar (VU) he was friends with the guys from Russia, and already ate porridge together! Let us discuss these news from the point of view of the analysis - WHAT WAS ??? - WHAT WILL BE ??? - WHO IS FAVORABLE ??? etc.
                  Personally, I think, to stoop to insults, accusations, reproaches - this is not ours, colleagues, not ours! Most of you know as competent, calm and seasoned professionals.
                  And in our person (citizens of the Republic of Belarus), you will find millions of friends.
                  1. +3
                    7 February 2020 09: 50
                    Quote: Cutter
                    Oh, Tatyana, they made me laugh ......! He is a professional ACCOUNTANT, TREASURY ... but not a military.

                    In 1990, Sergei Rumas graduated from the Yaroslavl Higher Military Financial School with a degree in financial support of troops. Therefore, I consider him to be a military man, because his mentality is in the economy with such a military profile education must be imprisoned initially to secure the army command finances.

                    True, Sergey Rumas later received additional education at the Academy of Management under the President of the Republic of Belarus, specializing "Organization and management of foreign economic activity."
                    Sergei Rumus at the age of 25 (count immediately after graduation) headed one of the branches of Belarusbank.

                    As a "manager of financial, economic and administrative divisions" in my second higher education, I have a question about Rumas. What then did Sergei Rumas specialize in his foreign economic activity at the bank? On disarmament-armament deals? Kebich was after all a creature of Shushkevich - the first president of the Republic of Belarus according to the conspiracy against the USSR in Belovezhskaya Pushcha.
            2. +25
              6 February 2020 14: 46
              Quote: Thrall
              If this is a joke, then not funny.

              This is a JOKE, IRONIA ... Belarus, our brotherly people, I really want us to be together ...
              As always! The bar at the top is kicking ... and we have nothing to share, we just want to live normally in our country, in friendship and harmony with all the BROTHER peoples.
              PS I don’t confuse flies with cutlets, therefore, I separate the tops from the roots by default.
              1. +8
                6 February 2020 17: 32
                Quote: rocket757
                Belarus, our brotherly people, I really want us to be together ...

                good drinks
              2. +2
                6 February 2020 20: 44
                Quote: rocket757
                As always! The bar upstairs is kicking ...

                Lukashenko began to consider himself a local prince.
            3. +38
              6 February 2020 15: 30
              Quote: Thrall
              Us dad suits, more than.

              Well, to health. But he does not suit us. More than. More precisely, he is not himself, he is your headache, not ours, but his behavior. Or are you a solid and consistent ally. And then yes, then you can count on preferences and arise when you do not receive them. Or are you all of yourself multi-vector and multi-polar. But then do not blame yourself that you can fly from any of the vectors and poles, and your interests will be considered in the same list with the requests of the penguins.
            4. +59
              6 February 2020 15: 41
              Quote: Thrall

              Us dad suits, more than. We respect Putin, we do not write nasty things about him on the forums.

              For God's sake, let it suit you, but not at the expense of Russia ... As of January 1, 2020, the total amount of subsidies that Minsk received from Moscow amounted to $ 133 billion !!!!! (such a sum of money, but for the Minsk Soviet industrial past and attach, say, to the same Bryansk region?). At the same time, Lukashenka managed to make money on the "banned-sanction", without his knowledge no one would have dared to do this.
              Minsk has always closed its market for Russian goods - today there are 18 tariff restrictions - this is a world record.
              Minsk buys gas for $ 129 per thousand cubic meters, and sells it to its population for $ 270-300. It is not known where the difference goes. Apparently, someone in Belarus is speculating.
              . In addition, agreements on the deployment of the Russian air force base in Belarus were canceled. And now Lukashenko is proving that Moscow did not need it at all. Which is strange, because in Moscow they probably know better. The base was needed because it took control of the US base in Poland.
              Your Old Man regularly deceives his "ally", tries to cash in on him ... playing on the integration of the two countries ..

              I don’t have anything against the Belarusian people, we all understand that this is our people .. But everything goes according to the Ukrainian scenario - when endless subsidies from Russia end, in the former Soviet republics this is perceived as hostile action by Russia and declared Moscow and Russian as enemies people ... Belarus is rolling along this road and it is deliberately led along it - Lukashenko!
              1. -16
                6 February 2020 16: 06
                Come on, you can count, but compare the potential of countries ...
                What is the result?
                I will not justify anyone.
                And do not poke your nose in debt anyway.
                They will return to you, but that sediment will remain ...
                1. +24
                  6 February 2020 16: 11
                  Quote: Russobel
                  Come on, you can count, but compare the potential of countries ...
                  What is the result?
                  I will not justify anyone.
                  And do not poke your nose in debt anyway.
                  They will return to you, but that sediment will remain ...

                  I do not need to compare the potential of countries .. But if you decide to build a union state, then build, and do not create the appearance ... Over the entire period of the existence of the Union state, only 10% of what was originally planned was completed. And we have not poked our nose in debt all these years ... but on the contrary, we popped and popped Old Man money in all pockets ... a couple of generations of Belarusians grew up on this - Russia owes money otherwise there will be no integration ... here you have a precipitate ...
                  1. -30
                    6 February 2020 16: 13
                    So it means that with the head it’s not an order of times, you bustle everyone
                    1. +24
                      6 February 2020 16: 18
                      Quote: Russobel
                      So it means that with the head it’s not an order of times, you bustle everyone

                      They’re used to trusting brothers .. but, in principle, you’re right ... it’s time to correct mistakes ...
                      1. +17
                        6 February 2020 18: 23
                        He used to beg, but now extorted ...
                  2. -17
                    6 February 2020 16: 32
                    The trouble is that money was being poured illiterate in their pockets. Otherwise, how to understand that Russia has fewer allies every year? There is a complete failure of foreign policy, and as a result, internal tension is also growing. Old Man is not an angel either, but there are no others. And he understands that at such a pace of development of relations, it is simply necessary to look for ways out, although one does not want to. If the older brother behaves arrogantly towards the younger ones, then the small ones will rebel unambiguously.
                    1. +22
                      6 February 2020 17: 10
                      ltc35
                      Hello.
                      1. What does it mean, illiterate?
                      Write yourself that Lukashenko is not an angel, but there are no others. So they gave him. Neither competently nor illiterate - they simply gave.

                      2. As for the pace of development of relations, it is Mr. Lukashenko who is guilty of precisely such a pace, and not of those that he was afraid to support by signing the union agreement.

                      3. Mr. Lukashenko has never supported Russia when it needed foreign policy support. Lukashenko has shown himself to be an ally who does not want to burden himself with the performance of an allied duty, passionately wanting to cash in on an ally.

                      4. Mr. Lukashenko simply wants to remain a small king, to maintain power and the wealth earned by him and his clan.
                      That is why Mr. Lukashenko has long and consistently pursued a policy of de-Russification of Belarus, disengagement from Russia, and flirts with the local Nazis, whom he could transmit instantly.
                      One "Lithuanian theory", sucked out of a dirty finger and being actively implemented in Belarus (that Belarusians are an ancient people who are not actually Belarusians, but Lithuanians, and seven or eight centuries ago they were forced to defend their sovereignty from the Russians enslavers) what is worth ...
                      And it is he who, like a bazaar woman, brings to the public any of our interstate difficulties. At the same time he lies like a gray gelding. Especially for Belarusians - it’s possible for us to watch Belarusian TV. So we look .... And we see how arrogant he is towards Russia.
                      By the way, when he lies about our oligarchs, he forgets to inform the population that our oligarchs (who are pressed to the same extent as in Belarus) are dangerous only to Belarusian oligarchs and those who are members of the clan of the head of Belarus. First of all, they are dangerous due to the fact that, as a whole, our resources have more and more elementary illegality to run into them if the Union State is created, as it is used to now, it will not work.
                      These are such funny things.
                      1. -15
                        6 February 2020 18: 25
                        I have heard stories about "insidious freeloaders who eat us" since the end of the 80s. At first, the "freeloaders" were the republics of Central Asia. Then Ukraine. Now Belarus. Each time they said that we will get rid of them - and we will live! Who is next to the "freeloaders" - the Caucasus, Siberia or the Far East?
                        There is a reason to think about why the neighbors prefer to go to Poland to "wash toilets" and pick strawberries, and not work for us in their specialty?
                        The geography is such that having quarreled with Belarus over $ 20 per ton, we can get a second belt of unfriendly countries as part of the Baltic states, Ukraine, Belarus. We can get a hole in a single radar field. We can receive transit duties through their territory such that we will travel through Finland. We can get the NATO base very close at hand ... We can get the cessation of the sale of multi-axle chassis to us. And many other nasty things. And all for $ 20 ...
                        At the same time, the thought is actively hammered into people's consciousness that everyone is enemies. In such a situation, it is easier to justify the need to "tighten" the belts.
                        1. +1
                          6 February 2020 20: 03
                          It seems to be not about 20, but about 10 dollars of premium to the market price.
                        2. +3
                          6 February 2020 22: 12
                          There is a reason to think about why the neighbors prefer to go to Poland to "wash toilets" and pick strawberries, and not work for us in their specialty?

                          Have you counted how many people travel to "wash toilets" in Poland and work in Russia? If in the course, please provide the difference in numbers. It just got very interesting. And so even here in Russia with the work of the official stress.
                        3. -4
                          6 February 2020 22: 38
                          I strongly suspect that people go to Poland and other countries not only for seasonal work. Most interesting, is it really more profitable to "wash the toilets" and pick fruits THERE than to do the same with us?
                        4. +2
                          6 February 2020 23: 31
                          Quote: Tavrik
                          I strongly suspect

                          Thanks for the specifics.
                      2. -1
                        6 February 2020 18: 34
                        I spoke not specifically about Lukashenko, but about the policy towards the allies. She is not very successful. If the tsarek is bothered, then it is up to diplomats and politicians to find worthy leverage. Give an example of Russia's success in the external field in recent times. We do not take Syria, because the situation there is more than controversial. News from the zombie? That is all we know.
                    2. +6
                      6 February 2020 18: 02
                      Quote: ltc35
                      The trouble is that money was being poured illiterate in their pockets.

                      It's all about the approach. The difference is that Russia finances states, and states, individuals in these states. In the first case, it is weakly noticeable (for any growth is slow), in the second case, we see a series of color revolutions.
                    3. +8
                      6 February 2020 18: 12
                      Well what are you talking about fool The Russian Federation and Belarus have a temporary agreement for the time of the creation of the union state, at which the price was lower than under the contract. The term of the contract is over - there are no states request Accordingly, there is no reason for the price to remain below the contract price. tongue Does that mean ????? And this means there is no reason to continue to deliver goods below the price of a firm contract. And the Russian Federation fulfills its obligations under the contract. And it will be obliged to fulfill the Internet of sense, even spend time on it wassat All the screaming around this topic is a warm-up for those who do not know what a contract is. So to speak pisses in the eyes of his electorate. And in fact, we have everything according to the contract. love if you don’t want as per contract - please be kind to keep the promise hi You do not want? Well, we have a lot of little brothers like dad .... But where is his support? The opposite is true. Does that mean? And that means nothing personal - pure business.
                    4. +2
                      6 February 2020 22: 04
                      But the question is, where does your beloved Old Man run in case of repeating the story in Ukraine?
                  3. 0
                    9 February 2020 06: 28
                    And about Crimea, that they forgot how to recognize it in the international arena for Russia, so the Bulbash say NO, RUSSIA must give it to Ukrainians. With the Georgians in 2008, RUSSIA is again wrong, you think your peacekeepers were shot! Maybe even now, when the Georgians are demanding compensation for the fact that in the summer Russian tourists did not go to them to rest and did not finance their budget, we are to blame (although they did not pay for the fuel when they opened the message in 18)! I won’t be surprised that the Belarusians would say, but they are to blame, right ?! As far as hydrocarbons are concerned, all our "brothers" together with you are calling; Well, what is there to think about trifles, but when the tap was screwed on, they immediately rushed to look for the fifth corner and once again showed that your daddy's little soul is rotten like swamp potatoes. Markets for our goods were also closed, but we have "Belarusian goods" on every corner , "Belarusian sausages", you can, of course, choose something from the goods. But grub (sausage, ham sausages, etc.), in addition to radiation, is just rubbish! It's good that your vodka (pure moonshine) and beer from swamp water are not sold with us! How do I know? So the relatives of the wife from Krichiy and Baranovichi treated them! After all this, as I did not believe your "brother" and dad, I NEVER will!
              2. -1
                6 February 2020 17: 23
                Quote: Nasr
                Minsk buys gas for $ 129 per thousand cubic meters, and sells it to its population for 270-300 dollars. It is not known where the difference goes. Apparently, someone in Belarus is speculating.

                For comparison and reflection (taking into account the ratio of wholesale / retail):
                in St. Petersburg, gas for private consumers costs $ 100 / 1000m3.
                Draw your own conclusions.
                1. 0
                  6 February 2020 18: 49
                  It is very necessary to add that in Russia in the regions gas for the population is subsidized.
                2. 0
                  7 February 2020 14: 42
                  In the Moscow region for 2020, the price for the population is heating, hot water plus a stove - $ 102 per 1000 m3, without a stove $ 90,46 per m3, the same is the same throughout the European part - Tula region. $ 92 per 1000 m3 (all at the rate of 64 rubles per dollar). 270-300 dollars is not sickly. "Where is the money, Zin?"
            5. +10
              6 February 2020 15: 57
              Well here, write, do not write ... feel We have clear contracts between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus. We can laugh - but they are written in real prices. lol And these contracts are in effect and will continue to operate. But everything else was "reduced rates" - this was valid for a certain period - the so-called "transition to a union state." According to the current gentlemen's agreement, in the event of the end of the period, prices automatically become market prices. The period is over. The state can only kiss me on this buttock and this one - my brothers and sisters were sitting in the same trenches. soldier All - Contracts continue to be valid under previously agreed agreements. belay And everything else is to warm up the electorate. am No state - there is no more agreement. fool
              1. 0
                6 February 2020 16: 26
                good That's it!
                Truth is truth.
            6. +5
              6 February 2020 16: 54
              Please answer for yourself. You m. and happy. Me personally and all my acquaintances and friends - no. As the last 5 years show, the number of those who are satisfied with the AHL in power is constantly decreasing.
            7. +4
              6 February 2020 18: 11
              Quote: Thrall
              Us dad suits, more than.

              Not all.
              1. 0
                7 February 2020 11: 19
                Quote: MyVrach
                Quote: Thrall
                Us dad suits, more than.

                Not all.

                + support, speak better for yourself.
            8. 0
              6 February 2020 18: 17
              This will pass for you, about the "dad". It happens.....
            9. +6
              6 February 2020 18: 59
              He didn’t recognize Crimea. He supplies fuel to Bandera. He refused to set up a Russian military base. I don’t need to know anything more about it. Enough time has passed to create a union state. It’s already like a divorce.
            10. -4
              6 February 2020 21: 56
              Quote: Thrall
              Us dad suits, more than.

              hi
              Belarus will continue to strengthen its relations with Russia, but will not "dwell on" them. This was stated by Belarusian Foreign Minister Vladimir Makei.

              Ex-Chairman of the Supreme Council of Belarus Stanislav Shushkevich  supported the position of a diplomat.
              “Makey is a reasonable person, he says everything correctly. But if Belarus tries hard, it will get out of this difficult situation. Lukashenka drove her into this position. You need to pay for oil as much as it costs, and not mix political and economic issues. Thanks to Lukashenko, Belarus has swallowed the bait, it now owes Russia a lot.
              With such a president who only cares about preserving his power and does not bother with economics, political science and believes that manual control can lead to positive results, it is difficult to get out of the situation in Belarus. If the power in our country had been elected - the Kremlin is to blame here, that we have an unelected power, because it recognizes the rigged elections, thereby enslaving Belarus. We have one problem - our president. He knows only one way of managing "I'm the boss, you do @@ k". That is, he gives commands and demands their implementation. He does not understand what economic development is ", - explained Shushkevich.

              This is from a conversation between Shushkevich and the National News Service.
              One can still see sober-minded people! hi
              1. +4
                6 February 2020 22: 04
                What are the thinking?, A trick that with Yeltsin and Kravchenko in Viskuli took my future ...
                Open your face ...
                1. -3
                  6 February 2020 22: 19
                  Quote: GenNick
                  with Yeltsin and Kravchenko in Viskuly

                  Firstly; not Kravchenko, but Kravchuk, at that time the leader of Ukraine.
                  Secondly; Shushkevich, at that time. Chairman of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Belarus, and we did not choose him.
                  Before you write, study the mat part! hi
            11. 0
              7 February 2020 00: 35
              Which department do you serve in?
            12. +1
              7 February 2020 08: 05
              Who are you? And I don’t know all the people I know! Whom he would suit. And I know a lot of people.
          2. +1
            6 February 2020 15: 11
            Once Lukich didn’t manage collective farms and the state farm worked as a history teacher and troops were guarded in the KGB
            1. +2
              6 February 2020 18: 55
              Yes, it is figuratively "chairman", for a demeanor that is completely unacceptable even in a narrow circle of respected people, let alone in public, but in a high position ...
              1. 0
                6 February 2020 19: 05
                Well, from the countryside, people are different from urban
          3. +4
            6 February 2020 16: 30
            For a long time, with the whole family, wherever you are near Rostov
            This is you in vain. Yankees are thoughtful people, they don't need exes. Most likely, the "indignant people" put him under the hot hand, but the whole family in one. And the Americans would watch live and clap their hands.
            1. -11
              6 February 2020 17: 32
              Quote: evgic
              And the Americans would watch live and clap their hands.

              Unfortunately, some Russians would clap their hands clapping their hands Americans.
              1. +1
                6 February 2020 18: 58
                It would be obscene. But after all, the rascal, he managed to turn "some of the Russians" against himself ...
          4. +2
            6 February 2020 22: 13
            And why should all Belarusians be called collective farmers?
            1. +1
              7 February 2020 18: 08
              This is wrong. But the people come across not very delicate, they can blurt out in the heat of the moment: not diplomats at all.
        2. +33
          6 February 2020 14: 20
          I’m very interested in what statements will Lukashenko make tomorrow? At least organize a tote ...
          Loss due to Russia ... this is certainly a masterpiece!
          1. +22
            6 February 2020 14: 25
            Loss due to Russia ... this is certainly a masterpiece!

            The borzometer rolls over. Lukashenko considers our money to be his own. And if we don’t give it, then we are guilty, because we owe it. Even they don’t say thanks for the help provided to Belarus. We should. As if Mamai had settled in Lukashenko, it’s interesting.
            1. +21
              6 February 2020 15: 03
              But I'm also interested in raising the price of transit by 6,6%, which is not a little, this is normal by his standards and quite "corresponds" to all the agreements. But when Russia got tired of batskin's throwing the fifth point between the chairs, and they fried this fifth point for him a little, they immediately started screaming about Russia's failure to fulfill the agreements.
              So no one agreed with you that you will behave like the last selling girl. Ally? Do you want normal (read the lowest) energy prices? So do at least something for Russia. Well, for starters, at least admit Crimea or something ?!
          2. +19
            6 February 2020 14: 39
            Tomorrow he will be silent (if they do not agree on anything) or talk about brotherly love (if they agree on something). And this is what he will say the day after tomorrow, when he returns .... this will be a "litmus test".
          3. +15
            6 February 2020 15: 04
            Loss due to Russia ... this is certainly a masterpiece!


            the funniest thing is the tax maneuver - the internal tax maneuver. Now taxes are simply paid not at the border, but at the well wassat

            Those. This is an absolutely internal issue of the Russian Federation. Tax legislation has been amended in Russia. Yes, because of this, Lukashenko lost money, but where does Lukashenko in general. The fact that he used to have more was a flaw in the legislation of the Russian Federation and the loss of those companies that drove oil there
            1. -5
              6 February 2020 15: 32
              Quote: s-t Petrov
              Yes, because of this, Lukashenko lost money, but where does Lukashenko in general.

              Read the agreement on the EEC.
              1. +1
                6 February 2020 16: 20
                Well lay out, lawyer, the points that violated the Russian Federation)

                Now we’ll pause after the fact)
                1. -10
                  6 February 2020 17: 08
                  Quote: s-t Petrov
                  Well lay out, lawyer, the points that violated the Russian Federation)

                  The basis of the EAEU. And to the son of a lawyer - this is not for me. To Zhirinovsky.
              2. 0
                7 February 2020 11: 32
                Quote: mordvin xnumx
                Quote: s-t Petrov
                Yes, because of this, Lukashenko lost money, but where does Lukashenko in general.

                Read the agreement on the EEC.

                Did you read it yourself?
                1. -1
                  7 February 2020 11: 47
                  Quote: Gost2012
                  Did you read it yourself?

                  Read. Only now we have the priority of the WTO, IMF and the European Union. They said that domestic energy prices should be aligned with world prices, so we are trying. But Old Man does not want this.
            2. +3
              6 February 2020 19: 06
              Selling natural resources to non-residents at the same prices as Russian consumers is a CRIMINAL mistake, because the owner of these resources was deprived of the natural rent inherent in him. Someday this question will come up.
              1. -5
                6 February 2020 22: 11
                I waited for the exact comment, plus. I did not expect from you (you?) Such an assessment of the tax maneuver.
                .. at the same prices as Russian consumers is a CRIMINAL mistake ..
                . Bravo!
                Ps: I won’t be surprised if in Europe our oil becomes cheaper than domestically. Just because the currency is more attractive than Russia Bank tickets.
                1. +1
                  6 February 2020 22: 21
                  Quote: Hypatius
                  I will not be surprised if in Europe our oil becomes cheaper than domestically. Just because the currency is more attractive than Russia Bank tickets

                  1. The currency has been "more attractive" for thirty years, and oil in Europe is "cheaper than inside", still has not become. Apparently, there are some reasons?
                  2. Tickets of the Bank of the Russian Federation are freely exchanged for any conceivable currency. At the rate of the same bank on the day of exchange.

                  You wrote stupid man request
                  1. -5
                    6 February 2020 22: 29
                    1.Keyword - not yet. Until the "tax colonial maneuver" is over.
                    2. And here the exchange of bibariks (non-money and non-rubles, by the way) for money. The oligarchs, these bibariks annually by the State Duma, subsidize in trillions, write off.
                    You wrote nonsense, friend request
                    1. +1
                      6 February 2020 22: 33
                      Quote: Hypatius
                      Keyword - not yet

                      For thirty years. Are you few?

                      Quote: Hypatius
                      Until the "tax colonial maneuver" is over

                      What is a tax maneuver? And what did you see "colonial" in him?

                      Quote: Hypatius
                      2. And here the exchange of bibariks (non-money and non-rubles, by the way) for money. The oligarchs, these bibariks of the State Duma annually, subsidize in trillions, write off

                      I do not understand the logic, take the trouble to express the idea more clearly.

                      For the exchange of large amounts - there is a currency exchange, by the way. Convertibility of the ruble has not yet been canceled.

                      Looks like you said another stupid thing, buddy wink
                      1. -6
                        6 February 2020 22: 47
                        According to claim 1, the Maneuver is 30 years old? What incompetence!
                        According to item 2. Reread the start topic of Victor N.
                        According to claim 3, the logic is elementary. Gazprimam bibariki are uninteresting, since they will be poured on them as much as they want. The convertibility of these bills here is generally out of place (although, by the way, real rubles are exchanged on exchanges on exchanges).
                        You said another stupid thing, buddy wink
                        1. 0
                          6 February 2020 22: 55
                          Quote: Hypatius
                          According to claim 1, the Maneuver is 30 years old? What incompetence!

                          No need to bustle ... 30 years, as the sale of oil for currency is separated from the state. So understandable? wink

                          So what's wrong with the "maneuver"? I see that you don’t like him very much, but carefully hide it, why exactly what

                          Quote: Hypatius
                          According to claim 3, the logic is elementary. Gazprimam bibariki are uninteresting, because they will be poured on them as much as they want

                          Right here for free? At any time and without restrictions?

                          So it is possible not to work at all - just receive "bibariki" and exchange them for the coveted greenery ... but at least on the same exchange.

                          Something your ends don't grow together, man Yes
                        2. -6
                          6 February 2020 23: 11
                          Listen, I’m not a tutor to repeat the 3rd time. Reread the start topic and beyond. Is there really something difficult to realize? There is enough logic, only to bring down the topic, then by exchange, then:
                          So you don't have to work at all - just get "bibariki" and ..
                          If there is a lack of facts on the topic, then read about the tax maneuver, how much taxes the oil and gas sector owes and really pays. And so - an empty chatter with unforgiven kanzami negative
                        3. -1
                          6 February 2020 23: 19
                          Quote: Hypatius
                          Reread the start topic and further

                          Already.

                          Quote: Hypatius
                          Is there really something difficult to realize?

                          No. There is essentially nothing there request

                          Quote: Hypatius
                          how much taxes should and really pay the oil and gas sector

                          What does this have to do with? Here's to yours:

                          Quote: Hypatius
                          in Europe, our oil will become cheaper than domestically ... "tax colonial maneuver"

                          You are worried about my logic ... and here I am - for your laughing
                        4. +2
                          7 February 2020 04: 33
                          Yes, do not pay attention to this revised YouTube about Russia as Medvedev LLC, about the not real ruble, passports, etc. Everything is very neglected there.
                      2. 0
                        7 February 2020 10: 33
                        "Tax on the extraction of minerals" is a form of extraction by the owner (state) of natural rent, which is a sovereign right and obligation. This is an internal affair of the country. Previously, part of the natural rent was withdrawn with the help of duties; their cancellation for another state is wrong. Taking natural rent by non-residents is a crime.
          4. 0
            6 February 2020 19: 56
            It may turn out to be simpler: YES-YES, NO-NO, and that’s it. And then a headache for everyone. As far as I understand, the world oil price will reduce the profitability of oil refineries to zero. Of course, if Luka raises the tax on pumping by 1000%, he may be able to make up for something. Change in domestic taxation, you won’t dig, the same feint as the tax maneuver in the Russian Federation. In principle, do not want to - do not download. Bullshit, of course. And this is not touching on military issues.
        3. +2
          6 February 2020 14: 35
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter

          Famously dad counts "his" money in someone else's pocket.

          And he forgets about other people's money in his pocket.
          1. +3
            6 February 2020 14: 46
            Looks like he does not consider this money to be strangers.
            1. -1
              6 February 2020 14: 52
              Quote: Sky Strike fighter
              Looks like he does not consider this money to be strangers.

              I thought so too.
        4. -8
          6 February 2020 14: 58
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          Famously dad counts "his" money in someone else's pocket. Here he is the result of a policy of beautiful gestures and sponsoring "allies." They sit on their necks. You see, they should. I wonder what Trump would answer to Alexander Grigorievich, if he were in Putin's place, to such a hit?

          And dad then, the worse the rest or worse? While all talk shows talked about how just a little bit more and Ukraine would bend without Russian support, in Ukraine they were looking for a way out of a difficult situation. They searched and found, despite the fact that Bandera in power and in general, as you know, the inhabitants of Uraina can only ride on a rake. Well, judging by the talk shows and the numerous comments, even here in VO. Oh yes, I almost forgot about the way out of the situation found in Ukraine (source Lenta.ru):
          Naftogaz Ukrainy in January received $ 578,4 million in payments for gas transit from the Russian Gazprom. This was announced on his Facebook page by the company's executive director Yuri Vitrenko.
          He explained that 239,5 million were received for transit in December, 175,1 million - an advance payment for January, and 163,8 million - an advance payment for February. “If we compare with the revenues of the state budget for January 2020, this is almost 33 percent (a third of all state budget revenues!), ”Vitrenko specified. According to him, if Kiev could not insist on its terms of the contract, then supplies would bring him 338,9 million less.
          This is how you need to be able to, and not just count, but directly use someone else's pocket. And you are all dad, dad. laughing laughing laughing
          And on the other hand, everything is according to a popular proverb: beat your own people (who are our allies among us?) So that strangers are afraid.
          Wow, how afraid they are, it takes the horror directly, as I think for a frightened Ukraine. With the fear of the great, Ukraine has filed several more lawsuits against the Russian Federation. Well, flatten, and flatten the banner will be the case of Belarus. She does not file claims, so simply, asks compassionately. Here on it we will win back, for the amusement of the internal consumer. What would I know that the Russian Federation does not give anyone a descent!

          Well, we’ve got it and that's enough. Consider the situation in the context of a transit of power. And Lukashenka goes to "beat the pots". Or the Russian Federation will abandon attempts at urgent unification, under the further rule of Putin and, accordingly, weaken the economic pressure on the Republic of Belarus, in this regard. Or Lukashenko, who still does not agree to this option of extending Putin's powers, and not unreasonably fearing for his fate and the fate of his elite, after this meeting, having achieved nothing, will make a serious attempt to get closer to the West. And of course the West will support him in this matter.
          The interests of the peoples of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus? They are not here, the Russian Federation does not have an attractive economic agenda even for its own citizens, and their interests, the interests of the peoples, are not taken into account in this issue. At stake is the fate of the ruling elites of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus, first of all. Therefore, I would not "root" for any of the parties to the negotiations. hi
          1. +5
            6 February 2020 15: 15
            Leshiy1975 Today, 14:58
            Or Lukashenko, still not agreeing to such an option to extend Putin’s powers,
            What idiocy did I just read? If it is necessary to extend Putin’s powers, they will find other, less complicated and less costly methods. So do not carry nonsense.
            1. -6
              6 February 2020 15: 37
              Quote: Alexander Suvorov
              Leshiy1975 Today, 14:58
              Or Lukashenko, still not agreeing to such an option to extend Putin’s powers,
              What idiocy did I just read? If it is necessary to extend Putin’s powers, they will find other, less complicated and less costly methods. So do not carry nonsense.

              Yes, I know that, according to supporters of the authorities, I only bring nonsense and idiocy. At first, while the authorities were giving up the Ukrainian gas transportation system for scrap for several years in a row, I carried it proving that Gazprom’s affairs were bad.
              Then, while many supporters of the authorities managed to celebrate the victory in Syria several times in a row, I continued and continue to carry on nonsense again, because I can’t understand which of the victories is final and what needs to be done for a complete and final victory now, at least with Turkey in Idlib.
              And I continue to carry nonsense today, according to supporters of the authorities, when on argument
              If it is necessary to extend Putin’s powers, they will find other, less complicated and less costly methods.
              I answer that the idea of ​​changing the constitution for the sake of the State Council is not so simple a thing as it seems at first glance. Therefore, even Putin, at a meeting in Cherepovets, was not able to give a clear answer why the State Council should be introduced and the constitution should be changed. And he answered any questions except the most important one. Unless of course count as an answer, here's a message:
              that the municipalities in our country, it turns out, are not included in the system of government, a mess. That’s why we live so badly. Need to fix it.

              PS So do not be discouraged and do not read my idiocy, why bother yourself, really. Continue to hand over the Ukrainian gas transportation system to scrap and celebrate victories in Syria (while not forgetting to express condolences to the relatives of the next dead servicemen, you can never bother about private traders). And do not believe anyone but yourself. Good luck to you. hi
              1. -4
                6 February 2020 16: 12
                You know, Leshiy ..., you write everything correctly, but I get the impression that VO has more writers than readers.
                As it’s just not fermented, we will turn it off, we will screw it, we won’t let it, we ..., we ...
                Yes, rather, they (millers / sechins, etc.) will cut off their fingers than anything for you Russians will do. .In your US newspapers, the enemy is utterly irrelevant, but in reality, stalls.
                Having lived up to gray-haired muda, I always thought that only in sex are partners ... Explain to the dark, from the top, who ???
                1. -1
                  6 February 2020 16: 39
                  Quote: GenNick
                  You know, Leshiy ..., you write everything correctly, but I get the impression that VO has more writers than readers.
                  As it’s just not fermented, we will turn it off, we will screw it, we won’t let it, we ..., we ...
                  Yes, rather, they (millers / sechins, etc.) will cut off their fingers than anything for you Russians will do. .In your US newspapers, the enemy is utterly irrelevant, but in reality, stalls.
                  Having lived up to gray-haired muda, I always thought that only in sex are partners ... Explain to the dark, from the top, who ???

                  And on top of everything rises one small at first, but then very rapidly increasing in size human feature - greed. Rises by only one right - by the right of the strong. The rest is all tinsel and kit of civilization. And all partners only to the extent that you can take advantage of the weaker or you stronger. The modern world is such, such is its ugly truth. And in the post-Soviet space, this is all the more noticeable, considering who managed to take the place of the "elite" after the collapse of the USSR.
                  And everyone who calls for a different model of behavior is declared "urban crazy". Therefore, for me personally, there is not any riddle in the behavior of the "elite", that of the Russian Federation, that almost any others. Ideological, probably nowhere left. And I do not expect any miracles and worries from the current state of the Russian Federation. I just wait for the accumulated contradictions in the system to reach critical mass and bring down the structure. And then perhaps it will be possible to build a fairer (in every sense) state.
                  In the meantime, it will be so, we will declare enemies, but cooperate. We will declare allies, but use.

                  PS Well, I will continue to try my best to explain to fellow citizens that not everything that seems to be such is. And the key to solving our Russian, and then many of the neighboring problems, lies not in the outside of the country, we participate even in dozens of wars abroad, but in its very heart. hi
                  1. -9
                    6 February 2020 17: 01
                    That's right, Goblin ...
                    They write that your guys, their special forces, were blown up by a land mine today in Syria, one was killed. It is very insulting and sad, but `` who is the war, and who is his mother ''
                    After all, no one will say that the WARRIOR died for ... another ounce of despicable metal or an extra barrel of oil.
                    Where does the World go ??? Well, why are we Russians (I, according to my Belarus passport), namely Russians, that everyone considers as idiot and fools and the place for us is a whisk code?
                    1. -5
                      6 February 2020 17: 11
                      Quote: GenNick
                      That's right, Goblin ...
                      They write that your guys, their special forces, were blown up by a land mine today in Syria, one was killed. It is very insulting and sad, but `` who is the war, and who is his mother ''
                      After all, no one will say that the WARRIOR died for ... another ounce of despicable metal or an extra barrel of oil.
                      Where does the World go ??? Well, why are we Russians (I, according to my Belarus passport), namely Russians, that everyone considers as idiot and fools and the place for us is a whisk code?

                      No way, let's break through. This has already happened in history, and even worse. This is due to such a national feature as patience. This is good in war, such a warrior is steady, as they say, blows away all hardships. But this also interferes in peaceful life. When we allow ourselves to do this and again we endure, to the last. Well, nothing can be done about it, they do not choose nationality, as well as inherent features. I think and hope that we will break through. And we will again, as expected, travel around relatives without any boundaries. I am in Brest and in Lviv, and from there to visit us. hi
                    2. D16
                      +4
                      6 February 2020 21: 53
                      After all, no one will say that the WARRIOR died for ... another ounce of despicable metal or an extra barrel of oil.

                      Another banshee lol . For an army to be an army, it must fight. And preferably in a foreign territory. And you know very well that they are not fighting because of sympathy for Assad or the interests of Prigogine. Fighting the Wahhabis. After what they did in the Caucasus, they need to be wetted everywhere. The rest (oil, metal) is a bonus smile .
                      1. -5
                        6 February 2020 22: 16
                        After what they did in the Caucasus ...
                        It makes no sense to argue, to object, but not to award the Hero Star.
                        And about the bonuses, you tell his parents ...
                        1. D16
                          +1
                          6 February 2020 22: 27
                          And what would they say if he crashed at home? What does the parents have to do with it? They should be ready for this since he went to military school. And the wife knew what he was paid for. So your cry is past the checkout.
                          It makes no sense to argue, to object, but not to award the Hero Star.

                          What are you talking about request .
              2. D16
                +4
                6 February 2020 21: 08
                Quote: Leshy1975
                while many supporters of the authorities managed to celebrate the victory in Syria several times in a row, I continued and continue to bear nonsense again, because I can’t understand which of the victories is final and what needs to be done for a complete and final victory now, at least with Turkey in Idlib.

                You do not worry about Idlib. Dawicz, out, Serakib freed from greenery. With Turkish support, of course, things are going slower than they could, but despite your lamentations.
                Continue to hand over the Ukrainian gas transportation system to scrap and celebrate victories in Syria (while not forgetting to express condolences to the relatives of the next dead servicemen, you can never worry about private traders).

                It would have been if the contract had not been extended. But the Trans-Balkan gas pipeline from Ukraine can already be cut and delivered. Rather, the Bulgarians use the part that passes through their territory for the Bulgaria-Serbia-Hungary state enterprise connected to the Turkish stream. G-m reserved one thread to Romania for pumping 3 mln m / 3 to Moldova and Romania, but the rest can already be handed over. So everything has its time. laughing Let me remind you that for an army to be an army, it must fight. Otherwise, it will turn into a kindergarten. And in a war, anything happens. Our losses in Syria against the background of the size of the contingent that gained combat experience, compare the statistical error. So the dogs bark, and the caravan goes on. hi
          2. 0
            6 February 2020 18: 37
            Russia has no attractive economic agenda even for its own citizens
            I have to agree, but in the context of this article it would be fair to add ": like Belarus, it also lacks an attractive economic model."
            1. -4
              6 February 2020 19: 01
              Quote: Icarus
              Russia has no attractive economic agenda even for its own citizens
              I have to agree, but in the context of this article it would be fair to add ": like Belarus, it also lacks an attractive economic model."

              I agree. It’s just that I proceed from the fact that the Russian Federation is still the leading one (in relation to the Republic of Belarus), due to the size and economy, population, and natural wealth. And this agenda should come primarily from us. We have more opportunities for this. And of course I agree that Belarus has a cloud of problems, with which it is difficult to cope. Their standard of living doesn’t seem attractive to us either. hi
          3. 0
            6 February 2020 19: 18
            As for Naftogaz, this happened, any business involves risks, they must be able to count. It's okay, the disruption of supplies threatened with large losses.
            But the economic interests of citizens in Russia are ensured quite well - those who want to earn money - earn money, if not at home, then on shift. They categorically disagree on low-paying jobs, where migrants almost exclusively help out. And their whine and the government hut, only this is by the ears.
            1. -7
              6 February 2020 19: 40
              Quote: Victor N
              As for Naftogaz, this happened, any business involves risks, they must be able to count. It's okay, the disruption of supplies threatened with large losses.
              But the economic interests of citizens in Russia are ensured quite well - those who want to earn money - earn money, if not at home, then on shift. They categorically disagree on low-paying jobs, where migrants almost exclusively help out. And their whine and the government hut, only this is by the ears.

              So, we live in slightly different countries. I will provide the latest economic news from my country.
              Voronezh region with. Yurasovka. Recently closed the last 3 farms. Import substitution, food security and all that, you know. 58 people were fired. I haven’t seen it myself, I haven’t driven there for a long time, since the summer. But I believe my father, he does not wear gossip. So, the farms are not even there, quickly dismantled. What do you think, how many new places have been created in Yurasovka?
              Meet Moscow, the capital, your new shift guards.
              Oh yes, back in Yurasovka, well, let's talk about it to the end. Built FAP. And this is good. The bad thing is that there is neither a specialist nor equipment. It’s worth it, it’s not clear why. Also, they did not count when they built it.
              No, I myself am not Yurasovsky, it just so happened that the latest news about the economic "success" in my country came from there. There is also news from other villages in the region, but they are also unlikely to give you reason to be proud of my country: closed, reduced, premises for sale.

              And about Naftogaz.
              any business is a risk, they must be able to be considered.
              Yes, if Gazprom had problems only with Naftogaz. He has problems almost everywhere now. After all, they miscalculated with TP, too, starting with planning 4-threads, and then digging out two. This is when they started to do it without waiting for permission. But this is a different story, I wrote a lot about it, already tired of the problems of Gazprom. hi
          4. -2
            6 February 2020 20: 05
            Well, we’ve got it and that's enough. Consider the situation in the context of a transit of power. And Lukashenka goes to "beat the pots". Or the Russian Federation will abandon attempts at urgent unification, under the further rule of Putin and, accordingly, weaken the economic pressure on the Republic of Belarus, in this regard. Or Lukashenko, who still does not agree to this option of extending Putin's powers, and not unreasonably fearing for his fate and the fate of his elite, after this meeting, having achieved nothing, will make a serious attempt to get closer to the West. And of course the West will support him in this matter.

            Of course, there is no humor here. The alignment of further events is undesirable, but not even possible at all. It's like in a movie: "Do you want to bang you right away or do you want to suffer?" so it will turn out, if you go to enter the Russian Federation, then this is death, and the second option will still give some other options, time will tell. Only the countries will become in very difficult relations and there will be no turning back. Just another world war, with new winners who will establish new international rules. All this is sad.
            1. -2
              6 February 2020 20: 15
              Oh, the Americans have already fussed. They made a statement on the revision of the status of the Belarusian economy. What do you say, they know how to use the situation for themselves. And here we are money-money!
        5. -1
          6 February 2020 15: 02
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          what would Trump answer to Alexander Grigorievich

          "Trump in Putin's place" - how do you imagine it? It is easier to imagine a square trinomial.
        6. +3
          6 February 2020 15: 05
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          It is interesting that Trump would answer Alexander Grigoryevich, if he were on Putin's place, on such a run-in?

          Alexander Grigorievich has a chance to hear.
        7. +6
          6 February 2020 15: 55
          The most interesting thing is when such statements are made by Russia's largest debtor. Or ready to pay all debts recourse
          1. -1
            7 February 2020 12: 17
            Quote: K-612-O
            The most interesting thing is when such statements are made by Russia's largest debtor. Or ready to pay all debts recourse

            If they break the pots, they won't give it back. The example of Kiev, which "just squeezed out 3 yards for nothing," while not repaying a debt of the same amount, does not allow Minsk to sleep normally. It's like a personal challenge - it's a shame not to squeeze money from the Russian Federation.
        8. +1
          6 February 2020 16: 21
          Yes, the dad in general purely ignites the electorate. fool Russia has just begun to fulfill its obligations under the Contracts. wink There was simply a gentleman's agreement while the state was being built. But the terms of creation have come out. Accordingly, the agreement has ended. But contracts exist and will continue to operate. It is under these contracts that we are obliged to work - and we are working. And I hope now we will only work on them and work. Otherwise, I’ll go to vote for Trump - you’ll excuse me))))) crying
      2. +4
        6 February 2020 14: 23
        We need to make a "memory pill" in the style of Sharia. Pick up videos of Lukashenka from the era of the 90s and the beginning of the XNUMXs, they say what he said then. And then start cutting his today's statements about the sovereign choice of Belarus, etc.
        1. +6
          6 February 2020 14: 40
          Yes, at first I spoke about the wooden mac, and then treat with understanding. 10 years ago, he repented before Poland, now he suddenly regained his sight ....
          And there are a lot of such examples.
      3. +5
        6 February 2020 14: 38
        In light of such antics of Lukashenka, I would cancel the meeting with him! Do you see him, “Russia must” forever! And nowhere is anything accidental, or will Lukashenka’s be inadvertently bursting with greed? It's time to introduce a tax of 300 percent on the shrimp-for a start!
        1. +4
          6 February 2020 15: 30
          Quote: Thrifty
          It’s time to introduce a tax of 300 percent on Krivetki, for starters!

          Shrimps from the Belorussian Sea (in memory of our father, beloved in his stupidity J. Psaki laughing ) - customs duty 1000%. And there’s another 500 for avocados from the Bolorussian marshes. Well, just in case, apples that the Poles don’t climb into any hole in the body, but in Europe (compared to the Spanish and Italian ones) do not need 200 more.

          I would sit and smoke bamboo about fees, who keeps whom and who owes to whom.

          America is the genetic brothers of Ukrainians (Vyatrovich told), and now, it turns out, and Belarusians.

          In Rostov, the Old Man has already looked after housing? How does the word "Maidan" sound there in Belarusian? America knows - they don’t mind another 5 billion "to support democracy" - they will publish it ...
      4. +1
        6 February 2020 18: 12
        How can you lose what you don't have? It is like "not being given mercy." Let the doctor make a diagnosis, but Putin cannot meet with him!
      5. 0
        6 February 2020 21: 34
        Quote: rocket757
        It’s like that, only the stick always has two ends!

        Hello Victor.
        That's it. Before demanding something, you should pay with a partner for previously received. The Arab League recognizes only its Wishlist, not taking into account the interests of Russia, and, moreover, goes over to threats of collapse of allied relations. Here is a table of debtors to Russia:
      6. 0
        7 February 2020 01: 01
        And how much Russia has lost, he did not count a pancake ?! And how many of our people lost didn’t count ?! It's time to cover up a freebie!

        Quote: rocket757
        because of Russia, Belarus “lost” several hundred million dollars.

        It’s like that, only the stick always has two ends!
    2. Ham
      0
      6 February 2020 14: 08
      well, right - before surrender you need to beat the show off)))
      Russian (Belarusian) Pont - as you know, it is more expensive than the American dollar
    3. +2
      6 February 2020 14: 13
      Carry out dad's sk.olko we sank because of his fortels
    4. -35
      6 February 2020 14: 14
      Is it really not clear that the gentlemen from the Kremlin are ready to make the whole world enemies, if only the people thought that the Kremlin has nothing to do with it.
      You read such articles, so Belarus, like Grudinin, has ruined all of Russia. And you ask this, Lukashenko makes the money stored in American papers, or maybe he ordered everyone to forgive debts.
      1. +1
        6 February 2020 14: 20
        Why do we need "brothers" when we have partners hi
        1. +4
          6 February 2020 15: 08
          Quote: Popuas
          Why do we need "brothers" when we have partners hi

          Here, at VO, I have "shabras" and, I'm not afraid to say, "brothers" from Belarus.

          In the geopolitical arena, as practice shows, I have neither "brothers" nor "shabras."
          Only the army and navy.
          1. -3
            6 February 2020 18: 48
            . Only the army and navy.

            Are you talking about Crimean or Russian-Japanese?
            As practice shows, allies except the army and navy were not there.
            hi
            1. +4
              6 February 2020 18: 57
              Quote: Avior
              Are you talking about Crimean or Russian-Japanese?

              Any.

              Two cans of "tukha", ammunition - how much you can carry, water at least. "Mom" threw out MI-8 - go look for "allies" in the mountains ...

              I don’t think I'm talking about Russian-Japanese. And the allies are the same.

              And the Belarusians and the fathers of the current "jumpers" were brothers. Without any quotes. "Tuhu" ate together from one can with Finns.
              We are already "non-brothers" for the skippers, for the Belarusians - to choose who is their "brother" and "scraper" ...
              1. -1
                6 February 2020 20: 17
                I don’t think I'm talking about Russian-Japanese. And the allies are the same.

                And is the result the same?
                1. +2
                  6 February 2020 21: 06
                  Quote: Avior
                  I don’t think I'm talking about Russian-Japanese. And the allies are the same.

                  And is the result the same?

                  If we talk about the Russian-Japanese - it's not the same. We don't have such a naval "eny" as Admiral Rozhdestvensky.
                  1. +1
                    7 February 2020 07: 38
                    Perhaps I didn’t understand you correctly, as I understand it, did you write about Afghanistan?
                    But if in general, the phrase about allies is only the army and navy, it is certainly well-known and often used, but if you look closely at the history, the results if you only have these allies are often not very good, such as the Crimean, Russian-speaking Japanese or Afghan, but in the presence of countries - allies - much better.
                    Anyway, no worse
                    hi
                    1. 0
                      7 February 2020 15: 29
                      Quote: Avior
                      in the presence of only these allies are often not very good, such as the Crimean, Russian-speaking Japanese or Afghan, but in the presence of countries - allies, it is noticeably better.

                      Is it Afghan that under the "allies" passed better?
                      Wake up !!!
                      See how we were there. Look at our operations, at what was built there during our time, at Kamaz trucks with flour, which M. Kozhukhov showed in the Vremya program. The fact that we walked around Afghanistan and were not afraid of anyone.

                      And compare with today's "allies" who sit at the bases, afraid to stick their nose out. On YouTube there was a video, by the "allies", by the way, filmed, as they go under the cover of "Bradley" for cigarettes - laugh! Tsykuns and stupid militarily.

                      I won’t even talk about Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria and Iraq - when there are such "allies" - and enemies are not needed ...
      2. +12
        6 February 2020 14: 21
        Lukashenko wants Russia to always forgive his debts. So you think we need to stop subsidizing Belarus? I agree, but categorically disagree with Lukashenko, who is used to considering subsidies as his own. He behaves like a little child who was suddenly not given sweets, because he is obliged to give. market price, that's why Lukashenko is going to negotiate with Putin, he has no other choice.
        1. +8
          6 February 2020 14: 42
          for example, Abkhazia and South Ossetia exist in the form of a line in the budget of the Russian Federation, and I don’t remember such statements from them, as well as other "freaks" similar to the Belarusian ones. Maybe we should come to this here too?
        2. +11
          6 February 2020 15: 40
          First, a freebie is perceived with gratitude
          Then - for granted.
          A bit later, discontent appears - they did not finish.
          And if you turn off the freebie flow, you will instantly become the worst enemy.
        3. 0
          6 February 2020 19: 31
          I apologize: but what days does Putin serve? Now is not a post?
      3. +3
        6 February 2020 14: 21
        Tell me how much more can you sponsor this dad? and in return receive only spitting.
        1. -5
          6 February 2020 14: 27
          Tricky plan.
      4. 0
        6 February 2020 14: 27
        Do not look for white, fluffy, where they can not be by definition.
        Everything is relative, therefore, you have to look at the most important thing ... if you accept that the people choose nobody and nothing, then everything is clear, and if you suddenly assume that people are allowed to choose, then nothing is clear.
        Is life of a working people in Belarus much better than ours? Why.
        Is life worse than ours? Why?
        How to make people’s life good there and there? If not, then why?
        Discard emotions and see who, what and how is doing wrong.
      5. +5
        6 February 2020 14: 35
        Do you think that an amount of less than $ 11,5 billion is a very large sum of 530 billion gold reserves? Compared to 1.6 trillion of Japan and 1.1 trillion of China - invested in US Securities?
        And why does Lukashenko not talk about the debt of Belarus to Russia of $ 7.5 billion?
      6. -2
        6 February 2020 14: 38
        And the Kremlin is like Caesar’s wife.
      7. +4
        6 February 2020 14: 45
        Dear Gardamir, but then what’s Grudinin ????
        1. +2
          6 February 2020 15: 10
          Dear Gardamir, but then what’s Grudinin ????

          he chose him in elections in the Russian Federation wassat this is his president.

          PS Gardamir citizenship is another question what. Patriot is dissatisfied with the Kremlin, but he understands both the Vukrainian Rada and the Minsk things for the norm, no matter what they answer, he immediately takes out phrases about olegarchs, class struggles and other game from his pocket. The meaning is generally simple - the Kremlin - thieves and crooks - the State Department is not the enemy - Putin is fabulous and shows only cartoons - Putin must leave - Grudinin president what Even with Khodorkovsky complete synchronization. You can read MBH and then Gardamira and voila.

          PS This theme with sternin is funny. It's not the first year I've been using the "communists" from VO. Even the accounts in Switzerland withheld from voters were justified. It's time for you to let go of phantom pains. I do not urge you to turn on the head. Because sternin is already a diagnosis.
        2. +2
          6 February 2020 15: 17
          He is convinced that Grudinin, since the Communist is the only one who has found his billions in a natural way, so to speak.
          Everyone else stole and plundered.
          1. -1
            6 February 2020 15: 19
            He is convinced that ...


            Yes, there to disassemble the posts line by line - gloom in general. Sheer.
          2. -3
            6 February 2020 15: 25
            Well, firstly, Grudinin is not a communist. And following your own logic, you can steal the rest?
            1. 0
              6 February 2020 15: 29
              Well, firstly, Grudinin is not a communist.

              Once the Communist Party nominated him as a candidate for himself in the elections - the Communists mean ended in the Communist Party - I had to resort to an external personnel reserve, agreed with Washington. Well, I already knew that. I thought you forgot. But no
              Tricky)



              Faded when I saw-US capitalism drowned for the Communist in the elections of the Russian Federation wassat At first, the ambassador’s heartburn - and an article in the Washington Post

              K - Communists wassat



              Of course, the "communists" of Russia are now a pitiful sight. This is some kind of modern emo communism. Merciless. Supported by the USA wassat

              Maybe if you didn’t write this Semin game everywhere, you wouldn’t have spoiled what your brethren drown for .. Although what do you have to do with it. Who else but Zyuganov got around the whole idea)
              1. +2
                6 February 2020 16: 08
                Quote: s-t Petrov
                Of course, the "communists" of Russia are now a pitiful sight. This is some kind of modern emo communism. Merciless. Supported by the USA

                They have such a breed ... A century ago, too ... Trotsky example, how he brought support from the United States ...
              2. +1
                6 February 2020 19: 04
                Quote: s-t Petrov
                At first, the ambassador’s heartburn - and an article in the Washington Post

                McFaul in 2018 is no longer the US ambassador to the Russian Federation, but a simple "teacher" at the university. Petrov, change the manual, about the fact that the Communist Party is supported by the United States, this is complete absurdity. I am far from a supporter of the Communist Party, but they are financed by our budget (as a faction that passed to the Duma), not by the United States.
                1. +1
                  6 February 2020 19: 42
                  Exactly, this is fundamentally changing the matter. Former ambassador who is happy for the sternum along with a newspaper from Washington. No support ☝️

                  And when Yukos bought the Communist Party, this is also .. Accident. funny communism, yes. And the fact that the bulkman suddenly called on his hamsters to participate in smart voting and vote for the Communists - well, it also happened so simply

                  The budget, yeah, like the echo of Moscow, serving the interests of foreign states. One must be naive to think so. Looking at how the party has already performed since 1996. Although its main implementation was when it (the party) decided that communism was enough to build, now it is being built by commentators with
                2. -4
                  6 February 2020 20: 03
                  And I’ll also say such a disgrace from the training manual sent to me from the Kremlin - the ex-ambassador always says what the ambassador cannot say because of the specifics of working in this position. Although I think it’s easy to find pictures of how Zyuganov is hanging out with the ambassador already new) but the picture as the head of the US Democratic Party, for example, hanging out with our ambassador, I think I’ll look longer

                  I have already presented how the Russian ambassador invites the republican leader to the embassy to discuss a plan for further actions before the election
            2. -2
              6 February 2020 15: 35
              That is, he was not a member of the Communist Party? How did he then come forward from the Communist Party, not being a member of this party?
              And following your own logic, you can steal the rest?

              It is rather following your logic. Since a communist is known, or is part of the Communist Party, the merits of his wealth should not be doubted.
            3. +1
              6 February 2020 16: 49
              That's right, the billionaire is not a communist, but a communist candidate, a personal business squeezed into mortgage auctions, a national enterprise, the Central Committee of the party that did not read Lenin and Marx, is also wonderful. Yes Zyuganov with Rashkin sucking money from the 90s at MBH - this is your bright communist present and future.
          3. +4
            6 February 2020 15: 36
            The communist is a billionaire. Sounds like an Orthodox Satanist.
            1. -7
              6 February 2020 16: 02
              As long as you do not talk about the Communists you are a reasonable person.
              Not necessarily a Communist candidate. Rather, the Social Democrats.
              1. -2
                6 February 2020 16: 04
                Not necessarily a Communist candidate.


                laughing stop the earth
              2. +2
                6 February 2020 16: 10
                Well, then they would rename the party. At least in the RSDLP. And the meaning would be put in order with the content and returned to the roots.
        3. -8
          6 February 2020 15: 19
          It’s just that the situation is similar, in order to remove the competitor, they piled in the mud.
          Now they have taken up Lukashenko, the methods are the same.
          Moreover, it is not necessary to be an analyst, it is enough to remember who and how much they forgave, but Lukashenko is to blame for everything.
          1. +4
            6 February 2020 15: 20
            It’s just that the situation is similar, in order to remove the competitor, they piled in the mud.


            who is the competitor? In what? Is RB a competitor? With a population of 2 districts of Moscow? Competitor of Russia? - All his competition is tied to cheap energy. His competition is our good will. Without subsidies - everything will fall. All his miracle is production, all his agricultural industry. The chain will go all the way to the right for the price. From cranes to potatoes.

            Now they have taken up Lukashenko, the methods are the same.


            chopping off a freebie is a great method, I think. This is just the way it is with those who bite the hand giving food.

            Moreover, it is not necessary to be an analyst, it is enough to remember who and how much they forgave, but Lukashenko is to blame for everything.


            He was told that he should. It's not his fault. He is simply a debtor. And he owes us money. And he gnaws at our hand. He apparently needs other lenders and western / eastern collectors.
          2. +5
            6 February 2020 15: 33
            In the mud of him, Grudinin, no one wallowed, he got into it himself and his whole story with his company is very entertaining, believe
            1. +2
              6 February 2020 15: 39
              his whole story with his company is very entertaining, believe


              emo communists are now very offended laughing shaking hands aim at "-" and here comes the communism of Grudinin

              1. -3
                6 February 2020 15: 46
                Quote: s-t Petrov
                and here comes the communism of the sternum

                Sergeant Petrov appeared wink Ole, ole, ole ... Rassia, go ahead!
                1. +2
                  6 February 2020 15: 51
                  Sergeant Petrov appeared wink Ole, ole, ole ... Rassia, go!


                  The stability of your latent forum revolution, choosing Yeltsin and considering the 90s a holy and satisfying time, inspires me to posts

                  drinks
                  1. -2
                    6 February 2020 17: 14
                    Quote: s-t Petrov
                    who chose Yeltsin and considers the 90s holy and satisfying

                    That's who I did not choose. I voted for Lebedev. And in the 90s I lived much better than now ... They gave milk ... laughing
            2. -4
              6 February 2020 15: 56
              Serdyukov, too, got into a mess, but went on increasing. And there are those who got into it themselves, but on a horse, because there are many who are loyal to the current.
              1. 0
                6 February 2020 16: 16
                You are constantly trying to compare the incomparable; you are always absolutely guilty, God forbid, and in life you have the same position
                1. -5
                  6 February 2020 16: 38
                  By the way! lol
                  You are not confusing anything. Inept diplomacy in Ukraine, the United States is to blame. Reluctance to negotiate with Belarus, because priority is not Russia's good, but its own pocket. Stupid relations with Turkey, Erdogan is to blame. For decades, they repented for the Soviet Union, now Europe is to blame, in revised history.
                  So does anyone there like to blame others? Ah, yes, Lenin planted a mine ...
                  1. +1
                    6 February 2020 19: 49
                    Agree with Belarus ?! You did not confuse the vector? Beggar master leads to a notary public ....
                2. +2
                  6 February 2020 19: 57
                  Quote: Andrey VOV
                  You are constantly trying to compare the incomparable; you are always absolutely guilty, God forbid, and in life you have the same position

                  Yes, he’s like a radio here, he talks the same thing .. Don’t pay attention .. The dispossessed pensioner is clearly from the party nomenclature!
                  I tried to communicate with him, it's useless .. he's like a bulldozer wink
                  1. -7
                    6 February 2020 20: 04
                    like a bulldozer
                    Thank you for the compliment.
              2. 0
                6 February 2020 19: 46
                Leave Serdyukov, he was a cover.
                1. -3
                  6 February 2020 19: 55
                  Quote: Victor N
                  Leave Serdyukov, he was a cover.

                  Judging by how sharply the Russian Army behaved in the Crimea, Syria, etc. Especially in armament and equipment ..
                  This is exactly how it was while "our liberals" chewed "stooltkin" tongue Shoigu came, already when the foundation hardened, well, and of course the work began there already without chatter .. soldier
                  We re-equipped the Army and set it to a new level .. hi And then they showed the whole world that Russia was reborn and was not going to bow to the west, etc.
                  The effect was stunning, just raise the men archives of the time ..
                  At least ten years of P / S rearmament of the Army is needed, especially for such a huge country like Russia! and we did it, no wonder sanctions fell in)))
            3. -1
              6 February 2020 17: 22
              Quote: Andrey VOV
              In the mud of him, Grudinin, no one wallowed, he got into it himself and his whole story with his company is very entertaining, believe

              I remember how our "real patriots" beat themselves in the chest laughing
        4. +3
          6 February 2020 16: 33
          And he can see one of his shareholders. Recently, the sect of witnesses of communism, together with the great Sue, falls into insanity or childhood
    5. +8
      6 February 2020 14: 17
      But sho, is it already customary to record traditional Christmas charity as a source of stable income? wassat
      1. +3
        6 February 2020 14: 49
        ... do not judge the musician ... he plays as he can ...
        The thinking of the collective farm chairman, to whom the state owes everything to everyone, has not disappeared ... just over the years, they have just transformed to the interstate level ...
    6. +12
      6 February 2020 14: 17
      Lukashenko - to officials: What has been done to ensure that Russia fulfills its obligations


      And what has Belarus done to fulfill its obligations? In addition to tryndzha, of course)
      1. +2
        6 February 2020 14: 39
        Learned to beg, blackmail and grow shrimps well))))
        1. +1
          6 February 2020 14: 40
          No matter how their "Western partners" themselves gobbled up like shrimp))
          1. 0
            6 February 2020 15: 20
            In fact, partners are to the Kremlin, this is their vocabulary.
            1. 0
              6 February 2020 15: 23
              And for Rygorych - the owners, sorry, gaspadars?))
          2. +2
            6 February 2020 16: 59
            And they will devour, but Old Man believes that he is still cunning.
          3. -1
            6 February 2020 19: 52
            Oh, to be complete, to eat with such stuff ... fairy ...
            1. 0
              8 February 2020 13: 06
              Well, they eat the Tarkans, in China, the whole cockroach fast food industry.
    7. +8
      6 February 2020 14: 20
      Sergey Rumas estimated the total “losses” as a result of this Russian maneuver at a third of a billion dollars, of which 130 million are direct losses for the Belarusian budget.

      They fed, fed the brotherly people, but again the bad ones. We must finally take an example from the Americans - if you want money, plant a puppet.
      1. +14
        6 February 2020 14: 34
        Cool. Americans are fed by the whole world. American bases are maintained at the expense of countries where these bases are located. We have "union" Belarus, which is almost at the expense of the RF budget, flatly refuses the base of the Russian Aerospace Forces on its land. Feel the difference: who does business. It is no wonder that the United States emerged victorious from the Cold War. They welded on the allies, and the allies welded on the Union, and when the USSR ran out of money, everyone fled, but the United States did not feed them, but began to milk them.
        1. +1
          6 February 2020 17: 25
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          but the US did not feed them, but began to milk them.

          maybe this makes some sense? maybe it's time to move to the American model of cooperation? raskhrenach a couple of hostile countries as the United States did with Iraq or Serbia, only so that others understand how the "unfriendly" could end, and begin to seat their governments.
          the truth is not clear where and why? what request to put a military base in Poland or Georgia? so without that we are shot to all.
          1. -2
            6 February 2020 20: 00
            Therefore, you do not need to be like, but to build yourself a comfortable country. What I observe, and what I am glad. Although not everyone notices this and welcomes Well, well ... "He would notice the trembling of the stars, he would not step on the violet, If he did not carry a beam on his back, bent over, in three girths" (Alexey Markov).
    8. -5
      6 February 2020 14: 24
      Billions of "brotherly countries" were forgiven, but here commercial interest, yes, capitalism grimaces ...
      1. +2
        6 February 2020 14: 28
        So everyone does so as not to forgive anymore fool so that people like you don't say that anymore hi
        1. -13
          6 February 2020 14: 37
          They forgave Africa and gave more money. Partner Erdogan S-400 presented. And with Lukashenko, what kind of profit for their own, which they don’t give up?
          1. +1
            6 February 2020 14: 53
            Partner Erdogan S-400 presented.

            In mid-July, Bloomberg, citing its sources in Ankara, said that Turkey agreed to purchase C-400 complexes from Russia for a total of $ 2,5 billion. “I can say that they (Turkey. - RBC) pay 45% of the total contract amount as an advance, 55% - Russian credit funds ”,

            VO becomes an incubator for anti-Russian trolls
            1. +2
              6 February 2020 15: 21
              Do not confuse love for Russia with love for the authorities.
      2. +15
        6 February 2020 14: 36
        Quote: Pessimist22
        Billions of "brotherly countries" were forgiven, but here commercial interest, yes, capitalism grimaces ...

        In fact, only according to official data, Belarus costs the budget of the Russian Federation $ 6 billion a year.
        That is, in just four years, "fraternal aid" covers the sum of all debts written off to all African countries from 1991 to 2019.
        1. +4
          6 February 2020 15: 06
          In fact, only according to official data, Belarus costs the budget of the Russian Federation $ 6 billion a year.
          That is, in just four years, "fraternal aid" covers the sum of all debts written off to all African countries from 1991 to 2019.


          Some are so used to a boobs that even at an advanced age they cry and act up like newborns.
    9. +17
      6 February 2020 14: 25
      Lost it?
      Reminds of an anecdote how a man was giving alms to a beggar all the time. After a while, the good-natured man got married and the charity became less. The beggar was indignant: "Why at my expense?"
      1. +4
        6 February 2020 14: 29
        laughing .... in the case of a joke
    10. -4
      6 February 2020 14: 25
      Right Here Lukashenko sold his homeland to the Americans, but what did they do ????
    11. The comment was deleted.
    12. +4
      6 February 2020 14: 40
      “Lukashenka to officials: What has been done to make Russia fulfill its obligations” sounds like what each official did to spoil Russia.
      “The meeting was also attended by the head of the government of the Republic of Bashkortostan Sergei Rumas. Speaking with the report, Rumas told the head of state that because of Russia Belarus“ lost ”several hundred million dollars.”, Not because of the eccentricities of the “dad”, but because of for Russia, only this way and not otherwise.
      Considering that the eccentricities do not stop, the "losses" from Russia will continue to grow.
    13. +1
      6 February 2020 14: 42
      Judging by the text, the usual verbal chatter for domestic consumption. I also have one frame in a cage squealing. My granddaughter called Grisha, sometimes biting, when you put a finger in his cage, and even release him, he flies, feels himself a proud bird. And just a parrot. So Luka, a lot of cry, but a little sense.
    14. +1
      6 February 2020 14: 58
      There are NO contracts for the supply of Russian oil to Belarus, but Russia has not fulfilled its obligations! No words, literary. fool
    15. -3
      6 February 2020 14: 58
      I heard that the old man is sick shzfr. and this is his next aggravation, is it true?
    16. -4
      6 February 2020 15: 03
      No matter how bad Ukraine is, but it doesn’t ask for an alliance with Russia and Maidana is not happy about it.
      Now Russia, with its redneck attitude towards Belarus, is stepping on the same rake as with Ukraine.
      And here we are on the forum, pouring mud on Belarusians with mud, we help this.
      These are we brothers ....
      1. 0
        6 February 2020 15: 15
        And why does Russia always owe something to Ukraine or Belarus? Let’s at least for the sake of interest see what would happen if Russia demanded discounts and multibillion preferences from Ukraine or Belarus, as they always demand from us, what would they say? rob?
        These are we brothers ....

        Friendship is friendship, but tobacco is apart. I'm not talking about Friendship, but about friendship between nations.
        1. -3
          6 February 2020 15: 26
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          And why does Russia always owe something to Ukraine, then to Belarus?

          As for "forever": until 1991, there was no Russia, Ukraine, or Belarus. Russia has entered a period of disintegration. Someone has to reverse this decay. Otherwise, there will be no first, no second, no compote.
          Well, such problems are not solved by voting!
          1. +4
            6 February 2020 16: 11
            Quote: iouris
            As for "forever": until 1991, there was neither the Russian Federation, nor Ukraine, nor Belarus.

            But the 1977 Constitution of the USSR does not agree with you. wink
            The Union Republic is a sovereign Soviet socialist state, which merged with other Soviet republics into the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

            And even during the Soviet era, the Union budget had only two donors - the RSFSR and the BSSR. All the rest lived sweetly, drank deliciously, and even laughed at their "hungry, lazy and, moreover, a drinking elder brother."
            And in the new union, it’s even worse - for some reason, one RF should feed everyone.
            1. -5
              6 February 2020 18: 01
              Both Ukraine and Kazakhstan were in the donors, Belarusians were not a big donor.
              1. +1
                6 February 2020 21: 02
                Quote: Lamata
                Both Ukraine and Kazakhstan were in the donors, Belarusians were not a big donor.


                Or:
                1. 0
                  7 February 2020 15: 35
                  The data for Belarus is simply fantastic and looks like cranberries. Judge for yourself, the population of Russia / Ukraine / Belarus is correlated as 15/5/1 - and the production is supposedly 17.5 / 12.4 / 15.6
                  Those. each Ukrainian produced twice as much Russian, and Belarus 13-14 times more than Russian? How is this possible in principle?
                  1. +2
                    7 February 2020 15: 41
                    Quote: Sergey49
                    How is this possible in principle?

                    Data - "per capita". It even says it there, but below, in white on black and not everywhere.
                    1. 0
                      7 February 2020 17: 52
                      Thanks for the help, I didn’t notice about the soul of the population.
      2. -1
        6 February 2020 16: 14
        Freebie ends about the "brothers" remembered, do not worry Vlad for the lads, it will be fucking nicer to Ukraine than a brother than a Muscovite will not have a pan-head.
    17. -7
      6 February 2020 15: 05
      It seems that soon the Belarusian region in Russia will be added.
      1. -6
        6 February 2020 15: 19
        Who is minus that? Liberasts and here jackals on a patriotic site?
        1. -1
          6 February 2020 15: 49
          It looks like the "brothers" are playing pranks.
        2. +2
          6 February 2020 16: 49
          ... it was not necessary to abolish the flags ...
    18. -7
      6 February 2020 15: 31
      Apparently, people were even called out from vacation, there are not many volunteers.
      I surrender you defeated Lukashenko with universal evil, Medvedev is the best prime minister, Hero of Russia Serdyukov strengthened the army.
      Long live capitalism all over the world!
      Oh yes, I support raising the retirement age to 90 years.
    19. -1
      6 February 2020 15: 35
      Quote: Sky Strike fighter
      Us dad suits, more than. We respect Putin, we do not write nasty things about him on the forums.

      If they didn’t suit you. Belarus’s economy rests on a bunch of Lukashenko-Putin. Leave one of them from politics and that’s where the current specific economy of Belarus will end.

      And this is how to say more .. I would not generalize. At the moment, there is practically no irreplaceable position in the world. An alternative to everything and everything is available. The only limiting factor is a shared past and genetic kinship. No one’s economy now rests on a bunch of individuals. The bunch could be even stronger ..
      1. pio
        +4
        6 February 2020 17: 19
        Well, for example, replace 30 percent of the equipment of oil refineries with other brands of raw materials, choose a supplier who agrees to provide the same discounts. How easy it all is in the comments!
      2. -4
        6 February 2020 19: 16
        Here you are about the alternative, and I tell you
        -imagine, you are lying on a bed in a formation, on the left is a beauty, on the right, blue, and to whom should you turn your back? Dillem, however ...
        1. 0
          6 February 2020 19: 29
          Quote: GenNick
          You are lying on the bed in formation, on the left is a beautiful woman, on the right is blue, and to whom should you turn your back?

          They reminded me of a joke ... And I dreamed of such a blonde ... And I dreamed of a brunette whoo with such buffers ... And I ... and I ... and I dreamed of skiing and the poles broke ...
    20. +1
      6 February 2020 15: 35
      Speaking with the report, Rumas reported to the head of state that Belarus “lost” several hundred million dollars because of Russia.

      Well, where does Lukashenko have to do with it? AND! There is no time to read, - it is necessary to write.
    21. +1
      6 February 2020 15: 56
      An unpredictable ally, worse than a predictable enemy.
    22. +2
      6 February 2020 15: 56
      ... "Because of Russia, Belarus" lost "several hundred million dollars" ...
      That’s such a bad Russia, it’s only strange that against this background Belarus has the largest debts to the same Russia.
      It turns out to like it, but give it not so much?
    23. -1
      6 February 2020 16: 00
      Thief Rygorych will spread bully
    24. +3
      6 February 2020 16: 14
      consequences from all kinds of maneuvers of our partners.

      Old Man has already survived Russia "partners" .. Eh Old Man ..
      The freebie spoiled you, how much did you cash in on sanctions against Russia, etc. Moscow turned a blind eye to it .. okay, all the same, allies are brothers ..
      And here patience burst from arrogance ..
    25. +10
      6 February 2020 16: 18
      "The requirements are known - not a single citizen of Belarus, not a single enterprise should feel the consequences of all kinds of maneuvers of our partners."
      - for this we need to start producing oil and gas in Belarus. you have the experience of import substitution .. I remember years earlier there were Belarusian shrimps and sprats. I remember your banana groves bloomed .. it remains to repeat the same thing .. but with new western partners!)
    26. +1
      6 February 2020 16: 30
      Quote: ML-334
      It looks like the "brothers" are playing pranks.

      Well, you only sold the cons, and + only to the Americans ...
    27. +2
      6 February 2020 16: 31
      The potato "przydend" decided that he was the ruler of the world and that he had everything "on parcels" .... Sorry, but here it is clearly not diplomats who should speak, but gerontologists.
    28. The comment was deleted.
    29. +1
      6 February 2020 16: 47
      Empty chores, you can not meet.
    30. +6
      6 February 2020 17: 09
      The people, the entire older generation, who grew up under the USSR, for unification with the Russian Federation and ceased to love Lukashenko. My mother, and she is 91 years old, turns off the TV with such performances. The old people voted for Kebich, and the younger collective farmers, plus the dim-witted intellectuals, succumbed to the stuffing of Luke that he had two suitcases of dirt on Kebich and Shushkevich. Kebich was a supporter of the union with the Russian Federation, and it was already a question of a single currency. But, Luke won at the expense of the collective farm. And then, when the Supreme Council impeached him, Zyuganov and his ilk and normal people came to the head that he could become king of Russia. And now everyone and the pensioners have seen. But the system is such that it wins any election. United Russia students studied in Belarus.
      1. +2
        6 February 2020 17: 23
        It's to blame, Chernomyrdin and Seleznev came.
    31. pio
      +4
      6 February 2020 17: 11
      Let me remind you of a classic Jewish joke in the subject: a local beggar has been serving for many years on the corner of Kobylyanskaya St. Madame Prikhodko passes by, leaves him a dime - thanks, Madame Prikhodko! The merchant Sabateev serves half a penny - May God give you health! Rabinovich’s lawyer took out a ruble note, but the beggar is not happy, I apologize, I don’t understand, you always filed 2 rubles ?! - I got married and my expenses increased. - So it turns out I should now support your family ?!
    32. +4
      6 February 2020 17: 33
      Quote: Thrall
      Us dad suits, more than. We respect Putin

      Well, of course, your good life was essentially funded by a Russian taxpayer. And Putin was led to such sponsorship. And you all loved.
      But Putin has a deal inside, and there are recipients of money inside, and they asked questions. TIRED. We have many in poverty, why should you be fine, for our money !? hi
    33. -4
      6 February 2020 18: 14
      The site clearly shows a rather vile and vile direction: sowing hostility between Russia and Ukraine, Russia and Belarus. Who writes the truth mercilessly minus. I would like to remind the close comrades that Belarus is protecting the borders of Russia from a possible NATO invasion. For this alone, you can give her oil for free. No need to worry about the type of oligarchs who do not build an extra pair of dozens of palaces in the West. In general, history does not teach anything. In 1941, Belarus covered up the Moscow direction for some time. But the loot of the oligarchy is more important to you. So continue to minus and sow enmity. And it will end, as always, in the history of Russia. Any disunity led to bloody wars, where we suffered immeasurable losses with the enemy.
      1. +1
        6 February 2020 19: 19
        Quote: Old Fuck
        So continue to minus and sow enmity.

        No one wants to sow hostility, Belarusians and Russians have nothing to share. But there are questions to Lukashenko. hi
      2. +1
        6 February 2020 20: 00
        How and by what means does it cover the border? Wouldn’t it be easier to do it together for our airfields, places of deployment of other parts, receive money ?? enough demagogy about the cover and moreover draw an analogy with 41 years
    34. 0
      6 February 2020 18: 20
      Quote: fa2998
      Quote: Thrall
      Us dad suits, more than. We respect Putin

      Well, of course, your good life was essentially funded by a Russian taxpayer. And Putin was led to such sponsorship. And you all loved.
      But Putin has a deal inside, and there are recipients of money inside, and they asked questions. TIRED. We have many in poverty, why should you be fine, for our money !? hi

      How much can you say the same thing. I will repeat:
      - You live in a country where even your skin does not belong to you ...
      And please, the address below is Moscow, the Kremlin.
    35. +1
      6 February 2020 19: 11
      I would like to ask Lukashenka - How many promises have you fulfilled? What have you done to get "nishtyaks" from the Russian Federation ?. 1 A single currency has not been created 2 The base of the RF Aerospace Forces in Belarus has not been created 3. Visa-free with 80 countries is allowed (a hole in the border of the Russian Federation) 4. Smuggling of sanctioned goods 5 Non-recognition of Abkhazia, Ossetia, Crimea 6. Restrictions on the import of goods from the Russian Federation - here is an incomplete list what Lukashenka has done to damage the economy and security of the Russian Federation. And for this the impudent wants to receive "nishtyaki"?
      1. -2
        6 February 2020 21: 46
        Byalorus friends on one side and are friends only for the money. This is their
    36. 0
      6 February 2020 19: 46
      And someone publishes obligations from Belarus, the counter ?! Surely there were oncoming?
    37. 0
      6 February 2020 19: 52
      Lukashenka's VERY stupid position: Russia "should", but "does not fulfill its obligations", because of Russia Belarus "suffers losses". If tomorrow he stubbornly DEMANDS that Russia "fulfill its obligations" - it will come out VERY bad.
    38. +2
      6 February 2020 21: 43
      Just some. Lukashenko completely fell off the oak tree. Andependence is a disease of the brain and can only be treated with fire.
      Russian oil suppliers offered 83% of the global + $ 10 premium per tonne, which is about $ 342 per tonne,but it didn’t suit the independent-independent ones and they refused from such prices. However, in Norway they bought at $ 520 per ton (with delivery to the port and shipping by train).
      Isn’t it strange? The buyer refused, he was shown the world market.
      Now complete and sign-quality Lukashenko declares that Russia does not fulfill the conditions. There are simply no words for this stupidity. Apparently this is all designed for Bialorussian.
      After the Norwegian tricks, Russian oil companies will definitely not want to make oil discounts. Later.
      Now Lukashenko declares that he is ready to buy Russian oil at world prices, which is $ 400 per ton.
      Well, great. All is well: Russia will receive about $ 1 billion in plus, and the Belarusian territory (alas, I can’t call this self-invented pseudo-state a misunderstanding) can load an oil refinery.
    39. -1
      6 February 2020 21: 46
      In general, if the decomposed bialorus want preferential oil prices, then you can sell it on condition:
      A ban on the re-export of oil and oil products produced from Russian oil and fuel of at least 40% of the issued volume should be delivered to Russia with a discount of an equal discount on the world price.
    40. 0
      6 February 2020 21: 55
      So the moment of truth has come: it can't go on like this! Lukashenko SHOULD stop self-acting, crap on the sly of Russia (supporting Russia's ill-wishers and enemies), blackmail her with his "friendship", extorting undeserved privileges and "snacks", agree to the CLOSE honest Union (or even entry into the Federation) proposed by him himself, and start - truly, brotherly cooperate for the sake of Belarus and Belarusians. Otherwise, Lukashenka will become Russia's enemies. If he will be able to pacify his own PERSONAL ambitions and pride - it will be good for both Belarusians and him. No - a long bloody path will begin, which will lead him, and the country, and the people to ruin. And, again, - to the subsequent inevitable alliance with Russia! Maybe you shouldn't repeat Yanukovych's stupid mistakes? ...
    41. for
      -4
      6 February 2020 22: 09
      And Vaska (those in power) listens and eats. Gnawing over soon to their joy. But Putin will give cheap oil anyway. For me, it is better to give Belarus for free than China and Turkey for a great price.
    42. 0
      6 February 2020 23: 04
      * Maidan 1999 *:
      “On Sunday, October 17, 1999, the release of Sergei Dorenko’s author’s program opened a report from Minsk, where thousands of protest actions of the Belarusian opposition took place, which turned into riots. slogans “Live Belarus!” The journalist said that there were at least twenty thousand of them. They walked along Skaryna Avenue, held a rally in the Friendship of Peoples Park. The culmination of the manifestation was the symbolic act of burning the draft treaty on the creation of the Union State between Belarus and Russia. this is a young man himself, whose name was Valentin Grigorievich Vechorko. "
      *20 years later*:
      “If twenty years ago Belarusians, having obeyed Vintsuk Vyachorka, overthrew Lukashenka and thwarted the creation of the Union State by staging a coup, as happened in Ukraine in 2014, then the history of Belarus would have taken a completely different path. but in the mirror of the events of 1991-1994, one can guess ... "
      “But what about Vintsuk Vyachorka himself, or Valentin Grigorievich Vechorka? He still lives in Belarus. He does not sit, did not run, did not disappear, about which he went bankrupt at the rally on October 17, 1999. For many years he was a member of the leadership of the Belarusian Popular Front (BPF ), is a member of various pro-Western public organizations. On December 1 of this year, signed under the appeal "On the threat of independence of Belarus" in connection with the preparation of the signing of "road maps." Forgotten nothing, learned nothing. Belarusian editorial office of Radio Liberty, and any work of art that he created is immediately showered with generous awards from the EU. The film "Long Live Belarus!", filmed in Poland for two million dollars donated by France, received the "Best Screenplay" award and 2000 euros at the Brussels International Film Festival in 2013. Franak Vyachorka - laureate of the Golden Apostrophe awards, for the best debut in prose, For Personal Courage from Charter 97, The New Generation. Lm of the Polish director Miroslav Dembiński "The Belarusian Lesson", in the filming of which Vechorko took part, has 18 awards, including "Movies that matter" in Amsterdam, "Prix Europa" in Berlin, as "The best documentary film in Europe". Politically, he is the son of his dad through the BPF. In turn, dad is the son of his dad: the assistant to the first secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the BSSR, Peter Mironovich Masherov. Dad and son live in Minsk, enjoy full freedom guaranteed by Lukashenka’s constitution and the advantages of the Union State. Are his principal opponents. "
      *What now*:
      "It is quite clear that the West does not need Lukashenka. The West needs Belarus without Lukashenko <...> These cunning and ruthless" partners "have a very long time to wait for Father to end.
      They saw the fall of not such systems: what is the collapse of the USSR worth! They don't need Belarusian potash, agricultural machinery, nothing. It is important for the West to degrade education, to ruin the population with tariffs, to knock residents head-on in an ethnic conflict, to quarrel with Russia, and to plunge the political system into a state of permanent crisis. And then calmly cut the Belarusian forest until it is completely cleaned to zero. For the far-sighted Brussels already sees the day when the last tree will be cut down in the Carpathians ... "
      https://ukraina.ru/exclusive/20191213/1026020912.html
    43. The comment was deleted.
    44. -2
      7 February 2020 00: 10
      And they also calculated the profit, or, having counted the results, hid it away.
    45. -1
      7 February 2020 12: 38
      Quote: Sky Strike fighter
      Famously dad counts "his" money in someone else's pocket. Here he is the result of a policy of beautiful gestures and sponsoring "allies." They sit on their necks. You see, they should. I wonder what Trump would answer to Alexander Grigorievich, if he were in Putin's place, to such a hit?

      Trump has already answered China to their show-offs
    46. +3
      7 February 2020 13: 12
      You will report to me what has been done so that Russia fulfills its obligations.

      Maybe an investigation was undertaken that showed that you drove oil products to the outskirts? Do you have enough oil for Belarus? Then do you fucking sell it to the left?
    47. -2
      7 February 2020 13: 15
      Quote: Pilat2009
      Trump has already answered China to their show-offs

      Since the end of 2017, Trump has tried to twist his hands to China, seeking from him a “best offer”. Already in May 2019, it became clear the complete exhaustion of the possibilities of pressure on Beijing. The results of 2018 showed the general futility of the sanctions efforts. Imports from China, of course, dipped by $ 477 billion, but American exports there also fell by 133 billion.

      Given the scale of the process, it turned out that China lost only 17,1% of total exports to the United States, while US sales to the Celestial Empire fell by 33,5%. As already noted then, the White House was in a worse position than before. If in 2016 the trade balance was 1 to 2,9 in favor of the Red Dragon, then in 2018 the ratio was already 1 to 3,5.

      He is malad! To drive the trade balance even deeper into the afhedron than it was before - not everyone can
    48. -1
      7 February 2020 13: 40
      Quote: Cowbra
      Quote: Pilat2009
      Trump has already answered China to their show-offs

      Since the end of 2017, Trump has tried to twist his hands to China, seeking from him a “best offer”. Already in May 2019, it became clear the complete exhaustion of the possibilities of pressure on Beijing. The results of 2018 showed a general free

      He is malad! To drive the trade balance even deeper into the afhedron than it was before - not everyone can

      You confuse the sanctions and their results. China flogged for a year and signed everything that required trump, including import of LNG from the USA
    49. -2
      7 February 2020 22: 09
      Putin licks his boots for 20 years. Here is the result. KGB Putin disgraces his pluralism.
    50. 0
      7 February 2020 22: 28
      Belarus threw me in 1990. The money was deposited in the savings bank of the BSSR in 1988, an urgent contribution. In 1990, money was urgently needed, her husband had a heart condition. There was an opportunity to buy imported medicine. We arrived to collect money and a bummer. A week earlier, the government passed a decree that deposits are issued only to residents of Belarus. As always ahead of the rest, the USSR has not yet collapsed, and the weaning of other people's money has begun. Then other republics reached out. And now they say that they burned down in the bank. There will be no indexation. So living for other people's money is a habit.
    51. 0
      8 February 2020 00: 27
      We are waiting for the result of communication!!!

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"