T-90M tank tests successfully completed

T-90M tank tests successfully completed

State tests of the latest Russian tank The T-90M "Breakthrough" was successfully completed, the timing and volume of serial deliveries of tanks to the troops will be determined by the Ministry of Defense. This was announced by the official representative of Uralvagonzavod.


According to the representative of "UVZ", the state tests of the T-90M tank were successfully completed, contracts for the supply of an experimental batch to the troops were signed at the Army-2019 military-technical forum, the contract is currently being implemented, the vehicles will enter the troops on a predetermined date .

Recall that the military department at the end of June 2019 entered into a state contract with UVZ for a major overhaul with the modernization of the T-90A tanks, bringing the T-90M to a view. At the same time, the UVZ did not name the number of tanks that will undergo major repairs, although earlier plans were announced to modernize at least 400 T-90 tanks already in the troops to the T-90M level. The first batch of arming T-90M can be at least a battalion set.

In November last year, Major General Sergei Bibik, head of the main armored directorate of the Russian Ministry of Defense, said in an interview with the Krasnaya Zvezda newspaper that funds had already been allocated for the purchase of T-90M tanks, and the delivery of serial vehicles was expected in 2020.

The T-90М tank was developed as part of the Breakthrough-3 development work and is a deep modernization of the T-90 with increased combat and operational characteristics.

In the course of modernization, a new turret module with a 90-mm gun of increased survivability and accuracy was installed on the T-125M. A remote-controlled machine gun installation caliber 12,7-mm is installed on the turret. In addition, the new tank is equipped with a highly automated digital fire control system that provides search, recognition, auto-tracking and hitting targets.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. _Ugene_ 6 February 2020 10: 58 New
    • 8
    • 2
    +6
    they forgot to mention
    1. figwam 6 February 2020 11: 02 New
      • 11
      • 2
      +9
      Have you forgotten about KAZ?
      1. carstorm 11 6 February 2020 11: 16 New
        • 33
        • 9
        +24
        nobody forgets about him. just now he is not needed. even if KAZ is now ordered to put everything in a row, you won’t see them anyway. they’ll just go to the warehouses with sets. here for each block of conventional DZ it is also necessary to answer KAZ and shove it into the cars so that they would tear them apart or cripple through one more joy) onboard DZ dismantle or just do not put on the arrival of new cars because it tears everything off))) what do you think happens for loss explosive?)))
        1. figwam 6 February 2020 11: 58 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: carstorm 11
          just now he is not needed

          Right now it is needed for testing, and you are already talking about the combat parts where they can be removed so as not to damage.
          1. carstorm 11 6 February 2020 12: 40 New
            • 4
            • 3
            +1
            Now it is at the moment by cars. for testing, I think the conditions are created and so what photos are sometimes laid out about)))
          2. zloybond 6 February 2020 19: 59 New
            • 4
            • 3
            +1
            Here you go! There is a good technique! Perhaps soon our tankers will be able to drive to the Baltic states for reparations, for the damage caused .... well, and not only maybe they will reach Poland ... there, too, you need to shake the ungrateful non-ladies ....
        2. Frederick 6 February 2020 12: 44 New
          • 14
          • 0
          +14
          what do you think happens for the loss of explosive?)))

          Another nonsense, in parts, all DZ charges are stored in warehouses and are installed on vehicles, as a rule in two cases: to work out standards for installing (replacing) DZ elements or immediately before sending a tank to a combat zone, that is, for war.
          1. carstorm 11 6 February 2020 12: 58 New
            • 5
            • 2
            +3
            not quite so), as I understand it, the order of 98 years for parts of constant combat readiness you missed)
        3. Xenofont 6 February 2020 13: 08 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          As far as I understand, there are parts of constant readiness and they will not have time to mount KAZ if something happens.
          1. carstorm 11 6 February 2020 13: 15 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            also a question by the way. which will have to be solved. It is possible to put on a permanent basis in such parts and will have to. I didn’t think about it, but now it somehow inspired me ... by the standards that they’ll certainly set now. Now everything is changing so fast ... I quit in 11, now I can not catch up with something))))
          2. kenig1 6 February 2020 15: 13 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            In the area of ​​concentration will be located at least 24 hours
          3. Alexandre 6 February 2020 17: 17 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            They have both training and battle tanks, as a rule, battle tanks are practically not operated, they are in combat readiness
        4. Doliva63 7 February 2020 16: 15 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: carstorm 11
          nobody forgets about him. just now he is not needed. even if KAZ is now ordered to put everything in a row, you won’t see them anyway. they’ll just go to the warehouses with sets. here for each block of conventional DZ it is also necessary to answer KAZ and shove it into the cars so that they would tear them apart or cripple through one more joy) onboard DZ dismantle or just do not put on the arrival of new cars because it tears everything off))) what do you think happens for loss explosive?)))

          Machines of the battle group, in theory, should be hung with everything that is supposed to. And no one hangs on training, of course.
      2. Piramidon 6 February 2020 12: 25 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        And about the air conditioning.
    2. Spambox 7 February 2020 08: 44 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Part of the ammunition if I'm not mistaken
  2. Constanty 6 February 2020 11: 01 New
    • 38
    • 8
    +30
    However, a new 90A2-82M gun was finally installed on the T-1M tanks - the same as on the T-14 Armata.

    In general, in my opinion, the Breakthrough 3 is today one of the best tanks in the world! Handsome.
    1. bessmertniy 6 February 2020 11: 15 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      The main thing is to justify the name - break through and win.
      1. Constanty 6 February 2020 18: 17 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        In my opinion, it would be better that he would be able to do this, but never
        he should not have shown it. The perfect weapon.
    2. d4rkmesa 6 February 2020 11: 17 New
      • 8
      • 1
      +7
      I’ll upset you, but apparently, the improved 2A46 is on all frames. Please note, the gun of Almaty is longer and without an ejection device.
      1. seti 6 February 2020 11: 40 New
        • 7
        • 3
        +4
        And there is. The T-14 is another weapon.
        1. parkello 6 February 2020 16: 54 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          and automatic loader? winked they eat some shells, BOPS-pugs .. ATGMs. OFSy ... and so on.
      2. Xenofont 6 February 2020 13: 09 New
        • 12
        • 0
        +12
        The lack of an ejector on Armata is a sign of an uninhabited tower.
      3. avdkrd 6 February 2020 15: 34 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        It's just that an ejector is not needed on Armata, but it can be one gun. The question is different - without core lengthening, our bops will significantly lag behind the western ones, and the AZ dimensions do not allow lengthening. The solution could be to place the AZ in the tower niche, but for some reason they placed an additional bomkomplekt there. In my opinion, the game is full, no one will carry anything there. You can get this extra bomkomplekt only outside, pointlessly and mercilessly.
        1. Spambox 7 February 2020 08: 48 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          To the point, do not add do not diminish!
      4. Constanty 6 February 2020 18: 14 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        The question is, how much do these photos show the current car?

        Editorials can use old photographs to illustrate articles.
    3. carstorm 11 6 February 2020 11: 18 New
      • 5
      • 5
      0
      2A46M there goes .2A82 the military changed their minds to put.
  3. svp67 6 February 2020 11: 04 New
    • 12
    • 1
    +11
    The first batch of arming T-90M can be at least a battalion set.
    That's the right decision. Equipment in the troops should come at least "battalion kits"
    During modernization, a new turret module with a 90-mm gun of increased survivability and accuracy was installed on the T-125M.
    A similar tower, but adapted for the system, must be installed during the modernization of the T-80B.
    1. Frederick 6 February 2020 13: 01 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      It is necessary, but most likely they will not do this. Because it’s expensive, and the budget is not rubber ... The developers of the combat module have long stated that, if the customer wishes, it can be installed on the T-80 and T-72, I just heard about the “Breakthrough-2,” which did not go into series, but has been upgraded to Breakthrough 3.
      Well, if they buy on a “battalion” per year, then I’m afraid I can’t survive to the sane count in the troops ... laughing As for me, there’s at least a “battalion” per quarter, then there will be at least some “commodity” quantity in the troops.
  4. Victor_B 6 February 2020 11: 05 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Harsh unit!
  5. askort154 6 February 2020 11: 06 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    T-90M tank tests successfully completed

    And not only at the landfills of Russia. wink
  6. Zaurbek 6 February 2020 11: 07 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    In some news, they write about the 2A82 gun, in others about the improved standard
    1. Chaldon48 6 February 2020 11: 11 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Go forward towards military success!
  7. Elephant 6 February 2020 11: 09 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    The tank is good. The machine gun module on the turret looks bulky.
    1. _Ugene_ 6 February 2020 12: 22 New
      • 12
      • 0
      +12
      The machine gun module on the turret looks bulky.
      it's much better than a machine gunner on a tower with a hole in his head
    2. Usher 6 February 2020 12: 23 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: Elephant
      The tank is good. The machine gun module on the turret looks bulky.

      It looks normal to me, you look at the module at Abrams.

      But on other tanks and this is not.
    3. Incvizitor 6 February 2020 12: 50 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Remote-controlled are all bulky.
      1. Doliva63 7 February 2020 16: 21 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Incvizitor
        Remote-controlled are all bulky.

        No, on 64 ke looked modestly.
    4. figwam 6 February 2020 14: 50 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Elephant
      The machine gun module on the turret looks bulky.

      There is a panoramic sight of the commander along with a machine gun.
  8. Dmitry Potapov 6 February 2020 11: 09 New
    • 10
    • 9
    +1
    It is necessary to form an army of these tanks, and call the English Channel. Well, for the farce.
    1. Dart 6 February 2020 23: 28 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      then from 80-k .. they will be there faster))
  9. Lamata 6 February 2020 11: 10 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Do we have again 2 revs planned? to 72 more in the troops.
    1. Zaurbek 6 February 2020 11: 13 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      This is a difficult question, new only T14 and T90M. T80 in storage about 5000pcs, T72 and 64 do not know how much.
      1. Lamata 6 February 2020 11: 15 New
        • 1
        • 6
        -5
        ok so 5000 t 80, but not used because of the gas turbine engine? 64 where the thread is in the troops or in storage. essentially right now obt t 72
        1. Zaurbek 6 February 2020 11: 24 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          They are also in storage and are slowly being upgraded and delivered to the troops.
          I mean, we still have 10 years of these reserves and we can still provide the Syrian tank crews in parallel.
        2. Doliva63 7 February 2020 16: 28 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Lamata
          ok so 5000 t 80, but not used because of the gas turbine engine? 64 where the thread is in the troops or in storage. essentially right now obt t 72

          No. Because of:
          1. In the Russian Federation there is not so much BTV that there was a need for tanks;
          2. UVZ, which needs to sell its 72 matches (they are T90, etc.), do not like them very much.
      2. Dikson 6 February 2020 11: 21 New
        • 4
        • 4
        0
        As far as I remember, the T80 is not even in the warehouses, but is being modernized and delivered to the north of the country .. there have been articles repeatedly .. So the T80, T72, and T90M, and .. well, in general ..)
  10. Prjanik 6 February 2020 11: 18 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Great news, finally waiting for the troops! And there, and until the T-14 it comes.
  11. rudolff 6 February 2020 11: 42 New
    • 6
    • 4
    +2
    It seems to me that it should be put into production, not Armata. Armata is crude.
  12. Alex_Rarog 6 February 2020 11: 44 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    It certainly looks more futuristic than what we're used to) handsome and not a tank)
  13. Magog 6 February 2020 11: 49 New
    • 9
    • 3
    +6
    "In addition, the new tank is equipped with a highly automated digital fire control system that provides search, recognition, auto tracking and hitting targets." In this regard, I am amused by the competition "Tank Biathlon". The guys are tormented, in the heat of racing through the stages, they can’t hit the target for a long time - and here the ACS fire control! Maybe put such tanks on the biathlon? And there will be only the competition "Tank Formula 1" ... yes
    1. Magic archer 6 February 2020 12: 02 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      For a long time, I also want our people to transfer from good, but old T-72s to newer equipment. I wonder how she will show herself there. wink
      1. Magog 6 February 2020 12: 19 New
        • 5
        • 3
        +2
        ATsS on T-72, and nothing needs to be changed. Competitions will lose their meaning and all sorts of experiences ... models of targets can be eliminated. Unless compete in the speed of movement in stages, in tactical techniques, in the speed of loading of ammunition, in the "tank ballet".
    2. Alekseev 6 February 2020 12: 14 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: Magog
      . "I am in this regard amused by the competition" Tank Biathlon. "The guys are tormented in the heat of racing

      Yes, biathlon is for fun - to popularize military service and, quite rightly, the systems do not fire on their own, (by the way, the tanks on the MSA biathlon are also quite perfect), but the guys. wink And the guys are also preparing tank weapons for firing.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Magog 6 February 2020 13: 22 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        For popularization - purely aesthetic performances "tank rhythmic gymnastics or ballet." Or the contest "whose tank is more beautiful" (Indians or Pakistanis will win). Competition why? The winner is determined by voting as in "Eurovision" (Pah-pah-pah! So as not to jinx it!) Well, yumar, you know.
    3. Metlik 6 February 2020 14: 08 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      It's time to make tank biathlon - a war of robots. And the views would skyrocket.
      1. nikon7717 7 February 2020 00: 25 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Competitions of robots in a separate program should be highlighted. Advertising will be good
  14. zloybond 6 February 2020 12: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Since I missed this point, I would like to clarify the following question: will smaller-caliber machine guns be installed to protect against infantry? Well, not with a large caliber (12,7) shooters to drive away?
    1. Magog 6 February 2020 12: 40 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      You cannot hang all the tasks of combined arms combat on a tank. Therefore, there are "Terminator", BMP T-15 ... Yes, and there are specialized tanks.
      1. zloybond 6 February 2020 13: 46 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        So it seems like you need to protect yourself. Goals should be highlighted by others; it is easier to use a small-caliber armored tracker than to hammer shells at each shooter. A demolished caterpillar? Stand on the defensive and armor-piercing for each with a slingshot to peel - there will not be enough shells. And then they want arrows on the armor and neigh - the crew smoke)
      2. Doliva63 7 February 2020 16: 52 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Magog
        You cannot hang all the tasks of combined arms combat on a tank. Therefore, there are "Terminator", BMP T-15 ... Yes, and there are specialized tanks.

        Terminators do not appear therefore, but because UVZ needs money.
    2. Doliva63 7 February 2020 16: 34 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Quote: zloybond
      Since I missed this point, I would like to clarify the following question: will smaller-caliber machine guns be installed to protect against infantry? Well, not with a large caliber (12,7) shooters to drive away?

      So for protection against infantry there is infantry, if that. Well, nobody canceled FCT, actually.
      1. zloybond 7 February 2020 16: 46 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Takya also asked: is there something small-caliber left in the tower?
        1. Doliva63 7 February 2020 17: 27 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: zloybond
          Takya also asked: is there something small-caliber left in the tower?

          Well, where does it go? laughing The NSVT (or whatever was installed there) with a remote control, of course, is more universal than the old DShKM, but, say, a car is shot and 7,62 is enough, and the anti-aircraft gun’s ammunition is not so big as to exchange small things. Although, I remember, in the school there were firing from anti-aircraft and ground targets. But since the tower, in fact, is the same, then the FCT is in place drinks
  15. Mechanocleap 6 February 2020 12: 24 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    They’ll finish off so that, quietly, I’ll remake everything T-90 in armature, and voila, army aromas
  16. Usher 6 February 2020 12: 26 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I have a question, but it is impossible to put blocks without a gap on the side screens? Especially leave a gap? Or DZ blocks more tightly put to the shoulder of the tower? Well, what kind of garbage, it seems obvious.
  17. Xenofont 6 February 2020 13: 12 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I still don’t understand: a new tower or modernization?
    1. Paranoid50 6 February 2020 23: 17 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Xenofont
      new tower or upgrade?

      Like this:
      During modernization, a new tower module was installed on the T-90M
  18. Pastor 6 February 2020 13: 43 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Right. There must be a modern mass tank.
    1. L-39NG 6 February 2020 16: 17 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      That's right, every Russian tank!
      1. seregarodionov 7 February 2020 06: 38 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I’ll go to the tax office for a mat of capital. It's me to the collectors
  19. ficus2003 6 February 2020 15: 20 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Climate control established or is it only for people from Asia and Africa?
  20. Pavel57 6 February 2020 15: 45 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Will a new series or upgrade be available?
  21. Petrol cutter 6 February 2020 20: 18 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    This is in the photo T 90M?!. Taking off my hat. hi
  22. Alexey G 6 February 2020 23: 06 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Assad must be helped to Syria! Maybe a company at least! Turks scare!
  23. seregarodionov 7 February 2020 06: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    auto tracking means tesla fur
    1. Doliva63 7 February 2020 16: 53 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: seregarodionov
      auto tracking means tesla fur

      On the 80s in the Union also put Tesla? belay
  24. lvov_aleksey 8 February 2020 00: 17 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    while we see one thing at the tank competition (biathlon): our good, old though M. I want to see our Armata there, not only at the parade !!!
  25. Adimius38 8 February 2020 01: 04 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I'm afraid that this tank will not receive even half of what can be put on it, therefore it will not differ much from the usual T90 in terms of security. Cheaper everything that is possible including the lack of KAZ