T-90M tank tests successfully completed

State tests of the latest Russian tank The T-90M "Breakthrough" was successfully completed, the timing and volume of serial deliveries of tanks to the troops will be determined by the Ministry of Defense. This was announced by the official representative of Uralvagonzavod.

According to the representative of "UVZ", the state tests of the T-90M tank were successfully completed, contracts for the supply of an experimental batch to the troops were signed at the Army-2019 military-technical forum, the contract is currently being implemented, the vehicles will enter the troops on a predetermined date .

Recall that the military department at the end of June 2019 entered into a state contract with UVZ for a major overhaul with the modernization of the T-90A tanks, bringing the T-90M to a view. At the same time, the UVZ did not name the number of tanks that will undergo major repairs, although earlier plans were announced to modernize at least 400 T-90 tanks already in the troops to the T-90M level. The first batch of arming T-90M can be at least a battalion set.

In November last year, Major General Sergei Bibik, head of the main armored directorate of the Russian Ministry of Defense, said in an interview with the Krasnaya Zvezda newspaper that funds had already been allocated for the purchase of T-90M tanks, and the delivery of serial vehicles was expected in 2020.

The T-90М tank was developed as part of the Breakthrough-3 development work and is a deep modernization of the T-90 with increased combat and operational characteristics.

In the course of modernization, a new turret module with a 90-mm gun of increased survivability and accuracy was installed on the T-125M. A remote-controlled machine gun installation caliber 12,7-mm is installed on the turret. In addition, the new tank is equipped with a highly automated digital fire control system that provides search, recognition, auto-tracking and hitting targets.

Comments

[_Ugene_]

they forgot to mention

[figwam]

Have you forgotten about KAZ?

[carstorm 11]

nobody forgets about him. just now he is not needed. even if KAZ is now ordered to put everything in a row, you won’t see them anyway. they’ll just go to the warehouses with sets. here for each block of conventional DZ it is also necessary to answer KAZ and shove it into the cars so that they would tear them apart or cripple through one more joy) onboard DZ dismantle or just do not put on the arrival of new cars because it tears everything off))) what do you think happens for loss explosive?)))

[figwam]

Quote: carstorm 11

just now he is not needed

Right now it is needed for testing, and you are already talking about the combat parts where they can be removed so as not to damage.

[carstorm 11]

Now it is at the moment by cars. for testing, I think the conditions are created and so what photos are sometimes laid out about)))

[zloybond]

Here you go! There is a good technique! Perhaps soon our tankers will be able to drive to the Baltic states for reparations, for the damage caused .... well, and not only maybe they will reach Poland ... there, too, you need to shake the ungrateful non-ladies ....

[Frederick]

what do you think happens for the loss of explosive?)))

Another nonsense, in parts, all DZ charges are stored in warehouses and are installed on vehicles, as a rule in two cases: to work out standards for installing (replacing) DZ elements or immediately before sending a tank to a combat zone, that is, for war.

[carstorm 11]

not quite so), as I understand it, the order of 98 years for parts of constant combat readiness you missed)

[Xenofont]

As far as I understand, there are parts of constant readiness and they will not have time to mount KAZ if something happens.

[carstorm 11]

also a question by the way. which will have to be solved. It is possible to put on a permanent basis in such parts and will have to. I didn’t think about it, but now it somehow inspired me ... by the standards that they’ll certainly set now. Now everything is changing so fast ... I quit in 11, now I can not catch up with something))))

[kenig1]

In the area of ​​concentration will be located at least 24 hours

[Alexandre]

They have both training and battle tanks, as a rule, battle tanks are practically not operated, they are in combat readiness

[Doliva63]

Quote: carstorm 11

nobody forgets about him. just now he is not needed. even if KAZ is now ordered to put everything in a row, you won’t see them anyway. they’ll just go to the warehouses with sets. here for each block of conventional DZ it is also necessary to answer KAZ and shove it into the cars so that they would tear them apart or cripple through one more joy) onboard DZ dismantle or just do not put on the arrival of new cars because it tears everything off))) what do you think happens for loss explosive?)))

Machines of the battle group, in theory, should be hung with everything that is supposed to. And no one hangs on training, of course.

[Piramidon]

And about the air conditioning.

[Spambox]

Part of the ammunition if I'm not mistaken

[Constanty]

However, a new 90A2-82M gun was finally installed on the T-1M tanks - the same as on the T-14 Armata.

In general, in my opinion, "Breakthrough-3" today is one of the best tanks in the world! Handsome.

[bessmertniy]

The main thing is to justify the name - break through and win.

[Constanty]

In my opinion, it would be better that he would be able to do this, but never
he should not have shown it. The perfect weapon.

[d4rkmesa]

I’ll upset you, but apparently, the improved 2A46 is on all frames. Please note, the gun of Almaty is longer and without an ejection device.

[seti]

And there is. The T-14 is another weapon.

[parkello]

and automatic loader? they eat some shells, BOPS-pugs .. ATGMs. OFSy ... and so on.

[Xenofont]

The lack of an ejector on Armata is a sign of an uninhabited tower.

[avdkrd]

It's just that an ejector is not needed on Armata, but it can be one gun. The question is different - without core lengthening, our bops will significantly lag behind the western ones, and the AZ dimensions do not allow lengthening. The solution could be to place the AZ in the tower niche, but for some reason they placed an additional bomkomplekt there. In my opinion, the game is full, no one will carry anything there. You can get this extra bomkomplekt only outside, pointlessly and mercilessly.

[Spambox]

To the point, do not add do not diminish!

[Constanty]

The question is, how much do these photos show the current car?

Editorials can use old photographs to illustrate articles.

[carstorm 11]

2A46M there goes .2A82 the military changed their minds to put.

[svp67]

The first batch of arming T-90M can be at least a battalion set.

That's the right decision. Troops must receive equipment at least in "battalion kits"

During modernization, a new turret module with a 90-mm gun of increased survivability and accuracy was installed on the T-125M.

A similar tower, but adapted for the system, must be installed during the modernization of the T-80B.

[Frederick]

It is necessary, but most likely they will not do this. For it is expensive, and the budget is not rubber ... The developers of the combat module have long stated that, if the customer wishes, it can be installed on the T-80 and T-72, as if I heard this about the "BM Breakthrough-2", which did not go into production, and was upgraded to "Breakthrough-3".
Well, if a year they buy for a "battalion", then I'm afraid you may not live up to a sane number in the troops ... As for me, the minimum "battalion" per quarter, then the troops will have at least some "commodity" quantity.

[Victor_B]

Harsh unit!

[askort154]

T-90M tank tests successfully completed

And not only at the landfills of Russia.

[Zaurbek]

In some news, they write about the 2A82 gun, in others about the improved standard

[Chaldon48]

Go forward towards military success!

[Elephant]

The tank is good. The machine gun module on the turret looks bulky.

[_Ugene_]

The machine gun module on the turret looks bulky.

it's much better than a machine gunner on a tower with a hole in his head

[Usher]

Quote: Elephant

The tank is good. The machine gun module on the turret looks bulky.

It looks normal to me, you look at the module at Abrams.

But on other tanks and this is not.

[Incvizitor]

Remote-controlled are all bulky.

[Doliva63]

Quote: Incvizitor

Remote-controlled are all bulky.

No, on 64 ke looked modestly.

[figwam]

Quote: Elephant

The machine gun module on the turret looks bulky.

There is a panoramic sight of the commander along with a machine gun.

[Dmitry Potapov]

It is necessary to form an army of these tanks and call it the "English Channel". Well, for the farce.

[Dart]

then from 80-k .. they will be there faster))

[Lamata]

Do we have again 2 revs planned? to 72 more in the troops.

[Zaurbek]

This is a difficult question, new only T14 and T90M. T80 in storage about 5000pcs, T72 and 64 do not know how much.

[Lamata]

ok so 5000 t 80, but not used because of the gas turbine engine? 64 where the thread is in the troops or in storage. essentially right now obt t 72

[Zaurbek]

They are also in storage and are slowly being upgraded and delivered to the troops.
I mean, we still have 10 years of these reserves and we can still provide the Syrian tank crews in parallel.

[Doliva63]

Quote: Lamata

ok so 5000 t 80, but not used because of the gas turbine engine? 64 where the thread is in the troops or in storage. essentially right now obt t 72

No. Because of:
1. In the Russian Federation there is not so much BTV that there was a need for tanks;
2. UVZ, which needs to sell its 72 matches (they are T90, etc.), do not like them very much.

[Dikson]

As far as I remember, the T80 is not even in the warehouses, but is being modernized and delivered to the north of the country .. there have been articles repeatedly .. So the T80, T72, and T90M, and .. well, in general ..)

[Prjanik]

Great news, finally waiting for the troops! And there, and until the T-14 it comes.

[Alex_Rarog]

It certainly looks more futuristic than what we're used to) handsome and not a tank)

[Magog]

"In addition, the new tank is equipped with a highly automated digital fire control system that provides search, recognition, auto-tracking and destruction of targets." In this regard, I am amused by the Tank Biathlon competition. The guys are tormented, in the heat of the races through the stages they can't get into the target for a long time - and here the ACS of fire control! Maybe we should put such tanks on the "biathlon"? And there will only be competitions "Tank Formula-1" ...

[Magic archer]

For a long time, I also want our people to transfer from good, but old T-72s to newer equipment. I wonder how she will show herself there.

[Magog]

ACS on T-72, and nothing needs to be changed. Competitions will lose their meaning and all sorts of experiences ... target layouts can be abolished. Is that to compete in the speed of movement in stages, in tactical techniques, in the speed of loading ammunition, in the "tank ballet".

[Alekseev]

Quote: Magog

"In this regard, I am amused by the Tank Biathlon competition. The guys are tormented in the heat of the races.

Yes, biathlon is for fun - to popularize military service and, quite rightly, the systems do not fire on their own, (by the way, the tanks on the MSA biathlon are also quite perfect), but the guys. And the guys are also preparing tank weapons for firing.

[Magog]

For popularization - purely aesthetic performances "tank rhythmic gymnastics or ballet". Or the competition "whose tank is more beautiful" (Indians or Pakistanis will win). Why competition? The winner is determined by voting as in Eurovision (Pah-pah-pah! So as not to jinx it!) Well, humor, you know.

[Metlik]

It's time to make tank biathlon - a war of robots. And the views would skyrocket.

[nikon7717]

Competitions of robots in a separate program should be highlighted. Advertising will be good

[zloybond]

Since I missed this point, I would like to clarify the following question: will smaller-caliber machine guns be installed to protect against infantry? Well, not with a large caliber (12,7) shooters to drive away?

[Magog]

You can't hang all the tasks of combined arms combat on a tank. Therefore, there are "Terminator", BMP T-15 ... Yes, and there are specialized tanks.

[zloybond]

So it seems like you need to protect yourself. Goals should be highlighted by others; it is easier to use a small-caliber armored tracker than to hammer shells at each shooter. A demolished caterpillar? Stand on the defensive and armor-piercing for each with a slingshot to peel - there will not be enough shells. And then they want arrows on the armor and neigh - the crew smoke)

[Doliva63]

Quote: Magog

You can't hang all the tasks of combined arms combat on a tank. Therefore, there are "Terminator", BMP T-15 ... Yes, and there are specialized tanks.

Terminators do not appear therefore, but because UVZ needs money.

[Doliva63]

Quote: zloybond

Since I missed this point, I would like to clarify the following question: will smaller-caliber machine guns be installed to protect against infantry? Well, not with a large caliber (12,7) shooters to drive away?

So for protection against infantry there is infantry, if that. Well, nobody canceled FCT, actually.

[zloybond]

Takya also asked: is there something small-caliber left in the tower?

[Doliva63]

Quote: zloybond

Takya also asked: is there something small-caliber left in the tower?

Well, where does it go? The NSVT (or whatever was installed there) with a remote control, of course, is more universal than the old DShKM, but, say, a car is shot and 7,62 is enough, and the anti-aircraft gun’s ammunition is not so big as to exchange small things. Although, I remember, in the school there were firing from anti-aircraft and ground targets. But since the tower, in fact, is the same, then the FCT is in place

[Mechanocleap]

They’ll finish off so that, quietly, I’ll remake everything T-90 in armature, and voila, army aromas

[Usher]

I have a question, but it is impossible to put blocks without a gap on the side screens? Especially leave a gap? Or DZ blocks more tightly put to the shoulder of the tower? Well, what kind of garbage, it seems obvious.

[Xenofont]

I still don’t understand: a new tower or modernization?

[Paranoid50]

Quote: Xenofont

new tower or upgrade?

Like this:

During modernization, a new tower module was installed on the T-90M

[Pastor]

Right. There must be a modern mass tank.

[L-39NG]

That's right, every Russian tank!

[Seregarodionov]

I’ll go to the tax office for a mat of capital. It's me to the collectors

[ficus2003]

Climate control established or is it only for people from Asia and Africa?

[Pavel57]

Will a new series or upgrade be available?

[petrol cutter]

This is in the photo T 90M?!. Taking off my hat.

[Alexey G]

Assad must be helped to Syria! Maybe a company at least! Turks scare!

[Seregarodionov]

auto tracking means tesla fur

[Doliva63]

Quote: seregarodionov

auto tracking means tesla fur

On the 80s in the Union also put Tesla?

[lvov_aleksey]

while we see one thing at the tank competition (biathlon): our good, old though M. I want to see our Armata there, not only at the parade !!!

[Adimius38]

I'm afraid that this tank will not receive even half of what can be put on it, therefore it will not differ much from the usual T90 in terms of security. Cheaper everything that is possible including the lack of KAZ