What is allowed to the Central Bank, or Is it far from the rate to resignation

What is allowed to the Central Bank, or Is it far from the rate to resignation

The whole question is whether the heads of the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Economy, the Bank of Russia themselves, as well as the profile deputy prime ministers themselves know what course they should adhere to. Declarations are declarations, but in fact it is a matter of the fact that the real struggle against poverty and inequality, as well as for social justice, is replaced by these very declarations.


Do not bet, gentlemen


On February 7, the Bank of Russia must make a decision: the key rate will remain at the level of 6,25 percent per annum or it can be further reduced a little. But both in the government and the Bank of Russia at the moment they seem to prefer not to remember the key rate at all, acting on the principle: there will be a team, we will lower it; will not - leave at around 6,25 percent.


The gap between inflation and the key rate of the Central Bank is reduced too slowly

And few people are embarrassed by the fact that with inflation, which is official, let’s say, already decreasing by 3 percent, such a rate, even if immediately reduced by half a percent, is, in fact, prohibitive. So, the new First Deputy Prime Minister Andrei Belousov, while still serving as presidential aide, made it clear that one should be extremely careful in relations with the Central Bank itself and its rate.

Commenting on her fifth decline, to just 6,25 percent, which happened on December 13 of last year, he reasoned:

“Reducing the key rate requires increased coordination, and daily coordination within the monetary authorities, that is, between the Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance with budget expenditures, with balances in treasury accounts, using these accounts and so on.”

And let someone say that this is not the apparatchik’s speech, but the husband’s. The final passage “and so on” is especially impressive. It seems that the cheat sheet is over or the sheet should have been turned over. Now, too much emphasis on bank rates can completely hinder our high-ranking bureaucrats from the point of view of opportunities to balance in the notorious system of checks and balances.

However, professionals who were actually squeezed out of the real economy into the academic economy do not cease to worry about what the new monetary policy will become. So, the former Deputy Chairman of the Bank of Russia Oleg Vyugin, I must admit, a very moderate liberal from the economy, and now a professor at the Higher School of Economics, believes that it can be even tougher than it could be.

In his opinion, if it is right now to open budget bins in which "the funds accumulated were postponed just for 2020, this could lead to the currency market being unbalanced." Of course, under the threat of a coronavirus and a new wave of tension in Syria, the oil ruble could hardly resist a fall, and here it is.

The liberal economist just wants to ask: what about demand? It is precisely in Russia that it continues to collapse, to which attention is already drawn at the very top. And without any injections (they are difficult to come up with except for budget ones), you cannot stimulate demand. What can one “ask” from tens of millions of poor people? A couple of millions of the rich, or at least relatively wealthy, will not form effective demand with all their will.

And you, friends, no matter how you sit down ...


All large-scale changes in the executive branch turned out to be an operation that did not really affect the most important federal departments. The social block, culture, sport - all this, of course, is interesting, and people are directly affected. But there, nobody decides practically nothing.

We will not argue, the change of the prime minister in itself is an epoch-making event. The shuffling of the cabinet tops, which touched several deputy prime ministers at once, is no laughing matter either. But, in fact, I'm sorry for repeating, because nothing changes at all.

Yes, the retinue makes the king. But servants make the retinue, and in our country they are hard-working apparatchiks who have gained experience from senior comrades, well-trimmed by the Soviet party bureaucracy. That is why under Mikhail Mishustin, even if he was the heir, even the technical prime minister, all, more precisely, almost all the key ministers and deputy prime ministers, who are the power and economic blocs of the government, retained their posts.

At the same time, the business press has already dubbed the changes in the economic bloc radical. However, it is difficult to perceive in this way the return to the government of former presidential aide Andrei Belousov, moreover, right away as the first deputy prime minister, and the departure of Maxim Oreshkin, who was the head of the Ministry of Economy and is among the favorites of the head of state, as his assistant.

As one would expect, these traditional critics of the Bank of Russia’s harsh policies did not at first take on its mitigation, but on the hardware games. But how else could you characterize the creation of the next coordinating body at a time when the business was seriously counting on an operational reduction in the key rate? Apparently, Maxim Oreshkin will be the coordinator, for which he was saved from a headache as a minister.


Will Andrei Belousov and Maxim Oreshkin be able to dictate anything to the Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance?

However, Oreshkin, namely Belousov, is not yet commenting on the creation of the next interdepartmental gasket, but, most likely, only because it is more accessible to journalists. According to him, the Central Bank and the government received a consultation mechanism to support macroeconomic stability. However, the mechanism will probably be engaged in the release of the next servings that do not solve anything and nobody but the officials themselves need the papers.

Rate and cancel


The number of all kinds of commissions of subcommittees and subcommittees in Russia is clearly going wild. Councils and committees are created much faster than then liquidated. Presidential representatives settled in the best mansions in all regions, and regional offices are sometimes not inferior in luxury and comfort to foreign embassies.

In response to the harsh criticism of the Accounts Chamber towards financial market development programs, the Bank of Russia immediately proposed the creation of a specialized working group. The same Maxim Oreshkin actively advocated for a subcommittee on ensuring economic growth and promoting structural reforms, but received a refusal from the Central Bank, whose head Elvira Nabiullina regarded the prospect of creating such an authority as somehow very ornate.

It

“It will be regarded as the state’s readiness to ensure the necessary economic growth rates through managing aggregate demand.”

But Belousov was sure that the subcommission

"It will help to better assess the economy and take measures already independently in the field of their competencies."

Do you understand anything? We are also nothing ... even competencies.

Thank you, of course, for remembering the demand, but also for not opening yet another bureaucratic shop with unimaginable salaries for officials, thanks too. Although it seems that the Central Bank, as before, will justify its conservative policy, unprecedented pressure on the very demand and stubborn reluctance to invest in anything other than dollar instruments, solely by the actions of the government.


The government, in turn, will try to somehow draw the independent Central Bank into its sphere of influence. And any decent and viable business will continue to function somehow not because of, but in spite of.

The majority will either die (which continues at a declining pace just because there is no one else to die), or go into the “gray” sector. That is, under the wing of crime and semi-crime, who has long tried on white shirts and azure-colored suits with trousers ankle-deep.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mordvin 3 7 February 2020 06: 06 New
    • 18
    • 4
    +14
    Karoche, I did not understand nichrome. Am I the only one so dumb? recourse
    1. Far B 7 February 2020 06: 11 New
      • 18
      • 4
      +14
      No not one drinks D and in general, I am increasingly asserting that it (economic policy in modern Russia) is impossible to comprehend with the brain. Because they came up with it obviously not the brain.
      1. Uncle lee 7 February 2020 06: 21 New
        • 13
        • 4
        +9
        Twist, twirl ...
      2. Vladimir B. 7 February 2020 14: 55 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Quote: Far In
        I am increasingly asserting that this (economic policy in modern Russia) is impossible to comprehend with the brain. Because it was obviously not invented by the brain

        but experts at the government are all economists and candidates or doctors of economic sciences with a bunch of scientific articles
        1. Lister 7 February 2020 23: 39 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Vladimir B.
          but experts at the government are all economists and candidates or doctors of economic sciences with a bunch of scientific articles

          including Kudrin, he is still a doctor of economic sciences laughing
      3. bayard 8 February 2020 04: 52 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        If something more worthwhile comes out of these gestures, then only after the amendments to the Constitution, about the primacy of Russian legislation over others. Then many orders and rules (including the law on the Central Bank) can be canceled in the working order.
        In short - down with the Central Bank, long live the Treasury! It is a sovereign financial system.
        But only after editing.
        Not earlier than May.
        And no later than autumn.
        Then it will be in abundance of funds for all national projects, lending to businesses, salaries to state employees and pensions to pensioners.
        Well, for now - Nabiulina is watching. bully
    2. Finches 7 February 2020 06: 20 New
      • 22
      • 7
      +15
      Автор перепутал страницы ВО со страницами Коммерсанта! Но в России всем давно известно, что Центробанк, это частная ротшильдовско-рокфеллеровская контора специально организованная в преступные времена ельциновского режима для контроля над российскими финансовыми потоками! Все банки России - это организации США и Запада, поэтому Сбербанк не может работать в открытую в Крыму и у нас самые драконовские % по кредиту! Я даже больше скажу, что закредитованность "дорогих россиян" это установка Вашингтонского обкома - дабы народ висящий на долговом крючке особо не ерепенился в отстаивании своих прав! А то народ устроить второй Октябрь и отрежет от лакомых кусочков мировых буржуев.... (А так, типа "независимость", Красная кнопка...Правда если опуститься до формы, то деньги на оплату обслуживающего персонала этой самой кнопки выделяются в тиши офисов на Уолл-стрит!) Ведь если ты в ипотечной квартире - то 10 раз подумаешь, барагозить ли тебе на площадях - завтра тебе позвонят на работу соответствующие ребятишки и начальник (любой) выпнет тебя, дабы не иметь проблем. Все! Финита ля комедия - потом тебя выкинут из квартиры и ты пойдешь жить в коробку из под телевизора! А у нас не Калифорния - в коробке можно прожить максимум месяца три...А Вы думаете почему армию, Росгвардию и т.п. посадили на обеспечение жильем через ипотеку? Правильно - чтобы в случае чего вооруженные и силовые конторы отстаивали интересы "правильных" пацанов... laughing
      Everything is simple in the world of finance!
      1. Ross xnumx 7 February 2020 06: 23 New
        • 12
        • 4
        +8
        Quote: mordvin xnumx
        Karoche, I did not understand nichrome. Am I the only one so dumb?

        Quote: Far In
        (economic policy in modern Russia) is impossible to comprehend with the brain.

        Quote: Finches
        But in Russia, everyone has long known that the Central Bank, a private Rothschild-Rockefeller office specially organized during the criminal times of the Yeltsin regime

        Briefly, but the essence!
        good
      2. Mordvin 3 7 February 2020 06: 26 New
        • 11
        • 4
        +7
        Quote: Finches
        Everything is simple in the world of finance!

        Ага, на горнолыжные курорты катаемся по скоростному интернету. laughing
        1. Finches 7 February 2020 06: 31 New
          • 2
          • 11
          -9
          Well, I personally have not been deceived by the GDP in this matter ... What a sin to conceal! laughing
          1. Mordvin 3 7 February 2020 06: 37 New
            • 12
            • 4
            +8
            Quote: Finches
            Well, personally, the GDP in this matter did not deceive me ...

            But it broke me off. repeat Both mom and dad ... sad
            1. bessmertniy 7 February 2020 06: 47 New
              • 12
              • 2
              +10
              Judging by the schedule, everything seems very simple: the Central Bank rate allows banks to constantly be in profit and not to suffocate on inflation. And enterprises and people are stifled by loans, which put a heavy burden on them. As a result, the real economy gives out a miserable growth, or even goes into a "minus". recourse
              1. Mathafaka 7 February 2020 07: 47 New
                • 8
                • 2
                +6
                You are absolutely right, economists say the same thing
              2. Varyag71 7 February 2020 13: 41 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                legal slavery
            2. Finches 7 February 2020 06: 51 New
              • 14
              • 8
              +6
              Yes, the point is not in Putin - he receives his salary on Wall Street! Figuratively speaking! The point is capitalism - capitalism of retirees perceives how waste material is incapable of bringing surplus value and only the memory of the bourgeoisie about the Red October Revolution forces them to shell out a little bit for social needs! After all, a worker in the West before the Russian October was very disenfranchised ... In schools, for some reason they don’t talk about this today, and all pensioners in Scandinavia and Switzerland must pray every day for Lenin’s grandfather - if not for him, figs, they lived so well today ! And we just pr .... Great country and Great idea!
              Here I am, sometimes I think why Gorbachev will not die in any way - God doesn’t tidy him up specially allowing the people to see and hang him and his minions on Red Square, but the Russian people, as they were dumb in 91, so nothing changed in 2020! (These are such seditious thoughts).
              1. AU Ivanov. 7 February 2020 09: 47 New
                • 2
                • 11
                -9
                I’ll tell you a little secret: in the same Denmark and Switzerland, the social sphere was developed even when your god - grandfather Lenin, drank beer in the Swiss emigration. Long before the October Revolution.
                1. Finches 7 February 2020 09: 50 New
                  • 6
                  • 1
                  +5
                  But did you live in Denmark and Switzerland at that time to reveal secrets to me? Would you even remember the tales of Hans Christian Andersen if you read them in childhood! hi
                  1. AU Ivanov. 7 February 2020 10: 00 New
                    • 1
                    • 10
                    -9
                    It is enough to read documentary literature and understand that Soviet social security, and especially the way to implement it, is an example of how to do it.
                    1. SOVIET UNION 2 7 February 2020 14: 05 New
                      • 3
                      • 1
                      +2
                      It is enough to read documentary literature and understand that Soviet social security, and especially the way to implement it, is an example of how to do it.
                      Does this mean today the perfect system is being created? winked
                      1. Vladimir B. 7 February 2020 15: 09 New
                        • 7
                        • 0
                        +7
                        Quote: SOVIET UNION 2
                        Does this mean today the perfect system is being created?

                        today we are more than ever far from an ideal system in both economics and politics.
                      2. Lister 7 February 2020 23: 40 New
                        • 2
                        • 1
                        +1
                        Quote: Vladimir B.
                        perfect system

                        The ideal system was before Gorbachev came to power.
                    2. AU Ivanov. 7 February 2020 16: 46 New
                      • 0
                      • 1
                      -1
                      An ideal society is created by ideal people.
              2. Mihail2019 7 February 2020 15: 52 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Link to the studio, dear AS Ivanov!
            3. Sima anwar 8 February 2020 19: 22 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              ну это Вы бросьте-в капитализме , даже смешно какой такой капитализм был в СССР в 1975 году ась? А торговать начали именно тогда -в 1975 году ресурсами СССР за доллары-а, понимаете что это значит?Нет конечно не понимаете, а это значит, что ресурсы СССР стали обеспечением для доллара, другими словами СССР лишился своих ресурсов в пользу фрс сша. Вот как и откуда ноги то перестроечные растут , товарищ Андропов славно поработал на реализацию идеи захвата власти над миром кучкой дельцов, правда почти все отни евереи почему-то , из этой самой фрс . Подробности про технику субординарных кредитов см в https://www.facebook.com/sima.anwar.7/posts/1533663290120913, при этом за каждый полученный нами доллар за наши ресурсы фрс получает в свой бюджет 9 зеленых. Это называется коэффициетом мультипликации (подробности в википедии про этот коэффициет). Как только перейдут, если перейдут, наши правители на торговлю ресусами за рубли и по рублевым кредитам эти суммы( а это почти 9 наших бюджетов) достанутся России. А поскольку все привыкли с 1975 год торговать нашими ресусами в пользу фрс или теперь вот ес вырисовывается, то сами понимаете - врать и тянуть наши так сказать экономические светила и эксперты будут бесконечно- лишь бы все ресурсы России работали на кагал и ни в коем разе на Россию.
  2. Vladimir_2U 7 February 2020 06: 47 New
    • 8
    • 4
    +4
    But because the case when you cannot close your eyes with hypersonic "Armata".
    1. depressant 7 February 2020 10: 10 New
      • 6
      • 3
      +3
      I draw the attention of all colleagues to the fact that an article on the report of the Accounts Chamber should have preceded an article by respected Authors. This report has been published and is a softened version of what lay on the table of the head of state and, apparently, horrified him. But in the public version, the report is terrifying. He is about the work of the Medvedev government. For three years, auditors worked and dug up such a thing! It was checked the work of almost all the ministries, it seems, fifty-three.
      Вывод аудиторов -- полная разбалансированность в работе министерств -- кто в лес, кто по дрова, отсутствие координации между ними ( а кто ее должен был осуществлять, отложив в сторону айфон, а?), полный пофигизм в отношении результатов работы -- не вышло, да и черт с ним, все одно не накажут! Массовая некомпетентность сотрудников министерств (понятно, как их набирали). Далее -- профанация в смысле искажения результатов работы, иными словами -- подделка, имитация деятельности; далее -- трусость в принятии решений там, где это надо было делать срочно; ещё далее -- откровенное игнорирование должностных обязанностей и главное -- отсутствие внутреннего аудита -- то есть поручили дело чиновнику, а проверять, делает он это дело или нет, никто не станет. Чиновничество на каждом нижнем этаже смотрит вертикально вверх и ждет отмашки с соответственного верхнего, ибо если что у нас и наказуемо, то только инициатива.

      Для меня итог такой: политическое руководство в лице президента было сосредоточено только на внешней политике, а экономического руководства страной в лице Медведева -- не было вообще. Была имитация. Налицо разбалансированность во взаимодействии не только министерств и ведомств, она в разбалансированности во взаимодействии двух ветвей власти -- политической и экономической. Политическая часть власти, имея рычаги давления на экономическую, не использовала их должным образом. Не выстроена у нас правильная структура власти! Так что работу Центробанка нужно оценивать, прежде всего принимая во внимание общую слабость нашей власти, либо имитацию этой слабости -- уж пусть разберутся между собой, что это было. Даже в той же ЮАР -- надо было, так взяли и погнали МВФ, попутно национализировав Центробанк. Влегкую! В Турции МВФ погнали! И сняли его главу. Влегкую! Потому что народ заволновася...
      Очевидно, что выстроенная под условных "друзей", что было задумано еще в советские времена, наша власть дала настолько очевидный сбой в осуществлении властных полномочий, что в народе зарождаются революционные настроения -- мы ведь всего не знаем. Потому, помимо прочих причин, -- поспешность в дате послания президента, испуганное лицо Медведева, хаотичное шевеление в виде заседаний, брифингов и проч. Но они же ничего не умеют делать! Национализировать Центробанк -- не проблема лишь там, где власть осуществляется в соответствии с надеждами народа.
      1. dSK
        dSK 8 February 2020 00: 19 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        STATE BANK - Chinese version, with state regulation of the $$
        - и как китайский ВВП до сих пор растёт, хотя уже и не двухзначными числами.
        And why should our Central Bank increase GDP? Than the population buys less - the lower the inflation, you can go to the cashier for another premium.
        Могут ещё и в Штатах дать приз, как самому лучшему Центробанку в мире.
        "All is well beautiful Marquise ..."
        1. dSK
          dSK 8 February 2020 03: 35 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          МОСКВА, 7 февраля. /ТАСС/. Олег Дерипаска раскритиковал снижение Банком России ключевой ставки на 0,25 п.п., до 6% годовых. По мнению бизнесмена, которое он выразил в пятницу в своем Telegram-канале, решение Центробанка негативно скажется на промышленности и уровне доходов населения. В конце января Дерипаска призвал Банк России снизить ключевую ставку до 4%, чтобы сбалансировать финансовый рынок РФ.
          "A mine for national projects and a program to combat poverty. The robbery by the Central Bank of Industry and the Population continues. Fasten your seat belts," the businessman wrote.
          On the eve of Deripaska, in his channel he spoke about the importance of reducing the key rate by the regulator "to 4,5% adequate to the global trend, and not to the next shameful 0,25%."
  3. Konstantin Shevchenko 7 February 2020 11: 12 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Просто автор умолчал про депозит и в графике не обозначил. Остальное вода с недосказанными контекстами про "войну" между ЦБ и экономистами из правительства. В итоге по статье ЦБ молодец не дал раздутся экономистам на каждый вздох. Ну а ставка, про нее уже забыли в конце, можно только додумывать как в финале остросюжетном фильме.
  4. Gene84 7 February 2020 14: 53 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    all that I understood from the article is the last two paragraphs, from which I understood the business kapets
    “The government, in turn, will try to somehow drag the independent Central Bank into its sphere of influence. And any decent and viable business will continue to function somehow not because of, but contrary to.
    The majority will either die (which continues at a declining rate only because there is no one else to die), or go to the “gray” sector. That is, under the wing of crime and semi-crime, who has long tried on white shirts and azure-colored suits with trousers ankle-deep. "
    1. Lister 7 February 2020 23: 43 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      not a fact, oh not a fact ... the bourgeois will find a way out of the crisis, but only at whose expense? possibly at the expense of the people. how to know ...
  5. Sima anwar 8 February 2020 19: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    ну еще бы. Тут игры на миллиарды идут. Вот здесь Вы можете оценить размер этой игры https://www.facebook.com/sima.anwar.7/posts/1533663290120913 за каждый полученный нами доллар за наши ресурсы фрс получает в свой бюджет 9 зеленых. Это называется коэффициетом мультипликации (подробности в википедии про этот коэффициет). Как только перейдут, если перейдут, наши правители на торговлю ресусами за рубли и по рублевым кредитам эти суммы( а это почти 9 наших бюджетов) достанутся России. А поскольку все привыкли с 1975 год торговать нашими ресусами в пользу фрс или теперь вот ес вырисовывается, то сами понимаете - врать и тянуть наши так сказать экономические светила и эксперты будут бесконечно- лишь бы все ресурсы России работали на кагал и ни в коем разе на Россию.
  • Ryaruav 7 February 2020 06: 33 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    that Oreshkin that the Belousov nothing will change, at least Putin at least Volodin, or else who is all one
  • samarin1969 7 February 2020 06: 46 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    Pretty good analytics, thanks to the authors. Visual schedule. And about the abundance of "supra-constitutional" bodies that no longer fit into more than one scheme - right.

    "... but what about the demand? It is precisely in Russia that it continues to collapse ..."


    But this is a question of questions! And this does not solve the Central Bank. And not even the fussy "monetarists," as the authors write.
    After I sent the last "master of the Russian land" to the saints, I don’t know who in Russia solves the question of the level of income of the population. But he, as in the USSR, is regulated.
    1. bessmertniy 7 February 2020 07: 52 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      That's right. The state finds opportunities to save on population incomes. lol It regulates our salaries so as not to corrupt people with luxury. repeat
      1. Gene84 7 February 2020 15: 24 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: bessmertniy
        That's right. The state finds opportunities to save on population incomes. lol It regulates our salaries so as not to corrupt people with luxury. repeat

        Our country lives in two parallel realities. One reality is for officials in whom the thought of victory over the economic crisis crept in. Another reality for ordinary citizens in wallets and everyday life. The presence of two realities is bad for the state.
        1. Lister 7 February 2020 23: 44 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Gene84
          One reality for officials in whom the thought of victory over the economic crisis crept in

          it’s not their reality, it’s their illusion yes
    2. Monster_Fat 7 February 2020 09: 22 New
      • 13
      • 1
      +12
      ЦБ поступает просто- и единственно разумно, исходя их условия своего независимого существования -зарабатывая как можно больше для себя (своих бенефициаров), ему интересна прибыль от своей деятельности, ибо ЦБ не что иное, как обыкновенная финансовая компания, созданная для извлечения прибыли которая "странным образом" обрела надгосударственные, регулирующие функции. Забавно, правда? ЦБ вкладывает деньги туда где считает им будет наиболее безопасно и нет особенных рисков-в ценные бумаги по всему миру, и ссуживая афилированным российским банкам под максимальный процент, а вот в экономику России должны вкладываться уже, именно те, кто должны брать кредиты у банков, которым ссуживает ЦБ. Все просто. Все именно так, как "заложил" еще, господин Кудрин.-"отец" современной, экономической модели в России и "птенцом" которого является, сегодняшний "премьер".
      I remind you (for the umpteenth) of the main points of "curdinomy":

      "1-banks are primary in the economy and therefore the main and constant support of the state is to them,
      2 - no state property, all state property should be privatized, in order to reduce government spending on the management of this property and remove government guarantees for staff as an employer, everything should be transferred to a "private owner",
      3- "direct financing" is harmful - any financing only through credit, credit (loan interest) - the basis of the entire financial system,
      4-it is necessary to withdraw all the "excess" money from the economy and accumulate it abroad for the "convenience" of their "movement", the development of the economy only through external borrowing and external investment, and through internal, bank loans,
      5-wage - payment of any labor should, under any conditions, be maintained at the very minimum level, the lowest level, of all surrounding countries, to ensure the attractiveness of the labor market for entrepreneurs and foreign investors,
      6- cutting all social programs to a minimum — citizens of the country must pay for everything themselves, and preferably through a loan, to constantly “feed” banks,
      7-cash should be withdrawn from circulation and the turnover of any penny should be accountable and controlled by the state and must go through banks for the functioning of the banking system,
      8- citizens should not have their “free” money, any accumulation of money by citizens is unacceptable — money should “work”, that is, be only in banks, so that banks can support and increase their capital at their expense and invest them there where they see fit. In order for citizens not to be able to accumulate money, that is, to become economically independent from banks, employers and the state, it is imperative to set interest on citizens' deposits below inflation, for the gradual "burning" of their money,
      9-citizens should be loaned as much as possible — this, on the one hand, provides constant replenishment of the banking system and withdraws free money from the pockets of citizens in favor of banks, and, on the other hand, improves the manageability of citizens by the state — a loaned citizen thinks more about how to get money to pay for a loan, and thinks less about something else, also a loaned citizen is more accommodating in the labor market.
      10-required free conversion of the ruble through exchanges.
      11 — no prohibitions on the “export” of capital — capital should have free “movement” precisely abroad — this is one of the principles of the economy’s attractiveness for foreign investment,
      12- The labor code should be written in such a way that the interests of the employer are primary, the state should completely eliminate regulation on the labor market, all regulation should be reduced to an agreement between the employer and the employee,
      13- social guarantees to citizens from the state should be minimal, in the future it is necessary to remove them from the state’s jurisdiction, shifting to “private”, “charitable foundations”.
      14-pension provision should be reformed so that the share of state payments does not exceed 25%, the remaining amount should be formed by “accumulation funds” and by the pensioner throughout his life — in the future, the state’s participation in pension programs should be completely eliminated, being reduced only to legal support
      15-any "recommendations" of the IMF and international financial regulatory authorities are not discussed, but implemented, since they are the only correct ones and ensure the functioning of the global financial system where Russia is embedded, therefore, the interests of the global financial and economic system should prevail on the "internal" interests of Russia ,
      16- to ensure migration attractiveness by attracting as many migrants as possible and removing all kinds of barriers for the arrival of migrants, but only those who cost the business and the state as cheap as possible, to replace the "expensive" internal labor force, etc. "
    3. Alf
      Alf 7 February 2020 18: 55 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: samarin1969
      After sent to the saints of the last "master of the Russian land"

      Whom?
      1. samarin1969 7 February 2020 19: 43 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        No. It is rather a tyun.
        And this one.
  • Lamata 7 February 2020 07: 48 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    As for the commissions and other obscure bodies to the point.
  • Hypatius 7 February 2020 10: 10 New
    • 2
    • 6
    -4
    Ни один экономист, не убедит меня, технаря, что инфляция может быть ниже ставки рефинансирования ЦБ. Это как нарушение закона сохранения энергии с КПД>100%. Как они с ней мухлюют физике неизвестно.
    Ps The article is written in a heavy syllable, unpopular.
  • kin
    kin 7 February 2020 10: 35 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The key rate at the level of 6,25 percent per annum, hence the interest on the mortgage is calculated, affects the yield of the securities. Lowering the rate may drop the ruble, because the yield on debt obligations will fall, market players will withdraw their money by dropping them.
    1. Monster_Fat 7 February 2020 11: 58 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      The Central Bank of Russia has many "miracles" in actions, for example, at one time the Central Bank invested in securities of foreign countries with a yield of 0,5-3,5% depending on the term of the deposit, and sold Russian government bonds in a currency with a yield .... 3,5-7,5%. These "papers" were snapped up at times by "unnamed buyers." wink Well, what is it worth, only one, the notorious "recapitalization" of selected banks and financial institutions ..... winked
  • Seld 7 February 2020 12: 18 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    only "one" question: how does "... in the case of inflation, which is official, let’s notice, already declining to 3 percent, .." с повышением стоимости проезда в метро на 4 рубля? С 36 до 40 рупелей? Пусть нам расскажут, как считается эта самая инхлятция? Из каких показателей? Очевидно, стоимость метро (и маршрутки, к слову, тоже) там не фигу рирует... А что тогда фиргурирует? Стоимость бочки с бизином и / или расходы на платный сортир? В общих чертах хотя бы хотелось бы по знать....
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Tektor 7 February 2020 17: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The docs of economics (sik!) Did not say in plain language that while the rate is higher than that of our partners, our manufacturer is very bad: on the road of disappointment - to the cemetery. And this flattery is expressed in the ruble exchange rate: with such a difference in rates, the ruble exchange rate must be greatly underestimated in order to compensate, so to speak. The task of supporting the manufacturer is solved by reducing the rate. BUT! At a certain rate of decline above the optimal ruble exchange rate, it may fall due to investors leaving the ruble. So you need to choose such a rate of rate reduction so that the ruble does not sag much: there is nowhere to sink further - the ruble is the most undervalued currency in the world. You can’t beat him completely.
  • faterdom 7 February 2020 18: 51 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Кроме всего прочего, утерян баланс между промышленным капиталом и финансовым ( и во всем мире тоже). Банковский поставлен во главу угла, он - священная корова, которому нельзя мешать, нельзя доить - можно только кормить, причем нарастающей пайкой.
    And we have through this ... well, according to Parkinson’s law: if something can be done through the "bodyback" - then this is exactly the way everything will be done. We and the Pension Fund - in fact a bank, and even with forced depositors - hence the results of operations.
    And the famous renovation is direct support of banks, and through them - developers. And “First Car” / “Family Car” is not a direct help to the addressee, but through a bank, through a loan, please.
    And financiers at the head of everything and everything - how? The same Golikova, and the other nuts there ... The accounting department should not lead social and production processes - it is incompetent in this, which we have been observing for many years.