Turkish strike on CAA positions in Idlib hit the video


The network appeared footage striking Turkish troops on the positions of the Syrian government forces in the province of Idlib. This blow, as previously reported in the General Staff of the Turkish Armed Forces, was a response to the shelling of the Turkish observation post. A video posted online raises a number of questions.


The first question is what are Turkish observation posts in Idlib, if their arsenal of weapons is such that they even have multiple launch rocket systems? It is also strange that the Turkish troops allow the militants in Idlib to actually hide behind the very “observation posts” of the Turkish army, although, based on the Astana agreements, the appointment of the Turkish military presence in Syria is far from this.

The frames show the intensity of fire from the Turkish troops. Volley fire is being fired in the area of ​​the settlement of Serakib, which the militants tried to keep under their control in the province of Idlib. The militants hid behind the Turkish "observation post", fearing to lose the main thing - the supply route, which, as one of the captured militants told the SAA, is carried out by Turkey and Saudi Arabia.

The Turkish army hit the video on the SAA:


Recall that after this strike, the Syrian army lost more than 70 troops killed.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

79 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. 1959ain 5 February 2020 10: 20 New
    • 6
    • 31
    -25
    What if it’s Hollywood or Photoshop, staged shots wink
    1. Hunter 2 5 February 2020 10: 26 New
      • 28
      • 11
      +17
      And what if - The Answer will arrive, by this photo ass? wink
      Erdogan will be played ...
      1. Vita vko 5 February 2020 10: 47 New
        • 19
        • 0
        +19
        Quote: Hunter 2
        And what if - The Answer will arrive, by this photo ass?
        Erdogan will be played ...

        Surely, the Center for Reconciliation provided all the data to the Turkish troops on the deployment of the SAA troops in order to prevent provocations and "friendly fire". Now, after 70 dead, there can be no talk of any trust and data exchange.
        1. minomoto 5 February 2020 14: 17 New
          • 5
          • 3
          +2
          Well, do not take the Turks word for word, they lie like they breathe. In fact, the advance of the Syrian army did not slow down after the strike, only yesterday the Syrians squeezed 100km2 from the Barmalei. If there was a blow, then it was ineffective and did not cause significant damage to the Syrians, if at all.
      2. Olgovich 5 February 2020 10: 49 New
        • 31
        • 9
        +22
        Quote: Hunter 2
        Erdogan will be played ...

        from whom?

        Syria cannot, there is no strength for this, Russia cannot ...

        The huge, terrible losses of the Syrians, at the same time 70 people were killed, and after all, there certainly are wounded ... Crime, definitely!

        Something needs to be changed and rethought, for example: on the basis of which UN resolution or SAR permission does Turkey stay there and destroy the Syrians in Syrian territory?

        This is aggression and occupation, by all standards.
        1. Sky strike fighter 5 February 2020 11: 07 New
          • 6
          • 3
          +3
          What to rethink? At least in the spring of 2012, the next international aggression of the United States and companies this time under the wrong flag of terrorism with the wrong hands against another country of the victim, in this case Syria. What resolutions, who cares at all in our day? Who is in force he was right. Turkish soldiers also died. That was supposed to happen sometime in that confusion amid the fighting.
          Link to cards.
          https://riafan.ru/1247860-siriya-novosti-4-fevralya-22-30-saa-osvobodila-eshe-4-poseleniya-v-idlibe-kurdskie-boeviki-obstrelyali-shkolu-v-afrine
        2. x.andvlad 5 February 2020 11: 17 New
          • 7
          • 3
          +4
          Quote: Olgovich
          Turkey is there and destroys the Syrians in Syrian territory?


          This is exactly what GDP should tell Erdogan in the next conversation. And it turns out with such an ally and enemies are not necessary. Erdogan then verbally agreed to maintain the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Syria, but in fact continues to support its collapse. It's time to talk tough with him.
          1. Nyrobsky 5 February 2020 12: 20 New
            • 9
            • 1
            +8
            Quote: x.andvlad
            Quote: Olgovich
            Turkey is there and destroys the Syrians in Syrian territory?


            This is exactly what GDP should tell Erdogan in the next conversation. And it turns out with such an ally and enemies are not necessary. Erdogan then verbally agreed to maintain the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Syria, but in fact continues to support its collapse. It's time to talk tough with him.

            Already talked. Edik tried to complain that the SAA was advancing and endangering the lives of his soldiers, which the GDP told him that this was the result of Ankara’s inability to deter his “wards” from provocative attacks on the positions of the SAA and civilians. That compliance with de-escalation measures is not a concern of one side and the Turks are obviously to blame for this jamb. But, along the way, the offensive is slowed down, although 8 km are left to Idlib.
        3. the most important 5 February 2020 15: 41 New
          • 6
          • 5
          +1
          Quote: Olgovich
          Something needs to be changed and rethought, for example: on the basis of which UN resolution or SAR permission does Turkey stay there and destroy the Syrians in Syrian territory?

          Change what ?? It is necessary to change WHO !!! Turkey is a centuries-old enemy of Russia, and only very naive people can try to tame it. And the policy of Russia in Turkey is a policy of humiliation. The plane crashed - they cost tomatoes ... (But you could also walk around the airfield with Caliber) Gas flow? - you are welcome!! Nuclear station? - we will build for our own and do not worry about payment! Crimea do not recognize? - Nothing ... Military assistance to Ukraine? - we will not notice ...
          1. Nyrobsky 5 February 2020 17: 00 New
            • 7
            • 6
            +1
            Quote: the most important
            And the policy of Russia in Turkey is a policy of humiliation.

            Come on!?
            Quote: the most important
            The plane crashed - they cost tomatoes ... (But you could have walked along the airfield with Caliber)
            Everyone imagines himself a strategist seeing the battle from the side. Well, they would. What's next? Turkey is the second largest army in Europe, a member of NATO, and therefore under the guarantee of collective security, in connection with which, with the beginning of the military cut, other countries of the bloc must enter military operations on the side of Turkey against Russia. The total number of aircraft, artillery, armored vehicles at times exceed the existing potential of Russia. According to people. Turkey has 80 million people + human potential of 28 NATO countries, which will already exceed half a billion people. Russia has 145 million with children, aunts, retirees and pacifists for whom the year of service is equal to premature death. The possibilities of a mobilization resource in comparison with the resources of NATO countries are limited, and war cannot be extended by one contract. Nuclear war is in favor of the underdeveloped, because the use of nuclear weapons by one side entails an answer from the other side. This scenario would be just right mattresses, and therefore shot down the plane without the knowledge of Erdogan because The decision to open fire on the plane was made by Prime Minister Davutoglu, who was blowing towards the mattresses and was not opposed to perching himself on the Turkish throne, substituting the chief under attack. It’s good that they managed to figure it out and not bring the situation to the start of hostilities. I think with such a development of the scenario, you wouldn’t be juggling with “airplane and tomatoes” here, but you would quite bravely and courageously endure the hardships and deprivations of military service at the forefront, unless of course you are registered with the Military Commissariat.
            Quote: the most important
            Gas flow? - you are welcome!! Nuclear station? - we will build for our own and do not worry about payment!
            A normal move, the development of an economic strategy for many years. A pipe without Russian gas is just a pipe. A nuclear power plant without Russian fuel for reactors is simply an architectural structure against the backdrop of the Turkish landscape. With the filling and work of rectors, stable foreign exchange earnings in the Russian budget for decades to come.
            Quote: the most important
            Crimea do not recognize? - nothing
            Nothing. Since 1975, we also have not recognized the territory of Northern Cyprus as Turkish territory.
            Quote: the most important
            Military assistance to Ukraine? - we will not notice ...
            This is not help, but a bribe for the surrender of Guleno’s, “friends” of Erdogan, entrenched in Ukraine. As a manufacturer of weapons, Turkey can also sell it to those who buy it. In addition, we do not know what product range Turkey will sell - whether it is lethal or not. We also sell to Armenia, which has its own strains and territorial claims with the Turks.
            1. the most important 5 February 2020 17: 28 New
              • 2
              • 6
              -4
              Quote: Nyrobsky
              Everyone imagines himself a strategist seeing the battle from the side. Well, they would. What's next? Turkey is the second largest army in Europe, a member of NATO, and therefore under the guarantee of collective security, in connection with which, with the beginning of the military cut, other countries of the bloc must enter military operations on the side of Turkey against Russia.

              They all unanimously showed a fig when the Turks came running for help.
              Quote: Nyrobsky
              A pipe without Russian gas is just a pipe. A nuclear power plant without Russian fuel for reactors is simply an architectural structure against the backdrop of the Turkish landscape. With the filling and work of rectors, stable foreign exchange earnings in the Russian budget for decades to come.

              Brilliant !!! But if the whole banquet was at the expense of Turkey. and not at the expense of Russia.
              Bagdasarov, and I think his thoughts are true, said that there was no need to dance in front of the Turks. but to build them problems in response, it is very necessary.
              1. Nyrobsky 5 February 2020 22: 52 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Quote: the most important
                They all unanimously showed a fig when the Turks came running for help.
                They showed. Only not to the Turks, but to Erdogan. He himself was in ah.e. affect when this situation with the plane happened. But it was promoted in the sense that it was almost written off. The mattresses promised support for Davutoglu and the Gulenlenites, but they were pierced by the fact that D. Kerry, in a conversation with Lavrov, leaked in the sense that the United States “would support any development in Turkey in the coming days,” which Edika was warned about. As it turned out on time.
                Quote: the most important
                Brilliant !!! But if the whole banquet was at the expense of Turkey. and not at the expense of Russia.
                You’re an adult, you know the letters on the keyboard, but why are you so sure that the wolf should be tame if he gets his own food? As for me, if tossing meat to him, the process of taming will be faster.
                Quote: the most important
                Bagdasarov, and I think his thoughts are true, said that there is no need to dance in front of the Turks
                No, Bagdasarov is really a good specialist in B. Vostok, an ardent supporter of the preservation of Christian shrines with which Syria is full. In any case, he is not a supporter of war. Understand (those) one thing - delaying war does not always mean cowardice. Sometimes, years won without war provide a peaceful decade ahead. These lapdogs throw themselves at the pit bull without worrying about what will happen to the hostess who, in order to save this provocative crap, will pick her up in her arms. The lap-dog has no mind and instinct of self-preservation, and the mistress will be torn to shreds. Bagdasarov would definitely not support you, in terms of delivering strikes against Turkey, since he is inclined to analyze and evaluate the event. Saber dancing is not about him.
      3. Karaul73 5 February 2020 15: 06 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        But he is directly afraid, he does not sleep at night. DO NOT ARRIVE! Do not worry.
  2. Olya Tsako 5 February 2020 10: 22 New
    • 26
    • 38
    -12
    The spinelessness of Russia is the reason. And the unreasonable credit economic policy of Russia in relation to Turkey.
    There was nothing to climb into Syria, so Turkish dishonored the Russian Federation to the whole world.
    1. Nastia makarova 5 February 2020 10: 28 New
      • 21
      • 12
      +9
      do not go anywhere and it will be good for us. then they will climb to us
      1. tihonmarine 5 February 2020 10: 33 New
        • 5
        • 10
        -5
        Quote: Nastia Makarova
        do not go anywhere and it will be good for us. then they will climb to us

        It is necessary to fulfill the covenants of Emperor Alexander III.
        1. Voltsky 5 February 2020 10: 48 New
          • 7
          • 14
          -7
          it's about those covenants where an incapable politician argues that the country he leads cannot rely on his allies, because they do not exist as such!?
          The phrase that he squeezed out of himself, "Russia has only 2 allies - the army and navy"; beautiful no doubt ... But everything else is bad.
          1. ultra 5 February 2020 10: 55 New
            • 6
            • 3
            +3
            Quote: Voletsky
            that the country he leads cannot rely on its allies,

            Allies can only be equal and equivalent, in all other cases they are vassals.
            1. Voltsky 5 February 2020 11: 04 New
              • 1
              • 2
              -1
              And if they perform the same option, why pay more!? A prospective ally in the future is an equal enemy, and what you want, damn it, you'd better write about unicorns, it’s something close to life or something.
              Although ... Boris Nikolaevich - is that you!? "Take as much sovereignty as you can fit into your hands," and then peers and peers write on the pillars "Don’t leave the Russians, we need slaves"

              Krch basta amigo ... allies are needed as trained Dobermans by the sound of faces, and equal and equal - this is for you with us, on the grill for a beer, but all friends
          2. Nastia makarova 5 February 2020 10: 57 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            what is your bad I'm good
          3. tihonmarine 5 February 2020 13: 07 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Voletsky
            The phrase that he squeezed out of himself, "Russia has only 2 allies - the army and navy"; no doubt beautiful ..

            This is a phrase, but not relevant. He had the concept of "Preventing war by any means." And during his reign there were no wars. Thank you for the minus, we have a lot of militant people.
            1. Voltsky 5 February 2020 13: 24 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              I do not minus the young man :) it's me who are romantically minded in life.
              1. tihonmarine 5 February 2020 13: 44 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                Quote: Voletsky
                I'm not minus a young man

                Thank you, at least once someone called a "young man", it's nice to hear.
                1. Voltsky 5 February 2020 14: 24 New
                  • 1
                  • 1
                  0
                  as far as I remember you are as young as you think ... in other cases, I also do not recommend crossing the line of senile dementia.
                  1. tihonmarine 5 February 2020 16: 09 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: Voletsky
                    as far as I remember you are as young as you think.

                    I try to match, soul and body.
    2. Voltsky 5 February 2020 10: 34 New
      • 2
      • 4
      -2
      yes yes, it’s about how ?! "there was nothing to leave the stove, look heresy would not be written"

      Well, Rajep Taipych, as always in his repertoire, is frantic about tossing and waving his sword on his head, should he not know the old saying from the east “whoever sows the wind will reap the storm”; in other matters, he most likely considers himself to be a storm, the notes here are cocaine's fault, apparently.
    3. Guards turn 5 February 2020 10: 53 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Olya Tsako (Olya Tsako) Something you stopped on the InfoResist website to write your comments what is the reason?
      1. tihonmarine 5 February 2020 14: 00 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: Guards turn
        Olya Tsako (Olya Tsako) Something you stopped on the InfoResist website to write your comments what is the reason?

        After a minute of visiting this site, the condition becomes such as a morning hangover, after a liter of drunk. This is where black is painted white.
        1. Guards turn 5 February 2020 14: 13 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          At first, it was the way you write, too. But then, in order to laugh heartily from the "dizzying successes of Ukraine" I began to go there more often, to raise my spirits.
          1. tihonmarine 5 February 2020 16: 07 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Guards turn
            At first, it was the way you write.

            Nonsense is not out of the blue, but they believe her. I won’t talk about komenty, "Chamber No. 6" is just resting.
    4. Mavrikiy 5 February 2020 11: 24 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      Quote: Olya Tsako
      There was nothing to climb into Syria, so Turkish dishonored the Russian Federation to the whole world.

      Yes, yes, Olenka. Not figs Ukraine in the Crimea was to climb and would sit smoothly. repeat
    5. _Ugene_ 5 February 2020 11: 27 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      The spinelessness of Russia is the reason. And the unreasonable credit economic policy of Russia in relation to Turkey.
      There was nothing to climb into Syria, so Turkish dishonored the Russian Federation to the whole world.
      Syria’s war with Israel, Turkey and any other country is not our business, we are helping Syria in the war against terrorists and not with other countries, why should we get involved in these wars? did your belligerence rise too much there? so go to Syria and help in its struggle since you are so warlike
    6. Gray brother 5 February 2020 13: 18 New
      • 7
      • 3
      +4
      Quote: Olya Tsako
      There was nothing to climb into Syria,

      If they had not climbed into Syria, the barmaleys would have climbed to us, through the same Turkey and Georgia as in Chechnya. It’s better to fight in someone else’s territory with the wrong hands than to sit on your own stupidly in defense.
  3. Loess 5 February 2020 10: 22 New
    • 11
    • 2
    +9
    Recall that after this strike, the Syrian army lost more than 70 troops killed.
    This is according to the Turkish side.
    1. bessmertniy 5 February 2020 10: 29 New
      • 7
      • 4
      +3
      In making vile attacks on Syria, Turkey must understand that a civil war in this country can spread across the border. In Turkey, too, there are many contradictions that can inflate it ..
    2. 1959ain 5 February 2020 10: 35 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Turkish President discusses the situation in the Syrian province of Idlib with Vladimir Putin
      22:52 YESTERDAY 264 0
      Recep Tayyip Erdogan spoke with the Russian leader about a recent incident with shelling of the Turkish military, reports “Interfax.” “Turkey will fully continue to use the legal right to self-defense in the event of such attacks,” Turkish-language Anadolu news agency quoted Erdogan as saying.
      Earlier, the Turkish military fell under the shelling of Syrian government forces. Then, Turkish aircraft retaliated against targets in Syria. Erdogan then stated that the number of Turkish soldiers killed in artillery shelling in Idlib was eight. The Russian Center for Reconciliation of the warring parties in Syria said that Turkish aviation did not violate the airspace of the Arab country, and the skies over the de-escalation zone in Idlib were controlled by the Russian air forces.
    3. Tzar 5 February 2020 11: 13 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Only for some reason, in the text of the news, this is indicated as an undeniable fact:
      Recall that after this strike, the Syrian army lost more than 70 troops killed.

      although there is no confirmation of information about the dead and their number, only the brave speeches of Erdogan.
  4. cniza 5 February 2020 10: 26 New
    • 7
    • 1
    +6
    The first question is what are Turkish observation posts in Idlib, if their arsenal of weapons is such that they even have multiple launch rocket systems?


    Here it is necessary for the Sultan and ask what it is and how it relates to the agreements ...
  5. Livonetc 5 February 2020 10: 27 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Quote: Less
    Recall that after this strike, the Syrian army lost more than 70 troops killed.
    This is according to the Turkish side.

    And vice versa, according to the Syrian side, "there are no losses."
  6. rotmistr60 5 February 2020 10: 32 New
    • 13
    • 1
    +12
    Yesterday, we already discussed this topic. And many had a question posed in the article why "Turkish troops allow the militants in Idlib to actually hide behind the very" observation posts "of the Turkish army." Yes, because Erdogan hates Assad, has views of part of Syrian territory and actively supports terrorists.
  7. Old Horseradish 5 February 2020 10: 40 New
    • 8
    • 8
    0
    Good partner and friend! And now we have all such "partners and friends": the Chinese, Turks, Western "partners". All are good! But we have bad Ukrainians and Ukrainians. The Slavs, in general, are bad, and all the rest are good.
  8. Tenet 5 February 2020 10: 48 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    The Turks are playing their game and we need to pinpoint their proteges from the game, and the answer should be appropriate for FSB officers. Find and destroy organizers and performers soldier
    1. Zaurbek 5 February 2020 11: 27 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      There, like, a land mine was. Anyone could be blown up.
  9. Mathafaka 5 February 2020 11: 00 New
    • 1
    • 9
    -8
    And here's how to believe Min now. Defense.
    They said there were no shelling
  10. KBaHT_BpeMeHu 5 February 2020 11: 14 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Footage of shelling by the Turkish army of SAA positions in the Serakib area pic.twitter.com/kShNwrz5DN
    - Volodin-Topwar (@VolodinTopwar) February 5, 2020

    Volodin, it’s like Grads are working. Perhaps of course Sakarya, but she has two packages.
    1. KBaHT_BpeMeHu 5 February 2020 13: 48 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      More like this.
  11. Zaurbek 5 February 2020 11: 26 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    You can enter a useless zone and the Syrians themselves will strike airstrikes.
  12. protoss 5 February 2020 11: 48 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I wonder if these mutual shelling will develop into a full-fledged war between Turkey and Assad's Syria, what will be our actions?
    1. Dikson 5 February 2020 12: 27 New
      • 2
      • 3
      -1
      And we’ll be sitting in Hmeimim .. And in Tartus .. Quietly .. So that we don’t inadvertently catch anyone ..
    2. Romario_Argo 5 February 2020 14: 27 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      now Syria no matter who: Turks, Israel, USA
      The Kursk brigade kit OTRK Tochka-U migrated to the Syrian army
      at the same time, there were cassette warheads that had not been exported before
  13. Avior 5 February 2020 12: 13 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    And they wrote that Turkish rockets were shot down.
    Or am I misunderstood?
    Confirmed the loss?
  14. Romario_Argo 5 February 2020 12: 22 New
    • 3
    • 6
    -3
    The Turkish dog only barks - and the Su-34 this morning on the Idlib ODAB-500P throws
  15. Kostadinov 5 February 2020 13: 05 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Recall that after this strike, the Syrian army lost more than 70 troops killed.

    This can beat the Turkish information about the losses of the Syrian army.
    In the information of the so-called "Observatory" from London - Syrian losses from Turkish shelling - 13 killed and 20 wounded.
    The Syrian command did not report any casualties from the Turkish fire. If at least one Syrian soldier died from the Turkish fire, they announced to the whole world. The offensive of the Syrian army continues without noticing the Turkish shelling.
  16. Kostadinov 5 February 2020 13: 17 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Quote: protoss
    I wonder if these mutual shelling will develop into a full-fledged war between Turkey and Assad's Syria, what will be our actions?

    They are unlikely to develop into a full-fledged war. The Syrians have no where to retreat and they will fight with the Turks getting weapons from Russia. Kurdy will also fight with the Turks getting weapons from the United States.
    And finally, no one will allow Turkey to occupy Syria. In other words, the Turks will suffer losses and fight, and in the end Russia, the USA and the EU will take away everything they have captured.
    1. protoss 5 February 2020 13: 23 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      The EU can’t take anything from anyone at all, it’s a non-military organization.
      and the Syrians always have a place to retreat - to the same place in the EU for benefits.
  17. sabakina 5 February 2020 13: 49 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    I don’t know how anyone, but I was struck by this quick-firing thing. Our City seems to be slow ...
    1. Oquzyurd 5 February 2020 15: 30 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      T-122 reactive systems. The Turks of 2018 adopted a more advanced version of this reactive complex. The video is more of a modernized version of 2018 ..
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVoIpozqmUY Испытания этих систем 2016 году.
  18. Kostadinov 5 February 2020 15: 33 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: protoss
    The EU can’t take anything from anyone at all, it’s a non-military organization.
    and the Syrians always have a place to retreat - to the same place in the EU for benefits.

    Some EU states, such as France, will be able to supply the Kurds with weapons and declare a no-fly zone for Turkish aviation, of course agreed with the United States and Russia, as was the case in Libya.
  19. Demagogue 5 February 2020 15: 40 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The Turks dug in Sarakib and from there they iron the surroundings, Asadites bypass it from two sides. As I announced yesterday, they will cut the m5 in the region of Kirat east. Also, in a brazen rod west of the green on Sarmin, to cut off the group in Sarkib from Idlib. The astronauts are clearing the road.
  20. Goblin 5 February 2020 16: 17 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Erdogan became brutal .. Straight running up! It was not for nothing that Putin recently spoke out like "The world is at a dangerous point .."
  21. Zaurbek 5 February 2020 16: 29 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    If until the end of February the Syrian troops of Bashar al-Assad did not retreat from the observation posts of the Turkish Armed Forces in the Idlib de-escalation zone, then the Turkish military will be forced to do this on their own. With such an ultimatum today, February 5, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan made a speech at a meeting of the parliamentary faction of the ruling Justice and Development Party in Ankara.
  22. svoit 5 February 2020 19: 18 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Zaurbek
    If until the end of February the Syrian troops of Bashar al-Assad do not retreat from the observation posts of the Turkish Armed Forces

    What is the connection here? there is an agreement on the posts, if it is respected then there is no cause for concern, the posts can also be in the rear .... But shelling or blocking them is not good ...
  23. lvov_aleksey 6 February 2020 04: 14 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I hate politics !!!
  24. 501Legion 6 February 2020 08: 41 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Recall that after this strike, the Syrian army lost more than 70 troops killed.
    Uryuk Erdogan, personally held a candle. or of those who express condolences to the unkilled after every bunch on the Internet?