After the "impeachment" of trump. How Russia to moderate the aggressive ardor of the United States


President Trump, the world still owes something. At least by the fact that he clearly, using his own example, showed how the power in America is structured, how it really works today.


American power


History with an attempt to impeach President Trump by the Democratic Party, she showed us real power in the United States: without signs of democracy, moral values, separation of powers, but with methods of far-fetched accusations falsified by special services that give the media credibility and promote in society. And they create a terrible image of Trump. But the American people elected President Trump, that is, most Americans defame him!

Instead of democratic values, we see underhanded hypocritical politics when they say one thing, think another, and do the third. We know, sometimes the democrats in the USA say this, that Trump is persecuted for trying to pursue an independent policy with which he went to the polls, in the world and in relation to Russia, different from what was previously carried out by the "deep state" of the democrats. And then what did they do?

They falsified the accusation of conspiracy with Trump and Putin, found fault with other ambiguous reasons, inflated them in the press and in the Congress and began impeachment because of "abuse of power by the US president." It is known that you can find fault with a post: it’s not there!

Instead of the institution of separation of powers, we see in the USA a “deep state”, which in all institutions acts on the principle that who is not with us is against us. The only progress since the assassination of President John F. Kennedy was that Trump was not killed, although many observers expected this, apparently, do not want the striking analogy with John F. Kennedy. After all, they killed him for the same reason that Trump was poisoned: he wanted to improve relations with the USSR after the Caribbean crisis.

What do we have to do with it?


All this is directly related to the world and to Russia. Because the USA acts by the same methods in the international arena, only even more cynically. Therefore, it is useless to rely on any values ​​in relations with America: it is considered only with force.

The United States pursues an active power policy in the world, intervenes wherever it can, and Russia will have to actively oppose such a policy in order to neutralize it.

The United States is trying in every way to interfere in the affairs of Russia: the adoption by Congress of laws on US Opponents, sanctions, funding and information support for our “liberal column”, arousing false rumors in society, attempts to sow confusion, hiding behind democratic values.

And Russia will have to move on to an active policy towards the United States, starting with the statement that we are dealing not with democracy, but with an oligarchic aggressive American state acting globally on the principle that who is not with us is against us. Russia will have to declare active intervention in US affairs, especially since we still pay for it: Congress has already appointed us as an adversary and announced our further intervention.

USSR experience


It is appropriate to recall that the USSR did not hesitate to actively intervene in the affairs of the United States, and this at one time led to a positive result - a policy of detente. How?

The USSR did not hesitate to talk about the ulcers of American society, supported the opposition in the United States and beyond, opposed the United States in the "third world". And it had beneficial results! The US has tempered its aggressive fervor!

The era of Moscow's stoic indifference to Washington’s boorish behavior is ending: the critical import substitution has already been completed. Armed Forces of the Russian Federation mainly rearm on modern types weapons, hypersonic "Vanguard" is already on alert!
Author:
Photos used:
twitter.com/realdonaldtrump (video frame)
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Uncle lee 6 February 2020 06: 13 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    The era of Moscow's stoic indifference to Washington's boorish behavior ends
    If you don’t immediately give a tough answer, they will frown at the full!
    1. Svarog 6 February 2020 07: 37 New
      • 13
      • 2
      +11
      The USSR did not hesitate to talk about the ulcers of American society, supported the opposition in the United States and beyond, opposed the United States in the "third world". And it had beneficial results!

      So now we have the same “ulcers” as in the USA. To beat the United States need to recreate the USSR.
    2. Monster_Fat 6 February 2020 07: 40 New
      • 9
      • 5
      +4
      The USSR did not hesitate to talk about the ulcers of American society, supported the opposition in the United States and beyond, opposed the United States in the "third world". And it had beneficial results! The US has tempered its aggressive fervor!

      In-in. And now, only on Twitter does Zakharova utter something with a smart, formidable look, streamlined phrases, and even in Russian, go and all Americans read it ..... Or on Russian TV, again in Russian, "for the Americans" with a formidable look, something is broadcasting .... But Lavrov from international stands from the classics pushed the incomprehensible, even modern, graduated from MGIMO. To call a spade a spade for Russian public politicians is taboo, "no, no, no, no way." Even the President reads something on a piece of paper in general phrases, which then, the written "ikspert" of all stripes, begin to "decipher", saying that he wanted to say something and that was it. yes
      1. Uncle lee 6 February 2020 07: 45 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        Quote: Monster_Fat
        "no no",

        It seems that the above characters say only what they allow the overseas "partner"!
        1. Arlen 6 February 2020 13: 56 New
          • 6
          • 1
          +5
          Quote: Uncle Lee
          It seems that the above characters say only what they allow the overseas "partner"!

          Lenin has repeatedly said that "the foreign policy of the state, due to its class essence, the nature of its domestic policy, is its direct continuation".
      2. Lipchanin 6 February 2020 08: 44 New
        • 1
        • 6
        -5
        Quote: Monster_Fat
        And now, only on Twitter does Zakharova utter something there with an intelligent, formidable look, streamlined phrases,

        What does Zakharova have to do with it?
        Do you know her position?
        She decides NOTHING. Only voiced.
        And not only on Twitter

        . Even the President reads something on a piece of paper

        In general, everyone reads a piece of paper
        common phrases

        "He who has ears will hear" C
        which then, notebook "ikspert" of all stripes begin to "decipher" they say that he wanted to say something, and this is it. yes

        And this is their bread, pour from empty to empty
  2. Far B 6 February 2020 06: 14 New
    • 10
    • 3
    +7
    But President Trump was elected by the American people
    Actually, Trump was chosen by electors. And, despite the active defamation in the media, they still chose him. Without attracting a resource of 146%. This is not to say that everything is in the beam in Omerig and you need to learn from them - there’s that same adder, of course. (The bestial grin of capitalism, what else to expect?). Just the author’s thesis about the complete absence of democracy in the states, as it seems to me, is not quite true. Within the states themselves, some kind of democracy is still acting quite well.
    analogies with John F. Kennedy. After all, they killed him for the same reason that Trump was poisoned: he wanted to improve relations with the USSR after the Caribbean crisis
    A. Another version. Probably also has the right to life.
    The era of Moscow’s stoic indifference to Washington’s boorish behavior is ending: the critical import substitution has already been completed
    Oh really? Will we no longer express concern and start banging our boots on the stands?
    1. Octopus 6 February 2020 07: 53 New
      • 4
      • 3
      +1
      Quote: Far In
      let's start pounding a shoe on the podium?

      So there are cartoons.
      After all, they killed him for the same reason that Trump was poisoned: he wanted to improve relations with the USSR

      Oswald, by the way, was a communist and recently returned from the USSR. So the version is very good.
      Quote: Far In
      Actually, Trump was chosen by electors

      What is more interesting, the American people did not choose Trump, but a clinton, if you count the votes of voters, not electors. Democracy is not an easy task.
      Quote: Far In
      Within the states themselves, some kind of democracy is still acting quite well.

      To me alone, the arguments of Russians about democracy are reminiscent of the arguments of school virgins about allbabahshlyuhah?
  3. rotmistr60 6 February 2020 06: 26 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    How Russia to moderate the aggressive ardor of the United States
    Only tough policies and retaliatory measures against all their and their satellite machinations. More enthusiasm and aggressive pressure in the information war that the West has long unleashed under the leadership of the United States. And of course, strengthening our defense capabilities and the economy.
  4. Mathafaka 6 February 2020 06: 35 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    There is no democracy in America, but the deep state decides everything.
    The deep state did not want to see Trump as president; Trump became president.
    The deep state wanted to kick Trump out of the presidency and impeached him. But Trump remained the president, despite any deep state.
    1. depressant 6 February 2020 10: 14 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      The US deep state is conditionally divided into two parts - industrialists and bankers. I can’t live without each other, the hitch is objectively tight, but they are at war, each part has claims to the other. Trump is a protege of the Rockefellers, big industrial capital. Not a single US president has been and is not an independent figure.
  5. Vasily Ponomarev 6 February 2020 06: 37 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    "The story of the attempt to impeach President Trump by the Democratic Party showed us real power in the United States: without signs of democracy, moral values, separation of powers, but with methods of far-fetched accusations falsified by special services that give the media credibility and promote in society" what nonsense, well, let's try to blame Putin not on the couch, but for real, here we’ll see who the authorities are here, and if you still start throwing glasses at the police, that's all, a death sentence, the glasses are killing
    1. bessmertniy 6 February 2020 09: 15 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      American power reflects the interests of those who choose it. And Trump today acts in the interests of many Americans who will ultimately elect him for a second term.
      1. Gene84 6 February 2020 13: 38 New
        • 7
        • 1
        +6
        Quote: bessmertniy
        Trump today acts in the interests of many Americans

        Slightly less than half of the US population voted for Trump. Trump became president thanks to some kind of "electors." So Trump represents the interests of those who stand behind the electors. And some such financial and industrial groups are behind the "electors" who knows.
  6. parusnik 6 February 2020 06: 39 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    But the American people elected President Trump, that is, most Americans defame him!
    ..... So that's it? in the absence of direct elections?
    The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation basically rearm on modern types of weapons, the hypersonic Avangard is already on alert!
    ..... We must protect the property of TNCs, Ford factories, Pepsiko and Coca-Cola companies and other foreign business partners ... laughing
    1. tihonmarine 6 February 2020 09: 00 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: parusnik
      We must protect the property of TNCs, Ford factories, Pepsiko and Coca-Cola companies and other foreign business partners

      Yes, if only Pepsiku yes Kaka Cola ....
  7. Lamata 6 February 2020 07: 38 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Woton, the true ginger of evil. And we call them partners.
  8. rocket757 6 February 2020 08: 00 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    USSR experience

    We must remember, take into account, direct, direct, adopt it ... it just won’t work. The world is changing, although not fundamentally, but it is necessary to take into account the circumstances and the changes that have occurred.
    In general, we’ll see who will behave wisely and who will trample on the old rake.
  9. mikh-korsakov 6 February 2020 08: 01 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    That's what I don't like. The USA insolently stopped the construction of SP2. Lavrov and many others were verbally indignant at their behavior and promised an answer to arrogance. However, nothing happened. Insult swept under the carpet. Well, let’s say we seriously have nothing to answer them with, although I don’t believe in it. But why was it then smearing the snot in the face and threatening with a fist? And here is our chief speaker accepting the ambassador prays for establishing relations on an equal basis. Hehe, after this behavior, will someone talk to us "on an equal footing"?
    1. Lamata 6 February 2020 08: 17 New
      • 8
      • 3
      +5
      but Lavrov always has a sternly brutal expression
    2. Lipchanin 6 February 2020 08: 49 New
      • 1
      • 5
      -4
      Quote: mikh-korsakov
      Insult swept under the carpet.

      Sure? Do you know what is preparing?
      Take it straight away and put it right?
      The answer must be well prepared so that it is the answer, and not "zilch"
      1. mikh-korsakov 6 February 2020 12: 03 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        The dish is good while it is hot. Then it's not about me and not about us, it's about heating American ambitions - like we can do anything. They already want to ban buying gas from SP2, if Russia builds it herself. Do we need it?
        1. Lipchanin 6 February 2020 12: 09 New
          • 1
          • 4
          -3
          Quote: mikh-korsakov
          The dish is good while it's hot

          Nope.
          "Revenge is a dish that needs to be served cold." C
          They already want to ban buying gas from SP2, if Russia builds it herself.

          Well, wanting is not harmful.
    3. tihonmarine 6 February 2020 08: 58 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: mikh-korsakov
      That's what I don't like. The USA insolently stopped the construction of SP2. Lavrov and many others were verbally indignant at their behavior and promised an answer to arrogance.

      Wrong weight categories. (You yourself wrote that GDP growth is below the global average).).
    4. Arlen 6 February 2020 14: 09 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: mikh-korsakov
      However, nothing happened. Insult swept under the carpet. Well, let's say we have nothing to seriously answer them, although I do not believe in it. But why was it then smearing snot in the face and threatening with a fist?

      Maybe because we rely on the words of Henry Kissinger, who said that Russia should be seen as a key element of global equilibrium, and not as a threat to the United States, and thus expect that the United States will consider us partners? But this is not so. The US will consider us primarily as enemies, but not partners. And this will continue until the enemy appears to us and them, and then they will begin to temporarily consider us partners and friends, as during the Second World War.
  10. rudolff 6 February 2020 08: 18 New
    • 11
    • 1
    +10
    We have the same oligarchic power, as there, and to call us more democratic, the language will not turn. There you can put the president in place; in our country, power is untouchable in general. And in order to withstand the dignity of the states it is necessary to have a weight category appropriate. Our GDP growth is below the global average. That is, in fact, we are not developing, but degrading. By some indicators, we are no longer even a developing state, but a third world country. We must not get carried away with the search for external enemies, but call our own authorities to account.
    1. mikh-korsakov 6 February 2020 08: 35 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      There, in America, the same bastard as the president can replace the president. People are watching this in the style of the show and no more. Well, they can afford it, but we can’t, because we’ll start putting it in its place and everything will crumble, as in the nineties, because the GDP is small. Think of Newton’s bin
      1. tihonmarine 6 February 2020 08: 55 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: mikh-korsakov
        There, in America, the same bastard as the president can replace the president.

        In America, only those forces that put him in the presidency can put the president in place, and no one else.
  11. paul3390 6 February 2020 08: 26 New
    • 6
    • 4
    +2
    In order to poke the faces of Americans in the absence of democracy-it is necessary to have some moral right to this .. What the current Russian Federation has is completely absent. The USSR was a much more democratic state, moreover, an order of magnitude more powerful. And who in the world will now listen to our outpourings? They will immediately answer - look at yourself. And alas, they will be right.
    1. your1970 7 February 2020 10: 43 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: paul3390
      The USSR was a much more democratic state, moreover, an order of magnitude more powerful.

      1) in which place was "more democratic"? In Novocherkassk? In the elections, where there was no other party even for decency? In official growth, where you had to be a member of the CPSU to occupy at least the minimum leading posts
      2) kaneshno !! Everything is certainly "an order of magnitude more powerful" "- the only problem is that the USSR collapsed in a day. And no one joined the USSR ...
      1. iouris 7 February 2020 13: 58 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: your1970
        Trouble only that the USSR collapsed in a day.

        Well, firstly, not in one day. Secondly, the USSR did not “collapse”, but was disbanded “from above”. Thirdly, the USSR has evolved: Novocherkassk is one USSR, and a completely different USSR was dissolved. Fourth, career growth in the USSR was not necessarily associated with membership in the CPSU. There were no political parties in the USSR, the CPSU - this is not a "political party", but the "core of the political system of the USSR" - that was exactly what was written in the fundamental documents. In any political system, the bureaucracy rather than the individual plays the main role. Finally, why are you gloating if your state and country are in the process of “collapse”? The process may not have been completed at a certain stage and negative consequences will come for you, too, regardless of whether you are a citizen of this state or not.
        1. your1970 7 February 2020 21: 18 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          1)
          Quote: iouris
          Secondly, the USSR did not “collapse”, but was disbanded “from above”.
          -when everyone doesn’t care from the bottom, it’s just “collapsed”
          2)
          Quote: iouris
          Fourth, career growth in the USSR was not necessarily associated with membership in the CPSU.
          -Of course, to senior lieutenant or brigadier you could be expensive. But to become the head of the workshop or a major position without membership was impossible. Even do not argue ....
          3)
          Quote: iouris
          There were no political parties in the USSR, the CPSU - this is not a "political party", but the "core of the political system of the USSR" - that was exactly what was written in the fundamental documents. In any political system, the bureaucracy rather than the individual plays the main role.
          "And where did you see democracy in the USSR? If the bureaucracy played the main role there too?"
  12. Alex_59 6 February 2020 08: 32 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    apparently, they don’t want the striking analogy with John F. Kennedy. After all, they killed him for the same reason that Trump was poisoned: he wanted to improve relations with the USSR after the Caribbean crisis.

    Kennedy wanted to improve relations with the USSR? Hmm ... I don’t know what they have in the Americas, but we still have it. People believe in some “good” presidents sincerely “ours” who just want to improve relations with us humanly, in a friendly manner. Yes, the truth is pure and naive soul of a Russian person.
    Some curtsies towards the USSR which Kennedy carried out were dictated by quite pragmatic interests, and were the result of other processes. At the same time, there was one thing in words, but in fact there was an escalation in Vietnam and a decision on the lunar race. Kennedy is a friend of the USSR to us, and his defense minister, McNamara, is it like you? Already not very friend, right? And they killed him not at all for a number of very secondary decisions on the USSR, but for an unsuccessful domestic policy. Quarreled with business, with gangsters. Those who brought him to power began to wet. His brother Robert did this as a US attorney.
    We need to remember one thing - if we want to improve relations with someone, then we must put the matter in such a way that, thanks to political and economic logic, the only sound solution to us will be to establish friendship. So that partners have no choice. Then they will be friends with us.
    1. tihonmarine 6 February 2020 08: 52 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Alex_59
      Kennedy is a friend of the USSR to us, and his defense minister, McNamara, is it like you?

      I allow myself to disagree, Kennedy is a friend of his class, but he really knows what the opposition of our countries will lead to. Therefore, he wanted to offer a peaceful coexistence, and no more. In America, capitalism, and in the USSR there was socialism, they could not be friends, like fire and water.
      1. Alex_59 6 February 2020 09: 10 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: tihonmarine
        I beg to differ

        And with what to disagree then? I do not deny that he took certain steps. Yes, there was detente after the Caribbean crisis, yes there was a nuclear test agreement. There was a meeting with Khrushchev. There was a proposal to build Apollo together. So what? In your opinion it was out of kindness? Or could he have been killed for these steps? Do not make me laugh. For this they do not kill. And they don’t do this because of love for the USSR, they do it because it’s profitable. And in the article they write as if they killed him precisely for his love of the USSR.
        Even if we assume that he was killed for the failure of the invasion of Cuba, then again the root cause will not be that he could not break the USSR bastion on the island, but that he could not return the assets in Cuba to the business and the criminal community of the USA in the form of gambling establishments and resort hotels . The USSR here is as if secondary. And Kennedy not only did not return the Cuban assets, but also arranged a hunt for the former owners of these assets. But of course they killed him for his love of the Communists, yes yes.
        1. tihonmarine 6 February 2020 09: 25 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Alex_59
          And in the article they write as if they killed him precisely for his love of the USSR.

          I, too, are not talking about love, but about discharge and no more. Friendship is out of the question.
  13. Mavrikiy 6 February 2020 08: 42 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    that Trump is being persecuted for trying to pursue an independent policy with which he went to the polls, in the world and in relation to Russia, different from what was previously carried out by the “deep state” of the Democrats.
    And here is politics, Russia, etc.
    Trump simply changed the value system for power. For him, "the United States above all," and not the enrichment of TNCs. And he took steps to implement it.
  14. tihonmarine 6 February 2020 08: 45 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The USSR did not hesitate to talk about the ulcers of American society, supported the opposition in the United States and beyond, opposed the United States in the "third world". And it had beneficial results! The US has tempered its aggressive fervor!
    As Adolf Schicklsgruber used to say, "The crowd is a woman, and a woman loves strength." America is a woman and she also loves power.
  15. Ross xnumx 6 February 2020 09: 11 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    How Russia to moderate the aggressive ardor of the United States

    NO ...
    Why ask questions, the answers to which were given by Mr. deceased Brzezinski?
    Russia may have as many nuclear suitcases as you like, but since $ 500 billion of the Russian elite lies with our banks, you still have to figure out whose elite it is. Yours or already ours?

    Military people know that any offensive, any attack should imply not only "second-tier troops", but also an operational supply and reliable rear areas.
    Call those - “from the second echelon” who subscribe to the fight against the United States on the side of Russia ... Right on the list and let's go ... request
    Further, what supply can Russia claim if in energy companies and leading industries we are “tied” with foreign co-founders and investors?
    And what's in the rear? In those provinces where per capita GDP is determined from the center many times less? Where in the regions do they choose the last crumbs on the “Sobyaninsky tile”?
    But this is not the main thing. If you agree with Brzezinski’s words about the elite, then why doesn’t anyone give his other statements? For instance:
    Like so many empires that existed before, the Soviet Union ultimately exploded from the inside and split into piecesbecoming a victim not so much of direct military defeat as disintegration process accelerated by economic and social problems.

    At such a pace of development of our country with the most severe imbalance in income and development, it may soon become for us to replace the words: “Soviet Union” with “Russian Federation” ... belay
    I would be glad to be mistaken, but the zealous opinion about the need to give the country (“for complete happiness”) not 6, like Shura Balaganov, but just the “Supreme Ruler” at the head of the State Council ...
  16. tso1973 6 February 2020 09: 29 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    To moderate the ardor of the United States, it is necessary to clean out those from the government who have accounts abroad, real estate abroad, dual citizenship, children study or live abroad.
  17. Operator 6 February 2020 10: 39 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    The other day, US-Russian talks began in Washington on a new arms limitation treaty (either strategic, or along with the RSD). And before that, in October last year, the Russian Federation came in second after Canada for oil exports to the United States.

    Therefore, our best policy is the accelerated development of our science, technology, economy and the armed forces. Then everything else will follow.
  18. kriten 6 February 2020 11: 59 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Find how you can, the question is who will be solved ??? Even when the United States openly spits in the face of Russia in response, it sees only Christian humility and an invitation to spit again and again.
  19. Seld 6 February 2020 12: 09 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Far In
    But President Trump was elected by the American people
    Actually, Trump was chosen by electors. And, despite the active defamation in the media, they still chose him. Without attracting a resource of 146%. This is not to say that everything is in the beam in Omerig and you need to learn from them - there’s that same adder, of course. (The bestial grin of capitalism, what else to expect?). Just the author’s thesis about the complete absence of democracy in the states, as it seems to me, is not quite true. Within the states themselves, some kind of democracy is still acting quite well.
    analogies with John F. Kennedy. After all, they killed him for the same reason that Trump was poisoned: he wanted to improve relations with the USSR after the Caribbean crisis
    A. Another version. Probably also has the right to life.
    The era of Moscow’s stoic indifference to Washington’s boorish behavior is ending: the critical import substitution has already been completed
    Oh really? Will we no longer express concern and start banging our boots on the stands?


    I agree ...
    In general: there is a "president", there is a "parliament". Parliament opposes the president. And vice versa. Reasons: someone is dissatisfied with something.
    Well, what is not a democratic movement? Both of them are officially chosen by the people.
    And what should democracy look like? How is EP? or like in Congo during the time of Mabutu?
    But at the same time, another impression arises, in general, not only in shatas: all these chosen ones (both, both) are engaged in some garbage. And they spend taxpayer money on some similar garbage. To put it mildly...
  20. Sova 6 February 2020 12: 32 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Mavrikiy
    For him, "the United States above all", not the enrichment of TNCs.

    And because of this, they impose sanctions on SP2 and force them to buy their own democratic gas, which is generally enrichment of TNCs.