After the "impeachment" of trump. How Russia to moderate the aggressive ardor of the United States

44

President Trump, the world still owes something. At least by the fact that he clearly, using his own example, showed how the power in America is structured, how it really works today.

American power


History with an attempt to impeach President Trump by the Democratic Party, she showed us real power in the United States: without signs of democracy, moral values, separation of powers, but with methods of far-fetched accusations falsified by special services that give the media credibility and promote in society. And they create a terrible image of Trump. But the American people elected President Trump, that is, most Americans defame him!



Instead of democratic values, we see underhanded hypocritical politics when they say one thing, think another, and do the third. We know, sometimes the democrats in the USA say this, that Trump is persecuted for trying to pursue an independent policy with which he went to the polls, in the world and in relation to Russia, different from what was previously carried out by the "deep state" of the democrats. And then what did they do?

They falsified the accusation of conspiracy with Trump and Putin, found fault with other ambiguous reasons, inflated them in the press and in the Congress and began impeachment because of "abuse of power by the US president." It is known that you can find fault with a post: it’s not there!

Instead of the institution of separation of powers, we see in the USA a “deep state”, which in all institutions acts on the principle that who is not with us is against us. The only progress since the assassination of President John F. Kennedy was that Trump was not killed, although many observers expected this, apparently, do not want the striking analogy with John F. Kennedy. After all, they killed him for the same reason that Trump was poisoned: he wanted to improve relations with the USSR after the Caribbean crisis.

What do we have to do with it?


All this is directly related to the world and to Russia. Because the USA acts by the same methods in the international arena, only even more cynically. Therefore, it is useless to rely on any values ​​in relations with America: it is considered only with force.

The United States pursues an active power policy in the world, intervenes wherever it can, and Russia will have to actively oppose such a policy in order to neutralize it.

The United States is trying in every way to interfere in the affairs of Russia: the adoption by Congress of laws on US Opponents, sanctions, funding and information support for our “liberal column”, arousing false rumors in society, attempts to sow confusion, hiding behind democratic values.

And Russia will have to move on to an active policy towards the United States, starting with the statement that we are dealing not with democracy, but with an oligarchic aggressive American state acting globally on the principle that who is not with us is against us. Russia will have to declare active intervention in US affairs, especially since we still pay for it: Congress has already appointed us as an adversary and announced our further intervention.

USSR experience


It is appropriate to recall that the USSR did not hesitate to actively intervene in the affairs of the United States, and this at one time led to a positive result - a policy of detente. How?

The USSR did not hesitate to talk about the ulcers of American society, supported the opposition in the United States and beyond, opposed the United States in the "third world". And it had beneficial results! The US has tempered its aggressive fervor!

The era of Moscow's stoic indifference to Washington’s boorish behavior is ending: the critical import substitution has already been completed. Armed Forces of the Russian Federation mainly rearm on modern types weapons, hypersonic "Vanguard" is already on alert!
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    6 February 2020 06: 13
    The era of Moscow's stoic indifference to Washington's boorish behavior ends
    If you don’t immediately give a tough answer, they will frown at the full!
    1. +11
      6 February 2020 07: 37
      The USSR did not hesitate to talk about the ulcers of American society, supported the opposition in the United States and beyond, opposed the United States in the "third world". And it had beneficial results!

      So we now have the same "ulcers" as in the United States. To beat the United States you need to recreate the USSR.
    2. +4
      6 February 2020 07: 40
      The USSR did not hesitate to talk about the ulcers of American society, supported the opposition in the United States and beyond, opposed the United States in the "third world". And it had beneficial results! The US has tempered its aggressive fervor!

      In-in. And now, Zakharova only on "Twitter" utters something there with a smart, menacing look, streamlined phrases, and even in Russian, go, all Americans read it ..... Or on Russian TV, again in Russian, "for Americans" with a formidable look, something is there, broadcasting .... And Lavrov from the international tribunes of the classics pushed the incomprehensible, even modern, graduated from MGIMO. To call a spade a spade for Russian public politicians is taboo, "no, no", "no way." Even the President, who reads something from a piece of paper in general phrases, which later, written "iksperts" of all stripes begin to "decipher", they say, he wanted to say "that" and now - "that." Yes
      1. +3
        6 February 2020 07: 45
        Quote: Monster_Fat
        "no no",

        It seems that the above-mentioned characters say only what their overseas "partner" permits them!
        1. +5
          6 February 2020 13: 56
          Quote from Uncle Lee
          It seems that the above-mentioned characters say only what their overseas "partner" permits them!

          Lenin repeatedly said that "the foreign policy of the state, due to its class essence, the nature of its domestic policy, is its direct continuation".
      2. -5
        6 February 2020 08: 44
        Quote: Monster_Fat
        And now, Zakharova only in "Twitter" says something there with a smart, menacing look, streamlined phrases,

        What does Zakharova have to do with it?
        Do you know her position?
        She decides NOTHING. Only voiced.
        And not only on Twitter

        . Even the President reads something on a piece of paper

        In general, everyone reads a piece of paper
        common phrases

        "He who has ears will hear" C
        which then, written "iksperts" of all stripes begin to "decipher", they say, he wanted to say "that" and now - "this". yes

        And this is their bread, pour from empty to empty
  2. +7
    6 February 2020 06: 14
    But President Trump was elected by the American people
    Actually, Trump was chosen by electors. And, despite the active defamation in the media, they still chose him. Without attracting a resource of 146%. This is not to say that everything is in the beam in Omerig and you need to learn from them - there’s that same adder, of course. (The bestial grin of capitalism, what else to expect?). Just the author’s thesis about the complete absence of democracy in the states, as it seems to me, is not quite true. Within the states themselves, some kind of democracy is still acting quite well.
    analogies with John F. Kennedy. After all, they killed him for the same reason that Trump was poisoned: he wanted to improve relations with the USSR after the Caribbean crisis
    A. Another version. Probably also has the right to life.
    The era of Moscow’s stoic indifference to Washington’s boorish behavior is ending: the critical import substitution has already been completed
    Oh really? Will we no longer express concern and start banging our boots on the stands?
    1. +1
      6 February 2020 07: 53
      Quote: Dalny V
      let's start pounding a shoe on the podium?

      So there are cartoons.
      After all, they killed him for the same reason that Trump was poisoned: he wanted to improve relations with the USSR

      Oswald, by the way, was a communist and recently returned from the USSR. So the version is very good.
      Quote: Dalny V
      Actually, Trump was chosen by electors

      What is more interesting, the American people did not choose Trump, but a clinton, if you count the votes of voters, not electors. Democracy is not an easy task.
      Quote: Dalny V
      Within the states themselves, some kind of democracy is still acting quite well.

      To me alone, the arguments of Russians about democracy are reminiscent of the arguments of school virgins about allbabahshlyuhah?
  3. +2
    6 February 2020 06: 26
    How Russia to moderate the aggressive ardor of the United States
    Only tough policies and retaliatory measures against all their and their satellite machinations. More enthusiasm and aggressive pressure in the information war that the West has long unleashed under the leadership of the United States. And of course, strengthening our defense capabilities and the economy.
  4. -1
    6 February 2020 06: 35
    There is no democracy in America, but the deep state decides everything.
    The deep state did not want to see Trump as president; Trump became president.
    The deep state wanted to kick Trump out of the presidency and impeached him. But Trump remained the president, despite any deep state.
    1. +3
      6 February 2020 10: 14
      The US deep state is conditionally divided into two parts - industrialists and bankers. I can’t live without each other, the hitch is objectively tight, but they are at war, each part has claims to the other. Trump is a protege of the Rockefellers, big industrial capital. Not a single US president has been and is not an independent figure.
  5. +4
    6 February 2020 06: 37
    "The story of the attempted impeachment of President Trump by the Democratic Party showed us real power in the United States: without signs of democracy, moral values, separation of powers, but with the methods of far-fetched accusations, falsified with the help of special services, which are credited by the media and promoted in society." what nonsense, well, let's try to accuse Putin not on the couch, but for real, so let's see who is the power here, and if you start throwing glasses at the police, that's all, a death sentence, glasses are killed
    1. +1
      6 February 2020 09: 15
      American power reflects the interests of those who choose it. And Trump today acts in the interests of many Americans who will ultimately elect him for a second term.
      1. +6
        6 February 2020 13: 38
        Quote: bessmertniy
        Trump today acts in the interests of many Americans

        Just under half of the US population voted for Trump. Trump became president thanks to some "electors". So Trump represents the interests of those behind the electorate. And what kind of financial and industrial groups stand behind the "electors" who knows.
  6. +3
    6 February 2020 06: 39
    But the American people elected President Trump, that is, most Americans defame him!
    ..... So that's it? in the absence of direct elections?
    The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation basically rearm on modern types of weapons, the hypersonic Avangard is already on alert!
    ..... We must protect the property of TNCs, Ford factories, Pepsiko and Coca-Cola companies and other foreign business partners ... laughing
    1. +1
      6 February 2020 09: 00
      Quote: parusnik
      We must protect the property of TNCs, Ford factories, Pepsiko and Coca-Cola companies and other foreign business partners

      Yes, if only Pepsiku yes Kaka Cola ....
  7. +1
    6 February 2020 07: 38
    Woton, the true ginger of evil. And we call them partners.
  8. +1
    6 February 2020 08: 00
    USSR experience

    We must remember, take into account, direct, direct, adopt it ... it just won’t work. The world is changing, although not fundamentally, but it is necessary to take into account the circumstances and the changes that have occurred.
    In general, we’ll see who will behave wisely and who will trample on the old rake.
  9. +12
    6 February 2020 08: 01
    That's what I don't like. The United States insolently stopped the construction of SP2. Lavrov and many others were verbally indignant at the behavior and promised a response to their insolence. However, nothing happened. The offense was swept under the carpet. Well, let's seriously say that we have nothing to answer them, although I don't believe in it. But why then smear snot on the face and threaten with a fist. And then there is our chief persuading, receiving the ambassador, begs for the establishment of relations on an equal basis. Hehe, after such behavior, will anyone talk to us "on an equal basis"?
    1. +5
      6 February 2020 08: 17
      but Lavrov always has a sternly brutal expression
    2. -4
      6 February 2020 08: 49
      Quote: mikh-korsakov
      Insult swept under the carpet.

      Sure? Do you know what is preparing?
      Take it straight away and put it right?
      The answer must be well prepared, so that it would be an answer, and not "pshik
      1. +2
        6 February 2020 12: 03
        The dish is good while it is hot. Then it's not about me and not about us, it's about heating American ambitions - like we can do anything. They already want to ban buying gas from SP2, if Russia builds it herself. Do we need it?
        1. -3
          6 February 2020 12: 09
          Quote: mikh-korsakov
          The dish is good while it's hot

          Nope.
          "Revenge is a dish to be served cold."
          They already want to ban buying gas from SP2, if Russia builds it herself.

          Well, wanting is not harmful.
    3. +3
      6 February 2020 08: 58
      Quote: mikh-korsakov
      That's what I don't like. The USA insolently stopped the construction of SP2. Lavrov and many others were verbally indignant at their behavior and promised an answer to arrogance.

      Wrong weight categories. (You yourself wrote that GDP growth is below the global average).).
    4. +7
      6 February 2020 14: 09
      Quote: mikh-korsakov
      However, nothing happened. Insult swept under the carpet. Well, let's say we have nothing to seriously answer them, although I do not believe in it. But why was it then smearing snot in the face and threatening with a fist?

      Maybe because we rely on the words of Henry Kissinger, who said that Russia should be seen as a key element of global equilibrium, and not as a threat to the United States, and thus expect that the United States will consider us partners? But this is not so. The US will consider us primarily as enemies, but not partners. And this will continue until the enemy appears to us and them, and then they will begin to temporarily consider us partners and friends, as during the Second World War.
  10. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      6 February 2020 08: 35
      There, in America, the same scoundrel as the president can put the president in his place. The people are watching this in the style of the show and no more. Well, they can afford it, but we cannot, because we will start to put it in place and everything will crumble, as in the nineties, because the GDP is small. Think "Newton's binomial"
      1. -1
        6 February 2020 08: 55
        Quote: mikh-korsakov
        There, in America, the same bastard as the president can replace the president.

        In America, only those forces that put him in the presidency can put the president in place, and no one else.
  11. +2
    6 February 2020 08: 26
    In order to poke the faces of Americans in the absence of democracy-it is necessary to have some moral right to this .. What the current Russian Federation has is completely absent. The USSR was a much more democratic state, moreover, an order of magnitude more powerful. And who in the world will now listen to our outpourings? They will immediately answer - look at yourself. And alas, they will be right.
    1. 0
      7 February 2020 10: 43
      Quote: paul3390
      The USSR was a much more democratic state, moreover, an order of magnitude more powerful.

      1) in what place was it "more democratic"? In Novocherkassk? In elections - where, even for decency, there was no other party? In the service growth - where one had to be a member of the CPSU to occupy at least minimal leadership posts
      2) kaneshna !! Everything is certainly "an order of magnitude more powerful" "- the only trouble is that the USSR collapsed in a day. And no one stood up for the USSR ...
      1. +1
        7 February 2020 13: 58
        Quote: your1970
        Trouble only that the USSR collapsed in a day.

        Well, first of all, not overnight. Secondly, the USSR did not "collapse", but was dissolved "from above". Thirdly, the USSR has evolved: Novocherkassk is one USSR, and a completely different USSR was dissolved. Fourthly, career growth in the USSR was not necessarily associated with membership in the CPSU. There were no political parties in the USSR, the CPSU is not a "political party", but "the core of the political system of the USSR" - this is exactly what was written in the fundamental documents. In any political system, the main role is played by the bureaucracy, not the individual. Finally, why are you gloating if your state and country are in the process of "collapse"? The process may not be completed, and at a certain stage, negative consequences will also occur for you, and regardless of whether you are a citizen of this state or not.
        1. +1
          7 February 2020 21: 18
          1)
          Quote: iouris
          Secondly, the USSR did not "collapse", but was dissolved "from above".
          -when from below all do not care, it is exactly "collapsed"
          2)
          Quote: iouris
          Fourth, career growth in the USSR was not necessarily associated with membership in the CPSU.
          -Of course, to senior lieutenant or brigadier you could be expensive. But to become the head of the workshop or a major position without membership was impossible. Even do not argue ....
          3)
          Quote: iouris
          There were no political parties in the USSR, the CPSU is not a "political party", but "the core of the political system of the USSR" - this is exactly what was written in the fundamental documents. In any political system, the main role is played by the bureaucracy, not the individual.
          "And where did you see democracy in the USSR? If the bureaucracy played the main role there too?"
  12. +1
    6 February 2020 08: 32
    apparently, they don’t want the striking analogy with John F. Kennedy. After all, they killed him for the same reason that Trump was poisoned: he wanted to improve relations with the USSR after the Caribbean crisis.

    Kennedy wanted to improve relations with the USSR? Hmm ... I don't know what they have in the Americas, but we have everything as before. People believe in some kind of "good" presidents sincerely "ours" who want to just like that, humanly, in a friendly way, to improve relations with us. Yes, the soul of the Russian person is truly pure and naive.
    Some curtsies towards the USSR which Kennedy carried out were dictated by quite pragmatic interests, and were the result of other processes. At the same time, there was one thing in words, but in fact there was an escalation in Vietnam and a decision on the lunar race. Kennedy is a friend of the USSR to us, and his defense minister, McNamara, is it like you? Already not very friend, right? And they killed him not at all for a number of very secondary decisions on the USSR, but for an unsuccessful domestic policy. Quarreled with business, with gangsters. Those who brought him to power began to wet. His brother Robert did this as a US attorney.
    We need to remember one thing - if we want to improve relations with someone, then we must put the matter in such a way that, thanks to political and economic logic, the only sound solution to us will be to establish friendship. So that partners have no choice. Then they will be friends with us.
    1. +3
      6 February 2020 08: 52
      Quote: Alex_59
      Kennedy is a friend of the USSR to us, and his defense minister, McNamara, is it like you?

      I allow myself to disagree, Kennedy is a friend of his class, but he really knows what the opposition of our countries will lead to. Therefore, he wanted to offer a peaceful coexistence, and no more. In America, capitalism, and in the USSR there was socialism, they could not be friends, like fire and water.
      1. 0
        6 February 2020 09: 10
        Quote: tihonmarine
        I beg to differ

        And with what not to agree then? I do not deny that he took certain steps. Yes, there was detente after the Caribbean crisis, but there was a nuclear test treaty. There was a meeting with Khrushchev. There was a proposal to build Apollo together. So what? Do you think it was out of the kindness of your soul? Or could he have been killed for these steps? Do not make me laugh. They don't kill for that. And this is not done out of love for the USSR, this is done because it is profitable. And in the article they write that they killed him precisely for his love for the USSR.
        Even if we assume that he was killed for the failure of the invasion of Cuba, then again the root cause will not be that he could not break the USSR bastion on the island, but that he could not return the assets in Cuba to the business and the criminal community of the USA in the form of gambling establishments and resort hotels . The USSR here is as if secondary. And Kennedy not only did not return the Cuban assets, but also arranged a hunt for the former owners of these assets. But of course they killed him for his love of the Communists, yes yes.
        1. +2
          6 February 2020 09: 25
          Quote: Alex_59
          And in the article they write as if they killed him precisely for his love of the USSR.

          I, too, are not talking about love, but about discharge and no more. Friendship is out of the question.
  13. 0
    6 February 2020 08: 42
    that Trump is being persecuted for trying to pursue an independent policy with which he went to the polls, in the world and in relation to Russia, different from what was previously carried out by the “deep state” of the Democrats.
    And here is politics, Russia, etc.
    Trump simply changed the value system for power. For him, "the United States is above all," and not the enrichment of TNCs. And he took steps to implement it.
  14. 0
    6 February 2020 08: 45
    The USSR did not hesitate to talk about the ulcers of American society, supported the opposition in the United States and beyond, opposed the United States in the "third world". And it had beneficial results! The US has tempered its aggressive fervor!
    As Adolf Schicklsgruber used to say, "The crowd is a woman, and a woman loves strength." America is a woman and she also loves strength.
  15. +1
    6 February 2020 09: 11
    How Russia to moderate the aggressive ardor of the United States

    NO ...
    Why ask questions, the answers to which were given by Mr. deceased Brzezinski?
    Russia may have as many nuclear suitcases as you like, but since $ 500 billion of the Russian elite lies with our banks, you still have to figure out whose elite it is. Yours or already ours?

    Military people know that any offensive, any attack should imply not only "second-tier troops", but also an operational supply and reliable rear areas.
    Call those - “from the second echelon” who subscribe to the fight against the United States on the side of Russia ... Right on the list and let's go ... request
    Further, what supply can Russia claim if in energy companies and leading industries we are “tied” with foreign co-founders and investors?
    And what's in the rear? In those provinces where per capita GDP is determined from the center many times less? Where in the regions do they choose the last crumbs on the “Sobyaninsky tile”?
    But this is not the main thing. If you agree with Brzezinski’s words about the elite, then why doesn’t anyone give his other statements? For instance:
    Like so many empires that existed before, the Soviet Union ultimately exploded from the inside and split into piecesbecoming a victim not so much of direct military defeat as disintegration process accelerated by economic and social problems.

    At such a pace of development of our country with the most severe imbalance in income and development, it may soon become for us to replace the words: “Soviet Union” with “Russian Federation” ... belay
    I would be glad to be mistaken, but the zealous opinion about the need to give the country (“for complete happiness”) not 6, like Shura Balaganov, but just the “Supreme Ruler” at the head of the State Council ...
  16. -1
    6 February 2020 09: 29
    To moderate the ardor of the United States, it is necessary to clean out those from the government who have accounts abroad, real estate abroad, dual citizenship, children study or live abroad.
  17. +3
    6 February 2020 10: 39
    The other day, US-Russian talks began in Washington on a new arms limitation treaty (either strategic, or along with the RSD). And before that, in October last year, the Russian Federation came in second after Canada for oil exports to the United States.

    Therefore, our best policy is the accelerated development of our science, technology, economy and the armed forces. Then everything else will follow.
  18. -1
    6 February 2020 11: 59
    Find how you can, the question is who will be solved ??? Even when the United States openly spits in the face of Russia in response, it sees only Christian humility and an invitation to spit again and again.
  19. 0
    6 February 2020 12: 09
    Quote: Far In
    But President Trump was elected by the American people
    Actually, Trump was chosen by electors. And, despite the active defamation in the media, they still chose him. Without attracting a resource of 146%. This is not to say that everything is in the beam in Omerig and you need to learn from them - there’s that same adder, of course. (The bestial grin of capitalism, what else to expect?). Just the author’s thesis about the complete absence of democracy in the states, as it seems to me, is not quite true. Within the states themselves, some kind of democracy is still acting quite well.
    analogies with John F. Kennedy. After all, they killed him for the same reason that Trump was poisoned: he wanted to improve relations with the USSR after the Caribbean crisis
    A. Another version. Probably also has the right to life.
    The era of Moscow’s stoic indifference to Washington’s boorish behavior is ending: the critical import substitution has already been completed
    Oh really? Will we no longer express concern and start banging our boots on the stands?


    I agree ...
    In general: there is a "president", there is a "parliament". Parliament opposes the president. And vice versa. Reasons: someone is dissatisfied with something.
    Well, what is not a democratic movement? Both of them are officially chosen by the people.
    And what should democracy look like? How is EP? or like in Congo during the time of Mabutu?
    But at the same time, another impression arises, in general, not only in shatas: all these chosen ones (both, both) are engaged in some garbage. And they spend taxpayer money on some similar garbage. To put it mildly...
  20. 0
    6 February 2020 12: 32
    Quote: Mavrikiy
    For him, "the United States is above all," and not the enrichment of TNCs.

    And because of this, they impose sanctions on SP2 and force them to buy their own democratic gas, which is generally enrichment of TNCs.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"