PRC media: China may become the first country in the world with 100% production of stealth fighters

47

Chinese military experts wondered about the operation of 4th generation fighters (according to Chinese classification - 3rd). This question arose in connection with the increase in production of the 5th generation fighter J-20 and the expectation of the start of serial production of the J-31.

In the Chinese edition of Sina, it is noted that to optimize the park aviation The PLA Air Force might find it worthwhile to switch entirely to a new generation of fighters. At the same time, it is noted that a whole line of combat aviation equipment can be created on the basis of the J-20: in addition to a fighter, it can be a bomber, as well as strike and reconnaissance Drones. Additionally, the possibility of creating a UAV or an aircraft that would act as a coordinator of military operations is being considered. And also based on the J-20.



In China, it is noted how Russia, on the basis of the Su-57 fighter, is trying to create an attack-type UAV. We are talking about the drone "Hunter", which is already being tested in pair flight with a combat aircraft.

From the material:

Relying on a new generation of combat aircraft may allow the country to re-equip the country's air force, enable manufacturers to maintain orders, and increase the number of jobs.

It is additionally noted that China could become the first country in the world to switch to a 100% production of stealth fighters, abandoning the production of previous generation fighters.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    47 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +1
      4 February 2020 15: 21
      And what about the engines, or 90 percent of them will be bought from us for their "unknowns", because the knowledge and technologies themselves simply do not have anything like it ???
      1. -2
        4 February 2020 15: 22
        it’s about the fact that he will stop releasing the third generation and the fourth for for many thousands of them
        1. +5
          4 February 2020 15: 28
          Let the coronavirus be sorted out first.
          And then no one will not see the invisible smile
          1. +6
            4 February 2020 15: 29
            Is there a Pentagon hand? apchi!
          2. 0
            4 February 2020 16: 13
            I put on an invisible hat on a speck of dust. My dust will become invisible ... And on the chain sits Gorynych Snake.
      2. +8
        4 February 2020 15: 28
        In general, was there at least one war in China that they won?
        Go surrender to the enemy, with a population of one and a half billion people, this is such a threat that will stop any aggressor.
        1. +2
          4 February 2020 15: 49
          Well, for example, they can win the war from the United States and this will send offline for a week ukrosibiryakov and then these horizontally looking partners will cut these bots ud.
          1. +2
            4 February 2020 15: 59
            Quote: Evil Booth
            they can win the usa war

            And what is the main word here?
            I do not like yellow rabbits, well, I can’t eat straight. That's my right. And you learn the grammar, and start writing, not like a three-year-old skipping classes
            1. -3
              4 February 2020 20: 55
              Quote: Siberia 75
              I do not like yellow rabbits, well, I can’t eat straight.


              Are you a Russian fascist?
              1. +5
                4 February 2020 20: 58
                Quote: PO-tzan
                Quote: Siberia 75
                I do not like yellow rabbits, well, I can’t eat straight.


                Are you a Russian fascist?

                Yes, he is a simple Russian guy .. And who will you be from?
                1. -3
                  5 February 2020 11: 58
                  And you are his personal secretary, what are you responsible for? It would be better to continue testing the "Stalin-3000".
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. -1
          6 February 2020 14: 07
          Quote: Siberia 75
          In general, was there at least one war in China that they won?


          Civil war (ousted the Chiang Kai-shek to the islands).

          And perhaps the main thing: the Korean War 1950-1953
          The offensive of the 270th Chinese army under the command of General Peng Dehuai began on October 25, 1950. Using the effect of surprise, the Chinese army crushed the defense of the UN forces, but then retreated to the mountains. The 8th American Army was forced to defend along the southern bank of the Hangan River. UN forces, despite this blow, continued their offensive towards the Yalu River. At the same time, in order to avoid formal conflicts, the Chinese units operating in Korea were called "Chinese people's volunteers"


          The American historian and veteran of the Korean War, Bevin Alexander, described the tactics of the Chinese troops in his book “How Wars Win”:
          The Chinese did not have aviation, only rifles, machine guns, hand grenades and mortars. Against a much more well-equipped American army, they used the same tactics that they used against the nationalists during the civil war of 1946-1949. The Chinese attacked mainly at night, and they chose smaller military formations — a company or platoon — and then attacked, using numerical superiority. Typically, the attackers were divided into several parts of 50-200 people: while one part of the attackers cut off the escape routes, others with concerted efforts attacked from the front and flanks. The attacks continued until the defenders were defeated or captured. Then the Chinese moved to the open flank closer to the next platoon and repeated their tactics.


          Despite the heavy losses, each side had an army of about a million people. Despite the superiority in technical means, the United States and allies were not able to achieve a decisive advantage.

          That is, the Chinese with the help of the USSR reduced the war to a stalemate - which, with their meager technical equipment - is simply an outstanding achievement in a battle with the UN forces.
      3. +1
        4 February 2020 15: 29
        It is additionally noted that China could become the first country in the world to switch to a 100% production of stealth fighters, abandoning the production of previous generation fighters.

        It can also "become" two completely different concepts. And 100% production can mean complete assembly, but not absolute production of all parts in their factories. Even Americans buy quite a lot for their own from abroad.
      4. -1
        4 February 2020 15: 58
        They even have engines for 2, and they still produce our corn mailer, at one time they bought our plants that Yeltsin handed over for scrap, bought them from us and they work perfectly for them, but now they are doing the same with Ukraine. So they have engines and we do not have them in Russia. True, this dirty production failed them, they can only stop Coronovirus drinks
      5. +2
        4 February 2020 23: 54
        Quote: Thrifty
        no one will not see the invisible

        let them come up with the invisibility first !!! wink and then got used to how to fantasize about the invisibility of the mericatos !!! wassat
      6. 0
        6 February 2020 11: 27
        Hush you! Do not crush them with a sore spot.
        Let our engines happily and carefree,
        confident in their own technological superiority.
        It is in our interests.
        Well, we ... "smile and wave." :)
    2. +8
      4 February 2020 15: 23
      No one has invisible fighters. Only in science fiction.
      1. +5
        4 February 2020 15: 49
        the most invisible man was MIG31 he REALLY fought a battle for the appearance of commercials from hundreds of kilometers knocking down to launch on his own .... but this is something like an interceptor.
        1. +1
          4 February 2020 19: 25
          Quote: Evil Booth
          the most invisible was MIG31

          There is no concept of invisibility, but there is a concept of LOW-MILLING.
          1. 0
            5 February 2020 01: 49
            yelling) here it’s very subtle when you have a radar and a missile up to 100km and it is up to 200 and you see a narrow sector and they are 180 degrees and there are several of them. LOW notice)))
        2. +1
          4 February 2020 21: 48
          Quote: Evil Booth
          the most invisible was MIG31

          MiG-25 flew over Israel and they just did not have time to catch up with him in order to see. But the MiG-31, he was not, but still there is
          1. +1
            5 February 2020 18: 40
            MiG-25 flew over Israel and they just did not have time to catch it

            Do not catch up!
            Do not beg to get at such a height!
            After the Americans brought more advanced air defense systems, up to 40 km., The MiG-25 stopped flying over Israel.
    3. 0
      4 February 2020 15: 28
      It is quite a reasonable strategy if in the next 10 years their analysts do not foresee a grandiose world or regional slaughter. Or if, on the contrary, beyond the horizon of this value, they anticipate ..
    4. +2
      4 February 2020 15: 42
      The day is like this: pearls of two brothers - Ph.D., "plow" ..
      I can write jokes myself)))
    5. +1
      4 February 2020 15: 43
      It is further noted that China may become the first country in the world ....

      Or maybe not. What is it all about? "Chickens are counted in the fall" and others "don't say: gop" ...
      1. +2
        4 February 2020 16: 54
        That is, you deny the main postulate of marketing, "The main thing is to crow, and then at least don't dawn there"? !!! You argue apolitically !!! laughing
        1. +1
          4 February 2020 17: 33
          Quote: Stroibat stock
          Politically argue !!!

          It's to blame .... recourse
    6. +4
      4 February 2020 15: 45
      Quote: Siberia 75
      In general, was there at least one war in China that they won?

      Do you think that they lost the war in Korea 1950-53 against the USA? I don’t remember someone else who had fought so successfully against the United States in a normal war against the fronts (not a partisan war).
      1. +3
        5 February 2020 00: 08
        Quote: Kostadinov
        Quote: Siberia 75
        In general, was there at least one war in China that they won?

        Do you think that they lost the war in Korea 1950-53 against the USA? I don’t remember someone else who had fought so successfully against the United States in a normal war against the fronts (not a partisan war).

        nuuuu ... for that matter ... China is much more deserved to sit in the UN Security Council than the treasuries of the British, the British or the merikatos !!! request
    7. +2
      4 February 2020 15: 48
      And what about the engines, or 90 percent of them will be bought from us for their "unknowns", because the knowledge and technologies themselves simply do not have anything like it ???

      But is it somehow bothering you? And why do they buy only 90 percent if they have no knowledge and technology at all? How do they make the remaining 10 percent?
      1. +1
        4 February 2020 17: 20
        Kostadins - the rest 10 percent they politely sputter from other countries. ...
    8. 0
      4 February 2020 15: 49
      The Chinese edition of Sina notes

      And in the even more yellow press there is nothing more? fool
    9. 0
      4 February 2020 16: 31
      For the Chinese, apparently, only the media have taken over 100% show-offs from the west, unlike techies.
    10. 0
      4 February 2020 17: 01
      It will not work, such ideas have never ended in good.
      1. kpd
        0
        4 February 2020 18: 17
        Well, why, it will even work out - only stealth will do it themselves, but for the service they will buy Sushek again from Russia.
    11. +3
      4 February 2020 17: 04
      China could be the first country in the world with 100 percent


      In recent years, statements by the Chinese press and experts regarding both their own and foreign military-industrial complex, except for writing legends, legends and even fables, can not be called.
    12. +1
      4 February 2020 17: 17
      They are invisible fighters, in China, only no one saw them. They are invisible.
    13. -1
      4 February 2020 18: 43
      Chinese military experts wondered

      The strength of the Army and armaments is now nothing in world politics ..
      If it weren’t for Russia, China would again be lowered to the level of the middle of the 20th century .. The Chinese have become too self-confident and are engaged in self-love .. And this will not lead to good (how many US Treasury bills you probably already have 10 trillion?), The West only and awaits the opportunity to deal with you with the wrong hands .. hi And he will do it. Sooner or later .. Remember this!
    14. +1
      4 February 2020 19: 20
      with this nonsense about invisibility probably will not part soon
    15. +1
      4 February 2020 19: 51
      Quote: Amateur
      The Chinese edition of Sina notes

      And in the even more yellow press there is nothing more? fool

      The concept of "yellow press" now on VO acquires a different meaning laughing
      1. +1
        5 February 2020 05: 07
        The concept of "yellow press" now on VO acquires a different meaning

        Well, judge and IN no less yellow press
    16. -1
      5 February 2020 01: 42
      Quote: Evil Booth
      Is there a Pentagon hand? apchi!

      Most likely, these are the hands of the heirs of the Japanese laboratory, Detachment 731.
      Do not hide other people's machinations. And this is war.
    17. 0
      5 February 2020 08: 23
      Does the title of the article have at least some semantic meaning?
    18. -1
      5 February 2020 12: 20
      sohu is a propaganda portal with no meaning, the purpose of which, according to the decree of the party, is to praise China in all endeavors. It is necessary to perceive everything that this aggregator publishes through a very serious prism of critical thinking.
    19. The comment was deleted.
    20. amr
      -2
      5 February 2020 16: 16
      Comments are as if we are releasing 80% of all microelectronics, as if we have the 2nd economy in the world, as if we are releasing 5th generation planes hundreds in a year!
    21. 0
      5 February 2020 17: 12
      Loud statement..J-10 & 11 will be the mainstay of the PRC Air Force for a long time.
    22. 0
      10 March 2020 19: 29
      They will be invisible to China, Bangladesh Somalia and you dy))))

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"