ZRPK "Shell-S" of the Khmeimim air base intercepted a small drone

On Monday, the Russian Pantsir-S air defense system of the Khmeimim air base spotted and destroyed an unidentified small-sized drone approaching the territory of a Russian military base from the Mediterranean Sea. This was reported by the press service of the Ministry of Defense.

According to the military department, the air defense systems of the base, with the onset of darkness, detected a "small-sized unmanned aerial vehicle" approaching the Russian military base from the northeastern part of the Mediterranean Sea. Affiliation drone failed to install.

Missile armament of the anti-aircraft missile-cannon system "Shell-S" of the Russian air base, the air target at a distance from the air base is destroyed. No injuries or material damage

- stated in the Ministry of Defense, adding that the last attempt to attack the Khmeimim airbase with the help of drones was made on January 19. The air base is operating normally.

Recall that earlier the Western media announced the inability of the Russian Pantsir-S air defense missile systems to detect and hit small targets such as drones.

Comments

[Victor_B]

The carapace is a wonderful machine.
But!
Every launch is very expensive ...
Although cheaper than the Torah.
Well, in general, money in this case should be considered not by the cost of missiles, but by the cost of eliminating possible damage and, God forbid, the victims.
Then it will not be expensive.
One ago, I remember, the Su-34 was damaged. I think a couple of three missiles and it would not be a pity.

[Thrall]

Quote: Victor_B

Every launch is very expensive ...

Looking at the cost of whose life to compare ...

[Victor_B]

Quote: Thrall

Looking at the cost of whose life to compare ...

Human
Even the Syrians.
Yes, yes - they are the same people.

[Thrall]

And what if the Russian liberal?

[Victor_B]

Quote: Thrall

And what if the Russian liberal?

If Chubais, then the whole country the next day will not work!

[bessmertniy]

If we evaluate the liberal at "zero", then the opinion of the liberal will also be zero. Simple arithmetic.

[Victor_B]

Quote: bessmertniy

If we evaluate the liberal at "zero", then the opinion of the liberal will also be zero. Simple arithmetic.

You will still be surprised, but there are also negative numbers.
So that is just below zero!

[Magog]

A little "ears cut" "zero" or "zero"? They say (women to loser men): "You are a complete ZERO!" And then "zero" should be considered a digit (icon) ...

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Thrall

And what if the Russian liberal?

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Thrall

And what if the Russian liberal?

And what, they were noted in Syria? I doubt it.
But there are some doubts. Imagine .., the barmalei, on their knees, will rivet simple UAVs worth $ 2 and stupidly launch them towards our base. And we will shoot them with missiles worth $ 200. After 5 years, they will strip us to the skin. Or maybe earlier. Everything will depend on the performance of the barmalei.

[Rzzz]

There is no drone for 2 bucks. If we estimate only the key components (motor, battery, autopilot, GPS, compass, pressure sensor, regulator, two servos), then in the most budgetary version it will just get close to 200 bucks. And it will be "kamikaze", without any feedback. Plus the costs of making the plane itself from local plywood and a fee to the dude who collects, configures and programs it all.

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: rzzz

There is no drone for 2 bucks. If we estimate only the key components (motor, battery, autopilot, GPS, compass, pressure sensor, regulator, two servos), then in the most budgetary version it will just get close to 200 bucks. And it will be "kamikaze", without any feedback. Plus the costs of making the plane itself from local plywood and a fee to the dude who collects, configures and programs it all.

But the Shell armor is also not worth 200 bucks.

[Rzzz]

It is not necessary to wet the rocket. Of the guns even better. It is harder for a missile to hit such a small target, and it is not a fact that the missile will hit it reliably. On the package, the rod warhead, and a small target may not hit the damaging element

[Krasnoyarsk]

= The missile armament of the Pantsir-S anti-aircraft missile-gun system of the Russian airbase destroyed the air target at a distance from the airbase. No injuries or material damage [/ quote] =
[quote = Rzzz] It is not necessary to wet it with a rocket. Of the guns even better. It is harder for a missile to hit such a small target, and it is not a fact that the missile will hit it reliably. On the package, the rod warhead, and for a small target, the damaging element may not hit [/ quote]
Well, why be smart when it comes to a specific case?

[Rzzz]

Quote: Krasnoyarsk

Well, why be smart

Why not? I can afford.

Quote: Krasnoyarsk

when it comes to a particular case?

I was not talking about a specific case, but "in general."

[Mar.Tirah]

Quote: Victor_B

Human
Even the Syrians.
Yes, yes - they are the same people.

Well said. Against this background, for some reason, the interception of Turkish missiles by the "Shell" during shelling of Syrian positions with multiple launch rocket systems remained unnoticed. Turks victorious reports on the destruction of the SAA. According to the Russian Center for Reconciliation in Syria, Turkey launched a large-scale missile attack on February 3 to clear the territory and advance the Turkish military. But this operation failed completely.























































































































































































































According to the Syrian military, thanks to the placement of the Pantsir-S air defense missile defense system in the north-eastern part of Syria, it was possible to almost completely repel the attack. The “Shell-C1” complex intercepts 40 of 44 missiles launched by Turkey. Thanks to this, no one was hurt, and only small material damage from missed 4 missiles was recorded. Effective air defense allowed stopping the advance of the Turkish military towards Idlib. At the same time, the Turkish Minister of Defense, Hulusi Akara, reported on the successful operation and the significant damage to the Syrian Army, although he did not give specific figures.

Experts say that such a report on achievements is understandable, Turkey simply cannot recognize the failure, and therefore spreads false information.

[Magog]

Did you start so many empty lines? On business now. I have not heard if you have tried electronic warfare "Mercury BM" in Syria? Just our case with a multiple launch rocket system. The fact that "Armor" worked like this is beyond praise, but 4 pcs. broke through, and this is a danger to the soldiers of the Syrian army.

[Mar.Tirah]

Quote: Magog

Has it started so many empty lines?

Without a clue, I saw my comment myself in about .... menia ????? Admins if you can correct ????

[Magog]

I also have problems: it seems everything is clear how to put quotes, place pictures - I tried it, but nothing works ...

[Den717]

Quote: Thrall

Looking at the cost of whose life to compare ...

It seems that an artillery shell with remote detonation would be cheaper and, most importantly, no less effective than a missile for small UAVs. I think that those who are supposed to do this topic already. I just would like to speed up the result. Only.

[Victor_B]

Quote: Den717

It seems that an artillery shell with remote detonation ...
no less effective than a rocket for small UAVs.

I’ll disappoint you very much.
Anti-aircraft fire is the most difficult task in artillery.
They taught me this. Just on the S-60 57mm. VERY everything is complicated there! Highly!
And shells with remote detonation of money cost ... good and you need to shoot the queue and the probability of getting low.
Here is a look here http://window.edu.ru/catalog/pdf2txt/999/21999/5212?p_page=3
Meteo is average.
This calculation is required before shooting!

[Magog]

For manual counting, of course, it is difficult. Bungle the program, then the whole calculation is seeds. It would seem: what can be opposed to high-precision aviation weapons (missiles, guided bombs)? And everything is terribly expensive, and calculations for bombing with conventional ammunition are no simpler than here illustrated with 57 mm artillery ... "Acting and retired military, analysts are surprised that Russian aviation in Syria strikes militants using old aircraft and ammunition The main work is performed by the time-tested Su-24 bombers and Su-25 attack aircraft, dropping conventional Soviet-style high-explosive and concrete-piercing bombs ... However, the fact that old planes drop old bombs right on target is horrifying to Western experts .. A specialized computing subsystem (SVP-24) analyzes data on the position of the aircraft and the target, atmospheric pressure, wind speed and direction, dozens of other parameters and gives the optimal bomb drop point.The technology works so well that ammunition deviates from targets from a height of six kilometers four meters. " As for artillery with programmable shells, this is how you have to work, and the result will be.

[Victor_B]

Quote: Magog

Play the program, then the whole calculation is the seeds.

No problem.
Here are just the INITIAL data from where to get?
The ball probe is launched and removes the incision in height. At different heights, different densities and air temperatures, humidity and wind through the layers can blow in different directions.
Determining the speed of a parameter and the course of a target ...
All this can make a mistake of tens of meters. And gives.
It is practically IMPOSSIBLE to hit a plane with one shell. Let him at least a hundred times with remote detonation.
By the way, 100mm shells (KS-19 cannon) EVERYTHING with remote detonation and for some reason I didn’t hear that they covered the sky somewhere. In height, by the way, they shoot at 10 km.

[Magog]

This is about "Shell", isn't it? The caliber of the gun is small, the height for such a gun is too. If something is wrong in the initial data, then the program automatically makes corrections, using the data of the radio-optical measuring instruments of the complex. I do not see, accordingly, problems with other art systems of a larger caliber, if they work in conjunction with measuring instruments. Well, yes, the first round missed. The system corrected itself, and the second - to the target ... I wanted to learn here about the artillery of the Navy against air targets, on the AK-100, AK-130, apparently, this is how they work.

[Starover_Z]

Quote: Victor_B

Well, in general, money in this case should be considered not by the cost of missiles, but by the cost of eliminating possible damage and, God forbid, the victims.

Interestingly, and "Peresvet" did not think there to check its amazing abilities?
If, of course, a real installation exists, then it would just be tested for real purposes!

[Victor_B]

Quote: Starover_Z

it would just be testing for real goals!

Maybe his shot is more expensive?
Again, secrecy.
Fog of war. Why dissipate?

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Starover_Z

Interestingly, and "Peresvet" did not think there to check its amazing abilities?

Actually, he BLINDS, but DON'T HAZARD.

[Zaurbek]

The Shell is the cheapest missile launch. Missile without seeker. Cheaper only with a gun. And then the correction must be made on the number of spent shells.

[hydrox]

That's just the munition for the gun and will be more expensive!
After all, what is a NURS (just a rocket for a shell)?
A stamped shell-shell (it can even be cardboard in principle), in the head part an explosive charge with a simple fuse (with a remote more expensive (with a seeker much more expensive)) with striking elements, the rest is occupied by solid fuel RD, stabilizers are riveted.
There is no operation using even a lathe!

[Magog]

And how do you imagine the work of the GOS (albeit expensive) at NURS? That is, the head is "by itself", and the solid fuel NURS is by itself. The abbreviation "NURS" is an unguided rocket projectile ... With everything that you have listed for NURS, a shell with the same set will be cheaper! In addition, the projectile is sent to the calculated lead point, and with the NURS-ohm in this case, trouble (while it accelerates, until it reaches). For example, NARs (aviation analogs of NURSs) are launched at distances of up to 2 km. Further - you will not get, they will fly away "into milk". If you spin it well along the longitudinal axis, then yes, you will get somewhere else. The projectile during acceleration in the barrel just has the property of spinning up, and almost any speed can be reported (depending on the length of the barrel and the acceleration charge).

[hydrox]

I was engaged in 3-band GOS 35 years ago, and my reaction was thwarted only by a reaction coup :: and of course, how do I know about this?

[Magog]

Sorry, maybe I misunderstood something in your presentation. So it is written! 35 years old, something is forgotten!

[hydrox]

Everything can happen ...

[kupitman]

depending on what - the rocket may yes. But how much is 1 UAV?
and how many shells for his cannon weapons cost?

[Magog]

"That back, I remember, the Su-34 was damaged." And here is more detailed, please. Didn't hear.

[Zaurbek]

And people died

[Zaurbek]

If from the sea, then Israeli!

[Mavrikiy]

Quote: Zaurbek

If from the sea, then Israeli!

Well, why so firmly, softer is necessary, pro-Israeli

[Same lech]

But the Turks can not be?

[Zaurbek]

If Israel flew to the left, then from Antalya, then Turkish.

[seregin-s1]

Syria Watan reported that government forces managed to drive terrorists out of Tarnaba and Nairab by cutting off the M4 Latakia-Aleppo motorway and cutting off terrorists in Serakiba from reinforcements from Jisr al-Shugur. There are fierce battles along the front line, SAA artillery strikes at militant positions near the settlements of Kumeinas, Al-Mastum, Serakib, Afs, Binnish and Ariha in Idlib. Currently, CAA is located 8 km from the provincial capital, the city of Idlib, a Twitter source (@islamicworldupd) notes.

Maybe this time they will finish off the Wasp's Nest.

[bessmertniy]

It seems that the offensive continues successfully, despite the deep defense that the militants have been building for many years.

[hydrox]

This circumstance infuriates the Sultan.
Apparently, he wanted to gain a foothold there on the Turkomans, and the Russians "did not work" in his interests against Assad (well, right, this is an element of the war with the United States, and not with the barmaley)!

[Amateur]

Recall that earlier the Western media announced the inability of the Russian Pantsir-S air defense missile systems to detect and hit small targets such as drones.

Drones were originally one of the target types that Pantsir must fight. At the time of the creation of the complex, these were fairly large and high-speed aircraft-type targets. Then drones became small, with a small effective scattering area, flying at low speeds. The vulnerability of all radar systems is precisely the work on such small low-speed targets. When they go at low speeds and altitudes against the background of strong reflections from the earth's surface, the target detection station is clogged. This is a very difficult problem however, "Carapace" copes with it... (TASS interview with the chief designer of the Pantsir-S air defense missile system Valery Slugin. January 29.01.2020, XNUMX)

[Mountain shooter]

The skill of calculations and the quality of the "Pantsir" grows with its successful operation. Pleases. Experience in combat use cannot be replaced by any polygons.

[Magog]

You won’t drink skill - even far from your relatives and loved ones!

[rocket757]

ZRPK "Shell-S" of the Khmeimim air base intercepted a small drone

Systems work ... in the photo you can see that the paint has already peeled off the launchers! Everything is fine.

[rotmistr60]

Earlier, Western media announced the inability of the Russian Pantsir-S air defense missile systems to detect and hit small targets such as drones

Western media have managed to say a lot about Russian weapons, even over the past year. But why go far - on the VO website, "specialists" from Israel as soon as they did not joke about Russian air defense systems, in particular in Syria. And how many UAV attacks have been repulsed over the years, few of the Western public cares, because the main thing is to say at least something about "imperfection", "low combat capabilities", etc.

[Rostislav]

Earlier, Western media reported the inability of the Russian Pantsir-S air defense missile systems to detect and hit small targets such as drones.

Someone from the bearded read and decided to try?

[Elephant]

Still to trace where from the Mediterranean Sea the drone was launched and destroy a terrorist object!

[Ros 56]

So the answer to the start-ups is when it will be to repulse the hunt?

[Victor March 47]

Quote: Victor_B

Quote: Thrall

And what if the Russian liberal?

If Chubais, then the whole country the next day will not work!

Better, of course, the Chubas brothers. You can celebrate a week.

[iouris]

"Intercepted" is not clear.

[Magog]

Everything is clear. In the terminology of the Air Defense Forces, "to intercept an aircraft" means to shoot it down or force it to sit down in the required place. It is in our media that "young ladies" practice different words, sometimes not understanding what they mean in military slang and often confuse "rapprochement" (with the goal of: drive away, warn, interfere, look, find out belonging, etc.) with " intercept ".

[lvov_aleksey]

I am proud of our rocket science, and on the price bill, I want to see documents with a seal and a signature - ours and the iron dome, you can’t talk about star-striped, but you can throw here too