In China, said that the "stealth" fighter J-31 will become the basis of the wing of promising aircraft carriers


China is discussing the construction of its own aircraft carriers. In particular, attention is paid to the Type003 aircraft carrier, in relation to which certain issues arose with the wing.


On Chinese TV, it is noted that while for Liaoning, Shandong and Type 002 aircraft carriers (which have not yet received a name) with aircraft wings, everything is quite definite, but for promising aircraft carriers everything is different.

The reports say that the basis of the deck aviation PLA Navy today are J-15 fighters, but in a few years they will refuse from this fighter.

From a message on Chinese TV:

The promising Type003 aircraft carrier will receive fifth-generation carrier-based fighters. Thus, the J-15 may cease to be the basis of the wing for aircraft carriers built after 2022.

Chinese experts note that new aircraft carriers will receive J-31 aircraft as carrier-based fighters. These are stealth fighters that are being developed in China, but which have not yet reached the level of mass production and supplies to the troops.

According to some reports, during the creation of the aircraft there were difficulties with the engines. The available engines do not yet allow you to turn this aircraft completely into a decked version. However, within two years, according to Chinese media, the problem will be solved.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Uncle lee 3 February 2020 08: 06 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    within two years the problem will be solved.
    In give!
    1. bessmertniy 3 February 2020 08: 23 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      And who would doubt the Chinese pace. wink Nimble to be the first.
      1. orionvitt 3 February 2020 08: 54 New
        • 3
        • 6
        -3
        Quote: bessmertniy
        Nimble to be the first.

        Being the first does not always mean being the best.
    2. Pessimist22 3 February 2020 08: 54 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      In Wuhan, a hospital with 1000 beds per week was built.
      1. Lamata 3 February 2020 08: 59 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        That’s amazing what they built it from, it’s an infectious diseases hospital and there’s a ripple.
        1. IL-18 3 February 2020 09: 28 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          There are no requirements particularly affecting the pace of construction. And the fight against nosocomial infection has always been in favor of this infection, and there already such strains are formed over the years that takes nothing! Therefore, the shorter the time, the lower the construction costs. Consequently, the Chinese approached the ideal: no repairs (can save a super-resistant infection), only the demolition and construction of a new building.
        2. neri73-r 3 February 2020 11: 27 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Quote: Lamata
          That’s amazing what they built it from, it’s an infectious diseases hospital and there’s a ripple.

          They spit from the height of the Eiffel Tower on safety requirements, just like when the laboratory in Wuhan was built from which the coronovirus popped up.
          1. SAG
            SAG 3 February 2020 23: 27 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            You do not know what you are carrying. This laboratory is with the highest level of protection. There are one in the world.
            You are not confused that the appearance of the virus coincided with the Chinese New Year, when there is mass migration in China, do not be confused that the Western tabloids scream, the Chinese themselves released the virus, do not mind that the Chinese indices collapsed by 8%, they will seriously slow down the economic growth rate, do not mind thrown fakes on the Internet and artificial panic. But the conclusion made especially for you, you "grabbed" and probably already think this is your thought. hi
            P. S: When it comes to Russia, we see (not without the help of Our media, of course) all the lies and provocation. But there is no own critical thinking and analysis ((
      2. bessmertniy 3 February 2020 09: 00 New
        • 2
        • 4
        -2
        Skyscrapers in a month raise! And we sometimes have a house of floors 15-20 for ten to fifteen years.
        1. Pessimist22 3 February 2020 09: 18 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          And at the same time, the cost increases five times smile how the zenith arena built it generally the series was.
        2. Lamata 3 February 2020 09: 30 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Well, the skyscraper, the technology has been worked out, and the infection has its own peculiarities, which are pretty surreal. and how to do it in 8 days !!
      3. Ros 56 3 February 2020 10: 14 New
        • 1
        • 4
        -3
        And our jackals would plunder it in a week.
        1. NEOZ 3 February 2020 11: 16 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Quote: Ros 56
          And our jackals would plunder it in a week.

          eh ... sorry sho not you, huh?
          1. Ros 56 3 February 2020 13: 32 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            The rustle of a liberalist is immediately heard. fool
      4. orionvitt 3 February 2020 10: 26 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Pessimist22
        In Wuhan, a hospital with 1000 beds per week was built.

        Well, not quite built. Assembled from finished blocks. The construction is temporary and not capital.
  2. aszzz888 3 February 2020 08: 30 New
    • 3
    • 4
    -1
    These are stealth fighters that are being developed in China, but which until they reached the level of mass production and supplies to the troops.
    Do not count your chickens before they are hatched. Although there is no reason to doubt that China will “invent something”.
  3. Thrifty 3 February 2020 08: 31 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    And someone kind uncle who will give them the technology of the 5th generation engine?
    1. IL-18 3 February 2020 09: 37 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      They did not even think of disposable engines, so as not to bother with the blades and other things. The minimum price, the most convenient replacement, quick and easy disposal.
      By the way, 100000 airplanes of the same type, as a part of Vova Rezun’s little book, with such an approach in China can become a reality.
      1. voyaka uh 3 February 2020 15: 59 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        "They did not even think of disposable engines" ////
        ----
        Americans - thought of it. They have on their last Block F-16 - a disposable engine. Warranty - for the entire life of a fighter - 35 years. No replacement in the middle of operation.
  4. rocket757 3 February 2020 08: 33 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    within two years, according to Chinese media, the problem will be solved.

    It may well be. The Chinese rod forward purposefully, the result will be.
    1. Boa kaa 3 February 2020 12: 53 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: rocket757
      The Chinese rod forward purposefully, the result will be.

      Communist pressure with capitalist enterprise - this cannot be taken away from them ... But you can even break the device foolishly! For everything went into the nuances: metal science, nanotechnology, etc. Dvigun 5 generation should have colossal temperatures in the flow part of the turbine and before the second stage. According to the Brighton cycle, T * = 2 * C ... And for this you need to have ultra-heat resistant materials. It’s not that 300 people should be put on oars, here “you need to deceive nature” (c) and work not with your hands but with your head!
      Even the purchase of Motor Sich for China is not a way out of the mess! Because Yesterday's technology there, not like Salute ...
      Unlike hongfuzy our "product 117" in metal chases on the stand.
      1. rocket757 3 February 2020 13: 28 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        All the same, we have a serious scientific and design school appeared much earlier. Yes, our people are distinguished, as they say now, by creative, advanced thinking ... but this is a merit of education, SOVIET.
        1. Boa kaa 3 February 2020 15: 07 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: rocket757
          it is the merit of education, SOVIET.

          But am I denying this? Everything is based on scientific and design-engineering schools, which take decades to form.
          Inventors in the wild forest do not grow!
          1. rocket757 3 February 2020 15: 11 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            The Chinese have organized and are building their own. Grow their scientific staff. This will surely give the desired result, especially since the state has not invested little in the process, and they have great human resources!
  5. orionvitt 3 February 2020 08: 51 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    will receive J-31 aircraft as deck fighters.

    First, let’s finish off their touted J-20. Oh yes, there are engine problems too.
    1. IL-18 3 February 2020 09: 42 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: orionvitt
      Let for a start

      It is written: TWO YEARS wink
      1. orionvitt 3 February 2020 10: 22 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: IL-18
        It is written: TWO YEARS

        Well ... Where two, there are three ... And there it will be seen.
  6. Vasyan1971 3 February 2020 10: 58 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    However, within two years, according to Chinese media, the problem will be solved.

    Like, hope to steal somewhere?
  7. Tuzik 3 February 2020 13: 18 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It is interesting that we added PGO to the deck (SU-33), while the Chinese, on the contrary, have a land J-20 with PGO, and J-31 does not.
    1. Magog 3 February 2020 15: 37 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Su-33: "The trapezoidal wing, which has developed influxes and smoothly mates with the fuselage, forms a single supporting body. The front horizontal tail is installed in the influx of the wing and increases both the maneuverability of the aircraft and the lifting force of the airframe." The Chinese prototype J-31 has no such potential (installation of PGO), obviously: there is a different layout of air intakes and fuselage. These are their problems.
  8. spectr 3 February 2020 15: 08 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    However, within two years, according to Chinese media, the problem will be solved.

    The last sentence killed the whole article. laughing
  9. lvov_aleksey 3 February 2020 22: 42 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I don’t believe, if they don’t commit it, they won’t take off