The USA declared readiness to provide Belarus with oil at 100%

The USA declared readiness to provide Belarus with oil at 100%

The United States is ready to supply Belarus with oil and oil products one hundred percent, while oil will be supplied at very competitive prices. This statement was made by US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo. This was reported by the Belarusian media.


Speaking to reporters after a meeting with President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko, Mike Pompeo said that the United States is ready to provide Belarus with oil in the volumes it needs and at competitive prices.

We had a long conversation on economic issues. Mr. Lukashenko said that Belarusians have their own country - sovereign and independent, and they cannot be part of any other state. The United States wants to help Belarus be a sovereign state. Our energy producers are ready to provide you with the necessary oil at 100% at competitive prices. We are the largest energy producer in the world. And all you need is to contact us

- he said.

According to Pompeo, in order for American companies to enter the Belarusian market, Minsk needs to overcome “some barriers”, including: to join the WTO, actively develop the private sector and unlock its trade potential.

Earlier it was reported that the head of the US State Department, Mike Pompeo, and President of the Republic Alexander Lukashenko met in Minsk.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

497 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Incvizitor 1 February 2020 14: 51 New
    • 90
    • 17
    +73
    Ukraine has already been provided with a loss of statehood, a loss of production, agriculture, debt for 100 years and a civil war.
    1. NIKN 1 February 2020 14: 56 New
      • 52
      • 8
      +44
      oil will be delivered at very competitive prices ...
      I admit the delivery of the first batch at Russian prices, but I will never believe that the price will not increase significantly later, but the contract will be drawn up in such a way that it will not be possible to refuse without substantial damage. The deal of the Trump century that valued the country at 50 billion, and even not at the expense of America, already indicates that the United States is never more expensive than cookies for anybody.
      1. Aristarkh Lyudvigovich 1 February 2020 14: 58 New
        • 128
        • 7
        +121
        Well, okay, now you can’t worry about Belarus. But the friendship of Belarus and Russia will not be burdened by mercantile interests. We will just be friends.
        1. NIKN 1 February 2020 15: 00 New
          • 26
          • 2
          +24
          Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
          But the friendship of Belarus and Russia will not be burdened by mercantile interests. We will just be friends.

          good drinks
          1. WILL 1 February 2020 15: 06 New
            • 32
            • 7
            +25
            Similarly, friendship is friendship, and tobacco is apart (s)
            Well, who would doubt the honesty and sincerity of both Pompeo and the United States - which he represents!
            Change your mind ... Lukashenko will be left without pants, benefactors are 100%.
            1. Range 1 February 2020 15: 45 New
              • 24
              • 11
              +13
              Another blockhead (the princes of the local flood - Bulbashia, who dreams of becoming a life-long king) was substituted by the millstone of Soros. Oh well.
              1. Operator s 2 February 2020 18: 58 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                And what is Bulbashia, comrade Sharikov?
        2. Black_Vatnik 1 February 2020 15: 03 New
          • 47
          • 6
          +41
          Just friends in the sandbox, friends in the school or sports section, etc. Countries are not friends for nothing.
          Another thing, it will be interesting to see how Lukashenko will manage without Russian loans, the Russian sales market and Russian military equipment, which were driven to Minsk at almost domestic prices. Good luck to Belarus)
          Previously, there were a sufficient number of people from Belarus at VO, will any of them appreciate the visit of Pompeo with a positive outlook for Minsk?
          1. Topol M 1 February 2020 15: 17 New
            • 42
            • 43
            -1
            It will not cost, but all the Strategic Missile Forces on the ointments from the MZKT keeps, With 300,400,500, Hurricanes and others on the same tractors. So it’s not necessary to say that you fed us, and no one forced us, the grandmothers themselves drove, NATO wasn’t at hand. The sanctions were introduced, we remembered that we had to live not according to concepts, but according to our conscience. figs are not needed. We are not Ukrainians, aspen on the enemies of the Fatherland is enough! Only with Russia can we live, in the West we are needed only as opponents of the Russian Federation.
            1. krokodil25 1 February 2020 15: 22 New
              • 15
              • 7
              +8
              Quote: Topol M
              It will not cost, but all the Strategic Missile Forces on the ointments from the MZKT keeps, With 300,400,500, Hurricanes and others on the same tractors.

              You are mistaken on the BAZ
              1. onix757 1 February 2020 15: 24 New
                • 10
                • 14
                -4
                You are mistaken on the BAZ

                Teach materiel.
              2. 210ox 1 February 2020 17: 24 New
                • 10
                • 2
                +8
                Point blank I did not see the same "Poplar" on the BAZ .. S400-yes.
              3. Hog
                Hog 1 February 2020 23: 19 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Strategic Missile Forces on the bases, in what place?
                BAZ does not produce chassis suitable for the characteristics (the maximum is BAZ-69099 12x12).
              4. Aldmit_2 3 February 2020 08: 09 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                The same MOBD based on MAZ 547
            2. ProkletyiPirat 1 February 2020 15: 32 New
              • 28
              • 5
              +23
              Well, MAZs are not monomolecular turbine blades, and even less so modern rockets, and in Russia there are a bunch of automakers who dream of replacing the MZKT.
              The point is, in fact, is there something else? What did Belarus supply to the Russian Federation and is it difficult or impossible to replace the Russian Federation?
              1. New Year day 1 February 2020 15: 43 New
                • 22
                • 15
                +7
                Quote: ProkletyiPirat
                Yes, and in Russia there are a bunch of automakers who dream of replacing the MZKT.

                a dream is good, but you have to live on earth. But on the ground so far with a replacement does not work
                1. neri73-r 1 February 2020 18: 27 New
                  • 15
                  • 4
                  +11
                  Did they give us burdens? No, for denyuzhki. And there’s nobody to sell them almost, the acre of China, and the latter already has its own. So either produce pots or sell to us.
                  1. www3 1 February 2020 20: 40 New
                    • 7
                    • 5
                    +2
                    I understand that oil and loans were free ?? )))
                    1. NEOZ 1 February 2020 21: 51 New
                      • 15
                      • 3
                      +12
                      Quote: www3
                      I understand that oil and loans were free ?? )))

                      oil at a discount, credit on favorable terms ... - a hidden subsidy to the economy of a foreign country.
                      1. notingem 2 February 2020 00: 15 New
                        • 8
                        • 10
                        -2
                        Alien? It's weird. I thought an ally. Who pushes the border of NATO
                      2. ProkletyiPirat 2 February 2020 12: 02 New
                        • 4
                        • 1
                        +3
                        Between the countries there is no friendship, no fraternity, no alliances, there are only "partners" who help in solving one or another of their problems. And with the same success, these same “partners” can interfere with the solution of their other tasks ...
                        For example, the same Turkey, we (the Russian Federation) partner in the Turkish stream and partner in Syria, in the first case helps in the second prevents.
                        As for the Republic of Belarus, preferences are allocated to it for the purpose of becoming a part of a single state with the Russian Federation, but this is not beneficial for the authorities of the Republic of Belarus because they will lose information and administrative leverage, which may lead to the loss of a “warm place”. That’s all tired of the Russian Federation and a decision was made to change financial flows. Somewhere tougher, as in the Baltic states, somewhere softer as with RB.
                      3. NEOZ 2 February 2020 14: 11 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        Quote: notingem
                        Alien? It's weird. I thought an ally. That pushes the border of NAT

                        Well, which one?
                        what's the point of pushing the border of NATO if there is Ukraine and the Baltic states?
                        ps
                        as practice shows (Maidan, etc.) it is more correct to subsidize politicians, not countries.
                        for many years, the Russian Federation subsidized the economy of Ukraine, and what's the point?
                        we were beaten simply by promises and populism, without serious investments.
                    2. www3 2 February 2020 12: 10 New
                      • 0
                      • 3
                      -3
                      “At the end of 2013, Belarus received $ 450 million, and in mid-2014 another $ 1,55 billion of this loan at a rate tied to the cost of Russian federal loan bonds on the Moscow Exchange. According to independent analyst Sergei Chaly, in 2014, after of how Krymnash started in Russia and economic problems, for some time the rate on this loan exceeded 10% per annum. The next Russian loan was $ 760, Belarus received in 2015. At the time of issuing the loan, this rate was approximately 3,6% . "

                      "The country received $ 3,52 billion from the IMF at a floating rate of LIBOR + 0,75%. It turned out about 5% per annum."

                      “The conditions under which Belarus received money from China have not been announced for a long time. Finally, in the summer, Deputy Prime Minister Vladimir Semashko said that we received $ 7 billion from the Chinese government at 2%.”
                    3. lotos2505 2 February 2020 13: 50 New
                      • 3
                      • 2
                      +1
                      Look overseas soft loans and then say
              2. Ponchik78 2 February 2020 10: 01 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Well, why? https://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/117868/
            3. onix757 1 February 2020 15: 43 New
              • 8
              • 10
              -2
              The point is different, but is there something that supplied Belarus to the Russian Federation and that the Russian Federation is difficult or impossible to replace?

              the bottom line is that nothing has been replaced. Starting from the fly to the electronic component base.
              1. Nikolai Grek 1 February 2020 19: 25 New
                • 10
                • 4
                +6
                Quote: onix757
                the bottom line is that nothing has been replaced. Starting from the fly to the electronic component base.

                nuuuuu .... for the sake of objectivity ... if you believe the latest messages !!! repeat

                Highly mobile chassis of domestic production, created in the framework of the Platform-O ROC, have been adopted by the Ministry of Defense. This was reported by TASS agency, citing its own source in the military-industrial complex. The new chassis is intended, among other things, for the Topol-M and Yars missile systems. The latter is actively entering service.

                https://wpristav.ru/news/ehlektroshassi_platforma_o_prinjaty_na_vooruzhenie_armii_rossii/2020-01-30-47170
                1. lotos2505 2 February 2020 13: 52 New
                  • 2
                  • 3
                  -1
                  You read peramoga everywhere. T50 is not accepted, but already how many raptors will fail. You need to judge what is in the troops. Straight country 404
                  1. Nikolai Grek 2 February 2020 17: 58 New
                    • 4
                    • 1
                    +3
                    Quote: lotos2505
                    You read peramoga everywhere. T50 is not accepted, but already how many raptors will fail. You need to judge what is in the troops. Straight country 404

                    Peremogi-it is ukrosteza !!! wassat in this yeah, you have serious problems with those of your efforts !!! request laughing
            4. BARKAS 1 February 2020 16: 01 New
              • 8
              • 6
              +2
              dream of replacing the MZKT.

              The KZKT has long been ruined, KAMAZ is really trying to make a chassis for the Strategic Missile Forces.
              1. Piramidon 2 February 2020 09: 44 New
                • 5
                • 1
                +4
                Quote: BARKAS
                KAMAZ really is trying to make a chassis for the Strategic Missile Forces.

                Not trying, but already done. Adopted
            5. signifera 1 February 2020 16: 04 New
              • 23
              • 2
              +21
              Shrimp, parmesan, a bunch of fruits and vegetables, the list is quite long. Europe does not sell, we don’t have one, but everything is caught and grown in Belarus, according to the documents. smile smile smile For instance...)
              1. www3 1 February 2020 20: 42 New
                • 3
                • 20
                -17
                you have incorrect data - all this is caught and grows in China and other non-sanctioned countries, but it travels through Belarus.
                so don’t see it.
                1. www3 2 February 2020 12: 17 New
                  • 1
                  • 6
                  -5
                  in the brains of fasty pozztriots, did patterns break? )))
            6. Hermann 1 February 2020 17: 25 New
              • 9
              • 3
              +6
              Everything can be replaced, it is difficult to replace tank sights and LCD displays for aircraft delivered from Belarus to the Russian Federation. even on the SU-57 they are Belarusian.
              And on the topic: something I don’t like is flirting with the Yankees.
              1. ProkletyiPirat 1 February 2020 21: 54 New
                • 5
                • 1
                +4
                That is, sights and displays produces RB? It produces, does not collect, does not re-export, but produces? If so, tell the manufacturer and model ...
                1. alexmach 2 February 2020 00: 32 New
                  • 6
                  • 2
                  +4
                  That is what collects. Tank sights for example using French matrices ..
                  Well, it still produces, collects the wrong word. Produces from imported components ... inaccessible to Russia by the way.
                  1. ProkletyiPirat 2 February 2020 11: 48 New
                    • 2
                    • 1
                    +1
                    Quote: alexmach
                    collects the wrong word.
                    Produces from imported components

                    Well, the phrase “produces” is also incorrect because the matrix is ​​the main element, and in fact the Republic of Belarus does not produce, but re-exports, not sights, but their components.
                    1. alexmach 2 February 2020 13: 11 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Well, I do not agree, nevertheless, in addition to the matrix and optics, there is also some kind of electronics and the layout of the product. Some kind of intellectual contribution and some kind of added value there is Belarusian. As for me, significant. Therefore, he agreed that they produce and do not collect. But yes, the most high-tech parts are not Belarusian.
                2. Hermann 2 February 2020 01: 58 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  By manufacturers: tank sights of OJSC "bearing", displays kb "display". By tank sights: yes almost all thermal imaging except sights on armature and pine-u (t-72b3, t-90m) it is Belarusian but is assembled under license in Russia .
          2. Black_Vatnik 1 February 2020 15: 38 New
            • 39
            • 1
            +38
            It’s fun when you give your neighbor money and stuff, and then he says something like “And you gave me money, I didn’t force you”
            1. lotos2505 2 February 2020 13: 55 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              The loan that we give back. And we gave it to Luka but not to the people, believe me. Do not judge Belarusians by power. If you look at your bureaucrats, what are all Russians like?
          3. Andrey Mikhaylov 1 February 2020 16: 26 New
            • 8
            • 0
            +8
            with 400 it's bryansk, chassis
            1. Uncle Izya 1 February 2020 19: 47 New
              • 1
              • 4
              -3
              You take an interest in how many bases receive components with MZKT
              1. Alexey LK 2 February 2020 01: 04 New
                • 5
                • 1
                +4
                And you take an interest in how many non-Belarusian components are available at the MZKT. And also at MAZ, BELAZ, MTZ, etc.
                1. 30143 2 February 2020 09: 23 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  ABOUT! Showdown went ...
                  One is longer and the other is shorter.
                  Reminds sra ... b with Ukraine.
                2. Uncle Izya 2 February 2020 11: 01 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Belaz is not a military man, he can steel a Swedish motor caterpillar generator siemens for your money any whim
                3. lotos2505 2 February 2020 13: 56 New
                  • 0
                  • 2
                  -2
                  Without the process of the beginning of Europe, the floor of your planes will not fly up. But it was made in Russia
              2. neri73-r 2 February 2020 10: 39 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                Quote: Uncle Izya
                You take an interest in how many bases receive components with MZKT

                Even your bolts.
          4. Xenofont 1 February 2020 16: 36 New
            • 20
            • 3
            +17
            The other day, the “O” platform from Kamaz was adopted for several versions specifically for the Strategic Missile Forces, and this is actually a breakthrough project on motor wheels.
          5. krillon 1 February 2020 19: 44 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Everything is new, well-forgotten old .. They are friends with anyone and against anyone.
          6. My doctor 1 February 2020 20: 04 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Quote: Topol M
            It will not cost, but all the Strategic Missile Forces on the ointments from the MZKT keeps, With 300,400,500, Hurricanes and others on the same tractors.

            Isn't a hurricane a ZIL chassis?
            I lagged behind life, I thought that the C400 and C500 on the BAZ chassis belay All new systems are installed on the Russian chassis.
            Quote: Topol M
            So it’s not necessary to say that you fed us, and no one forced us,

            When there was an interest in the transit of energy through Belarus, there was a certain balance between tariffs. As a result, the cost of pumping through Belarus was lower than across Russia itself. But nothing lasts forever. Russia has modernized its refineries and is no longer driving oil for export in such volumes as before, which means the cost of transit is no longer substantial. It’s not worth talking about gas transit.
            There is much more in the agreement between the countries that has lost relevance for the Russian Federation and requires replacement.
            1. www3 1 February 2020 20: 46 New
              • 3
              • 5
              -2
              modernized so that Antipinsky Oil Refinery went into bankruptcy)
              1. Pedrodepackes 1 February 2020 21: 44 New
                • 2
                • 2
                0
                Quote: www3
                Antipinsky Oil Refinery goes into bankruptcy

                According to URA.RU's own sources, the Atyrau Refinery is currently undergoing through bankruptcy proceedings in order to clear the company of debts. Already in the "finished" form, it will be liquidated and resold to persons interested in buying a turnkey enterprise, together with the team and the established production process. According to another agency insider, they agreed to buy the whole plant only if there were no large debts on it. The plant will continue to operate and maintain the existing volume of processing of raw materials and output. The company also continues to fulfill its full obligations to personnel, contractors and the regional budget. Liquidation of a legal entity does not automatically terminate the production complex of the plant
                simple change of owner who did not manage
          7. private person 1 February 2020 20: 06 New
            • 7
            • 1
            +6
            So do not say that you fed us, and no one forced us, the grandmas themselves drove

            Here is a look at what would happen to MAZ without Russian orders. And so at KAMAZ, only new orders will be happy.
          8. orionvitt 1 February 2020 20: 31 New
            • 5
            • 5
            0
            Quote: Topol M
            Hurricanes and others on the same tractors. So no need to say that you fed us

            This is called fed. Otherwise, Belarusians will be left alone with their MAZs and MZKT. They will eat them, washed down with American oil. This is the price for independence.
          9. Lekz 2 February 2020 00: 35 New
            • 8
            • 0
            +8
            No doubt, MAZ makes a good chassis. I even assume that in addition to Russia, someone else wants to buy them. But, let's take a sober look, with such an ally it is better to have their own manufacturers of critical products. I believe that people are already puzzled. We are waiting for the results.
            1. Olezhek 2 February 2020 09: 21 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              No doubt, MAZ makes a good chassis. I even assume that in addition to Russia, someone else wants to buy them. But, let's take a sober look, with such an ally it is better to have your own manufacturers


              More precisely, the "Sayuznik" crying
          10. The comment was deleted.
        3. Olgovich 1 February 2020 15: 43 New
          • 22
          • 4
          +18
          Quote: Black_Jacket
          Another thing, it will be interesting to see how Lukashenko will manage without Russian loans, the Russian sales market and Russian military equipment, which were driven to Minsk at almost domestic prices. Good luck to Belarus)

          Yes, and about oil, I can’t believe it: the cost of production in the US is more expensive than in Russia, and transportation by pipe is cheaper than a tanker: HOW can the USA be cheaper?
          I can’t believe it ....
          1. signifera 1 February 2020 16: 06 New
            • 16
            • 0
            +16
            They have a different brand, called "Democratic". It is more expensive and better than ours, ordinary. It is with the scent of freedom and independence. So it can be taken and more expensive.
          2. Vasily Ponomarev 1 February 2020 16: 21 New
            • 8
            • 14
            -6
            like this, if you didn’t know, oil in the states costs less than in Russia, we’ve survived
            1. Olgovich 2 February 2020 07: 54 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
              like this, if you didn’t know, oil in the states costs less than in Russia, we’ve survived

              Do not peat nonsense: cost of oil production in Russia 30-40 dollars, in USA $ 60-70.
              1. Vasily Ponomarev 2 February 2020 08: 32 New
                • 0
                • 4
                -4
                Sorry, I meant gasoline of course https://www.vedomosti.ru/business/news/2017/04/23/686979-benzin-stal-deshevle
                1. Olgovich 2 February 2020 08: 43 New
                  • 2
                  • 2
                  0
                  Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                  Sorry, I meant gasoline of course https://www.vedomosti.ru/business/news/2017/04/23/686979-benzin-stal-deshevle

                  Clearly, it happens.

                  But here you are WRONG:

                  Gas prices, 27-jan-2020
                  (liter, US Dollar)

                  Russia ... 0,73
                  USA .0,75
                  Latvia ..1,43
                  Germany ...1,54

                  https://ru.globalpetrolprices.com/gasoline_prices/
                  1. Vasily Ponomarev 2 February 2020 10: 24 New
                    • 0
                    • 5
                    -5
                    Well, yes, it jumps lower or slightly higher, but the fact that the United States already has a price at the level of Russia (and we have some of the smallest prices) with such a guzzling economy is just on the verge of fiction, it also exports 2 million tons oil
                2. Alex Justice 2 February 2020 10: 28 New
                  • 0
                  • 2
                  -2
                  We have gasoline 1.20.
          3. Victor N 1 February 2020 16: 29 New
            • 5
            • 1
            +4
            You can’t deceive geography, unlike your neighbor. But the earth is round ....
          4. krops777 1 February 2020 16: 48 New
            • 6
            • 1
            +5
            Yes, and about oil, I can’t believe it: the cost of production in the US is more expensive than in Russia, and transportation by pipe is cheaper than a tanker: HOW can the USA be cheaper?
            I can’t believe it ....



            Yes, the main thing for them is to lure Luka, to force him to sign a contract, and there they will complete the shoe.
          5. DymOk_v_dYmke 1 February 2020 18: 50 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            Quote: Olgovich
            Yes, and about oil, I can’t believe it: the cost of production in the US is more expensive than in Russia, and transportation by pipe is cheaper than a tanker: HOW can the USA be cheaper?
            I can’t believe it ....

            Russian will buy at a discount and resell.
            There have been precedents with liquefied gas.
            1. anykin 1 February 2020 23: 40 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: DymOk_v_dYmke
              Russian will buy at a discount and resell.

              At a discount for yourself, not for others. Profit is sacred.
          6. private person 1 February 2020 20: 10 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            production costs in the US are more expensive than in Russia,

            And who said that it would be American oil? For this, the Americans have Syria, Libya, Iraq. it’s not just because they were accepting them.
        4. Naive 1 February 2020 20: 36 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          A very positive moment for further bargaining with Putin. And so some close ones will earn a couple of soldiers.
          1. neri73-r 2 February 2020 10: 44 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Quote: Naive
            A very positive moment for further bargaining with Putin. And so some close ones will earn a couple of soldiers.

            Do not hold Putin for a fool. Sideways (or sideways) will come out.
            1. Naive 2 February 2020 13: 53 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              I’m not a fool for him, and I don’t think Lukashenko
        5. alexmach 2 February 2020 00: 24 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          will any of them appreciate Pompeo’s visit with a positive outlook for Minsk?

          In fact, Belarus has always been a very tasty morsel for America strategically.
          First, the ability to tear Russia's last ally from Russia
          Secondly, make an exemplary vassal Russian state. So to say, to show Russia and the Russians how they will feel good if Russia falls apart and the fragments fall entirely under America.
          We tried with Ukraine - but it didn’t work out ... With Ukraine, a dead number. But Belarus is just perfect for this. Firstly, it is small - it would be cheaper to maintain it. Secondly, there is overall order.
          1. Olezhek 2 February 2020 09: 26 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            In fact, Belarus has always been a very tasty morsel for America strategically


            A very beautiful bike that was actively used in Ukraine (Ukrainians believed) That everyone needs Kiev: EU, USA, China ....

            First, the ability to tear Russia's last ally from Russia


            This is not an ally - it is a "strategic partner for everyone and everyone individually."

            Secondly, make an exemplary vassal Russian state. So to say show Russia and Russian how they will feel good


            Why didn’t they do it in the Baltic states?
            Who hindered?

            Firstly, it’s small - it would be cheaper to maintain it


            Latvia is even smaller, but somehow no one began to contain it


            Karoche: Comrade White Propaganda - Take business at last.
            Learn Chinese galleries.
            And then from your fables ears are rolled up

            Exemplary Myths and Legends
            1. alexmach 2 February 2020 13: 06 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              Why didn’t they do it in the Baltic states?
              Who hindered?

              I mean not done? And in the Baltic states, everything is just fine, except for the weather, perhaps. That's exactly what they did there. Baltic States in the European Union, 10 years was on its content. I won’t tell you for Latvia, but Estonia from which I am writing right now receives more than Ukraine IMF loans free of charge per year than Ukraine, and this despite the fact that the population here is 1 \ 30 from Ukraine ... well, from old Ukraine. Everything is completely safe here. Not Germany of course
              Latvia is even smaller, but somehow no one began to contain it

              He became. Take a trip to Riga or something. It also has its advantages as the largest of the Baltic countries.

              Karoche: Comrade White Propaganda - Take business at last.

              Please keep the shortcuts for yourself, as well as your advice that no one has asked for.
              1. Nikolai Grek 2 February 2020 18: 32 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Quote: alexmach
                And in the Baltics, everything is just fine

                therefore, the population of the drain disappeared ?? !!! wassat
                1. alexmach 2 February 2020 19: 13 New
                  • 1
                  • 1
                  0
                  therefore, the population of the drain disappeared ?? !!! wassat

                  And in Russia, it’s not lost anywhere? Is everything in place in the provinces? And in general, is this normal with the growth of this population?
                  In the Baltics, including because they have such an opportunity, too.

                  PS: I'm just writing about what I see with my own eyes. Here it is quite possible to live comfortably and work for the average ordinary person. Since the emigrant himself, I see many immigrants around.
                  1. Nikolai Grek 2 February 2020 19: 42 New
                    • 2
                    • 2
                    0
                    Quote: alexmach
                    And in Russia, it’s not lost anywhere?

                    lope in Russia disappeared and lope in the Baltic states ... for clarity, write in percentage !!! wink and do not expose yourself, to put it mildly, illiterate, trying to hurt Russia and extol the worthless Baltic States !!! request
                    Quote: alexmach
                    Here it is quite possible to live comfortably and work for the average ordinary person.

                    everywhere you can, reducing the population by 30-50%, while receiving freebies from various sources !!! wassat
                    1. alexmach 4 February 2020 00: 58 New
                      • 0
                      • 1
                      -1
                      and do not expose yourself, to put it mildly, illiterate

                      I do not exhibit. I write about the facts. Yes, in the Baltic states there was a large outflow of the population, as there is the possibility of simply and legally leaving to live in the developed countries of Europe, or in places with a better climate. And people take this opportunity.
                      lope in Russia disappeared and lope in the Baltic states

                      With or without migrants from Central Asia? Given the internal migration to Moscow and St. Petersburg? Well, the truth should be noted that in Estonia the situation is similar, I basically know about the situation in Tallinn.
                      everywhere you can, reducing the population by 30-50%, while receiving freebies from various sources !!! wassat

                      Well, it seems to be worse in Russia.
      2. rich 1 February 2020 15: 19 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Aristarkh Lyudvigovich: Well, okay, now you can’t worry about Belarus. But the friendship of Belarus and Russia will not be burdened by mercantile interests. We will just be friends.

        Selfless fraternal friendship))
      3. New Year day 1 February 2020 15: 40 New
        • 10
        • 5
        +5
        Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
        We will just be friends.

        I doubt something
      4. mark1 1 February 2020 15: 43 New
        • 6
        • 2
        +4
        Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
        We will just be friends.

        Well, yes, as with the Republic of Mauritius, it seems that we are friends, but it seems that we don't need each other. Here is such a friendship.
      5. IrisFloDataSet 1 February 2020 15: 56 New
        • 0
        • 9
        -9
        are you 12 years old
      6. Lipchanin 1 February 2020 16: 01 New
        • 9
        • 2
        +7
        Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
        Well, okay, now you can’t worry about Belarus.

        Aha. Waiting for her fate of the neighboring suburbs
        1. 210ox 1 February 2020 17: 27 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          But this would not be desirable.
          1. Lipchanin 1 February 2020 17: 31 New
            • 6
            • 3
            +3
            Quote: 210ox
            But this would not be desirable.

            And now, something depends on us?
            We did not choose the path of "development" for them.
      7. vik669 1 February 2020 16: 11 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        We’ll just be friends - and they’ll look at it as long as there is one country in the world that is just friends with everyone — it is the USA!
      8. Zoldat_A 1 February 2020 17: 40 New
        • 10
        • 3
        +7
        Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
        But the friendship of Belarus and Russia will not be burdened by mercantile interests. Let's just be friends

        Old Man did not have time to say anything against Russia - America immediately set up a stool for him. At first it’s even cheaper - then in bondage. We have seen more than once with the sheikhs, with Oceania (see "The Confession of an Economic Killer" by J. Perkins) that they tried to do with us in the 90s (but, fortunately, purely American - "something at a certain moment" it’s gone wrong.) Yes, next to an example is “an independent country 404”. Nothing damn it convinces. You must personally burn your asshole.

        I don’t speak for Belarusians, I’ll say for Old Man - play the game "your-ours" - the point will break into two chairs to sit down. Nicho, in Rostov there will be enough space for all the "former". I think she won’t go to taxi drivers either - enough is enough to live on.
        1. Terenin 1 February 2020 18: 28 New
          • 11
          • 0
          +11
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          At first it’s even cheaper - then in bondage. We have seen more than once with the sheikhs, with Oceania (see "The Confession of an Economic Killer" by J. Perkins) that they tried to do with us in the 90s (but, fortunately, purely American - "something at a certain moment" it went wrong.) Yes, next to an example - “an independent country 404.” Nothing, damn it, does not convince. It is necessary to personally burn your asshole.

          hi
          Indeed, "bend to the cold." Well, from the USA it’s clear, this is like the first dose - for free.
          Pompeo wants to say that OPEC members will sell it at a cheap price in the United States so that they, with their wraps, drive it for Belarus? And if American gas is cheap, then why did the Germans fight for a pipe called SP-2?
          And the prices fell due to 2 times cheaper oil. That was 100 bucks and the price was 300-400, and then it became 40-50 and the price became 200.
          As a result: Lukashenko, do not choke on the cookie.
          1. Zoldat_A 1 February 2020 18: 51 New
            • 6
            • 3
            +3
            Quote: Terenin
            In summary: Lukashenko, don’t choke on cookies.

            Choking ... Not the first to choke. And, alas, not the last ... crying

            As long as the USA exists.

            Unfortunately for my brotherly Belarus ...
        2. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 2 February 2020 17: 51 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          Yes, next is an example - "an independent country 404". Nothing damn it convinces. You must personally burn your asshole.
          Really. It would seem that such an understandable and obvious thing - Ukraine itself has launched a civil war. Here we explain it to everyone, we explain, and they, stupid, even nod their heads, but, trying not to turn their backs, sneak towards the exit.
      9. venik 1 February 2020 21: 02 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
        We will just be friends.

        =======
        Yeah! "Befriend families"! But father, as usual, is trying to sit "with one seat on two chairs," while blackmailing the main partner! Oh well! Let's see what happens! Such "tricks" take place only when the "blackmailer" does not have restraint, composure and "iron" Faberge "" ......
        Otherwise, and "run into" - not for long! wassat
    2. Astoria 1 February 2020 15: 04 New
      • 20
      • 1
      +19
      The purchase question is simple, no one from the Gulf of Mexico is lucky. With the consent, tankers will also be bought in Ust-Luga (so total delivered LNG to the Baltic states).

      The key issue is logistics. Railway can provide loading of oil refineries of the Republic of Belarus at best only by one third - a feature of drain racks. Odessa-Brody is empty, the Baltic pipelines too. The Poles do not give consent to reverse Friendship (otherwise they themselves will have difficulties with delivery).
      1. New Year day 1 February 2020 15: 44 New
        • 10
        • 4
        +6
        Quote: Astoria
        Poles do not agree to reverse Friendship

        America will order and Poland will answer “yes”, Belarus is at stake!
        1. hydrox 1 February 2020 16: 20 New
          • 7
          • 2
          +5
          And what about "Belarus"?
          6 regions :: in Ukraine there were 25 regions - and then it cost the Americans only some unfortunate $ 5 billion ...
          1. New Year day 1 February 2020 16: 21 New
            • 5
            • 5
            0
            Quote: hydrox
            And what about "Belarus"?

            and if: + Ukraine + Moldova + Poland?
            1. Zoldat_A 1 February 2020 19: 07 New
              • 5
              • 4
              +1
              Quote: Silvestr
              and if: + Ukraine + Moldova + Poland

              Yes, at least plus Argentina ...

              Question - why the hell are they for us? Feed, as in the USSR? So the freebie, it seems, is over.
              1. Uncle Izya 1 February 2020 19: 50 New
                • 5
                • 1
                +4
                Under the USSR, the BSSR sent 3 lard dollars to the treasury
                1. Zoldat_A 5 February 2020 23: 01 New
                  • 1
                  • 1
                  0
                  Quote: Uncle Izya
                  Under the USSR, the BSSR sent 3 lard dollars to the treasury

                  There is no conversation. Sent.
                  Of only 15 union republics, only the RSFSR and Belarus had a positive balance. Use the search engines - everything is open.

                  And who is now the loudest shouting that we "robbed" them? Those who received the most are the Baltic states, Ukraine and the Caucasus.

                  Poor Georgia, "robbed"! Which least of all, not only in the absolute, but also in the RELATIVE dimension, sent to the budget.

                  We robbed them ... am
                  1. Zoldat_A 6 February 2020 01: 03 New
                    • 0
                    • 1
                    -1
                    Quote: Zoldat_A
                    Quote: Uncle Izya
                    Under the USSR, the BSSR sent 3 lard dollars to the treasury

                    There is no conversation. Sent.
                    Of only 15 union republics, only the RSFSR and Belarus had a positive balance. Use the search engines - everything is open.

                    And who is now the loudest shouting that we "robbed" them? Those who received the most are the Baltic states, Ukraine and the Caucasus.

                    Poor Georgia, "robbed"! Which least of all, not only in the absolute, but also in the RELATIVE dimension, sent to the budget.

                    We robbed them ... am

                    Nude ...

                    And to justify the disagreement is weak? Or so, farted into a puddle and fled?

                    I'm here with facts, and someone with emotions.
                  2. Uncle Izya 6 February 2020 09: 01 New
                    • 0
                    • 1
                    -1
                    Ukraine and the Baltic republics took off all the cream
                    1. Zoldat_A 6 February 2020 11: 52 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: Uncle Izya
                      Ukraine and the Baltic republics took off all the cream

                      Didn't I say the same thing?
            2. hydrox 1 February 2020 19: 47 New
              • 1
              • 2
              -1
              Sylvester, the more of them, THERE ARE SUCH, the less unit costs per unit are obtained! yes
              On the other hand: yes, indeed, these are territories suitable for arranging a military base, but this is better than the outfit of forces from an aircraft carrier that appeared where they had not expected (space-espionage business is clearly lame ...)
          2. Zoldat_A 1 February 2020 19: 04 New
            • 6
            • 2
            +4
            Quote: hydrox
            there were 25 regions in Ukraine - and then it cost the Americans just some unfortunate $ 5 billion ...

            I remembered the joke.

            Obama reports: "US budget revolution in Ukraine cost $ 5 billion."

            -That cho, we bought Crimea for Russia from Ukraine for 5 billion?!?! ??
            1. hydrox 1 February 2020 19: 49 New
              • 3
              • 1
              +2
              And I like this kind of humor! laughing
              1. Zoldat_A 5 February 2020 23: 02 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                Quote: hydrox
                And I like this kind of humor! laughing

                So the truth is ... Bookkeeping - it is like that - you cannot fool it.
      2. Zoldat_A 1 February 2020 19: 00 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        Quote: Astoria
        The key issue is logistics. Railway can provide loading of oil refineries of the Republic of Belarus at best only by one third - a feature of drain racks. Odessa-Brody is empty, the Baltic pipelines too.

        Something tells me (maybe many years of experience in dealing with hucksters of different sorts?) That it will end with the same thing as “reverse gas” for Ukraine - the Old Man will buy our Russian oil from hucksters at exorbitant prices. Well, the Americans aren’t quite ... beaten up - Texas oil is transported by tankers for thirty-three stars, when in Europe there is Russian oil - cheap.

        Oh, what America can’t refuse - and they know how to count loot.
        1. hydrox 1 February 2020 19: 52 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          So in logistics they are also docks - do not take away!
          How they traded our LNG last winter - it was nice to see!
          We’ll take a look today: under what flags will gas carriers drag LNG from Sabeta?
    3. Oleg Skvortsov 1 February 2020 15: 12 New
      • 31
      • 2
      +29
      Nikolay, here the Americans made a mistake with a competitive price. But father does not need a competitive, but a free price)
      1. Sergei 23 1 February 2020 15: 24 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        One gets the impression that the Old Man needs to live quietly. And you’re just attaching it to where ???
        1. Terenin 1 February 2020 18: 32 New
          • 10
          • 1
          +9
          Quote: Sergey 23
          One gets the impression that the Old Man needs to live quietly. And you’re just attaching it to where ???

          Let dad not worry no His new "friends" winked 100% will provide Belarus with gas, oil, legs, and also will be freed from ... industry and 100% will be provided with a new ... president.
        2. Zoldat_A 1 February 2020 19: 15 New
          • 6
          • 6
          0
          Quote: Sergey 23
          One gets the impression that the Old Man needs to live quietly. And you’re just attaching it to where ???

          I know for sure that GDP will survive retirement in Russia. For nowhere, except Russia, for his services (without any quotes) to Russia, he will not be allowed to live peacefully.

          Ukrainian-Georgian and other Lithuanian presidents will quietly live in America to retire the State Department.

          And Old Man ... Russia will cheat, before America has caved in enough for political asylum, they will tear their homeland - where to go? Not to mention the heir - I think Old Man II will not. Not that govinda.
          1. Zoldat_A 6 February 2020 01: 14 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            Quote: Sergey 23
            One gets the impression that the Old Man needs to live quietly. And you’re just attaching it to where ???

            I know for sure that GDP will survive retirement in Russia. For nowhere, except Russia, for his services (without any quotes) to Russia, he will not be allowed to live peacefully.

            Ukrainian-Georgian and other Lithuanian presidents will quietly live in America to retire the State Department.

            And Old Man ... Russia will cheat, before America has caved in enough for political asylum, they will tear their homeland - where to go? Not to mention the heir - I think Old Man II will not. Not that govinda.

            I see as many as 5 dissenting. And tell me, where do you think the GDP will survive? In London, or what?. Or in New York? Not a runaway governor, oligarch or banker, go ... Damn ....

            Saakashvili (continue the list yourself?) Is not Putin because, because Ukraine is not Russia - because guano is not chocolate.
        3. venik 1 February 2020 21: 06 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: Sergey 23
          And you’re just attaching it to where ???

          ========
          Where? In Karaganda! (More like and nowhere!) ... wassat
        4. sektant777 1 February 2020 23: 49 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: Sergey 23
          One gets the impression that the Old Man needs to live quietly. And you’re just attaching it to where ???

          It will be played out that the child will have to be built in Rostov. They will be neighbors in the country with Yanukovoschosh.
          1. Zoldat_A 5 February 2020 23: 04 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Quote: sektant777
            Quote: Sergey 23
            One gets the impression that the Old Man needs to live quietly. And you’re just attaching it to where ???

            It will be played out that the child will have to be built in Rostov. They will be neighbors in the country with Yanukovoschosh.

            Country cooperative "Lake 2.0"? laughing
      2. vik669 1 February 2020 16: 12 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Free only flies in the soup!
        1. IL-18 1 February 2020 18: 49 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: vik669
          Free only flies in the soup!

          Only soup is available for a fee.
        2. venik 1 February 2020 21: 07 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: vik669
          Free only flies in the soup!

          =======
          good Yes - "free" cheese in a mousetrap!
          1. beeper 2 February 2020 02: 37 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Yes - "free" cheese in a mousetrap!

            hi Yes, for free - for a second mouse! wink
    4. Petr1 1 February 2020 15: 19 New
      • 6
      • 6
      0
      Yes, they will simply drive Syrian oil; it is not expensive for them.
      1. Shkworen 1 February 2020 15: 29 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        or maybe shale, it’s dirtier than usual and it also needs to be drained somewhere :)
      2. Zoldat_A 1 February 2020 19: 18 New
        • 2
        • 3
        -1
        Quote: Petr1
        Yes, they will simply drive Syrian oil; it is not expensive for them.

        Over the sea, heifer is half. A ruble transportation.
    5. ProkletyiPirat 1 February 2020 15: 26 New
      • 12
      • 2
      +10
      Quote: NIKNN
      I admit the delivery of the first batch at Russian prices, but I will never believe that then the price will not increase significantly

      Well, why is it possible, simply the US will not get the benefit in money, but in the geopolitical and economic weakening of the Russian Federation. “A donkey loaded with gold will take an impregnable fortress” In terms of the United States, this (subsidy of the sovereignty of Belarus) is a very reasonable act.
      1. Astoria 1 February 2020 15: 31 New
        • 8
        • 3
        +5
        economic weakening of the Russian Federation
        - economic weakening - this is free grants from the budget of Belarus for 25 years. But in general, Russian oil has been sold, budget duties. At what price oil will be bought in Belarus - these are the problems of the Republic of Belarus (according to estimates, the purchase of Norwegian oil led to losses of $ 80 to $ 100 per ton).
      2. Olezhek 1 February 2020 16: 40 New
        • 1
        • 8
        -7
        In terms of the United States, this (subsidy of the sovereignty of Belarus) is a very reasonable act.


        Excuse me, how much have they allotted Belarus for free?
        When?
        Where?
        What kind of "subsidy of sovereignty"?
        Shaw for fairy tales? belay
      3. Zoldat_A 6 February 2020 01: 24 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: ProkletyiPirat
        Well, why is it possible, simply the US will not get the benefit in money, but in the geopolitical and economic weakening of the Russian Federation. "A donkey loaded with gold will take an impregnable fortress"

        Wisdom is old and faithful. It worked with us in the 90s. will work with these Now.

        Only two remarks - the donkey is loaded not with gold, but with dollars, whose value is increasingly questionable in the geopolitical aspect.

        And the second.
        "Donkey" will open the gate. The “ram” will take the gold ... But to whom of the “rams” in history did the gold bring happiness?
        200 thousand "American Express", pocketed by the President of South Korea and almost $ lam $ Nobel Peace Prize Humpback Dog brought a lot of happiness? Filming in fast food ads?

        And did Sverdlovsk Alkash’s “fees from books” extend his life at least?
        1. ProkletyiPirat 6 February 2020 03: 09 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          Only two remarks - the donkey is loaded not with gold, but with dollars, whose value is increasingly questionable in the geopolitical aspect.

          Nothing lasts forever when the dollar collapses, but it’s silly to talk about its fall in the coming years. The dollar is valuable not by the US Army, nor by speculation on exchanges, it is valuable as the best financial battery, and everything, everything, ALL opponents of the "dollar economy" they offer either the same thing as a dollar, but not a dollar (replace the dollar with euro \ yen \ rubles \ ...) or something that was abandoned long before the dollar (material standards of money). That's when you can come up with a more efficient financial battery, then the dollar will fall in the blink of an eye, Well, or if the US economic power goes completely, then someone else will take the place of the dollar .....
          1. Zoldat_A 6 February 2020 04: 56 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: ProkletyiPirat
            someday the dollar will collapse, but talking about its fall in the coming years is silly

            That I am not talking about February 23.
            Quote: ProkletyiPirat
            ALL opponents of the "dollar economy" offer either the same thing as a dollar, but not a dollar (replace the dollar with euros \ yen \ rubles \ ...) or something that was abandoned long before the dollar (material standards of money). That's when you can come up with a more efficient financial battery, then the dollar will fall in no time

            Have you read about Iraq, Saddam, Gaddafi and the Golden Dinar? Everything about America with Gaddafi was fine until Gaddafi with his "dinar" encroached on the "Sacred Cow" - the dollar. How did it end?


            But before that - there were allies. (Many call anyone - how to be friends with America). There, of course, also Malaysia - but it has been bought by America for a long time, just like the Arab sheikhs.

            These photos are for every leader of the country, standing in the pose of "si" in front of America on the desktop next to the photo of his wife and children.

            And after all, most importantly, they took it with honors ... And they called it a friend-ally ... And they licked in every way ....

            And the most interesting - the current "Enemy of America No. 1 in the Middle East" - Assad, congratulated on their victory in the "democratic elections." Not Russia would be-so "Iraq 2.0".

            Only here the Internet America cleans better than ours - the proof can not be found. Although two years ago it was easy.

            You see, after a couple of years, you will not find Saddam hanged.
    6. LiSiCyn 1 February 2020 15: 28 New
      • 19
      • 1
      +18
      Quote: NIKNN
      I admit the delivery of the first batch at Russian prices

      Delivery cannot be at Russian prices. no
      We deliver by pipe. They are by the sea. For Norwegian, the amount of delivery, etc. from Klaipeda to Minsk was $ 150 per ton.
      1. Astoria 1 February 2020 15: 37 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        You can buy through the pipe, as the Germans and Poles buy + outbid commission laughing (+ 100% duty to the budget of the Russian Federation). wink
    7. Lipchanin 1 February 2020 15: 57 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Quote: NIKNN
      that the United States did not give a freebie more expensive than cookies to anyone.

      But then the whole country was driven into bondage
    8. New Year day 1 February 2020 16: 02 New
      • 20
      • 20
      0
      Quote: NIKNN
      oil will be delivered at very competitive prices ...
      I admit the delivery of the first batch at Russian prices, but I will never believe that then the price will not increase significantly

      The States will drive cheap oil to Europe from Syria, Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Libya, the UAE, and other countries under its control. Plus - by sea, tankers. As a result, the price of oil will fall as well as gas, Belarus will receive oil through a pipe from Poland and the Baltic states.
      The United States, unlike our "defective managers", can think strategically and conduct global business. Today they will lose much due to dumping prices, but tomorrow they will become monopolists in the market. And along the way, they will deprive Russia of money so that there is nothing to fight in Syria and so that the people quickly overthrow the current government.
      1. Golovan Jack 1 February 2020 16: 16 New
        • 16
        • 15
        +1
        Quote: Silvestr
        so that there is nothing to fight in Syria and that the people quickly overthrow the current government

        Your cherished dream, if I’m not mistaken? wink

        Yes, Sylvester ... As they say, a girl can be taken out of the village. The village of a girl is much more complicated.

        And you confirm it over and over again, buddy request
        1. New Year day 1 February 2020 16: 19 New
          • 18
          • 17
          +1
          Quote: Golovan Jack
          As they say,

          there is essentially nothing to argue: while the United States was not on the market, we sold our gas to Europe for $ 300-400 for 1000 cubic meters, and as soon as the states began to ship their liquefied gas in tankers, the price fell to $ 120-150 for 1000 cubic meters , and continues to decline. So it will be with oil.
          Therefore, you are left blah blah
          1. Golovan Jack 1 February 2020 16: 36 New
            • 13
            • 15
            -2
            Quote: Silvestr
            Therefore, you are left blah blah

            Man, "blah blah" is not for me, but for you wink

            Quote: Silvestr
            we sold our gas throughout Europe at $ 300-400 for 1000 cubic meters

            It was a long time ago.

            Quote: Silvestr
            as soon as the states began to carry their liquefied gas by tankers, the price of it fell to $ 120-150 for 1000 cubic meters

            Do not write nonsense.

            following 2018 of the year Gazprom's gas export to Europe increased to 201,8 billion cubic meters, which is three times higher than the total supply of LNG of all world producers to this market and 55 times more U.S. LNG shipments to Europe


            As they say - reasonably enough wink

            But it was not about that at all, but about the fact that dreams of "wrestlers with a red" on the topic

            Quote: Silvestr
            so that people overthrow faster

            - still remain pink and wet. And this is good yes
            1. Observer2014 1 February 2020 16: 58 New
              • 7
              • 12
              -5
              Call yourself "Gray Noise" yes good You have a problem with creativity. yes I think that this would be the name of your nickname maximally consistent with your policy on the site.
            2. UserGun 1 February 2020 17: 26 New
              • 9
              • 7
              +2
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              It was a long time ago.


              And oil for 150 bucks was also long ago ?! ))) And the "heritage" of the people - gas meat, too, has long been worth more than a pagan apple ?! ))) Damn, because "quite a long time ago" (2008 !!!) this "property of the people" was the third by capitalization in the world! Karl, and the leader of cranes impressively told fairy tales, in his style of a fairy tale .... that "the era of cheap hydrocarbons has passed")))
          2. Olezhek 1 February 2020 16: 42 New
            • 7
            • 2
            +5
            The United States was not on the market, we sold our gas to Europe for $ 300-400 for 1000 cubic meters, and as soon as the states began to transport their liquefied gas by tankers, the price fell to $ 120-150


            The figures for the volume of exported liquefied gas from the United States to Europe bring?
            Last year, for example?
            How much percent of Gazprom's supplies?
            1. New Year day 1 February 2020 16: 52 New
              • 12
              • 8
              +4
              Quote: Olezhek
              Last year, for example?

              Gazprom IFRS Report: “In the third quarter of 2019 the average price per thousand cubic meters including excise tax and customs duties was 169,8 dollars. "A year ago, during the same period, it exceeded $ 250, that is, a drop in annual terms amounted to 32 percent."
              Gazprom's revenue in Europe fell from 934 billion rubles in the third quarter of 2018 to 586 billion rubles in July - September this year.
              Compared to the third quarter of last year, LNG exports from the US to Europe grew more than six times to 3,8 billion cubic meters, according to the US Department of Energy (EIA).
              In the second half of 2019, LNG from the United States and Qatar began to cost significantly less in Europe than pipeline gas supplied from Russia. The price of LNG at the largest gas hub in the EU - TTF in the Netherlands fell in November to $ 110-120 per 1.000 cubic meters. m., having decreased by 57% during the year. On average for the 3rd quarter of 2019, the cost of LNG at the TTF hub in the Netherlands and at the largest NBP hub in Britain was $ 140.
              According to the official forecast of the US Department of Energy, American LNG supplies to Europe will double in 2020, Qatar will increase its LNG supplies by 1.5 times by then.
              1. Olezhek 1 February 2020 17: 03 New
                • 7
                • 7
                0
                The figures for the volume of exported liquefied gas from the United States to Europe bring?

                According to the official forecast of the US Department of Energy, the supply of American LNG to Europe in
                2020 will double, Qatar by that time will increase its LNG supply by 1.5 times.


                laughing

                about what twice?

                wassat
                1. Golovan Jack 1 February 2020 17: 08 New
                  • 10
                  • 13
                  -3
                  Quote: Olezhek
                  about what twice?

                  Give up. Man has dreams. White and pink. Wet yes

                  Quote: Silvestr
                  so that there is nothing to fight in Syria and that the people quickly overthrow the current government

                  good laughing good
                2. Astoria 1 February 2020 17: 22 New
                  • 9
                  • 8
                  +1
                  about what twice? instead of 3,8 there will be 8 mld. cubes. Gazprom supplying + - 190 billion will go bankrupt, and the revolutionary Sylvester will enter the Kremlin on a white horse. laughing
                  1. Golovan Jack 1 February 2020 17: 44 New
                    • 9
                    • 11
                    -2
                    Quote: Astoria
                    and the revolutionary Sylvester will drive to the Kremlin on a white horse

                    Or even an elephant. Chess. On horseback belay
              2. Astoria 1 February 2020 17: 18 New
                • 10
                • 4
                +6
                In the second half of 2019, LNG from the United States and Qatar began to cost significantly less in Europe than pipeline gas supplied from Russia. The price of LNG at the largest gas hub in the EU - TTF in the Netherlands fell in November to $ 110-120 per 1.000 cubic meters. m., having decreased by 57% during the year.
                the reason was China’s refusal of additional LNG purchases, prices in Asia crawled down, catching Europe too.

                Bloomberg, Bank of America.

                The increase in gas production worldwide from Australia to North America has contributed to the filling of European storage facilities, and a drop in demand from China complicates the already difficult situation of producers. If this goes on, the American power engineers, whom the shale revolution has made the world's largest gas producers, will no longer have the opportunity to export it.

                Baker Hughes Report 31/01/20

                The number of gas installations has updated at least since October 2016, as gas prices in the United States remain in the minimum area.
            2. New Year day 1 February 2020 18: 42 New
              • 7
              • 6
              +1
              Quote: Olezhek
              For the last year

              Approximately 180 billion cubic meters of gas was supplied to the EU in 2019 by Gazprom - annual growth of volumes by 1,7%, annual decline in share by 2,5% (to 42,5%). Share 47,5%
              Deliveries of Gazprom’s traditional competitors to Europe in 2019: deliveries from Norway up to 119,2 billion cubic meters, Algeria - 32,5 billion cubic meters.
              The supply of liquefied natural gas to the EU in 2019 increased by 87% - up to 106 billion cubic meters. The largest supplier of LNG to Europe is Qatar, 29,5 billion cubic meters, supply growth by 48%, Novatek Yamal LNG and Kriogaz-Vysotsk - 20,8 billion cubic meters, USA - 17,5 billion
            3. Avior 1 February 2020 22: 26 New
              • 4
              • 2
              +2
              in order to bring down prices, large volumes of supply are not needed.
              It is enough to ensure a stable supply in the market that exceeds demand.
              And, although the gas market is rather inert due to the existing infrastructure, the excess of supply over demand in any case strongly presses the price down.
              hi
          3. Xenofont 1 February 2020 16: 47 New
            • 12
            • 2
            +10
            Have you heard about the profitability of shale gas production? The companies have wild loans and they go broke in heaps. No one knows how long such dumping will last and Gazprom can confidently wait, relying on the support of Germany.
          4. Terenin 1 February 2020 18: 40 New
            • 7
            • 4
            +3
            Quote: Silvestr
            Quote: Golovan Jack
            As they say,

            there is essentially nothing to argue: while the United States was not on the market, we sold our gas to Europe for $ 300-400 for 1000 cubic meters, and as soon as the states began to ship their liquefied gas in tankers, the price fell to $ 120-150 for 1000 cubic meters , and continues to decline. So it will be with oil.
            Therefore, you are left blah blah

            Sylvester, well, why are you making comments, copying word-for-word from a news feed, without your explanation? Punished for it negative
            https://yandex.ru/news/story/SSHA_zayavili_o_gotovnosti_obespechit_Belorussiyu_neftyu_na_100--6815f551807f12783f050d8c1663fa4b?lang=ru&from=main_portal&stid=GTP3rVc3f0QgFVJE8pkH&t=1580567804&wan=1&lr=20728&msid=1580568875.43021.140953.101249&mlid=1580567804.glob_225.6815f551&comments=1
            1. Nikolai Grek 1 February 2020 19: 33 New
              • 6
              • 2
              +4
              Quote: Terenin
              Sylvester, well, why are you commenting, from the news feed copy word for word

              belay here is etooooooooo nooooooooomerrrrrrrrrrrr !! belay laughing laughing
      2. qQQQ 1 February 2020 16: 24 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Quote: Silvestr
        Today they will lose much due to dumping prices, but tomorrow they will become monopolists in the market.

        Everything is clear with this, but it is unclear why they have not done so before. Probably sincere kindness, or all the same it turns out to be still more expensive to pull through half the world by tankers.
        1. New Year day 1 February 2020 16: 28 New
          • 12
          • 12
          0
          Quote: qqqq
          but it’s not clear why they hadn’t done so before.

          probably there was a signal from Minsk? We have a "union state" laughing ...It was
          1. qQQQ 1 February 2020 16: 37 New
            • 3
            • 2
            +1
            Quote: Silvestr
            probably there was a signal from Minsk? We have a "union state" ... was

            What does Minsk have to do with it? What did he hold them? After all, there is the whole of Europe consuming oil, so what is not dumped on it?
            1. Golovan Jack 1 February 2020 16: 44 New
              • 7
              • 9
              -2
              Quote: qqqq
              What does Minsk have to do with it? What did he hold them?

              Do not feed laughing
          2. Nikolai Grek 1 February 2020 19: 36 New
            • 7
            • 4
            +3
            Quote: Silvestr
            Quote: qqqq
            but it’s not clear why they hadn’t done so before.

            probably there was a signal from Minsk? We have a "union state" laughing ...It was

            You were asked a reasonable and rather burning question that you like didn’t see ... I think many people are interested in the answer to it ... so why rub comments from Yandex ??? laughing
      3. yang174 1 February 2020 16: 26 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        the price will fall on the exchange, grunting oil producers in the states loudly. yeah .. glad Belarus will ruin their own oil industry laughing
      4. Astoria 1 February 2020 16: 58 New
        • 12
        • 5
        +7
        Hosspadi - if it were cheap oil, the Americans would have poured all of Europe to it for a long time (after all, Europe is a high-margin market) but they don’t fill it with anything laughing They supplied a lot of virgin oil and gas to the Baltic states or Ukraine, in which only one out of 5 refineries operates (why is this so?) - ZERO.

        [quote] Belarus will receive oil through a pipe from Poland [/ quote] and Thank God - minus half a billion dollars for transit, which will go to ports and to the BPS, BTS 2.

        The United States, unlike our "defective managers", can think strategically and conduct global business.- Well, where are our managers Sylvester up to you? You are no other than the Guru of macroeconomics and business., only no one has heard of you outside of VO.

        Today they will lose much due to dumping prices, but tomorrow they will become monopolists on the market [/ quote]. - Wake up the oil market for a long time already, the fall in oil prices is killing the shale industry in the United States.

        And along the way, they will deprive Russia of money so that there is nothing to fight in Syria and so that the people quickly overthrow the current government. - Russia already has no money from deliveries to Belarus, oil duty free 25 years of the Russian Federation as a state does not earn anything on this, unlike the oligarchs whom you curse from sunset - until dawn.


        [quote] so that people quickly overthrow the current government
        [/ quote] - sit on the sofa and ride - overthrow good

      5. Sadam 1 February 2020 20: 49 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        about 15 years ago, Father I remember was called the last dictator of Europe, imposing all sorts of personal sanctions - for me he is an example of how to sit on 2 chairs with such a small body and stay stable. the American direction is also considered a priority here if they manage to put their foot in - they will probably cover the price difference from the budget amer - it hurts the temptation to bite off the last ally .... and return to Poland’s orbit where they also have a lot of past
      6. www3 1 February 2020 20: 54 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        + If that goes, Russia is losing a military base and is getting a problem with an early warning of a missile strike.
    9. SASHA OLD 1 February 2020 16: 36 New
      • 15
      • 1
      +14
      After the United States imposed sanctions against Venezuela and stopped buying oil there, it threatened to stop 12 of its heavy oil refineries from Venezuela. In 2019, the United States increased oil purchases in Russia by 310% of a similar brand. And they chose all the fuel oil !!! Belorussian refineries are also technologically adapted to process only heavy Russian oil. Question. Where the United States will take another kind of oil for Belarus? There is a similar one in Iran. But there they buy it nizya ....
      1. Olezhek 1 February 2020 16: 43 New
        • 7
        • 2
        +5
        Where the United States will take another kind of oil for Belarus?


        And who told you that they are going to supply something to Minsk, except for democracy?
        1. SASHA OLD 1 February 2020 19: 27 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Olezhek
          And who told you that they are going to supply something to Minsk, except for democracy?

          but...
          Well, yes, you're right)
      2. NKT
        NKT 1 February 2020 17: 27 New
        • 2
        • 5
        -3
        And what kind of “heavy” oil do you know that Russia exports to the world market?
        1. SASHA OLD 1 February 2020 19: 24 New
          • 4
          • 1
          +3
          Quote: NKT
          And what kind of “heavy” oil do you know that Russia exports to the world market?

          Urals
          1. NKT
            NKT 1 February 2020 21: 27 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            How heavy is she? This is a mixture of heavy oil from the Volga-Urals, sulfur up to 3% and API 26-28 with light oil from Western Siberia - Siberian Light, sulfur up to 0.5% and API 36-37. It turns out oil with API 31-33 and sulfur 1.3%. But oil with API 31-33 cannot be called heavy at all; according to the classification, it is average.
            1. SASHA OLD 1 February 2020 23: 16 New
              • 4
              • 1
              +3
              Quote: NKT
              How heavy is she? This is a mixture of heavy oil from the Volga-Urals, sulfur up to 3% and API 26-28 with light oil from Western Siberia - Siberian Light, sulfur up to 0.5% and API 36-37. It turns out oil with API 31-33 and sulfur 1.3%. But oil with API 31-33 cannot be called heavy at all; according to the classification, it is average.

              Well, I’m just sitting on telemetry, right now, I’m working in Surgutneftegas, that is, I’m one of the “ones” who is sitting on all the measurements, what are you trying to tell me here? I have been involved in oil production for many years (not a very big specialist, but what is there - a screw in the system), was born and raised in Surgut - the center of Russian oil production. Urals is a grade of “heavy” oil, high density and high sulfur content, it is our Surgut oil that goes to Belarus
              1. NKT
                NKT 2 February 2020 05: 54 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                Well, that you were born in Surgut and work in oil production does not mean anything. Once again, Urals is a mixture of heavy and light oil. From different regions of the Russian Federation. There are oil classification tables, including density. According to the GKZ, it is considered average and according to the American classification, too. They have a heavy API of 22 to 30 degrees. If we compare with Venezuela, then there are three types of oil. Light, almost like WTI, the Santa Barbara variety, but do not confuse it with the mine, heavy with API 16-26 and super heavy 6-8 API, this is Malta and bitumen.
                At the expense of your Surgut oil, specify, pliz, the field, as oil is different.
                1. SASHA OLD 3 February 2020 12: 59 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: NKT
                  please, pliz, the field, as oil is different

                  Now I am in West Surgut, a month ago I was at Rogozhinsky, soon we will probably go to West Salym
                  1. NKT
                    NKT 3 February 2020 13: 51 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Rogozhinsky:
                    SK2-5: density 824 cr / m3, viscosity 0.5 s Poise, sulfur - 0.36%
                    Z-Salym
                    Lower chalk: from 852 to 890 cr / m3, viscosity 2.1 cPoise, sulfur - 1.0-1.7%
                    Z-Surgut
                    Lower Cretaceous / Jurassic: from 873 to 889 cr / m3, viscosity 3.1-5.8 c Poise, sulfur - 1.6-2.1%

                    Well, according to our classification, heavy oil is from 871 kg / m3, according to American - below 30 degrees API, i.e. greater than or equal to 874 kg / m3

                    an API gravity of 34 or higher is "light", between 31-33 is "medium", and 30 or below is "heavy"

                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_crude_oil_products

                    In the upper examples, we have several types of oil that are mixed and fed into one Transneft pipe under the export name - Urals (API 31.7). There are, of course, our other varieties, but we are now talking about Urals.
    10. Alekseev 1 February 2020 19: 49 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: NIKNN
      oil will be delivered at very competitive prices ...

      That's right!
      But the point is not in oil, but in price. Buying oil on the market today is easy, there is no shortage. but Luke wants the RF to date the price for sovereign Belarus ... The sign of a truly sovereign state, unlike some Lithuania-Latvia, etc., is that it is itself capable of paying for what it needs.
      It is unlikely that the price of oil purchased in the United States (the cost of producing shale oil there is much higher), taking into account delivery to the refinery, will be lower than the Russian one. wink
      The same applies to any other oil purchased at market prices. For no reason, no one feeds anyone, not even Mom Dad. And Old Man, of course, understands everything and does not hope that someone will feed him cheaply. It’s not a matter of prices, it’s propaganda, they say, I’m fighting for Belarus and trying to shift responsibility for affairs in the economy to external forces.
    11. camo ridges 1 February 2020 20: 55 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Yes, it is unlikely that it comes to the supply of anything, because Pompeo
      made it clear that you must first join the WTO and expand
      the private sector, but for Grygorich it’s like death ...
    12. Chaldon48 2 February 2020 01: 36 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Free cheese is only in a mousetrap
    13. The comment was deleted.
      1. Olezhek 2 February 2020 09: 29 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        "According to Pompeo, in order for American companies to enter the Belarusian market, Minsk needs to overcome" some obstacles "- agree that they need to be bombed,


        So Belarusians themselves squeal with happiness in anticipation of how their Americans will “capitalize”
        So it’s not very sorry for them and sorry
        have a bon voyage
  2. GKS 2111 1 February 2020 14: 58 New
    • 20
    • 0
    +20
    " The United States wants to help Belarus be a sovereign state. "
    No comments.. laughing
    "Our energy producers are ready to provide you with the necessary oil at 100% at competitive prices."
    "Recently, politics has often smelled of oil, and oil has smelled of politics."
    Felix Dzerzhinsky, revolutionary, leader of the Communist Party and the Soviet state (1877-1926)
    It remains to promise liquefied gas overseas, and that's all ... In the literal sense, that's all ...
    100% "independence" is provided ..
    1. Kleber 1 February 2020 15: 03 New
      • 10
      • 0
      +10
      Quote: GKS 2111
      It remains to promise liquefied gas overseas, and that's all ... In the literal sense, that's all ...
      100% "independence" is provided ..


      For the price as in the Smolensk region. wink
      1. BARKAS 1 February 2020 15: 10 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        And why didn’t he promise a loan or promise without witnesses?
        1. Sergey39 1 February 2020 15: 16 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          And they will try to get a loan (interest-free), out of habit, from Russia.
      2. Senior manager 1 February 2020 19: 25 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Kleber
        For the price as in the Smolensk region.

        Oh how the brothers are poured diesel in the Smolensk region.
        1. www3 1 February 2020 20: 57 New
          • 1
          • 3
          -2
          the difference between the diesel engine in Smolensk and Minsk is only 10 kopecks. )))
    2. Lipchanin 1 February 2020 16: 04 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: GKS 2111
      "The United States wants to help Belarus be a sovereign state."

      At least one sovereign see which striped created ...
      1. Freeman 1 February 2020 16: 55 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Quote: Lipchanin
        Quote: GKS 2111
        "The United States wants to help Belarus be a sovereign state."

        At least one sovereign see which striped created ...

        In fairness, I must say that there was such an attempt.
        USA. actually created a republic Liberia in west africa.
        True, in the end, they turned out an evil parody of the USA itself.
        https://topwar.ru/54963-liberiya-pechalnaya-istoriya-svobodnoy-strany.html
        1. Lipchanin 1 February 2020 17: 03 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: Freeman
          USA. actually created the Republic of Liberia in West Africa.
          True, in the end, they turned out an evil parody of the USA itself.

          Here I am about it.
          For some reason, they always get sovereignty with a civil war
          Just like in Pugacheva’s song
          "I wanted to make a thunderstorm, but I got a goat,
          Pink goat with a yellow stripe.
          Instead of a tail leg, and on the leg of a horn,
          I would not want to meet that goat again. "
  3. smart ass 1 February 2020 15: 07 New
    • 10
    • 17
    -7
    Google how much GDP growth in Ukraine and compare with the Russian
    1. Black_Vatnik 1 February 2020 15: 11 New
      • 10
      • 1
      +9
      And what is the growth of GDP there? Enlighten please
      1. smart ass 1 February 2020 15: 56 New
        • 4
        • 7
        -3
        And what you attacked me, he was surprised to find
    2. Kleber 1 February 2020 15: 11 New
      • 13
      • 1
      +12
      Why google them then? Which is necessary, such and drew.
      1. Deniska999 1 February 2020 15: 19 New
        • 13
        • 7
        +6
        Like our Rosstat)
    3. Astoria 1 February 2020 15: 27 New
      • 7
      • 3
      +4
      Google, industry fell 2%, trade surplus negative as usual. Faithful path go comrades.
      1. Avior 1 February 2020 16: 32 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        and what is industry? salary increased
        1. Astoria 1 February 2020 17: 25 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          and what is industry? salary increased
          nominally? while the rate fell from 27 to 23 per dollar. Then yes, it has grown.
          1. DymOk_v_dYmke 1 February 2020 19: 23 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Astoria
            and what is industry? salary increased
            nominally? while the rate fell from 27 to 23 per dollar. Then yes, it has grown.

            Also, averaged over the ward 404.
          2. Avior 1 February 2020 22: 37 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            no, it grew without it, and in hryvnias and in dollars, and quite noticeably
            January 2018 7711 UAH
            January 2019 9223 UAH
            December 2019 12264 XNUMX UAH
            the hryvnia to the dollar has long been, for several years, relatively stable, somewhere around 26 plus or minus 1,5 hryvnias per dollar
            I don’t know what explains such a wage increase, but I don’t believe in all these GDP and so on, they really show nothing, they don’t have a direct connection with the incomes of the population.
            hi
    4. Sergej1972 1 February 2020 15: 52 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Ukraine’s GDP is at face value, and PPP is less than ten times less than Russian, although Ukraine’s population is almost four times less than Russian. With such a low starting base, it is not difficult to ensure GDP growth.
      1. smart ass 1 February 2020 15: 58 New
        • 6
        • 10
        -4
        Yeah, forget that there is a civil war on the territory of the country, communications and cooperation with the Russian Federation are broken and Crimea is lost. With all this, the growth of GDP is 3%
        1. Lipchanin 1 February 2020 16: 56 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Clever man
          With all this, the growth of GDP is 3%

          Due to what?
          Well, for example, what do they export?
          Or is the sale of everything, including black soil, a growth in GDP?
          And they sell everything on the vine
        2. Orkraider 1 February 2020 16: 57 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          And growth from what?
          You look at the schedule, and immediately it becomes clear ... growth)))
      2. hydrox 1 February 2020 16: 33 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        With such a low starting base, it is easy to ensure GDP growth

        To ensure growth, it is necessary for this, at least for a start, to have a need secured by money, then get investments somewhere, organize pr-in, and all this should be realized at affordable prices for the population.
        Are you in Ukraine ALL can fulfill these conditions?
        I don’t think it’s possible ...
    5. Dart2027 1 February 2020 16: 03 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Clever man
      what is the growth of Ukraine's gdp

      Growth of what? The production, mining, or sale of state assets?
    6. Xenofont 1 February 2020 16: 49 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      They have GDP growth due to tranches, but when they have to give it, it will become negative.
    7. www3 1 February 2020 20: 59 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      it's all fake made in poland)))
    8. Sadam 1 February 2020 21: 00 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      well, there’s nothing to brag about chaos and ruin about now, the main result is that Russia ceased to be the main trading partner of Ukraine this year, as the article was written 3 days ago ..... and yet it separated and went into its own swimming .... yes, probably lost ...... quite an acceptable intermediate result for the States
  4. TermNachTer 1 February 2020 15: 18 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    When communicating with mattresses, you always need to remember where free (inexpensive) cheese is.
  5. knn54 1 February 2020 15: 22 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    Old Man does not have to be president for long.
    1. Sergey39 1 February 2020 15: 35 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: knn54
      Old Man does not have to be president for long.

      Before the election.
  6. Paul Siebert 1 February 2020 17: 00 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Now the Yankees will plunder Belarus as Russia in the 90s.
    The local oligarchy will come to power, having its own accounts and offspring in the West.
    And then - on the thumb. Independence Square, Russophobia, impoverishment of the population ...
    What did Father want to achieve with his reverences to the Westerners?
    I hope this does not come to this. I really would not want to ... angry
    1. Olezhek 1 February 2020 17: 05 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Now the Yankees will plunder Belarus as Russia in the 90s.


      No. It's too late. "Everything is stolen before us." WITH
  7. Alexey LK 2 February 2020 01: 14 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    “The United States wants to help Belarus be a sovereign and independent state” - “It’s good that the American donkey is ready to hang a weight named Belarus on its neck, since the Russian bear pretends to want to remove it from its own,” thought Batska.
    "We are ready to provide you with 100% oil at competitive prices. All you need to do is join the WTO, develop the private sector and unlock your trading potential" - <We want you to give your hands to be tied, sell for money and spread legs> - thought Pompeo.
  8. Anatoly 288 2 February 2020 17: 22 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The US behavior reminds the USSR of the beginning of the 80s when it was swallowed, but couldn’t stroke ... I'm afraid this is not a bell, but a bell for the United States! Can it swallow? As if urges from the inside to the gun sounded ...
  • The leader of the Redskins 1 February 2020 14: 52 New
    • 3
    • 6
    -3
    QUESTION of a question ?!
    That's right, with a capital letter. And the price per barrel and what in return?
    1. Romka 1 February 2020 15: 04 New
      • 8
      • 1
      +7
      Expect Belarusian oil soon in the markets of Moscow and St. Petersburg.
      1. Xenofont 1 February 2020 16: 50 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        In Soviet milk cans ...
    2. Mordvin 3 1 February 2020 15: 22 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      what in return

      It's written:
      join the WTO, actively develop the private sector and unleash its trade potential.
      1. hydrox 1 February 2020 16: 41 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        For us, this will mean an increase in prices (with a growing deficit!) Of milk, but with a further increase in Russian agricultural production, this will continue for 3-5 years.
        And Belarus will join the fraternal family of "Baltigra", which already have their own cheeses across their throats ...
  • onix757 1 February 2020 14: 54 New
    • 23
    • 28
    -5
    A holy place is never empty. The oligarch is ready to sacrifice an ally for insignificant amounts, then others will come.
    1. lis-ik 1 February 2020 15: 01 New
      • 16
      • 18
      -2
      Quote: onix757
      A holy place is never empty. The oligarch is ready to sacrifice an ally for insignificant amounts, then others will come.

      And what are you minus? Indeed it is!
      1. onix757 1 February 2020 15: 06 New
        • 12
        • 14
        -2
        Apparently the defenders of the regime from some kind of lured node, my reasoning is not to my liking)
        1. ML-334 1 February 2020 15: 30 New
          • 9
          • 7
          +2
          Roll your sponges and admit the Crimea, some already shouted that America with them here and itchy in one place.
          1. Freeman 1 February 2020 17: 15 New
            • 7
            • 3
            +4
            Quote: ML-334
            Roll your sponges and admit the Crimea, some already shouted that America with them here and itchy in one place.

            Many Russian, as it were "state" companies, do not de facto recognize Crimea as Russian
            - The same Sberbank, for example.
            Motivating this reluctance to fall under the "sanctions", which will cause losses to the "shareholders".
            1. Astoria 1 February 2020 18: 25 New
              • 4
              • 2
              +2
              For example, Belarus has been sanctioned for three decades, 60% of exports to Russia and 20% to the EU (oil and oil products from duty-free Russian oil) are credited either to the Russian Federation or to China. - You can’t bite the hand that feeds you.
        2. www3 1 February 2020 21: 06 New
          • 0
          • 2
          -2
          and they have in stock hpp)
      2. Aleksandr56478 1 February 2020 15: 12 New
        • 17
        • 17
        0
        do not speak. Already takes anger that our multi-trackers from the government, in the pursuit of pennies, are ready to quarrel with all neighbors. You look at how quickly, against the backdrop of the oil and gas wars between Belarus and Russia, you came to Belarus to offer some conditions to take advantage of the situation and drive a wedge between the relations between the two countries. So once we lost Ukraine, now Belarus is next in line.
        1. michael2000 1 February 2020 15: 21 New
          • 16
          • 3
          +13
          Already takes anger that our multi-trackers from the government, in the pursuit of pennies, are ready to quarrel with all neighbors.

          What kind of connection is it that will be friends with you only if you borrow money for him for no reason?
          1. Mordvin 3 1 February 2020 15: 27 New
            • 3
            • 3
            0
            Quote: michael2000
            What kind of connection is it that will be friends with you only if you borrow money for him for no reason?

            And the “neighbor” came running from overseas, borrowing money for nothing.
            1. michael2000 1 February 2020 15: 32 New
              • 7
              • 5
              +2
              With such a neighbor, there is no need for bandits, he will undress him to his underpants, and then he also needs to force his underpants to wash, sell and give him money.
              1. Mordvin 3 1 February 2020 15: 39 New
                • 4
                • 3
                +1
                Quote: michael2000
                With such a neighbor, there is no need for bandits, he will undress him to his underpants, and then he also needs to force his underpants to wash, sell and give him money.

                And why is Old Man worse than us?
                Quote: michael2000
                forever, but failed.

                Settlement of prices in the foreign and domestic market is one of the requirements of the WTO, where Pompeo Lukashenko pushes.
                1. michael2000 1 February 2020 15: 42 New
                  • 6
                  • 2
                  +4
                  Quote: mordvin xnumx
                  Settlement of prices in the foreign and domestic market is one of the requirements of the WTO, where Pompeo Lukashenko pushes.

                  Lukashenko will not get into the WTO, because there you have to work and work a lot. And for thirty years he got used to an absolute freebie. All his escapades are designed to show Putin that he is all so independent and can do what he sees fit.
                  1. Mordvin 3 1 February 2020 15: 50 New
                    • 3
                    • 2
                    +1
                    Quote: michael2000
                    Lukashenko will not get into the WTO

                    And he has nowhere to go. Everything around him is already there.
                    Quote: michael2000
                    since there you have to work and work a lot.

                    There you must follow the rules that the organizers established.
                    Quote: michael2000
                    All his escapades are designed to show Putin that he is all so independent and can do what he sees fit.

                    He does the same as the rest, looking for where cheaper.
                    1. michael2000 1 February 2020 15: 53 New
                      • 6
                      • 1
                      +5
                      Quote: mordvin xnumx
                      And he has nowhere to go. Everything around him is already there.

                      The union state was offered to him.
                      There you must follow the rules that the organizers established.

                      Those who follow the rules will be left without pants, so China did not give a damn about all the rules of the WTO.
                      He does the same as the rest, looking for where cheaper.

                      Well, let it slip through the bazaar, maybe it’ll find cheaper.
                      1. Operator 1 February 2020 15: 57 New
                        • 5
                        • 8
                        -3
                        Mordvin and Litvin - brothers forever laughing
                      2. michael2000 1 February 2020 15: 58 New
                        • 6
                        • 2
                        +4
                        Mordvin and Litvin - brothers forever laughing

                        What a cool bunch in a puddle.
                    2. Mordvin 3 1 February 2020 16: 26 New
                      • 7
                      • 3
                      +4
                      Quote: michael2000
                      The union state was offered to him.

                      What the hell is it needed for, if Russia climbed into the WTO for twenty years, it is not clear why? What would Putin then modestly say so that they kind of deceived us?
                      Quote: michael2000
                      China does not give a damn about all WTO rules

                      China agreed with the United States.
                      Quote: michael2000
                      Well, let it slip through the bazaar, maybe it’ll find cheaper.

                      Pampeo offers cheaper ... In exchange for opening a market in Belarus. What is needed is swallowed, the rest will be spit out.
                    3. michael2000 1 February 2020 16: 28 New
                      • 3
                      • 1
                      +2
                      What the hell is it needed for, if Russia climbed into the WTO for twenty years, it is not clear why? What would Putin then modestly say so that they kind of deceived us?

                      And then the union state and the WTO?
                      China agreed with the United States.

                      That is, I do not care ...
                      Pampeo offers cheaper ... In exchange for opening a market in Belarus. What is needed is swallowed, the rest will be spit out.

                      Remember the proverb about cheese and a mousetrap?
                    4. Mordvin 3 1 February 2020 16: 37 New
                      • 6
                      • 2
                      +4
                      Quote: michael2000
                      And then the union state and the WTO?

                      Yes, despite the fact that Lukashenko perfectly understands what the alignment of energy prices to world will lead to in our conditions.
                      Quote: michael2000
                      That is, I do not care ...

                      I didn't give a damn. Reluctance to study the trade agreement that they concluded a month and a half ago.
                      Quote: michael2000
                      Remember the proverb about cheese and a mousetrap?

                      Oh, with what joy Russia got in there. Even cheese was not needed, it was enough pressure from any Deripaska who wanted to trade metal over the hill.
                    5. michael2000 1 February 2020 16: 44 New
                      • 3
                      • 1
                      +2
                      Yes, despite the fact that Lukashenko perfectly understands what the alignment of energy prices to world will lead to in our conditions.

                      Lukashenko was not supposed to join the WTO, it was up to the Russian Federation, so the argument is a bit weak.
                      I didn't give a damn. Reluctance to study the trade agreement that they concluded a month and a half ago.

                      And here a month and a half ago? China did not enter the WTO yesterday, and upon accession refused to synchronize its trade laws with WTO rules.
                      Oh, with what joy Russia got in there. Even cheese was not needed, it was enough pressure from any Deripaska who wanted to trade metal over the hill.

                      I agree to some extent, but nevertheless, the size of the economies of the Russian Federation and Belarus is not comparable.
                    6. Mordvin 3 1 February 2020 16: 53 New
                      • 1
                      • 1
                      0
                      Quote: michael2000
                      And here a month and a half ago?

                      Two weeks ago (dull).
                      On January 15, US President Donald Trump and Vice Premier of the State Council of the PRC Liu He signed the first package of documents as part of a trade agreement between the two countries.
                      Quote: michael2000
                      Lukashenko was not supposed to join the WTO, it remained for the Russian Federation,

                      It doesn’t matter whoever joins, all this contradicts the CU.
              2. Olezhek 1 February 2020 16: 46 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                Pampeo offers cheaper ... In exchange for opening a market in Belarus. What is needed is swallowed, the rest will be spit out.


                No, damn it, there is already no “market of Belarus - everything has died there, a long time ago.
                Pompeo rides her ears clean.
  • onix757 1 February 2020 15: 28 New
    • 4
    • 6
    -2
    only if you borrow money for him

    Debts worth tens of billions of green are simply described in this way, and the Republic of Belarus pays interest on annually on expensive loans.
    1. michael2000 1 February 2020 15: 30 New
      • 8
      • 2
      +6
      Quote: onix757
      only if you borrow money for him

      Debts worth tens of billions of green are simply described in this way, and the Republic of Belarus pays interest on annually on expensive loans.

      Remind me how many billions Belarus’s economy was sponsored when it resold oil products that cost it a third (!) Cheaper?
      Lukashenko thought that this would continue forever, but it did not work out.
      1. onix757 1 February 2020 15: 47 New
        • 5
        • 11
        -6
        Remind how many billions Belarus economy was sponsored

        Remind me how much the Russian Federation costs the operation of military facilities on the territory of the Republic of Belarus?
        1. Dart2027 1 February 2020 16: 04 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Quote: onix757
          how much the Russian Federation costs the operation of military facilities on the territory of the Republic of Belarus

          And what time?
        2. Olezhek 1 February 2020 16: 51 New
          • 5
          • 1
          +4
          Remind me how much the Russian Federation costs the operation of military facilities on the territory of the Republic of Belarus?


          Let me remind you: at one time, the Belarusians had a debt for gas in the region of a billion evergreens even under Yeltsin in the mid-90s,
          and so in exchange for write-off ... these bases are also operated.

          Conclusion: you can never have any serious joint projects with Belarusians.
          Only pure commerce under a contract with strictly prescribed fines.
          And then - the less - the better.

          Otherwise, they will devour a lot of your money, and then announce that "you still owe them"
          (Belarusian ikanamists counted)
        3. Xenofont 1 February 2020 16: 57 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          There are only a couple of objects and one is already closed.
    2. Olezhek 1 February 2020 17: 41 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      and the Republic of Belarus on expensive loans annually pays interest.


      This is normal for an independent state.
      get used to
  • qQQQ 1 February 2020 16: 30 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Quote: Aleksandr56478
    Already takes anger that our multi-trackers from the government, in the pursuit of pennies, are ready to quarrel with all neighbors.

    And to neighbors, what is it that you do not need to pay for resources? Preferential prices were provided in exchange for integration, there is no integration and no preferential prices. And friendship for money is prostitution. Pompeo is good, he suggested that the Old Man join the WTO, reforms, in general, bend down and push the loaves, I think Lukashenko cannot buy this, and all these meetings are elements of bargaining with us.
  • yang174 1 February 2020 16: 31 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    I’m wondering if you neighbors will be shitting on the rug every day — will you quarrel with them? and the neighbors have no fate to ask — are they ready to argue with us because of cents?

    why are you constantly presenting to the Russians, eh?
  • Lekz 2 February 2020 00: 45 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    You should decide whether you are ready to pay for such a “friendship” at your own expense or still we have common interests that are not dependent on money.
  • Aleksandr21 1 February 2020 15: 34 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    Quote: lis-ik
    And what are you minus? Indeed it is!


    What do we sacrifice for the sake of "low oil prices"? And it’s nothing that the tax maneuver hit hard at the Russian refineries and everyone suffers losses, not only the Belarusian side. And when Old Man was offered compensation, subject to unification of taxation within the framework of the union state ... What did Lukashenko do? He sent Russia, in other words, there is no way to put it .... Old Man slows down the integration process, and this whole story with oil because of this problem.
    1. michael2000 1 February 2020 15: 43 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Old Man slows down the integration process, and the whole story with oil because of this problem.

      Oil is an excuse, everything rests on a sweet word - POWER !!!
  • www3 1 February 2020 21: 03 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    they just have a stock in stock)
  • The comment was deleted.
  • RUSS 1 February 2020 15: 04 New
    • 8
    • 18
    -10
    Quote: onix757
    A holy place is never empty.

    For gas, in the same way, of the total gas consumption in Europe, only 30% is gas from Russia, and this percentage decreases .....
    1. Olezhek 1 February 2020 16: 52 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      For gas, as well, of the total gas consumption in Europe, only 30% is gas from Russia, and this percentage is decreasing ..


      Do we have excess gas that has been ousted from the market?
  • maidan.izrailovich 1 February 2020 15: 10 New
    • 18
    • 3
    +15
    The oligarch is ready to sacrifice an ally for insignificant amounts, then others will come.

    An ally who is just an ally in words is not an ally.
    In the list of countries that recognized Crimea as Russian, Belarus is not.
    1. onix757 1 February 2020 15: 18 New
      • 14
      • 13
      +1
      An ally who is just an ally in words is not an ally.
      In the list of countries that recognized Crimea as Russian, Belarus is not.

      And the Russian Federation as an ally was ready to compensate for the loss of Belarus from the recognition of the Crimea? And in general, which of the allies recognized Crimea?
      1. michael2000 1 February 2020 15: 49 New
        • 8
        • 1
        +7
        Quote: onix757
        And the Russian Federation as an ally was ready to compensate for the loss of Belarus from the recognition of the Crimea?

        And what obligations did the Russian Federation fail to fulfill?
        1. onix757 1 February 2020 16: 04 New
          • 3
          • 10
          -7
          And what obligations did the Russian Federation fail to fulfill?

          Apparently everything was fulfilled, because she did not want to bear obligations to the Republic of Belarus.
          1. michael2000 1 February 2020 16: 06 New
            • 6
            • 1
            +5
            Quote: onix757
            Apparently everything was fulfilled, because she did not want to bear obligations to the Republic of Belarus.

            It seems that you have no arguments and you begin to carry nonsense.
      2. mark2 1 February 2020 16: 21 New
        • 8
        • 2
        +6
        Yes, everyone recognized. And the army recognized and the fleet recognized, even the VKS were not opposed. And the rest are not allies. So ... Partners
      3. Olezhek 1 February 2020 16: 55 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        And the Russian Federation as an ally was ready to compensate for the loss of Belarus from the recognition of the Crimea?



        Baltic countries impose sanctions against Russia on US orders
        And the United States does not compensate them and is not going to compensate.

        If you need to "compensate for the loss" then this is not an ally - but a call girl
  • Kleber 1 February 2020 15: 16 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Quote: onix757
    A holy place is never empty. The oligarch is ready to sacrifice an ally for insignificant amounts, then others will come.


    No one will come there. The Belarusian economy will not stand the market price of oil.
    1. onix757 1 February 2020 15: 30 New
      • 11
      • 7
      +4
      The Belarusian economy will not stand the market price of oil.

      Is Ukraine already frozen?
      1. Kleber 1 February 2020 15: 32 New
        • 3
        • 5
        -2
        Do not compare the potential of Ukraine and Belarus. They are different.
        1. onix757 1 February 2020 16: 01 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          Different were at the time of the collapse of the USSR. Given the partial loss of industry in Ukraine, the potential is approximately equal
      2. michael2000 1 February 2020 15: 47 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        Quote: onix757
        Is Ukraine already frozen?

        Ukraine slowly squandered its wealth, this was due, inter alia, to the powerful potential of heavy and light industry. Belarus was worse off with industry, but it had been freebies for twenty years, however, like Ukraine.
        1. Bessarab 1 February 2020 16: 02 New
          • 7
          • 14
          -7
          "Freebie" is not Belarus, but the Russian oligarchs in the pursuit of dough. But the Russian state will have to pay dearly for their greed, go Belarus through Ukraine. Belarus from its budget contains 15 divisions on the borders with NATO. And Belarusians serve in them. And the Russian Federation will have to deploy its 15 divisions. And you will serve in them. And many more things will have to invest budgetary loot. That's when pensioners and hard workers will understand who really "freeloaded"
          1. michael2000 1 February 2020 16: 04 New
            • 5
            • 3
            +2
            Belarus from its budget contains 15 divisions on the borders with NATO. And Belarusians serve in them.

            What is the approximate cost of maintaining 15 divisions per year on the border with NATO? And the difference in oil prices gave Belarus about 106 mln. dale Obviously not so much division on the borders of NATO.
            So whose greed is here is another question.
            1. Avior 1 February 2020 16: 55 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              sturgeon needs to be slightly trimmed
              100 billion rubles, not dollars
              creates for the Russian Federation a lost profit of 1-1,5 billion dollars a year, that is, up to 100 billion rubles.

              all oil exports for the year about 130 billion dollars
              15 divisions is an army of 200-250 thousand people.
              1 billion dollars per 250 thousand is 4 thousand dollars per 1 fighter per year.
              In fact, this is only a salary of 20000 rubles per person on average.
              And the content is far from just a salary
              Non-greasy in general
              True, the army of Belarus is not 15 divisions, as you calculated, but much less
              but still inexpensive
          2. Astoria 1 February 2020 17: 33 New
            • 3
            • 2
            +1
            In dreams and on paper
            15 divisions on the borders with NATO.
            Vladimir - the whole army of Belarus + - 50 people for 000 years. Maybe 18 divisions - it would be more like the truth.
            1. Bessarab 1 February 2020 19: 20 New
              • 2
              • 3
              -1
              The number of personnel in the army RB-65ooo people. Plus Territorial Defense Forces -120000 people. In peacetime in the USSR, only one battalion was fully equipped in the regiment. The remaining two were staffed only by officer personnel and, if mobilized, were filled from these troops.and the army has more than 1600 units of armored vehicles. There are 3 airbases and much more that remains after the USSR. There are more than 200000 people. This figure appears in NATO’s combat calculations. Has the Russian Federation "saved" a lot of money by "pumping" Ukraine? By stopping feeding it, some brainless people claimed on different sites /
              1. Astoria 1 February 2020 19: 49 New
                • 4
                • 1
                +3
                RB-65ooo
                -of which in the region of 10-15 are civilians. Total 50-55.

                Plus, the Territorial Defense Forces -120000 people - still put under bayonets of cops and firefighters and a mobilization reserve in the region of 1,5 million people.

                and the army has more than 1600 units of armored vehicles.
                on paper, but a couple of dozen t72b3.

                There are 3 airbases, on which 1,5 dozen aircraft are in operational condition.

                Just a shield from NATO laughing
          3. Olezhek 1 February 2020 17: 39 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Belarus from its budget contains 15 divisions on the borders with NATO. And Belarusians serve in them. And the Russian Federation will have to deploy its 15 divisions. And you will serve in them


            How many bayonets in the Belarusian division?
            1. Astoria 1 February 2020 18: 29 New
              • 4
              • 1
              +3
              How many bayonets in the Belarusian division? well, if three thousand, then yes. Leave for 1000 - it will be possible to bring the number of divisions to 50 laughing
            2. Bessarab 1 February 2020 21: 25 New
              • 0
              • 5
              -5
              as much as in Russian
          4. Bessarab 1 February 2020 18: 59 New
            • 1
            • 6
            -5
            Thank. At the same time, cancel the registration. You don’t respect the truth of the uterus
          5. krillon 1 February 2020 20: 32 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Division-from 12 to 24.000 including In Belarus, 46 thousand troops. 15 divisions with a minimum of 180.000. Did the partisans count?
            1. Bessarab 2 February 2020 10: 17 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Those who served in the army know that in peacetime in each regiment of the division, only one battalion is fully equipped. The other two are staffed only by officers and officers, who were called partisans in the USSR.
              1. Astoria 2 February 2020 10: 46 New
                • 1
                • 2
                -1
                Those who served in the army know that in peacetime in each regiment of the division, only one battalion is fully equipped. The other two are staffed only by officers and officers, who were called partisans in the USSR
                paper troops laughing
              2. krillon 2 February 2020 19: 52 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Territorial troops so to speak. In peacetime, they plow, reap, children make. The state does not spend money on them as for troops of constant readiness. And then swung to 15 divisions ...
      3. Olezhek 1 February 2020 16: 58 New
        • 5
        • 2
        +3
        Is Ukraine already frozen?


        We are sincerely glad that Ukraine is "doing well."
        The main thing is not at our expense.
        1. Bessarab 1 February 2020 19: 24 New
          • 1
          • 4
          -3
          Did you save a lot of money?
  • Incvizitor 1 February 2020 15: 16 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Unexperienced friend that the nut is not chopped.
    laughing
  • Olezhek 1 February 2020 17: 11 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    A holy place is never empty. The oligarch is ready to sacrifice an ally for insignificant amounts, then others will come.


    Citizens are parasites, doors are closing, the next stop is Rotterdam prices plus ...
    1. Bessarab 1 February 2020 19: 41 New
      • 1
      • 7
      -6
      The next stop is the Pershing near Smolensk, thanks not even to the amers, but to the 5th convoy in Moscow and the foolish propagandists.
      1. Astoria 1 February 2020 21: 45 New
        • 5
        • 2
        +3
        The next stop is the Pershing near Smolensk, thanks not even to the amers, but to the 5th convoy in Moscow and the foolish propagandists.
        - As Zheglov said, this is Gleb -
        stubbornness is the first sign of dullness
        . Some also promised a NATO naval base in the Crimea, then the truth is that it ended badly. The Order of Judah is not just cast!
        Do you want to let the enemy to the doorstep on the threshold, it’s not a question - it means you are worse than the enemy, but you want to defecate, look for a place on the censor, they like those who are offended laughing
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Bessarab 2 February 2020 11: 39 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          It looks like you have already been awarded this medal, it’s painful you try to make Belarus and Belarus enemies of the Russian Federation. Not for nothing?
  • Sergei 23 1 February 2020 14: 55 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Old Man makes a move with a knight!
    1. Alex Nevs 1 February 2020 15: 05 New
      • 8
      • 1
      +7
      This move (ukro-rake) is known. Old Man is bluffing.
      1. maidan.izrailovich 1 February 2020 15: 13 New
        • 8
        • 3
        +5
        Old Man is bluffing.

        Old Man is fooling around.
        And the disease is progressing. crying
    2. askort154 1 February 2020 15: 16 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Sergey 23 ..... Old Man makes a knight's move!

      Only comes from the side of the hind hooves. yes hi
  • Chingachguk 1 February 2020 14: 55 New
    • 21
    • 5
    +16
    Well, that's great !!!! Soon cookies will start to deliver !!!! And Belarus will live, my dear mother !!!! Not that these Russians !!!! Keep it up!!!! If that is not clear, the Ukrainians will prompt !!!!! A start!
    1. onix757 1 February 2020 14: 58 New
      • 8
      • 20
      -12
      She already does not live badly. Tours from the Russian Federation are organized for treatment.
      1. Chingachguk 1 February 2020 15: 07 New
        • 10
        • 3
        +7
        Now everything will be fine. Found a new body for parasitism ???? Oh well....... laughing how great it is to look at these movements from the outside !!!
      2. askort154 1 February 2020 15: 22 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        onix757 ...She already does not live badly. Tours from the Russian Federation are organized for treatment.

        Only before each election, the super-president receives 3 lard of soft loans from Russia.
        1. onix757 1 February 2020 15: 39 New
          • 2
          • 11
          -9
          Only before each election, the super-president receives 3 lard of soft loans from Russia.

          These are the loans on which RB annually pays non-residential interest? Well, okay, RB pays, but to those who do not pay RF debts simply describes.
          But in general, the problem is not money, because in the Russian Federation, even with money, they cannot make the economy work.
          1. michael2000 1 February 2020 15: 50 New
            • 5
            • 2
            +3
            But in general, the problem is not money, because in the Russian Federation, even with money, they cannot make the economy work.

            Great economic guru. Or are you from the breed of sofa experts?
          2. Olezhek 1 February 2020 16: 59 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            These are the loans on which RB annually pays non-residential interest? Well, okay, RB pays, but to those who do not pay RF debts simply describes


            Well, apparently the presidents of "those" countries did not come from the collective farm and Russia is not regularly rude.
          3. Astoria 1 February 2020 17: 38 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            These are the loans on which RB annually pays non-residential interest?
            - No, these are those loans that no one else gives you in such a volume. If you want it cheaper, the borrowing market is open. laughing


            But in general, the problem is not money, because in the Russian Federation, even with money, they cannot make the economy work.
            -
            No money, no brains
            where to us to sign-quality.

            For 25 years, they have unanimously consumed more than $ 100 billion in subsidies, and still on the porch, along with Shklov's gypsy. Go there - where they do not know you. hi
            1. Bessarab 1 February 2020 21: 34 New
              • 1
              • 6
              -5
              Speaking of $ 100 billion. who “ate” the bad Belarusians. At the same time, the good and patriotic “new Russians”, they are the ruling Russian oligarchs, stole assets from the Russian Federation in excess of $ 1 trillion bucks. So, the geopolitical and military benefit of the Russian Federation from the Republic of Belarus, and the oligarchs only harm the threat of the collapse of Russia.
              1. Astoria 1 February 2020 21: 46 New
                • 7
                • 2
                +5
                At the same time, the Good and patriotic "new Russians", they are the ruling Russian oligarchs, stole assets from the Russian Federation for amounts exceeding 1 trillion bucks. So from the geopolitical and military benefits of the Russian Federation from Belarus, and from the oligarchs only harm and the threat of the collapse of Russia.
                this is our problem and our cross, but this does not mean that we should support everyone in a row without getting anything in return. Chop it on your nose. hi
                1. Bessarab 2 February 2020 10: 24 New
                  • 1
                  • 2
                  -1
                  Holy work. Your master needs to lick your ass and his right to steal another 100 lard in the future due to the loss of RB, carefully protect. You look and appreciate 30 pieces of silver toss.
                  1. Astoria 2 February 2020 10: 45 New
                    • 1
                    • 3
                    -2
                    Holy work. Your master needs to lick your ass and his right to steal another 100 lard in the future due to the loss of RB, carefully protect. You look and appreciate 30 pieces of silver toss.
                    yes you lick Judas masters, do not judge by yourself. hi
                    1. Bessarab 2 February 2020 11: 43 New
                      • 1
                      • 2
                      -1
                      Well, you are clearly and publicly licking. You call black white. And you judge me by yourself. And I'm just telling the truth. I wanted to ask if you are ashamed. But I realized that you do not know what it is. Not developed to this level.
      3. qQQQ 1 February 2020 16: 35 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Quote: onix757
        She already does not live badly. Tours from the Russian Federation are organized for treatment.

        She therefore does not live badly because Lukashenko did not allow liberalization, but if he makes a deal with the United States, I’m afraid that you will have to go through all the rakes in Russia and Ukraine, and there will be no time for tours.
    2. Alex Nevs 1 February 2020 15: 07 New
      • 6
      • 3
      +3
      That's for sure. The main thing is to jump higher.
    3. RUSS 1 February 2020 15: 07 New
      • 15
      • 26
      -11
      Quote: Chingachguk
      !!! Soon the cookies will start to deliver !!

      Go to the Savings Bank and take coins at 18%, while the Czechs will take in savings at 4%.
      And then burn over cookies getting a meager salary and try to survive until retirement.
      1. Chingachguk 1 February 2020 15: 12 New
        • 11
        • 8
        +3
        And I don’t look into someone else’s pocket .... Therefore, I don’t need to jump with pots on my head .....
        1. RUSS 1 February 2020 15: 21 New
          • 7
          • 14
          -7
          Quote: Chingachguk
          And I don’t look into someone else’s pocket ...

          Well, what so compensates Lukashenka’s actions? Do not look into someone else's pocket and do not meddle in other people's affairs.
          1. Chingachguk 1 February 2020 15: 35 New
            • 8
            • 5
            +3
            Do you suggest sitting silent and puffing in two holes? Why are you suddenly like this? Look, Americans don’t like when they insult democracy! They’ll give you less cookies! You choke yak zapreshchalovka found !!!! Now I want to watch and comment on everything from the first row !!!! Poetrahivatel, decided that he can peratrahat Americans ........ Ohhh very interesting !!!!! laughing Another circus came ...... Led by the circus acrobat Lukashenko !!!! laughing
      2. Kleber 1 February 2020 15: 51 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Credit in euros from 3 percent, in rubles to 12.
      3. Slasherrus 1 February 2020 16: 54 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        And you do not accidentally tell me in what currency, 4% in euros, 18% in rubles, see the percentage if you want to take in Russia in euros
  • The popuas 1 February 2020 14: 55 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    US become outbid! They break the ties of neighboring countries with Russia, and then they sell Russian oil and gas in the form of their own!
  • Romka 1 February 2020 14: 56 New
    • 9
    • 1
    +8
    That's how it does not twist, but everything revolves around oil. "Whoever can supply oil has power, brother!" yes
  • Cowbra 1 February 2020 14: 58 New
    • 25
    • 2
    +23
    Fools are born. They have Poland right by their side, didn’t they teach them anything about LNG, also American?
  • Arlen 1 February 2020 14: 59 New
    • 10
    • 3
    +7
    Mr Lukashenko said that Belarusians have their own country - sovereign and independent, and they cannot be part of any other state

    It is not regrettable, but it is worth noting that most likely there will be no possible nation-wide union, like the USSR. Very sorry. They are trying to artificially push us with yet another fraternal people. It is hoped that over time the power will change and the priorities of the new government to create a single state will change.
    1. Alex Nevs 1 February 2020 15: 08 New
      • 8
      • 2
      +6
      Now it will not be, the pans will not give up their wallet. But when the wallet disappears, he will have to kneel on the queen. Otherwise, the furry animal, Gaddafi ... Hussein ... Milosevic will come ...
    2. Sky strike fighter 1 February 2020 15: 14 New
      • 10
      • 3
      +7
      It is not regrettable, but it is worth noting that most likely there will be no possible nation-wide union, like the USSR. Very sorry.

      It’s clear that Lukashenko has always been against losing Belarus’s sovereignty for the sake of the USSR. He only flirted on this topic for the discounts and concessions that Russia is so generous with for all countries asking them to make another broad gesture.
      They are trying to artificially push us with yet another fraternal people.

      But that’s not the point. It’s just that interests diverge. There is either an independent Belarus or the Union State, as you put it in the likeness of the USSR.
      It is hoped that over time the power will change and the priorities of the new government to create a single state will change.

      What does it have to do with priorities if the Union State is needed only by Russia, and all other potential participants in this state need only independence? Here the interests diverge. What priorities do you not need to set for anyone except Russia? The Union State is not necessary. You have to face the truth. It is impossible to recreate the USSR. Nobody wants to go back. That's all. Even Lukashenko, who for the time being was forced to play with us in the Union State while not reached the red line, the loss of independence.
      1. onix757 1 February 2020 15: 33 New
        • 1
        • 9
        -8
        Union State is needed only by Russia

        Let's just say that a union state is desirable without Belarus, without industry and social programs.
      2. michael2000 1 February 2020 15: 57 New
        • 8
        • 1
        +7
        A union state is needed only by Russia, and all other potential participants in this state need only independence?

        But for some reason, everyone who wants independence wants to get energy for free, but better generally for free. Here it’s like in a joke: either remove the cross or put on your underpants.
        1. Sky strike fighter 1 February 2020 16: 10 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          So why not take it if you give in for free? This is already a question for those who arrange an attraction of unprecedented generosity, and not for those who take it. This policy is the art of the possible, agreements, in other words, who is doing business.
          Here it’s like in a joke: either remove the cross or put on your underpants.

          If you can, then you can not do either one or the other. You can sit on your head.
          1. michael2000 1 February 2020 16: 11 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            And as soon as they blocked the freebie, that's all -
            you are no longer my friend
            and don't pee in my pot
            don't play my toys
            and don’t eat my pie.
            1. Sky strike fighter 1 February 2020 16: 26 New
              • 2
              • 5
              -3
              So how can Belarus live now, if they ate making ends meet, without the means for which it has been accustomed to count all these years? A collapse is possible if there is no urgent alternative to the United States. We ourselves give Belarus to the West with our policies. We invested a lot of money there, but there is no return on the outcome. "Farsighted" policy. Grandmas piled up and left everything. That's the result.
              1. michael2000 1 February 2020 16: 40 New
                • 4
                • 2
                +2
                So how can Belarus live now, if they ate making ends meet, without the means for which it has been accustomed to count all these years? A collapse is possible if there is no urgent alternative to the United States. We ourselves give Belarus to the West with our policies. We invested a lot of money there, but there is no return on the outcome. "Farsighted" policy. Grandmas piled up and left everything. That's the result.

                Apparently you are banned from time to time on the site, forcing you to register new accounts over and over again.
                In fact, Lukashenko was offered to create a union state, but he is like a prostitute - I will, I won’t, but if I give it for money. And our policy didn’t stand on either side. I already wrote: the sweet word POWER !!! Everything rests on him
                1. Sky strike fighter 1 February 2020 17: 20 New
                  • 2
                  • 3
                  -1
                  ??? !!! what stop I hope I don’t see you at night under the sofa.
    3. Nikolay87 1 February 2020 15: 27 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      The EAEU is there. It is necessary to solve such issues there. All according to contracts and written arrangements. We just have to admit that in our world there are no "independent countries", everyone depends on the hegemon in whose hands the "printing press" (with all that it implies), including us. Everyone is trying to survive and not be burned in the flame of a color revolution first. And there is nothing natural as a big state-wu to survive at the expense of the small, crushing them economically, politically, military power. And it’s no secret that BR is a small state. So, speaking of independence, be prepared to raise gas prices in your country for independence is expensive and be sure to come up with the enemy. on which to blame this price increase otherwise with a pitchfork will come under your window.
      1. Sky strike fighter 1 February 2020 15: 51 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        The EAEU is there. It is necessary to solve such issues there. All according to contracts and written arrangements.

        But how to decide if the interests are directly opposite? Someone needs a Union State, and someone just buns for promises to join this Union State someday. According to contracts, they don’t know how to do it. We have gestures, incomprehensible discounts, flirtations that are incomprehensible in the style of someone who will push anyone.
        1. Nikolay87 1 February 2020 16: 08 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          The EAEU is there. It is necessary to solve such issues there. All according to contracts and written arrangements.

          But how to decide if the interests are directly opposite? Someone needs a Union State, and someone just buns for promises to join this Union State someday. According to contracts, they don’t know how to do it. We have gestures, incomprehensible discounts, flirtations that are incomprehensible in the style of someone who will push anyone.

          So in this I washed away the whole compromise to seek, to negotiate. We need (or do not need) an allied state, since under these obligations it is possible to use military bases further from our territory, etc. Others want money for it and it normally nowadays (mind you, I'm not saying it's good). It’s just that we have some people who, judging by the diess, live in their own fictitious Russia, each with its own. For some, all other countries owe it, for others - they should and should be happy with it, while others have nostalgia for the past.
          1. Sky strike fighter 1 February 2020 16: 42 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Lukashenko recently abandoned the Russian Air Force base in his country. This is the Union State.
            1. Gleborg 2 February 2020 08: 09 New
              • 1
              • 2
              -1
              Quote: Sky Strike fighter
              Lukashenko recently abandoned the Russian Air Force base in his country. This is the Union State.

              and did the right thing, Ukraine also remembers agreed to a base in the Crimea, it ended with the green men ...
              1. Olezhek 2 February 2020 09: 30 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                and did the right thing, Ukraine also remembers agreed to a base in the Crimea, it ended with the green men ...


                You retell the western training manuals elsewhere
          2. Cowbra 1 February 2020 17: 04 New
            • 7
            • 1
            +6
            There is a compromise - union and oil at a discount. From our side - oil. with yours - your leadership loses a part of independence. This is called a compromise. And when on our part - a concession, but on their part - nothing - this is called extortion
            1. Nikolay87 1 February 2020 17: 07 New
              • 1
              • 3
              -2
              Quote: Cowbra
              There is a compromise - union and oil at a discount. From our side - oil. with yours - your leadership loses a part of independence. This is called a compromise. And when on our part - a concession, but on their part - nothing - this is called extortion

              I do not know all the conditions and agreements. I will say this, it’s enough for me that Vova and Lukashenko are on a quick set and if necessary, they will resolve issues quickly.
              1. Olezhek 1 February 2020 17: 37 New
                • 2
                • 2
                0
                I will say this, it’s enough for me that Vova’s


                Who is Vova?
    4. Bessarab 1 February 2020 16: 07 New
      • 3
      • 8
      -5
      National unions are organized on the basis of a common ideology. RB is a social state about the Russian Federation oligarchic. Therefore, union is impossible without the development of a single ideology.
      1. Nikolay87 1 February 2020 16: 30 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        What do you mean by the words "RB is a social state"?
        1. Bessarab 1 February 2020 19: 33 New
          • 2
          • 4
          -2
          The level of social benefits to the population, providing jobs, creating infrastructure for the population. There are practically no liquidated villages in the Republic of Belarus. households. The KRG population is not lower than it was in the USSR. The salary level of the director of any enterprise cannot exceed more than 10 times the smallest salary in this enterprise. Compare this with the salaries of your leaders of state monopolies. Even in the prosperous Belgorod region, there are a lot of derelict villages. In the suburbs of the field in the weeds. And the former collective farms resemble the result of an invasion of SS troops on a partisan village.
          1. Ruslan67 1 February 2020 20: 13 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            Quote: Bessarab
            The level of social benefits to the population, providing jobs, creating infrastructure for the population.

            At whose expense?! Russian oil gas loans and the open market A little crane turn off and the second DPRK
            1. Bessarab 2 February 2020 10: 26 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              due to the labor of all Belarusians led by Lukashenko.
      2. Sky strike fighter 1 February 2020 16: 45 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Quote: Bessarab
        National unions are organized on the basis of a common ideology. RB is a social state about the Russian Federation oligarchic. Therefore, union is impossible without the development of a single ideology.

        You wanted to say an antisocial state?
        1. Bessarab 1 February 2020 19: 35 New
          • 2
          • 5
          -3
          What I wanted to say was what I said, and you said this vileness and slander against the Republic of Belarus.
    5. Olezhek 1 February 2020 17: 01 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Very sorry. They try to push us artificially with another fraternal people


      Take an interest in whom the Belarusians supported in the conflict in the Donbass.
      Be surprised. belay
      1. Bessarab 1 February 2020 19: 36 New
        • 2
        • 3
        -1
        Is it not a single team of businessmen from Ukraine with Medvedchuk and Poroshenko at the head?
  • Mouse 1 February 2020 15: 00 New
    • 13
    • 3
    +10
    United States want help Belarus to be a sovereign state

    States and help! Sur !!!
    1. Kleber 1 February 2020 15: 18 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      They really help .... get rid of industry, technology, money and other yummy.
      1. Mouse 1 February 2020 15: 39 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        Quote: Kleber
        They really help .... get rid of industry, technology, money and other yummy.

        Exceptional can only help in their own favor. yes
      2. cloud catcher 1 February 2020 17: 11 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        "... must join the WTO"
        Great tip.
        The accession to the WTO of new members usually takes 5-7 years.
        Prospects for development within the WTO, for new members, are mixed. Some states, China being the best example, have noticeably benefited from accession. Others, such as Bulgaria, Hungary, Moldova, and probably Ukraine, suffered losses in industry and agriculture, which turned out to be unprepared for competition with the corresponding sectors of other WTO members.

        "The United States is ready to provide Belarus with oil" after the implementation of paragraph 1?
        Strange throwing with this oil. Though the hell are you ready to buy? You can’t call it sober calculation for the future.
    2. Sky strike fighter 1 February 2020 15: 28 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      No, well, help is not free. Control over the lines of communication between Russia and Europe, that is, essentially control over trade between Russia and Europe by means of control or agreements at the same time with Ukraine, Belarus, and Poland, is at stake for the United States, which means partly control over Europe and to a greater extent over Russia, which is important for the hegemony of the United States. Divide and conquer. In vain we drove in. It was important for us to maintain the status quo. And so they can request an exorbitant tribute for the way of communication with Europe. Won Poland already says pay the price for the Second Worldwide. Blackmail, which became possible due to short-sighted policies.
      1. Bessarab 1 February 2020 16: 19 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        That's right. Back in the 90s, the United States did not hide that their goal was to separate Russia from the EU by a cordon of hostile states. He is already 80 percent. ready. The Baltic states, Ukraine, Moldova, even Finland are becoming more aggressive towards the Russian Federation. The last window is Belarus. But it seems that the Kremlin decided to simplify the task for their "partners" and do all the dirty work for them on the conflict between the two fraternal peoples. However, even in the Russian Federation they recognize that Russia is a US-occupied country. Therefore, the visit of the US Secretary of State to Belarus was prepared by the oligarchs and the government of the Russian Federation and carried out according to their general plan
        1. Olezhek 1 February 2020 17: 14 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          The Baltic states, Ukraine, Moldova, even Finland are becoming more aggressive towards the Russian Federation. The last window is Belarus.


          No, for a long time already one hundred percent Russophobic politics.
          You are behind the times.
          1. Bessarab 1 February 2020 19: 48 New
            • 2
            • 4
            -2
            Well, that means only Belarus remained with the stubborn Lukashenko. That's it.
      2. Cowbra 1 February 2020 17: 21 New
        • 6
        • 2
        +4
        Poland is an inadequate state. And it will be inadequate regardless of anyone else's policy. Example - Poland has been fed by Germany for 30 years. Poland is a state subsidized from the EU. The main EU donor is Germany, and it has been feeding Poland for 30 years, but Poland has now moved to Germany with reparations. If Old Man is the same woodpecker - peace be upon him. No one will indulge fools. He wants in Ukraine? It will be like in Ukraine, saving a fool who is trying hard to break his forehead - against him, a fool, desire - is not necessary, because it will not work
  • lis-ik 1 February 2020 15: 00 New
    • 11
    • 3
    +8
    So now we all hiccup and "perestroika" and a new "thinking"!
  • anjey 1 February 2020 15: 03 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    Sweet cheese (oil) in the American mousetrap, dad laughing . Oh, Syabry.
    1. Sky strike fighter 1 February 2020 15: 39 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      Ukraine has not taught us anything. All the same sharp and thoughtless steps in politics. And then the status quo changes and everything around is blazing, which is good for the USA.
      1. Bessarab 1 February 2020 16: 34 New
        • 1
        • 6
        -5
        Or maybe this is because the top of the Russian Federation simply carries out the commands of the Americans?
        1. Sky strike fighter 1 February 2020 16: 50 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          That is, Israel and Syria for one? Are we protecting Assad at the behest of the Americans? In the Donbass show, not war? Sanctions only on paper?
          1. Bessarab 1 February 2020 19: 58 New
            • 2
            • 5
            -3
            And with Israel and Syria of the Russian Federation in chocolate. The war in the Donbass is the big business of American, Ukrainian and Russian jackals. Well, for example, the famous operation to supply to Ukraine 1 million tons of American coal FOB Rotterdam. For charitable assistance collected by the Communists in the Russian Federation, miners in the DPR chop a coal that magically arrives in Ukraine with American documents. Guess this real war?
      2. Olezhek 1 February 2020 17: 15 New
        • 6
        • 2
        +4
        Ukraine has not taught us anything. All the same sharp and rash steps in politics.


        Just Ukraine has taught us a lot, so parasites from the neck are removed in advance.
        1. Bessarab 1 February 2020 20: 00 New
          • 2
          • 7
          -5
          Yes Yes. It is necessary to save. Because it will be necessary to spend several trillion rubles on the organization of the defense of the Russian Federation in the Smolensk region.
          1. Olezhek 2 February 2020 09: 32 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Yes Yes. It’s necessary to save. Because you have to spend several trillion rubles on the organization of the defense of the Russian Federation in the Smolensk region


            1 Non-fallow Belarus stupidly lacks a modern army. Existing forces will be defeated in a couple of hours, even by Poland alone.
            2 Belarus is an exorbitantly Russophobic country, counting on the fact that they will "cover us"
            from NATO
            only children and mentally disabled citizens can.
            1. Bessarab 2 February 2020 10: 40 New
              • 0
              • 3
              -3
              Quote: Olezhek
              Yes Yes. It’s necessary to save. Because you have to spend several trillion rubles on the organization of the defense of the Russian Federation in the Smolensk region


              1 Non-fallow Belarus stupidly lacks a modern army. Existing forces will be defeated in a couple of hours, even by Poland alone.
              2 Belarus is an exorbitantly Russophobic country, counting on the fact that they will "cover us"
              from NATO
              only children and mentally disabled citizens can.

              Hitler also thought so. Then he realized that he was wrong. Gentlemen, you are on the right path.
              Anecdote from the time of the first information attack on Belarus when President Medvedev =
              Medv is ringing. He asks Putin “I started a war with Belarus. Tell me how many divisions he has?”
              15, Putin answers. And how much will it reach Moscow, if that? 75, Putin responds.
              The army of the Republic of Belarus is very combat-ready ... there are more than 600 tanks in it. Moreover, they are all modernized by the Republic of Belarus.
              For Belarus is not under sanctions and the latest electronics are available to it. However, the mentally retarded details explain only time to spend. Well you are not really interested, but 30 pieces of silver from 5 columns.
  • Thrifty 1 February 2020 15: 06 New
    • 9
    • 2
    +7
    Now the United States will soon announce that there is American oil in Belarus! All that remains is to bring “American democracy” to Belarus, and Gaddafi Lukashenko’s fate will seem fabulous ....
  • Igor Polovodov 1 February 2020 15: 06 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    We will provide you with stolen Syrian oil at competitive prices ...
    1. onix757 1 February 2020 15: 20 New
      • 9
      • 10
      -1
      This is true, the influence of the Russian Federation is enough only to protect the palace of Assad.
      1. Kleber 1 February 2020 15: 43 New
        • 6
        • 6
        0
        Quote: onix757
        This is true, the influence of the Russian Federation is enough only to protect the palace of Assad.


        Bulk, are you chtol? belay
        1. onix757 1 February 2020 15: 53 New
          • 5
          • 10
          -5
          Bulk, it's you chtol

          For the defenders of the bourgeoisie, soon all the people under one name will go.
          1. Olezhek 1 February 2020 17: 25 New
            • 7
            • 2
            +5
            For the defenders of the bourgeoisie


            Lukashenko found a business jet for $ 60 million



            Lukashenko bought a new Gulfstream G550 business jet for his eldest son Viktor in Austria.

            https://lenta.ru/news/2020/01/30/plane_luka/

            How Lukashenko "raised" the collective farms: a salary of $ 35 per month, as in impoverished Africa This is reported by Rambler.
            Next: https://news.rambler.ru/cis/43538606/?utm_content=news_media&utm_medium=read_more&utm_source=copylink

            Kamunist mustachioed ...
          2. Cowbra 1 February 2020 17: 25 New
            • 6
            • 1
            +5
            This bourgeoisie? Does he ride on earned money? Go, the proletarian plowed all year behind the machine:
  • Mountain shooter 1 February 2020 15: 07 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    And here are the cookies ... Isn’t it too early? There is no Maidan yet, but cookies are already “loading” ...
  • Ross xnumx 1 February 2020 15: 10 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    According to Pompeo, so that American companies can enter the Belarusian market, Minsk it is necessary to overcome "some obstacles"including: to join the WTO, actively develop the private sector and unleash its trade potential.

    Documents ... Official Papers ...
    To overcome “some obstacles”, it turns out that the words of the US Secretary of State are enough and to join the WTO (somewhere I heard it somewhere today? Ah, Mr. Tersky!) ...
    The most interesting thing is that then no one leaves the WTO ... If only forward with your feet? wassat
  • Shkworen 1 February 2020 15: 12 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    for heaven’s sake, only how much will it cost to re-equip a refinery for shale oil and what is the price of the issue, taking into account transit, again by trains from Baltic ports? :)
    the price may be competitive, but the overhead will make it golden :)
    well, any whim for your money :)
    1. Astoria 1 February 2020 15: 34 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Come to your senses no one will be lucky for half the world shale oil, just as they do not carry LNG to the Baltic states.
      1. Shkworen 1 February 2020 15: 38 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        it’s easy here, America’s tanker fleet is not so big, and everyone is busy, as they increase, they will begin to carry :)
        although most likely they will engage in banal re-purchase, but of course not at a loss to themselves, so the old man the price tag may not please :)
        1. cniza 1 February 2020 16: 27 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Oh, I’m not happy at all ...
      2. Freeman 1 February 2020 17: 44 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: Astoria
        Come to your senses no one is lucky for half the world shale oil, as well as do not carry LNG to the Baltic states.

        Yeah. To transport LNG from Yamal to the same Europe and in the Asia-Pacific region (India, China, etc.), ice class gas carriers - This is not "half the world."
        They drive to where they buy and pay.
        1. Astoria 1 February 2020 18: 40 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Golden words
          Yeah. To transport LNG from Yamal to the same Europe and the Asia-Pacific region (India, China, etc.) as ice-class gas carriers is not "half the world."
          They drive to where they buy and pay.
          only for some reason they don’t bring gas from the states to the Baltic states, but they are transporting them from Sabetta — probably there are no fools.
  • Reserve buildbat 1 February 2020 15: 14 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    And the caravans of mattress tankers, accompanied by the 6th fleet, will go to the shores of Belarus. laughing
  • Retvizan 8 1 February 2020 15: 15 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    "The United States declared its readiness to provide Belarus with 100% oil" ...
    This is of course a brilliant statement, only how many competitors will the Belarusian fuel and lubricants be after that and how attractive will its price be for the residents of Belarus?
    1. cniza 1 February 2020 16: 26 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      And the plants must first be modernized, they are imprisoned for our oil ...
  • Amateur 1 February 2020 15: 16 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    Minsk needs to overcome "some obstacles", including: to join the WTO,
    / In addition, to ensure the unhindered access of American tankers to the Belarusian oil refineries, it is necessary to dig out the Belarusian Sea (with the theoretical assistance of the current protoucre) and find the money to pay for all of the above. And personally A.G. Luk-o decide where to buy a house - near Rostov or near Kyiv.
  • Gonduras-m 1 February 2020 15: 16 New
    • 9
    • 11
    -2
    Fear Danians, Giving Gifts!
    In short, we lost Belarus men .. Well, to hell with her !!!
    1. Mouse 1 February 2020 15: 42 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      Quote: Gonduras-m

      In short, we lost Belarus men .. Well, to hell with her !!!

      Do not run ahead of the engine ...
      1. Gonduras-m 1 February 2020 16: 08 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: Mouse
        Quote: Gonduras-m

        In short, we lost Belarus men .. Well, to hell with her !!!

        Do not run ahead of the engine ...

        Hope I'm wrong .. hi crying
        1. cniza 1 February 2020 16: 24 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          We all hope the mind wins ...
  • GABALIS 1 February 2020 15: 19 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Hashtag #If you like it, let # appear on the website of the Government of the Republic of Belarus laughing
    1. Olezhek 1 February 2020 17: 35 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Hashtag #If you like, let go #


      Flag in hand and drum on the neck!
  • RUSS 1 February 2020 15: 22 New
    • 8
    • 13
    -5
    Quote: Gonduras-m
    Fear Danians, Giving Gifts!
    In short, we lost Belarus men .. Well, to hell with her !!!

    Belarus is not a sack to lose it. You save your own!
  • senima56 1 February 2020 15: 25 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    What, Old Man, found a new "brother"? lol
  • ochakow703 1 February 2020 15: 27 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Shkworen
    deliver trains from Baltic ports again? :)

    Or maybe Pompeo also thinks that Belarus is a sea power ... They, the Americans, have their own globe.
    1. Bessarab 1 February 2020 16: 27 New
      • 4
      • 5
      -1
      No, he just knows that the Odessa-Brody oil pipeline has already been built a long time ago and with the great desire of the Americans and not so much investment, they really can provide Belarus with Middle Eastern oil. He would have already driven oil to Belarus, but then Lukashenko did not want to quarrel with Putin. The same one promised that duty-free trade at domestic prices would suffer in the CES, and then he took it and changed his mind. As for gas. When they bought a gas pipeline, they promised a price in the Smolensk region. And "thrown"
      1. Olezhek 1 February 2020 17: 29 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        No, he just knows that the Odessa-Brody oil pipeline has already been built a long time ago and with the great desire of the Americans and not so much investment, they really can provide Belarus with Middle Eastern oil.


        Why didn’t they provide Ukraine with "Middle Eastern oil?"

        He would have already driven oil to Belarus, but then Lukashenko did not want to quarrel with Putin.


        Holy man. crying
        1. Bessarab 1 February 2020 20: 10 New
          • 2
          • 5
          -3
          Ukraine has no problems with oil and fuel. Although Russia has declared a ban on its supply. The deficit is compensated by Middle Eastern tankers to Odessa. The deliveries of the Russian Federation to Ukraine are small and only for the family of Putin’s godfather Medvedchuk. His nada "feed" the godfather in any way. True, he eats more than half. Ukraine. Well, probably with someone shared in the Russian Federation. In Ukraine, it is shared with Poroshenko .. And the Odessa-Brody oil pipeline was intended for pumping oil from the port to the Republic of Belarus and Poland. With the failure of the Republic of Belarus, the project “hung up”. By the way, Erdogan is going to Ukraine. It is possible that for negotiations on this issue, as without it, such a lot of tankers will not be allowed to pass through the strait
          1. Astoria 1 February 2020 21: 09 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            Vladimir, you are behind the times.

            Russian supplies to Ukraine are small
            - more than 30%

            RF supplies to Ukraine are small and only for the family of Putin’s godfather Medvedchuk. His nada "feed" the godfather in any way. True, he eats more than half. Ukraine. Well, probably with someone shared in the Russian Federation. In Ukraine, it is shared with Poroshenko.
            probably eating, well this is the problem of the Ukrainians. Luke with his sons is also eating, and this is a problem for Belarusians.

            And the Odessa-Brody oil pipeline was intended for pumping oil from the port to the Republic of Belarus and Poland. With the failure of the Republic of Belarus, the project “froze”. By the way, Erdogan is going to Ukraine. It is possible that for negotiations on this issue, as without it, such a lot of tankers will not be allowed to pass through the strait


            Download, fill with oil and pump, it has already been said a hundred times - if the Republic of Belarus can find oil cheaper, then in Russia they will be only happy.
  • ochakow703 1 February 2020 15: 31 New
    • 5
    • 10
    -5
    It’s only a shame that the quarrel occurred through the fault of our thieves and their roof. Here we are, mere mortals, what do we have from oil and gas revenues? Here, gulkin’s nose, and then the smallest. And they have already beached coast from greed and gluttony. (well and further about close relatives)
    1. Olezhek 1 February 2020 17: 32 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      It’s only a shame that the quarrel happened through the fault of our thieves


      And where are you from, in fact?
      And what are your thieves?
      1. ochakow703 2 February 2020 10: 29 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        I am from Mother Siberia, where innumerable riches are stored in the bowels of the earth, which are mercilessly plundered by a bunch of bandits, and we who live on this land and work for this state - eat up the last without salt. And you, Olezhek, know the price of gasoline and gas no worse than me, and you saw, albeit on TV, how from the mud of the 90s villas and yachts, football clubs and power over everything and everyone appeared. So what am I wrong about? It is not right that, to a greater extent, because of the greed of the oligarchy, we lost Ukraine, now Belarus is on the line, and only Kazakhstan is holding on a little, and that’s only because it does not experience resource hunger.
  • askort154 1 February 2020 15: 31 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    The USA declared readiness to provide Belarus with oil at 100%

    Brothers Belarusians, prepare barrels. This is more complicated than putting a hat under the cookies. yes
  • Normal 1 February 2020 15: 33 New
    • 7
    • 2
    +5
    Fulled up, Lukashenko. He became so insolent that he began to use overt blackmail on hydrocarbons. The king who has his people buried holds on to the throne, he thinks forever. Oh well. Plunge your country according to the Ukrainian scenario, you bastard.
    1. Sergey49 1 February 2020 15: 42 New
      • 3
      • 8
      -5
      This time, Lukashenko is acting not only in his own interests, but also for the majority of Belarusians. The idea of ​​Belarus entering Russia is not popular among the people. So the hopes of Maidan are ghostly.
      1. Aleksandr21 1 February 2020 16: 19 New
        • 8
        • 2
        +6
        Quote: Sergey49
        This time, Lukashenko is acting not only in his own interests, but also for the majority of Belarusians. The idea of ​​Belarus entering Russia is not popular among the people. So the hopes of Maidan are ghostly.


        Is the idea of ​​supplying oil and gas to Belarus at fraternal prices popular among the people? And as a loan at a small rate, or subsidizing the economy of Belarus so are the brothers, and as the question comes to further integration within the framework of the union state, we are not independent. I don’t understand this moment .... if the people in Belarus and the Old Man want to be an independent state, they should pay at market prices, and there shouldn’t be any subsidization of the Belarusian economy from Russia, or am I wrong?
        1. Sergey49 1 February 2020 17: 12 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Your question is rhetorical. Well, who will refuse a freebie?
      2. Dr. Sorge 1 February 2020 17: 21 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        You do not use it specifically. At the oppov.
    2. Bessarab 1 February 2020 16: 30 New
      • 3
      • 6
      -3
      Lukashenko just cares about his people and cares about him. For the Russian oligarchy will come to own Belarus and the second wave of the “Deriban” will go, as in the 90s. And the whole social sphere of Belarus will fall into their endless pockets.
      1. Dr. Sorge 1 February 2020 17: 20 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        And with the pen-do-ssami she will not fall?
        1. Bessarab 1 February 2020 20: 14 New
          • 3
          • 5
          -2
          And with ami he will fall. Since the liberal jackal, he is a citizen of the world. Therefore, Luke has only one option - to maneuver between groups of these jackals, trying to save the country.
  • Rurikovich 1 February 2020 15: 34 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    And I want to say to our leadership - wretched, at least do not mess with America !!!! fool
  • Aliken 1 February 2020 15: 36 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    Look, Luka, you’re climbing into the mouth of a crocodile, Russia will not pull it out, your business is voluntary.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • 75 Sergey 1 February 2020 15: 41 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Normul.
    Well, in general, we would not have bought oil and gas, parasites would have dumped, otherwise it is impossible ...
  • Strashila 1 February 2020 15: 41 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    A classic, overseas heifer half, but a rupe transported.
    “they want to help Belarus be a sovereign state”, how did Yugoslavia help, help Iraq, help Libya, help Afghanistan, help Ukraine.
    You do not have sovereignty, then we will go to you.
  • Basarev 1 February 2020 15: 42 New
    • 15
    • 4
    +11
    The United States is ready to supply Belarus with oil and oil products one hundred percent, while oil will be supplied at very competitive prices.

    And Belarus does not need oil at competitive prices. She needs oil at prices much lower than her competitors, because almost the only serious source of income is a primitive resale. The thing is: Belarus received oil from Russia for a penny, almost dumping, bringing Russia a net loss ... But it was reselling to Europe at European high prices, causing losses again: unjustly occupying the market share that rightfully belongs to Russia and rendering unfair competition. So I won’t be surprised if, driven solely by political motives, Lukashenko (and his only political motive is to maintain his own power at any cost) nevertheless signs this unprofitable agreement ... And suddenly he sees a price - competitive by American standards, that is, in the field of pan-European. The profit of the Belarusian oil pump will drop sharply, perhaps even to zero, I do not exclude negative values ​​... And Lukashenko is expected to rush to Moscow, talk about the fraternity in the hope of divorcing Russia for compensation. This is the real hutspa: to reject the only breadwinner who justly does not want to pay all the growing requests without any return, to defiantly go over to the side of his competitor ... And when it comes time to pay for actions, go to the rejected breadwinner and demand everything to be compensated.
    1. Normal 1 February 2020 15: 48 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Everything is correctly described, neither diminish nor add!
    2. cniza 1 February 2020 16: 21 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      rightly not wanting to pay all growing requests without any return,


      Many times they asked for political support, but there was always an answer - I can’t benefit from this ...
  • K-50 1 February 2020 15: 51 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    The United States is ready to provide Belarus with oil and oil products at one hundred percent, while oil will be supplied at very competitive prices.

    What will provide no doubt, that's just the price. recourse
    They can, for an acceptable price and political concessions, ask them not for scrap. This Russia does not go anywhere with its "Wishlist."
    Lukashenko decided to sell his dos nicknames due to 10 bakos of the price difference. And this is a SOVIET general. !!!
    Ugh, shame! (c) Alexey Smirnov. Soviet warrior and artist (with a capital letter).