Russia is ready to create its own missile for the Sea Launch instead of the Ukrainian


The Russian rocket and space center Progress is ready to start creating a rocket for the Sea Launch as soon as S7 Space, which owns a floating spaceport, can afford it. To start work, Progress has all the technical capabilities.


This was stated by the head of the state corporation "Roskosmos" Dmitry Rogozin edition "Expert".

For the “Sea Launch”, it is planned to develop a rocket, which has already received the code name Soyuz-7. Most of the technologies that will be used in it are similar to those used for the Soyuz-5 rocket. The main difference is that the starting weight of Soyuz-5 will be approximately 530 tons, and the rocket for the Sea Launch will be lighter, as it will require less fuel.

Rogozin said that the design of the lower part of the new missiles will be similar to the design of the Ukrainian-made Zenit-3SL rocket, which was previously used for the project. At the same time, Soyuz-7 will be more powerful than its predecessor.

S7 Space had to look for a replacement for the rocket manufacturer for the Sea Launch project after it turned out that the Ukrainian enterprise Yuzhmash, which produced Zenit-3SL, was currently unable to establish mass production of these products.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

96 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. maxim947 30 January 2020 10: 22 New
    • 7
    • 4
    +3
    I will say more, this is already being done. Only with the deadlines seems to be a complete disaster.
    1. Thrall 30 January 2020 10: 35 New
      • 20
      • 5
      +15
      What exactly is this statement of Rogozin?
      Sign a contract, then report on success.
      What are these potential virtual victories for in the long run?
      1. maxim947 30 January 2020 10: 41 New
        • 5
        • 4
        +1
        Sea launch still stands on the enemy coast.
        There is no money, but the appetite is more than the stomach, so there are forecasts.
      2. michael2000 30 January 2020 11: 20 New
        • 14
        • 2
        +12
        I will support - when there is a lot of screaming that we will do something, then in the end there remains one dust that was knocked out of our own sternum when we knocked there with our heels.
      3. maidan.izrailovich 30 January 2020 12: 06 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Thrall
        What exactly is this statement of Rogozin?

        But you never know what Rogozin says.
        Roscosmos State Corporation consists of individual companies. Many of which are joint stock companies. With its development programs.
        S7 Space is generally an LLC. With whom he wants to and collaborates. Rogozin is not a decree for them at all.
        S7 Space intends to create the Orbital Cosmodrome [9] based on the elements of the ISS. The project is proposed to be implemented at the turn of 2022-2024 in the format of a concession agreement for the ISS Russian segment [10] [11]. TsNIImash supported the proposals of S7 Space for the implementation of the project [12]. On December 25, 2018, S7 Space announced that work on the project has begun[
        https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/S7_Space
      4. slipped 30 January 2020 12: 33 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        Quote: Thrall
        What exactly is this statement of Rogozin?


        This is not a "Rogozin statement" - this is the answer to a specific question to the journalist of "Expert". And it consists in the following - RCC "Progress" will make a rocket for S7, if they can (financially) order it. What do you not understand? laughing
      5. opus 30 January 2020 13: 24 New
        • 5
        • 3
        +2
        Quote: Thrall
        What exactly is this statement of Rogozin?

        this tops from 2019
        В июне 2019 During the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, the Director General of Roscosmos, Dmitry Rogozin, announced that he had introduced the representatives of S7 Space to the director and design staff of RCC "Progress". According to him, the state corporation is ready to either supply components, or create a rocket according to the technical specifications of a private company.


        At present, the specialists of our company are discussing with S7 Space the tactical and technical requirements for the launch vehicle to ensure launches from RSC Sea Launch and the timing of the main stages of work
        , - noted in the RCC "Progress".

        Quote: author
        This was stated by the head of the state corporation "Roskosmos" Dmitry Rogozin to the publication "Expert".

        fool
        1. I doubt that Rogozin will “give” the “expert” .. an interview, of course. wrong newspaper
        2. This news issued by the author on the expert is not (although my hands can be crooked)

        3.IT Interview was given by TASS, in the spring of 2019
        1 + 2 + 3 = fake anonymous again? good
      6. New Year day 30 January 2020 21: 31 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Quote: Thrall
        What exactly is this statement of Rogozin?

        how about what? Dust in the eyes.
        “There are billions being stolen, billions. Moreover, the technology is very simple - first the money is transferred, the family, and then the person involved. ”- Head of the Investigative Committee of Russia Alexander Bastrykino of theft identified in the state corporation Roscosmos (2019)
    2. 1959ain 30 January 2020 12: 26 New
      • 2
      • 4
      -2
      Quote: maxim947
      I will say more, this is already being done. Only with the deadlines seems to be a complete disaster.

      The main thing that would not fall laughing
    3. SovAr238A 30 January 2020 20: 48 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Quote: maxim947
      I will say more, this is already being done. Only with the deadlines seems to be a complete disaster.


      well yes. well yes...
      Have you ever been to Samara?

      Every dog ​​in Samara knows everything that the TsSKB Progress does.
      And there are no "engaged" - no.
      Projectioning. “Give money” - that's what it's called.
      TsSKB Progress is a rotten enterprise through and through.

      Rotting began at the moment when they began to postpone the giving to the enterprise workers of the army.
      And the general nepotism began.
      the fruits of which we are reaping now ...
      1. New Year day 30 January 2020 21: 32 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        Quote: SovAr238A
        TsSKB Progress is a rotten enterprise through and through.

        for some reason I'm not surprised
  2. BARKAS 30 January 2020 10: 26 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    SARMAT can be tested without conversion. wassat
  3. rocket757 30 January 2020 10: 29 New
    • 5
    • 5
    0
    I can, I can not .... NECESSARY, do it! No, then no ....
  4. Olgovich 30 January 2020 10: 30 New
    • 6
    • 7
    -1
    the design of the bottom of the new missiles will be similar to the design of the rocket Ukrainian production of Zenit-3SL, which was previously used for the project. At the same time, Soyuz-7 will be more powerful than its predecessor.

    "Ukrainian", yes:

    First stage
    The main structure is made of aluminum and includes solid profiled reinforcement elements. This stage is equipped with an engine. RD-171M, developed by the leading rocket and space design bureau of Russia, NPO Energomash

    Zenit-3SL rocket control systemDeveloped and manufactured in the Scientific and Production Association of Automation and Instrument Engineering (Moscow) etc.
  5. Mountain shooter 30 January 2020 10: 31 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    S7 is seriously invested in space ... Why? Private companies rarely invest in things that do not bode well. So they’re ready to make a rocket ... At least "in a fold"!
  6. bessmertniy 30 January 2020 10: 31 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Degradation of the military-industrial complex of Ukraine leads to a decrease in export earnings and trade with Russia.
    1. slipped 30 January 2020 12: 52 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: bessmertniy
      Degradation of the military-industrial complex of Ukraine


      after all, everything was ready for our enterprises to launch the “Ukrainian satellite Lebed”:

      the satellite itself -



      booster block "Frigate-SB" -



      and even parts of the rocket itself were already ready



      Canada paid for everything (!) But they "sawed off their own legs" in the end.
  7. knn54 30 January 2020 10: 31 New
    • 0
    • 10
    -10
    Is it really impossible to create conditions for the emergence of "own" Ilon Mask?
    1. kupitman 30 January 2020 13: 06 New
      • 5
      • 4
      +1
      So we have it, only he has already died, this is Sergey Mavrodi.
  8. cniza 30 January 2020 10: 37 New
    • 8
    • 8
    0
    Rogozin said that the design of the bottom of the new missiles will be similar to the design of the Ukrainian-made Zenit-3SL rocket, which was previously used for the project.


    It’s bad when a journalist does such things ...
    1. slipped 30 January 2020 14: 46 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: cniza
      It’s bad when a journalist does such things ...


      It is bad when the commentator lacks an elementary technical education. laughing The launch ring of the rocket at the SiLonch launch complex is sharpened to the diameter of the Zenit-2 rocket. That is why the diameter of the tail of the Soyuz-7, as by the way the Soyuz-5 is the same. But the diameter of the tanks is already different, they are wider.
      1. cniza 30 January 2020 17: 09 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        I tell you about the round, and you tell me about the hot ... lol
  9. nm76 30 January 2020 10: 44 New
    • 9
    • 9
    0
    And why did we (Russia) buy the Sea Launch?
    We have several of our own operating ones, one leased and one under construction ... we have many cosmodromes, but few launches.
    1. Grits 30 January 2020 10: 59 New
      • 7
      • 4
      +3
      Really.
      Baikonur, Plesetsk, Vostochny, and Kapustin Yar can also be added there. Now also the Sea Launch (which, incidentally, they plan to drag to Primorye in Slavyanka). There are more spaceports than the United States. Here are just half the space satellites than the Americans.
      1. Lord of the Sith 30 January 2020 11: 14 New
        • 5
        • 2
        +3
        Another Kourou in French Guiana, our missiles are also launched there.
      2. Vasily Ponomarev 30 January 2020 12: 34 New
        • 1
        • 4
        -3
        there are clearly fewer cosmodromes, they have at least 13 of them https://pikabu.ru/story/v_ssha_nachalsya_bum_stroitelstva_kosmodromov_5342736
      3. Genry 30 January 2020 14: 43 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Gritsa
        Sea launch

        "Sea Launch" is designed to reduce the cost of launches, due to the proximity to the equator.
        The remaining cosmodromes have their own list of launched missiles and possible (safe) launch paths (directions).
    2. A009 30 January 2020 11: 04 New
      • 8
      • 1
      +7
      Maybe the whole thing is that we (Russia) did not buy it?
      this private company and private transaction. What they want is what they buy.
      1. nm76 30 January 2020 11: 19 New
        • 5
        • 7
        -2
        95% of the shares of the sea launch belong to the Energy Corporation ...
        Find a relationship with Russia yourself please!
        1. Golovan Jack 30 January 2020 12: 16 New
          • 7
          • 4
          +3
          Quote: nm76
          95% of the shares of the sea launch belong to the Energy Corporation ...

          Not anymore. And for a long time already. Learn the materiel.
        2. slipped 30 January 2020 12: 20 New
          • 4
          • 1
          +3
          Quote: nm76
          95% of the shares of the sea launch belong to the Energy Corporation ...


          Left behind from life. laughing The Sea Launch platform has long been purchased from RSC Energia by the private company S7 Space Systems.
          1. nm76 30 January 2020 14: 08 New
            • 2
            • 4
            -2
            Yes, thanks for making the adjustment, I really lost sight of the change in ownership of the sea launch.
            I read about S7 space and understood why I had not heard about them. For almost four years of ownership of the sea launch, only plans were announced.
            Of course, I can be mistaken, but the S7 Space is like an E-mobile from Prokhorov or Marussia from Fomenko - only plans, timing adjustments, global ambitions ...
            1. slipped 30 January 2020 14: 33 New
              • 5
              • 0
              +5
              Quote: nm76
              Yes, thanks for making the adjustment, I really lost sight of the change in ownership of the sea launch.
              I read about S7 space and understood why I had not heard about them. For almost four years of ownership of the sea launch, only plans were announced.


              S7 is a successful aviation company, S7 space is its space division, which appeared relatively recently, and at the end of 2017, its specialists already participated in the launch of a space rocket from Baikonur. To use the Sea Launch, a transfer of the platform and the command ship to Russian jurisdiction was required - which took some time, only recently they received permission from the former co-owner, it will still take a couple of years to produce the first rocket under SL.
  10. Obi-Wan Kenobi 30 January 2020 10: 59 New
    • 4
    • 8
    -4
    Rogozin said that the design of the lower part of the new missiles will be similar to the design of the Ukrainian-made Zenit-3SL rocket, which was previously used for the project. At the same time, Soyuz-7 will be more powerful than its predecessor.

    Ahhhh, Rogozin !!! Well, if Rogozin said, then everything will be fine!
    And if Rogozin also ate the earth, he tore his shirt, “I swear by my mother,” he said! Then I am completely calm for the future of Russian cosmonautics.
    Nails would be made of these people ... Like Rogozin.
  11. Barmaleyka 30 January 2020 11: 03 New
    • 4
    • 5
    -1
    Russia is ready to create its own missile for the Sea Launch instead of the Ukrainian
    FUN !!!!!
    Ready!!!
    Create, then create and yell, otherwise the hen is always in the nest ...
    1. slipped 30 January 2020 12: 25 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      Quote: Barmaleyka
      Ready!!!


      What bothers you? The production technology of the carrier is currently being developed on the creation of our new Soyuz-5 rocket - all work is on schedule, tanks, inter-tank and a number of units of the first stage of the launch vehicle are manufactured. Or do you think that “S7 space systems”, having a platform for a specific carrier, can launch something else from it? Not spending a lot of money on a rework? laughing
      1. Barmaleyka 30 January 2020 12: 51 New
        • 4
        • 6
        -2
        Quote: slipped
        What bothers you?

        crowing
        Quote: slipped
        moment is being worked out on the creation of our new Soyuz-5 rocket

        Do not specify what is with the east and what is with the hangar ?!
        Quote: slipped
        Or do you think that “S7 space systems”, having a platform for a specific carrier, can launch something else from it? Not spending a lot of money on a rework?

        I think that we don’t need to crow, they did it, and ONLY AFTER THIS, SCREAM FOR THE WHOLE WORLD
        1. slipped 30 January 2020 13: 08 New
          • 6
          • 5
          +1
          Quote: Barmaleyka
          crowing


          "Crowing" so far, only you are here - knocking on the keys. lol

          Quote: Barmaleyka
          Do not specify what is with the east and what is with the hangar ?!


          I’ll clarify - on Vostochny the second package of Soyuz-2 LV has already been assembled, for the OneWeb launch commercial company, out of five sets delivered there before.



          The construction of a launch complex for Amur



          The second heavy vehicle is being prepared for shipment to Plesetsk, to continue its flight design tests in the summer.

          Quote: Barmaleyka
          I think that we don’t need to crow, they did it, and ONLY AFTER THIS, SCREAM FOR THE WHOLE WORLD


          Do you have cognitive dissonance? lol It says - this is an offer from the manufacturer, which you can refuse, or you can not refuse and receive dividends. laughing What do you not understand?
          1. Barmaleyka 30 January 2020 15: 32 New
            • 3
            • 3
            0
            Quote: slipped
            I will clarify - in the East

            Yes, at least start wondering how much from the schedule the launch of the eastern one is behind?
            Describe the start-up time for the Baikonur to you?
            Quote: slipped
            The construction of a launch complex for Amur

            I have clearly and distinctly asked you in Russian what happened with ANGARA ?!
            Quote: slipped
            Do you have cognitive dissonance? It says - this is an offer from the manufacturer, which you can refuse, or you can not refuse and receive dividends. What do you not understand?

            this is your dissonance, for today the main thing is not to create but to shout about creating
            1. slipped 30 January 2020 17: 01 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: Barmaleyka
              Yes, at least start wondering how much from the schedule the launch of the eastern one is behind?


              Not at all. The launch company begins in April.

              Quote: Barmaleyka
              Describe the start-up time for the Baikonur to you?


              From Baikonur, the first batch flies on February XNUMXth. The delay is solely related to the testing of spacecraft at the customer.



              Quote: Barmaleyka
              I have clearly and distinctly asked you in Russian what happened with ANGARA ?!


              And I told you clearly and clearly - getting ready to be sent to Plesetsk. What is not clear to you?

              Quote: Barmaleyka
              this is your dissonance, for today the main thing is not to create but to shout about creating


              And where is "someone screaming" about the creation? Aw, we are only beginning to test parts and components of the Soyuz-5 rocket this year. Is it unclear what? The rocket will be made by the year 2023, not earlier.
              1. Barmaleyka 30 January 2020 18: 15 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Quote: slipped
                Not at all. The launch company begins in April.

                Do not specify the date of the first manned launch?
                1. Barmaleyka 30 January 2020 18: 52 New
                  • 2
                  • 2
                  0
                  understand don't specify
                  1. slipped 30 January 2020 21: 15 New
                    • 2
                    • 1
                    +1
                    Quote: Barmaleyka
                    Do not specify the date of the first manned launch?

                    understand don't specify


                    He asked himself, answered himself. lol

                    The first manned launch from the Vostochny spaceport at the PTK NP is scheduled for 2025. The ship flies to the ISS as part of the tests.
                    1. Barmaleyka 30 January 2020 21: 49 New
                      • 1
                      • 3
                      -2
                      Quote: slipped
                      Vostochny at the PTK NP is scheduled for 2025. The ship flies to the ISS as part of the tests.

                      But what about the "journalist "’s bravura speech about 18 years ?!
                      did I come up with the same thing?
                      1. slipped 30 January 2020 21: 54 New
                        • 2
                        • 2
                        0
                        Quote: Barmaleyka
                        But what about the "journalist "’s bravura speech about 18 years ?!
                        did I come up with the same thing?


                        Can't you read? laughing Plans in 2016 have changed. They began to make another ship. Heavy for the moon.
                      2. Barmaleyka 30 January 2020 23: 06 New
                        • 1
                        • 3
                        -2
                        Quote: slipped
                        lans changed in 2016

                        this you do not understand read
                        in the Union, when a rocket was launched, TWO messages were prepared and when they didn’t yell in advance, they landed, and now they said one thing, a year later the other, and after two they changed plans, isn’t it easier if it’s easier to make you look stupid after that ?!
                      3. slipped 30 January 2020 23: 55 New
                        • 2
                        • 2
                        0
                        Quote: Barmaleyka
                        this you do not understand read
                        in the Union, when a rocket was launched, TWO messages were being prepared and when they did not scream in advance, they landed


                        It’s stupid so far only you look laughingconfusing different launches of different rockets.
          2. Barmaleyka 30 January 2020 18: 51 New
            • 2
            • 2
            0
            Quote: slipped

            And where is "someone screaming" about the creation? Aw, we are only beginning to test parts and components of the Soyuz-5 rocket this year. Is it unclear what? The rocket will be made by the year 2023, not earlier.

            Once again, first do it after announcing, and not as loudly declare now, but as a pat, it either worked, or it didn’t work, or they started another project altogether
            1. slipped 30 January 2020 21: 18 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              Quote: Barmaleyka
              Once again, first do it after announcing, and not as loudly declare now, but as a pat, it either worked, or it didn’t work, or they started another project altogether


              This is what happens in your virtual reality. They wrote to you in human language: if they can buy a rocket, we’ll make a special version for them.
              1. Barmaleyka 30 January 2020 21: 48 New
                • 1
                • 2
                -1
                Quote: slipped
                This is what happens in your virtual reality.

                tackle further, from this the holes in the cases will disappear, the connectors will connect correctly and the hangar will take off
                1. slipped 30 January 2020 22: 00 New
                  • 2
                  • 1
                  +1
                  Quote: Barmaleyka
                  about the holes in the cases will disappear


                  The household compartment has long been burned out in the atmosphere, the crew returned to Earth.

                  Quote: Barmaleyka
                  the connectors will connect correctly


                  For this, the cameras were installed. All 25 launches of last year are successful.

                  Quote: Barmaleyka
                  and the hangar will take off


                  All new military heavy payloads are being created today for this missile. Launches from Plesetsk this year.
                  1. Barmaleyka 30 January 2020 23: 04 New
                    • 0
                    • 2
                    -2
                    Quote: slipped
                    The household compartment has long been burned out in the atmosphere, the crew returned to Earth.

                    the question is not about who burned up where, but why holes appear patched up with "tape"
                    Quote: slipped
                    For this, the cameras were installed.

                    normal people do not set cameras and train professionals, but judging by the fact that the journalist controls the space, the camera is closer to him
                    Quote: slipped
                    All new military heavy payloads are being created today for this missile. Launches from Plesetsk this year.

                    Once again I’m talking about what you need to do first and then scream, until everything is the other way around and it looks to put it mildly not very

                    26 March 2018 year in response to a media request from the Communications Directorate of the Center named after Khrunichev was informed that the enterprise had begun manufacturing the first heavy-class Angara-A5 launch vehicle for launch scheduled for 2021 from Vostochny Cosmodrome

                    October 23 2019 years General Designer of Design Bureau "Salute" Center. M. Khrunicheva Sergey Kuznetsov told the media that Angara-A5M, which will replace Angara-A5, which does not meet the requirements of the Russian Ministry of Defense, will be first launched in late 2024 years from the Vostochny Cosmodrome

                    why call a date if you are not sure? !!!
                    or do you want PR and look beautiful?
                  2. slipped 30 January 2020 23: 40 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    Quote: Barmaleyka
                    normal people do not set cameras and prepare professionals


                    Exactly, schoolboy laughing Professionals are being trained, do not be slow. laughing

                    Quote: Barmaleyka
                    March 26, 2018 ... launch scheduled for 2021 from Vostochny Cosmodrome


                    The beginning of the construction of the USK KRK Amur was delayed for a year. And missiles without SK do not fly. Therefore, the launch of the A5 from Vostochny is planned today in 2023, after graduation the construction of the second stage, and not just the "starting minimum" as before. Construction is in full swing.

                    Quote: Barmaleyka
                    October 23, 2019 ..... will be first launched at the end of 2024 from the Vostochny Cosmodrome


                    So what? any rocket undergoes modernization. Proton-M had four in 20 years.
    2. Barmaleyka 30 January 2020 15: 48 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Quote: slipped
      "Crowing" so far, only you are here - knocking on the keys.

      specially for uryaklov
      from the speech of the "journalist" Rogozin in '14
      "The first launch of the launch vehicle from Vostochny is planned at the end of 2015, and in 2018, a manned spacecraft will take off for the first time from there. "
      don’t specify WHAT is the year today, I haven’t heard something about manned launches
      and there were only 5 simple ones from him, and the first one was not at 15 as our journalist swore but a year later

      so what about crowing ?!
      1. slipped 30 January 2020 17: 11 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Quote: Barmaleyka
        "The first launch of the launch vehicle from Vostochny is planned at the end of 2015"


        Especially for the "cackling by keys" - the first launch of the LV from the Vostochny took place in 2016.



        Quote: Barmaleyka
        and in 2018, a manned spacecraft will take off for the first time from there. "[/ i]


        The launch of the Soyuz-MS TPK considered at that time from the site V1 of the Vostochny spaceport was canceled back in 2016 in favor of creating new carrier and ship. Video of the construction of a new universal launch complex above them.

        Quote: Barmaleyka
        don’t specify WHAT today is the year, I didn’t hear something about manned launches and there were only 5 simple launches from it, and the first was not at 15 as our journalist swore but a year later


        But still remembered that the first launch was still? laughing
        1. Barmaleyka 30 January 2020 18: 14 New
          • 3
          • 3
          0
          Quote: slipped
          Especially for the "cackling by keys" - the first launch of the LV from the Vostochny took place in 2016.

          you either play the fool or cannot read
          once again for the illiterate, the first launch was late for a YEAR, it should have been launched at 15 in the 16th, doesn’t it seem a little expensive to build a cosmodrome for ONE launch a year, namely such a volume of launches in 4 years of operation
          Quote: slipped
          The launch of the Soyuz-MS TPK then considered from the site V1 of the Vostochny spaceport was canceled back in 2016 in favor of creating new carrier and ship.

          all the same, probably you aren’t fooling around, once again this is exactly what I wrote about, we crow first, and after ... transferring starts, canceling projects, etc.
          normal people do first and after that they tell everyone about it
          Quote: slipped
          But still remembered that the first launch was still?

          CAREFULLY read what you wrote
          FIRST LAUNCH 15 year FIRST LAUNCHED 18 year launch
          one was delayed for a year, the second is generally delayed
          1. slipped 30 January 2020 21: 35 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Barmaleyka
            the first launch was delayed for a YEAR, was supposed to be at 15 launched in 16 distance


            You can’t even count the campaign, schoolboy? lol From the end of 2015 to April 28 - 4 months. Those. late less than six months.

            Quote: Barmaleyka
            Don't you think that it’s a little unprofitable to build a cosmodrome for ONE launch a year, namely such a volume of launches in 4 years


            It does not seem. The cosmodrome is a very long time, for a century and beyond. What payloads were allowed to run from it - they launched. Starting in 2020, we can already afford to launch commercial airborne vehicles - that's why five missiles were delivered to this launch pad. With the construction of additional facilities, including sites for testing new technology, the range of products launched will only increase.

            Quote: Barmaleyka
            all the same, probably you aren’t fooling around, once again this is exactly what I wrote about, we crow first, and after ... transferring starts, canceling projects, etc.


            The manned program with the launches of Soyuz MS and Progress MS on the ISS is being successfully implemented from Baikonur. It was considered impractical to create a duplicate infrastructure in 2016 using the technologies of the previous generation - they decided to continue to use the infrastructure of Baikonur and even conduct the first tests of the PTK NP there. But Kazakhstan is delaying the reconstruction of its launch complex. Therefore, the tests of a new heavy ship for the Moon were returned to Vostochny. The launch of the Eagle layout is planned for the year 2023.

            Quote: Barmaleyka
            normal people do first and after that they tell everyone about it


            "And he said, well, so beautiful! That I almost got into the hands of Tel Aviv." laughing Musk there something about Mars weaved ... probably lied.
            1. Barmaleyka 30 January 2020 21: 47 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              2015 to April 28 - 4 months.
              Well, yes, well, not in such a distant future they would have leaned against the wall for that, and given what happened during the construction, before that there would have been a very "fun" life in the cellars of Lubyanka, and you kindly bypass the question hangars and manned flights
              Quote: slipped
              Musk there something about Mars weaved ... probably lied.

              Yes, I do not care about the mask, there they let them all at least manage, I will only be glad
              I don't want shit to go around
              1. slipped 30 January 2020 22: 14 New
                • 1
                • 2
                -1
                Quote: Barmaleyka
                Well, yes, well, not in such a distant future they would have been leaning against the wall for that, and given what happened during the construction, before that there would have been a very "fun" life in the cellars of Lubyanka,


                Everyone who committed the theft, and these are the leaders of Spetsstroy (Khrizman and Co.) and its contracting organizations, sat down for various periods.

                Quote: Barmaleyka
                and you kindly bypass the issue of hangars and manned flights


                and you are so stupidly stupid in my answers. lol

                Quote: Barmaleyka
                I don't want shit to go around


                rustic?
                1. Barmaleyka 30 January 2020 22: 58 New
                  • 0
                  • 2
                  -2
                  Quote: slipped
                  Everyone who committed the theft, and these are the leaders of Spetsstroy (Khrizman and Co.) and its contracting organizations, sat down for various periods.

                  sure?
                  Quote: slipped
                  and you are so stupidly stupid in my answers.

                  direct answer will be
                  Quote: slipped
                  rustic?

                  in elderberry garden
                  Do you really think that winning relations, and after not fulfilling promises are perceived differently?
                2. slipped 30 January 2020 23: 26 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: Barmaleyka
                  sure?


                  Concerning 58 persons, sentences have been passed in which convicts received up to 11 and a half years in prison

                  Quote: Barmaleyka
                  direct answer will be


                  Bench tests are underway, after they are completed this quarter, the rocket will be sent to Plesetsk, launch by decision of the Moscow Region.

                  Quote: Barmaleyka
                  in elderberry garden
                  Do you really think that winning relations, and after not fulfilling promises are perceived differently?


                  I do not see "defaults." All that is claimed is in work. This also applies to new carriers and their payload.
                3. Barmaleyka 31 January 2020 08: 45 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: slipped
                  I do not see "defaults." All that is claimed is in work.

                  When do they announce the launch at 18 and then transfer to after 24 is this performance or not performance?
                4. slipped 31 January 2020 14: 54 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Barmaleyka
                  When do they announce the launch at 18 and then transfer to after 24 is this performance or not performance?


                  This is banal pragmatism in the context of budget sequestration and more. Remind you that in 2016, Roscosmos received half the money in its space program from what was needed for its previously launched projects? That is why some projects have been moved to the right. I note - not closed, namely moved, with prioritization. All funding was directed towards closest readiness. And this was the right decision and the latest launches have confirmed it. And the creation of a manned system on Vostochny by 2018 on the basis of the Union, I remind you that only the launch of this carrier there was created, would lead to the dispersal of funds. Now a start is being built there for a new rocket and for a new ship. The readiness of both the launch and the rocket and the new ship for the first tests at the same time is the year 2023. Check the basic systems of the ship and its technical specifications. And after assembling the modification of the rocket certified for a manned flight, there will be an unmanned flight to the ISS of an already full-fledged ship - in the year 2024. The astronauts will fly in the third launch already in 2025. This is what concerns the current federal space program.
                5. Barmaleyka 31 January 2020 17: 44 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: slipped
                  This is banal pragmatism in the context of budget sequestration and more.

                  this is called balabolstvo
                  say a lot shouted Lavrenty Palych about the timing and what does ?!
                  or Korolev in the stands announced the timing?
  • Last centurion 30 January 2020 11: 14 New
    • 1
    • 5
    -4
    In place of s7, I would order design from Mask, and even return it to some barge # 2 ... just not the fact that he needs competitors
  • Victor March 47 30 January 2020 11: 34 New
    • 3
    • 8
    -5
    Quote: knn54
    Is it really impossible to create conditions for the emergence of "own" Ilon Mask?

    We had a lot of them. Mavrodi, Chubais, Berezovsky ..... What is this swindler so famous for? By the fact that he most beautifully mastered the experience of the USSR in drafting grandiose plans and with his hands attached to the state budget.
    1. Blackmokona 30 January 2020 11: 39 New
      • 4
      • 5
      -1
      Created the world's largest electric car manufacturer? Captured the commercial satellite launches market?
      Well and so on
      1. The comment was deleted.
  • for
    for 30 January 2020 11: 50 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: knn54
    Is it really impossible to create conditions for the emergence of "own" Ilon Mask?

    We already have Rogozin.
  • sinoptic 30 January 2020 12: 05 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Why can’t you put a light hangar on a sea launch?
    ... or just one of the hangar versions
    1. slipped 30 January 2020 12: 28 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      Quote: sinoptic
      Why can’t you put a light hangar on a sea launch?
      ... or just one of the hangar versions


      And why is there a "light Angara"? There, an average rocket is needed, for launching at the GSO 5 and a half tons - this is the standard size for most geostationary satellites. And the average A3 will require a radical alteration of the entire SL construction.
  • Victor March 47 30 January 2020 12: 06 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    Quote: BlackMokona
    Created the world's largest electric car manufacturer? Captured the commercial satellite launches market?
    Well and so on

    Let's start with TD. Vacuum locomotive rolling at speeds above the sound. In the pipe. A metro transporting not passengers, but cars with passengers according to an address-programmable system, when the car platform lowers from the surface into the tunnel, puts on the platform and carries, with rail relocation, on assignment, unloading the passenger in the car on the surface. Home solar roof power plants that return electricity to the network. An energy storage plant in Australia that stores and delivers hundreds of megawatts of electricity. True, consisting of 15 million failed and restored finger-type batteries made by the Chinese. The station, which is constantly under repair and replacement of dead elements. The specialist (not you, blockhead) understands what it means to have 149 megawatts of installed capacity and generate 100 megawatts. This means that the third part is constantly off and is being replaced. And he understands that the battery is not a source. It is the STORAGE, in which you first need to put it, and then pull it out. And this is a double conversion, losing 30% in the efficiency of the system.
    Monopolist in the production of cars.
    If this is so, then, the popularity and effectiveness of electric cars is such that they, for the most part, do not need anyone, and world mastodons do not work where there is no wide market. If I did something in a single copy, then I am a monopolist, the manufacturer of 100% of this iron. But this does not mean anything about popularity and attractiveness. Got it, that your arithmetic is arithmetic and so on?
    Further. Where are the promised 10 starts of EVERY first stage after 24 hours of maintenance and restoration of this ability? And where are 100 of these flights? Where is the reusable spaceship carrying passengers and tourists into orbit? Where are the starts to Mars, because tickets have already been sold there for an entire army of colonialists?
    And finally. It is not he who is running, it is we who have stopped.
    He is up to our number of starts as before Mongolia on four wheels.
    1. JonnyT 30 January 2020 12: 27 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Why are you doing this with the adaptations of the sect of the ingenious Mask)

      If the Russian Federation is ready to create a replacement for the zenith, then why did Dnepropetrovsk purchase a lot of tons of aluminum from the Russian Federation?
      1. slipped 30 January 2020 14: 51 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: JonnyT
        why did Dnepropetrovsk buy from Russia many tons of aluminum?


        They are still making first-stage tanks for the Antares carrier - this is their last “joint” program with Russia, through the American company Orbital ATK (part of Northrop Grumman), which is the integrator and customer of the project.
    2. Blackmokona 30 January 2020 13: 10 New
      • 2
      • 4
      -2
      You even flew away. A simple example is that he does not sell tickets to Mars at all, where does the information about breaking the battery system in Australia come from? From there, only messages about its super-profitability and its super-efficiency go, most of the starts indicated in the table are the USSR, and not the Russian Federation. Etc
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Victor March 47 30 January 2020 12: 27 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Quote: JonnyT
    Why are you doing this with the adaptations of the sect of the ingenious Mask)

    It is necessary to rub their faces on the asphalt.
    1. Dikson 30 January 2020 16: 16 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Mask for a week became richer by one and a half billion dollars .. this is our effective and never dreamed of ...
  • Elephant 30 January 2020 12: 41 New
    • 0
    • 4
    -4
    Why did you conclude a contract with Ukrainian Yuzhmash for the supply of aluminum? Selling resources again, instead of high-tech products. It turns out that we are helping the economy of banderlogs and merikos, and they are giving us new sanctions as a thank you.
    1. slipped 30 January 2020 14: 54 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: Elephant
      Why did you conclude a contract with Ukrainian Yuzhmash for the supply of aluminum?


      Elementary. Because they supply Antares first-stage tanks to America, for which we supply rocket engines as part of the ISS replenishment program. And the ISS is an international project.
      1. Elephant 30 January 2020 17: 28 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        This is a no brainer. I admit that part of our aluminum can be used for the needs of their defense.
  • Old26 30 January 2020 13: 02 New
    • 5
    • 4
    +1
    Quote: Gritsa
    Baikonur, Plesetsk, Vostochny, and Kapustin Yar can also be added there.

    Kapustin Yar - hardly. The only still operating "space" platform is 107, but there was a launch complex for 11K63 missiles, which were made in Ukraine and have not been produced long ago. Now only the "Poplar" at Kura and the "Topol-E" at Sary-Shagan are fired from there

    Quote: Gritsa
    There are more spaceports than the United States. Here are just half the space satellites than the Americans.

    They have NINE of them, so no more.

    Quote: Olgovich
    "Ukrainian", yes:
    First stage
    The main structure is made of aluminum and includes solid profiled reinforcement elements. This stage is equipped with an RD-171M engine developed by the leading rocket and space design bureau of Russia, NPO Energomash

    The Zenit-3SL missile control system was developed and is being produced at the Scientific-Production Association of Automation and Instrument-Making (Moscow), etc.

    Missiles, like planes, are usually considered someone else’s at the final assembly site. Zenit was made in Ukraine. There may be even more Russian components in the Voivode than in the Zenith - however, it is considered a Ukrainian missile at the place of construction and assembly.
  • Victor March 47 30 January 2020 14: 21 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Quote: BlackMokona
    You even flew away. A simple example is that he does not sell tickets to Mars at all, where does the information about breaking the battery system in Australia come from? From there, only messages about its super-profitability and its super-efficiency go, most of the starts indicated in the table are the USSR, and not the Russian Federation. Etc

    If you got married and you have a new surname, are you the same? Or began to live from the beginning?
    What the hell do you cling to formalities? Russia created both the USSR and the new Russia. And so, about iron and says nothing.
  • Victor March 47 30 January 2020 14: 38 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: BlackMokona
    You even flew away. A simple example is that he does not sell tickets to Mars at all, where does the information about breaking the battery system in Australia come from? From there, only messages about its super-profitability and its super-efficiency go, most of the starts indicated in the table are the USSR, and not the Russian Federation. Etc

    52 million greens. This is the ticket price for today. Defined by the rogue himself. One way, of course. For there is no chance to fly back. Fly alive on Mars is already a big question. For radiation in open space, without protection from it by the Earth’s body, belts, is much stronger. Well, and on a surface where there is no magnetic field, practically the atmosphere ....


    If you don’t know how to calculate using the methods of arithmetic, “We have an installed capacity of 149, we generate 100, then the remainder of 49 is ballast” - you are worthless as a student. What can we say about the theory of reliability, which says that the probability of failure of the SYSTEM is considered to be a multiplication of the probability of failure of all components. What with 15 million components, the probability of a unit even in 0,99999999999, multiplied by itself 15 million times, will give ..... Do you yourself, or help?
    1. Blackmokona 30 January 2020 14: 48 New
      • 0
      • 4
      -4
      Firstly, Musk does not sell tickets if he sells a link to it in the studio
      Secondly, the price of future tickets he announced in the region of 200 thousand dollars
      Thirdly, a return ticket if the person does not wish to stay
  • Victor March 47 30 January 2020 15: 00 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Quote: BlackMokona
    Firstly, Musk does not sell tickets if he sells a link to it in the studio
    Secondly, the price of future tickets he announced in the region of 200 thousand dollars
    Thirdly, a return ticket if the person does not wish to stay

    And what to fly back to? Are you completely crazy?
    1. Blackmokona 30 January 2020 15: 22 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Quote: Victor March 47
      Quote: BlackMokona
      Firstly, Musk does not sell tickets if he sells a link to it in the studio
      Secondly, the price of future tickets he announced in the region of 200 thousand dollars
      Thirdly, a return ticket if the person does not wish to stay

      https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1094796246613516289

      Translation of what you take off.
      It depends on the volume, but I'm sure that moving to Mars (a return ticket is free) Once, on a wonderful day It will cost less than 500 thousand. Dollars. And maybe even below 100 thousand. Dollars. Small enough for most people in advanced economies to sell their home on Earth and move to Mars if they want to.

      Quote: Victor March 47
      Quote: BlackMokona
      Firstly, Musk does not sell tickets if he sells a link to it in the studio
      Secondly, the price of future tickets he announced in the region of 200 thousand dollars
      Thirdly, a return ticket if the person does not wish to stay

      And what to fly back to? Are you completely crazy?

      On the BFR. Are you completely unaware of the system he is developing?
  • Victor March 47 30 January 2020 15: 04 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Quote: BlackMokona
    Firstly, Musk does not sell tickets if he sells a link to it in the studio
    Secondly, the price of future tickets he announced in the region of 200 thousand dollars
    Thirdly, a return ticket if the person does not wish to stay

    https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1094796246613516289
  • Victor March 47 30 January 2020 16: 00 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: BlackMokona
    On the BFR. Are you completely unaware of the system that he is developing

    That is, a crocodile from head to tail has 6 arshins, and tail to head is already 12. If a flight of HERE required one amount of fuel, then about the same, on the contrary. The difference in mass when starting from a planet with a rarer atmosphere and less attraction. In other words, you need to take almost double the amount from Earth’s orbit. And not low boiling, because there will be leaks over such a long period. So don’t make it up.
    1. Blackmokona 30 January 2020 16: 12 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Quote: Victor March 47
      Quote: BlackMokona
      On the BFR. Are you completely unaware of the system that he is developing

      That is, a crocodile from head to tail has 6 arshins, and tail to head is already 12. If a flight of HERE required one amount of fuel, then about the same, on the contrary. The difference in mass when starting from a planet with a rarer atmosphere and less attraction. In other words, you need to take almost double the amount from Earth’s orbit. And not low boiling, because there will be leaks over such a long period. So don’t make it up.

      Can you read what you criticize for a start?
      And then Mask has there the extraction of fuel on Mars in the plan. So you don’t need to take any double amount of fuel
  • Victor March 47 30 January 2020 16: 31 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Dikson
    Mask for a week became richer by one and a half billion dollars .. this is our effective and never dreamed of ...

    His cheating is known. But those who pray to these stumps do not understand that the count on the head is comic. One of the ways is that instead of a bonus, employees issue shares of their company. And it riches on the value of shares, impoverishing each individual shareholder, since the share of each decreases.
    Works on preorders. Collecting someone else's money and welding it in the bank. Queue for the year for him is the norm. Excluding tax for this transaction. Receiving subsidies from the budget for the use of "green" energy, which is still generated in a dirty way. Gaining preferences LOBBYING his agents in the Senate and other government agencies. This is called a bribe in our country. And the jurisdiction. Although, admittedly, not very, to very effective. There it is - within the framework of the law, that is, not by definition by jurisdiction.
  • Victor March 47 30 January 2020 16: 36 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Quote: BlackMokona
    Quote: Victor March 47
    Quote: BlackMokona
    On the BFR. Are you completely unaware of the system that he is developing

    That is, a crocodile from head to tail has 6 arshins, and tail to head is already 12. If a flight of HERE required one amount of fuel, then about the same, on the contrary. The difference in mass when starting from a planet with a rarer atmosphere and less attraction. In other words, you need to take almost double the amount from Earth’s orbit. And not low boiling, because there will be leaks over such a long period. So don’t make it up.

    Can you read what you criticize for a start?
    And then Mask has there the extraction of fuel on Mars in the plan. So you don’t need to take any double amount of fuel

    You- absolutely .... First you need to FIND. Oil, gas, water, or whatever it is ... Build a refinery in this place. Accumulation. A missile service plant, and a launch complex similar to Earth. And it’s with the power of ten boobies, like you. And BEFORE this, deploy a subsoil settlement.
    Yours already got it. Get away from sin.
    1. Blackmokona 30 January 2020 16: 48 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Quote: Victor March 47
      Quote: BlackMokona
      Quote: Victor March 47
      Quote: BlackMokona
      On the BFR. Are you completely unaware of the system that he is developing

      That is, a crocodile from head to tail has 6 arshins, and tail to head is already 12. If a flight of HERE required one amount of fuel, then about the same, on the contrary. The difference in mass when starting from a planet with a rarer atmosphere and less attraction. In other words, you need to take almost double the amount from Earth’s orbit. And not low boiling, because there will be leaks over such a long period. So don’t make it up.

      Can you read what you criticize for a start?
      And then Mask has there the extraction of fuel on Mars in the plan. So you don’t need to take any double amount of fuel

      You- absolutely .... First you need to FIND. Oil, gas, water, or whatever it is ... Build a refinery in this place. Accumulation. A missile service plant, and a launch complex similar to Earth. And it’s with the power of ten boobies, like you. And BEFORE this, deploy a subsoil settlement.
      Yours already got it. Get away from sin.

      You don’t even know on what fuel the BFR flies? Can you finally read about the rocket and the project, and only then will we talk? And then retell you all lazy like that.
  • Victor March 47 30 January 2020 17: 06 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Quote: BlackMokona
    Quote: Victor March 47
    Quote: BlackMokona
    Quote: Victor March 47
    Quote: BlackMokona
    On the BFR. Are you completely unaware of the system that he is developing

    That is, a crocodile from head to tail has 6 arshins, and tail to head is already 12. If a flight of HERE required one amount of fuel, then about the same, on the contrary. The difference in mass when starting from a planet with a rarer atmosphere and less attraction. In other words, you need to take almost double the amount from Earth’s orbit. And not low boiling, because there will be leaks over such a long period. So don’t make it up.

    Can you read what you criticize for a start?
    And then Mask has there the extraction of fuel on Mars in the plan. So you don’t need to take any double amount of fuel

    You- absolutely .... First you need to FIND. Oil, gas, water, or whatever it is ... Build a refinery in this place. Accumulation. A missile service plant, and a launch complex similar to Earth. And it’s with the power of ten boobies, like you. And BEFORE this, deploy a subsoil settlement.
    Yours already got it. Get away from sin.

    You don’t even know on what fuel the BFR flies? Can you finally read about the rocket and the project, and only then will we talk? And then retell you all lazy like that.

    And what, is this unique fuel in a native form lying everywhere, in the Solar system? I got it. It is necessary, the Earth gave birth to such beats.
  • Victor March 47 30 January 2020 21: 07 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Quote: nm76
    And why did we (Russia) buy the Sea Launch?
    We have several of our own operating ones, one leased and one under construction ... we have many cosmodromes, but few launches.

    Sea launch is necessary. You can choose a bunch of start places. Excavation routes should not fly over cities. There were still no debris in the streets.
    Further. The rocket should look at what the launcher needs. And this is Seattle today and Vancouver tomorrow. To fly over the right place, you need to wait for months, or spend a lot of fuel on a horizontal maneuver. Satellites do not carry so much on themselves. and the carrier from the sea launch is not that heavy, medium can not be launched. Not to mention the equatorial orbits that lift decently heavier satellites with the same carriers.
  • Avior 31 January 2020 00: 06 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    S7 Space had to look for a replacement for the rocket manufacturer for the Sea Launch project after it turned out that the Ukrainian enterprise Yuzhmash, which produced Zenit-3SL, was currently unable to establish mass production of these products.

    I don’t know where the author got it from. It would be interesting to see the link from where infa.
    In other sources
    On March 7, RIA Novosti reported that the Russian private company S12 Space, which had previously bought the Sea Launch Cosmodrome, wants to suspend, and later terminate, a contract involving the production of 7 Zenit missiles by Ukrainian Yuzhmash. The agency cited a “source in the space and rocket industry.” However, Roscosmos noted that they did not know anything about the alleged termination of the contract, and SXNUMX announced that the agreement would continue. Now the situation was also commented by the press service of Yuzhmash. “At present, Yuzhmash has no official communications from the customer regarding the alleged termination of the contract. For its part, Yuzhmash does not intend to initiate this issue, ”the company said.

    The press service of the Southern Machine-Building Plant noted that it has an order for three Zenit launch vehicles, for which a partial payment has already been received. Work is carried out within the previously agreed schedule.

    further confirmed denial
    The Russian company S7 Space, which owns the Sea Launch (Sea Launch) floating spaceport, suspended the contract for the production of 12 Zenit 3SL Ukrainian launch vehicles. About this agency RIA Novosti told a source in the rocket and space industry in Russia.

    According to him, the leadership of S7 Space informed the Ukrainian enterprise Yuzhmash about the suspension and the planned termination of the contract.

    Information about the planned termination of the agreement was confirmed by a source in S7 Space. He said that in April the production of rockets will be frozen at the current level.

    Yuzhmash did not comment on the media request. S7 reported on the current contract, but refused to talk about its prospects.

    The contract for 12 Zenit between S7 Sea Launch Limited and Yuzhmash was concluded on April 28, 2017. The first two rockets were supposed to be made in 2018-2019. The agency found out that the Ukrainian side had already received part of the total amount for its work - about $ 30 million.

    Wikipedia wrote about it like this
    In March 2019, an order for Ukrainian Zenit rockets was canceled, as S7 Space was unable to agree on the supply of critical elements from Russia to Ukraine for rocket production [35]; according to other sources, the contract was saved [36]. According to the agreement on debt repayment, Boeing received 5 free seats on Soyuz spacecraft for American astronauts in 2017, 2018, 2019, which NASA bought for $ 373 million. [37] [38] [39]
    .
    On August 14, 2017, S7 confirmed that it would use Zenit until 2023, after which it would switch to Soyuz-5 [44].
    On September 21, 2017, a source in the rocket and space industry told the media that Russia would not supply Yuzhmash with components for Zenit launch vehicles - the control system manufactured in Russia and the RD-171 first-stage engine will be delivered bypassing Ukraine directly to USA, missile rebuilding and testing will be carried out in Long Beach [45].
    On October 3, 2017, the head of RSC Energia Vladimir Solntsev told the media that at the first stage of using the cosmodrome, only Zenit will be launched from it. At the second stage, after the modernization of the cosmodrome and the appearance of the Soyuz-5 carrier, the Zenit will be abandoned [46].
    On February 13, 2018, the CEO of S7 Space Transport Systems (a subsidiary of the S7 group) Sergey Sopov told the media that the company ordered Yuzhmash to produce 12 launch vehicles until 2023 inclusive, based on the self-sustainability of the project in 3-4 launches in year. The composition of each Zenith includes an RD-171M first-stage engine, a second-stage combustion chamber, a control system and many other components, which are completely manufactured in Russia. In total, about 150 domestic enterprises are involved in cooperation. Their share in cost terms of the cost of the rocket is 80%. Fulfillment of the contract for 12 Zenit will bring Russian enterprises half a billion dollars [47].
    The Zenit launch vehicle for the first launch as part of the resumption of the Sea Launch project can be manufactured in 2019. The carrier is manufactured by Ukraine with the participation of Russia, and the final assembly of the rocket will take place in the United States [48]. In March 2019, a message was received to cancel this scheme.

    Then they wrote that the final assembly of the Zeniths will be carried out in the States, where components will be delivered from Russia and Ukraine, but this also died out.
    And why, all the same, the order was canceled and now S7 should pay for the development of a new rocket instead of long-established technologies of the inexpensive Zenith assembled by cooperation, it is not clear ....
    The fact is that not every missile can be adapted for a Sea Launch.
    Zenit was then the only robotic missile suitable for launching from the Sea Launch platform: after being installed in a vertical state, it independently refuel and discards the docking fasteners. For Sea Launch, this was a prerequisite: no people should remain on the platform.

    How the story of the Sea Launch will end is incomprehensible too ....
  • Victor March 47 31 January 2020 15: 51 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: Barmaleyka
    Quote: slipped
    This is what happens in your virtual reality.

    tackle further, from this the holes in the cases will disappear, the connectors will connect correctly and the hangar will take off

    Holes in the body will cease to appear a day later than healing the last hole in your head. Pravdorub your mother.
  • lvov_aleksey 1 February 2020 22: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    we have not finished unfinished construction in the east, why do we need a sea launch - who will explain the benefits for the future. This is not an argument:
    Quote: Victor March 47
    Quote: nm76
    And why did we (Russia) buy the Sea Launch?
    We have several of our own operating ones, one leased and one under construction ... we have many cosmodromes, but few launches.

    Sea launch is necessary. You can choose a bunch of start places. Excavation routes should not fly over cities. There were still no debris in the streets.
    Further. The rocket should look at what the launcher needs. And this is Seattle today and Vancouver tomorrow. To fly over the right place, you need to wait for months, or spend a lot of fuel on a horizontal maneuver. Satellites do not carry so much on themselves. and the carrier from the sea launch is not that heavy, medium can not be launched. Not to mention the equatorial orbits that lift decently heavier satellites with the same carriers.

    because I don’t understand this phrase:
    "The satellites do not carry so much on themselves. And the carrier from the sea launch is not that heavy, medium can not be launched."