The Kremlin commented on the initiative for the post of supreme ruler of Russia

194

The press service of the president of the country, journalists asked about the Kremlin’s position on the fact of the initiative to introduce a new post in the highest echelons of power. The point is that in the so-called constitutional commission recently began to receive proposals with a change in the main position of the country. In particular, it was proposed to introduce the post of “supreme ruler of Russia” in the country.

Dmitry Peskov, commenting on these proposals, noted that all such initiatives are more debatable.
According to TASS, Peskov added that initiatives are nevertheless being considered, and the Kremlin is paying attention to them.



From a statement by the head of the Kremlin press service:

Naturally, some (initiatives) will be eliminated; some are accepted, some are not.

What kind of initiatives the Kremlin is ready to accept, Dmitry Peskov did not explain.

Recall that in the course of his message to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, Russian President Vladimir Putin mentioned the need for a peculiar increase in the status of the State Council. This phrase, sounded from the lips of the president, caused an outburst of information, including an avalanche of proposals for "extending the authority of Vladimir Putin."

For reference: in stories Russia had only one “supreme ruler,” and that one was actually self-proclaimed. We are talking about Admiral Alexander Kolchak, who became the supreme ruler of Russia in 1918. In early 1920, the Bolsheviks shot Kolchak, and his body was drowned in the winter river. Kolchak's position was recognized by representatives of the White movement.
  • Russian President's website
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

194 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    29 January 2020 13: 14
    In early 1920, the Bolsheviks shot Kolchak, and his body was drowned in the winter river.

    However, 100 years have passed. But Kolchak’s children would live in the West, like Peskov’s, you look and would go to them. Kolchak's wife left Russia only in 1919.
    1. +6
      29 January 2020 13: 20
      Agree, "The Supreme Ruler" sounds somewhat archaic. But as you name the ship, so it will float.
      1. +4
        29 January 2020 13: 33
        Quote: depressant
        In particular, it was proposed to introduce the post of “supreme ruler of Russia” in the country.

        Why is that? The president certainly sounds better. fellow There were kings in Europe, we have princes, and after kings. It also sounded archaic, not in European?
        In particular, it was proposed to introduce the post of “supreme ruler of Russia” in the country.

        For me it sounds more Russian. And then they took the fashion president. The Anglo-Saxons are presidents, and with all their heads with their exclusivity, freedoms and democracy, full of holes.
        1. +1
          29 January 2020 13: 59
          Quote: NEXUS
          Europe had kings, we have princes, and after kings.

          So the prince is also debatable whether it belongs to the Slavs or is borrowed from the Scandinavians, so the word king is a modified Roman Caesar (Caesar or Caesar).
          1. 0
            29 January 2020 14: 00
            Quote: RUSS
            So the prince is also debatable whether it belongs to the Slavs or is borrowed from the Scandinavians

            The Scandinavians did not have princes, but konungs.
            Quote: RUSS
            also the word king is a modified Roman Caesar (Caesar or Caesar).

            So what? What do you know about such people as the Etruscans who lived there before the Romans in general?
            1. 0
              29 January 2020 14: 11
              Quote: NEXUS
              What do you know about people like the Etruscans

              What are you talking about?
            2. 0
              29 January 2020 17: 01
              The prince and kyonung comes from pragerman kyoningaz. Also, for example, how a Viking and a hero comes from a prag Germanic Viking
              1. +3
                29 January 2020 17: 34
                With such success from the Yakut word - Kiin Өs. In Russian it sounds like - KinES, hence the word - Prince. Kiin - central; navel. Kiin Өs - Central Counteraction or Center of Confrontation.
                1. +2
                  29 January 2020 17: 53
                  This is an etymology recognized in linguistics. And you just have idle etymologization
                  1. 0
                    29 January 2020 18: 27
                    Alternatively, there is no generally accepted etymology of the word "prince", there are more popular versions, there are less, and each will have inconsistencies.
          2. +3
            29 January 2020 14: 22
            The Scandinavians have konungs and labels.
          3. +2
            29 January 2020 19: 21
            The kings were with the Jews. King Herod, for example. Or Solomon and David.
            1. +1
              29 January 2020 20: 57
              Quote: Nick Russ
              The kings were with the Jews.

              Tsar, from the Latin "caesar". Hence, the conclusion. Either "translation difficulties" or the Bible (Torah) was written much later. The choice.
              1. -1
                29 January 2020 22: 14
                Quote: orionvitt
                or the Bible (Torah) was written much later.

                And it is very interesting who wrote, and after whom corresponded.
                1. 0
                  29 January 2020 22: 48
                  Quote: NEXUS

                  And it is very interesting who wrote, and after whom corresponded.

                  Say also that you yourself are God. People of course. The question is when and why?
                  1. -1
                    29 January 2020 22: 53
                    Quote: orionvitt
                    Say also that you yourself are God. People of course. The question is when and why?

                    Hmm, I thought I’ll understand ... when writing what were the goals of a person, and after how many of what was, they stupidly died out during the census?
                    1. +1
                      29 January 2020 23: 32
                      Quote: NEXUS
                      what happened during the census stupidly extinct?

                      What is there to understand .... People wrote, people also copied. And what became extinct, only God himself knows. Such a hitch. winked And I’ll tell you frankly about the goals that people pursue when writing such books. I do not believe in good intentions. Which was confirmed by history. Before the adoption of the Araamic religions, there were no religious wars. Or were very rare.
                      1. -1
                        30 January 2020 13: 34
                        Quote: orionvitt
                        People wrote, people also copied. And what is extinct, only God himself knows. Such a hitch.

                        During your life, you rewrite history, and here you are talking about hacks and evidence. I repeat, history has long been not science, but pseudoscience. It is remade as they want and interpreted to fit your needs.
                      2. +1
                        30 January 2020 21: 40
                        Quote: NEXUS
                        You rewrite history in your life

                        During my life, in Ukraine alone, history was rewritten already six times, and officially. The same thing is happening in the rest of the world, to one degree or another. Even what happened in our memory, some (individuals, organizations, states), often try to present it from a different angle, or even completely distort it. Some events are deleted, others, on the contrary, are invented, and still others are misinterpreted. I repeat, this is about events that we remember, or even in which we participated. What, then, can be said about the events of a hundred, two hundred, three hundred years ago (I am already silent about longer periods, a thousand years or more). However, historians unanimously claim that they "know everything thoroughly." And everywhere in different ways, and dogging among themselves is not childish. So, to history, my attitude, frankly, is ambiguous (there is no trust). For example, some "historians" (these are those who "know everything, as it was thousands of years ago), throw mud at Fomenko and Nosovsky (they found scapegoats), although they themselves did not go far.
                        I repeat, history has long been not science, but pseudoscience
                        Totally agree with you. It is especially pleasing that some "events" are already directly interpreted according to the Bible, without bothering at all, this is a religious mythology and has nothing to do with reality.
              2. -1
                30 January 2020 08: 06
                By the way, Gaius Julius - Caesar, it was a nickname and translates as hairy.
        2. -4
          29 January 2020 14: 09
          Quote: NEXUS
          The Anglo-Saxons have presidents, with the full head with his

          The Anglo-Saxons only have one president, and this is the president of the United States, and in Britain, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the Prime Minister and Queen of Great Britain!
        3. +5
          29 January 2020 16: 12
          Quote: NEXUS
          For me it sounds more Russian. And then they took the fashion president. The Anglo-Saxons are presidents, and with all their heads with their exclusivity, freedoms and democracy, full of holes.

          Andrei, according to our constitution, in accordance with Article 24 of the "Federal Constitutional Law on the Government of the Russian Federation," the head of the government is the "Prime Minister of the Russian Federation", and the Prime Minister is speaking on TV.
        4. 0
          31 January 2020 11: 55
          Quote: NEXUS
          Why is that? The president certainly sounds better. There were kings in Europe, we have princes, and after kings. It also sounded archaic, not in European?

          "Gen. sec." it turned out well, rather than an option, although the "Tsar of All Russia" will be better than the president!
      2. +28
        29 January 2020 13: 33
        "Supreme Ruler" - gives some kind of fantasy, fictional galaxies and other virtual worlds.
        1. +5
          29 January 2020 13: 38
          In my opinion, "Supreme Commander-in-Chief" is enough. An old military tradition. "Supreme Ruler" - already too much, two in one.
          1. +4
            29 January 2020 14: 28
            Supreme Commander is the same, two in one.
            1. +10
              29 January 2020 16: 42
              Quote: Prjanik
              Supreme Commander is the same, two in one.

              In our history there was a "Ruler" who combined three positions. I.V. Stalin.
              1. The Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces of the USSR. (military)
              2. General Secretary of the Central Committee of the party. (spiritual / ideological)
              3. Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR (secular).
              As far as he succeeded, everyone has his own opinion. My personal opinion is positive.
          2. +5
            29 January 2020 14: 52
            Quote: depressant
            "Supreme Ruler" - already too much, two in one.

            ----------------------------
            The "supreme ruler" is already Kolchakism and historical revisionism. With this title, the current ruling person will dip his hands in the blood shed by Kolchak. I think that the current ruler does not need such a historical and political nuance. And in general, such an initiative smacks of Zhirinovism.
            1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +12
          29 January 2020 13: 40
          Quote: DenZ
          "Supreme Ruler" - gives some kind of fantasy, fictional galaxies and other virtual worlds.

          I agree. Apparently the one who offered this position is a fan of Star Wars and other fiction.
          We have had one already "supreme ruler" in history ...
          1. +3
            29 January 2020 17: 42
            We have had one already "supreme ruler" in history ...

            His "merits" were "appreciated" by the people.
            and that one is actually self-proclaimed

            You might think "this" someone chooses ...
          2. -1
            29 January 2020 17: 58
            Quote: solzh
            I agree. Apparently the one who suggested this position is a fan of "Star Wars"

            Senator Palpatine
        3. 0
          29 January 2020 13: 48
          Quote: DenZ
          "Supreme Ruler" - gives some kind of fantasy, fictional galaxies and other virtual worlds.

          Yes, do not care, even though the king of all Russia and that sounds much more harmonious than the president.
          1. +5
            29 January 2020 17: 47
            it sounds much more harmonious

            Something, but he learned to "sound". Or rather, empty phone calls. But the cases - almost all with a minus sign.
        4. -2
          29 January 2020 14: 12
          Quote: DenZ
          "Supreme Ruler" - gives some kind of fantasy, fictional galaxies and other virtual worlds.

          Well, maybe everything’s coming to that, you never know what the Kremlin’s conceived laughing
        5. +1
          29 January 2020 16: 05
          "Supreme Ruler" - gives some kind of fantasy, fictional galaxies and other virtual worlds.

          It is quite normal, especially since we already have space troops))))
        6. +1
          29 January 2020 21: 04
          Quote: DenZ
          "Supreme Ruler" - gives some kind of fantasy, fictional galaxies and other virtual worlds.

          Here, for example, like a drum, how to call it. If only the man was strong-willed and competent, as befits a person responsible for the country and people, and it does not matter for how long. But not some kind of Gorbachev, or Yeltsin. And what they say in the West, or that there will degenerate a liberd about it, do not give a damn.
      3. +5
        29 January 2020 14: 47
        Of course, this is the most pressing issue, the renaming of the presidency (albeit imposed from the outside) into "ruler, sovereign, chairman" (well, not the president).

        It is unclear why they write about it ... And Zhirinovsky had a proposal on the State Duma: to limit the number of mandates for one party to 40%.
        Mironov would like to fix the previous retirement age in the Constitution (55 and 60 years for women and men, respectively).
        These are more relevant offers !!
        1. +10
          29 January 2020 15: 37
          Quote: Cloud Catcher
          And Zhirinovsky had a proposal on the State Duma: to limit the number of mandates for one party to 40%.

          -----------------------------------
          In this, of course, Zhirinovsky's initiative is interesting, because in fact in the country there was a usurpation of power by one social group in the form of a quasi-party superstructure of the United Russia, and this ruling superstructure brazenly restricts electoral rights in the form of all kinds of "filters", financial diktat and media defamation of political figures that it dislikes. one can recall the forced resignation of Levchenko in the Irkutsk region, the municipal crisis in Dimitrovgrad, the non-recognition of Ishchenko's victory in Primorye and many other episodes. In these cases, the use of the principle of "keep and not let go" only harms them, but this is a consequence of irrepressible greed. If United Russia used the conditional party of Navalny, who is socially close to them, as a counterbalance (electoral potential no more than 10%), it could completely take the Communist Party of the Russian Federation out of the political orbit and let off steam from the population. But United Russia is not looking for easy electoral routes and is diligently jumping on the old rake. Okay, they still try to follow the same political technological moves - lies, prohibitions and hypocrisy.
          1. +2
            29 January 2020 23: 38
            Quote: Altona
            in fact, the usurpation of power by one social group took place in the country

            All this is understandable. Answer one question. And when in the history of mankind it was different? Give at least one example. Just do not tell tales about democracy. And what exactly do you offer? You criticize, offer. And then everything is blah .. blah ... blah .. about the fact that everything is bad.
            1. -1
              30 January 2020 00: 39
              Quote: orionvitt
              And when in the history of mankind it was different? Give at least one example.

              -----------------------
              A year ago, I posted a video about Iceland, where a virtually socialist revolution took place in an elective way and absolutely peacefully. As for "blah-blah-blah," then from the hurray-patriotic petty-bourgeois blah-blah-blah, which are teeming with comments here for a long time already withering, but people like you don't notice it. hi
              PS And in the commentary I considered Zhirinovsky’s initiative, by the way, and not just criticized, and even offered dumb-headed political strategists methods of solution.
              PPS If there is only a dull blockage in society, then the lid will be torn off anyway. And now even manipulative democracy has been discarded, which could still be fooled by the cheers-patriots. But apparently they decided that it is better to switch to fascism.
              1. +2
                30 January 2020 07: 58
                Quote: Altona
                I posted a video about Iceland a year ago

                And about Luxembourg, or Monaco, did not spread it? Maybe about Andorra, or Liechtenstein? These are such "states", even "states", which, along with Iceland, are an example to the whole world. So to speak, the heavyweights of world politics and economics, on the example of which the whole world should learn.
                teeming with comments here long ago ears are wilting
                but people like you don’t notice it.
                and even suggested dumb-headed
                apparently decided that it’s better to go over to fascism
                My friend, you have megalomania. It seems that only you alone "see everything" and "know everything". Have you tried to save the galaxy?
        2. +1
          29 January 2020 16: 21
          Quote: Cloud Catcher
          And Zhirinovsky had a proposal on the State Duma: to limit the number of mandates for one party to 40%.

          If people vote only for a single party, you want to slip a couple more of your opposition - and you can do everything the people are against.
        3. 0
          30 January 2020 18: 51
          Quote: Cloud Catcher
          State Duma: limit the number of seats for one party to 40%.

          this is what a fright ??? what the apple will then suggest that their batches automatically give 20 percent !!! wassat laughing
      4. The comment was deleted.
        1. -8
          29 January 2020 15: 04
          Quote: martin-159
          Whatever you call it, it will swim the same. In the hole.

          And let's make you the president of the Russian Federation? I'd really like to see how you will not sink.
          1. +7
            29 January 2020 15: 38
            And let's make you the president of the Russian Federation? I'd really like to see how you will not sink.

            Come on, but how?
            In general, in Putin's Russia, the personnel policy works on the principle of an upward garbage chute. The higher - the worse, including Himself.
            1. +1
              29 January 2020 15: 44
              Quote: vadsonen
              Come on, but how?

              Well, we each have a strategist and an outstanding politician in his kitchen or on the couch. To judge what you don’t understand is of course cool ... is it good or bad .. You know about everything that is happening in the Kremlin, undercover fuss, and so on, that you are sitting here and maybe safely, come on. A simple example is Zelia. How much did he say that the feat of the Soviet soldier is holy for him? And what do we see now?
              In any country, the ruler is far from a free man. He is primarily the herald of those circles that de facto rule the country. And if you become the president, they will explain to you very popularly and intelligibly what to do and say, and what not to. And if you try to defy yourself, you will be resigned at best, and in the worst they will be stupidly removed, such as Kennedy.
      5. +8
        29 January 2020 16: 20
        yes, immediately the king, what to beat around the bush)
      6. The comment was deleted.
        1. +5
          29 January 2020 18: 21
          Quote: Nonna
          in some bastards right in the blood, waving power

          -------------------------
          Well, there is still a lot to develop the topic. No one has yet claimed to be the "Emperor of the Galaxy." laughing
          PS "You know, we have 45 Napoleons in our hospital. Of these, 33 are generals, 11 are cognacs and only I am a cake." laughing laughing
          1. +2
            29 January 2020 18: 38
            PS "You know, we have 45 Napoleons in our hospital. Of these, 33 are generals, 11 are cognacs and only I am a cake."

            Eugene hi

            For disrespecting the authorities, they can put on the "Klishas package" bully
      7. +3
        29 January 2020 19: 28
        Quote: depressant
        Agree, "The Supreme Ruler" sounds somewhat archaic. But as you name the ship, so it will float.

        That's right, it’s rather weak ... It’s necessary that the Lifelong Supreme Ruler of the All-Russian, Moscow, Kiev, Vladimir, Novgorod, Kazan, Astrakhan, Siberian, Tauric Chersonis and other, and other, and other ...
      8. 0
        30 January 2020 20: 26
        Agree, "The Supreme Ruler" sounds somewhat archaic.

        Not archaic, but sacred!
        But "President" no longer reflects the essence of its meaning, the world has changed sad
    2. +23
      29 January 2020 13: 36
      Dmitry Peskov, commenting on these proposals, noted that all such initiatives are more debatable.
      According to TASS, Peskov added that initiatives are nevertheless being considered, and the Kremlin is paying attention to them.


      Peskov’s answer says that we will soon have our own Elbasy ... I wouldn’t be against the supreme ruler and let him rule for 200 years .. if every year I saw that people’s life is only improving .. but I against Putin’s supreme ruler. Because there were no fundamental changes during his reign, and the situation only worsens every year.
      1. +13
        29 January 2020 13: 41
        What stupid thing? What is the Supreme Ruler ??? There was one - he finished badly.
        VO - I just don’t recognize recently! sad
        1. +5
          29 January 2020 14: 53
          And where does VO come up with in the State Duma.
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. 0
          29 January 2020 17: 58
          I would not be in a hurry to rejoice ...
  2. +28
    29 January 2020 13: 15
    The working group on constitutional amendments looks like a circus tent. When virtually everything is decided, they imitate the work.
    1. 0
      29 January 2020 18: 00
      everything is decided, they imitate work

      Like a "people's" initiative was considered ...
  3. +4
    29 January 2020 13: 15
    1: 9. What was, it will be; and what was done, then

    will be done, and there is nothing new under the sun.

    1:10. There is something that they say: "look, this is

    new "; but this was already in the centuries that were before us.

    ...

    Posted by: Bible, Old Testament
    1. +2
      29 January 2020 13: 34
      Book of Proverbs of Solomon.
  4. +19
    29 January 2020 13: 16
    They would immediately enter the position of the Supreme Deity of Russia ..
    1. +7
      29 January 2020 13: 44
      You are right, I read "The Supreme Ruler", and it became awkward. The greatness of the head of state is determined not by the adjective "supreme", but by his deeds.
      1. +1
        29 January 2020 14: 25
        Only "supreme" is a synonym for "chief", not "great."
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +5
      29 January 2020 15: 42
      They would immediately enter the position of the Supreme Deity of Russia ..

      And the state religion is putianism.
  5. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      29 January 2020 13: 23
      Vovka in Vovka appoint Vovka! Hurray comrades! fellow
    2. +5
      29 January 2020 13: 24
      So what will the king be?
      1. +5
        29 January 2020 14: 18
        Oh! Rurikovich, Romanovs. Putins ???? sad
        1. -2
          29 January 2020 18: 44
          Putins ????

          He has only daughters of the official children. So then there will be either a Korean or Dutch (in the official manner) surname. Or seven-boyars, and then some illegitimate "boriska for the kingdom." request
          1. 0
            29 January 2020 18: 53
            They’ll come up with something! But I really want to know the initiator! fellow
            1. 0
              29 January 2020 20: 40
              But I really want to know the initiator!

              They will say that "this is the will of the people."
          2. 0
            29 January 2020 19: 11
            About how koment Bubalik removed !!! What was he bad ???
            1. +2
              29 January 2020 19: 13
              About how koment Bubalik removed !!! What was he bad ???

              In that photo, the halo above his head ^ Roskomnadzor ^ glowed dimly. wink
    3. +9
      29 January 2020 13: 27
      Well, finally ... otherwise people began to worry, how can one live without a king ...
      1. +2
        29 January 2020 13: 35
        it’s hard to live without a king)))
        1. +5
          29 January 2020 14: 10
          Quote: Nastia Makarova
          it’s hard to live without a king)))

          many live normally with a constitutional monarchy in their head wink there is a king but all power belongs to cockroaches laughing
          1. -2
            29 January 2020 14: 12
            cockroaches can be fought and etched
    4. 0
      29 January 2020 13: 39
      Quote: bubalik
      The large Imperial crown of the Russian Empire is already waiting for its carrier. Sovereign. Hope and Defender of the Fatherland.

      Well, then let them call it "Emperor", simply in Russian.
      1. +7
        29 January 2020 13: 45
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Well, then let them call it "Emperor", simply in Russian.

        Don't ... Let's Chief Governor! That sounds! And in Russian! wink
        1. 0
          29 January 2020 13: 58
          Quote: solzh
          Let's Chief Governor! That sounds! And in Russian!

          No, this is the position of Sergei Kozhugetovich.
          1. +5
            29 January 2020 14: 02
            Quote: tihonmarine
            No, this is the position of Sergei Kozhugetovich.

            Exactly.
            Well ... So the Emperor! laughing
      2. +1
        29 January 2020 18: 24
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Well, then let them call it "Emperor", simply in Russian.

        --------------------
        Nicholas II, participating in the population census, in the column "occupation" wrote "the owner of the Russian land."
    5. +2
      29 January 2020 14: 25
      * Hello, Tsar, very nice! * "Ivan Vasilyevich is changing his profession." laughing
    6. -1
      29 January 2020 14: 57
      Not for Senka hat.
    7. +2
      29 January 2020 15: 10
      Quote: bubalik
      The large Imperial crown of the Russian Empire is already waiting for its carrier. Sovereign.

      Bagel! Change your profile picture! You like crowns more than hammer and sickle. hi
    8. +2
      29 January 2020 16: 14
      Hello, Sergey. hi Nothing changes, if there is no "king" in the head, then a King on the throne is certainly needed. The age-old slave psychology: here comes the good tsar-father, he will judge everyone justly ... or sue. Power without a baton and prison is not power for them. request
      1. +1
        29 January 2020 18: 52
        Eternal slave psychology: here comes the good king-father, he will justly judge everyone ... or condemn

        Konstantin hi
        Sluts of their own Kashchei the Permanent wanted forever young
        "Eternal youth", painting, Vasya Lozhkin (Alexey Vladimirovich Kudelin), Wonderful People's Artist
        1. 0
          29 January 2020 20: 41
          Great, Lesha! good Directly not in the eyebrow, but in the eye: to eternal life, oil and gas. laughing
          And Kashchei should have Likho One-eyed in the main guardians, Kikimor’s ministers, Robber brothers - Solovey Odikhmantievich and Lyagva, as well as the allied evil spirit Konchar, nicknamed Pimple, all as one evil and self-sacrificing. (If you believe the Strugatsky brothers).
          1. -3
            29 January 2020 20: 53
            Famously one-eyed

            There is one, only he is often completely eyeless, because he "blinks slowly" or sticks out on Twitter.
            Kikimora

            And there is one, got much better.
            brothers robbers

            You mean oligarchs?
            allied evil spirit Conchar nicknamed Pimple

            This is probably the one who used to bargain with cigarettes and alcohol on behalf of "higher powers" and exclusively for righteous purposes.
            I guess?
            1. -1
              29 January 2020 20: 59
              You mean oligarchs?

              Yes, they are all smeared there in one world, whatever you call them, at least the oligarch, even the Minister of Culture. Well, allah sends Konchar something to rummage, it’s called in their mountains.
    9. The comment was deleted.
  6. +8
    29 January 2020 13: 23
    the position of "supreme ruler of Russia."
    Guess three times who the main contender is!
    1. +9
      29 January 2020 13: 39
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      the position of "supreme ruler of Russia."
      Guess three times who the main contender is!

      There’s no reason to guess ... I immediately wrote, as the movements went, that the illusionists were magicians preparing the next performance.
    2. +1
      29 January 2020 13: 39
      Quote from Uncle Lee
      Guess three times who the main contender is!

      Is Zhirinovsky really?
      1. +2
        29 January 2020 13: 43
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Is Zhirinovsky really?

        You cannot refuse a sense of humor! laughing
        1. +5
          29 January 2020 13: 49
          Quote from Uncle Lee
          You cannot refuse a sense of humor!

          Well, it’s not Vali Matvienko who is to be emperor.
        2. +6
          29 January 2020 13: 56
          Then you will fall off laughing: Zhirinovsky and suggested
          1. +2
            29 January 2020 17: 21
            Igor, hi that's why I immediately thought about Zhirik when I read that "there is an initiative to appoint a ruler"? laughing
      2. +5
        29 January 2020 13: 46
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Is Zhirinovsky really?

        belay
        Although ... He has long wanted to become him ... laughing
    3. -1
      29 January 2020 15: 58
      I will guess from two-Volodya or Dima, the third is not given
  7. -5
    29 January 2020 13: 24
    Do not be surprised if they accept. Under a specific person. Maybe they should think about the monarchy.
    1. +11
      29 January 2020 13: 42
      Quote: balunn
      Maybe they should think about the monarchy.

      Here are the bunk crumbs on the site ...
    2. +1
      29 January 2020 14: 49
      Not a bad system, as I think. The monarch is still interested in the welfare of the country, but to transfer the ditachka.
      Minus - a new Nikolashka is possible. But this with the irremovability of the ruler will happen sooner or later.
  8. -2
    29 January 2020 13: 25
    Urusbashi, or Sovereign.
  9. +9
    29 January 2020 13: 26
    What kind of initiatives coming to the said commission is the Kremlin ready to acceptDmitry Peskov did not explain.

    What is there to explain? Here they are - the "initiators":
    1. +6
      29 January 2020 13: 33
      where the country is heading ...
      1. +14
        29 January 2020 13: 40
        where to where ??? ... in the Middle Ages ...
        it remains to legitimize serfdom ...
      2. +8
        29 January 2020 13: 47
        How to where? They take nonsense to the curve tracks of discussion, leading away from the main thing - the conversation about the development of the country. Hook up the topic.
      3. +1
        29 January 2020 13: 51
        Quote: Aerodrome
        where the country is heading ...

        The country lives its own life, and officials live their own lives.
      4. -4
        29 January 2020 15: 39
        Quote: Aerodrome
        where the country is heading ...

        The guarantor leads us back to the 20th century.
    2. +9
      29 January 2020 13: 50
      Quote: ROSS 42
      "Initiators":

      They, loyal subjects, in ecstasy will immediately offer the title of Emperor of All Russia!
      1. +6
        29 January 2020 14: 17
        Imagine being offered. Back in the 90s, all Duma members ran to Zakatov, the secretary of the imperial Russian house, to receive noble letters. Apparently, they decided that now is the time to cash them out. You will be surprised, but there are a lot of monarchical societies in Russia. In all major cities. What should we do? Fight for the title of serfs? Zakatov will not give us any other letters. I can imagine how the newly-minted nobles with spade-like muzzles will turn to me: "Hey, you servant!"
        1. +7
          29 January 2020 14: 21
          Whose will you be?
          Whose slam am I asking?
          Oh, and a stupid slap!
          1. 0
            29 January 2020 16: 11
            Quote from Uncle Lee
            Whose will you be?
            Whose slam am I asking?
            Oh, and a stupid slap!

            * And what are you, all serf, yes serf ... * From there. laughing And if on the topic, then some kind of initiative, well, stupid, or something.
        2. +3
          29 January 2020 14: 58
          Quote: depressant
          I can imagine how the newly-minted nobles with spade-like muzzles will turn to me: "Hey, you servant!"

          -------------------------
          Ask these newly-minted nobles with the words of Ostap Bender "In which regiment did they serve?", That is, what they did for the Motherland. In general, you can dismiss this boyar-noble fraternity with the words that Russia is still a republic, and not an autocratic monarchy. And let the "nobles" first take care of the borders of the former empire, and not their title paper, which is suitable only for wiping their noble ass.
        3. 0
          29 January 2020 16: 28
          Quote: depressant
          Imagine being offered. Back in the 90s, all Duma members ran to Zakatov, the secretary of the imperial Russian house, to receive noble letters. Apparently, they decided that now is the time to cash them out. You will be surprised, but there are a lot of monarchical societies in Russia. In all major cities. What should we do? Fight for the title of serfs? Zakatov will not give us any other letters. I can imagine how the newly-minted nobles with spade-like muzzles will turn to me: "Hey, you servant!"

          The noble assembly of the Proletarian district of the city of Saransk. Does that sound
  10. +6
    29 January 2020 13: 27
    Can we immediately proclaim the king? Or even God!
    1. +6
      29 January 2020 13: 58
      Quote: Million
      generally God!

      Jesus Christosovich!
  11. +12
    29 January 2020 13: 28
    So after all, you can immediately instead of the president or supreme ruler, prescribe Putin in the constitution.
    Clear and concise.
    As an example:
    Putin’s election was held in Russia, Putin won by 146% ....
    1. +13
      29 January 2020 13: 43
      Quote: nm76
      write Putin in the constitution.

      Hint of Julius Caesar. After his death, Caesar became the title ...
      1. +7
        29 January 2020 14: 02
        You clearly caught the idea!
        Now it will be voiced by Zhirinovsky))
      2. +2
        29 January 2020 16: 14
        And we have as an option: Putin the First. hi
  12. -5
    29 January 2020 13: 31
    or maybe instead of stupid comments we will read the text carefully?))) if someone puts forward the initiative to change the name of the country, but I’m sure there will also be friendly discussions?))) is it in Ukraine that this circus is seriously taken by you for some reason?)
    1. +5
      29 January 2020 13: 56
      Quote: carstorm 11
      why do you need this?)

      Duc, philistines. Yes
      1. +3
        29 January 2020 14: 13
        Well, thank you, dear, that you compare with "rabble" and "slaves" ...
  13. +5
    29 January 2020 13: 34
    In particular, it was proposed to introduce the post of “supreme ruler of Russia” in the country.

    We will be familiar - King!
    It is possible after all ... however, it already was.
    1. +13
      29 January 2020 13: 44
      Quote: rocket757
      In particular, it was proposed to introduce the post of “supreme ruler of Russia” in the country.

      We will be familiar - King!
      It is possible after all ... however, it already was.

      Welcome to feudalism .. back to the past .. Everything is somehow forward .. and we are back .. moreover, we missed the good and progressive past and decided to give up feudalism right away ..
      1. -1
        29 January 2020 13: 53
        who decided?) where do you read all this? someone put forward a stupid initiative, they answered it culturally and discussions started, don’t understand what) initiative and you can put forward there if that)
      2. +4
        29 January 2020 14: 01
        Quote: Svarog
        Everything is somehow forward .. and we are back.

        C'mon, there in the corridors, halls and cabinets, the sneak virus and others ... ideas are born. This is a brawl, outside this idea will die in the bud.
        1. +3
          29 January 2020 14: 06
          Quote: rocket757
          Quote: Svarog
          Everything is somehow forward .. and we are back.

          C'mon, there in the corridors, halls and cabinets, the sneak virus and others ... ideas are born. This is a brawl, outside this idea will die in the bud.

          I’m not sure lately crazy ideas have come into fashion .. yes they start in the corridors, with sneaks .. but since in the Duma they are sneaks and generally around .. then there’s no one to stop the orgy ...
          That’s all nonsense to the masses ..
          1. +2
            29 January 2020 14: 13
            Quote: Svarog
            That’s all nonsense to the masses ..

            I agree, some fuss is going on outside too ... but it seems we don't have a monarchical party! And without such a "portfolio" now nowhere.
      3. +4
        29 January 2020 14: 34
        Quote: Svarog
        Quote: rocket757
        In particular, it was proposed to introduce the post of “supreme ruler of Russia” in the country.

        We will be familiar - King!
        It is possible after all ... however, it already was.

        Welcome to feudalism .. back to the past .. Everything is somehow forward .. and we are back .. moreover, we missed the good and progressive past and decided to give up feudalism right away ..

        To you the countries to list where now there are kings? Even absolute monarchies are !!
        And they are all your way
        Quote: Svarog
        decided to wave immediately to feudalism ..
        ??

        Z.Y.
        Some sort of type of Zhirinovsky’s shokhmil- and in VO immediately the tantrum began ....
        Peskov said in Russian - they offer a lot of all sorts of garbage, they are forced to discuss everything, the president does not have the opportunity to constantly swear, therefore "he does not have a position on this issue" (does not react to complete nonsense)
    2. 0
      29 January 2020 13: 49
      Colleague, made fun! wassat love
  14. +3
    29 January 2020 13: 37
    primly somehow .. "Supreme Ruler". you can just King! Tsar of All Russia! yes, and to transfer power by inheritance. and transfer all deputies and officials to the category of Nobles !!
    1. +2
      29 January 2020 13: 44
      Quote: Janek
      primly somehow .. "Supreme Ruler". you can just King! Tsar of All Russia! yes, and to transfer power by inheritance. and transfer all deputies and officials to the category of Nobles !!

      Everything goes to this ..
    2. +8
      29 January 2020 13: 45
      Hush hush! And they will take it for the wishes of the people and they will!
      1. +5
        29 January 2020 13: 57
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        Hush hush! And they will take it for the wishes of the people and they will!

        Well, they accepted the pension reform and they will accept it .. and the people will soon be serfs .. so why ask him ..
    3. +4
      29 January 2020 13: 50
      I propose to revive the holy Inquisition ...
    4. -1
      29 January 2020 13: 55
      Quote: Janek
      Tsar of All Russia!

      Keep it simple, it turns out very long. There is a better word for "emperor".
      1. +3
        29 January 2020 14: 22
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Quote: Janek
        Tsar of All Russia!

        Keep it simple, it turns out very long. There is a better word for "emperor".

        For the emperor, an empire is needed .. but where is the empire? Former allied countries bounced back ..
        1. -2
          29 January 2020 17: 03
          Quote: Svarog
          For the emperor, an empire is needed .. but where is the empire? Former allied countries bounced back.

          Empires themselves do not appear, they are created.
          1. -1
            29 January 2020 19: 08
            Quote: tihonmarine
            Quote: Svarog
            For the emperor, an empire is needed .. but where is the empire? Former allied countries bounced back.

            Empires themselves do not appear, they are created.

            I agree .. but they couldn’t create anything in 30 years .. why will they create the same now ..?
  15. -1
    29 January 2020 13: 44
    The supreme ruler will dispose of the state as he wants. Well, people too. He wants to execute. He wants to have mercy ...
    1. +6
      29 January 2020 14: 00
      Quote: Million
      The supreme ruler will dispose of the state as he wants. Well, people too. He wants to execute. He wants to have mercy ...

      The court boyars soon chop off a couple of thousand souls .. Soon they will heal to the fullest ..
  16. +6
    29 January 2020 13: 45
    Uncle Vova to the kingdom!
    We'll have to change the passport to this)))
    1. +17
      29 January 2020 13: 52
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      We'll have to change the passport to this)))

      Not ... better on this one
      1. -1
        29 January 2020 13: 57
        As Uncle Vova himself said, those who were happy about the collapse of the Soviet Union did not have a heart, and those who wanted to revive the Soviet Union as it was before the collapse did not have a mind.
        And I agree with him.

        In general, it doesn’t matter how Mother Russia will be called. The main thing is not to stop and go forward, into a bright future.
        1. +14
          29 January 2020 13: 59
          Quote: Lord of the Sith
          those who want to revive the Soviet Union as it was before the collapse have no mind.

          So I have no mind laughing
          Quote: Lord of the Sith
          And I agree with him.

          Thank you for your frankness hi
          But I do not agree.
          1. +4
            29 January 2020 14: 04
            Personally, I really hope that Russia will take all the best from the previous lines, take into account all the mistakes and become the most powerful in history.

            Yes, I am romantic in this regard, but do I have to believe in something?
            1. +7
              29 January 2020 14: 06
              Quote: Lord of the Sith
              Yes, I am romantic in this regard, but do I have to believe in something?

              Of course. Without faith is bad. I believe the same thing, I believe in the revival of Russia.
        2. +9
          29 January 2020 14: 01
          Quote: Lord of the Sith
          The main thing is not to stop and go forward, into a bright future.

          And here I agree.
          Only I think so, we have different visions of the bright future of Russia with you.
        3. +1
          29 January 2020 14: 14
          Quote: Lord of the Sith
          As Uncle Vova himself said, those who were happy about the collapse of the Soviet Union did not have a heart, and those who wanted to revive the Soviet Union as it was before the collapse did not have a mind.
          And I agree with him.

          He said a lot of things .. he says mainly that they want to hear from him .. you have to judge by cases ..
        4. +2
          29 January 2020 15: 37
          Quote: Lord of the Sith
          The main thing is not to stop and go forward, into a bright future.

          Moses led the people of the desert for 40 years. And how old are people like you calling to go forward into a bright future? For me, in the bright future we already lived, and now we are going to the dark past! hi
          1. 0
            29 January 2020 17: 07
            I don’t know how personally you are, but I’m going to a bright future, and I’m doing my best for this.

            The whole world can be turned upside down by tearing your ass off the couch, not by November, but by working.
      2. +5
        29 January 2020 14: 01
        Quote: solzh
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        We'll have to change the passport to this)))

        Not ... better on this one

        No .. he denied it ..
    2. +5
      29 January 2020 14: 03
      Serfs do not have passports ..
    3. +2
      29 January 2020 14: 03
      The empire will not work out in fact ... except that whatever small, but proud to grab in the bud.
      They will not return to the USSR either, there is simply no fraternal union and cannot be. All self-styled "kings" have isolated themselves to the point.
      We must look for another, real option.
    4. -2
      29 January 2020 15: 07
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      Uncle Vova to the kingdom!

      The Kingdom of heaven? I agree! wassat
  17. -1
    29 January 2020 13: 55
    "The supreme ruler of Russia" - sounds like something not very ..., there is no connection with history.
    I suggest: "The supreme ruler of all Russia and the rest, and so on, and so on ..."
    In a more complete and up-to-date version ".... and other, and other, and other ..." - you can always expand or cut.
    :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
    1. +1
      29 January 2020 14: 24
      There is even a connection with history, remember Kolchak.
  18. +3
    29 January 2020 13: 55
    What can’t you do to stay in power))
  19. +1
    29 January 2020 14: 09
    the position of "supreme ruler of Russia"

    Why trifle. It is necessary, following the example of the beloved Poland, to introduce a position
    Head of State

    similar to Pilsudski, who was the "chief" from November 14, 1918 - December 9, 1922.
  20. +4
    29 January 2020 14: 09
    Quote: ROSS 42
    What kind of initiatives coming to the said commission is the Kremlin ready to acceptDmitry Peskov did not explain.

    What is there to explain? Here they are - the "initiators":

    Although they are `` in the law, '' they cannot exist without the Supreme Overseer ...
    And you invites me to unite with these (or, as they say, to integrate)
    1. +1
      29 January 2020 15: 03
      Quote: GenNick
      Although they are `` in the law, '' they cannot exist without the Supreme Overseer ...

      Looking over the thief must be! They live according to zonovskim concepts, so call them! Pahan, the beholder, bull, man, six ... laughing Rename the Kremlin to "Butyrka" wassat
  21. +4
    29 January 2020 14: 23
    This is probably Zhirinovsky suggested, he was haunted by the king’s laurels. And for me personally, it immediately inspired an association with Kolchak. I am personally against it. stop
  22. 0
    29 January 2020 14: 25
    this is not serious.
  23. -1
    29 January 2020 14: 26
    For me, it’s better — the Tsar, simply — the Tsar.
  24. -1
    29 January 2020 14: 28
    as an option: - Lord. simple and tasteful
  25. 0
    29 January 2020 14: 34
    the Bolsheviks shot, and his body was drowned in the winter river


    What a sophisticated way to get rid of the annoying ... The initiators are still entertainers.
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. 0
    29 January 2020 14: 54
    It is necessary to observe traditions. The president is the Tsar, the Duma are the Boyars, the Oligarchs are the Counts, the Barons (there are no dukes in Russia, it seems), generals and senior officers are hereditary nobles. Other estates: merchants, free serfs and serfs. Serfs are those who did not pay for loans with banks. Yes, and most importantly. Everything is inherited. No need to spend money on elections.
    1. +1
      29 January 2020 15: 31
      Quote: smart fellow
      Must be observed traditions. The president is the Tsar, the Duma are the Boyars, the Oligarchs are the Counts, the Barons (there were no dukes in Russia, it seems), generals and senior officers are hereditary nobles. Rest Estate: merchants, free slaves and serfs. Serfs are those who did not pay for loans with banks. Yes, and most importantly. Everything is inherited. No need to spend money on elections.


      Well, if you observe the estates, then the position of "President",
      will sound like this:
      - PRINCIPLES / CHAPTERny STARTelnik Software UEequalization Сconditions /
      After all, it is necessary to observe the "politeness" before the Western "partners". Ato it, not to understand, to call the "summits" to stop.
      wassat laughing
      Shl. And the Count with Barons, "sovereign democracy" is not a hindrance. Many of the current "elite" have "certificates of honor" and "diplomas".
  28. +5
    29 January 2020 14: 55
    In modern art, there was also a supreme ruler - in the film of Sasha Baron Cohen. He is the supreme obstetrician of Wadia, he is the inventor of pull-ups.
  29. +2
    29 January 2020 14: 56
    In early 1920, the Bolsheviks shot Kolchak, and his body was drowned in the winter river.

    One supreme ruler was shot and another shot. And they’ll do it right.
  30. The comment was deleted.
  31. +2
    29 January 2020 15: 38
    This is the German Oberführer galleries will be?
  32. +2
    29 January 2020 16: 00
    . Dmitry Peskov, commenting on these proposals, noted that all such initiatives are more debatable.

    When this leader talks about the discussion, we can expect the expected result, based on the discussions that have taken place))) And the notorious Pens.reform is confirmation of this)) I'm not surprised if on TV they start showing crowds of begging Smerds, begging to put on a Monomakh hat ...
    In general, a bad sign.
  33. 0
    29 January 2020 16: 25
    Well, damn it, you will have a good laugh)))))) By the way, according to prophecy, there will be a king in Russia)
    1. 0
      29 January 2020 16: 26
      Moreover, Orthodox))))
  34. -2
    29 January 2020 16: 29
    After 2024, the former president should remain someone, why not the Supreme Ruler? And the president ... well, there will be someone else. And the constitution ... and it is not difficult to change it, and the Ruler will have real power.
    1. 0
      29 January 2020 18: 12
      Quote: akropin
      After 2024, the former president must remain someone

      If they change the constitution, it should not. Will get the right to be elected again.
  35. 0
    29 January 2020 16: 35
    Everyone will not be called Great Pilot, because the Chinese title. But it's a pity there is a galley.
  36. 3vs
    +1
    29 January 2020 16: 44
    This, apparently, is Zhirinovsky’s response to Comrade Putin’s words that there is no Zhirinovsky, no party ...
  37. +1
    29 January 2020 16: 58
    The main shaman of Russia ... best of all and accurately characterizes ..peaches.
    1. -1
      29 January 2020 21: 14
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEwOLDUzHy8&feature=emb_logo
  38. +1
    29 January 2020 17: 25
    Vladimir Putin mentioned the need for a peculiar increase in the status of the State Council

    Well what can I say, it’s not in vain that this fuss with the Constitution has begun .. Putin is preparing to leave the presidents, but he is being prepared with an equally honorable post of the Head of the State Council!
    Oh cunning GDP! But Mishustin is a competitor to him, a serious man ... this is not Medvedev-Pokemon ..
    I do not like all these "agreements in power games" to anything good it will not lead .. I smell my genes!
    Putin will play in his many-steps, there is no particular faith in the sincerity of his reforms
    1. +5
      29 January 2020 23: 31
      Quote: Pension
      Vladimir Putin mentioned the need for a peculiar increase in the status of the State Council

      Well what can I say, it’s not in vain that this fuss with the Constitution has begun .. Putin is preparing to leave the presidents, but he is being prepared with an equally honorable post of the Head of the State Council!
      Oh cunning GDP! But Mishustin is a competitor to him, a serious man ... this is not Medvedev-Pokemon ..
      I do not like all these "agreements in power games" to anything good it will not lead .. I smell my genes!
      Putin will play in his many-steps, there is no particular faith in the sincerity of his reforms

      The prophet however winked
      ... (Well, hed heh heh I'll be back)
  39. +2
    29 January 2020 18: 28
    Who suggested? Probably some kind of shell-shocked "on the Kolchak fronts."
  40. +1
    29 January 2020 19: 48
    The initiative about the "supreme ruler" came from the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party - V.V. Zhirinovsky ..
    Joking as a joke, and after that I recommend to think seriously, to all those who believe that this party is separated from the EDRA ...
    1. 0
      30 January 2020 12: 39
      I think it's not a secret for anyone that all Zhirik's "initiatives" come from the supreme, or from his entourage.
      He is nothing more than Metatron - the voice of God
  41. 0
    29 January 2020 21: 11
    And there will be, the High Commissioner of All Russia .. And in modern and at the stand, you want to stand peacefully.
  42. +1
    29 January 2020 21: 13
    Pardoned a Jewess - for hash sat
    1. 0
      30 January 2020 12: 38
      Yes, there were 2,8 grams, I smoked for a long time
  43. 0
    29 January 2020 22: 42
    Well, immediately the Tsar of All Russia
  44. -2
    30 January 2020 00: 30
    I sincerely want to wish the future Supreme Ruler: Remember Kolchak!
  45. -2
    30 January 2020 03: 16
    The "Elbasy" title will look more menacing. Please consider.
  46. 0
    30 January 2020 12: 37
    Supreme ruler, great teacher, friend of all children ...
    Something familiar like riffles
    Well, yes, to the title "Your Honor" is not enough "Your Excellency" to him, in turn, asks for "Excellency", and then you will not stop "Highness", "Majesty" .... "merciful and merciful" ...
    I think two terms of 4 years are too much
  47. 0
    30 January 2020 12: 41
    It is amazing why, since 2018, our leader has been working all the time to lower his rating?
    Jinxed chtoli?
  48. The comment was deleted.
  49. The comment was deleted.
  50. The comment was deleted.
  51. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  52. The comment was deleted.
  53. The comment was deleted.
  54. 0
    31 January 2020 12: 43
    I do not mind. If the title is inherited. And heir number 1 will be D. A. Medvedev.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"