We will learn to defeat Russia, we will defeat Iran: US Air Force General on the development of aviation

67

The United States continues to reflect on the modernization of the country's air force. What will be aviation the future? This time, Air Force Chief of Staff General David Goldfein thought about this.

In his speech, the general, who has been heading the headquarters of the US Air Force for the fourth year, talked about the prospects for the development of military aviation and space forces as well. Goldfein knows what he is talking about. A professional military pilot, he began his service 36 years ago with the rank of lieutenant and went through all the stages of the American military hierarchy. He flew on an F-16 fighter, was shot down, participated in a number of wars. That is, this is a real combat officer who perfectly sees the key areas of development of American (and the world as a whole) aviation.



According to a senior military man, the main priorities in the development of the US Air Force should be modern software for the unhindered communication of pilots with artillery and ships, in cyberspace and in space, machine learning and systematization of data.

In modern warfare, coordination of the efforts of air, ground and naval forces comes to the fore, allowing you to create an integrated team. The pilot of a plane, detecting a ground target, directs fire of naval or land artillery, or vice versa. It is this coordination of efforts that makes strikes against the enemy inevitable. Actually, the United States is already testing similar tactics in the Middle East.

The general also spoke about the recent military exercises, in which the potential of the ground forces, the Navy and the US Air Force was simultaneously involved. The modern methods of collecting, analyzing and exchanging data in real time were analyzed. The target was identified and then hit by a simulated cruise missile.

Another plus is the new technology for coordinating the actions of pilots F-35 Lightning II and F-22 Raptors with units of ground forces and special forces on the ground, which significantly increased the possibility of defeating the enemy.

Now the US military command is promoting the concept of joint management of all domains of the armed forces, which will allow, more effectively, according to the Pentagon, to reflect threats and risks from such major US adversaries as Russia and China, not to mention Iran and North Korea.

The second main area, which the Air Force Chief of Staff spoke about, is space security. Star wars did not remain fiction, they are yet to come, I'm sure, apparently, an American general. In the future, one who can effectively control outer space will win in land wars, including in trade ones. Holding positions in space is directly related to the prospects for the economic development of modern America.

Donald Trump, as you know, became the main initiator of the creation of special space forces in the United States, which have to fight for American dominance in outer space. The military elite of the president supports, because the new type of armed forces is new appropriations, new programs and opportunities. General Goldfein tried to convince the audience that he did not have any jealousy for the new command of the Space Forces, which is headed by General John Raymond. The Air Force and Space Forces are the closest types of American armed forces in terms of tasks, and therefore they are going to work in the most close contact.

The American general made another important statement. He emphasized that if American aviation now concentrates on studying and improving the means of combating only one Iran, it will be defenseless before the great powers of our time - China and Russia. But if we initially build up the potential for a possible war with China and Russia, “if we learn to defeat them,” then Iran will be a feasible goal for the United States.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    29 January 2020 13: 55
    My Mother - Where do these Victories come from?
    Question: how much should the brain be underdeveloped in order to make a declaration of victory over the Nuclear Superpower? Or is it a specific diagnosis ???
    We need to send him a bag of soldiers - let him fight on the table.
    1. +4
      29 January 2020 14: 02
      Quote: Hunter 2
      My Mother - Where do these Victories come from?

      I just want to say to these David Goldfeins "Have you tried to live without war .;"
      1. +7
        29 January 2020 14: 05
        tihonmarine (Vlad)
        I just want to say to these David Goldfeins "Have you tried to live without war .;"
        Capitalists without war, it's like bees without honey! And to tell them something is useless, they will look at you as crazy. They understand only power, does history really teach you nothing?
        1. +11
          29 January 2020 14: 15
          Quote: Alexander Suvorov
          They understand only power, does history really teach you nothing?

          Not. Their story teaches nothing.
          We will learn to defeat Russia, and we will defeat Iran:

          I.e? Do they mean that Russia is weaker than Iran?
          Everything is bad in the states ...
          1. +4
            29 January 2020 14: 19
            solzh (Sergey)
            We will learn to defeat Russia, and we will defeat Iran:

            I.e? Do they mean that Russia is weaker than Iran?
            Everything is bad in the states ...
            I also drew attention to this Seryozha wink . In this regard, the question is, why immediately Iran, and why not Ethiopia or let's say Andorra ...?! laughing
            1. +8
              29 January 2020 14: 50
              In general, the states are interesting.
              I watched a film here once called "Why We Fight (Battle for Russia) 1943" filmed by the states. An interesting analysis of the USSR through the eyes of the United States. As "marketers" they analyzed the situation in the USSR, identified strengths and weaknesses.
              When watching the film, it seemed that even in those days, the United States was preparing for a post-war clash with the USSR.
            2. 0
              29 January 2020 17: 02
              This general must be put in place in the historical homeland-brains. So that he didn’t carry any crap. The customs ones are somehow more adequate. Either the shmal they have is not so picky, those (Meriks) from around the world can choose.
          2. +10
            29 January 2020 15: 23
            Quote: solzh
            I.e? Do they mean that Russia is weaker than Iran?
            Everything is bad in the states ...

            They not only think that Russia is weaker than Iran, but given the fact that after a small conflict with Iran, which took place after the assassination of Suleimani, the mattresses, having soaked their pants a little, did not translate a small conflict into a big war, then in order to if only somehow to justify their inaction, they decided to give such an argument as an argument, they say, first, we will figure it out with Russia and China, and then we will pay off with Iran for our shame. It sounds absurd, of course, but given that the mattress brain often generates mutually exclusive things, in their opinion, such an interpretation sounds weighty. So you're right - "The states are bad at all ..."
        2. +6
          29 January 2020 14: 18
          But if the potential for a possible war with China and Russia is initially built up, "if we learn to defeat them," then Iran will be a feasible goal for the United States.

          And after that, Liechtenstein itself will be tough, and even Monaco.
          1. opk
            +2
            29 January 2020 17: 03
            San Marino forgot to mention laughing
        3. 0
          29 January 2020 16: 14
          But they are not told by a specialist who MarxEngelsLenin is. The loss in textbooks begins not only for them.
        4. -1
          29 January 2020 16: 50
          Quote: Alexander Suvorov
          Capitalists without war, it's like bees without honey!

          I remember when I once read Lenin’s grandfather, he set it out well.
          1. +1
            30 January 2020 09: 05
            Read a little, you still need to correctly understand what you read !!!
      2. +1
        29 January 2020 16: 45
        Quote: tihonmarine
        I just want to say to these David Goldfeins "Have you tried to live without war .;"

        CAN NOT! They have such a civilization ("free and democratic") - to rob, kill, take by deception!
        1. -2
          29 January 2020 17: 05
          Quote: neri73-r
          They have such a civilization ("free and democratic") - to rob, kill, take away by deception!

          Like it or not, they are back to imperialism.
          1. 0
            30 January 2020 23: 11
            And they didn’t stop being them, Vlad.
    2. -10
      29 January 2020 15: 18
      And where do you come from, who don’t know anything, but yapping without ceasing, is this a diagnosis, stupidity or not sane?
      1. +9
        29 January 2020 15: 48
        Are you offended?
        Well, what can you do if your American idols are really not very smart.
      2. opk
        +2
        29 January 2020 19: 47
        Quote: Cyrus
        who do not know anything

        and what do we not know?
        Quote: Cyrus
        diagnosis, stupidity or lack of responsibility

        are you sick? Well, nothing you are treated. maybe you’ll recover.
      3. +1
        30 January 2020 09: 07
        Judging by your vocabulary, your own intelligence is much lower than the baseboard, whom you are trying to teach and criticize here, an expert unfinished !!!
      4. 0
        30 January 2020 10: 12
        Quote: Cyrus
        And where do you come from, who don’t know anything, but yapping without ceasing, is this a diagnosis, stupidity or not sane?

        Something a lot on the site appeared defenders of imperialism.
    3. +4
      29 January 2020 15: 21
      Quote: Hunter 2
      My Mother - Where do these Victories come from?
      Question: how much should the brain be underdeveloped in order to make a declaration of victory over the Nuclear Superpower? Or is it a specific diagnosis ???
      We need to send him a bag of soldiers - let him fight on the table.

      He said everything correctly. You will learn to fight against the Chinese and Russians, quickly make the Iranians. You will learn to fight against the Persians, the level of your army will be lower than the Russian and Chinese.
      In other words - you want to win the Dynamo Uryupinsk boxing championship, train with the guys who went to Russia, and not with the guys in the district section.
      1. +5
        29 January 2020 18: 12
        Quote: Krasnodar

        He said everything correctly. You will learn to fight against the Chinese and Russians, quickly make the Iranians. You will learn to fight against the Persians, the level of your army will be lower than the Russian and Chinese.
        In other words - you want to win the Dynamo Uryupinsk boxing championship, train with the guys who went to Russia, and not with the guys in the district section.

        If he learns to fight with the Russians (we will leave the Chinese behind the scenes), there will be nobody to fight with the Pes! laughing
        According to the Championship of Uryupinsk, training with the masters can end in a hospital bed! Yes
        1. +3
          29 January 2020 18: 16
          Quite the opposite - CCM and above gives you work (as a rule) and fulfills something of its own. A youngster in the area stupidly can go for an exchange. Head forward and abruptly.
          Heh. If you fight, it’s not enough for the whole world)).
          If you LEARN to fight against the Russians, you will quickly deal with the Persians.
          1. +3
            29 January 2020 18: 31
            Yeah, horses were mixed in a bunch, people and volleys of thousands of guns merged into a long howl ... laughing
            One is not the most stupid person ... Otto Von Bismarck said: enter into alliances with anyone, unleash Any Wars, but Never touch the Russians. (C) It is impossible to learn how to fight with the Russians. stop
            Let him play the soldiers ... wink
            About boxing I won’t ... upset you. Yes
            1. +3
              29 January 2020 18: 40
              Thrice Urya hi hi hi
              I believe that this refers to the ability to work against the S-300, S-400, Bukov and Carapace under the cover of VKS fighters, and not a full-scale war with Russia, which will end with an apocalypse. This is the Air Force chief of staff - not the head of the Pentagon. )) And his task is to minimize the loss of his aircraft in the destruction of Iranian targets - for this you need to train to work against the air defense and air forces of developed countries.
          2. +2
            30 January 2020 09: 22
            It’s reasonable, but still learning to fight against Russia does not mean at all that in the end you can reliably count on any significant ultimate success, you can pretend and blow the whole world that America is ahead of Russia in the quality and innovativeness of weapons, but this is only an attempt to give the desired for real, now it’s important not so much the quantity as the quality and effectiveness of the weapon, so let them blow themselves, and we will not so loud and pompous, but constantly and competently develop our Army and military-industrial complex.
            1. 0
              30 January 2020 10: 15
              Quote: sgrabik
              It’s reasonable, but still learning to fight against Russia doesn’t mean at all that in the end you can be guaranteed to count on any significant final success

              Learning to fight with Russia is possible, but dangerous to your health.
  2. +6
    29 January 2020 13: 56
    We will learn to defeat Russia, we will defeat Iran: US Air Force General on the development of aviation

    Is this general of bamboo smoked, or what?
    But if the potential for a possible war with China and Russia is initially built up, "if we learn to defeat them," then Iran will be a feasible goal for the United States.

    It's time to take a break and start thinking, in general!
    1. +11
      29 January 2020 13: 58
      Last year, hemp was legalized in a number of states. I look - there is an effect.
      1. 0
        29 January 2020 14: 06
        Quote: Cowbra
        Hemp legalized in a number of states last year

        Good, hempy hemp turned out. They know how to do it.
        1. +3
          29 January 2020 14: 11
          I go to the pharmacy, sometimes I ask Kan-A-bis, for "medicinal" purposes ... the trouble is, the pharmacist / pharmacist does not understand what I mean !!! Where is the world heading?
          1. +6
            29 January 2020 15: 28
            Quote: rocket757
            I go to the pharmacy, sometimes I ask Kan-A-bis, for "medicinal" purposes ... the trouble is, the pharmacist / pharmacist does not understand what I mean !!! Where is the world heading?

            Pharmacists are accustomed to the simple: is there? )))
            1. +2
              29 January 2020 17: 18
              Quote: Krasnodar
              Pharmacists are accustomed to the simple: is there? )))

              Not a "professional", did not know that this is possible.
      2. -2
        29 January 2020 15: 19
        People also thought about the same in 1940.
        1. +4
          29 January 2020 15: 22
          Yes, there were drug addicts who were very similar in general too. Goering for example. Also, everyone dreamed of winning the Russians.
          You are right they look alike
          1. +1
            29 January 2020 15: 49
            This is it about us Russians.
            But I understood your irony.
            1. +2
              29 January 2020 15: 52
              Tyk, I love the inhabitants of the book a sinful thing, not to shoot red, but to shoot manuals) They don’t know anything that is not written in the manual ... Therefore, they themselves are regularly dipped by themselves. Well, like this one.
              One trouble, as Pechkin said, "There are three people like you for a hat." smile Two more to be found
          2. +3
            29 January 2020 17: 24
            Quote: Cowbra
            You are right they look alike

            The bad is repeated! The same rake, but others are trying to jump on it!
        2. +3
          29 January 2020 17: 22
          Quote: Cyrus
          People also thought about the same in 1940.

          People, of course, allowed this, but convinced them specifically, lured manna from heaven ... however, anyway, they went, for which they then raked in full.
          It’s bad that besides the generals who smoked, we, for example, Kolya’s boys showed up.
        3. opk
          0
          29 January 2020 19: 44
          did you live then?
    2. +4
      29 January 2020 14: 17
      Quote: rocket757
      Learn to defeat Russia,

      And he did not think that this would be the last thing he learns from? belay
      1. +1
        29 January 2020 14: 22
        Choices - does he dream, rave, fantasize, joke?
        And so, according to the ranking, the general should talk about victories, not for nothing that he rose to the generals.
        1. +4
          30 January 2020 17: 15
          Quote: rocket757
          Does he dream, rave, fantasize, joke?

          No, colleague ... This is a military professional with combat experience and experience of staff work, "a real military man" And he speaks in all seriousness and not at all about what the site visitors are avidly writing about. Thoughts from his talk:
          1. This general, unlike many, spoke about the development of his own kind of armed forces and the wars of the future. He sees the war as network-centric, in close interaction of all types and arms of the army.
          2. To realize the goals of the war, it is necessary to act in real time. For this, the software should be improved. The Air Force platform in such a war would be the F-35 & F-22. The means of destruction of targets on the battlefield and in the depths of enemy territory will be CD. Therefore, a new technology is needed to coordinate the actions of the Air Force, Ground Force, and MTR.
          3. Cyberspace and outer space will be the arena of confrontation. The success of which depends on the state of the country's economy. Space security is a challenge today. And "Star Wars is still to come."
          4. Already being tested scenarios of future wars with the integrated use and interaction of all types and kinds of forces. This is practiced on the exercises of the Air Force, SV, Navy. Therefore, the general promotes the idea of ​​joint control of all forces in the operation, on the theater of operations.
          5. It is in this that he sees the way to improve the Air Force and the Armed Forces as a whole in order to confront China and the Russian Federation. Having learned this, you can easily deal with Iran. Therefore, "there is no need to focus on studying and improving the fight against Iran." This task can be easily solved if we learn to "defeat" a stronger opponent.
          Here is a brief summary of what the US Air Force NS reported.
          But colleagues fell into a propaganda bias: - to fight with us? yes we are them! yes they are with us! ("There are only stars above us, only the Caucasus mountains are steeper than us"!) But in fact - not a word! Is that how you can relate to analytical things?
          Many words, where are the thoughts?
          1. 0
            30 January 2020 20: 23
            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            He sees the war as network-centric, in close interaction of all types and arms of the army.

            It has been and is for a long time. The means of communication and intelligence have changed, electronic assistants and EVERYTHING have appeared! All this did NOT ADD talent, intelligence, or anything else to generals! You can’t talk about changes in the types, power, and lethality of weapons, it just is.
            Everything else you have listed is true, but by no means new, one way or another it has been discussed at VO more than once ...
            You admit such an option that the real headquarters do not know this and do not take into account ... I do not allow this.
            But in this phrase the whole point is, in short
            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            "there is no need to focus on studying and improving the fight against Iran." This task can be easily solved if we learn to "defeat" a stronger opponent.

            They themselves indicated that ... by the way, I liked the word IF???
  3. +4
    29 January 2020 14: 01
    It seems to be a military general, but apparently has not yet been fought.
  4. +4
    29 January 2020 14: 01
    been shot down, participated in a number of wars. That is, this is a real combat officer who perfectly sees the key areas of development of American (and the world as a whole) aviation.

    Well, right McCain -2. Only until the aircraft carrier burned. negative
  5. +4
    29 January 2020 14: 07
    There will be no one to defeat Iran ...
  6. +2
    29 January 2020 14: 17
    "Ostap suffered." Well, well, the printing press, this is certainly great, only it can break down, and the gluttonous vassals can cry out: - "Father, gratis - come on gratis", but "where to get it if you don't have it."
  7. +4
    29 January 2020 14: 24
    "According to a high-ranking military man, the main priorities in the development of the US Air Force should be modern software for the unhindered communication of pilots with artillery and ships, in cyberspace and in space" - this means that highly effective means of suppression and control interception should be created that would interfere with this communication, so that fairy tales did not come true.
  8. +5
    29 January 2020 14: 37
    Correctly, the General said: Will learn win Russia and China, then Iran will win.
    ...
    That is, will learn conquer the strong, conquer and the weak. It remains only to learn. And it almost happened right after the collapse of the Union, but then Putin got out of the box and recreated Russia and its army and they have to study again.
    1. +2
      29 January 2020 16: 37
      It turns out now Iran they can not win
  9. +4
    29 January 2020 14: 47
    Well, let a good electronic warfare system put "order" there in the coordination of interaction.
  10. +3
    29 January 2020 14: 49
    Oh, damn it, the gyrus of the general stiffened! Bang on the head with a butt wassat Forgot how their seaman on their knees in Iran crawled? And forgot about 400? Piece of meat! wassat
  11. +3
    29 January 2020 14: 50
    Goldfein knows what he is talking about
    So he "won" Russia and China last year Yes
    If China, Russia or any other adversary ever sees the F-35 in their airspace, I would like to say just two words: "We are here." Keep in mind that the F-35 will never be there alone, ”said Goldfein.
  12. 0
    29 January 2020 14: 57
    For the American general, Iran is a stronger opponent than Russia, since in order to defeat it, you need to train for us ...
    1. 0
      30 January 2020 09: 32
      The American general is idiotic logic, you can never learn how to successfully fight with Russia, because the United States will never remain safe and sound after such a war, and if so, then by their own logic and with Iran nothing good will come of !!!
      1. 0
        30 January 2020 09: 48
        We are constantly at war with America in different theaters of military operations ... Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, etc. Now let's say in Syria, remember the beginning of February of the year before last, when the Americans destroyed our "ichtamnet".
        1. +2
          30 January 2020 09: 56
          I agree that in local conflicts we will often intersect with each other, with success variables for each !!!
          1. -1
            30 January 2020 10: 21
            But I don’t believe in a real clash between our countries, with the declaration of war.
            Most likely, our nuclear-weapon confrontation will take place with China, moreover, on our territory.
  13. +1
    29 January 2020 15: 00
    Ashenazi are tightly entrenched in the US Department of Defense. "Squeezing out" taxes is a win-win.
  14. +2
    29 January 2020 15: 16
    "if you learn to defeat them" - it would be better to be silent, not to be disgraced. Gays learn to win in the army for a start ...
  15. +1
    29 January 2020 15: 16
    Well, if Goldfein "himself" got down to business, then Mother Russia is gone ...
    1. +1
      30 January 2020 09: 35
      Yeah, it's time to quickly get into pants from fear !!!
  16. +3
    29 January 2020 16: 44
    We will learn to defeat Russia, we will defeat Iran: US Air Force General on the development of aviation


    American science of winning.

    Military doctrine
    U.S.A
    Mastered the tricks
    "Science to win."
    And about the tricks of these
    Real former pilot -
    Goldfein is his last name,
    I decided to tell us.

    For example, you decide
    What to conquer peoples
    Suddenly turned up
    Lucky moment.
    No need to rush:
    With Russia or China
    Do it slowly
    You are this experiment.

    Soldiers in these countries
    They fight very weakly.
    And in service
    Only tanks and AK.
    And here is coordination
    All troops in cyber space
    Will certainly
    Hole them all with their sides ...

    Do not spray
    Well, if you beat, then in bulk.
    Two countries are enough
    For USA armies
    Suddenness of strokes
    Praised Tomahawks
    Recall their defense
    And everything will be "o 'kay"!

    And after this quick
    Small blood showdowns
    Perhaps earning money
    Strategy and plan
    You can get involved in a long
    Military campaign
    With countries “serious”:
    Korea il Iran ...

    So in the madhouse
    In a straitjacket
    Tied to the bed
    He raved and screamed.
    And from under the covers
    It carried a nasty stench
    And on the floor from the mattress
    Urine was dripping ...
  17. +1
    29 January 2020 17: 12
    Sometimes one gets the impression — the more absurd the Anglo-Saxon statement is, the more ecstasy he gets by looking at their faces. They are in themselves. Manyaki)))))
  18. +2
    29 January 2020 23: 36
    You are afraid of North Korea, with a dozen nuclear warheads, and climb to Russia, with its 30000 units of ammunition ... It is fraught with the destruction of the second coast of Carthage and the crazy Yankees inhabiting it

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"