Hiley Likely, or Brexit's Possible Secret


In late January, Britain finally decided to implement the so-called Brexit, a way out of the European Union. There is a corresponding justification. But how full is it? Is there a main reason for hiding?


To understand this, it is necessary to at least briefly understand the nature of this state. Officially, it positions itself as primordial democracy, a champion of humanism, a defender of human rights, and so on.

Therefore, first about democracy. It under the control of the monarchy? .. The once fashionable word “oxymoron” immediately comes to mind.

About British humanism. First, remember the British history. All of it represents a series of large and small crimes of the English against humanity. Hitlerite Germany, the main instigator of World War II, killed 50 million lives. But England is clearly circumventing this criminal regime. She carried out the genocide of the population of the whole continent - Australia, practically destroying the indigenous population, the insignificant remains of which were preserved only by a miracle. And the natives of the huge island of Tasmania were cut out by subjects of the Queen of England absolutely everything: from the elderly to infants. The area of ​​this island, by the way, is almost equal to the area of ​​Belgium and the Netherlands combined. And millions or tens of millions of people in Africa and Asia, destroyed by the British colonialists, are generally not accountable. In India alone, during the famine of 1769-1773 caused by the British, about a third of the inhabitants of Bengal alone died - from 7 to 10 million people. (Tyurin A.V. How Western capitalism was built: famine in British India.)

It is impossible not to recall that the indigenous population of another continent, North America, was also practically destroyed again by immigrants from Britain. Affected the British mentality.

It is advisable to write about human rights and other things from the position of the ex-Minister of Defense of Britain.

The right to life there is shamelessly violated. England does not spare either its subjects or foreign citizens. Recall at least the hanged Berezovsky. The official version of his suicide was criticized even by the British media. I have no evidence, but I have no doubt that he was killed by the bloody British intelligence services. Similarly, with the poisoning of the Skripals. I do not think that the queen personally participated in the development of this operation, but as the head of state, she is fully responsible for the activities of her special services.

On the outbreak of world wars without a British worldview. German naval minister A. von Tirpitz writes in Memoirs that it was Britain that pushed the German leadership to the outbreak of the First World War, having given Germany a signal through diplomatic channels that it would not enter an impending war. This, of course, does not remove responsibility from Germany, but shows the true role of England in this disaster.

The Second World War, of course, began with the attack of Germany and Poland on Czechoslovakia - this is an indisputable fact. But the information that Hitler came to power was financed by British banks, too, though with difficulty, made its way to the pages of the press. By the way, for some reason, documents on the flight of Hess to England are still not declassified. It is possible that he flew in to remind the British of some kind of pre-war accords, possibly pushing Germany back to this terrible war.

Against this historical background, the behavior of an island state, hastily escaping from the mainland, becomes alarming. Is it again preparing another world tragedy? Hiley Likely.
Author:
Photos used:
Graeme Maclean, commons.wikimedia.org
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. WILL 29 January 2020 05: 51 New
    • 18
    • 3
    +15
    A peculiar article, well, the fact that the Anglo-Saxons a lot of people around the world genocide is not a secret! But the binding of this inconvenient story for Britain to exit the European Union ... belay
    Brexit - the beginning of the collapse of the United Europe, too different countries and too different potentials!
    I think Russia from this process will definitely not lose. The USA will win first of all - having eliminated the economic competitor!
    1. Uncle lee 29 January 2020 06: 03 New
      • 11
      • 2
      +9
      The possible secret of Brexit
      The article was never disclosed .... But the arrogant Saxons conceived something tricky with this exit. we will wait.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Lelek 29 January 2020 23: 49 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        . But arrogant Saxons conceived something tricky with this exit. we will wait.

        hi Vladimir.
        IMHO, they didn’t conceive anything trickier than a cucumber, and the whole royal army stands by itself and scratches a melon. Yes, wait, see, laugh and pooh in their direction.
    2. Vladimir_2U 29 January 2020 06: 18 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      Against this historical background, the behavior of an island state, hastily escaping from the mainland, becomes alarming. Is it again preparing another world tragedy
      This is how, from the article it is decidedly incomprehensible! At least some analysis was carried out by the author, except for exposing the unconditionally criminal British monarchy.
      1. Aerodrome 29 January 2020 06: 21 New
        • 3
        • 4
        -1

        Against this historical background, the behavior of an island state, hastily escaping from the mainland, becomes alarming. Is it again preparing another world tragedy? Hiley Likely.
        and what, the "island" is closed by an impenetrable energetic plasma nanocap?
        1. bessmertniy 29 January 2020 10: 28 New
          • 3
          • 3
          0
          Britain’s exit from the European Union is not connected with its historical past. This is a pragmatic decision. The leading economies of the EU had to pull backward economies of other European countries to equalize the standard of living of the population. Great Britain decided to throw off this ballast from itself - and that’s it. Actually, Russia economically raised the former republics, but, rising, they decided to become independent. To some extent, it suited us too that we dropped this ungrateful burden from our neck. hi
          1. Sadam 29 January 2020 22: 06 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            so Likely Bridge the name will no longer be United Kind, but simply England .. without Scotland Ireland who remain there
    3. Waddimm 30 January 2020 09: 40 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: ANIMAL
      A kind of article,

      Such a good trolling, with humor! I like it!
    4. Alexander Sosnitsky 30 January 2020 21: 30 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Cool article. Finally, something specific appeared instead of the smeared nozzles ..
  2. Tank jacket 29 January 2020 06: 00 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Brexit turned out to be half brexit. Scotland and Ireland against Brexit. Britons cheated on everyone (high-likly). The Queen cannot enter the City of London as the Queen is without an invitation. So the main one in the city is sitting ... And the main ones are fleeing not from the mainland, but to mainland China.
  3. Mavrikiy 29 January 2020 06: 08 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Against this historical background, the behavior of an island state, hastily escaping from the mainland, becomes alarming. Is it again preparing another world tragedy?
    The question mark is not appropriate. Prepares and prepares. He hopes to stay on the island as always. In just 100 years, the planet has become tiny. recourse request
  4. Far B 29 January 2020 06: 18 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    The Second World War, of course, began with the attack of Germany and Poland on Czechoslovakia.
    I do not agree. The Second World War, IMHO, began with the Sino-Japanese War. And in Europe - from the Anschluss. Anyway, the Second World War is only a direct continuation of the First World War. "This is not peace, this is a truce of 2 years" (Field Marshal Foch, 1918).
    the British about some pre-war agreements
    But it turns out that Gitarlar fulfilled his agreements before the Rits by presenting them with a “Dunkirk miracle” and deciding to transfer the main burden of the bombing in the “Battle for Britain” from military airfields and aircraft manufacturing enterprises to civilian targets. Well, who studied what ...
    1. Cowbra 29 January 2020 07: 23 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The head grows from the Britons. The beginning of the tactics of carpet bombing of the Mirnyak:
      when, in the 20s, the Minister of Defense Industry and the Colonies of Great Britain, W. Churchill, was informed about the bloody arts in Iraq by the commander of the 45th air squadron Harris, he, he said, was “deeply shocked to hear about such cruelty towards women and children ".

      Then Churchill Harris appoints the commander in chief of bomber aircraft.
      Besides. The Germans did not bomb civilian objects even when the British bombed them.
      We started bombing targets in Germany before the Germans began bombing targets in Britain. This is a historical fact and is recognized everywhere. As it turned out, we chose the right, albeit difficult way. We sacrificed, at least temporarily, the inviolability of our cities. At the same time, we plunged our friends' cities into the flames of war. We were ready to sacrifice London to achieve common freedom ...

      James Spate, assistant secretary of state for the British Air Force, in his book, The Bombing of Retaliation.
      In general, I recommend - http://10otb.ru/content/history/souzniki/bomber_01.html
  5. Pessimist22 29 January 2020 06: 28 New
    • 13
    • 0
    +13
    John the Baptist once appeared to Trump and began to rebuke for the fact that
    he committed a lot of evil on earth with his aggressive policy against Iran. Trump called the CIA chief and asked him who had just lectured him like that.
    - It was John the Baptist, Mr. President, who is the Savior himself
    baptized in the Jordan River, and then his king Herod ordered to be beheaded. Also
    He used to poke truth in the eyes of Jewish kings, answered the CIA chief.
    “So decapitate him again,” Trump ordered and demanded to himself.
    a book in which the above stories about John were described in detail
    Baptist and Jewish kings.
    Having read to the end, he called the CIA chief again and began to bake him for
    what, it turns out, was Salome with her daughter, who at first
    entertained Herod with erotic dances.
    - Why didn’t anyone entertain me with erotic dances? In vain or something
    chopped off the head of the prophet? - asked Trump
    “You are mistaken, Mr. President,” the CIA chief answered. “Before you still
    several dance at once.
    - Who is it? - asked Trump
    - Well, besides the UK and other old prostitutes, three more appeared
    brand new: Baltic States, Ukraine and Georgia.
  6. rotmistr60 29 January 2020 06: 31 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Britain decided at last implement the so-called Brexit
    They gave birth for a long time, but they could not give birth fully. As if after the final release (finally), Britain did not become just England, because correctly written above about the attitude towards this of Scotland and Ireland. And in England itself there are enough those who were against the exit.
    Is it again preparing another world tragedy?
    So they live this for hundreds of years, and in relation to Russia since they learned about the existence of this country.
    1. raif 29 January 2020 14: 28 New
      • 5
      • 5
      0
      What kind of erotic fantasies are ideas about England? just as Scotland and Northern Ireland were in the composition of the Little Britons, they will remain so. these conversations from the category of “Saudis are reoriented toward the purchase of Russian weapons, Turkey will close the Incirlik base, Kharkov will become part of the LDNR” - dreams, dreams of “Urya-Patriots”
  7. rocket757 29 January 2020 06: 35 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Officially, it positions itself as primordial democracy, a champion of humanism, a defender of human rights, and so on.

    But in other matters, probably the most interesting thing is!
  8. parusnik 29 January 2020 06: 42 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    This Brexit will be eternal, they announced the withdrawal, but they did not really decide how to exit painlessly ... Actually, the topic of the article was not disclosed ... some assumptions ...
  9. Cowbra 29 January 2020 06: 43 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    After WWII, Great Britain acted as a Gauleiter from the USA in Europe, and along the way, as a box office holder. The United States unleashed a war with the EU, while a trade. Great Britain became nobody needs, but did not understand. And when the EU told her - everything, for you - there are no more privileges! Like, for example, the rejection of a single currency, about which you twist your tail ... England stood in a pose and croaked - "Yes I am! Yes, I have it! Here I am leaving - and how are you without a cashier ?!"
    And that’s all, the war is already going on, the cashier isn’t needed from the owner - the cash desk was quickly taken away from them (London already lost at least 54% of foreign capital, which the country earned at least 6,6% of GDP from and was serviced by over 1,1 million people.) And they said - yes Wali. And then it began in the style of Ukraine - but what about us? Hey, this joke was about gilyak! Only too late
    The author is NOT England coming out, they kick her out with kicks, and she has been holding on to the joint for 3 years now. But still, they’ll get out. AGAINST their wishes. So they didn’t conceive anything.
    You forgot another characteristic of the Anglo-Saxons - unmotivated arrogance. They are fucking for her now.
    1. Glory1974 29 January 2020 08: 55 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      NOT England comes out, they kick her out with kicks, and she has been holding on to the joint for 3 years now.

      If England does not want to leave, then why did they hold a referendum with the question "To leave or not?", After which the government made a decision. According to your version, it turns out that the referendum was held by the EU.
      1. Cowbra 29 January 2020 09: 10 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        And the referendum was caused by the actions of the EU! Didn’t you really know?

        The impudents were forced to live in the EU under EU laws. Migration policy was the first reason, then Johnson himself began to tell us that they are forcing us to abandon the pound! And comply with environmental standards! Why do they need us, EU rules? We have been in a special position in the EU all our lives! And it’s true - who else has not joined the EU for the Euro? England and Poland, which are now also being unfastened for this - a two-speed Europe.
        1. Glory1974 29 January 2020 13: 41 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          All the reasons you indicated at one time were given for the need to leave the USSR.
          It is clear that the first step is to organize a cover operation, which is done. But the real reasons are not on the surface.
  10. HAM
    HAM 29 January 2020 07: 18 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    We have a closer example and, rather, tracing paper from the Anglo-Saxons ... "we want independence from you, but you must feed and warm us for nothing, because we are great!"
    Doesn’t it remind anyone of arrogance? Well, does Europe have to contain Anglo-Saxons, whether she wants it or does not want .... because the jeltmens are such inventors! .......
  11. Jurkovs 29 January 2020 07: 27 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    There is no need to think. Trump has already spoken about everything. First, an expanded and preferential trade agreement between the United States and England (the United States and Canada already have such an agreement). Then the consolidation of the entire Anglo-Saxon world into a single "golden billion". The final step is introducing a common currency and forgiving your debts to everyone. The rest of the world and Europe will collapse with it in a grave economic crisis.
    1. Ren
      Ren 29 January 2020 08: 04 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Jurkovs
      Then the consolidation of the entire Anglo-Saxon world into a single "golden billion".

      Vladimir Volfovich predicted something else (video of 2008), after 10 years the forecast turned out to be more than 90%
  12. Ros 56 29 January 2020 07: 59 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Interestingly, if this island drowns in the depths of the sea, will global politics change?
  13. Amateur 29 January 2020 08: 06 New
    • 6
    • 3
    +3
    Uv Mr. Bondarev!
    Unfortunately, I could not understand the main thesis from your article:
    B.A. Berezovsky hanged himself because of Brexit, or vice versa Brexit took place due to the fact that B.A. toli hanged himself, or not.
    And how does this relate to each other fool
  14. Grandfather Crimea 29 January 2020 09: 16 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The name and essence do not correspond to each other. In any case, the worse the enemy, the more pleasant. But as always the people suffer, those who have no rights, and power in chocolate))
  15. iouris 29 January 2020 12: 12 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    There are many "possible secrets" of Brexit, but the true one. It will not be so easy to leave the EU: Germany will follow this. And Berezovsky highlilikli is alive.
  16. CBR600 29 January 2020 12: 28 New
    • 2
    • 5
    -3
    I was waiting for such an article, and yes, the question was raised and now he is handsome on the surface.
    We in Russia all the way the brain carried the abomination of capitalism. Since 1917, as since the creation of the socialist republic, they have been beckoning with communism, openly mocking the people. I am not an expert in history to handle the docks of treaties, agreements, dates and numbers, but it is obvious that Britain really rules the world. And at the beginning of 2020, the facts are simply a rod from all the cracks. Sovereignty.
    Sovereignty is the word that everyone avoids. You can minus me, but in addition to the monarchic (and this is not a fact of sovereignty) countries in Europe, the rest are the same directories in Britain. And it is obvious that the EU was created by it to manage these countries and for that the European Parliament was created. They put Germany as a stooge and healed calmly, getting rid of the spirit of communism and socialism, expelling Russian influence from all international institutions because no one needs a powerful, strong Russia, it is dangerous.
    The sovereignty of Russia since 1917 ... I’m half a hundred, and only today I realized for myself why in our country there are such poor and unhappy people, given the wealth of the country itself. And this is not a version. Historically, legislation in the country is from gangsters externally governed. Slavery and oppression. But what talents our land is rich in.
    Britain has created the EU and is now emerging from it in order to manage this EU and from outside. Because, this country is SOVEREIGN. It is she who will dictate her will to the Parliament, this EU will come for negotiations and consultations in Landon. Like ours, on the eve of NG.
  17. Sidor Amenpodestovich 29 January 2020 15: 20 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Is it again preparing another world tragedy?

    Great Britain, like an old Mowgli cobra, has long survived its poison.
  18. Undecim 29 January 2020 17: 56 New
    • 8
    • 5
    +3
    It seems that the VO site is positioning itself as a serious resource, and it publishes children's fantasies of some kind of no-name that has watched the TV for the night.
    1. Romka 29 January 2020 22: 27 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      I already thought adequate forum users ran away from here. Well, when you read the comments and you can’t understand, did the person run away from where or did the propaganda on TV try so? The most interesting thing is that these "evening air patriots" have a second citizenship (including British one), but they still believe and excitedly tell everyone how everything rots there. But such articles ... this is a complete kapets ...
      1. Undecim 29 January 2020 22: 30 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        Judging by the ratio (+/-) - not everyone escaped.
        1. Romka 29 January 2020 22: 38 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          Tomorrow is another article "skipipastenaya" from tutbaya (or maybe two), what a bad Lukashenko, about the Poles there has long been something (if not, well, then about the Ukrainians), Americans will remember the love, at least in the comments of forty members of the forum, but about Russia .... Well, it's not the most important thing that happens at home?
  19. CBR600 30 January 2020 11: 12 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    This is the Opinions section. Almost anything can be published. I am on the side of the author with his fears because our OPINIONS coincided =) (fears read as inferences)
  20. Gopstop 30 January 2020 17: 55 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Is it again preparing another world tragedy?

    Surrendered after the Second World War and the collapse of the USSR ..
    But it would not be time again to bleed someone off with each other, and in all sorts of deliveries and other operations to weld already more capital ..?
    Remember their slogan "Divide and conquer"?
  21. smaug78 31 January 2020 10: 54 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Article - Agitation
  22. Radikal 1 February 2020 10: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: CBR600
    This is the Opinions section. Almost anything can be published. I am on the side of the author with his fears because our OPINIONS coincided =) (fears read as inferences)

    What are the concerns for GB? And what do we care about them, do we have our own problems? Nothing more to distract? Let those with a British passport worry - do you have one? sad
  23. Basarev 2 February 2020 13: 41 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Well, what’s wrong with that? Britain therefore became so strong that it spared no one for the sake of its country and its people. But Russia - on the contrary - in every way courted strangers, ruthlessly exploiting its own. And what is now the place of Britain and the place of Russia? You can immediately see which approach is more effective.