Reflections on regional power after changes in the Constitution of the Russian Federation

39

The tension in the country caused by the upcoming changes in the constitution does not subside. Perhaps for most ordinary people this tension is hardly noticeable ... There are no discussions on television screens, there are no disputes in the Duma, there are no revelations of someone’s machinations ... The usual quiet work of lawmakers.

However, those who are interested in the issue today, it is clear that the work to amend the Basic Law is huge. For example, today more than a hundred proposals have already been submitted to the commission for the preparation of a new edition of the constitution. But the work has just begun.



About the state system of Russia


It is important for me, like many other citizens of Russia, to understand several issues. Will the changes in the state structure of the country affect? In other words, will we really become a federation or maintain status without real content, as is happening today?

Who will govern the country and what term of office will this be limited to? Will we continue to draw managerial personnel from Moscow and St. Petersburg? Or will there be an opportunity to be promoted to senior government posts by regional officials? There are many questions.

Let's start with the establishment of the state. Since the establishment of Soviet power, Russia has become known as federal. RSFSR. The word "federation" then migrated to the post-Soviet name of the country.

Are we a federation? Are our regions and national republics state entities? Personally, I can not unambiguously answer this question. Yes, we have our own regional thoughts, governments - and so what? What can all these bodies decide without coordination with the Kremlin? We select governors. And who accepts the resignation of these elected officials?

An elected official cannot be “eternal”


President Putin voiced an important decision. On limiting the term of office of the President of the Russian Federation. I completely agree that a long stay in the highest position in the state is nonsense. We are all human, and nothing human is alien to us. Any leader cannot live alone. He lives among people.

Gradually, not only professional, but also personal ties are being established. Good friends and friends appear. The official often does not even know how his personal acquaintance affected the life of another person. Slaughter, of which in any office in abundance, notice everything. And they will help a personal friend of "himself" to advance through the ranks, and get a profitable contract. Just in case. Suddenly, where fishing and people remember them with a kind word. And the owner will hear ...

There is another factor, the importance of which is undeniable for the leader. The official should not sit too long in his place. Russian emperors still knew this truth. Why is it so alarming in the offices when appointing a new boss? Because the broom is new. He sees unnecessary and sweeps. Or ... make work! Moreover, the current order will be broken. Pull subordinates. Build your vision of work. And so it will last three to five years. Until it breaks the old system. Until he achieves an improvement in the work of his office. Another year or two will be spent on “polishing” the new system. And then?

Then everything. Stagnation. There are no new ideas. The system is working well. You can rest on your laurels and receive well-deserved rewards. But time does not stand still. Working conditions are changing rapidly. We need to break something again. I don’t want to. And it is not known what to build in return. And I don’t want to leave.

Are long-lived governors effective?


The federal center is still the center of the state. But in the federal state there are other centers - regional. And governors and heads of republics rule there. And their power is not much less than presidential at their level. Each of us sees the result of such a separation of power in our own city. Even in the appearance of the city, if you will.

Houses and roads may not be repaired for decades. A classic excuse: there is no money for everything. But if only the president of the country plans a visit to this same city or region, the money is immediately available. Roads become good, stucco and paint at home. Parks equip. Miracles, and only.

And here a question arises, which I will try to answer today. Why are some governors elected (before 2004), appointed (until 2012), elected for one term or even part of the term, while others sit on their estates for decades?

I specifically looked at the ratings of the regions of Russia in order to understand the system for evaluating the performance of governors. The oldest governor of Russia is Evgeny Savchenko. He has been leading the Belgorod region since 1993. 27 years! At one time, the region achieved significant success in the development of industry, agriculture, and the mining industry. Even in social programs there were significant changes for the better. Today, others may be leaders, but still, Belgorod region is definitely not an outsider.

Kaluga Governor Anatoly Artamonov with a rating at the beginning of the fourth ten, but in his twentieth year in service. Since 2007, the head of the Republic of Tuva, Sholban Karaool, has been unable to raise the republic above 84th place. There is still a relative centenarian in the regional government - Ramzan Kadyrov, but this is generally a separate topic for discussion.

Why are they re-elected?


This means that the region’s economic indicators do not always affect longevity. I have little faith that some governor or head of the republic would risk freedom and offer a bribe. One thing remains.

Namely, the use of administrative resources within the region, which, given the system of election of governors, is quite capable of ensuring the winning of the next elections in the region. That is, in the region, in my opinion, there is a lobbying system for “their” candidate. Indeed, approximately the same systems existed in other regions of Russia, judging by the complete loss of confidence in the elections by voters.

I can’t talk about all the regions in which recently elected new governors, but, as it seems to me, this state of affairs has been identified without much influence from the center. The local political elite has bothered people to hell. And ceased to be monolithic. Hence the criminal cases against senior officials of the regions. Hence the leak of information and so on. Every man for himself.

New “governor wave” or Putin’s smart plan?


By the way, another interesting detail is noticeable in the political life of the regions. What most prefers not to notice. Putin’s managerial training program has been launched. Most of the new governors are from there. Young, eager for power, not afraid to take responsibility, in a good way arrogant people.

A year or two ago, when the first signs of dissatisfaction with the work of the government appeared, a lot of attention was paid in the press to discussing candidates for the post of new prime minister. Then several names sounded at once.

If you follow Putin’s logic, governors who were elected three or less years ago today may be “trained” in managing large regions. Or pass an exam, if you like, on the ability to manage complex territorial entities. Simply put, today the president is looking, again, perhaps, for his successor. Time runs fast and there is not much time left until the end of the presidential term.

I perfectly understand the situation that will develop in 2024. Presidential elections. One of the candidates is Putin's clear favorite. The rest, as always, is something like Ksenia Sobchak. There will be a couple more from the same “Putin chicks,” but from parliamentary parties.

Elections will pass, the follower will get everything. Not like Vladimir Putin himself had in 2000. That's all. Not only the presidency, but also the already prepared local elite, which will become an ally. By the way, the same applies to the formation of the future government.

Incorporate into the constitution ...


Returning to the beginning of the conversation about the governors of the Russian regions, I want to make my proposal for changing the constitution. It is necessary to introduce a time limit (no more than two terms) for election to the post of governor of one region. It is one region.

So we can give the opportunity to competent leaders who feel their strength and ability to benefit, apply for the position of governor many times. The rotation of personnel, which only the lazy does not speak about today, will not be at the pointing finger from above, but at the request of the official himself. And the concentration of talented officials on the centimeter of Moscow or St. Petersburg land we will definitely reduce.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    28 January 2020 11: 53
    You can change the constitution at least 200 times, but that will not change anything while the power in the country belongs to big capital ...
    1. +10
      28 January 2020 12: 04
      This is a postulate. who owns .... a lot of things, will strive to hold on to power by any means! "Revolutions" CANNOT be from above! They will bring some camouflage, because the tension in society is growing and a new generation is approaching, which does not suffer from immense patience and humility! Old slogans DO NOT WORK for the current government, because they are NOT theirs, this is obvious to EVERYONE!
      And their slogans are nothing more than slogan slogans. not responding to anyone’s requests, except for a handful of those who don’t care at all ....
      Like the fact that this is what we all have to see. CAMOUFLAGE, hiding the same thing.
      1. +7
        28 January 2020 12: 16
        Old slogans for the current government DO NOT WORK, because they are NOT theirs, this is obvious to EVERYONE!
        And their slogans are nothing more than slogan slogans. not responding to anyone’s requests, except for a handful of those who don’t care at all ....

        Indeed .. In the USSR there were many slogans and they responded to the requests of the masses .. now even slogans do not work .. good
        If you are a patriot, if you want confidence in the future, if you are not indifferent to the fact that the population in Russia has been declining for the second year already, if you want to see the country scientifically and technologically developed, if it annoys you that the natural heritage of the country, for which, among other things, was shed the blood of our ancestors, and not in one generation, now belong to a narrow group of people, and the so-called "partners" also have income from this, you must strive for socialism! And agitate for him in all possible ways! Only under socialism, we became a great empire, a technologically advanced country, with a powerful industry and advanced science!
        1. +2
          28 January 2020 12: 29
          Quote: Svarog
          If you are a patriot, if you want confidence in tomorrow, if

          Those in power have learned, from the "partners" they have gained wisdom on how to keep the people in a state of not standing .... although this "wisdom" is rooted so far away that you cannot find the ends / roots now.
          To us, those who have not forgotten how it could be otherwise, to pass our wisdom to the younger generation !!! To their activity, lack of patience and other things add .... maybe something interesting and succeed ???
          1. -1
            29 January 2020 02: 40
            although this "wisdom" is rooted so far away

            Neo-feudal lords can only dream of one thing - the revival of slavery / serfdom.
            pass on our wisdom to the younger generation !!! To their activity, lack of patience and other things add .... maybe something interesting and succeed ???

            A flame will ignite from a spark ... / (C) A. I. Odoyevsky “String of Prophetic Flaming Sounds ...” /
            And on the ruins of autocracy
            They will write our names! / (C) A.S. Pushkin. "To Chaadaev" /
            1. 0
              29 January 2020 08: 27
              Quote: lexus
              And on the ruins of autocracy

              Until those very fragments, still need to be brought, and this is a very difficult job.
      2. +3
        28 January 2020 13: 07
        I remember the "Outskirts of the USSR" during the stagnation.
        For example, in Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, the first secretary of the regional committee did not decide ANYTHING. Everything was in the hands of FAMILY clans. In Osh (1981) he died "from careless handling of a hunting carbine", although he was NEVER a hunter. The murder in the mountains of the Deputy Chairman of the Armed Forces of Kyrgyzstan in the same year.
        And the threats of the "small-town king" Adylov against Rashidov. I remember Pikul's novel "In the Backyard of the Russian Empire". the same film "Stationery Rat". And the leadership of Adjara (before the arrival of Saakashvili) for centuries was led by ONE family - first the princes, then the first secretaries of the regional committee.
        Nothing changed.
        Stalin wanted to put things in order with his Constitution (in particular, secret ballots and more).
        Received 1937 ... 1938.
        BUT the "fifth column", according to Harriman Roosevelt, was practically destroyed in the USSR.
        1. +2
          28 January 2020 14: 15
          Small-town bars "play tricks" when the central government is doing something "more important" or with them in one bundle. It is obvious.
          Question WHAT TO DO ???
          The example of many "Western dermocracies" is instructive and not only negatively. there are successful examples of how to do it, so that everything would go more or less AS IT WAS! IN LAW!
          In general, there are all kinds of examples.
          1. -3
            29 January 2020 02: 53
            Question WHAT TO DO ???

            Look closely at your "chains", study "blacksmithing" ... and start wanting "like in Paris".
            In general, there are all kinds of examples.

            Yes, but not about our honor ... "Until the roasted rooster pecked at the causal place."
            You have to fight for all the good things in this life. Neither Soviet citizens, nor today's residents of favorable countries for living, benefits themselves fell.
    2. +5
      28 January 2020 12: 06
      Quote: Greg Miller
      You can change the constitution at least 200 times, but that will not change anything while the power in the country belongs to big capital ...

      good Indeed, until the state becomes socially oriented, shaking up the government, changing the Constitution and other "transformations" is nothing more than another show ... which is designed to relieve tension in society.
      Only with the advent of the socialists can everything change. But they are not allowed to control even a cannon shot.
      1. -2
        28 January 2020 12: 14
        and they are worthwhile?)))
      2. +1
        28 January 2020 12: 17
        Speaking specifically about the Constitution of the Russian Federation, then - yes, dear Author, the majority of national entities in it are designated precisely as a "state". In plain text - read, do not hesitate. Mine planted in the 90s. Well, that's me, by the way. Regardless of the statements of colleagues.
        1. +1
          28 January 2020 12: 35
          The tension in the country caused by the upcoming changes in the constitution does not subside.


          BBC, Deutscheletle, Medusa and EchoMatsa Tape against. You are not enough ?! Tyutkin and Khodorkovsky, Svarog and Gardamir are also against it! What else is there to talk about. It must be canceled! 11! After all, the fair-faced elves are tense !!

          The tyrant beguiled the shores, gebnya is fussing! Urgently minus !! 1 Violation of freedom hangs in the air! A little bit more, they will come with a forged boot to the publicity of the forum! 11

          PS It’s not life, but the patriot’s solid

        2. 0
          28 January 2020 15: 41
          what I remembered the anecdote about the grandma's shed and the inscription on its wall. The mine was laid back in 1924. It was only then that the unitary state could be called federal. Realizing that neither the one nor the other name means nothing to people. I agree with your statement only in one case, if you allow us to correct your statement: - "Regioli with elements of statehood." Not the state, but the elements of the state. In this regard, even the communists were more honest. At least there were CCs of the Union republics. Is there a Criminal Code, for example, of Tatarstan or Adygea now?
          1. 0
            28 January 2020 16: 04
            If the Constitution of the Russian Federation does not even have a clear emphasis on the fact that national entities are full-fledged states, then national entities themselves do not think so. For example, the Constitution of Udmurtia:

            "Udmurtia is a state within the Russian Federation, historically established on the basis of the exercise by the Udmurt nation and the people of Udmurtia of their inalienable right to self-determination." (article 1)
  2. +1
    28 January 2020 12: 17
    Interested in federation. For Putin, Lenin planted a bomb. But Lenin gathered the country from what was left after the February coup and wars. Putin is out of the blue, ready to divide the country. With its current capabilities, it can easily equalize republics and regions. Thus, creating a single state, which he definitely will benefit.
    1. -4
      28 January 2020 12: 44
      Putin is out of the blue, ready to divide the country.


      I will comment on the fair-faced. Something you have few advantages. Actors of the circus genre have already forgotten about Chechnya.
      Putin came when the country was already divided according to documents and Chechnya was ready to get drunk with sovereignty.
      You probably just didn’t live in Russia, Patriot, so you don’t remember
      1. 0
        28 January 2020 13: 03
        You, Mr. Petrov, have been on the site for a long time, and you know my beliefs (unless someone else is sitting under your account).
        You seem to know little about Chechnya.
        I said only one thing. If the federation remains, then in 50 years, or maybe there will be a new Yeltsin earlier, who will divide the federations for the sake of personal power.
        By the way, Mr. Petrov, you will not argue that Putin respects Yeltsin very much.
        1. -2
          28 January 2020 13: 13
          and my beliefs know


          I can find out in advance. I’ll open some vomit newspaper in the West (I have a hobby, flipping through Western propaganda before going to bed so that VGTRK is not united, as they say) - and there will be a sheet from which you draw your thoughts on another occasion. BBS fits either MBX media or Deutscheletle or Censor. No. Uah. Moans one to one. Are you in sync?

          Although I think you’re not going to Washington.post site. You climb on Echo some sort of or RBC or other Rain. And there the retelling is already printed. Count the finished posts.

  3. +7
    28 January 2020 12: 18
    Dear author.
    Any government system is based primarily on legislation.
    A lot is dependent on the availability of certain laws.
    The second pillar is the executive branch - the president, the prime minister, etc.
    The third hypostasis is the judiciary.

    We seem to have everything in stock.
    And our "crew" must go as if on rails.
    But it goes either the wrong way, or at the wrong speed.
    Or even in reverse.

    Any strong executive power of the country is based on a strong parliamentary majority and on the support of the executive branch of the regions.
    And we have such a symbiosis - the EP has sucked into itself all the "cream of society".
    What this led to - no need to explain.

    One thing to understand.
    Only a system can be countered against a system.

    Even if you imagine the impossible, and imagine that during the next election a different, non-pro-Putin candidate wins, then again this does not change anything.
    Putin makes a smart move.
    Changes the Constitution and the form of government.
    Created over a state body - the Council of State, will incorporate the main levers of government. Including the appointment of ministers of law enforcement agencies.
    And this is the main thing.

    The President and the Prime Minister with their teams remain weak figures, accountable and controlled by the Chairman of the ToS.

    And here at least limit, at least do not limit the length of time in power - it does not give anything.

    But the figure of the Chairman of the Civil Assembly can be elected at least 10 times in a row - is this not specified in the Constitution?

    Everything is seen that way.
    1. +1
      28 January 2020 14: 44
      You obviously have not read the amendments. No transfer of power to the State Council is supposed. Even the status of this body will be spelled out in the ordinary law. And he will continue to be formed by the president.
  4. +3
    28 January 2020 12: 48
    It is necessary to write the phrase “All power to the Soviets” in the Constitution. And that’s all.
    And return the SNK apparatus.
    1. -2
      28 January 2020 12: 54
      It is necessary to write the phrase “All power to the Soviets” in the Constitution. And that’s all.


      they (the party) themselves gave it away (power). nobody took away. yourself. even enemy tanks were not needed to get off this power. Even Moscow did not have to occupy the Kremlin to lower the flag.

      These are not yard games where I ran away for lunch - and then again you return to the team to the same position. Communists retreated

  5. +3
    28 January 2020 12: 56
    In the Murmansk region, the governor is Mr. Andrey Chibis. His pre-election slogan after the appointment of acting. instead of Marina Kovtun, who left of her own free will and feels pretty good at the moment, having made herself up for a job (but that's another story), there was - "Live in the North!" The fact that he himself will not live permanently in the North is 1000% clear. But there was a bunch of additional window dressing, monitoring and regular "effective menegars".
  6. +2
    28 January 2020 12: 59
    Will we continue to draw managerial personnel from Moscow and St. Petersburg? Or will there be an opportunity to be promoted to the highest state posts by officials from the regions?

    I do not know how in Izhevsk, but in Moscow the mayor is not called a "reindeer breeder". Probably because he is not from St. Petersburg.
  7. +2
    28 January 2020 13: 02
    Putin’s managerial training program has been launched; most of the new governors are from there. Young, eager for power, not afraid to take responsibility, in a good way arrogant people.
    I would like to hear the names of these young hungry people in order to understand the author’s idea more clearly - otherwise in the photo of the capital Konovalov from the Communist Party and Furgal from the LDPR, whom the media do not spoil, and which are clearly not from Putin’s program.
    1. +2
      28 January 2020 13: 46
      Yes, a few months ago, back in the summer, I had a chance to read a long interview with the winners of the "Young Leaders of Russia" competition. So, it seems, this competition is called. In extensive comments, the people ridiculed these "leaders". Because the word "I" went through the word.
      I will develop ... I will achieve ... The prospects for my growth ...
      And in none of the proposals, none of the winners did not indicate the main thing - the understanding of responsibility at least for the production or institution entrusted to him. And even more so, the word was not said about responsibility to the people of Russia. As if in nature does not exist.
      1. +2
        28 January 2020 20: 46
        interview with the winners of the "Young Leaders of Russia" competition

        A couple of years ago, one of the sons was among the finalists of this competition.
        When, after the semifinals, I saw his interview on the federal channel, I thought that my son's roof moved. Not everyone will betray such nonsense and drunkenness. The answer was given to my father's roar: before the interview, a kind of matrix "question - answer template (insert the missing words)" was unobtrusively but unambiguously indicated.
  8. +4
    28 January 2020 13: 12
    Sevastopol, the third governor in less than 5 years ... the billionth theft, the failure of the federal program to the fullest ...
  9. The comment was deleted.
    1. +3
      28 January 2020 13: 23
      What kind of throat? And it carries something school-oval. = _ =
    2. +2
      28 January 2020 13: 34
      Now you really pushed. Also say that you do not need to give maternity capital to families, because this is Putin’s propaganda.
  10. +2
    28 January 2020 13: 15
    I specifically looked at the ratings of the regions of Russia in order to understand the system for evaluating the performance of governors. The oldest governor of Russia is Evgeny Savchenko. He has been leading the Belgorod region since 1993. 27 years! At one time, the region achieved significant success in the development of industry, agriculture, and the mining industry. Even in social programs there were significant changes for the better. Today, others may be leaders, but still, Belgorod region is definitely not an outsider.
    Kaluga Governor Anatoly Artamonov with a rating at the beginning of the fourth ten, but in his twentieth year in service. Since 2007, the head of the Republic of Tuva, Sholban Karaool, has been unable to raise the republic above 84th place. There is still a relative centenarian in the regional government - Ramzan Kadyrov, but this is generally a separate topic for discussion.

    Interestingly, what conclusions would you have in the Chelyabinsk region?
    My personal - the era of Sumin (governor) and Tarasov (mayor) was still a very good era. Let's just say that they "provided" themselves and their entourage, so that even for ordinary people they began to do something useful more or less regularly. And then all sorts of Yurevichs and Dubrovskys went - and went with an enviable frequency, respectively. criminal cases flashed in the news (well, the guys were in a hurry, they had to manage to provide for themselves in a rather short time, so they took it "not according to rank" - although "Misha-Baton" was generally crap initially - as a resident of Tankograd, I have a LOT what to show him, starting with his election campaign). And all this parsley, I am sure, will continue this way, no matter who is there and further from the "replacements" will be. Because the problem is in the state system itself.withoutcontrol of officials, and in education, life values ​​of society. Why did the system of governorship and governorship work pretty well in the Russian Empire? There people also sat practically for life, for tens of years - but the point is that not only had time to grab, but the quality of these people themselves was still an order of magnitude higher than the present. Petty tyranny happened, but there was no attitude towards the position solely as a feeding trough - after all, they understood that this was THEIR country, THEIR people, and that they were also part of it. And not "citizens of the world" with a "homeland" somewhere closer to the offshore.
    1. +2
      28 January 2020 14: 47
      The governor-generals in tsarist Russia did not deal with socio-economic issues, they were security officials who partially controlled the governors. They could not steal if they wanted to.
      1. 0
        28 January 2020 15: 54
        Quote: Sergej1972
        Governor-Generals in Tsarist Russia did not deal with socio-economic issues

        Alas, the governor general was in the Russian Empire in the border regions, Moscow and St. Petersburg. These were almost always not provinces, but several provinces. This is you rather talking about the current representatives of the president in the districts. The provinces were governed by a civil governor
        For example, the Warsaw Governor General included as many as 10 provinces!
  11. 0
    28 January 2020 18: 11
    no federations, only a unitary state, damn all the money in Moscow
  12. -1
    28 January 2020 20: 30
    It’s bad now. For some, it’s very bad.
    "On January 27, Deputy Prime Minister Tatyana Golikova said that 18,5 million Russians are below the poverty line. Most of them are families with children."
    Further it will be even worse.
  13. 0
    28 January 2020 21: 24
    To engage in state-building, we need an official ideology: what would we like to get in the end? Let it be unattainable, but of what we must strive for, what are our ideals. In the meantime, we have episodes torn over on the occasion of the expediency of the moment. With which they bound their hands and feet, and even blindfolded.
    Thus, the national-territorial division adopted by Lenin solved some tasks of attracting marginal nationalists against whites in the Civil War. It worked where how, where awry.
    The same Estonians well shamed Yudenich, but the Finns and Poles - to the Bolsheviks themselves. But then it exploded - and tore the Soviet Union, and even with territorial claims against Russia from the most zealous.
    In 91, the ideology of small blacksmiths and guilds, traders and thugs-Komsomol members won, which is not spelled out (or rather, that's why it is not spelled out in the Constitution - how can you write this down?), And still weighs on us ... , who did not fit in - well, it happens (reminded an episode from "Brother-2" - I actually, my grandfather fought ... - It happens ...), everything that prevents you from getting rich is not necessary at all, how can you keep unprofitable doctors , police or firefighters? For what? To be everywhere? But this does not bring money, even on the contrary - and therefore it is harmful!
    And now, having in fact this bizarre mix of feudal nationalism and undisguised thirst for profit, we want to build something solid and reliable? Strong and rich?
    Will not work!
    To begin with, these two factors must be cast down into the category of shameful and even forbidden. But what’s instead - it’s necessary to think, maybe the young ones will tell you ... They already have different priorities and views, and they are not worth the service-carpet-guns with silver, and even a car, and some even have an apartment! They are different, and have the right to want something of their own ....
    1. 0
      29 January 2020 16: 16
      Quote: faterdom
      To engage in state-building, we need an official ideology: what would we like to get in the end?

      "Official ideology" exists (since the state exists). "Officials" are guided by it. They also receive (in the end for their work). And we may want to have caloric, gas, water, electricity, TV. And so that they do not openly rob and kill on the streets.
  14. 0
    29 January 2020 19: 05
    Quote: iouris
    "Official ideology" exists (since the state exists).

    This is not an axiom, not at all.
    Or you do not understand what it is about.
    As Medvedev put it: “The work of governors should be assessed by the percentage of those who voted for United Russia !!!
    So this is a simulacrum, an extremely false and destructive criterion!
    The meaning of Russia in the rating of "United Russia" ???
    "Is the state me?"

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"