China.com: The West will destroy Russia in three hours, the main problem is the unavailability of aviation


A possible large-scale war is being discussed not only in Russia, the USA and Europe, but also in China. In China, they fear a quick defeat of Russia, which is supposed to be destroyed by the West, led by the Americans in three hours. Even the "reason" is called - "unavailability aviation".


The publication China.com writes that recently, the confrontation between Russia and the United States has significantly intensified. One of the main reasons was the conflict in the Middle East, in which the interests of the Russian Federation and the United States seriously clashed both in Syria and over the role of Iran in regional politics.

As a preemptive measure, the United States became preoccupied with isolating Russia. Moreover, this isolation is built from the Middle East through Eastern and Western Europe to the Arctic region. Russia, of course, is trying by all means to overcome this isolation, especially in the military sphere. So, the Arctic region is becoming very promising, where new weapons and military units are deployed, maneuvers are constantly being carried out.

However, the main direction, according to Chinese analysts, remains European. And it is on it that Russia is in for a tremendous danger. After all, here are concentrated both the contingents of US troops in Europe and the armies of American NATO allies.

In the European direction, the Americans deployed powerful medium-range missile defense, strategic aviation and, most importantly, 600 nuclear warheads and 80 strategic bombers capable of carrying nuclear weapon. These forces, according to China.com, are enough to sign a death sentence for Russia. Three hours - and Russia can be destroyed as an independent state: the Chinese media come to such a sad conclusion.

The Chinese accuse Russia of obsolete weapons. So, not so long ago, another Chinese publication, Sina, published a large-scale article in which it tried to justify why Russia could not produce strategic bombers, and even the PAK DA project is not a breakthrough in military aviation. The Chinese see the main problem in the lack of money: there is no funding - there is no development or production, and in terms of money, Russia, of course, is not a competitor.

But is this really so? The Americans are really building up their arms in Europe, integrating more and more countries into NATO. But their allies in Eastern Europe are dwarf states capable of displaying several battalions of little motivated soldiers. The use of nuclear weapons may be limited by the authorities of Western Europe, which would not want to turn their states into targets for Russian weapons.

In addition, recently, Russia has been paying special attention to the development of its own latest air defense and missile defense systems, radar stations, military aircraft, and submarines. Of course, maybe we are reequipping not at a very fast pace, but the fact that now the Russian army is the most combat-ready for the entire period since the termination of the Soviet Union. Moreover, this combat capability is provided not by the number of personnel, but namely by armament and the quality of training. Gone are the days when Russia "threw" the enemy with soldiers of rifle divisions. Now a new high-precision and high-tech weapon will operate.

Russia also claims that in a matter of hours it will be able to strike at the most important points of the enemy. It is unlikely that the American establishment and London financiers want to turn into nuclear dust under the blows of Russian missiles at key centers of the West. Perhaps the Polish or Baltic Nazi fanatics would agree with this prospect, but fortunately no one takes their opinion seriously even in the West.

The interest of China in a possible war of the West against Russia is also understandable. Beijing is well aware that, firstly, Russia is the “key” to Asia, and if the West defeats Russia, then China itself will become the next target of the American attack. Secondly, the overthrow of Russian power and the establishment of control over Russian territories will deprive China of the opportunity to use Russian natural resources, which will also have extremely dire consequences for the Middle Kingdom.

Finally, there is also the Arctic, into which China is also trying to break through, but since it is not an Arctic power, it can act in the Arctic latitudes exclusively through Russia. So all the reasons for China to worry about the fate of Russia lie in a purely pragmatic plane.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

161 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Whisper 28 January 2020 09: 12 New
    • 48
    • 0
    +48
    Well, at least for three minutes they gave us. Thanks for that too. And then we'll see how it goes.
    1. WILL 28 January 2020 09: 16 New
      • 51
      • 11
      +40
      Really amazing! I always thought China.com is a serious resource, it’s not Sohu ... and here such analytics request
      Well, let them now calculate how long China will last in the event of a Russian strike!
      And another question - why does China buy “unprepared” Aviation from us? Last purchase of Su35.
      1. GKS 2111 28 January 2020 09: 23 New
        • 13
        • 1
        +12
        Quote: ANIMAL
        Well, at least for three minutes they gave us. Thanks for that too.

        Yes, and thanks for that ...
        "It is unlikely that the American establishment and London financiers want to turn into nuclear dust under the blows of Russian missiles at key centers of the West. "
        1. WILL 28 January 2020 09: 26 New
          • 17
          • 3
          +14
          GKS 2111, This is not My comment ... and the words are not Mine.
          My - that this is nonsense and not analytics!
          1. krot 29 January 2020 23: 09 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            How much will the "west" then destroy China?))
            Hitler also planned to destroy in two months ..
            1. Range 30 January 2020 04: 58 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              What kind of nonsense? Yes, in three hours, civilization on Earth will simply cease to exist. From the very first minutes of the attack, an answer will fly from all strategic and secretly strategic gaps (such as the Club, Poseidon, the petrel, etc.). By the time the brains of the West are completely crazy, Poseidon and the petrel will already have begun this adventure. And "something else, and something else that they don’t talk about, that they don’t teach at school" ..
        2. Aerodrome 28 January 2020 09: 28 New
          • 28
          • 5
          +23
          China.com: West will destroy Russia in three hours,
          when did the start? I’m afraid I’ll miss it at night ...
          1. WILL 28 January 2020 10: 30 New
            • 30
            • 4
            +26
            Chinese experts come together somewhere
            To tell a little fortune about the Fates of the World
            First at the coffee shop, at the bottom of the examination
            Produced brilliantly, but began to check.
            Dice started to throw - quarreling among themselves
            Having reconciled a little - spread the tarot
            Achieved results, however thought
            After all, they were waiting for the result
            The last argument - the crystal ball got
            And knocked down tightly in a pile looked at him ...
            We watched, consulted terribly how tired
            But vsezh got the forecast, Experts Well Ohogo!
            And then for the computer And flew the news
            Chinese analytics, they have been waiting for them for a long time
            And we discuss these results together
            Although we know perfectly well that the result is Ga. But! laughing laughing repeat

            With uv. A.A wink
            1. novel66 28 January 2020 10: 50 New
              • 14
              • 3
              +11
              Russian bear in hard thoughts
              Europe, drooling in anticipation
              it would be better for the Chinese dragon to be silent ...
              1. Rusland 28 January 2020 10: 59 New
                • 15
                • 6
                +9
                If you talk like that hi , at the moment, and the Japanese, China is bent, while they are passionate about the virus. yes
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. Rusland 28 January 2020 12: 17 New
                    • 10
                    • 6
                    +4
                    Those will come with a peacekeeping mission, such as the Banzai, they will put their “daredevils” on the altar of victory, but they will go to heaven, and, to ours, to hell in a cube (degree). yes
                    1. novel66 28 January 2020 12: 20 New
                      • 3
                      • 0
                      +3
                      good that
                      cubed
                      not in distillation lol
            2. bayard 30 January 2020 00: 46 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              China is dizzy with success - she imagines herself the sovereign of the world. yes . One thing is missing - to hook the US into Russia in the war ... The old dream of the Chinese "cunning monkey" that sits on the edge of the valley. Only tigers are in no hurry to fight
              One tiger (the one that is the bear) seemed to promise to pull the ointment for the monkey ... earlier. But the monkey, she’s cunning, didn’t fulfill her part of the persuasion, and she didn’t intend to - she was waiting for the tigers to make a profit in the den (the tiger and the bear) and pocket the second tiger’s den. After all, after the fight, the tigers will be ... not fighters. winked After all, the monkey is very, very cunning yes . She even has such a name - MONKEY (China, if simpler).
              And now a monkey sits - such a cunning one, watches ... waits ... put on glasses ... looks forward ... smile
              Meanwhile, the tigers ... started a conversation:
              “Look,” one tiger says to the other (to the fact that the bear), “the monkey cannot decide everything, it’s smart or beautiful ... But I think it’s TASTY!” yes
              The tiger (which is like an eagle) said and licked. wink
              - So eat it - answers the tiger (which is a bear) fellow - I will not interfere. And I won’t pull the wax for her no . He lies, grimaces, does not keep his word ... does not help in trouble. And she’s not beautiful. But do not bother me to take that pig out - what is grazing at the edge ... lol
              That's what they decided! drinks
              For a bad world on a full stomach ... a horrarado is better than a good quarrel on an empty stomach. love

              So the cunning monkey outwitted itself.
              For neither smart ... nor even beautiful ... has not proved. no

              Hence the moral:
              Be always SMART, FAITHFUL and always BEAUTIFUL ... AND NO ONE WILL EAT YOU. love bully hi
          2. SanSanych Gusev 30 January 2020 16: 41 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Stopwatch do not forget to turn on
        3. Alekcandr Sokolenko 26 February 2020 08: 23 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Moscow rats (who sold the USSR for the nickname-enemies of the State Department?) - this is something new and very funny.
      2. lucul 28 January 2020 10: 12 New
        • 19
        • 4
        +15
        I always thought China.com is a serious resource, it’s not Sohu ... and here such analytics

        It is clear why China lost all the wars in its history)))
        With such a level of analytics .... yes, any of our grandmother, on a bench at the entrance, will make a more serious forecast ....
      3. svp67 28 January 2020 15: 05 New
        • 12
        • 2
        +10
        Quote: ANIMAL
        I always thought China.com is a serious resource, it’s not Sohu ... and here such analytics

        This is purely work for your own audience.
        How different is Chinese aviation from ours? It is based on our aircraft and even if they managed to upgrade them to more efficient machines, the question is, do their pilots have at least some kind of combat experience? Where could they get him?
        So, not so long ago, another Chinese publication, Sina, published a large-scale article in which it tried to justify why Russia could not produce strategic bombers, and even the PAK DA project is not a breakthrough in military aviation. The Chinese see the main problem in the lack of money: there is no funding - there is no development or production, and in terms of money, Russia, America, of course, is not a competitor.
        But this generally "killed". Note this is written by the RICH, if not the RICHEST country, which still has the main bomber, this is a modernized Soviet Tu-16 ... Did they want to say that?
      4. Grits 30 January 2020 13: 26 New
        • 0
        • 2
        -2
        Quote: ANIMAL
        Well, let them now calculate how long China will last in the event of a Russian strike!

        Do you mean Russia's blow to China? I can upset you. If this is a strike with strategic nuclear missiles, then nothing will come of it. Rather, it will come out partially. Since the range of our missiles is large enough - for the Americans. And for the Chinese, a decent dead zone is obtained, especially for the northern and central regions. But the Chinese, on the contrary, have short- and medium-range missiles. Which can begin to "stroke" us directly from the border
        1. kytx 31 January 2020 19: 55 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          China will be hit with lionfish, industrial areas and dams .. After which China will be blown away sharply.
      5. Sotnik77s 30 January 2020 14: 11 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I think they need to turn around and look more towards the East China Sea than to assess possible aggression against Russia. They expect that they will start against us here, and they will take and start there, against them.
        1. Gado 30 January 2020 20: 43 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          And I think that they have already begun. This coronavirus, as for me, is a biological weapon that someone used. Personal opinion.
        2. max702 1 February 2020 19: 33 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Sotnik77s
          I think they need to turn around and look more towards the East China Sea than to assess possible aggression against Russia.

          What China is doing, reducing the ground army and increasing the fleet., Aviation and MP .. With them it makes no sense to fight! They only need our lands as a source of resources; they don’t want to live in our area! And since we are happy to supply them with resources ourselves (and even lower than world prices), we will not fight with the nuclear power that hung everyone and everything in its history ..
    2. To be or not to be 28 January 2020 09: 53 New
      • 14
      • 1
      +13
      "However, the main direction, according to Chinese analysts, remains European. And it is on it that Russia faces a tremendous danger."

      Chinese comrades of analysts .. Oh. Comrades. Comrades ..

      They understand perfectly well that the struggle is in the economic sphere, and here the USA and the West have only one competitor = China!
      And, of course, the edge of their struggle will be aimed at undermining the Chinese economy and its growth rate; everything else is Chinese analytical tinsel.

      The threat of the Russian Federation within Russia itself. As with the creeping counterrevolution of internal forces with support from outside during the collapse of the USSR.
      1. Dimas84 29 January 2020 03: 53 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        . The threat of the Russian Federation within Russia itself.


        I fully share your opinion

        https://versia.ru/islamskie-fanatiki-zaxvatyvayut-ispravitelnye-kolonii

        Please read this material here. Obviously, this threat is much more real than the thoughts of Chinese "analysts"
    3. Pravodel 28 January 2020 10: 11 New
      • 7
      • 1
      +6
      As far as my memory serves me, the path will correct me, if it changes, there was already one person on Earth who planned to crush the Union-Russia in 3 months. Of course, 3 months - not 3 days, but what can you do, times are shrinking ...
    4. Starover_Z 28 January 2020 12: 52 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Sheptun
      Well, at least for three minutes they gave us. Thanks for that too. And then we'll see how it goes.

      The Chinese accuse Russia of obsolete weapons.

      Both on ! We have outdated weapons (((
      China, so sell us the latest, from your developments, if you are so worried about your flight if the West wins! We will begin to stamp it, so that Europe does not stick to us!
    5. NEXUS 28 January 2020 12: 58 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      However, the main direction, according to Chinese analysts, remains European. And it is on it that Russia is in for a tremendous danger. After all, here are concentrated both the contingents of US troops in Europe and the armies of American NATO allies.

      This contingents are something? What kind of armies are there that in just three minutes we will get kirdyk? fellow
    6. Fisherman 28 January 2020 13: 28 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      No, well, in the wrong hands he is always thicker))))). I am sure that everything is not so sad with us.
    7. mvg
      mvg 28 January 2020 19: 22 New
      • 6
      • 3
      +3
      Do you really want to see? Normally, . Keep it up, Ilya. No numbers, no facts. What are 80 strategists in Europe? What are 600 bombs? Even with France and Britain less.
      In short, a solid "bad", in the sense of "sit down, two"
      1. Passing 29 January 2020 21: 26 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Quote: mvg
        What are 80 strategists in Europe?

        The United States has 66 strategists capable of carrying nuclear weapons. In 2018, 49 of them were deployed. And they are based at three air bases in the United States. In Europe, there are raids, in the exacerbation of the situation, in a few pieces, such movements are secretly impossible to make, and if all 66 strategists fly to Europe, this will be obvious preparation for a nuclear war.
        Quote: mvg
        What are 600 bombs?

        The United States has 528 aviation cruise missiles. Each has a nuclear warhead. All are located in the United States. They will be applied both in the first wave and in the subsequent ones.
        And also 322 nuclear warheads in the form of bombs. All are located in the United States. This is a finishing weapon for a defeated / weak opponent. In the first wave, if they are used, they will be very limited.
        There are also 230 bombs for non-strategic aviation, of which 150 are deployed in Europe and Turkey. Perhaps they will be used in the first wave, when they are integrated with the F-35, for local tasks, such as knocking out border defense and air defense elements.
        Quote: mvg
        Even with France and Britain less.

        Bombs and cruise missiles are indeed a bit. But enough ballistic missile warheads. In total, both of them, France has about 300, Great Britain has about 200.
        In general, the thesis that strategic bombers pose the main danger to Russia is nonsense. The main danger is ballistic missiles, because their flight time is 30 minutes or less. So no three hours are needed. The thesis is also controversial that in the event of a nuclear strike, Russia will cease to exist. And the thesis is that the West will win an unconditional victory, i.e. actually not hurt, generally beyond common sense.
    8. smart ass 29 January 2020 09: 54 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The Chinese think in outdated standards, do not take into account our pro and electronic systems. No one will allow aviation to fly over its territory as in the 41st year.
    9. smart ass 29 January 2020 11: 41 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      France fell in a month, and in Stalingrad, for the same period of time, the Germans crossed to a neighboring street.
  2. Cowbra 28 January 2020 09: 14 New
    • 9
    • 7
    +2
    We have air defense. And they don’t. Therefore, let’s say, on the basis of Ramstein, a couple of dozen Iskanders will fly in - and there will be neither Ramstein nor aircraft on it. NO air defense
    1. kjhg 28 January 2020 09: 39 New
      • 20
      • 5
      +15
      Do not distort, anti-aircraft defense in Germany. I don’t remember exactly how much, but they have a lot of Patriot systems. There are other shorter range systems. The question is different, how effective is this system against our Iskanders and Caliber? So far, it seems that it is ineffective.
      In general, of course, the article is provocative. The West can destroy Russia in three hours? Well, let's say that with the help of nuclear weapons he can. And without a nuclear strike, there can be no question of any 3 hours or even days. But what will happen to the West itself after a retaliatory-counter or even retaliatory nuclear strike by Russia? A lot of analytical articles and even books have been written on this subject. Most boil down to the view that Western countries, at a minimum, would suffer unacceptable damage, and, at a maximum, they would be almost completely destroyed. That is why they will not fight with Russia by military methods. Economic - yes, please. Therefore, China will not wait for the bodies of its enemies to float along the river, while they peacefully, under the guise of a sage, sit on a tree. This is all in the past. The world has changed. China will not be able to sit aside if a new global redivision of the world order begins. Therefore, if you write articles on this topic, then you need to describe more or less real scenarios, and not your Wishlist.
      1. Wise Kaa 28 January 2020 10: 47 New
        • 6
        • 20
        -14
        But it’s interesting that we have a nuclear triad there ??? in the yard in 2020, the Voivode, on the idea, has reached the end of its life a long time ago, Russia does not have a new heavy ICBM, how many Mobile systems poplar-m and yars are in service, how many combat-ready systems, how many combat-capable SLBMs, what is there with nuclear weapons ??? what's with the production of uranium and plutonium to create new warheads ??? IMHO. In my opinion, every year our strategic nuclear forces are fraught with, and no one really cares about its preservation and the more so ...
        1. michael2000 28 January 2020 11: 49 New
          • 11
          • 3
          +8
          That is, you know how many new ICBMs were produced, how much the Governor was removed from duty, how many combat-ready SLBMs? Maybe then you can tell us, otherwise we are not in the know.
          Or just yap on the forums moonlighting?
          1. vik669 28 January 2020 12: 04 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            Yes, it’s very interesting what you have there - it would be more detailed what is seen from your couch and the opinion of the Chinese “comrades” is also interesting, but North Korea is something that no one even thinks of “destroying” because ...!
          2. Wise Kaa 3 March 2020 11: 39 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            If you did not notice this, I asked questions ... And do not answer a question with a question ... Tell me in essence, but if you have nothing to say, then it was not worth writing ...
          3. Wise Kaa April 3 2020 03: 41 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            From September 2019 to March this year, the United States reduced the number of nuclear warheads by three units, while Russia eliminated 100 pieces

            Photo: RIA Novosti
            Over the past six months, Russia has more than 30 times reduced the number of nuclear warheads in its arsenal compared to the United States. Moscow since September last year reduced 100 pieces in its arsenal, and Washington - only three. This is evidenced by the data of the US State Department.

            According to a statement published on the agency’s website on the reduction by two countries of their nuclear arsenals under an agreement on measures to further reduce and limit strategic offensive arms (START, the unofficial name is START-3), as of March 1, Russia had 485 (in September it was 513) deployed nuclear weapons - intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), heavy bombers (TB), ballistic missiles on submarines (SLBMs), while the United States has 655 (668).

            At the same time, Russia had 1326 warheads on these carriers (last September - 1426), and the United States - 1373 (1376).

            Read more at RBC:
            https://www.rbc.ru/politics/02/04/2020/5e85a8b69a7947d8c4b206f2?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fzen.yandex.com%2F%3Ffrom%3Dspecial&utm_campaign=dbr&utm_source=YandexZenSpecial
        2. BAI
          BAI 28 January 2020 16: 37 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          In my opinion, every year our strategic nuclear forces are fraught with, and no one really cares about its preservation and the more so ...

          12 The chapter tell it.
        3. Topol M 29 January 2020 14: 47 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Serpent, however you are not wise! If we turn the keys, then so many will sprinkle on their heads, mother don’t grieve. Only after the Pioneers destroyed, I learned that our regiment was wiping London and its surroundings from the ground, and that was 30 years ago
          1. Wise Kaa 3 March 2020 11: 44 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            My question is not how much is left, but that the trend is towards a further decrease in the number of warheads and their carriers ... My opinion is that it is constantly decreasing ... But no one answered more precisely ... Accordingly, I’m right and it’s alarming how The next generation of Russia will guarantee their safety ???
      2. NEXUS 28 January 2020 13: 03 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: kjhg
        I don’t remember exactly how much, but they have a lot of Patriot systems.

        What is the percentage of interception at these complexes?
        Quote: kjhg
        The question is different, how effective is this system against our Iskanders and Caliber?

        Regarding the Iskander, I think it’s not at all effective, since the rocket flies along a quasi-trajectory, which complicates its interception by an order of magnitude. As for the Caliber, ... I suppose here too the interception of the Patriots will not be outstanding. Especially if the shelling is massive on our part.
        But I think that it was the Iskander missiles that would fly before the Calibers in order to destroy this semblance of missile defense first. And it is not a fact that the warhead of these missiles will be without special charge.
        1. kjhg 28 January 2020 13: 13 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: NEXUS
          I don’t remember exactly how much, but they have a lot of Patriot systems.

          What is the percentage of interception at these complexes?

          The man wrote that the Germans did not have air defense. I answered him that she is. If you are interested in the effectiveness of the Patriots against these or those missiles, then you can search the Internet yourself or ask Evgeny Damantsev to write an article with the above calculations.
          1. Cowbra 28 January 2020 13: 28 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            There is but non-working = no. Interception percentage? What percentage, how many times they attacked - with drones, KR, tactics - nothing was intercepted AT ALL!
            Air defense - no! Air defense - not a piece of iron, but "O-harrow", and NO defense!
            1. kjhg 28 January 2020 13: 39 New
              • 2
              • 3
              -1
              Quote: Cowbra
              There is but a non-working

              I will upset you, but the Germans have it and it is working.
              Quote: Cowbra
              Interception percentage? What percentage, how many times were attacked by drones

              And how many times have Germans been attacked by drones and the Kyrgyz Republic?
              Quote: Cowbra
              nothing intercepted at all!

              Maybe because there were no attacks? lol
              Do you mean the Saudis? It has long been known that Arabs are still warriors.
              Each system has its own performance characteristics. It is well known that on them the Patriots lose the S-400. But with the exception of the S-400, he has no equal.
              1. Cowbra 28 January 2020 17: 01 New
                • 2
                • 3
                -1
                All clear. Jumping to the side. Air defense from the United States does not exist - it is proved in military operations. In Germany it is from the USA, the question is closed
  3. Svarog 28 January 2020 09: 14 New
    • 19
    • 16
    +3
    Chinese experts are even cooler than English scientists ..
    Secondly, the overthrow of Russian power and the establishment of control over Russian territories will deprive China of the opportunity to use Russian natural resources, which will also have extremely dire consequences for the Middle Kingdom.

    This is the moment that interests everyone .. and the Chinese and other "partners" .. But our natural resources are shared with our enemies .. and even the Chinese have been unfastened ..
    1. carstorm 11 28 January 2020 09: 37 New
      • 4
      • 3
      +1
      and what will remain for them? in the event of a defeat, these resources will go the other way and China will be in full .. it’s just scary of them. and what’s divided there, you’ll say that you’re bending so hard.
  4. paul3390 28 January 2020 09: 17 New
    • 7
    • 2
    +5
    It seems that according to the Chinese, only America has nuclear weapons ..
  5. _Ugene_ 28 January 2020 09: 20 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    In principle, they think correctly, but how can one forget about the huge number of ICBMs? After all, it’s no secret that at present no missile defense system can cope with a mass attack of ICBMs. Shooting them at the start is a great idea, at this moment they are most vulnerable, but the size of our territory does not allow this. And this means guaranteed unacceptable damage, which means there will be no war. This is essentially the issue under discussion, but in fact the USA will not fight with us anyway, why should they? Economic methods are much more effective now.
  6. Llur 28 January 2020 09: 23 New
    • 19
    • 30
    -11
    The Russian Federation is NOT an independent state. The economy has long been under the control and management of others, there will be no missile strikes in the West - our power has long been not ours and it’s keeping all the loot in the West (will our scumbags shoot at their money?), And the institutes involved in electronic strategic development - Dimasik is going to sell ...
    1. carstorm 11 28 January 2020 09: 31 New
      • 14
      • 11
      +3
      you know that Dimasik as you say resigned?)) manuals have not yet been updated?)))
      1. michael2000 28 January 2020 10: 15 New
        • 5
        • 6
        -1
        He got stuck a bit, and that is repeated.
      2. Wise Kaa 28 January 2020 10: 55 New
        • 11
        • 9
        +2
        Yes, you didn’t update yours. Dimasik went to the deputy. Chairman of the Security Council ... And this means that he is more important than the Chairman of the Government, BUT they will conduct their activities without any noise
        1. carstorm 11 28 January 2020 11: 04 New
          • 8
          • 10
          -2
          for sure. and he is also a freemason, and they rule the world from a lodge) and he is its head.
          1. Alex Fox 28 January 2020 11: 13 New
            • 8
            • 7
            +1
            Quote: Wise Kaa
            Yes, you didn’t update yours. Dimasik went to the deputy. Chairman of the Security Council ... And this means that he is more important than the Chairman of the Government, BUT they will conduct their activities without any noise

            And the planet Nibiru is approaching, and the earth is flat, and yet also still ... in general, there are a lot of all your shareware dreams :)
          2. BAI
            BAI 28 January 2020 16: 39 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            for sure. and he is also a freemason

            And he is a sucker, whose iPhone the Americans are listening.
            1. carstorm 11 28 January 2020 16: 49 New
              • 3
              • 1
              +2
              well, I won’t argue about this) it’s already a private matter for everyone to consider him) here I’m not his fan either) I’m not organically digesting stupid things)
  7. solzh 28 January 2020 09: 25 New
    • 15
    • 3
    +12
    the overthrow of Russian power and the establishment of control over Russian territories will deprive China of the opportunity to use Russian natural resources

    If Russia loses the war to the West, then China will be the first to begin the occupation of the Russian Far East.
    1. carstorm 11 28 January 2020 09: 33 New
      • 8
      • 2
      +6
      and they will have no choice. this is a logical decision, with what you want or not, you still need to. just as we would have to do the opposite.
    2. Svarog 28 January 2020 09: 34 New
      • 13
      • 15
      -2
      Quote: solzh
      the overthrow of Russian power and the establishment of control over Russian territories will deprive China of the opportunity to use Russian natural resources

      If Russia loses the war to the West, then China will be the first to begin the occupation of the Russian Far East.

      It is a fact. If such a war takes place, of which I am not sure. For why not fight. That China will begin to help the West even before Russia begins to lose. And now why fight with us? We fulfill all the requirements of the IMF, oil and natural resources are the "main partners" in the share .. There is no reason.
      1. carstorm 11 28 January 2020 10: 23 New
        • 6
        • 4
        +2
        Why should China help the West? what would then be left to face them alone?) just how beneficial it is for China to support us as well. simply because someone has to restrain and balance. as soon as one of us disappears automatically, the remaining one will become the main goal. there is no other way. China has no allies but there are tons of enemies around.
  8. Amateur 28 January 2020 09: 25 New
    • 12
    • 3
    +9
    Why do we retell this vomit from the yellow Chinese gossip? What is the point in such publications - scare, make laugh or piss off?
    Editorial Board VO (or what replaces it) -STOP!
    1. HAM
      HAM 28 January 2020 09: 34 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      With what fright did the Chinese analyze urgently? Notice that all the "analyzes" have recently been negative for Russia ... the equipment is bad, the submarines are old, the planes are generally seam ...
      It seems like such a Chinese trick - to transfer the arrows of the Americans from China to Russia ...
  9. bober1982 28 January 2020 09: 26 New
    • 9
    • 7
    +2
    The Chinese reproach us for not being able to produce strategic bombers, and they themselves are operating the modernized Tu-16, they have nothing more. And will not be.
  10. Ham
    Ham 28 January 2020 09: 27 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    if they could destroy us in three hours, they would have destroyed them long ago ...
    hi to the Chinese branch in
    1. maden.usmanow 28 January 2020 09: 38 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      John F. Kennedy in 1962, could destroy the Union, but did not want to lose two or three American millionaires.
      1. dauria 28 January 2020 12: 03 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        John F. Kennedy in 1962, could destroy the Union, but did not want to lose two or three American millionaires.


        No, I could not. The damage would be huge for our cities, but do not forget - 2 weeks and the Warsaw Pact on the shore of the Bay of Biscay. And then what? Sat, parted, but the Russians remained in Paris? You see, the army, unlike cities, suffers little from nuclear weapons.
        1. maden.usmanow 28 January 2020 13: 35 New
          • 1
          • 5
          -4
          For 1962, the United States had a total preponderance both in delivery vehicles and in the number of nuclear warheads.
          1. dauria 28 January 2020 16: 17 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            the USA had a total advantage

            Not total. Exchanged, and then? Or is it all, the war is over?
            The Americans sailed to Europe, the second time in Normandy to land and ordinary Brown a pair of platoons of the USSR on his knees to put, yeah. An army with vast experience that just grind Adolf. And he drove their pair of divisions throughout northern Africa to Suez. Really look at things. They could still cling to England and Japan, possibly in Turkey. How long ? Then what? Sitting over the ocean and gritting your teeth?
      2. dzvero 28 January 2020 12: 55 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Two or three would have done. R-14 reached Chicago and Philadelphia. Almost the entire eastern United States came under attack. At that time, the USSR had much less means of intercontinental delivery of nuclear weapons than the United States, and with the Anadyr operation, it was able to create a retaliatory threat of the same scale due to the BRMD and front-line aviation (IL-28). Asymmetric answer, so to speak.
  11. knn54 28 January 2020 09: 28 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    If Russia does not want to be destroyed within three hours, it needs to focus its efforts in three areas, which include: missile defense systems, the ability to retaliate, and the development of new models of strategic bombers.
    China.com (China).
  12. AAK
    AAK 28 January 2020 09: 31 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Nothing unexpected, the thesis of two "paper tigers" and a "wise Peking monkey" our "brothers forever" never discounted
  13. maden.usmanow 28 January 2020 09: 33 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Sorry ... but this is such nonsense.
    1. Terenin 28 January 2020 10: 03 New
      • 7
      • 2
      +5
      Quote: maden.usmanow
      China is afraid of the rapid defeat of Russia, which is supposed to be destroyed by the West, led by the Americans in three hours.

      Chef, u have gone belay
  14. Ka-52 28 January 2020 09: 41 New
    • 2
    • 4
    -2
    The West will destroy Russia in three hours ...

    it is possible in principle ... but
    1. It is worth clarifying that, together with the Russian Federation, the United States and most of Europe will be simultaneously destroyed.
    2. The problem is not the problem of Russian aviation. And the fact that the destruction of the military and economic potential will be carried out not by conventional weapons, but by nuclear weapons.
    3. with regard to the possibility of destroying the Russian Federation with the help of only conventional weapons, I recall one defense minister who promised to capture only a city (200 thousand people) with the help of one paratrooper regiment
    .
  15. Mavrikiy 28 January 2020 09: 44 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    China.com: The West will destroy Russia in three hours, the main problem is the unavailability of aviation
    The raven threw a raven throat .... the cheese fell out. request Provoke the West - dogs.
    What do not write for how much "ready" China will destroy Russia? Modesty? Have no plans? I don’t believe it! Just a monkey on a tree wants to sit out, shining his red backside. angry
  16. Felix 28 January 2020 09: 45 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    The West will destroy Russia in three hours, the main problem is the unavailability of aviation

    Something always interferes with a bad dancer ..
  17. kriten 28 January 2020 09: 49 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    China would like the west to weaken in the war with Russia. And this is logical - China and the United States - in the economy, these are two sides of the same coin, since one cannot exist without the other. He may be a temporary companion, but never allies. It is connected with the umbilical cord to enemies.
  18. Kibl 28 January 2020 09: 49 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    Why didn’t I catch it ..... From which budun recently our narrow-eyed people threw the whole world with their forecasts from the series “Chef, everything is lost”, let’s sort it out with its Hong Kong for a start. And Russia will figure it out herself, without snotty ...
  19. aszzz888 28 January 2020 09: 51 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    China.com: West will destroy Russia in three hours, ..
    Treat this kind of statements as a fake.
  20. anjey 28 January 2020 09: 51 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    These great-walled forecasters were still missing, where it’s interesting, they are preparing a huge ground army ???
    Russia needs to develop a non-alternative directive if someone shows aggression with the use of nuclear or other weapons associated with the destruction of the Russian state, for humane reasons, we will turn off the whole planet Earth from life, of course, not our method sounds cynical, but live with international wolves howl like a wolf.
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. rocket757 28 January 2020 10: 04 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    In China, they fear a quick defeat of Russia, which is supposed to be destroyed by the West, led by the Americans in three hours. Even the “reason” is called “unavailability of aviation”.

    But the readiness of air defense is not taken into account?
    Big mistake.
    By the way, the presence of a larger number of aircraft, is far from always an absolute advantage!
    Volume more, between such "vigorous" opponents, which can only be taken into account !!! The rest will just stand nervously on the sidelines and pray to God that something kind of, terribly "vigorous" does not fall on them!
    In general, someone's stoned delirium, nothing more.
  23. Alexander Pulkov 28 January 2020 10: 17 New
    • 1
    • 5
    -4
    CHINA in the course of MYSELF with RUSSIA confused !!!
    It is especially FUNNY to read about AIRCRAFT- in RUSSIA, THE READINESS OF ALL EQUIPMENT is 95% and at the same time MORE THAN 70% is THE NEWEST WEAPONS OR MODERNIZED!
    But the USA and NATO are AMAZING only 30% of EQUIPMENT, including ALL AIRCRAFT and at the same time they are 90% OLD !!!
    So in fact it is RUSSIA WILL DESTROY NATO and the USA FAST in less than 30 (thirty) minutes, even earlier than our air defense systems and electronic war systems will destroy all of their missiles and satellites !!!
  24. Petrik66 28 January 2020 10: 19 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    We all remember how China wiped himself and fled from Libya. We are cool, our tanks, our missiles ..... and our missiles were deployed near our border, under the umbrella of our air defense. From my amateurish point of view, Chinese weapons have shown themselves best in tank biathlon, breakdowns on breakdowns ...
  25. Paul Siebert 28 January 2020 10: 20 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    And this is to the question of whether China is our ally.
    Great China - the shaker of the universe!
    Only no one remembers at least one really great war in which China would win.
    Unhappy Tibet was able to occupy. Almost no armed forces.
    The Soviet Union freed him from Japan. He also achieved the inclusion of China in the UN Security Council. It is thanks to Stalin that China is considered the victorious country in World War II, however, like France.
    Then China intervened in the Korean War. Then they snored to their own border. Again, the Russian eyebrows had to frown - we already had a nuclear bomb ...
    In the seventies, China flooded into Vietnam. I wanted to join the provinces, densely populated by the Chinese.
    An unfortunate country that recently survived a terrible war with America, destroyed by bombing, managed to tackle the "great" Chinese army on the wort. Those almost lost their provinces.
    I'm not talking about Damansky Island. There, the Chinese could not even retreat. We just vaporized their invasion forces. Then they gave this island away for some reason. Politics...
    What era do not take - failure everywhere. Mongols, Koreans, again the Japanese, the league of European states ...
    And now these “greatest strategists” are talking through the lip about how many hours Russia will last! ...
    Crush the flies! Reduce fertility! Destroy your sparrows!
    Take care of the worm - the coronavirus is coming! winked
    1. Sergej1972 29 January 2020 14: 13 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Where is there to reduce the birth rate? For 1 billion 400 million of the population of China, only 17-18 newborns per year.
  26. Alexander Pulkov 28 January 2020 10: 24 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    And yes, and now about CHINA ANSWERING with KINES, so as NOT to show off! -Economy of China gave a WRONG because China, as in the WEST, PUMPED the economy with LOANS, that is. CHINA has a TOTAL DEBT of 282% of GDP for 2014, and GOS. Debt: -2000-23%, 2007-42%, and 2014-55% !! - If China's debt growth continues as fast, then in 2019 there will be an amount GOS.DOLGA above 9 trillion dollars or 67% of China's nominal GDP for 2018, and RUSSIA GOS.DOLG for 2018 was only 47 yards bucks or 3% of GDP !!!
    - Ruslan Karmanov about China and myths (part 1) - https://vk.com/video68556929_456248062?list=8a6a95705 ..
    - “The Chinese dragon is made of paper” - https://teleskop-by.org/2020/01/27/kitajskij-drakon-sdelan-iz-bumagi/
    - about China, about free gasoline, free communal services, etc. - https://cont.ws/@Sarmat1969/1206278
    -This is a problem in Russia, but look at China? !!! - https://vk.com/video68556929_456241223?list=e693225d9 ..
    -Antifeyk. In China, everything is free and loans can not be returned!
    https://www.russiapost.su/archives/164132
    -China - the economy as a debt pyramid- https://cont.ws/@narzur/1297377
    - Shelf life. Japanese view of the problems of the Chinese economy- https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3924070
  27. Operator 28 January 2020 10: 25 New
    • 5
    • 6
    -1
    Chinese three hours (not ending) equals 75 European years laughing

    It would be better if the Chinese "analysts" took up their coronavirus, and even before 2045 they will not survive.
    1. bober1982 28 January 2020 10: 44 New
      • 1
      • 5
      -4
      Quote: Operator
      It would be better if the Chinese "analysts" took up their coronavirus, and even before 2045 they will not survive.

      I specially looked through all the news from this respected, so-called Chinese publication - well, at least half a word about this terrible virus mentioned how they got water into their mouths.
  28. Vitaly Tsymbal 28 January 2020 10: 27 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Among the analytical materials (Chinese), I have never met much nonsense ... It seems that the authors of this "affirmative reflection" have played computer shooters and have no idea that if the West wars a nuclear war with Russia, there will be nothing left of the Chinese economy , as well as from the economies of other countries. Maybe I'm wrong, but for some reason I always thought that people win in any war, not budgets, planes and missiles .... Maybe it’s enough to retype Chinese nonsense ... Maybe it's time for our journalists to understand that there is propaganda in China for "Chinese ears", but there is serious analytics. Better write about the materials of party congresses and plenary sessions of the Chinese Communist Party - from these materials you can get more information than from obscure website analysts.
  29. VB
    VB 28 January 2020 10: 29 New
    • 7
    • 6
    +1
    Will the Russian authorities dust their property and money in the west? Where do they monthly billions driven by Nabiulina? All power in Russia is a faithful American servant. And the confrontation is to divert the eyes of the Russian people.
    1. Squelcher 28 January 2020 10: 49 New
      • 2
      • 5
      -3
      What kind of authorities?
      Kukareku !!!! all traitors, do not report meat to tigers !!!

      The decision to launch a nuclear strike is made by the president of Russia. He gives the order to the commander-in-chief of the Strategic Missile Forces, and he brings it to his subordinates through an automated combat control system or through other backup systems.
  30. megadeth 28 January 2020 10: 35 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    I agree with the Chinese .... If there were more of our publications, we would conduct an analysis of our weapons and readiness to repel aggression, and most importantly, this analysis would be heard by our leaders. A blow to Russia will be inflicted from at least two, three directions, and China will immediately cross the Russian border and begin to occupy territories ... it will find a reason. Modern aircraft are not enough, the existing fleet of military aircraft is outdated. Do we have enough combat stock of the same Caliber to respond to the MRI (massive missile strike) while with conventional weapons ??? And we, that in the media, on the Internet, as before WWII, are the best and we will all roll out. I went to outline the results and theses of the 2th Congress of EP !!!!!!!!!!!!!
  31. Goldmitro 28 January 2020 10: 42 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    China.com: The West will destroy Russia in three hours ....

    A recent strange trend in the Chinese
    analysts
    - Russia’s all is bad: both weapons, submarines and, in general, the West is about to arrange a trend for it! Better worry for how long their Celestial could turn into desert! They must pray to Russia!
  32. Sergey Gavrilov 28 January 2020 11: 04 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The author writes:
    "The Americans are really building up their arms in Europe, integrating more and more countries into NATO. But their allies in Eastern Europe are dwarf states capable of fielding several battalions of little motivated soldiers."
    A few battalions speak? Sure?
    I think only the countries of the former eastern bloc will recruit three hundred thousand + Ukraine and other republics of the former USSR. And you get a half-million army + army of the Western bloc ...
    1. dzvero 28 January 2020 13: 09 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Western armies are contracted and it is unrealistic to sharply increase the number at the expense of conscripts. This will be rabble, not troops. The days when Germany alone could set up 300+ full-blooded divisions are gone. Now, NATO, if that, is unlikely to be able to exhibit a tenth at a time ... and if the Turks join in ...
  33. stas-xnumx 28 January 2020 11: 21 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    The Germans also once stood right outside Moscow, but it turned out .....
  34. Sapsan136 28 January 2020 11: 25 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    If the armament of the Russian Federation is outdated, then why does such an allegedly advanced China buy weapons in the Russian Federation ?! Do not tell my sneakers!
    1. CBR600 28 January 2020 11: 42 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      They will destroy our economy in three hours, because there is not enough gold to take out planes = P
  35. Fedor Fortuna_2 28 January 2020 12: 09 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Russia has already gone through a lot of all sorts of blitzkriegs and we wanted to spit on their Wishlist !!!!
  36. God save the king 28 January 2020 12: 13 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    And why reprint these delusional fantasies of the liberal democrats?
    Another agitation with which America is trying to quarrel the fraternal Russian and Chinese people.
  37. The comment was deleted.
  38. Tzar 28 January 2020 12: 47 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Another nonsense from the Chinese, why is it here? .. With the same success, you can reprint articles about Putin's counterparts from opposition analysts who moved to Ukraine and the Baltic states.
  39. iouris 28 January 2020 12: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The main problem is that no one wanted to die.
  40. bandabas 28 January 2020 13: 12 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    So it's time for game developers to create a computer toy as opposed to "Red Alert". "Tolerance Alert" will be just that. By the way, you have to stake a patent for the name yes
  41. KUBANET Alexander Panyukov 28 January 2020 13: 17 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    ON SHOPS UNDER SITTING ANALYSIS?
  42. Zusul 28 January 2020 14: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "So all the reasons for China to worry about the fate of Russia lie in a purely pragmatic plane."
    It seems to me different here. This is such an absurd attempt to set the states against Russia. Type: look, they are finally weak, beat them! And then carefully tidy everything up
  43. Bongo 28 January 2020 14: 52 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Quote: bober1982
    And will not be.

    I'm afraid that already exists.
    In August 2018, China Central Television (CCTV) showed footage with an H-20 bomber on the runway of the Xi'an Aviation Plant airfield. In appearance, this bomber is similar to the American B-2A. The Chinese “strategist” H-20, if adopted, could become the second-ever serial strategic bomber with stealth and flying wing technologies.
    1. Lexus 29 January 2020 00: 38 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      I'm afraid that already exists.

      Sergey, with fermented patriots, when they scream their “Urya!” Eyes and ear canals are closed. And they open only under lulling "Litter-TV". All attempts to convince them of something else, even in the presence of irrefutable facts, are initially doomed to failure. This is so, from observations. hi
  44. zimzinov 28 January 2020 15: 16 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    I think that in the case of a large sheer, we, the Russian Federation, will intercept their missiles in important directions, and in return with a counter strike we will destroy our enemies in Europe and, essentially, weaken the United States with our strike, and if the United States tries to send us something in response (for example, our minutemans), instead of negotiating and recognizing their defeat, we will completely destroy the United States. But this is unlikely, because sacrificing allies (satellites) is one thing, and it is a completely different matter.
  45. Yuriy Malyshko 28 January 2020 15: 23 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Talking about someone's victory in a war between the main owners of nuclear weapons is fundamentally wrong. There will be no winners. Everything on this subject has been counted and proved many times.
  46. Radikal 28 January 2020 16: 01 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: ANIMAL
    Really amazing! I always thought China.com is a serious resource, it’s not Sohu ... and here such analytics request
    Well, let them now calculate how long China will last in the event of a Russian strike!
    And another question - why does China buy “unprepared” Aviation from us? Last purchase of Su35.

    And what, in your opinion, are the aviation readiness criteria? winked
  47. BAI
    BAI 28 January 2020 16: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In China, they fear a quick defeat of Russia, which is supposed to be destroyed by the West, led by the Americans in three hours.

    According to Chinese plans, Russia and the United States should weaken each other in the war, and after that, China will finish them. Therefore, it is not in China's plans that any of the survivors remain strong.
  48. Every 28 January 2020 16: 48 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    In the European direction, the Americans deployed powerful medium-range missile defense

    And these "strategists" from China take into account that our nuclear missiles will fly through the North Pole, and not through Europe.
    and, most importantly, 600 nuclear warheads and 80 strategic bombers

    It seems that the Chinese consider aviation to be the main means of nuclear deterrence and strike. In our country, land-based ICBMs are considered the main element.
    They generally forgot about the fleet, although we have enough PRKSN (thank God).
    An article from the category - "But Mary Ivanna said ......"
  49. Alexfly 28 January 2020 18: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    yeah, sadly.
  50. The comment was deleted.