China.com: The West will destroy Russia in three hours, the main problem is the unavailability of aviation

160

A possible large-scale war is being discussed not only in Russia, the USA and Europe, but also in China. In China, they fear a quick defeat of Russia, which is supposed to be destroyed by the West, led by the Americans in three hours. Even the "reason" is called - "unavailability aviation".

The publication China.com writes that recently, the confrontation between Russia and the United States has significantly intensified. One of the main reasons was the conflict in the Middle East, in which the interests of the Russian Federation and the United States seriously clashed both in Syria and over the role of Iran in regional politics.



As a preemptive measure, the United States became preoccupied with isolating Russia. Moreover, this isolation is built from the Middle East through Eastern and Western Europe to the Arctic region. Russia, of course, is trying by all means to overcome this isolation, especially in the military sphere. So, the Arctic region is becoming very promising, where new weapons and military units are deployed, maneuvers are constantly being carried out.

However, the main direction, according to Chinese analysts, remains European. And it is on it that Russia is in for a tremendous danger. After all, here are concentrated both the contingents of US troops in Europe and the armies of American NATO allies.

In the European direction, the Americans deployed powerful medium-range missile defense, strategic aviation and, most importantly, 600 nuclear warheads and 80 strategic bombers capable of carrying nuclear weapon. These forces, according to China.com, are enough to sign a death sentence for Russia. Three hours - and Russia can be destroyed as an independent state: the Chinese media come to such a sad conclusion.

The Chinese accuse Russia of obsolete weapons. So, not so long ago, another Chinese publication, Sina, published a large-scale article in which it tried to justify why Russia could not produce strategic bombers, and even the PAK DA project is not a breakthrough in military aviation. The Chinese see the main problem in the lack of money: there is no funding - there is no development or production, and in terms of money, Russia, of course, is not a competitor.

But is this really so? The Americans are really building up their arms in Europe, integrating more and more countries into NATO. But their allies in Eastern Europe are dwarf states capable of displaying several battalions of little motivated soldiers. The use of nuclear weapons may be limited by the authorities of Western Europe, which would not want to turn their states into targets for Russian weapons.

In addition, recently, Russia has been paying special attention to the development of its own latest air defense and missile defense systems, radar stations, military aircraft, and submarines. Of course, maybe we are reequipping not at a very fast pace, but the fact that now the Russian army is the most combat-ready for the entire period since the termination of the Soviet Union. Moreover, this combat capability is provided not by the number of personnel, but namely by armament and the quality of training. Gone are the days when Russia "threw" the enemy with soldiers of rifle divisions. Now a new high-precision and high-tech weapon will operate.

Russia also claims that in a matter of hours it will be able to strike at the most important points of the enemy. It is unlikely that the American establishment and London financiers want to turn into nuclear dust under the blows of Russian missiles at key centers of the West. Perhaps the Polish or Baltic Nazi fanatics would agree with this prospect, but fortunately no one takes their opinion seriously even in the West.

The interest of China in a possible war of the West against Russia is also understandable. Beijing is well aware that, firstly, Russia is the “key” to Asia, and if the West defeats Russia, then China itself will become the next target of the American attack. Secondly, the overthrow of Russian power and the establishment of control over Russian territories will deprive China of the opportunity to use Russian natural resources, which will also have extremely dire consequences for the Middle Kingdom.

Finally, there is also the Arctic, into which China is also trying to break through, but since it is not an Arctic power, it can act in the Arctic latitudes exclusively through Russia. So all the reasons for China to worry about the fate of Russia lie in a purely pragmatic plane.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

160 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +48
    28 January 2020 09: 12
    Well, at least for three minutes they gave us. Thanks for that too. And then we'll see how it goes.
    1. +40
      28 January 2020 09: 16
      Really amazing! I always thought China.com is a serious resource, it’s not Sohu ... and here such analytics request
      Well, let them now calculate how long China will last in the event of a Russian strike!
      And another question - why does China buy “unprepared” Aviation from us? Last purchase of Su35.
      1. +12
        28 January 2020 09: 23
        Quote: ANIMAL
        Well, at least for three minutes they gave us. Thanks for that too.

        Yes, and thanks for that ...
        "It is unlikely that the American establishment and London financiers want to turn into nuclear dust under the blows of Russian missiles at key centers of the West. "
        1. +14
          28 January 2020 09: 26
          GKS 2111, This is not My comment ... and the words are not Mine.
          My - that this is nonsense and not analytics!
          1. +3
            29 January 2020 23: 09
            How much will the "west" then destroy China?))
            Hitler also planned to destroy in two months ..
            1. +2
              30 January 2020 04: 58
              What nonsense? Yes, in three hours civilization on Earth will simply cease to exist. From the very first minutes of the attack, a response will fly from all strategic and secretly strategic slots (such as "club", Poseidon, petrel, etc.). By the time the West's brains go completely crazy, having started this adventure, there will already be both Poseidon and the petrel. And "something else, and something else, which is not talked about, which is not taught in school."
        2. +23
          28 January 2020 09: 28
          China.com: West will destroy Russia in three hours,
          when did the start? I’m afraid I’ll miss it at night ...
          1. +26
            28 January 2020 10: 30
            Chinese experts come together somewhere
            To tell a little fortune about the Fates of the World
            First at the coffee shop, at the bottom of the examination
            Produced brilliantly, but began to check.
            Dice started to throw - quarreling among themselves
            Having reconciled a little - spread the tarot
            Achieved results, however thought
            After all, they were waiting for the result
            The last argument - the crystal ball got
            And knocked down tightly in a pile looked at him ...
            We watched, consulted terribly how tired
            But vsezh got the forecast, Experts Well Ohogo!
            And then for the computer And flew the news
            Chinese analytics, they have been waiting for them for a long time
            And we discuss these results together
            Although we know perfectly well that the result is Ga. But! laughing laughing feel

            With uv. A.A wink
            1. +11
              28 January 2020 10: 50
              Russian bear in hard thoughts
              Europe, drooling in anticipation
              it would be better for the Chinese dragon to be silent ...
              1. +9
                28 January 2020 10: 59
                If you talk like that hi , at the moment, and the Japanese, China is bent, while they are passionate about the virus. Yes
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. +4
                    28 January 2020 12: 17
                    Those will come with a peacekeeping mission, such as "Banzai", they will put their "daring boys" on the altar of victory, but they will go to heaven, and according to ours, they will go to hell in a cube (degree). Yes
                    1. +3
                      28 January 2020 12: 20
                      good that
                      cubed
                      not in distillation lol
            2. +1
              30 January 2020 00: 46
              China is dizzy with success - she imagines herself the sovereign of the world. Yes ... One thing is not enough - to link the United States with Russia in the war ... The old dream of the Chinese "cunning monkey" that sits on the edge of the valley. Only tigers are in no hurry to fight
              One tiger (the one that is the bear) seemed to promise to pull the ointment for the monkey ... earlier. But the monkey, she’s cunning, didn’t fulfill her part of the persuasion, and she didn’t intend to - she was waiting for the tigers to make a profit in the den (the tiger and the bear) and pocket the second tiger’s den. After all, after the fight, the tigers will be ... not fighters. winked After all, the monkey is very, very cunning Yes . She even has such a name - MONKEY (China, if simpler).
              And now a monkey sits - such a cunning one, watches ... waits ... put on glasses ... looks forward ... smile
              Meanwhile, the tigers ... started a conversation:
              “Look,” one tiger says to the other (to the fact that the bear), “the monkey cannot decide everything, it’s smart or beautiful ... But I think it’s TASTY!” Yes
              The tiger (which is like an eagle) said and licked. wink
              - So eat it - answers the tiger (which is a bear) fellow - I will not interfere. And I won’t pull the wax for her No. . He lies, grimaces, does not keep his word ... does not help in trouble. And she’s not beautiful. But do not bother me to take that pig out - what is grazing at the edge ... lol
              That's what they decided! drinks
              For a bad world on a full stomach ... a horrarado is better than a good quarrel on an empty stomach. love

              So the cunning monkey outwitted itself.
              For neither smart ... nor even beautiful ... has not proved. No.

              Hence the moral:
              Be always SMART, FAITHFUL and always BEAUTIFUL ... AND NO ONE WILL EAT YOU. love bully hi
          2. 0
            30 January 2020 16: 41
            Stopwatch do not forget to turn on
        3. 0
          26 February 2020 08: 23
          Moscow rats (who sold the USSR for the nickname-enemies of the State Department?) - this is something new and very funny.
      2. +15
        28 January 2020 10: 12
        I always thought China.com is a serious resource, it’s not Sohu ... and here such analytics

        It is clear why China lost all the wars in its history)))
        With such a level of analytics .... yes, any of our grandmother, on a bench at the entrance, will make a more serious forecast ....
      3. +10
        28 January 2020 15: 05
        Quote: ANIMAL
        I always thought China.com is a serious resource, it’s not Sohu ... and here such analytics

        This is purely work for your own audience.
        How different is Chinese aviation from ours? It is based on our aircraft and even if they managed to upgrade them to more efficient machines, the question is, do their pilots have at least some kind of combat experience? Where could they get him?
        So, not so long ago, another Chinese publication, Sina, published a large-scale article in which it tried to justify why Russia could not produce strategic bombers, and even the PAK DA project is not a breakthrough in military aviation. The Chinese see the main problem in the lack of money: there is no funding - there is no development or production, and in terms of money, Russia, America, of course, is not a competitor.
        But this generally "killed". Note this is written by a RICH, if not the RICHest country, which still has the main bomber, this is a modernized Soviet Tu-16 ... What did they want to say?
      4. -2
        30 January 2020 13: 26
        Quote: ANIMAL
        Well, let them now calculate how long China will last in the event of a Russian strike!

        do you mean Russia's strike on China? I can disappoint you. If it is a strike by strategic nuclear missiles, then nothing will come of it. Rather, it will be released partially. Since the range of our missiles is long enough - for the Americans. And for the Chinese, it turns out to be a decent dead zone, especially for the northern and central regions. But the Chinese, on the contrary, have shorter and medium-range missiles. Which can begin to "stroke" us directly from the border
        1. 0
          31 January 2020 19: 55
          China will be hit with lionfish, industrial areas and dams .. After which China will be blown away sharply.
      5. 0
        30 January 2020 14: 11
        I think they need to turn around and look more towards the East China Sea than to assess possible aggression against Russia. They expect that they will start against us here, and they will take and start there, against them.
        1. 0
          30 January 2020 20: 43
          And I think that they have already begun. This coronavirus, as for me, is a biological weapon that someone used. Personal opinion.
        2. 0
          1 February 2020 19: 33
          Quote: Sotnik77s
          I think they need to turn around and look more towards the East China Sea than to assess possible aggression against Russia.

          What China is doing, reducing the ground army and increasing the fleet., Aviation and MP .. With them it makes no sense to fight! They only need our lands as a source of resources; they don’t want to live in our area! And since we are happy to supply them with resources ourselves (and even lower than world prices), we will not fight with the nuclear power that hung everyone and everything in its history ..
    2. +13
      28 January 2020 09: 53
      "However, the main direction, according to Chinese analysts, remains the European one. And it is there that Russia faces a colossal danger."

      Chinese comrades of analysts .. Oh. Comrades. Comrades ..

      They understand perfectly well that the struggle is in the economic sphere, and here the USA and the West have only one competitor = China!
      And, of course, the edge of their struggle will be aimed at undermining the Chinese economy and its growth rate; everything else is Chinese analytical tinsel.

      The threat of the Russian Federation within Russia itself. As with the creeping counterrevolution of internal forces with support from outside during the collapse of the USSR.
      1. +6
        29 January 2020 03: 53
        . The threat of the Russian Federation within Russia itself.


        I fully share your opinion

        https://versia.ru/islamskie-fanatiki-zaxvatyvayut-ispravitelnye-kolonii

        Please read this material at the link. Obviously, this threat is much more real than the thoughts of Chinese "analysts"
    3. +6
      28 January 2020 10: 11
      As far as my memory serves me, the path will correct me, if it changes, there was already one person on Earth who planned to crush the Union-Russia in 3 months. Of course, 3 months - not 3 days, but what can you do, times are shrinking ...
    4. +2
      28 January 2020 12: 52
      Quote: Sheptun
      Well, at least for three minutes they gave us. Thanks for that too. And then we'll see how it goes.

      The Chinese accuse Russia of obsolete weapons.

      Both on ! We have outdated weapons (((
      China, so sell us the latest, from your developments, if you are so worried about your flight if the West wins! We will begin to stamp it, so that Europe does not stick to us!
    5. +1
      28 January 2020 12: 58
      However, the main direction, according to Chinese analysts, remains European. And it is on it that Russia is in for a tremendous danger. After all, here are concentrated both the contingents of US troops in Europe and the armies of American NATO allies.

      This contingents are something? What kind of armies are there that in just three minutes we will get kirdyk? fellow
    6. 0
      28 January 2020 13: 28
      No, well, in the wrong hands he is always thicker))))). I am sure that everything is not so sad with us.
    7. mvg
      +3
      28 January 2020 19: 22
      Do you really want to see? Normally, . Keep it up, Ilya. No numbers, no facts. What are 80 strategists in Europe? What are 600 bombs? Even with France and Britain less.
      In short, a solid "bad", in the sense of "sit down, two"
      1. +1
        29 January 2020 21: 26
        Quote: mvg
        What are 80 strategists in Europe?

        The United States has 66 strategists capable of carrying nuclear weapons. In 2018, 49 of them were deployed. And they are based at three air bases in the United States. In Europe, there are raids, in the exacerbation of the situation, in a few pieces, such movements are secretly impossible to make, and if all 66 strategists fly to Europe, this will be obvious preparation for a nuclear war.
        Quote: mvg
        What are 600 bombs?

        The United States has 528 aviation cruise missiles. Each has a nuclear warhead. All are located in the United States. They will be applied both in the first wave and in the subsequent ones.
        And also 322 nuclear warheads in the form of bombs. All are located in the United States. This is a finishing weapon for a defeated / weak opponent. In the first wave, if they are used, they will be very limited.
        There are also 230 bombs for non-strategic aviation, of which 150 are deployed in Europe and Turkey. Perhaps they will be used in the first wave, when they are integrated with the F-35, for local tasks, such as knocking out border defense and air defense elements.
        Quote: mvg
        Even with France and Britain less.

        Bombs and cruise missiles are indeed a bit. But enough ballistic missile warheads. In total, both of them, France has about 300, Great Britain has about 200.
        In general, the thesis that strategic bombers pose the main danger to Russia is nonsense. The main danger is ballistic missiles, because their flight time is 30 minutes or less. So no three hours are needed. The thesis is also controversial that in the event of a nuclear strike, Russia will cease to exist. And the thesis is that the West will win an unconditional victory, i.e. actually not hurt, generally beyond common sense.
    8. +1
      29 January 2020 09: 54
      The Chinese think in outdated standards, do not take into account our pro and electronic systems. No one will allow aviation to fly over its territory as in the 41st year.
    9. +2
      29 January 2020 11: 41
      France fell in a month, and in Stalingrad, for the same period of time, the Germans crossed to a neighboring street.
  2. +2
    28 January 2020 09: 14
    We have air defense. And they don’t. Therefore, let’s say, on the basis of Ramstein, a couple of dozen Iskanders will fly in - and there will be neither Ramstein nor aircraft on it. NO air defense
    1. +15
      28 January 2020 09: 39
      Do not distort, anti-aircraft defense in Germany. I don’t remember exactly how much, but they have a lot of Patriot systems. There are other shorter range systems. The question is different, how effective is this system against our Iskanders and Caliber? So far, it seems that it is ineffective.
      In general, of course, the article is provocative. The West can destroy Russia in three hours? Well, let's say that with the help of nuclear weapons he can. And without a nuclear strike, there can be no question of any 3 hours or even days. But what will happen to the West itself after a retaliatory-counter or even retaliatory nuclear strike by Russia? A lot of analytical articles and even books have been written on this subject. Most boil down to the view that Western countries, at a minimum, would suffer unacceptable damage, and, at a maximum, they would be almost completely destroyed. That is why they will not fight with Russia by military methods. Economic - yes, please. Therefore, China will not wait for the bodies of its enemies to float along the river, while they peacefully, under the guise of a sage, sit on a tree. This is all in the past. The world has changed. China will not be able to sit aside if a new global redivision of the world order begins. Therefore, if you write articles on this topic, then you need to describe more or less real scenarios, and not your Wishlist.
      1. -14
        28 January 2020 10: 47
        But it’s interesting that we have a nuclear triad there ??? in the yard in 2020, the Voivode, on the idea, has reached the end of its life a long time ago, Russia does not have a new heavy ICBM, how many Mobile systems poplar-m and yars are in service, how many combat-ready systems, how many combat-capable SLBMs, what is there with nuclear weapons ??? what's with the production of uranium and plutonium to create new warheads ??? IMHO. In my opinion, every year our strategic nuclear forces are fraught with, and no one really cares about its preservation and the more so ...
        1. +8
          28 January 2020 11: 49
          That is, you know how many new ICBMs were produced, how much the Governor was removed from duty, how many combat-ready SLBMs? Maybe then you can tell us, otherwise we are not in the know.
          Or just yap on the forums moonlighting?
          1. +6
            28 January 2020 12: 04
            Yes, it is very interesting what you have there - in more detail what is there from your couch is visible and the opinion of the Chinese "comrades" is also interesting, but here is North Korea that no one even thinks to "destroy" because ...!
          2. 0
            3 March 2020 11: 39
            If you did not notice this, I asked questions ... And do not answer a question with a question ... Tell me in essence, but if you have nothing to say, then it was not worth writing ...
          3. 0
            April 3 2020 03: 41
            From September 2019 to March this year, the United States reduced the number of nuclear warheads by three units, while Russia eliminated 100 pieces

            Photo: RIA Novosti
            Over the past six months, Russia has more than 30 times reduced the number of nuclear warheads in its arsenal compared to the United States. Moscow since September last year reduced 100 pieces in its arsenal, and Washington - only three. This is evidenced by the data of the US State Department.

            According to a statement published on the agency’s website on the reduction by two countries of their nuclear arsenals under an agreement on measures to further reduce and limit strategic offensive arms (START, the unofficial name is START-3), as of March 1, Russia had 485 (in September it was 513) deployed nuclear weapons - intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), heavy bombers (TB), ballistic missiles on submarines (SLBMs), while the United States has 655 (668).

            At the same time, Russia had 1326 warheads on these carriers (last September - 1426), and the United States - 1373 (1376).

            Read more at RBC:
            https://www.rbc.ru/politics/02/04/2020/5e85a8b69a7947d8c4b206f2?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fzen.yandex.com%2F%3Ffrom%3Dspecial&utm_campaign=dbr&utm_source=YandexZenSpecial
        2. BAI
          +2
          28 January 2020 16: 37
          In my opinion, every year our strategic nuclear forces are fraught with, and no one really cares about its preservation and the more so ...

          12 The chapter tell it.
        3. +1
          29 January 2020 14: 47
          Serpent, however you are not wise! If we turn the keys, then so many will sprinkle on their heads, mother don’t grieve. Only after the Pioneers destroyed, I learned that our regiment was wiping London and its surroundings from the ground, and that was 30 years ago
          1. 0
            3 March 2020 11: 44
            My question is not how much is left, but that the trend is towards a further decrease in the number of warheads and their carriers ... My opinion is that it is constantly decreasing ... But no one answered more precisely ... Accordingly, I’m right and it’s alarming how The next generation of Russia will guarantee their safety ???
      2. +5
        28 January 2020 13: 03
        Quote: kjhg
        I don’t remember exactly how much, but they have a lot of Patriot systems.

        What is the percentage of interception at these complexes?
        Quote: kjhg
        The question is different, how effective is this system against our Iskanders and Caliber?

        Regarding the Iskander, I think it’s not at all effective, since the rocket flies along a quasi-trajectory, which complicates its interception by an order of magnitude. As for the Caliber, ... I suppose here too the interception of the Patriots will not be outstanding. Especially if the shelling is massive on our part.
        But I think that it was the Iskander missiles that would fly before the Calibers in order to destroy this semblance of missile defense first. And it is not a fact that the warhead of these missiles will be without special charge.
        1. 0
          28 January 2020 13: 13
          Quote: NEXUS
          I don’t remember exactly how much, but they have a lot of Patriot systems.

          What is the percentage of interception at these complexes?

          The man wrote that the Germans did not have air defense. I answered him that she is. If you are interested in the effectiveness of the Patriots against these or those missiles, then you can search the Internet yourself or ask Evgeny Damantsev to write an article with the above calculations.
          1. +2
            28 January 2020 13: 28
            There is but non-working = no. Interception percentage? What percentage, how many times they attacked - with drones, KR, tactics - nothing was intercepted AT ALL!
            Air defense - no! Air defense is not a piece of iron, but "O-harrow", and there is NO defense!
            1. -1
              28 January 2020 13: 39
              Quote: Cowbra
              There is but a non-working

              I will upset you, but the Germans have it and it is working.
              Quote: Cowbra
              Interception percentage? What percentage, how many times were attacked by drones

              And how many times have Germans been attacked by drones and the Kyrgyz Republic?
              Quote: Cowbra
              nothing intercepted at all!

              Maybe because there were no attacks? lol
              Do you mean the Saudis? It has long been known that Arabs are still warriors.
              Each system has its own performance characteristics. It is well known that on them the Patriots lose the S-400. But with the exception of the S-400, he has no equal.
              1. -1
                28 January 2020 17: 01
                All clear. Jumping to the side. Air defense from the United States does not exist - it is proved in military operations. In Germany it is from the USA, the question is closed
  3. +3
    28 January 2020 09: 14
    Chinese experts are even cooler than English scientists ..
    Secondly, the overthrow of Russian power and the establishment of control over Russian territories will deprive China of the opportunity to use Russian natural resources, which will also have extremely dire consequences for the Middle Kingdom.

    This is the moment everyone is interested in ... and the Chinese and other "partners" .. But our natural resources are shared with our enemies .. and even the Chinese have been unfastened ..
    1. +1
      28 January 2020 09: 37
      and what will remain for them? in the event of a defeat, these resources will go the other way and China will be in full .. it’s just scary of them. and what’s divided there, you’ll say that you’re bending so hard.
  4. +5
    28 January 2020 09: 17
    It seems that according to the Chinese, only America has nuclear weapons ..
  5. +4
    28 January 2020 09: 20
    In principle, they think correctly, but how can one forget about the huge number of ICBMs? After all, it’s no secret that at present no missile defense system can cope with a mass attack of ICBMs. Shooting them at the start is a great idea, at this moment they are most vulnerable, but the size of our territory does not allow this. And this means guaranteed unacceptable damage, which means there will be no war. This is essentially the issue under discussion, but in fact the USA will not fight with us anyway, why should they? Economic methods are much more effective now.
  6. -11
    28 January 2020 09: 23
    The Russian Federation is NOT an independent state. The economy has long been under the control and management of others, there will be no missile strikes in the West - our power has long been not ours and it’s keeping all the loot in the West (will our scumbags shoot at their money?), And the institutes involved in electronic strategic development - Dimasik is going to sell ...
    1. +3
      28 January 2020 09: 31
      you know that Dimasik as you say resigned?)) manuals have not yet been updated?)))
      1. -1
        28 January 2020 10: 15
        He got stuck a bit, and that is repeated.
      2. +2
        28 January 2020 10: 55
        Yes, you didn’t update yours. Dimasik went to the deputy. Chairman of the Security Council ... And this means that he is more important than the Chairman of the Government, BUT they will conduct their activities without any noise
        1. -2
          28 January 2020 11: 04
          for sure. and he is also a freemason, and they rule the world from a lodge) and he is its head.
          1. +1
            28 January 2020 11: 13
            Quote: Wise Kaa
            Yes, you didn’t update yours. Dimasik went to the deputy. Chairman of the Security Council ... And this means that he is more important than the Chairman of the Government, BUT they will conduct their activities without any noise

            And the planet Nibiru is approaching, and the earth is flat, and yet also still ... in general, there are a lot of all your shareware dreams :)
          2. BAI
            +3
            28 January 2020 16: 39
            for sure. and he is also a freemason

            And he is a sucker, whose iPhone the Americans are listening.
            1. +2
              28 January 2020 16: 49
              well, I won’t argue about this) it’s already a private matter for everyone to consider him) here I’m not his fan either) I’m not organically digesting stupid things)
  7. +12
    28 January 2020 09: 25
    the overthrow of Russian power and the establishment of control over Russian territories will deprive China of the opportunity to use Russian natural resources

    If Russia loses the war to the West, then China will be the first to begin the occupation of the Russian Far East.
    1. +6
      28 January 2020 09: 33
      and they will have no choice. this is a logical decision, with what you want or not, you still need to. just as we would have to do the opposite.
    2. -2
      28 January 2020 09: 34
      Quote: solzh
      the overthrow of Russian power and the establishment of control over Russian territories will deprive China of the opportunity to use Russian natural resources

      If Russia loses the war to the West, then China will be the first to begin the occupation of the Russian Far East.

      It is a fact. If such a war takes place, which I'm not sure about. For there is no reason to fight. Then China will start helping the West even before Russia starts to lose. Why fight with us now? We fulfill all the requirements of the IMF, oil and natural resources are the "main partners" in the share .. There is no reason.
      1. +2
        28 January 2020 10: 23
        Why should China help the West? what would then be left to face them alone?) just how beneficial it is for China to support us as well. simply because someone has to restrain and balance. as soon as one of us disappears automatically, the remaining one will become the main goal. there is no other way. China has no allies but there are tons of enemies around.
  8. +9
    28 January 2020 09: 25
    Why do we retell this vomit from the yellow Chinese gossip? What is the point in such publications - scare, make laugh or piss off?
    Editorial Board VO (or what replaces it) -STOP!
    1. HAM
      +2
      28 January 2020 09: 34
      With what fright did the Chinese analyze urgently? Note that all the "analyzes" have recently been negative for Russia ... the equipment is bad, the submarines are old, the planes are generally stitched ...
      It seems like such a Chinese trick - to transfer the arrows of the Americans from China to Russia ...
  9. +2
    28 January 2020 09: 26
    The Chinese reproach us for not being able to produce strategic bombers, and they themselves are operating the modernized Tu-16, they have nothing more. And will not be.
  10. Ham
    +4
    28 January 2020 09: 27
    if they could destroy us in three hours, they would have destroyed them long ago ...
    hi to the Chinese branch in
    1. -2
      28 January 2020 09: 38
      John F. Kennedy in 1962, could destroy the Union, but did not want to lose two or three American millionaires.
      1. +5
        28 January 2020 12: 03
        John F. Kennedy in 1962, could destroy the Union, but did not want to lose two or three American millionaires.


        No, I could not. The damage would be huge for our cities, but do not forget - 2 weeks and the Warsaw Pact on the shore of the Bay of Biscay. And then what? Sat, parted, but the Russians remained in Paris? You see, the army, unlike cities, suffers little from nuclear weapons.
        1. -4
          28 January 2020 13: 35
          For 1962, the United States had a total preponderance both in delivery vehicles and in the number of nuclear warheads.
          1. +2
            28 January 2020 16: 17
            the USA had a total advantage

            Not total. Exchanged, and then? Or is it all, the war is over?
            The Americans sailed to Europe, the second time in Normandy to land and ordinary Brown a pair of platoons of the USSR on his knees to put, yeah. An army with vast experience that just grind Adolf. And he drove their pair of divisions throughout northern Africa to Suez. Really look at things. They could still cling to England and Japan, possibly in Turkey. How long ? Then what? Sitting over the ocean and gritting your teeth?
      2. +4
        28 January 2020 12: 55
        Two or three would not have been enough. The P-14 reached Chicago and Philadelphia. Almost the entire inhabited east of the United States came under attack. At that time, the USSR had much less means of intercontinental delivery of nuclear weapons than the United States, and with Operation Anadyr, it was able to create a retaliatory threat of the same magnitude due to the IRSMD and front-line aviation (IL-28). Asymmetrical answer, so to speak.
  11. +2
    28 January 2020 09: 28
    If Russia does not want to be destroyed within three hours, it needs to focus its efforts in three areas, which include: missile defense systems, the ability to retaliate, and the development of new models of strategic bombers.
    China.com (China).
  12. AAK
    +1
    28 January 2020 09: 31
    Nothing unexpected, the thesis of two "paper tigers" and a "wise Peking monkey" our "brothers for a lifetime" have never been discounted
  13. 0
    28 January 2020 09: 33
    Sorry ... but this is such nonsense.
    1. +5
      28 January 2020 10: 03
      Quote: maden.usmanow
      China is afraid of the rapid defeat of Russia, which is supposed to be destroyed by the West, led by the Americans in three hours.

      Chef, u have gone belay
  14. -2
    28 January 2020 09: 41
    The West will destroy Russia in three hours ...

    it is possible in principle ... but
    1. It is worth clarifying that, together with the Russian Federation, the United States and most of Europe will be simultaneously destroyed.
    2. The problem is not the problem of Russian aviation. And the fact that the destruction of the military and economic potential will be carried out not by conventional weapons, but by nuclear weapons.
    3. with regard to the possibility of destroying the Russian Federation with the help of only conventional weapons, I recall one defense minister who promised to capture only a city (200 thousand people) with the help of one paratrooper regiment
    .
  15. +2
    28 January 2020 09: 44
    China.com: The West will destroy Russia in three hours, the main problem is the unavailability of aviation
    The raven threw a raven throat .... the cheese fell out. request Provoke the West - dogs.
    Why don't they write for how much "ready" China will destroy Russia? Modesty? Have no plans? I don’t believe it! It's just that a monkey on a tree wants to sit out, glowing with a red backside. angry
  16. -1
    28 January 2020 09: 45
    The West will destroy Russia in three hours, the main problem is the unavailability of aviation

    Something always interferes with a bad dancer ..
  17. +1
    28 January 2020 09: 49
    China would like the west to weaken in the war with Russia. And this is logical - China and the United States - in the economy, these are two sides of the same coin, since one cannot exist without the other. He may be a temporary companion, but never allies. It is connected with the umbilical cord to enemies.
  18. +4
    28 January 2020 09: 49
    And Che did not catch up ..... From what Budun lately our narrow-eyed people showered the whole world with their forecasts from the series "Chef, everything is lost", let them first deal with their Hong Kong. And Russia will figure it out on its own, without snotty ...
  19. 0
    28 January 2020 09: 51
    China.com: West will destroy Russia in three hours, ..
    Treat this kind of statements as a fake.
  20. -3
    28 January 2020 09: 51
    These great-walled forecasters were still missing, where it’s interesting, they are preparing a huge ground army ???
    Russia needs to develop a non-alternative directive if someone shows aggression with the use of nuclear or other weapons associated with the destruction of the Russian state, for humane reasons, we will turn off the whole planet Earth from life, of course, not our method sounds cynical, but live with international wolves howl like a wolf.
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. +1
    28 January 2020 10: 04
    The Celestial Empire fears a quick defeat of Russia, which will allegedly be destroyed by the West, led by the Americans, in three hours. They even named the "reason" - "unavailability of aviation".

    But the readiness of air defense is not taken into account?
    Big mistake.
    By the way, the presence of a larger number of aircraft, is far from always an absolute advantage!
    Volume more, between such "vigorous" opponents, which can only be taken into account !!! The rest will just nervously stand on the sidelines and pray to God that something like that, terribly "vigorous" does not fall on them!
    In general, someone's stoned delirium, nothing more.
  23. -4
    28 January 2020 10: 17
    CHINA in the course of MYSELF with RUSSIA confused !!!
    It is especially FUNNY to read about AIRCRAFT- in RUSSIA, THE READINESS OF ALL EQUIPMENT is 95% and at the same time MORE THAN 70% is THE NEWEST WEAPONS OR MODERNIZED!
    But the USA and NATO are AMAZING only 30% of EQUIPMENT, including ALL AIRCRAFT and at the same time they are 90% OLD !!!
    So in fact it is RUSSIA WILL DESTROY NATO and the USA FAST in less than 30 (thirty) minutes, even earlier than our air defense systems and electronic war systems will destroy all of their missiles and satellites !!!
  24. 0
    28 January 2020 10: 19
    We all remember how China wiped himself and fled from Libya. We are cool, our tanks, our missiles ..... and our missiles were deployed near our border, under the umbrella of our air defense. From my amateurish point of view, Chinese weapons have shown themselves best in tank biathlon, breakdowns on breakdowns ...
  25. +4
    28 January 2020 10: 20
    And this is to the question of whether China is our ally.
    Great China - the shaker of the universe!
    Only no one remembers at least one really great war in which China would win.
    Unhappy Tibet was able to occupy. Almost no armed forces.
    The Soviet Union freed him from Japan. He also achieved the inclusion of China in the UN Security Council. It is thanks to Stalin that China is considered the victorious country in World War II, however, like France.
    Then China intervened in the Korean War. Then they snored to their own border. Again, the Russian eyebrows had to frown - we already had a nuclear bomb ...
    In the seventies, China flooded into Vietnam. I wanted to join the provinces, densely populated by the Chinese.
    The unfortunate country, which recently survived a terrible war with America, destroyed by bombing, managed to knock the "great" Chinese army on the tinsel. Those almost lost their provinces.
    I'm not talking about Damansky Island. There, the Chinese could not even retreat. We just vaporized their invasion forces. Then they gave this island away for some reason. Politics...
    What era do not take - failure everywhere. Mongols, Koreans, again the Japanese, the league of European states ...
    And now these "greatest strategists" are talking through their lips about how many hours Russia will hold out! ...
    Crush the flies! Reduce fertility! Destroy your sparrows!
    Take care of the worm - the coronavirus is coming! winked
    1. 0
      29 January 2020 14: 13
      Where is there to reduce the birth rate? For 1 billion 400 million of the population of China, only 17-18 newborns per year.
  26. -2
    28 January 2020 10: 24
    And yes, and now about CHINA ANSWERING with KINES, so as NOT to show off! -Economy of China gave a WRONG because China, as in the WEST, PUMPED the economy with LOANS, that is. CHINA has a TOTAL DEBT of 282% of GDP for 2014, and GOS. Debt: -2000-23%, 2007-42%, and 2014-55% !! - If China's debt growth continues as fast, then in 2019 there will be an amount GOS.DOLGA above 9 trillion dollars or 67% of China's nominal GDP for 2018, and RUSSIA GOS.DOLG for 2018 was only 47 yards bucks or 3% of GDP !!!
    - Ruslan Karmanov about China and myths (part 1) - https://vk.com/video68556929_456248062?list=8a6a95705 ..
    - “The Chinese dragon is made of paper” - https://teleskop-by.org/2020/01/27/kitajskij-drakon-sdelan-iz-bumagi/
    - about China, about free gasoline, free communal services, etc. - https://cont.ws/@Sarmat1969/1206278
    -This is a problem in Russia, but look at China? !!! - https://vk.com/video68556929_456241223?list=e693225d9 ..
    -Antifeyk. In China, everything is free and loans can not be returned!
    https://www.russiapost.su/archives/164132
    -China - the economy as a debt pyramid- https://cont.ws/@narzur/1297377
    - Shelf life. Japanese view of the problems of the Chinese economy- https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3924070
  27. -1
    28 January 2020 10: 25
    Chinese three hours (not ending) equals 75 European years laughing

    It would be better if the Chinese "analysts" took up their coronavirus, or even until 2045 they will not live.
    1. -4
      28 January 2020 10: 44
      Quote: Operator
      It would be better if the Chinese "analysts" took up their coronavirus, or even until 2045 they will not live.

      I specially looked through all the news from this respected, so-called Chinese publication - well, at least half a word about this terrible virus mentioned how they got water into their mouths.
  28. +1
    28 January 2020 10: 27
    Among the analytical materials (Chinese), I have not yet met any greater delirium ... It seems that the authors of this "affirmative thought" have played computer shooters and have no idea that if a nuclear war starts between the West and Russia, then nothing will remain of the Chinese economy , as well as from other economies of other countries. Maybe I'm wrong, but for some reason I always believed that people win in any war, not budgets, planes and missiles ... Maybe it's enough to reprint Chinese nonsense ... Maybe it's time for our journalists to learn to understand that there is propaganda in China for "Chinese ears", but there is serious analytics. It is better to write about the materials of party congresses and plenums of the Chinese Communist Party - you can get more information from these materials than from obscure website analysts.
  29. VB
    +1
    28 January 2020 10: 29
    Will the Russian authorities dust their property and money in the west? Where do they monthly billions driven by Nabiulina? All power in Russia is a faithful American servant. And the confrontation is to divert the eyes of the Russian people.
    1. -3
      28 January 2020 10: 49
      What kind of authorities?
      Kukareku !!!! all traitors, do not report meat to tigers !!!

      The decision to launch a nuclear strike is made by the president of Russia. He gives the order to the commander-in-chief of the Strategic Missile Forces, and he brings it to his subordinates through an automated combat control system or through other backup systems.
  30. -3
    28 January 2020 10: 35
    I agree with the Chinese .... If there were more of our publications, we would conduct an analysis of our weapons and readiness to repel aggression, and most importantly, this analysis would be heard by our leaders. A blow to Russia will be inflicted from at least two, three directions, and China will immediately cross the Russian border and begin to occupy territories ... it will find a reason. Modern aircraft are not enough, the existing fleet of military aircraft is outdated. Do we have enough combat stock of the same Caliber to respond to the MRI (massive missile strike) while with conventional weapons ??? And we, that in the media, on the Internet, as before WWII, are the best and we will all roll out. I went to outline the results and theses of the 2th Congress of EP !!!!!!!!!!!!!
  31. 0
    28 January 2020 10: 42
    China.com: The West will destroy Russia in three hours ....

    A recent strange trend in the Chinese
    analysts
    - Russia’s all is bad: both weapons, submarines and, in general, the West is about to arrange a trend for it! Better worry for how long their Celestial could turn into desert! They must pray to Russia!
  32. +1
    28 January 2020 11: 04
    The author writes:
    "The Americans are really building up their arms in Europe, integrating more and more countries into NATO. But their allies in Eastern Europe are dwarf states capable of deploying several battalions of unmotivated soldiers."
    A few battalions speak? Sure?
    I think only the countries of the former eastern bloc will recruit three hundred thousand + Ukraine and other republics of the former USSR. And you get a half-million army + army of the Western bloc ...
    1. 0
      28 January 2020 13: 09
      Western armies are contracted and it is unrealistic to sharply increase the number at the expense of conscripts. This will be rabble, not troops. The days when Germany alone could set up 300+ full-blooded divisions are gone. Now, NATO, if that, is unlikely to be able to exhibit a tenth at a time ... and if the Turks join in ...
  33. 0
    28 January 2020 11: 21
    The Germans also once stood right outside Moscow, but it turned out .....
  34. +3
    28 January 2020 11: 25
    If the armament of the Russian Federation is outdated, then why does such an allegedly advanced China buy weapons in the Russian Federation ?! Do not tell my sneakers!
    1. -2
      28 January 2020 11: 42
      They will destroy our economy in three hours, because there is not enough gold to take out planes = P
  35. -1
    28 January 2020 12: 09
    Russia has already gone through a lot of all sorts of blitzkriegs and we wanted to spit on their Wishlist !!!!
  36. +1
    28 January 2020 12: 13
    And why reprint these delusional fantasies of the liberal democrats?
    Another agitation with which America is trying to quarrel the fraternal Russian and Chinese people.
  37. The comment was deleted.
  38. 0
    28 January 2020 12: 47
    Another nonsense from the Chinese, why is it here? .. With the same success, you can reprint articles about Putin's counterparts from opposition analysts who moved to Ukraine and the Baltic states.
  39. 0
    28 January 2020 12: 57
    The main problem is that no one wanted to die.
  40. 0
    28 January 2020 13: 12
    So it's time for game developers to create a computer toy as opposed to "Red Alert". "Tolerance Alert" will do just that. By the way, you need to stake out a patent on the name Yes
  41. -3
    28 January 2020 13: 17
    ON SHOPS UNDER SITTING ANALYSIS?
  42. 0
    28 January 2020 14: 52
    "So all the reasons for China to worry about the fate of Russia lie in a purely pragmatic plane."
    It seems to me different here. This is such an absurd attempt to set the states against Russia. Type: look, they are finally weak, beat them! And then carefully tidy everything up
  43. +6
    28 January 2020 14: 52
    Quote: bober1982
    And will not be.

    I'm afraid that already exists.
    In August 2018, China Central Television (CCTV) showed footage with an H-20 bomber on the runway of the Xi'an Aviation Plant airfield. In appearance, this bomber is similar to the American B-2A. The Chinese “strategist” H-20, if adopted, could become the second-ever serial strategic bomber with stealth and flying wing technologies.
    1. +3
      29 January 2020 00: 38
      I'm afraid that already exists.

      Sergei, the leavened patriots have their eyes and ear canals closed when they scream their "Urya!" And they open only for the lulling of "Litter-TV". All attempts to convince them of something else, even in the presence of irrefutable facts, are initially doomed to failure. This is so from observations. hi
  44. -1
    28 January 2020 15: 16
    I think that in the case of a large sheer, we, the Russian Federation, will intercept their missiles in important directions, and in return with a counter strike we will destroy our enemies in Europe and, essentially, weaken the United States with our strike, and if the United States tries to send us something in response (for example, our minutemans), instead of negotiating and recognizing their defeat, we will completely destroy the United States. But this is unlikely, because sacrificing allies (satellites) is one thing, and it is a completely different matter.
  45. +1
    28 January 2020 15: 23
    Talking about someone's victory in a war between the main owners of nuclear weapons is fundamentally wrong. There will be no winners. Everything on this subject has been counted and proved many times.
  46. +2
    28 January 2020 16: 01
    Quote: ANIMAL
    Really amazing! I always thought China.com is a serious resource, it’s not Sohu ... and here such analytics request
    Well, let them now calculate how long China will last in the event of a Russian strike!
    And another question - why does China buy “unprepared” Aviation from us? Last purchase of Su35.

    And what, in your opinion, are the aviation readiness criteria? winked
  47. BAI
    0
    28 January 2020 16: 33
    In China, they fear a quick defeat of Russia, which is supposed to be destroyed by the West, led by the Americans in three hours.

    According to Chinese plans, Russia and the United States should weaken each other in the war, and after that, China will finish them. Therefore, it is not in China's plans that any of the survivors remain strong.
  48. -1
    28 January 2020 16: 48
    In the European direction, the Americans deployed powerful medium-range missile defense

    And these "strategists" from China, take into account that our nuclear missiles will fly through the North Pole, and not through Europe.
    and, most importantly, 600 nuclear warheads and 80 strategic bombers

    It seems that the Chinese consider aviation to be the main means of nuclear deterrence and strike. In our country, land-based ICBMs are considered the main element.
    They generally forgot about the fleet, although we have enough PRKSN (thank God).
    An article from the category - "But Mary Ivanna said ......"
  49. 0
    28 January 2020 18: 31
    yeah, sadly.
  50. 0
    28 January 2020 20: 33
    Well, at least they gave me some time. But just don’t dream that our Russia can be destroyed in 3 hours. I wonder why China buys aviation and other weapons from us? It's a serious publication.
  51. UFO
    0
    28 January 2020 20: 54
    Firstly, Chinese articles are for Americans. How England sent Hitler with a blitzkrieg to the “weak” USSR in order to deflect his blow from itself. And secondly, it is a provocation for overgrown patriots with wounded pride - to lay out the real state of the defense without reconnaissance.
  52. 0
    28 January 2020 22: 24
    The morale of Western warriors is weak, cosmopolitanism has completely corrupted them, it is unlikely that today's French and German soldiers will want to die in their batons defending their Motherland.
  53. -1
    28 January 2020 22: 29
    China's famous warrior Anika, throughout her history she licked someone's ass, was never free (only in dreams) and if not for the USSR she would still continue to lick the ass of Ipponians. Loud statements should, at least for the sake of decency, be backed up with something, but the history of China is silent about such facts; the country’s experience for the freedom of its country boiled down to the fact that, having lost another war, the Chinese dissolved in the mass of victors, slipping their wives. This “strategy” really worked, China hasn’t disappeared, now it’s trying to be rude to its liberators, but oh well, they’ll get slapped with snot again and calm down. It’s as easy as shelling pears to hand them over to be torn to pieces by the Ipponians and...that’s it, there won’t be a warlike China. Ipponia knows how to make the Chinese understand what is where and how.
    So, all these Chinese conclusions, as they say, are lost in the water...
    1. -1
      29 January 2020 09: 08
      Your whole history is strange, in your opinion it is limited only to the times of the USSR. I advise you to read the history of China. It will be clear who licked what there
  54. +2
    28 January 2020 23: 05
    There are plenty of fools in China too. It’s true that neither bird flu nor SARS can take them...
  55. -1
    29 January 2020 00: 11
    Chinese nonsense. If the West really could destroy Russia in three hours, it would have destroyed it long ago. But apparently American analysts fundamentally disagree with Chinese ones.
    1. -2
      29 January 2020 00: 30
      Quote: Theseus
      If the West really could destroy Russia in three hours, it would have destroyed it long ago.

      What for?
      The West can destroy many people even faster. But it doesn’t destroy it either.
      Maybe your main message is wrong?
  56. 0
    29 January 2020 00: 45
    yes, they will destroy Russia in 3 hours... the West has only one problem - a rocket flies to Washington in 30 minutes...
  57. 0
    29 January 2020 01: 33
    China's activities in the information space are becoming increasingly clear. What the “true writers” of the Chinese media are doing is aimed at ideological erosion among their ally (in addition to the fact that these bravado speeches serve to brainwash their own citizens).
    The idea, apparently, is to gradually erode, through skeptical fermentation, the foundation of sustainability in certain regions of our country, gradually bringing people there to what happened in certain regions of Ukraine after 2014. This is most likely the beginning of a very long-term campaign aimed at some hypothetical predictive future. which analysts outline for the CCP (regarding the development of relations with Russia, they certainly need to somehow represent our movement and development - that’s what they “represent” it). I think it’s time for us to really prick up our ears to everything that our yellow-faced “friends” write, and draw far-reaching conclusions from this...
  58. 0
    29 January 2020 04: 14
    ))) Should China worry))) Russia has crushed everyone in its path... the Roman Empire.. and Byzantium.. and Hitler and Napoleon! . Should we be sad? Yes, there are difficulties... well, who doesn’t have them! but here it seems .. only selfish interests can be traced .. There is no justification for such reasons that we were not weak))) we bent down and sat down to tie our shoelaces .. and then the jackals howled!
  59. +1
    29 January 2020 06: 07
    I remember someone also gave that much time to clean up Donbass.
    Well, in short, let’s not try, and we won’t bury you, well, I’m tired of it, it’s just the same thing..... Boring girls (c)
  60. 0
    29 January 2020 06: 45
    The ravings of a drunk third grader.
  61. 0
    29 January 2020 08: 08
    The Chinese New Year passed happily, the corporate party was apparently a success - rice vodka works wonders. .... Whatever comes into your head when you're hungover))))))))
  62. 0
    29 January 2020 08: 45
    Why discuss the hype of information from the yellow publication? We are not discussing an article about battleships from AIDS-INFO! Well, they gave us three hours. Will we watch for 3 hours as 600 white dots fly towards us on the radar screens and reports of violations along the entire border?
  63. +1
    29 January 2020 09: 27
    Why don’t they write in how many minutes the West will be demoralized...if we launch ..escanders with calibers into this West...but I would like to know.
  64. 0
    29 January 2020 10: 19
    However, Kitays needs to use his brains! wassat Only one thing is true from the entire article. Russia is not yet a competitor to the United States in the economy, so Russia is being restrained, and the PRC will bomb the United States, and how long will the small-eyed ones hold out? tongue hi
  65. 0
    29 January 2020 10: 47
    Quote: svp67
    Quote: ANIMAL
    I always thought China.com is a serious resource, it’s not Sohu ... and here such analytics

    This is purely work for your own audience.
    How different is Chinese aviation from ours? It is based on our aircraft and even if they managed to upgrade them to more efficient machines, the question is, do their pilots have at least some kind of combat experience? Where could they get him?
    So, not so long ago, another Chinese publication, Sina, published a large-scale article in which it tried to justify why Russia could not produce strategic bombers, and even the PAK DA project is not a breakthrough in military aviation. The Chinese see the main problem in the lack of money: there is no funding - there is no development or production, and in terms of money, Russia, America, of course, is not a competitor.
    But this generally "killed". Note this is written by a RICH, if not the RICHest country, which still has the main bomber, this is a modernized Soviet Tu-16 ... What did they want to say?


    In Russia, aircraft were developed and built even in the 90s, when there was no funding at all...
  66. 0
    29 January 2020 11: 03
    Well, then let them give us a couple of trillion dollars since they are so worried about us. Oh, those Chinese analysts.
  67. 0
    29 January 2020 13: 02
    the Chinese sleep and see such a scenario, and they will select as much as they can from Siberia and the Far East
  68. 0
    29 January 2020 13: 44
    The Chinese are of course right about outdated weapons. But the country's air defense has been in flux since the creation of missile technology. The loudest example was when an Amer reconnaissance plane was shot down over the territory of the USSR (U-2, it seems). If we consider military actions without the use of nuclear weapons, then most likely it will be a war of the Monuments, i.e. Whoever is faster will win.
  69. 0
    29 January 2020 15: 18
    As far as I understand, Russia has a “problem of lack of readiness”, but the United States has no problems?
    Then why haven't they destroyed it yet? And what do “Russian aviation problems” have to do with the first nuclear strike? Is he being intercepted by planes? Nonsense ......
  70. 0
    29 January 2020 16: 22
    Apparently someone “far from analytical” (decided to introduce a new term, couldn’t come up with another definition) and did not know our GLORIOUS HISTORY wrote this article. What can I say, sit down 2.
  71. 0
    29 January 2020 18: 35
    Hitler thought so too. Didn't consult with smart people. I wanted it in three months. But ours had to save themselves, including Europe and China. They forgot who saved them from the “banzai”, otherwise there wouldn’t be so many people in China now. And they made me laugh about aviation. Now and then I see, as soon as the “White Swans” take off, the howling and buying of diapers begins.
  72. 0
    29 January 2020 19: 00
    I thought that the analysts in the Celestial Empire were smarter than the Ukrainian or Baltic ones.
  73. 0
    29 January 2020 19: 18
    It is unlikely that such an idea will arise in the near future (before the US fully deploys its missile defense system), but other things are also dangerous. Moreover, it is more likely. Initiating the weakening of Russia and placing it under full (and not, as now, partial) external control, but the leash will be shorter than in the 90s, approximately like in Ukraine now, only they will not give money. If the power is unstable (after or at the time of Putin’s departure), Ukraine will want to return Crimea, the Baltic states and other Poles and Romanians will actively help it in this..... Russia will not dare to use nuclear weapons (and our doctrine does not yet allow this) Belarus will a passive participant (will let missiles and planes pass through itself), the countries of Central Asia, China will be neutral. As a result, after significant losses (economic, military, moral), Russia will agree to the annexation of Crimea, the Kaliningrad region and the Kuril Islands and half (or even the whole) of Sakhalin, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Transnistria will lose their status, after which the “jam” (not without the help of the 5th column), the paid elite of the autonomies will want “independence”... The USA will stand aside, help intelligence satellites. information, resources and act as a “mediator”.
    1. 0
      29 January 2020 19: 48
      Don’t forget Siberia and the Far East.
  74. +1
    29 January 2020 19: 59
    To Chinese "experts" from Japanese poets:
    "It's spring again.
    A new stupidity is coming
    The old one is being replaced."
  75. 0
    29 January 2020 20: 11
    “Gone are the days when Russia bombarded the enemy with soldiers from rifle divisions.” And alternatively gifted experts who use such phrases still won’t quit.
  76. 0
    29 January 2020 20: 19
    How long will it take to China?
  77. 0
    29 January 2020 20: 24
    So the war will last about 10 minutes. If they hit us with nuclear weapons, we will hit them with nuclear weapons in return. Until the missiles reach, which is 10-15 minutes, the war will continue. And then the nuclear weapons will explode over the place of arrival of EVERYTHING. There we will prepare who will survive in the fourth world war with spears and stones.
  78. 0
    29 January 2020 20: 44
    I would like to read the original article.
    Otherwise it looks a lot like nonsense...
    SS-20 - you can’t reach them in 3 hours. But from their launch to the strike on the United States is less than 30 minutes.
  79. 0
    29 January 2020 22: 11
    If Russia's defense is so important to China, why then do they help it so little?
  80. 0
    29 January 2020 22: 33
    First, find out what war is, so that you have at least some idea about it, then reason.
  81. 0
    30 January 2020 05: 51
    The dogs are barking, the caravan is on.
  82. +1
    30 January 2020 08: 48
    All these pearls have no basis. All these Chinese articles have only one purpose. The fight for the arms market.
  83. 0
    30 January 2020 09: 28
    China.com: The West will destroy Russia in three hours


    Mouse and Rat
    “Neighbor, have you heard the good rumor? –
    Running in, the Rat Mouse said,
    After all, the cat, they say, fell into the claws of a lion?
    Now it’s time for us to rest!”
    “Don’t rejoice, my light,”
    The Rat says back to her,
    And don’t hope in vain!
    If it reaches their claws,
    That is true, the lion will not be alive:
    There is no stronger beast than a cat!”

    How many times have I seen, notice it yourself:
    When afraid of a coward,
    That thinks on that
    The whole world looks through his eyes.
    Fables of Ivan Andreevich Krylov
  84. 0
    30 January 2020 10: 35
    To want does not mean to be able, but to pass off what someone wants as reality, this has recently been a favorite pastime of many media, including Chinese ones!!!
  85. 0
    30 January 2020 16: 51
    Again, the Chinese yellow newspapers farted with an incomprehensible article.
    For that matter, the Chinese Yankees will grind nuclear weapons into powder in less than an hour.
  86. +1
    1 February 2020 05: 48
    “destroyed as an independent state” - he laughed heartily...
  87. 0
    2 February 2020 00: 48
    If we assume that the West destroys Russia in three hours, then China will disappear in the next 15 minutes
  88. 0
    3 February 2020 16: 44
    How is this “unpreparedness of aviation”?
    But aren’t Putin’s cartoons enough for our potential enemy?
    It all shows how we will certainly win if we are attacked!

    Although... it was Putin who said... and the cartoons, too, seem to be from him...
    Therefore, Americans already know how to trust Putin.

    Yes, we know too... alas... No. recourse belay

  89. 0
    18 February 2020 09: 18
    the West will destroy Russia in three hours, Russia will destroy the West in two.... as in the famous joke... only after 50 years will the Chinese understand the meaning of this joke about the fourth world war
  90. 0
    9 March 2020 06: 33
    What nonsense, now no one is going to fight with tanks and Samuls, they pressed the red buttons and ALL the gentlemen are waiting for the arrival!!!!!!
  91. 0
    14 March 2020 09: 53
    A Pentagon article and, as usual, nonsense. That's where the Tupori sit.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"