A batch of Norwegian oil will be transported from Lithuania to Belarus by wagons within 2 weeks

218

Today, around eight in the morning, a train consisting of 59 tanks filled with crude oil arrived at Novopolotsk station. This was reported in the press service of the state concern Belneftekhim.

After completing the necessary documentation, the raw materials will go to the Naftan refinery.



The approximate volume of the first batch delivered to the refinery amounted to 3,5 thousand tons. He arrived from the Lithuanian port of Klaipeda, where the Breiviken ship from Norway arrived on Friday. In total, 86 thousand tons of oil intended for the Naftan refinery arrived on this ship.

It is planned that oil will be transported in dozens of trains. It is important to note that Minsk does not yet name the cost of a barrel of Norwegian oil, transported first by sea, then by rail.

It is stated that all this volume will be delivered from Lithuania to the destination in about 2 weeks. The Lithuanian Railways assured that 90 wagons will be used daily for oil transportation. Delivery will be made in two trains of 40-50 wagons.

Prior to this, Belarus consumed only Russian oil. Its procurement volume in 2019 amounted to 17,6 million tons. After stopping supplies from Russia, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko made proposals for the purchase of crude oil to several oil-producing countries at once. Against the background of volumes that are usually “contracted” in Russia, Norwegian oil volumes look like a drop in the ocean. And - an expensive drop.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    218 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +51
      26 January 2020 14: 37
      This is "a teaspoon per hour". This is not an option, Alexander Grigorievich. However, it is his own fault. A miser pays twice.
      1. +28
        26 January 2020 14: 42
        For too long, all this vagabond dragged on at a discount, in Ukraine they drove gas for half the price, now the enemies, the same thing can happen with Belarus.
        In short - "They don't look for good from good." And something must be done with the legislation, it is impossible only by the decision of the head of the company, but if in reality the head of state should determine to whom at what price we sell minerals, etc.
        We have long had to decide whether we have a market or what?
        1. +24
          26 January 2020 14: 55
          Quote: maxim947
          We have long had to decide whether we have a market or what?

          At the expense of the market we have, the question is relative .... but with the prices just decided, Old Man from that and buzz.
          Who did he do better? His?
          1. +29
            26 January 2020 14: 57
            We are partly to blame, letting ourselves dance for too long.
            1. +20
              26 January 2020 15: 08
              Any "dad" when he gets away with any quirks and eccentricities, begins to think that he is so clever, and not that it is for the time being, until the need for his services ceases to be so necessary.
            2. -5
              26 January 2020 21: 34
              Quote: maxim947
              We are partly to blame, letting ourselves dance for too long.

              Just do not need words about "partly" ... The rotten, mired in corruption and permissiveness of the Russian government, completely forgetting about the interests of Russia and its people, is unable to defend any interests except its own. The surrender in Ukraine and the payment of indemnities to the junta only convinced Lukashenka that Russia is more willing to pay its enemies than allies ...
            3. +1
              26 January 2020 23: 29
              There is a union state. A plan for integration with dates, responsible, events, etc. The problem is two leaders. Where are we going, how at what speed, where is the finish line? Well, it’s clear that only those who don’t need to steer this way to build an alliance. And the oil dispute is the jambs of our leaders and it seems that our leaders' hands are growing out of ....
              1. -1
                27 January 2020 01: 57
                As long as Belarus is ruled by the "collective farm chairman" there will be no full-fledged union state. And Lukashenka himself signed the verdict, i.e. b. outsmarted himself. This prince is already tired of not only Russia, but also the West. The West will send him to waste at the first opportunity.
              2. +1
                27 January 2020 07: 40
                This union is on paper. At the first opportunity, everything will fall apart.
                Not a single prince has just gone under anyone.
                Lukashenko simply used the Russian Federation to his advantage. And Putin thought that he had already tied him hand and foot. Now hysteria will start against ... the Russian Federation. And it can happen, as with Ukraine. Balts will help.
                You can't cut it here. The right subtle game. Unfortunately, in the Russian Federation forgotten how. Only by force, both in the Donbass and in Syria.
          2. The comment was deleted.
            1. +9
              26 January 2020 15: 11
              Old Man is obliged to think of everyone, as it were, but who this particular Old Man is thinking about is a specific question ... clearly not about ALL.
          3. +15
            26 January 2020 16: 42
            Quote: rocket757
            dad from that and buzz.

            Old Man is furious because his autocracy is at stake. And on ordinary Belarusians and the country, he somehow does not care. Seems to be. It is not childish.
            1. +3
              26 January 2020 16: 49
              He made only an assumption. All residents of Belarus it is more visible and decide, if anything, will have to themselves.
              1. +8
                26 January 2020 16: 56
                Quote: rocket757
                All residents of Belarus it is more visible and decide, if anything, will have to themselves.

                You are talking about "ideal democracy" which does not exist in the world. In the case of Belarus, someone will decide. The main thing is not to miss, as happened with Ukraine.
              2. -1
                26 January 2020 17: 27
                While there will be money in (mainly Russian) for maintaining the vertical, people will be kept in check. That’s why he’s buzzing now, less and less money, and the main donor wants too much.
                1. +6
                  26 January 2020 19: 54
                  “In early December, the Ambassador of Belarus to Russia Vladimir Semashko said that the task was to unify the taxation of the two countries. This would become the basis for providing Belarusian refineries with the same benefits as Russian refiners. However, for the Belarusian president, this is an idea itself, as you can see appears to be an attempt on state sovereignty. " A more detailed article "Look" Business newspaper. author Mikhail Kuvyrko. Do you think the "donor" wants too much in the light of building a union state? State your vision of resolving this issue, so that ignorant members of the forum, including me, could assess the prospects for interaction between the two states.
                  1. +5
                    26 January 2020 22: 31
                    These (tasks) have already been set for 20 years, but they still won’t be delivered !!! Is it strange, is it? And the sovereignty of Belarus is his PERSONAL sovereignty and he will not give it back! What can your rulers offer him? Money? Power on third roles? So he has enough money and power like that of God (albeit in a small and impoverished country). He has a re-election this year and so soon he will become complaisant and accept your terms (unless of course he finds money on the side). But after the re-election ... And this song is good, start over again ...
                    1. +4
                      27 January 2020 00: 15
                      Today he is like a snotty little brother who hopes for the elder's broad back, but old enough to spit on it in the belief that the elder will endure. I agree about personal sovereignty. But it’s like in the cartoon “here is the pot empty, it’s a simple subject”, today it is, tomorrow it is not, and it seems there is nowhere to run, except for Russia, considering what the former employees of the special forces of the Republic of Belarus, who fled to the west about the reprisals against the opposition, are talking about. It is bad, but predictable, that people are pulling into their showdowns, although we are also worried and the bones are washed for "streams" as for their own.
              3. -2
                26 January 2020 17: 41
                People who can, at least need to send children to Russia.
          4. 0
            26 January 2020 17: 49
            Quote: rocket757
            Who did he do better? His?

            That the capitalists in Russia, that in Belarus, and the people still have forelocks popping from both of them.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +25
          26 January 2020 15: 47
          Quote: maxim947
          Ukraine drove gas for half the price, now the enemies, the same thing can happen with Belarus.
          In short - "They do not seek from goodness"
          This expression is more suitable for Ukraine and Belarus. They scooped it with two spoons to hiccups, but at the same time, they did not appreciate all the gestures of goodwill from the word at all, perceiving it as a duty of Russia.
          For Russia it is more applicable - "Do not do good, you will not get evil."
          Quote: maxim947
          We have long had to decide whether we have a market or what?
          They need to determine this in the sense that we have the Union State and integration, or all the same, independent Belarus, which wants to receive hydrocarbons as an internal Russian entity, not being such. Now for them the market. They go, look, bargain - everything is as it should be.
          1. +3
            26 January 2020 15: 54
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            all gestures of goodwill were not appreciated from the word at all,

            For that now + $ 100 per ton to the Russian price, this is normal! In the footsteps of the "jumpers" went "Old Man"! Nu-nu!
            1. 0
              26 January 2020 16: 25
              Quote: major147
              In the footsteps of the "jumpers" went "Old Man"! Nu-nu!

              Straight road. Has a residence already been prepared for him in Rostov? I would have done "repairs for the move" in its place.
              1. +1
                26 January 2020 16: 50
                Quote: Zoldat_A
                In Rostov, has the residence already been prepared for him?

                Rostov is not rubber, it is already occupied there. Old Man will finish badly that he will go to The Hague. They will be very happy to receive the "last tyrant of Europe".
              2. +3
                26 January 2020 18: 50
                Quote: Zoldat_A
                In Rostov, has the residence already been prepared for him?

                Yes, it’s normal here in Rostov!
                1. 0
                  27 January 2020 04: 45
                  Quote: major147
                  Quote: Zoldat_A
                  In Rostov, has the residence already been prepared for him?

                  Yes, it’s normal here in Rostov!

                  good
                2. +1
                  27 January 2020 17: 44
                  Quote: major147
                  Yes, it’s normal here in Rostov!

                  So in our country there are two Rostovs. Enough space for everyone. smile
                  1. 0
                    27 January 2020 18: 56
                    Quote: Alexey RA
                    Quote: major147
                    Yes, it’s normal here in Rostov!

                    So in our country there are two Rostovs. Enough space for everyone. smile

                    Thank God, I’m on the Don!
            2. +6
              27 January 2020 17: 53
              Quote: major147
              For now + 100 dollars per ton to the Russian price, this is normal!

              Sovereign state - sovereign prices. ©
              If Lukashenko does not support Russia, appealing to the inadmissibility of pressure on sovereign Belarus, then Russia and Belarus, as a sovereign state, are moving to market interstate relations - like with Poland or Germany.

              High price? So walk around the market, you might find where it’s cheaper.
              1. +1
                27 January 2020 18: 57
                Quote: Alexey RA
                So walk around the market, you might find where it’s cheaper.

                Which is logical ....
        4. 0
          26 January 2020 16: 24
          So this is the market — you give us economic preferences, we are giving you political preferences. And the price of the issue is: Russia is saving on defense. And if Belarus joined NATO, then we would have to pump millions into the defense of this section of the border. The same with Ukraine, cheap gas, resources, preferences in trade, the country was non-aligned. (by constitution)
          1. +11
            26 January 2020 17: 01
            Quote: Steffan
            So this is the market - you give us economic preferences, we will give you political preferences. Russia saves on defense. And if Belarus joined NATO, it would have to swell millions into the defense of this section of the border

            Where did you see this market? This is called completely different - blackmail. If the blackmail sounds too harsh, then you can a little and for more gentle, free feeding.
            1. -1
              27 January 2020 11: 15
              Where did you see the blackmail? Belarus, while everyone spat on Russia and was sanctioned, humbly showed loyalty and moral support. Is it, if the metropolis is not difficult, is it not worth the economic carrot? And when the carrot is not given, the child starts to be capricious.
          2. +6
            26 January 2020 17: 31
            Quote: Steffan
            So this is the market - you give us economic preferences, we give you political

            Nooo ... the market is "money in the morning, chairs in the evening." And the political orientation of the market to trade is already a kind of prostitution, IMHO.

            Quote: Steffan
            if Belarus joined NATO ...

            ... then Old Man would be kicked out a week in a row. Have not forgotten how his rotters from the West? Who covered it then, guess three times? wink

            But Old Man doesn't want to be "the last Belarusian president" laughing

            Quote: Steffan
            cheap gas, resources, preferences in trade, a non-aligned country was

            Passed already. And exactly

            Quote: Steffan
            with Ukraine

            Campaign, ate Yes
            1. -1
              26 January 2020 18: 54
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              Campaign, ate

              So far, no cookies have been eaten in Belarus, we must force the union.
              Old Man doesn’t understand that without Russia he’ll make hara-kiri and not what kind of power will not help! Circulate a finger around, the old man is naive Yes
            2. +2
              26 January 2020 21: 29
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              the market is "money in the morning, chairs in the evening"

              And this is how they will be written in the contract. wink
            3. 0
              27 January 2020 11: 24
              Hmm, a kind of prostitution, you say? And Churchill said that Britain has no enemies or friends, but only eternal British interests. And so everywhere in the world. Each country has its own interests. And if it becomes beneficial for Russia to cooperate with NATO and the USA, then Pu, based on national interests, the helm rotates 180 degrees, as was Su 24, at first accomplices of terrorists, and now rush through these gums with these friends and open pipelines. so there is no prostitution - THERE IS GLOBAL POLICY AND ONLY NATIONAL INTERESTS.
            4. +1
              27 January 2020 18: 03
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              Nooo ... the market is "money in the morning, chairs in the evening." And the political orientation of the market to trade is already a kind of prostitution, IMHO.

              She ... this is ordinary interstate relations.
              We give you loans for the development of industry and railways - and you will fit in for us if a neighbor climbs on us. We will give you loans for economic recovery - and you will become bastion of the free world in Europe. We give you loans and equipment - and you embark on the socialist path of development.
              1. 0
                27 January 2020 20: 59
                Quote: Alexey RA
                We give you loans and equipment - and you will embark on the socialist path of development

                And what, many still stood up? wink

                And loans - yes, they were taken willingly ... out, even later had to forgive, "socialist countries".
                1. -1
                  27 January 2020 22: 02
                  Envious of not being forgiven?
        5. 0
          26 January 2020 17: 41
          The price inside Russia’s gasoline is the market .... And maybe it can decrease or maybe it can increase .... it’s sick of all this
          1. +2
            27 January 2020 11: 27
            There is no market in the world. Soros has proved. Only liberal marketers believe that the country dropped in the 90s into the invisible hand of the market. Do you believe in a self-regulating MARKET? Then we will go to you.
            1. +4
              27 January 2020 18: 04
              Invisible hand of the market: smile
        6. 0
          26 January 2020 17: 42
          In short - "They don't look for good from good."

          Everything is much simpler. Luka wants to show his independence, thereby lowering the price of Russian oil and gas. His next step will be an increase in the price of agricultural products and goods imported into Russia. He has already raised the prices for pumping oil through the territory of the Republic of Belarus, as they wrote in the media.
          1. +3
            26 January 2020 19: 25
            Quote: private person
            His next step will be an increase in the price of agricultural products and goods imported into Russia.

            “If in 2000 we occupied 11 percent of Russian imports, then in 2019 the share fell by half - to 5,5 percent” - Lukashenka. So it will be even less with this option. As for goods, at the end of 11 months of 2019, according to the statistics of the Republic of Belarus - "Trade with the Russian Federation decreased by 1,8% and amounted to USD 31,8 billion, the foreign trade balance was negative, amounting to USD 7,3 billion. Exports increased by 4,4%, imports decreased by 5,3%. " Imports are already falling, but prices will rise ... And as for agricultural products, according to the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Belarus for 11 months of 2019, the share of the Russian Federation in the total volume of exports compared to 11 months of 2018 decreased by 0,9 percentage points and amounted to 78,2, 3,9%, or $ 78 billion XNUMX% - no matter how, you need to look for a replacement for such a market ...
            1. +2
              27 January 2020 12: 34
              If in 2000 we occupied 11 percent of Russian imports, then in 2019 the share fell by half - to 5,5 percent "


              And the Belarusian economy is degrading, nothing surprising.
        7. -3
          27 January 2020 09: 03
          Quote: maxim947
          Ukraine drove gas for half the price, now the enemies, the same thing can happen with Belarus.

          was the most expensive price with the smallest shoulder
          50 gas times were far 90s

          funny that after 2014 it began to decline
          generally energy blackmail is not working
      2. +2
        26 January 2020 15: 03
        As I understand it, not by wagons, but by tanks?
        1. +7
          26 January 2020 15: 05
          Well, these are the details, the tank-tanker, the grain-carrier truck .. I wonder how much oil is needed to set up the equipment for its processing ... again, what lot is needed to run .... oh, I grabbed the disease bike to the fifth point
          1. +21
            26 January 2020 16: 30
            Quote: Andrey VOV
            Well these are the details, the van tank

            Who cares. Annual consumption of 17 million tons! Over 3,5 tons in 2 weeks Lukashenko will carry more than 200 years. Why all this kipish? Soon they will make sensations who refuel where.
            The main problem now for Lukashenko is where to find almost $ 500 million (1% of GDP) to compensate for the budget deficit that will arise as a result of the loss of income from super-cheap Russian oil. And if Lukashenko still decides to buy oil at world prices, then budget losses will become 2 times more. therefore all these stupid statements to the public are directed only for domestic consumption, so that the Belarusian people would associate their problems not with the Lukashenko government, but with Russia.
        2. +1
          26 January 2020 15: 44
          Quote: Aaron Zawi
          As I understand it, not by wagons, but by tanks?

          A giant thought, however. wink
      3. +5
        26 January 2020 15: 52
        Quote: GKS 2111
        This is not a way out, Alexander Grigoryevich. However, he is to blame. He pays twice with a buyback.

        Will he pay from his own pocket? This is the same story as with Ukraine. Laws are being adopted to reverse the type of European gas, but in fact the gas is Russian, it just goes to Ukraine through Zimbabwe. And who pays in the end? That's right, the consumer.
        1. +4
          26 January 2020 19: 06
          Quote: NEXUS
          This is the same story as with Ukraine. Laws are being adopted to reverse the type of European gas, but in fact the gas is Russian, it just goes to Ukraine through Zimbabwe. And who pays in the end? That's right, the consumer.

          Is this how you imagine it? Everything is much simpler! She takes gas from her gas pipeline, but pays Europeans with their democratic wrap-up! They only reverse in money, and in their heads laughing
      4. +2
        26 January 2020 16: 18
        Quote: GKS 2111
        This is "a teaspoon per hour". This is not an option, Alexander Grigorievich. However, it is his own fault. A miser pays twice.

        Why not barrels (barrels) on a hand truck? There are many Belarusians. Each on a cart - that's "energy independence".

        Ah yes Alexander Grigoryevich, oh yes ... someone’s son ... (A.S. Pushkin, (s))
      5. +1
        26 January 2020 17: 29
        Quote: GKS 2111
        This is "an hour for a teaspoon"

        For public procurement, it’s exactly that for a teaspoon.
        The Lithuanian Railways assured that 90 wagons will be used daily for oil transportation. Delivery will be made in two trains of 40-50 wagons.

        Still interesting whose rail tankers are used for transportation?
        1. +1
          26 January 2020 18: 21
          Of course, Russian Railways ...
      6. 0
        26 January 2020 18: 40
        Then for the Pont-Schaub scream in the media.
    2. +30
      26 January 2020 14: 37
      "But father" has finally gone crazy. The crown has rubbed the corn, you see. I bought oil from the Norgs at exorbitant prices, "like brothers" helped the spratniks, quarreled with Russia ... This is, excuse me, senile dementia.
      1. +9
        26 January 2020 15: 12
        From fidgeting about the chairs in his elsewhere, the corn grew, and yet he could rule us, the people gave him preference for Belarus and Russia to grow together in the 90s with the drunk.
        1. +3
          26 January 2020 17: 44
          God was merciful from such a chairman!
    3. +28
      26 January 2020 14: 50
      And the younger brother is growing up, begins to live on his own ... Let's not interfere laughing
      1. -3
        26 January 2020 19: 06
        The poll started. Already smeared all the sheets. She licks herself on street women, but there is no money to buy paid love ...
    4. -2
      26 January 2020 14: 51
      It all started with the pollution of the Druzhba oil pipeline with chemicals that disabled several oil refineries in Belarus and other countries. So it is not clear what it was - negligence or sabotage? All oil recipients began to demand compensation for equipment repairs and downtime. Compensation in the form of a discount on oil prices. Well, the trade began for these discounts.
      1. +13
        26 January 2020 15: 06
        The equipment did not fail, do not exaggerate
        1. 0
          26 January 2020 15: 56
          Quote: Andrey VOV
          The equipment did not fail, do not exaggerate

          Only filters ....
      2. +2
        26 January 2020 15: 07
        yes any number of options. I don’t think that all this could be solved in the usual way without screaming and din. there are contracts and responsibilities of the parties. there are courts. sabotage is a strange option.
      3. +3
        26 January 2020 16: 55
        Quote: voyaka uh
        So it is not clear what it was - negligence or sabotage?

        Provocation.
      4. +1
        27 January 2020 09: 07
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Compensation in the form of a discount on oil prices. Well, the trade began for these discounts.

        many received. Even Ukraine
    5. +5
      26 January 2020 14: 51
      Norgi wants to try a new variety in Belarus. It’s also necessary to enter the market with him, so that they could make a serious discount.
    6. +45
      26 January 2020 14: 51
      The market value of a ton is just over $ 470. Belarus will pay $ 9 per tonne for transshipment at the port of Klaipeda, $ 40 per tonne for delivery to the Naftan plant. Plus $ 1 / ton for quality and quantity control, plus $ 2 / ton for discharge on railway overpasses and pumping into refinery tanks. Total in the region of $ 520 per tonne of Norwegian oil.
      The price of Russian oil for Belarus is 83% of the world. This means that oil from Russia costs Belarus in the region of $ 390 per ton. That is, $ 130 (THREE) cheaper.
      Lithuania can transship through its ports about 3 million tons of “alternative” oil per year. Belarus losses are about $ 400 million per year.
      Comments are superfluous.
      1. +4
        26 January 2020 15: 47
        Quote: knn54
        Comments are superfluous.

        Right! Thank you colleague, exhaustively! good
      2. -1
        26 January 2020 19: 10
        There is a lot of talk about integration, but as for the loss / infringement of power and the reduction of "easy" profit from fraternal resources, we see a dry financial calculation (not the best) without a trace. One of the controversial issues for Minsk and Moscow is the tax maneuver in the oil industry of the Russian Federation, which provides for a gradual zeroing of the export duty on oil and an increase in the tax rate on its production. when they are fully loaded, the loss of Minsk from switching to purchases abroad may amount to about $ 1,5 billion per year
        We need to give certain guarantees to the fraternal people, and the President of the Republic of Belarus to be a more progamic, loyal and wise strategist !!
    7. +7
      26 January 2020 14: 52
      It also turns out that Russia will also pay for this oil, because at the end of the year the "dad" will again beg for an interest-free non-repayable loan.
    8. +17
      26 January 2020 14: 52
      Reminds "I'm leaving you, I'm leaving, I'm leaving completely, I'm leaving forever, I'm leaving you, do you hear I'm completely gone?"
    9. +6
      26 January 2020 14: 53
      It’s better to lay the pipe right away so that it is easier to deliver, write the project Alexander Grigorievich.
    10. -27
      26 January 2020 14: 56
      The most war news in the past week. Keep us informed as Lukashenko tries to throw Russian freebie lovers off his tail.
      1. +12
        26 January 2020 15: 45
        Quote: sergo1914
        Lukashenko is trying to throw off the tail of Russian lovers of freebies.

        And what, Russian lovers of freebies stand in line for the delivery of Norwegian oil ?! I must tell my men, they don’t know !!!
      2. +2
        26 January 2020 18: 01
        In this case, not Russia is a lover of freebies.
      3. +1
        27 January 2020 18: 28
        Quote: sergo1914
        The most war news in the past week. Keep us informed as Lukashenko tries to throw Russian freebie lovers off his tail.

        Is he trying to throw himself off the tail? wink
        ... from 2000 to 2010, the level of annual financial support of Belarus or the shortfall of income of the Russian Federation in our economic relations ranged from hundreds of millions of dollars to 2-3 billion, and now it is already 5-6 billion a year ...
        © M. Babich
    11. +6
      26 January 2020 14: 57
      Just wondering: how long will Lyaksandr Rygorych be having fun with the delivery of "high-quality western oil" by tanks? laughing
      1. +8
        26 January 2020 15: 00
        Until the Belarusian people run out of money. We will pay for all these freaks of the mustachioed.
      2. +12
        26 January 2020 15: 42
        Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
        How long will Lyaksandr Rygorych be having fun with the delivery of "high-quality western oil" by tanks?

        Most likely not for long, here Rygorych was already preparing for winter in his Shklov residence. Oh, and he broke the firewood with his tricks.
        1. +8
          26 January 2020 15: 57
          Actually, I don't see anything terrible: this Norwegian party is a drop in the ocean. And the clever Lukashenko, of course, will buy the cheapest (despite the market increase) Russian oil. It's just that "dad", according to the old chairman's habit, swears in pictures, cries, is indignant and tries to knock out the price cheaper. Trade like in the eastern market.
          1. +10
            26 January 2020 16: 11
            Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
            swears picture, crying, indignant

            In Belarus, it seems, in August of this year, Lukashenka’s re-election, now it’s still January, but he has already said so much that he was "thrown ... put with cancer", etc., now there will be such propaganda of the "outstanding" Belarusian figure who in spite of all enemies did not surrender independence, did not caved in before Russia, the Belarusians will be called upon to tighten their belts because of the evil Kremlin, which is to blame for all Belarusian troubles, it is not Lukashenko's fault, namely Russia and in the elections Old Man in all white with 99% of the votes remains on the throne and thanks the Belarusians for the correct historical choice.
            1. +2
              26 January 2020 17: 12
              I don’t know about the re-election, but what the cunning Rygorych will say: “Look, good people, I kept our independence and sovereignty, which were encroached on, I wanted the best and cheaper, but they raised the price of oil for all of us ", - to justify the increase in energy - for sure. And if they entered the Russian Federation, then prices would decrease and sales of products would improve. It seems to me (my guess) that the majority of Belarusians will be FOR. But this conflicts with the personal ambitions of Lukashenka and the Belarusian nationalists (their minority). Although I may be wrong.
              1. +1
                26 January 2020 17: 36
                Everyone speaks correctly about the elections, an election campaign will come, Luka will say with a clear conscience: People, look, I honestly fulfilled my obligations under the Union Treaty, but I constantly got into opposition from the other side. I tried to make life in the state the most successful and reliable and so on. The most interesting thing is that reading the Union Treaty, he is right. First, equal conditions for all, and then everything else. There is no talk of joining the Russian Federation at all, the Union State is not being built. A referendum is needed in all cases, but at the moment the result will be negative. Strange, but the White opposition and the Russian side turned out to be allies, each with its own goals. At the moment, most likely, the siloviki will be “FOR”, but they are under Lukashenka, and business is generally against it. Nobody knows the cost of the contract, the numbers are very secret. RB will buy oil where it is cheaper.
            2. -2
              26 January 2020 17: 51
              This is if it survives the election ....
            3. +1
              28 January 2020 19: 55
              He won’t get 99 percent, ate INDEPENDENCE, that's enough. But he’ll easily get 50% + 1 vote. In Belarus, it’s not the people, but the population, and these are two huge differences
        2. +2
          26 January 2020 16: 36
          judging by the photo from him that the limo is driving a gas tank.
          1. +1
            26 January 2020 18: 39
            Quote: Strashila
            judging by the photo from him that the limo is driving a gas tank.

            For some reason, a locomotive firebox came to my mind. Well, they don’t prick firewood either in the stove or in the fireplace ...
            1. +4
              26 January 2020 21: 40
              Quote: sabakina
              Well, they don’t chop wood in the stove or in the fireplace.

              It's normal for the stove. The mother has a stove in her house, the furnace is large, we lay a lot of firewood at once, and large ones burn longer. hi
              1. +2
                26 January 2020 21: 45
                We had a "Dutch", a door somewhere 30x30 cm.
                1. +1
                  26 January 2020 21: 54
                  We have a heating and cooking, 5 channels. Up to -10, the mother drowns once a day (a blockhouse lined with bricks).
            2. +2
              27 January 2020 09: 50

              here immediately the engine, the gas tank checked by wars.
      3. +1
        26 January 2020 15: 58
        Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
        Just wondering: how long will Lyaksandr Rygorych be having fun with the delivery of "high-quality western oil" by tanks? laughing

        Yes, as much as with the Venezuelan last time.
        1. +2
          26 January 2020 18: 46
          Remember what ended up with Venezuelan oil? The Kremlin threw off prices for Belarusians
          1. +3
            26 January 2020 18: 51
            Quote: Avior
            Remember what ended up with Venezuelan oil? The Kremlin threw off prices for Belarusians

            Well, maybe not just like that? Compromise?
            1. +2
              26 January 2020 18: 53
              I don’t know, only after receiving oil from Venezuela did he receive a discount. Is this what we are observing now?
              1. +1
                26 January 2020 18: 53
                Quote: Avior
                I don’t know, only after receiving oil from Venezuela did he receive a discount. Is this what we are observing now?

                We will see ....
    12. +3
      26 January 2020 15: 02
      Norwegian Statoil has a little oil. It’s like the American shale gas that the Americans buy in Russia and sell it under the guise of their own to Europe lol
    13. +17
      26 January 2020 15: 04
      two weeks to carry oil which is enough for less than two days of operation of the refinery. this is a breakthrough in logistics)))
      1. +4
        26 January 2020 15: 43
        Quote: carstorm 11
        this is a breakthrough in logistics)))

        I would even say that this is a resumption of the New Thinking!
      2. +2
        26 January 2020 16: 03
        He apparently took over this experience from neighboring Ukraine, there were also "gods of logistics".
        A freight train sent from Ukraine bypassing Russia to deliver goods to the new Silk Road direction was stuck in China due to a lack of customers. “The train is not loaded with goods - there are no customers for transportation, so it did not go on the return route from China”
        1. +2
          26 January 2020 18: 42
          Quote: Guards turn
          “The train is not loaded with goods - there are no customers for transportation, therefore did not go on the return route from China»
          The Chinese pressed the Ukrainian train. laughing
          1. +1
            26 January 2020 20: 12
            They have experience. How much have Vietnam taken from our supplies? And now - our own development. recourse
    14. +1
      26 January 2020 15: 10
      For us, there is really no difference in the Republic of Belarus for consumers: every week fuel is a penny up. And oil pipelines had to be built. Ukraine itself, in spite of the loss of South Stream for Russia, has become much more accommodating. So the Russian Federation and Belarus would quickly agree on a price.
    15. +5
      26 January 2020 15: 11
      "Load oranges in barrels. Brothers Karamazov" (c) "Golden Calf". Old Man plays in the alternative of supplying resources. When the economy starts to sag from the inflated prices for resources, it will ask for a "loan" ... and will have to give, as an ally in the western direction.
    16. The comment was deleted.
    17. +3
      26 January 2020 15: 20
      A batch of Norwegian oil will be transported from Lithuania to Belarus by wagons within 2 weeks

      It is planned that oil will be transported in dozens of trains. It is important to note that Minsk does not yet name the cost of a barrel of Norwegian oil, transported first by sea, then by rail.

      Anyway, it will be cheaper!
      Look, the non-brothers carry coal from South Africa, they will confirm!
      1. +3
        26 January 2020 15: 33
        You can also try to order oil on Internet resources - on Avito or on Ali Express))). There, even delivery is sometimes free.
        1. +6
          26 January 2020 15: 45
          Quote: Reserve officer
          You can also try to order oil on Internet resources

          In the mid-90s they were kalym - linoleum was glued to the floor on PVA. The volume was large. We ordered 200 liters of glue. So the supplier brought in tubes. As ordered - 200 liters ... laughing I remember right now.
          1. +2
            26 January 2020 18: 13
            And how did that supplier stay alive? fellow lol laughing
        2. +2
          26 January 2020 16: 33
          "try to order oil on Internet resources," maybe gasoline ... in 1 liter bottles.
    18. +7
      26 January 2020 15: 25
      Total: to meet the annual demand (17,6 million tons), more than 200 such Norwegian tankers are needed. Collapses will occur in the port of Klaipeda, nothing will come of it. Then what is it all for?
    19. +5
      26 January 2020 15: 30
      Since "fortanulo" has already "agreed" on oil, now at the same time on gas with Norway to begin to agree, so as not to waste time.
    20. -4
      26 January 2020 15: 32
      I think I’ve seen somewhere .... ahhh .... yes ....

      I remembered ... here the Americans will appear, with 5 lard and cookies in Minsk, and then you will call names and complain about the axes near Smolensk. And to ask who did it ?!

      Since the strategic partner is helping, let's integrate ...
      1. +4
        26 January 2020 15: 34
        Do you know that Smolensk is in the Russian Federation? what nafig are you talking about?))) and on the topic, of course, we came up with three expensive oil to transport from Norway) as well as we came up with selling our gas but in other countries, like, and overpaying for a reverse which is not at all) those who sold for the liver let them continue and eat. what for relatives so better I will be an orphan. but do not worry in Belarus. people there are smarter.
        1. +10
          26 January 2020 15: 38
          Do you know that Smolensk is in the Russian Federation?


          Dmitry, I am aware that the expression "near Smolensk" and in Russian means "close to Smolensk". Or am I confusing? Correct, please, the language will do me good.
          1. 0
            26 January 2020 15: 43
            on the border of the Russian Federation will be more correct)
            1. +2
              26 January 2020 15: 44
              on the border of the Russian Federation will be more correct)


              understood accepted :)
              1. 0
                27 January 2020 09: 11
                Quote: Keyser Soze
                understood accepted :)

                it was more correct to measure the distance to Moscow earlier
                539 km.
                although all this has not been important for a long time.
        2. +4
          26 January 2020 15: 42
          and on the subject, of course, we came up with oil in three expensive to carry from Norway)


          Well, you let Minsk make a billion dollars a year on the resale of oil products. Bravo, sponsored partner economics. Strategic. But your oil farmers do not want to sponsor this partnership, as well as oil farmers all over the world. Well, well - take out the lard and give to the Belarusians, as a sovereign help. Here the Americans give Israel, if not yet a ton of money, so that they protect their interests.

          Something like this in today's world is moving geopolitical assistance.
          1. +4
            26 January 2020 15: 45
            these are economic troubles and are solved by the continuation of integration, for something must be given in exchange.
          2. -3
            26 January 2020 18: 00
            I serve poor. Stick the label.
          3. +2
            26 January 2020 18: 11
            As my brother always says, give me it will be under communism, and now, buy it.
      2. +3
        26 January 2020 15: 55
        Since the strategic partner is helping, let's integrate ...

        Either "let's" or "integrate".
        Integration is a mutual process. And in it, both sides must be active.
      3. +3
        26 January 2020 19: 44
        Quote: Keyser Soze
        and complain about the axes near Smolensk.

        It’s easy to talk about it from the outside, but Belarusians themselves are ready for topar and this will be connected with this. The share of the Russian Federation in foreign trade of the Republic of Belarus is about 50%, and the share of the Republic of Belarus in foreign trade of the Russian Federation is about 5%. Above the figures, 78% of Belarusian agricultural exports are the Russian Federation. The appearance of axes entails a break in economic ties, it will hurt both, but 5% versus 50% ....
        1. +4
          26 January 2020 20: 22
          The appearance of axes entails a break in economic ties, it will hurt both, but 5% versus 50% ....


          Ahh, we have already experienced the collapse of the CEB. laughing All economics were dying completely. And our goods in five minutes were unclaimed in the East and uncompetitive in the West.

          20 years it took to fix UTB.
    21. +3
      26 January 2020 15: 40
      Norwegian oil volumes look like a drop in the ocean. Moreover - an expensive drop.
      They will accept, process, count, and then decide what and where to buy next.
    22. +4
      26 January 2020 15: 43
      Old Man is merging quietly in the EU. I think so.
      1. +1
        26 January 2020 15: 53
        Old Man is merging quietly in the EU. I think so.

        In the EU, no one needs a dad personally. They will quickly find a replacement for some Belarusian A.Nalny. But the dad got over and he does not want to think anything.
        1. +1
          26 January 2020 18: 59
          And in the Russian Federation need someone?
      2. +1
        26 January 2020 19: 23
        It seems more like he is merging to the same place where Ukraine has merged. Which tried to merge into the EU, but did not swim.
    23. +6
      26 January 2020 15: 51
      Belarusian people pay dope to the fatherland.
      Such deliveries without an oil pipeline are not economically viable. Moreover, Norwegian oil is far from the cheapest in the world.
    24. +6
      26 January 2020 16: 03
      So 204,65 times! To deliver the volume of oil previously purchased from Russia.
      But: The tanker of Norway - in fact, the Lithuanian port - with the long-awaited additional work, the railway workers - with a salary.
      Everyone is happy, except for "Father".
      1. +1
        26 January 2020 16: 31
        “Everyone is happy, except for Batka.” If it were not for this, it would have been worthwhile to come up with it, everything is in business, and the Batka will not miss his own at every stage of oil delivery.
    25. +3
      26 January 2020 16: 05
      Hiiiitry father But .... A good mine with a bad game?
    26. +3
      26 January 2020 16: 11
      If 2 weeks deliver 86 thousand tons? At this rate, they will have to deliver the previous annual volume of 7 years and 10 months. We'll have to buy from Russia at world prices.
    27. 0
      26 January 2020 16: 16
      Miraculous dad, oh naughty.
    28. +1
      26 January 2020 16: 29
      "And - an expensive drop.", The more expensive the drop and the more intermediate delivery links, the more currency will dissolve abroad.
    29. +5
      26 January 2020 17: 03
      Well, brothers? Ate?
      Already wept, here it is independence! (it’s a pity, of course, that only from common sense ...)
    30. +6
      26 January 2020 17: 46
      I do not know a single situation in that oil and gas industry, wherever Lukashenko tries to deceive. Well, somehow, somehow, with fiction, or even according to the ancient scheme, "arrogant huckster." For example, working on Russian, in fact, tolling raw materials, but selling petroleum products not to Russia at domestic Russian prices, as by agreement, but to the side, under the guise of solvents and thinners. Yeah, we just had Khodorkovsky crouched for such tricks with “well fluids”. That is, these two berries are one meadow.
    31. +6
      26 January 2020 17: 50
      I don’t know how objective the flag is next to your nickname. In Russia, for the last 10 years I have constantly heard about glorious Belarus with excellent roads, work and a protected population. As if in the USSR about the Baltic states and Georgia.

      And it turns out the ins and outs of this holiday.

      In this regard, I still have two sensations divided into three conclusions.

      1. Even if there was compensation in Belarus for 10% of GDP, others did not follow the path of Belarus! Ukraine is richer and where has it slipped?

      2. These are the signed agreements on alliance with Russia, for which money has been given constantly now.

      3. This is disgusting behavior and conversation Mustachioed, the market I would say. Disgusting demands of further holidays.

      They give him more cattle than they are now taking away at the expense of Russian pensioners.

      With such comparisons, the Mustachioed is not my brother, but a trickster who decided to feed his family at the expense of my children and continue to feed.
      1. +2
        26 January 2020 18: 12
        And let's, namesake, without insults (if possible) ...
        If you get personal, then you have enough of your own tricks ...
        And another question, why should I go to the store to Pina Kopman, and not to Misha Sidarchuk?
        1. +1
          26 January 2020 23: 21
          Quote: GenNick
          you have enough of your earplugs ...

          Post a note about these tricks. Read the comments. And no one will ask them not to offend.
      2. +3
        26 January 2020 19: 48
        Freebie Corrupts
        The first time it is accepted with gratitude, the second time it is taken for granted. In the third - with a grimace "not given". And if you stop the flow of freebies, then you become the worst enemy.
      3. +1
        26 January 2020 21: 47
        Quote: Gennady Fomkin
        The mustachioed one is not my brother, but a trickster who decided to feed his family at the expense of my children and continue to feed.

        Do you seriously think that if Usatii bought "our" oil at the market price, you would get something? belay Top naivete, unless of course you are not a relative of Sechin.
        1. +1
          27 January 2020 09: 14
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          if Usatii bought "our" oil at the market price, you would get something

          for the media, this particular version is being promoted in society for correctness
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          you certainly are not a relative of Sechin.

          well this is the true reason
        2. -1
          27 January 2020 16: 17
          Naive such laughing laughing Too lazy to ask how the budget of the Russian Federation is being filled?
          1. +1
            27 January 2020 20: 31
            Quote: Gennady Fomkin
            Too lazy to ask how the budget of the Russian Federation is being filled?

            Visit the website of the Federal Tax Service Gennady. And study in detail the structure of the collected taxes. The bulk of the proceeds to the treasury is us.
            1. 0
              27 January 2020 20: 33
              Well, you need to study carefully .....
              1. +1
                27 January 2020 20: 36
                In what sense? belay I was just interested, but judging by the answer, no.
                1. 0
                  27 January 2020 20: 40
                  1. The oil and gas revenues of the federal budget include the revenues of the federal budget from the payment of:
                  mineral extraction tax in the form of hydrocarbon raw materials (oil, natural combustible gas from all types of hydrocarbon deposits, gas condensate from all types of hydrocarbon deposits);
                  export customs duties on crude oil;
                  export customs duties on natural gas;
                  export customs duties on goods derived from oil;
                  tax on additional income from hydrocarbon production;
                  (the paragraph is introduced by the Federal Law from 28.11.2018 N 456-FZ)
                  excise tax on refined petroleum feedstocks.
                  (the paragraph is introduced by the Federal Law from 28.11.2018 N 456-FZ)
                  2. When forecasting oil and gas revenues of the federal budget, the average annual price of Urals crude oil, the average annual export price for natural gas and the average annual exchange rate of the US dollar against the ruble are used.
                  3. The difference between the federal budget’s oil and gas revenues calculated on the basis of projected oil prices, natural gas export prices, projected alternative prices for AI-92 class 5 motor gasoline and class 5 diesel fuel and the projected exchange rate of the US dollar to ruble or received by the federal budget for the reporting fiscal year, and oil and gas revenues of the federal budget, calculated on the basis of the base oil price, the base export price of natural gas, the base prices of the export alternative for AI-92 class 5 motor gasoline and class 5 diesel fuel and either the actual exchange rate for the fiscal year of the US dollar against the ruble, accepting:
                  (as amended by Federal Law of 28.11.2018 N 456-FZ) The average price of Urals oil in January-June 2018 amounted to $ 68,81 per barrel, which is $ 18,69, or 37,3%, higher than in January - June 2017 ($ 50,12 per barrel), and $ 25,01, or 57,1%, above the average forecast price for Urals oil for 2018 ($ 43,8 per barrel). At the same time, the official exchange rate of the US dollar against the ruble in January-June 2018 amounted to 59,27 rubles per dollar, which is 1,3 rubles per dollar, or 2,2%, more than the level of January-June 2017 (57,97 rubles per dollar) and 5,43 rubles, or 8,4%, less than the forecast level of the dollar against the ruble as a whole for 2018 (64,7 rubles per dollar).
                  The value of exports of fuel and energy products increased in January - May 2018 compared to the corresponding period of 2017 by 27,8%, the physical volume - by 5,2%. ...
                  1. +1
                    27 January 2020 20: 44
                    AND? I'm glad you know the laws. But what is it when it was about SHARE oil and gas revenues in the budget of the Russian Federation?
                    1. 0
                      27 January 2020 20: 46
                      Non-oil and gas revenues of the federal budget in the first half of 2018 amounted to RUB 4,694 trillion, or 48% of the revenue forecast, and increased compared to the same period in 2017 by RUB 459,997 billion, or 10,9%.
                      In 2018, the amount of oil and gas revenues in Russia amounted to

                      9

                      trillion rubles

                      or about

                      46

                      %

                      all federal income
                      1. 0
                        27 January 2020 21: 01
                        Quote: Gennady Fomkin
                        and 48%

                        To be precise, then 46%. Those. less than half. It turns out, as I said, we pay the bulk.
                        Further, the size of discounts for oil and gas does not exceed 10% of Belarus' GDP. Estimate these figures in rubles, and you will understand that our budget is not losing so much money. Zakharchenko and Chekalin were seized more than the annual "aid" to Belarus. In addition, Belarus is eligible for these discounts, the EAEU agreement to help. In my opinion, article 28 of the contract, clause 3.
                        1. 0
                          27 January 2020 21: 03
                          Please read my comments below.
            2. -1
              27 January 2020 21: 16
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              study the structure of taxes collected. The bulk of revenues to the treasury - we are with you

              And this is said by a person who does not officially work and does not pay taxes. "Ingvar", well, where are you, right, in a row of Kalash request laughing
              1. +1
                27 January 2020 21: 20
                Quote: Golovan Jack
                and not paying taxes.

                Pussycat, sweetheart, you see the hard drive generally sprinkling, since you do not remember what I told you about my taxes. Personally, I pay 30% of my income to the budget. Want to pay more is your own business. If you have nowhere else to go, send me another tequila. I’ll drink for your health, I’ll correct you a little karma. And then you have already eaten her bile. drinks
                1. 0
                  27 January 2020 21: 41
                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  Pussycat, the sun

                  My friend, for the hundredth, probably, I repeat - with "kitties" and "suns" - to my wife, to anyone. Whether the past or the present laughing

                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  I told you about my taxes. Personally, I pay 30% of my income to the budget

                  You buddy don't pay income, MHIF and tede. But at the same time, you demand a free medical service for yourself. Surprisingly.

                  At the same time, you are very proud to pay VAT. There would be a way not to pay it - you would not pay it either.

                  At the same time, your language turns to say "you and I are the main source." What are you, to the devil, "source". You are nothing more than a receiver ... for the same tequila, for example request
                  1. +2
                    28 January 2020 08: 49
                    Quote: Golovan Jack
                    You, my friend, do not pay income, MHIF and tede. But at the same time, you demand a free medical service for yourself. Surprisingly.

                    Let's play the numbers of Kees. Imagine that I earn 40 thousand rubles, this is the average salary in the Russian Federation. 30% of this amount is 13 thousand rubles. In a year I pay the state 150 thousand rubles. Do you think I earned money for free medicine? And this despite the fact that by birth I am a co-owner of the bowels of Russia. Those. part of 46% of oil and gas budget revenues is also my contribution. Based on the fact that the budget of the Russian Federation is 18 trillion. rubles, 46% of this amount will be 8 trillion. rub. then dividing them by the number of citizens (140 million) we get about 60 tr on the nose. I have 5 people in my family (not counting the eldest daughters), 5 for 60 = 300 thousand rubles a year. Plus 150 thousand rubles, equal to 450 thousand rubles .. This is the contribution of my family to the budget of the Russian Federation. By law, the bowels belong to the people, yes Kitty? wink And this is the minimum, when calculating I did not take into account gold reserves and other deposits and investments of Russia. laughing
                    1. +1
                      28 January 2020 21: 05
                      Man, I understand - you really want to convince everyone (and yourself, first of all) that you are white and fluffy. But, unfortunately, your entire inspired speech is a set of errors, both semantic and grammatical. Go:

                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      I by right of birth am a co-owner of the bowels of Russia

                      No.

                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      By law, the bowels belong to the people

                      Show me this law, be beavers.

                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      This is the contribution of my family to the budget of the Russian Federation

                      This, sorry, nonsense request

                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      In a year I pay the state 150 thousand rubles. Do you think I earned money for free medicine?

                      Recalculate at a rate of 5.1%, you will get about 50 sput per year. But you (for you) do not pay them either. And what did you "earn" there? belay

                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      Let's play the numbers Kees

                      With kitties - to his wife. With numbers, however - you also don’t know how to use them. Buddy Yes
    32. +5
      26 January 2020 17: 53
      It is important to note that Minsk does not yet name the cost of a barrel of Norwegian oil, transported first by sea, then by rail.

      Open secret! The average cost of oil on the world market, plus customs clearance and double delivery (by sea and railway). Independence is expensive.
    33. -3
      26 January 2020 17: 53
      It is necessary to immediately chop off all support for Belarus in 12% of its annual GDP. And to sue for compensation of $ 140 billion in subsidies for all these years, due to the failure to fulfill the Union Treaty laughing
      1. +6
        26 January 2020 21: 01
        What are you quick, and if you think about it?
      2. -1
        27 January 2020 12: 08
        It is necessary to immediately chop off all support for Belarus in 12% of its annual GDP.


        necessary

        It’s pointless to sue
        1. 0
          27 January 2020 16: 26
          To the Basmanny court of MOSCOW laughing .Or FAS - The Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS Russia) is an authorized federal executive body that carries out the functions of adopting regulatory legal acts, controlling and supervising compliance with legislation in the field of competition in commodity markets, protecting competition in the financial services market, and the activities of natural monopolies and advertising.
    34. 0
      26 January 2020 18: 02
      I would not gloat over Belarus. From the word at all.
    35. -2
      26 January 2020 18: 06
      I remember there was such a president with the surname Yanukovych, he also tried to sit on 2 chairs, they laughed all over the world, as he collected his clothes when he was dribbling from his country to bad Russians. laughing
    36. 0
      26 January 2020 18: 06
      And if you wear enough buckets for five years? And how much during these two weeks will they be pumped through the oil pipeline? And how much will Luka pay for the railway tariff and how much for the pipeline.
      Yeah, greed fraer ruined.
    37. +5
      26 January 2020 18: 15
      Quote: Victor N
      I serve poor. Stick the label.

      Serfs and serfs are served on Red Square ... Are you in the know ???
    38. -2
      26 January 2020 18: 15
      you have to try everything, onion sommelier laughing
    39. +3
      26 January 2020 18: 27
      Carry, Sasha, carry - she is golden! ... Some clever people distill Russian gas and call it "Slovak" paying extra from their meager budget. Others buy more expensive on the principle "I'll buy a ticket and run after the tram to spite the conductor." Great thing "pryntsyp"!
    40. -2
      26 January 2020 18: 39
      Who knows what this kind and fabulous looks like
      Norwegian oil grandfather Joulupukki? laughing
      1. +4
        26 January 2020 21: 00
        It seems to be Finnish, but what's the difference ... lol
    41. +2
      26 January 2020 19: 03
      "After stopping supplies from Russia, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko addressed several oil-producing countries with offers to purchase crude oil."

      Typos creep in, plots creep in. (Ilf and Petrov)

      Only the enemy can write such nonsense, and, as an option, a perfect idiot. Worse yet.
      There was no cessation of export. There were misunderstandings with the price, and the dad’s threat to refuse to purchase oil from Russia. Old Man loves oil more than Trump. And, especially, free. When the comrade chairman of the collective farm refused to integrate with Russia (realizing that he could not become the leader of a united state). He desired to maintain a parasitic relationship with a neighbor. And he categorically did not agree with the revision of the price brought, as in trade WITH EVERYTHING, to a world level. To which Russia increased tax deductions to the budget for the fact that Belarusians receive it at preferential prices. This was called a tax maneuver. Here- or to save virginity, or to receive pleasure. Thirdly, it’s even sickening to think about it.
    42. +1
      26 January 2020 19: 42
      Yes, do not care. Let them carry from Mars
    43. -1
      26 January 2020 19: 53
      Clownery. 100mm will carry a month. This hysterical now even lost its position in the negotiations. Forever and ever. Now they can put any price on him. This performance is being watched in the Kremlin and it is unlikely that the price was offered "from the ceiling", rather, Father, as always, wanted "to eat a fish and not enter the union state."
    44. -1
      26 January 2020 20: 13
      Quote: rocket757
      Quote: maxim947
      We have long had to decide whether we have a market or what?

      At the expense of the market we have, the question is relative .... but with the prices just decided, Old Man from that and buzz.
      Who did he do better? His?

      So he needs to decide who is his own! And then it will turn out like with Gunpowder on an independent - theirs are those who allow you to put money from the budget into your pocket \ pocket of your little people. sad
    45. 0
      26 January 2020 20: 44
      "... addressed several oil-producing countries with offers to purchase crude oil ..." yes, God help! wassat I wonder how much gasoline from that Norwegian oil will cost after distillation at Belarusian refineries? lol
    46. +2
      26 January 2020 20: 56
      Here she is - overpowering! And Old Man was so worried! Now Belarus will heal! Fabulous profits! wassat Intergalactic gasoline sales! And let Putin choke on his oil! laughing
    47. +1
      26 January 2020 20: 58
      Moreover - an expensive drop.


      And in my opinion this is a stupid drop ...
    48. +2
      26 January 2020 21: 02
      Insanity grows stronger !!!!!! Buy from Moscow at world prices, don’t bow, at least save on delivery.
      It’s funny for people.
    49. +2
      26 January 2020 21: 08
      You can’t make a fortune!
    50. 0
      26 January 2020 22: 12
      How little Old Man is needed for happiness - oil in tanks. Now Belarusians need to give out a big spoon, slurp this happiness.
    51. +1
      26 January 2020 23: 31
      Nothing personal, dear sir, Sashko, just business.
    52. -1
      27 January 2020 00: 03
      I suggest that Belarusians return to their homeland - following the example of Crimea smile ...otherwise the example is Ukraine wassat . The era of "cheap oil" is over crying . Or switch to hydrogen... electric cars as a way out good
    53. 0
      27 January 2020 01: 58
      It is important to note that in Minsk they have not yet announced the cost, which is the cost of a barrel of Norwegian oil, transported first by sea and then by rail.

      It's a pity... I think it's no cheaper than from Russia. Or what kind of barter does Father want to extract from the Norgs? request He started talking about something again... Pasha, you should keep order there! wink
    54. 0
      27 January 2020 02: 05
      Is Lukoshenko being capricious or being forced, I think it’s the latter. He will certainly occupy a significant place in the Union State, but the same cannot be said about the people around him; many may find themselves out of work.
    55. 0
      27 January 2020 07: 40
      Quote: Spectrum
      As long as Belarus is ruled by the "collective farm chairman" there will be no full-fledged union state. And Lukashenka himself signed the verdict, i.e. b. outsmarted himself. This prince is already tired of not only Russia, but also the West. The West will send him to waste at the first opportunity.

      Do you think there will be a new president and we will immediately unite? It’s unknown who else will be elected. There are also plenty of nationalists in Belarus. And the younger generation is looking to the West. Belarus is Europe
    56. -2
      27 January 2020 08: 45
      Why do we need this Belarus, as well as the western regions of Ukraine. There is no oil, gas or raw materials there. There is no industry or special technology either. When joining, these are unprofitable areas that will have to be sponsored by Voronezh. Do we need it?! And so there are enough "kept women".
    57. +2
      27 January 2020 10: 05
      Read the people of Donbass and Belarus comments on the article under discussion.
      It is very indicative how the Russian brothers love their allies for their fraternal economic assistance.
      I don’t even know what’s better - to have such brothers or to remain an orphan.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    58. 0
      27 January 2020 11: 56
      If this is “brotherly help” from Norway and Lithuania, then Old Man is a creative manager.
    59. The comment was deleted.
      1. 0
        27 January 2020 12: 49
        Quote: sanych2020
        Russian oil is the lowest grade

        Why is it being mined?! And it’s not at all clear why they buy it. Eh, friend, Horatio...
    60. +1
      27 January 2020 12: 35
      Quote: sanych2020
      The last time Putin grabbed the valve, Belarus bought 11,5 million tons of oil from Venezuela, + Azerbaijan, and with the current depth of refining at Belarusian refineries, it was still profitable. And in all such conflicts there was one scenario.
      When Putin's anger subsides, he begins to realize that he is losing money and the market and his competitors are not sleeping. Then he quietly, without fuss, offers.
      - Bro, let's go our separate ways. I’ll give you oil at the same price and in the same quantity, and you’ll give me transit on the same terms and prices, but you only buy all the oil from me.-
      And this time it will be exactly the same, only with one BUT. In Belarus, a decision was made to reduce the share of oil purchased from Russia to 1/3 of the need, and to purchase the rest from other suppliers.
      Considering that Russian oil is the lowest grade on the market, has a lot of sulfur and a lower yield of light petroleum products, the difference in profitability in comparison with other oil is practically not noticeable.
      This is not a matter of one day or even a year, but the process has begun, Putin forces it.
      Neither a person nor a state wants to be eternally dependent on someone.
      And everything we hear now is ordinary propaganda for money.

      In reality, if it were cheaper, they would buy there. But you can even buy it on the stock exchange, because our oil is more expensive than on the stock exchange, according to Lukashenko. Then why all this demagoguery with indignation?
    61. +1
      27 January 2020 14: 52
      My dad was showing off. They drain it. Right now the budget will collapse in the pre-election year, prices will soar and interesting films will begin
    62. 0
      27 January 2020 16: 06
      The Smolensk region consumes 2 billion m³ of gas at a dated price. Russia supplies 20 billion m³ of gas to Belarus. And if the price of gas for Belarus is equated to the subsidized price for the Smolensk region, then Russia will subsidize the entire state for the full volume of gas consumed. Subsidize from your own budget. This, according to Lukashenko, would be fair, correct and brotherly. Although, the price of gas for Belarus is already lower than for Europe.

      Regarding the attempt to force Belarus to pay more for oil than the Germans and Poles pay, this is a statement for the internal listener. After all, no one dares to contradict Old Man; they listen obsequiously and write down every word he says. Even Belhydromet gives a forecast with an accuracy of 120% and nothing, everyone nods their heads in agreement. Yes, Alexander Grigorievich, with 120% accuracy.

      It seems to me that it is not Russia that is putting Belarus in a humiliating position. It is Belarus that is trying to push Russia over gas and oil. For gas, give it to yourself. Regarding oil – demonstrative purchases of oil from other countries. After all, this worked once, and Russia made concessions. Yes, in general, I caved in to Belarus.

      When Russia introduced export duties in 2010, Lukashenko stooped to outright blackmail. He rushed to Hugo Chavez and secured the supply of 30 million tons of Venezuelan oil (10 million tons per year) at a price of $737 per ton, including all transportation costs. In 2011, Belarus purchased a million tons of oil from Azerbaijan at a price of $838 per ton. There's nothing worth it, right? laughing
      1. 0
        27 January 2020 16: 25
        Quote: Gennady Fomkin
        In 2011, Belarus purchased a million tons of oil from Azerbaijan at a price of $838 per ton. There's nothing worth it, right?

        Lukashenko has a special love with Azerbaijan... Polonaise... not Oginsky...
    63. -3
      27 January 2020 16: 14
      Sorry, but it is useless to treat such people. But in themselves, the animals are interesting. And they will die en masse, like lemmings, according to rumors))
      Personally, I'm not sorry. That's where they go.
      Well, in all seriousness, when the Zmagarchuks don’t succeed, then it will be their fault... Russia, heheh)) laughing
    64. -1
      27 January 2020 16: 29
      And with him...everything is in the mood, like a stupid and hysterical woman (not a woman, but a woman). I don’t understand... either he’ll rush in with a rag, or he’ll rush ahead of his own squeal with a glass and crackling.
      Although...maybe for Moscow it demonstrates “alliance” and already the “gander” is pulling from the basement. laughing
    65. 0
      27 January 2020 16: 31
      One day, the Belarusian Academy of Sciences gave its sponsors the task of urgently finding something worthy of a Nobel Prize in the bins. laughing lol
      1. 0
        27 January 2020 17: 20
        They have their own Skolkovo.
    66. 0
      27 January 2020 17: 59
      To understand the situation: the budget of Chita and similar Russian cities is calculated in billions of rubles. For example, the Chita budgets of 2018–2019 were in deficit and amounted to about 5 billion rubles. The city cannot solve acute chronic problems (resettlement of people from dilapidated housing, creation of recreational areas, etc.).

      During these same years, the federal center annually subsidized Belarus by 5-6 billion dollars annually. The Russian Ambassador to this republic, Special Representative of the President of the Russian Federation Mikhail Babich, whom Alexander Lukashenko called an “accountant” for calculating subsidies, spoke about such amounts in March 2019. The Belarusian leader authorized a campaign of harassment against Moscow's official representative and put pressure on her to eliminate the unwanted Russian official. Babich left, having managed to update the key issue of bilateral relations - the meaning of subsidies from such a regime in a formally different state.
    67. 0
      27 January 2020 18: 19
      The world measures oil in barrels. In Russia, in tons. There are 7,28 barrels in a ton. A barrel today costs about $65. Price per ton is $473. These are basic numbers. Norwegian oil costs $520 per ton. Russian - 364, last year. This figure is only and exclusively for a member of the Union State. Moscow sells to other post-Soviet countries at $485 per ton. 364 is less than 485, much less 520. This means that the statement that the Kremlin demands that oil be bought from it at a price higher than the world price is false. Russian oil is sold to Belarus cheaper than to everyone else. That’s how it is.
    68. -1
      27 January 2020 18: 37
      Gasoline prices are going up again...
      1. 0
        27 January 2020 19: 04
        Where is yours? Region, region. laughing
    69. -1
      27 January 2020 19: 12
      Quote: Keyser Soze
      I think I’ve seen somewhere .... ahhh .... yes ....

      I remembered ... here the Americans will appear, with 5 lard and cookies in Minsk, and then you will call names and complain about the axes near Smolensk. And to ask who did it ?!

      Since the strategic partner is helping, let's integrate ...
      "Partner"? Do you measure your sad fate on others? laughing In the coffin they saw “allies” and “partners” just like you. laughingThe Bulgarian Energy Ministry will be forced to hold direct negotiations with the United States on the supply of American LNG to the country. Reuters writes about this. The message does not indicate the exact date, but the meeting of the delegations of the two countries will take place in the very near future. The pressure on Sofia from America is so great that the government of the republic cannot refuse its owners. The Bulgarian gas transportation system operator will acquire 20% of the future port infrastructure by paying $74 million. Such a forced adventure is only expenses and no profit. While on the transit of Russian gas after the launch of the second line of the Turkish Stream, the same Bulgartransgaz will be able to earn up to $200 million a year. laughing
    70. 0
      27 January 2020 19: 34
      Well, let's start quietly, praying. Because this mess that is going on in the heads of defenseless Belarusian citizens, trying to somehow connect Lukashenko’s insane governance, national pride bruised by reality and the idea that Russia must forever maintain Belarusian statehood, requires analysis. So, the first thesis: “Tariffs at the borders RB-Europe is pushing through the state, the tax maneuver is pushing through the state, and when they start to choke once again, these are “economic entities without surnames.” The Republic of Belarus can set any duties on the border of Belarus with Europe. Anything. And include them in your budget. There is only one condition - this very “anything” must belong to the Republic of Belarus. To be mined or produced on its territory. To be purchased for market money from another; well, or for less money, if the counterparty is somehow compensated for this by other preferences. To be processed by the Republic from raw materials purchased by it. And so on. It is precisely in this remarkable case that the Russian Federation does not, and cannot, concern how the Republic of Belarus carries out customs protection of its economy and how it fills its budget at the expense of customs. And this is true in reality. Russia does not interfere in the export policy either with regard to Belarusian potash fertilizers, or with regard to the same petroleum products that Belarus produces from alternative raw materials, or with regard to the export of oil produced on the territory of Belarus (there is also a volume there).
    71. 0
      27 January 2020 19: 36
      And the problem, our Belarusian friends, is solely that your Supreme Leader Lukashenko has long and thoroughly confused the Russian with his own. And he adopted the pig fashion of deceiving his partner - the Russian Federation. I don’t know a single situation regarding oil and gas where Lukashenko would not try to deceive. It would be okay if something was made up, otherwise it would be according to the ancient “arrogant huckster” scheme. For example, working on Russian, in fact, customer-supplied raw materials, but selling petroleum products not to Russia at domestic Russian prices, as under the contract, but externally, under the guise of solvents and thinners. Yeah, it was Khodorkovsky who came down for such tricks with “well fluids.” That is, these are two berries from the same clearing. laughing
    72. 0
      27 January 2020 19: 40
      Okay, duties. So, my dears, you will resell Russian oil exclusively on Russian terms if it is given preferences to you. For these very conditions you will pay in good money: economic, political, military. Since you don’t want to pay, and we’ll talk about this later, it’s the state’s job to somehow change its relationship with you. Once again, slowly - state policy is to ensure a balance of state interests. These same interests are not only the economy, but also other areas - international politics, defensive alliances, spreading one’s influence, and so on. In other, non-economic, state interests, this very state may decide to accept direct economic losses in the hope of profit in another, either real, or eventual, or unconditional in the future. The trick is that the state, in this very case, takes risks own budget; its business entities should not suffer. This is if there is a normal state that knows how to organize economically, and not our beloved USSR, which developed the economy of the same socialist countries to the detriment of its own economic sustainability: the production of furniture in Romania, buses in Hungary, passenger electric locomotives in Czechoslovakia (just think - they didn’t have their own), Polish shipbuilding, aircraft and mechanical engineering and so on. I’m silent for my beloved Africans “walking” the socialist path, although for some reason their bad debts to the USSR (20 billion dollars) written off by the Russian Federation were blamed on Putin. So, Russia, with all its shortcomings, is a state striving for a normal economic organization life, and business doesn’t hang its state external problems at all (there’s a separate conversation for internal ones). That is, our ally, the former BSSR, is financed by the Russian state budget. I’m telling you about how the budget of Belarus includes duties on petroleum products, which the Republic of Belarus stupidly resells to the foreign market.
    73. 0
      27 January 2020 19: 41
      The scheme is as simple as three kopecks. The Russian exporter pays a duty to the Russian budget and is free to sell to whomever he wants and what he wants. But he sells it to Belarus duty-free, which reduces the price for the Republic. But from Sineokaya this same oil goes further, without even stopping, and is already subject to an export duty. Yeah, which goes to the Belarusian budget and is spent on the needs (so it is considered) of Belarusian citizens. If these are not subsidies from the Russian budget of Belarus, and direct ones at that, then I am Santa Claus. laughing
    74. +1
      27 January 2020 19: 43
      Let me note that this is an independent story that is not related to the supply of raw materials to the refinery (more on that later). These are the 6 million (sort of) tons that are now falling under the distribution of the Russian tax maneuver. And about which there is a fight. Independent, but not isolated. But here the inconsistency is already visible - why the hell, according to this plot, should the Russian internal budget contain Lukanomics on its balance sheet? Directly and directly contain ?
    75. 0
      27 January 2020 19: 45
      And get it into your head, damn it, that this is money from the Russian budget. These hundreds of millions of dollars are not spent on internal Russian affairs. Hospitals and bridges were not built on them, roads were not built, and subsidies were not allocated to needy Russian regions for their development. Smolensk and Pskov won’t mind at all if this very money goes to them, and not to Lukashenko. Because these are precisely the funds not of “faceless business companies” (which are spent on yachts and sports teams, among other things), but directly of the Russian state. Yeah, it’s relevant here - they could have sent it to a pension fund.
    76. 0
      27 January 2020 19: 56
      Okay, we've sorted that out, let's move on. In the Kremlin and on Krasnopresnenskaya, as well as in other interesting houses around Moscow, fools are not everywhere. More precisely, they don’t always make stupid decisions. For example, stimulating oil and gas refining in Russia is a smart decision. That is, to make it more profitable for oil producers not to export crude oil, but to process it within the country.
    77. 0
      27 January 2020 20: 23
      For this purpose, a system of reverse excise taxes has been created, when oil is subject to duty at the well, and not when it goes abroad. The conditions for the duty refund are simple – production of high value-added petroleum products at Russian refineries. To give oil producers time to prepare and commission (modernize) their plants, they decided to cut off their tail piece by piece, making a long transition period. High value added means jobs, taxes, higher profits, lower transportation costs, and so on.
    78. 0
      27 January 2020 20: 25
      So, this very decision does not in any way interfere with the competence of the Republic of Belarus. And the fact that Belarusian refineries are placed in unequal conditions - this is what they are offered: to work according to Russian rules for the Russian market - they will be subject to the same reverse excise taxes.

      But Lukashenko doesn’t want anything - to the Russian market. The Mozyr Oil Refinery won a tender from him to supply the Ukrainian Armed Forces with diesel fuel. It’s much more interesting for him to sell these oil products to the West. Has the right to? Undoubtedly. But why the hell should the Russian Federation sponsor his wishes? And create preferences for it to the detriment of its producers?
    79. 0
      27 January 2020 20: 27
      The Union Agreement is being updated, within the framework of which the neighbor will receive all the working conditions that Russian regions have. Let me note that Lukashenko signed this agreement with Yeltsin, and not with Putin. And the conditions that Putin is talking about now were provided for even then. The fact that Lukashenko signed it without intending to implement it is the personal sexual drama of the Belarusian Leader.
    80. 0
      27 January 2020 21: 11
      Because I have lived for a long time and remember the 90s and the beginning of the XNUMXs. I remember production sharing agreements, when our minerals, even in the depths, did not belong to us. I remember precisely that the oligarchs did not give the state a penny when selling this oil. And I remember that order in this industry is still being established. It is being debugged exactly the way Russia needs it.

      Do you want order to apply to you, that is, to benefit from it? Become Russia. Then your problems will become the Kremlin's concerns. You do not want? It's up to you and don't whine.
    81. +1
      27 January 2020 21: 11
      I'll frostbite my ears to spite my mother. The older brother sometimes gave the younger brother candy, sometimes a waffle, sometimes a liver, sometimes they quarreled, but he still gave him a treat, because... the younger one always begged, sucked up and always promised something in return. And now he’s not a brother at all, since he stopped feeding him.
    82. 0
      29 January 2020 00: 08
      passed, it’s their right where to buy, and then what to do with it!
      p.s. it's boring to talk

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"