The first PD-14 engines for MS-21 delivered to Irkutsk Aircraft Plant

175
The first PD-14 engines for MS-21 delivered to Irkutsk Aircraft Plant

The first PD-21 engines were delivered to the Irkutsk aircraft plant, where the assembly of the medium-range passenger aircraft MS-14 is underway. This was reported by the press service of the state corporation Rostec.

In Irkutsk aviation The plant delivered the first turbojet dual-circuit engines PD-14 manufactured by "ODK - Perm Motors". The engines will be installed for the first time on the medium-range airliner MS-21, which is being created in cooperation with the holdings of the state corporation Rostec

- said in a press release distributed by the state corporation.



As it is specified, the engines were transferred to the section for additional assembly of the propulsion systems, and after the incoming inspection procedure, the PD-14 installation on the aircraft, which is already being assembled at the plant, will begin.


Rostekh specified that the first flight of the MS-21 airliner with Russian PD-14 engines will take place this year.

According to the release of the United Engine Corporation (UEC), the PD-14 is the first fully Russian turbofan engine for civil aviation since the 1980s, designed to meet international standards and requirements. The engine with a thrust of 14 tons was created using the latest technologies and materials that provide modern operational characteristics and a high level of environmental friendliness.
  • https://www.uecrus.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

175 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +46
    22 January 2020 10: 47
    Well, long and fruitful service. Well done!
    1. +34
      22 January 2020 11: 33
      God forbid ... A very necessary thing. There is nothing in the world of manufacturers of powerful and economical engines. MotorSich out of the game. It would be necessary to occupy a niche.
      1. +4
        22 January 2020 13: 46
        Well, PD - 14 to D - 18 in thrust, is still far away. Although for the sake of truth, it should be noted that the new D - 18 are not produced in Zaporozhye now. During overhaul, the old ones are converted into a new profile and that's it. There are certain doubts that Motor will be able to re-launch the production of D - 18.
        1. +18
          22 January 2020 14: 19
          Well, PD - 14 to D - 18 in traction, is still far away.

          So the MS-21 is not a Ruslan!
          Things got off the ground, and that is already good. And not so long ago, here someone shouted about the phantom of this engine.
        2. NKT
          +6
          22 January 2020 16: 46
          Well, PD - 14 to D - 18 in traction, is still far away.

          PD14 is the A320 / B737 level, even with a certain margin (137kN versus 118kN and 120kN, respectively).
        3. +1
          22 January 2020 17: 23
          Quote: TermNachTER
          Well, PD - 14 to D - 18 in traction, is still far away

          But D-436 has already bypassed.
          There are certain doubts that Motor will be able to re-launch the D - 18 production.
          If you stop producing such a complex product as an aircraft engine, then it is very difficult to resume production again. Technologies, documentation, equipment, specialists are lost, machines do not get younger, and so on. At the end of the 90s, Motor Sich decided to resume production of the R-95-300 engine (turbojet for cruise missiles) after five years of inactivity. There that engine (in comparison with the D-18, the smallest and largest), and even then, they barely adjusted it. Yes, and far from in those volumes and of the wrong quality.
          1. 0
            22 January 2020 17: 53
            Comrade "mountain shooter" said about a powerful engine, so I gave as an example D - 18, regardless of what it is installed on. D - 436, after the termination of the assembly of An - 148, 158, etc., no one needs it at all. Perhaps only on the Be - 200, but there are not so many of them.
            1. -2
              22 January 2020 21: 40
              Quote: TermNachTER
              said about a powerful engine

              Dear, I know perfectly well what is installed and what it flies on. And also where and how it is made.
        4. +3
          22 January 2020 17: 55
          Quote: TermNachTER
          Well, PD - 14 to D - 18 in traction, is still far away.

          ========
          Oh!!!! It's not so much in "traction"question (engines then different classes there are!) - rather in the destination, profitability, resource, maintenance cost, price, weight and size characteristics, etc., etc. !!!
          Well, you can't really compare an engine for a light "turntable" with engines for a super-heavy "transport" - different "weight" categories !!!!
        5. +10
          22 January 2020 19: 34
          Quote: TermNachTER
          Well, PD - 14 to D - 18 in thrust, is still far away. Although for the sake of truth, it should be noted that the new D - 18 are not produced in Zaporozhye now. During overhaul, the old ones are converted into a new profile and that's it. There are certain doubts that Motor will be able to re-launch the production of D - 18.

          if my memory serves me, they develop the PD family, and not just one PD14 !!! request
    2. +11
      22 January 2020 12: 10
      Quote: Bulls.
      Well, long and fruitful service. Well done!

      waited a long time: finally! Yes
      And then they talked a lot about two years ago about him, and then they somehow fell silent. But everything went according to plan!
  2. +15
    22 January 2020 10: 48
    According to the release of the United Engine Corporation (UEC), the PD-14 is the first fully Russian turbofan engine for civil aviation since the 1980s, designed to meet international standards and requirements. The engine with a thrust of 14 tons was created using the latest technologies and materials that provide modern operational characteristics and a high level of environmental friendliness.

    It would be nice to give a comparison with Western counterparts. In terms of efficiency it is especially interesting.
    1. +17
      22 January 2020 10: 54
      Here, just the comparison will be the most objective. One plane and two turbojet engines ..... and operation on civilian lines. And it’s important to compare the service. This will only benefit PD-14.
    2. +11
      22 January 2020 10: 56
      Declare that more economical and reliable. We will wait and hope that expectations are met.
      1. +4
        22 January 2020 11: 22
        Is it possible in parrots?
    3. -5
      22 January 2020 11: 53
      Quote: Svarog
      It would be nice to give a comparison with Western counterparts. In terms of efficiency it is especially interesting.

      Airbus A321XLR will be able to cover distances up to 8700 km, which is 15% more than the model A321LR, should go into operation in 2023. According to Airbus, fuel consumption per seat in the new version of the A321neo will be 30% less than competing aircraft of the previous generation.
    4. +1
      23 January 2020 11: 09
      It is necessary not to compare, but to put into series in the domestic market !!! Yes Already equated that our aircraft industry was driven into a grave! am
  3. +26
    22 January 2020 10: 51
    The first PD-21 engines were delivered to the Irkutsk aircraft plant, where the assembly of the medium-range passenger aircraft MS-14 is underway. This was reported by the press service of the state corporation Rostec.

    In general, that is the only right way, to restore the production of everything necessary in an amount sufficient for the normal functioning of all industries!
    It is not necessary to grow bananas, but we can eat our own lemons.
    1. -26
      22 January 2020 10: 57
      Difficult question. Modern Russia has no demand to load aircraft construction. But something does not go for export ...
      1. +18
        22 January 2020 11: 07
        Quote: Sancho_SP
        Difficult question. Modern Russia has no demand to load aircraft construction. But something does not go for export ...

        Yes, there is a problem generated by the past, MANY errors. But it’s not from scratch that everything will have to start ... maybe structural changes everywhere to carry out the time has come.
        Demand creates supply, it is necessary to create normal demand within the country, for starters. If / when it goes, it will be possible to move outside, with finished, tested products and a ready-made service infrastructure. It's time to start ... with yourself!
        1. +2
          22 January 2020 11: 16
          Quote: rocket757
          Yes, there is a problem generated by the past, MANY errors. But it’s not from scratch that everything will have to start ...

          the main problem is the lack of population ...
          1. +5
            22 January 2020 11: 21
            Quote: NEOZ
            the main problem is the lack of population ...

            This is no longer a mistake, this is a disaster !!! Spawned by different reasons, but the state, represented by the defense ... of various officials and .... these are the "servants of the people", has made a fair contribution to the creation of this disaster.
            1. +3
              22 January 2020 11: 53
              Quote: rocket757
              but the state, represented by obverse ... various bureaucrats and .... here are such "servants of the people", has made a fair share of its own contribution to the creation of this disaster.

              Apparently, in these countries, officials are all right:
              PLACE COUNTRY POPULATION GROWTH (%)
              1 Bahrain 4.31
              2 Niger 3.82
              3 Equatorial Guinea 3.66
              4 Oman 3.59
              5 Uganda 3.59
              6 Maldives 3.45
              7 Angola 3.29
              8 Dem Rep Congo 3.22
              1. +8
                22 January 2020 12: 01
                Invalid comparison. Among the northern, "developed" countries, we are not in last place, although the coefficient of 1,75 does not contribute to population growth, especially since we have such a decline .......
                In short, even the measures being taken now and planned, will not fundamentally correct the situation.
                "ERROR" is already in the minds of those who can / should reproduce and multiply.
                1. +3
                  22 January 2020 12: 26
                  Quote: rocket757
                  "ERROR" is already in the minds of those who can / should reproduce and multiply.

                  only in the regions of the North Caucasus there is no such mistake ... why?
                  1. +2
                    22 January 2020 12: 37
                    I won’t declare about the mentality and lack of obstacles ... maybe people have plans and hopes for a good future.
                    It is difficult to say, it is necessary to have specific knowledge, information ... in short, I will not guess.
              2. +2
                22 January 2020 12: 04
                In Bahrain and Oman, officials are all right; their living standards are better than in Europe.
                1. +2
                  22 January 2020 19: 40
                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  In Bahrain and Oman, officials are all right; their living standards are better than in Europe.

                  move there to live ... do not forget to capture your wife ... and be sure to take more of your female relatives !!! then share your impressions !!! laughing
                  PS ... and do not forget to meet there against all the bad for all the good !!! wink wassat
                  1. +4
                    22 January 2020 20: 47
                    Quote: Nikolai the Greek
                    move there live.

                    And I want that living here would be no worse than in Bahrain, and that my Motherland would not degrade, but flourish. But you and your government are slowly but surely pushing the country to the edge. But do not worry, you will get these 30 pieces of silver for which you work here, sideways. Karma is a stubborn thing, and the return of parental labor often goes to children. Have you thought about this? fool
                    1. -2
                      22 January 2020 21: 15
                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      than in Bahrain

                      You didn’t follow my advice, so you do not need to put forward this thesis as an axiom !!! wassat
                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      And I want that living here would be no worse than in Bahrain, and that my Motherland would not degrade, but flourish.

                      then less talk about "prosperity" in other countries, about which you have a mediocre idea, and do more in yours !! and look at life realistically, not through the prism of navalnist-lousy perception !!! fool laughing
                      1. +3
                        22 January 2020 21: 54
                        Quote: Nikolai the Greek
                        you did not follow my advice

                        Sense to listen to the advice of regular trolls? They don’t advise anything smart, one badass per person, nothing on the topic. I’m looking, today there’s a lot of yours on the site, yesterday-the day before it was several times less. Yes, and that week yours was less. Is troubles in your trolls today, or was there equipment prevention? wink
                        Quote: Nikolai the Greek
                        then less balakaite about "prosperity" in other countries

                        And what, will it get better right away? belay
                      2. +1
                        22 January 2020 22: 11
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        nothing on the topic.

                        everything is just on the topic ... you just pretend to be a hose !!! request an alternative is that you’re from Bahrain / Oman after at least 2-3 years of living there !!! wink Nah, the first option ?? !!! laughing
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        And what, will it get better right away?

                        at least you will not have pseudo-ideals for comparison !! lol
                    2. -1
                      24 January 2020 11: 56
                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      And I want to live here no worse than

                      want is not harmful...
                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      But you and your government are slowly but surely pushing the country to the edge

                      what do you mean? give examples of pushing to the edge facts / actions / consequences / figures ... as well as your analysis and your suggestions on these issues ...
                      and then all the slogans are much to yell, but in the case there is nothing to say !!!!
          2. -3
            22 January 2020 11: 36
            Quote: NEOZ
            the main problem is the lack of population ...

            What ??? And how many unemployed are there in the country? All that is needed is a sensible leader, able to properly dispose of this force.
            Alexander Vasilievich - "They fight not by number, but by skill"
            1. -5
              22 January 2020 11: 45
              Quote: Krasnoyarsk
              What ??? And how many unemployed are there in the country? Only a sensible leader is needed

              you are mistaken and mislead others ...
              I will give an example:
              conditionally
              In 2008, the Russian car market amounted to 3 million units of new cars. - These sales served 20 thousand. sales managers. - FURTHER CRISIS - market decline by 50% - in 2009 the Russian car market was 1,2 million units of new cars.
              QUESTION: how many sales managers will lose their jobs?
              1. -2
                22 January 2020 11: 52
                Quote: NEOZ
                QUESTION: how many sales managers will lose their jobs?

                I will not answer your question because I do not understand the phrase - sales manager.
                1. +2
                  22 January 2020 11: 59
                  Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                  I will not answer your question because I do not understand the phrase - sales manager.

                  You are well done! joke about you:
                  - Comrade military, are we going to the station right?
                  - What is right there? The ankle wobbles, the blow of the foot is not clear, and indeed not in the foot ...

                  ps
                  You are not ready for a constructive dialogue, if only you would have garlopan slogans at rallies ...
                  it is sad...
                  1. -5
                    22 January 2020 12: 05
                    Quote: NEOZ
                    it is sad...

                    And how sad I am, you have no idea. - so clever, but can’t use the Russian language, more and more on slang.
                2. +4
                  22 January 2020 12: 19
                  I don’t understand the phrase - sales manager.

                  Do not you understand or troll?
                  1. +4
                    22 January 2020 12: 24
                    Quote: bk316
                    Do not you understand or troll?

                    moving away from constructive dialogue to verbiage ...
                    1. -1
                      22 January 2020 13: 25
                      Quote: NEOZ
                      moving away from constructive dialogue to verbiage ...

                      Are you normal at all? Would you conduct a "constructive dialogue" with me in Turkish?
                      Sure - no. So what do you want from me? Go to a language that I understand, let's talk.
                      1. 0
                        22 January 2020 15: 56
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        Go to a language that I understand, let's talk.

                        Only a sensible leader is needed

                        on what basis is this conclusion made?
                        Alexander Vasilievich - "They fight not by number, but by skill"

                        Napoleon: Dieu est toujours pour les gros bataillons, God is always on the side of large battalions.
                        if you think that it’s only a sensible leader, then give examples of countries and its leader (with a population of up to 150 million people) that independently produces: ships of the ocean zone, submarines, fighter jets, bombers, narrow / wide / fuselage / passenger / cargo planes and engines for them, tanks and other armored combat vehicles. and other high-tech products.
                        give examples of such countries.
                      2. 0
                        22 January 2020 18: 39
                        Quote: NEOZ

                        Napoleon: Dieu est toujours pour les gros bataillons, God is always on the side of large battalions.

                        For which there was a bit.
                        Quote: NEOZ
                        on what basis is this conclusion made?

                        What is the conclusion? What is an intelligent leader needed? Those. Is this conclusion ambiguous for you? You have not decided who is closer to you, sensible or stupid?
                        An intelligent leader always has a huge number of plans and an understanding of how to implement them and only a shortage of labor constrains their implementation. The stupid leader also has a lot of floodlights, but there is not enough sense in how to do this and therefore he has crowds of unemployed.
                        And the fact that the country is doing something is not yet unemployed, as they say, not thanks, but in spite of.
                      3. 0
                        23 January 2020 11: 25
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        What is the conclusion? What is an intelligent leader needed?

                        slogan (for all good versus all bad)
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        You have not decided who is closer to you, sensible or stupid?

                        again the slogan !!!!
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        An intelligent leader always has a lot of plans and an understanding of how to implement them.

                        the slogan again !!!!! (for all the good)
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        The stupid leader also has a lot of floodlights, but there’s not enough sense how to do it

                        This is again a slogan !!!! (against all the bad)
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        And the fact that the country is doing something is not yet unemployed, as they say, not thanks, but in spite of.

                        Yes, yes, the USSR also won in spite of ......
                        Conclusion: essentially you have nothing to say, you are not able to confirm / refute with figures and / or facts.
                        You are just a spokesman for slogans in the square ...
                        you are not capable of any constructive dialogue ...
                      4. +2
                        23 January 2020 17: 09
                        Quote: NEOZ
                        you are not capable of any constructive dialogue ...

                        Yes, you "escaped" me, in your posts there is a solid constructive ...
                        Kindly, go ... no, you misunderstood me, just go.
                      5. +1
                        24 January 2020 00: 04
                        Tell us, lad about the bombers and wide-body airliners produced in Russia in 30 years, and then go through gas turbines for the Navy’s helicopters, power engineers and don’t forget about the turbines for gas plants novotek ...
                      6. 0
                        24 January 2020 11: 44
                        Quote: ElTuristo
                        Tell us, lad about production over 30 years in Russia.

                        where I argued that all of the above is done in the Russian Federation?
              2. NKT
                +1
                22 January 2020 23: 09

                QUESTION: how many sales managers will lose their jobs?

                12000? But in real life there will hardly be a directly proportional dependence.
            2. -2
              24 January 2020 22: 16
              Quote: Krasnoyarsk
              And how many unemployed are there in the country?

              Add to the unemployed all those who are engaged in non-production areas, since these people do not create goods, but only consume them. The entire range of services - from janitors to hairdressers. Doctors and teachers too. All government officials. The entire army, police and the Russian Guard.
              This is the "liability" of macroeconomics, which must be in a certain proportion to the "asset" that produces real output. When there is an imbalance in the "liability" - the economy goes into inflation, the greater the imbalance, the stronger.
              1. +1
                24 January 2020 22: 33
                Quote: rzzz
                these people do not create goods, but only consume them. The entire range of services - from janitors to hairdressers. Doctors and teachers too

                Yeah. That is, you are ready to walk unstable, sick and knee-deep in the mud. I wonder how long it takes what

                Quote: rzzz
                the "liability" of macroeconomics, which must be in a certain proportion to the "asset" that produces real output

                What is meant by "real products"? Matches? Tanks? Or maybe something immaterial is included there?

                And? wink
                1. -2
                  25 January 2020 00: 27
                  You really don’t understand, or are you kidding in such a peculiar way? I’m not ready to go sick, just as much as the doctor is not ready to go hungry, undressed, and yes, without matches either. These are the fundamentals of economics; this should almost be taught at school. Although for today's school I will not say what they teach there.
                  The real sector means any tangible product for which they are willing to pay money. In the amount that the market needs.
                  1. 0
                    25 January 2020 09: 14
                    Quote: rzzz
                    The real sector means any tangible goods

                    Is software, for example, a tangible product?

                    Quote: rzzz
                    ... goods for which they are willing to pay money ...

                    ... it is not always "material".

                    Quote: rzzz
                    Are you ... kidding me?

                    Me not. And you?
                    1. 0
                      26 January 2020 23: 22
                      Software is a product, but not tangible. And he also has a peculiar feature, software has the ability to multiply wassat, the manufacturer can release as many copies as he wants, practically without increasing his costs, this does not work on material goods. And yet - not the software itself is sold, but the license for it. Therefore, the classical mechanisms for setting prices in the software market do not work very well. But, nevertheless, software is a commodity, and it belongs to the "good", real sector of the economy.
                      1. 0
                        26 January 2020 23: 39
                        Quote: rzzz
                        software is a commodity, and it belongs to the "good", real sector of the economy

                        Right.

                        The next question (I will not go far from software yet) - are IT consulting services a commodity, or what? Example: some thread Korus-Consulting promises to carry out the implementation of an ERP-system in the office of "Horns and Hooves" in some thread of Ryazan for the final money. And, lo and behold - he even does what he promised.

                        Question: are Corus Consulting services a product? wink
                      2. 0
                        26 January 2020 23: 57
                        If without this service that software cannot be used, then this service is an integral part of the product, and is included in its price.
                        If the software will work without this service, then this is a separate service, and it does not apply to the real sector.
                        I am sorry, I do not know what ERP systems are, and what they eat with.
              2. +1
                25 January 2020 00: 39
                Quote: rzzz
                Add to the unemployed all those who are engaged in non-production areas, since

                I absolutely agree with you in the formulation of the question. But I cannot count the service sector as a "liability", as well as doctors and teachers. But the hefty men working to protect the bodies of bandits and half-bandits, watchmen, sellers, bouncers in all kinds of nightlife, all sorts of intermediaries, etc., etc. etc. all must be returned to productive labor. But no one is waiting for them. Because our economy is in stagnation thanks to the wise leadership of the departed.
                1. 0
                  26 January 2020 23: 31
                  I never wanted to offend these noble professions, but you try, in the form of a delusional fantasy, to imagine a country where there are only doctors, teachers, well, less noble - hairdressers, office managers and salespeople, and completely ignoble ones, like the ones you mentioned. What will become of such a country? That's right, he will die of hunger in a few days. These professions do not produce material values, which means that for the country's economic well-being, there must be a certain number of such people, and the money circulating in this "non-commodity" sphere must also not exceed certain limits. Then everything will be fine in the economy.
        2. +20
          22 January 2020 11: 27
          Svarog (Vladimir) : It would be nice to give a comparison with Western counterparts.

          Look, Vladimir




          1. +13
            22 January 2020 11: 58
            Quote: Rich
            Look, Vladimir

            Judging by the performance characteristics, PD-14 does not stand out. But there is one thing. He is ours (!) And costs our aircraft builders cheaper than imported! And more, for now, we do not need anything.
            1. +9
              22 January 2020 14: 43
              It allows our hard workers to receive a salary, to pay tax deductions for salaries to doctors and teachers. This is also a plus.
              1. +6
                22 January 2020 15: 14
                Quote: UAndrey
                This is also a plus.

                It's not just "too". This is perhaps the most important thing. After all, those 5-6 million dollars for each engine will not go to another country, moreover, an unfriendly one, but will remain and will work in our country.
            2. +1
              22 January 2020 18: 51
              Quote: Krasnoyarsk
              He is ours (!) And costs our aircraft builders cheaper than imported! And more, for now, we do not need anything.

              The most interesting thing is that "more" will spit out by itself. Work on the constant improvement of the motor, the creation of new modifications (PD-10, PD-18). From design experience, the creation of a new PD-35.

              The most important, at the moment, will achieve the proper quality and after-sales service. Well, a little state support in the form of, for example, protective duties on competitors' products.
            3. +2
              23 January 2020 09: 34
              Quote: Krasnoyarsk
              Judging by the performance characteristics, PD-14 does not stand out.

              First of all - the price!
              The second is lower specific fuel consumption - that is, operating costs.
              And the most important thing you indicated is independence in the field of engine manufacturing for civil aviation.
              1. 0
                24 January 2020 22: 27
                Quote: Stena
                First of all - the price!


                This is if you want to put it as a decoration in front of the house.

                In actual use, two factors are important.
                1. Reliability. Because just a few downtimes due to breakdowns will save your savings in the red. Therefore, the bone is better to pay more when buying, but get a hassle-free job.
                2. Service and supply. Why the superjet didn’t take off. Because the plane should fly, and not wait a month from the factory for the wiper motor. Airbus promises to deliver any item from the catalog to any country in the world in no more than a day. Until we do something like that, they won't even take motors from us for free.

                At work, I am now engaged in the operation of ships, there are also Soviet-era steamboats, and there are also new buildings. I know what I'm talking about.
                1. 0
                  26 January 2020 04: 35
                  Quote: rzzz
                  This is if you want to put it as a decoration in front of the house.

                  In actual use, two factors are important.
                  1. Reliability. Because just a few downtimes due to breakdowns will save your savings in the red. Therefore, the bone is better to pay more when buying, but get a hassle-free job.
                  At work, I am now engaged in the operation of ships, there are also Soviet-era steamboats, and there are also new buildings. I know what I'm talking about.

                  why are you writing this to me?
                  comrade with nickname Krasnoyarsk suggests that
                  Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                  Judging by the performance characteristics, PD-14 does not stand out.

                  in the above advertising booklets there is no assessment of reliability and service with supply.
                  and from the considered characteristics, the main difference is the price. no more. about which it was indicated.
                  Quote: Stena
                  First of all - the price!


                  Quote: rzzz
                  2. Service and supply. Why the superjet didn’t take off. Because the plane should fly, and not wait a month from the factory for the wiper motor. Airbus promises to deliver any item from the catalog to any country in the world in no more than a day. Until we do something like that, they won't even take motors from us for free.

                  regarding reliability - the probability of failure or MTBF and the cost of damage or its correction at a given time are important.
                  Aircraft and motor are different objects. The superjet has a French motor. here the French panic about this and arrange!
                  what kind of shitty logistics SaMa, or "Service and Supply".
                  Quote: rzzz
                  Until we do something similar, we will not even take motors for free.

                  when the UEC comes into full force, everything will be in order. by analogy with oil and gas.
                  how else to fight with two world monopolists for the civil aviation market?
                  1. 0
                    26 January 2020 23: 43
                    Quote: Stena
                    Aircraft and motor are different objects. The superjet has a French motor. here the French panic about this and arrange!

                    The aircraft manufacturer is responsible for the fact that he screwed it to his airplane for rubbish. If the plane has a bad engine, then this is a bad plane.
                    If you buy a car, and there the motor will jam, who will you blame? The manufacturer of the car, or the Indian who crookedly turned the piston?

                    Quote: Stena
                    when the UEC comes into full force, everything will be in order.

                    God forbid! These corporations, on the contrary, should collapse as soon as possible! This is nothing more than the official state "laundries" for the withdrawal of budget money to private shops. They rake a lot of money, do nothing themselves, pay a penny to factories and design bureaus, the price of products is frantic with extremely low quality. It is profitable for them that the aircraft have been developed for decades in order to "master" as much dough as possible.
                    1. 0
                      27 January 2020 09: 48
                      Quote: rzzz
                      These corporations, on the contrary, should collapse as soon as possible! This is nothing more than the official state "laundries" for the withdrawal of budget money to private shops. They rake a lot of money, do nothing themselves, pay a penny to factories and design bureaus, the price of products is frantic with extremely low quality. It is profitable for them that the aircraft have been developed for decades in order to "master" as much dough as possible.

                      Liberté, Egalité, Fraternite?
                      You are not at the address.
                      I am a supporter of state regulation of the economy.
                      Quote: rzzz
                      The aircraft manufacturer is responsible for the fact that he screwed it to his airplane for rubbish. If the plane has a bad engine, then this is a bad plane.
                      If you buy a car, and there the motor will jam, who will you blame? The manufacturer of the car, or the Indian who crookedly turned the piston?

                      The aircraft manufacturer is responsible for the input and output control of its product. As well as the manufacturer of the motor. And if those types of control reveal inconsistencies of those. documentation - then such a product is sent for completion (alteration).
                      In particular, the motors for the Superjet are made in France. Produced by the joint Franco-Russian office "PowerJet". The "hot part" is produced by Snecma factories (France). "Cold part" - NPO Saturn. Questions - to them.
                      Do you not know this? Then everything that you wrote about production (including the problems of engine building for the civilian sector) is not true.
                      1. 0
                        27 January 2020 14: 02
                        I know perfectly well who makes the miracle motor. It's the developer's fault that he chose such a motor, and it doesn't matter who makes it. The airline pays money for a finished plane, not for a do-it-yourself kit.

                        I agree that "state regulation of the economy" is not bad in some cases. But what all our "corporations" and "concerns" are doing is something completely different. These are not even state enterprises. And they don't produce ANYTHING, they just pump money.
                      2. 0
                        27 January 2020 15: 56
                        Quote: rzzz
                        It's the developer's fault that he chose such a motor, and it doesn't matter who makes it. The airline pays money for the finished plane, not for the do-it-yourself kit.

                        No. This is a manipulation.
                        For when designing, several alternatives are offered. And the situation with the choice of specifically SaM motor, at that time was dictated by the conditions and the possibility of conquering part of the market (that is, demand). At that time there were no reasonable assumptions about the economic war against Russia on such a scale. Now it’s finally clear that the Russian Federation will not be allowed to enter the world civil aviation market. Therefore, the orientation mainly on own forces is justified and in the near future there will be a Russian engine for these aircraft (as well as for the MS-21).
                        Quote: rzzz
                        But what all our "corporations" and "concerns" are doing is something completely different. These are not even state enterprises. And they don't produce ANYTHING, they just pump money.

                        It is not.
                        And the most striking example in this is the State Atomic Energy Agency Rosatom.
                        And in other areas we will come to the forefront. It takes a little time. And patience.
          2. +5
            22 January 2020 13: 14
            Look, Vladimir

            Thank you .. consumption is basically at a level, takeoff thrust a little more. You could say caught up. This is good, but it would be very good to overtake)
            1. +3
              22 January 2020 18: 55
              Quote: Svarog
              This is good, but it would be very good to overtake)

              Competitors have suffered their creations from decades of experience, developments and hundreds of engines sold. Any road starts from the first step. Although, as the great aircraft designer Bartini said, if you cannot overtake, you need to "cut" wink
        3. +8
          22 January 2020 11: 37
          Here you need to take a different approach: for each type of aircraft that has problems or restrictions on use, you need to have a dependency sheet: almost all civilian planes depend, all helicopters depend, all the more promising in development, 10 years without Be-200 engines (real money is lying on the road, the world needs more than 100 cars, a year ago only the USA wanted to buy 20 cars at once!).
          And according to this statement, track financial losses for which engine builders will have to answer.
          And these are not only engines for aviation, for the Navy - the same problems: both with turbines and with diesel engines. And LNG turbines for the Arctic fleet, for gas carriers?
        4. +3
          22 January 2020 15: 22
          Demand creates supply

          And on the back the OFFER creates demand! wink
      2. +5
        22 January 2020 11: 24
        Well, what kind of country do we have? They did something and immediately sell abroad. Master your market, we need at least a hundred aircraft. If the declared characteristics are confirmed and others will catch up. And then some kind of cognitive dissonance turns out, we make planes, we sell abroad, we fly on Boeing and beads ourselves.
        1. 0
          22 January 2020 12: 21
          Question. How do you make our airlines buy a domestic product?
          1. +7
            22 January 2020 12: 37
            A quantitative limit, protective duties, criminal cases against lobbyists of foreign companies (we have it as a bribe). Cruel, unfair, yes. Only Boeing in 2016 allocated $ 2 million. on lobbying interests in the Russian Federation.
            1. 0
              22 January 2020 13: 03
              How, after these barrage measures, will air transportation tariffs change? And which way? Only benefits and protection of airlines operating our equipment can help here.
              1. +2
                22 January 2020 18: 34
                Airlines on regional lines and so on receive money from the state.
          2. 0
            24 January 2020 22: 34
            Only product quality and service. No other way. AvtoVAZ is an example of this.
      3. +2
        22 January 2020 11: 32
        Demand by demand and there will be enough capacity to provide this demand?
        1. +2
          22 January 2020 12: 08
          Quote: BARKAS
          Demand by demand and there will be enough capacity to provide this demand?

          If there is demand, capacity needs to be developed.
      4. +1
        22 January 2020 12: 23
        if you throw out all the Boeing then the demand will be
        1. +2
          22 January 2020 15: 24
          They will leave if they offer better! wink
          1. +1
            22 January 2020 15: 39
            yourself never))) only throw
            1. -1
              22 January 2020 15: 44
              This is a citizen, and you buy a boot for quality and beauty, or because they are from the United States or France? wink
              1. +1
                22 January 2020 15: 59
                I choose a brand, the quality is often even not very good from France, 90% Turkey or China, but planes can be banned from buying from abroad, for example, to increase duties
                1. +3
                  22 January 2020 16: 14
                  Nastya was beaten with a joke metaphor. smile France never knew how to make good shoes! Italians yes, ali only for continental Europe and for moderate climate. For northern Europe and Rusiu, no Italian is already doing a sufficient quality. etc...... smile It’s possible, they will file duties, or it’s counter-productive (all prohibitions are in the HEAD CONTRA PRODUCT) Lushche how they do it STANDARDIMA AND GUEST! They have plundered the system for centuries without competition, they must destroy the system, not the Borits, and the system will follow! wink
                  1. +2
                    23 January 2020 07: 44
                    What country do you live in?
                    1. +2
                      23 January 2020 08: 08
                      Quote: Nastia Makarova
                      What country do you live in?

                      He lives in Serbia.
      5. +9
        22 January 2020 13: 04
        Quote: Sancho_SP
        Modern Russia has no demand to load aircraft ...

        Sorry, but I do not agree with you: what does it mean there is no demand? Does a country of this size have no demand for a good plane? How many airliners are needed: there will be planes, it will be possible to get rid of Western equipment, these are several hundred cars and replace them for more than one year of operation. There will be saturation of your market, you can see how it is organized and reformat it. You need to work for the country and yourself beloved.
        I also agree with
        Quote: rocket757
        it’s not from scratch that everything will have to start ... maybe structural changes everywhere to carry out the time has come.
        1. +3
          22 January 2020 15: 28
          [quoteA country of this size has no demand for a good plane?] [/ quote]
          A country of this size AIR MASTERS TRANSPORT IMPORTANT !!! Otherwise, transport begins to bat a brake on the development of the country! wink We need a lot of planes and more!
        2. -1
          22 January 2020 19: 26
          "A few hundred cars" Airbus makes in a year. And sells all over the world. This is mass production.

          If we set the task to fill the fleet, the Russian airline will say over 20 years (so that it would be renewed at the same production rate) - no more than 50 cars should be produced per year.

          With such a pace of production (and this is already a very optimistic figure), we will not be able to make airplanes cheaper and better. Simply, development costs in the price of each side will make up a much larger share.

          Joint projects with China can more or less extend, but in such projects we will most likely buy purely Chinese cars in 10 years.
          1. +3
            22 January 2020 20: 27
            Quote: Sancho_SP
            "A few hundred cars" Airbus makes in a year. And sells all over the world. This is mass production.

            To satisfy the needs of the Russian Federation alone, it makes no sense to restrain the pace of production, the pace of development of air transportation will allow to absorb any reasonable number of aircraft per year. Now they promise 70 pieces a year, this is not much, Russia will digest easily. It is necessary to organize the process, I hope there is someone and enough will.
            If you want to purchase 737 or А320 - stand in line for several years, the MS will be in production.
            How did Choi sing ...
        3. -1
          24 January 2020 22: 38
          Quote: Pete Mitchell
          Does a country of this size have no demand for a good plane?

          There is demand, there is no offer. Plus, somehow, foreign leasing companies need to vparit domestic product, and this will also be difficult.
          1. +1
            25 January 2020 01: 16
            The plane will be anyway, you look there and local leasing companies will catch up, followed by insurers and the process will go a little. Of course, I would like to see Russian aviation on Russian planes faster, but as is
            1. +1
              26 January 2020 23: 35
              Why did I say about foreign lessors wassat Our airlines will not take planes with Russian registration. Horse taxes, and monstrous bureaucracy.
              And if it goes through domestic leasing companies, then there will be a price like an intergalactic starship.
              1. +2
                27 January 2020 00: 00
                I would like to hope that responsible people understand that the development of civil aviation depends not only on the availability of airplanes: if you want to have your own civil aviation, you need to pull up all the related directions. Otherwise, moving bourgeois planes will fail even on the domestic market; falling out of the cage of leaders will cost the destruction of its production base, design school .... Either the state intervenes with all of its administrative apparatus, or after a decade will remain to remember the glorious times
      6. +4
        22 January 2020 13: 12
        Quote: Sancho_SP
        Modern Russia has no demand to load aircraft construction.

        Doesn’t civil aviation exist in Russia? belay
      7. +2
        22 January 2020 17: 33
        Quote: Sancho_SP
        Modern Russia has no demand to load aircraft

        Is it in Russia that, with its distances, there is no demand for air transportation? The question is only to approach. Of course, it’s easier to do nothing, but to buy a used one abroad. They are only happy there. For some reason, in the vast majority of countries, there are laws on the priority of their own producer over foreign ones, but not in Russia. I will not say anything about cars, I still have to pull it up, But Russian planes are no worse than foreign ones. And taking into account the fact that they are imprisoned for the Russian infrastructure, then the operation will be cheaper. The main thing is not to sit still.
        1. -3
          22 January 2020 19: 30
          Oddly enough, yes. Aircraft carry not distances, but solvent passengers. But with this we do not really.

          True, buying your own is more profitable than foreign at any price. But, on the contrary, in the absence of competition (or its restriction), we can forever lag behind.

          The infrastructure of the Russian Federation is already imprisoned for Boeing and Airbus. Late. Our new aircraft will be manufactured, certified and fly according to "their" rules in any case.
          1. +3
            22 January 2020 20: 29
            Quote: Sancho_SP
            The infrastructure of the Russian Federation is already imprisoned for Boeing and Airbus

            A state to clarify? What infrastructure
            1. -3
              23 January 2020 15: 57
              Quote: Pete Mitchell
              A state to clarify? What infrastructure

              Yes, at least that the documentation is in Russian. Oils, spare parts, specialized fluids, test benches, specialists, all their own, so to speak native. This is so offhand, without going deep. Few?
              1. +1
                23 January 2020 16: 19
                Do not take it for work, correct me: it was about the infrastructure already sharpened for boeing & airbus, and this will complicate the commissioning of the MS. Well, at least I understood that and it surprised me: what is the problem of developing infrastructure on its territory? When are all assembly lines close by? Consumables shouldn't be a problem at all. There is no need to translate the documentation, which is not very cheap. Here is the development of the spare parts supply system - this is really a task, there are more negative examples than good ones.
                1. +1
                  23 January 2020 16: 30
                  I mean, mine is always cheaper and more profitable. Factor of. Russia, one of the few countries that is capable of this. How to increase the capitalization of Western companies.
                  1. +2
                    23 January 2020 16: 45
                    I completely agree with you: the Russian Federation should use its aircraft and engines, and then the entire infrastructure will be tightened. Invested money will pay off: the development of technology, jobs, taxes and other and other .... Own territory for their own in the first place. When Russian civil aviation can cope with the demand at home, you can look around
        2. -2
          22 January 2020 19: 49
          Quote: orionvitt
          But Russian planes are no worse than foreign ones.

          Yes? Really?
          And can you name their brands?
          Just do not call the SSJ100, the degree of its Russian localization is only 30%.
          Yes, and MS-21 promise only 50%.
          1. 0
            22 January 2020 21: 36
            Can you name the degree of localization of the Boeing or Airbus? I'll tell you, the world is on a string, aircraft manufacturers. I'm not even talking about the others who pick up the crumbs from the "master's table". There is no localization at all.
      8. +1
        24 January 2020 08: 26
        Therefore, the state should finance promising and necessary developments for the country.
        And leave the "invisible hand of the market" for consumer goods at best.
  4. +12
    22 January 2020 10: 55
    News that really pleases the soul! :) Keep it up !!! good drinks
  5. +1
    22 January 2020 10: 56
    Have they already been skated on ILs?
    1. +8
      22 January 2020 11: 42
      Back in 16, if memory serves, 76 flew with PD-14.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  6. +7
    22 January 2020 10: 56
    Well, as they say with God, things have gone ..
  7. +11
    22 January 2020 11: 05
    I think when the actual actual characteristics of the engine (and the aircraft) become known, our brothers in the EU will definitely come up with changes in the standards for aircraft, excluding the possibility of the MS-21 flying over their territory. For example, they will make the permissible engine noise level a couple of decibels lower, published by PD 14. This has been done more than once, and what I wrote here is not my invention.
    1. +7
      22 January 2020 11: 15
      Under normal power (our power) there will always be a cunning nut on their bolt. And for starters, this and other sides and your market would be saturated, to replace the western.
    2. +7
      22 January 2020 11: 15
      Quote: Victor March 47
      I think when the actual actual characteristics of the engine (and the aircraft) become known, our brothers in the EU will definitely come up with changes in the standards for aircraft, excluding the possibility of the MS-21 flying over their territory. For example, they will make the permissible engine noise level a couple of decibels lower, published by PD 14. This has been done more than once, and what I wrote here is not my invention.

      And ours can’t find any aphids forbidden in the tires of airbuses ...?
    3. +1
      22 January 2020 11: 17
      Quote: Victor March 47
      our brothers in the EU will definitely come up with changes in aircraft standards

      100% will be so !!!!
      1. +2
        22 January 2020 12: 50
        Well then, SHARPLY Airbus will not comme il faut over Russia. Until 1991, our Tupolevs and Ilyushins flew as part of Aeroflot around the world and no one was tweeting.
        1. +4
          22 January 2020 12: 58
          There are many options for how to calm them down and a reasonable compromise will be found.
        2. -2
          22 January 2020 19: 54
          Quote: PROXOR
          Until 1991, our Tupolevs and Ilyushins flew as part of Aeroflot around the world and no one was tweeting.

          Until 1991, no one considered the costs of their operation. And when they began to count, Tu and Ily immediately stretched in orderly rows to the scrap. To its deserved place.
          1. +2
            23 January 2020 10: 33
            You apparently did not catch my promise. I wrote about 1991, not by the parameter, the cost of transporting one passenger, but by the fact that the engines on the Tu-154, Il-62 and Il-86 did not differ in reduced environmental friendliness and noise. And no one was drinking in Geyrop about noisy Russian airplanes.
            1. 0
              24 January 2020 22: 48
              Then Europe itself flew on the JT3C, but it was half a century ago !!
              Like this:

              Now they’re not allowed to fly anywhere.
              1. 0
                25 January 2020 01: 23
                You write now heresy. If you take at least 1990, then foreign companies already had a Boeing 747 and 767. The airbus had an A310 and an A320.
      2. +4
        22 January 2020 15: 55
        They came up with a tricky system for INFORMAL COMPETITION, one of these systems eats STANDARDI AIR CERTIFICATION !!! There are many ways that Boritsa can oppose it, because GOST must beat the FIRST on the internal market, and on the international standard of their standards. Then, before the OUN, it will raise the question of INFORMAL COMPETITION in international trade.! It is possible, and with the Chinese, to draw up a certification system for inter-two-seat aircraft construction for ASIU with 2-3 bolts for their aircraft, and many other ways can. There is no need to wait for Odra одatsia, but to attack against their cunning systems of stewing home production! ATTACK HIMSELF THE BEST DEFENSE! ASIA YOURSELF IMPORTANT PLANE OF PLANES AND YOURSELF AND CURRENTLY WILL BE IN THE FUTURE! You can crush them in different ways only if you want to eat! ;)
        wink
        1. +2
          22 January 2020 15: 58
          For this it is necessary and in a normal, high-quality production of aircraft, in sufficient quantities!
          1. +1
            22 January 2020 16: 18
            And the advanced standards of modern aircraft construction must be DECORATED IN ASIA, but there is no agreement on their stand! wink
    4. 0
      22 January 2020 11: 18
      Quote: Victor March 47
      our brothers in the EU are sure to come up with changes to the standards for aircraft, excluding the possibility of MS-21 flying over their territory.

      Only expect dirty tricks from these "brothers".
    5. +1
      22 January 2020 19: 52
      Quote: Victor March 47
      For example, they will make the permissible engine noise level a couple of decibels lower, published by PD 14. This has been done more than once, and what I wrote here is not my invention.

      Engines must be able to do. Just business.
      But there have always been problems with this in the USSR and Russia. There were NEVER such engines. And PD-14 is also still unknown how they will show themselves.
    6. +4
      22 January 2020 20: 59
      Quote: Victor March 47
      I think when the actual actual characteristics of the engine (and the aircraft) become known, our brothers in the EU will definitely come up with changes in the standards for aircraft, excluding the possibility of the MS-21 flying over their territory. For example, they will make the permissible engine noise level a couple of decibels lower, published by PD 14. This has been done more than once, and what I wrote here is not my invention.

      in this case we have something to answer !! at least block our airspace with them !! wink
  8. +6
    22 January 2020 11: 08
    I hope everything will be ok with the service and spare parts, and not like one well-known airplane ...
  9. +2
    22 January 2020 11: 11
    I rejoice and do not believe together ...
    1. +4
      22 January 2020 21: 00
      Quote: arhitroll
      I rejoice and do not believe together ...

      vidos spices for you done !! wassat drinks
  10. +5
    22 January 2020 11: 12
    At least one good news this morning. Success to peasants, it’s high time to fly on your own!
  11. +2
    22 January 2020 11: 22
    It is strange that for the SGS are not equipped with two types of turbojet engines.
  12. +5
    22 January 2020 11: 33
    Potentially, the MC-21 has a good market with Boeing’s problems, including the PD-14.
    1. -3
      22 January 2020 19: 58
      Quote: Pavel57
      Potentially, the MC-21 has a good market with Boeing’s problems, including the PD-14.

      As it were, MS-21-300 yes. But, I think, they will replace the 321st Airbas.
  13. +4
    22 January 2020 11: 40
    Control must be strengthened many times over. So that "friends" do not arrange an accident on the first flight. For them, this is the most convenient time to skip the idea itself.
  14. 0
    22 January 2020 12: 54
    I hope they will be better than on the SJ-100
  15. +3
    22 January 2020 12: 56
    The first all-Russian turbofan engine for civil aviation since the 1980s, designed to meet international standards and requirements.


    Wait, now only withstand criticism and as they say - there is no limit to improvement.
  16. +2
    22 January 2020 12: 59
    "partners" will impose sanctions on the engine, find a reason to block
    MC-21 road.

    And yet, I read about the planned volumes of engine production - somehow I was not impressed.

    Will they be able to produce enough engines for the MC21?
    After all, it is quite possible that they will need more than planned,
    for it is not a fact that tomorrow the deliveries of the PW1400G will not be closed.

    We are waiting for PD-7 for Superjet 100!
    1. +1
      22 January 2020 13: 34
      Quote: "Will they be able to produce enough engines for the MC21?"
      After all, it is quite possible that they will need more than planned,
      for it is not a fact that tomorrow the deliveries of PW1400G will not be closed. "
      Of course, the "partners" will be able to make a mess, but it is time for us to produce our own engines, because there are projects of aircraft under development in the queue for our engines.
      Demand will increase, so it will be necessary to increase output ...
      As for international certification, don’t worry about it, the engines are certified according to the list of technical and environmental requirements, so I hope it’s impossible to spoil it here, unless we do it ourselves, but everything seems to go fine here, how many prototypes have already been tested and driven .
      1. -1
        23 January 2020 23: 46
        Quote: Romanenko
        engines are certified according to the list of technical and environmental requirements

        And who sets these requirements? What should they slightly correct them so that our engine does not reach them?
        As the saying goes - "If a gentleman cannot win by the rules, then he changes the rules."
        1. 0
          24 January 2020 08: 57
          Well, this is unlikely, then you will have to select certificates from Pratt and Wittney, our engines are made taking into account the requirements for international certification. So your fears most likely will not be justified smile
  17. +3
    22 January 2020 13: 28
    Well, finally, the engines went to the airplanes, it's time it's time.
    Bon Voyage!!!
    In general, this is a historic event, maybe even abruptly than a change of government, we have a lot of officials, but aviation engines ....
  18. -1
    22 January 2020 13: 45
    Quote: Romanenko
    As for international certification, don’t worry about it, the engines are certified according to the list of technical and environmental requirements, so I hope it’s impossible to spoil it here, unless we do it ourselves, but everything seems to go fine here, how many prototypes have already been tested and driven .

    They’ll think that some kind of technology stuck high-like-likes - something already happened,
    just in relation to the person involved in the development of PD14.
  19. -1
    22 January 2020 13: 58
    That is:
    In Italy, detained the top manager of the PD-14 engine development company
    https://perm.aif.ru/society/incident/v_italii_zaderzhali_top-menedzhera_kompanii-razrabotchika_dvigatelya_pd-14

    The top manager of the company "ODK", which is engaged in the development and manufacture of the PD-14 engine, was detained in Italy. This was reported by the company "Rifey" with reference to the news agency "Fontanka.ru". The business development directors of the United Engine Corporation (UEC) Alexander Korshunov was detained at the request of the American side, who suspected him of industrial espionage.
    ...
    Russian President Vladimir Putin commented on the detention at the Eastern Economic Forum.

    “Now, American friends claim that some Americans went to work in this company. Something was stolen there. Stolen - let them deal with them. We don’t need anything. Everything is done with our own hands and the head of specialists. Consultations, joint work on modern products is a natural, open, public work. I believe that in this case we are dealing with attempts of unfair competition, ”the president is confident.
  20. +1
    22 January 2020 14: 19
    Yes, and then the name must be changed from PD 14. Since the first two serial went to the wing. Something like PM 14. Perm motor 14 tons of traction.))
    In general, I like the abbreviation PM.
  21. -2
    22 January 2020 14: 58
    Quote: NordUral
    Under normal power (our power) there will always be a cunning nut on their bolt. And for starters, this and other sides and your market would be saturated, to replace the western.

    You are mistaken. Non-certified aircraft according to THEIR standards, flying even over our territory, they can easily cut off the supply of what we need. Do you really think that you can talk with them honestly. and count on honest action? Remember at least the words of this schizophrenic from the penguin that he loves Syrian oil, and therefore ....
  22. -2
    22 January 2020 15: 20
    Quote: Lagging Neutron
    Yes, and then the name must be changed from PD 14. Since the first two serial went to the wing. Something like PM 14. Perm motor 14 tons of traction.))
    In general, I like the abbreviation PM.

    Yes, it’s not to marry and change your name. What nonsense. Tons of papers, developed glands, millions of points of instructions, programs and test methods, technical schedules, the drawings themselves, contracts, financial documents in which this name appears.
    And suddenly, from somewhere, how the hell out of the snuffbox pops up it is not known what .... An illegitimate monster with an absent creation story. Yes, you, my friend, are completely unaware. Admire how they are cast out in the names of all sorts of modernizations. Assign dozens of different indexes to the old name. Why, one asks? But just to save the story. Preservation of the LEGAL, and, if the CRIMINAL responsibility of the old developers in the new modifications. To poke and squeeze the scammer. Otherwise, bribes are smooth from them. What do they have to do with your XXXXX?
  23. +1
    22 January 2020 15: 43
    According to the release of the United Engine Corporation (UEC), PD-14 is the first completely Russian turbofan engine for civil aviation since the 1980s.
    95%, according to some experts) But also not bad
  24. -1
    22 January 2020 17: 18
    The main thing is that they do not turn out as Russian as modern cars of the Lada family ...
    1. 0
      22 January 2020 18: 12
      But what, there are engines not Russian?
      1. -1
        22 January 2020 18: 32
        there Russian property remains 25% .... even taxes do not go to the Russian Federation.
      2. 0
        22 January 2020 18: 52
        as for the production of this car, I’d better answer https://dvizhok.su/parts/myi-razobrali-lada-vesta-iz-chego-i-kak-ona-sdelana full alignment of the cogs). And you understand by ownership - claims to each other will begin with us, not like a controlling stake ... they won’t hear votes there)))
  25. -1
    22 January 2020 17: 22
    Quote: NEOZ
    about the main problem is the lack of population ...

    The main problem is the lack of money for this population.
    1. +5
      22 January 2020 21: 05
      Quote: Lena Petrova
      Quote: NEOZ
      about the main problem is the lack of population ...

      The main problem is the lack of money for this population.

      the main problem is the lack of brain in some writers !!! wink
      1. -1
        22 January 2020 22: 40
        Two-thirds of this population, according to polls, have no savings, so they cannot be potential users of air transport.
        1. +2
          22 January 2020 22: 53
          Everything is lost? laughing
          1. 0
            24 January 2020 09: 01
            Not lost, but significantly reduces passenger flow.
  26. -3
    22 January 2020 19: 45
    The first PD-14 engines for MS-21 delivered to Irkutsk Aircraft Plant

    After that, the localization of "Russian" aircraft will reach 50%.
    Already good, but we need to work further.
  27. +1
    22 January 2020 22: 03
    Well, thank God! good At last! Now I would wait for the first flights! drinks
  28. +1
    22 January 2020 22: 52
    This is after the PS, a really new engine and now the first two samples are ready to be put on the plane! We must wait for the test results!
  29. -5
    22 January 2020 23: 34
    Quote: arhitroll
    Quote: Victor March 47
    I think when the actual actual characteristics of the engine (and the aircraft) become known, our brothers in the EU will definitely come up with changes in the standards for aircraft, excluding the possibility of the MS-21 flying over their territory. For example, they will make the permissible engine noise level a couple of decibels lower, published by PD 14. This has been done more than once, and what I wrote here is not my invention.

    And ours can’t find any aphids forbidden in the tires of airbuses ...?

    They can. But it will be so inconspicuous for these airlines. There is a website with real-time tracking of aircraft flights. All over the world. Look at the number of tracks past Russia and inside our territory. We have a desert in comparison .... They will not even notice our tricks with the prohibitions of flying over us. http://www.flightradar24.com/

    1. +6
      23 January 2020 00: 58
      Quote: Victor March 47
      But it will be so inconspicuous for these airlines.

      so imperceptibly ??? what then they constantly whine about "royalties for flights over Russia" wassat

      https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4149044
      1. -1
        24 January 2020 22: 53
        Quote: Nikolai the Greek
        why then they constantly whine about "royalties for flights over Russia


        Because this wildness is utter. Nowhere is there such a requisite.
  30. -3
    23 January 2020 17: 34
    Quote: bullet
    Quote: PROXOR
    Until 1991, our Tupolevs and Ilyushins flew as part of Aeroflot around the world and no one was tweeting.

    Until 1991, no one considered the costs of their operation. And when they began to count, Tu and Ily immediately stretched in orderly rows to the scrap. To its deserved place.

    We got into a joke not because it is much worse in quality and profitability. Find a pair of identical and equal planes in MANY parameters. Quality incorporates hundreds of different numbers. And a generalized indicator can drag many well-known firms and models.
    Understand this, you would not write heresy. Dumbass.
    We got into a joke just because the parameters of NOISE (which is important, and decisive, you must think about it), was artificially drawn to the indicator, knocking our overboard. We ALWAYS had aviation, is and will be at the level and even higher. Competitor, you can fight him with ANY methods. As, for example, in sports.
    1. 0
      24 January 2020 22: 57
      Quote: Victor March 47
      We got into a joke just because the parameters of NOISE (which is important and decisive, you must think

      Have you lived in the airport area? I've been working in the area of ​​Dolgoprudny. When the IL-86 took off at Sheremetyevo, they kept windows in my room. And this is not so close.
  31. -3
    23 January 2020 17: 37
    Quote: Nikolai Grek
    Quote: Victor March 47
    But it will be so inconspicuous for these airlines.

    so imperceptibly ??? what then they constantly whine about "royalties for flights over Russia" wassat

    https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4149044

    But because poverty is elusive. Counts a penny. And caught by the scope of competition. And there - all means are good. Look at the picture. Will explain a lot.
  32. Eug
    0
    24 January 2020 09: 44
    Well done, quietly and without unnecessary PR, they are doing business ... success!
    1. 0
      24 January 2020 22: 58
      Only very long. Extremely long time.
  33. 0
    24 January 2020 10: 50
    Quote: NEOZ
    then give examples of countries and its leader (with a population of up to 150 million people) that independently produces: ships of the ocean zone, submarines, fighters, bombers, narrow / wide / fuselage / passenger / cargo planes and engines for them, tanks and other armored combat vehicles . and other high-tech products.
    give examples of such countries.

    France, Great Britain - there are no sensible leaders, but they produce all of the above.
  34. -3
    25 January 2020 09: 27
    Quote: rzzz
    Quote: Victor March 47
    We got into a joke just because the parameters of NOISE (which is important and decisive, you must think

    Have you lived in the airport area? I've been working in the area of ​​Dolgoprudny. When the IL-86 took off at Sheremetyevo, they kept windows in my room. And this is not so close.

    When competitors run ahead, ahead of their neighbors, making products better, cheaper, more reliable, one thing. But when they use a separate advantage as a bandwagon for the rest, this is the behavior of a bastard.
    Quality indicators are hundreds of different numbers. And there is not a single iron that has ALL these numbers better than other products. You will definitely win some things, but you will lose others. And if, for example, on the basis that your engine is shorter than others by a couple of tens of millimeters, prohibit the operation of all the others- .... Do not live in the airport area. Now it is possible in principle. Not only will the noise not interfere with you, but the possibility of falling on the plane's head will drastically decrease. In the USSR, you will be tied to a residence permit and a "free" apartment.
    Moreover, the routes and airports in Russia are like in the desert.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"