The new government of Russia: change of persons or change of course


Russian President Vladimir Putin has appointed members of the new government of Mikhail Mishustin. Many iconic figures of the former cabinet of Dmitry Medvedev were not included in it, but many new and relatively young managers. But do personnel shifts mean a change in the course of the Russian government?


The new government has almost completely updated the economic and social blocs. Thirteen ministers from Medvedev’s cabinet have lost their posts and among them are almost all those people whom Russian and foreign analysts predicted an early resignation. Changed and most of the deputy prime ministers responsible for various economic areas. In fact, the changes did not concern only the power block, in which only the Minister of Justice was replaced - instead of Alexander Konovalov, he became Konstantin Chuychenko (as media reports, Dmitry Medvedev’s classmate at Leningrad University).

The most radical shifts occurred in the economic bloc. And this is due to the fact that Vladimir Putin was very dissatisfied with the work of the previous cabinet on the implementation of national projects. As a result, Andrei Belousov, who had worked in the presidential administration for six years, put in charge of the economic area. He is 61 years old - in the new government he is clearly not one of the young cadres. At one time, Belousov was still an adviser on economic issues to Yevgeny Primakov, then he worked with Mikhail Fradkov and Mikhail Kasyanov. By the way, the new first deputy prime minister is the son of the Soviet economist Rem Belousov, who is called one of the authors of the famous Kosygin reform.


In 2018, Belousov proposed to take over profit of 14 billion rubles from the 513 largest companies in the commodity sector and to use the money to implement Putin’s decrees in May. But commodity companies, through their lobbyists, were able to thwart this initiative. However, the fact of Belousov’s similar position attracted attention.

A number of ministers were removed from the new government and met with mixed assessments in society. These are Veronika Skvortsova, Olga Vasilieva, Vladimir Medinsky, Vitaly Mutko, Maxim Topilin. For example, the unpopular pension reform is somehow associated with the latter. Thus, Putin went towards public opinion, satisfying the request of the Russians for a personnel update of the cabinet. But it is unlikely that such measures will lead to a real change or even a significant correction in the course of the Russian government.

So, those social measures that were voiced by Putin and which the new government has to implement are aimed at reducing the degree of public discontent, but on the whole they are more like buying votes.

Maternal capital for the first-born or payments to low-income parents up to the child’s 7th birthday is a good initiative aimed at actually improving the lives of the most vulnerable categories of Russians, but it indicates that the government will go along the path of paying social benefits instead of increasing salaries and pensions. Meanwhile, no separate benefits for families would be required if the parents of the children had decent income at the place of work.


The absence of changes in the power block and the Foreign Ministry indicates that, unlike domestic politics, Putin is very pleased. Shoigu and Lavrov are two “titans” on whom the rating of the Russian government is pretty much supported. Their president, of course, did not change. Indeed, no one, except Shoigu and Lavrov, from the members of the Medvedev government did not enjoy such authority among the population.

Russia's foreign policy will remain the same, but in the domestic, especially in the economy and social sphere, the new government will have to make efforts to find solutions that can improve the situation of citizens. And another direction is to implement projects of a national scale, which did not work out for the previous government.

But one does not have to expect any large-scale transformations from Mishustin’s cabinet: in his first speech, the new prime minister put an end to the hopes of the Russians for revising the pension reform. And the former chief tax specialist of the country will not go for the introduction of a progressive taxation scale.

It is important not to forget that the government in modern Russia is a technical body that, in any case, fulfills the tasks that the president and his entourage pose before him. Therefore, a change of faces does not mean a change in course.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

139 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. rocket757 22 January 2020 08: 10 New
    • 10
    • 7
    +3
    Okay, some face change ... is present. Let's see what happens next.
    1. Uncle lee 22 January 2020 08: 20 New
      • 29
      • 7
      +22
      a change of faces does not mean a change of course.
      And everything will go on the thumb ....
      1. novel66 22 January 2020 08: 25 New
        • 13
        • 4
        +9
        but ... without Mutko ... 100 grams for that! drinks
        1. Phil77 22 January 2020 08: 34 New
          • 19
          • 2
          +17
          Roman, hello! Mutko will head the state-owned company * House of the Russian Federation *, she is engaged in the search for investments and construction. The key word is * state *. Well, he's * a team member *, right! laughing
          1. lukewarm 22 January 2020 09: 38 New
            • 15
            • 1
            +14
            Yes. The very place for a "member". What is wrong with Dom.rf laughing if a chela with a beautiful surname Plutnik (the accounting chamber has questions for him, and the prosecutor's office is interested there) will be replaced by an equally outstanding type with a speaking surname Mutko? In general, after the party "Our Home Russia" (if anyone remembers), I have bad associations with this word: "Our house Russia russian house seleng. "Now here House.rf. So it’s good that they finally dispelled this misunderstanding. But the tradition of not giving offense to obtrusive ex kills hopes for a change for the better right here in the bud.
            1. Fan-fan 22 January 2020 12: 14 New
              • 11
              • 3
              +8
              kills hopes for a better change
              Indeed, if we, ordinary people are fired, then we ourselves are looking for a new job, and these nobles are simply transferred to another chair and even specially create a new office for them. And we are all happy - we fired the parasite, hurray!
              1. aybolyt678 22 January 2020 13: 38 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                Quote: Fan-Fan
                and these nobles are simply transplanted into another chair

                Undoubtedly! it is professional solidarity, such a tradition .. Each of them understands that he is next, and despite past grievances, this tradition will be supported.
                1. Tatyana 22 January 2020 14: 12 New
                  • 7
                  • 4
                  +3
                  Well done author Polonsky! I wrote it right!

                  Kudrinsky cadres - Siluanov and Nabiulina both headed the financial and economic bloc in the Russian Federation, and they head! Mishustin, only among the “friends” above will discipline from tax evasion hijacking and for the surviving people will quickly take a digital encoding order!

                  But the conceptual and ideological power in Russia, as it was the same, remains the same under Putin in essence - the MONETARY-MARKET!
                  At the same time, as they had in Russia the existing system of oligarchy dependent on the West / USA, so far we will have it. Most likely, capital from the Russian Federation will flow to the West both from the Russian oligarchs and from VIP officials themselves with foreign citizenship and foreign property, and so-called. "foreign" investors who own cheaply capital-assets of Russian strategic enterprises. It may just be that the number of such persons will narrow.

                  In general, on the old dress, the old cloth flounces were torn off and replaced with lace!
                  1. Tatyana 22 January 2020 14: 38 New
                    • 3
                    • 6
                    -3
                    In fact, professional economists and analysts - including Mikhail Khazin - divide the entire financial system in the world into 3 financial groups. Namely.

                    The first group is conventionally called the Rockefellers. It controls the financial system of the US Federal Reserve and works exclusively for the US economy. This is the USA. Israel. Iran.

                    The second group is the IMF, World Bank, WTO. This includes those who cannot move away from the global financial system. This includes Russia - the Russian Federation. They lead the Central Bank of Russia, the financial and economic bloc in the government of the Russian Federation. These people are practically deprived of their sources of income.

                    3rd group - conventionally called the "Rothschilds". They from percentages moved to the position of a money changer with a peg of gold. The operational base from London, they moved to Hong Kong.

                    The alignment of forces is as follows. The Rothschilds support Israel.
                    Rockefellers support Iran.
                    Axis Rome. Paris, Berlin - trying to make non-Atlantic Europe.
                    Brussels is located near Washington.
                    Merkel is located between the USA and Paris.

                    Against this background, one should also understand, financially and geopolitically, what is the current “restructuring” of Putin in the Russian Federation itself? And if it is, then what exactly? And between whom and by whom?
                  2. aybolyt678 22 January 2020 17: 36 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Quote: Tatiana
                    In general, on the old dress, the old cloth flounces were torn off and replaced with lace!

                    It all depends on fashion laughing If the fashion (public request for changes) gains strength, you will have to buy a new dress
              2. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. novel66 22 January 2020 10: 10 New
            • 5
            • 1
            +4
            my regards! I know that does not sink lol
        2. SRC P-15 22 January 2020 08: 34 New
          • 8
          • 1
          +7
          Quote: novel xnumx
          but ... without Mutko ... 100 grams for that!

          Nothing, now he will learn English and again in battle ... yes
          There are few comments, many seem to have burned out while waiting for this news.
          1. novel66 22 January 2020 10: 09 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            I’m really getting tense when he starts learning Chinese lol
          2. Krasnoyarsk 22 January 2020 11: 23 New
            • 7
            • 5
            +2
            Quote: SRC P-15
            There are few comments

            What can I say? I spoke about this earlier, and my words exactly coincided with the words of Ilya Polonsky. There is no great mind to come to this conclusion.
            If the prime minister was an independent figure independent of the president, one could hope that - a new broom sweeps in a new way. But since the broomstick is in the hands of the old janitor, it is not necessary to hope that it will be revenge in a new way. Is that a little better than the old.
            But here there is one important nuance - for whom is it better? For the "elite" or for the people, will it be better than revenge?
        3. Nyrobsky 22 January 2020 09: 26 New
          • 4
          • 1
          +3
          Quote: novel xnumx
          but ... without Mutko ... 100 grams for that! drinks

          stop If you start the day with 100 grams at 08h.25 min. that is, a certain risk of not noticing the onset of the evening yes But take 100 grams in the evening, on this occasion, the most drinks
          1. novel66 22 January 2020 10: 07 New
            • 6
            • 2
            +4
            So, in the evening how many reasons will accumulate !!! not overpower ...
      2. rocket757 22 January 2020 08: 51 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        a change of faces does not mean a change of course.
        And everything will go on the thumb ....

        It will very likely be so ... but, as always, hope dies last, if anyone has it ..
      3. Svarog 22 January 2020 08: 53 New
        • 16
        • 7
        +9
        It is important not to forget that the government in modern Russia is a technical body that, in any case, fulfills the tasks that the president and his entourage pose before him. Therefore, a change of faces does not mean a change in course.

        Everything is correct, you need to change the face and surroundings.
        1. rocket757 22 January 2020 08: 57 New
          • 16
          • 2
          +14
          Quote: Svarog
          Everything is correct, you need to change the face and surroundings.

          It’s necessary .... I don’t even want to list what is needed.
          The system is the power of the rich. That says it all.
          1. lukewarm 22 January 2020 09: 51 New
            • 10
            • 1
            +9
            I agree about the system. By and large, what is happening is redecorating. In general, no one was counting on anything else. Some predicted that it would be so. All the unpopular things will be done by the hands of these outright bastards, then they’ll show them off with a hat (in general, they replaced them and didn’t even threaten with a finger. But how else? Have you always expressed satisfaction with the work of the government! Have you been deceiving yourself?) by removing frankly colonial articles. The ban on dual citizenship and residence permits - this went to the URA. Well, pensions not lower than the subsistence level in the Constitution are not bad. Children's benefits and maternity capital for the first child are great. It is another matter to promise, vote and accept. So that later someone would say: "There is no money, but you stay here." We will see who and how and at whose expense will do this. I am afraid that ours is with you, for the prime minister is the former head of the Federal Tax Service. He will rip off three skins. With whom? He has already said that there will be no progressive taxation for the rich. That is, the mat capital and benefits to be thrown to us with you.
            1. rocket757 22 January 2020 10: 24 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Quote: unwillingly
              then they will give a show cap (in general, they replaced and did not even threaten with a finger. But how else?

              I wonder what hat they will be given? Rabbit or beaver?
              Quote: unwillingly
              It is another matter to promise, vote and accept.

              We'll see ... without fanaticism and unnecessary expectations, we will get fewer disappointments in the future.
              Quote: unwillingly
              That is, the mat capital and benefits to be thrown to us with you.

              "Father Native" said that the bins are filled with hard work ... of the previous government! That's what it says! They are hard workers there, and then with blood they ensure the well-being of everyone and everything!
              Somehow it seemed to me ... in short, neighing, oh hold me seven.
        2. SOVIET UNION 2 22 January 2020 09: 34 New
          • 3
          • 4
          -1
          Everything is correct, you need to change the face and surroundings.
          Well, the face and surroundings change. In vain have Medvedev been given a new position? Nobody thinks that it can be higher than the presidency? What does Alice say to the question Who owns the Russian Federation? They can change the constitution and make the term of the president 4 years. The question is, who will command the parade?
          1. Svarog 22 January 2020 09: 36 New
            • 21
            • 8
            +13
            Quote: SOVIET UNION 2
            Well, the face and surroundings change.

            You need to change the main person and his environment .. Medvedev, Mishutin and others are the executors of the will of the environment and the person.
            1. SOVIET UNION 2 22 January 2020 09: 37 New
              • 6
              • 3
              +3
              And who knows who our main person is in fact?
              1. Ross xnumx 22 January 2020 10: 39 New
                • 4
                • 3
                +1
                Quote: SOVIET UNION 2
                And who knows who our main person is in fact?

                In fact, the main person in the country is the people. But he, by the simplicity of his soul, thinks that some kind uncle will come and do everything for him: he will choose, vote, change, protest ...
                Here they expressed the idea that the authorities in Moscow do not care about the Far East ... Yes, they do not care about anything other than the situation in Moscow. There, at the place of her work, she still somehow puffed up ...
                Once again, to consolidate:
                1. qQQQ 22 January 2020 10: 45 New
                  • 3
                  • 3
                  0
                  Quote: ROSS 42
                  In fact, the main person in the country is the people.

                  No, this is legally the main person in the country, the people, but in fact we can only guess, I personally assume that the big oligarchs.
                  1. Fan-fan 22 January 2020 12: 27 New
                    • 2
                    • 4
                    -2
                    Guys, what are you doing? The main person is the guarantor, if he wants to press any oligarch, he pressed Hodora at the time, so that everyone "dances" to his tune.
                    1. qQQQ 22 January 2020 16: 44 New
                      • 0
                      • 1
                      -1
                      Quote: Fan-Fan
                      The main person is the guarantor

                      We are all dependent on someone, no exception, as he is. Landing a hodor, he simply pushed everyone else a bit. All politics and affairs over the past ten years confirms that all the same, in fact, we have an oligarchy in power.
        3. solzh 22 January 2020 11: 18 New
          • 4
          • 4
          0
          Quote: Svarog
          Everything is correct, you need to change the face and surroundings.

          Absolutely right. Once again, I want to emphasize and urge all those who have doubts and those who do not go to the polls because they think "everything is settled and there is no sense", go to the polls and vote for their candidates (preferably for the Communists repeat ) Together we will win!
      4. knn54 22 January 2020 09: 45 New
        • 7
        • 2
        +5
        The appointment of "effective publican" as prime minister speaks volumes.
        "Crush" will be in full. And WHO, LOOK.
    2. YOUR 22 January 2020 08: 30 New
      • 11
      • 4
      +7
      Judging by the first statements of Mishustin, the change of persons. No more.
      1. SRC P-15 22 January 2020 08: 47 New
        • 5
        • 2
        +3
        Quote: YOUR
        Judging by the first statements of Mishustin, the change of persons. No more.

        And now it’s not worth waiting for anything else from the government. "Cow at launch - milk is not coming soon!" stop
        1. rocket757 22 January 2020 08: 53 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Wait and see. There are no other options, but is there anyway, a question, questions!
        2. Mordvin 3 22 January 2020 09: 01 New
          • 8
          • 4
          +4
          Quote: SRC P-15
          "Cow at launch - milk is not coming soon!"

          That is, if earlier Siluyanov offered the population to pay a communal apartment six months in advance, now he will offer a year in advance? belay And I remember Golikova promised a thousand per month to add to her pension. laughing
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. Mordvin 3 22 January 2020 09: 15 New
              • 2
              • 4
              -2
              Quote: SRC P-15
              But by the way, Siluanov was still demoted.

              Now no one will distract him from finances. The minister will sing romances about finances.
              Quote: SRC P-15
              Golikov was left apparently because she loves to tell fairy tales.

              She was misunderstood. crying
          2. SRC P-15 22 January 2020 09: 18 New
            • 4
            • 3
            +1
            Quote: mordvin xnumx
            That is, if earlier Siluyanov offered the population to pay a communal apartment six months in advance, now he will offer a year in advance? And I remember Golikova promised a thousand per month to add to her pension.

            I hope Siluanov will descend from heaven to earth - it seems that for this Mishustin was placed. Well, Golikova loves to tell fairy tales, so she was left. It hurts us people love fairy tales. yes
          3. Flatter 22 January 2020 14: 00 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            There is no cheat sheet voiced: fellow
          4. for
            for 23 January 2020 17: 21 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            Quote: mordvin xnumx
            And I remember Golikova promised a thousand per month to add to her pension.

            At least at 5, prices will rise much more increase. At what they add one (pensioners, workers, employees, security officials), and prices are rising for everyone.
        3. lukewarm 22 January 2020 11: 05 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Quote: SRC P-15
          from the government now wait and not worth it.

          I am afraid that not only now. But in general. Perhaps the system will work more efficiently. Is it in our favor? He didn’t have time to rejoice for teachers, mothers and others, as he thought: where will you get the money from? Can you really shake the super-profits of the “national treasures” and top managers? Duck said the new prime minister: there will be no progressive scale. That is, I think that other citizens will be offered to chip in maternity capital in the form of new taxes.
      2. SOVIET UNION 2 22 January 2020 09: 53 New
        • 11
        • 5
        +6
        Judging by the sensations, unpopular reforms are being prepared. Mishustin is a tax specialist. And it may well fulfill the command to reform the tax system, and then it will be replaced as if due to unpopularity. Confirmation of economic growth is an increase in tax collection. Do you think they have already collected everything? You are mistaken! There are still reserves! Plato toll can be raised to a total toll on all vehicles. VAT raised. In line income up to 16%. Introduced a recycling fee for cars and in January 10% for bicycles. Tax on self-employed or actually per capita tax on persons of working age. Overhaul tax. And is that the limit? No. You can introduce a tax on the disposal of electronics, packaging, furniture, building materials, road and pedestrian pavement, transfer from card to card (not including transfer fees), tax on the disposal of rain and melt water (it’s like they pollute water bodies), an environmental tax on extinguishing fires and flood management. Do you think this is fantastic?
        1. Golovan Jack 22 January 2020 10: 04 New
          • 7
          • 17
          -10
          Quote: SOVIET UNION 2
          Do you think this is fantastic?

          For some reason, I think it just arrived fresh training manual request
          1. SOVIET UNION 2 22 January 2020 10: 19 New
            • 5
            • 4
            +1
            For some reason, I think it just arrived fresh training manual
            For Mishustin or from Mishustin? lol The plan is being implemented!
            1. Golovan Jack 22 January 2020 10: 51 New
              • 4
              • 16
              -12
              Quote: SOVIET UNION 2
              For Mishustin or from Mishustin?

              For the "Soviet Union" and Co. From whom - I do not know.

              Quote: SOVIET UNION 2
              The plan is being implemented!

              You probably have a good plan bully
        2. YOUR 22 January 2020 10: 27 New
          • 7
          • 4
          +3
          Quote: SOVIET UNION 2
          Toll plato

          This is almost a private shop, it is classified how it is divided between Rotenberg Jr. and the budget and whether it is divided. The new introduction is the chipization of all Russia, some kind of organization called the “Honest Sign” is generally not clear to whom it belongs, but they mark all products. In whose pocket billions will float. Or they forced all IPs to buy new cash desks, for which it is not yet clear, but again, we all pay billions to where, because private traders increase the cost of goods.
          Etc. not explicit methods pumping the last cents.
          1. Golovan Jack 22 January 2020 10: 57 New
            • 5
            • 15
            -10
            Quote: YOUR
            forced all IPs to buy new cash desks, for which it is not yet clear

            When and which ones? You have the date and brand of the box office, and from me - an explanation of "why." Are you changing?
            1. YOUR 22 January 2020 10: 59 New
              • 5
              • 4
              +1
              Why do I know without you
              1. Golovan Jack 22 January 2020 11: 04 New
                • 4
                • 12
                -8
                Quote: YOUR
                forced all SPs to buy new cash desks, for which it is not yet clear

                Quote: YOUR
                Why do I know without you

                You really ... decide for yourself, or something ... just next to me is a specialist on "zebras", scanners, cash registers and other hardware. I can ask him, "what and why." Is free wink
                1. YOUR 22 January 2020 13: 02 New
                  • 3
                  • 4
                  -1
                  Here he and take an interest in how much each cash desk costs and why they are needed in village shops. For one, let him tell you how much this will increase the price of goods.
                  1. AU Ivanov. 22 January 2020 13: 07 New
                    • 3
                    • 4
                    -1
                    For what? Well, at least so that you could pay by bank transfer. By card or via Google Pay. So that taxable profits are not concealed by the owner of the outlet.
                    1. YOUR 22 January 2020 13: 26 New
                      • 3
                      • 2
                      +1
                      You have a bad adviser. An online cash desk is not needed to purchase goods by bank transfer, for this you need a bank mobile terminal
                  2. Golovan Jack 22 January 2020 13: 40 New
                    • 3
                    • 9
                    -6
                    Quote: YOUR
                    Here he has an interest

                    Man, lower the heat. And then I'll send you somewhere too wink

                    New "(with old holes, stories exactly more than a year already) ticket offices differ from old ones in that the data for each broken check is faithfully sent to the tax office. Why - you probably already understand that.

                    Quote: YOUR
                    why are they needed in village shops

                    And how, in fact, does a village store differ from a non-village store? For tax - they are exactly the same ...

                    Is something else incomprehensible?

                    Quote: YOUR
                    For one, let him tell you ...

                    Once again - try not to advise others ... otherwise you run into, um, thanks yes

                    * at the same time - together, by the way.
        3. lukewarm 22 January 2020 12: 06 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          I didn’t come up, Yunna Moritz
          [media = http: //www.owl.ru/morits/stih/off-records378.htm]
          Now and here - stick in the air tax,
          So that the oligarchs do not reach the bottom ©
      3. astepanov 22 January 2020 09: 55 New
        • 11
        • 4
        +7
        Quote: YOUR
        Judging by the first statements of Mishustin, the change of persons.

        And not only judging by the statements. A characteristic detail: not one of the statements, speeches or publications contains a word about what Putin or Mishustin specifically want. How much is it planned to increase the income of the population? How much will national income grow? What will be the growth rate? What will be the dynamics over the years? Without numbers, only declarations remain. And precisely because there have been no concrete voiced plans in recent years, Putin and Medvedev calmly declare that the government "did a good job."
        Finally, there are no articles either in the Constitution or in the Criminal Code specifying RESPONSIBILITY for government failure to perform its work. We have a substitution of concepts: responsibility is a list of competencies. They say: “I am responsible for ...”, and we should say “I answer (what?) - with my head, property, freedom ...”
        Complete irresponsibility generates futility in the work and circulation of asses in chairs.
      4. AA17 22 January 2020 13: 55 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Dear YOUR (Vladimir). Changing faces from one to another is like a rotation. I liked the joke about rotation:
        Grandson comes to grandfather:
        - Grandfather, what is “rotation of personnel”?
        Grandfather:
        - I'll show you now.
        He approaches a tree, and crows are sitting on it. He takes drin and how he gives it on wood. All crows break loose and fly. Five minutes later, the crows stop flying and again sit on a tree.
        Grandfather: - You see! Each crow is now sitting on a new branch, but essentially nothing has changed!
    3. olegfbi 22 January 2020 08: 50 New
      • 4
      • 10
      -6
      a change of faces does not mean a change of course.

      Globally, the course is understandable - Make Russia a Great Power, not in words but in deeds!
      So maybe the course is global and does not need to be changed? You can go to the same goal in one course, but with different stops, speed and tacks ...
      Here are just stops, speed and tacks mean different approaches to social policy, salaries and production!
      Time will tell.
      1. rocket757 22 January 2020 08: 59 New
        • 15
        • 2
        +13
        Quote: olegfbi
        Time will tell.

        Russia is PEOPLE who are the foundation, the support of everything. It will not be good for people, everything else will fall apart by itself.
      2. SOVIET UNION 2 22 January 2020 09: 58 New
        • 5
        • 5
        0
        Oh well! Have many villages, cities, districts, regions and territories already made great? Why do we have many subsidized regions? If capitalism is efficiency, where is it at the level of these entities? Or are all effective only in Moscow?
        1. AU Ivanov. 22 January 2020 13: 23 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          Under "effective" socialism, I remind you, entire republics were subsidized.
          1. SOVIET UNION 2 22 January 2020 16: 17 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            There are no republics today. Why subsidies? Or will we move on as with the republics (we will separate subsidized regions from Russia)? Stop feeding subsidized regions? Leave only the donor regions? They have already said about a single-industry town, it is unprofitable to maintain.
            According to the Izvestia newspaper, the number of monotowns receiving state support in the coming years will be reduced by power from 321 to 170 - that is, almost doubled. Corresponding changes will be reflected in a special list of single-industry towns approved by the Cabinet. They will cut it alive. It is reported by Rambler. Next: https://news.rambler.ru/other/43075883/?utm_content=news_media&utm_medium=read_more&utm_source=copylink
            1. AU Ivanov. 22 January 2020 16: 23 New
              • 1
              • 2
              -1
              All is correct. Single-industry towns were built to service a particular enterprise. The enterprise was gone, the city was gone. Example: Inta. After energy began to switch to gas fuel, coal became unclaimed. Vorkuta deposits are sufficient for metallurgy.
  2. Deniska999 22 January 2020 08: 13 New
    • 3
    • 6
    -3
    I think that all these persons are temporary, they will still change until 2024. All.
    1. Gardamir 22 January 2020 09: 10 New
      • 11
      • 6
      +5
      And what will happen in 2024? There will definitely not be an election.
      1. SOVIET UNION 2 22 January 2020 10: 00 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        Elections will be. And they will choose the one who needs it. The only question is, who will choose the right people?
      2. bk316 22 January 2020 13: 12 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        There will definitely not be an election.

        And after all, someone plus frank stupidity.
        Or are you just described and wanted to write a choice laughing
        1. Gardamir 22 January 2020 13: 24 New
          • 2
          • 3
          -1
          At least for the sake of decency, you follow the site rules. I expressed my opinion, do not agree to argue, and rudeness shows that you have nothing to say.
          1. bk316 22 January 2020 13: 26 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            I expressed my opinion

            That is, your opinion that there will be no presidential election in 24 or earlier?
            This I clarify, maybe you really described?
            1. Gardamir 22 January 2020 13: 37 New
              • 0
              • 2
              -2
              Will be earlier.
              I remember my childhood, haymaking. Heat, not a cloud in the sky. And suddenly a cloud appeared on the horizon. But is it all running, rather raking hay, hiding from the rain. If you spare no energy, then you can handle it before a thunderstorm.
              The speed with which everything spun after the message, the government, the constitution, possible elections ...
              1. bk316 22 January 2020 13: 43 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Will be earlier.

                I apologize, I understood exactly how until 24
                The likelihood of early elections is certainly there.
                1. Gardamir 22 January 2020 13: 46 New
                  • 0
                  • 2
                  -2
                  I would even add not just probability, but obligatoriness. Well, in order to finally clarify its position, in 2024 it will not, because it will be earlier.
  3. lwxx 22 January 2020 08: 14 New
    • 28
    • 7
    +21
    The Bear left, Mishutka came, Such a Putin joke. But they are all one breed. Everything for themselves, not for the people. (c) Plenipotentiary, the sweat of the Far East remained Trutnev, he was also raised. As I understand it, things are arranging Moscow in the Far East.
    1. bessmertniy 22 January 2020 08: 19 New
      • 6
      • 7
      -1
      This is an indicator that the rest of Russia is even worse than in the Far East. wassat request recourse crying repeat
    2. Sergej1972 22 January 2020 10: 04 New
      • 0
      • 5
      -5
      And I will not be surprised that it is Trutnev who will become Putin's successor.
  4. 9PA
    9PA 22 January 2020 08: 17 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    Well, at least the devout was removed
  5. bionik 22 January 2020 08: 18 New
    • 6
    • 7
    -1
    the government in modern Russia is a technical body, which in any case fulfills the tasks that the president and his entourage pose before him. Therefore, a change of faces does not mean a change in course.
    Duck it was immediately understandable, in other words, there is the well-known "OBJECT" in all other words only in the other hand ...))
  6. Mavrikiy 22 January 2020 08: 19 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    A number of ministers were removed from the new government and met with mixed assessments in society.
    And where are Oreshkin left?
    1. Nyrobsky 22 January 2020 09: 31 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      A number of ministers were removed from the new government and met with mixed assessments in society.
      And where are Oreshkin left?

      “Gone him” to the president’s economic advisers. Instead, Reshetnikov was placed.
    2. SOVIET UNION 2 22 January 2020 10: 04 New
      • 1
      • 5
      -4
      Oreshkin is a young cadre and reserve of the country! It is unclear only with whom he and the ministers competed and what successes they and their competitors have chosen precisely these.
  7. Loess 22 January 2020 08: 24 New
    • 7
    • 9
    -2
    Thirteen ministers from Medvedev’s cabinet lost their posts, and among them almost all the people whom Russian and foreign analysts predicted an early resignation.
    Medvedev, for example, was predicted an early resignation of eight years, eight years ...
    that the government in modern Russia is a technical body that, in any case, fulfills the tasks that the president and his entourage pose before him.
    Almost more depends on a competent performer than on the one who sets the tasks for this performer.
    But one does not have to expect any large-scale transformations from Mishustin’s office:
    While all this is "fortune-telling on coffee grounds." The same refusal from pension reform (I personally do not particularly believe in this refusal) or the introduction of a progressive tax must first be calculated, justified and prepared, as well as any other large-scale action or transformation. Therefore, I would not pay much attention to the initial statements of the newly made prime minister. Some real estimates and forecasts can be given in a few months.
    1. Nyrobsky 22 January 2020 09: 35 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: Less
      Almost more depends on a competent performer than on the one who sets the tasks for this performer.

      The problem is where to find the literate. Performers are a dime a dozen. It seems like the words are attributed to Peter the first - “There is no more harm to the state of the Russian Federation than the executive du.rak. Assign this seedling to plant, so this five juvenile trees will break the fruit.” hi
  8. Same lech 22 January 2020 08: 24 New
    • 11
    • 3
    +8
    Meanwhile, no separate benefits for families would be required if the parents of the children had decent income at the place of work.

    This is perhaps the key point in the article, and indeed in fact.
    It is necessary to make sure that every family has a stable and reliable income that allows them to save for a rainy day ... when this is not there, there is always concern for the future of their children and the family as a whole.
    1. carstorm 11 22 January 2020 08: 53 New
      • 9
      • 2
      +7
      according to a bunch of research, the younger generation has not been saving money for a long time, but is spending it here and now. life and opportunities are different from ours in their years and there is the opportunity and the world to watch and all that you want to wish for yourself. a lot of friends are not even going to have children, they just live. and in the future they care only about their careers. the amount of money, of course, can indirectly influence the choice, but this is not a panacea. we look at Europe and yet before our eyes. with a higher standard of living and stability, even there is no question of raising the birth rate.
    2. SOVIET UNION 2 22 January 2020 10: 07 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      It is necessary to make sure that every family has a stable and reliable income that allows them to save for a rainy day ... when this is not there, there is always concern for the future of their children and the family as a whole.
      And this is agitation for socialism! And what did the guarantor say on this issue (socialism)?
      1. AU Ivanov. 22 January 2020 12: 28 New
        • 2
        • 3
        -1
        Not socialism, but a social state. These are different things. Socialism is a state-social system, with state ownership of the means of production, which has proved its inefficiency. The welfare state can be both monarchical (Saudi Arabia) and capitalist.
        1. SOVIET UNION 2 22 January 2020 16: 21 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          Capitalism today is less effective. And a decrease in social guarantees will not increase efficiency. Judging from Putin’s comments, they will not increase social guarantees.
          1. AU Ivanov. 22 January 2020 16: 26 New
            • 1
            • 3
            -2
            Seriously? How many social countries are there? DPRK and Cuba? And how are they doing there with efficiency? In China, a capitalist market economy is being built with a powerful private sector, so China is turning from a poor socialist country into a powerful power.
            1. SOVIET UNION 2 22 January 2020 16: 36 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              These countries are in blockade but survived. But will the cap of the country survive in a similar situation? This is understandable even from the mood regarding industry. Why do we need this? Are we uncompetitive? But China seeks to produce a host of products. And it didn’t ache that he had an illiterate population, no resources, no technology, no roads, no markets. Today he has it all. Who buys chips and cars from anyone, Russia from China or China from Russia? That is the whole effectiveness of capitalism. Some trade in raw materials, others in technological goods.
              1. AU Ivanov. 22 January 2020 16: 45 New
                • 1
                • 3
                -2
                They survived, of course they survived, but how? In Cuba, a used "Zhigulenok" for happiness will come down. Was it worth fighting for? And it is better not to compare us with China, our mentality is completely different. You would agree to plow, as the Chinese plowed, for pennies and a handful of rice, in anticipation of a brighter future. I would hardly. And many will not agree. I saw, in due time, how the Chinese are injecting. From dawn to dusk without extending your back. As if, I did not want such a fate.
    3. lukewarm 22 January 2020 11: 41 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: The same Lech
      It is necessary to make sure that every family has a stable and reliable income that allows you to save for a rainy day

      We have capitalism in the yard and from above dictate to each director, owner, etc. how much he will not be able to pay the employee. Only through the minimum wage and the cost of living. But I'm even talking about something else. What for? If it is possible to give less money in another way and not to infringe on the class brothers and raise the rating?
  9. Arctic 22 January 2020 08: 31 New
    • 10
    • 8
    +2
    And you are friends, as you don’t sit down ... Nothing will change, but it's a pity.
  10. savment 22 January 2020 08: 34 New
    • 11
    • 6
    +5
    Kolokoltsev stayed. Pretty boy. The collapse of the Ministry of Internal Affairs system will continue in the same volume. Finish it completely. True, there is little left.
    1. Stirbjorn 22 January 2020 09: 00 New
      • 8
      • 3
      +5
      Quote: savment
      Kolokoltsev stayed. Pretty boy. The collapse of the Ministry of Internal Affairs system will continue in the same volume. Finish it completely. True, there is little left.

      yes there probably aren’t any options, was Nurgaliyev better ?! The loyal ones are appointed to such a post, here is the main criterion
      1. savment 22 January 2020 09: 29 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        Yes I remember. Yogoy was engaged, the code of ethics was outlined in a chipboard notebook, viewing in the assembly hall of the board of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. It is so good that I quit this dump without waiting for reform. The only pity is 14 years of service on the wanted list.
  11. eagle owl 22 January 2020 08: 48 New
    • 5
    • 16
    -11
    With all due respect. What is this portal? Not even any devil do such topics here?
    Where am I wrong?
    1. eagle owl 22 January 2020 10: 46 New
      • 2
      • 5
      -3
      And at least one "egr-em" minus will justify? War of good, what do you say? Is your mouth busy?)
  12. eagle owl 22 January 2020 08: 49 New
    • 5
    • 13
    -8
    RIA-news number two. Guys, what’s the name of the portal?
  13. Mikhail Drabkin 22 January 2020 08: 57 New
    • 4
    • 15
    -11
    In vain there is so much negativity.
    Who seriously expected the rollback of pension reform ??? Pensions will increase, and reform is a forced measure.
    Russia chose capitalism. This is unchanging. I hope that with social responsibility, and with the primacy of multiplying the peoples of Russia.
    ".... You can only believe in Russia! ..."
    1. Egoza 22 January 2020 09: 06 New
      • 14
      • 3
      +11
      Quote: Michael Drabkin
      Russia chose capitalism. It is invariably

      Are you sure you chose Russia? But I see that the transfer of part of the powers is a beautiful move "all power to the soviets." And, if the people are dissatisfied, then all claims are against the parliament, and not against the president or the government.
      1. Mikhail Drabkin 22 January 2020 11: 06 New
        • 3
        • 4
        -1
        In fact!
        And how this happened - each has its own explanation.
        Mine - narcissists, indecisive and cowardly Gorbachev and resolute drunkard Yeltsin, both - ... with initiative. The rust of glasnost and its demons ... Soviet society, which has forgotten how to work, is tired of socialism. We got used to the good, and enthusiastically believed in fools and charlatans ... in the naive authorities manipulated by the West. They believed in the outright enemies of Russia ... Cancer of reforms and the exit of the Baltic states ... finished off the USSR.

        Profuka country. Overslept.

        They don’t vote for this, they don’t choose a change in the foundations of society ... It’s like the Flood, like the Fiend of Hell — it happens, gaining strength in the inaction of us. It was an “interesting time” ... the time of which the Chinese say “.. don’t bring live in an interesting time ...” Remember how you watched TV, the circus of People’s Deputies .. how eagerly read “Spark” and AiF from cesspools. .. including me.

        Of course, I understand you, but you can’t say better than GDP (approximately ~~~~) ".. whoever regrets the loss of the USSR is heartless ... and those who want to restore the USSR are mindless .."

        The train of socialism is long gone.

        Russia has no new blood to do bloodletting.
    2. Gardamir 22 January 2020 09: 19 New
      • 15
      • 3
      +12
      Here you are a little mistaken. This is for Russia chosen. And upstairs for a long time they will be “shy" to pronounce the word capitalism.
      1. SOVIET UNION 2 22 January 2020 10: 10 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        And privatization is not at all embarrassed to utter the word! And not even the words, even the privatization itself are going to be carried out! lol
      2. Mikhail Drabkin 22 January 2020 11: 11 New
        • 2
        • 3
        -1
        Who chose Russia for this?

        Somehow, you are downplaying becoming Russia, allowing “someone” to choose the fateful one for Russia.
        This, by the way, looks like defeatism.
        1. Gardamir 22 January 2020 11: 55 New
          • 2
          • 3
          -1
          Well, how about someone. You yourself said everything to Gorbachev with your publicity, led the people into the wilds of capitalism.
          Propaganda is a great thing, you can make people believe in anything. Then they believed that socialism with a market human face is a blessing. Now they believe in no brothers, but these are Russian lands. Tomorrow we will be told about svidomye not brothers of Siberians or Pomors and again everyone will believe.
          So you choose when you give it a thought and do not drip on the brain.
          1. AU Ivanov. 22 January 2020 13: 29 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            We never built capitalism. Unfortunately. Not only were the communists dragged the power along national burrows, according to Leninist perforation, but they also tried to push through the market reforms necessary for a couple of years. China, for example, has been moving towards market relations since the late 70s. And only recently have their reforms yielded results. We have everything as usual - through train.
    3. Mordvin 3 22 January 2020 09: 33 New
      • 9
      • 5
      +4
      Quote: Michael Drabkin
      and reform is a forced measure.

      Doctors Could and introduce progression. But we will go the other way!
      Quote: Michael Drabkin
      Russia chose capitalism.

      Who chose him? Maybe what referendum was? I do not remember.
      1. SOVIET UNION 2 22 January 2020 10: 13 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        What is the progression? Mishustin already said, ** We do not have a middle class ** ** There is no one to take taxes ** On the Forbes lists, you must assume that there is a small and very small business !? repeat
        1. Mordvin 3 22 January 2020 10: 15 New
          • 7
          • 3
          +4
          Quote: SOVIET UNION 2
          ** No one to take taxes **

          Maybe his wife doesn’t allow him ... request
          1. SOVIET UNION 2 22 January 2020 10: 21 New
            • 1
            • 2
            -1
            Well, then of course he has a micro-entrepreneur! Traded roofing felts with computers, invested somewhere in roofing felts! And then who are the self-employed then? Really a shark business !? fellow
    4. Nyrobsky 22 January 2020 10: 09 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Quote: Michael Drabkin
      Pensions will increase, and reform is a forced measure.
      Russia chose capitalism. This is unchanging. Hope with social responsibility

      Blessed is he who believes. Over the past few years, the state has been steadily pursuing a policy of avoiding fulfillment of social obligations to the population, shifting the social program onto its shoulders and transferring state guarantees to a paid basis. You can pay - scoop with two spoons, you can’t pay - go hungry, forgetting that the conditions for earnings in all regions are different, and it is the state’s duty to create equal conditions for self-realization. Catherine the second was an order of magnitude smarter than using human resources, which aimed to populate the empty regions of the Empire by replacing the death penalty with a link to Siberia for eternal settlement, justifying this with the fact that “cutting heads with such a size of the Russian State is unacceptable luxury.” The current leaders led the country to the opposite process - the outflow of the population from the North, D. Vostok and Siberia, the main reasons for which are lack of work and poverty. Now the task of the new government is to increase welfare and combat poverty, and the main thing here is that this work would not be reduced to a banal change in the criteria for assessing poverty instead of real work.
  14. Svetlana 22 January 2020 08: 57 New
    • 3
    • 5
    -2
    Theoretically, the change of faces occurred only because the government was unable to maintain the intended course, therefore it is wrong to talk about a change of course.
    But in practice: Wait and see.
    1. Svetlana 22 January 2020 14: 51 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      For minus traders, I’ll explain: because the team has changed on the ship (in the port), its course does not change. The quality of the team is changing, which leads to a change in the timing of achieving the goal.
  15. sergo1914 22 January 2020 09: 04 New
    • 11
    • 2
    +9
    Russian President Vladimir Putin has appointed a new Minister of Sports. Pavel Kolobkov was replaced by corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Education, head of the International University Sports Federation Oleg Matytsin.

    More details at the “Championship”:
    https://www.championat.com/other/article-3952987-novym-ministrom-sporta-stal-glava-fisu-oleg-matycin.html?utm_source=copypaste
    10 years ago, the prosecutor’s office charged the future minister with damage of 120 million. He escaped with a fine of 20 thousand.

    There was no less criminal and convict minister in our small and sparsely populated country ...
  16. aleks.29ru 22 January 2020 09: 05 New
    • 11
    • 4
    +7
    The country is deteriorating. The facade will be tinted, and who will change the sewer? ) We need a radical change.
  17. Mikhail Drabkin 22 January 2020 09: 08 New
    • 5
    • 10
    -5
    Mishustin says little.
    Successful on all tasks.
    Engineer, Applied Mathematics and Systems Solution / Analysis.

    And what an interesting way to provide parents with the necessary salary for "confidence in the future ..." in the vast vast Russia ????

    He will pull the cart, and will not allow "cancer, swans and pike .." to spend money ...

    Where did Kozak go? Man !!!! We will also hear / ..
  18. igorra 22 January 2020 09: 26 New
    • 9
    • 2
    +7
    Until they introduce a tax on excess profits (all of which are more than 25%), there is no point in raising a salary. Remember the recent past, raise the salary of state employees, our "entrepreneurs", no matter what, immediately raise prices for everything. As a result, all the increase goes into the pocket of traders. And now who is stopping private business from raising salaries for employees, but no, suddenly there’s not enough for a "hazel grouse with pineapples." And they saw us in a coffin, migrants are ready for anything.
  19. Gardamir 22 January 2020 09: 27 New
    • 10
    • 5
    +5
    Let's see what is in reality. The president used the moment of the message, not for our inventions. No one will change the course.
    So, at first we changed some in the government, mind you, it was not the head of government who changed it, as it should according to the Constitution, but the president.
    Now there is a rewriting of the Constitution. If you want, you can believe in the referendum.
    Well, the completion of this three-way life-long without elections ruling Russia. The country put a child's mat.
    1. Lexus 22 January 2020 20: 42 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      No one will change the course

      In general, the “faces” have not changed much

  20. Yrec 22 January 2020 09: 28 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    My father knows Mishustin personally when he was the main tax IT specialist in the Stavropol Territory. He is a signalman and set him up, first of all, for the implementation of "digital Russia", which Medvedev and his comrades successfully failed. I think (hopefully) that after the implementation of the “numbers”, technical capabilities and prerequisites will arise for the transition to a progressive personal income tax rate. The main thing that would continue to grow on this request of society. If we remind the authorities of this, they will have to do it, sooner or later. So I see from my sofa bully
  21. Million 22 January 2020 09: 30 New
    • 12
    • 3
    +9
    They don’t have a course, they don’t even try to choose it. They tramp around until around, if only money would flow into your pocket
  22. Simfy 22 January 2020 09: 30 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    sewed on soap?
  23. Boris55 22 January 2020 09: 40 New
    • 6
    • 17
    -11
    This is not a change of persons, but a change in the vector of movement of Russia. The pro-Western bloc, dominating the former government and whose sole purpose was the destruction of Russia, was defended. Professionals with experience working "on the ground" and having proved their ability to manage and achieve positive results came to the management.

    Let me remind you. To destroy the Stalinist USSR, the Trotskyists took 40 years, from 53rd to 93rd. According to the law of the time, it took Putin only 20 years to restore everything to its place. To rush - without preliminary preparation, it would be simply impossible to implement this. It will not be the USSR, but it will not be bourgeois Russia either.

    The enemies of Russia will certainly try to insert sticks into the wheels. Already now, to amend the articles of the Constitution on the supremacy of our right over not ours, all attempts are being made to leave at least some but a hint of the supremacy of not our right over ours. They do not need a sovereign, independent Russia. Their slavish nature is not able to accept the will, in this case they lose the meaning of life. Without a master, they will die.

    I have already laid out this definition: "State domestic policy and governance in a crowd-elite society is an agreement reached on the possibilities of various clan-corporate groups in using the state structure and system to achieve their narrowly corporate goals."

    Putin, transferring part of the presidential powers to the Duma on the appointment of the prime minister and ministers, leaving the president with the right to dismiss them, thereby forced clan-corporate groups to fight for a place in the sun themselves. As soon as one representative of one group is dismissed, then immediately a representative of another group will take his place. Thus, Putin made them work for the interests of Russia.

    Great changes await us ahead, and certainly for the better.
    With what I congratulate you all.
    1. Nonna 22 January 2020 09: 59 New
      • 6
      • 6
      0
      : Boris, where do you get updated manuals? belay
      1. Boris55 22 January 2020 10: 22 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Quote: Nonna
        Boris, where do you get updated manuals?

        I'm watching TV laughing
  24. Ross xnumx 22 January 2020 10: 24 New
    • 7
    • 4
    +3
    The new government of Russia: change of persons or change of course

    Here, the loss of losses ...
    Now Mr. (put the necessary letters yourself) Isaev from Edra gave birth to a replica, the meaning of which is that our Russian government has been doing everything for twenty years that has pulled us out of the "economic abyss" where it has pushed us ... Who would have thought? Absolutely in the hole! EBN mode ... Yes, yes. The very EBN, whose house for a budget of 9 billion was erected in Yekaterinburg (at the request of the workers) as a warning to posterity about the role of the first Russian president ...
    Ah, let's wait. What if these "new people" begin to rule.
    I will quote again:
    And you, friends, no matter how you sit down;
    All in musicians do not suit

    hi
  25. ZaharoFF 22 January 2020 10: 46 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    Like in a bearded joke about beds and girls with low social responsibility. Endless castling, instead of real offers / changes.
  26. Oleg1 22 January 2020 10: 58 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    I hope everyone remembers that Putin promised the shirnarmasses to receive such nishtyaks:

    1. The decision to pay maternity capital for the first child

    2. Increasing the size of maternal capital

    3. Assistance to low-income families - 10 thousand rubles per child

    4. Free hot meals for primary school students

    5. Surcharge 5000 to the salaries of teachers performing the duties of class teachers

    6. One-time payment to veterans of the Second World War 75 thousand rubles

    And how do we, normal people, react to these real benefits for the population, which will cost Mr. Unbelievable trillions from the budget? Yes, hell, we are all delighted, even those who are not included in any of the categories that fell under this manna! So I'm really happy for the people, and I hope that these grandmothers will help us get out of the demographic hole!

    And here is how, according to the “united training manual”, people with beautiful faces cover this topic ... in this article ???
    "So, those social measures that Putin voiced and which the new government has to implement are aimed at reducing the degree of public discontent, but on the whole they are more like buying votes."
    Ugh, you disappear, you disappear ...
    1. Boris55 22 January 2020 11: 06 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Quote: Oleg1
      Ugh, you disappear, you disappear ...

      The time, as Putin called them ferrets, is past and there is no need to stop them from saying that no one better than themselves will show all their hatred for us.
    2. BAI
      BAI 22 January 2020 20: 01 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      And how do we, normal people, react to these real benefits for the population, which will cost Mr. Unbelievable trillions from the budget?

      Immediately the joke was folded:
      Girl, how beautiful you are! Do you want 415 thousand, and then another 150?
  27. megadeth 22 January 2020 11: 11 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    A lot becomes clear .. https: //www.youtube.com/watch? V = P86aV_peRJU
  28. Van 16 22 January 2020 11: 22 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    “I don’t believe these cunning faces, especially the one with the Gascon face” (or how was it right in the Three Musketeers?)
  29. prior 22 January 2020 11: 47 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    What is happening is worse than pension reform.
    This is a cynical imitation of violent activity.
    The result will be even worse.
  30. iouris 22 January 2020 12: 22 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Well, it started. Little-known to the public are all people. Let them work in a team, then there will be something to discuss. Or maybe Moses led us through the desert for so many years to prepare a new team. Although, on the other hand, forty years have not even passed.
    1. Boris55 22 January 2020 12: 51 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: iouris
      Although, on the other hand, forty years have not even passed.

      According to the law of time, all processes are significantly accelerated.



      The new government was formed to address the tasks identified in the "May decrees" ie the horse, as expected, is placed in front of the cart, and not on the back.
      1. iouris 25 January 2020 12: 52 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Boris55
        all processes have accelerated significantly.

        I do not know. The government believes that a Russian person (of any nationality) is a child under almost thirty years old. And what is the acceleration? If we talk about Chinese smartphones, then it, of course, is yes, it certainly is a matter of business ... But, if something happens, then here you are.
  31. Oleg1 22 January 2020 13: 33 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Especially outrageous is the desire to enshrine in the constitution:
    "the provisions on the cost of living and minimum wage." And the ban for senior officials of the state of a residence permit or a second citizenship is hellish!
    Everyone will go to the protests !!!!!
  32. BAI
    BAI 22 January 2020 19: 59 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    But do personnel shifts mean a change in the course of the Russian government?

    OF COURSE NO!
    The number of articles where some hopes, assumptions, or even statements about a change in the course of the government are simply astounding. Do the authors really understand nothing or pretend to be? Nothing will happen! You can talk about a change of course when the appointing government changes. And this is one man. And everyone knows him.
  33. bandabas 22 January 2020 20: 05 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Shoigu and Lavrov? Do not make me laugh.
  34. However, dear 22 January 2020 23: 08 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Russia took 134th place in the global ranking of democracy, rooted in a group of countries with authoritarian regimes

    More details: https://www.newsru.com/world/22jan2020/democracy_rus.html
  35. wooja 23 January 2020 05: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    too little and too late ...., the author is right. Everyone knows the "cunning" plans for GDP, let them trick further ...., mnogohodchik.
  36. fif21 24 January 2020 22: 24 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The main mistake of the authorities is that they think they are omnipotent! But no! The navel was torn. They can write out at least how much paper, but they can no longer force the bourgeois to pay the employee. Labor productivity cannot be raised. They cannot force the regional authorities to increase payments (they themselves put them on a hungry rations, taking 70% of the taxes to the federal budget) They press on everyone with taxes (they do not introduce a progressive scale of taxation) the very busy, small and medium-sized businesses either go bankrupt or go into the shadows. And the Ministry of Agriculture, what can it do? To give instructions to farmers how much and what to plant? At what price to sell. NO! This is not the planned economy of socialism. So, let them talk what they want, the reformers are stupid already tired. hi