New technologies can hit capitalism

Technology development is an integral part of the market process. At least that is how the liberal economic school describes the situation. According to its interpretation, where the market is, there is certainly technological progress. Is it so?

The situation is trying to figure out an economist who does not gravitate to the recognition of liberal economic laws, Oleg Komolov.

The author considers such a typical economic concept as cost:

According to liberal approaches, value is a purely subjective value. It exists only in the minds of the buyer and seller. For example, in the desert, we will be ready to give everything we have for a glass of water. And on the banks of the river, the usefulness of this glass of water will tend to zero.

Oleg Komolov notes that not everything develops here. For example, it is unlikely that anyone will be taken out to a passing pack of dumplings at a meat processing plant for free. Although, according to the liberal law on marginal utility and cost, they seem to have to: the seller has tons of these dumplings.

The requested dumplings will be sent far away for free, since the labor law of value plays a role. On the basis of this law, one must also take into account the labor that was expended on the creation of the goods.

Details on how technology can strike capitalism in a video on the Prime Channel channel:

Comments

[Skay]

Syntec 6MD is my "beloved wife" (pictured).

[Aerodrome]

New technologies can hit capitalism

I just want to say "sho? again?"

[gridasov]

Really! Those who do not see that all development is based on the old fundamental principles in both industrial production and analysis and military technology, they will not understand that there is no such development.

[illi]

Fu pervert. that's who you need to marry.

[Skay]

that's who you need to marry.

As soon as the boss buys one, I’ll divorce immediately!

[bk316]

Sorry for the immodest question, are you working in a cemetery?

[gridasov]

it is not only the behavioral processes of consumers and producers. It is primarily the mathematics of the consciousness of the masses and the perception of reality by individuals. More precisely, these are aspects of the mathematics of thinking in various algorithmically changing circumstances. And these are algorithms of transformable landmarks in the minds of all groups of human communities, starting from the individual. Ultimately, these are processes associated with the formation of consciousness against the background of how we ourselves change our environment and change our values ​​in our consciousness. These processes are more likely to be mastered by mathematicians at new levels of knowledge about big data generation. But not on those mat foundations that lie in the space of analysis on the basis of a function of a variable value of a number, but on the basis of FPC.

[Monar]

This is primarily the mathematics of consciousness of the masses

Can I see at least one formula?

[gridasov]

If the processes of the development of the state of the USSR and Russia with respect to concerns for the welfare of the people are pranalized, then one can notice the algorithmic ups of such manifestations and the complete neglect of processes that are little controlled by the authorities. This is connected, already with other processes, and the accumulation of investments of citizens in state financial institutions, etc. So it seems that the authorities themselves do not notice that manual control is subject to certain laws. Again, all this is aggravated or weakened against the background of external processes in the world, as well as within the state and territory. Again, such an analysis is very difficult to carry out using the methods that are used now, but everything is obvious when using other methods.

[Pavel57]

The next part is Capitalism Striking Back?

[Same lech]

The next part is Capitalism Striking Back?

It is not clear only who will be in this battle Darth Vader and who is Skywalker ?.

[iouris]

Those. Russia is doomed? And then we were preparing to live better.

[gridasov]

Everything is simple! Now they will give a couple of years ottuzhin, and then clamp the loop even tighter than now. Your Putin is a cool president and also indispensable with his authority and charisma. But he is not able to hold and control the army of officials. Each thief is inherently natural. Put any afflicted official in his place and he will become the same. Therefore, Putin lost his active potential to manage many processes, and the jackals immediately felt it and took advantage of it and it is very natural. But the people are the foundation! This is the unshakable foundation for which everyone who is a true patriot should live.

[gmb]

Sounds like flat earth theory, just as convincing

[Spektr]

It used to be "commodity-money-commodity", but now it is "money-money-money". Some kind of virtual reality is obtained in the world economy. If we count the GDP in the United States as it does in other countries, then the United States will not be the first. Golimy cheating. USA-potassium is still that thimble.

[Alexander Sosnitsky]

There is such a principle of least action in nature, i.e. the cost of something. No one has canceled it. You must have complete free choice. This is the market. Nowhere without him. But here there should be a market regulator so that there are no various kinds of fraud, of which there are many. The main justice for all market participants. Any restrictions here are fraught.

[Ingvar 72]

Quote: Alexander Sosnitsky

Any restrictions here are fraught.

And the lack of restrictions is fraught even more. There must be reasonable control.

[nikvic46]

An interesting story. Knowing that production technologies have grown in some countries, we may wonder. Has capitalism weakened there? And what will the weakening of capitalism give the people? In addition, such a society has the ability to slide into an economic crisis. And the worst is depression.

[Dmitry Leontiev]

First of all, an anti-oligarchic limit on personal income and wealth is needed.

Ordinary, non-limited capitalism - in which there is no strict legal limit on the amount of capital owned - it simply means that one robber gets what many other people have created with their labor costs, and that many are left with nothing. Moreover, this robber receives not only funds, but also the shadow, not elected by the population, real political power that these funds give him - and uses this power for further, even worse robbery of all people around him in any rights, means and opportunities - for gaining even greater political power over society. That is, it is a system of direct, frank and total robbery of the population. The word "Robbery" is a direct and unambiguous definition of this system, its direct name. Is robbery (in any means, rights and possibilities) not a generally recognized and unequivocal crime? Is there a subject here itself for any discussion whatsoever?

Elementary logic suggests that in order to exclude this total robbery and no less total political power of robbers, a tough legislative anti-oligarchic limit is required for all people on the maximum amount of personal incomes and fortunes - which in no way can be more than seven times their most common level the entire working population; for funds exceeding this level, in any case, are not earned by the individual’s own labor, but are funds created by the labor costs of other people — and, accordingly, are due to other people. Everything that exceeds this limit should automatically be nationalized - go to the common piggy bank. And compliance with this law should be ensured by the most serious responsibility for its violation - the greater, the larger the amount of hidden income or wealth.

To stop the oligarchy (that is, the direct robbery of the population and the robbers' power over it), the whole society needs to unite under this simple requirement - the introduction of a strict anti-oligarchic limit. This limit is an elementary and quite obviously necessary element of the political security of the system and the social security of the population. And if the population is interested in the political and social adequacy of the system, it must demand the adoption of this anti-oligarchic limit.

https://cloud.mail.ru/public/4t7w/gXT492EyR

(file: "005 On capitalism and its inadmissibility").

[Ross xnumx]

New technologies can hit capitalism

No one will give us deliverance: neither god, nor king, nor hero, nor new technologies. No wonder the classics wrote down their thoughts on paper so that this would not be affected by the lack of short-term memory. But I want to remind everyone of the lines of the International:

 Show / Hide text

Get up, branded with a curse
The whole world of hungry and slaves!
Our mind is seething
And ready to lead a mortal battle.
We will destroy the whole world of violence
To the ground, and then
We are ours, we will build a new world:
Who was nothing, that will become everything.

Chorus:
This will be the last
And a decisive battle.
With the International
The human race will rise.

Pretty blood suck vampires
Prison, tax, poverty!
For you - all the power, all the blessings of the World,
And our right - the sound is empty.
We will build life differently
And here is our battle slogan:
All power to the working people,
And parasites of all - down!
(Chorus)

You are despicable in your wealth
Coal and became kings!
You are your thrones, parasites,
On our backs erected!
Factories, factories, chambers -
Everything is created by our work.
It's time! We demand a refund
That which was taken by robbery.
(Chorus)

Enough for the kings to please
Intoxicate us into a child of war!
The war of rams! Peace to the nations!
On strike, sons of the army!
When will tyrants force us
In battle, heroically fall for them,
The killers! Then we will direct you
We are the vents of battle guns.
(Chorus)

No one will give us deliverance:
Neither god, nor king, nor hero.
We will achieve liberation
With his own hand.
To overthrow oppressed by a skilled hand,
Win back your goods
Swell, forge, and forge boldly
While the iron is hot!
(Chorus)

Only we, the workers of the world
Great army of labor
We have the right to own the Earth,
But parasites never.
And if the great thunder strikes
Over a pack of dogs and executioners,
For us, the sun will become the same
Shine with the fire of your rays!
(Chorus)

[surok1]

Self-adjusting, self-replicating, self-repairing robot, guzzling garbage, powered by a power plant. The main thing is burning desire to serve.
The point is to call for the morality of the capitalist if we ourselves want the same?

[serg v stock]

It seems to me that someone is cheating. The loom did not completely replace the weavers, the harvesters did not replace the harvesters, the lathes did not remove the turners. etc. A person needs to sleep, eat, and the robot needs to be served, it can be turned off. Regarding the complexity of the mathematical modeling of these processes, recently Yoksel was too strong, but now schoolchildren are using it to concoct models to protect doctorates. And the video is nice to see, a competent lecturer, well done.

[surok1]

Harvesters now drive in jeepies very accurately. Without a man on board. The village has long been sentenced.

[serg v stock]

That's right, the collective farm was almost 700 combine harvesters, steering, repairmen, drivers. Less than 200 left! But, the field needs to be reached, the fields are uneven, refueling, unloading, minor repairs, something stuck needs to be pulled out and so on. Not soon the village will die.

[surok1]

Very soon they will go to the village on a rotational basis.

[Okay]

> According to liberal approaches, cost is a purely subjective value.
> It exists only in the minds of the buyer and seller. For instance,
> in the desert, we will be ready to give everything we have for a glass of water.
> And on the river bank the usefulness of this glass of water will tend to zero.
Very, very misinterpreted indifference / preference curves.
author -> author -> author of books on economics obviously did not read, heard something - after three or four people are so ...