Sarraj threatens Haftar with the invitation to Libya of international forces under the auspices of the UN

34
Sarraj threatens Haftar with the invitation to Libya of international forces under the auspices of the UN

The head of the Government of National Accord (PNS) of Libya, Faiz Sarraj, who is considered to be the head of the Libyan government in the West and is sitting in Tripoli, threatened to call international forces under the auspices of the UN in Libya if the Libyan National Army continues its offensive Khalifa Haftar. He stated this in an interview published in the newspaper Welt am Sonntag.

If Khalifa Haftar does not stop his offensive, the international community will have to take measures, namely to protect the civilian population of Libya, including through international forces. Such forces must operate under the auspices of the UN. Professionals then need to discuss who will participate, such as the European Union, the African Union or the League of Arab States

- he said.



At the same time, Sarraj called the role of the European Union in resolving the conflict in Libya insignificant. According to him, he expected a "more active position" and the EU’s speech against the offensive of Haftar.

Europeans came too late

- added Sarraj.

Meanwhile, German media reported that the commander of the LNA, Khalifa Haftar, arrived in Berlin to attend a conference to resolve the conflict in Libya

Germany will hold an international conference on the settlement of the situation in Libya on January 19 in Berlin. In addition to representatives of the warring Libyan parties, representatives are expected to participate, including at the level of heads of state, Russia, Algeria, Great Britain, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, China, the United States, Turkey, and France.
  • http://government.ru/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    19 January 2020 07: 49
    From the text of the article:
    In this case, Haftar called the role of the European Union insignificant in resolving the conflict in Syria. According to him, he expected a "more active position" and EU appearances against the offensive of Haftar.
    Where is the editor? lol
  2. +1
    19 January 2020 08: 03
    Does this naive think that UN international forces will FIGHT for the interests of a puppet government?
    These forces generally have the right to shoot only when guarding their own lives. These forces do not enter the zone of active hostilities ...
    1. +1
      19 January 2020 08: 29
      Too large a contingent of the UN is unlikely to be able to enter Libya, but it will not be of any use - it will not be able to distinguish between the warring parties.
    2. +1
      19 January 2020 08: 40
      it is obvious that Saraj is a traitor to his people, for which Gaddafi defended independence and sovereignty, how can jackals be invited to occupy and plunder his country, there are few examples of Yugoslavia and Iraq
    3. +2
      19 January 2020 10: 23
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Does this naive think that UN international forces will FIGHT for the interests of a puppet government?
      Why not, if it is the UN and the EU that recognize, as you said, the puppet government? Of course, they will not fight, but they can introduce a peacekeeping contingent to save the Sarajah government. Only Haftar has one trump card, which is that Islamic jihadists and other terrorists are fighting on the side of Sarajah, which means the UN is blowing in support of terrorism, which is certainly an inconvenient circumstance for the UN.
  3. +1
    19 January 2020 08: 04
    Who are we for? Those. Russia. Or take a wait position.
    1. +2
      19 January 2020 08: 16
      There, it is now unacceptable for the side to take sides. This is a choice between the bad and a little worse. If one side were a little more adequate than the other, then the advantage would be on its side.
      1. +1
        19 January 2020 09: 09
        Quote: ltc35
        This is a choice between the bad and a little worse.

        And how do you like this?
        Why can the operation to free Tripoli be called counterterrorism?
        1. 0
          19 January 2020 12: 15
          In fact, any state is a grouping, a community, clothed with law. And who and how is seeking power is soon "forgotten" or covered with legends. Examples: any state.
      2. -2
        19 January 2020 11: 26
        This is a choice between the bad and a little worse.

        You are one of the few who understands at least something. Yes
        1. -1
          19 January 2020 14: 13
          Quote: maidan.izrailovich
          You are one of the few who understands at least something.

          However, what political passions flare up on the site ... Thank God that there are already two of you ... fellow
          I want to please you with the fact that despite some kind of relations between Russia and Libya, an understanding of what is happening and the Russian situation in the world community does not at all depend on either Haftar or Sarraj. It is time for Russia to recognize completely different priorities and goals, and not try to grasp the immensity.
          And then we began to get used to being forced to choose which of the American candidates for the presidency is better - Trump or Clinton. As a result, Trump does not want to not only meet with the leader of Russia, but also adds to our country a package of economic inconveniences. Then we became interested in the attitude of China towards Russia.
          Now it’s Libya’s turn ...
          Now ask yourself if you can sing:
          I left the hut
          I went to fight
          To land in Libya land in grenada
          Peasants Give to Haftar.

          And after that, we will all together listen to your interpretation of what is happening and the reasons that prompted you to think that way. Perhaps we will "stand under your banner" ... belay
    2. +5
      19 January 2020 09: 13
      In fact, we are for Haftar. But not officially. There is such a tangle mixed up, you are tormented without a bottle to understand lol
      Many "allies" suddenly became "opponents". True, after Haftar's arrival in Moscow, ours distanced themselves from direct (indirect) participation. But at the level of advisors and technical staff, they are present.
      1. +2
        19 January 2020 10: 01
        Quote: LiSiCyn
        In fact, we are for Haftar


        Haftara elected the people, and Saraj is the UN appointee. I think the point is this.
        1. +6
          19 January 2020 10: 24
          Quote: Kleber
          Saraj is the UN appointed.

          Not certainly in that way. Saraj - recognized by the UN. And then, when Haftar was still on the horizon.
          1. +1
            19 January 2020 12: 47
            On October 9, 2015, the Libyan National Unity Government was announced. Bernardino Leon, Special Representative of the UN Secretary General in Libya on the same day at a press conference he announced that Faiz Saraj would become the country's prime minister
            1. +5
              19 January 2020 13: 05
              Quote: Kleber
              Bernardino Leon on the same day at a press conference he announced that Faiz Saraj would become the country's prime minister

              Because the government was formed and many "players" were involved, I doubt that Saraj was appointed by the UN. Rather, there was a compromise, and the UN has legitimized it.
  4. -1
    19 January 2020 08: 06
    If Khalifa Haftar does not stop his offensive, the international community will have to take measures, namely to protect the civilian population of Libya, including through international forces. Such forces must operate under the auspices of the UN. Professionals then need to discuss who will participate, such as the European Union, the African Union or the League of Arab States

    - he said.


    There is a huge distance between "should" and "accept".
    Sometimes years pass until the international community decides what to do or not to do.
    So - this is a "cry to the well".
  5. +3
    19 January 2020 08: 09
    After such statements, before the conference, it is unlikely that any compromise decisions will be made that suit both parties .. No, of course, some kind of document will be adopted, but the opposing sides will not execute points on it ... Bolivar will not bear two .. .
  6. +1
    19 January 2020 08: 31
    The head of the Government of National Accord (PNS) of Libya, Faiz Sarraj, who is considered the head of the Libyan government in the West and is sitting in Tripoli, threatened to call international forces under the auspices of the UN to Libya if the Libyan National Army continues its offensive Khalifa Haftar. He stated this in an interview published in the newspaper Welt am Sonntag. A naive dreamer. Haftar has as many supporters among Western countries as Sarraj. Libya needs a decisive victory by one of the parties to begin to restore order in the country. So far, Haftar seems more capable of doing this.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. 0
    19 January 2020 08: 56
    Sarraj let him remember Korea. They also invited there laughing
  9. -1
    19 January 2020 08: 58
    I understand that Sarraj in Libya, that Guaido in Venezuela ...
    But it’s time for the Libyans to remember whether they lived well under Gaddafi and draw conclusions ...
  10. +1
    19 January 2020 09: 17
    Haftar needs to hold a referendum and create a state of Cyrenaica.
    There is much less oil in Tripolitania.
    As a ONE state, Libya is not viable. Not as a monarchy, nor as a republic.
  11. for
    -1
    19 January 2020 09: 30
    Turkey is not profitable. and ours too.
  12. -1
    19 January 2020 09: 44
    Sarraj threatens Haftar with the invitation to Libya of international forces under the auspices of the UN

    UN in this case pf-e, will be measured by someone sponsors cooler!
    Better to make peace ... in extreme cases, there should be ONE, but so Schaub CAPITAL, STRONG!
  13. +2
    19 January 2020 09: 49
    Europeans came too late - added Sarraj.

    And if they did not come at all, then Libya would remain - a single, prosperous state. Yes
  14. -2
    19 January 2020 09: 50
    Aha, some have already brought in their own occupation armed bandit formations, the Turks tried to "throw kerosene into the fire"!
    1. +1
      19 January 2020 14: 55
      The Turks are already in Tripoli. Previously, there were only 35 "expert advisors", but now special forces + artillery + anti-tank systems + air defense + electronic warfare systems "Coral", etc. That is, Havtor missed the victory. They can agree, as others options are exhausted.
  15. -2
    19 January 2020 10: 12
    Is this yet another Yugoslavia? Under the auspices of the UN, mattresses will start to dust part of Libya?
  16. -1
    19 January 2020 10: 16
    The blind man. I would have looked around and saw that the Hohls had been dying out for many years as peacekeepers. But somehow somehow
    1. 0
      19 January 2020 11: 38
      ... the hohls have been dumbing down peacekeepers for many years. But somehow somehow

      The Ukrainians have a bummer with oil. So the "peacekeepers" are not coming.
      And where there is oil, "peacekeepers" are right there.
      1. 0
        19 January 2020 11: 39
        I'm about Peacekeepers and not about "Peacekeepers"
  17. -1
    19 January 2020 10: 53
    While they will resolve issues with the introduction of peacekeepers, Haftar will take all of Libya. Entering peacekeepers is a very long process.
  18. -1
    19 January 2020 11: 15
    ... At the same time, Haftar called the role of the European Union insignificant in resolving the conflict in Syria. According to him, he expected a "more active position" and the EU's action against Haftar's offensive.

    Something Haftarov too much, messed up, it seems
  19. -1
    19 January 2020 21: 08
    Actually, it’s not clear why they haven’t entered yet ?! Something like a world of miracles .. A guy in uniform, suddenly decided to remember something there and began to attack the type of government approved by the UN .. And at the same time, everyone is betting ... Are the laws somehow not taken into account? Then what for they are needed at all.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"