Agitprop quotes Zhirinovsky: don’t you know who appoints ministers here ...


In the program of Konstantin Semin, they recalled the “forecast” of Vladimir Zhirinovsky that by 2024 there would be no more presidential elections in Russia. The LDPR leader presented his forecast in 2018. Then he said that in 2018 there were the last presidential elections, and later the State Council will sit and choose a figure with presidential powers.


Vladimir Zhirinovsky 2 years ago:

They are tired of rigging the election. It will be like in China, like Xi Jinping. It will be for life. They removed the restrictions on two terms. That is, Asia ... We are Asia.

According to Konstantin Semin, it is completely unclear why the country needs institutes of political scientists and other knowledgeable experts, if all of them are successfully replaced by one 73-year-old man.

The Agitprop also contains a statement by Zhirinovsky from the rostrum of the State Duma on the day of the approval of Mikhail Mishustin as new prime minister.

Zhirinovsky:

They require a left turn. There will be no left turn. There will be a right-liberal course. Don’t you know who appoints the ministers or something ... Unfortunately, we have a presidential regime under the Constitution. He (the prime minister) himself does not know, they will give him a list, and that’s it.

Konstantin Semin notes that the process is reminiscent of canning vegetables, when "the brine is already ready, it remains to roll everything into jars."

Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Pessimist22 19 January 2020 04: 31 New
    • 27
    • 4
    +23
    Of course, the ruling class (the bourgeoisie) will appoint a person from his circle who will protect their interests.
    “When robbery becomes the lifestyle of a group of people living together in society, over time they create a legal system that legalizes it and glorifies its moral code.”

    Frederic Bastia (1801–1850), French liberal economist. "Economic sophisms."
    1. bessmertniy 19 January 2020 05: 08 New
      • 9
      • 5
      +4
      That is, do you think that Mishustin will continue to pursue a predatory policy towards the people? what And I was waiting, hoping and believing ... request
      1. Same lech 19 January 2020 05: 17 New
        • 10
        • 26
        -16
        Mishustin only just took up the post, it’s too early to criticize him for the work that has not been done ... we will wait six months and we can already draw conclusions ... everything will be clear by autumn.
        1. Ross xnumx 19 January 2020 06: 34 New
          • 24
          • 8
          +16
          Quote: The same Lech
          Mishustin only just took up the post, it’s too early to criticize him for the work that has not been done ... we will wait six months and we can already draw conclusions ... everything will be clear by autumn.

          Sometimes the dumbfold takes from dreamers "sanity of reason" ... Since 1991 we have been watching the same picture, since 2000 we have been waiting, sir ...
          They pull the bull for the navel: "Give us, the bull, milk!"
        2. Astra wild 19 January 2020 08: 15 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          Perhaps you are right. My surname is not Zherenovskaya and my name is not Vanga, and therefore I can say: "we will live and see"
        3. Poor 19 January 2020 18: 37 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          let's see, said the blind, how the lame will dance soldier
      2. Pessimist22 19 January 2020 05: 26 New
        • 5
        • 3
        +2
        You watch the video, everything is explained there in an accessible way.
        1. Same lech 19 January 2020 05: 34 New
          • 5
          • 4
          +1
          You watch the video, everything is explained there in an accessible way.

          At one time, according to the video, MP Makarov beautifully splashed the eyes of the people on how to carry out pension reform. smile ... here is the same story ... one must judge by deeds ... only by deeds.
      3. New Year day 19 January 2020 06: 15 New
        • 19
        • 6
        +13
        Quote: bessmertniy
        That is, do you think that Mishustin will continue to pursue a predatory policy towards the people?

        without a doubt! Moreover, the robbery will increase
        1. Mestny 19 January 2020 09: 54 New
          • 5
          • 13
          -8
          And if it decreases, people like you will scream that this is not true.
          You are not fighting for the people, but against the authorities.
          1. Range 19 January 2020 19: 52 New
            • 3
            • 9
            -6
            All this chatter reminded me of an old joke. Experts in symphonic music sit in the hall in the philharmonic and argue among themselves who is the author of the music they hear. One says: “This is Beethoven.” “No, it's Bach,” says the second. The third - "What are you? It's George Handel." And then the leader comes out and announces - "Our orchestra has finished tuning the instruments and We are starting our concert." And so there are experts at VO about the new premiere. It’s not yet evening ... and cockroaches have already climbed out of all the cracks.
      4. Mar.Tirah 19 January 2020 06: 25 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        Quote: bessmertniy
        And I was waiting, hoping and believing ...

        Zhirik as always smashed EP and power.
        1. Stas157 19 January 2020 08: 17 New
          • 11
          • 1
          +10
          Zhirinovsky is valuable in that the only one (of such a rank) from there can tell and is telling the truth. About the government, about Kremlin relations, how everything is arranged and give a forecast for the future.

          We are all outside observers and (as the forum shows) is often mistaken in evaluations, out of ignorance. And Zhirinovsky is in the process and sees the whole kitchen from the inside. He knows all the actors in the process personally.

          Therefore, according to Zhirinovsky it’s useful to check your personal opinion (about what is really going on in the Kremlin) True, with a slight correction for cunning and interest. This cheated says one thing, but always does (votes) another.
  2. Same lech 19 January 2020 04: 49 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    I liked this performance of Zhirinovsky more smile ... you have to go to the masses ... to the masses ... you have to be closer to the people and not wipe your asses in the State Duma.
  3. Uncle lee 19 January 2020 04: 56 New
    • 10
    • 2
    +8
    The thirst for power also encourages not such political somersaults!
    PS And the pickle in the bank is muddy and the foam on top ...
    1. Aerodrome 19 January 2020 05: 03 New
      • 11
      • 2
      +9
      Zhirinovsky is often right, and it scares.
      1. Mestny 19 January 2020 09: 55 New
        • 2
        • 9
        -7
        And often the opposite.
        Doesn't that scare?
  4. bessmertniy 19 January 2020 05: 05 New
    • 6
    • 4
    +2
    It is very curious which is better: rotten democracy or strong dictatorship, or vice versa - strong democracy or rotten dictatorship. what It is likely that there is not much difference. Value in one form or another gives the result. If the people get worse, then he sweeps away without distinction either dictatorship or democracy. hi
    1. Same lech 19 January 2020 05: 12 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      If the people get worse, then he sweeps away without distinction either dictatorship or democracy.
      Yeah... what who would have guessed that he would sweep away Soviet power ... verily, nothing lasts forever under the moon.
      The dialectic of the development of human society dictates its own laws ... in which the political power of any party, even the most popular, is only a temporary phenomenon.
      1. Essex62 19 January 2020 20: 00 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        What really It’s the people who killed the mother’s mother, so he took it right and dared? The people sat on sofas with a beer brewer and crackers when a real action movie was shown live, shooting from tank guns at legitimate authority. Well, how did he, the people, knew that chewing gum and jeans would appear in abundance, but jobs, in unlimited quantities and at the place of residence, pensions equal to s / n, prices not changing for decades, and other nishtyaks would sink into oblivion. It’s not provided for
    2. New Year day 19 January 2020 06: 21 New
      • 14
      • 3
      +11
      Quote: bessmertniy
      If the people get worse, then he sweeps away without distinction either dictatorship or democracy

      therefore, they throw up buns and create the illusion of understanding his problems. Do you think that Putin saw the plight of the people only for 20 years of his rule? Where then did he look for 20 years?
      It’s just that the boiler is slowly boiling, because Medvedev was also “punished” and promised to throw some money, if only they wouldn’t buzz. But in general, everything is still, everything is as before. And therefore, in perspectives, they are question marks
      1. Astra wild 19 January 2020 08: 24 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        "where did he look 20 years old"? He looked over the bear’s shoulder and tried to understand what was attractive about the iPhone?
        1. Paul Siebert 19 January 2020 09: 13 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          Maybe they should ... get married? ..
    3. New Year day 19 January 2020 06: 24 New
      • 10
      • 3
      +7
      Quote: bessmertniy
      which is better: rotten democracy or strong dictatorship or vice versa - strong democracy or rotten dictatorship

      it is better when there is no stratification by property qualification, social elevators work and there are no problems with healthcare and education. When it is, it makes no difference what this system is called. The Germans were pleased with Hitler, we with Lenin and Stalin
      1. Mestny 19 January 2020 09: 56 New
        • 1
        • 16
        -15
        Here you would go there, to Stalin or Hitler.
        Are you on the warm couch on the Internet so happy.
        1. Essex62 19 January 2020 20: 08 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          And what, during the time of Stalin was not so? It was necessary to work and discipline? So what's the crime. Well, the enemies of the Soviet government on the bunk, ali against the wall also does not cause rejection. Class struggle, my friend. How can it be without this? The good man was Vissarionitch, did not finish the counte, did not finish ... Now we are reaping the benefits.
        2. Greenwood 20 January 2020 16: 37 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Quote: Mestny
          to Stalin or Hitler.
          To equate Stalin with Hitler is strong, even for Putin's "patriots." And I thought there’s nowhere to fall below ...
    4. Zhan 21 January 2020 21: 27 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: bessmertniy
      It is very curious which is better: rotten democracy or strong dictatorship, or vice versa - strong democracy or rotten dictatorship. what It is likely that there is not much difference. Value in one form or another gives the result. If the people get worse, then he sweeps away without distinction either dictatorship or democracy. hi

      That's right, it's not about the system created, you can call it anything. The point is people climbed into this system .. smile hi
  5. Kuroneko 19 January 2020 06: 15 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    What Zhirik can not be taken away - he, damn it, is the best wang among our politicians. For he knows very well like the whole "inner kitchen", knows how to grasp cause and effect relationships, and he is also a cynic by nature.
    Well, a lot of things came true, albeit not immediately. So-called “experts” would be worth learning.
    1. bessmertniy 19 January 2020 06: 38 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Here for the truth, he is cute to us. Another leader will not be able to maintain the same popularity of the Liberal Democratic Party when Zhirinovsky leaves his post.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. rocket757 19 January 2020 06: 42 New
      • 2
      • 4
      -2
      To be honest, many people consider it exactly like Zhirinovsky. It’s just that he can express his point of view loudly, publicly .... and most of the rest are limited to various “small town talkers”!
      By law, all doubts are interpreted in favor of ....
      And what is the use / harm to us, from empty talk and any doubts ???
      1. Kuroneko 19 January 2020 06: 53 New
        • 1
        • 3
        -2
        Quote: rocket757
        It’s just that he can express his point of view loudly, publicly .... and most of the rest are limited to various “small town talkers”!

        Just because he took place as a big politician in spite of everything and everything (initially, he was generally an outsider among this "brawl" of the entire post-soviet "elite" who joyfully jumped on the bones of the USSR), and successfully not only won, but even created your personal unique niche.
        1. rocket757 19 January 2020 07: 09 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          "We will go our own way!"
          Let's just say that if we consider this “unique”, only against the background of the then public, which is used to all the approvals. There was such a time, the glass could no longer control everything and everything, as tightly as they would like, and some, capitalists, understood that the swamp should be diluted with anything! That's diluted.
          And now, after all, everything has rolled back, almost to the full “approval”, for objective reasons, by the way.
  6. Amateur 19 January 2020 07: 51 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Every single woman has a man. Every man has a cheap bottle of vodka. (V.V.Zhirinovsky)

    And where? There is neither cheap vodka, nor peasants in the bottle. Only the decrepit Vladimir Volfovich himself remained with signs of progressive amnesia, forgetting that he had said 5 minutes ago and saying the exact opposite. fool
    1. Kuroneko 19 January 2020 08: 21 New
      • 0
      • 3
      -3
      Quote: Amateur
      And where?

      Maybe in the same place as the presidency of Zhirinovsky? Those. nowhere
      Why is this your complaint? Zhirik did not become (and will not) become president, so what do you require him to fulfill these campaign promises?
      Ugly.
      1. Amateur 19 January 2020 08: 36 New
        • 1
        • 3
        -2
        so what do you require him to fulfill these campaign promises?

        I do not demand anything from V.V. Zhirinovsky. I just draw the attention of the authors of the material that "Zhirik" is not the same.
        1. Kuroneko 19 January 2020 12: 14 New
          • 1
          • 3
          -2
          Everything is no longer a cake.
          Although I would (possibly) have not refused, on the orders of El-President Zhirik, to join the company of some “single woman”, because like a man.
          But here again, in this slogan there is a second bottom, which almost everyone does not notice. Will explain:
          It is no secret that women in general live more than men. It’s normal, it’s everywhere like that (feminists do not rush into the miners for nothing - just by the way). However, there are more of them! Especially with regards to Russia, we have long had a noticeable bias towards the female population. Those. stupidly men do not have enough for all BAB (that's why they are running to all sorts of Turks and Chinese, well, or to the "come along churek"). So, perhaps, the true message of Zhirik was to correct this situation. = 3
          Well, wash the boots in the Indian Ocean.
  7. Astra wild 19 January 2020 08: 27 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: bessmertniy
    That is, do you think that Mishustin will continue to pursue a predatory policy towards the people? what And I was waiting, hoping and believing ... request

    Worse than it was unlikely to become
    1. Kuroneko 19 January 2020 12: 26 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Astra wild
      Worse than it was unlikely to become

      The pessemist says: "no, it will not be worse ... = _ ="
      And the optimist (joyfully): "no, it will!"

      You, my friend, are a pessemist. And now we have the time of optimists.
      1. Astra wild 19 January 2020 20: 54 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        In fact, the word "old man" does not fit a woman. In Russia they used the expression: "mother" - note if you do not know or forgot
  8. Astra wild 19 January 2020 08: 33 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: rocket757
    To be honest, many people consider it exactly like Zhirinovsky. It’s just that he can express his point of view loudly, publicly .... and most of the rest are limited to various “small town talkers”!
    By law, all doubts are interpreted in favor of ....
    And what is the use / harm to us, from empty talk and any doubts ???

    You want to say that Zhirinovsky is a court jester? A kind of Vampa at the court of the noble Cedric. Remember Walter Scott Aivengo?
    1. AU Ivanov. 19 January 2020 10: 43 New
      • 2
      • 6
      -4
      Zhirinovsky is not a jester, he is completely on his mind. He sits tight in the Duma, the chair does not stagger, and the Liberal Democratic Party is gaining its own interest. And sometimes they do not forget, and pushes speech. And he does not need power - he is not blowing anyway.
  9. nikvic46 19 January 2020 08: 41 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Speaking in the Duma, the LDPR leader opposed the left deviation. Nowhere in the world do governments voluntarily make concessions to peoples. It must be said that Zhirinovsky’s team was very skillfully prepared for the people. Many negatively reacted to the distribution of money. But here was a positive moment. People saw that Zhirinovsky, like everyone else, uses ordinary money, and not some kind of card. I’m used to speaking in a simple accessible language. All these advantages should be taken into account by other factions.
  10. Mestny 19 January 2020 09: 59 New
    • 2
    • 8
    -6
    Agitprop he is agitprop.
    Well, at least honestly - yes, we are brainwashing in the direction necessary for the owners.
  11. Stirbjorn 19 January 2020 11: 14 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Great video from Semin! Explanatory slices and conclusions.
    Threat "Local" guard, in the comments, strainedly trying to drown out the voice of truth from Konstantin Semin wassat
    1. St Petrov 20 January 2020 22: 09 New
      • 1
      • 4
      -3
      trying to drown out the voice of truth from Konstantin Semin wassat


      laughing Syomin’s children and his wife are held hostage in casemates in the United States. He speaks on behalf of the CIA, for the amusement of an opposition tribe (well, how is it different with the Communists in the United States?)

      I would regret Kostya.

      Well, if without irony, you can’t drown him. He was taught by specialists at the Department of Documentary Studies at New York University. And the Anglo-Saxon media machine quite gives him a go. In YouTube, they don’t even banyat. It’s not bad with everything. If you look at how he was led beautifully up the career ladder ...

      Konstantin in general will continue to burn
      And here you are about drowning. Oppositionists. Sad.
  12. Kuroneko 19 January 2020 12: 37 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Astra wild
    You want to say that Zhirinovsky is a court jester? A kind of Vampa at the court of the noble Cedric. Remember Walter Scott Aivengo?

    Plyusan, perhaps, is purely for the fact that someone else has read and remembers Ivanhoe.
    In general, Zhirik began. But he successfully outgrew his original position as a jester (and it was only a mask - and the only option at that time: even though he was a jester, but not “through the bed”, figuratively speaking, he fell into high spheres).
    But yes, he is not a driving force. Out of inexperience, he had once tried, but now he has completely figured out all this swamp and is content with his role. Which is also good. Far from holy, but not scum. Definitely my type of politician. For others, the skin is much more (and much) dirty.
    1. Astra wild 20 January 2020 06: 42 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I answer +, I agree that: "my skin is much more dirty." Moreover, I will say: he is from not many politicians who are respected in the army.
  13. Guazdilla 19 January 2020 13: 51 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    In general, not bad. For agitation will come down ... a thimble.
    The most important thing, only, contrary to the slogan of the authors, is the facts, especially fried and in hot sauce. And most importantly, you need to speak quickly, quickly, and the pictures flickered so that one after another, so that there was no time to figure out the fraud.
    For example, did you find a jester with knowledge of several languages, his party and the champion in the number of nominations for the highest post of head of state and being in the capacity of deputy of the State Duma at the head of a fraction of this own party?
    But this passage is about 40 kilometers along abandoned factories. So after all, the market and capitalism. But the Chinese comrades, they do not use capitalist levers to ruin these same Ural plants with further cutting them to scrap?
    Well, about weavers with turners sitting in the State Council of the PRC - this is generally a naive move. Clayed soldiers in the ancient imperial palace probably had more weight than some nominal members of the State Council of the present. The tradition and ritual of eastern despots, decisive idiots. It’s not necessary to go far to confirm their caricature resemblance to their North Korean colleagues.
  14. Sotskiy 19 January 2020 13: 54 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Zhirinovsky:
    ... they require a left turn. There will be no left turn. There will be a right-liberal course ....

    In what, in what, but I completely agree with this statement of Zhirinovsky.
    All these “gestures” with a message, with the resignation and redistribution of the roles of the former Government, as well as the announced amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation (they have been happy with the RF Health for 20 years, about which the Guarantor has repeatedly said, and here again? Just like with the pension reform. lol ), speaks about one thing: there is a retention and strengthening of the system existing in the Russian Federation for 30 years, through changes through the Russian Federation’s health facilities.
    There is no talk of any “revolution from above”, but some stubbornly believe that right now, wolves and jackals will stop tearing sheep.
    Something in Putin’s words I didn’t find a cardinal turn back to paternalism, from which he declared and promoted the idea of ​​leaving, and even more so, at least reconsidering his attitude to the Soviet system. And without the Soviet experience of building a social state for the people living in it, all attempts will come down to the same thing that is happening now. Capitalism is killing and demography in the Russian Federation has shown it perfectly.