Dates of All-Russian Voting for Amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation Defined

Dates of All-Russian Voting for Amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation Defined

An all-Russian vote (not a referendum) on amendments to the country's main document - the Constitution of Russia - is planned to be held before May 1, 2020. This was reported by TASS, citing a source in the Federation Council.


As the source of the news agency explained, the procedure for voting on amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, proposed by Russian President Vladimir Putin during an annual appeal to the Federal Assembly, is currently being developed.

Until May 1, an all-Russian voluntary vote will take place on bills that will concern amendments to the Constitution, voting will take place one weekend

- said the source, adding that the exact date has not yet been determined.

The bills themselves on amendments to the Constitution are expected to be submitted to the State Duma in February-March this year.

On January 15, Vladimir Putin announced the need to amend the Constitution. At the same time, he emphasized that there was no talk of a complete revision of the document, since the 1993 Constitution "has not yet exhausted its potential." The president considered the amendments proposed by him to be put to the All-Russian vote.

In particular, it is proposed to abolish the priority of international law over Russian constitutional legislation and prohibit large federal officials from having dual citizenship. Part of the amendments will concern presidential elections and presidential terms, as well as the powers of the Russian parliament and local authorities in the field, etc.
Photos used:
marafonec.livejournal.com
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

186 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Nastia makarova 16 January 2020 13: 56 New
    • 6
    • 8
    -2
    "as well as the powers of the Russian parliament of local authorities" is this more local power?
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Stas157 16 January 2020 14: 10 New
        • 23
        • 17
        +6
        But I didn’t understand. Why did you need to edit the constitution? What can radically change (change in life) from these amendments?
        Maybe behind the tinsel of the priorities of international law and citizenship of officials lies something else?
        1. Tiksi-3 16 January 2020 14: 13 New
          • 12
          • 10
          +2
          Quote: Stas157
          I don’t understand

          Part of the amendments will concern presidential elections and presidential terms, as well as the powers of the Russian parliament and local authorities in the field - this is the most important thing in the amendments to the Constitution !! ....
          1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 16 January 2020 14: 24 New
            • 24
            • 29
            -5
            Quote: Tiksi-3
            Part of the amendments will concern presidential elections and presidential terms, as well as the powers of the Russian parliament and local authorities in the field - this is the most important thing in the amendments to the Constitution !! ....
            Exactly. Under the guise of a ban on dual citizenship of officials, the people will choose an irremovable government until the second advent, because all this goes in one package.
            1. Prjanik 16 January 2020 14: 37 New
              • 17
              • 9
              +8
              [quote = Vyacheslav Viktorovich] - this is the most important thing in the amendments to the Constitution !! .... [/ quote] That's right. Under the guise of a ban on dual citizenship of officials, the people will choose an irremovable government until the second advent, because all this goes in one package. [/ Quote]
              This is where you saw this?
              One and the same person should not occupy the post of President of the Russian Federation for more two terms in a row.
              1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 16 January 2020 14: 43 New
                • 19
                • 15
                +4
                For the president, the word "in a row" will be canceled, some key powers will be removed, and these powers will be transferred to a certain "state council" that controls all branches of government, only his head has neither time limits for his stay, nor through the election procedure. Something like this, for example.
                1. Prjanik 16 January 2020 14: 48 New
                  • 12
                  • 5
                  +7
                  I do not see this in the amendments so that the presidential powers passed to the State Council. However, while there is no full list with amendments we will look. But it’s already obvious to me that this will not happen.
                2. Yura 16 January 2020 16: 51 New
                  • 8
                  • 1
                  +7
                  Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich
                  For the president, the word "in a row" will be canceled

                  For these couple of days, I look no one has understood the change in this wording, which means that what infuriates both the left and right most will be eliminated by this amendment - if the same person could be elected President for two terms in a row and after a break two more consecutive terms, etc., then this amendment so that this word "in a row" will be removed, makes sense to this "the same person can be elected president no more than two times"that is, it doesn’t matter in a row or in a row only two times one person can be president. You guys think sometimes, and only then decide to be silent or speak.
              2. Tiksi-3 16 January 2020 15: 09 New
                • 6
                • 11
                -5
                Quote: Prjanik
                more than two consecutive terms.

                Putin-Medvedev-Putin ?? ... not?
                1. Prjanik 16 January 2020 15: 13 New
                  • 9
                  • 6
                  +3
                  Quote: Tiksi-3
                  Quote: Prjanik
                  more than two consecutive terms.

                  Putin-Medvedev-Putin ?? ... not?

                  Seriously, guess at 24g. the election of Medvedev Supreme, and then again the GDP ..? Something I really doubt.
                  1. Tiksi-3 16 January 2020 18: 04 New
                    • 4
                    • 2
                    +2
                    Quote: Prjanik
                    Seriously, guess at 24g. Medvedev's election as Supreme

                    what for? this is a scheme, last names change. is it really not clear?
              3. dirk182 16 January 2020 15: 21 New
                • 14
                • 6
                +8
                do not you see? The president will be a purely symbolic figure. And even if a worthy candidate appears in the country and is elected by the people, then nothing can change. Since the main functions will pass to the State Department in the person of the State Council and irremovable bureaucrats. Fathers, damn it, the founders.
                1. Prjanik 16 January 2020 15: 50 New
                  • 4
                  • 4
                  0
                  I honestly don’t see it. I only see that you are proposing, through amendments to the Constitution, a change in the form of government and the transfer of all the functionality and powers of power to the State Council, right? But I don’t think so, and soon we will see whose assumptions come true.
                2. Oyo Sarkazmi 16 January 2020 22: 17 New
                  • 1
                  • 2
                  -1
                  Quote: dirk182
                  And even if a worthy candidate appears in the country and is elected by the people,

                  Gee. Promises are always chosen, not virtues. Until a person begins to work, you will not know anything about him. Actor, farmer, politician. Many "consciences" turned out to be a rotten little soul, because they rose not "for", but "against." And since losers are always opposed, and waiting for favors and cookies from overseas saints, lackeys and executioners turn out to be “worthy” in this light. They are always ready to outweigh everyone who is against the truth. Their, Kholuy, truth.
          2. paul3390 16 January 2020 15: 08 New
            • 18
            • 10
            +8
            “I believe that the most important element in strengthening Russian statehood today is stability. Stability in the country, in society, cannot be ensured by any other way than the stability of the legislation and the country's main law - the Constitution. Therefore under no circumstances do I intend to change the Constitution". Someone Putin ..

            Well it turns out - once again lie?
            1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 16 January 2020 15: 30 New
              • 15
              • 9
              +6
              By the way, yes. To the piggy bank. Together with retirement age.
            2. Prjanik 16 January 2020 15: 59 New
              • 8
              • 6
              +2
              So normal amendments, or are some of you not happy?
              1. paul3390 16 January 2020 16: 02 New
                • 15
                • 5
                +10
                Virtually everything. And they raise questions - who prevented doing this before? What - for the expulsion of persons with dual citizenship from the state posts, it is necessary to amend the constitution? Like a newborn goblin - and the world turns out to be green ..

                But it doesn’t suit - for example, how freely our president treats his own words and promises ..
                To the clarifying question of the correspondent, does Putin really think so, the president replied: “You want me to swear on the blood and for the hundredth time repeat what I said 99 times already. I think that I have clearly articulated my answers to previous questions. It's enough».
                1. Prjanik 16 January 2020 16: 06 New
                  • 7
                  • 5
                  +2
                  Well, specifically, which ones, and explain why, if not difficult. And then it’s very curious, on the contrary, from the fact that I heard everything suits me ..
                  1. paul3390 16 January 2020 16: 07 New
                    • 12
                    • 6
                    +6
                    I don’t understand why to amend the constitution after such words: “As soon as we begin to rule the Constitution, this is already the path to some kind of unstable situation. It’s only worth starting - then it won’t stop. Therefore, it is better not to touch the Basic Law of the state and work within the framework that those people who worked on this law laid».

                    Something too often he began to take his words back since the last election ...
                    1. Golovan Jack 16 January 2020 16: 10 New
                      • 11
                      • 16
                      -5
                      Quote: paul3390
                      I do not understand why

                      This is far from the only thing you "do not understand" negative
                      1. paul3390 16 January 2020 16: 11 New
                        • 15
                        • 7
                        +8
                        That's for sure. For example - I don’t understand how much more people will endure all the charms of the non-current bourgeois system ..
                    2. Prjanik 16 January 2020 16: 11 New
                      • 9
                      • 5
                      +4
                      That is, when there is an opportunity to change something for the better, then do not? Proud to keep your word and leave everything as it is? There are really very good corrections.
            3. Genry 16 January 2020 18: 36 New
              • 3
              • 2
              +1
              Quote: paul3390
              Well it turns out - once again lie?

              You are for sure!
              Always trying to take the phrase out of context.
          3. paul3390 16 January 2020 15: 15 New
            • 15
            • 8
            +7
            We must not deal with amendments, but raise the question of the return of the 1936 Constitution. Stalin.
            1. Paranoid50 16 January 2020 16: 34 New
              • 8
              • 5
              +3
              Quote: paul3390
              raise the question of the return of the 1936 Constitution. Stalin.

              No, really, no half measures - only Russian Pravda, only hardcore. fellow Hey bo, the second day is already done. wassat Thanks for the mood. hi
              1. paul3390 16 January 2020 16: 44 New
                • 11
                • 6
                +5
                What - from the thought of the people's constitution begins to root? This is characteristic of the liberals - in the name and face of Stalin, it is convenient to cast out demons from them. They immediately start to fight in hysterics and the foam from their mouths whips .. Gee.
                1. Paranoid50 16 January 2020 17: 25 New
                  • 5
                  • 6
                  -1
                  Quote: paul3390
                  in the name and face of Stalin, demons can be handled out of them handily.

                  laughing laughing laughing Well, as required. yes Discount - if only for a respectable age, which was, in this case, alas, alone. request
                  1. paul3390 16 January 2020 18: 04 New
                    • 6
                    • 4
                    +2
                    Well - and you, my dear - even a discount will not help ..
          4. Alex Justice 16 January 2020 16: 03 New
            • 15
            • 2
            +13
            Part of the amendments will relate to presidential elections and presidential terms, as well as the powers of the Russian parliament and local authorities in the field - this is the most important thing in the amendments to the Constitution !! ....

            It would be nice to hold a referendum on the death penalty and confiscation of property from thieves.
          5. Genry 16 January 2020 18: 21 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            Quote: Tiksi-3
            this is the most important thing in the amendments to the Constitution !! ....

            The most important thing is that they will remove the priority of international law.
            After that, it will be possible to send the Central Bank far from the IMF (change the article) and create the State Bank of Russia.
          6. Sandor Clegane 16 January 2020 18: 46 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Quote: Tiksi-3
            this is the most important thing in the amendments to the Constitution!

            it doesn’t matter, because they will vote for her as the new prime minister - unanimously
        2. Altona 16 January 2020 15: 23 New
          • 20
          • 8
          +12
          Quote: Stas157
          But I didn’t understand. Why did you need to edit the constitution? What can radically change (change in life) from these amendments?
          Maybe behind the tinsel of the priorities of international law and citizenship of officials lies something else?

          -------------------------
          1) Local government is emasculating. We do not have a people, there is a population, you understand.
          2) The figure of the president will be decorative, the post of Chairman will be introduced, who will rule forever.
          3) The State Duma will be held responsible for the poor social atmosphere in the country. Would you like to? Get it.
          4) “Priority of international law” will end where you decide to appeal to the ECHR in order to challenge a wild court decision.
        3. vlad.svargin 16 January 2020 16: 14 New
          • 12
          • 5
          +7
          Stas157
          Why did you need to edit the constitution?

          It’s kind of relieving the pressure of the “boiling boiler” in one way or another - or rather, preserving a regime that has begun to have difficulty holding power in the near future ...
        4. Machito 16 January 2020 16: 41 New
          • 8
          • 3
          +5
          It is necessary to cancel the priority of international law over Russian and change the article on the subsoil (return resources to the people).
        5. skif8013 16 January 2020 16: 53 New
          • 6
          • 1
          +5
          Quote: Stas157
          But I didn’t understand. Why did you need to edit the constitution? What can radically change (change in life) from these amendments?
          Maybe behind the tinsel of the priorities of international law and citizenship of officials lies something else?

          Something sensible, but something on the contrary will be. If they accept the supremacy of Russian law, then along with the pluses and spit on sanctions, there will also be minuses. Cons will be expressed in the fact that it will be useless to sue the same international court of human rights. And other authorities. In theory, before you vote, you need to think very carefully, but the problem is that many people will vote without thinking to advise the box.
        6. Deck 16 January 2020 16: 59 New
          • 10
          • 3
          +7
          But I didn’t understand. Why did you need to edit the constitution?


        7. Sling cutter 16 January 2020 19: 31 New
          • 9
          • 2
          +7
          Quote: Stas157
          Maybe behind the tinsel of the priorities of international law and citizenship of officials lies something else?

          The catch lies in the name itself. Such a procedure should be called a REFERENDUM !!!
      2. Major Yurik 16 January 2020 14: 11 New
        • 24
        • 10
        +14
        Quote: lexus
        Vote, do not vote ... / Russian folk wisdom /

        The optimism of some compatriots just scales !!! request Whatever is done or one answer is offered: - Oh well, it ....! We know this, we went through this, and to the question What to do? - the answer: - HZ!
        Here to sit on the couch, not to go anywhere, not to offer anything and to spit poison on the range of hit - that's YES!
        Search and find! (Matthew gospel) negative
        1. Hunter 2 16 January 2020 14: 14 New
          • 23
          • 4
          +19
          Why didn’t they create a working commission for amendments? Maybe I also have wishes ... request
          That all amendments will only go through the presidential administration? I think this is not entirely correct.
          1. Stas157 16 January 2020 14: 18 New
            • 25
            • 9
            +16
            Quote: Hunter 2
            Why didn’t they create a working commission for amendments? Can I also have wishes ...

            But for this and did not create!
            1. Edik 16 January 2020 14: 24 New
              • 10
              • 8
              +2
              Quote: Stas157
              But for this and did not create!

              Stas, and here they are, again you "did not guess"
              1. Stas157 16 January 2020 14: 48 New
                • 13
                • 7
                +6
                Quote: Edik
                Stas and created, again you "did not guess"

                And what can the people (anyone who wants) make changes there? Don’t tell!

                Quote: Hunter 2
                Maybe I also have wishes ...

                Alexey turn to Edik. He promises to help bring your wishes to the Constitution!
                1. Edik 16 January 2020 14: 55 New
                  • 11
                  • 12
                  -1
                  Quote: Stas157
                  And what can the people (anyone who wants) make changes there? Don’t tell!

                  Excuse me good
                  But the people for the most part, well, not very smart and very subject to informational influence! Unfortunately this is so. Therefore, whoever relies on the people builds castles in the sand ..
                  So I wouldn’t let you take a decision on a cannon shot hi
                  1. Stas157 16 January 2020 15: 01 New
                    • 17
                    • 7
                    +10
                    Quote: Edik
                    people for the most partwell not very smart

                    A smart person would hardly say such a thing!

                    Quote: Edik
                    Here you i would and on a cannon shot he wasn’t allowed to make decisions

                    If you were my boss, then perhaps I would be upset. And so your assessment of my person is like a flood of offended.
                    1. Edik 16 January 2020 15: 13 New
                      • 5
                      • 11
                      -6
                      Quote: Stas157
                      A smart person would hardly say such a thing!

                      A smart person would not write this crap! If he had not thought about this, he would have at least thought and agreed!
                      For the most part, people are not very smart and I doubt very much that they will think the same way as intellectuals or geniuses, who are few in percentage! I have told you more than once Stas, well, do not go into a place where you don’t understand what.

                      Quote: Stas157
                      If you were my boss, then perhaps I would be upset. And so your assessment of my person is like a flood of offended.

                      I brought you as an example wink
                      1. Stas157 16 January 2020 15: 21 New
                        • 9
                        • 4
                        +5
                        Quote: Edik
                        I have repeatedly Stas said, well, do not go into a place where you don’t understand what.

                        I do not recognize you in makeup. Who are you? Whose reincarnation? Maybe I really listen to you under the pressure of a "famous authority"!))
                      2. Edik 16 January 2020 15: 24 New
                        • 4
                        • 9
                        -5
                        Quote: Stas157
                        I do not recognize you in makeup. Who are you? Whose reincarnation? Maybe I really listen to you under the pressure of a well-known authority!))

                        Why do you need this?
                        You have a memory + - a week hi
                        I apologize for repairs to be done in the apartment.
                  2. Alex Justice 16 January 2020 16: 21 New
                    • 5
                    • 3
                    +2
                    A smart person would hardly say such a thing!

                    A smart person realized that we are talking about specialists, educated people. The crowd processed by MEDIA is not able to make a competent decision. Go to other popular sites, read, mats and curses.
                    1. Stas157 16 January 2020 16: 31 New
                      • 10
                      • 6
                      +4
                      Quote: Alex Justice
                      Crowdprocessed by MEDIA

                      These are your rationalizations. It was written differently:
                      Quote: Edik
                      people for the most part, well, not very smart

                      The crowd and the people - there is a difference. Why not love your people like that and elevate yourself (he obviously considers himself smarter) over him? A very arrogant statement compiled as a whole (in mass) about the people, made clearly not from a great mind.
                    2. Edik 16 January 2020 17: 08 New
                      • 3
                      • 6
                      -3
                      Quote: Stas157
                      The crowd and the people - there is a difference. Why not love your people like that and elevate yourself (he obviously considers himself smarter) over him? A very arrogant statement compiled as a whole (in mass) about the people, made clearly not from a great mind.

                      Stas, well, I'm torn
                      Quote: Stas157
                      And what can the people (anyone who wants) make changes there? Don’t tell!

                      It’s you who claim to say your weighty word hi
            2. The comment was deleted.
        2. Lexus 16 January 2020 14: 24 New
          • 21
          • 13
          +8
          Because in the end they will offer either to starve to death, or to lay hands on oneself. Where is the choice?
          1. Edik 16 January 2020 14: 30 New
            • 11
            • 12
            -1
            Quote: lexus
            Because in the end they will offer either to starve to death, or to lay hands on oneself. Where is the choice?

            Alex, are you so aggravated? Are you afraid of what?
          2. Nastia makarova 16 January 2020 14: 41 New
            • 4
            • 6
            -2
            Now they are throwing cons
            1. Lexus 16 January 2020 14: 50 New
              • 9
              • 13
              -4
              I will pay crying laughing
              1. Sidor Amenpodestovich 16 January 2020 15: 01 New
                • 9
                • 7
                +2
                Judging by your comments, you are already doing this permanently.
          3. Prjanik 16 January 2020 14: 43 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            Don't be so upset.
            Another suggestion is to directly establish in the Constitution the norm that the minimum wage in Russia cannot be lower than the subsistence level.
            1. dirk182 16 January 2020 15: 23 New
              • 9
              • 4
              +5
              this item looks especially cynical, given the size of the living wage in our country
              1. Prjanik 16 January 2020 15: 40 New
                • 3
                • 2
                +1
                But still the minimum wage is still smaller and some are brazenly using it, I think you agree that a good correction?
      3. Krasnoyarsk 16 January 2020 14: 32 New
        • 7
        • 4
        +3
        Quote: Hunter 2

        That all amendments will only go through the presidential administration? I think this is not entirely correct.

        Only the president, the Duma, and the Federation Council possess the right of legislative initiative. Who do you belong to?
        I would also like to make a proposal - to include in the constitution, along with the ban on dual citizenship to these officials, also a ban on the acquisition of real estate abroad. And it would be nice if people who were educated abroad did not have the right to occupy state and elective posts.
        1. Hunter 2 16 January 2020 14: 40 New
          • 11
          • 2
          +9
          I do not need to quote Article 104 of the Constitution. By the way, they forgot about the legislative bodies of the constituent entities of the Federation, the Supreme and Constitutional Courts.
          As a citizen, I have the right to come up with proposals to the relevant authorities, and they, in turn, should consider my wishes. Well, if there is no working group from these representatives of the Government ... where, Hypothetically, should I contact?
          1. Krasnoyarsk 16 January 2020 14: 58 New
            • 7
            • 1
            +6
            Quote: Hunter 2
            I, as a citizen, have the right to come up with proposals

            I fully share your position, but ... They are such "tricks", legislators, that have made it possible for the people to take legislative initiative in such a way that it would be very problematic for us to come up with such an initiative.
            It is necessary to create an initiative group, register it, these groups should be at least in (I don’t know how many subjects of the federation), then when the authorities (which ???) will consider our proposals for amending (supplementing, amending) the constitution, then they can say - on this topic you cannot take the initiative, or - you need a referendum, but a referendum cannot be held because .........
            In general, you understand me. You will not argue with the fact that any government creates laws for itself, so that it is easier and more convenient to manage ochlos.
        2. Alex Justice 16 January 2020 16: 26 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          a ban on the acquisition of real estate abroad.

          Must be required. This way the money is withdrawn abroad.
          Persons educated abroad did not have the right to hold public and elective posts.

          Brute force. A patriot with a good education is in demand in Russia.
          1. Krasnoyarsk 16 January 2020 17: 05 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Quote: Alex Justice
            Brute force. A patriot with a good education is in demand in Russia.

            On the one hand, the Western system of education is worse than the Soviet, on the other, the Western system gives, in your words, a good education in demand in Russia.
            On the other hand, I doubt that the Western education system instilled patriotism in a Russian student studying, for example, in Germany, towards Russia. Rather, the opposite.
            1. Alex Justice 16 January 2020 17: 27 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              On the one hand, the Western education system is worse than the Soviet

              Not true, the Western education system is no worse than the Soviet one.
              I doubt that the Western education system instilled patriotism in a Russian student

              The Western education system teaches students the subject, not the politics. Studied at two universities, daughter graduated from university. Not a word about politics in the classroom.
              1. Krasnoyarsk 16 January 2020 17: 52 New
                • 3
                • 1
                +2
                Quote: Alex Justice
                Not a word about politics in the classroom.

                As if in a more understandable way ...
                To kill a person, you do not have to do it yourself or hire a killer. You can gradually bring him to suicide.
                Studying, for example, in the USA, a person involuntarily masters their values, changes, again involuntarily, their mentality, and adopts their lifestyle. Not completely, but partially. Someone to a greater extent, someone less, but always, he takes something from them. Coming to Russia at the state. position, he will involuntarily begin to introduce alien into our life.
                Let prof. activity, who are against. But it does not govern the state. structures.
                1. Alex Justice 16 January 2020 18: 10 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Here, law and order are top notch. Everything works like a car.
                  What is wrong if a person with such experience works in Russia.
                  1. Krasnoyarsk 16 January 2020 23: 52 New
                    • 1
                    • 1
                    0
                    Quote: Alex Justice
                    Here, law and order are top notch. Everything works like a car.

                    "What is good for the Russian is bad for the German." And vice versa.
      4. The popuas 16 January 2020 14: 34 New
        • 7
        • 2
        +5
        They created a commission of 50 people ... Hartung is definitely there
        1. Hunter 2 16 January 2020 14: 46 New
          • 6
          • 1
          +5
          Quote: Popuas
          They created a commission of 50 people ... Hartung is definitely there

          Thank you for prompting! hi in the article about this is not a word ...
          1. The popuas 16 January 2020 15: 46 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            I read it on another site ... Everything is somehow one-sided, the news is "voiced"
      5. Sidor Amenpodestovich 16 January 2020 15: 02 New
        • 4
        • 5
        -1
        Could you give an example of an amendment that you could propose?
        Only, please, without trivialities, like "To dispossess the oligarchs; to put everyone in prison; the resources to the people."
        Something really balanced and specific.
        1. Mcar 16 January 2020 15: 19 New
          • 6
          • 2
          +4
          Quote: Sydor Amenpospestovich
          Could you give an example of an amendment that you could propose?

          "prohibit large federal officials from having dual citizenship"
          1. Why only large? Small bug and smelly!
          2. Who and how will determine the "size" of the official? May I will determine !!!
          3. What will this ban give IF the “major official” has the only citizenship, and all his relatives, starting with their parents, children, spouse, and / or double, triple, ... seven citizenship?

          When there will be an exact wording, I’m sure, from five heels of “amendments,” I would propose only on this, not to mention others, moment.
    2. Far East 16 January 2020 14: 22 New
      • 10
      • 9
      +1
      major! below already answered! under the current government, NOTHING WILL CHANGE FOR THE GOOD people! hare! as you ask, for whom !? NOT for them! (power) go! (Seek and find! (Gospel according to Matthew)) this is not what!
    3. Tank jacket 16 January 2020 14: 34 New
      • 8
      • 4
      +4
      They like the colonial Gaidar constitution wassat
    4. Nastia makarova 16 January 2020 14: 41 New
      • 2
      • 8
      -6
      they deserve such a guide
      1. Varyag71 16 January 2020 15: 11 New
        • 5
        • 4
        +1
        What do you deserve?
        1. Nastia makarova 16 January 2020 15: 23 New
          • 2
          • 5
          -3
          no, not deserved
  2. Invoce 16 January 2020 14: 16 New
    • 10
    • 4
    +6
    Quote: lexus
    Vote, do not vote ... / Russian folk wisdom /

    Instead of changing beds, they would be busy recruiting new, not corrupt, responsible personnel to the government. And personal responsibility for business. Those. First, you need to change the law on personal responsibility in the civil service, control over the executive branch, etc.
    1. Lexus 16 January 2020 14: 32 New
      • 14
      • 7
      +7
      Recently revised the wonderful film by Sergei Bondarchuk, "They Fought for the Motherland." So, if the enemy is advancing, you need to fight for the Motherland! Instead of bargaining, as today's "gentlemen" do, who are not comrades at all to us. hi
      1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 16 January 2020 14: 39 New
        • 9
        • 8
        +1
        Quote: lexus
        So - if there are enemies around, you need to fight for the homeland!
        When you are looking for enemies in order to protect your homeland from them, it is useful to pay attention to those who pull the last from the people’s pockets, pointing at that moment with a finger somewhere in the other direction.
        1. Lexus 16 January 2020 14: 59 New
          • 6
          • 4
          +2
          those who pull the last from the people’s pocket

          One of the tasks of the "agent" is to undermine the material base, including population. Here is the answer to the question - who are they.
          1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 16 January 2020 15: 06 New
            • 4
            • 6
            -2
            US agents who point a finger at the US?
            1. Lexus 16 January 2020 15: 16 New
              • 5
              • 3
              +2
              US agents who point a finger at the US?

              Have they grieved the United States with anything? It is vitally important for recruited agents not to arouse suspicion, which is why they "poke a finger." And in the soul they show the direction where they will move to permanent residence, if that.
              1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 16 January 2020 15: 19 New
                • 3
                • 8
                -5
                Quote: lexus
                Have they grieved the United States with anything?
                From the latter, I can recall the sale of a SAM system in Turkey and the construction of SP2.
                1. Lexus 16 January 2020 15: 29 New
                  • 7
                  • 5
                  +2
                  sale of turkey air defense systems

                  Faster than you rejoice, the time will come (either Erdogan will “change his hands” once again, or he will be replaced by a more loyal US candidate), and all the “partners” in the Turkish S-400 will “roll around” enough.
                  construction of SP2

                  Do you seriously think that you can upset anyone by supplying raw materials? Or is everything smooth with the prospect with SP2? You never know what some say.
    2. Starover_Z 16 January 2020 14: 37 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Quote: Invoce
      Instead of changing beds, they would be busy recruiting new, not corrupt, responsible personnel to the government. And personal responsibility for business.

      So just after that
      prohibit large federal officials from having dual citizenship.

      and have to recruit new ones. The old will give up Russian citizenship. But the question arose - they will give up local citizenship, and will they free up their posts ?!
    3. Nastia makarova 16 January 2020 14: 42 New
      • 2
      • 5
      -3
      the problem is not in new frames, new ones will come, they will also steal
  3. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 16 January 2020 14: 20 New
    • 13
    • 10
    +3
    Such a normal manipulation is to push the amendments in one package so that they vote either for everything or against everyone. Like cunning parents who slip a bitter pill with candy to their child. They will focus on the clauses on dual citizenship and priority over international law, and when after a while the people will once again be surprised, “how much longer can one look at the same people, incapable of doing anything normal in the economy, how many years “it’s already passed” - it will not be remembered that it was he himself who voted for the relevant amendments to the constitution so that these people would sit unchanged. sad
    1. AUL
      AUL 16 January 2020 14: 38 New
      • 11
      • 4
      +7
      Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich
      Such a normal manipulation is to push the amendments in one package so that they vote either for everything or against everyone.

      For a normal vote, it is necessary that each amendment be voted as a separate item on the ballot. And then it would already be possible to decide which one passes and which one goes into the furnace. But, firstly, our authorities will not allow this, and secondly, if they suddenly allow it, they will consider it! Therefore, such a vote is a farce!
    2. Prjanik 16 January 2020 15: 07 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      So offhand, tell me which amendment does not suit you and why?
      1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 16 January 2020 15: 23 New
        • 2
        • 5
        -3
        There are no specific amendments yet, there is nothing to discuss in detail. But to the same extent that it is obvious to you that there will be no amendments allowing the current ones to remain in power for an unlimited time, it, in turn, is obvious to me that everything is planned for exactly that.
  4. mavrus 16 January 2020 14: 53 New
    • 5
    • 5
    0
    "And volleys of tank guns ..." in the 93rd "gave" us this "constitution."
    And today, "vote" or "do not vote" ... And no one is interested.
  • tihonmarine 16 January 2020 14: 18 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: Nastia Makarova
    is it more local power?

    Is it good or bad?
    1. Nastia makarova 16 January 2020 14: 43 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      I think that bad, self-government will begin in the regions
      1. tihonmarine 16 January 2020 14: 46 New
        • 2
        • 3
        -1
        Quote: Nastia Makarova
        I think that bad, self-government will begin in the regions

        And it will turn out like in the old film "Republic of Shkid".
        1. Nastia makarova 16 January 2020 14: 49 New
          • 1
          • 3
          -2
          it may turn out like this, but with us everything is unpredictable
          1. tihonmarine 16 January 2020 15: 08 New
            • 1
            • 3
            -2
            Quote: Nastia Makarova
            it may turn out like this, but with us everything is unpredictable

            Of course unpredictable, but to follow the actions of the chairman of the village council, it is very difficult for the upper authorities to follow, and even keep them in check.
            1. Nastia makarova 16 January 2020 15: 22 New
              • 1
              • 3
              -2
              so maybe there will be attempts to break away
              1. tihonmarine 16 January 2020 16: 09 New
                • 0
                • 5
                -5
                Quote: Nastia Makarova
                so maybe there will be attempts to break away

                And to someone that you and I wrote, oh, how I do not like it. Cossacks.
      2. dirk182 16 January 2020 15: 37 New
        • 3
        • 5
        -2
        but in the regions now is it otherwise? The essence of their ideas is that they will push all the problems to local government. As they say, they will shift the focus of popular discontent. That's all. Believe that Putin wants something there for the people ..... well, that's enough. 20 years after all passed. Already persistent rejection of his performances. Internal rejection. All these greasy and nodding faces. Gref won’t even fall asleep inadvertently. Reminds me of some kind of utopia. Tragicomedy. Correctly, Kvachkov said that the fate of the Soviet Union awaits our country.
        1. Nastia makarova 16 January 2020 15: 52 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          and who else will disconnect? sk republics? so they are all subsidized
          1. dirk182 16 January 2020 15: 58 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            This is a question for the regions, not for me. In my commentary, I emphasized on why the power strengthens municipal power.
  • Vend 16 January 2020 14: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Promptly. All right time for this is not much. The former government must pass laws and quit.
  • Sergey39 16 January 2020 13: 57 New
    • 8
    • 1
    +7
    And the elections to the Duma will be postponed to this fall.
  • GKS 2111 16 January 2020 13: 57 New
    • 16
    • 1
    +15
    How many of these votes have already been, one referendum on the USSR is worth what, the authorities have listened to popular opinion. Here the same thing will happen.
    prohibit large federal officials from having dual citizenship.
    But this had to be done a long time ago. Yes, and not only large ones.
    1. vvvjak 16 January 2020 14: 05 New
      • 9
      • 1
      +8
      Quote: GKS 2111
      prohibit large federal officials from having dual citizenship.
      But this had to be done a long time ago.

      Only the main thing is not to forget about the triple, etc. citizenship. And it will be like with Kolomoisky.
    2. Lelek 16 January 2020 14: 09 New
      • 12
      • 2
      +10
      Quote: GKS 2111
      Prohibit large federal officials from having dual citizenship.
      But this had to be done a long time ago. Yes, and not only large ones.

      hi
      Perhaps this will be one of the most significant points of the constitution. With two hands - FOR.
      1. Alexander I 16 January 2020 14: 41 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        Well, let's see if they will renounce citizenship and which one.
        1. Overlock 16 January 2020 22: 36 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: AlexanderI
          Well, let's see if they will renounce citizenship and which one.

          who will leave his, all the more, over the hill?
      2. Uncle lee 16 January 2020 14: 48 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Quote: Lelek
        double citizenship.

        And what will be more expensive: a foreign passport or a mandate? The dilemma .... And real estate tama ... Horror!
        1. Alexander I 17 January 2020 08: 23 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          They do not forbid to have real estate, because you can also have a rest without citizenship to relax abroad in your own home, for example, on a lake in Italy.
      3. kapitan92 16 January 2020 14: 55 New
        • 10
        • 2
        +8
        Quote: Lelek
        Quote: GKS 2111
        Prohibit large federal officials from having dual citizenship.
        But this had to be done a long time ago. Yes, and not only large ones.


        Perhaps this will be one of the most significant points of the constitution. With two hands - FOR.

        hi I am sure that there will be no one besides the officials themselves.
        I am not a lawyer, and I do not understand, and here the Basic Law of the country. Wasn't Putin able to ban a large Fed 10 years ago, by presidential decree? officials, deputies, members of SovFed to have dual citizenship, residence permit?
        The information you gave is not new, and on the open spaces of the Runet it has been “walking” for a long time, though in a more expanded form, including the Fed. judges, governors, etc.
        The question arises for Mishustin, as the head of the Federal Tax Service. With what means, the powerful of this world, did they get it? Are we talking about hundreds of thousands and millions of bucks? For ministerial salaries, bonuses? Which way and through which banks did the funds transfer for the acquisition of n / a, investment?
        Was our Guarantor unaware? laughing
        Everything that happens is directing, using rehearsed political technologies !!!
        “I do not believe it!”, As Stanislavsky said.
        Why not hold a referendum in September, on Election Day, about budget savings? No time? After all, the elections to the Duma of 2021 are on the nose!
        To maintain power after 2024 is the main goal of these events, along the way to remove the "snickering friends"!
        Something like that! hi
        1. Lelek 16 January 2020 21: 18 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Quote: kapitan92
          kapitan92

          hi
          Vyacheslav, these are matters of jurisdiction Gene. The prosecutor’s office, and this is why this agency did not bother, is a big, big question that the president of the Russian Federation should ask.
          1. kapitan92 16 January 2020 21: 58 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Quote: Lelek
            these are matters of jurisdiction Gene. The prosecutor’s office, and this is why this agency did not bother, is a big, big question that the president of the Russian Federation should ask.

            In order to answer this question, just see whose it is!?
            In 1983, Yuri Yakovlevich was entrusted with the leadership of the investigative department of the transport prosecutor’s office, G. Taishet. Until the mid-90s, Chaika held various managerial posts in regional law enforcement agencies, successfully coping with the duties of both the head of the state legal department and the prosecutor of the Irkutsk region.
            Another promotion took place in the fall of 1995: Yuri Chaika was appointed first deputy Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation.
            Over the years, as an assistant to the Prosecutor General of Russia, Yuri Yakovlevich took part in the investigation of several high-profile crimes - the case of the “Xerox box” (theft of half a million dollars from the Government House during the election campaign) and the Petrov case (receiving by the Minister of Finance 1 million rubles for a scam in favor of a commercial bank).
            In the winter of 1999, Seagull was appointed acting The Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation, when his predecessor, Yuri Skuratov, was removed from a responsible position. But the career growth of the graduate of the UIS was not limited to this. In 2000, the capital’s media was already full of the latest news that Chaika would take the chair of the Prosecutor General of Russia. After a few years, Yuri Yakovlevich will continue to hone his professional skills in bureaucratic offices. First, he will be invited to work in the government commission on administrative reform, and in the spring of 2004, he will take the post of Minister of Justice of the Russian Federation.
            Two years later he is Gen. N / A prosecutor
            Since 1999 his son is constantly in the field of vision of organs, I will not list the “exploits”, but he earned some serious articles. In any civilized country, Chaika’s career would have ended long ago, but he’s a “family member,” and that’s it!
            He is a "need" for the current government!
            What questions should the President ask him !? smile hi
            1. Lelek 16 January 2020 22: 08 New
              • 2
              • 3
              -1
              Quote: kapitan92
              What questions should the President ask him !?

              hi
              These are the ones that you listed if there were violations of the LAW (and not building a career). Career growth is not a crime or disorder, and you, I hope, know about this. Well, I don’t know what you call the elder Seagull "family member" and I will not judge this, but your ardor impresses me.
              1. kapitan92 16 January 2020 22: 18 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: Lelek
                but your ardor appeals to me.

                This, dear, is the ability to analyze the available information. hi
      4. dirk182 16 January 2020 15: 39 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Listen) whoever is needed will be left at the helm. Whether they have foreign citizenship or a residence permit. An example Matvienko has not taught anyone anything? The age limit for staying in the civil service has come, but she is still sitting.
        1. Sergej1972 16 January 2020 17: 11 New
          • 0
          • 4
          -4
          The Chairman of the Federation Council is not a civil servant.
          1. kapitan92 17 January 2020 00: 49 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Sergej1972
            The Chairman of the Federation Council is not a civil servant.

            Alas!
            By the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated January 11, 1995 No. 32 “On State Positions of the Russian Federation”, the Consolidated List of State Positions of the Russian Federation is established. As of June 15, 2017, this list includes the following posts:

            President of Russian Federation
            Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation
            First Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation
            Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation - Plenipotentiary Representative of the President of the Russian Federation in the Federal District
            Deputy Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation
            Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation - Chief of Staff of the Government of the Russian Federation
            Minister of the Russian Federation - Plenipotentiary Representative of the President of the Russian Federation in the Federal District
            Minister of the Russian Federation - Head of the Office of the Government of the Russian Federation
            Federal Minister
            Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Russian Federation (in a foreign state)
            Permanent Representative (Representative, Permanent Observer) of the Russian Federation to an international organization (in a foreign state)
            Chairman of the Council of the Federation of the Federal Assembly
            First Deputy, Deputy Chairman of the Council of the Federation of the Federal Assembly
            Chairman, Deputy Chairman of the Committee (Commission) of the Council of the Federation of the Federal Assembly
            Member of the Committee (Commission) of the Council of the Federation of the Federal Assembly
            Chairman of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly
            First Deputy, Deputy Chairman of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly
            Head of the faction in the State Duma of the Federal Assembly
            Chairman, Deputy Chairman of the Committee (Commission) of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly
            Member of the Committee (Commission) of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly
            Chairman of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation
            Deputy Chairman of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation
            Judge of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation
            Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
            First Deputy, Deputy Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
            Judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
            The Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation
            Chairman of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation
            Secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation
            Human rights ombudsman
            The Presidential Commissioner for the Protection of Entrepreneurs' Rights
            Head of the supreme state executive authority of a subject of the Russian Federation
            Chairman of the Accounts Chamber
            Deputy Chairman of the Accounts Chamber
            Auditor of the Accounts Chamber
            Chairman of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation
            Chairman of the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation
            Deputy Chairman of the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation
            Secretary of the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation
            Member of the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation (full-time position)
            President of the Federal Court
            Deputy Chairman of the Federal Court
            Federal judge
            Director General of the Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
            1. Sergej1972 17 January 2020 01: 17 New
              • 0
              • 2
              -2
              All these persons are officials. Do not confuse them with civil servants. The president, mayor, minister, governor, deputy are not civil servants.
              1. kapitan92 17 January 2020 01: 24 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: Sergej1972
                All these persons are officials. Do not confuse them with civil servants. The president, mayor, minister, governor, deputy are not civil servants.

                2. A state civil servant of a subject of the Russian Federation is a citizen who carries out professional service activities as public civil service of a subject of the Russian Federation and receives monetary support (remuneration) from the budget of the corresponding subject of the Russian Federation.
                Article 10. Civil servants ...

                The deputy is not a civil servant, since he does not occupy a public position. The list of government posts at the top. hi
    3. tihonmarine 16 January 2020 14: 26 New
      • 2
      • 4
      -2
      Quote: GKS 2111
      It will be the same here.
      prohibit large federal officials from having dual citizenship.
      But this had to be done a long time ago. Yes, and not only large ones.

      Something is incomprehensible here. I’m zero in the gradations and regalia of modern officials, but if you look, I’m a colonel of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, a prosecutor, members of the tax inspectorate, heads of departments of ministries, state television channels and radio. Well, a lot of other posts. And what can they have dual citizenship? And the question is, what kind of citizenship does the official consider a priority, Russian, or foreign, and how to find out?
    4. AUL
      AUL 16 January 2020 14: 42 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      Quote: GKS 2111
      prohibit large federal officials from having dual citizenship.

      On good - to prohibit any persons who are in the public service in the Russian Federation, to have citizenship of another state.
  • den3080 16 January 2020 13: 58 New
    • 12
    • 3
    +9
    The priority of international law over national is high time to cancel.
    Melkopuziks, who have de facto lost their sovereignty, can be guided by the so-called international law, but not Russia.
    Moreover, “international law” is nothing today. Whoever has the club more dictates this “right” as he needs or spits from a high bell tower.
    1. Fibrizio 16 January 2020 14: 29 New
      • 10
      • 4
      +6
      So the baton is big at the Rosgvardeyts if you look in Russia. And the council for it can only be found in the human rights court.
      Torture in the colonies. Checks do not find them, if they find, the case is jammed.
      If I can still argue with riot police, then I believe no one doubts that the prisoners are pressed and hollowed on a systematic basis?
      In the Russian Federation, complaints do not help. Saves only the international court.
      After the changes, there will be no one to complain about any violations.

      And in general, a strange formulation regarding the rule of international law. Here the authorities are a little disingenuous. The rule of law takes place only in the part that we have ratified, i.e. they themselves voluntarily agreed to comply. And this can be abolished without changing the constitution. Just withdraw the ratification (forgot what is called). For example, stop recognizing human rights.
  • leshiy076 16 January 2020 14: 01 New
    • 14
    • 2
    +12
    Amendment to Art. 15, on the priority of Russian law over international law, in principle, is impossible without revising the 1993 Constitution as a whole, and the second chapter is generally high time to change. It is necessary to nationalize natural resources and heavy industry, to prohibit not only ministers with foreign citizenship from being in the civil service, but also to all, including close relatives, to prohibit civil servants from having accounts and property abroad, including their close relatives.
    1. carstorm 11 16 January 2020 14: 11 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      why nationalize what is already state?))) natural resources were and are in the possession of the state
      1. leshiy076 16 January 2020 14: 16 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        Article 9
        1. Land and other natural resources are used and protected in the Russian Federation as the basis of the life and activities of the peoples living in the relevant territory.
        2. Land and other natural resources may be in private, state, municipal and other forms of ownership.
        1. carstorm 11 16 January 2020 14: 25 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          well?) and how to nationalize resources?))) it's like with oil. mining companies do not own subsoil, but only receive a license for their production. for which they pay money to the state. Do you want the state to be engaged in production?) we will get Venezuela in 15 years, which, with huge reserves of luxury products, production is completely ruined. because the state needs to fill the budget and not engage in investment in production. because officials, by their nature, think only of reporting periods and do not plan for years to come. because the profit will go to patching the holes of FIGs understand where instead of developing production with the words then catch up.
    2. tihonmarine 16 January 2020 14: 30 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Quote: leshiy076
      to ban not only ministers with foreign citizenship from being in the civil service, but also to everyone, including close relatives

      I’m exaggerating, of course, but is it possible to imagine that an official with American and Russian citizenship is sitting in the US presidential administration or in Congress.
    3. Fibrizio 16 January 2020 14: 31 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      And after that, the ruble will not become exchange currency, trade with our country will almost cease and it will also be impossible to go abroad. We will become a closed country.
      Well, half of the country will be out of work, because after such an outright robbery, big business will run away from Russia. Then we’ll heal.
  • Hypatius 16 January 2020 14: 03 New
    • 9
    • 3
    +6
    "Human Rights" will be canceled? Well, and with them, and so did not comply. And the referendum should not be held to the draft Constitution of 1993, approved (or not, for it is not known for certain) at the "popular discussion", the stump is clear. For the Constitution of the RSFSR is legitimate, and the people have not repealed it.
  • rocket757 16 January 2020 14: 04 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Voting results depend on how the question is asked correctly ...
    It is possible, after all, when the choice is without a choice.
    1. New Year day 16 January 2020 14: 27 New
      • 13
      • 8
      +5
      Quote: rocket757
      Voting results depend on how the question is asked correctly ...

      ..and where they interrogate.
      1. rocket757 16 January 2020 14: 37 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Quote: Silvestr
        ..and where they interrogate.

        It is truth too.
        However, you can recall a poll on whether to keep the Soviet Union or not ... after all, most of them answered SAVE! And where is now the Soviet Union ???
        They play only by their own rules, even when they lose according to them, they begin to defame!
        In short, NOT INTERESNO ... but will have to.
  • Nyrobsky 16 January 2020 14: 04 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    In particular, it is proposed to abolish the priority of international law over Russian constitutional legislation and prohibit large federal officials from having dual citizenship. Part of the amendments will concern presidential elections and presidential terms, as well as the powers of the Russian parliament and local authorities in the field, etc.
    And it would not be bad at all if the provision on "state ideology" were returned to the Constitution, so that we could finally decide on what kind of idea unites the whole people, what we are building, what priorities we are choosing and where we are moving.
    1. Krasnoyarsk 16 January 2020 14: 40 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Nyrobsky
      And it would not be bad at all if the provision on "state ideology" were returned to the Constitution, so that we could finally decide on what kind of idea unites the whole people, what we are building, what priorities we are choosing and where we are moving.

      They will never do this, because they are afraid, and suddenly, when choosing an ideology, the people will say - "There is no private ownership of the means of production!" Those. will choose the Soviet ideology.
  • Van 16 16 January 2020 14: 05 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    Voluntary vote? For some reason, I think that the turnout will be extremely low ..
    1. matross 16 January 2020 14: 18 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Did the word "voluntary" alert you? So it is in any election and referenda, if you are not in the know. No one is dragged to the sites by force no
      So wang the opposite - the turnout will be unprecedentedly high.
      1. My_log_in 16 January 2020 15: 27 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        something like this was already in the past (not far away) and even an explanation surfaced that a voluntary popular vote has no clear limits on the number of people participating, i.e. cannot be recognized as "failed". Also, unlike all other procedures, a simple majority of those who participated in the voting is enough to make a decision. All this is EMNIP, well, or IMHO (to whom it is more pleasant).
  • Maalkavianin 16 January 2020 14: 05 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    It is high time. The constitution needs to be redone for our country. Where I read that our constitution is tracing someone’s. Dutch or something.
    1. dirk182 16 January 2020 16: 27 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      and what is it, our constitution? The original would at least see
  • ultra 16 January 2020 14: 09 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    I hope we will vote for each amendment separately, and not in bulk.
  • Roman070280 16 January 2020 14: 12 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    How quickly they got down to business .. They didn’t have time to crow yesterday - as the date has already been set ..

    That’s why they don’t understand real problems either ..
    1. New Year day 16 January 2020 14: 25 New
      • 11
      • 7
      +4
      Quote: Roman070280
      That’s why they don’t understand real problems either ..

      they are just working with them - the growth of protest activity of the population, furniture rearrange. Suddenly the people will like it
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Nastia makarova 16 January 2020 14: 46 New
        • 1
        • 3
        -2
        may like it)))) our people are patient and hardy and believe everything
  • 2 Level Advisor 16 January 2020 14: 19 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    and a residence permit will also be banned? or a little voila-residence permit turns into citizenship? And this is not the point - why is it simply not to add in the Federal Law On the Civil Service for a long time?
    and the Duma may now not miss the government .. so what?
    and why in the article the topic of the State Council (under which IMHO - all these changes are a screen) is again hushed up?
    Well, plus, why not a referendum as it should be, but just a vote? because then we don’t have time for the Duma elections in September (is it more difficult for a referendum)?
    1. My_log_in 16 January 2020 15: 33 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      something like this was already in the past (not far away) and even an explanation surfaced that a voluntary popular vote has no clear limits on the number of people participating, i.e. cannot be recognized as "failed". Also, unlike all other procedures, a simple majority of those who participated in the voting is enough to make a decision. All this is EMNIP, well, or IMHO (to whom it is more pleasant).
  • New Year day 16 January 2020 14: 24 New
    • 9
    • 9
    0
    Voting is not a referendum; it can be held within the Garden Ring. Anyway, we predict the result
  • Fibrizio 16 January 2020 14: 37 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: carstorm 11
    Do you want the state to be engaged in production?)

    Of course not. It is necessary to work. Mining resources is tremendously difficult. Now, if you have a choice, take the lead at the factory or rent your warehouse, what will you choose? Of course to sit on a lease. Doing nothing is unnecessary, money is dripping, the only thing left is to share. And if you yourself, billions must be poured into one intelligence, but then there is zero risk. Come, find - you will send a share.
  • gorenina91 16 January 2020 14: 47 New
    • 7
    • 4
    +3
    -It is obvious that our guarantor is going to "become Nazarbayev" ...
    1. New Year day 16 January 2020 14: 53 New
      • 10
      • 4
      +6
      Quote: gorenina91
      Obviously, our guarantor is going to "become Nazarbayev" ...

      definitely!
    2. rich 16 January 2020 14: 59 New
      • 7
      • 3
      +4
      By the way, a very competent legal move. Like any other citizen of the Russian Federation, GDP can safely change the name. Then the questions about the third term will disappear by themselves yes
      1. gorenina91 16 January 2020 16: 43 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        -Yes., The surname has nothing to do with it ...
        -Read about Nazarbayev and find out ...- what real power he has today ... despite the fact that in fact he officially does not occupy the dominant public office ... in Kazakhstan ...
  • Mordor 16 January 2020 14: 49 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    The constitutional change is long overdue. Personally, I am for!
  • mavrus 16 January 2020 14: 56 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: vvvjak
    Quote: GKS 2111
    prohibit large federal officials from having dual citizenship.
    But this had to be done a long time ago.

    Only the main thing is not to forget about the triple, etc. citizenship. And it will be like with Kolomoisky.

    But how am I the difference that this bureaucrat himself is still here, if his kids are already there a long time ago ... And he is mentally with them, and not with us.
  • Hey
    Hey 16 January 2020 14: 57 New
    • 3
    • 4
    -1
    Until May 1, an all-Russian voluntary vote will take place on bills that will concern amendments to the Constitution, voting will take place one weekend
    - knowing how the voting is going on, this is equivalent to nod to the TV.
  • Varyag71 16 January 2020 15: 02 New
    • 5
    • 6
    -1
    Do not try to vote !!!
  • cloud catcher 16 January 2020 15: 06 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    The priority of Russian constitutional law over international, apparently, is good. It is possible to pursue an independent state policy, the main thing is that it be socially fair and no worse than the tried and tested world methods! Will UN Security Council decisions not be a priority?
    I would also raise the question of tax evasion in the regions, at least up to 80% in local budgets. (Specialist on these issues is available).
    Remove paragraph 65 of the Constitution on cities of federal significance. May all cities have equal opportunities for development. The capitals of the Federal District (not to mention the cities of the "periphery") and the Russian Federation did not differ in living standards so significantly. All counties -
    equal opportunities, but under systemic and transparent control by federal services ... etc.
  • The point 16 January 2020 15: 09 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    It feels like we are led by thimbles. what
  • Alikjan 16 January 2020 15: 11 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    And what about the central bank? This is the basis of sovereignty! It will be so by constitution and not ours (state)?
    They say that gentlemen from USA own it ...
    1. Vadim237 16 January 2020 15: 22 New
      • 2
      • 3
      -1
      If the Central Bank was not ours, it would not have transferred 98% of its revenues to the budget. And all our gold would be kept abroad.
  • Dikson 16 January 2020 15: 18 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Our top spit on this Constitution for a long time .. they do not live on it .. Cancel the priority of international law? So that no one else in The Hague and Stockholm could leave a complaint against our officials about the violation of human rights? That is, they corrected the Constitution, Russia will no longer respond to decisions of international courts or what? Well, type fines Ukraine does not pay .. Or how? In the USA, by decision of a Boston court, they can take and steal a citizen of the Russian Federation from a third country .. Will we also be like this after amendments to our Constitution or not? Maybe at the same time and change the anthem to "God save the king" .. well, so as not to hold referendums and voting twice? ..))
  • My_log_in 16 January 2020 15: 28 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Quote: ultra
    I hope we will vote for each amendment separately, and not in bulk.

    ... blessed is he who believes ...
  • My_log_in 16 January 2020 15: 31 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Cloud Catcher
    ... UN Security Council decisions will not be a priority?
    .

    In priority, but only to the extent not contrary to the current Constitution.
  • Revival 16 January 2020 15: 40 New
    • 6
    • 3
    +3
    Yeah, the screen is a screen.
    Here, for example, is a clause on the priority of domestic law over international standards.
    Pure populism ... fiction.
    This is a fight against a windmill, a solution to a problem that does not exist.
    And some political experts are also disgraced when explaining the people how good it is. So today, to lead FM Mikheev, he cited the following example: “Russia supposedly signed an international treaty, and then all of a sudden, at some stage it becomes clear that it contradicts the domestic law and we can easily not comply with it.”
    Kindergarten, simply, well, at least in public, it didn’t carry such nonsense.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Dimy4 16 January 2020 15: 46 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Article No. 6 of the Constitution "The guiding and guiding force in the Russian Federation is the party United Russia" wink
  • Prahlad 16 January 2020 16: 13 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    New Elbasy in Russian, guys, this is crazy! You can’t vote for that.
  • Sars 16 January 2020 16: 26 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    When it was said that the occupation clauses should be removed from the constitution, the answer was that this was not possible under the constitution.
    1. Sars 16 January 2020 16: 27 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      And as the regime needed, so any changes - please.
  • Pux-m 16 January 2020 16: 43 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Yes, Putin made a horse move ..
    And the EBN Constitution needs to be changed unambiguously, it was written under the dictation of the State Department, after the monstrous execution of the Supreme Council in 93.
  • gurzuf 16 January 2020 16: 46 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: Stas157
    A smart person would hardly say such a thing!

    Smart people, I think, would not have been led in 1991 to the whole, with dire consequences, adventure in which we are all.
  • Esaul 16 January 2020 17: 20 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    If he really wanted to develop Russia, he would have accepted these amendments to the constitution 10-15 years ago, and since he decided to do it shortly before the end of his last presidency, it means that this is just an excuse, in fact, he just wants to stay at the feeding trough and further his Organized crime groups to manage.
  • ZVS
    ZVS 16 January 2020 17: 34 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Amazing deal! Russia is the only country where the Constitution is being redone not under economic development, but under the tsar! Under his control, even after leaving the throne.
  • Victor March 47 16 January 2020 18: 22 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Quote: lexus
    Vote, do not vote ... / Russian folk wisdom /

    And now you can go to the forest and hang yourself there.
  • Victor March 47 16 January 2020 18: 27 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Quote: SU
    Amazing deal! Russia is the only country where the Constitution is being redone not under economic development, but under the tsar! Under his control, even after leaving the throne.

    That is, the advantages of English (let’s say so), law, over Russian, suit you? Constitutions have always been written taking into account the present moment in the country. There was at one time an article in the Constitution under number 6. A wonderful article, allowing a gang of petty crooks to spend the country's budget at its discretion, for the maintenance of fraternal parties around the world. A gang that never had a population even approaching 5% of the population. Or maybe you are more comfortable with such long-term tasks laid down in the Basic Law, which will hang for hundreds of years, such items as joining NATO by your fellow tribesmen in Ukraine?
    1. kapitan92 16 January 2020 22: 15 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Victor March 47
      Constitutions have always been written taking into account the present moment in the country.

      Oh !?
      The US Constitution was adopted on September 17, 1787. at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia and subsequently ratified by all thirteen then existing US states. It is considered the first constitution in the world in the modern sense. It consists of seven articles; during the Constitution, twenty-seven amendments have been adopted, which are its integral part.

      Something in our country a lot! laughing hi
  • dirk182 16 January 2020 18: 45 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    When they wanted to hold a referendum on pension reform, they pulled and were silent. Putin himself deigned to squeeze out something ridiculous. Pension reform, which, in fact, contradicts our Constitution, came into effect without any referendum. And now how quickly everything is organized. I did not have time to announce how the action plan has matured and the deadlines have been set. Oh, sham. Like our brother will be deceived again.
    1. TAMBU 18 January 2020 01: 57 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      there already and the result is ready ... they will say May 1 ...
  • Mentat 16 January 2020 22: 54 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: Prjanik
    So normal amendments, or are some of you not happy?

    They will not be happy with everything that happens in Russia, always. Do you think they’re discussing amendments here?
  • dirk182 16 January 2020 23: 21 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    The working group on the preparation of amendments to the Constitution will include Zakhar Prilepin, Ataman Cossacks Doluda, Senator Klishas and actor Mashkov
    I stand applauding simply. After all, by the same. It’s strange that Timati is not. And he tried so hard lately. I even tried to sing again. Why is Putin not aware of the foreign citizenship of Klishas? Does anyone else have doubts?
    And the last one. Today I caught myself thinking. And who is our likely adversary? Someone saw a document of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation indicating this? Why are our teachings impersonal or anti-terror? I hear the concern. But the wording did not hear, did not see.
  • KrolikZanuda 17 January 2020 05: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    State employees, are you ready?)
  • fa2998 17 January 2020 18: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich
    doesn’t go through the election procedure.

    This is already called DICTATURE! They would hold a referendum on transferring pensions to 60-65. Then they themselves. negative hi
  • Alexey from Perm 17 January 2020 20: 01 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    You need to seriously understand, otherwise the "good" changes are visible, and others?
  • TAMBU 18 January 2020 01: 56 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    ...etc.
    sane? and what all the changes to the basic law broke write? like che is not important?