Military Review

European Parliament accuses Russia of distorting history

154
European Parliament accuses Russia of distorting history

The European Parliament once again accused Russia of trying to rewrite historyin particular, the history of World War II. Corresponding accusations were made in the framework of the discussion "Distortion of European history and the memory of World War II." The broadcast was conducted by the EP website.


EP MP from the European People’s Party, Manfred Weber, has accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of trying to "rewrite history." The question again concerned the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. According to the European MP, it was the signing of this pact that led to the outbreak of World War II.

We at the European People's Party cannot accept Putin’s attempts to rewrite history. Although the Soviet Union suffered enormous losses during the war and its soldiers showed heroism, it cannot be denied that the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact led to the outbreak of World War II.

- he said.

The Pact of Hitler and Stalin [Molotov-Ribbentrop] became an agreement between two devils, two monstrous dictators. For millions of European citizens, the Hitler-Stalin Pact marked the beginning of decades of oppression and suffering. Hitler-Stalin Pact - Crime Against Democracy and Peace

- the site quotes the words Weber.

In turn, a deputy from the European People’s Party and former Latvian Foreign Minister Sandra Kalniete called Stalin "Hitler's ally." According to her, the USSR supposedly allowed Germany to attack Western Europe and left Britain alone with the Wehrmacht troops.

However, during the discussion, words were voiced in defense of the USSR. Vera Jurova, European Commission Vice-President, called the unacceptability of equating the USSR with Nazi Germany.

We must not forget what Soviet soldiers did during World War II, when Germany was an enemy of the USSR. Soviet soldiers suffered huge sacrifices

- she said.

Earlier, Russian leader Vladimir Putin criticized the resolution of the European Parliament, which claimed that the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact led to the outbreak of war. According to Putin, the war was not provoked by a pact, but by the so-called Munich agreement of 1938 between Adolf Hitler and representatives of Great Britain, France and Italy. The Russian president noted the attempts of the collective West to distort history and called for preserving the truth about the war, opposing attempts to falsify.
154 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Gennady Fomkin
    Gennady Fomkin 16 January 2020 10: 27
    +51
    Putin just quoted one other document ... And they have such sorrow ... What will happen if you start to quote from the document per month ... laughing laughing
    1. Hunter 2
      Hunter 2 16 January 2020 10: 34
      +68
      What are they attached to the non-aggression pact between the USSR and Germany? Poland, England, France - it was possible to have such agreements, but the USSR - not?
      May they better answer for the Munich agreement!
      1. novel66
        novel66 16 January 2020 10: 38
        +18
        Munich was a gentleman, this is possible lol big ones! hi
        1. Hunter 2
          Hunter 2 16 January 2020 10: 57
          +20
          Hello Roman hi ! Yeah ... razdanilili on Gentlemensky Czechoslovakia, and so everything is fine! Well, we got it - what we ourselves created, now they are looking for the extreme ones. am
          1. orionvitt
            orionvitt 16 January 2020 13: 42
            +9
            Quote: Hunter 2
            razderbanili on Gentlemensky Czechoslovakia,

            They forgot about Austria. For some reason, few people mention it. But it was, even before Czechoslovakia.
      2. Mountain shooter
        Mountain shooter 16 January 2020 10: 42
        +11
        Quote: Hunter 2
        May they better answer for the Munich agreement!

        So they want to change the outcome of World War II. Make the winners the culprits, and on this base unite the decaying coalition.
      3. Prjanik
        Prjanik 16 January 2020 10: 47
        +8
        They will not blame themselves, but Russia has the task of demonizing, including history, that’s what they have attached to the pact. Moreover, such a year is the 75th of the Great Victory, and somehow it is necessary to spoil it, so this is still so, flowers.
        1. nov_tech.vrn
          nov_tech.vrn 16 January 2020 17: 14
          +4
          And then there are gifts from petty dirty tricks of Khrushchev and Gorbachev and a whole cohort of democratic Jews from the denigrants of the USSR.
      4. DMB_95
        DMB_95 16 January 2020 11: 10
        +12
        Quote: Hunter 2
        What are they attached to the non-aggression pact between the USSR and Germany? Poland, England, France - it was possible to have such agreements, but the USSR - not?
        May they better answer for the Munich agreement!

        And to whom should they answer, before the Czechs and Slovaks ?? So they don't even blather on this topic. Well, all the non-aggression treaties between Germany and the Euro-countries make these very countries guilty of pushing Hitler to War. And now, in order to transfer the responsibility and blame for provoking the 2nd World War from themselves, the "loved ones", they have to blame everything on the USSR - there is no one else. However, Western countries have done so, are doing and will always do so. We must officially send them to all letters, and teach our children the Correct History.
        1. Xenofont
          Xenofont 16 January 2020 15: 17
          +2
          And the Slovaks sent several divisions to the Eastern Front, reached Rostov, fought in the south of Ukraine, and even engaged in something indecent in Belarus. Well, at 43 they were so gouged that they weren’t collected ...
      5. Victor N
        Victor N 16 January 2020 11: 14
        0
        Weber is a GERMAN surname, he would be silent in a rag, a descendant of "the highest Aryan race."
        1. Lipchanin
          Lipchanin 16 January 2020 12: 11
          +1
          Quote: Victor N
          Weber is a GERMAN surname, he would be silent in a rag, a descendant of "the highest Aryan race."

          And note, the Germans do not raise this topic. Muffs fed by the State Department
      6. Starover_Z
        Starover_Z 16 January 2020 11: 18
        0
        Quote: Hunter 2
        What are they attached to the non-aggression pact between the USSR and Germany? Poland, England, France - it was possible to have such agreements, but the USSR - not?

        The USSR supposedly allowed Germany to attack Western Europe and left Britain alone with the Wehrmacht troops.

        And the dogs pull gas pipelines to these sons and daughters, and even for their money ?!
        1. Alex Justice
          Alex Justice 16 January 2020 16: 51
          0
          And the dogs pull gas pipelines to these sons and daughters, and even for their money ?!

          And then they will milk for decades
      7. zloybond
        zloybond 16 January 2020 11: 48
        +2
        "You will answer us for Sevastopol !!!" ..))))
      8. Basil50
        Basil50 16 January 2020 12: 49
        +6
        hunter
        Can you imagine what they wrote in those countries that are now in the EU Prior to signing the * Ribotrop * MOLOTOV pact *?
        So, in all these countries, future EU members, the SOVIET UNION was accused of lack of peace, because they did NOT sign a non-aggression pact with the Germans *.
        1. okunevich_rv
          okunevich_rv 17 January 2020 09: 01
          +1
          Yes, dear, just like that, only in promoting the truth you need to invest in creating both documentary films and feature films, but based on real documents and with links in the credits to documents, not only history lessons, namely, historical films worked out, any cheap stuff is enough to screen.
      9. g1v2
        g1v2 16 January 2020 16: 55
        +6
        Because within the framework of the ongoing dehumanization of Russia, it is quite logical to accuse her also at the beginning of WWII. Sooner or later, they will remember that Russia was at fault at the beginning of the WWII. Again, do not blame themselves. request And the eastern "Mordor" is quite accustomed to blame. I would not be surprised if sooner or later American schoolchildren are told that it was Russia that interrupted the Indians. lol
    2. NKT
      NKT 16 January 2020 10: 42
      +5
      What happens if you start citing the document per month ..


      Quote to the European Parliament, let the bile come .....
      1. Lipchanin
        Lipchanin 16 January 2020 11: 03
        +1
        Quote: NKT
        To quote in the European Parliament,

        To whom? They have waxed ears. And before our eyes, anti-Russian blinders are dressed.
        They at least write in the eyes, still you will not get
        1. NKT
          NKT 16 January 2020 11: 06
          +11
          All the same, it is necessary to poke their faces into history, otherwise, in due time, the good USSR covered European schools with a veil, and now they have gotten a distortion of facts.
          1. Lipchanin
            Lipchanin 16 January 2020 11: 11
            +5
            Quote: NKT
            Anyway, you have to poke their face in history,

            So they have a different "story"
            It has long been rewritten.
            The younger generation in Japan are sure that the USSR dropped an atomic bomb on them. Do you think they can be convinced of the opposite?
            Then the neighbors who were still studying in Soviet schools according to Soviet textbooks got their brains twisted so hard that it was impossible to reach it.
    3. knn54
      knn54 16 January 2020 11: 30
      +1
      - The question AGAIN concerned the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. According to the European MP, it was the signing of this pact that led to the outbreak of World War II.
      If a person often claims that he is not ..., then he himself doubts this
      In the documents of the Nuremberg trials EVERYTHING is arranged on the shelves!
    4. skif8013
      skif8013 17 January 2020 17: 10
      0
      Quote: Gennady Fomkin
      Putin just quoted one other document ... And they have such sorrow ... What will happen if you start to quote from the document per month ... laughing laughing

      And you have to start, it's time. It is ripe for their excuses to end on the 10th leaf.
  2. The Siberian barber
    The Siberian barber 16 January 2020 10: 29
    +3
    Here, the main thing is not to forget to pay for the "ticket" to this circus on time wassat
    It is also a "platform for the exchange of opinions"
    1. axiles100682
      axiles100682 16 January 2020 11: 07
      +6
      What kind of question did they return to this serpentarium for? Masochists are some kind
  3. Kerensky
    Kerensky 16 January 2020 10: 31
    +2
    Archives must be opened. What is it that, after so many years, people are not supposed to know?
    1. Andrey VOV
      Andrey VOV 16 January 2020 10: 43
      +1
      This period is all open
      1. Tatyana Pershina
        Tatyana Pershina 16 January 2020 14: 53
        +2
        Not all. Britain and the United States froze many documents of that time for another 50 years. Obviously, they are waiting for the letters to fade on them.
  4. rocket757
    rocket757 16 January 2020 10: 31
    +6
    A conversation between the deaf and the blind.
    Why do we need this almshouse?
    Stand aside and see how their own ... their incompetence will be destroyed.
  5. prior
    prior 16 January 2020 10: 36
    +1
    And our grandfathers sacrificed their lives for this "barnyard" called united Europe ?!
    But there is hope for higher justice.
  6. Prjanik
    Prjanik 16 January 2020 10: 36
    +4
    Well, fuck how "grateful" Europe began to bend! It's great that they decided to create the largest archive of documents and chronicles of the Second World War, let them be distorted with anger. yes
  7. Proton
    Proton 16 January 2020 10: 37
    +1
    They are all malacholny there in this EP wassat
  8. bars1
    bars1 16 January 2020 10: 38
    +7
    ,,The USSR allowed Hitler to attack Zap. Europe and left Britain alone with the Wehrmacht!"Fuck, we are accused that we wanted to ensure our own safety and signed the famous Act. And the fact that the representatives of Europe themselves kissed Hitler, pacifying him, for which they paid, is modestly silent. Bingo! Finish!
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 16 January 2020 11: 23
      -3
      Quote: bars1
      And the fact that the representatives of Europe themselves kissed Hitler, pacifying him, for which they paid, is modestly silent. Bingo! The finish!

      They just happily lay under Hitler. For the hundredth time I will say "Stalin did not need to" liberate Europe from Hitler. "
  9. iuocsfyu
    iuocsfyu 16 January 2020 10: 39
    -35
    We at the European People's Party cannot accept Putin’s attempts to rewrite history. Although the Soviet Union suffered enormous losses during the war and its soldiers showed heroism, it cannot be denied that the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact led to the outbreak of World War II.
    The Pact of Hitler and Stalin [Molotov-Ribbentrop] became an agreement between two devils, two monstrous dictators. For millions of European citizens, the Hitler-Stalin Pact marked the beginning of decades of oppression and suffering. Hitler-Stalin Pact - Crime Against Democracy and Peace


    And there is. And to justify this by the fact that the Europeans themselves allowed Hitler to do what he wanted, will not work. Whatever European countries allow Hitler, this is not comparable to the fact that the Russians fought on the side of the Nazis. And the excuses of their crime by the fact that others also committed never justify the offender.

    PS: I remember a phrase from a history textbook about how Hitler's Germany "treacherously attacked" in violation of the pact. I've always been interested in this paradox. To attack treacherously one had to believe. Who? Hitler? While he was crushing Europe and destroying the Jews?
    But if he had not attacked "treacherously", it would be good; Would the Russians also help him solve the Jewish question? And would you help make the whole of Europe fascist?
    1. Alexander Suvorov
      Alexander Suvorov 16 January 2020 11: 05
      +15
      iuocsfyu (iuocsfyu)
      Whatever European countries allow Hitler, this is not comparable to the fact that the Russians fought on the side of the Nazis.
      I understand that to enter into polemics with someone like you is to get covered in mud, but nevertheless, when did the Russians "fought on the side of the fascists" ?!
      And the excuses of their crime by the fact that others also committed never justify the offender.
      What is the composition of the "crime"?
      While he crushed Europe and destroyed the Jews?
      And what does the USSR care about Europe and the Jews? Didn’t we have our problems? And by the way, the USSR tried to help Europe against Hitler when it wanted to provide military assistance to Czechoslovakia, but who didn’t miss our troops, do not remind?

      P.S. Where does this rot come from? Otkel will not be respected, from skakuasii or from the Baltic?
      1. iuocsfyu
        iuocsfyu 16 January 2020 12: 13
        -16
        Quote: Alexander Suvorov
        I understand that to enter into polemics with someone like you is to get covered in mud, but nevertheless, when did the Russians "fought on the side of the fascists" ?!

        - And I understand that discussions are useless; especially with representatives of the empire. Therefore, I left a comment not just to discuss it, but to voice my own opinion. Let everyone remain in their opinion.

        PS: I, unlike the citizens of the empire, perfectly know the answer to the question: Why did the whole world have one war, the Second World War, and for the Russians propaganda came up with 2 wars - the Second World War and the Great Patriotic War?
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Lipchanin
          Lipchanin 16 January 2020 12: 33
          +4
          Quote: iuocsfyu
          Unlike the citizens of the empire, I perfectly know the answer to the question: Why did the whole world have one war, the Second World War, and for the Russians propaganda came up with 2 wars - the Second World War and the Great Patriotic War?

          There was ONE war for us.
          THE GREAT PATRIOTIC WAR
          They called it because they attacked the USSR, our homeland.
          It is not clear to us what kind of war the Patriotic War of 1812 was. There, like Napoleon, the whole geyropu was nightmare. And again, our kakzaki took Paris.
          What is "Bistro" to tell?
          We called it World War II because we took part in the finishing work of the Nazi allies. Remind about the Kwantung army too?
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. Lipchanin
              Lipchanin 16 January 2020 13: 04
              +1
              Quote: iuocsfyu
              Yeah, and she started later than the Second Virova,

              And so she was DOMESTIC.
              They attacked our MOTHERLAND, our FATHERLAND
              There, for example, who attacked Argentina? And she kind of "took part"
              Who finished off Japan?
              1. The comment was deleted.
        3. Foul skeptic
          Foul skeptic 16 January 2020 13: 18
          0
          Unlike the citizens of the empire, I perfectly know the answer to the question: Why did the whole world have one war, the Second World War, and for the Russians propaganda came up with 2 wars - the Second World War and the Great Patriotic War?

          Why? Very interesting. As interesting as the use of the word "invented" - did you come up with it when something was not there until the moment of inventing it? What was not - the Second World War or the Great Patriotic War? lol
          And then tell (according to your reasoning), well, for example, what did not exist yet - World War II or the Sino-Japanese War. ?
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. Foul skeptic
              Foul skeptic 16 January 2020 13: 50
              +1
              Great Patriotic War, until Hitler Germany "treacherously attacked"

              But what, an event can exist before the beginning of himself? Schrödinger's cat is just some.
              Sino-Japanese war existed before the Japanese attack on China?
              Why are you putting the word "treacherously" in quotation marks? Don't you understand its semantics?
              Allow a personal question?
              How old are you and are your parents alive? And the grandparents? Are they "homo sovieticus" or not? You are, apparently, a new link in evolution.
        4. Rzzz
          Rzzz 16 January 2020 13: 49
          +4
          Quote: iuocsfyu
          Why did the whole world have one war, the Second World War, and for the Russians propaganda came up with 2 wars - the Second World War and the Great Patriotic War?

          The world was solving its world problems, and our country had a question of survival. The survival of both the state as a whole and the people, and even each of the people individually. Therefore, they fought with the enemy not for life, but for death, they knew that he would not spare.
          If this is not clear to you, then this is the problem of your education and upbringing.
          1. iuocsfyu
            iuocsfyu 16 January 2020 14: 24
            -9
            Quote: rzzz
            The world was solving its world problems, and our country had a question of survival.
            - The problems that your country and its then ally created for him.

            Quote: rzzz
            Therefore, they fought with the enemy not for life, but for death, they knew that he would not spare.

            Uh-huh. And before that, together with this enemy, they created the very problems for the world, which later "raised the question of survival" for Sovk.
            1. Rzzz
              Rzzz 16 January 2020 16: 00
              +2
              Our country did not create problems for anyone, it was not before. The only problem that was created was that the war was postponed for a year, which made it possible for Adolf to seize Europe for himself. Although Europe saw itself in a different role, the conqueror of the eastern "barbarians". Pilsudski and his comrades explicitly negotiated with a friend Adik about a march to the east, they did not agree only when the negotiations came to the division of the loot.
            2. evgic
              evgic 16 January 2020 21: 07
              +1
              Your mental and moral degradation has exceeded all possible limits, it is amazing how you still manage to cope with the keyboard. Germany is an ally of the USSR. Well then, Poland is also an ally of Germany. And before that they became Britain and France. I wonder what rubbish you got education
        5. Tank hard
          Tank hard 16 January 2020 15: 25
          +2
          Quote: iuocsfyu
          And I understand that discussions are useless; especially with representatives of the empire. Therefore, he left a comment not just to discuss, but to voice his own opinion.

          You don’t have to speak here, you can shout in your toilet. wink
    2. Ka-52
      Ka-52 16 January 2020 11: 09
      +9
      And there is. And to justify this by the fact that the Europeans themselves allowed Hitler to do what he wanted, will not work. Whatever European countries allow Hitler, this is not comparable to the fact that the Russians fought on the side of the Nazis. And the excuses of their crime by the fact that others also committed never justify the offender.

      PS: I remember a phrase from a history textbook about how Hitler's Germany "treacherously attacked" in violation of the pact. I've always been interested in this paradox. To attack treacherously one had to believe. Who? Hitler? While he was crushing Europe and destroying the Jews?
      But if he had not attacked "treacherously", it would be good; Would the Russians also help him solve the Jewish question? And would you help make the whole of Europe fascist?

      no need to familiarize readers with the world of your personal parallel universe. What happened and is happening locally in your head is of no interest to anyone.
      Whatever European countries allow Hitler, this is not comparable to the fact that the Russians fought on the side of the Nazis

      interesting, but the Europeans did not fight on the side of Nazi Germany? It may be explained, WHO fought in the following SS compounds:
      - 27th volunteer grenadier division of the SS "Langemark" (1st Flemish);
      - 28th SS volunteer tank grenadier division “Wallonia” (1st Walloon);
      - 33rd SS Grenadier Division Charlemagne (1st French);
      - 23rd Volunteer Motorized SS Division "Nederland" (1st Dutch);
      - 23rd SS Mountain Division Kama (2nd Croatian);
      - 13th SS Mountain Division “Khanjar” (1st Croatian);
      - 14th SS division "Galicia" (1st Ukrainian);
      - 15th SS Grenadier Division (1st Latvian);
      - 19th SS Grenadier Division (2st Latvian);
      - 20th SS Grenadier Division (1st Estonian);
      - 24th SS Mining Division Karstjäger (Italian)
      And that's not all
      In your wizarding world of dreams, were these units equipped exclusively with Russian (not even Ukrainians, Belarusians, Kazakhs and other nationalities inhabiting the USSR) soldiers? laughing
      1. mihstep
        mihstep 16 January 2020 11: 23
        -16
        Quote: Ka-52
        Europeans did not fight on the side of Nazi Germany?

        A very small amount.
        Italians, short time.
        Hungarians, Romanians, Slovaks, Croats, Finns. It's all.
        The main and overwhelming majority of European countries were in the Anti-Hitler coalition. There, at the end of the war, almost all of Germany’s allies crossed over.
        Quote: Ka-52
        It may be explained, WHO fought in the following SS compounds:

        Some representatives of some countries.
        Very few.
        1. Ka-52
          Ka-52 16 January 2020 11: 41
          +5
          Italians, short time.

          only from June 1940 to spring 1945 laughing
          There, at the end of the war, almost all of Germany’s allies crossed over.

          Of course, when the ship sinks, rats flee from it.
          Some representatives of some countries.

          wonderful answer laughing Those. France, Holland, Italy, etc. are not European, just "some countries". And the staff of the SS division is "a few representatives" laughing you see another lover of alternative history laughing
          1. mihstep
            mihstep 16 January 2020 11: 55
            -18
            Quote: Ka-52
            only from 1940 to spring 1945

            In fact, from 1940 to 08.09.1943/XNUMX/XNUMX
            And from 13.10.1943/1945/XNUMX to XNUMX. Italy fought on the side of the countries of the Anti-Hitler coalition.
            Quote: Ka-52
            Those. France, Holland, Italy, etc. are not European, just "some countries".

            That's right, some (not all) European countries.
            Quote: Ka-52
            And the staff of the SS division is "a few representatives"

            That's right, a few representatives.
            Quote: Ka-52
            you see another lover of alternative history

            You are a lover of alternative history and other inventions.
            Here is a list of countries of the Anti-Hitler coalition, read:
            Australia, Argentina, Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, United Kingdom, Venezuela, Haiti, Guatemala, Honduras, Greece, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Egypt, India, Iraq, Iran, Canada, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Liberia, Lebanon Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, Nicaragua, New Zealand, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, El Salvador, Saudi Arabia, Syria, USSR, USA, Turkey, Uruguay, Philippines, France, Czechoslovakia, Chile, Ecuador, Ethiopia, Yugoslavia , South African Union.
            And also they were joined at the final metape:
            Bulgaria, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Finland.
            These are the facts. And what you write, your fabrications.
            1. Alexander Suvorov
              Alexander Suvorov 16 January 2020 12: 22
              +18
              mihstep (Mikhail Stepanovich)
              Here is a list of countries of the Anti-Hitler coalition, read:
              Yeah, especially amused from the list of countries of the "anti-Hitler" coalition: Argentina (where in the end most of the Nazi criminals were hiding), Belgium (as many as three SS divisions were staffed by Belgians), Denmark (where Belgium is), about Luxembourg, who served the Germans without exception let's not say anything, Norway (in a bunch to Belgium and Denmark), Poland there, France there, Czechoslovakia there, Turkey there. About the power of such titans as Honduras, Costa Rica, Liberia and others, I will modestly keep silent.
              The most disgusting thing is that people like you most likely knowing the truth knowingly distort it. The entire list you have provided is complete nonsense, since most of the countries on this list, if they were in the anti-Hitler coalition, are more nominally, because throughout the war France, Denmark, Belgium, Norway, Poland, and Czechoslovakia plowed on Hitler in a sweat, and voluntarily, although a little forcibly. And then, when the war was already coming to an end, we quickly tried to shed it from a sinking ship, like we weren’t, like the Germans forced us, and yes, we are with you.

              An abomination you are rare, one-day trolls from 404.
            2. Ka-52
              Ka-52 16 January 2020 12: 30
              +11
              Syria, THE USSR, USA

              you and your like-minded people have a split mindset. He writes that the Russians fought on the side of Nazi Germany, you refer the USSR to the anti-Nazi coalition. Understand among themselves, alternative workers laughing
              And also they were joined at the final metape:
              Bulgaria, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Finland.
              These are the facts. And what you write, your fabrications.

              - Bulgaria - since 1941, a direct participant in the Nazi bloc, so-called. "Axis" provided Germany with its armed forces, participated in the occupation and annexed part of Greece. It left the axis only under the pressure of the USSR in 1944(!!!)
              - Hungary, since 1940 a direct participant in the Nazi bloc, so-called. "Axis", provided Germany with its armed forces (including on the eastern front), participated in the occupation of Yugoslavia. December 28 1944(!!!)
              Italy - a direct participant in the Nazi bloc since the "Steel Pact" (1939). She directly participated in the war with her armed forces, was noted in the occupation of France, the capture of Greece, military operations against Great Britain in the Mediterranean theater of operations, in Africa and on the eastern front against the USSR. Withdrew from the military alliance with Germany only because of the approaching Allied troops in September 1943 (!!!).
              Romania, since June 1941 a direct participant in the Nazi bloc, the so-called. "axes". It directly participated in the war with its Armed Forces, noted in the occupation of the western part of the USSR, annexed Bessarabia, Bukovina and the territory between the Dniester and the Southern Bug. Withdrew from the military alliance with Germany since the coup August 23 1944(!!!)

              so that ̶t̶o̶v̶a̶r̶i̶̶̶ storyteller, go to the ears of others about these countries, as fighters against fascism
              1. Alexander Suvorov
                Alexander Suvorov 16 January 2020 14: 21
                +3
                Ka-52 (Andrey)
                you and your like-minded people have a split mindset.
                This one has a split, and even upset. This is the same Troll, all accounts are registered today at different times.
        2. maidan.izrailovich
          maidan.izrailovich 16 January 2020 11: 58
          +8
          Italians, short time.

          How much is "short time"?
          I will answer for you. You're a liar and you’ll lie anyway.
          The Italian 8th Army fought from 1941 to 1943. Since April 1, 1942, an expeditionary force. Numbering 335 thousand.
          Two years is not enough? Would have fought and more. But they got into the Stalingrad boiler (the remains of the building). But they don’t come out of Russian boilers. And besides, in 1943 they overthrew Mussolini.
          1. mihstep
            mihstep 16 January 2020 12: 20
            -14
            Quote: maidan.izrailovich
            How much is "short time"?

            3 year.
            With 10.06.1940 08.09.1943 for years.
            Quote: maidan.izrailovich
            But they don’t come out of Russian boilers.

            Soviet. The Russians in that war did not fight at all where you imagine it.
        3. Alexander Suvorov
          Alexander Suvorov 16 January 2020 12: 08
          +7
          mihstep (Mikhail Stepanovich)
          A very small amount.
          Lord, and from where from what crevices do you get out in such quantity? All of Europe, is this your opinion, not a significant amount? To fight on the side of Nazi Germany, this is not only to supply soldiers to its ranks, it is to work in factories and factories supplying the Wehrmacht with everything necessary. And the soldier in the Wehrmacht Europe did not throw sickly, do not lie.
          The main and overwhelming majority of European countries were in the Anti-Hitler coalition.
          What is the "majority" of European countries were in the anti-Hitler coalition? List of this "majority" in the studio ...
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
        4. Lipchanin
          Lipchanin 16 January 2020 12: 21
          +1
          Quote: mihstep
          Some representatives of some countries.

          Masterpiece laughing
          Are they accusing the USSR of "a certain number of certain countries"?
          Didn’t invent anything more?
          And nothing that such "some" were worse than the Germans.
          Just don’t tell me in the same Odessa that the Romanians passed by there
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. The comment was deleted.
        5. Alex Justice
          Alex Justice 16 January 2020 16: 56
          0
          The main and overwhelming majority of European countries were in the Anti-Hitler Coalition

          The main and overwhelming majority of European countries both lived and continued, only worked for Hitler’s army.
    3. Lipchanin
      Lipchanin 16 January 2020 12: 17
      +1
      Quote: iuocsfyu
      I have always been interested in this paradox. To attack treacherously it was necessary to believe.

      Non-aggression agreement. with which we are reproached.
      And we generally believe all American Presidents. Do not recall how many treaties they unilaterally withdrew?
      Sound familiar?
      A hint for memory, spit and they both wanted all contracts
  10. bessmertniy
    bessmertniy 16 January 2020 10: 42
    +9
    While the USSR was alive, no one in Europe even stuttered that the history of the Second World War was not such that Stalin and Molotov were to blame for it. There are documents, there are facts about why the war started, and there are people who are trying to shuffle our common history in their interests. negative
    1. Incvizitor
      Incvizitor 16 January 2020 11: 04
      +4
      Because there was order with the Union in Europe, the KGB would immediately get such creatures and nobody would see them again, and now the authorities do not give a damn about the history and its impudent rewriting by the Nazis.
      1. mihstep
        mihstep 16 January 2020 11: 24
        -13
        Quote: Incvizitor
        Because there was order with the Union in Europe, the KGB would immediately get such creatures and no one would see them again

        This is called terrorism. International.
        Extrajudicial reprisal.
        1. Incvizitor
          Incvizitor 16 January 2020 11: 38
          +4
          So you can’t make friends with the fascists, at one time not everyone was destroyed, now fascism throughout Europe has become the norm.
          1. mihstep
            mihstep 16 January 2020 11: 41
            -10
            Quote: Incvizitor
            with the Nazis can not girlfriend

            And if someone decides that it’s impossible for you to do otherwise?
            Do not be like a joke about our scouts and their spies.
        2. Barbus
          Barbus 16 January 2020 11: 51
          +5
          Quote: mihstep
          Quote: Incvizitor
          Because there was order with the Union in Europe, the KGB would immediately get such creatures and no one would see them again

          This is called terrorism. International.
          Extrajudicial reprisal.

          You tell it to the Americans
        3. Lipchanin
          Lipchanin 16 January 2020 12: 40
          +6
          Quote: mihstep
          This is called terrorism. International.
          Extrajudicial Execution

          You say this in Israel.
    2. mihstep
      mihstep 16 January 2020 11: 24
      -10
      Quote: bessmertniy
      While the USSR was alive, no one in Europe even stuttered that the history of the Second World War was not such that Stalin and Molotov were to blame for it.

      You just forgot to report it.
  11. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 16 January 2020 10: 45
    +6
    Less than 75 years later, Europe together forgot who started the war, who and when before that signed the treaty with Germany, who contributed to the spread of fascism. Is it really necessary to refresh the memory another world shake-up snickering bourgeois?
    Manfred Weber
    This German probably has a dislike for Russians from birth. Probably the ancestors were well battered on our territory, and the memory of the lost war gives no rest. Now he is peeping from the European corner about the fault of the USSR and rewriting history, in order to at least spoil it. Well, who better than he not to stutter about it, but modestly be silent in a rag. Well, one should not expect another from the European Parliament.
    1. Mcar
      Mcar 16 January 2020 11: 08
      +4
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Less than 75 years later, Europe together forgot who started the war, who and when before that signed the treaty with Germany, who contributed to the spread of fascism. Is it really necessary to refresh the memory another world shake-up snickering bourgeois?

      Gennady, you probably wanted to say something else.

      If by "shaking the snickering bourgeois" you meant world war, then it sounds like punishing a goat with a carrot. What a shake-up if the world's largest Capital dreams of a big war? And even not so - he does not dream, and this is vital for him.

    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 16 January 2020 11: 20
      +1
      Quote: rotmistr60

      In less than 75 years, Europe has unanimously forgot who started the war, who and when before that signed the treaty with Germany,

      For the Germans, revanchism is always in the foreground. How many times have the mug been cleaned, time will pass, the wounds will be licked and again for their "Germany Hubert Alles". (Few last heaped.)
    3. Alex Justice
      Alex Justice 16 January 2020 16: 59
      0
      Less than 75 years later, Europe together forgot who started the war, who and when before that signed the treaty with Germany, who contributed to the spread of fascism.

      We have documentaries paying much attention to the Munich agreement.
  12. Vita vko
    Vita vko 16 January 2020 10: 46
    +5
    Whoever benefits from the war is also to blame for war crimes. No wonder they say: to whom the war, and to whom the mother is dear. Therefore, we need to stop hiding behind "phony letters", which are worthless in the period of preparation for war. One must not look at the facts, i.e. the state of the economies of states and the capital of American and European oligarchs before and after the war. In addition, behind all attempts to revise the results of World War II, there is probably the work of corporations that have withdrawn from German and Swiss banks the gold and foreign exchange funds of large functionaries of the Third Reich.
  13. Dimy4
    Dimy4 16 January 2020 10: 48
    +4
    It still cripples them that Mr. Hitler succeeded in destroying us, and they themselves had to completely lie under it, before the arrival of the Soviet troops.
  14. Gennady Fomkin
    Gennady Fomkin 16 January 2020 10: 52
    0
    Quote: Andrey VOV
    This period is all open

    Far from all.
  15. taiga2018
    taiga2018 16 January 2020 10: 54
    +1
    It was clear that this whole pack would not offend one of their mongrel-Poland, the only thing that still does not allow them to completely equate Nazi Germany and the USSR is the Holocaust, after all, Jews were not destroyed in the USSR, and there was no theory of racial superiority It was...
  16. Mordor
    Mordor 16 January 2020 10: 55
    +6
    Cattle. Themselves raised Hitler. Now they blame the USSR - Russia. It's time to "print" the archives!
  17. Aliken
    Aliken 16 January 2020 10: 57
    +2
    It is time to hold a conference of historians on this issue. Within the walls of the European Parliament, and let everyone bring documentary arguments. There they will see everyone who falsifies something, once and for all.
  18. axiles100682
    axiles100682 16 January 2020 11: 04
    +1
    I want an iron curtain 2-0. I’d isolate myself from them and not hear and not see what
  19. g1washntwn
    g1washntwn 16 January 2020 11: 06
    +3
    Of course not. We were not strong enough from a military point of view. Munich's goal (that is, reaching an agreement in Munich) was to oust Russia from Europe, gain time and complete the armament of Germany

    Against whom were they allowed to increase militarization? Against "Iranian missiles"?
    The same Munich was not the reason for the outbreak of war. Communist ideology - that is what the collective West tried to destroy by the hands of Nazi Germany. And the clumsy attempts of neo-McCarthyists to look for left-wing causes look just like an exam on sopromatism in a nursery.
  20. Lipchanin
    Lipchanin 16 January 2020 11: 06
    0
    According to her, the USSR supposedly allowed Germany to attack Western Europe and left Britain alone with the Wehrmacht troops.

    Wehrmacht troops fought in the UK? belay
    And small-shaven "heroically" took Berlin? belay
    1. Avior
      Avior 16 January 2020 11: 42
      0
      By no means touching the main essence of your post, purely in the order of information, I want to draw attention to the nuance that the widespread belief that the Wehrmacht is the ground forces of Nazi Germany is not entirely true.
      The Wehrmacht is the generalized name for all military forces, including the Air Force-Luftwaffe, the Navy-Kriegsmarine, and the Ground Forces-Khir (Heer German). The name is not very used with us and was used because of the lack of consonance.
      https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Германская_армия_(вермахт)
      hi
      1. Lipchanin
        Lipchanin 16 January 2020 12: 44
        -1
        Quote: Avior
        The Wehrmacht is the generalized name for all military forces, including the Air Force-Luftwaffe, the Navy-Kriegsmarine, and the Ground Forces-

        Informative laughing
        Well then another question. How did all these others fight in the territory of small Britain?
        When did they start bombing them?
        When to sink ships?
        Or about "STRANGE WAR" have not heard?
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. Qwertyarion
    Qwertyarion 16 January 2020 11: 16
    +1
    . We must not forget what Soviet soldiers did during World War II, when Germany was an enemy of the USSR. Soviet soldiers suffered huge sacrifices

    Nobody is forgotten, nothing is forgotten.
  23. tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 16 January 2020 11: 16
    +3
    EP MP Manfred Weber accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of trying to "rewrite history."
    There is no need to rewrite history, our fathers and grandfathers made it on May 9 once and for all. And to Manfred Weber, the Bavarian German, I want to say "Hitler kaput!"
    1. mihstep
      mihstep 16 January 2020 11: 38
      -8
      Quote: tihonmarine
      There is no need to rewrite history; it was made by our fathers and grandfathers on May 9 once and for all.

      This is the rewriting of history. Since not only grandfathers won, but many.
      If you don’t know, the countries of the Anti-Hitler coalition won in WW2. One of which was the USSR.
      And the war in Europe actually ended on May 8, 1945.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 16 January 2020 11: 51
        +5
        Quote: mihstep
        And the war in Europe actually ended on May 8, 1945.

        And I spit on your Europe, and who, and when he believes the war is over. My father finished it on MAY 9, 1945, both my children and grandchildren celebrate Victory Day on MAY 9, and you and your homies from the Anti-Hitler coalition can celebrate May 8 and yell with them that you need to rewrite the history of WWII. You can rewrite a history textbook, but you cannot rewrite history.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. tihonmarine
            tihonmarine 16 January 2020 12: 21
            +4
            Quote: mihstep
            Have you fought in WW2? Or are you an impostor? Celebrating someone else's victory?

            This is the Victory of My Motherland, my grandfathers and my father. We remember this and will never forget about it, unlike you. This is the hundred and first time I have said, "Stavlin did not need to liberate Europe."
          2. Foul skeptic
            Foul skeptic 16 January 2020 13: 30
            -2
            Actually, there are documents. And they signed on 08.05.1945/XNUMX/XNUMX

            No. Jodl and Friedenburg signed an act of unconditional surrender on May 7.
          3. Fat
            Fat 17 January 2020 03: 56
            +1
            Quote: mihstep
            That's it. Therefore, do not even try to impose "Soviet history" on the world. Will not work.

            I do not like the Soviet documentary maker, honor at least the "international" one. In World War 2, 2 blocks axis (axis) and allies (allies) participated. And the anti-Hitler coalition, it was then, after the war, they thought up so that it would be more convenient to divide the fruits of victory, for their own benefit. Gauls especially touch me. Winners, God forgive me ..
      2. cniza
        cniza 16 January 2020 11: 59
        +5
        Who is sending you here? As soon as the earth wears you - Herods ...
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 16 January 2020 12: 22
          +4
          Quote: cniza
          Who is sending you here? As soon as the earth wears you - Herods.

          I think the neighbors.
  24. Aliken
    Aliken 16 January 2020 11: 29
    +3
    This is the parliament that beg for money from Russia for its existence, and which Russia saved from bankruptcy? Lesson learned, no? They take money with one hand and hit it on the cheeks with the other. Where is Tolstoy.
    1. cniza
      cniza 16 January 2020 11: 56
      +3
      No, not that one, but still they are animals ...
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 16 January 2020 12: 23
      +1
      Quote: Aliken
      Lesson learned, no?

      More likely no than yes.
  25. mortido
    mortido 16 January 2020 11: 37
    +3
    These shameless little people, crowded together in a hornet's nest called the "European Parliament," themselves distort history and reality by their existence, as evidenced by their delusional statements. At one time, from exactly the same statements of Hitler, fascism was born ... yes, yes, it was there, in the very heart of blinded Europe, and not somewhere in the east as they would very much like
    1. cniza
      cniza 16 January 2020 11: 56
      +3
      These little people don’t understand that those who forget their story face it in a new and worse situation.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 16 January 2020 12: 25
        +1
        Quote: cniza
        These little people don’t understand that those who forget their story face it in a new and worse situation.

        We have a story "Peace, peace!" they have Drang nach Osten.
  26. The comment was deleted.
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 16 January 2020 11: 54
      +1
      Quote: Yaro Polk
      the ungrateful signed the surrender pact again

      We do not need such a war.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
  27. Van 16
    Van 16 16 January 2020 11: 43
    +1
    Our partnerships started playing. Now we are also to blame. Above we wrote a lot about archives. And they wrote correctly, open with all the opportunity and poke our "partners" with their noses
    1. cniza
      cniza 16 January 2020 11: 52
      +3
      Not just poking, but making them learn by heart and teach their grandchildren ...
  28. cniza
    cniza 16 January 2020 11: 51
    +4
    and the so-called Munich agreement of 1938 between Adolf Hitler and representatives of Great Britain, France and Italy.


    True, it hurts my eyes, apparently decided to dance again on the rake, well, well ...
  29. Sapsan136
    Sapsan136 16 January 2020 11: 57
    +3
    And why in the EU often do not recall the Munich agreement, which really became, if not the reason, then the key moment to the outbreak of World War II? The Molotov-Ribentrop Pact did not change anything after the signing of the treacherous treaty in Munich ...
  30. Barbus
    Barbus 16 January 2020 12: 00
    0
    Another unfinished man messes up the brains of not thinking townsfolk: how can you plan a world war a week before it begins? And if they had not signed the contract, then where would the Germans share all the prepared resources? Is there really enough brain to just wear a suit and smile at the camera? If so, then the rumors about the level of European higher education are greatly exaggerated.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Lena Petrova
        Lena Petrova 16 January 2020 19: 13
        0
        What a fast you are! Was the Union ready in 40-41 itself to war? Or was he trying to delay it by any means, although he understood the whole inevitability of it in the end?
  31. mortido
    mortido 16 January 2020 12: 02
    0
    Quote: Sapsan136
    And why in the EU often do not recall the Munich agreement, which really became, if not the reason, then the key moment to the outbreak of World War II? The Molotov-Ribentrop Pact did not change anything after the signing of the treacherous treaty in Munich ...

    And also: ".... there is a lot of evidence that at the end of the war, the British intelligence agent MI-5 Anthony Blunt secretly removed from the Friedrichshof castle in Hesse documents confirming the Nazi impending abdication of George from the throne in favor of Edward. Among these documents was the correspondence between the Duke of Windsor and Hitler - now these papers are classified and kept in the royal archives. Needless to say, the “Windsor couple” got away with everything and were not brought to responsibility for their close cooperation with the Germans "
  32. Den717
    Den717 16 January 2020 12: 18
    +3
    The Pact of Hitler and Stalin [Molotov-Ribbentrop] became an agreement between two devils, two monstrous dictators. For millions of European citizens, the Hitler-Stalin Pact marked the beginning of decades of oppression and suffering. Hitler-Stalin Pact - Crime Against Democracy and Peace
    - the site quotes the words Weber.

    A raven will not peck out a raven's eyes. The European Union continues its racist traditions today, even within its own union. Therefore, for the sake of truth, they will never criticize the actions of the representatives of "Europe of the first speed" at the end of the 30s. They never admit the guilt of England, France and Italy, who initiated the Munich Agreement, in creating the necessary conditions for the outbreak of war. Until recently, they will cover Poland in its opposition to Stalin's peace initiatives. To defame Russia is an old tradition in Europe since the time of Ivan IV. And today there is no reason for them to give up their habits. They are quite satisfied with the lack of documentary evidence of their own position, because there are no instances that could require real proof of their correctness. In the realities of the current situation, Europe, as a civilization, has outlived its usefulness. It is quite in our hands to take measures to increase the influx of Arab-African migrants to European countries, so that they would ruin this union to the ground. The more difficult it will be for native Europeans to survive in the confrontation with the new wave of migrants, the more needs they will have in finding a real savior of the remnants of civilization. Then conditions of conversation with them on an equal footing can develop.
  33. Operator
    Operator 16 January 2020 12: 19
    +3
    German Manfred Weber and Latvian Sandra Kalniete are accomplices of the Nazis and are subject to prosecution according to the decisions of the Nuremberg Tribunal.
  34. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Lena Petrova
      Lena Petrova 16 January 2020 19: 17
      0
      And here the sheer nonsense! The main losses are the destruction of the civilian population. The burnt Khatyn and thousands of other villages, Leningraders dying of hunger, tortured to death in concentration camps, driven into slavery, etc., etc.
  35. sniperino
    sniperino 16 January 2020 12: 36
    +1
    European Parliament accuses Russia of distorting history
    Yeah! According to their version, the 1st World Gavrilo Principle started. Not genetic carriers of democracy and civilization are to blame for this ...
  36. Gennady Fomkin
    Gennady Fomkin 16 January 2020 12: 39
    +1
    Ordinary postmodern. Antur will not let you lie.

    Stalin and Hitler are allies.

    Russia and England / USA are allies.

    Man and worms are also allies. laughing
  37. PavelM
    PavelM 16 January 2020 12: 39
    0
    But you don’t find that not the Poles, but the top of the CPSU / USSR in the person of Khrushchev and Co., began to equate Stalin with Hitler, and Gorbachev, Yeltsin and, horror, Putin personally actively continued ?! And if Khrushchev and Yeltsin have long been in heaven, and Gorbachev, after the collapse of the country entrusted to him, on an honorary pension and for some reason, unlike the dead Stalin, is outside of official criticism, then Putin is on the spot and actively continues to boldly rot the dead Stalin and the USSR! And, notice, not the destroyer of the Gorbachev country, but its builder -
    Stalin! Isn't it strange?
    Then, let me ask you, what claims does Putin have towards Poland and the conventional West? Oh yes, "our" claims to Stalin are not at all for that, but for something completely different !?
    Do you think this is a ride? Do not even hope! In other words, we ourselves put a finger in their mouth and now they are actively nibbling our hand (Russia itself). And here no archives will help us, nobody will read them.
    The blind, of course, will not see that the scale of "our" claims to Stalin and the claims of the West is not commensurate! It is not enough for them to destroy Stalin, they are trying to multiply the USSR / Russia by zero - this is their goal.
    Will we continue to help them?
    Every word within Russia against Stalin is perceived by the West as support by Russia itself of their Western anti-Russian position!
    Someone in power should begin to understand that denigrating Stalin and "Stalinism" conventional "we", earlier, opened the way to the collapse of the USSR, and now, to the revival of Bandera and, in general, fascism?
    The West's equating Stalin with Hitler is a direct consequence of the flourishing anti-Stalinism in modern Russia, spared by Putin himself. Alas, these are links in one chain, a direct cause-and-effect relationship. I will say more, if we do not "correct mistakes", we will inevitably lose to the West. And when the USSR / Russia is the fiend of Hell, then this is already a direct road to another war to destroy Russia.
    So, no more, but no less.
    So, Putin should have started not from Poland, but from himself!
  38. Snail N9
    Snail N9 16 January 2020 13: 04
    +8
    I'll just leave it here (since "Western lovers" like to insert a similar picture with Soviet tanks in Poland):
    1. Alex Justice
      Alex Justice 16 January 2020 17: 09
      +1
      I see no joy and flowers
      1. Barbus
        Barbus 17 January 2020 11: 36
        0
        And they were saved until the 45th
  39. The comment was deleted.
  40. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 16 January 2020 13: 22
    +1
    Enough squealing, because your hands "good gentlemen" are in the blood of our people! Who else if not you killed and burned our people (and the crematoria of Auschwitz burned people not without your participation). You and only you are to blame for the unleashing of WWII !!! Putin has released only one document, wait for the second series. We have forgotten the Russian proverb! "Do not be dashing while it is quiet", we can remind you!
  41. Unknown
    Unknown 16 January 2020 13: 52
    +1
    well this was to be expected. that such resolutions will be adopted, it was clear even at the time of the labeled Gorbachev. all of Europe will rewrite the history of WWII. this is not the first time to do it. There are enough revanchists. but here we are, when we start our story to redo it is bad. after all, they themselves began to pour mud over the victory over Nazi Germany. from whom the memory has disappeared, remember all these repentances addressed to Poland and the Baltic states in 1990-91. from these books of the type ,, Arbat children ,,, cursed and forgotten ,, and other rubbish, and films ,, weary of the sun ,,, penal battalion ,, ,, Stalingrad ,, yes the present ,, rzhev ,, what are they worth. that’s where the allegations come from ,, Eavalil’s corpses, and type, Comrade STALIN was worse than Hitler ,,. they themselves gave rise to. and these are all revenge-seekers and happy to assent if the story itself is high. even now, this miracle in feathers - benedictes even crashed on stage, in a fit - proving what kind of contract was entered into incorrect in 1939. this is where all the dregs from Brussels come from. all these fifth columns must be banned in RF and stop making excuses to the whole world, and more to remind how the European Union, at number-1, was rolled to smithereens, so maybe they will think about the results of revising it.
  42. Pavel73
    Pavel73 16 January 2020 13: 59
    +1
    Anyone who wants to know the causes and culprits of the Second World War should familiarize themselves with its origins. Or rather, with "Mein Kampf". And even more precisely - with Chapter 14 "Eastern Orientation or Eastern Policy". The author, without any hesitation, declares the strategic task of the German Nazis - the destruction of Russia as a state, the conquest of its lands and the resettlement of Germans on these lands, who need to expand their "living space". It was written in 1923. It was published in 1925. In 1933 the author of this book came to power in Germany. From that moment on, any state in the world that has signed any treaty or pact with it, willingly or unwillingly, directly or indirectly, becomes an ally of the Nazis against Russia. Except for Russia itself, of course. For our pact was forced, serving one purpose - at any cost to delay the inevitable German attack on us in order to have time to raise our military-technical level to the German one. We managed to win for almost two years. During this time, the following were created: T-34, KV, Il-2, PPSh, BM-13, and much more of what would later be called the weapon of Victory. Without this pact and two years of delay, we would have ended.
  43. rotkiv04
    rotkiv04 16 January 2020 14: 04
    0
    What to do in this gay sodom, it’s disgusting to shake this rear-wheel drive arm, not like sitting next to it
  44. Alexfly
    Alexfly 16 January 2020 14: 14
    0
    Well, that’s what it means to badly teach history .... Europe is Europe ..
  45. Usher
    Usher 16 January 2020 14: 18
    +1
    No conscience, why is our Foreign Ministry silent? An observer would come and chastise them as Churkin in due time. I would drag them to what the light is))))
  46. AB
    AB 16 January 2020 14: 24
    0
    It is also interesting when our country leaves this dermis once and for all.
  47. Gennady Fomkin
    Gennady Fomkin 16 January 2020 14: 39
    +2
    European Union No. 3 (current) mourns European Union No. 2 under the leadership of Adolf Hitler.
    They have already forgotten about the European Union No. 1 under the leadership of Bonaparte. laughing
    1. Unknown
      Unknown 16 January 2020 14: 53
      +1
      you are right, it is necessary to remind about the European Union 1, so that we remember, and our liberals also need a fingernail. there is nothing to bend under Europe, but we must remember that once our well-known wrote about them ............. F. I. Tyutchev. “Vain work - no, you won’t understand them ...”
      Vain labor - no, you cannot expose them, -
      The more liberal, the more vulgar,
      Civilization is a fetish for them,
      But their idea is not available to them.

      As you bow down before her, gentlemen,
      You cannot gain recognition from Europe: ,,
      In her eyes, you will always
      Not servants of enlightenment, but slaves .........
  48. Wolf
    Wolf 16 January 2020 14: 48
    +2

    Earlier, Russian leader Vladimir Putin criticized the resolution of the European Parliament, which claimed that the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact led to the outbreak of war. According to Putin, the war was not provoked by a pact, but by the so-called Munich agreement of 1938 between Adolf Hitler and representatives of Great Britain, France and Italy. The Russian president noted the attempts of the collective West to distort history and called for preserving the truth about the war, opposing attempts to falsify.



    The Munich Treaty, the Czechs alone in Europe CALL "MINHEN'S betrayal" and interpretably this is the CORRECT NAME, all remains the name of the deception of the common people. The Minkhen betrayal beat the withdrawal from the world warrior, the Ribentrop-Molotov pact beat Stalin's deception that would unexpectedly attack Rusiu. In fact, Francia, Great Britain and Italy gave green light to Hitler for the warrior, the Minchen Betrayal. For this reason, history and lazyva, we assumed that bi names in the history of various sobits were called not by real names, but by phrases!


    In addition, until now, Great Britain has not disclosed documents for what did Hes fly to Britannia in the midst of a warrior? Neither Hitler nor Hes beat the fools that bi tourist Hes flew to Britannia, and Hitler that bi attacked the USSR and for Spinoј Britania and the USA!
  49. midshipman
    midshipman 16 January 2020 14: 53
    +1
    And how Mannerheim wanted to occupy Arkhangelsk. They stopped this .... only by the explosion of the dam on the BBK. Stalin had mercy on him. He was to be hanged by the Nuremberg court. Because of him there was a blockade of Leningrad.
  50. Amateur
    Amateur 16 January 2020 14: 58
    0
    Quote: OK22
    In fact, France is one of the FOUR main Nazi conquerors in Europe. Approximately with exactly the same status as the USSR.

    Did these ones defeat us too? V. Keitel

    To read that France is the winner "with approximately the same status as the USSR" is personally offensive to me.