Belarus turned to Kazakhstan for oil, Kazakhstan answered Minsk

226

Minsk turned to Kazakhstan with a proposal to discuss the terms of oil supplies to Belarus. For this, the Belarusian delegation will arrive in this Central Asian country on January 20.

This was announced by Minister of Energy of Kazakhstan Nurlan Nogaev.



Kazakhstan responds that the deal will be completed only if it is economically beneficial for Kazakhstan. Representatives of Belneftekhim will be able to communicate with Kazakhstani oil companies, and if any of them will enter into a contract, the oil will begin to be exported to Belarus.

Shortly before this, Belarusian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Krutoy announced that negotiations with Russia on oil supplies had reached an impasse. The reason for this was the tax maneuver undertaken by the Russian Federation, in which the price of oil for Minsk rose. In Belarus, they believe that these prices will now be higher than world prices.

Therefore, President Alexander Lukashenko ordered to urgently seek alternative options for the supply of this raw material. Belarus announced the search for an oil supplier to various countries, including Poland, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and the Baltic states.

Since such negotiations are held daily, Dmitry Krutoy hopes that oil will soon go to Belarus via alternative routes.

The exact route that oil can go from Kazakhstan to Belarus has not yet been reported.

Earlier, Minsk addressed other countries, including Azerbaijan, with a question about buying oil.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    226 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +32
      15 January 2020 13: 01
      I have a triple in geography, I’m not joking, though I didn’t understand where cheap oil for Belarus came from in Kazakhstan,
      1. +18
        15 January 2020 13: 03
        From western Kazakhstan.
        1. +27
          15 January 2020 13: 05
          hmm, it’s not clearer, I’ll follow the Belarusian-Kazakh globe
          1. +25
            15 January 2020 13: 08
            At the same time, look at the Russian-German globe. Maybe you can find cheap gas for the Germans.
            1. +6
              15 January 2020 13: 09
              he seems to be going through pipes to the addressee ...
              1. +28
                15 January 2020 13: 12
                For the same for which Kazakh oil in the Russian Federation. And back, gasoline from the Russian Federation is cheaper than for the Russians, "you understand."
                1. +33
                  15 January 2020 13: 17
                  That is, there is no way without Russia, and why such a gloomy logistics, in the spirit of reversing Slovak gas for an independent one, I do not understand what the Old Man is bargaining for and how, in fact, he asked, can anyone explain how oil will become cheaper?
                  1. +5
                    15 January 2020 13: 19
                    Well, for "non-brothers" transit has somehow become more profitable.
                    1. +19
                      15 January 2020 13: 36
                      Is reverse more profitable than direct purchases from us? There is a purely political-idiotic decision and not a gram of gain.
                      1. 0
                        15 January 2020 13: 38
                        I wrote about transit.
                      2. +10
                        15 January 2020 23: 37
                        It so seems to you that idiotic. In fact, gas is actually pumped directly from the GTS along its entire length, as before. A short pipe was laid on the border with Slovakia that pumps gas from Slovakia to the east, and then immediately returns it to the GTS. And there is again no west. In accounting, everything agrees. And the fact that it is impossible to pump both west and east at the same pipe at the same time, accountants are not supposed to know.
                        The difference between aggressive (but cheap) gas from the Russian Federation and "democratic" (but expensive) gas from Slovakia (which is still Russian) was put in the pocket by those who needed it. Starting with Poroshenko. Now the beneficiaries have changed, and kickbacks will go through another gas company. I will not say through which wink
                    2. 0
                      15 January 2020 18: 31
                      Quote: Vadim02rus
                      Well, for "non-brothers" transit has somehow become more profitable.

                      Just do not say it to "non-brothers", they will laugh. And there would be an opportunity, they would throw rotten eggs.
                      1. 0
                        15 January 2020 19: 03
                        Everything is possible in this walk-field. After the next maidan, most likely it will be so. But at the moment, some head there said something that this is the most profitable contract of all time for Gazprom for all time.
                    3. 0
                      17 January 2020 08: 29
                      Quote: Vadim02rus
                      Well, for "non-brothers" transit has somehow become more profitable.

                      Yes, he did not become more profitable.
                      No one will sell the goods for less than they bought.
                  2. +12
                    15 January 2020 14: 06
                    Quote: vanavate
                    gloomy logistics

                    Yes, there were more than once similar attempts by the dad. I even bought some Venezuelan oil, but ... in the end I returned to my "home harbor".
                  3. +12
                    15 January 2020 15: 31
                    Quote: vanavate
                    what the Old Man is bargaining for and how, in fact, this is why he asked, can anyone explain how oil will become cheaper?

                    I don't know about oil, but I feel that this is how he can bargain for "Pennsylvania coal"
                    1. +4
                      15 January 2020 18: 39
                      Quote: Gritsa

                      I don't know about oil, but I feel that this is how he can bargain for "Pennsylvania coal"
                      Reply

                      But father leads Belarusians to the Ukrainian scenario by leaps and bounds.
                      If this goes on, I will be sorry for the Belarusians, as now I feel sorry for the Ukrainians.
                      Medvedev resigned with his camarilla. Hooray!.
                      The question is who will replace him? Do not bring and have mercy, if Kudrin, Siluanov and others like them.
                      1. -3
                        17 January 2020 12: 17
                        Perhaps Ukrainians and Belarusians feel sorry for these quilted jackets.
                        1. +1
                          17 January 2020 12: 21
                          Quote: Sergey49
                          Perhaps Ukrainians and Belarusians feel sorry for these quilted jackets.

                          But Serezhenka did not learn to speak without insults? Is everything so sad in the Ukrainian family and school?
                    2. +1
                      17 January 2020 08: 30
                      Quote: Gritsa
                      but I feel that this is how he can bargain for "Pennsylvania coal"

                      From Donbass laughing
                2. +22
                  15 January 2020 13: 17
                  Quote: Vadim02rus
                  For the same for which Kazakh oil in the Russian Federation. And back, gasoline from the Russian Federation is cheaper than for the Russians, "you understand."

                  The import of petroleum products to Kazakhstan from Russia has been banned for already a year. In Kazakhstan, they don’t know where to put their gas.
                  1. +11
                    15 January 2020 13: 22
                    It is forbidden by fuel trucks but not by rail. Cut off illegal immigrants.
                    1. +7
                      15 January 2020 13: 26
                      Quote: Vadim02rus
                      It is forbidden by fuel trucks but not by rail. Cut off illegal immigrants.

                      Yes, and banned fuel trucks as well as export.
                      Our refineries have all been refitted, but the price tags at Gazpromneft, so one of the shareholders is such Kulebaev, so there all our gasoline is local.
                      1. 0
                        15 January 2020 13: 33
                        Yes, no one prohibited the export. The excise tax is introduced for the same reason as in the Russian Federation. Namely, it is more profitable to export for the refinery, since "there" it is more expensive, and even for foreign currency.
                        1. +3
                          15 January 2020 13: 49
                          Quote: Vadim02rus
                          Yes, no one forbade the export.

                          In the fall, they banned, in addition to a tank with a canister. At the request of Russia and Kyrgyzstan, they themselves will shear their sheep.
                        2. +8
                          15 January 2020 14: 01
                          "From November 2, 2019, a ban is introduced on the export of oil products from the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan

                          By a joint order of the Minister of Energy of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated October 16, 2019 No. 338 ...........

                          ..... a ban on export from the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan was introduced for a period of 6 months automobile vehicle goods belonging to the groups 2709, 2710, 2902, 3403, 3811 of the EAEU TNVED codes, except for cases of export in gas tanks provided by the manufacturer of automobile vehicles and installed in accordance with technical specifications, as well as in separate containers with a volume of not more than 20 liters. "
                          Where is there about the export ban?
                        3. +4
                          15 January 2020 14: 08
                          Quote: Vadim02rus
                          Where is there about the export ban?

                          So, such laws were adopted by Russia and Kyrgyzstan to ban the import of fuel from Kazakhstan, look for their Orders.
                        4. +1
                          15 January 2020 14: 13
                          Above you write:
                          In the autumn banned, except for a tank with a canister, At the request of Russia and Kyrgyzstan

                          And then it turned around, they themselves need to look.
                        5. +2
                          15 January 2020 14: 20
                          Quote: Vadim02rus
                          And then it turned around, they themselves need to look.

                          In the summer, our minister boasted that the ban on the supply of fuel to Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan would be lifted, for some reason they were solving the issue with Russia.
                          Yes, and with the Uzbeks they don’t understand, they don’t want to buy our gas and they will buy oil at the cost price with taxes, they have the same expensive gas.
                        6. 0
                          17 January 2020 12: 02
                          Russian oil is delivered to Kazakhstan via the Omsk-Pavlodar oil pipeline. Here are the data from the article for January 2020: "-Pavlodar Petrochemical Plant is focused on processing West Siberian oil from Russia. That is, its work directly depends on the supply of Russian oil. However, due to differences in laws, bureaucratic delays and a number of other reasons interruptions in the supply of Russian oil occur regularly. In particular, in May, Russia cut supplies to the Pavlodar petrochemical plant by almost half - 270 thousand tons of oil were supplied instead of the usual 500 thousand. "
                  2. +1
                    15 January 2020 13: 29
                    Quote: marshes
                    Import of oil products to Kazakhstan from Russia is prohibited, as early as a year

                    As well as re-export to Russia. At the moment, the market of the Republic of Kazakhstan is oversaturated with gasoline, and now there are rumors at the top about the lifting of the ban on the re-export of oil products to the Russian Federation.
                    1. -1
                      17 January 2020 12: 05
                      Yours is not true, here is a quote from an article for January 2020: "In general, a number of regions of Kazakhstan are constantly lacking fuel and lubricants. There are several reasons for this. First, the existing Pavlodar, Shymkent and Atyrau oil refineries simply cannot cope with the growing needs. industry and population. "
                3. +4
                  15 January 2020 15: 29
                  Quote: Vadim02rus
                  For the same for which Kazakh oil in the Russian Federation. And back, gasoline from the Russian Federation is cheaper than for the Russians, "you understand."

                  This is more difficult to explain than the dependence of the gas price in Russia on the world oil price. When there is a rise in the price of gasoline when the price of oil rises and a rise in the price of gasoline when the price of oil falls.
                4. +7
                  15 January 2020 19: 00
                  There is no Russian gas in Kazakhstan. It was once in small batches, but that was 12 years ago. All gasoline in Kazakhstan is local. The quality is worse than the Russian one, but it costs almost half the price.
                  1. +2
                    15 January 2020 19: 11
                    I have been in Astana since I was 11 years old. You can see the gas station from the window. 92nd has always been either the Omsk Oil Refinery or the Ufa. They wrote on the scoreboard. Now there’s nothing to write about) And so at almost all gas stations in the city.
                    1. -1
                      17 January 2020 12: 10
                      Was in Pavlodar in the summer, refueled at a gas station, called "Gazprom", I ask whose gasoline, answer Russian. By the way, for some reason, their gasoline costs 25 rubles a liter of A-92, and all the same costs both local and Russian. It means that it is profitable for Russian capitalists to sell at such a price.
                      1. +1
                        17 January 2020 12: 12
                        On the website "Gazprom-Neft Kazakhstan" it is written that they trade in Omsk gasoline.
                        1. 0
                          17 January 2020 12: 23
                          I will say more, the Omsk-Pavlodar oil pipeline is working at full capacity, I just don't know about it. We drove from Pavlodar to Omsk in the summer and turned off the road into the steppe behind the bushes to warm up, have a snack, etc., suddenly Niva rolls up to us along the steppe road, two men in camouflage and arms come out and ask: "What are you doing here," then: "Be careful, there is an oil pipeline under you," the general was asked to drive off to the side.
                5. -1
                  16 January 2020 17: 04
                  It’s the Kazakh’s business what price to set for gas ... Oil, gas too. In Russia, only processing. Or are you not familiar with such a scheme ???
                6. 0
                  16 January 2020 19: 27
                  It’s fundamentally wrong. Gasoline has become cheaper in Kazakhstan due to the reconstruction of 3 oil refineries and an increase in their productivity. And before that they really drove from Russia. Now there is no such need.
              2. KCA
                +10
                15 January 2020 13: 18
                Well, Belarus will abandon Russian oil, quickly, in about 10 years, they will build an oil pipeline, and for the time being they will ride on horses, although I can’t imagine how cheap it is to deliver oil from Kazakhstan bypassing Russia.
                1. +2
                  15 January 2020 15: 47
                  will build a pipeline

                  Where? On whose territory?
                  1. KCA
                    +3
                    15 January 2020 16: 05
                    I write that there is no way past the territory of Russia, a tanker to Baku, from there by train, this black gold is comparable in price to gold, you won’t let the supertanker go across the Caspian, there will be river-sea class shuttles with a capacity of a couple of railway tanks
                2. The comment was deleted.
                  1. KCA
                    0
                    18 January 2020 15: 15
                    Removing any organ is always a problem, they wanted to remove it in my childhood, but my father was categorically not, I live and do not cough, and my throat does not hurt, the sore throat last time was about 40 years ago. No lying, less, in 1992, laryngitis / forengitis forgot what it is, at school I was sick for half a winter
            2. 0
              16 January 2020 10: 46
              and there are others, if you look at globes from the inside out.
              on the flip side there is cheap oil gas
          2. +9
            15 January 2020 14: 56
            There is oil in Kazakhstan. Caspian western Kazakhstan. The only question is how can it be cheaper if it is transported further, you will have to pay for Russian transit. Besides, all oil producers of Kazakhstan have a foreign state share in companies of less than 50%, i.e. there is no control the package
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. +7
              15 January 2020 19: 11
              They don’t have nichrome! Everything is sold under the PSA. And the state’s share is much less than 50%. They, in principle, do not receive anything from production, because mining companies have not yet returned the investment. And when they return it is not clear. So the Kazakhs do not have their own resources.
              1. +13
                15 January 2020 19: 13
                Here you are driving everything against Putin, and our situation in the early 2000s was the same, if not worse! Vladimir Vladimirovich, by 2007, he had returned everything! And it was precisely with this that the general tonality of his Munich speech was connected! And the Kazakhs have wafed everything! Therefore, the poor 15M of the population can’t feed!
                1. +4
                  15 January 2020 20: 26
                  17 million people now. And the rest I agree completely. All sold to foreign companies.
                  1. +5
                    15 January 2020 22: 40
                    In fact, you can start returning at any time! Under any pretext. You can do it like we do - for environmental reasons; can I still somehow! But who will do this? The "family" heated billions on this, and they are still in power. And no one else has steel eggs! And it would be necessary to return, for what will they leave to future generations?
                    1. ABM
                      +3
                      16 January 2020 10: 36
                      all external assets will be arrested
                  2. 0
                    16 January 2020 20: 43
                    Quote: axiles100682
                    17 million people now. And the rest I agree completely. All sold to foreign companies.

                    ===
                    17 million were with the union. taking into account those who left, there is still an increase
                    1. +2
                      16 January 2020 21: 46
                      The experts left, the shepherds of the oralmans from Mongolia were transported. Well, of course, there is an increase, which is a sin
        2. +12
          15 January 2020 13: 06
          Quote: Vadim02rus
          From western Kazakhstan.

          Just pump it through our pipe.
          And do not hesitate - the price tag will be horse!
          So to speak - from our home, yours!
          1. 0
            15 January 2020 13: 53
            There, a "hot" pipe goes to Samara - as if the price tag will be a horse: after all, this oil cannot be loaded onto the railway, it will freeze in tanks.
          2. +2
            15 January 2020 16: 31
            Quote: Victor_B
            And do not hesitate - the price tag will be horse!

            exactly the price tag that Belarus asks for Friendship.
        3. +5
          15 January 2020 13: 27
          Quote: Vadim02rus
          From western Kazakhstan.

          ===
          as far as I know, there varieties contain highly paraffin, for transportation heating / stations are required, this is expensive
          1. +7
            15 January 2020 17: 43
            Quote: Victorio
            Quote: Vadim02rus
            From western Kazakhstan.

            ===
            as far as I know, there varieties contain highly paraffin, for transportation heating / stations are required, this is expensive


            Again, each refinery is imprisoned for its grade of oil, you just can’t change the technology.
          2. -3
            15 January 2020 19: 34
            Quote: Victorio
            Quote: Vadim02rus
            From western Kazakhstan.

            ===
            as far as I know, there varieties contain highly paraffin, for transportation heating / stations are required, this is expensive

            Kazakhstan has already exported nearly 500 million tons of its Tengiz oil. Only through one of its pipelines to Novorossiysk.
            And it refers to light.
            1. 0
              16 January 2020 13: 17
              Quote: SovAr238A
              Quote: Victorio
              Quote: Vadim02rus
              From western Kazakhstan.

              ===
              as far as I know, there varieties contain highly paraffin, for transportation heating / stations are required, this is expensive

              Kazakhstan has already exported nearly 500 million tons of its Tengiz oil. Only through one of its pipelines to Novorossiysk.
              And it refers to light.

              ===
              light is a classification by density. paraffin content is different. pipe / pipes go to Novorossiysk, and not from it. continue to be transported by tankers, then you should forget about low cost
              1. +3
                16 January 2020 19: 27
                Quote: Victorio
                pipes go to Novorossiysk, and not from it. continue to be transported by tankers, then you should forget about low cost


                Enough to carry nonsense about the prohibitive low cost of pipelines.
                We have almost 55 thousand kilometers of oil pipelines in the Russian Federation.
                I’ll ask you - do you know that pipes in western Siberia change every 15-20 years?
                Do you know that replacing 1 kilometer of pipe costs about 1-1,3 billion rubles?
                To replace 200 km of a pipe is equal to the construction of one Borea, to replace 500 km of a pipe is equal to a new nuclear aircraft carrier.
                And transneft changes thousands of kilometers of pipe annually.

                Do you know what a huge economy provides oil pumping through a pipe?
                This is a huge LPDS with a bunch of staff
                and a bunch of guards, also by the way very well paid, with a huge fleet of expensive equipment.
                do not think that the pipe is very cheap. It could be cheaper. But not more than 5-10 percent.
                Otherwise, oil would not have been dragged by tankers in principle ...
                1. -1
                  16 January 2020 20: 18
                  Quote: SovAr238A
                  Enough to carry nonsense about the prohibitive low cost of pipelines.

                  ====
                  in particular. enough for you, the cost of transporting through the pipe is lower
                  1. +1
                    16 January 2020 20: 44
                    Quote: Victorio
                    Quote: SovAr238A
                    Enough to carry nonsense about the prohibitive low cost of pipelines.

                    ====
                    in particular. enough for you, the cost of transporting through the pipe is lower


                    Unlike you, I am engaged in providing transportation of specialists for the pipe and for the pipe.
                    and I travel around the facilities myself.
                    I myself am in dozens of offices of the same transneft.
                    and I understand perfectly the scale of this organization.
                    And you are just a jerk and a balabol ..

                    Tankers transport half of the world's oil.
                    HALF!
                    Explain to us why Sheskharis, CPC, Tuapse, Primorsk, several Murmansk terminals have a total shipment of about 200 million tons of oil per year?
                    And they drive oil only to Europe.
                    And only 50-70 million tons of oil goes through the pipe through the Soviet oil pipeline yet?

                    Are you curious about this? It is so?
                    Well, if the pipe is so much cheaper. then why through transshipment - there is a lot of oil leaving, but so little through the pipe?

                    Learn materiel and stop thinking with slogans and slogans ...
                    1. -1
                      16 January 2020 20: 50
                      Quote: SovAr238A
                      Teach materiel

                      ===
                      teach what the problem is. here you have the bones: pipelines are expensive, tankers can use the whole range of oil products, the market for oil products consumption is large in order to cover everything with pipes, but this goes
                      1. -1
                        16 January 2020 20: 52
                        Quote: Victorio
                        Quote: SovAr238A
                        Teach materiel

                        ===
                        teach what the problem is. here are the bones: pipelines are expensive, ....


                        But you just proved to me that oil pipelines are much cheaper ...

                        And I explained to you that oil pipelines, on the contrary, are very expensive ...


                        Did you change your shoes?
                        On the fly?

                        and I wrote about the oil transportation market. namely oil, crude oil ...
                        and not final products from oil ...

                        Please do not argue with the topic. who at least somehow, but in the subject.
                        1. -1
                          16 January 2020 20: 54
                          Quote: SovAr238A
                          Did you change your shoes?

                          no

                          Well, if the pipe is so much cheaper. then why through transshipment - there is a lot of oil leaving, but so little through the pipe?

                          I answered you

                          and I wrote about the oil transportation market. namely oil, crude oil ...
                          and not final products from oil ...


                          pointed out as one of the advantages of shipping by sea
                        2. -1
                          16 January 2020 21: 03
                          Quote: Victorio
                          ... shipping by sea

                          I understand ... you have to change shoes often. nothing was left of your original post ..
                          No further meaning
                        3. -1
                          16 January 2020 21: 09
                          Quote: SovAr238A
                          Quote: Victorio
                          ... shipping by sea

                          I understand ... you have to change shoes often. nothing was left of your original post ..
                          No further meaning

                          ===
                          true, but in another, in comprehending the meaning. again: pipelines are expensive, tankers can the whole range of petroleum products, the petroleum product consumption market is large in order to cover everything with pipes, but the thing is going to
                          - cost at the construction stage, on the provision of transportation
                          - this is the advantage of a tanker (TRANSPORTATION OF DIFFERENT OIL PRODUCTS), and not in the cost of transportation.
        4. +3
          15 January 2020 15: 45
          It is clear that from Kazakhstan. The question is, how will it get to Belarus? Again through Russia and through NP "Druzhba"? By rail, again through Russia. And you will have to pay for transportation and this oil in the end cannot be cheaper than Russian oil. Well, if, of course, the Kazakhs will not give it away for nothing, well, they are not fools of China geographically closer to them.
        5. AAK
          +4
          15 January 2020 19: 04
          Magyshlak oil in Kazakhstan has a very high paraffin content, it must be pre-cleaned before refining or before transportation through the pipeline (if there is a jumper of the pipeline systems of the Russian Federation and Kazakhstan. If driven by tanks, it will be very expensive)
          1. +3
            15 January 2020 19: 27
            But Vaseline can do a lot.
            1. +1
              15 January 2020 22: 49
              Quote: Vadim02rus
              But Vaseline can do a lot.

              And candles in addition.
      2. -3
        15 January 2020 13: 06
        where in Kazakhstan cheap oil for Belarus

        Caspian Sea
        1. +1
          15 January 2020 13: 13
          Quote: Obi Wan Kenobi
          Caspian Sea

          Logistics of supplies is incomprehensible. request
          1. +8
            15 January 2020 13: 21
            Quote: Mordvin 3
            Logistics of supplies is incomprehensible.

            What is not clear, transneft will agree to be through the pipeline, or via Ust Luga-Poland, the Baltic States-Belarus or by Rail, via Batumi to Ukraine or Novorossiysk, as agreed.
            The main thing is that we would not be a loser.
            1. +2
              15 January 2020 13: 26
              Quote: marshes
              The main thing is that we would not be a loser.

              the government of the Russian Federation will not be a loser, but we Russians will not get anything from this ..... the fuel is growing without interruption ... already the diesel engine in NN 49-63 ... (((
              1. -1
                16 January 2020 16: 40
                And what side are you on this? The involved transport workers will receive, the budget will receive, the Russians from the budget do not refuse to receive ...
            2. +5
              15 January 2020 13: 26
              Quote: marshes
              Quote: Mordvin 3
              Logistics of supplies is incomprehensible.

              What is not clear, transneft will agree to be through the pipeline, or via Ust Luga-Poland, the Baltic States-Belarus or by Rail, via Batumi to Ukraine or Novorossiysk, as agreed.
              The main thing is that we would not be a loser.

              And what similar logistics will cost Old Man?
              1. +3
                15 January 2020 13: 29
                Quote: Piramidon
                And what similar logistics will cost Old Man?

                They need to be asked, maybe they will get out with new duties and excise taxes.
                1. 0
                  16 January 2020 13: 20
                  Quote: marshes
                  Quote: Piramidon
                  And what similar logistics Old Man will cost?

                  They need to be asked, maybe they will get out with new duties and excise taxes.

                  ===
                  Yes, not so much, only the railway fare inside the union. but everything is certainly more expensive than the pipe.
            3. +9
              15 January 2020 13: 28
              Quote: marshes
              via Ust Luga-Poland, Baltic States-Belarus or by Rail, Through Batumi to Ukraine or Novorossiysk, as agreed.

              It's complicated. Did the Ukrainians find their ghost train that they sent to China?
              1. +3
                15 January 2020 13: 33
                Quote: Mordvin 3
                false. Did the Ukrainians find their ghost train that they sent to China?

                What they needed was brought to Kazakhstan, because it was not in vain that he was spinning in the north of Kazakhstan, and that there was no problem for their return orders.
              2. +4
                15 January 2020 13: 57
                How to deliver? Psheki said the 6th fleet could approach the coast of Belarus. So tankers can.))
                1. +2
                  15 January 2020 20: 24
                  No, not Poles, but Jen Psaki sent 6 US fleets to the coast of Belarus hi
            4. -2
              15 January 2020 13: 58
              But what, did they build a hot pipe for oil from U.-Luga from Mangyshlak?
              I doubt :: it will be painfully expensive to transit ...
              1. +7
                15 January 2020 14: 11
                Quote: hydrox
                that, did they build a hot pipe for oil from U.-Luga from Mangyshlak? I doubt that transit will be painful ...

                It has been going there for a long time, mixes up with Siberian in the Samara region, and oil is extracted not only in Mangyshlshlak.
                1. -1
                  15 January 2020 14: 17
                  I thought it was interfering, but it’s refining it at two oil refineries, but then there’s something ...
                2. -3
                  15 January 2020 19: 37
                  Quote: marshes
                  Quote: hydrox
                  that, did they build a hot pipe for oil from U.-Luga from Mangyshlak? I doubt that transit will be painful ...

                  It has been going there for a long time, mixes up with Siberian in the Samara region, and oil is extracted not only in Mangyshlshlak.


                  except Samara, look at the Caspian Pipeline Consortium. There are options too.
              2. -2
                15 January 2020 19: 36
                Quote: hydrox
                But what, did they build a hot pipe for oil from U.-Luga from Mangyshlak?
                I doubt :: it will be painfully expensive to transit ...

                there is nothing hot there ...
        2. The comment was deleted.
          1. 0
            15 January 2020 14: 34
            Oil from Libya. Already in Odessa a couple of tankers, if not more, went ...
        3. 0
          15 January 2020 13: 20
          where in Kazakhstan cheap oil for Belarus



          Caspian Sea


          The conversation was about the price below market.
      3. +12
        15 January 2020 13: 13
        They have at least oil
        About 200 oil and gas fields are located in Kazakhstan. The total reserves are estimated at 11-12 billion tons. Almost 70% of these resources are concentrated in the western regions of Kazakhstan.
        It is annoying to me as a citizen of the largest oil and gas producing country. In local currency, the cost of the 92nd liter is 145 tenge, or about 26,5 rubles. The price of NGV fuel is 55 tenge, or 9,11 rubles. Diesel fuel in Kazakhstan is sold at 193 tenge, or 31,96 rubles per liter. We go to them and, well, purchases between things. It’s cheaper.
        1. +1
          15 January 2020 13: 16
          Amendment - 92nd costs 152 tenge. In 2020 they promised a raise. This is in Astana and the region.
          1. +3
            15 January 2020 14: 52
            The price, in general, is different, with us, Aktobe region, ranges from 139 to 154 tenge, the 92nd
            1. +2
              15 January 2020 16: 30
              Well, of course it is different, as in different regions of the Russian Federation, it is different. And not only the price but also the quality of the "product".
            2. 0
              17 January 2020 11: 44
              In the morning I refuel at 152. I looked out the window now - 156.
        2. -6
          15 January 2020 13: 19
          Annoyingly different. In local currency, the cost of a 92nd liter is 145 tenge, or about 26,5 rubles


          Well, yes, but in Germany, gas prices are higher than in Russia ..
          The richer the country, the usually higher the price.
          1. +8
            15 January 2020 13: 31
            Quote: Olezhek
            Well, yes, but in Germany, gas prices are higher than in Russia ..

            And where is Germany on the list of oil producing countries? wink
            1. +5
              15 January 2020 14: 01
              The issue is not production, the matter is refineries and their effectiveness in terms of scaling and diversification of suppliers. The easiest way is a coastal refinery, they have a purely technical problem, but onshore they have to organize logistics, and these are always artificial monopolies or a pipeline company, or a railway company or even be driven from local bandits to states with their geopolitics. Therefore, oil prices can jump from city to city ....
              1. -4
                15 January 2020 16: 53
                Quote: ProkletyiPirat
                It's not about production, it's about refineries and their effectiveness

                Those. In your opinion there is no difference, free raw materials for refineries, or purchased? belay
                1. 0
                  16 January 2020 03: 47
                  Well, many people think that "only cheese in a mousetrap is free", turning a blind eye to the fact that a mouse pays for cheese with its sweat and blood. Well, or bringing analogs, even stolen oil tanks will cost money because you have to pay accomplices and the roof, and / or pay with your sweat and blood. So there is no freebie, even if you think the opposite ...
            2. -2
              15 January 2020 14: 07
              And where is Germany on the list of oil producing countries?


              Belarus already cut off from Google? belay
              1. +2
                15 January 2020 16: 52
                Quote: Olezhek
                Belarus already cut off from Google?

                Someone was cut off from the brains - I live in Russia, and have never been to Belarus. wink
        3. +5
          15 January 2020 13: 23
          Quote: GKS 2111
          Annoyingly different. In local currency, the cost of the 92nd liter is 145 tenge, or about 26,5 rubles. The price of NGV fuel is 55 tenge, or 9,11 rubles.

          92 with NG for 10 tenge went up, the excise tax for the poor. Now it is 155 tenge.
          1. -2
            15 January 2020 13: 38
            Quote: marshes
            92 with NG for 10 tenge went up, the excise tax for the poor. Now it is 155 tenge.

            And why do your prices rise so slowly? What do the WTO requirements do not concern you? what
            1. +5
              15 January 2020 13: 43
              Quote: Mordvin 3
              And why do your prices rise so slowly? What do the WTO requirements do not concern you?

              And here is the WTO, there are no agreements on oil products under the WTO, only in terms of the amount of oil produced there is an agreement with OPEC,
              1. +1
                15 January 2020 13: 48
                Quote: marshes
                And here is the WTO, there seems to be no agreement on oil products under the WTO

                When Russia joined the WTO, one of the main requirements was to bring domestic energy prices to world prices. And how are you screwed up, it is not clear? By the 25th year, our tax maneuver will end, and it looks like it will be so.
                1. +4
                  15 January 2020 13: 57
                  Quote: Mordvin 3
                  When Russia joined the WTO, one of the main requirements was to bring domestic energy prices to world prices. And how are you screwed up, it is not clear? By the 25th year, our tax maneuver will end, and it looks like it will be so.

                  We have the same thing until the age of 25, only here it is not the WTO but the EAEU, by that time they say that the internal market of the participating countries will be regulated.
                  1. 0
                    15 January 2020 14: 05
                    Quote: marshes
                    We have the same until the age of 25, only here is not the WTO

                    It is the requirements of the IMF, WTO and the European Union. All newspapers wrote about this.
                    At least:
                    http://www.rgwto.com/digest.asp?id=4418&full_mode=1
                    And then all this automatically transferred to the EAEU. So do not really rejoice there, we are all in the same boat. sad crying And we’ll cram the old man there. feel
            2. +5
              15 January 2020 13: 54
              And why do your prices rise so slowly?

              Last memory in my memory right after the EXPO. Then the truth was even slightly reduced. Before the EXPO 142-143 was, now 152. For three years this is nothing.
      4. -5
        15 January 2020 13: 31
        it’s basically cheap there but bad
      5. +3
        15 January 2020 13: 48
        Quote: vanavate
        I have a triple in geography, I’m not joking, though I didn’t understand where cheap oil for Belarus came from in Kazakhstan,

        Is this a mystery ?! Here is a riddle !!! - "Kazakhstan + oil", "Azerbaijan + oil" is somehow understandable, but it is not at all clear how this formula is related to "Ukraine + oil", or "Poland + oil" did they have the earth with oil? Resale, in any case, will increase the cost of raw materials so that my father shaves his mustache. What is he counting on?
      6. +3
        15 January 2020 13: 48
        Well, if cheaper in Europe, why not buy there?
        1. 0
          15 January 2020 14: 59
          Well, if cheaper in Europe, why not buy there?


          God himself commanded !!!! laughing
        2. +4
          16 January 2020 01: 30
          Quote: Alex Nevs
          Well, if cheaper in Europe, why not buy there?

          what because there is no cheaper !!! wassat
      7. +2
        15 January 2020 14: 36
        The issue is not geography, but the perspective of the EAEU.
      8. 0
        15 January 2020 14: 47
        There is oil there, of course not on such a scale, but there is.
      9. +1
        15 January 2020 15: 12
        cotton
        Lukashenko is not looking for cheap oil and other things for Belarus. He is looking for an opportunity to profit not only for himself, but for his growing clan. Because so much pathos in speeches and ostentatious resentment.
        By the way, the Poles have already promised those who will throw off all possible assistance to Lukashenko, at the same time they have promised political asylum to Lukashenko himself and his clan.
      10. -1
        15 January 2020 16: 01
        there, the cost of production is low, but preparation + transportation + taxes, etc. on exhaust are almost the same world price. But father is not a businessman, he is an ordinary farmer and thinks in the same way
      11. 0
        15 January 2020 19: 20
        Quote: vanavate
        I have a triple in geography, I’m not joking, though I didn’t understand where cheap oil for Belarus came from in Kazakhstan,


        Kazakhstan has a pipeline to Novorossiysk.
        It is completely independent of Transneft.
        It is managed by an international consortium, where the share of the Russian Federation is 24%.
        And most importantly, it is a powerful oil pipeline. Up to 75 million tons of oil per year.

        Also, Kazakhstan has an introduction to the Transneft pipeline system.
        Accordingly, through mutual settlements with Transneft, Kazakhstan has a full opportunity to ship "its" oil to Belarus.
      12. -1
        16 January 2020 13: 18
        It's funny when the future republics of Russia discuss something behind her ...
        1. +1
          16 January 2020 19: 29
          Quote: Paul Siebert
          It's funny when the future republics of Russia discuss something behind her ...


          Did he want to fight with the Kazakhs and Belarusians?
          Or "threw in" so podonkovski?
    2. +6
      15 January 2020 13: 02
      Already sick of this circus with horses!
      I personally don’t know who to regret, Belarus or our loved ones.
      Absolutely, our liberal bloc can not tolerate the father, and are simply ready to shit on his head!
      On the other hand, Luka is still a pretzel! On my own mind.
      Belarusian shrimp alone are worth something!
      1. +5
        15 January 2020 13: 18
        Absolutely, our liberal bloc can’t tolerate the father’s


        Do you want to say that our siloviki are in awe of the dad? belay
        1. +1
          15 January 2020 13: 22
          Quote: Olezhek
          Do you want to say that our siloviki are in awe of the dad?

          In any case, they do not scream about it!
          1. +1
            15 January 2020 16: 55
            Quote: Victor_B
            Quote: Olezhek
            Do you want to say that our siloviki are in awe of the dad?

            In any case, they do not scream about it!

            so, after all, the siloviki, they’re not screaming for them, are harsh and silent, look disapprovingly and play with cheekbones, spit through their teeth and think something gloomy ..
      2. +5
        15 January 2020 13: 24
        Quote: Victor_B
        On the other hand, Luka is still a pretzel! On my own mind.
        Belarusian shrimp alone are worth something!


        1. -2
          15 January 2020 13: 32
          Do you want to live - know how to spin! bully
    3. -1
      15 January 2020 13: 05
      And what is there to think about. We will deliver to the port of Vitebsk across the Caspian Sea. We will take the transport for ourselves. We will not abandon the brothers !!!!
    4. +2
      15 January 2020 13: 06
      Wow, we are already trying to sell Belarus at prices above world prices, but funny)
      1. +12
        15 January 2020 13: 10
        it’s so strange they just think. taking into account transportation from Kazakhstan, it basically can’t be any cheaper than ours) the game to the public continues. and above the world it also cannot be elementary due to the fact that oil goes to Belarus without duties.
        1. -8
          15 January 2020 13: 12
          it’s so strange they just think. taking into account transportation from Kazakhstan, it basically can’t be any cheaper than ours) the game to the public continues

          Well, well, the stories that someone buys something at a loss is certainly good, but they have little faith)
          1. +4
            15 January 2020 13: 13
            and someone sold or bought something?)))
            1. -9
              15 January 2020 13: 14
              and someone sold or bought something?)))

              Buy, you doubt it? Well, so you can not doubt)))
              You can still raise then a transfer from Europe will be advantageous to buy, but this is at the discretion of Moscow)
              1. +5
                15 January 2020 13: 18
                yeah) elementary algebra and geography apparently are not available to you?))) or don’t you understand what the bargaining is for?))) this is called creating inflated competitors. delivery of the necessary RBs 24 million tons per year from Kazakhstan or from the Russian Federation as you think is cheaper) and there and here everyone has understood these games for a long time. Old Man raises rates to say that you see, we are already agreeing only to consider that everyone knows how to be worse than him)
                1. -5
                  15 January 2020 13: 21
                  Cheaper, well, voice the price from the Russian Federation and Kazakhstan, otherwise your elementary algebra is lame)
                  1. +8
                    15 January 2020 13: 24
                    everything is fine with mine. I remember very well how they tried to buy oil from Azerbaijan. eventually overpaid almost half a billion dollars a year) new races for the sake of God)
                    1. -6
                      15 January 2020 13: 26
                      show you the exchange oil prices or open Yandex yourself for example?)

                      To me are real on which RB will sell the Russian Federation and Kazakhstan, and the exchange ones you can see for yourself how much you want)
                      1. +4
                        15 January 2020 13: 36
                        okay) to convince a person who does not even understand what the price is somehow troublesome) the Internet will help you
            2. Fat
              0
              15 January 2020 14: 27
              Quote: carstorm 11
              and someone sold or bought something?)))

              Yes, no .. It’s just that oil from Russia is so bad and expensive that it’s more difficult to convert it into products that are profitable for the budget of Belarus at existing refineries in Belarus ... It’s special if you don’t invest anything in the refinery)))
              You might think that Kazakh oil is better than Urals.
              So the Urals at least under brent lift up.
        2. 0
          15 January 2020 14: 17
          And if Belarus nevertheless purchases oil from Kazakhs, then what will you say? No one will work at a loss.
          1. +4
            15 January 2020 14: 52
            And if Belarus nevertheless purchases oil from Kazakhs, then what will you say?


            Already said - a flag in hand! Officially
            the full right of sovereign Belarusians.

            Crazy dispute in general - oil supplies to the Republic of Belarus at prices below the market is like an implicit form of sponsoring "friends"
            But if a friend is suddenly
            And not a friend or an enemy, but ... sad

            Here you have a commercial price tag.

            Here father and howled ...
      2. +1
        15 January 2020 13: 19
        Quote: stepka_razin
        Wow, we are already trying to sell Belarus at prices above world prices, but funny)

        In Belarus, they believe that these prices will now be higher than world prices.

        https://yandex.ru/turbo?text=https%3A%2F%2Fregnum.ru%2Fnews%2F2824156.html
      3. Fat
        +4
        15 January 2020 13: 25
        Quote: stepka_razin
        Wow, we are already trying to sell Belarus at prices above world prices, but funny)

        Alas. Not funny. Belarus re-export of oil is becoming difficult. Belarusian oil is becoming more expensive than world price tags. Well, they have a lot of options for re-export ... Let them do it, maybe they will find a profit somewhere on the Andaman Islands for example.
        What kind of fashion is this at all?
        Minsk is losing its budget, so Moscow is to blame.
        As in some, and in other shorts, Chanel does not smell ...
      4. 0
        15 January 2020 13: 28
        Quote: stepka_razin
        Wow, we are already trying to sell Belarus at prices above world prices, but funny)

        It is not funny that our oil businessmen are ready to rip off everyone, from their population to their allies. They see whether you have no profitability. Yesterday was, but not today. Inflation, see, whether.
        And all the inflation in their brains, immense greed, which does not give them peace, due to lack of dough for the Forbes list!
        And the state condones them.
    5. +10
      15 January 2020 13: 10
      The exact route that oil can go from Kazakhstan to Belarus has not yet been reported.

      By the sea, of course. The main thing is not to unravel the shrimp along the road!
      1. -2
        15 January 2020 13: 13
        Quote: Vasyan1971
        By the sea, of course. The main thing is not to unravel the shrimp along the road!

        Do you think railway is not fate?
        Here everyone dreams of transit of goods from China and Korea to Europe by rail through Russia. And in this case, the route is much shorter. Why not?
    6. DPN
      0
      15 January 2020 13: 11
      Belarus was clamped on both sides, and who will benefit from this: Russia? or WEST? Do not go over the DUBIN.
      1. -3
        15 January 2020 13: 19
        Belarus is initially at a disadvantage between a rock and a hard place, and sooner or later it will be crushed
      2. +10
        15 January 2020 13: 36
        Probably the time has come to CHOOSE ....
        Quote: DPN
        Clamped Belarus from two sides

        Quote: DPN
        Do not go over the DUBIN.

        Stick ... wink
      3. +1
        15 January 2020 15: 04
        Belarus was clamped on both sides, and who will benefit from this: Russia? or WEST? Do not go over the DUBIN


        There is no strategic scope for Lukashism?

        .
    7. -37
      15 January 2020 13: 13
      Ukrainians have thrown Belarusians now throw what are you for the Russian people?
      1. +15
        15 January 2020 13: 18
        Nobody threw Ukrainians. Bandera’s leadership set the Ukrainians with cancer.
        1. -5
          15 January 2020 13: 50
          Not without your participation ...
          1. +9
            15 January 2020 14: 02
            We considered this to be Ukraine's internal affairs. If we intervened, then in Belarus (and not only) would have yelled about the terrible "Russian imperialism". They still invite us to the war, but we are not ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
      3. NKT
        +5
        15 January 2020 16: 17
        We dated Ukrainians at $ 400 billion, Belarus - at $ 120 billion. So here we are bad.
        1. -1
          15 January 2020 19: 54
          Let's not forget Yanukovych's three-ruble note sad "- was given for 3 (three) years in 2013, and today 2020 -" ... where is the three-ruble note "Zin? ..." what
          1. 0
            15 January 2020 23: 03
            Quote: cat Rusich
            Let's not forget Yanukovych's three-ruble note sad "- was given for 3 (three) years in 2013, and today 2020 -" ... where is the three-ruble note "Zin? ..." what

            Perhaps somewhere in the country near Rostov? Or even in which apartment they are stacked in cubes.
      4. +7
        16 January 2020 01: 35
        Quote: frizzy
        Ukrainians have thrown Belarusians now throw what are you for the Russian people?

        you yourself what nations will you be ?! !! wassat
        1. +10
          16 January 2020 01: 46
          Hail Nicholas! hi He is a foundling, without a clan and a tribe! Sent to the VO - to conduct subversive activities ... the intruder in general! drinks
          1. +7
            16 January 2020 01: 48
            Quote: Hunter 2
            Hail Nicholas! hi He is a foundling, without a clan and a tribe! Sent to the VO - to conduct subversive activities ... the intruder in general! drinks

            kind!!! drinks hi he can undermine his current !! wassat
            1. +8
              16 January 2020 01: 51
              Well, Duck, look at his Comments ... dancing on a rake is a favorite pastime ... maybe what hurts? belay
              1. +7
                16 January 2020 02: 57
                Quote: Hunter 2
                Well, Duck, look at his Comments ... dancing on a rake is a favorite pastime ... maybe what hurts? belay

                what to look at him ... is it really something different from the all-local proponents ??? lol
                1. +10
                  16 January 2020 03: 09
                  This "special" case - he simply hates Russia! Selflessly and to the depths ...
                  I don’t understand how - knowing Language, History, Culture - Our ... can you be so stubborn?
                  1. +7
                    16 January 2020 03: 15
                    Quote: Hunter 2
                    This "special" case - he simply hates Russia! Selflessly and to the depths ...
                    I don’t understand how knowing Language, History, Culture - Our ... can you be so stubborn?

                    wassat Yes, here these others in their hatred of RYZHYMU do not see how they began to hate Russia !!! wink wassat
                    1. +9
                      16 January 2020 03: 21
                      I was surprised more by another ... Everything just came out hysterically - The Government is in Retirement !!!
                      Resignation ... Now hysteria - Tricky plan, again deceived! laughing
                      1. +7
                        16 January 2020 03: 24
                        Quote: Hunter 2
                        I was surprised more by another ... Everything just came out hysterically - The Government is in Retirement !!!
                        Resignation ... Now hysteria - Tricky plan, again deceived! laughing

                        and I knew that they would distort any thing in their direction ... well ... and to rivet a bunch of comments under the next "military article" on the "military resource" !!! wassat lol
                        1. +10
                          16 January 2020 03: 28
                          Duck here the characters are full of which in these articles and climbs ... they are military articles - uninteresting!
                          They need to dive. They need to tell how they live badly ... but why will it be good - if you don’t break away from the computer? Question - Have you tried to work ??? ends with silence and minus request
                        2. +8
                          16 January 2020 03: 35
                          Quote: Hunter 2
                          Duck here the characters are full of which in these articles and climbs ... they are military articles - uninteresting!
                          They need to dive. They need to tell how they live badly ... but why will it be good - if you don’t break away from the computer? Question - Have you tried to work ??? ends with silence and minus request

                          I tyayayayayayayaya begging yayayayayu ... they and under a military article they manage to rivet, as here ... the main thing in the beginning, the comment about Putin to rivet !!! laughing
                        3. +8
                          16 January 2020 03: 39
                          100% infa, I’ll throw off a couple of Bots in a personal - there’s not just one Army or Navy commentary, there’s not just one comment - Joyful, only tears and snot! hi
    8. +3
      15 January 2020 13: 19
      Market prices - understandably, and world prices - what kind of beast? laughing
      1. +2
        15 January 2020 13: 36
        The price of oil inside Russia is formed mainly on the basis of NetBack from Urals quotes on the Roterdam Exchange, and on the basis of these quotes a tax scheme has been built to pay mineral extraction tax and export duties. Formulas are directly attached to them.
    9. +10
      15 January 2020 13: 33
      In 1979, two "billionaires" were opened in Kazakhstan: Karachaganak and Tengiz. So there is oil in Kazakhstan, and not only these fields.
      Tariffs for pumping oil or transportation w / d are equal for everyone.
      It’s just that out of this tax maneuver, basically because of Belarus, the whole oil industry of Russia is now cancer. The bottom line is that in our country it makes no sense to invest in processing at all, it essentially works at a loss for many enterprises.
      Belarus is not negotiating with oil companies in Russia, but with the government, and why? Yes, because they beg for preferences for duties and benefits. In fact, they want to buy oil below market prices within Russia.
    10. +4
      15 January 2020 13: 37
      Quote: Didn't serve
      at the Rotterdam Stock Exchange

      This is the market price.
    11. -2
      15 January 2020 13: 50
      Oh heavily non-declining ...
    12. +4
      15 January 2020 14: 00
      As today's youth says: - "Too late." It is a pity that the personal wishes of the benefits of the Belarusian Sumerian will affect the welfare of the entire people of Belarus.
    13. -3
      15 January 2020 14: 02
      Quote: mordvin xnumx
      Quote: Obi Wan Kenobi
      Caspian Sea

      Logistics of supplies is incomprehensible. request

      That's why on VO and plans you are building ...
      But, as I understand it, adults have gathered here, well, with a few exceptions. This is what I mean, a strategic mistake of the government of the Republic of Bashkortostan, that all these years oil / gas was purchased only in the Russian Federation. Why? -the scheme is old: to accustom you to a cheap price, well, and then the price tag can be stuck up, above the Sun, like so where are you going?
      And the most interesting, name the prices which you can’t agree on. Secret !!!!, what else ...
      1. +3
        15 January 2020 14: 10
        why? -the scheme is old: to accustom to a cheap price, well, then the price tag can be stuck up, above the Sun, like so where are you going?


        Belarus is stupidly insolvent.
        According to this scheme, it makes sense to work with rich countries
        but who will give you?
        1. -2
          15 January 2020 16: 39
          Azerbaijan will supply fuel to Belarus, if not today, then tomorrow ... In exchange for weapons + "well, for mutual understanding" ...
      2. -3
        15 January 2020 14: 18
        Quote: GenNick
        And the most interesting, name the prices which you can’t agree on. Secret !!!!, what else ...

        Yeah. By the way, I have a question for you. If on my Ocean receiver the stamp is April 81st, and May 81st on the tuning indicator, then when was it about to be released?
        1. 0
          15 January 2020 14: 57
          December 31, 1981 ...
    14. +4
      15 January 2020 14: 03
      So, at the expense of free oil in Kazakhstan, it with the Abundance, due to Opek, had to reduce production and preserve a number of old wells.
      Think about Kazakhstan. About 17 mini-refineries worked before the intervention of the National Security Committee, where they processed stolen oil from pipelines and boreholes, the factory costs from 4 Lyamov Baku.
      1. 0
        15 January 2020 15: 58
        Where will the oil be free if custody + is still valid
        1. +2
          15 January 2020 16: 04
          Quote: Kamikadze19
          Where will the oil be free if custody + is still valid

          So OPEC regulates the volume of oil exported and not for domestic consumption, if the EAEU market is considered to be internal, all the more there are completely different agreements, including not to climb into a clearing, like Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, the situation is different here.
    15. 0
      15 January 2020 14: 06
      Quote: Operator
      Market prices - understandably, and world prices - what kind of beast? laughing

      And I wonder what kind of world it is ....
    16. Eug
      0
      15 January 2020 14: 15
      If anything - the tariff for pumping through the territory of the Russian Federation is equal to the one that Father installed ...
    17. +1
      15 January 2020 14: 25
      Kazakhs, to put it mildly, sent Belarusians! Of course, they can transport oil, but:
      1. Through ports, but then its cost will be higher than Russian.
      2. Through the Atyrau-Samara pipeline, but here everything depends on Russia's consent to provide additional capacities for oil transportation.
      And it is unlikely that Kazakhstan will have excess oil for Minsk.
      1. +1
        15 January 2020 14: 48
        And it is unlikely that Kazakhstan will have excess oil for Minsk.


        And here it is - how much does it have in Kazakhstan and not in foreign mega-concerns?
        Does she even exist? Free?
      2. +1
        16 January 2020 17: 05
        And what ports in Kazakhstan do you know ?? And where from these ports can you swim?
    18. +4
      15 January 2020 14: 41
      When business partners conduct business negotiations, they try not to reflect tongue And if "but father", as a politician, wants to force the Russian Federation to reduce the price of the rise. oil for Belarus is where the "stuffing" in the media begins.

      "Uk..r. scheme" - checked! hi
    19. 0
      15 January 2020 14: 50
      For this, the Belarusian delegation will arrive in this Central Asian country on January 20.
      The more independence the sometimes closer to absurdity and petty blackmail, where were you before the sabers, since Kazakhstan is closer and more profitable to you, you just can't believe that once it was one big country and there was one, soviet and not always bad, order for all laughing
    20. 0
      15 January 2020 14: 54
      Classic ... overseas heifer half, yes transport rupe.
      Everything is counted ... ship the oranges in the barrels of the Karamazov brothers.
    21. 0
      15 January 2020 15: 00
      In general, in vain Belarusians occupies the Russian Federation. No matter how ally the state
    22. -3
      15 January 2020 15: 09
      Belarus sent proposals for the purchase of oil "to all possible countries"
      https://nn.by/?c=ar&i=244398&lang=ru


      Nokia / Reply
      14.01.2020 / 17: 47
      Tanker swim)))
      https://nn.by/?c=ar&i=244398&lang=ru


      Hooray! The tanker is sailing! Glory to Zmagram! wassat
    23. -1
      15 January 2020 15: 19
      Well, in general, of course, our government has a strange policy ..
    24. +3
      15 January 2020 15: 29
      in Venezuela it is necessary to take gasoline there cheaper than water, flooded the tanker and drove to the house.
    25. 0
      15 January 2020 15: 41
      Quote: KCA
      Well, Belarus will abandon Russian oil, quickly, in about 10 years, they will build an oil pipeline, and for the time being they will ride on horses, although I can’t imagine how cheap it is to deliver oil from Kazakhstan bypassing Russia.

      Probably oil is not produced on Red Square, at least look at the globe.
    26. +1
      15 January 2020 15: 55
      Sednya read an article that RB bought oil from Russian oil companies for a price of 87% of world value. They said that it’s expensive, they refused.
    27. 0
      15 January 2020 15: 56
      Old Man just shows off. Anyone who is even remotely familiar with oil refining understands that oil refineries are being built under a specific brand of oil. Those. to load heavy sour oil into a plant designed for light low sour and, conversely, it will not work.
    28. +2
      15 January 2020 16: 35
      Gee. Where will Old Man find fools to sell him oil CHEAPER than world prices?
      After all, the problem is precisely that - from domestic prices, Belarus is transferred to world prices. Therefore, I bought_cheap-sold_ by_ the world does not pass anymore. Old man stuffed.
    29. +1
      15 January 2020 17: 00
      "In Kazakhstan, they answer that the deal will take place only if it is economically profitable for Kazakhstan." - what did you want ?! It is important for Minsk that the deal is beneficial to Old Man! wassat
    30. -2
      15 January 2020 17: 34
      And Luka will carry oil by tankers, so the Kazakhs have ports only in the Caspian Sea or in tanks through all of Russia. So there he lifted up some kind of price for our export to Europe, ours will recoup. What does Luke really want? and eat fish and don’t choke on bone, but it doesn’t. Everything in this world has its price, including the wishes of the unholy Luke.
    31. -1
      15 January 2020 18: 42
      Yeah, Old Man again freaks started .. Stop talking already! Already accustomed to crab their own catch in Russia to supply and re-export oil? Well, maybe enough to be foolish .. Will Kazakhs deliver oil to you by air?
      Ever talk to Lukashenko, I’ve got everyone already ..
      1. +1
        15 January 2020 19: 17
        But how many brothers quarreled borrowing money. Want to lose a friend, lend him money. As we see, this is also relevant for states.
    32. 0
      15 January 2020 18: 59
      Quote: Vadim02rus
      Well, for "non-brothers" transit has somehow become more profitable.

      Actually, I didn’t. Because the volume of transit has sharply decreased.
    33. -1
      15 January 2020 19: 01
      Quote: Vadim02rus
      For the same for which Kazakh oil in the Russian Federation. And back, gasoline from the Russian Federation is cheaper than for the Russians, "you understand."

      Already cited a number of links with articles explaining the situation with gas prices in Kazakhstan, including from Kazakh sites.

      However, you all know very well, but your line is clear: everything in Russia is bad.
    34. +3
      15 January 2020 19: 16
      Quote: marshes
      Quote: Vadim02rus
      For the same for which Kazakh oil in the Russian Federation. And back, gasoline from the Russian Federation is cheaper than for the Russians, "you understand."

      The import of petroleum products to Kazakhstan from Russia has been banned for already a year. In Kazakhstan, they don’t know where to put their gas.

      There was a time when we had a lot of moonshine in Chechnya and they also had nothing to do with their gas. But from the quality of this moonshine, the engines wedged already in the second hour of work. So that, .....
    35. -1
      15 January 2020 19: 24
      Quote: Ru_Na
      And it is unlikely that Kazakhstan will have excess oil for Minsk.

      It is unlikely that Kazakhstan will quarrel with Russia over this lousy dough. Not so much money to ...
    36. -4
      15 January 2020 19: 54
      Quote: x.andvlad
      Quote: stepka_razin
      Wow, we are already trying to sell Belarus at prices above world prices, but funny)

      It is not funny that our oil businessmen are ready to rip off everyone, from their population to their allies. They see whether you have no profitability. Yesterday was, but not today. Inflation, see, whether.
      And all the inflation in their brains, immense greed, which does not give them peace, due to lack of dough for the Forbes list!
      And the state condones them.

      What other muti do you write? It is perfectly understandable why the price of oil rises. It is not clear - give yourself labor and first sort it out. But it is imperative to blurt out about the oligarchs, bad Russia, tear off. Whose mill are you pouring water on, doesn’t it matter by ignorance, stupidity or intent?
    37. -1
      15 January 2020 20: 16
      Cheap oil from Kazakhstan to Belarus can be delivered by "diplomatic mail" via "diplomatic pipeline" wink
    38. 0
      15 January 2020 21: 56
      Quote: Fantazer911
      No, not Poles, but Jen Psaki sent 6 US fleets to the coast of Belarus hi

      Thank. I forgot.
    39. +2
      15 January 2020 22: 12
      Oil is not only gasoline, but also a number of oil products. Oils, for example ...
      If Kazakhstan agrees with Russia, then Belarus can also agree with Kazakhstan. There will be a muddy little scheme, but there will be Russian oil in the pipe ..
    40. 0
      15 January 2020 23: 08
      It is surprising how else Belarusian scientists, by order of the Old Man, had not thought of producing oil from the bulb?
      It’s somehow better to breed shrimps and lobsters in Belarusian swamps (:
    41. +1
      16 January 2020 04: 17
      "Kazakhstan responds that the deal will be completed only if it is economically beneficial for Kazakhstan."- The freebie is over, dad!
    42. +1
      16 January 2020 11: 08
      Well, let them look for cheaper prices below world prices.
    43. +1
      16 January 2020 11: 34
      Finally, someone was tired, through, of our strategic ally and brother Lukashenko for 6 years in a row to support the fuel and lubricants of the Bandera-NATO army of Ukraine that kills Russians.
    44. 0
      16 January 2020 13: 23
      Quote: cat Rusich
      Let's not forget Yanukovych's three-ruble note sad "- was given for 3 (three) years in 2013, and today 2020 -" ... where is the three-ruble note "Zin? ..." what

      Soon there will be a court on the next appeal. And the interest is dropping
    45. 0
      16 January 2020 13: 29
      Quote: Mentat
      Quote: Vadim02rus
      Well, for "non-brothers" transit has somehow become more profitable.

      Actually, I didn’t. Because the volume of transit has sharply decreased.

      The volume of transit is specified in the new contract, and if Gazprom pumps less, then the money will not be returned
      1. +1
        16 January 2020 16: 58
        Why should Gazprom download less ?? Yes, and much less. And so 40 billion cubic meters per year in total. Earlier in Ukraine, they received 3,5 to 4 billion dollars a year for transit, but now in 5 years there will be only 7 billion dollars
    46. 0
      16 January 2020 14: 35
      Will agree
    47. +1
      16 January 2020 16: 56
      Well, agreeing with Kazakhstan is still half the battle. Will have to negotiate with Russia about transit
    48. 0
      16 January 2020 18: 41
      But father: "that is, how is it - the deal will take place only if it is economically profitable for Kazakhstan?!? You JUST GIVE us oil! And I WILL PROMISE something for that! What if it goes wrong?";)
    49. 0
      17 January 2020 04: 25
      Since nobody wants to supply oil to Belarus, the Old Man means that the price is too low.
    50. 0
      17 January 2020 09: 12
      Correctly!!! It is necessary to raise prices for Belarus ... for everything .. And then it’s not African countries, Syria, Cuba ... everything should be done there ... and it is desirable for nothing ... Loans were forgiven to everyone except Belarus .. why Russia Belarus ?
      1. 0
        17 January 2020 10: 12
        In the skill of losing friends and creating enemies, we have surpassed ourselves.
    51. 0
      17 January 2020 22: 57
      Well, okay, Belarusians are poor... and maybe it’s right to sell oil and so on to some ally at world prices for the benefit of the Russians... but... Russians, since you are so rich, why are you so poor?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"