Military Review

A teenager opened fire at a school in the USA

80

At Beller High School in Houston, Texas, one of the high school students suddenly started aiming at his classmates.


This was reported by the Houston TV channel KHOU11.

The young man, seriously wounded in the chest, was taken to the hospital, but he could not save his life. The doctors could not help him. The 16 year old guy has passed away.

Mayor Sylvester Turner expressed his condolences to the relatives and friends of the deceased. Initially, the school administration intended to continue classes tomorrow. But the parents of the students organized a spontaneous rally and insisted on the contrary.

Law enforcement agencies began interviewing witnesses and classmates of a suspected shooting suspect, as well as searching for him. As a result, yesterday at 19:40 pm local time, the suspect and his potential accomplice were detained. Police say a young man who shot schoolchildren was hiding behind a garbage container near a grocery store on a city street.

According to one version, the suspect is another so-called “columbainer” (the materials of this community in Russia are subject to blocking in connection with its destructive activity). This is indicated by the fact that he most likely did not act alone.
80 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Victor_B
    Victor_B 15 January 2020 10: 24
    +1
    Immediately allow a short barrel in Russia!
    People without him already "can’t kill"!

    Such massacres will certainly become at least as much as ours!
    The keys to my father’s weapons safe, with a great desire, are not so difficult (on average in a hospital) to get.
    1. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 15 January 2020 10: 37
      0
      I am afraid much more often. with ours, then maybe in life.
    2. Vladimir_2U
      Vladimir_2U 15 January 2020 10: 38
      +3
      Quote: Victor_B
      Immediately allow a short barrel in Russia!
      People without him already "can’t kill"!

      Well, the "Kerch" gn_ida did not have a short-barrel, who felt better from this?
      1. Victor_B
        Victor_B 15 January 2020 10: 40
        -1
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        Well, the "Kerch" gn_ida did not have a short-barrel, who felt better from this?

        This one has been carefully prepared for a long time!
        And they just offended me at school, ran home, grabbed Papa's trunks, hid Alga in his bosom!
        1. Roman070280
          Roman070280 15 January 2020 11: 19
          +3
          Well, in fairness, it’s more likely that the offenders themselves will be to blame ..
          For, the absence of the offended trunk is no reason to offend him ..

          Although I myself am against weapons ..
        2. whatis love
          whatis love 15 January 2020 12: 54
          +2
          What is the difference? In your opinion, a teenager will not be able to get the same Saigu out of a safe, but a gun will?
    3. _Sergei_
      _Sergei_ 15 January 2020 10: 39
      +8
      You just need to teach your children how to handle weapons. My from the age of 7 already shot with Makarov. And he’s not getting into the safe behind my gun. And then we mainly learn from shooting games where you can shoot right and left.
      1. Victor_B
        Victor_B 15 January 2020 10: 41
        -3
        Quote: _Sergey_
        You just need to teach your children how to handle weapons. My from the age of 7 already shot with Makarov. And he’s not getting into the safe behind my gun.

        So you do not live in Russia.
        1. _Sergei_
          _Sergei_ 15 January 2020 10: 43
          +7
          Altai Territory, Rubtsovsk
          1. Victor_B
            Victor_B 15 January 2020 10: 44
            -3
            Quote: _Sergey_
            Altai Territory, Rubtsovsk

            And why do you have Makarov at home?
            Are you from the special services?
            1. _Sergei_
              _Sergei_ 15 January 2020 10: 54
              +6
              I have a TT at home, and Makarov was in the service. And the son has already grown up, 35 years old to die.
              1. Usher
                Usher 15 January 2020 15: 02
                0
                where is the TT from? Interesting?
                1. _Sergei_
                  _Sergei_ 15 January 2020 16: 54
                  +2
                  It is quite official, permission to keep and carry.
        2. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 15 January 2020 10: 57
          +6
          Well, I also played with my service personnel from my father’s early childhood) my dad on duty will come to dinner, he’ll run off and have fun for now) I started taking to landfills with me from 4-5) shooting from AK) he keeps me panting, trying to push downhill) class in the second they shot from a tank at the training ground) I’m really single, but I still remember how it was. as yesterday damn it was so much emotion)
      2. Vladimir_2U
        Vladimir_2U 15 January 2020 10: 42
        0
        Quote: _Sergey_
        And then we mainly learn from shooting games where you can shoot right and left.
        Yeah, in games where trunks are used, you can immediately see boobies, even real trunks are not to be given into hands.
      3. Vasyan1971
        Vasyan1971 15 January 2020 10: 46
        -2
        Quote: _Sergey_
        And he’s not getting into the safe behind my gun.

        While does not climb.
        1. Victor_B
          Victor_B 15 January 2020 10: 57
          -1
          Quote: Vasyan1971
          Until it climbs.

          Well, why so far?
          Normally educated, normal parents and the boy will not climb.
          It’s just that sometimes even a normal person tears off the roof.
          Well, then just statistics - big numbers ...
          1. Vasyan1971
            Vasyan1971 15 January 2020 11: 36
            0
            Quote: Victor_B
            Well, why so far?

            Quote: Victor_B
            It’s just that sometimes even a normal person tears off the roof.

            About that and speech ...
          2. revnagan
            revnagan 15 January 2020 13: 33
            -2
            Quote: Victor_B
            It’s just that sometimes even a normal person tears off the roof.
            Well, then just statistics - big numbers ...

            Therefore, prohibit proactively. Polls, in advance, so to speak, in order to avoid .... And then you never know what ... Maybe "gopniks" bandits and other criminals will never get in. Or maybe they just kick it, they will give a crack and let it go. But to shoot the neighbors, well, 100 % will want according to the law of large numbers.
            1. volodimer
              volodimer 15 January 2020 17: 31
              -2
              There will be many letters .. Now, I’m quite a calm person, with me on a drunken party no one arranges a showdown, I manage to extinguish their aggression, but the same drinking companions have often been awakening without me. Not bragging, it just comes out that way. But!!! if in the 8th-9th grade of the school I had access to a quick and effective means of resolving conflicts ... I’m not sure that I wouldn’t use it ... One shot and a chisel that spoils my life is eliminated ... Of course, compliance rules for using and storing weapons ... But my grandfather’s iron toolbox and the lock on it never stopped me ... Now, I’m an adult and confident, and even almost FOR the opportunity to have weapons, but sometimes I think how good that this is not.
      4. orionvitt
        orionvitt 15 January 2020 11: 40
        0
        Quote: _Sergey_
        You just need to teach your children how to handle weapons.

        It is not a matter of learning how to handle weapons, but the psychological instability of modern youth (and not only). Here you have unlimited internet, shooters, horror movies, pornography, dubious bloggers and everything else taken together.
        1. whatis love
          whatis love 15 January 2020 12: 56
          +4
          What does pornography, games and the Internet have to do with it? Stop shifting responsibility for parenting to “Angry Games”
          1. Vladimir_2U
            Vladimir_2U 15 January 2020 13: 15
            +2
            Quote: Whatislove
            What does pornography, games and the Internet have to do with it

            Ahaha, don’t touch the porn!
        2. _Sergei_
          _Sergei_ 15 January 2020 14: 23
          0
          Put "parental control" in the Internet settings and it will not be fumbled anywhere.
          1. orionvitt
            orionvitt 15 January 2020 22: 01
            0
            Quote: _Sergey_
            Put "parental control" in the Internet settings and it will not be fumbled anywhere.

            Well, yes, too old boobies, to put parental controls for forty years until they become wiser?
            1. _Sergei_
              _Sergei_ 16 January 2020 05: 38
              0
              As my grandmother used to say: "You need to educate when it lies across the shop, and when it is along it is too late." It is only in the cinema that a 27-year-old fool was re-educated in two or three months ("The Kholop").
      5. loki565
        loki565 15 January 2020 11: 45
        +1
        Here it is also necessary to approach wisely, even experienced instructors make fatal mistakes.
        1. sharp-lad
          sharp-lad 15 January 2020 22: 16
          0
          He would give her Barrett! And cho, there is a muzzle brake, the return is small!
      6. Blacksmith 55
        Blacksmith 55 15 January 2020 12: 17
        +2
        Well, we are .... village, we are from a slingshot, and we did not ask our parents. :))))
    4. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 15 January 2020 10: 45
      +1
      At Beller High School in Houston, Texas, one of the high school students suddenly started aiming at his classmates.
      these are the results of the education of modern youth, where many do not see a chance. you do not need to be "seven inches in the forehead" to understand this. young people do not have prospects in the bulk, the plot is already compressed into science fiction films with a similar situation. and the situation is awful, all over the world, the division into slaves and masters got everyone, like not the Middle Ages, but still the same. the spring can no longer fold, it will burst, it will burst so much that we all find ourselves in burning neighborhoods, in lawlessness, in gangs and looters, and the "authorities" at any moment - in the "turntable" and ... "adyos". "and Rosgvardia" will be a bargaining chip, it will also be stupidly thrown later. a terrible dream, and everything goes to this. well if it doesn't come true.
      1. carstorm 11
        carstorm 11 15 January 2020 11: 05
        +2
        oh yes hare already escalate) youth options darkness. you just need to decide on your life and move towards the goal. nowhere will you find yourself in any burning neighborhoods) understand in the end that your nostalgia for the past of young people does not stir at all. since childhood they have been preparing to build careers. my eldest 11 year old already knows English better than I do) master slaves ... how will a child from childhood try to grow like this and grow up. will the ox push will remain in one place. will try to become whoever he wants. and everything will be fine with them. the main thing is not to interfere with them, but simply to direct them.
        1. Aerodrome
          Aerodrome 15 January 2020 11: 18
          -4
          Quote: carstorm 11
          oh yes hare already escalate) youth options darkness.

          and darkness - without a gap ... I understand well that you are a "bot", do not build the illusion that I will enter into polemics, I know you, and I communicate out of boredom.
          1. carstorm 11
            carstorm 11 15 January 2020 12: 03
            +3
            Why am I a bot? because I think and I’m saying not how are you?) I’ll disappoint you confuse me with someone) I’m not campaigning for anyone and I’m not asking you to agree on anything. I do not have political preferences and I do not go to the polls. I am apolitical. I do not go into topics about the fleet and aviation because it’s not mine. since he graduated from the tank and served a decent time after mostly rummaging in those topics. I feel comfortable there. I do not go into topics about pensions and other garbage. so sorry but you oh how wrong)
      2. loki565
        loki565 15 January 2020 11: 49
        +2
        How cleverly did you switch from the USA to Russia, can you in any article ???))) or in the USA there is also the Russian Guard ???)))
        1. whatis love
          whatis love 15 January 2020 12: 57
          -2
          The National Guard of the Russian Federation and the Russian Guard are the same
      3. AU Ivanov.
        AU Ivanov. 15 January 2020 12: 08
        +6
        So educate your children who is stopping you. Including the culture of handling weapons. Or should uncle do this for you? Do you entrust the education of your offspring to a stranger or public institution? Personally, my children didn’t even send a toy weapon with a barrel at a person outside the game. And there are more than enough prospects for today's children, they are now quick-witted, smart, kids. It’s us, the old fighters howling at the long-gone moon, and the youth are rowing their paws.
    5. Abbot
      Abbot 15 January 2020 10: 46
      +3
      Quote: Victor_B
      Immediately allow a short barrel in Russia!

      It is necessary to engage in the education of young people, to change the public climate, the rule of law ... and not to clutch at the trunks. We are not Americans, after all. Why do we need their gadgets, I do not understand. Or are you joking like that?
    6. Irokez
      Irokez 15 January 2020 10: 50
      0
      Quote: Victor_B
      Immediately allow a short barrel in Russia!

      Well yes. If all the other schoolchildren had pistols with them, then they would have immediately eliminated the shooter. And what is logical, after all. As it turns out complete nonsense, but we must somehow justify the possession and carrying gunshots for lovers of those.
      1. Victor_B
        Victor_B 15 January 2020 10: 59
        -3
        Quote: Irokez
        but it is necessary to somehow justify the possession and carrying of gunshots for lovers of those.

        The most interesting thing is that there are only a few percent of such people in the population, and the noise is raised ...
        1. loki565
          loki565 15 January 2020 11: 55
          0
          The legalization of the short barrel has long been lobbying for manufacturers of such. In Russia, a huge market, just money and nothing personal)))
      2. Fibrizio
        Fibrizio 15 January 2020 11: 00
        +7
        I do not at all advocate for the legalization of wearing in the Russian Federation, but just the same all the shootings take place in the states in the gun free zone. Those places where it is forbidden by law to bring weapons. They are chosen precisely for the purpose of the absence of weapons from law-abiding citizens.
        After all, the goal of such people is to take revenge (or maybe kill more). You can't kill a lot in a shootout. + Psychology is completely different. It is one thing to go to kill unarmed people, and it is another thing to go to a place where they can fight back.
        I do not urge permission to carry weapons to children in the states (if that).
      3. whatis love
        whatis love 15 January 2020 12: 59
        +5
        Stop projecting their hoplophobic thoughts on life. All shootings take place in the “Gun free zone” that came up with such hoplofoby as you.
    7. Fibrizio
      Fibrizio 15 January 2020 10: 56
      +3
      There will be no short barrels; he will take daddy saiga short at 5.45. Here the logic is strange. I would rather not stick it at all, but seeing a guy with an assault rifle and full-sized shops at thirty is much more unpleasant than with a gun.
      1. Victor_B
        Victor_B 15 January 2020 11: 01
        -8
        Quote: Fibrizio
        There will be no short barrels; he will take daddy saiga short at 5.45. Here the logic is strange. I would rather not stick it at all, but seeing a guy with an assault rifle and full-sized shops at thirty is much more unpleasant than with a gun.

        And that could be ...
        But with a long barrel you don’t really walk along the street.
        And he put the gun in his pocket and went to the boys to brag. And there, and not far from the accident.
        1. AU Ivanov.
          AU Ivanov. 15 January 2020 12: 47
          +3
          In our childhood, the "echo of war" was in bulk, the district police officer forgot to confiscate. So, that went, some with TShnik, some with Luger. And how many mortars were blown up.
          1. Victor_B
            Victor_B 15 January 2020 12: 49
            -6
            Quote: AS Ivanov.
            So, they went, some with TTshnik, some with Luger. And how many mortars were blown up.

            Oh, and how many of you have remained children forever ...
            1. AU Ivanov.
              AU Ivanov. 15 January 2020 12: 50
              +5
              A man is a randomly surviving boy.
      2. Irokez
        Irokez 15 January 2020 11: 02
        -1
        Quote: Fibrizio
        but to see a guy with an assault rifle and full-sized shops thirty is much more unpleasant than with a gun

        And how nice it is when there are none with weapons at all.
        1. bessmertniy
          bessmertniy 15 January 2020 11: 17
          -3
          Well, just somehow calmer. In the 90s, and without a firearm, many people were sent to the other world. And with a firearm there would be much more.
      3. _Sergei_
        _Sergei_ 15 January 2020 11: 36
        +1
        The magazine for civilian weapons is allowed no more than 10 rounds.
        1. Irokez
          Irokez 15 January 2020 11: 38
          -2
          Quote: _Sergey_
          10 cartridges

          10 rounds - 10 corpses. Logic and nothing more.
      4. Abbot
        Abbot 15 January 2020 11: 45
        +1
        Quote: Fibrizio
        take daddy saiga

        You think it's so easy to go and get it? Not if dad imbecile, then of course.
    8. revnagan
      revnagan 15 January 2020 13: 28
      0
      Quote: Victor_B
      Immediately allow a short barrel in Russia!

      Yes, and prohibit immediately: private vehicles (if you want to drive a car, go to taxi drivers), otherwise you can fly into the crowd and kill a lot of people; prohibit air, railway and sea transport (wow, how many people die at once ), prohibit for sale to individuals: gasoline, foam, glass containers, ammonium nitrate, diesel fuel, aluminum powder. Knives, axes, pitchforks - you can definitely prohibit hunting rifles only at the local police department or, even better, prohibit .And there will come a paradise for hoplofobov. And, no, they will come up with a lot of things to "ban". And the police to issue slingshots, as in Indonesia laughing .
      1. sharp-lad
        sharp-lad 15 January 2020 22: 26
        0
        Slingshots are not prohibited ... ... However, IDEA !! hi
  2. Squelcher
    Squelcher 15 January 2020 11: 03
    +4
    Quote: Aerodrome
    marauders, and the "authorities" at any moment - in the "turntable" and ... "adyos". "and Rosgvardia" will be a bargaining chip, it will also be stupidly thrown later. a terrible dream, and everything goes to this. well if it doesn't come true.


    And here is the Rosguard in America?
    Or maybe you can’t wait for the reservation, when they flood Russia with blood, for the sake of the next batch of traitors?
    1. loki565
      loki565 15 January 2020 12: 04
      +2
      And here is the Rosguard in America?
      Or maybe you can’t wait for the reservation, when they flood Russia with blood, for the sake of the next batch of traitors?

      There are commentators who can add Russia to any news, usually these are just "bots")))
  3. Fibrizio
    Fibrizio 15 January 2020 11: 13
    +3
    Quote: Irokez
    And how nice it is when there are none with weapons at all.

    From the point of view, it is safe for everyone to have a transponder under the skin and a ban on movement. Many dystopias were written by writers. There, the population is equal to cattle, can fulfill its function. Step left, step right you are the enemy of the people. Disposal
    So you can drive and ban everyone, from a traffic accident a lot of people die.
    To have a weapon is the right of a free person. And the ability to realize it should be mandatory, albeit with reservations.
    1. Loess
      Loess 15 January 2020 11: 35
      -4
      Quote: Fibrizio
      To have a weapon is the right of a free person. And the ability to implement it should be mandatory

      Service under the contract gives such an opportunity.
      1. Fibrizio
        Fibrizio 15 January 2020 12: 07
        +5
        But the will of application is absent. It’s like a person who wants to get rich offers to get a job at the mint to the minted machine.
        1. Loess
          Loess 15 January 2020 12: 14
          -5
          Quote: Fibrizio
          But the will of application is absent.

          These are the same reservations that you mentioned.
      2. whatis love
        whatis love 15 January 2020 13: 05
        +3
        It does not give any opportunity. The weapon is always in a rifle pack, it is given current by the decision of a company company. Yes, it’s stupid to go into the army for the sake of arms
    2. Irokez
      Irokez 15 January 2020 11: 46
      0
      Quote: Fibrizio
      To have a weapon is a free man’s right

      A free person must have the right to security and confidence in security. If a person has a weapon, then this is a potential danger to others and the person himself.
      1. revnagan
        revnagan 15 January 2020 13: 44
        +1
        Quote: Irokez
        A free person must have the right to security and confidence in security.

        And who in the state guarantees a free person this right? Law enforcers? Put a cop with a gun to every free person? A free person and a citizen can and should be able to protect their rights and the rights of other fellow citizens from criminal encroachments. And often there is no "Uncle Styopa". Therefore, such a right is guaranteed to a person with a weapon, and it is irresponsible to shift the concern for his safety and protection from criminal encroachments to the state.
        1. Irokez
          Irokez 15 January 2020 16: 34
          -3
          Quote: revnagan
          Therefore, such a right is guaranteed to man by arms.

          Complete nonsense. Having a weapon, any person can kill another at a distance of 5, 10, 100 meters or more. So what kind of guarantees are you talking about?
          1. revnagan
            revnagan 15 January 2020 22: 04
            -1
            Quote: Irokez
            So what kind of guarantees are you talking about?

            Well, suppose you disarmed normal, law-abiding citizens who do not want to "shoot each other" just in case. But the criminal element has a weapon left. And now, the police are not nearby, and the criminal is nearby, and maybe
            Quote: Irokez
            kill another at a distance of 5, 10, 100 meters or more.
            .What or who guarantees a normal, law-abiding person safety within a radius of 5,10,100 meters or more from the criminal? Only the presence of legal weapons in him and in the surrounding citizens, who are much more than criminals. Will the criminal risk using his weapon in such an environment? , unlikely ... Well, a psycho can drive a dump truck into a crowd of passers-by without a gun.
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 15 January 2020 11: 36
    0
    Columbiner
    No wonder they say that a bad example is contagious. After the crime of two teenagers in the American school "Columbine" there was (and the basis was already) a whole course of undergrowth with an unbalanced psyche. Naturally it was picked up in other countries. It is necessary to deal with adolescents thoroughly, otherwise in the 90s they completely let it go, which was immediately taken advantage of by criminals and radical organizations. Well, in the United States, school shooting is not a rare phenomenon and, unfortunately, has a following.
    1. Kerensky
      Kerensky 15 January 2020 11: 52
      +4
      Well, shooting in the United States is not a rare occurrence in the school and unfortunately has followers.

      Gennady.
      How common is the phenomenon? Purely mathematically ... Here! And no matter what it will be, a barrel or a hammer ..
      1. Irokez
        Irokez 15 January 2020 11: 58
        -2
        Quote: Kerensky
        And no matter what it will be, a barrel or a hammer.

        This is just the big difference.
        You can dodge and run away from the hammer, but you won’t run far from the bullet. And from a psychological point of view, there is a huge difference for the attacker, because you shoot at a distance not within your reach, that is, you won’t get the answer in the form of blows to your legs or arms, and you’ll be safe. This is a strong motivation to play a dirty trick and not answer for anything (that is, stay safe).
        1. Kerensky
          Kerensky 15 January 2020 12: 20
          +3
          Sergei. The first part of my message did not interest you?
          I will answer the second. We already have a classic: ".. I watched them one by one ..." The key word is "caught". That is, in this "habitat" a hammer can fly from behind the door ...
          1. Irokez
            Irokez 15 January 2020 12: 27
            -2
            Quote: Kerensky
            "caught up"

            It is a little different and personal. But there will be no mass killings or shooting. Windetta is selective, not mass.
            1. revnagan
              revnagan 15 January 2020 13: 46
              -1
              Quote: Irokez
              Windetta is selective, not mass.

              So in this case ONE offender was killed. Where is the mass?
        2. whatis love
          whatis love 15 January 2020 13: 10
          +4
          And why, then, the majority of those killed are killed with hammers and knives? By your logic, you can dodge them? And how do you explain the fact that in Russia, with the help of legal weapons, less than 800 crimes are committed per year, given 6 million barrels in 4 million Russians?
          1. Fibrizio
            Fibrizio 15 January 2020 13: 44
            0
            It’s not the murder that scares people, but the massacre or potential massacre. It's like an accident and an airplane accident. Yes, every day people are beating in minced meat. But if at least a dozen at once - yes, it excites the minds. And for 1-2 people do not care, they won’t even notice.
          2. Irokez
            Irokez 15 January 2020 16: 41
            -3
            Quote: Whatislove
            in Russia with the help of legal weapons less than 800 crimes are committed per year

            And can you imagine if there will be no firearms, then these 800 crimes may not even happen. Purely logic and all.
            1. _Sergei_
              _Sergei_ 15 January 2020 16: 56
              0
              But what about the hunters?
              1. Irokez
                Irokez 15 January 2020 18: 08
                -2
                Quote: _Sergey_
                But what about the hunters?

                Hunters are already a profession and a vital necessity, and there the percentage of sane is almost 100%, which can not be said about amateurs and young people.
            2. whatis love
              whatis love 15 January 2020 22: 31
              +2
              And if there were no knives and a car, then there would be TENS of THOUSANDS DEATH. Pure logic
              1. Irokez
                Irokez 16 January 2020 10: 15
                +1
                Quote: Whatislove
                Pure logic

                Well, that's right. I agree. And we also have to deal with this somehow.
  5. Usher
    Usher 15 January 2020 15: 04
    -4
    This is what "lovers" of weapons in Russia want, fashionable buyers of "tactical" gear and "survival" in the forest, lovers of walking in "masks". Delirium is shorter. Who are they going to fight against? If you want to shoot, go to the army.
  6. Fibrizio
    Fibrizio 16 January 2020 17: 57
    +1
    Quote: Irokez
    Hunters are already a profession and a vital necessity, and there the percentage of sane almost 100%

    I go hunting collective once a year 6 times. There are drunk every first while hunting. Just look what would not have been shot.