Belarus announced the search for an alternative to Russian oil supplies

131
Belarus announced the search for an alternative to Russian oil supplies

Belarus is looking for an alternative to Russian oil supplies. Minsk has already sent out commercial offers to potential oil suppliers in exchange for Russian. This was stated by First Deputy Prime Minister of the Government of Belarus Dmitry Krutoy, reports Sputnik Belarus.

All commercial services of our plants, the Belarusian Oil Company are in negotiations almost daily. I think that here too we will soon receive alternative options for the supply of specific oil

- said Cool.



According to the First Deputy Prime Minister of the Government of Belarus, Minsk considers Ukraine, Poland, the Baltic countries, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan as suppliers of alternative oil.

Krutoy explained that the problem with the supply of Russian oil is that Minsk does not want to pay Russian oil companies a premium to the market price in the same volumes.

Given the implementation of the tax maneuver and the annual increase in the cost of oil for Belarus by reducing customs duties, paying a premium to Russian oil companies in the amount that we agreed to do in 2011 does not make any sense today. It is just not economically feasible

- he said.

At the same time, RIA News referring to a source, it informs that Minsk’s reluctance to pay a market price for it prevents the negotiation of contracts for the supply of Russian oil to Belarus. At the same time, it is specified that Russian deliveries on the proposed conditions will be cheaper than other deliveries from the world market by at least $ 1,6 billion per year with an annual volume of 24 million tons.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    131 comment
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +35
      14 January 2020 18: 31
      Good luck biting with a real cap world !!!! The main thing then deal with debts and loans yourself.
      1. +39
        14 January 2020 18: 38
        According to the First Deputy Prime Minister of the Government of Belarus, Minsk is considering suppliers of alternative oil Ukraine, Poland, the Baltic countries, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan.
        This is really father’s annealing. Well, in our country, the most oil-bearing regions are concentrated on the Moonsund and near Khatsapetovka in the Poltava region ... laughing lol laughing
        I don’t want to offend the Belarusians, but the father’s guys generally went to the poor fellow from the coils. But he was warned not to leave him alone.
        1. -12
          14 January 2020 19: 23
          Alexander, you’re ironic in vain. There is a lot of oil on the border of Poltava and Kharkov (and not only) oil, but it will take time and money even to re-preserve Belarus, but the Yankees have already put their paws. the British, and even the Chinese.
          1. NKT
            +10
            14 January 2020 19: 36
            Ukraine practically did not engage in geological exploration, and ate the reserves explored in Soviet times. The peak of oil production was in 1972, about 15 million tons, now about two. So in the near future there is nothing to make up for the loss. She herself buys oil twice as much as she produces.
            1. +13
              14 January 2020 20: 38
              The mercantile desire of the Belarusians is quite understandable and reasonable on their part. But for a better understanding of this dispute, it would be nice to know at what price they want to buy and at what price we are ready to sell. There is no such information, only assumptions, officially the prices did not seem to be advertised. And without them, it is difficult to assess the action of the parties to the dispute. But intuitively, I suppose that the neighbors are lying a little, in the part that we offer them a price higher than the market.
              1. +6
                14 January 2020 20: 57
                Omerika will help.
              2. NKT
                0
                14 January 2020 21: 31
                What is on the Internet, speaks of numbers, for 2018, in the region of 80% of the market price + premium. In 2014, it was 50%.
          2. 0
            14 January 2020 20: 22
            The Chinese have time for everywhere, they have accumulated a lot of green paper, so they are in a hurry to materialize it.
          3. +5
            15 January 2020 01: 29
            Quote: knn54
            On the border of Poltava and Kharkov (and not only) a lot of oil.

            If you drill through the globe through to Indonesia.

            In the meantime, from assets
            Quote: knn54
            on the border of Poltava and Kharkov

            only black earth ....
          4. +2
            15 January 2020 04: 03
            On the border of Poltava and Kharkov (and not only) a lot of oil.

            What is "a lot" in your understanding?
            In the ranking of countries in the world by oil reserves, Ukraine is on the 52nd (!!!!) place. What "a lot" are we talking about?
        2. +5
          15 January 2020 01: 26
          Quote: Alexander Suvorov
          This is really father’s annealing.

          The outskirts have already found an alternative to Russian gas. But father does not give glory to sleep glorious Poroshenko?
        3. -2
          15 January 2020 06: 02
          Anyone who is leading the movement of Father's "whirligig" understands how important a reserve fuel base for NATO is for NATO in the very center of Europe and practically on the front line of the NATO Liberation Campaign (it is clear that nothing of this will happen, but Stolbik needs at least something interest the media in the "off season") laughing
      2. +5
        14 January 2020 18: 54
        Quote: Azazelo
        Good luck biting with a real cap world !!!! The main thing then deal with debts and loans yourself.

        And what is there to cope with?
        n1. Donate "capitalist" debts to the Russian government.
        n2. Declare yourself Cuba or Mongolia.
        p3. Expect debt relief of $ 11 to $ 32 billion.
        1. +3
          14 January 2020 19: 24
          Well, as I understand it, we did not just write off debts, but immediately entered into lucrative contracts for much larger amounts. Somewhere I came across such information. Yes
          1. 0
            14 January 2020 21: 07
            Well, as I understand it, we did not just write off debts, but immediately entered into lucrative contracts for much larger amounts

            It’s like you can’t pay one loan at a bank and immediately impose another to pay off the first. What's the point? Money as it was not and never will be. Where is the logic ? Anyway, the debt as it was and remained.
      3. +7
        14 January 2020 21: 19
        Quote: Azazelo
        Good luck biting with a real cap world !!!! The main thing then deal with debts and loans yourself.

        Belarusians are our brothers, but Old Man behaves like a girl with low social responsibility. He is looking for cheaper where, despite the fact that about the debts of the USSR, which only the Russian Federation took upon itself no gu. But he wants to get gas and oil at prices lower than domestic. And he understands that the Kremlin will not let Belarus go, as it did with Ukraine, since it’s definitely not necessary to have a NATO base somewhere near Brest. That twirls backwards, like an obscene girl.
        1. +2
          14 January 2020 21: 34
          Quote: NEXUS
          somewhere near Brest, the NATO base is definitely not needed.

          And from Poland near Brest, is it necessary?
        2. +4
          15 January 2020 01: 34
          Quote: NEXUS
          Belarusians are our brothers

          No doubt
          Quote: NEXUS
          but the Old Man behaves like a girl with low social responsibility

          And with a wide seat, able to sit simultaneously on both the American and Russian chairs.

          Only now I really haven’t seen such broad-shouldered people.
          1. +1
            15 January 2020 01: 53
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            Only now I really haven’t seen such broad-shouldered people.

            Lesha, just in this case, either the ass will tear horizontally, or the chairs will part. But the trick is that more often both of them happen at the same time.
          2. +1
            15 January 2020 05: 14
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            Only now I really haven’t seen such broad-shouldered people.

            How, and when the Americans buy the tanker with Russian LNG and drive the goods to Europe, what is it called? And without export duties, I note.
        3. 0
          15 January 2020 17: 10
          He is looking for cheaper where, despite the fact that about the debts of the USSR, which only the Russian Federation took upon itself no gu.

          I would like to recall that the Russian Federation assumed not only debts, but also real estate of the USSR over the hill, foreign debts to the USSR. Another question is how the new Russian authorities took advantage of this. I remember how they forgive very many-billion-dollar debts ... Do you think this is for free? And how many percent of foreign debts fell on the accounts of specific persons of Russia during this operation. How many Soviet foreign real estate was seized. Somehow, I would not speak about the debts of the USSR that Russia took upon itself. Yours faithfully hi
      4. +4
        14 January 2020 22: 02
        Quote: Azazelo
        Good luck biting with a real cap world !!!! The main thing then deal with debts and loans yourself.

        Listen, don’t interfere with politics here. As one influential person said (I hint), these are disputes of economic entities. As I understand it, purely commercial Russian private companies Neftis and Russneft, owned by citizen Gutseriev, supply oil to Belarusian oil refineries. And the Belarusian refineries are Naftan with a state share of 99,83% and Mozyr Oil Refinery with a state share of 42,76% and a share of 42,58% of the Russian (!) Slavneft company. Feel the difference? Therefore, for the interests of their refineries, Belarusian officials and Lushashenko himself, and on the Russian side are private traders and Putin shrugs. It may be right that we take it so close to our hearts, but the pockets of this story are still different and far from popular.
        1. 0
          15 January 2020 00: 25
          Quote: Abbot
          Lushashenko himself

          Lukashenko. Typo.
      5. 0
        15 January 2020 13: 07
        Quote: Azazelo
        Good luck biting with a real cap world !!!! The main thing then deal with debts and loans yourself.

        =======
        Lord Yes let them seek cheaper oil..... If they find !!!
      6. 0
        15 January 2020 23: 08
        Interestingly, in Belarus, did you hear the word logistics? Oil can be bought anywhere, even in Australia. How much will the transportation cost? - this is the main question.
    2. +6
      14 January 2020 18: 31
      According to the First Deputy Prime Minister of the Government of Belarus, Minsk considers Ukraine, Poland, the Baltic countries as suppliers of alternative oil,

      Do these countries produce oil? strange statement, didn’t our offered such an expensive price for oil of Belarus ..
      1. +7
        14 January 2020 18: 51
        Vladimir hi Let them joke. How to let people in. And everything will be fine until the next cycle of oil shukaniya cheaply laughingThis is not my first year on the site and this is not the first time I have been publishing such a comment on this subject. After a couple of years we’ll talk about their gurgling of cheap oil again drinks
        1. +3
          14 January 2020 20: 38
          Quote: Observer2014
          Vladimir Let them joke. How to make a mess

          I even know where. Isil sells oil at lower than market prices. laughing
          1. -1
            15 January 2020 06: 15
            Ага.
            Overseas price is a penny, only rupee delivery.
            Someone think that the supply of 3-5 oil tanks can be done anonymously?
            Figures! The traffic of each tank is tracked no worse than aircraft or sea.
      2. +2
        14 January 2020 20: 18
        Old Man considers any price other than zero (from Russia), dear.
    3. +36
      14 January 2020 18: 39
      as Rosneft said no more concessions will be made. all this fuss is only due to the fact that the re-export that the RB has been involved in all these years is too tired of everyone. want lower prices-integration. do not want integration, spin. everything went to this. and it was necessary to start earlier of course. if you want preferences that go beyond the cooperation of two independent states, if you want us to support you, go for integration. you don’t want to force it will not. but the freebie is over. Well, it's wildness - getting oil below the market price is also free of duties since the Customs Union and stupidly sell everything at normal prices to everyone. well settled down.
      1. +1
        14 January 2020 19: 01
        Quote: carstorm 11
        well this is wildness - getting oil below the market price is also free of duties since the Customs Union and stupidly sell
        Namely, that the customs union and the EEC. And these are the current agreements, according to which Russia is obliged to sell oil to Belarus without export duties, which, according to the Ministry of Finance last year, amounted to $ 90 per ton of oil. Article 28, paragraph 3 of the EEC Treaty. Nobody forced Russia to sign the EEC treaty; everything suited us at the time of signing. request And now our managers want to get the price higher, and in violation of the contract.
        Yes, Old Man makes money on this corny, but he does it within the framework of the contract. I recommend to all those who are outraged by the "impudence" of the Old Man to read the above-mentioned agreement. hi
        1. +22
          14 January 2020 19: 21
          you’re a little mistaken. There are quotas for supplies that have always been calculated based on your approximate consumption and the possibility of processing. but in recent years, Belarus has constantly demanded an increase. the quantity in my opinion in the year 18 was such that even in an emergency it was impossible to process or spend it. it is all blocked. further more. taking into account the fact that Belarus is geographically closer than Europe, this has always influenced the price and taking into account that there are no duties, the price is lower than for deliveries of 50 bucks per ton to Europe. what else does he need, I don’t understand. what else makes fun of these bonuses and other things is an agreement of 11 years. but now they have declared that it’s impractical to pay this money. OK. Under the agreement, the oil that the Republic of Belarus refined should be sold in the form of a product in the Russian Federation or countries of the same CU or paid a full fee if sold outside the union. Have you heard about RB payments to the treasury of the Russian Federation? me not. nevertheless, for example, petroleum products are sold openly to Ukraine. About schemes with dark petroleum products, I generally keep quiet.
          1. +3
            14 January 2020 19: 30
            Quote: carstorm 11
            there are quotas

            Is there a link? I did not find information on quotas. Let's start from the fact that I'm wrong - correct me with the facts.
            Quote: carstorm 11
            Under the agreement, the oil that the Republic of Belarus refined should be sold in the form of a product in the Russian Federation or in countries of the same CU or paid in full if sold outside the union.

            Where is this commitment spelled out?
            P.S. Petroleum products to Ukraine are also sold by Russia, and in large volumes. hi
            1. +3
              14 January 2020 19: 39
              look for bitumen schemes and solvents. there are often references to these contracts. too lazy to look. Yes, and Novak in 18 talked about restricting supplies, it is also easy to find.
              1. +1
                14 January 2020 19: 52
                Quote: carstorm 11
                Yes, and Novak in 18 talked about restricting supplies

                Yes, they are limited by an intergovernmental agreement on the settlement of trade and economic cooperation in the field of export of oil and oil products, and are limited to 24 million tons. Article 1 point 2. -
                2. The indicative oil balances take into account the volumes of Russian crude oil intended for the Republic of Belarus at the request of the competent authority of the Republic of Belarus, from 2017 to 2024 - 24 million tons per annum by pipeline, as well as volumes of Russian crude oil destined for the Republic of Belarus, supplied by other means of transport.

                Next, we look at the picture of the amount of oil imported by Belarus in 2019.

                I have all the data converging. Correct again if I am wrong. request
                1. -1
                  14 January 2020 19: 54
                  Yes, I do not dispute the data) I'm more about the next steps)
                  1. +3
                    14 January 2020 19: 56
                    Quote: carstorm 11
                    I'm more about the next steps)

                    Are you talking about deliveries to Ukraine? Claims would be appropriate if we didn’t deliver the same, but many times more. request
                    1. +7
                      14 January 2020 19: 59
                      Actually, I'm talking about the fact that the sale of products abroad from Belarus is possible, only then you will have to pay duties, but I have not heard that they would be paid, and you? Ukraine seems not to be in the vehicle)
                      1. +4
                        14 January 2020 20: 07
                        Quote: carstorm 11
                        then you have to pay duties

                        The only thing I found on the subject of restrictions is an intergovernmental agreement. http://docs.cntd.ru/document/902047009
                        There duties are provided for exceeding quotas of 24 million tons. RB does not exceed them, respectively, the duty is not required to pay.
                        P.S. Once again - I'm not talking about the moral side of the issue, I'm talking about the legal rights of Belarus.
                        1. 0
                          14 January 2020 20: 19
                          I know. but I remember the amount of 18 million. only me about something else. selling these products outside the CU, a fee must be paid. selling a duty within the TS should not be paid. realizing for example in Ukraine it was paid? what implements the Russian Federation abroad is subject to duty if that.
                        2. +2
                          14 January 2020 21: 59
                          Quote: carstorm 11
                          what implements the Russian Federation abroad is subject to duty if that.

                          Once again - it should, if it exceeds the amount of oil under the contract. request And if the contract stipulates a limit of 24 million tons, and it is not exceeded, then it is absolutely their business what they will do with oil. At least bury it in the ground.
                        3. +3
                          14 January 2020 22: 06
                          You don’t understand what you’re talking about. I am talking about export duties abroad. about those duties that our treasury can receive by selling itself. if the Republic of Belarus trades our oil outside the CU without paying these duties, then this is called theft. last year, disassemblies on this topic were for this reason and began to reduce oil supplies. There are no duties only in the union zone, but if you are trading outside the limits without paying duties, you are obliged to pay them. everything is very simple.
                        4. +3
                          14 January 2020 22: 19
                          Quote: carstorm 11
                          if the Republic of Belarus trades our oil outside the Customs Union without paying these duties, then this is called theft

                          No, they bought this oil under an agreement with us, and have the right to dispose of it as they want. If you buy a thing at a discount and sell it at full cost - will you commit an act of theft? No, it will be speculation within the law. But Belarus does not sell oil, it processes it. And sells petroleum products.
                          Dmitry Anatolyevich personally signed the agreement! wink
                        5. 0
                          14 January 2020 22: 24
                          Under the new agreement for the needs of oil refineries in 2017-2019. 18 million tons of oil are being transported. The remaining 6 million tons are re-exported by the Belarusian side, at its discretion, outside the territory of the Eurasian Economic Union. Since oil export outside the EAEU implies levying duties on the budget, the Belarusian side began to benefit from this, and the Russian budget only lost. It is clear that the Russian Ministry of Finance did not like it much. Proceeds from the re-export of Russian oil in the budget of Belarus are shown as gratuitous receipts from foreign countries. In 2017, our country received 1 million BYN under this article. Since other incomes also contain gratuitous receipts from other states, the approximate amount of duties from oil customs clearance over the past year can be estimated at BYN 242 billion. At the average dollar exchange rate, this amount reached about 1-500 million USD. What happened in 520? For 2018, Russia laid down 2018 billion rubles in the federal budget for the implementation of the re-export of oil condition. At the dollar exchange rate for the first half of 24,6, this amount became equivalent to 2018 million USD. The Ministry of Finance of Belarus recently reported on the implementation of the republican budget for the first half of the year. The volume of gratuitous receipts from abroad in 415 amounted to BYN 2018 million. This amount in dollars amounted to 925,6 million USD. It turns out that Belarusians for 465,4 months could very well choose the money that the Russian Federation determined for transfer for a whole year. Larger transfers to Belarus already require amendments to the federal budget of Russia. It is clear that the Russian authorities will not go on a budget correction just like that. A tough bargain is guaranteed for every million dollars. It is possible that, as a result, the Belarusian government will not be able to get extra money out of the Russian Federation at all. For 6, the Russians painted their expenses for the transfer of re-export duties in the amount of RUB 2019 billion. At the current exchange rate, the USD / RUB pair is less than 26,2 million USD. If nothing changes, next year the “charity” from Russia will end even earlier than in 400 - somewhere in the spring.
                        6. +3
                          14 January 2020 22: 43
                          Part of the article with banki24.by. Emotions and assumptions, no more. Well, for example -
                          Larger transfers to Belarus already require amendments to the federal budget of Russia.
                          This does not require any amendments, because the amounts are not the ones that would drive our budget into deficit. Especially with this surplus.
                          Website banki24.by. according to my observation (!) it is similar to our Kommersant and Novaya Gazeta - a liberal site, languidly fumbling with the policies of the current government. It seems that the numbers give the correct ones, but the presentation is peculiar. Or, like bulk, he speaks the truth, with the goal of destabilizing the country, and not improving people's lives.
                        7. +6
                          14 January 2020 22: 48
                          On October 8, 2010, the CIS Economic Court gave Belarus and Russia three months to resolve a dispute over duties on petroleum products outside the court.

                          On December 9, following a meeting of the heads of state of the Customs Union, the head of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation Elvira Nabiullina said that from January 1, the Russian Federation will abolish oil duties for Minsk upon ratification of documents on the CES (Common Economic Space), export duties on oil products will be levied on the external borders of the Customs Union, and Belarus agreed to completely transfer them to the Russian budget. and these 6 million tons were just a freebie. but this was not enough. thinners and bitumen began. awesome schemes for the withdrawal of petroleum products without paying duties. and this cannot be attributed to private traders because deliveries are all at the state level. damage billions to our treasury. constant blackmail and rising transit prices. constant demands of some new preferences. this whole circus is finished. and these statements about deliveries from other countries are another scam, for in any case our deliveries are cheaper anyway.
                        8. +1
                          14 January 2020 22: 34
                          Quote: Ingvar 72
                          But Belarus does not sell oil, it processes it. And sells petroleum products.

                          I have to disagree with you.
                          In 2018, Belarus produced 1 million 670 thousand tons of oil. This is the highest figure in seven years, BelTA was told in the press service of Belorusneft.


                          94,4 thousand tons were produced from new wells - this is the best result over the past 23 years. "Last year, the most ambitious drilling program was completed, the largest number of hydraulic fracturing operations were carried out."
                          94,4 thousand tons were extracted from new wells - this is the best result for the last 23 years. “Last year, the largest drilling program was completed, the largest number of hydraulic fracturing operations was carried out. And this list can be continued, ”the press service noted.

                          40 new wells were commissioned - a maximum of the last 30 years. High-quality oil (light oil) delivered 311 thousand tons - the best result since 2008 ..

                          All oil produced in Belarus is exported to Europe at market prices and receives a resounding "European ruble" for this.
                          Russian oil is refined, taking into account preferences, and then oil products go to the same Europe at market prices.
                        9. +1
                          14 January 2020 22: 47
                          Quote: kapitan92
                          I have to disagree with you.

                          Did not know. Interesting information. What about the quality of oil in Belarus? The oil that we produce in the Volga region does not differ in quality at all. Sukhodol’s brother-in-law pumps oil, says Kaka rare. Only for the mix goes.
                        10. +1
                          14 January 2020 22: 55
                          Quote: Ingvar 72
                          Quote: kapitan92
                          I have to disagree with you.

                          Did not know. Interesting information. What about the quality of oil in Belarus? The oil that we produce in the Volga region does not differ in quality at all. Sukhodol’s brother-in-law pumps oil, says Kaka rare. Only for the mix goes.

                          Volga and Ural oil is "heavy", with a large amount of impurities and sulfur compounds.
                          How is Belarusian oil characterized: High-quality mobile, industrial oil. Lightweight, low in sulfur. And the yield of light petroleum products during processing is quite high.
                          By the way, oil produced in the Republic of Belarus could cover 1/3 of domestic needs, but almost all is exported to Europe.
                          https://www.neft.by/2020/01/10/v-belarusi-otkryty-tri-novye-zalezhi-nefti/
                        11. +3
                          14 January 2020 22: 41
                          Quote: Ingvar 72
                          Quote: carstorm 11
                          if the Republic of Belarus trades our oil outside the Customs Union without paying these duties, then this is called theft

                          No, they bought this oil under an agreement with us, and have the right to dispose of it as they want. If you buy a thing at a discount and sell it at full cost - will you commit an act of theft? No, it will be speculation within the law. But Belarus does not sell oil, it processes it. And sells petroleum products.
                          Dmitry Anatolyevich personally signed the agreement! wink

                          No. You bought a thing inside the country and you can sell it inside the country by paying VAT on the sale. As soon as you sell a thing abroad, you pay an export duty when registering a cargo customs declaration, but VAT is refunded to you upon confirmation of export.
                        12. +2
                          14 January 2020 22: 48
                          Quote: CheeRock
                          You bought a thing inside the country and you can sell it inside the country by paying VAT on the sale

                          Unless otherwise specified in the contract. But it is indicated. hi
        2. +10
          14 January 2020 19: 30
          Yes, Old Man makes money on this, but does it within the framework of the contract


          Only here is the question, but it is spelled out in the contract. that he can resell this oil outside Belarus?
          Belarus, within the framework of the agreement, must return to Russia a predetermined volume of refined petroleum products, but does not return, carried away by resale. It is useful to read the agreement on both sides.
          1. +3
            14 January 2020 19: 32
            Quote: sir_obs
            Reading the contract is useful on both sides.

            Tell me the article of the contract?
        3. -1
          14 January 2020 19: 51
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          And these are the current agreements, according to which Russia is obliged to sell oil to Belarus without an export duty, which, according to the Ministry of Finance last year, amounted to $ 90 per ton of oil.

          It has been written for several years that a tax maneuver associated with lowering the excise rate (possibly duties, but the customs duty is kind of import rather than export. I’m not sure) with a significant increase in the tax on mineral extraction (MET) should lead to higher oil prices. .
          1. -1
            14 January 2020 20: 02
            Quote: Flood
            maybe duties. but the customs duty seems to be import, not export. not sure

            EEC Treaty, Article 28, Clause 3. As part of the functioning of the domestic market, in mutual trade in goods, Member States do not apply import and export customs duties (other duties, taxes and charges having equivalent effect), non-tariff regulation measures, special protective, antidumping and countervailing measures, with the exception of cases provided for by this Agreement.
            The market price of oil for all other 430-450 dollars per ton. Last year Belarus bought oil from us at 364 dollars. The difference is just the same export duty. hi
            1. +1
              14 January 2020 20: 51
              I now read this agreement fluently and there are a lot of nuances. and under these nuances you can bring a lot of things .. and probably the same PDP ...
              I’ll just give an example of Art.29, Art. 71 and there are still slippery articles ... if you refer to this contract you need to read it and understand the whole, completely, and not separate articles, this is for any ..
              1. -1
                14 January 2020 21: 40
                Quote: vitvit123
                Article 29, Article 71

                29 article no sideways. 71 read carefully.
                1. +1
                  14 January 2020 21: 47
                  Article 29 ....
                  1. Member States are entitled to apply restrictions in the mutual trade of goods (provided that such measures are not a means of unjustified discrimination or an implicit restriction on trade) if such restrictions are necessary for:
                  1) protecting human life and health;
                  2) the protection of public morality and the rule of law;
                  3) environmental protection;
                  4) the protection of animals and plants, cultural property;
                  5) fulfillment of international obligations;
                  6) ensuring the defense of the country and the security of a member state.
                  Well, this is for you no sideways, but someone may be a PDA for ... substitute any of these points
                  similar to Article 71 ... I generally led this, as an example, to the fact that I doubt that you are very familiar with this agreement. while I think you pulled out an article and focus on it ....
                  further I speak for addition ---
                  except as provided by this Agreement....
                  Do you know this contract, have studied very well?

                  Well, why does Luke not sue? there, even the court of the union state is registered in the agreement, it is possible to file it in your own, Belarusian ... so far nowhere .. I was interested in why? .. vague doubts torment me ...
            2. 0
              14 January 2020 21: 19
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              The market price of oil for all other 430-450 dollars per ton. Last year Belarus bought oil from us at 364 dollars. The difference is exactly the same export duty.

              Yes, you are right, trade with the Republic of Belarus is duty-free. But with the growth of mineral extraction tax, the oil price for the Republic of Belarus increases accordingly.
              1. +1
                14 January 2020 21: 54
                Quote: Flood
                But with the growth of mineral extraction tax, the oil price for the Republic of Belarus increases accordingly.

                And for gas for us.
                1. +2
                  14 January 2020 22: 07
                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  And for gas for us.

                  So, you still do not know.
                  In the domestic market, the increase in the severance tax rate is offset by a negative excise tax (the law was adopted by the State Duma in the summer of 2018).
                  https://rg.ru/2018/07/24/gosduma-priniala-zakon-o-zavershenii-nalogovogo-manevra-v-otrasli.html
                  Export price - due to zeroing the export duty by 2024.
                  As a result, the price rises for Belarus.
                  1. 0
                    14 January 2020 22: 57
                    Quote: Flood
                    So, you still do not know.

                    So, "ours" have found a loophole in the EAEU agreement. request
                    Quote: Flood
                    In the domestic market, the increase in the severance tax rate is offset by negative excise tax

                    At first, it may be so, but for some reason I’m sure that on the excise tax, + instead will appear over time. laughing hi
        4. 0
          14 January 2020 20: 21
          And where did you find the export duty in the PDI? Is this a domestic tax in Russia? sort of. No ?
          dad, it’s probably grated kalach, if everything was so simple, then he would have sued at least ... no?
          there at this point, there is little specificity, what taxes, duties, etc. ... In Belarus, then, too, enterprises pay taxes to the treasury of Belarus, no one in Russia seems to be outraged? if I'm wrong, then correct ..
          except as provided by this Agreement. this addition is suspicious. if you decrypt it, then ....
          1. 0
            14 January 2020 21: 51
            Quote: vitvit123
            And where did you find the export duty in the PDI? Is this a domestic tax in Russia? sort of. No ?

            Do you want to argue with the Ministry of Finance, which claims that the export duty in the market price of oil is $ 90?
            Instead of accusing Belarus of theft, you would pay attention to "our" managers.
            Dough in the country - chew booty, but they did not come up with anything better than foreign deposits.
            1. +3
              14 January 2020 22: 01
              I don’t 100% know what the Ministry of Finance said (far from you), but it seems that all the parsley that is being talked about here (well, you mention the EAEC agreement in this context) is a price increase because of the NPI, I’m talking about it. no ? By the way, I don’t even know whether Belarus pays this export duty, I’m just glad that Belarus will finally buy oil in another country (which I still doubt), for any price, it makes no difference to me (well done, well done) and time will tell where it will go ..
              ------ You, instead of accusing Belarus of theft, paid attention to "our" managers .----- you again ... why do I need our managers ... here we speak for Belarusian managers, here I also speak.
              and again, these videos (in which it’s not possible to be sure), the numbers (from different statistics) are more mundane, otherwise we’ll go to the side again ..

              you just spoke that Russia allegedly violates the agreement, and I modestly indicated that these were just your words and brought some questions ...
              1. 0
                14 January 2020 22: 06
                Quote: vitvit123
                I'm just glad that Belarus will finally buy oil in another country

                Somewhere in your life Belarusians have spoiled you for something, you already roll a barrel in all the topics against Belarus. Just like Olezhek Egorov. wink
                Quote: vitvit123
                let's go more mundane, otherwise we’ll leave again ..

                Yes, of course, crane in the sky is better to discuss. And at this time, even a tit will not remain in the hand.
              2. 0
                15 January 2020 06: 02
                Quote: vitvit123
                here we speak for Belarusian managers, so I’m talking.

                And on the other side of the negotiation process, who are the ananimas? No, guys, this does not happen))
            2. 0
              15 January 2020 05: 58
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              Instead of accusing Belarus of theft, you would pay attention to "our" managers.

              Exactly!
        5. +2
          14 January 2020 22: 00
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          and EEC.

          Most likely you meant the EAEU (Eurasian Economic Union).
          EEC (European Economic Community). hi
          1. +1
            14 January 2020 22: 02
            Quote: kapitan92
            Did you mean the EAEU

            Yes, thanks for the amendment. hi
            1. +1
              14 January 2020 22: 03
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              Quote: kapitan92
              Did you mean the EAEU

              Yes, thanks for the amendment. hi

              drinks hi
      2. +1
        15 January 2020 05: 51
        Quote: carstorm 11
        as they said in Rosneft

        And where is Rosneft here, you can ask?

        The agreements between Russia and Belarus regarding oil supplies are private contracts of companies in which the government cannot intervene, said Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Kozak, noting that the premium requested by the Belarusian side will require “radical” changes in the principles of the Russian oil industry.
        ...
        Half of the country's needs will be provided by the companies Russneft and Neftis Mikhail Gutseriev.
        https://oilcapital.ru/news/markets/13-01-2020/tseny-na-neft-dlya-belorussii-pravitelstvo-rf-ne-reguliruet


        Once again, what side does Rosneft supply to Belarusian refineries? Why is there no problem with gas? It is obvious that the state is hiding behind Russian private oil companies and twisting their hands to the Belarusian side. It is the lobbyists of private interests who sit in the government of the Russian Federation and push business interests of large private capital under the patriotic information blizzard. Ukraine 2.0 - Chernomyrdin and Co. You have to be blind, so you do not see pointless animals at your zoo.
      3. 0
        15 January 2020 17: 24
        to get oil below the market price even without duties since the Customs Union and stupidly sell everything at normal prices to everyone in a row. well settled down.

        Dear, do you, at least somehow, read something sometimes. Belarus does not sell oil, but oil refined products (I decode for young men: gasoline, kerosene, diesel fuel, fuel oil, etc.). By the way, the depth of oil refining in Belarus is 20 percent higher than in Russia.
    4. +4
      14 January 2020 18: 40
      Fell into childhood Rygorovich! Boils water like a little .....
    5. +1
      14 January 2020 18: 47
      Shaw again?
      News for 2 weeks already.
      The day before yesterday, we didn’t agree on transit, or rather, on the price.
      Today, that there is no need to adjust the budget of Belarus.
    6. +9
      14 January 2020 18: 49
      "Bad example - contagious" - REVERSE oil supplies. No offense, residents of Belarus.
    7. +1
      14 January 2020 18: 51
      The desire to gain energy independence from the Russian Federation is the first step on the path of benderofascism.
      1. +5
        14 January 2020 18: 53
        They have long been Litvin, or whatever. So everything is good there with small steps.
    8. -6
      14 January 2020 18: 59
      Quote: carstorm 11
      as Rosneft said no more concessions will be made. all this fuss is only due to the fact that the re-export that the RB has been engaged in all these years is too tired of everyone

      We need to maintain good relations with Belarus, and the problem of re-export is not worth a damn, it is simply forbidden. Moreover, the issue is not being resolved at the state level, but at the level of business entities. Just by writing in the contracts where the oil and products made from it go.
      1. +2
        14 January 2020 20: 33
        if everything is so simple, then what doesn’t work?
    9. +11
      14 January 2020 19: 09
      Oh Old Man, even though I am for you and Belarus .. But look, the frayer's greed will destroy! They will arrange a maidan there in Minsk (and they have the strength and money)
      You will sit in Russia with Yanykovich and wait for the trial of the Slavs!
      Temper your ardor in eloquence hi
      1. 0
        14 January 2020 21: 54
        Under Lukashenko, it is not realistic to organize a Maidan in Belarus. It is quite convenient for the Russian Federation, and even the west is used to it. Power is too strong. Opposition - these are clowns (I won’t be surprised if they are supported at the expense of the budget), purely for the sake of democracy, so that in the West they will be less buzzing. And the mentality of Belarusians is not the same. The partisans are good, and the revolutionaries are so-so.
      2. +2
        14 January 2020 21: 57
        That's the joke, that he does not want the Maidan, and the Russian Federation does everything for this Maidan on purpose. They want in-depth integration and use oil prices, etc. as a lever, for pressure. As a result, nationalism in Belarus is growing under the cries of integration, and living standards are falling as a result of this lever. The result for the Russian Federation - they wanted the best, it turned out as always. Everything is as usual, or maybe it’s they specially? The government remained the same, pro-American.
    10. +3
      14 January 2020 19: 14
      All commercial services of our plants, the Belarusian Oil Company are in negotiations almost daily. I think that here too we will soon receive alternative options for the supply of specific oil

      - said Cool.


      An experienced marketer would not say that. On the contrary, I would strongly emphasize that there is no end to offers. And they work for days on the choice of the most-most ....
    11. +4
      14 January 2020 19: 18
      Quote: svoit
      Quote: carstorm 11
      as Rosneft said no more concessions will be made. all this fuss is only due to the fact that the re-export that the RB has been engaged in all these years is too tired of everyone

      We need to maintain good relations with Belarus, and the problem of re-export is not worth a damn, it is simply forbidden. Moreover, the issue is not being resolved at the state level, but at the level of business entities. Just by writing in the contracts where the oil and products made from it go.

      An interesting suggestion about bans. This is how you think to implement? He, the creature, will raise a howl that rape a sovereign country. It is much more effective to look at his own needs for domestic consumption and give two tons more. So that he does not have opportunities in re-export. Which is already being done. What this pirate is trying to do, blaming Russia, and continuing re-export. Cheap Russian for extra money, putting your economy on someone else's oil.
    12. +4
      14 January 2020 19: 18
      Old Man bargains, even blackmails! As it is in gypsy. There is no alternative. Well, let them buy the reverse one, all the same, there are Russian molecules in it, but the price ... Or "To evil grandmother - I'll frostbite my ears!"?
    13. +7
      14 January 2020 19: 18
      I wonder what alternatively gifted Lukashenko will sell oil at least 5% cheaper than the world, not that more than 20% ... What does he like ...
      1. +6
        14 January 2020 19: 59
        Quote: Cottodraton
        which alternatively gifted will Lukashenko sell oil at least 5% cheaper than world oil,

        Lukashenka has a friend - the Russian oligarch Gutseriev, owns Slavneft, now the company has signed an agreement for the supply of 750 thousand tons of oil to Belarus without a premium, the supplies seem to have begun. Gutseriev even gave Lukashenka a "Maybach" somehow, this to those who say that Lukashenka does not accept oligarchs { laughing } But the main thing, for Gutseriev in Belarus, is the mining and processing plant for fertilizers under construction near Lyuban, and they will be built by 2024 and partners expect a profit of up to $ 600 million annually. So Gutseriev is hoping to recapture his oil losses with future superprofits on Belarusian fertilizers. Lukashenko even blurted out that he would transfer Lyuban to Gutserievsk. It remains to wait for 2024, who will throw someone? what
        1. +2
          14 January 2020 20: 08
          Quote: Anatol Klim
          it’s for those who say that Lukashenko does not accept oligarchs

          So he does not accept his own, but Gutseriev is a Russian oligarch! wink
          1. +3
            14 January 2020 20: 35
            I always hear that Belarusians are afraid of Russian oligarchs, well, on this site, at least ..
        2. +2
          14 January 2020 20: 38
          There was a lot of talk about the comprador bourgeoisie in Russia. Here either it will come to Gutseriev that it is not worth it to go across the party’s policy, or it will become less than one Russian oligarch.
    14. +3
      14 January 2020 19: 37
      At the same time, it is specified that Russian deliveries on the proposed conditions will be cheaper than other deliveries from the world market by at least $ 1,6 billion per year with an annual volume of 24 million tons.
      Well, here Father will look at what ruberoid is in Odessa, compare and decide, at least not later blame someone! He did it himself, he will be guilty if he does not grow together normally. smile
    15. +3
      14 January 2020 20: 04
      The owner is a gentleman. The buyer's right to look for a cheap product, the seller's right to ask for an acceptable price for his. Only surrenders "wash" but father is not childish. Until being blackmailed.
      1. +4
        14 January 2020 20: 21
        But who against let them look for suppliers of cheap oil - only it seems to me that Old Man will find it only on the black market.
        1. +7
          14 January 2020 20: 37
          Quote: Vadim237
          But who against let them look for suppliers of cheap oil - only it seems to me that Old Man will find it only on the black market.

          hi
          I agree. This is the same ordinary market, and the market is traded. Some people manage, from the process of "bargaining", even to enjoy.
        2. +3
          14 January 2020 23: 45
          Quote: Vadim237
          Old Man will find her only on the black market.

          For some reason, "bearded" oil tankers from Deir Es Zor immediately appear. wassat Well, then he will also have to negotiate with Erdogan for transit. Yes It becomes clear why Azerbaijan appears - however, the scheme. laughing
    16. +1
      14 January 2020 20: 23
      laughing Old Man didn’t sneak up his refineries on the Chinese comrades?
    17. 0
      14 January 2020 20: 28
      If there was an alternative at such a price, there would already be a long line. wassat
    18. +2
      14 January 2020 20: 34
      For 2015, the price tags were as follows:

      Belarus imports oil from Russia at a price of ~ $ 240 per ton, while the average export price of Russian oil is $ 370 per ton.

      Belarus exports oil products at an average price of ~ $ 400 per ton. At the same time, the main importing countries are Britain (where oil products are exported at a price of $ 370 per tonne) at $ 2,8 yards, and ... tadam ... Ukraine at 1,7 yards.

      IMHO, it is obvious that in the case of cooperation between Russia and Belarus at world prices, the Old Man needs to close its oil refineries. laughing Yes, impressive figures against the background of Lukashenko’s constant tantrums. Was he there that he had completely moved from old age to old age? laughing laughing
    19. -15
      14 January 2020 20: 34
      Oil .. tights .. yes it's time to live normally
      ... without Russia
      1. -1
        15 January 2020 07: 21
        To get started, get drunk with Russian-speaking resources, europophiles.
        Nobody cares about you and your "opinion"
    20. -16
      14 January 2020 20: 35
      Sense from Russia ..
    21. -15
      14 January 2020 20: 39
      Iran, Syria, Zimbabwe-level of Russia ...
      1. +3
        14 January 2020 21: 50
        And who are you? apparently you get paid a little ...
    22. +2
      14 January 2020 20: 46
      Quote: maxim947
      The mercantile desire of the Belarusians is quite understandable and reasonable on their part.

      Yes, there’s a half-cow across the sea, but the ruble is transported! Where they will buy even cheaper if the oil is piped, and taking into account discounts. BLACKING THIS. The price is still being knocked down. hi
    23. +4
      14 January 2020 20: 46
      That the price of gas for the Republic of Belarus should differ from Bryansk and Smolensk by VAT and export duties, at least.

      However, oil comes to Belarusian refineries without VAT, the pipe tariff on the territory of the Republic of Belarus from the border with the Russian Federation is higher than on the territory of the Russian Federation to the border, and the mustachioed is small. The mustachioed is again scandalous, because the metropolitan quarter of the inhabitants is demanding the level of gizz. belay what what
    24. +3
      14 January 2020 21: 11
      “Why haven't we reached an agreement on oil with the President of Russia? Because Russia wants us to buy oil from it at prices higher than world prices. Where have you seen this?” Alexander Lukashenko was indignant. “That is why I refused such oil and stated directly : if there are no supplies at the world price from Russia, we will find this oil in a different place. What we are doing. And we found "-Yaaaaa ..... Man TBM words! Already cut so much when he will sew up. laughing Russia is not just a kindred country to him, but its resource base !! Potato Fuhrer.hrenov.
      1. +4
        14 January 2020 21: 49
        And many believe and are led, or use Russophobia for their own purposes.
    25. +1
      14 January 2020 21: 13
      Namely, the option “Let's eat yours today, and tomorrow we'll think about whether it's worth eating mine” is not interesting to Russia, and Lukashenka does not offer anything else. laughing laughing
    26. +2
      14 January 2020 21: 19
      No one will sell Belarus oil at a loss. Do Belarusians know about these 1,6 billion lost profits? Who will block this amount.
      1. +4
        14 January 2020 21: 45
        Belarusians do not know, but Old Man will steer and it seems to Yanukovych.
    27. +1
      14 January 2020 21: 23
      They will be dragged from Ukraine or from Europa ... "reverse".
      1. +3
        14 January 2020 21: 42
        They'll be taken to donkeys ...
    28. -1
      14 January 2020 21: 24
      Yes, they sound, give out wishful thinking. As in a specialized magazine, I read about the course and problems of modernizing Belarusian refineries, with various technical details and other ideas. So there are drawn such costs to achieve the desired percentage, it is clear that in the near future nothing will happen. Billions of dollers, not one. And where are their knots? Muscovites do not give, but they need their own. Yes, and those are dumb. Dillema. Insoluble.
      1. +4
        14 January 2020 21: 44
        Everything is more complicated there, much already belongs to Russian business and the Old Man intends to nationalize everything ...
    29. +3
      14 January 2020 21: 41
      Belarus is looking for an alternative to Russian oil supplies.


      Tell me, does everyone have a roof or just mine?
    30. +2
      14 January 2020 22: 34
      Quote: Abbot
      Quote: Azazelo
      Good luck biting with a real cap world !!!! The main thing then deal with debts and loans yourself.

      Listen, don’t interfere with politics here. As one influential person said (I hint), these are disputes of economic entities. As I understand it, purely commercial Russian private companies Neftis and Russneft, owned by citizen Gutseriev, supply oil to Belarusian oil refineries. And the Belarusian refineries are Naftan with a state share of 99,83% and Mozyr Oil Refinery with a state share of 42,76% and a share of 42,58% of the Russian (!) Slavneft company. Feel the difference? Therefore, for the interests of their refineries, Belarusian officials and Lushashenko himself, and on the Russian side are private traders and Putin shrugs. It may be right that we take it so close to our hearts, but the pockets of this story are still different and far from popular.

      Of course. Oil is not gas, producers and traders are more than dofig. The state here is only duties and taxes.
    31. -1
      14 January 2020 22: 51
      Quote: cniza
      Tell me, does everyone have a roof or just mine?

      That's right, it is not very expensive to buy from Iran, then by railway from Volgograd to bring to Belarus and it will not be expensive.
    32. +2
      14 January 2020 23: 02
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      Quote: CheeRock
      You bought a thing inside the country and you can sell it inside the country by paying VAT on the sale

      Unless otherwise specified in the contract. But it is indicated. hi

      The bottom line is this: you are a state, you have mining enterprises in your country, they produce, say, 100 million tons. Domestically, they sell 50 million for processing with a minimum profit, with which you get VAT and excise taxes, they can sell 50 million for export with a good profit, you get export duty and tax from this good profit, that is, more than with processing within the country. You have an ally neighbor who says: we also need oil so that cars can drive inside the country and are inexpensive. You say ok - buy according to our internal conditions, get VAT from the oil producer. And then you will learn that your neighbor makes gasoline from oil, which is sold at domestic prices, and sells it for export, receiving an export duty for this, but does not share it with you. This is called ratism. therefore, we are talking about the duty-free volume, from which fuel is made for the national economy and people and the "duty" from which your neighbor earns extra profit. hi
      1. +1
        15 January 2020 00: 56
        absolutely right, nothing to add.
    33. 0
      14 January 2020 23: 13
      These famous Lithuanian-Polish oil and gas fields ...
    34. +1
      14 January 2020 23: 17
      Belarus is looking for an alternative to Russian oil supplies.

      Are all Belarusian tankers already on stream and ready for transportation? winked
    35. 0
      15 January 2020 00: 20
      Well ... let him search. Seeker, yes, he will find it.
    36. +3
      15 January 2020 00: 54
      I live in Belarus. If you only heard how much this "person" carries delirium every day. Just because of 1 patient - the whole nation has been suffering for 20 years.
      1. 0
        15 January 2020 07: 24
        So someone throws these ideas to him
      2. +1
        15 January 2020 08: 03
        Quote: volf
        Just because of 1 patient - the whole nation has been suffering for 20 years.

        Is Statkevich better? Or Gubarevich?
      3. 0
        15 January 2020 09: 33
        Well, it’s not in vain that we are fraternal people ..))
        So we suffer .. brotherly .. because of two patients ..
    37. +2
      15 January 2020 09: 24
      At the same time, it is specified that Russian deliveries on the proposed conditions will be cheaper than other deliveries from the world market by at least $ 1,6 billion per year with an annual volume of 24 million tons.


      Apparently the Old Man is not enough ...
    38. 0
      15 January 2020 09: 31
      Let them search ..
      All the same, we won’t succeed anyway, and we won’t create a promising state .. for 20 years they’ve only been stealing, and they’re not doing anything else .. But because the fewer the people, the more oxygen ..

      And yes .. if someone thinks that we need Belarus to "protect the borders" from the West, then you can calm down .. no one will attack us ..
      To whom we surrendered, feed us ..
    39. +1
      15 January 2020 12: 12
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      Yes, Old Man makes money on this, but does it within the framework of the contract.

      The fact of the matter is that no. Lukashenko constantly and regularly violates both oral “gentlemanly” agreements and those signed regarding re-export of oil products. They put up with it, condescended, forgave, looked with understanding for many years. But there is a limit to everything.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"