The Russian complex of active protection "Drozd-2" will be tested on MBT T-72BK

The Russian complex of active protection "Drozd-2" will be tested on MBT T-72BK

T-80UM2 with a complex of active protection "Drozd-2"


Russia will test the active protection complex TKB-0252 code "Drozd-2". Relevant information was posted on the public procurement portal on December 17 last year.

As follows from the document, the customer is the Instrument Design Bureau (KBP) them. Shipunova. The name of the purchase reads: "Ensuring the carrying out of control tests and demonstration displays of the experimental prototype of the TKB-0252 active defense complex (code" Drozd-2 ")."

According to reports, KAZ was mounted on MBT T-72BK. According to Rossiiskaya Gazeta, it is noteworthy that the placed list of special equipment and ammunition refers to 3OF77 protective shells used on another complex of active protection - Afganit, which, in turn, is installed on the promising T-tank 14 "Armata".

The documents do not indicate when and where control tests of the experimental sample will be carried out, as well as demonstration displays. Most likely, more complete information about the complex itself, as well as its tests, will appear after the tests are completed.

At the moment, it is known that work on KAZ Drozd-2 has been going on for quite some time. From open sources it is known that the complex provides protection in azimuth of 360º, and in elevation from -6 º to +20 º. The caliber of high-explosive fragmentation shells of the complex is 95 mm, the mass of the entire KAZ is 850 kg. (data could be outdated).

The complex is able to provide protection for heavy and light armored vehicles with a probability of 0,8 - 0,9, for special vehicles - at least 0,7 - 0,8.
Photos used:
https://pikabu.ru/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Nastia makarova 14 January 2020 13: 15 New
    • 18
    • 17
    +1
    our tanks are the best
    1. Siberia 75 14 January 2020 14: 21 New
      • 6
      • 4
      +2
      Quote: Nastia Makarova
      our tanks are the best

      The best tanks are not yours. The best Russian. wink
      But seriously, this is the third type of KAZ being tested. When will they go into production?
      The RF Ministry of Defense picks it up, or the systems are not brought up to the required level of performance characteristics, that’s what I would like to know from the article.
      1. IImonolitII 14 January 2020 14: 58 New
        • 8
        • 20
        -12
        Or simply money for R&D is easier to pocket than for mass production.
      2. Nastia makarova 14 January 2020 15: 39 New
        • 5
        • 6
        -1
        No, it’s my tanks !!! then TTX does not suit or most likely something does not work
        1. Siberia 75 14 January 2020 15: 43 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: Nastia Makarova
          No, it’s my tanks !!!

          Uvazhuha hi
          Quote: Nastia Makarova
          then TTX does not suit or most likely something does not work

          Little information. It’s often not clear whether the problem is really with the technology, or the corruption component
        2. aws4 15 January 2020 02: 00 New
          • 0
          • 2
          -2
          can you specifically about your tanks? where do you work with tanks?
          1. Nastia makarova 15 January 2020 07: 55 New
            • 2
            • 2
            0
            tanks of my homeland !!! which means mine too))))
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. Nastia makarova 17 January 2020 07: 12 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                I offer a spoon of honey for those who are in a barrel
            2. aws4 18 January 2020 03: 20 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Makarova are you the admin of the site? I just don’t understand why my comas were removed? in them there was no abuse or abuse of anything .. I do not understand what is happening here?
              1. Nastia makarova 20 January 2020 07: 30 New
                • 0
                • 2
                -2
                I did not complain about you
          2. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
      3. Doliva63 14 January 2020 16: 38 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        Quote: Siberia 75
        Quote: Nastia Makarova
        our tanks are the best

        The best tanks are not yours. The best Russian. wink
        But seriously, this is the third type of KAZ being tested. When will they go into production?
        The RF Ministry of Defense picks it up, or the systems are not brought up to the required level of performance characteristics, that’s what I would like to know from the article.

        Not yet - Soviet laughing
        1. Siberia 75 14 January 2020 16: 43 New
          • 6
          • 3
          +3
          Quote: Doliva63
          Not yet - Soviet

          I am a friend, I do not divide Russia, the Russian Empire, the USSR, the Russian Federation, .... into unrelated parts. This is a process, and it certainly has not ended.
          1. Dzungar 16 January 2020 16: 42 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            I do not share Russia- Russian Empire- USSR- Russian Federation
            Very correct! And then that some are still divided into red, white, Orthodox Christians, pagans .....
      4. Konatantin 1992 16 January 2020 07: 58 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        The best tanks are not Russian, but Soviet can? how, in fact, is KAZ Drozd itself?
    2. Incvizitor 14 January 2020 16: 10 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      And KAZ is the best, but here they are usually not on tanks laughing
      1. Nastia makarova 14 January 2020 16: 18 New
        • 1
        • 4
        -3
        apparently not the most since they are not accepted into service
        1. alexmach 14 January 2020 20: 57 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          As they write below, apparently they arranged big "meetings", which means that they are working on KAZ and plan to implement it .. But apparently so far they are only choosing which one to develop further ...
          1. Nastia makarova 15 January 2020 07: 54 New
            • 0
            • 2
            -2
            apparently it does not work as it should or in a large percentage of failures
            1. alexmach 15 January 2020 09: 10 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Here the question "how is it necessary" is still important. Drozd-1 was not massively used not to mow its own infantry. In addition, the old systems were well hit by cumulative ATGMs but were useless against sub-caliber ammunition. And if you do protection against anti-tank systems then
              in elevation from -6 º to +20 º
              Well, obviously not good.
  2. The leader of the Redskins 14 January 2020 13: 16 New
    • 14
    • 11
    +3
    Wait! I'm talking about "thrush", how I heard about secret development twenty-five years ago!
    1. Ratmir_Ryazan 14 January 2020 13: 23 New
      • 12
      • 10
      +2
      [quote] [I'm talking about "thrush", how I heard about secret development twenty-five years ago! / quote]

      I think that Drozd from Drozd-2 is also different as T-72 from T-72B3, that is, a generation.
    2. Nikolaevich I 14 January 2020 14: 19 New
      • 8
      • 2
      +6
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      twenty five years ago heard!

      I don’t understand by someone ... why did they “minus” you? request Well, KAZ Drozd-2 appeared “a bit” later than KAZ Drozd; but still quite a while ago! Drozd-2 was developed as part of the Black Eagle project, until it was finally shut down!
      1. The leader of the Redskins 14 January 2020 15: 02 New
        • 5
        • 6
        -1
        There are two options))) Either they believe that between Drozd and Drozd2 as well as between T72 and T72b3 the COLOR difference (the third track in the tank or two barrels is seen), or my personal "minusers")))
        1. Nikolaevich I 14 January 2020 17: 33 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: Leader of the Redskins
          or my personal "minusers")

          Lucky ! recourse Though “minusers”, but personal ones! winked Straight, like a "personal guard"! yes And if you even cleaned the shoes or washed the floor in the kitchen ... so finally it would be great! fellow
      2. Dzungar 16 January 2020 16: 53 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        On the "Black Eagle" no KAZ stood .... Generally. And "Drozd" was first installed on the T-55 already in the early 80's
        1. Nikolaevich I 16 January 2020 17: 36 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Dzungar
          "Drozd" was first installed on the T-55 already in the early 80's

          KAZ "Drozd" was developed even before the 80s ... in the 70s. last century. And, indeed, it was installed on the T-55 ... Later, the KAZ Drozd-2 was developed ... namely, this KAZ was supposed to be installed on the Black Eagle MBT being developed! So do not confuse the "plug with a bottle"! hi
          1. Dzungar 16 January 2020 17: 40 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            The Black Eagle issue was not expected. Someone’s thoughts are not considered aloud. He himself had no hopes for production in that situation, and everyone knew perfectly well about it, its creators including of course. By the way, the compartment at the back of the tower is just a model ...... An iron box, and there was no new type of AZ there
            1. Nikolaevich I 16 January 2020 17: 48 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: Dzungar
              The Black Eagle issue was not expected.

              The performance characteristics of the tank Black Eagle
              Crew, prs: 3
              Layout: Alternative
              Developer: KBTM OJSC
              Number of issued units: 1
              Tank Weight Black Eagle
              - 48 tons
              Tank Dimensions Black Eagle
              - body Length, mm: 7970
              - housing width, mm: 3095
              - Height, mm: 1793
              - Ground clearance, mm: 500
              Armor of the tank Black Eagle
              - Type of armor: modular
              - Active defense: "Drozd-2"
              - Dynamic protection: DZ "Cactus"
              The armament of the tank Black Eagle
              - Caliber and brand of gun: 125 mm
              - gun type: smoothbore gun
              - gun ammunition: 32 (in AZ)
              - Machine guns: 1 × 12,7 mm cord, 1 × 7,62 mm PKT
              - Other weapons: smoke grenade launchers
              Tank Engine Black Eagle
              - engine type: gas turbine engine
              - Engine power, l. s: 1500
              - Speed ​​on the highway, km / h: about 80
              - Cruising on the highway, km: more than 500 (without external tanks)
              - Specific power, l. s / t: 31,25: Type of suspension: torsion bar
          2. Dzungar 16 January 2020 17: 46 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Oh yes, sorry! In addition to KAZ Drozd, the installation of the GSh-6-30 six-barreled cannon, 2 packages of 4 SAMs from Tunguska, and two torpedo tubes, one at a time each ..... excuse me, forgive me for not learning .... Not I knew about it, right now I just google it .....
            1. Nikolaevich I 16 January 2020 17: 54 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: Dzungar
              I did not know about it, right now I just google .....

              Yes, google badly! They didn’t google anything about a nuclear reactor! Ata you for it! negative
              1. Dzungar 16 January 2020 19: 29 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                YES! YES! Two nuclear reactors ...! No, THREE!
    3. 1976AG 14 January 2020 15: 14 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      Wait! I'm talking about "thrush", how I heard about secret development twenty-five years ago!

      25 years ago, this was no longer a secret. The Military Parade magazine wrote a lot about this.
  3. svp67 14 January 2020 13: 17 New
    • 6
    • 4
    +2
    MBT T-72BK
    "Commander" tank. Well, yes, he needs protection most of all, because he’s only ONE per battalion.
    Photo. T-80UM2 with a complex of active protection "Drozd-2"
    Strange, but then, that the tests were not carried out?
    1. Ratmir_Ryazan 14 January 2020 13: 22 New
      • 8
      • 9
      -1
      "Commander" tank. Well, yes, he needs protection most of all, because he’s only ONE per battalion.


      How is your nagging justified? Somewhere it is written that KAZ will be put only on command tanks ?!
      1. svp67 14 January 2020 13: 23 New
        • 11
        • 2
        +9
        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        Somewhere it is written that KAZ will be put only on command tanks ?!

        Well, he is tested on it. Not on a linear, but on a commander’s. And this is strange
        1. Ratmir_Ryazan 14 January 2020 13: 27 New
          • 4
          • 6
          -2
          Well, he is tested on it. Not on a linear, but on a commander’s. And this is strange


          The main thing is that at least something is being done in this direction, and "According to reports, KAZ mounted T-72BK on MBT ..." may not be true.
        2. LiSiCyn 14 January 2020 13: 37 New
          • 9
          • 2
          +7
          Quote: svp67
          Not on a linear, but on a commander’s.

          What's the difference ? No, I understand the connection there, the devices ... But the significant difference is what? In the name ?
          1. svp67 14 January 2020 20: 29 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: LiSiCyn
            But what is the significant difference? In the name ?

            In destination. And I probably agree that I got excited. The tank of the battalion commander or regiment, brigade commander, is a mobile command post and its protection is very important, so that working out on it is rather positive.
            Quote: LiSiCyn
            But what is the significant difference? In the name ?

            In meaning and importance, when deploying all antennas, it is difficult for him to immediately change position
            1. LiSiCyn 14 January 2020 21: 12 New
              • 9
              • 0
              +9
              Sergey, welcome hi
              Quote: svp67
              In meaning and importance, when deploying all antennas, it is difficult for him to immediately change position

              In fact, this is a mobile communications center. Not in the forefront is coming. But against partisan saboteurs, it is even needed (KAZ). The main thing is not to be outside at this moment ... A map is there, to be considered, or something else ...
  4. Thrifty 14 January 2020 13: 19 New
    • 6
    • 6
    0
    And what about the “Arena?” When will KAZ begin to put on at least tanks? ??
    1. Thrifty 14 January 2020 15: 02 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      When, instead of answering, you get only cons, even for simple questions, it’s clear that on the site more and more people living with only one goal — minus someone! By this they try to hide their innate inferiority! !! fool fool fool
  5. Ratmir_Ryazan 14 January 2020 13: 21 New
    • 6
    • 4
    +2
    KAZ we need our tanks like air.

    As soon as possible they should be put on tanks, especially those that we send to Syria.
    1. Antidote 14 January 2020 14: 13 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      years through 30.
      arenas, afghanite, here they dug up a thrush.
      shay yes ...
  6. BARKAS 14 January 2020 13: 23 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    The trophy is one for several types of combat vehicles, and we have several KAZs for one tank, and even in the future some kind of nonsense turns out.
    1. Aaron Zawi 14 January 2020 13: 28 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      Quote: BARKAS
      The trophy is one for several types of combat vehicles, and we have several KAZs for one tank, and even in the future some kind of nonsense turns out.

      All the same, it was decided to put “Hets Dorban” on “Eitan”.
    2. Nikolaevich I 14 January 2020 14: 10 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: BARKAS
      we have several KAZs per tank

      "Do not drift, Masha! I Dubrovsky!" ... There are no statements so far that “several” KAZs are going to be adopted! It is more logical to assume that “shows” are being held to select the most “suitable” KAZ: “Arena-M” or "Drozd-2" ... I do not exclude the possibility that the "officials" may have a "thought" like: "Arena-M" for tanks ... "Drozd-2" for BMP (BTR)! Or vice versa...! But I’m sure that Arena-M will be enough for both tanks and infantry fighting vehicles! I’m also sure that KAZ “Arena-M” can be produced (and used ...) in various versions ... can be installed on tanks and on BMPs (BTR) ... can be produced in a “sophisticated” version, and in a simplified ("budget") option .. use more complex (expensive) and more "simple" (cheap) protective ammunition!
    3. Krasnoyarsk 14 January 2020 15: 21 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      Quote: BARKAS
      The trophy is one for several types of combat vehicles, and we have several KAZs for one tank, and even in the future some kind of nonsense turns out.

      Several KAZs not because several, but because none of them meets the stated requirements. Each subsequent small step forward, but the whole path has not yet been completed.
  7. Servisinzhener 14 January 2020 13: 32 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    It would be nice to provide protection from above from the FGM-148 and the like.
  8. Paul Siebert 14 January 2020 13: 49 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    And does this KAZ tank protect itself from hitting from above?
    And then here in one fraternal state, the "Jewels" appeared ...
    1. alexmach 14 January 2020 20: 55 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Of course it protects, it says + 20% in elevation.
  9. Professor 14 January 2020 14: 14 New
    • 9
    • 3
    +6
    At the moment, it is known that work on KAZ Drozd-2 has been going on for quite some time. From open sources it is known that the complex provides protection in azimuth of 360º, and in elevation from -6 º to +20 º.

    That means he is not capable of rockets hitting the roof. request
  10. cherkas.oe 14 January 2020 14: 47 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Quote: Nastia Makarova
    our tanks are the best

    Anastasia, you can’t write anything here, just go back and forth and there will be only advantages for you, and such statements annoy some public.
  11. Xenofont 14 January 2020 15: 11 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The very idea is to turn the tower towards the approaching ammunition? Is there enough turret turning speed to protect against a threat from the rear sector? When firing rocket-propelled grenade, for example.
  12. V1er 14 January 2020 15: 30 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Finally!
  13. Crimean partisan 1974 14 January 2020 15: 43 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    all these KAZ bullshit is complete. it’s better to equip the military guard with all sorts of IR detectors and motion detectors. and not bullshit
  14. Lesorub 14 January 2020 15: 51 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    From open sources it is known that the complex provides protection in azimuth of 360º, and in elevation from -6 º to +20 º

    At the moment, it is imperative to cover with KAZ and the upper part of the tank, since anti-tank ATGMs striking from above are gaining production rates in Western countries.
    1. Sanichsan 15 January 2020 18: 05 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Quote: Lesorub
      At the moment, it is imperative to cover with KAZ and the upper part of the tank, since anti-tank ATGMs striking from above are gaining production rates in Western countries.

      gaining ??? they are already a quarter century in production! Photos of tanks destroyed by RPGs, Cornets and TOW are full on the Internet ... kindly proofs of tanks destroyed by these prodigies. yes
      everything seems to be beautiful with the concept, but with real results it’s not very ... request
  15. Victor March 47 14 January 2020 17: 27 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: IImonolitII
    Or simply money for R&D is easier to pocket than for mass production.

    Dumbass.
    You cannot unfasten much with R&D. There are many observers, from the CUSTOMER to the financial overseers .... And everyone is interested. A series is the tediousness of being. There is already no interest. And volumes are a thousandfold.
  16. Zaurbek 14 January 2020 20: 37 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    It reached our .... that without KAZ it is no longer possible to participate in local wars.