Media: The Ministry of Defense has planned serial production of PAK DA for 2027

74
Media: The Ministry of Defense has planned serial production of PAK DA for 2027

PAK YES (promising aviation Long-Range Aviation Complex) is due to go into production in 2027. The newspaper Izvestia writes about this on Tuesday.

According to the publication, the Ministry of Defense and the Tupolev Design Bureau signed a contract that states that the preliminary tests of the PAK DA are scheduled for April 2023, and the state ones for February 2026.



The publication also reveals some data on the new bomber. It is noted that the PAK DA will be built on the technology of "stealth", in its arsenal will include hypersonic missiles. The crew of the latest aircraft will remain the same as that of the Tu-160, i.e. 4 people.

According to the contract, it is planned to release three flight bomber models. Preliminary tests of the assembled prototypes, including the rescue system, are ordered to begin in April 2023 and be completed by the fall of 2025. This will be followed by a stage of state testing

- writes the edition.

According to previously voiced data, the rollout of the first PAK DA sample is planned for 2021-2022.

Earlier it was reported that the promising long-range aviation complex (PAK DA), created by the Tupolev design bureau, will replace the long-range and strategic bombers and missile carriers Tu-160, Tu-95MS and Tu-22M3 in service with the airborne forces.

It is assumed that the PAK DA will be subsonic. In addition, based on the voiced data, the new aircraft will be able to carry more weapons than the Tu-160. The nomenclature of armaments should include as hypersonic weapon, and air-to-air missiles - this solution should allow the aircraft to fly unaccompanied.
74 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    14 January 2020 10: 32
    One can only hope that our designers will succeed, and within 6-7 years we will see a fundamentally new aircraft.
    1. +22
      14 January 2020 10: 38
      Media: The Ministry of Defense has planned serial production of PAK DA for 2027

      It would not be bad if the Ministry of Defense, with the same ease as they planned there, would produce military equipment!
      1. +3
        14 January 2020 10: 55
        Plan - not carry bags. Everything is planned easily, but soon things are being done. what
        1. +6
          14 January 2020 11: 06
          Quote: bessmertniy
          soon things are being done.

          "But fairy tales quickly tell ..." Yes
        2. +3
          14 January 2020 11: 37
          Quote: bessmertniy
          Plan - not carry bags.

          Tell me honestly, honestly, does anyone believe in the announced deadlines? Which of the plans for the GPA 2010–2011 announced in 2020 was implemented? Only on the S-400?
          1. +4
            14 January 2020 11: 49
            Naturally, no one has long believed in voiced dates!
          2. -2
            14 January 2020 11: 50
            Believe in the Plan! For the Plan is the essence of our Hope, which dies last! hi
            1. +1
              14 January 2020 11: 59
              Quote: bessmertniy
              Believe in the Plan! For the Plan is the essence of our Hope, which dies last! hi

              It’s just that without a plan there will be nothing at all.
              "Hope dies last!
              Vera said and shot at Love "
            2. +4
              14 January 2020 12: 00
              I love "news" in "future tense". Yes At the same time, I always remember Nasreddin with his "donkey" and "padishah". Yes
          3. 0
            14 January 2020 13: 15
            And what about the S-400? In 2019, at least one division was delivered to the Armed Forces? Only the modernized S-300s and in China and Turkey, brand new went.
            1. +4
              14 January 2020 13: 24
              In the village of Kruglovo, Kaliningrad Region. Did I answer your question? feel
          4. -3
            14 January 2020 17: 40
            Quote: kjhg
            Which of the plans for the GPA 2010–2011 announced in 2020 was implemented? Only on the S-400?

            Sound first the main thesis of this rearmament program!
      2. 0
        14 January 2020 14: 19
        Quote: СРЦ П-15
        It would not be bad if the Ministry of Defense, with the same ease as they planned there, would produce military equipment!

        The Defense Ministry should deal with defense, and not with the release of military equipment. Let everyone do what they should. There will be more use.
        1. -1
          14 January 2020 18: 23
          The General Staff of the Armed Forces is directly involved in defense, while the Ministry of Defense and the Minister have rather administrative functions. It is no coincidence that the minister of defense is a former minister of the Ministry of Emergencies, and his deputy is the former general director of the Kalashnikov concern.
          1. -1
            14 January 2020 18: 31
            Quote: Volder
            The General Staff of the Armed Forces is directly involved in defense, while the ministry and minister have rather administrative functions. It is no coincidence that the minister of defense is a former minister of the Ministry of Emergencies, and his deputy is the former general director of the Kalashnikov concern.

            What do you mean by the term "administrative functions"? And what is the nonrandomness of the Emergencies Ministry and Kalashnikov?
            1. -1
              14 January 2020 18: 34
              It is no coincidence that a "pure" warrior does not have to manage the MO. Then think for yourself ...
              1. -1
                14 January 2020 18: 38
                Quote: Volder
                it does not have to be a "clean" warrior

                There is such a point of view. Somewhere even gynecologists train in this position. I believe that any organization should be managed by a “core business” specialist with additional operational and strategic planning competencies.
                1. 0
                  15 January 2020 09: 22
                  Professionals must meet the objectives and goals. For example, the Minister of Defense (Shoigu, before him - Serdyukov, Ivanov) interacts with our defense industry, and the Chief of the General Staff (Gerasimov) acts on the battlefield. "Warriors" are sharpened for planning and conducting military operations, and for organizing everyday life, building military bases, monitoring the activities of the defense industry, providing "warriors" with everything they need, knocking out money from the budget, the administration of the Ministry of Defense serves (Shoigu, Krivoruchko, Shevtsova, Borisov - until 2018 .).
                  1. 0
                    15 January 2020 10: 19
                    You are far from MO. From your opinion, the tasks of the MO will not change. Is it worth it to discuss?
                    1. 0
                      15 January 2020 13: 16
                      Instead of discussion, you can simply read Wikipedia about the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation - the purpose and tasks of the Defense Ministry, the General Staff are clearly written there, the division of roles is indicated. In addition, our armed forces are composed of 1 million troops. Think about who the remaining 900 thousand people are.
                      1. 0
                        15 January 2020 13: 46
                        Quote: Volder
                        you can just read Wikipedia about the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation

                        Dry theory, my friend, but the tree of life is magnificently green ....
      3. +1
        15 January 2020 11: 36
        if in the Ministry of Defense, with the same ease as they plan there, they released military equipment!

        This is impossible in any way.
        The Ministry of Defense does not produce equipment - not its task. laughing laughing
        But her receipts are just planning, she must.
    2. -1
      14 January 2020 16: 22
      Quote: Alexey-74
      One can only hope that our designers will succeed, and within 6-7 years we will see a fundamentally new aircraft.

      Much for surrender to the troops was planned for the 20th year. We’ll see how it all goes. Now a new date-2027 pops up. There and a new UDC and an aircraft carrier, and here's PAK YES ....
    3. 0
      14 January 2020 20: 06
      In fact - everything has already worked out! The new PAK DA, which does not exist even in the drawings, has already surpassed the currently existing strategic aircraft of a potential enemy in a number of critical performance characteristics, and is also on par with new aircraft of a potential enemy undergoing flight tests at the moment!
  2. 0
    14 January 2020 10: 32
    Good news. If only she was not too optimistic.
    1. +4
      14 January 2020 12: 39
      "It's a pity - to live in this wonderful time
      You won't have to - neither me nor you. ")))
      1. +1
        14 January 2020 17: 01
        Quote: Romka
        "It's a pity - to live in this wonderful time
        You won't have to - neither me nor you. ")))

        Ishak ... Padishah ... Ayayayay, they killed the black man ...
  3. +4
    14 January 2020 10: 32
    God grant that everything works out on time. We will wait and hope!
    1. +11
      14 January 2020 11: 17
      proceeding from the existing Russian reality, no matter how you would have to wait until the "second coming" ...
      we have already heard about the SU-57 squadrons and the "Armat" division ...
  4. +16
    14 January 2020 10: 32
    probably achipyatka ... there it is necessary to indicate the year 2037. How funds are being mastered and with what result .. At least the Su-57 can be mastered until 2027
  5. +1
    14 January 2020 10: 43
    Yes, they are immortal there! Plans are planning! I want the power to change after six months.
    1. +2
      14 January 2020 10: 46
      Quote: Gardamir
      Yes, they are immortal there! Plans are planning! I want the power to change after six months.

      I support! That’s why they plan for dates after 2024, because they know that they won’t do a fig before this time, and then at least the grass does not grow.
      1. 0
        14 January 2020 10: 51
        From the change of power today, nothing changes. feel Literally, as from a permutation of terms.
        1. 0
          14 January 2020 10: 55
          Quote: bessmertniy
          From the change of power today, nothing changes. feel Literally, as from a permutation of terms.

          It is a very controversial statement and it should be noted that if everything continues in the same mode as now, then forget about PAK YES forever.
    2. +8
      14 January 2020 11: 05
      Quote: Gardamir
      I want the power to change after six months.

      I am also a supporter of the change of power, but could you please announce the list of those who will replace the existing one?
      1. +4
        14 January 2020 11: 39
        Good replacements will not be allowed even to the regional Duma.
        We have a quartet since 1991
        "Donkey, goat, monkey and clubfoot bear" ©
      2. -9
        14 January 2020 11: 40
        As an option: unite in the Union State with Belarus and at the helm put the Old Man, a great fighter with the oligarchy and guardian for the common people.
      3. +3
        14 January 2020 12: 15
        And I am the enemy! Order in the country when there is a master. And when, as a station hotel, the floors are constantly spat on. It would seem that the authorities for more than 20 years should feel like a master. But no, everyone looks at the partners when he is given Misha free.
    3. -2
      14 January 2020 12: 49
      Quote: Gardamir
      I want the power to change after six months.

      Crossed out all plans and started planning from the beginning? laughing
      1. 0
        14 January 2020 13: 39
        Do you think if you bring it to the point of absurdity, it will be funny? Yes, they themselves do not fulfill their laws and plans.
        1. -3
          14 January 2020 14: 35
          Quote: Gardamir
          Do you think if you bring it to the point of absurdity, it will be funny? Yes, they themselves do not fulfill their laws and plans.

          Who exactly can you offer to the HIGH authority, Zyuganov, Zhirinovsky, Grudinin, or maybe Ksyusha or Navalny? Then, it really will be no laughing matter. Do you have alternative candidates? Or, just to tryndet, published the next, not bearing any specifics, slogans, like - I just want another power, and which one - do not care?
          1. +2
            14 January 2020 15: 30
            Zyuganov, Zhirinovsky and others are also from the series tryndet.
            Roughly speaking, choosing between Putin and Navalny is like swimming between Scylla and Charybdis, but Odysseus swam ...
            1. -1
              14 January 2020 16: 47
              Quote: Gardamir
              Zyuganov, Zhirinovsky and others are also from the series tryndet.
              Roughly speaking, choosing between Putin and Navalny is like swimming between Scylla and Charybdis, but Odysseus swam ...

              Well, from the question to your comment -
              I want the power to change after six months.
              you are still trying to slip and wash it with your tryndzhe
              Roughly speaking, choosing between Putin and Navalny is like swimming between Scylla and Charybdis, but Odysseus swam ...
              . You have been asked a question. On whom, specifically, do you count on when changing your government? Why is this your verbiage?
              1. -2
                14 January 2020 19: 00
                On whom, specifically, do you count on when changing your government?
                Who will tell you the last name. So far, they are planning to be president of Dmitry Anatolyevich.
          2. 0
            14 January 2020 16: 15
            If you think about it, nothing will come of "power change". Why? Yes, very simply, the country has already built a power pyramid of power groups that rely on their own created and supported (financed) management tools. If a person comes from the street (outside), then he simply will not be able to use these controls, since he does not know them corny and does not know how to force them to work, how to use them for control. He will not have any support. And you have to start running the country right away - there will be no time for the buildup. An outsider will have to re-create all management, change personnel and rely on someone and something. For whom and for what? Where will he get so many people familiar with the system?
            1. +1
              14 January 2020 18: 58
              Where will he get so many people familiar with the system?
              The most true question, but many small officials, at any change of power, will remain in their places, so it is necessary to look at large officials, which of them will be able to work in changing conditions.
          3. -2
            14 January 2020 18: 05
            If only to tryndet, published the next, not bearing any specifics, slogans, like - I just want another power, and which one - do not care?
            And you just say that your idols are Medvedev, Volodin, Kudrin, Matvienko and many of Putin’s clips. What would you be sad without them)))
            1. +1
              14 January 2020 19: 13
              Quote: Snark1876
              If only to tryndet, published the next, not bearing any specifics, slogans, like - I just want another power, and which one - do not care?
              And you just say that your idols are Medvedev, Volodin, Kudrin, Matvienko and many of Putin’s clips. What would you be sad without them)))

              In general, I did not write anything about the change of power, I only asked "Gardamir", a revolutionary who longs for a change of power, but does not know who to change and by whom. So leave your speculations to yourself and do not attribute them to me.
              1. 0
                14 January 2020 23: 31
                Your position is understandable. We don’t have 140 million more talented among Russians than this krodrokaya power. With these, I agree with you.
    4. +1
      14 January 2020 18: 30
      Are you sure that the new liberal power that will come after the current one in 2024 will generally plan something ?? I remember that in the 90s liberals cut, cut and wrote off more than they built something. Do you hope that another government will begin to more zealously spend state money on defense? What naivety! No matter how worse it was ...
  6. +7
    14 January 2020 10: 44
    Set real dates, select real TTX and ... do it!
    1. +4
      14 January 2020 13: 41
      And even better, first do it, and then show and make us all happy, as with weapons.
      1. +3
        14 January 2020 14: 02
        Quote: cniza
        And even better, first do it, and then show and make us all happy, as with weapons.

        The current manner of publicizing on plans, projects, FANTASIES is not at all pleasing ...
        It is IMPOSSIBLE to be completely secret and closed! Because because of previous restrictions, so many DEVELOPMENTS, PATENTS are lost !!! EVERYTHING is stolen, and the international PATENT, designed in accordance with all the rules, brings developers not very small funds! It will not hurt both the state and the inventors / designers at all!
        1. +4
          14 January 2020 15: 08
          Everything should be balanced and reasonable.
      2. +5
        14 January 2020 14: 23
        Quote: cniza
        then show and please us all

        what Victor, but they believed in communism and even rejoiced that here .....
        Although yes ... Th talk in vain recourse
        1. +4
          14 January 2020 15: 09
          Yes, they should have lived under communism for 40 years, but ... lol
  7. +5
    14 January 2020 10: 59
    Who will remember about this article in 2027! And there you can promise a new child prodigy by the 20th .... th year, which has no analogues
  8. +11
    14 January 2020 11: 24
    Maybe not in this topic, but just about promises. It would be interesting to see what they promised us seven or ten years ago ... Armata, Boomerang, Su-57 and other and other, just about five years ago they promised a year for 2020
  9. -7
    14 January 2020 11: 50
    Is it subsonic? Nonsense, our pilots will easily accelerate it to supersonic speed when performing the "heavenly slide" figure !!! laughing
  10. +3
    14 January 2020 11: 53
    Quote: Tzar
    and at the helm put the Old Man, a great fighter with the oligarchy and guardian for the common people.

    Yeah, he fights only with those who are not on his team, and even then it is ostentatious, on the camera - a Sumer that you take from him, as quick as an infusoria and all his efforts in full view.
  11. +1
    14 January 2020 12: 12
    In principle, real. The only difficulty is the layout of the aircraft - a flying wing. The Sayans are already developing electronic warfare (perhaps the main element of the avionics of an inconspicuous bomber) The fancy radar is not so critical for him, most likely they will take it from the Tu-160M2 (the derivative of the Novella radar as well as the Tu-22M3M, not the most advanced radar model, frankly) for a strategic LOW bomber, one can confine oneself only to weather radars, and dangerous objects must be detected using optical sensors using RTR. Nothing to radar like a lantern on a November night!
    Engines are also not created from scratch. So the main features there are stealth and electronic warfare. In general, it turns out a budgetary such strategic bomber
    1. +2
      14 January 2020 12: 45
      It depends on what radar
      The Americans have on their B-2 super-sophisticated multi-mode AN / APQ-181, capable of working in 21 modes, including LPI, automatic flight at ultra-low altitude with relief envelope, mapping, passive and others
      By the way, they also have radio detectors with LPI mode for complete stealth.
      1. +1
        14 January 2020 16: 07
        And why should a strategic bomber - missile carrier terrain bending mode? This let the CR penetrate the targets at extremely low altitudes. Here are LPI altimeters that come in handy to make it difficult for enemy RTRs to spot it
        1. 0
          14 January 2020 16: 47
          For multifunctionality and expanding opportunities, for striking at mobile targets, including strategic ones, which the Kyrgyz Republic cannot do, for self-defense, situational awareness
          Then, why did B1B have a similar regime and in Tu 160 they began to provide for such a regime
          For stationary targets in the global and BR, it’s enough, but if you have to strike at the rear of the advancing troops, cutting them off the supply, it will be
          1. -1
            14 January 2020 18: 18
            Well, if so, then I join the majority opinion that the terms are extremely optimistic. By the way, the question is: why so many people on board? Well, the commander, the second pilot, okay the third - the electronic warfare operator. But why the fourth one? Is it a navigator or an onboard engineer? There is a Su-34 crew of 2 people. On the B-2 crew 2 people, though there is a place for an electronic warfare operator
            1. 0
              14 January 2020 19: 38
              I don’t know, maybe a weapon operator, maybe a technician.
              hardly a navigator
  12. -2
    14 January 2020 12: 38
    I doubt about rolling out, because there is not even an approved layout.
  13. 0
    14 January 2020 13: 47
    I’m straightforwardly sure that in 2027 he won’t go into the series, we don’t have anything when he doesn’t go to the series on time :(
    1. 0
      14 January 2020 22: 03
      The Su-57 (PAK FA) was launched in 2001. It took 19 years of the NO series. There is no engine (it is expected in two years). In general, in its final form, I think the series will be in 23-24. We will live and see! hi
  14. 0
    14 January 2020 15: 57
    How will he replace that 160 if it is subsonic, and air-to-air missiles, then the fighter will still replace
  15. 0
    14 January 2020 16: 26
    Do we have such stealth technology? Paint it blue?
  16. 0
    14 January 2020 16: 59
    Preliminary tests of the assembled prototypes, including the rescue system, are ordered to begin in April 2023 and be completed by the fall of 2025. This will be followed by a stage of state testing

    Is it a parachute or something?
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. 0
    14 January 2020 21: 55
    Quote: bessmertniy
    Plan - don't carry bags

    Instruct me! I will launch a "death star" by the year 50. And give me 2-3 trillion. laughing lol hi
  19. +1
    15 January 2020 11: 44
    Stop PR.
    Do not fulfill the plans.
    ANYTHING READ AN ARTICLE?
    According to the publication, The Ministry of Defense and the Tupolev Design Bureau signed a contract which states that the preliminary tests of the PAK DA are scheduled for April 2023, and the state ones for February 2026.

    Do you know what that means?
    The blonde girl from the news whose duties it is to monitor the public procurement website found an entry about the conclusion of the contract and wrote an email to the boy responsible for the topic, he searched the Internet for suitable words and copied the excerpts into the article.
    And you make conclusions about the profession of Minister of Defense. Not funny yourself?