Media: The Ministry of Defense has planned serial production of PAK DA for 2027

Media: The Ministry of Defense has planned serial production of PAK DA for 2027

PAK YES (promising aviation Long-Range Aviation Complex) is due to go into production in 2027. The newspaper Izvestia writes about this on Tuesday.


According to the publication, the Ministry of Defense and the Tupolev Design Bureau signed a contract that states that the preliminary tests of the PAK DA are scheduled for April 2023, and the state ones for February 2026.

The publication also reveals some data on the new bomber. It is noted that the PAK DA will be built on the technology of "stealth", in its arsenal will include hypersonic missiles. The crew of the latest aircraft will remain the same as that of the Tu-160, i.e. 4 people.

According to the contract, it is planned to release three flight bomber models. Preliminary tests of the assembled prototypes, including the rescue system, are ordered to begin in April 2023 and be completed by the fall of 2025. This will be followed by a stage of state testing

- writes the edition.

According to previously voiced data, the rollout of the first PAK DA sample is planned for 2021-2022.

Earlier it was reported that the promising long-range aviation complex (PAK DA), created by the Tupolev design bureau, will replace the long-range and strategic bombers and missile carriers Tu-160, Tu-95MS and Tu-22M3 in service with the airborne forces.

It is assumed that the PAK DA will be subsonic. In addition, based on the voiced data, the new aircraft will be able to carry more weapons than the Tu-160. The nomenclature of armaments should include as hypersonic weapon, and air-to-air missiles - this solution should allow the aircraft to fly unaccompanied.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

74 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Alexey-74 14 January 2020 10: 32 New
    • 8
    • 7
    +1
    One can only hope that our designers will succeed, and within 6-7 years we will see a fundamentally new aircraft.
    1. SRC P-15 14 January 2020 10: 38 New
      • 29
      • 7
      +22
      Media: The Ministry of Defense has planned serial production of PAK DA for 2027

      It would not be bad if the Ministry of Defense, with the same ease as they planned there, would produce military equipment!
      1. bessmertniy 14 January 2020 10: 55 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        Plan - not carry bags. Everything is planned easily, but soon things are being done. what
        1. SRC P-15 14 January 2020 11: 06 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          Quote: bessmertniy
          soon things are being done.

          "But quickly tales affect ..." yes
        2. kjhg 14 January 2020 11: 37 New
          • 9
          • 6
          +3
          Quote: bessmertniy
          Plan - not carry bags.

          Tell me honestly, honestly, does anyone believe in the announced deadlines? Which of the plans for the GPA 2010–2011 announced in 2020 was implemented? Only on the S-400?
          1. Thrifty 14 January 2020 11: 49 New
            • 8
            • 4
            +4
            Naturally, no one has long believed in voiced dates!
          2. bessmertniy 14 January 2020 11: 50 New
            • 4
            • 6
            -2
            Believe in the Plan! For the Plan is the essence of our Hope, which dies last! hi
            1. Livonetc 14 January 2020 11: 59 New
              • 3
              • 2
              +1
              Quote: bessmertniy
              Believe in the Plan! For the Plan is the essence of our Hope, which dies last! hi

              It’s just that without a plan there will be nothing at all.
              "Hope dies last!
              Vera said and shot in Love "
            2. Snail N9 14 January 2020 12: 00 New
              • 9
              • 5
              +4
              I love the "news" in the "future tense". yes At the same time, I always remember Nasreddin with his “donkey” and “padishah”. yes
          3. YOUR 14 January 2020 13: 15 New
            • 2
            • 2
            0
            And what about the S-400? In 2019, at least one division was delivered to the Armed Forces? Only the modernized S-300s and in China and Turkey, brand new went.
            1. Dmitry Donskoy 14 January 2020 13: 24 New
              • 4
              • 0
              +4
              In the village of Kruglovo, Kaliningrad Region. Did I answer your question? repeat
          4. Edik 14 January 2020 17: 40 New
            • 0
            • 3
            -3
            Quote: kjhg
            Which of the plans for the GPA 2010–2011 announced in 2020 was implemented? Only on the S-400?

            Sound first the main thesis of this rearmament program!
      2. Den717 14 January 2020 14: 19 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: SRC P-15
        It would not be bad if the Ministry of Defense, with the same ease as they planned there, would produce military equipment!

        The Defense Ministry should deal with defense, and not with the release of military equipment. Let everyone do what they should. There will be more use.
        1. Volder 14 January 2020 18: 23 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          The General Staff of the Armed Forces is directly involved in the defense, while the Defense Ministry and the Minister are more likely to have administrative functions. It is no coincidence that the Minister of Defense is the former Minister of Emergency Situations, and his deputy is the former general director of the Kalashnikov concern.
          1. Den717 14 January 2020 18: 31 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            Quote: Volder
            The General Staff of the Armed Forces is directly involved in defense, while the ministry and the minister are more likely to have administrative functions. It is no coincidence that the Minister of Defense is the former Minister of Emergency Situations, and his deputy is the former general director of the Kalashnikov concern.

            And what do you mean by the term "administrative functions"? And what is the randomness of the Ministry of Emergencies and Kalashnikov?
            1. Volder 14 January 2020 18: 34 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              It is no coincidence that the “pure” warrior does not have to manage the Moscow Region. Then think for yourself ...
              1. Den717 14 January 2020 18: 38 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                Quote: Volder
                MO must not be controlled by a “pure” warrior

                There is such a point of view. Somewhere even gynecologists in this position are training. I believe that any organization should be managed by a specialist in "main production" with additional competencies in operational and strategic planning.
                1. Volder 15 January 2020 09: 22 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Professionals must meet the goals and objectives. For example, the Minister of Defense interacts with our defense industry (Shoigu, before him - Serdyukov, Ivanov), and the chief of the General Staff (Gerasimov) acts on the battlefield. The "warriors" are imprisoned for planning and conducting military operations, and for the organization of life, the construction of military bases, monitoring the activities of the defense industry complex, providing the "warrior" with everything necessary, knocking money out of the budget, the administration of the Ministry of Defense serves (Shoigu, Krivoruchko, Shevtsova, Borisov - until 2018 .).
                  1. Den717 15 January 2020 10: 19 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    You are far from MO. From your opinion, the tasks of the MO will not change. Is it worth it to discuss?
                    1. Volder 15 January 2020 13: 16 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Instead of discussion, you can simply read Wikipedia about the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation - the purpose and tasks of the Defense Ministry, the General Staff are clearly written there, the division of roles is indicated. In addition, our armed forces are composed of 1 million troops. Think about who the remaining 900 thousand people are.
                      1. Den717 15 January 2020 13: 46 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: Volder
                        you can just read Wikipedia about the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation

                        Dry theory, my friend, but the tree of life is magnificently green ....
      3. bk316 15 January 2020 11: 36 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        if in the Ministry of Defense, with the same ease as they plan there, they released military equipment!

        This is impossible in any way.
        The Ministry of Defense does not produce equipment - not its task. laughing laughing
        But her receipts are just planning, she must.
    2. NEXUS 14 January 2020 16: 22 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Quote: Alexey-74
      One can only hope that our designers will succeed, and within 6-7 years we will see a fundamentally new aircraft.

      Much for surrender to the troops was planned for the 20th year. We’ll see how it all goes. Now a new date-2027 pops up. There and a new UDC and an aircraft carrier, and here's PAK YES ....
    3. Korg 14 January 2020 20: 06 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      In fact - everything has already worked out! The new PAK DA, which does not exist even in the drawings, has already surpassed the currently existing strategic aircraft of a potential enemy in a number of critical performance characteristics, and is also on par with new aircraft of a potential enemy undergoing flight tests at the moment!
  2. Thrall 14 January 2020 10: 32 New
    • 7
    • 7
    0
    Good news. If only she was not too optimistic.
    1. Romka 14 January 2020 12: 39 New
      • 8
      • 4
      +4
      "It’s a pity only - to live in this wonderful time
      I don’t have to - neither to me nor to you. ")))
      1. Mordvin 3 14 January 2020 17: 01 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Romka
        "It’s a pity only - to live in this wonderful time
        I don’t have to - neither to me nor to you. ")))

        Ishak ... Padishah ... Ayayayay, they killed the black man ...
  3. thanks 14 January 2020 10: 32 New
    • 12
    • 8
    +4
    God grant that everything works out on time. We will wait and hope!
    1. kepmor 14 January 2020 11: 17 New
      • 19
      • 8
      +11
      Based on the existing Russian reality, one would not have to wait until the "second coming" ...
      about the SU-57 squadrons and the Armat divisions have already heard ...
  4. dima314 14 January 2020 10: 32 New
    • 26
    • 10
    +16
    probably achipyatka ... there it is necessary to indicate the year 2037. How funds are being mastered and with what result .. At least the Su-57 can be mastered until 2027
  5. Gardamir 14 January 2020 10: 43 New
    • 18
    • 17
    +1
    Yes, they are immortal there! Plans are planning! I want the power to change after six months.
    1. Sling cutter 14 January 2020 10: 46 New
      • 18
      • 16
      +2
      Quote: Gardamir
      Yes, they are immortal there! Plans are planning! I want the power to change after six months.

      I support! That’s why they plan for dates after 2024, because they know that they won’t do a fig before this time, and then at least the grass does not grow.
      1. bessmertniy 14 January 2020 10: 51 New
        • 7
        • 7
        0
        From the change of power today, nothing changes. repeat Literally, as from a permutation of terms.
        1. Sling cutter 14 January 2020 10: 55 New
          • 15
          • 15
          0
          Quote: bessmertniy
          From the change of power today, nothing changes. repeat Literally, as from a permutation of terms.

          It is a very controversial statement and it should be noted that if everything continues in the same mode as now, then forget about PAK YES forever.
    2. cherkas.oe 14 January 2020 11: 05 New
      • 12
      • 4
      +8
      Quote: Gardamir
      I want the power to change after six months.

      I am also a supporter of the change of power, but could you please announce the list of those who will replace the existing one?
      1. Runoway 14 January 2020 11: 39 New
        • 12
        • 8
        +4
        Good replacements will not be allowed even to the regional Duma.
        We have a quartet since 1991
        "Donkey, goat, monkey and clubfoot" ©
      2. Tzar 14 January 2020 11: 40 New
        • 2
        • 11
        -9
        As an option: unite in the Union State with Belarus and at the helm put the Old Man, a great fighter with the oligarchy and guardian for the common people.
      3. Gardamir 14 January 2020 12: 15 New
        • 9
        • 6
        +3
        And I am the enemy! Order in the country when there is a master. And when, as a station hotel, the floors are constantly spat on. It would seem that the authorities for more than 20 years should feel like a master. But no, everyone looks at the partners when he is given Misha free.
    3. Piramidon 14 January 2020 12: 49 New
      • 2
      • 4
      -2
      Quote: Gardamir
      I want the power to change after six months.

      Crossed out all plans and started planning from the beginning? laughing
      1. Gardamir 14 January 2020 13: 39 New
        • 5
        • 5
        0
        Do you think if you bring it to the point of absurdity, it will be funny? Yes, they themselves do not fulfill their laws and plans.
        1. Piramidon 14 January 2020 14: 35 New
          • 1
          • 4
          -3
          Quote: Gardamir
          Do you think if you bring it to the point of absurdity, it will be funny? Yes, they themselves do not fulfill their laws and plans.

          Who exactly can you offer to the HIGH authority, Zyuganov, Zhirinovsky, Grudinin, or maybe Ksyusha or Navalny? Then, it really will be no laughing matter. Do you have alternative candidates? Or, just to tryndet, published the next, not bearing any specifics, slogans, like - I just want another power, and which one - do not care?
          1. Gardamir 14 January 2020 15: 30 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            Zyuganov, Zhirinovsky and others are also from the series tryndet.
            Roughly speaking, choosing between Putin and Navalny is like swimming between Scylla and Charybdis, but Odysseus swam ...
            1. Piramidon 14 January 2020 16: 47 New
              • 1
              • 2
              -1
              Quote: Gardamir
              Zyuganov, Zhirinovsky and others are also from the series tryndet.
              Roughly speaking, choosing between Putin and Navalny is like swimming between Scylla and Charybdis, but Odysseus swam ...

              Well, from the question to your comment -
              I want the power to change after six months.
              you are still trying to slip and wash it with your tryndzhe
              Roughly speaking, choosing between Putin and Navalny is like swimming between Scylla and Charybdis, but Odysseus swam ...
              . You have been asked a question. On whom, specifically, do you count on when changing your government? Why is this your verbiage?
              1. Gardamir 14 January 2020 19: 00 New
                • 1
                • 3
                -2
                On whom, specifically, do you count on when changing your government?
                Who will tell you the last name. So far, they are planning to be president of Dmitry Anatolyevich.
          2. Snail N9 14 January 2020 16: 15 New
            • 2
            • 2
            0
            If you think about it, nothing will come of it “with the change of power”. Why? Yes, it’s very simple — a power pyramid has already been built in the country from power groups that rely on the controls created and supported (funded) by them. If a person comes from the street (outside), then he simply will not be able to use these controls, since he does not know them corny and does not know how to force them to work, how to use them for control. He will have no support. And it is necessary to begin to rule the country, because right away, there will be no time for the buildup. An outsider will have to re-create all the management, change personnel and rely on someone and something. To whom and for what? Where will he get so many people familiar with the system?
            1. Gardamir 14 January 2020 18: 58 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Where will he get so many people familiar with the system?
              The most true question, but many small officials, at any change of power, will remain in their places, so it is necessary to look at large officials, which of them will be able to work in changing conditions.
          3. Snarkxnumx 14 January 2020 18: 05 New
            • 0
            • 2
            -2
            If only to tryndet, published the next, not bearing any specifics, slogans, like - I just want another power, and which one - do not care?
            And you just say that your idols are Medvedev, Volodin, Kudrin, Matvienko and many of Putin’s clips. What would you be sad without them)))
            1. Piramidon 14 January 2020 19: 13 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              Quote: Snark1876
              If only to tryndet, published the next, not bearing any specifics, slogans, like - I just want another power, and which one - do not care?
              And you just say that your idols are Medvedev, Volodin, Kudrin, Matvienko and many of Putin’s clips. What would you be sad without them)))

              In general, I did not write anything about the change of power, I only asked the Gardamir, a revolutionary who was eager for a change of power, but he himself did not know whom and by whom to change. So leave your speculations with you and do not ascribe them to me.
              1. Snarkxnumx 14 January 2020 23: 31 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Your position is understandable. We don’t have 140 million more talented among Russians than this krodrokaya power. With these, I agree with you.
    4. Volder 14 January 2020 18: 30 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Are you sure that the new liberal power that will come after the current one in 2024 will generally plan something ?? I remember that in the 90s liberals cut, cut and wrote off more than they built something. Do you hope that another government will begin to more zealously spend state money on defense? What naivety! No matter how worse it was ...
  6. rocket757 14 January 2020 10: 44 New
    • 9
    • 2
    +7
    Set real dates, select real TTX and ... do it!
    1. cniza 14 January 2020 13: 41 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      And even better, first do it, and then show and make us all happy, as with weapons.
      1. rocket757 14 January 2020 14: 02 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: cniza
        And even better, first do it, and then show and make us all happy, as with weapons.

        The current manner of publicizing on plans, projects, FANTASIES is not at all pleasing ...
        It is IMPOSSIBLE to be completely secret and closed! Because because of previous restrictions, so many DEVELOPMENTS, PATENTS are lost !!! EVERYTHING is stolen, and the international PATENT, designed in accordance with all the rules, brings developers not very small funds! It will not hurt both the state and the inventors / designers at all!
        1. cniza 14 January 2020 15: 08 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Everything should be balanced and reasonable.
      2. Serg65 14 January 2020 14: 23 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: cniza
        then show and please us all

        what Victor, but they believed in communism and even rejoiced that here .....
        Although yes ... Th talk in vain recourse
        1. cniza 14 January 2020 15: 09 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Yes, they should have lived under communism for 40 years, but ... lol
  7. Eskobar 14 January 2020 10: 59 New
    • 12
    • 7
    +5
    Who will remember about this article in 2027! And there you can promise a new child prodigy by the 20th .... th year, which has no analogues
  8. nm76 14 January 2020 11: 24 New
    • 18
    • 7
    +11
    Maybe not in this topic, but just about promises. It would be interesting to see what they promised us seven or ten years ago ... Armata, Boomerang, Su-57 and other and other, just about five years ago they promised a year for 2020
  9. Thrifty 14 January 2020 11: 50 New
    • 0
    • 7
    -7
    Is it subsonic? Nonsense, our pilots will easily disperse it to supersonic sound when performing the figure "heavenly hill" !!! laughing
  10. cherkas.oe 14 January 2020 11: 53 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    Quote: Tzar
    and at the helm put the Old Man, a great fighter with the oligarchy and guardian for the common people.

    Yeah, he fights only with those who are not on his team, and even then it is ostentatious, on the camera - a Sumer that you take from him, as quick as an infusoria and all his efforts in full view.
  11. bars1 14 January 2020 12: 12 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    In principle, real. The only difficulty is the layout of the aircraft - a flying wing. The Sayans are already developing electronic warfare (perhaps the main element of the avionics of an inconspicuous bomber) The fancy radar is not so critical for him, most likely they will take it from the Tu-160M2 (the derivative of the Novella radar as well as the Tu-22M3M, not the most advanced radar model, frankly) for a strategic LOW bomber, one can confine oneself only to weather radars, and dangerous objects must be detected using optical sensors using RTR. Nothing to radar like a lantern on a November night!
    Engines are also not created from scratch. So the main features there are stealth and electronic warfare. In general, it turns out a budgetary such strategic bomber
    1. Avior 14 January 2020 12: 45 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      It depends on what radar
      The Americans have on their B-2 super-sophisticated multi-mode AN / APQ-181, capable of working in 21 modes, including LPI, automatic flight at ultra-low altitude with relief envelope, mapping, passive and others
      By the way, they also have radio detectors with LPI mode for complete stealth.
      1. bars1 14 January 2020 16: 07 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        And why should a strategic bomber - missile carrier terrain bending mode? This let the CR penetrate the targets at extremely low altitudes. Here are LPI altimeters that come in handy to make it difficult for enemy RTRs to spot it
        1. Avior 14 January 2020 16: 47 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          For multifunctionality and expanding opportunities, for striking at mobile targets, including strategic ones, which the Kyrgyz Republic cannot do, for self-defense, situational awareness
          Then, why did B1B have a similar regime and in Tu 160 they began to provide for such a regime
          For stationary targets in the global and BR, it’s enough, but if you have to strike at the rear of the advancing troops, cutting them off the supply, it will be
          1. bars1 14 January 2020 18: 18 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            Well, if so, then I join the majority opinion that the terms are extremely optimistic. By the way, the question is: why so many people on board? Well, the commander, the second pilot, okay the third - the electronic warfare operator. But why the fourth one? Is it a navigator or an onboard engineer? There is a Su-34 crew of 2 people. On the B-2 crew 2 people, though there is a place for an electronic warfare operator
            1. Avior 14 January 2020 19: 38 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              I don’t know, maybe a weapon operator, maybe a technician.
              hardly a navigator
  12. Ros 56 14 January 2020 12: 38 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    I doubt about rolling out, because there is not even an approved layout.
  13. Clueless 14 January 2020 13: 47 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    I’m straightforwardly sure that in 2027 he won’t go into the series, we don’t have anything when he doesn’t go to the series on time :(
    1. fa2998 14 January 2020 22: 03 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The Su-57 (PAK FA) was launched in 2001. It took 19 years of the NO series. There is no engine (it is expected in two years). In general, in its final form, I think the series will be in 23-24. We will live and see! hi
  14. jeka424 14 January 2020 15: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    How will he replace that 160 if it is subsonic, and air-to-air missiles, then the fighter will still replace
  15. yfast 14 January 2020 16: 26 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Do we have such stealth technology? Paint blue?
  16. Mordvin 3 14 January 2020 16: 59 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Preliminary tests of the assembled prototypes, including the rescue system, are ordered to begin in April 2023 and be completed by the fall of 2025. This will be followed by a stage of state testing

    Is it a parachute or something?
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. fa2998 14 January 2020 21: 55 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: bessmertniy
    Plan - don't carry bags

    Charge me! By the year 50 I’ll launch the "death star." And give me 2-3 trillion. I’ll give a tooth! laughing lol hi
  19. bk316 15 January 2020 11: 44 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Stop PR.
    Do not fulfill the plans.
    ANYTHING READ AN ARTICLE?
    According to the publication, The Ministry of Defense and the Tupolev Design Bureau signed a contract which states that the preliminary tests of the PAK DA are scheduled for April 2023, and the state ones for February 2026.

    Do you know what that means?
    The blonde girl from the news whose duties it is to monitor the public procurement website found an entry about the conclusion of the contract and wrote an email to the boy responsible for the topic, he searched the Internet for suitable words and copied the excerpts into the article.
    And you make conclusions about the profession of Minister of Defense. Not funny yourself?