“Russia will buy everything”: in Ukraine, the “battle” for land law is resuming

49

The deputies of the “unbundled” parliament have adopted a law on the opening of the agricultural land market, which the curators from the International Monetary Fund demand from Kiev, on the nose. There is reason to believe that it will be tabled for discussion at the next meeting of the Ukrainian parliament as "urgent." At the same time, starting January 14th, the Joint Headquarters for the Protection of Ukrainian Land announced the continuation of protests against the “anti-people’s decision to sell off the national treasure.”

What is wrong with this notorious bill No. 2178-10?


In the current, absolutely surreal and pretty psychic clinic everyday life, the realities of Ukraine in order to reliably cajole any undertaking, they try to tie Russia to it one way or another with the words: "Russia will buy everything." If the case burns out - victory, count in your pocket. It is on the basis of this proven know-how that one of the main smokers of protest actions against the "land sellers" acts - radicals from the same "Freedom." They say that it is worth the deputies to vote “for” - the oligarchs from the “aggressor country” will flock in packs with full suitcases of money, and they’ll buy everything up to the last hectare. And there will be nowhere for the poor patriots, who have not yet left to work in Poland and other "Europeans", to go ...



A terrible prospect. Heartbreaking, I would say. But only in this case there is a typical shift from a sick head to a healthy, so beloved by the throaty and unscrupulous tribe of professional "patriots" in almost to the foundation of a destroyed country. It is precisely against any persons or companies participating in the purchase of Ukrainian black soil, at least somehow, albeit indirectly associated with Russia, the “fuses” in the bill are the most reliable ones. Starting from a direct ban on acquiring at least a couple of hundred to persons with Russian citizenship or enterprises having those among the founders to not allowing “persons from the sanctions lists” to offshore companies and companies whose ultimate beneficiary is impossible to establish. In preparation for adoption, the law in black and white means: to sell only to citizens of Ukraine and the firms they founded. So, there are no problems and all the violent protests with pigs in a coffin - a storm in a glass of water? Not certainly in that way.

Sober-minded Ukrainian experts note that the mass of loopholes that were invisible to the naked eye and several times rewritten to complete unrecognizability was left behind. And it is precisely because of them that the “non-fallowing” agrarians, especially small farmers and ordinary peasants, can really lose their land-nourishment. Moreover, all attempts to nod at the “Moscow hand” in this case are simply ridiculous. First of all, Russia has enough of its land, if it were hands to cultivate it ... But the main point is that initially the initiative to turn the agricultural land of Ukraine into a purchase and sale site belonged to the curators of Ukraine from the IMF. In recent years, it was they who entangled Kiev with so many commitments of both material and political nature that, in principle, they could demand that the authorities controlled by them take any decisions to suit themselves. To the fact that bill No. 2178-10 was written out just under the interests of international financial tycoons, there is reinforced concrete evidence.

The only, in fact, foreign companies that can freely buy up fertile black soil, as well as other soils of Ukraine, in accordance with it, are banks! Moreover, if for other owners there is a restriction on the purchase of 10 thousand hectares, then for financial institutions, including foreign ones, it is absent as such. The “relatively fair weaning” scheme is as simple as lowing - bankers will receive land as collateral for loans. The fact that any loan can be made irrevocable in principle, to clarify, I think is not necessary. Within two years, the financiers who allegedly have to own the land will supposedly have to sell it - but it is clear that the property will be transferred to "their" people.

Well, the "battle" for the law continues. And, having invested a lot of money in support of the “post-Maidan” Ukrainian authorities, international bankers are eager to get at least something in return. In addition to agricultural hectares, a country with completely destroyed industry and infrastructure has virtually nothing. Now the Ukrainians can only say: “Goodbye, earth ...”
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    14 January 2020 08: 22
    Now the Ukrainians can only say: “Goodbye, earth ...”

    The prospect is sad, tragic. for any farmer.
    1. 0
      14 January 2020 08: 43
      Poor, unhappy Ukraine ...... but how all is well in Russia ...... Yes
      1. +2
        14 January 2020 09: 14
        Quote: Snail N9
        Poor, unhappy Ukraine ...... but how all is well in Russia ...... Yes

        Whether there will still be \ maybe oh, oh, oh! And this is not about Krayna I oke!
      2. +1
        14 January 2020 09: 30
        A tt-ozhzhzh .... !!!
        good
    2. 0
      14 January 2020 10: 22
      And who does not agree - the outskirts of transplantation rates are officially recognized. There and go for the money-compensation.
    3. +3
      14 January 2020 17: 04
      Quote: rocket757
      The prospect is sad, tragic. for any farmer.

      The final stage of the robbery of the Outskirts has begun .. Fertile land will begin to be exported to the EU .. And then Ukraine will definitely be tse Europe ..
      1. +1
        14 January 2020 17: 29
        Earth was what is connected with Multiple was inextricably! It seemed so, and now it may happen that the wrong god people were baptized, since they still want to punish them.
        1. +3
          14 January 2020 18: 21
          Quote: rocket757
          Earth was what is connected with Multiple was inextricably! It seemed so, and now it may happen that the wrong god people were baptized, since they still want to punish them.

          Let's see, God has punished Ukraine for some time .. Maybe they will finally understand, although I really doubt it ... hi
          1. 0
            14 January 2020 18: 31
            "God loves trinity!" .... or have they already crossed this line?
            1. +3
              14 January 2020 19: 03
              Quote: rocket757
              "God loves trinity!" .... or have they already crossed this line?

              Well, the only thing I’m sure of is that Ukraine will no longer be the state .. They didn’t pass the statehood test either this time .. Betrayal is not forgiven, but they had a chance .. Forgive me real Ukrainians.! hi
      2. -1
        17 January 2020 22: 15
        Fertile land will begin to be exported to the EU


        Again mythology and ignorance. We are allowed to buy land for foreigners. So what - bought up and taken out? The same black soil as in Ukraine.

        And let’s give at least one example with the land bought up and exported to the EU.
  2. +7
    14 January 2020 08: 26
    adoption of the law on the opening of the agricultural land market, which curators from the International Monetary Fund demand from Kiev
    In Russia, life began to improve when the IMF and other similar organizations were denied the right to demand something and advise the Russian authorities. And immediately money appeared with debts to pay off and raise the standard of living of the people. Considering what kind of power the neighbors have right now - even if they continue to listen to the IMF's advice, they may grow wiser.
    1. 0
      14 January 2020 09: 25
      Quote: Less
      In Russia, life began to improve when the IMF and other similar organizations were denied the right to demand something and advise the Russian authorities.

      If you give a finger to the IMF, tomorrow it will grab your hand, you will not have time to look around, and you will be swallowed with hair.
    2. +4
      14 January 2020 10: 04
      In Russia, life began to improve when the IMF and other similar organizations were denied the right to demand something and advise the Russian authorities. And immediately money appeared with debts to pay off and raise the standard of living of the people.

      Yes? Is life getting better in Russia? And that's true. We are all good. Well, there are little difficulties, so nonsense. And even then, the IMF is to blame for this. Here (on VO) Boris55 has been broadcasting for the second year that it is the IMF in Russia that raised the retirement age (personally, Christine Lagarde put his signature under the law ....) ... and in general, it is the IMF that constantly raises the prices of natural monopolies in Russia (even such a law has been issued on compensating them for inflation), raises housing prices, raised VAT, excise taxes, constantly comes up with new levies such as "repairing buildings", "toll roads", "roads for rent", etc. They say the IMF plans raise personal income tax in Russia to 16% and tax pension savings, and so on, it means that they have not completely expelled the damned foe-IMF from Raseyushka, we still need to work in this regard ... but nothing our President with Rosgvardia, soon, by 2000 ... in the twentieth "year, they will expel the damned IMF from Russia forever, to the delight of all the people. And the land and mineral resources in Russia belong to the people according to the Constitution, and no one can extract and export anything there, and even more so sell the land, without the consent of the people. ... Not like in Ukraine. Yes. Yes
      1. 0
        14 January 2020 10: 10
        Quote: Snail N9
        Yes? And here (on VO) "Boris55" has been broadcasting for the second year

        Something I did not understand you, who should I answer, you or Boris? Moreover, I did not even understand whether you agree with Boris or not? Or is this your second alias?)
    3. +6
      14 January 2020 10: 56
      Quote: Less
      In Russia, life began to improve when the IMF and other similar organizations were denied the right to demand something and advise the Russian authorities.

      Not certainly in that way. Yes, Russia was able to pay off its debts to the IMF ahead of schedule and reduce the amount of debt on interest, but we have not yet managed to get rid of the custody of the IMF. The IMF imposed its rules as it does. On pension reform (raising the age) and raising the VAT from 18 to 22%, recommendations from the IMF were received by the Russian government in 2017, and these recommendations were implemented in 2018. For the sake of fairness, it must be admitted that the IMF recommended raising the VAT to 22%, but the "Medvedevs", so as not to fiercely before the citizens, decided to demonstrate "obstinacy" and raised it to 20%. Now the government is conscientiously fulfilling the recommendations of the IMF on the second wave of privatization. More details here
      http://katyusha.org/view?id=13455&utm_source=finobzor.ru
      1. 0
        14 January 2020 11: 17
        Despite the fact that in general I have a negative attitude to those reforms that you cited as an example, I have my own point of view on some of them.
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        On pension reform (increase in age)

        Without justifying the government, I’ll still note that maintaining the retirement age and increasing pensions is possible only with continuous population growth. As soon as population growth stops, raising the retirement age becomes a matter of time. But the demographic failure of the 90s is not possible to overcome within one generation. So I would not exaggerate here the importance of the IMF recommendations.
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        and increase VAT

        The increase in taxes again relies more on two other factors. The first is all kind of social, and the second is that a fairly large number of the population consider it a feat not to pay taxes. At the same time, without a twinge of conscience, it uses those social services that the state is still able to provide.
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        IMF recommendations on the second wave of privatization

        I was not interested in this question, so I will leave it without comment.
      2. +4
        14 January 2020 13: 30
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        For the sake of fairness, it must be admitted that the IMF recommended raising the VAT to 22%, but the "Medvedevs", so as not to fiercely before the citizens, decided to demonstrate "obstinacy" and raised it to 20%.

        But at least for the sake of objectivity, say that we have stolen the IMF recommendations a long time ago, because we do not ask for loans from them, but we ourselves are members of this organization, and even somehow influence their policies. All domestic decisions in the country are the initiative of our government, which sometimes does not lend itself to a reasonable explanation, but tying it to the IMF is at least naive, given our gold and foreign exchange reserves. Even China does not shy much to overthrow the IMF and US hegemony in the economic sense, realizing that everything will be bad if the dollar collapses completely and the US government refuses to pay its unsecured pieces of paper with the faces of the presidents.
        So no need to nod at the IMF - we have our own cranks in the government, and what they do without IMF recommendations is obvious to me, judging by the fact that Kudrin again gives "recommendations" to Putin. They simply refer to the opinion of the IMF, while they themselves push their illiterate ideas on the sly.
    4. +2
      14 January 2020 12: 04
      Quote: Less
      In Russia, life began to improve when the IMF and other similar organizations were denied the right to demand something and advise the Russian authorities.

      And despite the fact that "the IMF was denied the right to demand and advise the Russian authorities," the retirement age was raised precisely in accordance with the requirements / recommendations of the IMF. How disobedient we are! It's just a coincidence.
      1. 0
        14 January 2020 12: 23
        Quote: McAr
        And despite the fact that "the IMF was refused

        A little higher, I clarified my point of view exactly on the question you are interested in.
        1. +3
          14 January 2020 13: 02
          Oh, this IMF! Right now, through the mouth of the State Duma Deputy from United Russia, Sergei Vostretsov, the IMF ( wink ) suggested making housewives pay taxes, as they are, according to the IMF ( wink ), are self-employed. This Vostretsov said in an interview with the agency Rosbalt.

          The parliamentarian noted that housewives do not belong to any social category. They are not disabled, students and have already left maternity leave. “But for benefits and in the clinic they are the first to break. Maybe then they will be provided with this according to the residual principle? ”, Vostretsov asks a question.

          He noted that, according to him, about 20 million people in Russia evade paying taxes and offered to track them down. “Do they have no children, no TIN, are they not moving? So let's look after them, ”the deputy said. Vostretsov also said that teachers and doctors have low salaries because of unscrupulous taxpayers, since the budget does not receive “trillions of rubles”.

          You see, the IMF (wink) found the reason for the poverty of Russians - "housewives do not pay taxes." So we will impose taxes on them, and then on dogs and cats, taxes and fines, as malicious tax evaders, using the benefits of the owners and "then we will live." Yes.
          1. -1
            14 January 2020 13: 46
            Quote: Snail N9
            in Russia, about 20 million people evade taxes

            I do not know about the IMF, but 20 million taxpayers is a serious increase to the budget. And they themselves and their children enjoy the benefits that the state provides at the expense of those citizens who pay taxes. And accordingly, they worsen the quality of services for law-abiding taxpayers. With regards to "housewives", this also has its own logic. There is such a thing as parental leave, maternity leave. This is enough to some extent. But why, for example, as a taxpayer, should I provide free medical care for a healthy, able-bodied person, just because this person is a "housewife"? Why should I provide from my taxes the opportunity to receive education and the same medical assistance for children of a healthy, able-bodied, but not working "housewife"? Let a person have many children, but this person will work and then it will turn out that from "each according to his ability" in relation to taxes. This is normal. But providing social benefits for an outright lazy person is both unprofitable and immoral and unfair. We must either make him work, or deny him social equality, if he is a healthy, able-bodied person.
            1. -1
              14 January 2020 15: 33
              Right. And we also have homeless people - they are out, every day they rummage through the garbage cans and drag aluminum cans from there, collect paper, scrap metal and hand it over for MONEY! FOR MONEY, Karl! And without paying taxes on the money received! And some even help in stalls-shops to carry something there, unload, load and again without paying taxes on the food they receive there! This is how much the budget loses in tax revenues from this category of citizens! Disorder. However, it is difficult to tax them - go and find out how much they get and earn there. But there are more and more homeless people every year. Therefore, I suggest that all citizens of Russia, upon reaching 18 years of age, automatically assign the status of "self-employed" and let them either pay this tax at a flat rate, like for a patent, or prove that they study somewhere and are not subject to taxation, serve or they already pay taxes as workers or as entrepreneurs-owners, on a different scale of taxation, then there will be complete fairness and fullness of the budget. wassat
              1. 0
                14 January 2020 15: 40
                Quote: Snail N9
                And we also have homeless people

                That's what the market economy does with people - you offer to take a tax on the homeless, but for example I have another proposal - to attach them to the case, even if forcibly. And for the homeless, it is more useful for society.
                Quote: Snail N9
                I suggest that all citizens of Russia, upon reaching 18 years of age, automatically assign the status of "self-employed"

                And in fact it is, all citizens who have reached the age of 18 are divided into dependents (these are students, if anything), working and unemployed. And in this case, the "unemployed" is the same "housewife" who receives all the social benefits without benefiting society.
                1. +1
                  14 January 2020 15: 56
                  The benefit to society, the Motherland is the main thing! Already, a draft law on "Presumption of consent to posthumous donation" is being prepared. A very useful law - even after their death, citizens will serve as spare parts for their homeland. The state will be able to either sell their organs for currency, which is very necessary for the state, or save a sick official who is very useful to the state and possibly other wealthy citizens, or, whoever is there in the queue for transplantation, will get something to repair his body.
                  https://ria.ru/20191231/1563037401.html wassat
                  1. 0
                    14 January 2020 16: 06
                    Quote: Snail N9
                    The benefit to society, the homeland is the main thing!

                    Is it not so?
                    Quote: Snail N9
                    Now, a draft law is being prepared

                    Well, excuse me, but "a draft law is being prepared" - this is still the level of gossip, I see no reason to even discuss it.
              2. 0
                15 January 2020 12: 10
                According to visual observations, homeless people, on the contrary, became much less.
  3. 0
    14 January 2020 08: 33
    A very dangerous game of lawmakers. As a result, there can be not only just a massive purchase of Ukrainian lands by Poles, Romanians, Hungarians, etc., but also just their withdrawal from circulation in order to eliminate Ukrainian food competition in the food market of Western Europe. hi
  4. +2
    14 January 2020 08: 48
    Russians are coming..
    buy everything said gold
    I’ll take everything said damask.
    Fear Buryat in a padded jacket.
  5. +2
    14 January 2020 08: 57
    And, in fact, so what? The main thing at the level of law is to leave the mechanism of land confiscation in case of inefficient use. Then it will be possible to sell the same thing several times ..
  6. 0
    14 January 2020 09: 06
    It would be great if it turned out to be True!
  7. 0
    14 January 2020 09: 22
    Moreover, if for other owners there is a restriction on the purchase of 10 thousand hectares, then for financial institutions, including foreign ones, it is absent as such
    Tear Ukraine apart like an Ace warmer.
  8. 0
    14 January 2020 09: 33
    The main thing is to introduce a ban on the sale of land to foreigners! This is important, then the head will not hurt. There is a lot of land in Russia, just like in Ukraine, but what kind of yield per hectare does soy, rapeseed, wheat, corn, sunflower grow there? In Ukraine, good crops of these crops are in the center, and the land is the most expensive there, as well as local farmers and agricultural holdings themselves dream of buying everything.
  9. 0
    14 January 2020 09: 56
    Got a photo

    If you compare two politicians with an interval of 100 years, it becomes interesting
    1. -1
      14 January 2020 11: 47
      And what is the comparison, what did you want to say?
      1. 0
        14 January 2020 14: 19
        If you want to reflect, I recommend the link: https://khersonline.net/lenta/151669-zhertva-revolyucii-ili-zaschitnik-nacionalnyh-interesov-poydet-li-zelenskiy-po-stopam-kerenskogo.html
  10. 0
    14 January 2020 10: 56
    Do you think that Zelensky will also run away in a "woman's dress"?
    Another confirmation that banks rule the world. Earth. which has become a mortgage, can be sold to anyone. And in whose hands banks and finances. It is not necessary to explain. I think that in the Rada NOBODY proposed an amendment to ban the use of land as collateral. Although it would still not have passed
  11. 0
    14 January 2020 12: 08
    When will the Russian Empire begin to acquire land? what is needed for this? Crimea alone is somehow not enough for a world power!
    1. -1
      14 January 2020 12: 17
      Is 1/6 of land small? Do you have fogged glasses?
      1. 0
        14 January 2020 12: 25
        off-topic answer winked and on your question I’ll say that there are not enough warm edges.
  12. +1
    14 January 2020 12: 51
    Well, right in the subject ... well, what did they want ...
  13. 0
    14 January 2020 22: 50
    ... and sell. But already cheaper.
  14. +1
    19 January 2020 15: 40
    Of course he’ll buy it! And the power will still be pro-Russian. Mentality and
    The basic foundations of worldview and culture are so close that it’s even a sin to say that these nations are different nations.
    1. Maj
      0
      19 January 2020 15: 43
      Quote: gridasov
      Mentality and
      The basic foundations of worldview and culture are so close that it’s even a sin to say that these nations are different nations.

      Just the mentality of Little Russians and Great Russians is completely different. Diametrically opposite even.
      And the mentality of Ruthenians (Galicians) and Litvinians, it is even further from the mentality of Great Russians.
      1. +1
        19 January 2020 15: 47
        we put different meanings in this concept. Moreover, if you carefully consider that it is not the Ukrainians who seek to secede from Russia, but Russia creates all the conditions for exclusion. In addition, Galicians are now so diluted with other principles that talking about their potential is stupid. And then money compensates for all aspects!
        1. Maj
          0
          19 January 2020 15: 52
          Quote: gridasov
          it is not Ukrainians who seek to secede from Russia

          Ukrainians seek to secede from Russia. And always sought. At the first opportunity.
          The only ones who want to live together, but not only with Russia, but in general, with everyone, as before in the USSR, are Soviet. Russia no longer has any supporters in Ukraine.
          Quote: gridasov
          talking about their potential is stupid.

          You are wrong.
          Quote: gridasov
          And then money compensates for all aspects!

          And you are mistaken in this.
          1. +1
            19 January 2020 15: 56
            I’m never mistaken! Only you will not have the opportunity to check it!
  15. +1
    19 January 2020 16: 19
    We consider the process, and if we use the appropriate terminology, then as soon as the Ukrainians feel that all the places on the planet are already occupied and in order to defend their place as pieces of earth and what they call their identity, and behind the soul there is only confusion and loss of all identity. So they will immediately go look for a wing under which they can be saved. It is not worth telling how many applicants and methods of seizing the territories of present-day Ukraine. Russia is now in the place of a philosophical image that they hate for all the good deeds that it, as a historical image of statehood, did decades ago. Therefore, there is biblical wisdom - do not bring good or evil. Do what your heart tells you in certain circumstances and at that moment in time when this can be done.
  16. 0
    20 January 2020 20: 02
    So this is Russia. It turns out that Russia will buy Russia. Meaning?