"Battleships will deal with them": in the US on the fight against the "battering rams" of Russian ships

156

USS Iowa


The American public has shown increased attention to the incident in the Arabian Sea. According to the Pentagon, the Russian reconnaissance ship Ivan Hurs made a “dangerous rapprochement” with the USS Farragut destroyer (DDG-99). Many Western publications reproach the military personnel of the Russian Federation for irresponsible behavior, seeing in it intimidation with a battering ram.



Thus, The War Zone believes that "ships of this size maneuver relatively slowly, which increases the risk of a serious and potentially fatal accident when they are in such close proximity." In general, readers of this portal share the opinion of this publication.

They [Russians] may simply not have discipline and / or vaccinated military professionalism. Russian troops are still mostly made up of conscripts, aren't they? (spookysquirrel).


In a normal universe, spy ships are a bit more secretive than this one (edcoolio).


Russians have become increasingly impudent lately (Jet_whisperer).


Many commentators voiced the “cliche” that has formed in the West regarding the Russian Navy thanks to the efforts of the press:

Perhaps they just wanted to have a good look at the warship that was sailing without a smokescreen. This should be interesting for them (F12berlinetta).


Fake news - I doubt that it was a ship of the Russian Navy. I do not see any accompanying tugboat (Zenit Yaho).



Incident with Ivan Hurs, January 2020


The behavior of the Russian crew was seen as "childishness", supposedly peculiar to the sailors of the Russian Navy:

Just another day at sea with the Russians [...] In the last two deployments, we had similar skirmishes with them. The most recent case was with Deleted [June 2019]. My commander threw his coffee cup at them from the wing of the bridge (SeaWookie).


A number of readers have suggested how to deal with similar problems that arise during the naval confrontation:

Next time, lower the boat and [from its side] break through the hull with a baseball bat (Joinupdriver).


I am for pulling out a couple of Iowas [battleships that have become museums], one for the South China Sea and one for the Russians if they want to fool around with bumpers (Binderman).


I wonder if the 5-inch HVP [127 mm Mark 45 mount] can flash such a target? (Cluebat Vanexodar).


Why didn't the captain order a few warning shots from 25 mm cannons? (Mrcrea).


Some Russian reconnaissance ship is too close to the American destroyer, I repeat - the destroyer. What the heck? Is this a real destroyer or an inflatable boat, for God's sake? (StealthFan).



Bulk of the "Selfless" at USS Yorktown, February 1988
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    156 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +19
      January 12 2020
      Which country, such and comments fool fool Against their battleship on "Ivan Khurs" there may be something larger than a tank gun negative
      1. +10
        January 12 2020
        More battleships are needed, more)))
        1. +32
          January 12 2020
          The American public has shown increased attention to the incident in the Arabian Sea. According to the Pentagon, the Russian reconnaissance ship Ivan Hurs made a “dangerous rapprochement” with the USS Farragut destroyer (DDG-99).

          The Americans, as usual, break the rules and yell the most. Judging by the video, we were going to overlap the course of our ship, which they had from the starboard side. Therefore, the American destroyer "Farragut" had dangerous maneuvers in neutral waters. To make it clearer, there is a similar rule "interference from the right".
      2. +59
        January 12 2020
        Quote: Thrifty
        Which country, such and comments

        In such articles, the selection of comments is always biased. If Americans read comments from VO, they will also be impressed. Sometimes it is written that you generally doubt the adequacy of a person. Therefore, when you read articles that provide comments from the network, this should not cause a normal person anything but a smirk.
        1. +6
          January 13 2020
          Quote: kjhg
          If Americans read VO comments,

          well-deserved comments !!! they are second after Hitler to destroy people ... and maybe the first already !!! request
      3. Hog
        +14
        January 12 2020
        Against their battleship on "Ivan Khurs" there may be something larger than a tank gun

        Just for fun, what could be on a reconnaissance ship, what could disable a battleship?
        1. +1
          January 12 2020
          team of clowns - make fun of death!
        2. -4
          January 12 2020
          Only the option with 50-100 tons of TNT along the side comes to mind ...
        3. +20
          January 12 2020
          Quote: Hog
          Against their battleship on "Ivan Khurs" there may be something larger than a tank gun

          Just for fun, what could be on a reconnaissance ship, what could disable a battleship?

          advanced network-centric system
          Snow Maiden rides in a jeep. It hurts 600. Come out bros:
          - Well, Snow Maiden, pay.
          - Right now, guys, I’ll call Grandfather Frost. He knows my finances.
          After 10 minutes, a crowd of jeeps flies up. Guys fall out of them
          athletic physique and begin to peel the mates out of 600 in full,
          got into jeeps and drove off.
          These get up:
          - What is it, Snow Maiden? Did Santa Claus say?
          - Santa Claus could not come. He is his
          scumbags sent.
        4. +15
          January 12 2020
          Quote: Hog
          Just for fun, what could be on a reconnaissance ship, what could disable a battleship?

          So no matter what, with the exception of the presence of will, spirit and confidence that one should rest on a just cause, which the mattresses do not have a priori, since they serve for money. If our sailors go, then the mattresses on any swim. Yes
        5. +4
          January 12 2020
          If the destroyer sinks the Russian reconnaissance ship, then it can catch its military base. There it will be repainted and renamed. It may not be in time, or the repainted one may sink as soon as it leaves the sea. According to unspoken international rules.
          1. +14
            January 12 2020
            And maybe not in time. Sail, and then there is no base already. winked
            1. -19
              January 13 2020
              But you will not know about this anymore, your house will no longer be either, naturally with you ..
              1. +4
                January 13 2020
                Quote: Cyrus
                But you will not know about this anymore, your house will no longer be either, naturally with you ..

                it is doubtful ... also taking into account the fact that they had air defense / missile defense at the level of 0,0, and they serve their nuclear component with one set of tools !!! wassat
              2. 0
                January 16 2020
                but nothing, the Iranians know everything. Such formidable warriors,
                so much so. The main thing is for diapers to be changed on time.
        6. The comment was deleted.
        7. -4
          January 13 2020
          Robot Fedya.
        8. 0
          January 14 2020
          Quote: Hog
          what could be on a reconnaissance ship that could disable a battleship?

          Do you really assume that ships, as parts of the territories of their countries, will begin to sink each other in the open sea? Even the exchange of shots from automatic defense systems against each other is already an occasion for breaking diplomatic relations and declaring war ....
          1. Hog
            0
            January 14 2020
            Before commenting, read the previous comment.
            1. 0
              January 14 2020
              Quote: Hog
              Before commenting, read the previous comment.

              Yes, this whole topic is a continuous phantasmagoria ....
              1. Hog
                0
                January 14 2020
                Quote: Den717
                Quote: Hog
                Before commenting, read the previous comment.

                Yes, this whole topic is a continuous phantasmagoria ....

                Well, why are you developing it?
                1. 0
                  January 14 2020
                  Quote: Hog
                  Well, why are you developing it?

                  Do you like to fantasize about impossible things?
                  1. Hog
                    0
                    January 14 2020

                    Do you like to fantasize about impossible things?

                    Where are my fantasies at all (I didn’t notice anything, can I quote)?
                    1. 0
                      January 14 2020
                      Quote: Hog
                      And where are my fantasies at all

                      On battleships ...
      4. +26
        January 12 2020
        Quote: Thrifty
        Which country, such and comments

        Well, the less educated citizens of the state, the easier it is to graze them, cut their hair and milk them.
        Next time, lower the boat and [from its side] break through the hull with a baseball bat (Joinupdriver).

        Unblock your head with a baseball bat. fool
        I wonder if the 5-inch HVP [127 mm Mark 45 mount] can flash such a target? (Cluebat Vanexodar).

        I wonder if Caliber or Onyx will fly back ... how far away from the remnants of the ship will female pads fly?
        1. +5
          January 12 2020
          Quote: NEXUS
          Unblock your head with a baseball bat.

          Americans already do foil sides along the way, if they argue
      5. +3
        January 12 2020
        Near the "Ivan Khurs" there may be something much larger, from which the mattress battleship will deflate like a rubber boat.
        1. +7
          January 12 2020
          Ivan Khurs may have something more powerful than the well-known "Khibiny". And not only navigation and detection and tracking systems will go out for these destroyers, but also something ... like the main power plant. Binoculars can also "go out". There is such a thing in the optical (light) range as a stroboscope works. Shown already. And the Sumerians complained about it. :)
      6. The comment was deleted.
      7. -1
        January 13 2020
        "What country, such are the comments ...", and I read it and thought: God, how much we have in common ... We have 9 out of 10 comments in a similar situation are absolutely identical. Apparently, the number of “clever men” and couch warriors in our countries is approximately the same.
      8. +2
        January 13 2020
        Yes, we have about the same comments on similar cases. :-)
    2. -64
      January 12 2020
      After all, they can sink us ...
      1. +54
        January 12 2020
        They say you do not drown
        1. +8
          January 12 2020
          Quote: kit88
          They say you do not drown

          It does not swim and does not sink ... Shit it is!
      2. +14
        January 12 2020
        Quote: Diversant Holuy
        After all, they can sink us ...

        Well yes, belay we are on warships ... we take tourists for fishing
        1. +30
          January 12 2020
          If you look closely at the footage, you can see that the plots have been reversed. It was the American destroyer that cut our "Ivan Khurs" (watch the second half of the plot, it should be the first) from its left side, having our ship on its right side. And the moment of overtaking, when our ship ended up in the wake of the US destroyer, was put in the first part of this "assembly gluing". Look carefully and everything will become obvious to you.
          It is the Americans who regularly cut and provoke our ships on the high seas, and then, after installation, they squeal to the whole world.
          Look at the wake of the American in the first part of the plot - it is clearly visible there that he just cropped.
          1. +14
            January 12 2020
            Quote: bayard
            Look at the wake of the American in the first part of the plot - it is clearly visible there that he just cropped.

            About the interference on the right, in this situation, only some Americans make surprised eyes ...
          2. +1
            January 13 2020
            "If you look closely at the footage, you can see that the plots have been reversed."
            Absolutely.
            And the parts of the video were reversed, probably so that they could lie handy.
      3. +20
        January 12 2020
        Quote: Saboteur Holuay
        After all, they can sink us ...

        YOU can’t, you have 2 tugboats left, and they’re not on the move ... Yes, and you don’t sail more in the seas, just jump in ....
      4. +2
        January 13 2020
        And you do not go to our ships with your battleships.
    3. +5
      January 12 2020
      “The battleships will deal with them” winked Wait for Iowa? :))
      1. +15
        January 12 2020
        with Seagal and Tommy Lee Jones on board !!! Hello! hi
        1. +16
          January 12 2020
          Quote: novel xnumx
          with Seagal and Tommy Lee Jones on board !!! Hello! hi

          Roma hi , Steven Seagal is a citizen of Russia, so it is not known who will be "Under siege" bully

          1. +6
            January 12 2020
            our man on board doesn’t interfere with hello! hi
          2. +5
            January 12 2020
            That is, we have a citizen of the Russian Federation who owns martial arts and has already passed the initial training for operations on these ships. And whether it is seizure or its prevention, it is already secondary. The galley will blow them up and the whole crew will die of hunger laughing
            1. 0
              January 14 2020
              We don’t have enough of our clowns, so we still lure the foreign characters ...
          3. +2
            January 12 2020
            And he bought an apartment on the Lighthouse of Minsk.
          4. -1
            January 12 2020
            And I wonder when Iowa in the residential neighborhoods of Beirut, in the 80s, hollowed the main caliber, carried American shit, and when the movie went to the last parking lot, the captain was killed there ... Was this the captain historically, or was replaced?
        2. +2
          January 13 2020
          Roma, there was Missouri.
          1. +2
            January 13 2020
            coped with the "missouri" will cope with the "iowa"
      2. +2
        January 12 2020
        And we will send one well-known cruiser from St. Petersburg to them in return. They have only one look of it all the toilet paper immediately run out. And if he still smells once - the local niggas will immediately get all the junk out of the stores.
        1. +2
          January 13 2020
          Quote: Rusticolus
          And if he still smells once -

          it would be more logical to assume that the revolution will begin at the merikatos !! wassat wink
    4. +8
      January 12 2020
      However, "interference from the right" must be passed. soldier
      1. +9
        January 12 2020
        Quote: gurzuf
        However, "interference from the right" must be passed. soldier

        Are you the same Americans !!!!! They should all be passed, including beacons !!! wassat And ours they take and omit, the hegemon is doing bad things.
      2. -15
        January 12 2020
        A little untruth or “under-registration” and everything is turned upside down in the best style of the famous German pre-war propagandist!
        "However, the" interference from the right "must be passed."
        Yes it is! If they are alone. But Amer was escort ships, the aircraft carrier Truman was on the left of the amer, and Amer could not miss the Russian ship between himself and the aircraft carrier. Well, the captain of the Russian ship could not see the aircraft carrier (unless it was made using stealth technology, although I doubt it). They just showed once again Russian indifference.
        1. +11
          January 12 2020
          "But the Amer was escorting ships, the aircraft carrier Truman was on the left of the Amer." I wonder how far our board was from the airplane shed? Was he going to lapping? And what prevented the escort seiner (who had a higher speed of movement compared to our reconnaissance ship) to stand between ours and his own in the middle, having entered from the starboard side on the course from ours without this hooligan trick, and then leveling up speed with our noble ship, politely pushing him back from your barn with planes? Well, the American commander of the formation could not fail to calculate this (unless only if he was not sober). Now I'm not surprised that pind ... our partners could have rammed the lighthouse.
        2. 0
          January 14 2020
          But it is clear that he missed to his aircraft carrier, leaving ours on the left side behind him (left shell). So what's the point of not missing it? Like, "the passage to the aircraft carrier just behind me"?
    5. BAI
      +9
      January 12 2020
      Russians have become increasingly impudent lately (Jet_whisperer).

      And the fact that the States have long become infinitely impudent - nothing?
    6. HAM
      +37
      January 12 2020
      ".... My commander threw his coffee cup at them from the bridge wing (SeaWookie)."

      And if in response a faceted glass flies in a cup holder with hot strong tea!? ... didn’t think?
      1. +6
        January 12 2020
        Quote: HAM
        ".... My commander threw his coffee cup at them from the bridge wing (SeaWookie)."

        And if in response a faceted glass flies in a cup holder with hot strong tea!? ... didn’t think?

        It only remains for the Yankees that next time to produce an airborne salvo from coffee cups! Yes
        1. +4
          January 12 2020
          Eureka, it will not work, because they have long been drinking coffee in their paper cups. But the coffee machine is a terrible thing! And that intersection wrote about the cup for the sake of a red word. Well for weight.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +2
            January 12 2020
            Quote: sabakina
            Eureka, it will not work, because they have long been drinking coffee in their paper cups. But the coffee machine is a terrible thing! And that intersection wrote about the cup for the sake of a red word. Well for weight.

            Vyacheslav hi I’ll forget all the time that they’re not human! request Yankees, in a word, a dead end branch of civilization! Yes
            1. +2
              January 13 2020
              "..a dead end branch of civilization ..." Descendants of cattle and rabble, excreted by Europe.
    7. +11
      January 12 2020
      So, The War Zone believes that "ships of such sizes are relatively slow in maneuvering, which increases the risk of a serious and potentially fatal accident when they are in such close proximity."
      And no one mentions compliance with shipping regulations
      1. +8
        January 12 2020
        The rules of the islands are changed at their discretion, they are an exceptional nation. I propose to exclude them from the inhabitants of the planet earth) wassat
        1. +5
          January 12 2020
          Not only and not so many Americans, how many Anglo-Saxons! This is an infection on the body of the planet. Alas, it’s true.
    8. +10
      January 12 2020
      Some Russian reconnaissance ship is too close to the American destroyer, I repeat - the destroyer. What the heck? Is this a real destroyer or an inflatable boat, for God's sake? (StealthFan).

      Now, if you, a sofa cowboy, were sitting in this inflatable boat, after the incident, it is unlikely that you would pound yourself on the chest crying
      1. +4
        January 12 2020
        Good health, Buddy hi Apparently one decided that he was Gulliver, but the suspender strings were not enough for him, or maybe the length was not the same, but they might break.
        1. +7
          January 12 2020
          R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№ hi Boat number 17 from "The Secret of Two Oceans" and let them go to the intersection of the course. The fire ships in the navy have not yet been buried.
          1. +3
            January 12 2020
            you are kind of evil ..
            1. +7
              January 12 2020
              Roma hi And what do we do? It was before us, in the 14th century! wink
              1. +3
                January 12 2020
                smacks of excuse ...
                1. +8
                  January 12 2020
                  And there is nothing to arrange an unscheduled exam. So wait, the sailor after the holiday will explain to you the history of the use of firewalls in the Navy. am
                2. +7
                  January 12 2020
                  hi I agree, everything was destroyed before us. Yes
                  1. +7
                    January 12 2020
                    Is there anything left? recourse
                    you are kind of evil ..
                    drinks
              2. +7
                January 12 2020
                Quote: Svarog51
                Roma hi And what do we do? It was before us, in the 14th century! wink

                Sergei hi Well, we are. smile
                1. +7
                  January 12 2020
                  R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№ hi This Roma does not believe. There are no questions for you. good
                  1. +7
                    January 12 2020
                    Hello Sergey hi I think that "Thomas the Unbeliever" is not for Roma, look, otherwise we will both get it. laughing
                    1. +7
                      January 12 2020
                      It’s not against two. Two battalions are more than one. We have nothing at all, we are for the Motherland and for our families. feel
                      1. +2
                        January 12 2020
                        de la merde! la garde meurt mais n'abandonne pas
                        there you are!
                        1. +7
                          January 12 2020
                          No need to swear in a foreign language. You will be like D "Artagnan in a duel. The weapon is vodka. You will lose to two. tongue
                        2. +2
                          January 12 2020
                          Is it me ?? and one - Vital ?? come out to fight
                        3. +8
                          January 12 2020
                          Tomorrow after 19-00 in the same place. Take the seconds. drinks
                        4. +3
                          January 12 2020
                          then no chance at all ... guess who will be
                        5. +6
                          January 12 2020
                          There will be everything, because tomorrow is the Old New Year. One against all? Health is not enough.
                        6. +3
                          January 12 2020
                          not afraid!!! the second will help in every way
                        7. +7
                          January 12 2020
                          He will only offer; he cannot vouch for the consequences.
                        8. +2
                          January 12 2020
                          bad you know him ... to bring ..
                        9. +8
                          January 12 2020
                          Enough, look, that did not break. laughing
                        10. +2
                          January 12 2020
                          so that I blunder ??
                        11. +8
                          January 12 2020
                          The main thing - do not miss!
    9. +3
      January 12 2020
      In pair, Khurs urgently needs an icebreaker
      1. +3
        January 12 2020
        hole punch rather
    10. +5
      January 12 2020
      It’s time for the United States to get rid of the shores and borders of the Russian Federation, otherwise their impudence will end with the closure of America ...
    11. +3
      January 12 2020
      The Americans are completely overwhelmed ...
    12. +6
      January 12 2020
      My commander threw his coffee cup at them from the wing of the bridge.
      Strong wassat
      1. +7
        January 12 2020
        Strong

        Die Hard lol
      2. +3
        January 12 2020
        Apparently he was ashamed to show his reasons. I decided to use a coffee cup. wink
        1. +1
          January 12 2020
          In this incident, US Navy also turned out to be a victim, having suffered damage equal to the price of a statutory statutory standard coffee mug.
          By the way, large fines are imposed for throwing garbage overboard.
        2. +1
          January 12 2020
          It would be something to show lol
        3. +3
          January 12 2020
          maybe a woman? hi there hi
          1. +1
            January 12 2020
            Roma prYuvet? Who will disassemble them now? I'm sitting here, listening to the Russian group "Plasma" ... But handsome guys ...
            1. +7
              January 12 2020
              and I love the Swedes "SABATON" !!!
    13. +2
      January 12 2020
      "Battleships will deal with them": in the US on the fight against the "battering rams" of Russian ships

      We look forward to, From the battleship, the fish will set up many bright houses for themselves. feel
    14. +2
      January 12 2020
      Someday all these "approximations" will end badly. I don’t see the point of “showing off”. Always the lot of the weak. On the road, usually such karma quickly overtakes. Is not it?
      1. +1
        January 12 2020
        Quote: Romka
        Is not it?

        No .. you just need to know the whole story ..
        Three years ago, exactly the same situation was with Yarik. In Middle-earth. There, Burke, under the command of a woman’s cap, caught up with and cut off our guard ... And why all ..? Because the AUG guard found him in the line of sight ..
        And then the reconnaissance ship, hung its ears .. It was necessary to squeeze it out earlier, and not when I saw it in the optics .., but the preservation of AUG as always ...
        1. 0
          January 12 2020
          You yourself answered: the reason for the aggressiveness is "keeping the AUG". They have it. And we have? USA if that and "will not notice the loss of a soldier." But Russia is not doing well in the navy these days. For now, anyway.
          1. +4
            January 12 2020
            Quote: Romka
            the reason for the aggressiveness is "preservation of AUG"

            The reason is aggressive or unprofessionalism or sloppiness .. And the howl is heard from the USA .. our simply refer to the rules of shipping .. In any case .. finding an enemy ship in optics means one thing .. a pack of anti-ship missiles is already flying to you .. because of this such a reaction esma from guarding avik ..
      2. 0
        January 12 2020
        Quote: Romka
        On the road, usually such karma quickly overtakes. Is not it?

        1. The road is different. Here they met in the sea 2a of the military.
        2.
        A song about a proud bird rattled in their lion's roar,
        the rocks trembled from their blows, the sky trembled from the formidable
        songs:
        “We sing glory to the madness of the brave.
        The madness of the brave is the wisdom of life!


        Stupid penguin shyly hides
        a fat body in the cliffs ... Only proud
        The petrel flies boldly and freely
        over the gray-haired sea of ​​foam!

        3. This is not a show off.
        Quote: Romka
        Always the lot of the weak.

        Yes, now we are weak. Only this is not our "destiny"
        And do you ask the sailors how the strong Americans behaved (and behave), especially in 1990-95?

        Threat. author, please pass to the portal, comments left by spookysquirrel, edcoolio, Jet_whisperer, F12berlinetta, Zenit Yaho, etc.
        You still answer us for Kuzyu
        Well, like they didn’t look, or what?
    15. +3
      January 12 2020
      The Russians became arrogant, that’s their key thought.
      1. +2
        January 12 2020
        It is surprising that no one wrote that the Russians were trying to attack ...
    16. +16
      January 12 2020
      In general, the destroyer is faster in the video (is it the video from it?), Then the question is who crossed the course, a slow reconnaissance, or a fast destroyer ?! fool
      The situation is like in a joke about the ice rink and the Mercedes: well, tell me how you overtook, how you cut it? laughing
      In short, as usual: he framed himself, he blamed himself! negative
      1. +1
        January 12 2020
        Quote: Eroma
        In short, as usual: he framed himself, he blamed himself!

        So after all, this is their credo, especially recently. To organize a provocation, which would then be blamed for aggression. Although, even in frames from this destroyer, it is the American side that blows aggression.
        PS: this style is also adopted by all their henchmen, especially the "newcomers".
      2. +8
        January 12 2020
        In the second fragment of the video, by the way, you hear how the destroyer adds speed, the whistle of the turbines changes.
        It seems to have overtaken the “Khurs”, went in front of its bow, and abruptly dropped the course, substituting the stern. On "Khurs" they reacted in time and competently, turning to the left, supplying the starboard side under the destroyer's wake jet, which threw our ship aside. The American, seeing that the setup did not work, gave gas and went into the lead.
        It seems to me, but on the basis of my navigational experience.
    17. +4
      January 12 2020
      The usual "pumping" of the layman! From all sides to the same.
      Choices, elections, all candidates ..... change their ..... cockroaches!
    18. CYM
      +5
      January 12 2020
      The skill and modesty of American military "ships" have long been known to everyone.
    19. +1
      January 12 2020
      Quote: Hog
      Just for fun, what could be on a reconnaissance ship, what could disable a battleship?

      A slingshot with acorns and injuries, there the crew is mostly civilian, there are more translators than sailors.
    20. +3
      January 12 2020
      The commander of the Russian ship Iron eggs! Honor and respect to him! Keep it up!
    21. +2
      January 12 2020
      But if you look at the situation from our ship, but the Americans cut our ship
    22. +3
      January 12 2020
      "My commander threw his coffee cup at them from the bridge wing (SeaWookie)."

      Glamorous ...... Well, at least not a thong)))))))
      But, in general, do not give descent anywhere - on land, in the sky, on water! (straight, poems)))))))))))
      1. 0
        January 12 2020
        So far, not all US destroyers command women
        1. +1
          January 12 2020
          Women ????? 7 Women have nothing to do with it))))))))))
    23. +4
      January 12 2020
      The Russian Ministry of Defense said that thanks to the competent actions of the crew of the Russian ship, it was possible to avoid a collision with an American destroyer in the Arabian Sea. Judging by the Defense Department's commentary, the US sailors "forgot" the rules for crossing ships. The ministry pointed out that the destroyer's crew acted unprofessionally and in violation of the 1972 convention on international rules for preventing collisions at sea.
      1. +4
        January 12 2020
        Quote: Gennady Fomkin
        US sailors "forgot" the rules for crossing ships.

        They have not forgotten; they consider themselves above all rules.
        https://youtu.be/yk9HON6Et-8
      2. -6
        January 12 2020
        There is no crossover situation here.
      3. 0
        January 12 2020
        Enough to apply such cowardly definitions - "I acted unprofessionally" What little to write to the parquet sharks, "I acted provocatively ..." Or are they afraid, what will "our western partners say?" Or are they afraid. They will not be allowed into Europe. after resignation? But real estate has already been bought there and a "warm place" of what kind of consultant on Russia at the n-th university is in store. And the children-granddaughters have been living abroad for a long time.
    24. +4
      January 12 2020
      Earlier in June, another USS Fitzgerald crashed into a cargo ship off the coast of Japan, causing the death of seven members of the American crew. Last week, his commanders were fired for incompetence following a naval investigation. In May, another US military cruiser, Lake Champlain, collided with a South Korean fishing vessel. The fourth accident occurred when the American warship Antietam ran aground off the coast of Japan. Professionals laughing
    25. +4
      January 12 2020
      However, as the last incident with the destroyer "John McCain" showed, and in the criminal negligence and incompetence of the US Navy. After all, as the American military expert rightly remarked in an interview with CNN, how “an advanced destroyer equipped with several radar systems and communications equipment” could not detect and avoid a “monster weighing 30 thousand tons that works at a low speed of 10 knots?”.
    26. +2
      January 12 2020
      Russians have become increasingly impudent lately (Jet_whisperer).

      Take your health, brave man, put things in order.
    27. +1
      January 12 2020
      theoretically, of course, a well-armored ship could provoke with impunity any situation with any modern troughs, but in fact, these are only mothballed battleships in the USA
    28. +1
      January 12 2020
      You can burst with frustration, anger and your own dope. Mattresses, prickly hedgehogs!
    29. +4
      January 12 2020
      There was information in the media that the destroyer crossed the course from the port side of our ship, therefore, according to the MPSS, it had to yield to our scout. This is clearly visible in the video. And what in this case to argue?
    30. +2
      January 12 2020
      Next time, lower the boat and [from its side] break through the hull with a baseball bat (Joinupdriver).

      Knock yourself on the forehead! Yes fellow laughing
      The last time that was offered was the small-shaven, to combat submarines. lol
    31. +1
      January 12 2020
      Yeah. The comments themselves clearly show the level of intellectual development of the authors of these opuses. lol
    32. +5
      January 12 2020
      I served in the Navy in Soviet times, the NATO people provoked me all the time, I don’t think that their psychology changed, America is always a provocation, they were born from ancestors who were pirates :)
    33. +2
      January 12 2020
      In the good old days (mid-80s) Iowa looked great on the IKO MR-10 in the Baltic Sea at a distance of guaranteed defeat ... There was no command to use ...
    34. +6
      January 12 2020
      Many commentators voiced the “cliche” that has formed in the West regarding the Russian Navy thanks to the efforts of the press:


      We need to send them our comments, let them "rejoice." laughing
    35. 0
      January 12 2020
      They (amers) were lucky that the plane did not arrive, Su24 or Su 34 with Khibiny.
    36. +1
      January 12 2020
      They did him an x-ray ?! laughing
    37. +1
      January 12 2020
      And who will collect them when they "figure it out" ???
    38. +4
      January 12 2020
      This is some kind of loser. We need to build much larger destroyers - so that they are all afraid from afar and respected. And more expensive, of course, otherwise we will always make fun of such a cheap one. More Zumvolts, comrades Americans, certainly with railguns, otherwise the road will not give way!
    39. 0
      January 12 2020
      Why is it dangerous? The big ship ahead, the little one behind, couldn’t the big one stop faster than the small one?
    40. +3
      January 12 2020
      Iowa is not on the move, and our icebreakers are ready for contacts.
    41. +1
      January 12 2020
      Daredevils right? It threw a cup! And his smelly Donald Cook after the Russian Vanya pinned him, what did not remember? How many of these daredevils on arrival at the port jerked off him and in general from the army? Hero eclmn!
    42. +1
      January 12 2020
      I do not understand, but the tasks of such ships include providing communications and fleet control, conducting reconnaissance and electronic warfare, tracking the components of the American missile defense system and air defense systems. Well, that is, purely hypothetically, our ship could not be there alone. The submarine, for example, could accompany him, being outside the range of the equipment of the American ship. Could this be? And if there was a real threat to our scout, I think we would have something to answer.
    43. The comment was deleted.
    44. +2
      January 13 2020
      Just another day at sea with the Russians [...] In the last two deployments, we had similar skirmishes with them. The most recent case was with Deleted [June 2019]. My commander threw his coffee cup at them from the wing of the bridge (SeaWookie).
      And how is he captain with such nerves? A tantrum and nothing more.
    45. +2
      January 13 2020
      The video consists of two parts, and the most interesting wink They were swapped. The destroyer first caught up with our ship, and then cut it. In a word, simple juggling.
    46. +1
      January 13 2020
      While at the top we “butted”, down the noise below. A submarine erupted ..
    47. 0
      January 13 2020
      Not the USA, but chamber number six!
    48. +1
      January 13 2020
      Honestly, it’s not clear to me why our ship maneuvered so much.
    49. +1
      January 13 2020
      The reason for the meaningless bleeding? White people have nothing to share, this set against both sides comes from Baruchov and Hilary. Their article. And yes, in the Russian Federation the reed fleet.
      While such articles are being thrown in, Siluanovs will privatize your plants.
    50. 0
      January 13 2020
      the commander threw a delicious coffee at Hursa
    51. lot
      0
      January 13 2020
      VO in its own spirit: reprinting gossip from yellow forums. the content you need.
    52. 0
      January 14 2020
      For some reason, everyone is discussing who had the interference on which side. Let's look at this matter from the other side. The Hors reconnaissance ship was in “mode” collecting intelligence information. Obviously, sharp maneuvers in “mode” are contraindicated. What should the Americans have done? Make Horse maneuver, and then, as usual, they explained everything in their own way.
    53. 0
      January 14 2020
      Why rehash fake news? After all, it has long been known that the control systems failed on the Ivan Khurs, so they could not change course and speed. Thanks to the efforts of the team, they managed to turn off the failed electronics, turn off the engine and manually change course.
    54. Hog
      0
      January 14 2020
      Quote: Den717
      Quote: Hog
      And where are my fantasies at all

      On battleships ...

      I said give a quote where I specifically fantasize.
    55. 0
      January 16 2020
      Quote: Den717
      Quote: Hog
      what could be on a reconnaissance ship that could disable a battleship?

      Do you really assume that ships, as parts of the territories of their countries, will begin to sink each other in the open sea? Even the exchange of shots from automatic defense systems against each other is already an occasion for breaking diplomatic relations and declaring war ....

      Isn’t shelling a military base with rockets a reason? No?
    56. 0
      January 16 2020
      Quote: Korg
      Why rehash fake news? After all, it has long been known that the control systems failed on the Ivan Khurs, so they could not change course and speed. Thanks to the efforts of the team, they managed to turn off the failed electronics, turn off the engine and manually change course.

      And the question, again, is not for us, but for those who violate the rules of maritime driving. And you, so brave, don’t cross the ship’s course, so as not to shit your pants later. Or, having driven into the back of a car, you will also start yelling: that you are not maintaining the speed, you are braking at the wrong time. Just change your diapers more often and don’t yell to the whole world about it, otherwise these pompous incompetents are full of stench!

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"