Confirmed information about the crash of the Mi-35 in Afghanistan

33

The American media report that a Mi-35 helicopter crashed in Afghanistan today. We are talking about a transport-attack helicopter, which was previously delivered, among others, for the Afghan Air Force.

According to some reports, the helicopter crashed in the province of Farah the day before. It is known that the Mi-35 helicopter took off from the administrative center of the specified province in the Parchaman area.



According to American media reports, both pilots died.

At the moment, there is no data on for what specific reason the Mi-35 of the Afghan Air Force crashed. But the priority version is called "technical malfunction." For some reason, the piloting error and a possible hit from the ground are out of the question.

Information about the helicopter crash is confirmed by Afghan sources.

According to the press service of the governor of the province, Mohammad Sabet, the helicopter transported ammunition for the needs of the Afghan army. It is reported, in particular, about mortars, grenades, as well as cartridges for small arms arms. There is no data on the detonation of ammunition as a result of a fall in the airborne.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    33 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +1
      9 January 2020 18: 10
      overload in the mountains is not the most optimal action (why not cargo used to deliver BC xs)
      1. -13
        9 January 2020 18: 17
        Quote: c-Petrov
        overload in the mountains is not the most optimal action (why not cargo used to deliver BC xs)
        Mines, too, are still in stock. Americans could have cut down the electronics with electronic warfare, although there is protection, but a close, powerful impact will prevail.
        1. +1
          9 January 2020 19: 26
          Quote: Mavrikiy
          Americans could ebbs electronic

          Poles could carry out repairs. They refused official service.
        2. -1
          10 January 2020 08: 27
          knock out their allies?
          1. -2
            10 January 2020 09: 04
            Quote: Nastia Makarova
            knock out their allies?

            Are you seriously? Why not? the Americans blew up their cruiser "Maine" with a crew, and they knew very well about the strike on Pearl Harble, they had previously hijacked their aircraft carriers from the base. And we got Belly's incidents.
            Why bullies in Afghanistan? God himself commanded.
            The Afghans have perfectly mastered our technology and categorically demand our rotary. Americans give money to buy them. But they are inclined to buy their own. If our Afghan-troopers begin to fall, then ......, and then the newest car. Undermine trust.
            Support for your military-industrial complex, a holy cause.
            1. -1
              10 January 2020 09: 09
              yes what nonsense))) because of the purchase of their helicopters))) helicopters are bought with American money, they also rule with purchases, they don’t have to push anything to buy
              1. -1
                10 January 2020 09: 12
                Girl, I can’t help you. Track the question on VO. Do not be stupid and do not be rude negative .
                "The Pentagon notified the US Congress of its decision to purchase from Rosoboronexport https://www.amur.kp.ru/daily/25899.4/2857235/
                12 Mi-17 helicopters for the Afghan army. 2 "turntables" have already been purchased this year to replace the crashed ones, and now another 10 rotary-wing machines are required. The amount of the deal, which provides for the maintenance of equipment and the supply of spare parts for it, is estimated at $ 217,7 million. "
                1. -2
                  10 January 2020 09: 40
                  bought and then started to drop? there is no logic
                  1. -2
                    10 January 2020 10: 52
                    Quote: Nastia Makarova
                    bought and then started to drop? there is no logic
                    Well, only those who do not want to understand anything. request
                    The logic is iron. Elimination of a competitor in the arms market. Not only in Afghanistan, but around the world. Everything is tracked.
                    1. -1
                      10 January 2020 11: 01
                      and where is the helicopter crash this competition? but not one air defense missile shot down in Iraq is a defeat defeat
                      1. -2
                        10 January 2020 11: 09
                        Quote: Nastia Makarova
                        and where is the helicopter crash this competition? but not one air defense missile shot down in Iraq is a defeat defeat

                        But the downing of missiles in Iraq, this is nonsense. And it does not cast a shadow on the US missile defense. Alas. request
                        Missile defense is several times more expensive than broken-up container houses. Negotiated guaranteed broken pots, no more.
                        1. -1
                          10 January 2020 11: 15
                          with such logic there is nothing to argue about !!! helicopter crash is nothing, and went unnoticed by the world, but missile defense. the globe is already laughing and there’s no pity for any money !!! Israel for example
                        2. -3
                          10 January 2020 11: 28
                          I agree, "with this logic" work on the sites of your Motherland and leave ours.
                        3. -1
                          10 January 2020 11: 30
                          leave if you want with our VO
      2. +8
        9 January 2020 18: 25
        In Indonesia, recently, they also almost killed the Mi-35
        1. +8
          9 January 2020 18: 29
          Today I saw it.
          Crooked hands and lack of brains.
          1. +4
            9 January 2020 18: 36
            maybe on take-off one engine failed, well, in this situation it’s still easy to get off, they won’t arrange a fleet on the helipad)))
            1. +4
              9 January 2020 18: 48
              Quote: loki565
              maybe on take-off one engine failed, well, in this situation they still got off easily, they won’t arrange a fleet on the helipad)))

              In the morning this video was thrown off by a relative whose godfather flies to Mi17 in Afghanistan, but the most interesting thing he sent it to him is video, and said to him that the schoolchildren were hijacking.
              1. mvg
                +3
                9 January 2020 20: 27
                what the students are stealing.

                schoolchildren have steel eggs and a long record of work behind them .. I applaud. stop
            2. +1
              9 January 2020 19: 18
              Quote: loki565
              maybe on takeoff one engine failed,

              He was blown away by a gust of wind. There the weather was non-flying and some queen on it decided to fly to the disaster area.
      3. +2
        9 January 2020 18: 28
        Quote: s-t Petrov
        overload in the mountains is not the most optimal action (why not cargo used to deliver BC xs)

        It’s cool and the pressure is normal and the air is dry.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. -4
      9 January 2020 18: 23
      It’s anyway, a stone in our garden!
      1. +9
        9 January 2020 18: 30
        Even if a technical malfunction - and then what have we got to do with it? Bought - service, regulations, repairs carry out.
      2. 0
        9 January 2020 19: 19
        It's your paranoia anyway)
      3. -2
        10 January 2020 08: 28
        in your garden 10 cons
    4. 0
      9 January 2020 18: 37
      Well, if not our pilots, then to hell with him ..... hi Heroin was probably transported and something was not divided ..
    5. +2
      9 January 2020 19: 07
      For information, in Afghanistan, people from the Union or the Socialist Camp fly mainly on Mi-17/35.
      There may be Russians in combat.
      1. +1
        10 January 2020 02: 02
        Maybe. But for several years now there are local crews, undergoing training, preparation and training in one of the CIS countries specifically on Mi - 8/17, - 24/35. Americans and their allies also teach.

        Many years have passed since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the number of schools has decreased everywhere, the pilots of the Soviet era, in the majority, have long been "old", in the extreme Chechen, many pilots of the "Afghans" were no longer 30 years old. And modern Russia and Ukraine have simply stopped physically training a large number of pilots.
    6. +1
      9 January 2020 19: 23
      The couple often started spinning in the new year. Over in Taiwan Chief of Staff of the Black Hawk - to smithereens
    7. 0
      9 January 2020 20: 16
      They still switch to American copters
    8. -2
      9 January 2020 20: 21
      Yankesov and do not feed bread - AT ONCE technical malfunction of the "competitors" equipment
    9. +1
      9 January 2020 21: 17
      Turntables in the highlands beat more often.
      1. -1
        10 January 2020 16: 58
        Two more Mi17 crashed in three days ..... In a week, 3 helicopters.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"