Iraq resumes negotiations on the purchase of the Russian S-300 air defense system


Iraq resumed negotiations with Russia on the purchase of S-300 anti-aircraft systems. It is reported by RIA News with reference to a statement by the head of the committee on defense and security of the Iraqi parliament Muhammad Reed.


According to the representative of the Iraqi parliament, the resumption of negotiations should have happened a long time ago, and the complexes should have already been purchased. Reed said that he does not know exactly what stage the negotiations are currently at, but the Iraqi government has definitely sanctioned them. At the same time, he noted that the US is expected to oppose this deal, as past negotiations were disrupted by the fault of Washington.

A few months ago, after the attacks on the Shiite militia bases of Al-Hashd al-Shaabi in Baghdad and other provinces, the need arose weapons and the responsible party resumed negotiations on the S-300 contract. We anticipate US opposition on this issue.

- he said.

Reed noted that some Russian systems are included in Iraq’s air defense, but they are already outdated, and the country wants to acquire modern Russian air defense systems. He stressed that the share of Russian weapons, in his opinion, in the armed forces of Iraq should exceed 50%, since it is reliable and cheaper than the US.

In May last year, Iraq’s ambassador to the Russian Federation, Haidar Mansur Hadi, announced that Iraq intends to purchase the Triumph S-400 Russian air defense systems, but did not specify a date for a possible deal.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

96 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Thrifty 9 January 2020 17: 09 New
    • 24
    • 0
    +24
    Why only the C300? Maybe Torah and Buki, and Armor sell for cash! This is a market - we will not sell, we will sell the same China
    1. marshes 9 January 2020 17: 12 New
      • 13
      • 0
      +13
      Quote: Thrifty
      Why only the C300? Maybe Torah and Buki, and Armor sell for cash! This is a market - we will not sell, we will sell the same China

      Now the point is, the buyer will not set additional requirements.
      1. Thrifty 9 January 2020 17: 14 New
        • 15
        • 0
        +15
        Bolot hi Trump played inadvertently, you need to be able to extract the maximum benefit for the military-industrial complex and the country! !!
        1. Abbot 9 January 2020 17: 18 New
          • 4
          • 5
          -1
          Reed noted that some Russian systems are included in Iraq’s air defense, but they are already outdated, and the country wants to acquire modern Russian air defense systems. He stressed that the share of Russian weapons, in his opinion, in the armed forces of Iraq should exceed 50%, since it is reliable and cheaper than the US.
          Interestingly, and Iraq has closed its skies for flights of American military aircraft and UAVs? There was a decision on the withdrawal of foreign troops, but regarding the air I did not notice the information ... Maybe I missed it ...

          And so, yes, everyone urgently needed a Russian air defense system. I would like to ask: Where have you been, dear ones? Which way did your eyes look?
          1. Shurik70 9 January 2020 19: 21 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: Thrifty
            hi Trump inadvertently played for us

            Why out of the ordinary? bully
            In anticipation of the new election, Trump wants to have time to do his maximum in pushing Central Asia to treaties with Russia. Does everything possible!
            1. cniza 9 January 2020 20: 50 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              He doesn’t just push, but pushes his patriot with his broom ...
          2. Leeds 9 January 2020 19: 39 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Quote: Abbot
            Reed noted that some Russian systems are included in Iraq’s air defense, but they are already outdated, and the country wants to acquire modern Russian air defense systems. He stressed that the share of Russian weapons, in his opinion, in the armed forces of Iraq should exceed 50%, since it is reliable and cheaper than the US.
            Interestingly, and Iraq has closed its skies for flights of American military aircraft and UAVs? There was a decision on the withdrawal of foreign troops, but regarding the air I did not notice the information ... Maybe I missed it ...

            And so, yes, everyone urgently needed a Russian air defense system. I would like to ask: Where have you been, dear ones? Which way did your eyes look?

            Iraq is for them a defeated, kneeling country. Her opinion and statements do not interest them from the word at all. And I advise the people of Iraq to recall how they lived under the bloody Tiran Saddam, and how they ran out to meet the liberators and destroyed the monuments.
            1. xGibSoNx 9 January 2020 19: 53 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              Iraq is for them a defeated, kneeling country. Her opinion and statements do not interest them from the word at all. And I advise the people of Iraq to recall how they lived under the bloody Tiran Saddam, and how they ran out to meet the liberators and destroyed the monuments.
              Apparently a country on its knees, on so many knees that it had officially put an oppressor on its knees, it states that it is time for him to bring him down! And in general, no one asks him there! I’m just wondering ?! Well, how long should you be naive, what should I write like that? Ask yourself a question that is otherwise rhetorical! What would be at all .. no! Would you even read about it if Saddam was at the helm? He was so good that he wasn’t even kneeling ... they wouldn’t even know anything ... You get a good stand .. Kneeling, you can send anyone and anywhere .. at the same time, that's all still alive!
              Well, regarding the people of Iraq .. Which part of the people of Iraq, do you advise something to remember? Or is everything simple for you! I like - the rest are not people?
          3. alexmach 9 January 2020 21: 15 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            Interestingly, and Iraq has closed its skies for flights of American military aircraft and UAVs?

            Prohibited the movement including in the airspace. In words, of course. They do not have such technical capabilities.
            1. Abbot 9 January 2020 22: 40 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: alexmach
              Prohibited the movement including in the airspace. In words, of course. They do not have such technical capabilities.

              Here it is, understandably. They are not able to control the airspace over their territory. But airfields may well block. In general, these desires to acquire systems such as S-300, they are fantasy. It is not enough to buy complexes, it is necessary to build a national air defense system. This requires power over the entire territory, the state to restore a single army. So far, they are useless to sell such systems as the S-300, in my opinion.
        2. marshes 9 January 2020 17: 19 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: Thrifty
          Trump inadvertently played for us

          Yeah.
          Yesterday, our programs were interrupted on our TVs, his speeches were broadcast in English, and even on a sports channel. Something a little kumuy, a little soul at ease, That there will be no war, we disagree!
          Here you can see our Republican man and not the undercover - Democrat smile
          So the client is ripe!
        3. demo 9 January 2020 18: 17 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Swamps hi-trump inadvertently played up to us
          You think inadvertently!
          Although .... Tc !!!!!!!
          Decipher, inadvertently, an eccentric.
      2. Nyrobsky 9 January 2020 22: 18 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: marshes
        Now the point is, the buyer will not set additional requirements.

        In general, this is true, but this does not apply to Indians who, in any matter on the acquisition of our weapons, spin like flies on glass with the goal of either dropping the price of the contract to the price of a bag of incense, or simply accepting it as a gift along with technology.
        1. Old Michael 10 January 2020 19: 23 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Nyrobsky:
          like flies on glass

          Ek, you affectionately ...
      3. bayard 9 January 2020 23: 23 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Apparently Iraq is trying to get the S-300 out of the balance sheet to expedite the purchase (S-400 must wait). The whole question is in the calculations, if they managed to prepare in our universities ahead of time, planning to purchase in the future, it’s easier. If there isn’t, then the presence of complexes without prepared calculations will give little benefit.
    2. donavi49 9 January 2020 17: 53 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      They have shells.
    3. TermNachTer 9 January 2020 18: 55 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Those C - 300, which are being decommissioned - recapitalize and for sale.
      1. Dmitry Donskoy 9 January 2020 19: 00 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Finally burst. In the queue now become. fellow
        1. Vadim237 9 January 2020 20: 33 New
          • 0
          • 2
          -2
          And someone thought that would not break?
      2. Tusv 9 January 2020 20: 03 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: TermNachTER
        Those C - 300, which are being decommissioned - recapitalize and for sale.

        Judging by the Iranian contract, it is very expensive. There is an Antey-2500 rolled back in Egypt (export version of the S300VM). Better PMU2, but worse than the S-400 and S-300V4. The most
        1. TermNachTer 9 January 2020 20: 34 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Well, if he is used - why not make a discount? He has already worked out his value in defense of Russia.
          1. Tusv 9 January 2020 21: 00 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: TermNachTER
            Well, if he is used - why not make a discount?

            What a discount. S-300PM2. Still on the DB. Bring the S-300PM to the S-300PMU2 more expensive than the finished Antei-2500, which is on the stream. In fact, you offer to work in the red, and even provide a discount hi
            1. TermNachTer 9 January 2020 21: 09 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              If the Persians (Iraqis) shoot at the mattresses, and the nishtyaks get all of this from Russia, then it's worth it. At least in the form of an increase in the price of oil (gas).
              1. Tusv 9 January 2020 21: 13 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: TermNachTER
                If the Persians (Iraqis) will shoot at the mattresses

                Persians are Iran and not Iraq hi
                Do not be like illiterate Yankees
                1. TermNachTer 9 January 2020 21: 56 New
                  • 1
                  • 1
                  0
                  I studied geography in a Soviet school, one of my favorite subjects is 5. I know the difference between Iran and Iraq. I meant that it does not matter who shoots - these or these, the main thing is that Russia be in +.
                  1. Tusv 9 January 2020 22: 05 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Quote: TermNachTER
                    I studied geography in a Soviet school, one of my favorite subjects

                    Mine, by the way, is also a math. But damn it. I have a triple in Russian with a minus and I know how to build a sentence (if I’m not too drunk or I have no free time)
                    Persians (Iraqis),

                    It should be written as "Persians or Iraqis."
                    And yes, Mesopotamia is the birthplace of the Sumerians, but this is Iraq and not a fig not Ukraine.
                    But this is history
        2. hydrox 9 January 2020 20: 45 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          OK: now the Yankees will be afraid of 400, not like the S in the edging from Buki and Tori, but with good survey locators.
          Interestingly, we are now releasing Sunflower for export? laughing
          1. Tusv 9 January 2020 21: 10 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: hydrox
            Are we releasing a sunflower for export?

            There is no sunflower. I hope not. Only Russia and the USA own such systems, possibly China. And it makes no sense to sell them when they can be transferred from Old for very expensive
    4. xGibSoNx 9 January 2020 19: 36 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Why only the C300? Maybe Torah and Buki, and Armor sell for cash! This is a market - we will not sell, we will sell the same China
      Regarding China, in fact, the Russian Federation has only one trump card left, “for nothing." Because China, in fact, if desired, is capable of dumping very heavily .. including even at a loss. The whole issue is politically motivated. If suddenly, some sort of “grater” will begin with the Russian Federation .. Very simple.
      On the other hand, Iraq does not have many opportunities, including the "extra dough," to buy the entire assortment of air defense nomenclature. This is not even considering the fact that the United States can and, in fact, will be against it. It is also necessary to take into account one more point about which, for some reason, “everyone” suddenly forgot. At the moment, the ruling "majority" in Iraq, so to speak, is that part of the population that is worst affected by the United States! But this does not mean that there are no people in the country who, to put it mildly, do not completely agree with the position of the current "majority"! In general, the topic, in fact, from a practical point of view for an ordinary layman of the Russian Federation, is of little interest .. It's just "purely business and nothing personal." Which, by definition, has nothing to do with mere mortals at all.
      1. Nyrobsky 9 January 2020 23: 01 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: xGibSoNx
        Regarding China, in fact, the Russian Federation has only one trump card left, “for nothing." Because China, in fact, if desired, is capable of dumping very heavily .. including even at a loss.

        Ahem ... China recently acquired the S-400, conducted tests and was very pleased with what it acquired. I don’t think that a whole bunch of countries will fight to buy from China what is obviously inferior to the S-400. At the very least, they will strive to ensure that they are at the level of protection, even to the detriment of some of their internal interests, redistributing funding from social programs to defense.
        Quote: xGibSoNx
        On the other hand, Iraq does not have many opportunities, including the "extra dough," to buy the entire assortment of air defense nomenclature. This is not even considering the fact that the United States can and, in fact, will be against it.

        I agree, but everyone who wants to purchase C = 400 has an example in the person of Turkey, which consciously went on to acquire a system despite the fact that the United States will apply sanctions.
        Quote: xGibSoNx
        At the moment, the ruling "majority" in Iraq, so to speak, is that part of the population that is worst affected by the United States! But this does not mean that there are no people in the country who, to put it mildly, do not completely agree with the position of the current "majority"!
        This argument makes no sense due to the fact that the Iraqi parliament has decided to oblige the United States to withdraw its troops from Iraq.
        Quote: xGibSoNx
        In general, the topic, in fact, from a practical point of view for an ordinary layman of the Russian Federation, is of little interest.

        It all depends on the interest.
        Quote: xGibSoNx
        It's just "purely business and nothing personal." Which, by definition, has nothing to do with mere mortals at all.
        Of course a business. Nevertheless, albeit indirectly, he has the most direct relation to simple estimates, because no one wants to die due to the lack of state protection. hi
    5. hydrox 9 January 2020 20: 37 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: Thrifty
      This is a market - we will not sell, we will sell the same China

      This is how to sell: China sells Chinese, and Russia sells Russian. I have already cited an example: a new Chinese AK is five times cheaper on the market than a used Russian one.
      1. cniza 9 January 2020 20: 48 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: hydrox
        the new Chinese AK is five times cheaper on the market than used Russian.


        And what is the best buy?
        1. hydrox 10 January 2020 19: 39 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Uh-uh, so whoever takes what purposes :: if for ISIS, then the kettle will go, and if as a Weapon it’s not advertised.
      2. hydrox 10 January 2020 19: 36 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        More expensive than Russian - only Finnish ...
    6. Vadim01 9 January 2020 21: 18 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      Quote: Thrifty
      Why only the C300? Maybe Torah and Buki, and Armor sell for cash! This is a market - we will not sell, we will sell the same China

      So the Syrians already have such a set, but not much use. hi
    7. maidan.izrailovich 10 January 2020 06: 24 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Why only the C300? Maybe Torah and Buki, and Armor sell for cash! This is a market - we will not sell, we will sell the same China

      Iran already has: 29 Tor-M1, 10 Armor-C1, 4 S-300PMU2 divisions. Of course, it’s still worth buying.
      In addition to air defense systems, Iran should think and buy from Russia a dozen more "Varshavyanka".
      1. hydrox 10 January 2020 19: 41 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        They forgot about the "Bastions" ... then the need for diapers will increase sharply!
    8. Alexander Petrov1 10 January 2020 06: 28 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      The more the United States and Iran butt in Iraq, the more Iraq will want to buy our weapons to counter both the United States and Iran, and of course, “our new friend” Turkey.
      1. hydrox 10 January 2020 19: 44 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: Alexander Petrov1
        the more Iraq itself will want to buy our weapons to counter both the us and Iran

        Do not drink anymore, your tongue is tangled :: Iraq and Iran - ALLIES! laughing
        1. Alexander Petrov1 11 January 2020 01: 32 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          Of course, you’re sober allies, they’ve only been fighting among themselves for 10 years, but now Iran is bombing the territory of its friendly Iraq with missiles, it’s good that the missiles hit the American target, and you could get into a settlement with Iraqis.
          1. hydrox 11 January 2020 07: 59 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            And because of what they fought, are you our historical expert?
            And how much effort you need to make to get to the American target, and the Persians did it!
            And who got into you, what are you saying SUCH now? But it’s definitely not the Iranians !?
            But Russia does not fight Ukraine, although Ukraine claims the opposite - do not be like Ukraine, you will be more whole!
            1. Alexander Petrov1 11 January 2020 08: 46 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              And you will learn to write without rudeness, you will be more whole, woe to a connoisseur of history.
              1. hydrox 11 January 2020 09: 25 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Please leave me alone, victim of the exam ...
    9. atalef 11 January 2020 09: 32 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Quote: Thrifty
      Why only the C300? Maybe Torah and Buki, and Armor sell for cash! This is a market - we will not sell, we will sell the same China

      First Syrians, then Iranians, now Iraqis.
      They’ll shoot all civilian aircraft in the entire BV.
      S-300 was delivered to Syria.
      laughing
      And many are wondering why the Israeli Air Force still fly where they want and how they want.
      yes because they will bring down another Il
  2. St Petrov 9 January 2020 17: 10 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    this is beautiful. Putin returns markets. Agent Doni is doing everything right. KJB like a phoenix from the ashes.

    Iraq must fuel our defense industry. And Iraq and Iran will catch up. And there, in Libya, they will restore order.
    1. xGibSoNx 9 January 2020 19: 40 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Iraq must fuel our defense industry
      Um ... Well, how did replenishing our market with Afghanistan help you personally? I note, in the case of Afghanistan, the United States was not only not opposed (at least sanctions, various pitfalls that will not be discussed on the first channel), but in general, even the dough itself was brought in for these purposes?
      1. St Petrov 10 January 2020 17: 00 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        So how did Afghanistan’s recharge of our market help you personally?


        how can one write such nonsense?

        I understand that for you personally, it would be better if Afghanistan (USA) acquired French or American equipment for itself.

        And you see, I loaded factories with work on 60+ boards in Russian
        1. xGibSoNx 10 January 2020 19: 42 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          how can one write such nonsense?

          I understand that for you personally, it would be better if Afghanistan (USA) acquired French or American equipment for itself.

          And you see, I loaded factories with work on 60+ boards in Russian
          Nonsense? Nonsense, you carry! What are you personally not happy with in this situation? The fact that it was the United States that loaded the Russian factories with work and paid them money for it? And it would seem .. what does Afghanistan have to do with it!
        2. hydrox 10 January 2020 20: 05 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          The main value for us is not the sale of boards, but the service of the equipment sold :: much more profitable and much more weighty in advance ...
  3. gurzuf 9 January 2020 17: 13 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    You must sell !!! soldier... and not just the s-300.
    1. cniza 9 January 2020 20: 47 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      This is the whole point, the United States was unable to protect someone ...
  4. businessv 9 January 2020 17: 15 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    According to the representative of the Iraqi parliament, the resumption of negotiations should have happened a long time ago, and the complexes should have already been purchased.

    Trump will inspire many to acquire Russian weapons, even those who still doubted!
    1. xGibSoNx 9 January 2020 19: 43 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Trump will inspire many to acquire Russian weapons, even those who still doubted!
      The main thing! Whatever it turns out to be "specially" .. including due to the fact that we do not know ...
  5. RussianRoulette 9 January 2020 17: 26 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    The stranger got into a poop in a city square .. the administration thought and bought some bio-toilets that weren't there before ... the stranger continued to poop in a public garden under a tree ... However, the seller of bio-toilets was pleased and even expanded production with the money :) the seller himself was almost never in the public garden, as he lived outside the city :)
    1. Livonetc 9 January 2020 17: 37 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      And do not clarify the citizenship of the pusher of dry closets? laughing
      1. St Petrov 9 January 2020 17: 43 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        And do not clarify the citizenship of the pusher of dry closets?

        is there anti-Semitism? wassat
        1. Livonetc 9 January 2020 17: 46 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: c-Petrov
          And do not clarify the citizenship of the pusher of dry closets?

          is there anti-Semitism? wassat

          Procurement Article.
          He stressed that the share of Russian weapons, in his opinion, in the armed forces of Iraq should exceed 50%, since it is reliable and cheaper than the US.

          I admit I did not quite understand the comment / annexed and suggested only two options. :)
          1. businessv 10 January 2020 10: 00 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Livonetc
            I admit I did not quite understand the comment / annexed and suggested only two options. :)

            Iraq and the USSR were friends, the Iraqis were familiar with Soviet weapons, they were armed with the Iraqi army before the invasion of the mattress, hence the phrase in the article, there is no humor in it.
        2. marshes 9 January 2020 17: 51 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: c-Petrov
          is there anti-Semitism?

          Tautology, the most interesting thing here is that the comments under the comments are much more interesting, I hope with subsequent development.
          1. Livonetc 9 January 2020 19: 06 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Apparently so.
            "Where is the point?
            But there is no point here.
            Eat sit and drink vodka.
            Just nothing to invite filthy snakes to the table. "
  6. Grandfather-Shchukar 9 January 2020 17: 36 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Iraq resumes negotiations on the purchase of the Russian S-300 air defense system

    First, drive the US military out of the territory, and then let’s talk seriously about supplies and services .. hi
    1. donavi49 9 January 2020 17: 57 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      It is frightening to get a kicker out without air defense (the available F-16s, if something is burned at the bases, together with the T-50s, but those 20-30 armor will not do anything, by themselves). Americans will not go anywhere without chasing.

      In general, there, as it were, the right people were no longer working with the generals. I won’t be surprised if, even before the election, some thread of the Sunni General Saddam on Abrams and T-90 from the 9th tank division will drive up to parliament and the government, arrest everyone there and proclaim himself the savior of the nation - and the United States is the guardian of Iraq for centuries, with legal securing years by 50 in exchange for international recognition.
      1. Grandfather-Shchukar 9 January 2020 18: 12 New
        • 2
        • 3
        -1
        Quote: donavi49
        It is frightening to get a kicker out without air defense (the available F-16s, if something is burned at the bases, together with the T-50s, but those 20-30 armor will not do anything, by themselves). Americans will not go anywhere without chasing.

        You can still try (mass rallies, well, etc.) .. It is from Iraq that the US military bases threaten everyone in the BV.!
        Quote: donavi49
        In general, there, as it were, the right people were no longer working with the generals. I won’t be surprised if, even before the election, some thread of the Sunni General Saddam on Abrams and T-90 from the 9th tank division will drive up to parliament and the government, arrest everyone there and proclaim himself the savior of the nation - and the United States is the guardian of Iraq for centuries, with legal securing years by 50 in exchange for international recognition.

        This is all scary .. This can last for decades ..!
        Amers need to be driven out by a filthy broom, and there is a chance to establish peace!
      2. hydrox 9 January 2020 20: 55 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        We would now somewhere in the Kamyshly-Khasek district take a nito a / b freed by the Yankees, then we can talk about a stick-forcing, and about a long whip, and about freeing oil fields from thieves, or something then taxes to the budget began to come weak ... laughing
    2. xGibSoNx 9 January 2020 19: 46 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      First, drive the US military out of the territory, and then let’s talk seriously about supplies and services ..
      Are you serious now ?! And who would you suggest replacing them there? Or is it so simple for you, since the roses have bloomed? Like you think that there are no problems from the word at all? And the United States portrayed there, just because they are bad by definition?
      1. cniza 9 January 2020 20: 46 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Why are you so excited that the United States will soon run away from there ... I won’t argue, time will judge us.
  7. Old26 9 January 2020 17: 48 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Thrifty
    Why only the C300? Maybe Torah and Buki, and Armor sell for cash! This is a market - we will not sell, we will sell the same China

    In about 20 years, maybe they will buy it. And then, if the Americans leave Iraq or if a more accommodating American president appears. In this case, it's just a dream ....
    1. Tusv 9 January 2020 20: 10 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Old26
      20 years later, maybe they will buy

      Namesake hi In 20 years, the S-300 will be like a Square compared to Beeches. Hopelessly outdated systems. And we are selling Antei-2500 right now and the Americans are not particularly resistant to sales. The Yankees are afraid of long-range systems (S-400, S-300V4), when the Carrier is destroyed by anyone, before entering the attack zone
  8. eagle owl 9 January 2020 17: 52 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    In general, they rather need the S-350. And close range in cover
    1. tarakan 9 January 2020 19: 31 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      All the air defense under the letter "C" Americans. Block, and the tori can pass
      1. hydrox 9 January 2020 21: 01 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        The time has passed for the American blocs, it is our turn to restore the infrastructure of the fields, pump oil and guard YOUR BV-shnoy airspace ..
  9. rocket757 9 January 2020 17: 59 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Good air defense, this increases the chance to maintain statehood and independence!
    The question is, as always, and who pays?
    1. cniza 9 January 2020 20: 44 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Citizens always pay ...
      1. rocket757 9 January 2020 23: 13 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: cniza
        Citizens always pay ...

        A clarifying question is the citizens of which country ???
        Okay, this is a joke .... but the question is not idle if the striped sanctions are also piled on Iraq, where will they get the money? Because they need more than one kit, that's for sure!
        1. cniza 10 January 2020 13: 09 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          They have hydrocarbons ... yes
          1. rocket757 10 January 2020 13: 15 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: cniza
            They have hydrocarbons ... yes

            They seem to be there, but what does Trump say that they invested there too. They want to get back, let them pay .... a vicious circle.
            1. cniza 10 January 2020 13: 22 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Trump can say anything, but in this case they will have to tighten their tail.
              1. rocket757 10 January 2020 13: 30 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: cniza
                Trump can say anything, but in this case they will have to tighten their tail.

                Oh oh Trump really loves oil, as he himself said.
                Of course, the area is dumb, to protect, really, that's all there, it’s getting ready for big losses! But maybe he himself will not give a damn and I will not give it to others ... who knows what has settled in his head?
                1. cniza 10 January 2020 13: 32 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Trump went overboard, they will have to leave their region, this is clear to everyone, and on the other hand, he fulfills campaign promises. lol
                  1. rocket757 10 January 2020 17: 33 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    He has promises only to his voters!
                    Trump said a lot of things and spanked on Twitter, now you do not know what to expect from him.
                    1. cniza 10 January 2020 17: 48 New
                      • 2
                      • 0
                      +2
                      Nevertheless, according to the Americans, he has already fulfilled many promises ...
                      1. rocket757 10 January 2020 18: 48 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        I heard that. In fact, the main thing, as voters think, is for them all this circus is.
                      2. cniza 10 January 2020 20: 54 New
                        • 2
                        • 0
                        +2
                        That's the whole point - the election, but it adjusts reality.
                      3. rocket757 10 January 2020 22: 21 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        In principle, it’s about the same everywhere.
                        Most candidates lie godlessly, but in some countries, candidates have to fulfill at least part of what is promised, especially if this at least partially coincides with their interests.
                        That's what Trump is losing, since they have already overripe and some changes are necessary!
                        He will fulfill his promises and will go for a second term.
                        Something like this turns out. He is not drowning for the whole world, but only for his own.
  • hydrox 9 January 2020 21: 05 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Like who?
    Whose land - he pays, and our business loot received from the Arabs to pay taxes and send to the budget, and the economy to disinfect from liberoids. laughing
    1. rocket757 9 January 2020 23: 14 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Our business is understandable ... but with these specific Arabs, or rather with their financial viability, everything is not so obvious now!
      1. hydrox 10 January 2020 08: 25 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Good question!
        So it's all about the source of the dough.
        All the years that we have flocked to Syria (which borders Iraq), the Yankees of DAROM have been stealing oil like a thief (in both countries !!) - the very oil whose income should have gone into Russia's pocket in the form of payment for restoration infrastructure deposits in Iraq and Syria, which we tied up ten years ago, but the Yankees do not allow us to do this.
        Therefore, Trump is not a political enemy or ideological to us, but a real money thief who grabs our income from capital (from oil!), The interest from which should go into our pocket, but they are intercepted by Donka. But he is arrogant, and geopolitically arrogant (which ALL liberoids of the planet pray for!), And therefore we can’t give him a tinsel that we will instantly restore the WHOLE WORLD against us (liberd rules!), And especially our own oligarch, which has long been already (about 20 years!) should have been swinging on the console! sad
        1. rocket757 10 January 2020 08: 56 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Cousins ​​have always been able to shove competitors from everywhere where they got interes!
          Just Trump to bring this matter to the absolute ... if not to a crisis in relations with everyone, even allies! Here is such a shot. It seems that the line between a businessman and just a gangster does not matter to him.
          Happy times have come. We’ll see ... and what else remains to be done if there is not enough strength, will, for something else.
          1. hydrox 10 January 2020 08: 58 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Take a look - see! laughing
  • sagitch 9 January 2020 19: 25 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The whole world only does what is arming, and that is bitter.
  • tarakan 9 January 2020 19: 34 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Interesting censorship appeared on the Sforum, I write, ameri (in Russian) inserts, American. smile
    1. cniza 9 January 2020 20: 43 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      What is censorship then?
  • Chingachguk 9 January 2020 20: 39 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    The gate! In queue! yes
  • cniza 9 January 2020 20: 43 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Iraq resumed negotiations with Russia on the purchase of S-300 anti-aircraft systems.


    Of course, against the background of the free passage of Iranian missiles past a sleeping patriot.
  • Old26 9 January 2020 20: 53 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: Tusv
    And Antei-2500

    And how many consumers have we sold them? As far as I remember, two S-300V4 divisions to Venezuela and 4 S-300Vm batteries to Egypt in 2014. And all
  • Nitarius 10 January 2020 04: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    ))) how they drove the United States ... so immediately for protection)))) so as not to be the next ones))