The Black Sea and Northern Fleet exercises were held off the coast of Crimea

The Black Sea and Northern Fleet exercises were held off the coast of Crimea

In the Black Sea off the coast of Crimea, joint exercises of forces and assets of the Black Sea and Northern Fleets took place. The exercises from the Marshal Ustinov missile cruiser SF were watched by the Supreme Commander of the Russian Armed Forces Vladimir Putin, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and Navy Commander Nikolai Evmenov.


The joint exercises in the Black Sea involved more than 30 ships from both fleets, a Black Sea Fleet submarine, and more than 40 aircraft. Caliber cruise missiles were launched from the surface and underwater positions, anti-ship missiles, as well as the launch of the Dagger hypersonic aeroballistic missile.

From the Black Sea fleet The frigates Admiral Grigorovich, Admiral Makarov, RTOs and missile boats Orekhovo-Zuevo, Naberezhnye Chelny, Ivanovets, BDK Caesar Kunikov and Azov, patrol ships Dmitry Rogachev took part in the exercises and Vasily Bykov, Kolpino submarine, small anti-submarine ships and sea minesweepers. From the Northern Fleet - the missile cruiser "Marshal Ustinov" and the large anti-submarine ship SF "Vice Admiral Kulakov". Aviation represented Su-30SM, Su-24M, Tu-95. The exercises were monitored by drones.

Practical missile launches of the Kyrgyz Republic Caliber were carried out by the frigate Admiral Grigorovich, RTO Orekhovo-Zuevo and the Kolpino submarine. Missile boats Ivanovets and Naberezhnye Chelny launched missile launchers Moskit. Two missile launches carried out combat calculations of the Utes cliff missile complex. In addition, the MiG-31 launched a hypersonic dagger.

The exercises were successful

- Nikolay Evmenov, Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy, reported to Putin upon their completion.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Sergst 9 January 2020 15: 53 New
    • 9
    • 2
    +7
    Great news!
    1. Dmitry Donskoy 9 January 2020 16: 50 New
      • 3
      • 4
      -1
      Yeah, and this is near the Mediterranean, where something happens all the time. You have to be prepared. soldier
    2. antivirus 9 January 2020 18: 10 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Two missile launches carried out combat calculations of the Utes cliff missile complex. In addition, the MiG-31 launched a hypersonic dagger.
      ------ and missiles flew off to Yavorov training ground
  2. Nastia makarova 9 January 2020 15: 57 New
    • 10
    • 6
    +4
    Solid group
    1. smart ass 9 January 2020 16: 06 New
      • 7
      • 12
      -5
      Could capture Turkey in the final exercises
      1. Nastia makarova 9 January 2020 16: 09 New
        • 11
        • 2
        +9
        what for? who will buy gas?
        1. smart ass 9 January 2020 16: 11 New
          • 9
          • 1
          +8
          Very simple. Russian troops are divided into blue and red. The blue captured Turkey, and the red freed everything according to the scenario.
          1. Kunica 9 January 2020 16: 40 New
            • 14
            • 1
            +13
            Blue captured Turkey, but did not pour red request
          2. DPN
            DPN 10 January 2020 23: 51 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Probably the colors are a little messed up. Reds in the Russian Federation are not respected today, whites have come.
      2. DPN
        DPN 9 January 2020 16: 17 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Constantinople with a strait would be enough, I hope not all the missiles went to the Black Sea, but Syria also got to help.
        1. Talgat 148 10 January 2020 03: 54 New
          • 1
          • 3
          -2
          Tsargrad powerful Russian Empire was too tough, but now even more so.
      3. Talgat 148 10 January 2020 03: 53 New
        • 1
        • 6
        -5
        Turkey cannot be captured, but Crimea is easily lost, the Turks have a fleet many times more powerful!
    2. Catfish 9 January 2020 17: 12 New
      • 13
      • 3
      +10
      Very solid. Four relatively large ships, the rest boats and other trifles. Oh yes! There was also ONE submarine, diesel, as I understand it.
      Have you ever seen the composition of the Black Sea Fleet of the USSR? If not, then look at least out of curiosity, that was where Solid Groups were.
      1. dvina71 9 January 2020 18: 53 New
        • 8
        • 1
        +7
        Quote: Sea Cat
        USSR Black Sea Fleet ever seen

        We saw ... saw .. If we compare by pennants, then the sailing Black Sea Fleet from the time of Catherine the Second is now far away .. let's compare the striking power of the modern frigate and destroyer of the second half of the last century .. or the diesel engines of the then and modern 636s ..
        Three RTOs and two frigates are 40 pu of various pkr and 64pu air defense systems ..
        1. Sergey S. 9 January 2020 19: 59 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          Quote: dvina71
          If we compare by pennants, then the sailing Black Sea Fleet of the times of Catherine the Second is now far away for everyone .. let's compare the striking power of the modern frigate and destroyer of the second half of the last century .. or the diesels then and modern 636 ..

          Around 1976, was in the summer in Sevastopol .... Almost every day I went around the bays .... I thought ...
          I counted 127 pennants - I still remember. was so inspired. At the same time, many well-known ships were in the Middle East in the 5th Opek.
          He returned home climbed into the directories: summarized the fleets of Turkey, Greece, Italy ... Pride in the Red Banner Black Sea still helps to live.
          After all, we can, if they do not bother us!

          I think my method of comparing the current state of possible opponents is more correct than trying to analyze progress in historical development.

          Today, according to the most rough estimates, we went down by the number of ships about 5 times ...
          Sad.
          1. dvina71 9 January 2020 20: 39 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            Quote: Sergey S.
            I think my method of comparing the current state of possible opponents is more correct than trying to analyze progress in historical development.

            so what's the problem? Let’s analyze. 1976 .. I’m trying to get into the directories, but then the base of the fleet was then artillery ships with missile defense .. Submarines are all torpedo .. In fact, the fleet was then for short range combat. Now all missile ships coming into service. Even a small missile defense system has 8 pu for various missiles .. The huge Krk missile has Slava 16 .., and the BOD has 8 pu for the same missiles. Simply put, the modern frigate in armament surpasses the destroyer of the second half of the last century ... and this is normal. The modern Black Sea Fleet in terms of launching is superior to the Black Sea Fleet of the USSR by an order of magnitude .. not to mention the missiles themselves .. and this is a long-range fleet and universal.
            You will not deny that the modern ms company is superior in firepower to the battalion of the Red Army.? The same applies to the fleet .. As Lenin said there .. better less and better ..
            1. Catfish 9 January 2020 20: 54 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              ... 1976 .. can't go into the directories


              But in vain ...

              Submarines are all torpedo ..


              Is it in 1976, and are all torpedo? laughing
              1. dvina71 9 January 2020 21: 57 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: Sea Cat
                Is it in 1976, and are all torpedo?

                If it does not complicate .. the number of the missile project as part of the USSR KChF?
                1. Catfish 9 January 2020 23: 44 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  It’s not difficult, but you’re better on your own.
                  1. dvina71 10 January 2020 01: 29 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    Quote: Sea Cat
                    You are better yourself.

                    I understand what you mean .. it's 613e with p-p-5 attached ..
                    Strictly speaking, such a project, as they were torpedo, have remained so, regardless of the fact that two cr are still stuck. From the underwater position they couldn’t shoot these missiles .. so using them they became an NK. Considering the limits on wave and speed ... emnip wave excitement is not more than 3 points ... Tell me how many days in a year there is less excitement in the Black Sea?
            2. Sergey S. 10 January 2020 04: 21 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: dvina71
              Let’s analyze. 1976 .. I’m trying to get into the directories, but then the base of the fleet was then artillery ships with missile defense .. Submarines are all torpedo .. In fact, the fleet was then for short range combat. Now all missile ships coming into service. Even a small missile defense system has 8 pu for various missiles .. The huge Krk missile has Slava 16 .., and the BOD has 8 pu for the same missiles.

              A fairly complete analysis of the USSR fleet requires a sector of specialists ... Therefore, only at the top.
              It is rather difficult and interesting to talk about artillery ships. I remember how we discussed Khrushchev’s decision to cut the latest cruisers, pr. 68 bis, and on the priority of missile weapons ....
              As the naval did not resist, in 1976 the results of this decision were already visible.
              By the way, back then in Inkerman the project 644 submarines were the ones that sucked and cut, the very ones with 2 surface launch missiles ...
              In 1976, the KChF included already missile boats of projects 205 and 205U, MPK of projects 204, 1124, MRK of project 1234, SKR of projects 159, 35, 1135, EM with air defense systems "Volna" and anti-ship missile systems "P-15", project 61 and 1134B, missile cruisers of project 58, cruisers of PLO of project 1123.
              BPK Azov was already on modernization with the installation of the Fort complex ...

              No other world Navy had such saturation with rocket weapons.
              Moreover, the idea of ​​striving for balance by means of anti-aircraft defense, air defense, and strike capabilities was traced.
        2. Catfish 9 January 2020 20: 49 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Then compare with the modern US fleet. And the striking power of the main units and the number of ships and aircraft.
          1. dvina71 9 January 2020 20: 56 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Quote: Sea Cat
            Then compare with the modern US fleet

            Two questions .. When and how many pennants of the US Navy were based in Sevastopol. And two ... why? In the era of yawing, all large formations will no doubt be attacked by special charges .. dozens of Berks should be fenced for this ... is it necessary?
            1. Catfish 9 January 2020 20: 59 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              Is the US Navy in Sevastopol? What is this for?
              Although already somehow it was once: "In the garden of elderberry, and in Kiev, uncle." request
              1. dvina71 9 January 2020 22: 00 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: Sea Cat
                The elderberry garden, and the uncle in Kiev. "

                Are you talking about a proposal to compare the composition of the Black Sea Fleet with the Ameroflot in the light of the exercises of the Northern Fleet and the Black Sea Fleet near the Crimea? Well then .. respect self-criticism ..
                1. Catfish 9 January 2020 23: 48 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  I suggested comparing the US and Russian fleets, and not just the Black Sea Fleet, and not only in the light of the exercises. As for self-criticism, for God's sake, exercise her health.
  3. KAVBER 9 January 2020 16: 08 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    From Istanbul home on a cruiser, also with animations along the way, great.
    1. Romka 9 January 2020 17: 40 New
      • 8
      • 7
      +1
      Yes, great. First they dragged the Orsk, and then the missile cruiser Marshal Ustinov could not moor to the pier at the Dolmabahce Palace in Istanbul. There is already a video on the network how Turkish tugs are trying to park the ship. Whether the cruiser received damage is unknown. Here's how to get the news: the glass is half empty or half full. Teaching is good, but window dressing is bad.
      1. New Year day 9 January 2020 20: 04 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        Quote: Romka
        There is a video on how Turkish tugboats try to park a ship. Whether the cruiser received damage is unknown.

        1. Romka 9 January 2020 20: 07 New
          • 4
          • 4
          0
          Bad weather again. The helicopter crashed - bad weather. The crane fell - it's a storm. "This is some kind of horror"
      2. Sergey S. 9 January 2020 20: 05 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        There is already a video on the network how Turkish tugs are trying to park the ship. Whether the cruiser received damage is unknown.

        Do not rejoice ...
        "Marshal Ustinov" is in order.
        But that's why the three tugboats could not cope with the mooring of the cruiser, a question for the Turkish port workers.
        Apparently, their practice of working with large ships is not enough ...
        1. New Year day 9 January 2020 20: 08 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          Quote: Sergey S.
          "Marshal Ustinov" is in order.

    2. Charik 9 January 2020 18: 40 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Most likely immediately to the country to ski
  4. Same lech 9 January 2020 16: 08 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    It was interesting whether they were planned exercises or related to events in the Middle East ... again, our partners will yell about aggressive Russia.
    1. tihonmarine 9 January 2020 16: 14 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: The same Lech
      It was interesting whether they were planned exercises or related to events in the Middle East ... again, our partners will yell about aggressive Russia.

      It would be surprising if they had not yelled. They will scream as in our collective farm pigsty "US Security Violation!"
  5. Chingachguk 9 January 2020 16: 13 New
    • 3
    • 15
    -12
    Interestingly, if we compare Iran’s missile launches at US bases and our missile launches during exercises, our missiles also flew to ground squirrels and their falling into these targets is doubtful?
    1. Rusland 9 January 2020 16: 28 New
      • 12
      • 3
      +9
      Are Our Missiles your North American? It seems from those edges judging by the nickname. wink
      1. Chingachguk 9 January 2020 20: 19 New
        • 2
        • 5
        -3
        One must not judge by feathers, but by a tunic! fool wink
        1. Rusland 10 January 2020 12: 02 New
          • 5
          • 1
          +4
          Quote: Chingachguk
          One must not judge by feathers, but by a tunic! fool wink

          Greetings buddy. It seems like we have no funny troops. request Do not drill a hole in your head. laughing
    2. businessv 9 January 2020 17: 10 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Chingachguk
      Now, if you compare Iran’s missile launches against US bases and our missile launches in exercises

      All fired missiles hit the places where they were sent, you can be sure! If the Iranians wanted to get into the barracks with a rocket, they would have hit.
      1. Chingachguk 9 January 2020 20: 20 New
        • 2
        • 6
        -4
        The fact of the matter is that they were afraid to get ..... A squeal that was !!!! 80 corpses! Slap and so on !.
        1. businessv 10 January 2020 09: 55 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Chingachguk
          Slap and so on !.

          Can you bring at least one similar case, with rockets hitting mattress bases? Of course this is a slap in the face, colleague! The goal is not to bang the more, the better - such an action would be regarded as a terrorist attack. Why kill the soldiers who serve there because their president decided to kill the general in the same territory?
          1. Chingachguk 10 January 2020 10: 09 New
            • 0
            • 3
            -3
            Hmm winked strong logic ...... "Why smack a blacksmith? We have one! Let's get a groom! We have two of them ..." So to kill a general of a foreign country on the territory of a third country is not a terrorist attack, but to get an answer for it, in form - an eye for an eye, is this your attack? And about the slap in the face, then I really do not understand where does the gopher shooting? request
            1. businessv 10 January 2020 10: 13 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: Chingachguk
              So to kill the general of a foreign country on the territory of a third country, this is not a terrorist attack, but to get an answer for it, in the form - an eye for an eye, is this your attack?

              The answer "eye for eye" will only be if Iran kills the mattress general in the same Iraq right? And how will it then differ from the mattress? The whole world has recognized that the mattress prez has committed a terrorist attack, but this does not mean that everyone should begin to follow this example! Thank you for reminding the classics of Soviet cinema! hi
              1. Chingachguk 10 January 2020 10: 22 New
                • 0
                • 3
                -3
                By your logic, the atomic bomb was dropped on Japan, and Iraq was destroyed, and Libya, and so on. And who did it? I will answer - the United States, and why, but because no one condemned and no one gave the real answer! The question is - will we wait when the United States itself stops doing this? Well, that would not be likened to them, it is not necessary to answer the murder with murder. Just need to turn the other cheek ...... I do not agree with this.
                1. businessv 10 January 2020 10: 29 New
                  • 3
                  • 0
                  +3
                  Quote: Chingachguk
                  By your logic, the atomic bomb was dropped on Japan, and Iraq was destroyed, and Libya, and so on.

                  You confuse, colleague! This is not my logic! Mattresses live only due to wars and plunder of resources of foreign countries, this is not news for the whole world! In the days of the Union, this was not because there was military parity and the mattress was forced to comply with it. After the collapse of the Union and the countries of the socialist bloc, one military bloc remained all over the world - NATO, led by a mattress. The dictatorship of the winner began. And no one is asking us, unfortunately, whether we agree with this or not, a colleague! And it is still unknown whether Iran would dare to give a missile response before the joint exercises of the fleets of China, Russia and Iran.
                  1. Chingachguk 10 January 2020 10: 33 New
                    • 0
                    • 3
                    -3
                    Quote: businessv
                    Quote: Chingachguk
                    By your logic, the atomic bomb was dropped on Japan, and Iraq was destroyed, and Libya, and so on.

                    You confuse, colleague! This is not my logic! Mattresses live only due to wars and plunder of resources of foreign countries, this is not news for the whole world! In the days of the Union, this was not because there was military parity and the mattress was forced to comply with it. After the collapse of the Union and the countries of the socialist bloc, one military bloc remained all over the world - NATO, led by a mattress. The dictatorship of the winner began. And no one is asking us, unfortunately, whether we agree with this or not, a colleague! And it is still unknown whether Iran would dare to give a missile response before the joint exercises of the fleets of China, Russia and Iran.

                    This US behavior must be forcibly stopped. I think if you ask the people of any country that is a member of NATO whether they want to receive a missile strike from Russia due to the actions of the United States, it seems to me few people will say - YES.
                  2. Chingachguk 10 January 2020 10: 40 New
                    • 0
                    • 2
                    -2
                    The people of the affected countries from the actions of the United States, must endure all this precisely because the United States lives this way? And you try to do this with Israel, for example, with North Korea, or with a country that has nuclear weapons ..... To offend those who are weaker than you does not honor you. But everyone is silent, because they understand that the United States needs to do this, because the United States lives this way, exists, and so on. I fundamentally disagree with this! Colleague.....
          2. Chingachguk 10 January 2020 10: 15 New
            • 1
            • 2
            -1
            It is clear "like God's day" "this blow was contractual" some showed that they could kill, others to calm their audience, broke gophers and called it the answer! Class! The main thing that would suit everyone is this show.
            1. businessv 10 January 2020 10: 21 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Chingachguk
              The main thing that would suit everyone is this show.

              Well, of course, a contractual one, Iran did not hide it, warned 2 hours before the Iraqi strike, those in turn mattresses. Nobody needs a war, but this will not help Kassim Suleymani, unfortunately. Our general Ivashov spoke very respectfully of him. May all the dead rest in peace!
              1. Chingachguk 10 January 2020 10: 28 New
                • 0
                • 2
                -2
                Quote: businessv
                Quote: Chingachguk
                The main thing that would suit everyone is this show.

                Well, of course, a contractual one, Iran did not hide it, warned 2 hours before the Iraqi strike, those in turn mattresses. Nobody needs a war, but this will not help Kassim Suleymani, unfortunately. Our general Ivashov spoke very respectfully of him. May all the dead rest in peace!

                Well I do not know. Such logic would be acceptable to our military, our generals, God forbid, and Putin would have let it go on the brakes like Iran.
  6. Mouse 9 January 2020 16: 18 New
    • 7
    • 4
    +3
    Black Sea and Northern Fleets

    All class !!! checked the line from the North Sea to Turkey ....
  7. Azazelo 9 January 2020 16: 24 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    We are waiting for the protests of Sumeria and new sanctions)))
  8. dvina71 9 January 2020 16: 35 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    It seems that in a couple of hours they lowered the budget of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine ...
  9. Grandfather-Shchukar 9 January 2020 16: 45 New
    • 5
    • 5
    0
    Well done, of course, but I dream that such exercises should be carried out in the Mediterranean Sea, near Cuba, Venezuela, etc. Especially in conjunction with China, Iran, India ..
  10. Thrifty 9 January 2020 17: 07 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    So the “Dagger" along the way is brought to mind by the launch method for the goal, as long as it’s training, but for now. ..
  11. Petrol cutter 9 January 2020 18: 17 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Well, the exercises are always successful (usually). Nevertheless .... I love our teachings gentlemen. Especially off the coast of the Crimean Federal District.
    This gives enough confidence in the future to local residents.
    And then Maman asks me everything - Vital, but they won’t give us back ?!
    And maman will be eighty-three years old (just a minute). She will not survive the reverse gear ....
  12. Charik 9 January 2020 18: 38 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Is there a movie about teachings?
    1. Petrol cutter 9 January 2020 19: 21 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Of course. There are tons of movies. For example, "Silence in the compartments."
      Yes, the same "72" meter is a very educational film. If you drop the lyrics. It even shows a secret factory at the very end. Which I had the honor to work on hi
      1. Charik 9 January 2020 19: 27 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        I mean, with these teachings, the Chief from where I observed was also interesting.
        1. New Year day 9 January 2020 19: 48 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: Charik
          I mean, with these teachings

          hi

          1. Charik 9 January 2020 20: 53 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            thank you hi , and the Chief-marine headdress?
        2. Petrol cutter 9 January 2020 20: 32 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Where I watched is not our business. Our business is to have something to observe in fact. hi
  13. Adimius38 9 January 2020 18: 47 New
    • 1
    • 5
    -4
    what can’t you do for the sake of the owner) and the teachings were quickly muddied)
    1. Petrol cutter 9 January 2020 20: 28 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      What kind of master? Is it the United States?
      Yes. It must be made clear to the OWNER that slaves can give a kick in one place!
    2. next322 9 January 2020 20: 41 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      They have been preparing for this teaching since mid-December ....... type of wit-you rural ......
      1. The comment was deleted.
  14. Chingachguk 9 January 2020 20: 42 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Interestingly, the Ukrainian Bandera fleet greatly interfered with our teachings? lol
  15. georggy 10 January 2020 10: 42 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    From the Black Sea Fleet, the frigates Admiral Grigorovich, Admiral Makarov, RTOs and missile boats Orekhovo-Zuevo, Naberezhnye Chelny, Ivanovets, BDK Caesar Kunikov and Azov, patrol ships took part in the exercises Dmitry Rogachev "and" Vasily Bykov ", the Kolpino submarine, small anti-submarine ships and sea minesweepers. From the Northern Fleet - the missile cruiser "Marshal Ustinov" and the large anti-submarine ship SF "Vice-Admiral Kulakov". Aviation was represented by the Su-30SM, Su-24M, Tu-95.


    We collected everything we could.
    and even the naval commander got a cap.
    Test show. played the "sea battle".