US ready for talks with Iran to de-escalate conflict

US ready for talks with Iran to de-escalate conflict

The United States is ready to negotiate with Iran without preconditions to reduce tensions in the region. This is stated in a letter to the US Permanent Representative to the UN Kelly Kraft, sent to the Security Council, Reuters reported with reference to the text of the document.


The document notes that Washington is ready to negotiate with Tehran to "prevent a further threat to international peace and stability or escalation from the Iranian regime." At the same time, the United States is ready to take additional measures if the conflict continues.

The US is ready to take additional measures in the region if it becomes necessary to protect American personnel and interests

- says the text of the document.

The letter also explains the assassination of Iranian general Kassem Suleimani. According to the document, the United States exercised its right to self-defense in accordance with Article 51 of the UN Charter, which obliges countries to immediately report to the Security Council on military operations undertaken for self-defense. According to her, US airstrikes on the Iraqi Shiite militia al-Hashd al-Shaabi on December 29, 2019 were launched "in response to a series of attacks by Iran and the formations it supports on American forces and interests in the Middle East."

Kelly Kraft emphasized that all US actions did not go beyond international laws.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Tank hard 9 January 2020 09: 05 New
    • 23
    • 1
    +22
    United States ready for talks with Iran without preconditions to reduce tension in the region.

    That's what a life-giving rocket does! laughing
    1. Same lech 9 January 2020 09: 10 New
      • 21
      • 1
      +20
      Hmm what if every country that attacked the United States desperately fought by all means and methods, the United States would never have been able to crawl like this all over the world.
      1. Tank hard 9 January 2020 09: 14 New
        • 10
        • 3
        +7
        Quote: The same Lech
        Hmm, if every country that attacked the United States desperately fought by all means and methods, the United States would never have been able to crawl like this all over the world.

        Probably everything has its time, but "the king is already naked." wink
        Soon Kiev can be taken (now slippers will fly ... repeat ) lol
        1. alexmach 9 January 2020 09: 27 New
          • 10
          • 1
          +9
          Soon Kiev can be taken (now slippers will fly ... feel) lol

          Catch; maybe it’s possible (maybe) but why? What then to do with it?
          1. Tank hard 9 January 2020 09: 28 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: alexmach
            Catch; maybe it’s possible (maybe) but why? What then to do with it?

            I agree, but you understand what I mean? wink hi
        2. Aleksandr21 9 January 2020 10: 21 New
          • 7
          • 2
          +5
          Quote: Tank Hard
          Probably everything has its time, but "the king is already naked."
          Soon Kiev can be taken (now slippers will fly ...)


          This is a serious misconception that the “king is already naked,” in this story the USA crossed one more red line and eliminated almost the second person in power and influence in Iran. What other country in the world can do this? And the fact that Iran showed its teeth can also be considered as a weakness, given how all this was done, what goals were chosen and the statement after the answer that they said we took revenge and will not attack again. Yes, Iran retained its face, but here he was clearly afraid to cross the line for which even the Senate and opponents of the trump could not calmly look at it. And the point here is not the weakness in the United States, but the fact that their power is now more concerned with the internal struggle for power, and Trump himself is bound by many restrictions, not to mention the attempt to impeach.
          1. Tank hard 9 January 2020 10: 58 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: Aleksandr21
            This is a serious misconception that the “king is already naked,” in this story the USA crossed one more red line and eliminated almost the second person in power and influence in Iran. What other country in the world can do this? And the fact that Iran showed its teeth can also be considered as a weakness, given how all this was done, what goals were chosen and the statement after the answer that they said we took revenge and will not attack again. Yes, Iran retained its face, but here he was clearly afraid to cross the line for which even the Senate and opponents of the trump could not calmly look at it. And the point here is not the weakness in the United States, but the fact that their power is now more concerned with the internal struggle for power, and Trump himself is bound by many restrictions, not to mention the attempt to impeach.

            Well, you can continue to admire the actions of the top US and even idolize them. But I do not agree with you. request
            1. Aleksandr21 9 January 2020 11: 30 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              Quote: Tank Hard
              Well, you can continue to admire the actions of the top US and even idolize them. But I do not agree with you.


              I do not belong to fans of the USA, there are simply a lot of people on the site who hate the USA and cannot look at the whole picture without emotion. For example, many write, the USA was all blown away, they were afraid to answer ... but no one delves into the subtlety of the fact that Trump is now impeached, in January in the Senate hearings on this case and frankly now he does not need war, since there is no support among voters whom he promised to return troops home, and even more so among opponents who are one step away from depriving him of power. If he had domestic support, then everything could have turned out differently for Iran. And Iran, too, retained only a face with this gesture, here are their recent statement:

              "Iran has completed revenge for the assassination of General Kassem Suleimani and will not take new military action if there is no aggression from the United States, said Iran’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Majid Taht-Ravanchi.

              “All our actions were proportional to the assassination of Kassem Suleimani. They are completed. If the United States will no longer take military action against Iran, on our part, we will also not take such actions, "the TASS Iranian diplomat quotes."

              therefore, the loss of Iran is more likely here, since Sulemaini is difficult to replace with someone. The only thing if the Americans leave BV is that it will be a strategic victory, but it is doubtful if their military will leave Iraq, but they have many bases on BV in other countries, and the Americans are definitely not going from there.
          2. BARKHAN 9 January 2020 11: 39 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Aleksandr21
            This is a serious misconception that the “king is already naked,” in this story the USA crossed one more red line and eliminated almost the second person in power and influence in Iran. What other country in the world can do this?

            Yes, it’s the same as if an attempt on Shoigu had been committed and Russia would have kept silent ...
      2. Nyrobsky 9 January 2020 11: 00 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Quote: The same Lech
        Hmm, if every country that attacked the United States desperately fought by all means and methods, the United States would never have been able to crawl like this all over the world.

        Unfortunately, few countries subjected to aggression by the United States had the same set of countermeasures as Iran.
    2. bessmertniy 9 January 2020 09: 12 New
      • 12
      • 0
      +12
      Somehow this is incomprehensible - it turns out that international laws allow the killing of foreign generals !!! ??? belay
      1. Qwertyarion 9 January 2020 09: 45 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        . Kelly Kraft emphasized that all US actions did not go beyond international laws.

        Quote: bessmertniy
        Somehow this is incomprehensible - it turns out that international laws allow the killing of foreign generals !!! ??? belay

        The aggressor can justify any violence, including applicable laws.
        Moreover, if the aggressor is very strong, then no one will pick against.
    3. Olgovich 9 January 2020 09: 15 New
      • 7
      • 7
      0
      Quote: Tank Hard
      The United States is ready to negotiate with Iran without preconditions to reduce tensions in the region.

      That's what a life-giving rocket does!


      Yeah. the mattresses swallowed the pill. managed it. yes

      and how many screams were from a red-haired clown about 52 blows to Iran. lol

      The letter also explains the assassination of Iranian general Kassem Suleimani. According to the document, the United States exercised its right to self-defense in accordance with Article 51 of the UN Charter, which obliges countries to immediately inform the Security Council of military operations undertaken to self defense.

      while the usa are on the other end of the world from the place of conflict.
      Bastards .....
      1. Tank hard 9 January 2020 09: 17 New
        • 9
        • 2
        +7
        Quote: Olgovich
        while the United States is located on the other side of the world from the place of conflict.
        Bastards .....

        Nothing, soon Iran will finish the “core installation” and everyone will be happy, especially Israel. hi
        1. Paranoid50 9 January 2020 13: 33 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: Tank Hard
          soon Iran will finish the "vigorous installation" and everyone will be happy, especially Israel.

          The latter will have to come to terms. yes
    4. SOVIET UNION 2 9 January 2020 09: 22 New
      • 9
      • 1
      +8
      That's what a life-giving rocket does!

      I’m also getting so slightly overexposed! And this is without deep concern and threats of a mirror or asymmetric response! That's what a good understanding of English means! If you talk with the Americans in their own language and they understand it turns out you can communicate with them! No, well, I don’t know! It turns out everything is so elementary and simple! A small blow to the liver and the client is ready to talk! laughing
      1. Tank hard 9 January 2020 09: 26 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: SOVIET UNION 2
        And this is without deep concern and threats of a mirror or asymmetric response! That's what a good understanding of English means! If you talk with the Americans in their own language and they understand it turns out you can communicate with them! No, well, I don’t know! It turns out everything is so elementary and simple! A small blow to the liver and the client is ready to talk!

        Well, not so simple, but not that hegemon, not that one. This hegemon will answer for the death of your namesake. hi
        1. SOVIET UNION 2 9 January 2020 09: 44 New
          • 4
          • 2
          +2
          The fortress did not fall because the fortress was bad. The manual was corrupt! If you look at a map of Russia's business, it turns out Russia is a hunger strike! We like to talk about the abundance of shops. But it turns out chain stores are not Russian! And we do not have Russian businessmen! The whole business is foreign! There are our managers. And if tomorrow is war? fool
      2. lis-ik 9 January 2020 09: 32 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        Quote: SOVIET UNION 2
        It turns out everything is so elementary and simple! A small blow to the liver and the client is ready to talk

        This must be wound on the mustache of our crooks, and how trembling creatures only flow around and regret.
    5. spirit 9 January 2020 10: 07 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Yes, an agreement of pure water! Do you think if they hit the barracks full of marines the result would be the same? And so Trump is happy and Iran defused the situation, everyone is happy hi
    6. Skarpzd 9 January 2020 10: 23 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      but right now, in the place of Iran, I would be very wary and would not allow relaxation. a very suspicious moment.
    7. maidan.izrailovich 9 January 2020 11: 52 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      That's what a life-giving rocket does!

      I would not be in a hurry to rejoice.
      This is a tactical move. Especially Iran’s loss is disproportionately greater.
      Trump needs to be re-elected. And war to him while need not.
      After the presidential election, and it doesn’t even matter who gets elected, the United States will return to this topic. Habitually tearing up any agreements. After all, Iran has already passed all this (agreement).
      1. Tank hard 9 January 2020 12: 25 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: maidan.izrailovich
        I would not be in a hurry to rejoice.

        This is your personal choice.
        And I rejoice in the small, often from the small and their totality something more is born ...
        I understand that Turkey did not give an opportunity to attack from bases on its territory, a trifle, but ...
        The United States is entering more and more trade wars, and not only with China, but also with Europe, a trifle, but ...
        The USA has practically decomposed the WTO, are many happy about this? A trifle, but ...
        In my opinion, the United States now annoys many more than the Soviet Union in the past. A trifle, but ...
        And such trifles ... Water sharpens a stone ...
        Quote: maidan.izrailovich
        This is a tactical move. Moreover, the loss of Iran is incommensurably greater.

        It let Iran understand.
        Quote: maidan.izrailovich
        Habitually breaking any agreements

        And this is no longer a trifle .. But here everyone decides for himself. And this assassination of an Iranian general is too reminiscent of the most shameful terrorist attack committed absolutely unscrupulously. And this is not a trifle at all ... hi
    8. venik 9 January 2020 14: 31 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Tank Hard
      That's what a life-giving rocket does!

      =======
      good drinks

      "..Here is the life-giving Cross doing !!! ..."
  2. 1976AG 9 January 2020 09: 05 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    That is, they don’t remember about the retaliatory strike on 52 objects in Iran ... We realized that it’s more expensive
  3. Far B 9 January 2020 09: 06 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Strange letter. On the one hand, they are ready for negotiations without preconditions, on the other, the "Iranian regime," "acted in accordance with international laws," and other dregs. Trying to save face, no?
    1. Tank hard 9 January 2020 09: 09 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: Far In
      On the one hand, they are ready for negotiations without preconditions, on the other, the "Iranian regime," "acted in accordance with international laws," and other dregs. Trying to save face, no?

      No, well, they’ll probably refuse to buy tomatoes ... wink
      Quote: Far In
      Trying to save face, no?

      This is unlikely ... request
    2. 1976AG 9 January 2020 09: 11 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      They have completely lost their face.
      1. Tank hard 9 January 2020 09: 19 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: 1976AG
        They have completely lost their face

        At this pace, and your ass will soon lose. repeat
    3. GKS 2111 9 January 2020 09: 13 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Yes, they saved their whole faces there, Iran replied, the United States was ready for negotiations. Nobody wanted to die, everyone stayed with their own. Grandmasters agreed to a draw.
      1. 1976AG 9 January 2020 09: 19 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: GKS 2111
        Yes, they saved their whole faces there, Iran replied, the United States was ready for negotiations. Nobody wanted to die, everyone stayed with their own. Grandmasters agreed to a draw.

        Not at all. The United States has shown its inability to ensure the security of its forces and this stain cannot be erased.
    4. SOVIET UNION 2 9 January 2020 09: 31 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Kelly Kraft emphasized that all US actions did not go beyond international laws.
      International laws are established by the United States. Translated into Russian, it will sound that the United States has the right to eliminate Shoigu! Shoigu has no right to liquidate partners! Wonderful international law !? Russia also seems to want international law !?
  4. Dmitry Donskoy 9 January 2020 09: 06 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    But is it not a crime to kill an official on the territory of another state? Striped law is not written? am
    1. bessmertniy 9 January 2020 09: 14 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Act that drawbar. In the interests of the United States, they can spin it at the UN as you like.
    2. SOVIET UNION 2 9 January 2020 09: 34 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      But is it not a crime to kill an official on the territory of another state? Striped law is not written?
      Iraq seems to be occupied by the United States. No? And if this is the zone of occupation, then the supremacy of the laws of the occupation authorities! No?
  5. rocket757 9 January 2020 09: 11 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Agree now or agreed earlier ... who will understand them ???
    1. knn54 9 January 2020 10: 01 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Suleimani was against treaties with the United States and a supporter of an alliance with the Russian Federation.
      I won’t be surprised if Pompeo and Co. begin to argue that the standoff between the USA and Iran is beneficial to Russia.
      1. rocket757 9 January 2020 10: 45 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: knn54
        Suleimani was against treaties with the United States and a supporter of an alliance with the Russian Federation.
        I won’t be surprised if Pompeo and Co. begin to argue that the standoff between the USA and Iran is beneficial to Russia.

        What is profit and what is not? A complex, multifaceted question.
        On the one hand, look, as it were, but on the other ... yes what for do we need this?
  6. Victor_B 9 January 2020 09: 13 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    This is called - to spoil directly on the dining table, and then say that it was.
    More precisely - he is to blame! I was forced! And in general, what is attached!
    1. Far B 9 January 2020 09: 18 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      This is called - to spoil directly on the dining table, and then say that it was.
      More precisely - he is to blame! I was forced! And in general, what is attached!
      But I'm ready for negotiations wassat
      1. Victor_B 9 January 2020 09: 19 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: Far In
        But I'm ready for negotiations

        But I'm not going to apologize!
  7. Vitaly Tsymbal 9 January 2020 09: 21 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The United States is ready to bargain, and not negotiate on equal terms, the United States needs profit, not peace ... Iran can significantly reduce this profit in the event of war. The rulers will be able to "correctly" explain any defeat in the battle, but the American people will not understand why the victory led to a decrease in profit.
  8. rotmistr60 9 January 2020 09: 28 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    ... without preconditions ...
    The United States is completely unlike politics, and therefore surprising. True, a statement was made for the UN Security Council, but what is really in their head is difficult to say. The main thing is that the conflict has not reached the extreme point - the war. All the events that have occurred confirm only one thesis - Americans are ready to talk (negotiate) only when they see that they can be repulsed.
  9. Stirbjorn 9 January 2020 09: 28 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    On the one hand, the exchange is certainly not equivalent ... rocket fire, with vague damage, against the death of the legendary IRGC general, on the other hand, is much more serious than our "tomatoes", followed by the "regret" that our media gave as an official apology
  10. The Siberian barber 9 January 2020 10: 03 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    . Kelly Kraft emphasized that all US actions did not go beyond international laws.

    Something I can’t recall such a law that allows you to kill a citizen of another country, without trial or investigation!
    The borzometer rolls over, however
  11. Victor1 9 January 2020 10: 05 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    the circus goes on
    in general, these are ideal conditions for the United States, they killed a serious man and achieved the destruction of an airplane with Iranian specialists in nuclear and military industry, and in response a small shelling without losses, just a couple of warehouses and a piece of iron ..
    all this is sad
    if once again they get away with it, they will become more impudent and stronger.
  12. SID
    SID 9 January 2020 10: 06 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    Quote: Far In
    Strange letter. On the one hand, they are ready for negotiations without preconditions, on the other, the "Iranian regime," "acted in accordance with international laws," and other dregs. Trying to save face, no?

    what Or maybe the United States is ready for decisive action against Iran, and these letters are an attempt to present its aggression to the world as a forced one: "We supposedly tried to do this and that, and through the UN called, but Iran is on the contrary. Well, we ..."
  13. Chingachguk 9 January 2020 10: 07 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    There they shook a test tube and slammed the whole country, then the general was killed and something is being unprovenly sculpted. What nonsense !? Their generals threaten the whole world with their statements and conclusions, anything can be tied to this and bang them too! But no one has done this yet!
  14. Guru 9 January 2020 10: 10 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "in response to a series of attacks by Iran and its supported formations on US forces and interests in the Middle East. "
    What a blurry and wording.
  15. cniza 9 January 2020 10: 18 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The United States is ready to negotiate with Iran without preconditions to reduce tensions in the region.


    A good statement, only you can’t believe them ...
  16. solovald 9 January 2020 10: 24 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Iran is not the enemy to fight directly with it: any proxy warriors and / or sanctions will be enough. As the saying goes, “the game is not worth the candle” - the states (by the standards of the "golden billion") will lose more than they gain from a direct victory over Iran.
    1. maidan.izrailovich 9 January 2020 12: 08 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      ...- states (by the standards of the "golden billion") will lose more than they gain from a direct victory over Iran ..

      The elite of a country printing money for the rest of the world will not lose anything.
      1. solovald 13 January 2020 07: 10 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        What does the money have to do with it? Read the comment carefully and thoughtfully.
  17. 75 Sergey 9 January 2020 10: 30 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    What the hell, the USA banged the general of a country that was not friendly to him, when he unofficially yanked into the territory of another state, in response, the non-friendly country grumbled unclear where the rockets were, and then a passenger plane crashes, why would Shtatnikov go so negotiations so zealously?
  18. EDWARD 9 January 2020 10: 33 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Iran should not go on any negotiations with amers for some time. now is their time to raise bets, and set conditions. let the Americans are now afraid of making a mistake on BV in something ..
    Today Iran is a hero. and the whole world knows that.
    is like a "nerd" beat a yard bully.
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. Ham
    Ham 9 January 2020 11: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Kelly Kraft stressed that all US actions did not go beyond international laws

    what to talk about with them?
  21. maidan.izrailovich 9 January 2020 12: 02 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well, by golly, kindergarten pants with straps. Why so euphoric?
    Believe me, my soul also warms that someone spat on the hegemon in the face.
    But back to sober logic. After all, nothing prevents the United States from taking all its military personnel to a range not attainable for Iranian missiles. And then it’s easy to carry a massive blow with “axes” and all the rest, which is complete in the US arsenal, Iranian air defense. After that, the creation of chaos in this territory is a matter of technology.
    I hope Iran takes advantage of the emerging respite to strengthen the country's defense capabilities. Sooner or later, the United States will necessarily break any agreement.
  22. Old26 9 January 2020 12: 25 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: Olgovich
    Yeah. the mattresses swallowed the pill. managed it. yes

    and how many screams were from a red-haired clown about 52 blows to Iran.

    Not only the United States, but also Iran, "managed". All the steam went off the whistle. How many formidable statements by the United States that they would strike at 52 targets - lowered on the brakes. Although, to be honest, they have the potential for this and remained
    How many cries from Iran about the "terrible revenge" against America and all its possible allies? Same. The steam went off the whistle. "exemplary strike" with zero effect - and that’s it. On this "terrible revenge" is completed ...

    Quote: spirit
    Yes, an agreement of pure water! Do you think if they hit the barracks full of marines the result would be the same? And so Trump is happy and Iran defused the situation, everyone is happy hi

    Iran pulled the brake in time and reversed. It is one thing to arouse a millionth crowd, it is quite another to start a war with a predictable end for yourself. And so "the sheep are full, and the wolves are intact"

    Quote: EDWARD
    Iran should not go on any negotiations with amers for some time. now is their time to raise bets, and set conditions. let the Americans are now afraid of making a mistake on BV in something ..
    Today Iran is a hero. and the whole world knows that.
    is like a "nerd" beat a yard bully.

    If Iran does not negotiate, the threat may reoccur. And in fact, they have no leverage to “set conditions” for the Americans. I think that the Iranians will go for a new version of the nuclear deal. Despite the fact that the new option for Iran will be worse than the previous one.
    Iran “reassured” its citizens with this missile strike. But after all, everyone perfectly understands that this was an agreement. Blow into the void. Iran had enough political restraint and sanity. This is a plus for him. But it’s hardly worth considering him a winner.
  23. Andrey.AN 9 January 2020 12: 53 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    May clarify the nature of these phenomena
    1. Tank hard 9 January 2020 15: 58 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      [Andrey.AN]May clarify the nature of these phenomena


      I feel they’ll finish the “halal” installation, and then a specific kirdyk will loom before the “kosher” ones, because I don’t know how it is to the USA, but it will fly to the “Old Testament” and crawl through the underground tunnels, and the lasers in the “fog” will not they will help, and the "iron dome" may rust, but the country is not big, there may be enough for everyone ... Such things may be ... repeat
      1. Andrey.AN 9 January 2020 16: 26 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Jews are not fools, they understand in general that no one will begin to exterminate them from scratch, they will use it as long as there are other people's weaknesses, then they will become an example of law-abiding, will use international laws.
        1. Tank hard 9 January 2020 16: 32 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Andrey.AN
          Jews are not fools, they understand in general that no one will begin to exterminate them from scratch, they will use it as long as there are other people's weaknesses, then they will become an example of law-abiding, will use international laws.

          I won’t argue here. I simply expressed My opinion, and it, not necessarily and correct, will show life. hi
      2. Krasnodar 9 January 2020 22: 42 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        The laser and the iron dome for missiles with a vigorous loaf are not designed
        The Ayatollahs know that the Israeli response will quickly lower them to the level of Afghanistan - both in terms of population, and in terms of infrastructure and industry - therefore there will simply be a parity of threats.
        1. Tank hard 10 January 2020 07: 09 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Krasnodar
          The Ayatollahs know that the Israeli response will quickly lower them to the level of Afghanistan - both in terms of population, and in terms of infrastructure and industry - therefore there will simply be a parity of threats.

          the "yaren loaf" (if it appeared (appears) in Iran) will also lower Israel to the level of the times of the "Old Testament", so yes, there will be parity. wink
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. Gunner 9 January 2020 17: 15 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    An attempt by the United States to smear the shit that the UN themselves and the members of the UN Security Council (Russia and China) entered.
  26. Grandfather-Shchukar 9 January 2020 17: 25 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    For good Iran, you need to once again plummet and threaten .. Then the negotiations will be on an equal footing!