Iranian TV Channel Launches Video of Missile Launch at US Military Bases

Iranian TV Channel Launches Video of Missile Launch at US Military Bases

A video appeared on the Web of launching Iranian missiles to strike at the American military base of Ain al-Assad, located in western Iraq. Video on YouTube was posted by the Iranian television channel PressTV Extra.


Explanations for the posted video say that the footage shows how Iran launches missiles at American bases in response to the assassination of General Suleimani. In addition, in the upper right corner there is an inscription in Farsi, which can be translated as "tough revenge."

Earlier it was reported that the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) launched several ground-to-ground missiles at American bases in western Iraq and Erbil. This attack was a response to the killing by the Americans of Iranian General Kassem Suleimani in the area of ​​Baghdad international airport on January 3 this year.


According to Iranian media, the attack on American bases resulted in the deaths of 80 people, and there are no American troops among them. Washington itself said that the strikes did not result in losses, and US President Donald Trump said that "everything is fine."

At the same time, the Office of the Prime Minister of Iraq, Adel Abd al-Mahdi, said that Iran had warned her of impending attacks on US military facilities. However, it is not specified what kind of objects are in question. It is also unknown whether the US military was warned of the attacks.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

153 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. spirit 8 January 2020 15: 05 New
    • 8
    • 4
    +4
    Trump is just like in a classic wassat
    1. krot 8 January 2020 15: 59 New
      • 10
      • 4
      +6
      A valid and positive video, knowing what the goals of these not the smartest and most beautiful rockets are))))
      1. for
        for 8 January 2020 19: 02 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: krot
        A valid and positive video, knowing what the goals of these not the smartest and most beautiful rockets are))))

        Still to see how and where they landed. Pictures from space.
      2. antivirus 8 January 2020 20: 38 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        In the first half of the 90s, the United States imposed sanctions against several universities of the Russian Federation for teaching students at the "rocket" departments.
        25 years is not a term in history.
    2. rich 8 January 2020 16: 12 New
      • 15
      • 7
      +8
      IMHO, as for these attacks, I do not rule out some kind of cunningly muddy agreement between Iran and the Americans, which allows both sides to save face and prevent a war from flaring up. Someone clearly warned the Americans that the coalition from the American bases of Iraq is moving to the American bases of Kuwait. The IRGC launches a ground attack in Idlib against the IG. Well, somehow it’s not right from a military point of view for parties in a pre-war state
      1. Flooding 8 January 2020 16: 21 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Rich
        as for these attacks, I do not rule out some kind of cunningly muddy agreement between Iran and the Americans, which allows both sides to save face and prevent the war from flaring up.

        Quote: https://diana-mihailova.livejournal.com/4370169.html
        The Prime Minister of Iraq made a statement according to which the Iranians warned the Iraqi government of the strike, and the Iraqi government warned the Americans. "To avoid victims":
      2. Vadivak 8 January 2020 16: 33 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Rich
        IMHO, as for these attacks, I do not rule out some kind of cunningly muddy agreement between Iran and the Americans, which allows both sides to save face and prevent a war from flaring up.

        According to CNN, the Iraqi authorities had previously notified the United States of those facilities that should be hit by Iranian missiles, thus avoiding casualties among personnel.
        1. xGibSoNx 8 January 2020 17: 49 New
          • 5
          • 15
          -10
          Iraqi authorities notify the United States in advance of those facilities
          If only the Iraqi authorities! Here's the thing ... The matter of principle, so to speak! No matter what the policy in the USA is not stirred up, no president will sit there if, under his leadership, they will brazenly begin to kill US citizens! And he, in turn, will just sit and be silent ... This only happens in the movies! If Iran still exists on the world map, it is only because at least there are some unspoken agreements. Actually in Iran, too, do not sit. It makes sense to develop a war, while the task is to raise the country .. Especially with those on whom a lot depends! If Iran unleashes a full-fledged war against the United States, it would be bad, problematic for the United States, etc. there was, for Iran, this would mean a 100% collapse of the system of government! And the number of missiles launched, targets hit, etc. .. does not matter what! All this, exclusively for domestic consumption.
          1. CERBERFOL 8 January 2020 20: 17 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Mutual collapse
          2. Alexey LK 9 January 2020 03: 17 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: xGibSoNx
            Whatever the politics in the USA,

            So this is the whole point! There are different Americans ... The war with Iran will help someone win the election, but it will hinder someone ...
      3. Cottodraton 8 January 2020 17: 07 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        100%, yesterday afternoon I saw news that said that the Americans had dumped everything from the bases. Even the video was.
        But where I saw, unfortunately, I will not say.
      4. g1v2 8 January 2020 17: 19 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Well, there really was a relocation of parts of the American and allied forces from the airfields in Iraq. Tch could be an agreement. Type you answer and we will be even. But on the other hand, these bases were quite logical targets for the Persians and the states could predict. And intelligence could also report on possible attacks.
        In general, we will see everything by what the Americans will do next.
        1. Cat Kuzya 8 January 2020 18: 09 New
          • 1
          • 4
          -3
          Well, how can we know what the mattresses of weapons have in the blanker, for example, on new principles? For example, the latest news:
          Two earthquakes - magnitudes 4,9 and 4,5 - occurred in Iran near the Bushehr nuclear power plant, according to the US Geological Survey (USGS).
          According to her, an earthquake of magnitude 4,9 occurred at 2.20 UTC (5.20 Moscow time). The epicenter of tremors was located 10 kilometers southeast of the city of Borazcan, the focus lay at a depth of 10 kilometers.
          The second earthquake of magnitude 4,5 occurred at 3.19 UTC (6.19 Moscow time). The epicenter was located 17 kilometers southeast of the city of Borazcan, the focus lay at a depth of 10 kilometers.

          https://ria.ru/20200108/1563176975.html
          Could this be a warning with the help of "tectonic" weapons?
          1. g1v2 8 January 2020 18: 32 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            There are many tales about tectonic weapons, but there is no real information. They talked about him for another year from 92. But so far, the only known possibility is the explosion of an atomic device or an extremely non-atomic one at the junction of lithospheric plates. If, at the same time, water from the lake or sea rushes into the breach, then an even more powerful explosion will follow. There were no signs of this. Most likely earthquakes - traces of underground explosions. Since they were at about the same time as missile launches, it can be assumed that not all missiles came out normally. Possible crashes at startup. Given that Iran has not yet massively fired ballistic missiles, accidents are quite possible. For example, an accident when refueling. The Iranian missile program is still relatively young, they still have to fill in cones. request
          2. Fat
            Fat 9 January 2020 02: 58 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Cat Kuzya
            Well, how can we know what the mattresses of weapons have in the blanker, for example, on new principles? For example, the latest news:
            Two earthquakes - magnitudes 4,9 and 4,5 - occurred in Iran near the Bushehr nuclear power plant, according to the US Geological Survey (USGS).
            According to her, an earthquake of magnitude 4,9 occurred at 2.20 UTC (5.20 Moscow time). The epicenter of tremors was located 10 kilometers southeast of the city of Borazcan, the focus lay at a depth of 10 kilometers.
            The second earthquake of magnitude 4,5 occurred at 3.19 UTC (6.19 Moscow time). The epicenter was located 17 kilometers southeast of the city of Borazcan, the focus lay at a depth of 10 kilometers.

            https://ria.ru/20200108/1563176975.html
            Could this be a warning with the help of "tectonic" weapons?

            Everything, paragraph. The earthquake in Spitak is the work of Brzezinski specialists ...
            Sid Meer is resting. It was just a “warning”
            I don’t even know how to perceive such a comment.
            Probably an ad for TV, isn't it?
      5. Vita vko 8 January 2020 18: 58 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        Quote: Rich
        As for these attacks, I do not rule out some kind of cunningly muddy agreement between Iran and the Americans, which allows both sides to save face and prevent the war from flaring up. Someone clearly warned the Americans

        A couple of days ago, Trump said that US troops would leave Iraq after the Iraqi Government paid for the construction of American bases. Therefore, Iran and Iraq have found a compromise - will destroy American bases. They showed strength, you do not need to pay for the ruins, and most importantly, they did not give a reason for a retaliatory strike, none of the Americans died.
        1. Fat
          Fat 9 January 2020 03: 06 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Vita VKO
          Quote: Rich
          As for these attacks, I do not rule out some kind of cunningly muddy agreement between Iran and the Americans, which allows both sides to save face and prevent the war from flaring up. Someone clearly warned the Americans

          A couple of days ago, Trump said that US troops would leave Iraq after the Iraqi Government paid for the construction of American bases. Therefore, Iran and Iraq have found a compromise - will destroy American bases. They showed strength, you do not need to pay for the ruins, and most importantly, they did not give a reason for a retaliatory strike, none of the Americans died.

          Well. And the wolves are safe and the sheep are full ...)))
          Cho then you distorted .. Is there any experience? Country, what is playing poker? The bank decided to divide by the "backstage" ...
          I do not believe!
  2. _Ugene_ 8 January 2020 15: 07 New
    • 17
    • 3
    +14
    it would be better if they showed a video of hitting targets
    1. Nyrobsky 8 January 2020 15: 41 New
      • 14
      • 4
      +10
      Quote: _Ugene_
      it would be better if they showed a video of hitting targets

      This is for the Americans, because they are the exclusive "lurepriyateli". But something tells you that they will not show and will not tell.
      1. _Ugene_ 8 January 2020 17: 05 New
        • 1
        • 3
        -2
        This is for the Americans, because they are the exclusive "lurepriyateli". But something tells you that they will not show and will not tell.

        where does the Americans, even our Moscow Region, try to upload video from drones confirming the effectiveness of
        1. Nyrobsky 8 January 2020 17: 52 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: _Ugene_
          This is for the Americans, because they are the exclusive "lurepriyateli". But something tells you that they will not show and will not tell.

          where does the Americans, even our Moscow Region, try to upload video from drones confirming the effectiveness of

          I can hardly imagine that Iranian drones would swarm in swirl over American bases in Iraq, and generally somewhere above the goals set for retaliation, in order to satisfy the interest of the picky philistine Ugene and provide him with a picture of the results of a missile strike. request
          1. _Ugene_ 8 January 2020 17: 55 New
            • 2
            • 4
            -2
            Faintly imagine
            these are your problems that you have little idea, I repeat - the base is not in the United States but in Iraq, and judging by how they shot these missiles from the air defense, the Americans have no buzz there, so they could have hung a reconnaissance UAV, I do not exclude that it was, nothing to boast about
            1. Fat
              Fat 9 January 2020 03: 23 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: _Ugene_
              Faintly imagine
              these are your problems that you have little idea, I repeat - the base is not in the United States but in Iraq, and judging by how they shot these missiles from the air defense, the Americans have no buzz there, so they could have hung a reconnaissance UAV, I do not exclude that it was, nothing to boast about

              Along the way, just the Iranian satellite observer flew in the wrong orbit, maybe optics failed? No one saw anything! The Americans lie, as always, but the fanatics don't care at all. The main thing was launched Plukhk. In childhood, you used to throw up a handful of gravel and shout: “a fool is on your head!” ... Well, from experience no one liked
              ... especially not involved in the fun of passers-by ...
    2. Flooding 8 January 2020 16: 27 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: _Ugene_
      it would be better if they showed a video of hitting targets

      Look at Diana Mikhailova
      https://diana-mihailova.livejournal.com/4370169.html
      1. _Ugene_ 8 January 2020 17: 04 New
        • 0
        • 3
        -3
        Look at Diana Mikhailova
        https://diana-mihailova.livejournal.com/4370169.html

        did you watch it yourself? this video can be attached to anything, it does not contain any information - where something that flickered in the dark
        1. Flooding 8 January 2020 17: 10 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          Quote: _Ugene_
          did you watch it yourself? this video can be attached to anything, it does not contain any information - where something that flickered in the dark

          Of course I watched. It is strange that you are surprised. After all, expecting something else would be very naive.
          This is what today is from the Iranians. And the skepticism about this video is quite natural.
          Did you expect to see terrain and runaway Americans with open IDs? I have already written about naivety. There is nothing to add.
          1. _Ugene_ 8 January 2020 17: 16 New
            • 0
            • 2
            -2
            It is strange that you are surprised.
            It is strange that you are surprised that I am surprised. What is the point of giving a link to a video in which there is virtually nothing, justifying it with the fact that there is no other.
            There is nothing to add.
            1. Flooding 8 January 2020 17: 32 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: _Ugene_
              What is the point of giving a link to a video in which there is virtually nothing, citing the fact that there is no other.

              I will offer an answer option, suddenly it will suit you.
              First: this is so far the only video from the direct executor of rocket fire - Iran.
              Second: in the absence of reliable and complete information, it is customary to use those few of its crumbs to which there is access. The subtext to the reference was with a certain amount of skepticism, obvious to any sane person.
              Third: in the link I provided, it is clearly and unambiguously written over the video that it allegedly illustrates the penetration of missiles through the territory of the American base.
              Fourth: I repeat that it is very naive to expect complete information in the public domain in this rapidly unfolding situation in the first days. "Diana Mikhailova" knows how to work with information, unlike.
              1. _Ugene_ 8 January 2020 17: 45 New
                • 0
                • 2
                -2
                Nowadays, if the military officially reports a strike, then the video of the result of the drone strike is proof of the effectiveness of this strike, if it isn’t there then they almost certainly screwed up and there’s nothing to boast about, so I wrote in the first message
                it would be better if they showed a video of hitting targets

                there is nothing more to discuss and nothing
                1. Flooding 8 January 2020 17: 47 New
                  • 5
                  • 1
                  +4
                  Quote: _Ugene_
                  Nowadays, if the military officially reports a strike, then the video of the result of the drone strike is evidence of the effectiveness of this strike.

                  UAV over an American military base?
                  It seems that we really have nothing more to discuss.
                  1. _Ugene_ 8 January 2020 17: 51 New
                    • 1
                    • 2
                    -1
                    the base is not in the United States but in Iraq, and judging by how they shot down these missiles from the air defense, the Americans have no buzz there, so they could very well hang a reconnaissance UAV
                    1. Flooding 8 January 2020 18: 03 New
                      • 1
                      • 1
                      0
                      Quote: _Ugene_
                      the base is not in the US but in Iraq

                      Its location is not at all important.
                      Air defense cover is required.
                      Quote: _Ugene_
                      judging by how they shot down these missiles with anti-aircraft defense, the Americans there are not buzzing

                      It is precisely this moment that is now being discussed at forums very hotly as a subject of concession from the states.
                      Quote: _Ugene_
                      so it could well have hung a scout UAV

                      Let's start from the version that it was an honest exchange of blows, without any intrigue.
                      It is not at all a fact that the Iranians were sure of the final result.
                      Was it worth risking your UAVs in the zone of almost guaranteed defeat of enemy air defense? Of course not. By the way, what are Iran's capabilities in UAVs? I think very meager.
                2. Fat
                  Fat 9 January 2020 03: 51 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: _Ugene_
                  Nowadays, if the military officially reports a strike, then the video of the result of the drone strike is proof of the effectiveness of this strike, if it isn’t there then they almost certainly screwed up and there’s nothing to boast about, so I wrote in the first message
                  it would be better if they showed a video of hitting targets

                  there is nothing more to discuss and nothing

                  Ahh! Leave proof of victory shots of a machine gun and eyewitness accounts .. No words ... Some heroes shot down 300 aircraft each. The latter do not consider the equipment destroyed if they were written off from the list after the “forced” landing and disposal of non-ferrous metal. This is for example ..
                  Why is the Fuhrer interesting, according to legend, declared Levitan an enemy of the Reich? Almost a personal enemy?
                  In! .. The main thing is Charisma. Missiles left on the head of the enemy, somewhere hit ..
                  Big "Baba Boom" ...
                  “From our side there are no losses and damages, and F. with him, with a foreign tanker” (c)
  3. Kenji 8 January 2020 15: 11 New
    • 23
    • 7
    +16
    Knowing the peculiarity of counting the dead at the US Armed Forces (all who serve for the notorious green card are never listed as dead American soldiers in the official submission), they can be cunning saying that there are no losses on their part.
    1. Reserve officer 8 January 2020 15: 23 New
      • 13
      • 3
      +10
      Something inspired after Trump's statement:
      “All is well, beautiful marquise,
      Things are going and life is easy
      Not a single sad surprise
      Except for a trifle ... "
    2. Yves762 8 January 2020 15: 24 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      Here they write that the bourgeois SPRN allegedly worked, that Fort Meade, and the bourgeois managed to hide ....

      And it’s not a fact that the Iranians weren’t “in the direction of” - just to scare - they aimed. Pontus is, but there is no blood.
      1. Fat
        Fat 9 January 2020 04: 25 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Yves762
        Here they write that the bourgeois SPRN allegedly worked, that Fort Meade, and the bourgeois managed to hide ....

        And it’s not a fact that the Iranians weren’t “in the direction of” - just to scare - they aimed. Pontus is, but there is no blood.

        I don’t know the truth. Amers always has this ... After a wreckage of a kamikaze wing fell into the aircraft carrier’s elevator, a fire broke out on the hangar deck ... The fire was extinguished ... MIA 86 sailors ... And those that LIA then Rimbaud will save ... Es-but in full composition, well, of course, slightly rumpled, but all ..
        I hate the memories of American fleet guides, especially under the supervision of MOST C. Nimitz.
        The temple of chronology, the embodiment of the marine genius of the US Navy.
        Well, and here: "it’s okay, it happened worse ...
        Yes it happened.
        There is no faith in politicians, especially big ones ...
        Here exaggerate slightly, downplay there.
        And then?
    3. Terentich 8 January 2020 15: 33 New
      • 12
      • 22
      -10
      Quote: Kenji
      Knowing the peculiarity of counting the dead

      Yeah .. you just know for sure that you don’t go to the grandmother ... It’s long been known that here all the super druper are specialists in the USA, they know all the ins and outs by heart. fellow
      In general, I even envy you sometimes - bring any nonsense about the “enemy” and get universal approval and stick out your pockets wider so that all the pluses fit, and to check how it really is, the main thing is to be patriotic and “enemy” one more time "hurt" ... good wassat fellow
      1. Kenji 8 January 2020 15: 42 New
        • 13
        • 3
        +10
        To get started, read the memoirs of the US military, from where I actually know how they count the dead for advertised information. So your comment is at least not relevant or will you say that US troops openly lie in describing their everyday life, way of life and the peculiarity of their own army?
        1. Terentich 8 January 2020 15: 48 New
          • 6
          • 20
          -14
          Quote: Kenji
          or will you argue that US troops openly lie in describing their everyday life, way of life and the peculiarity of their own army?

          No, they don’t lie if it’s really about memoirs ...
          Quote: Kenji
          will argue

          I will argue that you have not seen any of these memoirs in your eyes. If only because there are many pages and letters, and reading is no longer in fashion. hi
          1. Fat
            Fat 9 January 2020 04: 48 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Terentich
            Quote: Kenji
            or will you argue that US troops openly lie in describing their everyday life, way of life and the peculiarity of their own army?

            No, they don’t lie if it’s really about memoirs ...
            Quote: Kenji
            will argue

            I will argue that you have not seen any of these memoirs in your eyes. If only because there are many pages and letters, and reading is no longer in fashion. hi

            Somehow it happened that the people in VO are not your trend, some except Nimitz and Kuwahara have also read, although it’s true yours, the syllable of nihon is more complicated than the American official and somehow slipped from the staff of accounting.
            The Anglo-Saxons are not able to transfer so many lyrics to the page .. The Japanese will say a lot of words about his service under the guidance of the legendary Onisi. It’s immediately clear that Americans are evil guys, but ..
            But they lie a lot and, sometimes, ineptly.
            From hopelessness or something ...
      2. Po-tzan 8 January 2020 16: 05 New
        • 7
        • 7
        0
        Quote: Terentich
        Yeah .. you then just know for sure that sales to the grandmother do not go ...


        Judging by the story with Wagner, in which nameless novoros fight and die, it is easy to guess that the Americans just as well send passportless Latinos and other green card applicants to death. They are not holy either, you know ...
        1. Terentich 8 January 2020 16: 19 New
          • 3
          • 9
          -6
          Quote: PO-tzan
          Judging by the story of Wagner, in which nameless novoros fight and die

          Um ... your argument is strange ... the mercenaries in PMCs are one thing, the official army of the country is different ... Anyone who serves in the US Army is a soldier, and there they calculate the losses of soldiers and not citizens of the country.
          1. Po-tzan 8 January 2020 16: 31 New
            • 3
            • 3
            0
            USA, such as PMCs do not use in Iraq?

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_private_military_contractors
            1. Terentich 8 January 2020 16: 37 New
              • 3
              • 8
              -5
              Quote: PO-tzan
              USA, such as PMCs do not use in Iraq?

              And here it is in general? Speech ("dispute") was originally about calculating losses in the US Army and not in PMCs. PMCs is a completely different topic.
              1. Ramzaj99 8 January 2020 17: 01 New
                • 2
                • 2
                0
                Quote: Terentich
                And here it is in general? Speech ("dispute") was originally about calculating losses in the US Army and not in PMCs. PMCs is a completely different topic.

                It's about the dead Americans. Military men, PMCs, or toilets at the base were washed, it does not matter. In addition, PMCs are almost everywhere there. Starting from security and ending with the service staff and security of the base.
                1. Terentich 8 January 2020 17: 18 New
                  • 2
                  • 4
                  -2
                  Quote: Ramzaj99
                  In addition, PMCs are almost everywhere there.

                  There were no reports anywhere that there were PMCs on the attacked bases. And indeed, in Syria, Amers do not have PMCs, they have Afghanistan, maybe they still have a little in Iraq, in Syria maybe the Kurds are still being trained ... and even that is unlikely.
                  Quote: Ramzaj99
                  Starting from collateral to service staff

                  This is usually done by civilian contractors.
                  1. Ramzaj99 8 January 2020 18: 14 New
                    • 1
                    • 1
                    0
                    Quote: Terentich
                    This is usually done by civilian contractors.

                    It is very interesting to see how civil contractors drive caravans with provisions and fuel in a conditionally not safe territory))))
                2. Astronaut 8 January 2020 21: 33 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  How much stupidity can be carried? They explained to you that PMCs and the regular army are two different things.
                  1. Ramzaj99 8 January 2020 23: 14 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Quote: Astronaut
                    How much stupidity can be carried? They explained to you that PMCs and the regular army are two different things.

                    First, get into the topic of who in the US Army is engaged in providing this army abroad. And then bring the blizzard .....
                    1. The comment was deleted.
  4. Fedor Sokolov 8 January 2020 15: 11 New
    • 10
    • 8
    +2
    A sufficiently powerful slap in the face to the exceptional, to which they are unlikely to respond, a large war in the region is unnecessary to anyone.
    1. Vol4ara 8 January 2020 15: 14 New
      • 2
      • 4
      -2
      Quote: Fedor Sokolov
      a big war in the region is unnecessary to anyone.


      aha wassat
    2. Yves762 8 January 2020 15: 30 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Why "big war"? What prevents them from still doing a lot of time and doing what to periodically shoot, especially not aiming? India and Pakistan have been living like this for decades - and nothing; even things are common.
    3. dzvero 8 January 2020 15: 31 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      War - no, aggravation - yes. Perhaps they will hit the places of deployment of rocket launchers. Although, even at the moment, the elements of the "Nanai Boy Fight" are visible ...
  5. opuonmed 8 January 2020 15: 14 New
    • 2
    • 7
    -5
    shas usa live will bambit Iran))))
    1. maidan.izrailovich 8 January 2020 15: 18 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      shas usa live will bambit Iran))))

      Therefore, it is likely that the aggressor’s planes will also be shot down live.
      1. Kleber 8 January 2020 15: 42 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        I would have looked at this sight.
    2. dzvero 8 January 2020 15: 46 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      So they have everything worked out - they fly, they bomb, then they watch on TV where they got to - to the hospital, school, mosque, registry office or bulldozer ...
  6. Konstantin Shevchenko 8 January 2020 15: 15 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    If only someone could describe the amazing power of these non-nuclear missiles.
  7. 501Legion 8 January 2020 15: 15 New
    • 18
    • 7
    +11
    that's who has eggs, Iran
  8. The comment was deleted.
    1. AllBiBek 8 January 2020 15: 36 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      Yesterday they said that they did bang one. In Kenya, in the very attack on the base, which launched a suicide bomber on a motorcycle with explosives at the gate. States have not yet confirmed.
      1. Aleksandr21 8 January 2020 16: 12 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: AllBiBek
        Yesterday they said that they did bang one. In Kenya, in the very attack on the base, which launched a suicide bomber on a motorcycle with explosives at the gate. States have not yet confirmed.


        Yesterday and exposed this fake. In Kenya, 3 people were killed in an attack on an American base, 1 soldier and 2 civilians from service personnel, the general was not among them :) now these fakes are a dime a dozen, Iranians need to show what heavy losses the United States suffers and how they avenge Suleymani, and it doesn’t matter that even the figure of 80 dead is a fake .... where will the Iraqi people from 80 come from? Especially at night they stood and waited for the rocket to fly to them? Well, nonsense.
    2. Guards turn 8 January 2020 16: 12 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Iran has developed 13 possible answers - this is the first.
      1. Semurg 8 January 2020 18: 43 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Quote: Guards turn
        Iran has developed 13 possible answers - this is the first.

        13 rockets fired and this is 13 possible answers.
  9. Sergey39 8 January 2020 15: 17 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    There will most likely be no retaliatory strike. Democrats will not let Trump get drawn into the war, but take advantage of the moment to throw him off.
    1. Nikolay87 8 January 2020 15: 29 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: Sergey39
      There will most likely be no retaliatory strike. Democrats will not let Trump get drawn into the war, but take advantage of the moment to throw him off.

      I beg of you. You might think that under the Democrats, the United States does not fight abroad. They will now express dissatisfaction, bargain with the Republicans, so that they make concessions on some laws or other preferences and push through what kind of law is necessary with a minimum number of majority votes in order to save face.
      1. Sergey39 8 January 2020 15: 38 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        You look at the news what's happening there. Trump is attacked from all sides. And they won’t be able to answer at all, they will do something, but throwing Trump off will be the main goal.
        1. Nikolay87 8 January 2020 16: 08 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          Are you watching? Can you name the day the American media did not drive Trump? They will not throw off anyone whom they themselves know. Republicans in power, then they are hired by the Democrats. Democrats in power, Republicans criticize them. And the cart goes in the same direction and it does not matter who is at the helm. Doesn’t resemble anything?
      2. den3080 8 January 2020 15: 59 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Nikolay87
        Quote: Sergey39
        There will most likely be no retaliatory strike. Democrats will not let Trump get drawn into the war, but take advantage of the moment to throw him off.

        I beg of you. You might think that under the Democrats, the United States does not fight abroad. They will now express dissatisfaction, bargain with the Republicans, so that they make concessions on some laws or other preferences and push through what kind of law is necessary with a minimum number of majority votes in order to save face.

        A retaliatory strike will only be possible if Democrats or Republicans have a majority in the Senate and Congress.
        Moreover, in the case of the Democrats, the Democrat President is also needed.
        It will also be impossible to agree "on the laws", since the point of no return has been passed - the Democrats want to deprive the Republicans of the main prize - the presidency. So long as this is not resolved (by rejecting impeachment in Congress, for example) or by new elections, there will be no answer.
        In my unenlightened view. hi
        1. Nikolay87 8 January 2020 16: 13 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: den3080
          Quote: Nikolay87
          Quote: Sergey39
          There will most likely be no retaliatory strike. Democrats will not let Trump get drawn into the war, but take advantage of the moment to throw him off.

          I beg of you. You might think that under the Democrats, the United States does not fight abroad. They will now express dissatisfaction, bargain with the Republicans, so that they make concessions on some laws or other preferences and push through what kind of law is necessary with a minimum number of majority votes in order to save face.

          A retaliatory strike will only be possible if Democrats or Republicans have a majority in the Senate and Congress.
          Moreover, in the case of the Democrats, the Democrat President is also needed.
          It will also be impossible to agree "on the laws", since the point of no return has been passed - the Democrats want to deprive the Republicans of the main prize - the presidency. So long as this is not resolved (by rejecting impeachment in Congress, for example) or by new elections, there will be no answer.
          In my unenlightened view. hi

          I bet half a point that even before the end of impeachment (its execution or refusal to sell) and before new elections there will be a US response to a missile attack.
    2. opuonmed 8 January 2020 15: 35 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      Quote: Sergey39
      There will most likely be no retaliatory strike. Democrats will not let Trump get drawn into the war, but take advantage of the moment to throw him off.

      grandmas if they offer grandmas they will approve at least that))) in the same place, one group labs and every time a prez is selected and the others change labyroys)) each senator and others labs in the world for 1-3 flows) if the United States will benefit from war, it will be if not then we can bamboozut in Iran no matter what, and sanctions are and will calm down on this))
    3. classik46 8 January 2020 16: 28 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Of course it won’t be, because if there was a war, the stock market of American companies will go down rapidly, not to mention the fact that in January Trump will need to decide whether to inject a new injection of freshly printed dollars to patch holes. It is advisable if the stock drop exceeds 3-4% it can become a domino effect. In the summer, KST already saved someone big in America from falling, so neither Trump, nor the Democrats, nor even Israel (who already understood everything and quickly spoke out for non-interference and closure of airspace) US Armed Forces).
  10. Lesorub 8 January 2020 15: 17 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    A video appeared on the web of launching Iranian missiles to strike at Ain al-Assad US military base

    If Iran really wanted to have significant casualties among American soldiers, it would seem that this would come true, but it becomes clear that the information about the retaliatory strike spread faster than the strike itself.
  11. Leshy1975 8 January 2020 15: 21 New
    • 17
    • 2
    +15
    Of course, I did not expect Iran to openly attack the US bases like this. I thought that it would be bombings and shelling without taking responsibility. It seems like everyone understands who, and there is nothing special to show, well, someone partisaned.
    On the other hand, such a Trump oversight is clearly in the hands of the Democrats. He puffed out his cheeks, threatened, and in the end acted like an elephant in a china shop.
    And in this regard, there is an idea that perhaps Iran received a certain signal from the US democrats that act, but not particularly harshly, we will not allow a serious answer, but at the same time we decide the general interest:
    you (Iran) save face and show your decisive answer,
    we (US Democrats) use this Trump blunder in the election race (maybe they will add something else to impeachment).

    Here is some kind of impression so far. hi
    1. FORCE 38GB 8 January 2020 15: 39 New
      • 7
      • 1
      +6
      A high-level contract and a "demonstrative otvetka" in order to "remove" the trump with specific fanfares ... Hmm .. why not ...
      1. Mityay65 8 January 2020 15: 52 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Quote: FORCE 38RUS
        High-level negotiation and "indicative otvetka"

        In principle, this option could be agreed with Trump, if there is an intermediary. A mediator is required in such a situation.
        As I understand it, a pin strike - or 10 or 15 missiles, losses are unknown. This is a demonstration.
        Given the low supposed accuracy of Iranian RBs, it may turn out for some time that there are no losses at all.
        1. Nyrobsky 8 January 2020 16: 48 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: Mityai65
          Quote: FORCE 38RUS
          High-level negotiation and "indicative otvetka"

          In principle, this option could be agreed with Trump, if there is an intermediary. A mediator is required in such a situation.
          You apparently missed the news that the representatives of Qatar, almost on the second day after the assassination of Suleymani, arrived in Tehran with the mission to settle the problems between Iran and the United States in the light of the statements about the retaliatory strike. It is assumed that they brought the wishes of the mattresses not to beat them excessively and confine themselves to demonstrative retaliatory strikes with minimal losses for the United States. So the intermediaries are practically spinning online.
    2. artifact 8 January 2020 15: 43 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Leshy1975
      He blew his cheeks, threatened, and in the end

      and not the first time already, with North Korea an example before my eyes
      1. Sergey39 8 January 2020 16: 29 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        But then Trump framed in full.
        1. alexmach 8 January 2020 16: 49 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          But then Trump framed in full.

          Yes, let's see more. Maybe a small victorious war will only benefit him.
          1. Sergey39 8 January 2020 17: 07 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            It is also possible to specially stir up this story, so that later you can catch a fish in troubled water as a businessman. Then Trump and the presidency will no longer be needed.
    3. Stas157 8 January 2020 16: 30 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: Leshy1975
      Я certainly did not expectthat Iran like this in the open, defiantly hit the US bases.

      I did not expect the Iranians to respond. Even the news and analytics did not look at this. Thought escaped with tomato threats. But no.
    4. Alex Nevs 8 January 2020 18: 01 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Unlikely. If there is a leak according to the agreement. There will not just be a howl. Outskirts-will be just zilch in comparison.
      1. Leshy1975 8 January 2020 18: 19 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Alex Nevs
        Unlikely. If there is a leak according to the agreement. There will not just be a howl. Outskirts-will be just zilch in comparison.

        Well, no one signed the paper. If only verbally, through intermediaries.
        It's just that the reaction of the Americans is still a little strange. From the opponents of Trump, even too peaceful. Although knowing how the United States relates even simply to threats to its security and the country's image, this seems unusual. The feeling that the Democrats are simply happy with such a gift in the fight against Trump. And just because all sorts of agreements (including illegal ones) have happened before, and from here such an idea arose. Iran was sure that there would be no continuation in response.
        And Trump, today was supposed to appeal to citizens from the oval office (which I read in the media, then retell), and then canceled the appeal and so far no gu-gu. It can be seen that he was pulled. Well, further events will show. If that’s all, then it’s for sure that the agreement with the Democrats on the discharge of Trump. Well, he himself is to blame, so he framed. For that matter, it could have been done quieter (the Israelis had a lot of experience, they would have thought of something) or to refuse and not admit that he gave the order and in general that the USA had nothing to do with it. hi
  12. Thrifty 8 January 2020 15: 34 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The Iranians said that "this is only the beginning," that is, the United States will not have a peaceful life in the region!
    1. Kleber 8 January 2020 15: 45 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      It is possible, and not only in this region.
  13. Paul Siebert 8 January 2020 15: 34 New
    • 8
    • 3
    +5
    In missile strikes, the Yankees will give the Persians a hundred points ahead.
    But every war is won on earth.
    And then the Iranians are able to drown the Americans in their own blood. In Iranian.
    If those spirits have enough to land.
    One thing is clear - a war with Iran is inevitable, and perhaps has already begun.
    Because declaring war officially has not been fashionable lately ...
    1. eagle owl 8 January 2020 15: 41 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      What parts of the US can land in Iran? Which specifically? They can scrape together a couple of regiments. Therefore, even Venezuela did not succeed in pressing - there is no infantry! And NATO will not give them a soldier now. They got along with all of NATO themselves. Iraq-2 will not work - there is nothing to attack
      1. alexmach 8 January 2020 16: 51 New
        • 0
        • 2
        -2
        What parts of the US can land in Iran? Which specifically?

        Damn, whatever your question, why should I land then? Bombed in the Stone Age and all.
        1. eagle owl 8 January 2020 17: 43 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Have you seen the strike of Kyrgyzstan in Syria? The hits are successful - on the fingers of one hand to count with several thousand Axes launched. This is still in Syria air defense ek. There are in Iran. But flying there will not work either - one strategic drone has already reached. And garbage is not even that. that Iran has long been preparing for the bombing (did you see missile launchers in the bunkers?). and what’s the main danger for the USA - the grandfather of ayatola will whistle. and ideological Muslims will spring up to terrorize the states with terrorist attacks, to cover this, it is necessary to work out all their focal points on a pawn on the ground
          1. alexmach 8 January 2020 18: 07 New
            • 1
            • 2
            -1
            Have you seen the strike of Kyrgyzstan in Syria? The hits are successful - on the fingers of one hand to count with several thousand Axes launched.

            A few thousand? You’ve seen something wrong. Several thousand are Iraq and Yugoslavia, and they are still ground. What a few thousand more, 60 missiles, while the blow was at an airfield in a deserted area.
            This is still in Syria air defense ek. There are in Iran

            Both statements are highly controversial. And in Syria there is so-so in Iran with POB - nothing special.
            But flying there will not work either - one strategic drone has already reached

            It will come out, it will come out after the “Several Thousand Topers”, which probably have an expiration date soon and something needs to be done with them, you can safely fly on the “ganships” and finish everything that moves.
            Iran has been preparing for bombing for a long time (did you see missile launchers in bunkers?)

            Have you seen the news about the modernization of anti-bunker missiles? But it’s not even an issue. Well, the Iranians will keep these launchers, let’s say they’ll use them, let’s say they’ll even use something up for them, even if the base is in Kuwait, and then what? They then cease to iron after that or what? In the best case, they will shoot their entire supply of missiles, in the worst, most of it will be destroyed on the ground.
            and jump on ideological Muslims to terrorize states with terrorist attacks

            Over the ocean? Well, that. After all, there are all kinds of special services there too. Well, one or two maybe someone will break through, but I don’t think that they will get mass terror.
            1. eagle owl 8 January 2020 19: 30 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Firstly. There were all kinds of dopig axes in Syria, the result of the blow was not zero, but already negative - a massive blow to milk! You should keep in mind that targeting is necessary for a strike, while the USA does not and cannot have a proxy in Iran. And there is no one to work on the ground))) Iran has air defense, it’s clear from the drone - they didn’t just fill it up. and flunked SO, so that he grunted on the territory. to get into playful pens to whom should. This is a sign of non-acidic air defense. Which is, it is the States that do not have it, which clearly demonstrates the plague over Aramco and the bases. And what else they have in store for the United States is unclear.
              About special services laughing They just will not fight for Iran themselves? Im Trump is the enemy themselves. And yet, the SPECIAL SERVICE is a myroscope, the IRGC is an army. The special forces do not play against the military unit - they will clamp and crush MASS. Iran has mass, but the USA has a fig in his pocket and a yoke in the form of three wars they have already lost
              1. alexmach 8 January 2020 20: 56 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                Why are you writing this nonsense. Remind me of the drunk Zhirinovsky broadcasting from Baghdad about 4 million Kalashnikov assault rifles.
                There were all kinds of dopig axes in Syria, the result of the blow was not zero, but already negative - a massive blow to milk!

                60 this nirazu is not dofig, it’s so, trained. Dofiga was in Iraq.
                About the result, you only know what you showed in the news. And there they showed something profitable.
                You should keep in mind that targeting requires targeting, and the USA does not and cannot have a proxy in Iran. And there is no one to work on the ground)))

                Really? And does targeting only from the earth happen? Those same drones there just so that flew?
                Iran has air defense, it’s clear from the drone

                Nothing is clear about the drone. To shoot down one at the same time from how many and repel the blow of the same 60 cruise missiles is 2 very big differences
                About the special services laughing. They just will not fight for Iran themselves?

                Still what nonsense write? Their work is the fight against terrorism in America and not military operations.
                1. eagle owl 8 January 2020 21: 36 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  I do not specialize in stupid things.
                  "What is beneficial is what they showed." USA means it was unprofitable to show the effect of work when on that. how they screwed up with rockets, of which there was not 60 nichrome, and at least FOR a hundred - even Deutsche Welle was laughing at the mud over the “blow” with an ax and muzzle. And Syria showed the carcasses of axes lying in the bare desert. Iran immediately showed exactly hit the hangars, point!

                  And the United States does not need to show nichrome - advertising is no longer the engine of trade and show a beautiful picture with an ax flying into the window for the growth of military-industrial complex sales.
                  So what about stupid things? I can’t compete with you!
                  Pss. It is interesting that the helicopters in the parking lots did not have time to evacuate. They say that Iran warned, but it seems that the satellite warning system for missile launches worked, and there was no time for evacuation - just hide in the cracks.
    2. Mityay65 8 January 2020 16: 48 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: Paul Siebert
      every war is won on earth.

      I do not agree.
      US ground operation against Iran is impossible. For different reasons. Everyone understands this and the stripes made this conclusion a long time ago. Yes, and not in the style of the Yankees. Modern analysts and journalism, the Yankees, if you notice, the operation against Iraq is now presented as absolute stupidity, bordering on a crime.
      Quote: Paul Siebert
      In missile strikes, the Yankees will give the Persians a hundred points ahead.

      Yes, here is this option, coupled with the ongoing next version of the Anaconda plan, just in the style of striped villains.
      They are able to shell the ayatol with a supply of old Axes for a long time, gradually destroying the regime, increasing sanctions and provoking Iran’s ground invasion of Iraq.
      Now the task of the stripes is to anger and provoke the ayatol on stupidity.
      1. IL-18 8 January 2020 17: 20 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Mityai65
        striped task to anger and provoke ayatol on

        About nonsense, hardly. It’s more correct to say that in a hopeless situation, except how to respond to provocations with missiles, terrorist attacks, etc. to promote the complete isolation of Iran. And there, over time, popular unrest like the Maidan, but with another harsh reaction from the authorities. And the tougher, the Americans will have a deeper sense of satisfaction. And when Iran is completely crumbled, it will be possible to engage in democratization, or divide the country ... By the way, THERE ARE KURDS.
        1. Mityay65 8 January 2020 17: 37 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          I think that this morning the ayatols retired in a deep cave and were busy collecting the atomic bomb. Well, spinning centrifuges of uranium enrichment. Now they have no options. Of course, they will lie, without hesitation, that they comply with the agreement, but this will not change the essence.
          Now, for ayatol, much depends on how quickly they can assemble and test nuclear weapons. If the estimates that it takes no more than 2 years are correct, then they can do it. Otherwise, the US will be able to isolate and marginalize Iran.
          Well, the campaign, old Trump tried to make the "roaring twenties" interesting from the very beginning lol
    3. SovAr238A 8 January 2020 18: 07 New
      • 2
      • 3
      -1
      Quote: Paul Siebert
      In missile strikes, the Yankees will give the Persians a hundred points ahead.
      But every war is won on earth.
      And then the Iranians are able to drown the Americans in their own blood. In Iranian.
      If those spirits have enough to land.
      One thing is clear - a war with Iran is inevitable, and perhaps has already begun.
      Because declaring war officially has not been fashionable lately ...


      Iran and Iraq muttered each other for several years, having lost more than a million people killed.
      No one could win.
      The Americans came and cleaned Iraq for a month.

      the essence - and Iran and Iraq, and all the Arabs / Persians / other evil spirits, the suffering hury - really can not fight. Partisans, maximum.
  14. taurtaurov 8 January 2020 15: 34 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    I think we would know about the loss of soldiers to the minke whales they had strictly funded with. I. D. JEWS and we do not show launches, but we show after-effects, satellite images, all this is my personal opinion for internal consumption and the intensity MAKES A MORE PRESS
    1. Nyrobsky 8 January 2020 16: 54 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      Quote: taurtaurov
      I think we would know about the loss of soldiers in the minke whales
      In fact, they have the practice of declaring losses only after notifying the relatives of the victims. If they were jammed at night, then it would take time for anyone to identify and notify, so you don’t have to expect that they will immediately voice their losses simply because it does not comply with the established regulations.
  15. artifact 8 January 2020 15: 36 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    but the war started, they warned before the strike. but with the reaction of the trump, I generally laugh: - "I didn’t get it, bang bang", everything is fine.
    still want more details about the quality of the attack.
    Well, as I understand it, Erdogan made a choice not in favor of the "Patriots" for nothing!?
  16. eagle owl 8 January 2020 15: 37 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Spacing molecules of democracy into molecules winked
  17. Avior 8 January 2020 15: 41 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    They write that missile launches were from Iraq, not Iran
    1. Vadmir 8 January 2020 17: 52 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      And who writes? Anyone who does not really know the difference between these countries and can not find them on the world map even in 10 minutes? Journalistic incompetence sometimes rolls over.
  18. Jack O'Neill 8 January 2020 15: 42 New
    • 6
    • 4
    +2
    So I did not understand, why did the Iranians bomb the Iraqis? What have 80 Iraqis done to them?
    After all, it is clear that Iran wanted to respond in such a way as to preserve its face and allow the States to get out of this situation.
    Otherwise, with the death of American soldiers, the United States would have no choice but to hammer on Iran.
    And now here, we shot, such as "revenge", but do not force the opponent to respond. The bargaining chip for Iran was the Iraqis.
    By the way, no one wrote that what Iranians are bad, right and left, they wet the Iraqis for their own benefit. laughing
  19. pytar 8 January 2020 15: 43 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Nothing much happened. The Iranians launched a couple of missiles, warning the Americans in advance that they would retire to a safe distance from the site of the strike. It and Iranian proxies previously launched rockets against US bases. This time, Iran conducted an “attack” in its own name. Wallpaper countries in conflict puff out their cheeks, but do not want to go to a full-blown war. The leaders are promoting, they will show on TV, “how cool we are” and that’s all! The situation will go down.
    By the way, 2 hours ago, near the Iranian nuclear power center in Bushehr, 2 earthquakes of 4 stages occurred sequentially ...
    1. olegyurjewitch 8 January 2020 23: 04 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The sovereignty of any state is prescribed by the constitution of that state. No one has attacked America.
      Not much was given in the teeth, you are not the only ones cool.
  20. eagle owl 8 January 2020 15: 45 New
    • 7
    • 2
    +5

    News from the fields)))
  21. Shahno 8 January 2020 15: 49 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: pytar
    Nothing much happened. The Iranians launched a couple of missiles, warning the Americans in advance that they would retire to a safe distance from the site of the strike. It and Iranian proxies previously launched rockets against US bases. This time, Iran conducted an “attack” in its own name. Wallpaper countries in conflict puff out their cheeks, but do not want to go to a full-blown war. The leaders are promoting, they will show on TV, “how cool we are” and that’s all! The situation will go down.
    By the way, 2 hours ago, near the Iranian nuclear power center in Bushehr, 2 earthquakes of 4 stages occurred sequentially ...

    Concrete slammers can do that ...
    1. dzvero 8 January 2020 16: 01 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      It is unlikely that the outbreak depth is 10 km.
      https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/
  22. tech3030 8 January 2020 16: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Probably missiles were detected very early on such a trajectory?
  23. KURT330 8 January 2020 16: 14 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    Only Iraqis killed. Iran considers this revenge?
  24. Star Destroyer 8 January 2020 16: 15 New
    • 3
    • 6
    -3
    Ayatola correctly understood his task and played it well - “menacingly revenge” at the same time, so that not a single American was hurt.
    After the death of Suleymani in Iran, more than 250 people died, and not a single American ... beat your own - so that strangers are afraid.
    1. Kronos 8 January 2020 17: 01 New
      • 2
      • 3
      -1
      1 killed in Kenya during an attack by Somalis
  25. bars1 8 January 2020 16: 15 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    But what about the American missile defense?
    1. eagle owl 8 January 2020 16: 49 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      It is for SALE. And not for WORK
    2. Volga073 8 January 2020 19: 55 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Trump is sleeping. Air defense too.
  26. MAGRIB 8 January 2020 16: 19 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Iran again hit the Kiyam and Zulfikar missiles.
  27. kventinasd 8 January 2020 16: 25 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Iraqi analyst Husham al-Hashim shared the following information:
    - in the missile attack on the Ain al-Assad airbase, Fateh-110, Fateh-313 and Fateh Mobin short-range missiles were used;
    - Another channel of communication through which the US military was warned is through Qatar;
    - the missiles that were fired at the headquarters of the Coalition in Erbil did not carry any damaging elements and were ordinary "blanks."
    So from Iran, it was most likely just a small warning star-striped.
  28. Altai72 8 January 2020 16: 28 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    It was infa that the Iranian general was killed with the help of the "queen of the killer drones" MQ-9 Reaper, which took off from Germany. More precisely from the US air base in Germany Ramstein.
    1. Volga073 8 January 2020 19: 54 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      The Israeli drone was.
  29. Altai72 8 January 2020 16: 30 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Iran refused to transfer black boxes of broken civilian side to Ukraine.
  30. zhvjhrf 8 January 2020 16: 31 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    1 what missiles hit and damage
    2 whether the Americans had air defense
    3 Boeing 737 of Ukraine fell on the territory of Iran who will be to blame (analogy with 2014)
    4 if there is a land operation, you just have to buy the Ukrainians and let them fight plus recycling
    5.
    6.
    7.
    just logical thoughts, but I warn you, it's just conspiracy
    1. Vadmir 8 January 2020 17: 48 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Boeing 737 of Ukraine fell on the territory of Iran who will be to blame (analogy with 2014)
      Yes, the analogy is visible, but most likely it’s just a coincidence, it takes time to prepare such an operation, but it wasn’t there, though ... It doesn’t matter who is to blame, it is important who will be appointed to be guilty.
  31. Vadim01 8 January 2020 16: 36 New
    • 4
    • 6
    -2
    From a military point of view, Iran is Iraq number two. In my opinion, the Americans will destroy all Iranian mobile launchers in a few weeks.
    1. kventinasd 8 January 2020 16: 41 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Vadim01
      In my opinion, the Americans will destroy all Iranian mobile launchers in a few weeks.

      If Iran does not have time to destroy all US military bases in the district. Americans will not substitute the Saudis and Israel. The price is too high. Everything will end with an ordinary zilch.
      1. maden.usmanow 8 January 2020 16: 51 New
        • 2
        • 4
        -2
        If Iran does not have time to destroy all US military bases in the district.


        Good joke. It’s not Iran, but the Soviet Union.
        1. kventinasd 8 January 2020 16: 54 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Quote: maden.usmanow
          Good joke. It’s not Iran, but the Soviet Union.

          And what prevented Iran from launching rockets today?
          1. maden.usmanow 8 January 2020 16: 55 New
            • 3
            • 4
            -1
            Again. You believe that Iran,
            able to destroy all American bases in the region?
            1. kventinasd 8 January 2020 17: 23 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: maden.usmanow
              Again. You believe that Iran,
              able to destroy all American bases in the region?

              If mattresses will continue to use their Patriots, then easily. laughing
              1. SovAr238A 8 January 2020 18: 13 New
                • 0
                • 4
                -4
                Quote: kventinasd
                Quote: maden.usmanow
                Again. You believe that Iran,
                able to destroy all American bases in the region?

                If mattresses will continue to use their Patriots, then easily. laughing


                In Iraq, at least once stood the Patriots?

                Iraq also boasted a lot.
                And how many generals, especially Soviet-Russian, are in our ears or how Saddam will punish everyone ...
                And Skadov he had an order of magnitude more than the Americans ...

                Nothing helped.
                For stupid.

                Arabs do not know how to fight.
                And the Persians are the same Arabs.
    2. eagle owl 8 January 2020 16: 55 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      From a military point of view. the US army, spread over Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan, quarreling with all of NATO - these are not even closely united coalition forces. Purely not even in the lack of free infantry plugging, but in banal logistics. And further. In Iraq, Saddam’s army was actually bought. The IRGC is not Saddam’s Europeanized army. And very religious. They will not change Allah for bucks. So here with a purely strategic t.z.
      1. Andrey.AN 8 January 2020 17: 34 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Still, from a military point of view, the battalion of the marine corps, with the support of aviation, artillery, space reconnaissance and other things, will be better than the division that does not have these bonuses, Iranian forces have bonuses only in Iran.
      2. Andrey.AN 8 January 2020 17: 42 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Americans will have more problems with bureaucracy, with sanctions for any actions.
  32. bars1 8 January 2020 17: 11 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: kventinasd
    Iraqi analyst Husham al-Hashim shared the following information:
    - in the missile attack on the Ain al-Assad airbase, Fateh-110, Fateh-313 and Fateh Mobin short-range missiles were used;
    - another communication channel through which the US military was warned is through Qatar;
    - the missiles that were fired at the headquarters of the Coalition in Erbil did not carry any damaging elements and were ordinary "blanks."

    So from Iran, it was most likely just a small warning star-striped.

    Or maybe the late Suleymani got some in Iran and these were not against his death. Intra-elite showdowns, the struggle for power I do not claim that the Iranians agreed with the Americans on its elimination, no. Of course, the general is well-known, it is necessary to express the anger of sorrow, to threaten revenge. Well, the toothless retaliatory strike has turned out painfully. So they threatened to take revenge: “Our revenge will be terrible!” But in fact, according to Amers and al-Hashim, an empty formality turned out to be, but Suleimani seemed to be avenged. Like, they took revenge and relations with the USA did not cross the point of no return. It turns out that Suleimani is a martyr squared - unnecessary neither to Trump and Co., nor to some influential persons in the leadership of Iran
  33. Vasyan1971 8 January 2020 17: 25 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    ... in the upper right corner is an inscription in Farsi, which can be translated as "tough revenge."

    Well, I don’t know ... This "revenge" is not a strong pull.
  34. bars1 8 January 2020 17: 35 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Quote: Vasyan1971
    Well, I don’t know ... This "revenge" is not a strong pull.

    That's it . And whoever will argue will say: ,, Look how cool we are, the only ones who over the past 15 years have shelled as many as two American bases! "Suleimani avenged, he smiles at us from heaven, we part."
    And by the way, there are no fools to fight the United States in the leadership of Iran.
    1. Vadmir 8 January 2020 17: 42 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      And by the way, there are no fools to fight the United States in the leadership of Iran.
      But the ball is now on the side of Washington. What will be Trump's answer? War or peace now does not depend on Iran. They made their move.
      Trump will speak about this today at 19 p.m. Moscow time.
  35. Old26 8 January 2020 17: 55 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Yves762
    Here they write that the bourgeois SPRN allegedly worked, that Fort Meade, and the bourgeois managed to hide ....

    Linden. The distance to the launch point from Fort Meade is more than 11000 km. None of the SPRN radars operate at such a range. But the radar in Qatar is quite

    Quote: Konstantin Shevchenko
    If only someone could describe the amazing power of these non-nuclear missiles.

    1. Fateh-313 missiles. As the main part of the launched missiles is written - missiles of this particular type.
    Solid fuel. Range 500 km. PP - from 450 to 600 kg
    2. Qiam-1 missiles. Iran launched at least a couple of these liquid rockets tonight.
    Range 800 km. PP - from 747 kg

    Quote: AllBiBek
    Yesterday they said that they did bang one. In Kenya, in the very attack on the base, which launched a suicide bomber on a motorcycle with explosives at the gate. States have not yet confirmed.

    Yeah. And then he came out with a refutation of his death. You about this "super" information?

    Quote: Avior
    They write that missile launches were from Iraq, not Iran

    No. Missile launches were carried out from the Eslamabad-e-Garb region of the Iranian province of Kermanshah
    1. Vadmir 8 January 2020 18: 12 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      But the radar in Qatar is quite
      There was no particular need. They write that Iran warned of the attack in advance in order to avoid casualties among the Americans.
  36. Alevil 8 January 2020 18: 15 New
    • 5
    • 4
    +1
    Pindodrocher mourning, but they are trying to prove that "no one died," "agreed in advance," etc., etc.
    In fact, the mattresses were dunked and humiliated once again. This is already becoming the norm: first S. Korea, and now also Iran.
  37. Shahno 8 January 2020 18: 26 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Is that all steam released?
    Now you can do business ....
  38. Shahno 8 January 2020 18: 40 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: g1v2
    There are many tales about tectonic weapons, but there is no real information. They talked about him for another year from 92. But so far, the only known possibility is the explosion of an atomic device or an extremely non-atomic one at the junction of lithospheric plates. If, at the same time, water from the lake or sea rushes into the breach, then an even more powerful explosion will follow. There were no signs of this. Most likely earthquakes - traces of underground explosions. Since they were at about the same time as missile launches, it can be assumed that not all missiles came out normally. Possible crashes at startup. Given that Iran has not yet massively fired ballistic missiles, accidents are quite possible. For example, an accident when refueling. The Iranian missile program is still relatively young, they still have to fill in cones. request

    From anti-bunker bombs with a successful combination of a pair of three points is enough.
    As for tectonic weapons .. well, to use it now. It’s easier to activate the virus, there are few moles on Iranian objects, fighters for a “bright future” yes
  39. Pytnik 8 January 2020 18: 58 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Quote: alexmach
    Both statements are highly controversial. And in Syria there is so-so in Iran with POB - nothing special.

    According to one of the editors of the book "Persian Bastion," military expert Yuri Lyamin, Iran’s main air defense forces and facilities are organizationally part of the army’s air defense and air defense forces of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC).

    "To ensure the management and coordination of the air defense of the army and the IRGC, there is an operational command of the unified air defense system of Iran, known as the base or headquarters of the air defense system" Khatam al-Anbiya. "

    Automated control systems connect various air defense systems and command centers into a single network, ”he explained. - Iran is a large country, a significant part of the territory of which is mountains, so they try to provide multilayer radar coverage there.
    For these purposes, they have a wide range of various modern radars of Russian, Belarusian, Chinese and Iranian production, designed to control airspace and detect air targets, including Resonance-NE, Sky-IED, Caste 2E2, Vostok-E "," Gamma-DE ", Nazir, Fath-14, the Matla ul-Fajr and Kashef families, Meraj-4 and others.

    At the same time, the main anti-aircraft weapons are concentrated on protecting the most important administrative and industrial centers of Iran - the cities of Tehran, Isfahan and others, as well as key military facilities and centers of the defense, oil and nuclear industries, for example, the main naval base in Bandar Abbas near the Strait of Hormuz , Natanz uranium enrichment plant and so on.

    The most modern anti-aircraft systems and complexes of Iran are the Russian S-300PMU-2 air defense systems and the Tor-M1 air defense systems, the new Iranian air defense systems Bavar-373, 15th Khordad, Talash, 3rd Khordad, Mersad-16.
  40. Usher 8 January 2020 19: 06 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    Where are the cocks that crowed about "Iran is pissed" ???
  41. Volga073 8 January 2020 19: 49 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    And where is America's air defense? )))
  42. Chingachguk 8 January 2020 22: 28 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Well, they saw missile launches, but it’s not clear where they flew away and to whom they slapped them there ..... I have a friend, he is terribly afraid of spiders, even the smallest, harmless spider makes him panic. He grabs a thicker magazine, or a book, and screams to nail him! So, I’ve never seen a spider myself before me, but like Vitsin in the movie Prisoner of the Caucasus, he tells how he gave it! So Iran .......
  43. Halkoliant 8 January 2020 23: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Trumpogankster in the tavern showed that he may be what he wants!
  44. Protos 9 January 2020 01: 05 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Iranian OTRK is a modernized Luna TS
    On the new element base of less weight, and due to this increased range and accuracy! yes
  45. Old26 9 January 2020 15: 23 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Uhu
    I do not specialize in stupid things.

    Unfortunately, Dear, judging by your several posts - you specialize.
    Satellite photographs of the strike on the Syrian base are in the public domain (at least there were). To count the number of hits with a pencil in your hands is a lot of time and knowledge is not necessary. All missile hits were at the air base. Another thing is that the desired effect was not.
    The second strike, covered by the press service of our Ministry of Defense, headed by General Koshenkov, was carried out by the EMNIP of 105 or 110 missiles. The effectiveness of their destruction is not worth talking about. The first briefing - said the general about almost 70 missiles destroyed. The second, less cited, is about 46 ...

    Quote: Uhu
    "What is beneficial is what they showed." USA means it was unprofitable to show the effect of work when on that. how they screwed up with rockets, of which there was not 60 nichrome, and at least FOR a hundred - even Deutsche Welle was laughing at the mud over the “blow” with an ax and muzzle.

    we must understand that the Americans agreed with the press service of our Ministry of Defense so that we would confirm the strike with exactly 60 “axes”, and not “over a hundred,” as you say. By the way, "for a hundred" in reality was, though in a different place and much later. But in any case, we are not talking about thousands of “axes” in Syria. In total, for all the time, if applied, then less than 2 hundred, and not only the "Axes", but also others ...

    Quote: kventinasd
    Iraqi analyst Husham al-Hashim shared the following information:
    - in the missile attack on the Ain al-Assad airbase, Fateh-110, Fateh-313 and Fateh Mobin short-range missiles were used;
    - Another channel of communication through which the US military was warned is through Qatar;
    - the missiles that were fired at the headquarters of the Coalition in Erbil did not carry any damaging elements and were ordinary "blanks."
    So from Iran, it was most likely just a small warning star-striped.

    Purgu is mainly carried by this analyst.
    short-range Fateh-110, Fateh-313 and Fateh Mobin missiles were used in a missile strike at Ain al-Assad airbase;

    The minimum distance the Iranians had to shoot was 400 km (from Erbil to Kermanshah. The Iranians couldn’t physically shoot using any Fateh-110 missiles. The maximum range for firing missiles of this type was 300 km ..

    another communication channel through which the US military was warned is through Qatar;

    It is possible, since there is an American radar SPRN

    the missiles that were fired at the headquarters of the Coalition in Erbil did not carry any damaging elements and were ordinary "blanks".

    I wonder how. So they removed the combat unit and loaded it under the fairing ... What? Sandbags? Scrap metal? And how does it suddenly ONE ROCKETreleased by Erbil suddenly became ROCKETS

    Quote: Uhu
    From a military point of view. the US army, spread over Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan, quarreling with all of NATO - these are not even closely united coalition forces. Purely not even in the lack of free infantry plugging, but in banal logistics. And further. In Iraq, Saddam’s army was actually bought. The IRGC is not Saddam’s Europeanized army. And very religious. They will not change Allah for bucks. So here with a purely strategic t.z.

    What, in fact, all quarreled and all NATO countries refuse to obey orders if they come from the Americans ?? Well, do not distort so much.
    There is no coalition at all now. If necessary, they will create it. Where by persuasion, where by order. No one thought that in the same coalition with the United States, Syria would fight against Iraq, however, it fought.
    There is no need for "free infantry." Infantry will remain on the west coast of the Persian Gulf and in Iraq (maximum), everything else is the business of the US Air Force and Navy (and of the Allies)
    What prevents buy an army or part of it in Iran. Moreover, the 80 millionth population - they have their own stress points there, which are now not particularly noticeable. But start Mesilov, it is not known how the Kurds, and other national minorities and the territories in which they live will behave

    Quote: Protos
    Iranian OTRK is a modernized Luna TS
    On the new element base of less weight, and due to this increased range and accuracy! yes

    Do not carry nonsense !!! Luna TS didn’t stand there.
    The length of any Fateh rocket is longer than that of the Moon. The diameter is at least 610 mm versus 545 mm for the “Moon”. Well, less weight - it amused. The lightest of Fateh missiles is 3,5 tons versus 2,5 tons for the Moon. So 3,5, or even 4,5 tons (at Zulfikar) now means less than 2,5 tons at the Moon ???
    Teaching materiel, comrade, materiel