Media to start World War III: online commentators on Iranian response


According to Pentagon officials, Iran fired more than a dozen rockets at two bases in Iraq, where US troops are located. The Pentagon believes that the strike by Iranian forces is likely a retaliatory strike against an American air strike, the purpose of which was a senior Iranian general.


Iran’s attacks were “the biggest test for President Donald Trump” for his entire presidency, CNN said.

The Trump administration tried to prevent Iran’s strike and tried to defuse tensions with Iran, the channel said. However, Tehran vowed to avenge the murder, which, according to Iranian representatives, was an "act of war" and "state terrorism." In a special statement, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) indicated that these attacks were "revenge" for the death of Suleimani.

The IRGC also said that any country in which US troops are deployed could be the target of hostile and aggressive actions. Therefore, American citizens must demand from the government the withdrawal of American troops from the region.

The United States was called the "Great Satan." If the “great Satan” repeats “his evil”, for example, carries out any additional acts of aggression, then the IRGC will respond “in an even more painful and crushing way.”

According to Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, published on Twitter, Tehran’s response should be proportionate to the US attack, which killed General Suleymani. “Iran has taken proportional measures for self-defense in accordance with Article 51 of the UN Charter,” Zarif said, referring to the “cowardly” American attack. “We do not seek escalation or war, but we will defend ourselves against any aggression,” he added.

Retaliatory strikes and their similar characteristics were largely unexpected for the White House. The western segments of the Internet are full of comments on this topic, as well as on the Iranian response.

Under the Fox News Youtube video, you can find the following reviews.

Opeoluwa Awoniyi:

“One thing is certain: World War III will launch the media.”

Anthony Richmond:

“If you cannot make them see the light, make them feel warm” (Ronald Reagan).

Lord Raptor:

"Iran threatens America? I'm going to bed".

It was an accident:

“I think it’s much more frightening that I haven’t seen Trump tweets for hours.

Marshall Mason:

"Iran can wait, our home is a much more dangerous enemy."

Hillbilly Mtman:

“There is no need to invade their country, we have submarines, aircraft carriers and drones, so let's give them this !!!!”

marpsr:

“Hit them, Mr. President!”
Author:
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

111 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mixanson 8 January 2020 11: 27 New
    • 19
    • 12
    +7
    Framed Donald specifically and now he can leave After all, so "comrades" from Israel? .. hi
    1. Sky strike fighter 8 January 2020 11: 35 New
      • 13
      • 4
      +9
      It looks like an agreement to save face and not get involved in the conflict.

      NEW YORK, January 8. / TASS /. The US military stationed at the Ain al-Assad airbase in Iraq, spotted the approaching missiles and were able to take cover in time. This was reported on Tuesday by the newspaper The Los Angeles Times, citing an American military source.


      The quote below sounds strange. Didn’t they attempt to intercept or couldn’t intercept, and therefore, as it were, I really didn’t want to intercept?
      According to him, the US military was able to detect missiles during the flight, but made no attempt to intercept them. Thanks to the early detection of missiles, the military managed to take cover in time, as a result of which, according to the newspaper, there were no reports of casualties in the ranks of the American armed forces.

      https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/7477855
      1. Mixanson 8 January 2020 12: 20 New
        • 6
        • 5
        +1
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        It looks like an agreement to save face and not get involved in the conflict.

        It is possible .. Putin did not fly to Syria for a reason, and then to Turkey .. The game is on and the rates are rising!
      2. bayard 8 January 2020 17: 59 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter

        The quote below sounds strange. Didn’t they attempt to intercept or couldn’t intercept, and therefore, as it were, I really didn’t want to intercept?

        Most likely there was simply no missile defense equipment at those bases. And there were radar reconnaissance aids.
        1. CERBERFOL 8 January 2020 21: 17 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          But I don’t believe in the power of modern intelligence, I believe in the power of dough. Either Trump sprinkled milk in Syria, then Iran moved through striped bases. It is completely possible that in Iran itself the information about the attacks and the coordinates were leaked. The billions that in Iran, that in USA want to sail their yachts everywhere, without the threat of exposure. Big politics and the media are for the people. And the big uncles have their own trouble.
      3. for
        for 9 January 2020 02: 18 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        It looks like an agreement to save face and not get involved in the conflict.

        They are.
        Revenge for the assassination of the commander of the Al-Quds special forces, General Kassem Suleimani, took place, Tehran will not take new military action in the absence of aggression from the United States. This was stated by Iran’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Majid Taht-Ravanchi, in an interview with TASS.
        https://lenta.ru/news/2020/01/09/mest/
      4. 1976AG 9 January 2020 03: 17 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        It doesn’t look like a contract from any side. If, for example, Iran conducts this attack only to save face, then for example three missiles are enough, that is, there was formally an answer, but what didn’t hit .. well, it happens .. But if you release 15! missiles, and not one hits, for the Iranians another question arises - can we even hit the target? For Americans, too, is not all right with the face. If they slept through an attack when the danger is real, then they are by no means fighting. If they detected missiles and didn’t shoot them down, then ... well, there are simply no words! After all, even if they removed people in a timely manner, you won’t clean up the infrastructure, and you will find out which missile you get after you hit it. Well, if they tried to bring down and could not, then they are also warriors. And their weapons are very so-so .. And finally ... Trump promised to strike at 52 targets in Iran if Iran hits the Americans. About the loss did not go. Iran hit the Americans.
      5. DRM
        DRM 9 January 2020 19: 29 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        It looks like an agreement to save face and not get involved in the conflict.

        This conclusion lies on the surface. It’s just that many people like to look for a “black cat in a dark room ...” Moreover, with the help of the states, the liberals in the Iranian leadership received -1 influential opponent. I recall the series "Homeland".
    2. rich 8 January 2020 12: 03 New
      • 13
      • 4
      +9
      Mixanson:Framed Donald specifically and now he can leave After all, so "comrades" from Israel? ..
      Strange comment. It seems to be mowing under Mikhan. Yes, only Vitaly always writes the word "Israel" with a small letter and the word "comrades" without quotes. I feel with genes that something is wrong here request
      1. BARKHAN 8 January 2020 12: 17 New
        • 5
        • 3
        +2
        Quote: Rich
        Mixanson:Framed Donald specifically and now he can leave After all, so "comrades" from Israel? ..
        Strange comment. It seems to be mowing under Mikhan. Yes, only Vitaly always writes the word "Israel" with a small letter and the word "comrades" without quotes. I feel with genes that something is wrong here request

        ... and the king is not real ...
    3. donMigel 8 January 2020 12: 38 New
      • 3
      • 4
      -1
      Quote: Mixanson
      Framed Donald specifically and now he can leave After all, so "comrades" from Israel? ..


      Iran clearly hit in the hope that they won’t get it back. The strike was struck on the Iraqi side of the bases, strange how it happened. When one missile hits it is an accident, when two is a coincidence, when 3 or more is a regularity. Well, as if without theatricality: here is a photo from "spruce arabia"

      and this is where the picture comes from
      https://www.thenational.ae/world/mena/israel-strikes-hamas-targets-in-gaza-after-rocket-fire-1.938169
      1. Mixanson 8 January 2020 12: 49 New
        • 7
        • 6
        +1
        Quote: donMigel
        Iran clearly hit in the hope that they won’t get it back. The strike was struck on the Iraqi side of the bases, strange how it happened. When one missile hits it is an accident, when two is a coincidence, when 3 or more is a regularity. Well, as if without theatricality: here is a photo from "spruce arabia"

        Well, Trump, too, I remember bombing Syria and everything in milk hehe
        We don’t know much in this fucking policy ..
        But obviously no one wants to fight. Besides Israel (by the wrong hands))))
        1. donMigel 8 January 2020 13: 03 New
          • 2
          • 10
          -8
          Quote: Mixanson
          But obviously no one wants to fight. Besides Israel (by the wrong hands))))


          There was such an organization as the Comintern,


          They were also for world peace, like the Cods organization. So it’s not entirely clear who wants to fight and for what revolution.
          1. Mixanson 8 January 2020 13: 19 New
            • 12
            • 7
            +5
            Quote: donMigel
            There was such an organization as the Comintern,

            With Jews at the head and screaming that Russia is firewood for their world revolution .... hehe
            Quote: donMigel
            They were also for world peace, like the Cods organization. So it’s not entirely clear who wants to fight and for what revolution.

            At the head of the gulags and other punitive bodies were "comrades" with specific surnames .... Do not believe me, look .. Just not in the wiki, etc. he he
            Interesting reading matter I tell you .. hi
            1. donMigel 8 January 2020 13: 46 New
              • 2
              • 4
              -2
              Quote: Mixanson
              With Jews at the head and screaming that Russia is firewood for their world revolution .... hehe


              Are you against the Bolsheviks? For the bourgeoisie? Friends from the forum will not understand you correctly. it's off topic here. The committee was cited as an example of the spread of the revolution throughout the world, purely as an allegory to the Iranian "codes" having a similar attitude, but only an Islamic Shiite revolution.

              Quote: Mixanson
              At the head of the gulags and other punitive bodies were "comrades" with specific surnames .... Do not believe me, look .. Just not in the wiki, etc. he he
              Interesting reading I tell you


              Yes, and the Red Terror was unfolded after one Jew shot another Jew, entertaining however.
            2. TAMBU 8 January 2020 13: 56 New
              • 0
              • 7
              -7
              forgot to take medicine again?
            3. yustas 8 January 2020 15: 10 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Well, Meehan, here I agree with you ... that was exactly how it was, but now they don’t want to notice it, 4 and the fact that the Jews themselves supported Hitler in the first place, were destroyed, only those who did not fall under the profit function and developments. And so yes, Jews suffered more than Russians, but by now, all Russians have been divided into Belorus, Ukrainians and Sibiryakov ... the position of the West is understandable, the position of our leaders is not clear. (
            4. Looking for 8 January 2020 15: 15 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              [quote = Mixanson] At the head of the gulags and other punitive organs were "comrades" with specific surnames .... Do not believe me, look. [/ quoteWell, not the Rothschilds and the Windsor with the Hohenzollerns were at the head of all the revolutions, but the most oppressed strata.
    4. Tank jacket 8 January 2020 13: 25 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Here is a photo posted by Trump's son
      1. Catfish 8 January 2020 13: 35 New
        • 9
        • 1
        +8
        But at the store, behind bars, clearly the face of Clintons. laughing
        And what's the point?
        1. Mixanson 8 January 2020 13: 48 New
          • 5
          • 5
          0
          Quote: Sea Cat
          But at the store, behind bars, clearly the face of Clintons. laughing
          And what's the point?

          There is a sign of Georgia ha ha ha
          1. Vyazemsky partisan 8 January 2020 16: 28 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            There is a sign of the crusaders so!
          2. Tank jacket 8 January 2020 21: 12 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            There is Killary behind bars. And higher is the stylization of the Knights Templar helmet.
        2. donMigel 8 January 2020 14: 02 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Sea Cat
          And what's the point


          They have such love, it seems to be stronger than between Mr. Zyablintsev and the Anglo-Saxons.
        3. dSK
          dSK 8 January 2020 14: 09 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          The third world war will start the media

          And what about the media? "Who pays - he orders the music."
          1. novobranets 8 January 2020 14: 58 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: dsk
            And what about the media? "Who pays - he orders the music."

        4. novobranets 8 January 2020 14: 53 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: Sea Cat
          But at the store, behind bars, clearly the face of Clintons. laughing
          And what's the point?

    5. The comment was deleted.
  2. Operator 8 January 2020 11: 28 New
    • 8
    • 31
    -23
    Trump / Khamenei = 1: 0
    1. antivirus 8 January 2020 11: 53 New
      • 5
      • 5
      0
      the bill is not in units, in hundreds will be
    2. Same lech 8 January 2020 12: 23 New
      • 5
      • 13
      -8
      I remembered the song ... What a pain, what a pain: Trump - Khamenei 5: 0,
      What a pain, what a pain: Trump - Khamenei 5: 0,
  3. Barmaleyka 8 January 2020 11: 28 New
    • 12
    • 7
    +5
    No need to invade their country, we have submarines
    and slightly land operation to carry out
    or scared ?!
    1. Aleksandr21 8 January 2020 12: 42 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: Barmaleyka
      and slightly land operation to carry out
      or scared ?!


      Trump’s hands are tied, if he starts a land operation, he can say goodbye to the second term, and voters will not understand, he promised to return the Americans home. And by the way, not everything is so smooth in the USA:

      "US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi responds to Iran’s attacks on US forces in Iraq. She posted a comment on her Twitter account.

      “I closely monitor situations in connection with the bombing of the US military in Iraq. We must ensure the safety of our troops, including putting an end to unnecessary provocations on the part of the [White House] administration, ”the representative of the Democratic Party wrote."

      those. Trump did not receive support.
    2. Paul Siebert 8 January 2020 12: 52 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      In the year of his own election, Trump will climb into Iran only as a last resort.
      In the case of large losses among Americans at their own bases around the world.
      Or in the case of a major terrorist attack on its territory.
      The irony is that after this, US losses in Iran will increase at times, or tens of times or hundreds ...
      Then - "goodbye, the White House"!
    3. NEXUS 8 January 2020 13: 14 New
      • 13
      • 2
      +11
      Quote: Barmaleyka
      and slightly land operation to carry out
      or scared ?!

      Do not pull the US ground operation against Iran. If the Iranian president did not have the support of the same Russian Federation or China, he would not butt without mattresses alone. A missile strike on US bases is a declaration of war, with all that it implies. Washington will either raise the glove and try to start a full-scale war against Iran, with its allies, the Israelis, or will soon begin to curtail its bases, which Iran can reach. In the first case, nothing good shines on mattresses, since it will not work to crush Iran, as Iraq used to be. And in the second case, this is prejudice to the credibility of the US power and a precedent that could push others not to talk with Washington, but to “beat in the face”, knowing that the king is naked.
      1. Pavel57 8 January 2020 13: 23 New
        • 2
        • 6
        -4
        You can raise the glove, answer with cruise missiles.
        1. NEXUS 8 January 2020 13: 29 New
          • 9
          • 3
          +6
          Quote: Pavel57
          You can raise the glove, answer with cruise missiles.

          You, to understand all the stupidity that you wrote, take a look at how much the Desert Storm operation was taking into account, considering logistics, troop deployment, concentration of the sea component, and so on ...
          1. Pavel57 8 January 2020 13: 31 New
            • 5
            • 6
            -1
            No ground operation required. Only cruise missiles and sanctions to the allies.
            1. ultra 8 January 2020 14: 18 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              I’m afraid the “allies” (Poland and the trials do not count) will not approve, and the fact that they don’t join is 100500%. laughing
              1. Kleber 8 January 2020 15: 15 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Balts and Poles will not join, but the APU will be considered an honor to become cannon fodder.
              2. Sergey M. Karasev 8 January 2020 16: 57 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: ultra
                I’m afraid the “allies” (Poland and the trials do not count) will not approve, and the fact that they don’t join is 100500%. laughing

                Why not join? 12/2 still those! They will come running, flashing their heels, because the OWNER himself has called! Here are the Germans, the French, these are unlikely. Not even for the Britons. Spaniards, Italians and other Belgians also can not wait. States are similar wars, with wide participation of ground forces since 1991. start only in a coalition. And here she is kind of frail.
                APU will be considered an honor to become cannon fodder.

                These will send. The battalion, another, but no more. Purely to be noted.
      2. Qwertyarion 8 January 2020 17: 38 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: NEXUS
        Washington will either raise the glove and try to start a full-scale war against Iran, with its allies, the Israelis, or will soon begin to curtail their bases, which Iran can reach

        There is a third option, to turn on the fool and pretend that nothing special is happening, but in the meantime agree with Iran and temporarily freeze the hot topic.
        Otherwise, a big woman can get big ....
  4. Tank jacket 8 January 2020 11: 30 New
    • 8
    • 7
    +1
    CNN again throws on a fan. None of the backstage manipulators will play the Third World War ... I want to live behind the scenes. Therefore, the Clinton team will be given a quiet glanders in the wort and the US troops will leave the BV.
    1. Barmaleyka 8 January 2020 11: 32 New
      • 9
      • 3
      +6
      Quote: Tank jacket
      I want to live behind the scenes.

      Yes, who knows, the generation that knew what war was gone and these really think that it will be like on a computer
      1. Tank jacket 8 January 2020 11: 35 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        And where is the backstage to live? There are not enough places on the ISS ... Maybe on Mars or on Venus?
        1. Barmaleyka 8 January 2020 11: 39 New
          • 6
          • 3
          +3
          I’m saying that lately many people have really considered the possibility of a limited nuclear conflict and survival after it, and not about what will actually happen
          1. Tank jacket 8 January 2020 11: 41 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            I agree with many of the frantic generals at the Pentagon think so ... But they are not a world behind the scenes.
            1. Barmaleyka 8 January 2020 11: 44 New
              • 5
              • 3
              +2
              I think that the generals just know what this will turn out to be, but the rest are not sure
              1. DMB_95 8 January 2020 12: 01 New
                • 5
                • 0
                +5
                Quote: Barmaleyka
                I think that the generals just know what this will turn out to be, but the rest are not sure

                When you listen to or read statements from the western offs. individuals, it seems that they will start World War 3 any day. But in reality, everything can turn out with Iran, as with North Korea.
                1. 1976AG 9 January 2020 04: 50 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: DMB_95
                  Quote: Barmaleyka
                  I think that the generals just know what this will turn out to be, but the rest are not sure

                  When you listen to or read statements from the western offs. individuals, it seems that they will start World War 3 any day. But in reality, everything can turn out with Iran, as with North Korea.

                  Excuse me, what about North Korea? And then I was not at home for a day. Was she destroyed?
        2. Chaldon48 8 January 2020 11: 42 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          In the south of Ukraine, I kind of looked after a place for New Israel.
          1. Pavel57 8 January 2020 13: 24 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            And the name is - New Khazaria.
          2. Kleber 8 January 2020 15: 17 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Judging by the concentration of Jews, this place has long been Odessa.
    2. Evil543 8 January 2020 11: 36 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      "The Trump administration was trying to prevent Iran’s strike and tried to defuse tensions with Iran, the channel said."
      The murder of the general goes Trump's joke.
      1. Tank jacket 8 January 2020 11: 39 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Just a means to get their generals to leave BV ...
    3. parusnik 8 January 2020 12: 23 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      World War III none of the backstage manipulators will not play ...
      ... Especially in the Persian Gulf, in the oil source, if it is set on fire, there will not be enough shale oil for everyone ... and the money will cost not small, and the USA itself will need ... Not the fact that when Iran and the USA they’ll throw missiles, something will not fly into the neighbors ... the Persian Gulf is not so wide, and troops were closer to Vietnam and safer than now delivering to the Gulf ...
      1. Tank jacket 8 January 2020 12: 37 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Greetings)), hi , "Everything is good" (c). All rockets are fired, thank you all ... Everyone is free ... Home.
        1. parusnik 8 January 2020 12: 54 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          hi Indeed, is it worth writing in a life-giving spring from which everyone drinks living water. And then I thought, a sort of note in the future: at the very beginning of hostilities between Iran and the United States, not a single American soldier was injured ...
    4. Boa kaa 8 January 2020 14: 54 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Tank jacket
      and US troops leave BV.

      Oh how! The states have repeatedly stated that BV is the zone of vital interests of the USA ... and all of a sudden - "leave the BV!" This is a strategically important area of ​​the globe!
      And secondly. But what about ISRAEL!? Then Iran will eat it and not even frown ... will not save the nuclear weapons of the Jews. Their conventional weapons are tortured to death. Nah ... From the Middle East, the Yankees themselves will not leave, just as you don’t ask them. Now, if under the back of the knee, as in Vietnam, tady .. OH!
      1. Tank jacket 8 January 2020 16: 08 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Israel to be asked to the Eurasian Union ...
  5. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 8 January 2020 11: 30 New
    • 18
    • 4
    +14
    A very strange idea is to use random comments from the Internet as a news item.
    1. Barmaleyka 8 January 2020 11: 31 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich
      A very strange idea is to use random comments from the Internet as a news item.

      an occasion not comments, comments are a background, there are plenty of reasons for the last week
      1. rich 8 January 2020 12: 20 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich
        A very strange idea is to use random comments from the Internet as a news item.

        I perfectly understand your indignation. It turns out like in the proverb "Troll stole something from the troll" laughing
  6. Mavrikiy 8 January 2020 11: 33 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Retaliatory strikes and their similar characteristics were largely unexpected for the White House
    Rave. The Pentagon knew very well that fifty of its bases in the region were under the gun. That is why immediately stated, this is not us, this is Trump.
  7. Azimuth 8 January 2020 11: 38 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Any response from the United States is the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Take a person by the throat and squeeze the carotid artery. You don’t jerk for a long time. Oil is the blood of the economy.
    1. borberd 8 January 2020 14: 53 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      This has already happened with the same actors - the operation "Mantis" in modern realities.
      1. Boa kaa 8 January 2020 15: 24 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: borberd
        Operation "Mantis" in modern realities.

        That's right, but here
        In 2003, the International Court of Justice ruled that US actions in this operation could not be justified as a measure aimed at protecting America’s vital interests ...

        However, even hegemon urinate in the eye - he is all God's dew!
        (No shame, no conscience - orphans!)
  8. Thrifty 8 January 2020 11: 50 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    The time is now on the side of Iran, whether they have time to prepare for the attacks of the Americans, and the fact that a crazy trump decides to bomb Iran again is understandable.
    1. VIT101 8 January 2020 12: 04 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      Exactly crazy. Our top management has pierced and put on the wrong horse. Democrats in power and half that shit wouldn’t have done for us what “Trump” did.
      1. Tank jacket 8 January 2020 12: 15 New
        • 5
        • 3
        +2
        Clinton would have unleashed a war for a long time ... Therefore, they were not allowed to steer.
      2. akims 8 January 2020 12: 58 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        The cost of oil is growing, gold is growing, the ruble is strengthening, Europe is in shock. Yes Trump is 100% agent of Uncle Vova.
        1. Chaldon48 8 January 2020 18: 42 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Is it so good that the ruble is strengthening. The economy is a subtle thing.
  9. tihonmarine 8 January 2020 11: 54 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Mattresses are surprised by the plague, as cockroaches spread all over the world themselves, they spoil everyone, and then they are surprised that they are hated. They would sit in their warm America, suck on a Coke and eat apple pie.
    1. Mouse 8 January 2020 12: 24 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      And they swam near their shores ... walked ???
      1. tihonmarine 8 January 2020 12: 27 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: Mouse
        And they swam near their shores ... walked ???

        Normal people walk, and only feces in a barrel float. So the mattresses as feces float.
        1. Mouse 8 January 2020 12: 33 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          My dad said ...
          How is it in the hole ...
          And let me be banned ... wassat
          1. tihonmarine 8 January 2020 12: 47 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            Quote: Mouse
            My dad said ...

            It’ll take you somewhere out of the hole, and the barrel will be leavened.
            1. Masha 8 January 2020 13: 12 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              And the smell !!!!! laughing
              1. tihonmarine 8 January 2020 13: 14 New
                • 4
                • 0
                +4
                Quote: Masha
                And the smell !!!!!

                The smell is such that there is a stench all over the world.
                1. Masha 8 January 2020 13: 17 New
                  • 2
                  • 1
                  +1
                  Bought an air freshener with a floral scent. Now, as soon as I smell flowers, I immediately pull to the toilet .... wink
  10. Terenin 8 January 2020 11: 57 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    The third world war will start the media
    if it is completely excluded, in nuclear countries, the presence of intelligence with their analysts ...
  11. HAM
    HAM 8 January 2020 12: 03 New
    • 9
    • 2
    +7
    All these military calls from the American inhabitants to the first victims and terrorist attacks on the territory of the states themselves ... then just panic and cries: "what for us !?"
  12. Gennady Fomkin 8 January 2020 12: 05 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    The flag was not removed from the mosque, and CNN - declared "victory" laughing
  13. Chs4t 8 January 2020 12: 06 New
    • 12
    • 3
    +9
    It is very interesting to watch the reaction of the media.
    By and large, there is silence: the statement of fact and the calculation of damage.
    Surprising restraint and an attempt to release everything on the brakes, you can not hear "yes we are now ...", it is correct.
    The Americans clearly went too far, killing Sulejmani and the campaign intuitively understands this.
    Iran, too, could not leave everything as it is and, by all accounts, broke it into the Americans, everyone also understands this.
    It seems to me that the Americans themselves did not count on such an outcome.
    And then two scenarios:
    1-quietly hush because 80 allegedly killed Americans actually do not feel sorry for anyone.
    2-Arrange a full-scale war with an uncertain outcome, only a question, does everyone need it?
    1. Thrifty 8 January 2020 12: 21 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      There is a third option — a temporary truce, as it were, and then there will be a game of chess — the United States will be randomly exposed, and with the wrong hands the same military Iranians in Syria, the Iranians will “accidentally” damage several US tankers, and so on, for each move of one country, a response from opponent. ...
      1. Chs4t 8 January 2020 12: 41 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        There is a third option - they will inadvertently spoil, the Iranians "accidentally" will damage several US tankers, and so on

        For me, this is the best option.
        And the sheep are safe and the wolves are full)))
        Apparently getting old, only with age did the understanding come that war is the senseless deaths of some and the benefits of others (naturally, not participating in the war).
    2. Snusmumrik 8 January 2020 15: 14 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The question is how to release 80 corpses of US citizens on brakes now (if this is of course true). Trump has an election on the nose. The withdrawal of troops in such a situation looks like a shameful flight. It’s unlikely to quietly hush, but no one is ready for a big war. It’s not a stalemate, it’s a zugzwang. Each subsequent move only leads to a worsening of events. I think some extraordinary actions (at least media-image-making) could save the situation. For example, Trump publicly recognizes the reluctance to start the Third World War and personally flies to negotiate with the ayatollah. He won’t do this, cowboy damn ...
  14. Mouse 8 January 2020 12: 27 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    any country in which US troops are deployed can become the object of hostile and aggressive actions.

    Look back more often ...
    Will fly from where you did not expect yes
  15. Altona 8 January 2020 12: 37 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Donald Fredovich certainly gave a blunder when he destroyed the famous partisan Suleymani in a terrorist way. In general, it was apparently a gesture of some despair. The general, of course, is also a well-known fruit, but at one time the USA also could not do without his services. And the situation there of course is still there. Both Iran and Iraq are also against it, demanded that the remnants of the American army get out of the territory (Iraq is now preparing a package of saktsii). The Turks are also in treason. What was it for? I abandoned my own twitter for a long time, it was possible to read Fredovich's impulsive tweets. He’s a “great guy” and apparently also decided to shut up with Rocketman (he gave this nickname to Kim at the time).
    1. Boa kaa 8 January 2020 15: 59 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Altona
      Donald Fredovich certainly gave a blunder

      1. It seems that the god-driven ones pushed Don to “lift” the lid of Pandora’s box ... Because the Jews are most afraid that Iran will get the “Islamic” atomic bomb. And this calls into question the very existence of the Jewish state.
      2. In this tense situation, the "liberal" media, in the pursuit of sensations and fried facts, are able to OPEN Pandora's box. Say what you like, but the media under control form public opinion ... in the direction necessary for customers ... The fourth power, its mother is a child!
  16. friend of animals 8 January 2020 12: 37 New
    • 5
    • 4
    +1
    What is the 3rd world, who will fit in for Iran? Judging by the first reaction, the damage to the bases is small. Here is more a matter of principle. The bases were attacked, so you have to answer. Even if it was a pure adventure from Trump, the Democrats simply won’t let him go for a draw with Iran. And its electorate requires a response to Iran’s strike.
    1. Kleber 8 January 2020 15: 23 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      So the Iranians will not again be in debt, and the Iranian response will follow the American response.
  17. Sarkazm 8 January 2020 12: 57 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Wait for the publication of official data on the loss of Americans in manpower, the glands do not count. If they are big, the United States has no options, no matter who the president is. If there are no losses at all or less than 10, then Trump has a chance to taxi.
    The point is to shake the air before? ...
  18. Aliken 8 January 2020 13: 07 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    If the World War 3 is unleashed, it is only in the territory of the United States, so that these couch experts such as "cut them the president" would not seem enough.
    1. Boa kaa 8 January 2020 16: 07 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Aliken
      If you unleash World War 3, then only in the United States,

      Dreaming is not harmful, it is harmful not to dream! (with)
      And who, tell me, is the "territorial" opponent to the States on the North American continent? Nothing of the above bothers you? no?
      1. Aliken 9 January 2020 08: 43 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Confused by your reaction, my comment was rhetorical, with the message that everything is relative, to fight in someone else's or your own territory.
        1. Boa kaa 9 January 2020 14: 05 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Aliken
          my comment was rhetorical, with a message,

          A colleague, in such cases it is customary to "hang around" with appropriate emoticons. You didn’t burden yourself with anything like that ...
          I somehow understood the mockery, but those who piled on your pluses - hardly ...
          AHA. yes
          1. Aliken 9 January 2020 18: 43 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Yes, I sneeze on these conventions, as I want, and I write, I do not care about those who plus or take away there, and do not care about those whom the toad strangles for the pluses of others.
  19. K-50 8 January 2020 13: 18 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Trump administration tried to prevent Iran strike and tried to defuse tensions with Iran

    Apparently the killing of a senior military officer in a third country is a way to reduce international tension.
    Only in a dumb pin dos head such a scenario can fit sad
  20. eagle owl 8 January 2020 14: 07 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Finished the horseradish on the violin. It has long been said that the United States will destroy their firm belief that the planet is limited to the borders of the United States! They are. it seems they didn’t even understand that Iran was put in such a position that it couldn’t just not answer ... Idiets. And now the USA cannot answer. And then Lucy in the sky with diamonds. Iran alone terrorist attacks can the United States arrange the sky in diamonds
  21. Vladyak2000 8 January 2020 14: 12 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Oil market participants do not seem to suggest that the Americans will respond quickly.
    1. Snusmumrik 8 January 2020 15: 23 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      It may well be a rollback of the price before jumping higher. After a week you need to watch.
  22. borberd 8 January 2020 14: 38 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Did the whole Iranian fuse go away? Really warned when and where they will shoot? I won’t believe it! wassat
    1. Snusmumrik 8 January 2020 15: 22 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Why not? Like the "Night of the Long Axes" in Syria. Maybe this is the style of warfare now:
      - I'm shooting!
      - Got it. I catch!
      And God forbid that anyone was killed.
  23. GELEZNII_KAPUT 8 January 2020 15: 14 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I hope that in the USA they realized that a slap came not only from Iran! hi
  24. Incvizitor 8 January 2020 16: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    They have such a technique for themselves ...
    According to MBT
    540 T-54/55, 168 M47, 150 M60, 100 "Chieftain. I personally consider it garbage
    480 T-72, up 300 Zulfikar 75 T-62 Still bearable.
    By artillery
    40-60 M110 and M115, 20-30 M107, 20 M1978, I think about 70 HM41, although there is not much exact data, up to 120 GHN-45, up to 200 M109A1B, pieces 20-30 Raad-2, several hundred Type-59-1, several hundred D-30 / HM40, a few "cloves" squeezed from Iraq.
    MLRS
    About 100 Fajr-5, about 100 Fajr-3 and 2, full of all 122 mm type "hail" and Soviet and own and Korean, many smaller systems like Fajr-1, Falagh-2, Falagh.
    Air force
    Fighters: 30 HESA Azarakhsh, 43 F-14 Tomcat, 36 MiG 29, 10 F1, 24 F-7M 25 Dorna / Tazarv, more 75 Northrop F-5.
    Bombers / attack aircraft: 10 su 25 30 Su-24MK, 64 F-4D / 4E, 75 F-5.
    Helicopters: 50 Shahed 285, 100 Cobra.
    SAM
    30 "rapier", 250 HQ-7, 15 Tigercat, 150 MIM-23B Hawk, 45 S-75, 20 Sayyad-1, 50 Sayyad-2, 32 PU S-300, 10 S-200, 30 Fajr-8, 29 Tor-M1, 10 C1 200 Pu Mersad, several thousand MANPADS, and all sorts of memory and the like
    1. Vyazemsky partisan 8 January 2020 17: 57 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Your comment is so-so. The United States has everything on the rainbow, but aviation and their missiles are EVERYTHING. On earth, they only dealt with the Indians ... But that's another story ...
      1. Incvizitor 8 January 2020 21: 31 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        FSA with puppets can crush Iran, if there is a conflict, Iran will have to help in any case.
  25. Old26 8 January 2020 17: 33 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Sky Strike fighter
    The quote below sounds strange. Didn’t they attempt to intercept or couldn’t intercept, and therefore, as it were, I really didn’t want to intercept?

    It is unlikely that such a base in the interior of Iran has a missile defense. That is unnecessary. The Shiite police are unlikely to have strike weapons such as ballistic missiles. Most likely the presence of anti-aircraft guns is something like our "Shell". Perhaps their Avengers. The flight range of such missiles is about 300-500 km, depending on the modification of the missile. The speed of the same "Fateh" from 3 to 3,5M. When fired, the flight time was about 6 minutes. But intercepting such missiles is actually a very difficult problem. The apogee of “Fateh” is much less than that of “Scud”. The accuracy is not very high. Unless suitable for firing at area targets. True warhead in 400-600 kg is not the best option

    Quote: Barmaleyka
    No need to invade their country, we have submarines
    and slightly land operation to carry out
    or scared ?!

    What the hell? If the head of the country (Supreme Commander-in-Chief) is “with pribabah,” then he will do so. Throws his troops to slaughter. Normal - will try to minimize their own losses ....

    Quote: Azimut
    Any response from the United States is the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Take a person by the throat and squeeze the carotid artery. You don’t jerk for a long time. Oil is the blood of the economy.

    By blocking the Strait of Hormuz, Iran itself will "shoot in the foot." Other countries have access to oil pipelines not only in the Persian Gulf. And here NONE OF OIL PIPELINES Iran DOESN'T HAVE "continuation" outside the national territory. By blocking the strait, it will reduce, of course, the export capabilities of the Gulf countries. But he reduced his own to almost zero.

    Quote: akims
    The price of oil is growing, gold is growing the ruble is strengthening, Europe is in shock. Yes Trump is 100% agent of Uncle Vova.

    And at the same time, prices in stores went up due to the fact that oil went up
  26. 7,62h54 8 January 2020 21: 39 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Sofas go head-on to ram
  27. Jarserge 9 January 2020 16: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Forgot these "cockroaches" as they fled on September 11, when will the war come to the United States?
  28. Kunica 9 January 2020 16: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Interestingly, if Russia launches a rocket in a deserted US square, they will forgive us too what