“Where were the Patriot?”: US reaction to an Iranian missile strike


The missile strike inflicted by Iran on US military bases in Iraq attracted the attention of world media. The American public began to vigorously discuss the high-profile headlines with which Western publications were full. In particular, this topic attracted readers of the publication The War Zone, specializing in military topics.


Most commentators believe that the Iranian authorities tried to save their face with this attack after the death of one of the most prominent figures of the IRGC, Kassem Suleimani. The attack was intended to show the population and the world only the steadfastness of the country's leadership, who was not afraid to strike at American targets. Therefore, the damage was minimal, users say, paying attention to the fact that there are no casualties among US troops and a small number of missiles were involved.

They lost their commander, a bunch of militias, and then a bunch of people at the funeral of their commander. And now they have fired 15 rockets as a firework (An Ngo).


As if they knew exactly where to aim the missiles, so as not to harm the American personnel (toecutter) at all.


I have seen more effective rocket attacks from the Gaza Strip (Raul Estovez).


Many Americans spoke peacefully enough, hoping for a de-escalation of the conflict:

I would be happy if Trump laughed and asked: “Is that all you have?” - and decided that it was not worth taking revenge for it (Jeff Rielley).


It certainly was an interesting night. I think Iran and the US have just played high stakes poker, and now (hopefully) it's over (DarthNader).


“Where were the Patriot?”: US reaction to an Iranian missile strike


However, aggressive moods sounded against this background. A number of users see Tehran as an implacable enemy, which should be "crushed" by troops along with nuclear infrastructure.

Retaliation carte blanche. I'd love to see the menu. The [Iranian] island of Hope Kharg [57 km from the Bushehr nuclear power plant] is at the top of the list (Bogdan Panek).


I really hope that we will use this as an excuse for the complete destruction of their nuclear infrastructure. We will not get a better opportunity (outshine8).


Some commentators are looking forward to military clashes, in particular, aircraft of the two countries:

Is there any chance that the F-35 [US Air Force] and F-14 [Iranian Air Force] will fight tonight ??? (BravoSierra007).


If all the Iranian air forces are really in the air, a few new aces may appear in the US air force tonight (stanleywinthrop).


Others drew attention to the weak air defense of US military installations:

Why do American bases in Iraq have only C-RAM [an analogue of Russian Shells] for defense (TI).


I thought that at least 2 Patriot [air defense] batteries were in the area (HAmm3r3D).
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

297 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. The leader of the Redskins 8 January 2020 08: 56 New
    • 51
    • 6
    +45
    All the same, I do not want to witness the escalation of the conflict and I do not envy those who accidentally end up in the "front row" ...
    1. Same lech 8 January 2020 09: 03 New
      • 26
      • 0
      +26
      The night was a stormy ... shelling of American bases ... a catastrophe with a Ukrainian plane ... now the whole escalation of the conflict will subside on the Internet at various forums and sites ... the Americanists will smash the Iranians and vice versa ... that is a lot of noise and dust.
      1. Evil543 8 January 2020 09: 37 New
        • 29
        • 1
        +28
        Before the next move, the battle will be transferred to the combat sofas angry
        1. Every 8 January 2020 12: 25 New
          • 39
          • 3
          +36
          Quote: Evil543
          Before the next move, the battle will be transferred to the combat sofas angry

          These ones:
          1. krot 8 January 2020 13: 21 New
            • 46
            • 5
            +41
            Most commentators believe that the Iranian authorities tried to save their face with this attack after the death of one of the most prominent figures of the IRGC, Kassem Suleimani.

            They did not try, they did it! Who else did such an otvetka striped? Americans with impunity on any continent kill and abduct any people they dislike. And all just blah blah blah. And Iran did! And it doesn’t matter that no one was hurt from the striped. So even better. The soldiers are not to blame for their rulers.
            And yet .. Where is all the vaunted "exceptional" air defense? Blown away? )
            1. krot 8 January 2020 21: 43 New
              • 5
              • 0
              +5
              Excerpt from the news:
              Trump statement after attacks on US military bases: “It looks like Iran has retreated”

              Cool Iran backed down! laughing Exceptional recognize power. Everyone has seen it now.
              As well as the vaunted clever Patriots, who were covering the base exactly, they morally obsolete the Scuds)
          2. Vitaly gusin 8 January 2020 13: 22 New
            • 6
            • 10
            -4
            Quote: Every
            Quote: Evil543
            Before the next move, the battle will be transferred to the combat sofas angry

            These ones:

            SUPER TECHNOLOGY
            But the shock of the most powerful modern weapon is not enough, modification is required.
          3. brr1 8 January 2020 13: 37 New
            • 6
            • 2
            +4
            Quote: Every
            Quote: Evil543
            Before the next move, the battle will be transferred to the combat sofas angry

            These ones:

            Now the training is going on
          4. ananias mudishev 8 January 2020 22: 09 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            This couch lacks room for beer and chips
      2. Strashila 8 January 2020 09: 49 New
        • 6
        • 2
        +4
        "something a lot of noise and dust", dust and knocking keys.
        1. Gene585 8 January 2020 10: 47 New
          • 26
          • 6
          +20
          Quote: Military Review News
          “Where were the Patriot?”: US reaction to an Iranian missile strike

          Patriot was, as always, there - where he should be - in .ope ...
          1. Nomad Plus 8 January 2020 12: 14 New
            • 8
            • 1
            +7
            it's time for the us and its allies to buy from 400 and the patriots do not work.
          2. Levius RU 8 January 2020 16: 49 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            Yes not ..... They forgot to turn it on
      3. Unmer 8 January 2020 12: 07 New
        • 13
        • 9
        +4
        For the plane ... Why, we’ll rejoice like * pan *, for Dr. Lisa? At the Ukrainian forums for our TU 154 there was a great change. But I don’t feel like it .. Now, if there was a pastor with Petka there was a different scenario.
        1. Nyrobsky 8 January 2020 12: 18 New
          • 39
          • 2
          +37
          Quote: Unmer
          For the plane ... Why, we’ll rejoice like * pan *, for Dr. Lisa? At the Ukrainian forums for our TU 154 there was a great change. But I don’t feel like it ..

          No one here is happy about the crash, at least I haven’t seen a single enthusiastic comment. In contrast to the "saucepan", there is quite an adequate audience. Condolences to the relatives of the victims.
          1. Deathmaker 8 January 2020 13: 41 New
            • 6
            • 2
            +4
            It might not have been here, but in the same Peysbukh the brothers were tearing to pieces with delight, as if they had buried the next cavalry-armored brigade of the Buryat special forces.
        2. Vol4ara 8 January 2020 13: 35 New
          • 2
          • 5
          -3
          Quote: Unmer
          For the plane ... Why, we’ll rejoice like * pan *, for Dr. Lisa? At the Ukrainian forums for our TU 154 there was a great change. But I don’t feel like it .. Now, if there was a pastor with Petka there was a different scenario.

          Pan 11 people, the rest are Iranians and citizens of other countries
          1. samaks 8 January 2020 19: 40 New
            • 6
            • 2
            +4
            Why all under one comb. (I'm talking about "pots")?
      4. Shelest2000 8 January 2020 15: 20 New
        • 10
        • 0
        +10
        accident with a Ukrainian plane

        Somehow, this catastrophe happened just in time in Iran, after which almost all international flights to / from Iran were canceled. Something it reminds me of .....
      5. Alexey LK 9 January 2020 02: 08 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: The same Lech
        The night was stormy ... shelling of American bases ... a disaster with a Ukrainian plane ...

        and still strange earthquakes near the Bushehr nuclear power plant ...
    2. Sergey79 8 January 2020 09: 08 New
      • 14
      • 5
      +9
      I agree. Any worst world is better than war.
      1. SRC P-15 8 January 2020 09: 14 New
        • 64
        • 7
        +57
        "Where were the Patriot?"

        Where Patriot missiles can fly quietly! laughing
        1. BARKAS 8 January 2020 09: 41 New
          • 8
          • 1
          +7
          There, the air defense is even worse than at the Saudi oil facilities, but the accuracy and efficiency of the missile attack is much worse than the conclusion that Iran did not shoot at Saudi aramco.
          1. SRC P-15 8 January 2020 09: 48 New
            • 20
            • 4
            +16
            Quote: BARKAS
            the conclusion is not Iran shot at Saudi Aramco.

            And for a long time now, the idea has been walking around the network that the Saudis themselves blew up the oil storage from the filing of the United States. America really needs a high oil price to make shale oil profitable. But alas and ah, prices jumped slightly. Now the United States has taken a different path: they fanned the conflict with Iran - the price of oil has crept up. The whole question is: will the US and Iran be able to stop the confrontation in time.
            1. Rostislav Bely 8 January 2020 10: 49 New
              • 8
              • 4
              +4
              Not a fact, an increase in oil prices increases gas station prices and hits Trump’s voters ...
              1. UAZ 452 8 January 2020 13: 20 New
                • 3
                • 2
                +1
                While the voter does not consider this to be Trump's fault, everything for him is within the permissible limits.
                1. Rostislav Bely 8 January 2020 14: 12 New
                  • 1
                  • 7
                  -6
                  I won’t tell you for all of Odessa ...
                  From the life of banderlogs - say how many times a dog, he barks
              2. aybolyt678 8 January 2020 22: 05 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: Rostislav White
                Not a fact, an increase in oil prices increases gas station prices and hits Trump’s voters ...

                All right! just like ours, it hits the voter’s pocket but not the puppeteers with Trump! laughing
            2. Cheldon 8 January 2020 13: 08 New
              • 3
              • 1
              +2
              Quote: SRC P-15
              Now the United States has taken a different path: they fanned the conflict with Iran - the price of oil has crept up.

              Leviathan’s gas production on the Israeli shelf of the Mediterranean Sea also needs to be quickly recouped.
            3. Evgeny Goncharov (smoogg) 9 January 2020 01: 07 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              Why should Trump raise the price of gas in the pre-election period. Why would he even support shale mining, which, even without support, is more alive than all living things? Have you been told all this on REN-TV?
          2. Vol4ara 8 January 2020 13: 43 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            Quote: BARKAS
            There, the air defense is even worse than at the Saudi oil facilities, but the accuracy and efficiency of the missile attack is much worse than the conclusion that Iran did not shoot at Saudi aramco.

            That would be a joke if Iran hoped that the missiles would be knocked down, and therefore fired at the ancient skads. And they were not shot down: D
          3. The comment was deleted.
        2. Herman 4223 8 January 2020 13: 21 New
          • 6
          • 4
          +2
          "Where were the Patriot?"
          Ukrainian Boeing probably drenched.
      2. Revolver 8 January 2020 09: 24 New
        • 27
        • 4
        +23
        Quote: Sergey79
        Any worst world is better than war.

        Not necessarily.
        "If a country, choosing between war and shame, chooses shame, it receives both war and shame." - Winston Churchill about the Munich agreement.
        1. Sergey79 8 January 2020 09: 31 New
          • 4
          • 4
          0
          Do you think that if a war starts, it will bypass us?
          1. Revolver 8 January 2020 09: 50 New
            • 13
            • 4
            +9
            Quote: Sergey79
            Do you think that if a war starts, it will bypass us?

            If it affects Russia, then only indirectly and positively. Energy prices will rise.
            1. Sergey79 8 January 2020 10: 01 New
              • 15
              • 6
              +9
              We have radically different views on events and consequences. Your "measure" is money and financial gain. And mine are human lives and destinies.
              1. AU Ivanov. 8 January 2020 10: 22 New
                • 21
                • 11
                +10
                Why not. The war in the Middle East is not only a rising price of hydrocarbons, but also an increased demand for weapons. And then this is beneficial for Russia. We must use the moment, and not chew on idealistic snot.
                1. Sergey79 8 January 2020 10: 27 New
                  • 14
                  • 7
                  +7
                  Tell the military and their relatives about this. I am sure that the units will agree with your opinion, since it will not work to stay aside, and you will have to fulfill the order.
                  1. AU Ivanov. 8 January 2020 10: 33 New
                    • 14
                    • 4
                    +10
                    But we should not interfere in this war. If you fight, then with the wrong hands on someone else’s territory and, preferably, someone else’s money. But trading vital for the conduct of hostilities, including information, is still worth it.
                    1. kubash66 8 January 2020 10: 45 New
                      • 4
                      • 4
                      0
                      smart thing, terrible thing
                2. URAL72 8 January 2020 10: 38 New
                  • 24
                  • 1
                  +23
                  Russia is not profitable weakening, and especially the defeat of Iran. The increase in oil prices does not compensate for this. But the withdrawal of troops from Iraq is very beneficial to us. New arms contracts can be expected, which is billions. Together with the equipment, our specialists and advisers will return to Iraq, and PMCs will ensure the work of our companies under long-standing contracts. With Shiites and Kurds, we have everything exactly. So I hope this conflict is settled. But the attacks of local groups on the base will continue until they leave.
                  1. riwas 9 January 2020 05: 16 New
                    • 1
                    • 1
                    0
                    So the modern leadership of Iraq from the very beginning was against the United States. Therefore, I bought our equipment with American money. And she took the very first reason to declare the armed forces of the United States non grata.
                3. Herman 4223 8 January 2020 19: 18 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Oil revenues will go to the foreign exchange reserve, and it is forbidden to sell weapons to the belligerent side according to international standards, Iran is prohibited to sell weapons by decision of the UN.
              2. maidan.izrailovich 8 January 2020 10: 28 New
                • 17
                • 5
                +12
                And mine are human lives and destinies.

                Do not escalate. And do not invent what is not. You are not a liberal?
                Russia does not need to send its military to Iran. Advisors do not count. It is enough to provide Iran with military-technical assistance. Perhaps even the type of Lend-Lease. 81 million Iran has a sufficient mobilization resource.
                1. Sergey79 8 January 2020 10: 42 New
                  • 2
                  • 8
                  -6
                  I do not escalate the situation, but I know what I'm saying.
              3. DMB_95 8 January 2020 15: 32 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: Sergey79
                We have radically different views on events and consequences. Your "measure" is money and financial gain. And mine are human lives and destinies.

                That's just events can take such a turn that you have to fit into them, despite the consequences ..
            2. Grievous 8 January 2020 10: 37 New
              • 20
              • 8
              +12
              For Russia, the price of energy does not matter, gas will still go up.
              1. AU Ivanov. 8 January 2020 10: 45 New
                • 10
                • 4
                +6
                Even as it has. Remember the "full zero" when the price per barrel was above a hundred green.
                1. Krasnodar 8 January 2020 12: 30 New
                  • 8
                  • 0
                  +8
                  Quote: AU Ivanov.
                  Even as it has. Remember the "full zero" when the price per barrel was above a hundred green.

                  And until 2014, before the slate, everything was normal
                  By the way, oil creeps up carefully. At 68,5 Brent Futures
                  1. Tersky 8 January 2020 12: 41 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    Quote: Krasnodar
                    By the way, oil creeps up carefully. At 68,5 Brent Futures

                    Brent at 11: 10 Moscow time 69,08 USD. + 0,54 to yours hi
                    1. Krasnodar 8 January 2020 12: 44 New
                      • 7
                      • 1
                      +6
                      Good afternoon hi
                      Investing 68.67, at 12:43
                      After the attack on Suleymani, she was already over 70
                      1. Tersky 8 January 2020 12: 46 New
                        • 3
                        • 0
                        +3
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        After the attack on Suleymani, she was already over 70

                        Judging by the latest events (shelling, Boeing’s downfall), by the evening it might be over 70.
                      2. Krasnodar 8 January 2020 12: 48 New
                        • 7
                        • 1
                        +6
                        With God's help
                        According to financial analysts, people are in no hurry to invest in oil futures, considering them currently too risky assets. Everyone is expecting
                    2. Vitaly gusin 8 January 2020 13: 25 New
                      • 1
                      • 3
                      -2
                      Quote: Krasnodar
                      After the attack on Suleymani, she was already over 70

                      What are you implying?
                    3. Krasnodar 8 January 2020 13: 34 New
                      • 6
                      • 1
                      +5
                      H Gematria magic number 70. lol
                      Brent Oil Futures Cost
                      Energy prices
                    4. The comment was deleted.
                2. kapitan92 8 January 2020 21: 14 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Krasnodar
                  Investing 68.67, at 12:43
                  After the attack on Suleymani, she was already over 70

                  Brent 65.39 65.42 -3.12 -4.55 21:12:22
                  Light 59.60 59.63 -3.08 -4.91
                  Forex trading. on 21-12 of Moscow. hi
            3. AU Ivanov. 8 January 2020 12: 42 New
              • 7
              • 3
              +4
              If shipping in Hormuz is blocked, the oil price will not creep, but will rush up.
              1. Krasnodar 8 January 2020 12: 46 New
                • 10
                • 2
                +8
                The same thing if strikes on the oil infrastructure of the Saudis and Persians
      3. Herman 4223 8 January 2020 13: 26 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        If the United States takes control of Iran, it will control the entire Middle East and oil prices, respectively. Iran is one of the main suppliers of oil to China; if the thread is cut, prices for Chinese goods will soar.
        1. Krasnodar 8 January 2020 13: 43 New
          • 8
          • 2
          +6
          And China will sit on our oil))
          1. Grits 8 January 2020 14: 49 New
            • 6
            • 1
            +5
            Quote: Krasnodar
            And China sits on our oil

            Is not a fact. But we will become a little poorer. Since almost everything we have is made in China.
            1. Krasnodar 8 January 2020 14: 58 New
              • 6
              • 3
              +3
              Well, what kind of alternatives will China have in case of difficulties with a stable supply of Iranian oil?
              We will not become poorer - there will be more money in the budget, more state projects, more employment, increased business activity - i.e. our purchasing power will increase
              1. Herman 4223 8 January 2020 19: 03 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                There will be no more money in the budget. We have a budget rule (cut-off price), if I’m not mistaken, $ 40 now, if the oil price is higher, then budget revenue does not go. The money goes to the foreign exchange reserve, which is controlled by the Central Bank, and according to our laws, it has no right to lend to the government of the Russian Federation.

                https://youtu.be/0KvBJajVRHo

                https://youtu.be/zoa1UdTWDN4
                1. Krasnodar 8 January 2020 19: 36 New
                  • 6
                  • 0
                  +6
                  So in the budget for next year there will be a cutoff of 70 ₽ - have already passed this
                2. Herman 4223 25 January 2020 16: 56 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  When oil cost $ 100, the cutoff price was $ 27.
                3. Krasnodar 25 January 2020 16: 57 New
                  • 4
                  • 0
                  +4
                  Nothing
                  And how much did it hold?
                4. Herman 4223 29 January 2020 07: 25 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  The rule was introduced in 2004, when oil was expensive, the cutoff price was $ 20; in 2006, it was raised to $ 27. In 2008, when the price of oil collapsed, they made $ 45-50. The maximum was in 2013, $ 91.
                  Now since 2017, $ 40.
        2. aybolyt678 8 January 2020 22: 11 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Krasnodar
          there will be more money in the budget, more government projects, more employment, increased business activity

          and will the state have more responsibility for its citizens? and what kind of ideology other than "more money" will be ???
          1. Krasnodar 8 January 2020 22: 25 New
            • 8
            • 0
            +8
            There will be nothing - Trump merged)))
            And what is the responsibility for their citizens? It is impossible for the majority of the population to convict a doctor of negligence; it is possible to dismiss a worthless employee only after two official disciplinary warnings, still paying 40% of the salary for him, etc. Where is more responsibility? And what is the ideology? Let's stop giving bribes in universities for a diploma to our children? Or stop stealing? Just wondering..
          2. aybolyt678 8 January 2020 22: 36 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Krasnodar
            Condemn a doctor for negligence

            think fine, though rightly but one-sidedly. It meant the responsibility of the "Elite" for assignments, the feasibility of national projects ...
            Quote: Krasnodar
            And what is the ideology? Let's stop giving bribes to universities

            it is necessary to give knowledge the status that they are more expensive than money, that more expensive than money, the prospect of the development of society. This is a long question ......
          3. Krasnodar 8 January 2020 23: 06 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            Well, sorry for my small-town mentality, to think globally like the responsibility of the "Elite" ... who is the elite in FIG? The bureaucrats who climbed to power? Responsibility for national projects has surrendered to them ... and what do they mean to you? Accumulative pension programs of some kind of bank nationalized by the state with a guarantee of indexation by the level of inflation / basket of world currencies is a national project. Gasification of all villages. Building a bridge to Sakhalin, for example. And Roskosmos should be given to the Ministry of Defense - they fly high there for military purposes, there is no dough to conquer Mars.
            Knowledge is more expensive than money - people will get to this only with an adequate monetary assessment of this knowledge after school. Those. Chubais’s office - to privatize, to make a state program to support high-tech industries, to open international offshores with conditions for providing jobs to citizens of the Russian Federation, etc. This is my small, small-town thinking.
          4. aybolyt678 9 January 2020 08: 40 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Krasnodar
            people will only get to this if they have an adequate monetary assessment of this knowledge after graduation.

            again you have a common denominator - money! how do you feel about Plato, his immortal phrase, what kind of money can you buy a bed but not a dream, medicine but not health, pleasure but not happiness ???
            Quote: Krasnodar
            open international off-shores with conditions for providing jobs to citizens of the Russian Federation, etc.

            this is not clear what kind of offshore and what are the prospects ??? I’m generally for closed borders, for Roskosmos and Chubais you respect! +++
            Is it better to replace the self-name "Elite" with Cream ??
          5. Krasnodar 9 January 2020 08: 45 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            Like a dad of four children - I do not agree with Plato laughing
            Off-shores - tax-free zones for foreign companies are made in places that are profitable in the country - such as the Far East or Belgorod. Foreigners can place any production there subject to the nth percent of employment at enterprises of citizens of the Russian Federation.
            Yes, I prfig their self-name, the elite is Alferov, Perelman, Kaspersky, etc. Cream is just officials.
            And why are closed borders? On the contrary - visa-free travel for the first thirty developed countries (by HDI, by GDP per capita). Let them spend the loot here.
          6. aybolyt678 9 January 2020 08: 50 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Krasnodar
            Foreigners can place any production there subject to the nth percent of employment at enterprises of citizens of the Russian Federation.

            a prerequisite should be not only percentage but also qualifications. The level of development of any country depends on the link - the science of the introduction of production. If a foreign company opens an enterprise, does not pay taxes, uses only its high-tech equipment, uses our cheap electricity, then it is an even greater competitor to our enterprises !!! it will kill our science even more. This is a disguised version of the screwdriver assembly. Yours faithfully.....
          7. Krasnodar 9 January 2020 08: 55 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            So you can determine what places our citizens should occupy there - out of 10 engineers, say, two Russians, etc. Hai chatter for their retraining courses in their own country. And our enterprises, in any situation, are very far from competing with them - all sorts of Boeings and Lockheeds will not transfer their plants to us - but tablets, smartphones and all that, for example, we do not produce anyway.
          8. aybolyt678 9 January 2020 10: 24 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Krasnodar
            our citizens should occupy there - out of 10 engineers, say, two Russians

            out of 10 engineers, 8 Russians, otherwise we will die of modesty laughing
          9. Krasnodar 9 January 2020 10: 27 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            If they agree)))
            In short, when do we start? laughing
          10. aybolyt678 9 January 2020 10: 35 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            undermining the political system ???? laughing
          11. Krasnodar 9 January 2020 20: 13 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            So... laughing ... I'm actually for the natural evolutionary changes in society))
          12. Egor53 9 January 2020 21: 31 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            And who will approve these laws of evolution?
          13. Krasnodar 9 January 2020 22: 07 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            We will evolve with you
            And with us - the country fellow
        3. aybolyt678 9 January 2020 22: 00 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Krasnodar
          So ... laughing ... I'm actually for natural evolutionary change

          judging that we understand each other, they have already begun ... changes in society begin with a public request for them, the main thing is that this request is correctly formed. In order not to work out as with investments in the economy. They decided that investments were needed, and allowed amers to extract oil ... Investments ??? wassat
        4. Krasnodar 9 January 2020 22: 09 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          Quote: aybolyt678
          Quote: Krasnodar
          So ... laughing ... I'm actually for natural evolutionary change

          judging that we understand each other, they have already begun ... changes in society begin with a public request for them, the main thing is that this request is correctly formed. In order not to work out as with investments in the economy. They decided that investments were needed, and allowed amers to extract oil ... Investments ??? wassat

          Hemp, Flax, Wheat))
  2. Egor53 9 January 2020 21: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The answer to Krasnodar.
    "And our enterprises, in any situation, are very far from competing with them - all sorts of Boeings and Lockheeds will not transfer their plants to us ..."
    Also how to transfer.
    The Boeing titanium aircraft parts manufacturing plant in Russia both funded and, to a large extent, built. For several years now, the products of this plant have been bought by Boeing and Airbus. And there is NO competition with the products of this plant in the US or the EU.
  3. aybolyt678 9 January 2020 22: 07 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Egor53
    Boeing titanium aviation parts in Russia

    titanium with aluminum is materialized electricity. That is, 89 percent of its value is the cost of the energy of its receipt and processing. At what price does Boeing buy electricity in Russia? what taxes does it pay? how much does the workers pay and do our engineers work there, do they share technology ?????? Or maybe it's just a way to get around customs? Do you know that even doing business on our land, Boeing Corporation is obliged to pay taxes at home, in America? and conclusion: Boeing dues do not pay us !! and nobody needs our engineers and designers, and while we are complacent that the plants are being built, our science is dying
  4. Krasnodar 9 January 2020 22: 08 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Keyword - Titanium
  • Vol4ara 8 January 2020 13: 46 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Quote: Nagan
    Quote: Sergey79
    Do you think that if a war starts, it will bypass us?

    If it affects Russia, then only indirectly and positively. Energy prices will rise.

    But the fact that in the future, if Iran loses and its oil is in the hands of the United States, it will not affect us indirectly, but directly and fuck it negatively, do not you care? And the fact that we border Iran on the Caspian is nothing like that?
    1. Krasnodar 8 January 2020 15: 00 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      States will not go to the occupation of Iran - a troublesome business. But oil will be in Russian hands - they can sell it only through Sechin
  • Levius RU 8 January 2020 16: 56 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Portugal supplied tungsten to World War II. To everyone. Gold reserves increased several times. Here we are now nefig climb into disassembly. You can provide Iran with gum help. States do not tease much. And there it will be seen.
  • Harry.km 8 January 2020 19: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Nagan
    Energy prices will rise

    At our gas stations, which was not once.
  • aybolyt678 8 January 2020 22: 07 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Nagan
    If it affects Russia, then only indirectly and positively. Energy prices will rise.

    ??? which side will it affect positively? will gasoline prices rise? will more Russians have yachts? wassat But the only thing is that we’ll sell weapons to anyone, so will we sell today and tomorrow?
  • SSR
    SSR 8 January 2020 09: 59 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Quote: Nagan
    Winston Churchill over the Munich agreement.

    It seems more precisely so.
    He criticized Hitler’s pacification policy pursued by Chamberlain’s government.
    And when the Munich Agreement on the transfer of the Sudetenland to Germany was concluded in 1938, Churchill spoke in the House of Commons as follows:

    (c) You had a choice between war and dishonor. You have chosen dishonor, now you will receive war.
  • Olgovich 8 January 2020 10: 26 New
    • 3
    • 8
    -5
    Quote: Nagan
    "If a country, choosing between war and shame, chooses shame, it receives both war and shame." -

    Iran did not have to beat openly, substitute a clearly more powerful enemy ....
    it was necessary to beat stealthily and through his allies.

    and so straightforward ..... no
    1. GELEZNII_KAPUT 8 January 2020 11: 09 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Olgovich
      Iran did not have to beat openly, substitute a clearly more powerful enemy ....
      it was necessary to beat stealthily and through his allies.

      and so straightforward .....

      Yes, penguins are specifically drawn into the conflict.
    2. Sergey M. Karasev 8 January 2020 11: 38 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Iran did not have to beat openly, substitute a clearly more powerful enemy ....
      it was necessary to beat stealthily and through his allies.

      Not the fact that this is the final answer. Someone he is too unconvincing, symbolic. A full answer, IMHO, will come later.
      PS: Did you lower the red flag of revenge for Suleymani in Qom? Not heard yet.
  • Siberia 75 8 January 2020 09: 13 New
    • 47
    • 6
    +41
    The eternal memory of Kassem Suleimani. He faithfully served his homeland.
    What I think about striped, I will not write, banned.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Siberia 75 8 January 2020 09: 24 New
        • 32
        • 6
        +26
        Quote: Nagan
        Iranian mullococracy with its chief terrorist Suleymani in particular.

        This is the choice of a sovereign country. Do not impose on anyone. You are not in a hurry to blame the bloody US oligarchy.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. Siberia 75 8 January 2020 09: 35 New
            • 22
            • 6
            +16
            Quote: Nagan
            Wake up, the USSR has been gone for a quarter century

            Well, we'll see it.
            Quote: Nagan
            And I personally voted for Trump and will vote again,

            I support you comrade
            Quote: Nagan
            "bloody oligarchy of the USA" is only in your brain

            Give you statistics, or you’ll use the search engines yourself tongue
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. Siberia 75 8 January 2020 09: 54 New
                • 29
                • 2
                +27
                Quote: Terentich
                There are statistics of the bloody US oligarchy? Surprisingly?

                That's what I'm talking about.
                Information about US wars, with the bombing of civilian targets, with the number of people killed, is publicly available. And they write to me "Surreal". What is it? What is the medical term?
                1. vargo 8 January 2020 11: 04 New
                  • 5
                  • 1
                  +4
                  "Sursyozno" and the abundance of emoticons in discussions once again emphasize the seriousness of the interlocutor and has already become a sign of a troll on the network and on this site specifically. It is directly visible that they pull on emotions. Just trolls, we’re not waiting for the mind there.
              2. shark 8 January 2020 10: 13 New
                • 16
                • 5
                +11
                Seriously, do you doubt the existence of a bloody US oligarchy? Yah. But the Union itself fell apart? Did Ukraine itself get hooked? It is strange to hear such nonsense from a person writing in Russian.
                1. TermNachTer 8 January 2020 18: 24 New
                  • 0
                  • 2
                  -2
                  These nonsense - well paid, so you can hear and not that. After all, the man does not even hide that he voted for Trump and will soon be again.
              3. Tersky 8 January 2020 12: 51 New
                • 9
                • 0
                +9
                Quote: Terentich
                There are statistics of the bloody US oligarchy?

                After World War II, the United States unleashed about 66 wars and armed conflicts. And it’s only open, but how many are hidden. No wonder the United States was nicknamed the dog of war.
            2. NordUral 8 January 2020 10: 53 New
              • 5
              • 0
              +5
              It is useless already, Alexei, this one fits in well with the way of thinking of the American layman.
          2. grandson of Perun 8 January 2020 09: 41 New
            • 20
            • 1
            +19
            Quote: Nagan
            "bloody oligarchy of the USA" is only in your brain

            Vietnam, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria ... A long list of "friendliness" of the United States ...
            1. Terentich 8 January 2020 09: 55 New
              • 6
              • 40
              -34
              Quote: Perun's grandson
              Vietnam, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria ...

              And what exactly happened in these countries? What is the background of conflicts, causes, their consequences, etc.? According to your post, only one thing is clear, your knowledge begins with the name of these countries and there they end. good crying Once they looked at the globe and voila - the "expert" in geopolitics is ready. wassat
              1. grandson of Perun 8 January 2020 11: 55 New
                • 13
                • 0
                +13
                I can remind you, “what exactly happened in these countries”: massive US war crimes, bombing of cities with civilian casualties traditional for the United States. In Vietnam and Yugoslavia, enormous environmental problems are in addition due to the use of chemistry and "depleted" uranium.
                And all this despite the fact that not one of these countries in the United States threatened!
                The states "carried democracy" on their own exclusively "friendly" initiative.
                So slide about the "globe" elsewhere.
              2. artifact 8 January 2020 11: 56 New
                • 6
                • 1
                +5
                Quote: Terentich
                Quote: Perun's grandson
                Vietnam, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria ...

                And what exactly happened in these countries? What is the background of conflicts, causes, their consequences, etc.? According to your post, only one thing is clear, your knowledge begins with the name of these countries and there they end. good crying Once they looked at the globe and voila - the "expert" in geopolitics is ready. wassat

                let’s take Iraq, what story is there before !? what are the reasons for the flat-handed invasion, "CHEM WEAPONS" isn't it ...!? that's it and the rest ...
          3. The comment was deleted.
        2. hydrox 8 January 2020 12: 50 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Ay-ay! This is not so with the terminology :: the American oligarchy is separated from the bloody hands of its puppets, so the appearance of purity is preserved, despite the habits of the American military, implicated in theft and terrorism.
          Only theft of oil from the Syrian oil fields is STATE theft, and the protection of terrorists is under the slogans of democracy, and therefore we have state-democratic geopolitical terrorism.
          On the other hand, the Kiev military, under the direction and management of American military advisers, has already distinguished itself in the production of 15K corpses and about 10K disabled people, but personally not a single marine or whatever they had had a hand in the descent of the murder weapon - all this was done by Ukrainian mercenaries disguised as the national armed forces.
      2. Mountain shooter 8 January 2020 09: 32 New
        • 17
        • 0
        +17
        And I agree with you ... The beautiful, rich, secular country was driven "in the Middle Ages". I remember the movie Iranian. "Mazandaran Tiger", about fighters. Girls in light dresses, love-carrots, youth on the streets ... Not a single burqa ...
        But this is no reason to kill her generals, who through diplomatic channels make a visit to a neighboring country.
        1. Revolver 8 January 2020 09: 45 New
          • 11
          • 46
          -35
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          no reason to kill her generals, who through diplomatic channels make a visit to a neighboring country

          Well, Khattab was also a type general, like the country of Ichkeria. And Basayev is so finally generalissimo. And what, they also could not be soaked in the toilet? Keitel and Jodl were military personnel, and nevertheless they were hanged on their own merits. Suleymani was a terrorist, with hands on his shoulders in blood, and got what he deserved. And by the way, his Al-Quds Forces are officially considered a terrorist organization. Terrorists must be eliminated where and when such an opportunity arises.
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          The beautiful, rich, secular country was driven "in the Middle Ages"

          And Iran is truly sincerely sorry. This bastard Jimmy Carter, instead of assisting the shah in his showdown with the Islamists, began to teach him human rights, shabby freedoms, and other liberal crap. The entire nation of Iran fell under the hand.
          1. Kurare 8 January 2020 10: 51 New
            • 19
            • 1
            +18
            Quote: Nagan
            Well, Khattab was also a type general, like the country of Ichkeria.

            You forgot to write "the country of Ichkeria not recognized by anyone", which, incidentally, was simply a republic of the Russian Federation. And the liquidation of the militants - this is, as is now customary to say especially in the USA - the internal affairs of a sovereign country.
            Quote: Nagan
            Keitel and Jodl were military personnel, and nevertheless they were hanged on their own merits.

            A moot point so far. Rather, they were executed for having committed war crimes.
            Quote: Nagan
            And by the way, his Al-Quds Forces are officially considered a terrorist organization.

            And here, please, in more detail: WHO considers “Codes” or “Al-Quds” as you write a terrorist organization? UN - definitely not! And if so - let the selective opinion remain where it came from.
            Quote: Nagan
            And Iran is truly sincerely sorry. That booby Jimmy Carter, ...

            Here I agree with you 90%, since it was not necessary to put this villainous shah on the throne as a puppet, it was not necessary to kill (by the way, a manifestation of state terrorism) Mossadegh.
          2. user1212 8 January 2020 10: 54 New
            • 5
            • 2
            +3
            At the moment, any definition of the term "terrorist" or "terrorist organization" should be attributed to "except the United States, NATO and their creatures", otherwise embarrassment
            For example, how have the Al-Quds forces earned recognition, but the Albanians are not in the Yugoslav conflict? The Syrian Opposition? "Libyan opposition"? Anti-Soviet Movement in Afghanistan and ...
            By the way, the organizations of Irgun and Lehi were also terrorist. Why are the veterans of these organizations not liquidated by the special services of Israel, a prominent "fighter against terrorism"?
          3. lewerlin53rus 8 January 2020 11: 41 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            People like you begin to equate the Iranian military with terrorists first, then go on to equalize Stalin and Hitler and the USSR with the 3rd Reich.
        2. onega67 8 January 2020 10: 34 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          I also saw this movie. Cool movie to say !!!
          1. Mordvin 3 8 January 2020 11: 18 New
            • 1
            • 2
            -1
            Quote: onega67
            I also saw this movie.

            And there is also a film about how the leadership of Iran hit the road in the United States. "A house of sand and fog" is called. Also cool.
        3. AU Ivanov. 8 January 2020 11: 05 New
          • 9
          • 1
          +8
          There is no Middle Ages in Iran. Regarding the rules of Sharia - this is their choice and do not climb with your charter into a strange monastery. The medieval country does not build nuclear power plants and does not have a sufficiently developed industry.
          1. Otshelnik 8 January 2020 18: 34 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            I agree ... 96% literacy rate
  • Yang yangov 8 January 2020 09: 28 New
    • 13
    • 2
    +11
    The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps announced the start of a retaliation operation for the assassination of General Kassem Suleimani. Land-to-ground missiles were fired from Iran at Ain Assad base in the Iraqi province of Barn, where the US military contingent is located.

    The US Air Force plane was destroyed on the runway at the Ain Assad base in Iraq during a missile attack from Iran, the Lebanese TV channel Al-Mayadin reports.

    "Confirmed the destruction of one of the aircraft on the runway on the US side of the base," - said the channel.
    1. Alex Justice 8 January 2020 15: 40 New
      • 1
      • 6
      -5
      The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is an armed religious group, such as the guardsmen. Poke your nose even into privacy. The new generation does not like them. The time will come and they will be removed along with the mullah.
      1. Otshelnik 8 January 2020 18: 38 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        And where did the hundreds of thousands of young men and women in their ranks come from, since they don’t like them?))
        1. Alex Justice 10 January 2020 17: 01 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          And where are the hundreds of thousands of young men and women in their ranks since they are not loved?

          Religious propaganda of uneducated people is doing its job.
  • 4ekist 8 January 2020 12: 16 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Most likely, the Iranians in this way simply hinted at the possible consequences of a further exacerbation. And I don’t see anything unexpected about the effectiveness of Patriot. Everything was supposed to end. While they announced their readiness, while they turned on, and probably didn’t have time to visit the targets. Played the human and time factor. Yes, and the media from the military constantly overestimate the effectiveness of weapons.
  • TermNachTer 8 January 2020 18: 22 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Not fast, the Persians shot off on the mattresses somehow very clumsily - no one was hurt. But on the other hand - where is the vaunted mattress air defense? How many missiles shot down?
    1. Cetron 8 January 2020 20: 38 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The Persians warned in advance where and when they would shoot. The personnel of the bases managed to take refuge in shelters, only the Iraqi personnel were injured - the Americans apparently do not count them and did not warn them. Both Western and Iranian media commented on this.
      1. TermNachTer 8 January 2020 22: 07 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        But should the bases be covered by some means of air defense or mattresses finally believed in their immortality?
    2. Oleg83 8 January 2020 21: 13 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Quote: TermNachTER
      Not fast, the Persians shot off on the mattresses somehow very clumsily - no one was hurt. But on the other hand - where is the vaunted mattress air defense? How many missiles shot down?


      What kind of air defense? There are no Patriot installations in Iraq
      1. Egor53 9 January 2020 21: 33 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        And who told you that Patriot installations are air defense?
  • Alexander Petrov1 10 January 2020 06: 24 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Another fat plus and several billion dollars to our piggy bank with S-400 and Shell.
  • Udav kaa 8 January 2020 09: 02 New
    • 17
    • 15
    +2
    How Putin has not yet been afraid to fly to Syria .. Risky man!
    1. Ingvar 72 8 January 2020 09: 05 New
      • 17
      • 51
      -34
      Quote: Udav Kaa
      Risky man!

      Or uninformed.
      1. Mastrer 8 January 2020 09: 13 New
        • 46
        • 4
        +42
        If he is not knowledgeable, then here we just do a circle of fortunetellers on coffee grounds and pigeon droppings.
        1. Ingvar 72 8 January 2020 09: 17 New
          • 17
          • 17
          0
          Quote: Mastrer
          then here we just do a circle of fortunetellers on coffee grounds and pigeon droppings.

          And someone here seriously believes that Iran reported on upcoming attacks to Putin? belay
          1. artifact 8 January 2020 13: 12 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Ingvar 72
            Quote: Mastrer
            then here we just do a circle of fortunetellers on coffee grounds and pigeon droppings.

            And someone here seriously believes that Iran reported on upcoming attacks to Putin? belay

            and what, someone does not read official messages from the Iranian leaders !?
      2. Udav kaa 8 January 2020 09: 14 New
        • 12
        • 9
        +3
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        Quote: Udav Kaa
        Risky man!

        Or uninformed.

        Laugh hehe heh
      3. Siberia 75 8 January 2020 09: 15 New
        • 24
        • 7
        +17
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        Or uninformed.

        Putin ignorant ???
        You either did not depart from the holidays, or we are talking about different Putin.
      4. Prisoner 8 January 2020 09: 53 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Enlightened. Sorry for the information?
    2. Same lech 8 January 2020 09: 06 New
      • 10
      • 2
      +8
      How Putin has not yet been afraid to fly to Syria .. Risky man!

      And what was there to be afraid of ... the protection was reliable ... under the guise of air defense and drying, why not fly ... only that was the point of the Supreme Commander to meddle in advanced positions.
      1. Udav kaa 8 January 2020 09: 13 New
        • 18
        • 6
        +12
        Quote: The same Lech
        And what was there to be afraid ... the protection was reliable ... under the guise of air defense and drying, why not fly.

        Still seriously risked .. And if they shot down? And the country would have remained without a chapter, that would have begun ..
        Quote: The same Lech
        only that was the point of the supreme commander to meditate on the front lines.

        You can tickle your nerves or most likely show the whole world that Russia is not going to flee from BV and is serious about it ..
        So probably .. hi
        1. Fishery 8 January 2020 11: 15 New
          • 7
          • 2
          +5
          or maybe in Moscow there are a couple more spare Putins)
      2. Evil543 8 January 2020 09: 16 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Today we find out, he is in Turkey.
        1. Same lech 8 January 2020 09: 19 New
          • 7
          • 2
          +5
          Today, Putin will attend the opening ceremony of the Turkish Stream.
          Maybe Trump’s task was to distract the world from this event.
          1. Evil543 8 January 2020 09: 29 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            There will still be a statement on the USA and Iran, let's see what Putin and Erdogan say
            1. askort154 8 January 2020 10: 34 New
              • 3
              • 1
              +2
              Evil543 ...The statement on the USA and Iran will still be, let's see what Putin and Erdogan say

              And what in such cases, speaking in a diplomatic language ?!
              Only one thing is the "call for political dialogue." hi
          2. Udav kaa 8 January 2020 09: 30 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Quote: The same Lech
            Today, Putin will attend the opening ceremony of the Turkish Stream.
            Maybe Trump’s task was to distract the world from this event.

            Most likely so ..! hi They got things done with this general’s murder .. Well, why? What they do not live peacefully then ..
            1. artifact 8 January 2020 13: 16 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: Udav Kaa
              Quote: The same Lech
              Today, Putin will attend the opening ceremony of the Turkish Stream.
              Maybe Trump’s task was to distract the world from this event.

              Most likely so ..! hi They got things done with this general’s murder .. Well, why? What they do not live peacefully then ..

              by analogy with a joke: - sir ...
          3. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 8 January 2020 09: 39 New
            • 4
            • 4
            0
            Quote: The same Lech
            Today, Putin will attend the opening ceremony of the Turkish Stream. Maybe Trump’s task was to distract the world from this event.
            What for?
            1. Same lech 8 January 2020 09: 55 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              What for?


              I don’t know ... I need to ask Trump ... that he still wonders about his red head ... an impulsive person like Zhirinovsky who called the people slaves on Red Square.
      3. mikh-korsakov 8 January 2020 09: 29 New
        • 8
        • 1
        +7
        Alexei! The point was to coordinate with Assad the position in the conflict without the risk of being overheard. I disagree with those who believe that in Russia, as in the United States, they were not aware of the impending strike. Ukrainian plane crashed inappropriately. Passengers are sincerely sorry. And everyone else will stink.
    3. anjey 8 January 2020 09: 24 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      He is the Supreme, both the Commander and the Manager, and that’s all said, it’s difficult to make a good blanket from the BV political rags, but it’s necessary why we are there at all.
    4. axiles100682 8 January 2020 09: 24 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      But he did not fly to Syria through Iran? soldier
      1. Avior 8 January 2020 09: 57 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        It is very doubtful, probably through Turkey, especially since after a couple of hours there he returned
        1. axiles100682 8 January 2020 10: 00 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          It was sarcasm. But still I think that the Iranians, if they didn’t consult with us, at least warned
          1. Avior 8 January 2020 10: 10 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            about the hit?
            So the Americans knew about him
  • Michael HORNET 8 January 2020 09: 04 New
    • 15
    • 3
    +12
    Well, while it looks more like an imitation of a blow to save face. They aimed missiles past and killed no one. Judging by Trump’s reaction, who tweeted about “all is well, beautiful marquise”. Let's see how it will be after calculating the real damage.
    But in general, the one with stronger testicles will win now.
    Iran of the Russian Federation is not a friend at all; its development project is completely opposite to the Russian one. Therefore, the fact that he is an enemy of the USA does not make him a friend of the Russian Federation
    1. bar
      bar 8 January 2020 09: 28 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Well, while it looks more like an imitation of a blow to save face.

      Now it’s the turn of the striped “save face”. Otherwise, the posts on Twitter about the Marquise will be perceived by the "world community" as a drain.
    2. Gray brother 8 January 2020 10: 00 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Michael HORNET
      Well, while it looks more like an imitation of a blow

      It’s also like the destruction of runways.
      1. Fishery 8 January 2020 11: 17 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        the lanes are closed during the day maximum, well, destroyed, and that
        1. Gray brother 8 January 2020 11: 22 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Tonya
          stripes are closed during the day maximum

          Concrete is gaining strength for about a month. There will be restrictions.
    3. Mordvin 3 8 January 2020 11: 31 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Quote: Michael HORNET
      Iran of the Russian Federation is not a friend at all; its development project is completely opposite to the Russian one.

      I wonder why it is so opposite?
  • tihonmarine 8 January 2020 09: 05 New
    • 21
    • 1
    +20
    I really hope that we will use this as an excuse for the complete destruction of their nuclear infrastructure. We will not get a better opportunity (outshine8).
    You would sit Uncle Sam's chicks in your states, and not run around the world like girls with "low social responsibility" and did not spread infectious diseases.
  • igorbrsv 8 January 2020 09: 08 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    . Therefore, the damage was minimal, users say, paying attention to the fact that there are no casualties among US troops and a small number of missiles were involved.

    Interesting girls are dancing. The world is informed that not a single United States has suffered, and I heard about the destroyed planes at the bases and the death of the "democrats" in the nth amount
    1. Terentich 8 January 2020 10: 11 New
      • 5
      • 11
      -6
      Quote: igorbrsv
      and the death of "democrats" in the nth number

      Yeah .. and infa about this came from Iran’s state TV even before the missiles fell on the base amer wassat Do not believe it, compare the date and time of publication of state media in Iran. There literally a few minutes passed after the blow, how did they manage to count the dead so quickly in a couple of minutes (literally)? wassat It seems that generally repulsed propagandists are sitting there, here even Simonyan with his RT smokes on the sidelines.
  • rocket757 8 January 2020 09: 10 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Let's wait and see.
    The general impression ... of a serious conflict, so far, no one wants.
    1. parusnik 8 January 2020 09: 35 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Yes, and he will not be. Persian Gulf, painfully narrow ...
      1. rocket757 8 January 2020 11: 06 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: parusnik
        Yes, and he will not be. Persian Gulf, painfully narrow ...

        Narrow and burn there is something!
        Brew "porridge", relatively easy, rake, then, for a long time.
  • Thrifty 8 January 2020 09: 11 New
    • 11
    • 3
    +8
    Yeah, the United States has no casualties, as usual, and then they will smuggle corpses in zinc coffins secretly home? But the patriot has already shown himself as complete bullshit! !!
    1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 8 January 2020 09: 16 New
      • 3
      • 9
      -6
      Quote: Thrifty
      the usa has no losses, as always,
      What? There were losses in past attacks. For them, they overwhelmed the whole Suleimani.
    2. Tank jacket 8 January 2020 09: 51 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      I support, I do not believe that there were no losses during the shelling ...
      American media - "fake news" (c).
      I believe that the losses of American soldiers at the bases in Iraq after the rocket strike were BIG.
      Indirect sign-economic and stock indices, prices for precious metals.
      These financiers are the meanest and most knowledgeable type of non-people ...
  • Semurg 8 January 2020 09: 12 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    The Iranians seem to have written that with this shelling they avenged the general and will no longer take revenge. The Iranians answered weakly, now it is Trump’s turn to bomb a couple of ksir bases and finish this, everyone is happy.
    1. Sirocco 8 January 2020 09: 22 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      Quote: Semurg
      The Iranians answered weakly, now it is Trump’s turn to bomb a couple of ksir bases and finish this, everyone is happy.

      I think it will be so, most likely they agreed behind the scenes, and Iran answered, the locals are in the positive, and the Americans will let out bubbles, a couple of rocket planes, that’s where they go. As it is suspiciously soft and cheap all this.
    2. malyvalv 8 January 2020 12: 33 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      A pair of IRGC bases will not get off. Since the ultimate goal as Trump said: "Iran will never have nuclear weapons."
  • Sirocco 8 January 2020 09: 13 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    A strange attack, at first everyone and everyone was warned that there would be nobody within a radius of 1 km, of course, and the United States heard this)))) And then when everyone hid they dealt an “unexpected” blow. Well, it’s not serious. I could be wrong, but the blow for maximum damage should be unexpected and in an unexpected place. And so it looks like an attempt at a good mine with a bad game. In general, let's look further. What to say now, these are so thoughts of perplexity in the ear.
    1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 8 January 2020 09: 21 New
      • 3
      • 5
      -2
      Everyone expects everything from each other, surprise now does not exist as such. Not surprise is needed for a successful attack, but data is where anyone is sitting. Trump also warned about the attack in which Suleimani was killed on Twitter.
    2. PN
      PN 8 January 2020 09: 30 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Well, as if there was no official war between them in order to overwhelm each other with corpses. But at the same time, the effect is, as it were, the allies of the amers gave at least a gang ...
    3. gurzuf 8 January 2020 10: 54 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      But does Iran have another option with an answer? He will not be until they have nuclear weapons. Well, if only repeat on September 11th.
      1. AU Ivanov. 8 January 2020 11: 08 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        There is. Terrorist attacks on American targets around the world, including in the United States.
  • Mirakuru 8 January 2020 09: 14 New
    • 8
    • 1
    +7
    To be honest, I don’t really believe that there are no losses. Many people like to keep silent about their losses. Especially Trump in anticipation of the election. Although of course the farce has a place to be. On the other hand, farce or not, but there was an attack, and now the United States is faced with the choice to respond or wash. By the way, some write about the losses of both equipment and personnel.
    1. Kerensky 8 January 2020 09: 50 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      To be honest, I don’t really believe that there are no losses. Many people like to keep silent about their losses.

      Now, if two posts are not liked, the wanted list is announced. If someone from the base didn’t call back that everything is fine, then such a high will rise!
      1. Mirakuru 8 January 2020 10: 15 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Many are silent and no one raises any high.
  • Tank jacket 8 January 2020 09: 23 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Trump did everything to start evacuating American soldiers from the region. Canadians have already covered their skis.
  • demo 8 January 2020 09: 24 New
    • 10
    • 2
    +8
    Yes.
    Comments on the one hand, and on the other hand clearly indicate the immaturity of the writers.
    "Anthology" of the conflict.
    Iran purposefully, for the sake of third countries (read Israel and the CA), is drawn into a military confrontation.
    Which is clearly not profitable for the Persians.
    And they will lose him.
    But Iran did not get involved in the war.
    Then the advisers, I think it’s clear to everyone who decided to remove the general.
    And not simple, but very important.
    Most likely he was the first among the best.
    The expediency of his murder can be characterized by two concepts - and bloodthirstiness.
    Iran, in order not to lose face at all, deals two blows.
    But the bases are so well chosen that not a single American s.voloch suffer.
    By this fact, Iran confirms its right and its desire to respond with blow to blow, regardless of who hit it.
    By the way, unlike my country, which very quickly forgot both the Turkish and Israeli fortels.
    Shot down in response - this would give an understanding of pride in their country.

    Iran is well done.
    Real warriors.
    And then it will be very bad, but a man, a warrior, should not retreat.
    1. Sirocco 8 January 2020 10: 35 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      Quote: demo
      By the way, unlike my country, which very quickly forgot both the Turkish and Israeli fortels.

      About Turkey, you probably don’t know, but after the well-known events with our plane and pilot, Turkomanov and instructors were with them, grinded with rocks or wasn’t that? probably I was looking and seeing something wrong)))) They burned more than one column of smuggled oil with the Turks, or wasn’t this? Here with the Jews, yes, here is what we see, the Jews got off just with tomatoes, but this is the visible part for the public, and we don’t like this answer. Now, following your logic in the case of the Jews, we also wanted to pit us in a mess with them? Or were the Jews insolent? And they need to be smashed to pieces? Well, in this case, I would have been proud of the country, for I am a supporter of putting the snickering Jews in their place, in the case of Iran they had a hand in eliminating the general, as well as our plane. Tricky, mean, and hypocritical.
      Now about the answer as you put it
      Quote: demo
      Iran is well done.
      Real warriors.

      In a sport where only the lazy one does not poke us, what happened to the so-called attack is called a match, that is, a purchased match. Well, who is doing well here? Do you like match-fixing in sports?
      Your neighbor will spoil you under the door, you saw it, there is a photo, video recording, you go out, clean, wash the floor, and say thank you to the neighbor? I have neighbors for garbage and bull-calves under the balcony after repeated warnings that had no effect (why quarrel with the neighbors, there are important, necessary, cool ones), so I collected the garbage and put it under the doors to all the happy owners of this device. What happened? nothing, no one came to sort things out and the bull-calves with packs disappeared from the balcony. The same is the case with Iran. Not even a multi-way pull. Or did Iran still respond with something that was not announced in the media, and 10 rockets were fired for the media and us? After all, ours have decomposed the Global Hawk, and not one in the Mediterranean and Syria. Quietly peacefully they crashed in the USA))))
      1. demo 8 January 2020 10: 46 New
        • 5
        • 3
        +2
        I don’t even know if an answer to your detailed comments is needed.
        I will explain a little.
        The general tendency of Russia is to behave quieter than water and lower than grass.
        The reason is well known.
        Based on this, as a patriot of my country, I have a feeling of deep dissatisfaction with the policies of our leaders.
        What we are provided for review is, of course, one thing.
        What happens behind closed doors is different.
        But!
        In a day, in a month, in a year, in decades, everything climbs out.
        And all of our, even heroic deeds begin to harm us.
        You, I think, understand what I'm hinting at. soldier
        Therefore, all of our steps taken because of political expediency or political cowardice (how else to call it?) Will, without any doubt, be put to our peak.
        Russia is always to blame for everything.
        Why?
        We have been appointed eternal guilty for everything.
        This is what prevents the normal (or adequate) perception of the outside world.
        1. your1970 8 January 2020 16: 07 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: demo
          hinting.
          Therefore, all of our steps taken because of political expediency or political cowardice (how else to call it?) Will, without any doubt, be put to our peak.
          Russia is always to blame for everything.
          Why?

          Here he flew through the USSR for several years U-2 ... ... According to your theory, in response to such an insult, the USSR should have fallen, well, for example, tanks in West Berlin ...
          And so the whole history of the USSR ..
          When Stalin - Dry River
          When Khrushchev-U-2
          When Brezhnev. Korean Boeing and Afghanistan
          Also "political cowardice"? Or just a sober assessment of the possible consequences?
          1. demo 8 January 2020 16: 25 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Each generation has its own dances.
            Probably so.
            Our current capabilities (even theoretical ones) cannot be adequately compared with our capabilities (and, as a result, answers to challenges) of those times.
            This is about this.
            1. your1970 8 January 2020 17: 19 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: demo
              cannot adequately compare with our capabilities (and as a result answers to calls) of those times.

              At the time of the IVS, the Red Army could occupy all of Europe in 2 weeks without straining.
              At the time of Nikitos, the Soviet army could nullify Europe and part of the United States in 40 minutes
              Our current strength is lot less than those times.

              Nevertheless, neither during the IVS, nor during Nikitos, nor during Brezhnev that I did not observe military responses to the challenges of those times.

              Maybe this is a political responsibility after all (including now) - and not political cowardice?
              1. demo 8 January 2020 17: 57 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Maybe I didn’t quite accurately state my point of view, but it is precisely that our capabilities are not commensurate with the capabilities of the USSR, of different eras.
                But IVS - it made me stumble when reading a comment.
                Until I realized that it was you who drove Comrade Stalin into the initials.
    2. Chingachguk 8 January 2020 10: 46 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      And why then shoot somewhere, if you know in advance that it will be a simple firework? Does this somehow speak of the courage and strength of arms and spirit?
    3. Stas157 8 January 2020 11: 36 New
      • 7
      • 1
      +6
      Quote: demo
      "Anthology" of the conflict.
      Iran purposefully, for the sake of third countries (read Israel and the CA), is drawn into a military confrontation.

      I will join your opinion. I have the same impression. It is as if a puppeteer is sitting behind all these events, who is steadily pushing the situation toward disaster (for Iran). Russia is also unprofitable. In all international situations, Iran played in our field.
  • Chingachguk 8 January 2020 09: 27 New
    • 5
    • 6
    -1
    Hmm .... Missile strike! Loud statement! But in fact, it would be better if they didn’t shoot and did not disgrace .....
    1. Livonetc 8 January 2020 09: 37 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      The mattresses inflicted massive missile attacks on Syria, the result of which was scanty.
      Let’s see if the minke whales inflict a blow from thrown shortly before to the B52 region.
      And Iran at the moment meant determination and the possibility of striking.
      By the way, out of 15 missiles fired, 11 reached the target (territory of the military base).
      And interestingly, there is no information about the operation of the US air defense systems.
      1. Chingachguk 8 January 2020 09: 42 New
        • 1
        • 7
        -6
        In this case, the United States may well launch a nuclear strike against Iran and call it attractive since Iran threatens America with a missile strike and even already fired somewhere there ......
      2. Chingachguk 8 January 2020 13: 32 New
        • 0
        • 2
        -2
        Well, what's the determination then? The fact that they pulled into the void? ))))) They gave a gopher a slap in the desert.
    2. Barmaleyka 8 January 2020 09: 44 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Chingachguk
      But in fact, it would be better if they didn’t shoot and did not disgrace .....

      but what exactly is the shame?
      1. Chingachguk 8 January 2020 09: 49 New
        • 1
        • 4
        -3
        Interestingly, this is how all countries will answer the Americans if that, for the murder of their military generals if God forbid this happens? As a child, I shot up a slingshot in the private sector, and hoped that the pebble would damage the roof to bad neighbors, and then I was also proud of what I had done! Here is Iran’s answer, it looks about the same.
        1. Barmaleyka 8 January 2020 10: 01 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          I repeat the question, what exactly is the shame ?!
          please, without smearing the green substance on a plate
          1. Chingachguk 8 January 2020 10: 09 New
            • 3
            • 7
            -4
            I repeat the answer - "to oppose the neighbor’s wheel for breaking his car," this is not a punishment for what was done! Or is this enough for you?
            1. Barmaleyka 8 January 2020 10: 25 New
              • 1
              • 2
              -1
              damn, you do not know how to read, or simply not able to answer?
              clearly and distinctly without any allegories, WHAT IS THE SHAME? !!!
              1. Chingachguk 8 January 2020 10: 37 New
                • 2
                • 3
                -1
                I answer for the particularly "comprehensible" In a bespontoa answer! They will now receive a favorable nuclear strike from the United States, and that will be the end of it. Why pull the snake by the tail? She will turn around and finish what she started ...... Here either, or ....... "If not in your hands, STOP the language!" Well this is my opinion. I just don’t like it when people make loud statements, but at the output you get zilch;
                1. Barmaleyka 8 January 2020 11: 18 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Chingachguk
                  and the output is zilch,

                  what zilch ?!
                  Do you know about the results of a blow to the mattress base? !!
                  Do you know about the reaction of the main hairy ?!
                  Sorry, but you shake the air
              2. Chingachguk 8 January 2020 10: 42 New
                • 1
                • 2
                -1
                At the funeral of the general, more people were injured than after a missile strike at a US base! Walking along the cell with Garila and making her grimaces is one thing, and you open the cage and enter it!
                1. Barmaleyka 8 January 2020 11: 19 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Chingachguk
                  At the funeral of the general, more people were injured than after a missile strike at a US base!

                  you have data on the number of victims of the blow, then bring them BY FAMILY
                  1. Chingachguk 8 January 2020 13: 16 New
                    • 0
                    • 3
                    -3
                    I don’t understand why you grabbed onto this ??? Were you there? I judge by the statements of states, I look through the media, and where do you get the info from? If you know something more, then tell us! Or is it a secret?
                  2. Chingachguk 8 January 2020 13: 18 New
                    • 0
                    • 3
                    -3
                    The fact of the matter is that there is no data on the affected mattresses! It was just a salute! In whose honor, it is not clear.
                    1. Ramzaj99 8 January 2020 14: 07 New
                      • 1
                      • 0
                      +1
                      Quote: Chingachguk
                      The fact of the matter is that there is no data on the affected mattresses! It was just a salute! In whose honor, it is not clear.

                      The fact of the matter is that some media say there are no casualties, while others say that more than 80 corpses have already been taken there. And at least 2 aircraft are damaged. If the figures for the amount of damage is already much more than the cost of the issued ammunition.
                      1. Chingachguk 8 January 2020 22: 20 New
                        • 1
                        • 3
                        -2
                        Have you seen 80 killed US soldiers? US media does not talk about any killed soldiers. I think if they were, Trump would be pecked! And they would put an end to his second term. Therefore, I still believe that Iran hit the gophers in the desert and declared a slap in the face. It is designed for the internal user.
                      2. Ramzaj99 8 January 2020 23: 11 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: Chingachguk
                        Therefore, I still believe that Iran hit gophers in the desert

                        You can count anything. The network is already in bulk satellite imagery. And the gophers burnt there are the same.
                      3. Chingachguk 9 January 2020 09: 59 New
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        -1
                        So I have not seen these videos yet. And on the news I didn’t hear what they were talking about. If you're right, then I won’t understand why the US media are silent about this, CNN for example ..........
                2. Barmaleyka 8 January 2020 14: 57 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Chingachguk
                  The fact of the matter is that there is no data on the affected mattresses!

                  how old are you ?!
                  when did the mattresses give loss data to SI?
                  1. Chingachguk 8 January 2020 22: 14 New
                    • 0
                    • 4
                    -4
                    I saw the funeral of an Iranian general. I saw the number of people who came to the funeral. I have not heard of the funeral of 80 US soldiers. Although everyone understands that any death in the U.S. Army due to Trump’s actions is a nail in the coffin of Trump’s second term. The American media immediately raised all this and inflated everything so that Trump would have to resign himself, or give a concrete answer to Iran to end him once and for all.
  • demo 8 January 2020 10: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Right.
    It was necessary to embed Israel.
    That there would be no stone on the stone.
    And whatever happens !!!!!!!! good
    Then surely there would be no shame.
    1. Chingachguk 8 January 2020 13: 23 New
      • 0
      • 3
      -3
      Well, if it were Israel who committed a terrorist attack against the general, then why not? Or for those who are stronger, you can kill people from other countries and states? If in the world they knew that for every crime the country would be punished, such an idleness would not have happened. The UN is silent, the world community is silent. And for the Violinists, Russia is still vilified, although there is no evidence of its guilt.
      1. demo 8 January 2020 13: 38 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Well, if it were Israel who committed a terrorist attack against the general, then why not?
        For some reason, I have doubts about the initiator?
        And you, dear son of a great nation - businessmen - have?
        1. Chingachguk 8 January 2020 22: 08 New
          • 0
          • 3
          -3
          There is. I do not believe in guesses and not relying on them. I believe the facts.
  • Stas157 8 January 2020 11: 41 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    Quote: Chingachguk
    But in fact, it would be better if they didn’t shoot and did not disgrace .....

    It would be better to say that you won’t get off with tomatoes?

    I remember, then the whole world was really waiting ... and Putin again deceived everyone!
    1. Chingachguk 8 January 2020 13: 28 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      And what, Turkey said that it would destroy Russia if it crashes it for a plane?
    2. Chingachguk 8 January 2020 22: 06 New
      • 0
      • 3
      -3
      And do you think it was necessary to launch a rocket attack on the gophers? Would it be cooler? Russia and some incomprehensible missile strike to nowhere and Putin’s statement about the slap ... It doesn’t even fit my head.
  • Gennady Fomkin 8 January 2020 09: 29 New
    • 7
    • 5
    +2
    . By the way, once Iraq was the richest Arab country, if anyone did not know. Now there is nothing to eat. Democracy. laughing
    1. Avior 8 January 2020 10: 03 New
      • 2
      • 5
      -3
      Once upon a time, until Hussein started his adventures and started a war with Iran
      began a devastating war with Iran, which lasted 8 years (1980-1988). During the war, Saddam Hussein ordered the operation "Anfal" against Iraqi Kurds, during which Iraqi troops used chemical weapons, at the same time carried out reprisals against anti-war activists, mostly members of the Shiite community. The war brought huge casualties, becoming one of the largest conflicts that occurred after the end of World War II, leading to the decline of all sectors of the economy and a sharp decline in the standard of living of the population in both countries. In addition, Iraq was in a severe financial crisis due to the accumulation of unpaid debts to foreign creditors.
      1. gurzuf 8 January 2020 11: 00 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        If Hussein had nuclear weapons, then no striped star colorado would come close to it.
        1. Avior 8 January 2020 11: 24 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          It seems that you have not read carefully
          But the reality is that Iraq’s financial problems began even before the US invasion of Iraq. And in the 70s Iraq is really a very rich state, this is an undoubted fact
          ... oil export revenues allowed for large-scale reforms (many under the direct supervision of Saddam Hussein) in the economic and social fields. Saddam came up with a program of transformations, the purpose of which he formulated briefly: “a strong economy, a strong army, a strong leadership” [28]. Trying to cope with the shortcomings of the socialist economy, Saddam decided to encourage the development of the private sector. By the mid-1970s, he strongly encouraged entrepreneurs and more and more attracted private companies, local and foreign, to state development programs. Universities and schools, highways and power plants, water supply and sewage systems, and small and large houses were under construction throughout the country. Multidisciplinary and specialized hospitals were opened [49]. A system of universal education and health care was created. Under the leadership of Saddam, an intensive literacy campaign began. ... Electrification is being carried out, the network of roads has significantly increased. The standard of living in Iraq has become one of the highest in the Middle East. Iraq has created one of the most advanced healthcare systems in the Middle East [53] [54] ....
          After the nationalization of foreign oil interests, Saddam began to modernize the countryside, starting the mechanization of agriculture on a large scale, and also allocating land to the peasants [58]. According to estimates of international banks and other financial institutions (IBRD, IMF, Deutsche Bank and others), Iraq has formed a very large foreign exchange reserve of $ 30-35 billion [59]. As a result of the economic boom in Iraq, a significant number of migrants from Arab and other Asian countries arrived in search of jobs. ....
          By the early 1980s, Iraq became, along with Egypt, the most developed state in the Arab world [60].

          Above, as in the previous post, there was a quote from Wikipedia
          https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BC_%D0%A5%D1%83%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B9%D0%BD
          But after the start of the war with Iran, the situation has changed
          here is another quote from there
          As a result of the war with Iran, the Iraqi economy suffered significant damage. Over the eight years of hostilities, external debt has formed, estimated at about $ 80 billion. The country did not have the opportunity to repay it; on the contrary, additional financial revenues were required to restore industry. In this situation, Saddam Hussein saw potential prerequisites for the emergence of social instability .... He assumed that he would be able to solve the country's social and economic problems accumulated during the war in a short time, relying on the help of Arab countries .... However, it soon became apparent that no one is going to forgive him a large debt, much less to continue free financial assistance. Several times, Saddam asked Arab countries to write off Iraqi debts and provide new loans, but these calls were largely ignored ...

          hi
          1. demo 8 January 2020 13: 59 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            https://www.yakutseni.ru/articles/66-political-ecology-of-oil-production-and-refining
            We read carefully.
            On many eyes will open.
            1. Avior 8 January 2020 14: 28 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              And what is there to open? War costs money, and a lot of money.
              Especially if it goes on for years
              1. demo 8 January 2020 14: 37 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                I understand.
                I don’t feel like wasting time.
                But you strain.
                Read it.
                Much that seemed obvious yesterday would be unbelievable. And vice versa.
          2. gurzuf 8 January 2020 15: 29 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            The experience of Un and his family to help them. hi
  • svp67 8 January 2020 09: 33 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    “Where were the Patriot?”: US reaction to an Iranian missile strike
    How where, on prevention, they were preparing for war ...
  • Yang yangov 8 January 2020 09: 45 New
    • 8
    • 1
    +7
    "Patriots" were rubber ?? or did Earth curvature prevent them?)
  • maden.usmanow 8 January 2020 09: 48 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    Small flying time, which is surprising.
  • Pytnik 8 January 2020 09: 50 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Michael HORNET
    Well, while it looks more like an imitation of a blow to save face. They aimed missiles past and killed no one.

    As a result of a missile strike on several US military facilities in Iraq, 80 American troops were killed. Such data has led Iranian state television, reports Reuters.

    It is noted that on Iranian TV the victims of the shelling were called "American terrorists." The Pentagon did not comment on this information, but earlier information about the dead was not received.
  • Strashila 8 January 2020 09: 51 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    But in fact, the American army bureaucrats and suppliers will benefit from all this, write off all shortages for a blow, and push something else to the left.
  • maden.usmanow 8 January 2020 09: 53 New
    • 1
    • 10
    -9
    Iran has already stated that it does not want war, this is great news. But I think the United States is already preparing retaliatory strikes on launch, oilfield, and port infrastructure. The Americans got a legitimate reason to answer, and miss this chance, they obviously will not.
    1. Sniper 8 January 2020 10: 37 New
      • 12
      • 2
      +10
      and the United States will receive with their "Patriots", and Israel will also get after. be with your Iron Cumpole. just wait !!
  • maden.usmanow 8 January 2020 10: 08 New
    • 1
    • 7
    -6
    The most likely answer, in addition to the military, is the naval blockade of Iran. I'm sorry Iranian economy
  • midshipman 8 January 2020 10: 13 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    My opinion should urgently consider the issue at the UN. The war should be stopped, US troops should be withdrawn from Iraq. Russia, China and India should jointly oppose this conflict unleashed by the United States, and the countries of Europe should not be silent. A bad world is better than a good war.
    1. mirexes 8 January 2020 10: 17 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Is the UN now deciding something?
  • mirexes 8 January 2020 10: 15 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Really no one understands that this is a rally. Previously, everyone played this way with North Korea, but this game has already tired everyone and everyone is used to it, but here it’s new. It's just that Mirasego’s strengths are distracting attention from something.
  • spectr 8 January 2020 10: 15 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    As I understand it, after two such punctures in the USA, they will be forced to revise the agreement with Israel and increase the number of purchased iron dome complexes. So it is quite possible that Iran has a delay of 2-3 years before the start of hostilities, if they do not merge their own location of military facilities.
    Now, IMHO, the United States is not profitable to start hostilities. Weak air defense and missile defense in the United States (and Iran has shown that it is ready to use this weakness), the presence of S-300 in Iran (plus, if you didn’t lie, there was once a statement that they learned to rivet their counterparts), recent joint maneuvers of Iran, China, Russia (that is, as an option, Iran can count on help with weapons and / or components for organizing the production and repair of necessary equipment).
    1. maden.usmanow 8 January 2020 10: 47 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Iran Sea Blockade - Remember My Forecast
      1. spectr 8 January 2020 11: 01 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Maybe. And if there was a Trans-Iranian channel, which is periodically recalled, it would not be so catastrophic.
        1. demo 8 January 2020 14: 04 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Today in Iran there is only one power.
          And we, Russia and the Caspian littoral countries, are in relative safety.
          Tomorrow the power has changed.
          And the Americans and the like became friends.
          It means that the entrance to the Caspian Sea can allow everyone who is not lazy to come.
          This is the first.
          The marine biota of the Caspian and the marine biota of the Indian Ocean are completely uncorrelated with each other.
          Ocean flora and fauna will kill the sea (read the lake).
          This is the second.
      2. Sergey M. Karasev 8 January 2020 12: 54 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: maden.usmanow
        Iran Sea Blockade - Remember My Forecast

        And through the Caspian? Here, even first, ours must be persuaded to join the blockade, which is now unrealistic.
        The Persian Gulf, if necessary, Iran itself will fill up with mines.
        1. maden.usmanow 8 January 2020 13: 44 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          The Caspian is not connected with the World Ocean. Iran will be pinched in the Gulf, and taken to blockade
          1. Sergey M. Karasev 8 January 2020 14: 16 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            So most of the trade with Iran will go through Russia. It is beneficial for us. And the exhaust from the sea blockade will be frivolous.
  • Gennady Fomkin 8 January 2020 10: 24 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Quote: Avior
    Once upon a time, until Hussein started his adventures and started a war with Iran
    began a devastating war with Iran, which lasted 8 years (1980-1988). During the war, Saddam Hussein ordered the operation "Anfal" against Iraqi Kurds, during which Iraqi troops used chemical weapons, at the same time carried out reprisals against anti-war activists, mostly members of the Shiite community. The war brought huge casualties, becoming one of the largest conflicts that occurred after the end of World War II, leading to the decline of all sectors of the economy and a sharp decline in the standard of living of the population in both countries. In addition, Iraq was in a severe financial crisis due to the accumulation of unpaid debts to foreign creditors.

    Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, with whom the United States fought two wars and who was ultimately overthrown, came to power largely thanks to the American intelligence services. Moreover, at least five American administrations maintained close contacts and almost allied relations with him. laughingAnd in 1985, Washington allowed US firms to export high-tech products to Iraq. The most advanced technologies that Baghdad then acquired became a decisive condition for the implementation of Saddam's program for the production of weapons of mass destruction. And soon Saddam Hussein applied it. But not against Iran, but against the Kurds in their own country. laughing
    1. Avior 8 January 2020 10: 53 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      There situational allies took turns
      And the USSR supported Hussein, Iraq had full Soviet weapons
  • Chingachguk 8 January 2020 10: 29 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    I think that the Iranian government had a difficult task. On the one hand, it’s somehow to show your face and not applicable to the actions of the United States to your own population, who came to the general’s funeral. On the other hand, shoot very carefully so that an otvetka would not immediately receive an attractive blow from America. It’s good not to mess with mattresses to Iran more expensive, whatever they say there .... When you want to hit and win quickly, you don’t have to say a lot and yell about it. That’s all. Hit or miss. Or be silent. "NOT IN HANDS, STOP THE LANGUAGE"
    1. Fishery 8 January 2020 10: 59 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      it was just a firework)))) the curvature of the earth prevented)
  • Mixanson 8 January 2020 10: 33 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    I would be happy if Trump laughed and asked: “Is that all you have?” - and decided that it’s not worth taking revenge for it

    Laugh for now .. Someday the American continent will flare up .. Do you hope that the ocean will save you?
    Then we’ll see what you will write when your houses begin to burn and your loved ones begin to perish ..
  • Paul Siebert 8 January 2020 10: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Trump is the only post-war president of the United States who, during his reign, did not carry out a massive military invasion.
    He limited himself to local rocket attacks, and loud rhetoric on Twitter.
    Now he has every chance to "improve."
    The attack on two US military installations in Iraq is the “first signs” of a series of upcoming US problems.
    If a tiger is pulled for a long time by a mustache - sooner or later he will bite off his hand.
    I'm afraid then the tiger will have to be euthanized - if the flayer has enough spirit ...
  • Lunaaron 8 January 2020 10: 42 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Behind all this bloody booth, Israel's ears stick out.
  • Air force 8 January 2020 10: 52 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The standard comments as we have in VO are radical, there are sensible, there are vile, etc. But with regard to the issue of air defense, it seems to me that the Americans had good air defense, until no one dared to strike at their bases or their allies for fear of retaliation. And so, then the plant in Saudi Arabia has the “0” air defense result, then they’ll hit the bases directly, the result is the same, but if the strike were carried out by more advanced missile weapons, for example, the export “Klub-K”, then it’s possible in general as in a dash would you beat wherever you want? For example, take Syria, whatever one may say, but their air defense is even outdated, it does intercepts, it doesn’t always do it, but how their air defense showed itself in massive strikes, how many 60 axes they fired and intercepted most, but we can say that there were agreements, the Americans specially beaten in the desert, or at the plant in Arabia, the "patriots" were specially silent, but why is this anti-American advertising? It may turn out that the Americans simply have no air defense, they really didn’t work on them, which would be smart and modern missile weapons.
  • Fishery 8 January 2020 10: 58 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    cool Iranian jewelry experts did not hit any American))))))))))))))))))))
  • Fishery 8 January 2020 11: 21 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Tehran said it does not exit the nuclear deal

    Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Arakchi said that despite Iran’s decision to abandon uranium enrichment restrictions, the nuclear agreement has not been terminated. )))))))))))) I can not)) funny
  • Ivanov IV 8 January 2020 11: 25 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Iran acted worthy!
    He demonstrated his readiness, dignity, and lack of protection in the United States.
    Retribution will be! But it must be deliberate and prepared.
    Iran needs to find out the role of Israel in this vile affair.
    Iran got out of the "nuclear" deal.
  • Gennady Fomkin 8 January 2020 11: 41 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: Tonya
    cool Iranian jewelry experts did not hit any American))))))))))))))))))))

    And even warned in advance laughing Persian Trick laughing
  • Gennady Fomkin 8 January 2020 11: 49 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: maden.usmanow
    Iran Sea Blockade - Remember My Forecast

    Yeah, the Strait of Hormuz will be covered and mustache laughing
    1. Nomad Plus 8 January 2020 12: 21 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Iran will easily block not only the Gulf of Oman but also the Red Sea, and then what? it is not beneficial to anyone ..
      1. Avior 8 January 2020 14: 33 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        It happened before.
        Operation Mantis is over.
        https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Богомол_(операция)
  • Dima_Anlim 8 January 2020 11: 52 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    One would like to ask - "was there a boy?" It seems like the Iranians launched rockets. It seems like on American bases. Only the United States has neither destruction nor loss. But the Iraqis suffered. Those who want to expel the Americans. If the Iranian troops call such strikes "retaliation", then they are very mistaken about the concept of "retaliation." And all this shows how poor-quality and inaccurate missiles Iran has. Something like the "Scada" of the Iraqis during the long-standing war with the US coalition.
    1. Nomad Plus 8 January 2020 12: 25 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      loss of amers is. they are hiding. they are afraid of fighting with Iran, it is not profitable for them. War cannot be avoided if profitability finds out about losses ..
    2. Vladimir Borzenko 8 January 2020 14: 15 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Dima: Scud are missiles being developed in the USSR for delivering nuclear strikes. So the low speed and lack of maneuver is compensated by the power of charges. The use of Scuds in this limited area will have irreparable consequences.
  • Nomad Plus 8 January 2020 12: 15 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    it is time for the United States and its allies to buy from 400, and then the patriots do not work.
  • HMR333 8 January 2020 12: 53 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    honestly crazy, they at least understand what these people write, they want a war thinking that they won’t get enough God give them reason!
  • Aleks2000 8 January 2020 13: 09 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    That is, the United States coped even without a PATRIOT? ???
    This is if you drop the husk
  • The comment was deleted.
  • alexey alexeyev_2 8 January 2020 13: 37 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Where is the patriot? Where, where. You answer in rhyme or understand yourself
  • Deathmaker 8 January 2020 13: 43 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: Rostislav White
    higher oil prices increase gas station prices

    That is if you import oil. And the USA is an exporting country.
  • Dimon Dimonov_2 8 January 2020 13: 46 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    The Americans declared war on the whole world!? Naive .... Against will be Russia ... China ... Iran .. and Skoreya ..
    1. Gennady Fomkin 8 January 2020 15: 20 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Again AUG threaten kimmu? laughing We already saw them there. laughing He will walk along the coast of the United States without hesitation laughing
  • zlideny 8 January 2020 13: 56 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    There are rumors that things could even reach a nuclear strike. I have only one question: what about amerenoses in the contaminated area will pump oil out for the next 50 years. Everything comes from it.
  • Vladimir Borzenko 8 January 2020 14: 02 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Starting with the Vietnam War, Russian air defense systems are regularly tested in all military conflicts and regularly modernized. Therefore, they are so effective. And remember at least one conflict where American air defense was tested.
  • eagle owl 8 January 2020 14: 18 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Remember, American weapons are not made for defense. And for sale!
    So Patriot was in place))) Together, by the way, with the F-35 super-fighters, which, incidentally, are also part of the air defense wassat
  • Host Tavern 8 January 2020 14: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Good luck to those who are now in the BWA soldier soldier
  • 0x0
    0x0 8 January 2020 14: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I condole with the relatives of the dead. Iran is accused of a plane crash (but it’s too much too “on time” with the plane ... It reminds me of something).
    Now the "move" of the Yusovites? They will answer - coffins will go for a puddle, and here they have elections on their nose. They will not answer - they will lose face (with the prospect of the appearance of coffins), and here their elections are approaching ... Trump has a difficult choice, like that of a monkey. Is he smart or handsome? Do not tear it up!
  • Killemall 8 January 2020 14: 32 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I would be happy if Trump laughed and asked: “Is that all you have?” - and decided that it was not worth taking revenge for it (Jeff Rielley).

    no-no-no, Jeff .. the doctor said to the morgue ... then to the morgue!
  • Gennady Fomkin 8 January 2020 15: 15 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: Avior
    It happened before.
    Operation Mantis is over.
    https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Богомол_(операция)

    Wikipedia? laughing Yes, this is the most "indisputable authority" that knows everything. laughing I doubt that the Persians did not take all this into account laughing